Rheology
Rheology
Rheology
Faculty of Engineering
Petroleum Engineering Department
REPORT 2 #
(EXPREMENT)
Rheology and gel strength
:Prepared by
μ Apparent Viscosity.
Plastic Viscosity: is part of the flow resistance of the fluid caused by mechanical friction
within the fluid.
Where θN is the viscometer dial reading at any rotational speed of N. The plastic viscosity of
the mud is usually obtained by:
μp = θ600 – θ300
μa = (θ600 / 2)
τy = θ300 – μp.
The gel strength in unit’s lb./100 ft2, is measured by taking the maximum dial deflection
when the rotational viscometer is turned at low rotor speed after the mud has been static for a
period of time generally 10 seconds or 10 minutes.
The Gel strength is a function of the inter-particle forces. An initial 10-second gel and a 10-
minute gel strength measurement give an indication of the amount of gelation that will
occur after circulation ceased and the mud remains static. The more the mud gels
during shutdown periods, the more pump pressure will be required to initiate
circulation again.
EQUIPMENT USED:
Marsh funnel :
Table2
Procedure
RHEOLOGY TEST:
Rheology test results have been divided into 4 sections, namely mud density results,
Plastic viscosity test results, yield point test results and 10 sec gel strength test results.
Record the maximum deflection of the dial before the Gel breaks, as the
Gel strength in lb/100 ft². (lb/100 ft² x 5.077 = Gel strength in dynes/cm²).
Obtain a recently agitated mud sample from each of mud tanks (1) and
(2).
Using the Baroid Rheometer, obtain dial readings at 3, 300 and 600
RPM.
By means of the rheological calculation’s procedure, determine the
Apparent and Plastic Viscosities, Yield Point and initial 10 sec. and final
10-minute Gel Strength parameters.
Tabulated results
Test procedure:
1) Take sample of pre-mixed mud sample and measure
the following properties:
a) Density in ppg.
b) Plastic viscosity.
c) Yield point.
d) Flow behavior index.
e) Consistency index.
f) 10sec\10min.gel strength.
Calculations:
θ 300
n=3.323log , k= (510* θ 300)\(510)n.
θ 600
Conclusion:
Figures:
Reference
Adeaga, A. (2010). Effects of Additives on the Rheology and Corrosion Characteristics of
Drilling Mud. Halifax, NS: Dalhousie University.
Alderman, N. J., Gavignet, A., Guillot, D., & Maitland, G. C. (1988). High-Temperature,
HighPressure Rheology of Water-Based Muds. Society of Petroleum Engineers , 187-195.
Ali, M., & Al-Marhoun, M. (1990). The Effect of High Temperature, High Pressure, and Aging
on Water-Based Drilling Fluids. Society of Petroleum Engineers , Unsolicited.
Annis, M. R., & ESSO, P. R. (1967). High-Temperature Flow Properties of Water-Base Drilling
Fluids. Journal of Petroleum Technology [Volume 19, Number 8] , 1074-1080.
API Recommented Practice 13B-1, I. 1.-1. (2003, December). Recommended Practice for
Field Testing water-based Drilling Fluids. American Petroleum Institute.
Azar, J. J., & Lummus, J. L. (1975, 28 September-1 October 1975,). The Effect of Drill Fluid pH
on Drill Pipe Corrosion Fatigue Performance. Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum
Engineers of AIME .
Bourgoyne Jr., A. T., Millheim, K. K., Chenevert, M. E., & Young Jr., F. (1986). Applied Drilling
Engineering. Richardson, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineering.
Model-35-Viscometer-Instruction-Manual.