Udc1 Section 1 - The Fundamentals
Udc1 Section 1 - The Fundamentals
Udc1 Section 1 - The Fundamentals
01 FUNDAMENTALS
1.1 The importance of urban design 1.2 Key design principles 1.3 How the Compendium is organised
When the Urban Design Compendium was first published in 2000
it noted that quality of design was becoming one of the most
important criteria in determining whether a project should be
eligible for public funding. Since this time understanding of the
importance of design quality in creating places people want to live
and work in has grown. All development proposals – whether for
new development or redevelopment of small infill sites – need to
demonstrate that they will be delivering quality places.
In the years since these documents were published there has been
increasing government commitment to the improvement of
design quality. Planning Policy Statement 1 (2005) clearly states
that ‘high quality and inclusive design should be the aim of all
those involved in the development process’.
Good design is one of the key elements which help the Homes
and Communities Agency achieve their aim to invest in homes
that create sustainable environments. This means creating areas
that are desirable, healthy, safe and better places for people of all
ages to live and flourish. The Agency understands that good
design can create attractive sustainable communities for
residents and justify their sense of pride in their environment.
Over the past decade the Homes and Communities Agency and
its predecessors have used their Quality Standards and the
The Guinness Trust and Knightstone Housing
Association have combined in Frome, Somerset, competitive bidding process to improve standards and the
to create ‘The Piggeries’ – a mix of high density
housing that responds sensitively to local context
quality of design. In addition the Agency and the Local
Government Association agreed a national protocol which set
out how they would work together in ensuring that high quality
affordable housing is built and managed.
Since the Second World War, this country has seen very extensive urban
development and renewal. While there are exceptions, a great deal of this
1
development has been third-rate and is lacking in any ‘sense of place’. At
worst, the results have been downright ugly and unpleasant. Fine urban
fabrics have been spoilt through the process of re-development. The
remarkable built heritage flowing from the English urban tradition has
yielded to banal and monotonous development, humdrum in design and
dominated by traffic. We have repeated standard housing types and layouts,
retail boxes and road layouts so many times, with little or no regard for local
context, until we find that now almost everywhere looks like everywhere else.
7
6
5
4
7
Set out below is a summary of some key aspects of urban design which run
throughout this Compendium. These have been developed with specific
reference to regeneration and development issues and provide a basis for
starting to think about a site or area - whether an empty brownfield or
greenfield site, or for the refurbishment of an existing urban area. As such
they differ in emphasis although not in broad policy direction, from design
principles or objectives published in other design documents.
The table below sets out how these key aspects of urban design relate to the
principles and objectives in key design documents
Places for people Quality of the public Make Places Robustness create an environment where
realm everyone can access and
benefit from the full range
Continuity and
of opportunities available to
Enclosure
members of society
Enrich the existing Character Build beautifully Visual appropriateness be integrated into the existing
urban form and the natural and
Richness
built environments
Make connections Ease of Movement Allow movement Permeability be integrated into the existing
logically and legibly urban form and the natural and
built environments
Work with the Design using natural consider the direct and indirect
landscape harmonics impacts on the natural
environment.
Mix uses and form Diversity Engender social Variety address the connections
interaction between people and places by
considering the needs of people
to access jobs and key services
For every piece of general guidance produced, there is an excellent place that
defies the guidance, or shows other ways of achieving high quality solutions.
Genius, or indeed serendipity, breaks the rules.
If Urban Design is ‘the art of shaping the interaction between, people and
places, environment and urban form, nature and built fabric, and influencing
the processes which lead to successful villages, towns and cities’ (Campbell
and Cowan, 1999) this Compendium deals with the former aspects and the
second Compendium addresses the processes which lead to successful
villages, towns and cities. Urban Design Compendium 2: Delivering Quality
Places therefore builds on the principles of this Compendium to provide
guidance on how these principles can be effectively delivered in practice.
The first edition of this Compendium noted that it was prepared against a
shifting and evolving backcloth. In the seven years since it was published
there have certainly been significant changes in public policy, technological
development and environmental thinking which have significant
implications for urban design. The second compendium looks to address
some of these in more detail, particularly with regard to environmental
issues and long term management of places.
The Compendium does not purport to be the final word on best practice in
urban design. Further information on urban design principles and case
studies can be obtained from organisations such as Commission for
Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE), the British Urban
Regeneration Association, the Urban Design Group, the Civic Trust and the
Resource for Urban Design Information (RUDI) website (www.rudi.net).
As a best practice guide such as this derives its value from the projects
and partnerships it forms and stimulates. The Homes and Communities
Agency wants the Compendium to continue to be used but we also desire
feedback from the experience of its use. What needs to be changed? What is
missing? What should not be there? What is difficult to understand? What is
difficult to implement?
We will learn from this feedback and use it to develop both the web based
guidance and our other best practice documents. We will also look to
implement any suggestions for better, more effective ways of working in our
future projects.