Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Statistics Meeting 10

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Ali Akbar
    1. The regression line for predicting speaking scores based on grammar scores is ý = 0.2007x + 6.5412. 2. Grammar explains 20.1% of the variance in speaking scores based on an adjusted R-squared value of 0.201082. 3. There is a significant relationship between grammar and speaking scores as the significance F-value of 0.007527207 is lower than 0.05.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Statistics Meeting 10

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Ali Akbar
    29 views3 pages
    1. The regression line for predicting speaking scores based on grammar scores is ý = 0.2007x + 6.5412. 2. Grammar explains 20.1% of the variance in speaking scores based on an adjusted R-squared value of 0.201082. 3. There is a significant relationship between grammar and speaking scores as the significance F-value of 0.007527207 is lower than 0.05.

    Original Title

    Statistics meeting 10

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. The regression line for predicting speaking scores based on grammar scores is ý = 0.2007x + 6.5412. 2. Grammar explains 20.1% of the variance in speaking scores based on an adjusted R-squared value of 0.201082. 3. There is a significant relationship between grammar and speaking scores as the significance F-value of 0.007527207 is lower than 0.05.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    29 views3 pages

    Statistics Meeting 10

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Ali Akbar
    1. The regression line for predicting speaking scores based on grammar scores is ý = 0.2007x + 6.5412. 2. Grammar explains 20.1% of the variance in speaking scores based on an adjusted R-squared value of 0.201082. 3. There is a significant relationship between grammar and speaking scores as the significance F-value of 0.007527207 is lower than 0.05.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Regression Statistics

    Multiple R 0,478153
    R Square 0,22863
    Adjusted R
    Square 0,201082
    Standard Error 4,398173
    Observations 30

    ANOVA
    Significance
      df SS MS F F
    0,00752720
    Regression 1 160,5367 160,5367 8,29907416 7
    Residual 28 541,63 19,34393
    Total 29 702,1667      

    Coefficient Standard Upper Lower Upper


      s Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% 95% 95,0% 95,0%
    2,43444098
    Intercept 6,541209 2,004859 3,262677 0,00290423 8 10,64798 2,434441 10,64798
    Grammar 0,05799549
    scores 0,200713 0,069672 2,880811 0,00752721 5 0,34343 0,057995 0,34343

    Speaking scores
    25

    20

    15 f(x) = 0.2007126784833 x + 6.54120904399033


    Axis Title

    R² = 0.228630463812332
    10

    0
    0 10 20 30 40 50 60
    Axis Title

    1. The regression line is ý = 0.2007x + 6.5412.


    2. The predicted score of speaking for the student having a grammar score of 32 =
    ý = 0.2007x + 6.5412
    ý = 0.2007(32) + 6.5412
    ý = 6.4224 + 6.5412
    ý = 12.9636 ≈ 13
    3. Adjusted R2 = 0,201082 ≈ 20.1%
    Grammar explained 20.1%of the variance in speaking or the contribution of grammar to speaking
    is 20.1%
    4. H0: There is no significant relationship between grammar and speaking.
    H1: There is a significant relationship between grammar and speaking.

    Or

    H0: There is no significant contribution of grammar to speaking.


    H1: There is a significant contribution of grammar to speaking.

    Based on ANOVA table the significance F-value = 0,007527207. Because the sig. F-value (0,007527207) is
    lower than 0.05, H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. It means that there is a significant relationship
    between grammar and speaking.

    Model Summaryf
    Change Statistics
    Adjusted R Std. Error of R Square
    Model R R Square Square the Estimate Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
    1 .755 a
    .570 .517 2.834 .570 10.622 1 8 .012
    2 .887 b
    .786 .725 2.137 .216 7.067 1 7 .033
    3 .978c .956 .935 1.042 .170 23.443 1 6 .003
    4 .987 d
    .975 .955 .865 .019 3.702 1 5 .112
    5 1.000 e
    1.000 1.000 .000 .025 . 1 4 .
    a. Predictors: (Constant), Organazation
    b. Predictors: (Constant), Organazation, Content
    c. Predictors: (Constant), Organazation, Content, Grammar
    d. Predictors: (Constant), Organazation, Content, Grammar, Vocab
    e. Predictors: (Constant), Organazation, Content, Grammar, Vocab, Mechanics
    f. Dependent Variable: Writing

    The contribution of organization to writing = Adjusted R2 = 0.517 = 51.7%.


    The contribution of content to writing = Adjusted R2 = 0.725 – 0.517= 0.208 = 20.8%
    The contribution of grammar to writing = 0.935 – 0.725 = 0.21 = 21%
    1. H0: There is no significant difference between the sample mean and the population mean (88).
    H1: There is a significant difference between the sample mean and the population mean (88).

    One-Sample Test
    Test Value = 88
    95% Confidence Interval of the
    Difference
    t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Lower Upper
    MathScores -.618 19 .544 -1.350 -5.92 3.22

    One-Sample Statistics
    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
    MathScores 20 86.65 9.767 2.184

    The results of one sample test are t obtained = 0.618 and p value = 0.544. At the significance
    level 0.05 in two tailed testing with df = 19, the critical value is 2.093. because the t-obtained
    (0.618) is smaller than the critical value (2.093), H 0 is retained. It means that there is no
    significant difference between the sample mean and the population mean (88).

    You might also like