1. გენდერ განსხ
1. გენდერ განსხ
1. გენდერ განსხ
nino javaxiSvili1
Summary
Content analysis of dating ads revealed gender differences in preferences for choosing a partner.
Georgian women and men provided similar resutls to those encountered in numerous studies
worldwide: men prefer younger and good looking women, while women prefer older and well-
off men. Employing additional data obtained from focus group discussions, the article brings
evidence to show that Georgian sample of partner seekers reflect gender stereotypes typical to
Georgian population.
dawyvilebis strategiebis zogierTi tendenciis aRmoCenis Semdeg daisva sakiTxi: rogor irCeven
adamianebi partniorebs, ra roli aqvs genderul sxvaobas partnioris arCevisas, ra gavlena aqvs
asaks, fizikur mimzidvelobas, ganaTlebas, Semosavlis odenobas da sxva faqtorebs am procesze
[26:463-481; 10: 805-819; 31:331-335; 19: 327-335].
warmodgenili sfero gasuli saukunis 70-iani wlebidan intensiuri kvlevis sagani gaxda. TiTqmis
yvela amgvar kvlevaSi monacemebi erTmaneTs emTxveva: mamakaci upiratesobas aniWebs
axalgazrda da kargi garegnobis qals, xolo qali amjobinebs asakiT ufros da finansurad
uzrunvelyofil mamakacs. magram ar emTxveva monacemebis interpretacia. am TvalsazrisiT,
gamoiyofa ori ZiriTadi mimarTuleba: evoluciuri da sociokulturuli.
1
am kvlevisaTvis monacemebi Seagroves da nawilobriv daamuSaves Tsu genderis specialobis magitsraturis
studentebma: d. gabuniam, l. obolaZem, g. urCuxiSvilma, s. bujiaSvilma, s. kvernaZem, n. xarCilavam, e. gigaurma,
a. kalandiam, T. TaTaraSvilma, n. kobalaZem, n. xaratiSvilma da l. ZamukaSvilma.
1
evoluciuri fsiqologiis mTavari debuleba isaa, rom adamianis fsiqika evoluciis procesis Sedegia
[1: 31-41]. evoluciuri mimdinareobis Tanaxmad, raki, pirvelyofil sazogadoebSi cxovrebis
pirobebi ukiduresad mZime, konkurencia Zalian maRali iyo, gadarCenisaTvis brZola adamianTa
sazogadoebaSi iseve dramatulad mimdinareobda, rogorc cxovelebTan. STamomavlobis
gadarCena gansakuTrebiT rTuli iyo, mravali gaCenili Svilidan mxolod erTi-ori Tu aRwevda
zrdasrul asaks, amitom bevri Svilis gaCena iyo saWiro. am Teoriis warmomadgenlebi amboben,
rom mamakaci da qali gansxvavdeba dawyvilebis optimaluri qcevis mixedviT [11: 204-232; 28:
136-174]. qals biologiurad SezRuduli raodenobiT Svilebis gaCena da aRzrda SeuZlia.
Sesabamisad, man unda eZebos mewyvile, romelic ekonomiurad uzrunvelyofs mis
STamomavlobas. kacs ki SeuZlia Svilebis SeuzRudavi raodenoba hyavdes da am gziT miaRwios
warmatebul reproduqcias. am mizniT igi eZebs axalgazrda da mimzidvel qals, rogorc
nayofierebis da janmrTelobis nimuSs [13: 559-570; 12:1-49; 1996; 25: 1074-1080; 29: 755-779;
23: 367-402; 15: 675-685].
2
imave monacemebze daydnobiT daiwera da gamoqveynda statia saerTaSoriso JurnalSi 2008 wlis bolos.
inglisurenovani winamorbedisagan gansxvavebiT, aq oTxi sakvelvi kiTxvaa dasmuli da Sesabamisad, ganxiluli.
