Rose
Rose
Rose
The first act of bankruptcy occurs when a debtor flees the country or his place of
residence, or remains outside the country, with the goal of evading or delaying payment
of his obligation. Because it is a subjective requirement, proving the debtor's purpose
may be challenging.
The second act of insolvency is defined by three conditions, only one of which must be
met in order for the conduct to be considered an act of insolvency to occur. A debtor fails
to comply with the first of these criteria when a court has granted judgment against him
and the debtor has failed to pay the debt; secondly when the debtor fails to indicate to
the sheriff disposable movable property sufficient to satisfy the order; and thirdly when it
appears from the sheriff's report that he has not discovered sufficient disposable assets
to satisfy the judgment.
The third act of bankruptcy has to do with the debtor's assets and possessions. Any
disposition of the debtor's property that has or would have the effect of prejudicing their
creditors, or that has the effect of favoring one creditor over another, would be
considered an act of insolvency by the court. Creditors, on the other hand, may not
always have intimate knowledge of a debtor's situation and behavior, making it harder to
substantiate this act.
The debtor commits the fourth act of bankruptcy when he takes or seeks to remove any
of his property with the goal of prejudicing his creditors or favoring one creditor over
another. This act of insolvency may be difficult to show for the same reasons as those
mentioned above. Furthermore, the test for intent is a subjective one, which makes it
more difficult to meet the burden of evidence.
The debtor commits the fifth act of bankruptcy when he or she makes or promises to
make any agreement with any of his or her creditors with the purpose of freeing him or
her totally or partly from his or her obligations. If the creditors are not aware of each
other's existence, it may be difficult to substantiate their claims.
The sixth act of bankruptcy happens after a debtor has issued a notice for the surrender
of his insolvent estate, which has not expired or been withdrawn.
The debtor's seventh act of bankruptcy is the delivery of a written notice to any of his
creditors, alerting them that he is unable to pay part or all of his obligations.
When a debtor, such as a merchant, delivers notice of insolvency, this is the eighth act
of bankruptcy. By simply asking the debtor to settle his obligation once you have
received and read the notice that was published in the Government Gazette, you may be
able to detect this act of bankruptcy rather easily.
The Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 governs the administration of a debtor's estate when it is
sequestered for the benefit of creditors.
The debtor must demonstrate that sequestration will benefit creditors, which poses a
roadblock for the debtor when filing for voluntary surrender of his estate.
Insolvency refers to situations in which a debtor is unable to repay her debts. For
instance, Rose will become insolvent because she is unable to repay its creditors money
owed on time, often leading to a bankruptcy filing.
The phrase "liquidation" refers to the bankruptcy of a company or close corporation and
certain other legal organizations. "
The phrase "sequestration"refers to the insolvency of a natural person or a trust.
Liquidation is the winding up of a firm by selling off its free (un-pledged) assets to turn
them into cash to pay the firm's unsecured creditors. Before a liquidation application may
be issued in court, a founding affidavit needs to be drafted. This affidavit will cover all the
details of the Applicant and / or Respondent. The Applicant is the person who seeks to
liquidate the company and the Respondent is the company. In the instance where the
Applicant is the firm, there will be no Respondent. The affidavit will also include any data
about the company, employees and creditors. A bond of security also needs to be
signed for the purpose of the Master of the High Court.
Sequestration is the preferable alternative for the individual who has tried all other
avenues of settlement, and is now in a position where even if all their assets are sold,
they would be left with such a huge shortfall that it would be ridiculous to expect them to
recoup from this loss. A sequestration involves a bit more administration work before a
court date can be acquired.
Before the Notice of Motion and Founding Affidavit are drafted, a valuer needs to be
appointed in order to value the Applicant or Respondent's estate. This needs to be done
in order to identify whether the debtor is genuinely over-indebted, and whether he / she
has adequate assets to provide a benefit for all creditors involved.
Compulsory Sequestration similarly requires a court application, but the Applicant is the
debtor's creditor. If the debtor has a strained relationship with a creditor, we refer to this
as a "aggressive" sequestration (for example the bank).
Banks, on the other hand, rarely launch sequestration proceedings against the average
debtor, as it is far more cost effective and convenient for them to follow the collection
procedures: - attach property and sell it, as well as attach your salary.
If the debtor has a good relationship with the creditor, we regard to this as a "friendly"
sequestration (for example, a family member or a friend to whom you owe money).
The effect that sequestration has on an uncompleted contract (general) is that because
the insolvent estate vests in the trustee, he steps into the shoes of the insolvent and
must decide whether to comply in terms of the contract or not (see Bryant & Flanagan
(Pty)Ltd v Muller). This means that the trustee has the decision to deliver specified
performance (as stipulated in the contract whatever it may be) or not. He will make this
decision depending on whether it will benefit the overall body of creditors.
[Performing in terms of the contract = specified performance]