Ignition and Burning Rate of Sheanut Shell Briquettes Produced at Moderate Temperature and Die Pressure
Ignition and Burning Rate of Sheanut Shell Briquettes Produced at Moderate Temperature and Die Pressure
Ignition and Burning Rate of Sheanut Shell Briquettes Produced at Moderate Temperature and Die Pressure
net/publication/331231111
CITATIONS READS
3 1,058
7 authors, including:
U. A. Birnin-Yauri
Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto
48 PUBLICATIONS 724 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
COMBUSTION PROFILES OF BRIQUETS FROM BLENDS OF CHARCOAL AND SOME AGRICULTURAL WASTES View project
All content following this page was uploaded by U. A. Birnin-Yauri on 20 February 2019.
Email address
*
Corresponding author
Citation
Elinge Cosmas Moki, Birnin Yauri Umar Abubakar, Muhammad Aminu Bayewa, Musa Mu’azu. Ignition and Burning Rate of Sheanut Shell
Briquettes Produced at Moderate Temperature and Die Pressure. American Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences.
Vol. 1, No. 3, 2018, pp. 145-149.
Abstract: Energy availability is a crucial requirement to societal development. In an effort to provide a cheap firewood
alternative to the rural households in Nigeria, this study was carried out to produce biomass briquette from sheanut shell using
a simple extruder briquetting machine. The proximate analysis of the raw and briquetted samples were carried out and were
found that these properties were improved as a result of briquetting. The density was found to be 0.46g/cm3 and the
compressive strength was 2120Mpa while the ignition time was 1.70mm/s and the afterglow time was 38sec. It took 1kg of the
briquette, 22 mins to boil 2 litres of water while it took kerosene 16mins to boil the same quantity of water. The efficiency
based on kerosene was 73.58% which indicates that this agro-waste residue is a good resource for biomass briquetting.
constitutes a disposal problem [5]. Obviously most of the sieve to obtain a fine particle size. The pulverized sample
world’s demand for energy is yet to be met by fossil fuels was kept in a polyethene bag until required for briquettes
which provides about 80% of man’s energy source but has preparation.
failed to meet the huge demand of the teeming population
which has kept on increasing on daily basis, while the 2.3. Preparation of Briquettes
volume of the fossil fuels has kept on depreciating too. There A cylindrical mould 16 cm in length and 2.5 cm internal
is now a world-wide growing concern on the rate of depletion, diameter was constructed. A metal bar of 2.3 cm diameter
and final exhaustion of these fossils. The life span of this was used in pushing the formed briquette out of the moulding
resource in the world which at present is the main source of cylinder.
energy and petrochemical feedstock is now measured in few The pulverized sample was thoroughly mixed with the
decades [6]. In an event of depletion of the crude reserves, slurry of starch (the binder) in the mass ratio of 6:1 [16]. The
the ugly scenario that could be predicted by the energy crises mixture was then loaded into the cylindrical mould and
will be better imagined than experienced. compressed with a screw presser and kept for 30 mins. The
The fact that oil has a “turbulence factor” in contemporary densified briquette was pushed out of the mould with the aid
international affairs has led to a boast in research for of the metal bar. The same procedure was repeated several
alternative sources of energy especially in the technologically times to obtain a good quantity of briquettes. The briquettes
advanced countries in the West geared towards reducing the so produced were then air dried for three weeks [17].
dependence on the OPEC nations [7, 8].
For most developing countries, biomass particularly 2.4. Determination of Moisture Content
agricultural wastes, has become one of the most promising
energy sources. Biomass are organic matter in the original A sample of the briquette was weighed (Wi) and placed
natural form, growing on the basis of photosynthesis, collecting into an oven whose temperature has been adjusted to 110°C
and transforming solar energy into plants [9]. Biomass are and left for 24 hours after which it was removed and re-
excellent renewable energy sources intensively used as weighed (Wf) after cooling [18]. The moisture content was
substitute for fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum products in the computed from equation 2:
modern world [10]. Huge volumes of agricultural residues and
Percentage (%) moisture = 100% (2)
residues from wood processing mills are not fully utilized. One
of the major world crop, rice, has about 25% of the crop in the
form of husk which amounts to about 100 million tonnes of 2.5. Determination of Ash Content
husks while groundnut has about 45% of it in the form of shells, A sample of the briquette was placed in a pre-weighed
with a production of about 10 million tonnes worldwide [10]. In crucible (Wc) and weighed (Wsc). The crucible was heated at
the light of this, it is reasonable to assume that about 25% of any 600°C for 2 hours in a furnace. It was allowed to cool to
agricultural feed stock is residue [11]. room temperature before it was re-weighed (Wac). The ash
Briquette is described as a substance made when small content was computed from equation 3:
particles of solid materials are pressed together to form a
coherent shape of large size with or without a binder [12]. Percentage % ash content = 100% (3)
In Malaysia, briquetting has been used to upgrade the
properties of oil palm biomass [13, 14] reported increased 2.6. Determination of Volatile Matter
energy content and reduced moisture content of 5% and 38%
of palm biomass briquettes. Where a binder is used in Volatile matter is defined as those products, exclusive of
briquettes making, the binder to waste ratio is important so as moisture, given off by a material as gas or vapour. The
not to confer unnecessary material strength to the briquettes volatile matter of the sample was determined using the
and affects the mechanical characteristics, such as Meynell’s method. The dry sample from the moisture content
compressive strength [15]. determination was heated at 300°C in a furnace for 2hrs to
drive off the volatiles. The temperature was then raised to
470°C for 2hrs (just before the material turns black i.e.
