SI-Kim-2002-Continuous Dynamic Recrystallization of AISI 430 Ferritic St...
SI-Kim-2002-Continuous Dynamic Recrystallization of AISI 430 Ferritic St...
SI-Kim-2002-Continuous Dynamic Recrystallization of AISI 430 Ferritic St...
7~13
The high-temperature deformation behavior of AISI 430 ferritic stainless steel was studied by torsion tests. The
−2
deformation tests were performed in the temperature range of 900-1100oC and strain rate range of 5.0×10
-5.0/sec. The evolutions of flow stress and microstructure show the characteristics of continuous dynamic
recrystallization (CDRX). The flow stress gradually decreased with strain over the peak stress without steady
state. Below the 100% effective strain, grains appeared in small angle grain boundaries with a misorientation
of 3-9o. In addition, when heavy deformation (>300%) was applied, higher misorientation (~15o) was achieved.
The tendency of CDRX increased with increasing strain rate and decreasing temperature. The dependence
of CDRX grain size on the strain rate and temperature was discussed.
Keywords : high temperature deformation, ferritic stainless steel, continuous dynamic recrystallization (CDRX),
grain boundary misorientation, electron back-scattered diffraction
Fig. 1. Effective stress-effective strain curves under (a) various temperatures at 0.5/sec and (b) various strain rates at 1000 oC.
The deformed specimens were polished with 0.5 μm dia- within original grains In spite of the deformation, the shape
mond paste and then etched with a solution of 50% concen- of the original grain was little changed. Especially, severely
trated HNO3 to reveal the microstructure on tangential deformed microstructures have many subgrains inside fine
planes just below the surface of the deformed specimen. The grains as shown in Fig. 2(e). The microstructure was clearly
analysis of microstructure was performed by optical micros- distinguished from the original, slightly deformed, one by
copy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Philips optical microscopy.
CM200). The specimens for TEM observation were mechan- Fig. 3 shows the characteristics of grain boundaries with
ically ground to ~60 μm and then jet-polished. The charac- increasing strain. At low strain deformation, Figs. 3(a) and
teristics of grain boundaries were investigated with electron (b), a low density of dislocations could be observed. On the
back scattered diffraction (EBSD, JSM 6300 & Link Opal, other hand, at a large strain deformation, the dislocation sub-
Seoul National University). structures were developed to subgrain and many dislocations
were tangled around the subgrain boundaries. Especially, these
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION subgrains with low angle grain boundaries are evolved into
grains with high angle grain boundaries with increasing strain.
3.1. Continuous dynamic recrystallization (CDRX) Therefore, it is concluded that dynamic recovery and contin-
Fig. 1 shows the effective stress effective strain curves of uous work hardening processes develop strain-induced fine
AISI 430 ferritic stainless steel obtained under various defor- grains. The flow curves and microstructural evolutions show
mation conditions. The flow stress curves exhibit the peak the characteristics of CDRX [13-21].
value and gradually reduce with strain. The flow curves do Fig. 4 represents the evolution of grain boundary angle
not show the steady state of flow stress. It is interesting to obtained from electron back scattered diffraction (EBSD).
note that the flow curves show different features from the The five color lines in the misorientation map and color
traditional characteristics of DRV and DRX [1-8]. The flow areas in the crystal orientation map indicate the ranges of
stress curves of the metals, softened by DRX or DRV, have grain boundary angle and crystal axis, respectively. The image,
the steady state of flow stress. However, the flow stress curves a grain boundaries misorientation map and crystal orienta-
of AISI 430 ferritic stainless steel do not have the steady tion map of a 10% strain deformed specimen are shown in
state. This evolution of flow stress with strain was confirmed Figs. 4(a), (d) and (g), respectively. Most grain boundaries
from the work hardening rate (θ = dσ/dε) of flow curve shown have a low angle and some subgrain boundaries are not
in Fig. 2(a). The work hardening rate reduced with strain and exhibited on the misorientation map. When 50% strain
reached zero at the peak strain corresponding to peak stress. deformation was applied on AISI 430 ferritic stainless steel,
The work hardening rate decreased gradually to negative the misorientation of the subgrain boundaries increased (Figs.
values with increasing strain and then approached zero at a 4(b) and (e)). For large strain deformation (500%), most
very high strain. This result indicates that another softening grains have high angle grain boundaries (Figs. 4(c) and (f)).
