Wind Energy Assessment-R1

Wind Energy Assessment
Course No: M06-002

Credit: 6 PDH
Steven Liescheidt, P.E., CCS, CCPR
Continuing Education and Development, Inc.

22 Stonewall Court
Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
P: (877) 322-5800
info@cedengineering.com
WIND RESOURCE
ASSESSMENT HANDBOOK
Fundamentals for Conducting
a Successful Monitoring Program
Prepared By:
AWS Scientific, Inc.
CESTM, 251 Fuller Road
Albany, NY 12203
www.awsscientific.com
April 1997
NREL Subcontract No. TAT-5-15283-01
Prepared for:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
1617 Cole Boulevard
Golden, CO 80401
NOTICE: This document was prepared as an account of work
sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither
the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of
their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or
assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy,
completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product,
or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe
privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific
commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark,
manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply
its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States
government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of
authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of
the United States government or any agency thereof.
FOREWORD
The Wind Resource Assessment Handbook was developed under National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL) Subcontract No. TAT-5-15283-01. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S.
Department of Energy managed by Midwest Research Institute under contract No. DE-AC36-
83CH10093.
Much of the material presented in the handbook was originally compiled for the preparation of
the U*WRAP Handbook. This publication was written by AWS Scientific, Inc., in support of the Utility
Wind Resource Assessment Program (U*WRAP), and was distributed to interested utilities. The success
of the U*WRAP Handbook prompted requests from wind energy industry representatives that a similar
handbook be made available for the public domain. In response to these requests, NREL contracted with
AWS Scientific, Inc. to write a wind resource assessment handbook suitable for any organization or
individual desiring to conduct a formally structured wind measurement program.
The principal authors were Bruce H. Bailey and Scott L. McDonald of AWS Scientific, Inc.
Contributing authors were Daniel W. Bernadett, Michael J. Markus, and Kurt V. Elsholz, also of AWS
Scientific, Inc.
Page i
Wind Resource Assessment Handbook
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The approval process for this handbook included extensive peer review. The authors would like
to extend their appreciation to those who gave time and effort to review chapters and make invaluable
suggestions, thereby improving this document: Marc Schwartz, Dennis Elliott, Dave Blittersdorf, Ken
Cohn, Rich Simon, Jack Kline, Vaughn Nelson, and Ken Starcher. Special thanks go to Donna Baker for
production support.
The authors also express their appreciation to the following individuals for their support of the
Utility Wind Resource Assessment Program: Ron Loose, Department of Energy; Bob Thresher, Sue
Hock and Marc Schwartz, National Renewable Energy Laboratory; Charles Linderman, Edison Electric
Institute; Earl Davis, Electric Power Research Institute; and Robert Putnam, Electrotek Concepts, Inc.
Page ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD i
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 OVERVIEW OF CHAPTERS 1-2
Chapter 2: GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF A WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

PROGRAM
2.1 APPROACHES AND OBJECTIVES 2-1
2.2 MEASUREMENT PLAN 2-2
2.3 MONITORING STRATEGY 2-2
2.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN 2-3
2.5 MONITORING DURATION AND DATA RECOVERY 2-3
Chapter 3: SITING OF MONITORING SYSTEMS

3.1 USE OF WIND DATA SOURCES 3-1
3.2 TOPOGRAPHIC INDICATORS 3-3
3.3 FIELD SURVEYS AND SITE RANKING 3-4
3.4 TOWER PLACEMENT 3-5
3.5 LAND LEASING AND PERMITTING 3-6
Chapter 4: MEASUREMENT PARAMETERS

4.1 BASIC PARAMETERS 4-1
4.2 OPTIONAL PARAMETERS 4-2
4.3 RECORDED PARAMETERS AND SAMPLING INTERVALS 4-3
4.4 SUPPLEMENTAL PARAMETERS TO CLASSIFY WIND ENERGY SITES 4-4
Chapter 5: MONITORING STATION INSTRUMENTATION

5.1 BASIC SENSORS 5-1
5.2 OPTIONAL SENSORS 5-4
5.3 DATA LOGGERS 5-5
5.4 DATA STORAGE DEVICES 5-6
5.5 DATA TRANSFER EQUIPMENT 5-7
5.6 POWER SUPPLIES 5-8
5.7 TOWERS AND SENSOR SUPPORT HARDWARE 5-9
5.8 WIRING 5-10
5.9 GROUNDING AND LIGHTNING PROTECTION 5-10
5.10 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY 5-11
Page iii
Table of Contents
Chapter 6: INSTALLATION OF MONITORING STATIONS

6.1 EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT 6-1
6.2 EQUIPMENT ACCEPTANCE TESTING AND FIELD PREPARATION 6-1
6.3 INSTALLATION TEAM 6-3
6.4 SAFETY 6-3
6.5 DETERMINATION OF TRUE NORTH 6-4
6.6 TOWER INSTALLATION 6-4
6.7 SENSOR AND EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION 6-6
6.8 SITE COMMISSIONING 6-9
6.9 DOCUMENTATION 6-10
Chapter 7: STATION OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

7.1 SITE INSPECTIONS 7-1
7.2 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES 7-2
7.4 EQUIPMENT FUNCTIONAL CHECKS 7-4
7.5 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY 7-5
Chapter 8: DATA COLLECTION AND HANDLING

8.1 RAW DATA STORAGE 8-1
8.2 DATA RETRIEVAL 8-2
8.3 DATA RETRIEVAL FREQUENCY 8-2
8.4 DATA PROTECTION AND STORAGE 8-3
Chapter 9: DATA VALIDATION, PROCESSING, AND REPORTING

9.1 DATA VALIDATION METHODS 9-2
9.2 DATA PROCESSING AND REPORTING 9-6
9.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTING 9-8
Chapter 10:COSTS AND LABOR REQUIREMENTS FOR A WIND MONITORING