2. Materials and Methods before it ashes). The volatile organic matter was calculated
2.1. Sample Collection from equation (4).
Volatile matter = wt of residual dry sample – wt of dry
Samples of sheanut shells was collected from Aliero, sample after heating
Latitude 12017’24.14”N and Longitude 4028’1.57”E town of
Kebbi State, Nigeria, while cassava starch was purchased at %= × 100 (4)
the Sokoto Central Market, Sokoto, Nigeria.
2.7. Determination of Fixed Carbon
2.2. Sample Preparation
Fixed carbon represents the quantity of carbon that can be
The collected sample was sun-dried for three days to drive burnt by a primary current of air drawn through hot bed of a
off moisture and then pulverized and sieved with 80 mesh fuel. The fixed carbon content of the samples was calculated
American Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 2018; 1(3): 145-149 147
3. Results
Table 1. Proximate Analysis of Raw and Briquetted Samples.
Sample Moisture Content (%) Ash Content (%) Volatile Matter (%) Fixed Carbon (%)
SN (R) 3.50±0.50 2.50±0.40 10.50±0.33 83.50±0.40
SN (B) 2.50±0.50 4.50±0.10 16.00±0.50 77.00±1.40
Sample Density (g/cm3) Compressive strength (Mpa) Ignition time (mm/s) Afterglow time (s)
SN (B) 0.46±0.10 2120.00±1.00 1.70±0.03 38.0±0.85
Sample Combustibility test (mins) Calorific value (Mj/Kg) Specific Power Output (W/Kg) Efficiency, based on kerosene (%)
SN (B) 22 6.75±0.18 439.95 73.58
Kerosene 16 - 597.96 100.00
Key:
*SN(R) – Sheanut shell raw sample
SN (B) – Sheanut shell briquette.
which is in agreement with the work of [25]. The lower the matrix of the briquette has inhibited flame propagation due to
ash content of a briquette, the better the quality of the fuel, low thermal conductivity [33].
hence the sheanut shell briquette is a good fuel as supported The results of the combustibility characteristics of the fuel
by its combustibility results in Table 3. briquette is shown in Table 3. The combustibility test was
The result of the volatile matter varied from 10.50% (Raw carried out to compare the cooking efficiency of the briquette
sample) to 16.0% (briquetted sample). It is noted that and it measures the time taken for the briquette to boil an
briquetting has improved the volatile matter of the waste equal volume of water under similar conditions. From the
material and the higher the volatile matter of a fuel briquette, result on Table 3, it took the sheanut shell briquette 22
the higher the combustibility of the fuel briquette when the minutes to boil 2 litres of water while it took the kerosene
ash content is low [26]. High volatile matter is an indication stove 16 minutes to boil same quantity of water. The calorific
of easy ignition of the briquette and proportionate increase in value of a fuel is the amount of energy liberated by burning a
flame length [27]. unit mass of the fuel. The computed calorific value of the
The fixed carbon of the briquette, which is the percentage briquette was 6.75(MJ/kg) and is observed to be far lower
of carbon (Solid fuel) available for char combustion after the than some wood species such as Iroko (18.60MJ/kg),
volatile matter is distilled off, gives a rough estimate on the Mahogany (18.24MJ/kg) and silk cotton (16.93MJ/kg) as
heating value of a fuel and acts as the main heat generator reported by [30].
during burning [24]. The result of the fixed carbon varied The specific power output was 439.95(W/kg) while that of
from 77.0% (briquetted sample) to 83.50% (raw sample). It is kerosene was 597.96(W/kg) and this low value could be
noted that the raw sample has a higher fixed carbon content attributed to the high density and low propagation time of the
than the briquetted sample and the low fixed carbon of the briquette [33]. Also the efficiency based on kerosene was
briquetted sample indicates prolong cooking time but with computed to be 73.58% which indicates that the sheanut shell
low heat released [28]. briquette is good for cooking in households and can be used
The result of the viability test (density, compressive for heating in cottage industries.