mechanism is involved in this alloy. These results can be explained by the fact that the subgrains
Figs. 2(b)-(f) show the evolution of microstructure with with low angle grain boundaries evolved to the grains which
strain observed by optical microscopy. The initial grain size were composed of high angle grain boundaries, with increas-
before deformation was about 400 μm. At the small strain ing strain. Also, the crystal orientation maps indicate that the
deformation, Figs. 2(c) and (d), the subgrains were developed CDRX induces grain refinement (Figs. 4(g)-(i)). In addition,
Continuous Dynamic Recrystallization of AISI 430 Ferritic Stainless Steel
Fig. 2. (a) Flow stress curve and (b)-(f) microstructures obtained under various deformation conditions. The microstructures of (b), (c), (d), and
(e) were obtained from A (before deformation), B (50% strain deformation), C (100%), and D (300%) in (a), respectively.
o
Fig. 3. TEM bright field images of the samples deformed at 1000 C and 0.5/sec under various strains; (a) 10%, (b) 50% and (c) 100%.
the CDRX developed the various crystal orientations at each the range of 20-80 MPa under various deformation condi-
grain so that ridging was restricted. It is, therefore, reason- tions (Fig. 1). Under the same deformation condition, these
ably concluded that the development of a substructure refines values are lower than those of austenitic stainless steels which
grains by continuous deformation. were softened by DRX [2,8]. The flow stress increased to
about 50 MPa with an increasing strain rate from 0.05 to 5/sec
3.2. Effects of temperature and strain rate on CDRX (Fig. 1). The flow curves are useful regardless of softening
The flow stress of AISI 430 ferritic stainless steel was in mechanisms since they are used to estimate the mean flow
Sung-Il Kim and Yeon-Chul Yoo
o
Fig. 4. Images of electron back scattered diffraction (EBSD) at 1000 C and 0.5/sec under various strains; (a) 10%, (b) 50% and (c) 500%. Grain
o
boundary misorientation maps of electron back scattered diffraction (EBSD) at 1000 C and 0.5/sec under various strains; (d) 10%, (e) 50% and
o
(f) 500%. Crystal orientation maps of electron back scattered diffraction (EBSD) at 1000 C and 0.5/sec under various strains; (g) 10%, (h) 50%
and (i) 500%.
stress in an operation to a specific deformation. Thus, the m. The calculated strain rate sensitivity of AISI 430 ferritic
dependence of flow stress on the strain rate is expressed by stainless steel is about 0.23 in the temperature range of 900-
o
Fig. 5(a) and by following the equation: 1100 C. Under the same deformation condition, this value is
quite similar to that of austenitic stainless steel [2,8].
ε· = Aσp
n
(1) As the strain rate is increased, softening is constrained
with successive deformation, although the deformation energy
where, σp is the peak stress and ε· is the strain rate. The value is accumulated. The accumulation of dislocation increase the
of peak stress can be taken from Fig. 1. The values of A and n number of subgrains and CDRX grains. Fig. 6 shows the
are experimental constants obtained from Fig. 5(a). A is the microstructures of AISI 430 ferritic stainless steel with a
−8
8.1×10 and n is the reciprocal value of strain rate sensitivity, 500% strain deformed under various deformation condi-
Continuous Dynamic Recrystallization of AISI 430 Ferritic Stainless Steel
Fig. 5. (a) Relationship between peak stress and strain rate and (b) Relationship between peak stress and temperature.
Fig. 6. Optical microstructures of AISI 430 stainless steel deformed under various deformation conditions: (a) 900oC, 5/sec, (b) 1000oC, 5/sec, (c)
o o
1000 C, 0.05/sec and (d) 1100 C, 0.05/sec.
tions. The mean size of grain which has the high angle grain energy developed during deformation [2,3,8]. To simulta-
boundary decreased with increasing strain rate (Figs. 6(b) neously evaluate the effects of temperature and strain rate on
and (c)). In addition, subgrain boundaries were not found at flow stress, a temperature compensated strain rate parameter,
higher strain rate deformation. This means that the CDRX the Zener-Hollomon parameter (Z), was applied to Eq. 1.
can be activated by high strain rate deformation. The Zener-Hollomon parameter was defined as:
The flow stress values also increased with decreasing tem-
Z= ε· exp(Q/RT) (2)
peratures at a constant strain rate (Fig. 1). The optical micro-
structural observations indicated that the area of recrystallized where Q is the apparent activation energy and R is the gas
grain increased with decreasing temperature (Fig. 6). The constant. The apparent activation energy can be obtained
deformation energy was more accumulated at low tempera- from the plot of ln σp versus 1/T shown in Fig. 5(b). The cal-
tures so the CDRX occurred at low temperatures. It is known culated mean value of Q is 83.54 kJ/mol. This value is lower
that the softening is controlled by thermally activated stored than that of austenitic stainless steel (304 kJ/mol) [8].