PROGRAM
10.1 COST AND LABOR ESTIMATES 10-1
10.2 STAFFING RECOMMENDATIONS 10-2
Appendix A: WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT EQUIPMENT VENDORS A-1
Appendix B: BIBLIOGRAPHY B-1
Page iv
LIST OF FIGURES,
TABLES AND FORMS
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1: Obstruction Effects on Airflow 3-6
Figure 5.1: Single Point Grounding System 5-10
Figure 6.1: Map of Magnetic Declination 6-4
Figure 6.2: Sample Installation 6-7
Figure 9.1: Data Validation Flowchart 9-1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: Upper Limits for Classes of Mean Wind Power Density 3-2
Table 4.1: Basic Measurement Parameters 4-1
Table 4.2: Optional Measurement Parameters 4-2
Table 4.3: Basic and Optional Parameters 4-3
Table 5.1: Specifications for Basic Sensors 5-2
Table 5.2: Specifications for Optional Sensors 5-4
Table 5.3: Data Storage Devices 5-7
Table 6.1: Soil Type and Recommended Anchoring System 6-5
Table 8.1: Card Storage Capacity in Days 8-2
Table 9.1: Sample Range Test Criteria 9-3
Table 9.2: Sample Relational Test Criteria 9-4
Table 9.3: Sample Trend Test Criteria 9-4
Table 9.4: Sample Validation Codes 9-5
Table 9.5: Sample Monthly Data Reporting 9-6
Table 10.1: Labor Tasks to Account for When Budgeting 10-1
LIST OF FORMS
Sample Site Information Log 6-11
Sample Site Visit Checklist 7-6
Sample Site Data File Log 8-5
Sample Site Data Validation Log 9-9
Sample Monthly Data Reporting 9-10
Sample Quality Assurance Report Form 9-11
Page v
Wind Resource Assessment Chapter 1
Handbook
Fundamentals for Conducting INTRODUCTION
a Successful Monitoring Program
This handbook presents industry-accepted guidelines for planning and conducting a wind
resource measurement program to support a wind energy feasibility initiative. These guidelines, which
are detailed and highly technical, emphasize the tasks of selecting, installing, and operating wind
measurement equipment, as well as collecting and analyzing the associated data, once one or more
measurement sites are located. The handbook’s scope encompasses state-of-the-art measurement and
analysis techniques at multiple heights on tall towers (e.g., 50 m) for a measurement duration of at least
one year. These guidelines do not represent every possible method of conducting a quality wind
measurement program, but they address the most important elements based on field-proven experience.
The intended audience for this handbook is any organization or individual who desires the
planning framework and detailed procedures for conducting a formally structured wind measurement
program. Personnel from the management level to field technicians will find this material applicable. The
organizational aspects of a measurement program, including the setting of clear program objectives and
designing commensurate measurement and quality assurance plans, all of which are essential to ensuring
the program’s successful outcome, are emphasized. Considerable attention is also given to the details of
actually conducting the measurement program in its many aspects, from selecting instrumentation that
meets minimum performance standards to analyzing and reporting on the collected data.
The predecessor of and motivation for this handbook was a similar document—the U*WRAP
Handbook—developed in 1995 for the Utility Wind Resource Assessment Program (U*WRAP).
This program was initiated by the U.S. Department of Energy and is administered by the Utility Wind
Interest Group, Inc., to technically and financially support utilities that conduct wind resource
assessments. The goal of U*WRAP is to increase the quality and quantity of wind data available to
utilities, thereby improving their ability to evaluate and integrate wind energy as an electric generation
technology. By establishing standard measurement procedures, this program is compiling high-quality
data sets, which enable utility participants to evaluate resource-related wind energy feasibility issues
among a large number of dispersed sites. With the present handbook, the non-utility entity can achieve
similar benefits.
Page 1-1
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 OVERVIEW OF CHAPTERS
The handbook contains 10 chapters and an appendix. Following is a brief overview of the
contents of each chapter.
Chapter 2: Guiding Principles of a Wind Resource Assessment Program
Discusses various resource assessment approaches and recommends the use of a formal
measurement plan, a monitoring strategy, and a quality assurance plan.
Chapter 3: Siting of Monitoring Systems
Summarizes the most commonly used siting techniques and addresses land leasing and
permitting requirements for a measurement tower.
Chapter 4: Measurement Parameters
Details the recommended measurement parameters and offers guidelines for

incorporating other optional parameters that may benefit your monitoring program.
Chapter 5: Monitoring Station Instrumentation
Describes the instrument components (sensors, data loggers, towers, peripherals) of a

recommended wind resource monitoring station, including the performance specifications for
basic and optional sensors.
Chapter 6: Installation of Monitoring Stations
Provides guidelines on equipment procurement, inspection and layout, site layout, tower
installation, sensor and equipment installation, site commissioning, and documentation.
Chapter 7: Station Operation and Maintenance
Details the key elements of an operation and maintenance program, including scheduled and
unscheduled site visits, on-site procedures, checklists and logbooks, calibration checks, and a spare parts
inventory.
Chapter 8: Data Collection and Handling
Highlights data issues related to in-field raw data storage, data retrieval and protection,
retrieval frequency, and documentation.
Chapter 9: Data Validation, Processing, and Reporting
Recommends specific steps to inspect all recorded data values, deal with erroneous
values, create validated data files, and generate standard summary reports.
Page 1-2
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 10: Costs and Labor Required for a Wind Monitoring Program
Illustrates the approximate cost and labor effort to site, procure, install, and operate a
qualified monitoring station for two years.
Appendices
A. Wind Resource Assessment Equipment Vendors

B. Bibliography
Page 1-3
Chapter 2
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
OF A WIND RESOURCE
ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
A wind resource assessment program is similar to other technical projects. It requires planning
and coordination and is constrained by budget and schedule limitations. It demands a clear set of
objectives so the best assessment approach is selected. Its ultimate success rests on the quality of the
program's assembled assets—sound siting and measurement techniques, trained staff, quality equipment,
and thorough data analysis techniques.
2.1 APPROACHES AND OBJECTIVES
Several approaches are available when investigating the wind resource within a given land area.
The preferred approach will depend on your wind energy program objectives and on previous experience
with wind resource assessment. These approaches can be categorized as three basic scales or stages of
wind resource assessment: preliminary area identification, area wind resource evaluation, and
micrositing.
A. Preliminary Area Identification
This process screens a relatively large region (e.g., state or utility service territory) for suitable
wind resource areas based on information such as airport wind data, topography, flagged trees, and other
indicators. At this stage new wind measurement sites can be selected. Details on site screening
techniques are provided in Chapter 3.
B. Area Wind Resource Evaluation
This stage applies to wind measurement programs to characterize the wind resource in a defined
area or set of areas where wind power development is being considered. The most common objectives of
this scale of wind measurement are to:
• Determine or verify whether sufficient wind resources exist within the area to justify
further site-specific investigations
• Compare areas to distinguish relative development potential
• Obtain representative data for estimating the performance and/or the economic viability
of selected wind turbines
• Screen for potential wind turbine installation sites.
Page 2-1
Chapter 2 Guiding Principles of a Wind Resource Assessment Program
C. Micrositing
The smallest scale, or third stage, of wind resource assessment is micrositing. Its main objective
is to quantify the small-scale variability of the wind resource over the terrain of interest. Ultimately,
micrositing is used to position one or more wind turbines on a parcel of land to maximize the overall
energy output of the wind plant. This step is beyond the scope of this handbook. For more information,
refer to the sources listed in the bibliography.
2.2 MEASUREMENT PLAN
Common to all monitoring programs is the need for a measurement plan. Its purpose is to ensure
that all facets of the wind monitoring program combine to provide the data you need to meet your wind
energy program objectives. Therefore, the program's objectives should dictate the design of the
measurement plan, which should be documented in writing, and reviewed and approved by the project
participants before it is implemented. The plan should specify the following features:
• Measurement parameters
• Equipment type, quality, and cost
• Number and location of monitoring stations
• Sensor measurement heights
• Minimum measurement accuracy, duration, and data recovery
• Data sampling and recording intervals
• Data storage format
• Data handling and processing procedures
• Quality control measures
• Format of data reports.
This handbook provides guidance on all these features.
2.3 MONITORING STRATEGY
How the measurement plan is carried out is the basis for the monitoring strategy. Its core is good
management, qualified staff, and adequate resources. Everyone involved should understand the roles and
responsibilities of each participant, and the lines of authority and accountability. Everyone should be
familiar with the program's overall objectives, measurement plan, and schedule. Communications among
the players should be often and open.
Because of the complexities of siting and monitoring, the project team should include at least one
person with field measurement experience. Data analysis, interpretation, and computer skills are also
necessary assets. Available human and material resources must be commensurate with the measurement
program's objectives. High standards of data accuracy and completeness therefore require appropriate
levels of staffing, an investment in quality equipment and tools, prompt responsiveness to unscheduled
events (e.g., equipment outages), access to spare parts, routine site visits, and timely review of the data.
Page 2-2
Chapter 2 Guiding Principles of a Wind Resource Assessment Program
2.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
An essential part of every measurement program is the quality assurance plan, an organized and
detailed action agenda for guaranteeing the successful collection of high-quality data. The plan should be
prepared in writing once the measurement plan is completed.
• Quality Assurance Policy: The program manager must first establish and endorse the
quality assurance plan. This will lend credence to the party assigned the responsibility of
enforcing the plan.
• Quality Assurance Coordinator: The link between the plan and the program management
should be the quality assurance coordinator. This person should be knowledgeable of the
routine operation requirements for collecting valid data. If the quality assurance plan is to be
taken seriously, this person must be authorized to ensure that all personnel are properly
trained, correct procedures are followed, and corrective measures are taken. In addition, the
coordinator should maintain the proper documentation in an organized format.
Data quality is usually measured in terms of representativeness, accuracy, and completeness. The
quality assurance plan relies heavily on the documentation of the procedures involved to support claims
of data quality. The components of the plan should include the following:
• Equipment procurement tied to the program’s specifications

