Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 22 views

    Pcis E-Tool SBM

    Uploaded by

    Ronayla Gandulan Usman
    The document is a scoring matrix validation form for the Polomolok Creek Integrated School. In step 1, the school's performance improvement is determined based on indicators in access, efficiency, and quality over multiple school years. For access, the school received full points based on enrollment increases between 11-14% and having no dropout rate. For efficiency, the school received partial points based on graduation and promotion rates. For quality, the school again received full points based on no increase in the GSA average. In step 2, the school received no points for its SBM principles. In step 3, combining the performance improvement and SBM assessment, the school received a final rating in the 'developing' range.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Pcis E-Tool SBM

    Uploaded by

    Ronayla Gandulan Usman
    22 views4 pages
    The document is a scoring matrix validation form for the Polomolok Creek Integrated School. In step 1, the school's performance improvement is determined based on indicators in access, efficiency, and quality over multiple school years. For access, the school received full points based on enrollment increases between 11-14% and having no dropout rate. For efficiency, the school received partial points based on graduation and promotion rates. For quality, the school again received full points based on no increase in the GSA average. In step 2, the school received no points for its SBM principles. In step 3, combining the performance improvement and SBM assessment, the school received a final rating in the 'developing' range.

    Original Title

    pcis e-tool SBM.xlsx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a scoring matrix validation form for the Polomolok Creek Integrated School. In step 1, the school's performance improvement is determined based on indicators in access, efficiency, and quality over multiple school years. For access, the school received full points based on enrollment increases between 11-14% and having no dropout rate. For efficiency, the school received partial points based on graduation and promotion rates. For quality, the school again received full points based on no increase in the GSA average. In step 2, the school received no points for its SBM principles. In step 3, combining the performance improvement and SBM assessment, the school received a final rating in the 'developing' range.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    22 views4 pages

    Pcis E-Tool SBM

    Uploaded by

    Ronayla Gandulan Usman
    The document is a scoring matrix validation form for the Polomolok Creek Integrated School. In step 1, the school's performance improvement is determined based on indicators in access, efficiency, and quality over multiple school years. For access, the school received full points based on enrollment increases between 11-14% and having no dropout rate. For efficiency, the school received partial points based on graduation and promotion rates. For quality, the school again received full points based on no increase in the GSA average. In step 2, the school received no points for its SBM principles. In step 3, combining the performance improvement and SBM assessment, the school received a final rating in the 'developing' range.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    REVISED SBM SCORING MATRIX VALIDATION FORM

    Name of School: POLOMOLOK CREEK INTEGRATED SCHOOL Division: SOUTH COTABATO

    Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)


