Analysis of Chivalry
Analysis of Chivalry
Analysis of Chivalry
70)
Abstract: Knights appeared and flourished in the Middle Ages. Some scholars call the Middle Ages the ages of knights. Knights were cavalrymen in heavy armors and played a decisive role in the battlefield in the Middle Ages. They were also an important social class and strictly abided by the code of chivalry, which had a far reaching impact on the social culture and attitudes towards women of the Western Europe even after the decline of the knighthood. Key words: the Middle Ages; knight; chivalry; influence
1. Introduction
Knights existed from the year 800 A.D. to the year 1450 A.D.. Knights were an important class and played an important role on the medieval stage of Europe. Today we can only see them in movies or books as a group of courageous men who killed dragons or rescued princesses. Knights have become a legend. But as a fascinating topic, they are not forgotten. There have been books written about them for more than 500 years, such as King Arthur & the knights of the round table, King Arthur and Merlin, The death of King Arthur, The song of Roland, and some of them are still in print, such as A Knights own book of chivalry and Book of knighthood and chivalry: With the anonymous Ordene De Chevalerie. With courage and loyalty as the core, knights spiritchivalry produced a prominent effect on the civilization and thoughts in the Middle Ages of Europe.
QIU Hai-ping, M.A., lecturer of School of Foreign Languages, Huaiyin Normal University; research field: British and American culture. 60
captains directly by the emperor to reward their efforts in the conquests. And in turn, the captains were to grant benefices to their warrior contingents, who were a mix of free and unfree men. In the century following Charlemagnes death, this newly empowered warrior class grew stronger and Charles the Bald declared their fiefs to be hereditary. The period of chaos in the 9th and 10th centuries, between the fall of the Carolingian central authority and the rise of separate western and eastern Frankish kingdoms, entrenched this newly-landed warrior class because governing power and defense against Viking, Magyar and Saracen attack became an essentially local affair which revolved around these new hereditary local lords and their demesnes. The resulting hereditary landed classes of mounted warriors, the knights, were increasingly seen as the only true soldiers of Europe. During the Crusades, knights entered into its golden age and the crusader was the pattern of the perfect knight. The knights regarded the rescue of the holy places of Palestine from Moslems domination and the defense of pilgrims as their holy duty. In return for their work, the church took them under her protection in a special way, and conferred upon them exceptional temporal and spiritual privileges, such as the remission of all penances and dispensation from the jurisdiction of the secular courts. As a means of defraying the expenses of the journey to the Holy Land, they were granted the tenth of all the church revenues. After the conquest of Jerusalem, in order to prevent the loss of the Holy City to surrounding hostile nation, the necessity of a standing army became peremptory. Out of this necessity arose the military orders of perpetual warfare against the infidels. In these orders, the religious and the military spirit of knights merged perfectly. Chivalry reached its highest point. The knightly duties and military orders enrolled them in a vast brotherhood of manners, ideas and aims. The knights had imposed on them fidelity to their lords and to their words, fair play on the battlefield, and the observance of maxims of honour and courtesy. After the Crusades, knights gradually lost its religious duties. Honour remained the peculiar worship of knighthood. This spirit was manifested in many knightly exploits which filled the annals of the long contest between England and France during the Hundred Years War. Bloody battles alternated with tournaments and gorgeous pageants. And under the influence of romance, love now became the mainspring of chivalry. As a consequence, there arose a new type of chevalier, vowed to the service of some noble lady, who could even be another mans wife. With the advent of gunpowder and the general use of firearms in battle, infantry, on its revival as an effective force on the battlefield during the 14th century began to challenge the supremacy which heavy cavalry had so long, enjoyed. Knights rapidly disintegrated and finally disappeared altogether. Chivalry became a mere court service and the sport of jousts and tournaments became the most serious business of knights. These war games consisted of individual contests and group combat. Prizes were given to the winners, and some knights, such as the famous William Marshall, made their fortunes on the tournament circuit. By the 14th century, tournaments became rousing fairs complete with singing, dancing and feasting which might last for several days. Chivalry had degenerated to a futile pastime and an empty promise.
medieval times. While chivalry had its beginning around the 9th and 10th centuries, this system flourished in the 12th and 13th centuries. Chivalry faded toward the end of the Middle Ages. However, its ideals influenced standards of behavior for gentlemen and the nobility through the Renaissance in the 16th century. Knights believed in the code of chivalry. When they were knighted, they had to make a vow. In the vow, they promised to defend the weak, be courteous to all women, be loyal to their king, and serve God at all times. Knights were expected to be humble before others, especially their superiors. They were also expected to not talk too much. In other words, they should not boast. The code of chivalry demanded that a knight give mercy to a vanquished enemy. The song of Roland, a full portrait of the excellent knight from the actual society, was an epic of medieval France and became knights manual in the medieval society. However, the very fact that knights were trained as men of war belied the code of chivalry. Even though they came from rich families, many knights were not their families firstborn. They did not receive an inheritance. Thus they were little more than mercenaries. They plundered villages or cities that they captured, often defiling and destroying churches and other properties. Also the code of chivalry did not extend to the peasants. The weak was widely interpreted as noble women and children. They were often brutal to common folk. They could sometimes even rape young peasant women without fear of reprisal, all because they were part of the upper class. This code was rarely lived up to, but it remained the standard for chivalry and proper behavior amongst the nobility for centuries.