• Equipment calibration method, frequency, and reporting
• Monitoring station installation and operation and maintenance checklists
• Data collection and retrieval forms
• Data analysis guidelines (calculations, etc.)
• Data validation methods, flagging criteria, and reporting format
• Internal audits to document the performance of those responsible for site
installation and operation and maintenance, as well as collecting and handling data.
Another goal of quality assurance is to minimize the uncertainties that unavoidably enter into
every step of the siting and measurement processes. No site perfectly represents the entire area it
describes, no sensor measures perfectly, and no data gathered over an extended measurement period
perfectly reflect all future wind conditions a wind plant will experience during its 30-year lifetime.
However, if the magnitude of these uncertainties is understood and controlled through a concerted quality
assurance plan, the conclusions can be properly qualified to provide useful information.
2.5 MONITORING DURATION AND DATA RECOVERY
The minimum monitoring duration should be one year, but two or more years will produce more
reliable results. One year is usually sufficient to determine the diurnal and seasonal variability of the
wind. With the aid of a well-correlated, long-term reference station such as an airport, the interannual
variability of the wind can also be estimated. The data recovery for all measured parameters should be at
least 90% over the program’s duration, with any data gaps kept to a minimum (less than a week).
Page 2-3
Chapter 3
SITING OF
MONITORING
SYSTEMS
The main objective of a siting program is to identify potentially windy areas that also possess
other desirable qualities of a wind energy development site. There are three steps in the siting effort:
• Identification of potential wind development areas;

• Inspection and ranking of candidate sites; and
• Selection of actual tower location(s) within the candidate sites.
Since the initial analysis region can be quite large, such as a utility service territory or even an entire
state, the siting process should be designed so it efficiently focuses on the most suitable areas.
The next two sections discuss several industry accepted siting techniques and tools. These
include the use of existing wind data and the analysis of topographic maps. The final three sections
outline steps to be taken following initial site identification. These include site surveys, choosing an
appropriate tower location, and obtaining necessary permits before the tower is installed.
The following documents contain more detailed discussions of general siting techniques:
• Recommended Practice for the Siting of Wind Energy Conversion Systems

• Siting Guidelines for Utility Application of Wind Turbines
• The Meteorological Aspects of Siting Large Wind Turbines
• A Siting Handbook for Small Wind Energy Conversion Systems
See Appendix B for ordering information.
3.1 USE OF WIND DATA SOURCES
Wind data are useful in the early stage of the siting process. These data represent records of
actual wind conditions, so they must be evaluated before the windiest areas of a particular region are
sought. Unfortunately, most historical wind data were not collected for wind energy assessment purposes.
Thus the results often represent the mean conditions near population centers in relatively flat terrain or
low elevation areas. Their primary benefit to the analyst, therefore, is to provide a general description of
the wind resource within the analysis area, not to pinpoint the windiest locales.
Common sources of wind information include the National Climatic Data Center (which archives
weather data from all National Weather Service stations), universities, air quality monitoring
Page 3-1
Chapter 3 Siting of Monitoring Systems
networks, electric utilities, the U.S. Forest Service, and various other government and private
organizations. Wind information from many of these sources has been synthesized by the Pacific
Northwest Laboratory on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy. You should contact several data
sources, as no one particular organization likely possesses full data coverage for the area(s) of interest or
provide all statistics used in the wind resource characterization. For example, wind shear data are
generally not available from National Weather Service stations because these stations do not use multi-
level towers. A better source of information in this instance may be a utility’s air quality monitoring
tower if it is in a representative location.
A. Regional Wind Resource Data
Regional wind resource estimates can be obtained from the Wind Energy Resource Atlas of the
United States. The atlas integrated pre-1979 wind measurements with topography and landform
characteristics to arrive at its wind resource estimates. Data from approximately 270 post-1979 sites,
including nearly 200 that were instrumented specifically for wind energy purposes, were used to verify or
update the original wind resource values. The updated wind resource values are depicted on gridded
maps, 1/4° latitude by 1/3° longitude resolution for the 48 contiguous states. Different resolutions were
used for Alaska, Hawaii, and the U.S. territories. Estimates of the wind resource are expressed in wind
power classes ranging from Class 1 to Class 7, with each class representing a range of mean wind power
density or equivalent mean wind speed at specified heights above the ground. Table 3.1 defines the wind
power classes in terms of the upper limits of mean wind power density and mean wind speed at 30 m (98
ft) and 50 m (164 ft) above ground level.
Grid cells designated as Class 4 or greater are generally considered to be suitable for most wind
turbine applications. Class 3 areas are suitable for wind energy development using tall (e.g., 50 m hub
height) turbines. Class 2 areas are marginal and
Class 1 areas are unsuitable for wind energy Table 3.1
development. The gridded wind resource Classes of Wind Power Density
estimates were not meant to address the 30 m (98 ft) 50 m (164 ft)
Wind Wind Power Wind Wind Power Wind
variability in mean wind speed on a local scale Power Density Speed Density Speed
but to indicate broad areas where a high wind Class (W/m²) m/s (mph) (W/m²) m/s (mph)
resource is possible. Therefore, in approaching 1 ≤160 ≤5.1 (11.4) ≤200 ≤5.6 (12.5)
an area designated as Class 2, for example, the 2 ≤240 ≤5.9 (13.2) ≤300 ≤6.4 (14.3)
3 ≤320 ≤6.5 (14.6) ≤400 ≤7.0 (15.7)
analyst should not rule out the possibility that it 4 ≤400 ≤7.0 (15.7) ≤500 ≤7.5 (16.8)
may contain smaller-scale features possessing a 5 ≤480 ≤7.4 (16.6) ≤600 ≤8.0 (17.9)
more energetic (Class 3 or greater) wind 6 ≤640 ≤8.2 (18.3) ≤800 ≤8.8 (19.7)
resource. 7 ≤1600 ≤11.0 (24.7) ≤2000 ≤11.9 (26.6)
Certainty ratings were also generated for each grid cell to depict a confidence level in the wind
resource estimate. The degree of certainty depends on the following three factors:
• The abundance and quality of wind data

• The complexity of the terrain
• The geographical variability of the wind resource.
The highest degree of confidence (rating 4) was assigned to grid cells containing abundant historical data
and relatively simple terrain; the lowest certainty (rating 1) was assigned to data-sparse regions or those
within complex terrain.
Page 3-2
B. Site-Specific Wind Data
If you wish to closely examine wind data from selected stations, several attributes about the data
should be determined including:
• Station location
• Local topography
• Anemometer height and exposure
• Type of observation (instantaneous or average)
• Duration of record.
Data are more representative of the surrounding area where the terrain is relatively flat. In
complex terrain, the ability to reliably extrapolate the information beyond a station's immediate vicinity
is limited. In recent decades, most airport measurements have been taken adjacent to the runways where
the surrounding area is open and unobstructed. Measurements taken from rooftops may be unreliable due
to the building’s influence on the wind flow and should be used with caution.
Typical airport anemometer heights are in the 6 m to 15 m (20-50 ft) range. When comparing
data with other stations, all wind speed data should be extrapolated to a common reference height (e.g.,
30 m or 40 m). Wind speeds can be adjusted to another height using the following form of the power law
equation:
α
é z2 ù
v 2 = v1 × ê ú
ë z1 û
where
v2 = the unknown speed at height z2
v1 = the known wind speed at the measurement height z1
α = the wind shear exponent.
As a first approximation, the wind shear exponent is often assigned a value of 0.143, known as
the 1/7th power law, to predict wind profiles in a well-mixed atmosphere over flat, open terrain.
However, higher exponent values are normally observed over vegetated surfaces and when wind speeds
are light to moderate (i.e., under 7 m/s or 16 mph).
Referenced data sets should be at least one year in duration and possess consistent data for at
least 90 percent of that period. A useful format is a time series of hourly wind speed and wind direction
measurements, which can be analyzed for a number of user-specified wind characteristics. In many
instances, wind data summaries will already be available, which eliminates the need to process the data.
3.2 TOPOGRAPHIC INDICATORS
The analysis of topographic maps is an effective means of

streamlining the siting process. Maps on a 1:24,000 scale (1 in = 2,000 ft)
available from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) are the best source of
information for identifying suitable terrain features. The topographic
screening should attempt to identify features that are likely to experience a
Page 3-3
greater mean wind speed than the general surroundings. This process is especially important for areas
containing little or no relevant historical wind speed data. Features that are likely to be windier include:
• Ridges oriented perpendicular to the prevailing wind direction
• Highest elevations within a given area
• Locations where local winds can funnel.
Features to be avoided include areas immediately upwind and downwind of higher terrain, the lee side of
ridges, and excessively sloped terrain. In each of these situations, increased turbulence may occur.
Topographic maps also provide the analyst with a preliminary look at other site attributes,
including:
• Available land area