3
igulisxmeba is kontingenti, romelic saWirod da misaRebad miiCenevs gancxadebebis ganTavsebas presaSi
2
meTodi:
es monacemebi Segrovda 2006 wels, rodesac amgvari gancxadebebi mxolod erT gazeTSi -
“sityva da saqme” qveyndeboda. SevarCieT am gazeTis 12 nomeri. sul 471 gancxadeba
gavaanalizeT, maTgan, 226 qalis ganTavsebulia, xolo da 244 – mamakacis.
asaki: 15-dan 70 wlamde, yvelaze yvelaze xSiri asakobrivi kategoria iyo 37-47 weli.
homoseqsualuri gancxadebebi ar yofila.
Catarda 4 fokusjgufi.
………
fokusjgufi monawileebi saqmianoba asaki
pirveli 5 mamakaci studentebi, abiturientebi, arqiteqtori, 17-47 weli
umcrosi leitenanti
meore 5 mamakaci studentebi 21-23 wli
mesame 5 gogona studentebi 18-23 weli
meoTxe 7 gogona studentebi, mosamsaxureebi 17-32 weli
Sedegebi
asaki – 82%
garegnoba – 41.2%
ekonomikuri statusi – 33.5%
ganaTleba – 10%
aplikantebi sakuTar Tavs iseTi TvisebebiT axasiaTeben, rogorebicaa asaki, garegnoba (simaRle,
Tvalis feri, Tmis feri); pirovnuli TvisebebiT, rogorebicaa keTili, mosiyvarule da sxv. garegnobis
mxriv, qali da mamakaci aplikantebis daxasiaTebebi gansxvavebulia: qalebis 83% sakuTar Tavs
axasiaTebs sakmaod detalurad: simaRle, Tvalis da Tmis feri, aseve, xmaroben zedsarTav
saxelebs, rogorebicaa: lamazi, momxiblavi, koxta, tanwerweta da sxv. mamakacebis mxolod
4
termini “unobtrusive”-is qarTuli Targmania. samwuxarod, literaturaSi es termini qarTulad ar Semxvedria. is
niSnavs, rom raime movlenis gazomvis meTodi obieqtze zemoqmedebas ar axdens da Sedegad ar viRebT e. w.
“hotornis efeqts”
3
16% axasiaTebs sakuTar garegnobas, Tanac, zedsarTavebs ufro zomierad xmarobs: simpaTiuri,
sasiamovno. garegnobaSi ki ZiriTadad aRniSnaven simaRles.
maTgan, vinc maTze umcrosi asakis partniori moiTxova 100% iyo mamakaci, da saerTod ar iyo
qali, xolo maTgan, vinc maTze ufrosi asaki partniori moiTxova, 97% iyo qali da 3% mamakaci.
aqve unda aRiniSnos, rom am 3% mamakacis asaki aris 17-19 weli, rac mniSvnelovania da am
sakiTxis ufro detalur ganxilvas fokusjgufebis monacemebSi SemogTavazebT.
maTgan, vinc momavali partniorisagan ekonomikuri statusi moiTxova, qalebi 77%, xolo
mamakacebi 23%-s Seadgenen. maTgan, vinc potenciuri partniorisagan garegnoba moiTxova,
mamakacebi 64%, xolo qalebi 36%-s Seadgenen. ganaTlebas ki qalebi ufro iTxoven potenciuri
partniorisagan, vidre mamakacebi.
4
fokusjgufebis Sedegebi:
monawileebi daeTanxmnen imas, rom mamakacs masze umcrosi qali unda colad:
“me da Cems garSemo yvelas, Cvenze umcrosi qali gvinda, ufrosi ar dagijerebs, umcross ki ise
gazrdi, rogorc ginda”
axsnes, Tu ratom aris, rom iSviaTad, magram zogjer mainc surT mamakacebs maTze ufrosi
asakis qalze daqorwineba.
