Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

PAMM Proc. Appl. Math. Mech. 4, 384385 (2004) / DOI 10.1002/pamm.

200410173

Prediction of Yield-line Geometries for Arbitrary Simply Supported Slabs


Jochen Wust1
1

Institut f r Baustatik, Universit t Karlsruhe, Kaiserstrae 12, D-76131 Karlsruhe u a

The calculation of limit loads of slabs using the yield-line theory requires the assumption of a kinematical collapse mechanism. In recent years several approaches concerning the optimization of predened mechanisms have been introduced. Usually they contain semi-automatic procedures which depend on user-dened yield-line predictions. This paper presents a systematic approach and a numerical procedure to nd yield-line predictions for arbitrary all-side supported slabs.
2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

1
1.1

Description of yield-line patterns


Introduction

Yield-lines are assumed to be straight without any breaks and without ending within the slab. As they have to form kinematical admissible collapse mechanisms they must run through the intersection point of two rotation axes. These principles were dened by Johansen [1]. The corresponding planes form one common yield-line and the contact point of three planes is called branching point. Considering an all-side simply supported polygonal slab we nd that the number of branching points p depends on the number of edges n in the relationship p = n 2. 1.2 Numerical encoding and admissible code combinations

For the description of yield-lines and branching points we use the numbering of the adjacent planes. In this way yield-lines will be encoded by two digits, branching points will be denoted by three digits. Fig. 1 illustrates that the two end points of
015 15 I 12 012 125 25 II 235 23 023 V 35 III 45 345 045 IV 34 034

Fig. 1 Encoded yield-line mechanism of a slab

a straight yield-line have to possess both of its numbers. This leads to the possibility to record the yield-line pattern exactly. Furthermore it is obvious that no more branching points with the same two digits may appear. For this reason the theoretical number of branching point code combinations C is calculable and we nd the principle of the Catalan numbers, e.g. in [2] C (p) = 2p 1 p+1 p = (2p)! p! (p + 1)!

where p signies the number of branching points.

2
2.1

Algorithm of systematical generation


Analogy to polygon triangulations and binary trees

An application of the Catalan numbers is the triangulation of polygons. The example of a pentagon (see Fig. 2) shows the ve different congurations given by the formula above. The congurations of binary trees can also be described depending on the depth of their vertices. Five binary trees are displayed below the according pentagon.

Corresponding author: e-mail: jochen.wuest@bs.uni-karlsruhe.de, Phone: +49 721 608 2284, Fax: +49 721 608 6015
2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

Section 8
1 2 5 2 1 5 2 1 5 2 1 5 2 1 5

385

0011
1 2 3 4 5

0110
1 2 4 3 1 5 4 2 3 4 5

1010
1 2 3 4 1 2 5 3 4 2 5

0101
1 4 3 5

1001
1 2 3 5 4

1 2 3

1 2 3

5 4

1 5 2 3 4

Fig. 2 Triangulated pentagon and analogous binary tree

Bege and K sa [3] present a system to encode binary tree structures using binary code sequences where each two digits a describe the run of a vertex. The four combinations of the digits 0 and 1 dene the run of the vertices. In case of a furcation the related root point will be stacked (code: 00) and after the end of the left strand it will be taken to add a right vertex (code: 11). The decoding instructions are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Decoding of binary trees

00 Put vertex root into memory Annex vertex to left

01

10

11 Put vertex root out of memory

Annex vertex to left

Annex vertex to right

Annex vertex to right

2.2

Transfer to yield-line geometries

Binary tree structures are conform to the theoretical admissible yield-line patterns of a polygonal slab. The binary code is adopted to the requirements of the numerical code of yield-lines. In this way the tree digit numbering of branching points is recalculated and the theoretical admissible collapse mechanisms are recorded. In the next step the individual geometry of a given problem is analyzed. Since the coordinates of a theoretical possible branching point may be situated beyond the slap area, the corresponding yield-line congurations are discarded. Crossing yield-line patterns will also not be accepted. Finally the actually admissible initial yield-line assumptions remain for the adjacent collapse load calculation.

Optimization process

As the output of a yield-line theory calculation is affected by the assumed kinematical prediction, it is important to detect all possible mechanisms systematically. The next step would be to evaluate the most critical mechanism and to optimize the exact location of the branching point coordinates without changing the yield-line conguration. Initially the coordinates are derived from intersection points of yield-lines which are assumed to be bisecting lines. Therefore the calculation process has to be completed by an optimization as proposed e.g. in the semi-automatic approaches by Johnson [4] and Thavalingam et al. [5]. Furthermore, local effects like corner lever and fan mechanisms have to be considered in order to complete the problem analysis and to minimize the limit load factor.

References
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] K. W. Johansen, Yield-line Theory (Cement and Concrete Association, London, 1962) H. Siemon, Anwendungen der linearen Gruppentheorie (Klett, Stuttgart, 1981) A. Bege and Z. K sa, Coding objects related to Catalan numbers, Studia Univ. Babes-Bolyai, Informatica 46(1), 31-40 (2001) a D. Johnson, Yield-line analysis by sequential linear programming, Int. J. Solids Struct. 32(10), 1395-1404 (1994) A. Thavalingam, A. Jennings, J. J. McKeown ans D. Sloan, A computerised method for rigid-plastic yield-line analysis of slabs, Comput. Struct. 68, 601-612 (1998)

2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

You might also like