• Positions of existing roads and dwellings
• Land cover (e.g., forests)
• Political boundaries
• Parks
• Proximity to transmission lines.
Following the topographic screening, a preliminary ranking can be assigned to the list of candidate sites
based on their estimated wind resource and overall development potential.
3.3 FIELD SURVEYS AND SITE RANKING
Visits should be conducted to all potentially suitable areas with the main goal of verifying site
conditions. Items of importance include:
• Available land area

• Land use
Page 3-4
• Location of obstructions
• Trees deformed by persistent strong winds (flagged trees)
• Accessibility into the site
• Potential impact on local aesthetics
• Cellular phone service reliability for data transfers
• Possible wind monitoring locations.
The evaluator should use a USGS topographic map of the area to note the presence or absence of
the above site characteristics. A Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver should be used to record the
location coordinates (latitude, longitude, elevation) of the sites. A video or still camera record is useful
for future reference and presentation purposes. While at the site, the evaluator should determine the soil
conditions so the proper anchor type can be chosen if a guyed meteorological tower is to be installed.
An updated ranking of all candidate sites should be developed following the site visits. This can
be obtained by constructing a matrix that assigns a score to each siting criterion. For example, suppose
the siting criteria are similar to the bulleted features listed above. The evaluator assigns a numerical
score (e.g., 1 to 10) to every criterion for each site that was visited. If some criteria are more important
than others, their scores can be weighted accordingly. The weighted scores are then summed and sorted
by magnitude to reach a composite ranking.
Field visits also provide an opportunity to make personal contact with landowners. The
program’s objectives can be presented and questions answered in a friendly face-to-face conversation.
The landowners’ concerns and interest in the monitoring program or the prospects of a wind turbine
project can also be assessed..
While wind turbines are increasingly becoming an accepted part of the landscape, the issues of
aesthetics can still present real obstacles to any project. There is no universal or consistent view of what
is or is not pleasing to the eye, so the evaluator must rely on his or her judgment based on the character of
the land and the proximity of public viewing areas. It is in the project’s best interests to investigate this
topic in-depth during the evaluation process. A detailed examination of this issue is beyond the scope of
this handbook. For more information, refer to the bibliography.
3.4 TOWER PLACEMENT
Two important guidelines should be followed when choosing an exact location for the
monitoring tower:
• Place the tower as far away as possible from local obstructions to the wind
• Select a location that is representative of the majority of the site.
Siting a tower near obstructions such as trees or buildings can adversely affect the analysis of the
site's wind characteristics. Figure 3.1 illustrates the effects of an undisturbed airflow that encountering an
obstruction. The presence of these features can alter the perceived magnitude of the site's overall wind
resource, wind shear, and turbulence levels. As a rule, if sensors must be near an obstruction, they should
be located at a horizontal distance no closer than 10 times the height of the obstruction in the prevailing
wind direction.
Page 3-5
Figure 3.1 Obstruction Effects on Airflow
3.5 LAND LEASING AND PERMITTING
Inquiries must always be made to determine whether permits are required before a tower is
installed. Tilt-up towers usually fall into the category of temporary structures, so permitting requirements
are generally minimal. Jurisdictions normally require a standard building permit, which should be
displayed at the site during the installation period. Building permits can be acquired from the town clerk
or directly from the town building inspector. Fees are usually $10-$100 range.
Formal lease agreements should be negotiated between the utility and the landowner to protect
the parties involved. They should include:
• The tower location

• Total area required for monitoring
• Duration of monitoring period
• Liability
• Insurance
• Title to data and equipment
• Access to premises
• Payment schedule.
Page 3-6
Chapter 4
MEASUREMENT
PARAMETERS
This chapter details the basic recommended measurement parameters and provides guidelines for
incorporating optional parameters that may benefit your wind resource monitoring program.
4.1 BASIC PARAMETERS
The core of the monitoring program is the collection of wind speed, wind direction, and air
temperature data. A description of each parameter, its purpose, and appropriate monitoring height(s) is
presented below and summarized in Table 4.1. These nominal parameters are recommended to obtain the
basic information needed to evaluate resource-related wind energy feasibility issues.
A. Wind Speed
Wind speed data are the most important indicator of a site’s wind energy resource. Multiple
measurement heights are encouraged for determining a site’s wind shear characteristics, conducting
turbine performance simulations at several turbine hub heights, and for Table 4.1
backup. Heights typical of recent NREL-affiliated wind measurement Basic
programs are 40 m, 25 m, and 10 m. Measurement Parameters
Measured Monitoring
• 40 m: This height represents the approximate hub height Parameters Heights
Wind Speed
of most utility-scale wind turbines. Actual hub heights (m/s) 10 m, 25 m, 40 m
are usually in the 50 m to 65 m range. Wind
Direction 10 m. 25 m, 40 m
(degrees)
• 25 m: This level approximates the minimum height Temperature
reached by the blade tip portion of a rotating turbine rotor (°C) 3m
and will help define the wind regime encountered by a
typical turbine rotor over its swept area.
• 10 m: This is the universally standard meteorological measurement height. However, in

locations where the interference of local vegetation (e.g., forest) at this height is
unavoidable, an alternative low-level height of 10 m above the forest canopy may be
used.
These significant measurement heights are becoming commonly observed and will be referenced for the
balance of this handbook. You may select additional or alternative heights.
Page 4-1
Chapter 4 Measurement Parameters
B. Wind Direction
To define the prevailing wind direction(s), wind vanes should be installed at all significant
monitoring levels. Wind direction frequency information is important for identifying preferred terrain
shapes and orientations and for optimizing the layout of wind turbines within a wind farm.
C. Temperature
Air temperature is an important descriptor of a wind farm’s operating environment and is

