0059 Primary Computing Assessment Guidance - tcm142-635628
0059 Primary Computing Assessment Guidance - tcm142-635628
0059 Primary Computing Assessment Guidance - tcm142-635628
1. Assessment to give information about current learning and to inform next steps
This type of assessment should happen every day during classroom activities. Whenever learners
demonstrate their current learning you can use this information to give them feedback and to inform your
next steps for them and the class.
The aim of this type of assessment is to uncover what a learner, or group of learners, currently knows,
understands, or can or cannot do. This allows you, as the teacher, to give timely and specific feedback to
help them improve. It will also inform next steps (for example, it will help you to decide whether to spend
more time on a learning objective, to go back to prior learning or to move on).
When this is the main purpose of an assessment, it is important to retain details rather than summarise
information as a single grade. For example, if a learner is to improve, it is much more useful to say
‘remember that most robots are not designed to look like a human’ than to say ‘all of the robots you have
drawn have heads, two arms and two legs’ or ‘you did that at a Grade C level’.
These informal, regular assessments are very important because you can make ongoing changes to
maximise progress during the learning process, rather than waiting until the end of a period of study.
Using assessments in this way can be called Assessment for Learning (AfL), formative assessment or
using assessment formatively. You can find information and advice on this process in Section 5 of the
Cambridge Primary Computing Teacher Guide.
The summary is often a grade which describes a level of performance. Common examples of grades
include bronze / silver / gold; working towards expected standard / at expected standard / above expected
standard; and letters or numbers.
The grade given can be used to compare a learner’s overall performance in different subjects or to
compare the performance of learners in different classes, stages or schools. For example, Cambridge
Primary Checkpoint for English, English as a Second Language, Mathematics, Science and Global
Perspectives all provide a grade or standardised score. Assessments used in this way can be called
summative assessments.
Although many Cambridge Primary subjects have a Cambridge Primary Checkpoint, there is currently no
Cambridge Primary Checkpoint for Computing. This document provides guidance on other ways to assess
Cambridge Primary Digital Literacy.
When deciding what activities and tasks to use to assess your learners in Cambridge Primary Computing, you
may wish to note the following points:
Your learners will show what they know, understand and can do in different ways. Some assessments
can be based on what learners write or say in response to questions (for example, in group discussions).
But in Primary Computing some of the most relevant evidence will be what learners demonstrate through
the production of algorithms, programs, representations of data and/or through your observations of them
discussing computer software or hardware.
Give your learners the opportunity to perform tasks that reflect their age and attainment. The suggested
activities in the schemes of work give suggestions of age-appropriate activities, although you can
substitute these for other activities. Opportunities for assessing Primary Computing include when
learners:
o create algorithms for sets of specific instructions
o create programmes that combine programming constructs
o correct or change algorithms and programs
o explain the differences between input and output, software and hardware
o interact with different datasets to show how they are collected, stored and analysed
Learners should have experience of creating algorithms and programs for different contexts. They should
also be able to demonstrate the use of different programming constructs and be able to combine these in
their programmed solutions. You can choose how many of these you wish to assess.
A single piece of work or activity is unlikely to cover all of the learning objectives although it may cover
learning from more than one. Aim to build a more comprehensive representation of learners’ knowledge
by looking at learners’ work and interactions in a range of contexts and through a range of activities.
Seek to identify whether a learner can consistently achieve a learning objective over a period of time
rather than focusing on a single piece of work.
It can be very powerful to involve learners in identifying their progress and next steps. In Primary
Computing you can use digital tools, across a range of contexts and media, to record the process a
learner used to improve their knowledge or skills as well as to identify how their knowledge and skills
came together in their final project or other output. As an example, learners can create a portfolio of their
algorithms and programming projects. They can also add comments to their program code to explain their
intentions, achievements, and future goals.
The learning objectives in the curriculum framework provide a structure against which learners’ knowledge,
understanding and skills development can be checked. One possible approach for checking progress against
the learning objectives is:
Learners can apply some, but Learners can apply the Learners can apply the
not all, of the knowledge, knowledge, understanding knowledge, understanding and
understanding and/or skills and/or skills described in the skills described in the learning
described in the learning learning objective in some objective in a wide range of
objective in limited contexts contexts, especially familiar contexts, including unfamiliar
only. and simple contexts. and complex contexts.
A possible method for recording progress based on this approach is described below.
Safiya wants to demonstrate that she knows the similarities and differences between two robotic
vehicles: a public service taxi and a warehouse floor robot in a distribution company.
She wrote a clear design brief for both vehicles demonstrating her understanding of inputs, wireless
technology, and aesthetic requirements of the vehicle design.
However, she was unable to specify the benefits of the two vehicles compared to machines
controlled by a human operator.
Here is an example with learning objectives from the Managing Data, Networks and Digital
Communication and Computer Systems strands. It records whether this learner is working towards, at, or
above the standard of each learning objective.
You can find more information on giving feedback in Section 5.5 of the Cambridge Primary Computing
Teacher Guide.
Consider these different styles of reports and their accompanying strengths and weaknesses.
Report 1 is simple to understand and makes it easy to compare a learner’s attainment between subjects. It is
likely that this style of report will require limited record keeping by teachers. However, there is not enough
information to indicate how an individual learner might make progress.
Report 2 is similar to Report 1 but the additional comment lets teachers give some feedback on how to
progress further.
Report 3 is still simple to understand but might require more time for teachers to complete than Reports 1 or 2.
It allows learners, and their parents, to identify strengths and areas for improvement within a subject as well as
compare between subjects.
Report 4 is a much more detailed and extensive document as it lists every learning objective. This level of
detail can be confusing for non-specialists to understand (i.e. parents) but can help identify particular areas of
strength and areas for improvement.
You can choose to use different styles of reports at different times of the year. For example, you could use
Report 2 at the end of Terms 1 and 2. Then you could have a fuller report in the style of Report 3 at the end of
the school year.
Whichever type of report you choose to use, it is important that it provides value to learners and parents. It is
also important that it does not take too much time for teachers to produce. Teachers can also get value from
monitoring the progress of a class by identifying areas that their current class needs more time on, and ways
to improve their teaching for future classes.