Sung-Il Kim and Yeon-Chul Yoo
Fig. 7. Images of electron back scattered diffraction (EBSD) and misorientation at various deformation conditions: (a) 1100oC, 0.05/sec, (b)
o o
1000 C, 0.5/sec, (c) 900 C, 5/sec.
where DCDRX is the mean grain size which was determined The high-temperature softening mechanism of AISI 430
from the specimens quenched after deformation up to effec- ferritic stainless steel was investigated by a hot torsion test in
tive strain of 500%. Eq. 3 was obtained from the linear fitting the temperature range of 900-1100oC and strain rate range of
−2
of measured grain size (Fig. 8). When the AISI 430 stainless 5.0×10 -5.0/sec. The following conclusions were drawn
steel was deformed under higher Z conditions, the refined from the analysis of flow curves and microstructures.
grains could be achieved. (1) The substructures with low angle grain boundaries
When the initial grain size of the AISI 430 stainless steel were developed to the high angle grain boundaries by contin-
used was smaller than 400 μm, the effect of grain refinement uous dynamic recrystallzation. Grain refinement was achieved
increased [22]. by heavy deformation.
Continuous Dynamic Recrystallization of AISI 430 Ferritic Stainless Steel
(2) The dependence of flow stress on temperature and 8. S. H. Cho, S. I. Kim and Y. C. Yoo, Metals and Materials
strain rate was expressed by the following equation. 4, 732 (1998).
9. P. Juntunen, A. Kyrolainen and P. Karjalainen, Proc. of the
ε· = 2.2×10 σ 4.35 exp(-83540/RT)
−4
p
3rd European Congress of Stainless Steel 99 Science and
(3) The effect of continuous dynamic recrystallzation on Market, p. 163, Chia Laguna Sardinia, Italy (1999).
grain refinement was high at high Z value, i.e., high strain 10. J. Harase, K. Ohta, T. Takeshita and R. Shimizu, Mater.
rate and low temperature. The continuous dynamic recrystal- Forum. 14, 296 (1990).
lized grain size could be expressed with the Zener-Hollomon 11. H. Takechi, H. Kato, T. Sunami and T. Kakajama, J. Jpn.
parameter as in the following equation. Inst. Met. 31, 717 (1967).
−0.17
12. A. Najafi-Zadeh, J. J. Jonas and S. Yue, Metall. Trans. A
DCDRX = 386.76 Z . 23, 2607 (1992).
13. N. Tsuji, T. Shinmiya, Y. Saito and M. Muraki, ISIJ Int. 38,
ACKNOWLEDGMENT 380 (1998).
14. N. Tsuji, K. Tsuzakia and T. Maki, ISIJ Int. 34, 1008
The authors would like to express their appreciation for (1994).
the RA financial support from Inha University. 15. N. D. Ryan, H. J. McQueen, E. Evangelista, Proc. of the
7th RisInter. Sympo. on Metall. and Mater., p. 527 (1986).
REFERENCES 16. Hiroshi. Fujimura and Shinji Tsuge, Int. 3rd. Cong. Stain-
less Steel '99 Sci. and Mar. 2, 67 (1999).
1. C. M.Sellars, Mater. Sci. Tech. 6, 1072 (1990). 17. S. J. Hales and T. R. Mcnelley, Acta metall. mater. 36, 1229
2. H. J. McQueen and J. J. Jonas, J. Appl. Metal Work 233- (1998).
241, 410 (1985). 18. K. Tsuzaki, H. Xiaoxu and T. Maki, Acta. metall. mater. 44,
3. E. Valdes and C. M. Sellars, Mater. Sci. Tech. 7, 622 (1991). 4491 (1996).
4. C. Roucoules, P. D. Hodgson, S. Yue and J. J. Jonas, Met- 19. H. Gudmundsson, D. Brooks and J. A. Wert, Acta metall.
all. Mater. Trans. A 25, 389 (1994). mater. 39, 19 (1991).
5. B. C. Ko, K. S. Park and Y. C. Yoo, Mater. Sci. Tech. 14, 20. T. G. Nieh, L. M. Hsiung, J. Wadsworth and R. Kaibyshev,
265 (1999). Acta metall. mater. 46, 2789 (1998).
6. T. Sakai and M. Ohashi, Mater. Sci. Tech. 6, 1251 (1990). 21. M. E. Kassner, Metall. Trans. A 20, 2182 (1989).
7. S. H. Cho, S. I. Kim and Y. C. Yoo, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 16, 22. S. Gourdet, E.V. Konopleva, H. J. McQueen. and F. Montheil-
1836 (1997). let, Mater. Sci. Forum 217-222, 441 (1996).