As fear of the lance drives back the unarmed, so the knight drives back the enemies of the church (Baker, Alan, 2003, p. 178). As for the sword, it was said that, The two edges of the sword show that the knight serves God and the people (Baker, Alan, 2003, p. 178). With the end of the ceremony, the squire became a knight. But this was just the beginning of the young mans career as a knight. The promotion to a knight was correlated tightly to his battle achievements. Only by war can he get the rank of nobility and wealth. Tournaments provided a means for knights to practice warfare and build their strength in times of peace. Tournaments were essentially mock battles with audiences. The audience was usually made up of fair damsels. This was another way in which a knight was expected to act chivalrous. The tournaments had different rules that had to be followed. They were judged by umpires that watched for dishonest play. Tournaments were usually fought between either two people or two teams. If two people fought a tournament, it was usually by jousting. The two knights would gallop across the playing field at each other. They carried long, blunt poles and shields. The objective was to knock the other person out of his saddle. Team play was conducted with fierce mock combat between two bands of fighters. They fought with wooden or blunted weapons so as to reduce the risk of getting hurt.
6. Influence of chivalry
In the military sense, knights, the professional soldiers of the Middle Ages, were the heavy cavalry which constituted the chief and most effective warlike force. The armors of knights made them the winner in the battle field. Unfortunately, the armors caused the innovation of military technology as well. The knight was one of the three types of fighting men during the Middle Ages: Knights, foot soldiers and archers. A knight was armed and armored to the teeth. With the metal protection, an armored knight is a moving castle. It was impossible to kill him with a sword or lance. No single foot soldier or archer could stand up to any one knight. The need to break the impenetrable armors was urgent. This problem was solved after gunpowder imported to the Europe from China.
63
With the invention of gun and cannon, armored knights were destroyed easily. The knights love concept became an important part of the chivalry and was a rebel to the asceticism preached by the church. Knights love concept appeared in the age when God was the absolute authority in the minds of people. The idea that women were the source of evil was widely accepted in the early Middle Ages. The church vigorously preached mens superiority to women, strongly belittled womens statue, and emphasized womens dependence on and obedience to men. Thus, asceticism naturally became the doctrine publicized by the church. But this began to change after the formation of knights love concept and its assimilation into code of chivalry in the late of 11th century and early of 12th century. In the eyes of knights, women, especially the noble women, were the persons of admiration. They respected them for their noble status and lofty qualities. They praised them for their beauties. They regarded themselves as the servant of the noble women. They showed unswerving loyalty to them, protected them from any danger and defended them in time of need. In order to obtain good graces of noble women and princess, they fought and sacrificed for their love without expecting any reward. A word of compliment was enough. Knights love concept included ideas of loyalty and obedience, but not equality. It did not regard marriage as the last goal. This love affair was condemned by some scholars nowadays. But in the Middle Ages, knights love concept broke the confinement of asceticism, showed personal desires, and contributed to the emergence of humanism. At the same time, it made possible the transition from sacred love for God to the secular love for human beings, and showed the changing idea of esthetics from theology faith to secular taste. The knights emphasis on personality and individualism, which had been spread widely by knights attitude towards love and by the literature works about knights as well, had great influence on the humanism in the Renaissance in the 16th century. Code of chivalry was not abandoned with the decline of knightly class. On the contrary, the knights code of chivalry heightened the ideas, ethics, and sentiment that were once respected and approbated by Western European in the Middle Ages. Some of them were accepted as the conduct of the whole society. One who conformed to the code and performed it could be treated as heroes and models. The admiration and following of the code of chivalry of the whole society was the result of the spread and recognition of the epopees, and romaunt about knights. The heroes in them not only invigorated the knights themselves, but also the other classes.
7. Conclusion
Knights used to be a great means of fighting before the appearance of guns and cannons. Nowadays knights as a legend, is remembered for their heroic character, invincible strength and courage, justice, loyalty to superiors, compassion to weakness and courtesy to ladies. These chivalric qualities are the basis of civilization in Europe after the Middle Ages.
References: Baker, Alan. 2003. The knight. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. Bulfinch, Thomas. 2000. The age of fable (Vol. III): The age of chivalry. New York: Bartleby.com. Gerteis, Joseph. 2002. The possession of civic virtue: Movement narratives of race and class in the knights of labor. The American Journal of Sociology, 108(3), 580-615. LIU Qiu-xiang. 2006. Summarizing the studies on Middle Age knights in recent years of China. World History, (4), 124-128. (in Chinese) NI Shi-guang. 2004. Life of knights in the Middle Ages Europe. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University Press. (in Chinese) WANG Hong-li. 2006. KnightsWestern European noblemen in chants and battles. Shanghai: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House. (in Chinese) ZHANG Bao-mei. 2007. On the influence of the chivalry system upon the society development of the Middle Ages. Journal of Xinzhou Normal University, (6), 75-78. (in Chinese) ZHE Hong-yan (Ed.). 1999. Chivalry. Xian: Northwest Industry University Press. (in Chinese)