Radio Discussion
Radio Discussion
Radio Discussion
Format-Discussion
Meaning
Elements of Discussion
Four elements drive the shape of a discussion: the radio host, the topic, the
program's goals, the listeners or callers.
Topic
If the show covers a broad theme, such as current affairs, ideas can be
drawn from many different sources, including political affairs; international,
regional or local developments; scientific breakthroughs and new books.
Feedback from the audience can generate new topics for the show
Goals
Goals are influenced by the program's overall focus as well as the specific
topics for a given program. Typical goals include:
Discussion-Listners/Caller
Callers will influence the flow of the discussion with their comments and
questions. The host needs to keep callers focused on the topic at hand.
Having screeners answer the phone lines frees the host to focus on the
current discussion. Screeners need to have a good understanding of the
overall program goals as well as the current program topic. Often, program
producers will fill this role.
Advice to contributors
Contributor nerves
Nervousness is an emotional reaction to an unusual situation and as such it is
inevitable. Indeed, it is desirable in that it causes the adrenalin to flow and
improves concentration – with experience it is possible to use such ‘red
light’ tensions constructively. On the other hand, if the contributor is too
relaxed he or she may appear to be blasé about the subject and the listener
may react against this approach.
The host should have everyone’s name, and his or her designation, written
down so as to be clearly visible – it is amazing how easy it is for one’s mind
to go blank, even when you know someone well. The introductions are then
made, making sure that all their voices are heard as early as possible in the
programme. During the discussion continue to establish the names, at least
for the first two ‘rounds’ of conversation, and again at intervals throughout.
It is essential that the start of the programme is factual in content and
positive in presentation
Speaker control
Subject control
Is it boring?
Is it incomprehensible?
Next question.
Who next?
Technical control
The chairman has to watch for, and correct, alterations in the balance of
voices that was obtained before the programme began. This may be due to a
speaker moving back, turning ‘off-mic’ to someone at the side, or leaning in
too close. There may be wide variations in individual voice levels as the
participants get annoyed, excited, discomfited or subdued. It’s also
necessary to be aware of any extraneous noise such as paper rustle, jingling
bracelets, matches being struck or fingers tapping the table. Nonverbal
signals should suffice to prevent them becoming too intrusive.
If the discussion has gone well, the listener will already have recognized the
main points being made and the arguments that support them. If a summary
is required, it is often better to invite each speaker to have a ‘last word’.
Alternatively, the chairman may put a key question to the group which
points the subject forward to the next step – ‘Finally, what do you think
should happen now?’ This should be timed to allow for sufficient answering
discussion. Many a good programme is spoiled by an untidy ending.
News programs sometimes use discussions when there are phone-ins from
listeners.
Magazine programs use discussions to supplement feature stories. These
discussions can take the form of interaction with guests, calls from listeners
or questions from live audiences.
Talk shows use discussions as the main format for the show.
a. Discussions might be between the program host and guests on the program,