Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii: Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii: Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Knowledge knowledge of Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and content within and or Inter-observer
Services Pedagogy across curriculum agreement forms done
teaching areas. through on-site/ face-to-
face/ in-person classroom Efficiency
observation
Timeliness
2. Used a range of 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
teaching strategies Tool (COT) rating sheets
that enhance or Inter-observer
learner agreement forms done
through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
achievement in
literacy and face/ in-person classroom
numeracy skills. observation
Timeliness
3. Applied a range 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheets
strategies to or Inter-observer
develop critical agreement forms done
and creative through on-site/ face-to-
face/ in-person classroom Efficiency
thinking, as well as
other higher-order observation
thinking skills.
Timeliness
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Environment classroom structure Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and Diversity to engage learners, or Inter-observer
Services of Learners individually or in agreement forms done
groups, in through on-site/ face-to-
meaningful face/ in-person classroom
exploration, observation Efficiency
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
Timeliness
Timeliness
6. Used 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
differentiated, Tool (COT) rating sheets
developmentally or Inter-observer
appropriate agreement forms done
learning through on-site/ face-to-
experiences to face/ in-person classroom
Efficiency
address learners’ observation
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences.
Timeliness
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio and Planning managed and Tool (COT) rating sheets
n implemented or Inter-observer
Services developmentally agreement forms done
sequenced through on-site/ face-to-
teaching and face/ in-person classroom
learning processes observation Efficiency
to meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts.
Timeliness
8. Participated in 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
collegial LAC sessions/ FGDs/
discussions that meetings/ other collegial
use teacher and discussions
learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC
enrich teaching sessions/ FGDs/
practice. meetings/ other collegial
discussions on use of
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of
Efficiency
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching Timeliness
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions/ FGDs/
meetings/ other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
proofs of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
9. Selected, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
developed, Tool (COT) rating sheets
organized and used or Inter-observer
appropriate agreement forms done
teaching and through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
learning resources, face/ in-person classroom
including ICT, to observation
address learning
goals. Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Assessment selected, organized Tool (COT) rating sheets
n and and used or Inter-observer
Services Reporting diagnostic, agreement forms done
formative and through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
summative face/ in-person classroom
assessment observation
strategies
consistent with Timeliness
curriculum
requirements.
11. Monitored and 7% Any one (1) of the Quality
evaluated learner following:
progress and ▪ Individual
achievement using Learning
learner attainment Monitoring Plan
data. (ILMP)
▪ Peer assessment
data
▪ Sample of
learners’ outputs
with reflection/
self-assessment
▪ Progress charts/
anecdotal records
▪ Class/ e-class
Efficiency
record/ grading
sheets
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
by minutes of Efficiency
meeting
▪ Communication Timeliness
with key
stakeholders (e.g.
parents/guardians,
co- teachers, LGU)
using various
modalities
▪ Anecdotal records
showing entries per
quarter
▪ Any equivalent ALS
form/ document that
highlights the
objective (e.g.
Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment
Form 2)
▪ Other documents
showing learners’
needs, progress
and achievement
submitted to other
stakeholders
Timeliness
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
14. Set 7% 1. Certification from the Quality
professional ICT Coordinator/ School
development Head/ Focal Person in
goals based charge of
Efficiency
on the e-SAT
Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Midyear Review Form
Standards for (MRF) Timeliness
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP
Phase II
Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education various related
● Committee
Services works/
involvement
activities that ● Involvement as
contribute to module/ learning
the teaching- material writer/
learning validator
process. ● Involvement as a
resource person/
speaker/ learning
facilitator in the
RO/ SDO/ school-
initiated TV/Radio-
Efficiency
based instruction
● Book or journal
authorship/ co-
authorship/
contributorship
● Advisorship/
coordinatorship/
chairpersonship
● Participation in
demonstration
teaching
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Mid-year
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Review Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
● Participation as
research presenter Timeliness
in a forum/
conference
● Mentoring of pre-
service/ in-service
teachers
● Conducted
research within the
rating period