“es xdeba sakmaod iSviaTad, magram roca xdeba, mTavari mizezi aris materialuri – axalgazrda
mamakaci zrdasruli, ukve “Semdgari” qalis xarjze cxovrobs”.
janmrTeli cxovrebis wesi - iTvleba, rom mamakacebi ufro midrekilni arian iseTi
deviaciebisaken, rogorebicaa narkotikebi, alkoholi, moweva, TamaSi fulze. amitom aRniSnaven
ganmcxadebeli mamakacebi specialurad, rom aseTebi ar arian. qalebs amgvari gancxadebis
gakeTeba ar sWirdebaT, radgan iTvleba, rom isini isedac jansaRad cxovroben.
calke msjelobis sagani gaxda sami saxeli: qarTveli kaci, tradiciuli kaci, namdvili mamakaci.
jgufis wevrebma aRniSnes, rom es sami Tviseba praqtikulad erTsa da imaves niSnavs, anu imas,
rom:
5
“namdvili qarTveli mamakaci aris gamocdili seqsualuri partniori, hyavs bevri megobari, uyvars
qeifi da drostareba, pativs scems qals, rogorc dedas, pativs scems cols, rogorc Tavisi Svilebis
dedas. ojaxis ufrosi da marCenali Tavadaa, gadawyvetilebebsac Tavad iRebs”.
calke unda gamovyo terminebi sevdiani, gulCaTxrobili, gulgatexili, daCagruli. es niSnavs, rom
qalis brali ar aris, rom is aqamde ver gaTxovda, an martoa. is yvela dadebiTi TvisebiTaa
Semkuli, magram bedma ar gauRima, ar gaumarTla da ver ipova sabedo. amitomaa igi sevdiani.
amave jgufSi SeiZleba SeviyvanoT termini “mowyvetili foToli”.
Sedegebis warmodgenas vasruleb kidev erTi monacemiT imis Sesaxeb, Tu ra mizniT aTavseben
gancxadebebs aplikantebi:
qorwineba – 51%
megobroba – 24.6%
anonimuri megobroba – 7%
Sedegebis ganxilva:
5
es termini saqorwino gancxadebebSi sakuTari Tavis daxasiaTebisasac Segvxvda, ara mxolod darqmeul saxelebSi.
6
miRebuli Sedegebi TiTqmis srulad emTxveva sxva qveynebis kvlevebis monacemebs da
miuTiTebs, rom arsebobs genderuli gansxvaveba dawyvilebis prioritetebSi [12: 1-49; 13: 559-
570; 23:367-402; 25:1074-1080; 29:755-779; 15: 675-685; 14:205-235; 26: 463-481].
saintereso monacemia da calke ganxilvis sagani unda gaxdes is faqti, rom aplikantebi sakuTari
Tavis daxasiaTebisas TiTqmis ar iyeneben seqsualur informacias, xolo Tu iyeneben, mxolod
mamakacebi. gancxadebaSi sakuTari Tavis daxasiaTebisas mamakacebis 21%-ma aRniSna
mxolod, rom kargi seqsualuri partnioria. seqsualuri potenciis datvirTvis mqone darqmeuli
saxelebi kidev ufro mcire raodenobiT aplikantma warmoadgina, aseTia Svidi saxeli. samagierod,
eqvsi aseTi saxeli gamoCnda qalebis gancxadebebSi, rac, imaze miuTiTebs, rom qalebs Riad
seqsualobaze aqcentis gakeTeba uWirT da mxolod SeniRbulad gascmen am informacias. am
sakiTxze qarTuli kvlevebi ver movipoveT, rogorc rusudan fxakaZe aRniSnavs, “Cvens
qveyanaSi seqsologiis Semadgenel arsebiT elementebze gamokvlevebi praqtikulad ar arsebobs”
[5: 33-39].
genderuli stereotipebis kidev erTi maCvenebelia is faqti, rom anonimur megobrobas mxolod
mamakacebi asaxeleben, rogorc gancxadebis ganTavsebis mizans, xolo megobrobas asaxelebs
qalTa 37 da mamakacTa 63 procenti. rogorc Cans, qalebi bedaven megobrobaze saubars, radgan
es termini pirdapir ar miuTiTebs imas, rom aplikants mxolod “garToba” surs.
gamoyenebuli literatura:
7
1. d. gomarTeli. ra aris evoluciuri fsiqologia. qarTuli fsiqologiuri Jurnali, Tbilisi, 2005, #5
2. m. kuWuxiZe. genderuli stereotipebi dRevandel saqarTveloSi. krebuli: saqarTvelo dRes,
Tbilisi, 1999
3. T. mataraZe, T. Carkviani, a. gelaSvili, n. WeliZe. ”qalwulobis instituti” rogorc
problema. krebulSi: sociologiuri kvlevebi genderis sferoSi. Tbilisi, 2002
4. n. sumbaZe, g. Tarxan-mouravi. genderi da sazogadoeba samcxe-javaxeTSi.