normally measured either near ground level (2 to 3 m), or near hub height. In most locations the average
near ground level air temperature will be within 1°C of the average at hub height. It is also used to
calculate air density, a variable required to estimate the wind power density and a wind turbine's power
output.
4.2 OPTIONAL PARAMETERS
You may expand your monitoring effort to include additional measurement parameters. Possible
optional parameters are presented in detail below and summarized in Table 4.2.
A. Solar Radiation
You may want to take advantage of your wind monitoring program to measure the solar resource for later
solar energy evaluating studies. Solar radiation, when used in conjunction with wind speed and time of
day, can also be an indicator of atmospheric stability and is used in Table 4.2
numerical wind flow modeling. The recommended measurement height is Optional
3 to 4 m above ground. Measurement Parameters
Measured Monitoring
B. Vertical Wind Speed Parameters Heights
Solar Radiation
(W/m2) 3-4m
This parameter provides more detail about a site’s turbulence and Vertical Wind Speed
38 m
can be a good predictor of wind turbine loads. Historically this parameter (m/s)
Delta Temperature 38 m
has been a research measurement, but as wind energy development 3m
(°C)
spreads into new regions of the country, regional information on vertical Barometric Pressure
wind velocity may become important. To measure the vertical wind (kPa) 2-3m
component (w) as an indicator of wind turbulence, a “w” anemometer should be located near the upper
basic wind speed monitoring level (but not exactly at that level to avoid instrument clutter).
C. Change in Temperature With Height
This measurement, also referred to as delta temperature (∆T), provides information about
turbulence and historically has been used to indicate atmospheric stability. A matched set of temperature
sensors should be located near the lower and upper measurement levels without interfering with the wind
measurements.
Page 4-2
D. Barometric Pressure
Barometric pressure is used with air temperature to determine air density. It is difficult to
measure accurately in windy environments because of the dynamic pressures induced when wind flows
across an instrument enclosure. An indoor or office environment is a preferred setting for a pressure
sensor. Therefore, most resource assessment programs do not measure barometric pressure and instead
use data taken by a regional National Weather Service station that is then adjusted for elevation.
4.3 RECORDED PARAMETERS AND SAMPLING INTERVALS
The measured parameters presented in this section represent internal processing functions of the
data logger. All parameters should be sampled once every one or two seconds and recorded as averages,
standard deviations, and maximum and minimum values. Data recording should be serial in nature and
designated by a corresponding time and date stamp. The recorded values will be the basis for the data
validation procedures presented in Chapter 9. Each is presented below and summarized in Table 4.3.
A. Average
The average value should be calculated for all parameters on a ten-minute basis, which is now
the international standard period for wind measurement. Except for wind direction, the average is defined
as the mean of all samples. For wind direction, the average
Table 4.3
should be a unit vector (resultant) value. Average data are
used in reporting wind speed variability, as well as wind Basic and Optional Parameters
speed and direction frequency distributions. Measured Parameters Recorded Values
Wind Average
Speed Standard Deviation
B. Standard Deviation (m/s) Maximum/Minimum
Wind Average
Direction Standard Deviation
The standard deviation should be determined for both (degrees) Maximum Gust Direction
wind speed and wind direction and is defined as the true Temperature Average
population standard deviation (σ) for all one or two second (°C) Maximum/Minimum
Solar Radiation Average
samples within each averaging interval. The standard (W/m2) Maximum/Minimum
deviations of wind speed and wind direction are indicators of Vertical Average
the turbulence level and atmospheric stability. Standard Wind Speed (m/s) Standard Deviation
Barometric Pressure Average
deviation is also useful in detecting suspect or erroneous data (hPa) Maximum/Minimum
when validating average values. Delta Temperature Average
(°C) Maximum/Minimum
C. Maximum and Minimum * Shaded parameters are optional
Maximum and minimum values should be determined for wind speed and temperature at least
daily. The maximum (minimum) value is defined as the greatest (lowest) one or two second reading
observed within the preferred period. The coincident direction corresponding to the maximum
(minimum) wind speed should also be recorded.
Page 4-3
4.4 SUPPLEMENTAL PARAMETERS TO CLASSIFY WIND ENERGY SITES
The primary purpose of the wind measurement program recommended thus far is to collect data
for use in basic wind resource assessment applications. However, additional processing of these data to
include recorded ten-minute maximum wind speeds and wind speed differences between measurement
levels would provide new information for use in the detailed classification of wind energy sites. As
described below, these classifications comply with the new International Electrotechnical Commission
(IEC) standards for both wind sites and wind turbines.
• The maximum one-second value of wind speed and the coincident wind direction
corresponding to that speed would be recorded for each ten-minute interval
• The wind speed difference between two anemometers installed at different heights would be
determined. The average, standard deviation, and maximum values of one-second speed
differences would be recorded for each ten-minute interval. For anemometers installed at
heights of 10 m, 25 m, and 40 m, speed differences would be determined for three height
layers: 10 m to 40 m, 10 m to 25 m, and 25 m to 40 m.
Page 4-4
Wind Resource Assessment Handbook: Draft
Tower Sensors Masts Chapter 5
Data Grounding Data

Transfer
MONITORING
Storage
STATION
Power
Datalogger Wiring Supply INSTRUMENTATION
The instrumentation used in a wind resource assessment program should meet all your data
monitoring objectives. For example, the equipment should reliably measure the selected parameters at the
prescribed heights for the full monitoring duration and at the specified levels of data recovery and
accuracy. It should also be tailored to the environment of the intended location (e.g., weather extremes,
dust, salt) and the remoteness (i.e., whether data will be retrieved manually or via communication link).
The equipment should also be proven, affordable, and user-friendly. Complete monitoring systems can be
purchased from a single vendor or components combined from different ones (see Appendix A).
This chapter describes the instrumentation components of a wind resource monitoring station. It
provides details on a station's major components (sensors, tower, and data logger) as well as the
peripheral parts such as power supplies, wiring, earth grounding, data storage devices, software, and
communication systems. All guidelines are consistent with accepted industry standards for
meteorological monitoring (see AWEA Standard 8.1 - 1986: Standard Procedures for Meteorological
Measurements at a Potential Wind Turbine Site).
5.1 BASIC SENSORS
Meteorological sensors are designed to monitor specific environmental parameters. This section
describes instruments for measuring wind speed, wind direction, and air temperature. Table 5.1 lists the
nominal specifications for these sensors.
A. Wind Speed
Cup or propeller anemometers are the sensor types most commonly used for the measurement of
near-horizontal wind speed.
1. Cup anemometer: This instrument consists of a cup assembly

(three or four cups) centrally connected to a vertical shaft for
rotation. At least one cup always faces the oncoming wind. The
aerodynamic shape of the cups converts wind pressure force to
rotational torque. The cup rotation is nearly linearly proportional to
the wind speed over a specified range. A transducer in the
anemometer converts this rotational movement into an electrical
signal, which is sent through a wire to a data logger.
Page 5-1
Chapter 5 Monitoring Station Instrumentation
The data logger then uses known multiplier (or slope) and offset (or intercept) constants to
calculate the actual wind speed.
2. Propeller anemometer: This instrument consists of a propeller (or