    Thematic Performance Rating & Equivalent
    Computation Results
    Area Indicators Points
    Enrolment Increase % of Inc. A. ENROLMENT INCREASE
    1 – Marginal: At least 3% increase
    SY 2019-2020 708 (3.0% – 4.99%)
    2 – Average: At least 5% increase
    SY 2020-2021 804 13.56% (5.0% - 6.99%)
    Access
    (45%) 3 – High: At least 7% increase 3 x 0.45 1.35
    SY 2021-2022 895 11.32% (7.0% & above)
    If < 3%, 0; if > 7%, 3 points
    Average: 12.44%
    Points 3
    % of Dec. B. DROP-OUT RATE DECREASE
    Dropout Rate
    1 – Marginal: At most 2% decrease
    SY 2018-2019 0.00% (0.01% - 2.0%)
    SY 2019-2020 0.00% 2 – Average: At most 4% decrease
    SY 2020-2021 0.00% (2.01% – 4.05)
    3 – High: Has 0 DR or more than 4%
    Average: 0.00%
    decrease (4.01% & above)
    Points 3 If 0 drop-out, 3 points
    Graduation Rate: % of Inc. C. GRADUATION RATE INCREASE
    SY 2018-2019 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
    SY 2019-2020 #DIV/0! (5.0% – 6.99%)
    SY 2020-2021 #DIV/0! 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
    Efficiency (7.0 – 9.99%) 3.00 x 0.25 0.75
    (25%) Average: #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 3 – High: At least 10% Increase
    (10%+ or an ave. of 95% GR
    Points 3 If < 5%, 0; if > 10%, 3 points
    D. PROMOTION RATE INCREASE
    Promotion Rate % of Inc. 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
    (5.0 – 6.99%)
    SY 2018-2019 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
    SY 2019-2020 #DIV/0! (7.0 – 9.99%)
    SY 2020-2021 #DIV/0! 3 – High: At least 10% Increase
    (10% - up) or an ave. of 95% PR
    Average: #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
    If < 5%, 0; if > 10%, 3 points
    Points 3
    Sub-Total Points 3.00
    GSA % of Inc. OPTION 1: Get % of Increase
    Elementary: Baseline:
    2018-2019 1 - Marginal: At least 2% increase
    (2.0 – 4.99%)
    2 – Average: At least 5% increase
    2019-2020 0.00% (5.0 – 6.99%)
    3 – High: At least 7% increase
    (7.0% - up) or at least an average of 75%
    2020-2021 0.00% If < 2%, 0; if > 7%, 3 points
    Secondary: Baseline:
    Quality 1 - Marginal: At least 7% increase
    (30%) (7.0 – 7.99%) 3 x 0.3 0.90
    2 – Average: At least 8% increase
    (8.0 – 9.99%)
    3 – High: At least 10% Increase
    Average: 0.00% 0.00% (10% - up) or at least an average of 75%
    If < 7%, 0; if > 10%, 3 points
    OPTION 2: Get the MPS Average
    1 – Marginal : 26 – 50%
    2 – Average : 51 – 75%
    3 – High : 76 – 100%
    Points 3
    Sub-Total: 3.00
    Interpretation Best

    Legend:
    Numerical Rating
    Description
    Scale
    0.50 – 1.49 Good
    1.50 – 2.49 Better
    2.50 – 3.00 Best

    Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of “Better” can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.

    Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

    SBM Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle


    Weight Results
    Principles Computation
    Leadership 30% 0.00 0.00
    Curriculum &
    Learning 30% 0.00 0.00
    Accountability 25% 0.00 0.00
    Resource
    Management 15% 0.00 0.00
    Subtotal 100% 0.00
    #N/A ###
    Interpretation

    Legend:
    Numerical
    Rating Description
    Scale
    0.50 – 1.49 Good
    1.50 – 2.49 Better
    2.50 – 3.00 Best

    Step 3: Compute for Final Rating


    Areas Weight Computation Results
    A. Performance
    Improvement
    60% 0.00

    B. SBM
    Assessment 40% 0.00
    Score (DOD)
    TOTAL 100% 0.00
    #N/A ###
    Interpretation:

    Description of SBM Level of Practice:


    Numerical
    Description
    Rating Scale
    0.50 – 1.49 Developing
    1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
    2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

    Note: For Operational Try-out


    REVISED SBM SCORING MATRIX VALIDATION FORM
    Name of School: POLOMOLOK CREEK INTEGRATED SCHOOL Division: SOUTH COTABATO

    Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)


