Division : Realty & Townships Division

Subject : Escalation
Sector : All
SVH : All
As on date: 30-Jun-14

S. Contract Value Contract Escalation Date of Date of Time

No. SVH Project Package Contractor Name in Lakh Rs. expiry date Escalation Reason & Item Amount recommenda
Submission tion by FISPL Status Taken Remarks by FISPL
Days

1 Labor Escalation submitted by 25,292,196 12-Sep-12 DELAYED 656 1. As per our contract agreement, no
contractor due to revised min. Escalation should be given to the
wages during the project by contractor.
state Govt. 2. The claim is returned back to the
contractor (BLK) and ask to give the
details, justification, quoting provision in
the contract agreement & the manner in
which the provision of C.A. supports
their claim.

3. Latest submitted by
Escalation due to increase in 5,141,476 12-Sep-12 DELAYED 656 BLKAs
1. on per
12-09-12
our contract agreement, no
price index on material, fuel Escalation should be given to the
and power. contractor.
Logix City Center, Civil & Structural Work M/s. B L Kshyap & 11,200 14/May/12
Noida Sons Ltd. 2.
Escalation on cost impact of 66,708,168 12-Sep-12 DELAYED 656 Latest
1. As submitted by BLK onagreement,
per our contract 12-09-12 no
fixed expense due to decrease Escalation should be given to the
of volume of contract work in contractor.
contractual time frame.
3.
Latest submitted by BLK on 12-09-12
Fixed expense cost impact due 29,690,971 12-Sep-12 DELAYED 656 1. As per our contract agreement, no
to delay (because of Escalation should be given to the
revision/delay) in drawing after contractor.
project completion Date(14-03-
12) to(07-06-12)

Interest on delay in RA 13,911,067 12-Sep-12 DELAYED 656 1. As per our contract agreement, no
Payments and mobilisation Escalation should be given to the
contractor.