strength, ignition time and afterglow time) are shown in
Table 2. 5. Conclusion
It has been stated that density of biomass briquettes
depends on the density of the original biomass material [29]. The findings of this study have shown that briquettes
The density of the briquette was 0.46(g/cm3). However, this produced from sheanut shell would make a good biomass
value is higher than the densities of elephant grass and fuel which could be used for cooking and ironing. It can also
spear grass briquettes with 0.319(g/cm3) and 0.367(g/cm3) be said that this biomass briquette will not crumble during
respectively as reported by [30]. Although the briquetting transportation and storage due to the high values obtained for
process increased the density of the bulk material; improved its density and compressive strength. Hence, an efficient and
its handling characteristics, but it was still relatively low. affordable alternative source of energy can be obtained from
Low density biomass briquettes usually have low energy this waste residue which could be a source of nuisance to the
and cooking with such briquettes in a briquette stove environment.
requires frequent re-feeding the stove with the briquette
especially for a cooking that requires a long simmering
phase due to its low mass to volume ratio [31]. The References
compressive strength of the briquette materials was
2120MPa which is reasonable when compared to elephant [1] H. R. Jarret. A geography of manufacturing MacDonald and
Evans, Plymouth, 2nd Ed. 1979, P. 20.
grass and spear grass briquettes [30]. The high compressive
strength and maximum force of the sheanut shell briquettes, [2] P. Longrigg. The coming struggle for the resources in the
indicates more volume displacement which is good for southern Ocean in Energy world, 1980, 76: 2.
packaging, storage and transportation and above all, it is an [3] A. O. Adegbulugbe. Energy and Environmental Issues in
indication of good quality briquette because of the strong Nigeria. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 1994,
inter-particle bonds that exist [32]. 6 (12): 7-18.
The end-point of ignition in subjective and depends on
[4] FAO, Food and Agricultural Organization. Wood Structure
one’s judgement according to what stage has ignition been and Utility W. T. 102 – FAO working document. Rome, 1990
achieved [33]. In this study, ignition time was taken as the P. 35.
average time taken to achieve a steady glowing flame. The
result of the ignition time was 1.70(mm/s) and is higher than [5] O. Y. Ogunsanwo. Effective Management of Wood Waste for
Sustainable Wood Utilization in Nigeria Proceedings of the
those of rice husk (1.0mm/s) and corncob (1.2mm/s) as 27th Annual Conference of FAN Abuja FCT 17-21 Sept., 2001,
reported by [20] while the afterglow time of 38.0sec was Pp 225-234.
recorded and is lower than those of rice husk and corncob as
reported by [20]. This could be attributed to the high density [6] I. O. Akpabio, and K. D. Bartle. Distribution of n-alkanes in
Coal – Derived liquids, Nigerian Journal of Renewable
of the briquette which results in delayed ignition time and Energy, 1996, 4 (44): 6-9.
reduced porosity [34]. Reduction in air content within the
American Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 2018; 1(3): 145-149 149
[7] C. Ikoku. Coal in the Energy Mix of Nigerian in: Harry C. [22] A. Maciejewska,; H. Veringa, J. Sanders, and S. D. Peteve. Co
Okolo (Ed) Nigerian Coal, Published by Raw Materials – firing of Biomass with coal; constraints and role of Biomass
Research and Development Council Abuja, 1996 Pp. 25-29. Pre-treatment, institute for Energy, 2006, Pp. 496. 23-50.
[8] O. Adegoke, and A. Mohammed. Investigating Composite [23] P. A. Idah, and E. P. Mopah. Comparative Assessment of
Sawdust. Briquette as a Source of Fuel for Domestic Cooking. Energy Value of Briquettes from Some Agricultural By-
Nigerian Journal of Renewable Energy, 2002, 7 (1&2): 106- products with different Binders, IOSR Journal of Engineering,
111. 2013, 3 (1): 36-42.
[9] D. Plastil; M. Brozek, J. Molatak, and P. Henamman. Heating [24] O. J. Akowuah, F. Kermausuor, and J. S. Mitchual. Physico-
Briquettes from energy Crops. R. E. S. A. G. S, 2004, 50 (4): chemical Characteristics and Market Potential of Sawdust
136-139. Charcoal Briquette, International Journal of Energy and
Environmental Engineering, 2012, 3 (20): 18-26.