    Thematic Performance Rating & Equivalent
    Computation Results
    Area Indicators Points
    Enrolment Increase % of Inc. A. ENROLMENT INCREASE
    1 – Marginal: At least 3% increase
    SY 2019-2020 708 (3.0% – 4.99%)
    2 – Average: At least 5% increase
    SY 2020-2021 810 14.41% (5.0% - 6.99%)
    Access
    (45%) 3 – High: At least 7% increase 3 x 0.45 1.35
    SY 2021-2022 895 10.49% (7.0% & above)
    If < 3%, 0; if > 7%, 3 points
    Average: 12.45%
    Points 3
    % of Dec. B. DROP-OUT RATE DECREASE
    Dropout Rate
    1 – Marginal: At most 2% decrease
    SY 2018-2019 0.00% 0.00% (0.01% - 2.0%)
    SY 2019-2020 0.00% 0.00% 2 – Average: At most 4% decrease
    SY 2020-2021 0.00% 0.00% (2.01% – 4.05)
    3 – High: Has 0 DR or more than 4%
    Average: 0.00%
    decrease (4.01% & above)
    Points 3 If 0 drop-out, 3 points
    Graduation Rate: % of Inc. C. GRADUATION RATE INCREASE
    SY 2018-2019 100.00% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
    SY 2019-2020 100.00% 0.00% (5.0% – 6.99%)
    SY 2020-2021 100.00% 0.00% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
    Efficiency (7.0 – 9.99%) 3.00 x 0.25 0.75
    (25%) Average: 100.00% 0.00% 3 – High: At least 10% Increase
    (10%+ or an ave. of 95% GR
    Points 3 If < 5%, 0; if > 10%, 3 points
    D. PROMOTION RATE INCREASE
    Promotion Rate % of Inc. 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
    (5.0 – 6.99%)
    SY 2018-2019 98.77% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
    SY 2019-2020 96.81% -2.02% (7.0 – 9.99%)
    SY 2020-2021 100.00% 3.19% 3 – High: At least 10% Increase
    (10% - up) or an ave. of 95% PR
    Average: 98.53% 0.58%
    If < 5%, 0; if > 10%, 3 points
    Points 3
    Sub-Total Points 3.00
    GSA % of Inc. OPTION 1: Get % of Increase
    Elementary: Baseline:
    2018-2019 83.41% 1 - Marginal: At least 2% increase
    (2.0 – 4.99%)
    2 – Average: At least 5% increase
    2019-2020 84.02% 0.61% (5.0 – 6.99%)
    3 – High: At least 7% increase
    (7.0% - up) or at least an average of 75%
    2020-2021 86.57% 2.55% If < 2%, 0; if > 7%, 3 points
    Secondary: Baseline:
    Quality 1 - Marginal: At least 7% increase
    (30%) (7.0 – 7.99%) 3 x 0.3 0.90
    2 – Average: At least 8% increase
    (8.0 – 9.99%)
    3 – High: At least 10% Increase
    Average: 84.67% 1.58% (10% - up) or at least an average of 75%
    If < 7%, 0; if > 10%, 3 points
    OPTION 2: Get the MPS Average
    1 – Marginal : 26 – 50%
    2 – Average : 51 – 75%
    3 – High : 76 – 100%
    Points 3
    Sub-Total: 3.00
    Interpretation Best

    Legend:
    Numerical Rating
    Description
    Scale
    0.50 – 1.49 Good
    1.50 – 2.49 Better
    2.50 – 3.00 Best

    Note: Only Schools having a Performance Improvement of “Better” can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.

    Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

    SBM Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle


    Weight Results
    Principles Computation
    Leadership 30% 0.00 0.00
    Curriculum &
    Learning 30% 0.00 0.00
    Accountability 25% 0.00 0.00
    Resource
    Management 15% 0.00 0.00
    Subtotal 100% 0.00
    #N/A ###
    Interpretation

    Legend:
    Numerical
    Rating Description
    Scale
    0.50 – 1.49 Good
    1.50 – 2.49 Better
    2.50 – 3.00 Best

    Step 3: Compute for Final Rating


    Areas Weight Computation Results
    A. Performance
    Improvement
    60% 0.00

    B. SBM
    Assessment 40% 0.00
    Score (DOD)
    TOTAL 100% 0.00
    #N/A ###
    Interpretation:

    Description of SBM Level of Practice:


    Numerical
    Description
    Rating Scale
    0.50 – 1.49 Developing
    1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
    2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

    Note: For Operational Try-out

    You might also like