prop) mounted on a horizontal shaft that is oriented into the wind
through the use of a tail vane. The propeller anemometer also generates
an electrical signal proportional to wind speed.
Although the two sensor types differ somewhat in their responsiveness to wind speed
fluctuations, there is no clear advantage of one type over the other. In practice, the cup type is most
commonly used for resource assessment.
Table 5.1
Specifications for Basic Sensors
Specification Anemometer Wind Vane Temperature
(Wind Speed) (Wind Direction) Probe
0° to 360°
Measurement Range 0 to 50 m/s -40° to 60°C
(≤8° deadband)
Starting Threshold ≤1.0 m/s ≤1.0 m/s N/A
Distance Constant ≤4.0 m N/A N/A
Operating Temperature Range -40° to 60°C -40° to 60°C -40° to 60°C
Operating Humidity Range 0% to 100% 0% to 100% 0% to 100%
System Error ≤3% ≤5° ≤1°C
Recording Resolution ≤0.1 m/s ≤1° ≤0.1°C
When selecting an anemometer model, the following should be considered:
• Intended Application: Anemometers intended for low wind speed applications, such as
air pollution studies, are usually made from lightweight materials. These are probably
not suited for very windy or icy environments.
• Starting Threshold: This is the minimum wind speed at which the anemometer starts
and maintains rotation. For wind resource assessment purposes, it is more important for
the anemometer to survive a 25 m/s wind gust than to be responsive to winds under 1
m/s.
• Distance Constant: This is the distance the air travels past the anemometer during the
time it takes the cups or propeller to reach 63% of the equilibrium speed after a step
change in wind speed. This is the “response time” of the anemometer to a change in wind
speed. Longer distance constants are usually associated with heavier anemometers;
inertia causes them to take longer to slow down when the wind decreases. Anemometers
with larger distance constants may overestimate the wind speed.
• Reliability and Maintenance: Wind sensors are mechanical and eventually wear out,
although most have special long-life (two years +) bearings.
The most popular wind sensor for wind resource measurements is the NRG Maximum #40 three-
cup anemometer. It has demonstrated long-term reliability and calibration stability. The cup assembly is
made of molded black polycarbonate plastic. The assembly is attached to a hardened beryllium copper
shaft that uses modified Teflon bearings for rotation. This bearing assembly requires no maintenance and
remains accurate for at least two years in most environments.
Page 5-2
The use of redundant anemometers at a given height is recommended for minimizing the risk of
wind speed data loss due to a failed primary sensor. Redundant sensors are situated to not interfere with
the wind the primary sensor measures. The redundant sensor can also be used to provide substitution data
when the primary sensor is in the wake of the tower (i.e., when the wind direction places the primary
sensor directly downwind of the tower, resulting in erroneous data). Generally, it will be less expensive
to provide sensor redundancy than to conduct an unscheduled site visit to replace or repair a failed
sensor.
At the onset of the measurement program, the measurements from the redundant sensor should
be compared with the primary sensor in a side-by-side field comparison of sequential recorded values.
This test will determine the difference in readings attributed to the instruments themselves. To ensure
that the collected sample size is sufficient and representative of a broad range of wind speeds, the test
period should last at least one week. The wind direction should be noted during this period so that values
taken when either sensor is downwind of the tower are not included in the comparison. A least-squares
regression analysis of the valid data values will provide slope and offset calibration constants for the
redundant sensor.
B. Wind Direction
A wind vane is used to measure wind direction. The most familiar type uses a fin connected to a
vertical shaft. The vane constantly seeks a position of force equilibrium by aligning itself into the wind.
Most wind vanes use a potentiometer type transducer that outputs an electrical signal relative to the
position of the vane. This electrical signal is transmitted via wire to a data logger and relates the vane's
position to a known reference point (usually true north). Therefore, the alignment (or orientation) of the
wind vane to a specified reference point is important.
The data logger provides a known voltage across the entire potentiometer element and measures
the voltage where the wiper arm contacts a conductive element. The ratio between these two voltages
determines the position of the wind vane. This signal is interpreted by the data logger system, which uses
the ratio (a known multiplier) and the offset (a known correction for any misalignment to the standard
reference point) to calculate the actual wind direction. Electrically the linear potentiometer element does
not cover a full 360°. This “open” area is the deadband of the wind vane. When the wiper arm is in this
area, the output signal is random. Some manufacturers compensate for the deadband in their data logger
software to prevent random signals. Therefore, the deadband area should not be aligned into or near the
prevailing wind direction.
When choosing a wind vane, you should use the same selection criteria as for the anemometer.
Pay particular attention to the size of the open deadband area of the potentiometer; this should not exceed
8°. The resolution of the wind vane is also important. Some divide a complete 360° rotation into 16,
22.5° segments. This resolution is too coarse for optimizing the layout of a wind turbine array.
A popular wind vane model is the NRG 200P because of its simple design and low maintenance
requirements. It is a passive potentiometer constructed of thermoplastic and stainless steel components.
Other models offer enhanced performance, such as higher sensitivities, but this comes at a much higher
price usually not warranted by the program objectives.
Page 5-3
C. Air Temperature
A typical ambient air temperature sensor is composed of three parts: the transducer, an interface
device, and a radiation shield. The transducer contains a material element
(usually nickel or platinum) with a relationship between its resistance and
temperature. Thermistors, resistance thermal detectors (RTDs), and
semiconductors are common element types recommended for use. The resistance
value is measured by the data logger (or an interface device), which uses a known
equation to calculate the actual air temperature. The transducer is housed within a
radiation shield to protect it from direct solar radiation. A common radiation
shield is the Gill type, multi-layer, passive shield.
5.2 OPTIONAL SENSORS
In addition to the required measurements, you may wish to include optional sensors for solar
radiation, vertical wind speed, ∆T, and barometric pressure. Table 5.2 lists the nominal specifications for
these sensors.
Table 5.2
Specifications for Optional Sensors
Pyranometer W ∆T Sensors Barometer
Anemometer (Delta
Specification (Solar (Vertical (Atmospheric
Radiation) Temperature) Pressure)
Wind Speed)
94 to 106 kPa
Measurement Range 0 to 1500 W/m2 0 to 50 m/s -40 to 60°C (sea level equivalent)
Starting Threshold N/A ≤1.0 m/s N/A N/A
Distance Constant N/A ≤4.0m N/A N/A
Operating Temperature Range -40 to 60°C -40 to 60°C -40 to 60°C -40 to 60°C
Operating Humidity Range 0 to 100% 0 to 100% 0 to 100% 0 to 100%
System Accuracy ≤5% ≤3% ≤0.1°C ≤1 kPa
Recording Resolution ≤1 W/m2 ≤0.1 m/s ≤0.01° ≤0.2 kPa
A. Global Solar Radiation
A pyranometer is used to measure global, or total, solar radiation, which combines direct
sunlight and diffuse sky radiation. One common type uses a photodiode that
generates a small voltage (millivolts) across a fixed resistance proportional to the
amount of solar radiation (insolation). The recommended pyranometer, the LI-COR
Model LI-200S, is a photodiode sensor. Another common type uses a thermopile, a
group of thermal sensors that react to radiant energy and produce a voltage
proportional to temperature.
An output current is measured from both types by the data logger (or
interface device), which uses a known multiplier and offset to calculate the global
solar radiation. The current output is usually very small (microamps or less). Normally, the measuring
instrument will have a “dropping” resistor and an amplifier that conditions the signal to obtain adequate
output range.
Page 5-4
The pyranometer must be horizontally level in its final mounting position to measure accurately.
It should be located above any obstructions or with its boom arm extending southward (in the Northern
Hemisphere) to prevent or minimize any shading.
B. “W” Anemometer
The propeller anemometer is especially suited for measuring the vertical wind
component. It consists of a propeller mounted on a fixed vertical arm. The sensor requires
a transducer that can electrically relate both the rotational direction (indicative of upward
or downward motion) and the speed of the propeller. This signal is usually a polarized DC
voltage that is interpreted by the data logging system (or interface device). The polarity
indicates rotational direction; the magnitude indicates rotational speed. The data logger
then uses a known multiplier and offset to calculate the actual vertical wind speed.
C. Delta Temperature Sensors
The parameter ∆T is used to determine atmospheric stability and is defined as the temperature
difference between a matched pair of temperature sensing subsystems located at different heights. The
sensor types previously cited are applicable and are usually tested over a specified range and matched by
the manufacturer. Identical subsystems are required because of the inherent errors in the method and
equipment used. If you want to conform to the rigorous guidelines cited in the EPA Quality Assurance
Handbook (1989), the maximum allowable ∆T error is 0.003°C/m. Using the monitoring configuration of
10 m and 40 m levels, the allowable error would be approximately 0.1°C, which is quite small. To
minimize errors caused by environmental factors such as direct sunlight, both monitoring heights should
use identical equipment (e.g., radiation shield, mounting hardware, etc.) so they similarly respond to the
ambient conditions. When the difference between the two values is taken, both errors are about the same
and cancel each other out in the equation. To reduce radiation errors during all conditions, a radiation
shield that uses either forced (mechanical) or natural (passive) aspiration is required. To meet EPA
guidelines, forced aspiration is normally required. You should consult with the data logger manufacturer
to determine a compatible sensor type and model.
D. Barometric Pressure Sensors
A barometer measures atmospheric (barometric) pressure. Several