[10] P. D. Grover, and S. K. Mishra. Biomass Briquetting:
Technology and practice FAO United Nation Bangkok, 1996, [25] W. L. Danbature. Combustion Characteristics of Briquettes
Pp. 47-49. Produced from Coal Char Blends with Agricultural Wastes. An
M.Sc Thesis Submitted to the Post Graduate School, Abubakar
[11] J. N. Piels,; D Nielde; J. Kiel. Potential Agro-residues and Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi. 2002, Unpublished.
their Characteristics, Presented at IEA Exco Workshop on
Biomass Co-firing, Copenhangen, 2005, Pp. 4-6. [26] R. Maninder, K. Singh, and S. Grover. Using Agricultural
Residues as a Biomass Briquetting: An Alternative Source of
[12] J. A. Akande. Briquette Sawdust and Low Density Coal for Energy. Journal of electrical and electronic Engineering,
Sustainable Livelihood, Proceeding of the 28th Annual 2012, 1 (5): 11-15.
conference of FAN Abuja FCT, 2002, Pp 127-135.
[27] S. Loo Van, and J. Koppejain (eds). Handbook of Biomass
[13] H. W. Kong. Wood and Charcoal Briquetting in Malaysia. In: Combustion and Co-firing, prepared by task 32 of the
Proceedings of International Workshop on Biomass Briquettes, Implementating Agreement on Bioenergy, under the auspices
P. D. Grover, and S. K. Mishra, (Ed.), 1995, Pp. 68-74. of the International Energy Agency, Twente University press,
ISBN 9036517737, 2004, Pp 8-18.
[14] A. B. Nasiru,; A. N. Ma., Y. M. Choo, M. H. Mohammed; A.
A. Rohaya, and Z. Zainab. Oil Palm Biomas as Potential [28] A. O. Olorunnisola. Production of Fuel Briquettes from Waste
substitution Raw Materials for Commercial Biomass Paper and Coconut Husk Admixtures. Agricultural
Briquettes Production. Am. J. App. Scie. 2008, 5 (3): 179-183. Engineering International: the CIGR E-Journal. Manuscript
EE 06 066. 2007, 1: 12-15.
[15] S. Timoshenko. Strength of Materials, 3rded. Kreiger Pub. Co.,
Paris France, 1976, Pp. 152-164. [29] A. Demirbas, and A. Sahin. Evaluation of Biomass Residue
Briquetting Waste Paper and Wheat-Straw Mixtures. Fuel
[16] A. S. Sambo, A. C. Etonihu, and I. O. Akpabio. Effect of Processing Technology, 1998, 55 (2): 175-183.
Compressive Strength and Calorific Value on the Burning
Profiles of Fuel Briquettes. International Journal of Chemical [30] T. U. Onuegbu, Ogbu I. M., and C. Ejikeme. Comparative
Science, 2008, 1 (2): 205-213. analysis of Densities and Calorific Values of Wood and
Briquettes Samples Prepared at Moderate Pressure and
[17] M. Z. Kyari. Briquetting of Corncob. Unpublished M.Sc. Ambient Temperature. International Journal of Plant sciences,
Dissertation, Submitted to the Chemistry Programme of 2012, 2 (1): 40-45.
AbubakarTafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, 2000, Pp. 31-35.
[31] P. C. Kwong, J. H. Wang, C. W. Chao, C. W. Cheung and C.
[18] ASTM American Society for Testing Materials. Annual Book Kendall. Effect of Co - Combustion of Coal and Rice Husk on
of ASTM Standards; Petroleum Products, Lubricants, and the Combustion Performance and Pollutant Emission,
Fossil fuels, Vol. 5 (part 5); Gaseous Fuels, Coal and Coke, Proceeding of the 7th Asia Pacific Symposium on Combustion
D3173-87, 1990a, Pp. 308-309. and Energy Utilization, 2004 Pp. 1-6.
[19] W. Moore and D. Johnson. Procedures for the Chemical [32] N. Kaliyan and R. V. Morey. Densification Characteristics of
Analysis of Wood and Wood Products. Madison, WL: U.S. Corn stover and Switchgrass. Trans ASABE 2009, 52 (3): 907-
Forest products Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 920.
1999, Pp. 35-75.
[33] K. C. David, M. N Dauda, and M. G. Jason. Effect of Binder
[20] J. T. Oladeji. Fuel Characterization of Briquettes produce Types and Amount on Physical and Combustion
from Corncob and Rice Husk residues. The specific Journal of Characteristics, International Journal of Engineering
Science and Technology, 2010, 2 (1): 101-106. Research and Science Technology, 2013, 2 (1): 12-20.
[21] C. A. Zaror, P. D. Pyle. The Pyrolysis of Biomass: A General [34] R. M. Davies, and D. S. Abolude. Ignition and Burning Rate
Review. Sadhana Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci. 1982, 5 (4): 269-285. of Water Hyacinth Briquittes, Journal of Scientific Research
and Reports, 2013, 2 (1): 111-120.