sazogadoebrivi politikis instituti, Tbilisi, 2005
5. r. fxakaZe qalTa seqsualobis problemebi da maTi gadawyvetis gzebi. krebulSi: genderuli
problematika saqarTveloSi, Tbilisi. 2002
6. d. Radua. genderuli stereotipebisa da qalTa faruli diskriminaciis kvleva saqarTveloSi.
kavkasiis qalTa qseli. Tbilisi, 1999
7. m. wereTeli. genderuli cnobierebisa da stereotipebis Camoyalibebisa da moqmedebis
ganwyobiseuli meqanizmebis Sesaxeb. qarTuli fsiqologiuri Jurnali Tbilisi, 2004, #7
8. m. wereTeli. qalTa uflebebi maTi Rirebulebebis TvalsazrisiT. Tbilisi, 2000
9. E. Aronson, T. Wilson, and R Akert. Social Psychology; Person, Prentice Hall, 2005
10. B. Braun. Female waist-to-hip and male waist-to-shoulder ratios as Determinants of
romantic partner desirability. In: Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2006,
Vol. 23(5)
11. D.M. Buss, D.P Schmitt. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human
mating, Psychological Review, 1993
12. D.M. Buss. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested
in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1989
13. D. Buss, M. Barnes. Preferences in human mate selection, Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 1986, 50 (3)
14. S. Gangestad. Sexual selection and physical attractiveness – implications for mating
dynamics, Human Nature-an Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 1993, 4 (3)
15. T. Greitemeyer. What do men and women want in a partner? Are educated partners
always more desirable? Sex Roles, 2006, 23
16. N. Javakhishvili. Mating Preferences in Choosing a Future partner. Does Georgia Repeat
the Same Worldwide Trend? Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal,
2008, V.XII, No. 4
17. N. Javakhishvili, I. Bregvadze. Women Roles at a State and Family Levels; In:
Exploring Gender Issues in the Caucasus Workshop Materials, Yerevan, 2000
18. D. Kenrick, R. Keefe. Age Preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human
reproductive strategies. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1992, 15
19. N. Koyama, A. McGain. Self-reported mate preferences and “feminist” attitudes
regarding marital relations, Evolution and Human Behavior, 2004, 25
20. D. G. Myers. Social Psychology. McGraw Hill, 1999
21. A. Rusu, A. Bencic. Choosing a Mate in Romania: A Cognitive Evolutionary
Psychological Investigation of Personal Advertisements Market. In: Journal of Cognitive
and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 2007, Vol. 7, No 1
22. Schmitt et al. Are men universally more dismissing than women? Gender differences in
romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions. In: Personal Relationships, 2003, No10
23. Schmitt et al. Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment across 62 Cultural
Regions. Are Models of self and other Pancultural Constructs? In: Journal of Cross-
Cultural Psychology, 2004, Vol.35, No 4
24. S. Sprecher. Importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning
potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction, Sex Roles, 1989, 21
25. S. Sprecher, Q. Sullivan, E. Hatfield Mate selection preferences: Gender differences
examined in a national sample, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 66
1080.
8
26. S. Sprecher, P. Regan. Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner
preferences in romantic relationships and friendships, Journal of Social and Personal
Relationships 2002, 19
27. S. Taylor, L. Peplau and D. Sears. Social Psychology, Prentice Hall, 2006
28. R.L. Trivers., Parental investment and sexual selection. In: B. Campbell, Editor, Sexual
selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971, Aldine, Chicago, 1972
29. E. Waynforth, R. Dunbar. Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: evidence from
“Lonely hearts' advertisements”. Behavior, 1995, 132
30. M. Wiederman, E. Allgeier. Gender differences in mate selection criteria:
Sociobiological or socio-economic explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology, 1992, 13
31. Widerman. Evolved gender differences in mate Preferences: Evidence from personal
Advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1993, 14