barometric pressure sensors are commercially available. Most models use a
piezoelectric transducer that provides a standard output to a data logger. This may
require an external power source to operate properly. Again, consult with the data
logger manufacturer to determine a compatible sensor model.
5.3 DATA LOGGERS
Data loggers (or data recorders) come in a variety of types and have evolved from simple strip
chart recorders to integrated electronic on-board cards for personal computers. Many manufacturers offer
complete data logging systems that include peripheral storage and data transfer devices.
Page 5-5
Data loggers can be grouped by their method of data transfer, either in-field or remote. Those
that feature remote phone modem or cellular phone data transfer capabilities allow you to obtain and
inspect stored data without making frequent site visits. Section 5.5 provides detailed information on data
transfer equipment options.
The data logger should be electronic and compatible with the sensor types, number of sensors,
measurement parameters, and desired sampling and recording intervals. It should be mounted in a non-
corrosive, water-tight, lockable electrical enclosure to protect itself and peripheral equipment from the
environment and vandalism. It should also:
• Be capable of storing data values in a serial format with corresponding time

and date stamps
• Contribute negligible errors to the signals received from the sensors
• Have an internal data storage capacity of at least 40 days
• Operate in the same environmental extremes as those listed in Table 5.1
• Offer retrievable data storage media
• Operate on battery power.
A number of electronic data loggers that meet these criteria are commercially available. A
vendor’s list is provided in Appendix A.
5.4 DATA STORAGE DEVICES
Every electronic data logger has some type of operating software that includes a small internal
data buffer to temporarily store incremental (e.g., once per second) data. Internal algorithms use this
buffer to calculate and record the desired data parameters. The data values are stored in one of two
memory formats. Some data loggers have a fixed internal program that cannot be altered; others are user-
interactive and can be programmed for a specific task. This program, and the data buffer, are usually
stored in volatile memory. Their drawback is that they need a continuous power source to retain data.
Data loggers that incorporate the use of internal backup batteries or use non-volatile memory are
available. They are preferred because data cannot be lost due to low battery voltage.
A. Data Processing and Storage
Data processing and storage methods depend on the data logger chosen. A basic understanding of
how the logger processes data is important with respect to data protection issues (refer to Chapter 8).
There are two commonly used formats for recording and storing data, ring memory and fill and stop.
• Ring Memory: In this format, data archiving is continuous. However, once the
available memory is filled to capacity, the newest data record is written over the oldest.
The data set must be retrieved before the memory capacity of the storage device is
reached.
• Fill and Stop Memory: In this configuration, once the memory is filled to capacity, no
additional data are archived. This effectively stops the data logging process until more
memory becomes available. The device must be replaced or downloaded and erased
before the data logger can archive new data.
Page 5-6
B. Storage Devices
Most manufacturers offer several options for data storage devices. The most common are
presented in Table 5.3 below.
Table 5.3
Data Storage Devices
Storage Memory/Storage Download Method/
Description
Device Configuration Needs
Solid Integrated electronic device that Ring or Fill and Stop Read and erased onsite or
State directly interfaces with the replaced. Reading device and
Module data logger. Volatile software required.
Data Programmable read write device Fill and Stop Read and erased on-site or
that plugs into a special data logger replaced. Reading device and
Card socket. Volatile/Non-volatile software required.
EEPROM An integrated circuit chip incorporating Fill and Stop EEPROM reading device and
Data an electrically erasable and programmable software required.
Chip read-only memory device. Non-volatile
Magnetic Familiar floppy disk or magnetic tape Fill and Stop Software required to read data
Media (i.e., cassette). Volatile/Non-volatile from the media.
Portable Laptop or notebook type computer. Magnetic Media Type Special cabling, interface device,
Computer and/or software may be required.
5.5 DATA TRANSFER EQUIPMENT
Your selection of a data transfer and handling process and data logger model, will depend on
your resources and requirements. As a rule, work with the manufacturer when selecting your equipment.
Some vendors may allow you to test their system before you purchase it.
Data are typically retrieved and transferred to a computer either manually or remotely.
A. Manual Data Transfer
This method requires site visits to transfer data. Typically this involves two steps: (1) remove
and replace the current storage device (e.g., data card ) or transfer data directly to a laptop computer; and
(2) upload the data to a central computer in an office. The advantage of the manual method is that it
promotes a visual on-site inspection of the equipment. Disadvantages include additional data handling
steps (thus increasing potential data loss) and frequent site visits.
B. Remote Data Transfer
Remote transfer requires a telecommunication system to link the in-field data logger to the
central computer. The communications system may incorporate direct wire cabling, modems, phone
lines, cellular phone equipment, or RF telemetry equipment, or some combination thereof. An advantage
of this method is that you can retrieve and inspect data more frequently than you can conduct site visits.
This allows you to promptly identify and resolve site problems. Disadvantages include the cost and time
required to purchase and install the equipment. This may prove worthwhile in the long term if data
monitoring problems can be spotted early and quickly remedied.
There are two basic remote data retrieval types: those that require the user to initiate the
communications (call out) and others that contact the central computer via the link (phone home), both at
prescribed intervals. The first type requires you to oversee the telecommunication operation. You initiate
communications to the in-field data logger, download the data, verify data transfer, and erase the logger
Page 5-7
memory. Some call-out data logger models are compatible with computer-based terminal emulation
software packages with batch calling features. Batch calling automates the data transfer process by
initiating the modem’s dialing sequence at a prescribed interval to sequence through the various
monitoring sites. Batch programs can also be written to include data verification routines. You should
consult with data logger manufacturers to determine compatibility of their equipment with this beneficial
feature.
The phone home type data logger automatically calls the central computer to transfer data. A
single personal computer can communicate with a larger number of sites in the call out mode compared
to the phone home mode. In the latter case, enough time must be allotted for each call to account for a
normal data transfer time and several retries for unsuccessful transfer attempts.
Cellular phone data loggers are gaining popularity today for their ease of use and reasonable cost.
You need to determine the minimum signal strength requirements of the data logger and relate that to
actual field testing when researching this type of system. A portable phone can be used at the proposed
site to determine the signal strength and the cellular company. Locations that experience weak signal
strengths may be improved by selecting an antenna with higher gain. Guidelines for establishing a
cellular account are usually provided by the data logger supplier. Work closely with your supplier and
cellular telephone company to resolve any questions before you begin to monitor. To avoid conflicts with
local or regional cellular network use, you should schedule data transfers during off-peak hours. This
often has an economic advantage, as many cellular networks offer discounts for volume off-peak usage.
In addition, the ability to perform frequent data transfer will maximize your data recovery.
5.6 POWER SUPPLIES
All electronic data logger systems require a main power source that is sized to meet the total
power requirements of the system. A backup power supply should be included to minimize chances of
data loss caused by power failure. The backup system should be designed with the objective of saving the
stored data. This can be accomplished by shutting down peripheral devices (modems, cellular telephones,
and other data transfer equipment) at a designated low voltage level, or isolating a particular power
source that is dedicated to protecting the data.
Most systems offer a variety of battery options including long-life lithium batteries or lead acid
cells with various charging options (AC or solar powered). Nickel cadmium batteries do not hold a
charge well in cold temperatures. Examples of power supplies are presented below.
A. AC Power
AC power (through a power transformer) should be used as the direct source of system power
only if a battery backup is available. In this case, you should use AC power to trickle charge a storage
battery that provides power to the data logger. Be sure to install a surge/spike suppression device to
protect the system from electrical transients. In addition, ensure that both systems are properly tied to a
common earth ground (see Section 5.9).
Page 5-8
B. Lead Acid Battery
A deep discharge, gel type lead acid storage battery is the preferred power source. It withstands
repeated discharge and recharge cycles without significantly affecting the energy storage capacity of the
battery. It also offers a margin of safety over a wet acid battery, because the acid is contained in a gel and
cannot be easily spilled. Always use caution when working with batteries to avoid a short circuit between
the battery terminals.
C. Solar Power
The solar recharge option is a convenient way to recharge a lead acid battery when AC power is
unavailable. The solar panel must supply enough wattage to recharge the battery and maintain system
power during extended periods of low solar conditions (i.e., winter months). As a precaution, the battery
should be sized to provide at least a week of reserve capacity to power the entire system without
recharging. Be sure that the solar panel is reverse bias protected with a diode to prevent power drain from
the battery at night. In addition, the solar panel must include a voltage regulator to supply a voltage
compatible with the battery and to prevent overcharging.
5.7 TOWERS AND SENSOR SUPPORT HARDWARE
A. Towers
There are two basic tower types for sensor mounting: tubular and lattice. For both, tilt-up,
telescoping, and fixed versions are available. In addition, these versions may be either guyed or self-
supporting. For new sites, tubular, tilt-up guyed types are recommended for their ease of installation (the
tower can be assembled and sensors mounted and serviced at ground level), minimal ground preparation,
and relative low cost. Towers should:
• Have an erected height sufficient to attain the highest measurement level

