Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

UCC Flow Chart

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

10/13/21, 11:03 AM OneNote

UCC 2-207 Flow Chart 


Monday, October 4, 2021  12:19 PM 

Offer vs. Reply Document (Acceptance) 


 
1) Look at doc. No. 2 
"A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a
reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from
those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the
additional or different terms 
 
2) Look at doc. No. 1 (if no. 2 is acceptance) 
"The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants
such terms become part of the contract unless: 
• The offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer 
• They materially alter it (hardship or surprise); or 
• Notification of objection to them has already been given or it is give within a reasonable time after
notice of them is received  
 
*if not between two merchants, the additional merchants, the term will not go in 
 
3) If reply document is expressly conditioned language, it’s a counteroffer, move to 2-207 (3) 
If you act like you're in a contract, the actual terms will be whatever you agreed on 
—>Terms the two merchants agreed upon + any UCC default 
 
 
Examples of expressly conditioned language 
"seller's acceptance is expressly conditioned on Buyer's assent to the additional or different terms
and conditions set forth below and printed on the reverse side" 
 
NOT expressly conditioned language: 
https://nesl-my.sharepoint.com/personal/alexandra_m_green_nesl_edu/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc={e5da7078-447a-4137-9437-71cc14a52ae9}&action=edit&… 1/2
10/13/21, 11:03 AM OneNote
"This is an acceptance only if the additional terms 
 
 
 
Additional term: when reply document puts in something new that was not remotely in offer 
 
Different term: when reply document puts in something that conflicts with a term that was in the offer 
 
 
When there are different terms: knockout or dropout (if acceptance) 
Go to 2-207(1) to find out acceptance or counteroffer 
If it's an acceptance, Skip 2-207(2) 
 
Either drop both terms and use default terms (knockout rule), or drop the reply term and use offer
version 
 
Opposite of mirror image and last shot doctrine 
 
 
 
Different term e.g. 
 
Offer:                                              Acceptance: 
Same price term                            same price term 
 
 
Diff term: red                               diff term blue 
 
 
Solution:  
2-207 (1) If acceptance, don’t use 2-207 (2),  either knockout rule and use the UCC default, or the FIRST
red term of the offer will go in (term in the reply will drop out, leaving offering term as the governing
term) 
If a counter-offer, go to 2-207 (3) 
*not last-shot doctrine* 
 
 
 
Battle of the forms, "boiler forms", something additional or different in terms of reply document, trying
to find out if new terms go into the contracts—use UCC 2-207 
 
 
 
 
 
Counter-offer in classical common law (SERVICES, NOT GOODS) 
 
 
Mirror image/last shot 
 
In common law for services, use last shot doctrine for counteroffer, reply doctrine goes in the contract 
 
You can accept by conduct (Princess case) 
 
Mirror image rule: anything that does not mirror offer is a counteroffer 
 
 
 
Intent to be bound UCC 2-204, Restatement §27 
 
Open Price term UCC 2-305 (In common law, open price term= no contract) 
 
Illusory promises, if within someone's discretion to decide whether or not to be bound 
Doesn't destroy, you can still accept by performance, converts a bilateral contract into a unilateral 

https://nesl-my.sharepoint.com/personal/alexandra_m_green_nesl_edu/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc={e5da7078-447a-4137-9437-71cc14a52ae9}&action=edit&… 2/2

You might also like