• Be able to withstand wind and ice loading extremes expected for the location
• Be structurally stable to minimize wind-induced vibration
• Have guy wires secured with the proper anchor type, which must match the site’s
soil conditions (see Section 6.6)
• Be equipped with lightning protection measures including lightning rod, cable,
and grounding rod
• Be secured against vandalism and unauthorized tower climbing
• Have all ground-level components clearly marked to avoid collision hazards
• Be protected against corrosion from environmental effects, including those
found in marine environments
• Be protected from cattle or other grazing animals.
B. Sensor Support Hardware
The sensor support hardware includes the masts (vertical extensions) and mounting booms
(horizontal extensions). Both must position the sensor away from the support tower to minimize any
influence on the measured parameter caused by the tower and the mounting hardware itself. Sensor
Page 5-9
support hardware should:
• Be able to withstand wind and ice loading extremes expected for the location
• Be structurally stable to minimize wind-induced vibration
• Be properly oriented into prevailing wind and secured to the tower
• Be protected against corrosion from environmental effects, including those
found in marine environments
• Not block the sensor housing drainage hole. Water accumulation and expansion during
freezing conditions will likely damage the internal sensor components. Tubular (hollow)
sensor masts should be used instead of solid stock material.
5.8 WIRING
Here are some guidelines for selecting the proper electrical wire or cable type:
• Use the proper class wire for the voltage level employed (typically low voltage)
• Use wire with a UV resistant insulating jacket
• Use insulation and conductor types that are flexible over the full temperature range expected
at the site
• Use shielded and/or twisted pair cable. Both prevent ambient electrical noise from affecting
your measurements. Normal practice is to tie only one end of a shielded cable's drain wire to
earth ground.
5.9 GROUNDING AND LIGHTNING PROTECTION
Grounding equipment is especially important when using electronic data

loggers and sensors. Electrical surge type events, such as electrostatic discharge,
lightning induced spikes or surges, or a difference in ground potential, will likely
occur over an extended monitoring period. For each event, the continuous data stream
is at risk from individual sensor failures or a data logger meltdown. Tower and data
logger manufacturers may provide complete grounding kits designed to protect their systems. Keep in
mind that different monitoring areas may have different requirements. Sites prone to lightning activity
likely require a higher level of protection. Protection against a direct strike cannot be guaranteed. Each
type of grounding need is presented below.
Figure 5.1
The single point grounding system, presented in Figure 5.1, Single Point Grounding System
is the recommended configuration. This setup will minimize the
potential for developing an offset voltage by a grounding loop.
In this system, the down conductor wire (≤10 gauge) is directly
connected to earth ground, via a grounding rod, buried ring or plate
(or combination). It is not routed through the data logger’s grounding
stud. The sensor drain or shield wires are electrically tied to the same
earth ground via the data logger’s common grounding buss (terminal
strip). Earth ground is an electrical potential (voltage) level
referenced to the earth. Typically the grounding rod, ring and plates
are copper-based to provide a low resistivity for charge dissipation.
Page 5-10
Their dimensions will determine the contact surface area with the soil, a key element for proper system
grounding. A combination of the three can be used to enhance the contact area if they are all electrically
connected.
It is helpful to know the resistivity characteristics of the soil to select the proper grounding
system. This is the electrical resistance to current flow within a unit volume of soil, usually located near
the earth's surface. It can be approximated by measuring the resistance between two conductive rods
driven into the soil to a specified depth and distance apart. In general the lower the resistivity of the
earth, the better the earth ground it will provide. Soils with low resistivity (e.g., moist dirt) will quickly
dissipate any voltage potential that develops between two points and provide a better earth ground. High
resistivity soil (e.g., dry sand) builds up a large potential voltage and/or current that may be destructive.
The resistance between the grounding system and the earth should be less than 100 ohms. Soil resistivity
will likely change seasonally. The value in early spring, following a winter thaw, may not reflect the soil
conditions during the lightning season. In addition, towers in arid climates may be prone to electrostatic
discharge if system grounding is poorly done. When in doubt, take the conservative approach and provide
added protection. It is, in the long run, the least costly route. Section 6.7 presents additional means for
improving a system’s earth ground.
A. Data Logger and Sensor Grounding
Lightning protection devices, such as spark gaps, transorbs, and metal oxide varistors (MOVs),
should be incorporated into the data logging system electronics to supplement grounding. Anemometers
and wind vanes are available with MOVs as part of their circuitry, and if not, can easily be outfitted.
Their primary purpose is to limit the peak surge current allowed to reach the protected equipment while
diverting the destructive surge current. You should inquire about the protection offered by each data
logger manufacturer. Additional protection equipment may be needed in lightning-prone areas.
B. Tower Grounding
Lightning protection equipment must be installed on the tower and connected to the common
ground. An example of a lightning protection kit consists of an air terminal, sometimes referred to as a
lightning rod, along with a length of heavy gauge (≤10 gauge), non-insulated copper wire referred to as
the down conductor tied to the earth ground with a grounding rod or loop. The air terminal should have at
least one point, with several points preferred (streamer retardant air terminal).
The protection equipment is designed to equalize any voltage potential that may develop between
the soil and the air at the tower top. This is accomplished by allowing a path for electrons to flow from
the soil surface up through the down conductor and then be dispersed into the surrounding air by the air
terminal. This equipment is not intended as a path for lightning to travel.
5.10 MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY
Manufacturers use various definitions and methods to express their product’s accuracy and
reliability. With that in mind, how can you know that the system you assemble will meet the
specifications cited in Table 5.1? This section provides the basic information needed to select the proper
equipment.
Page 5-11
A. Accuracy
The accuracy of any system is determined by its weakest link, or least accurate component. It is
also influenced by its complexity, the total number of components or links. The measurement of wind
speed, for example, requires that several components (sensor, cabling, and data logger), each potentially
contributing an error (or inaccuracy) to the measured parameter, be interconnected. The combination of
these errors will determine the system error for that parameter. Errors contributed by the physical
subsystem (sensors) represent the main concern, because those associated with the electronic subsystem
(data logger, signal conditioner, and associated wiring and connectors) are typically negligible (less than
0.1%).
System error is the difference (or inaccuracy) between the measurement reported and the
accepted standard (or true value). Using wind speed again as an example, the system inaccuracy in the
reported wind speed should be less than or equal to 3% of the true wind speed value at wind speeds of
4.5 m/s (10 mph) and greater. This allows for a 6% error window (±3%) centered about the true wind
speed.
Accuracy is typically expressed in three ways:
1. As a difference (as in, for temperature, ≤1°C), calculated as
( Measured Value - Accepted Standard Value)
2. A difference stated as a percentage of the accepted standard value (as in, for wind speed,
≤3%), calculated as
é Measured Value - Accepted Standard Value ù
ê ú(100 )
ë Accepted Standard Value û
3. An agreement ratio stated as a percentage of the accepted standard value

(as in, 95% accuracy), calculated as
é Measured Value ù
ê ú(100 )
ë Accepted Standard Value û
Accuracy is often confused with precision. System precision (sometimes expressed in terms of
standard deviation) is the measure of mutual agreement between repeated values under constant
conditions. In other words, it is a comparison of a measured value against the average value.
B. Reliability
System reliability is the measure of a system's ability to constantly provide valid data for a
parameter over its measurement range. Vendors usually test the reliability of their equipment to
determine the product's life cycle. They will often provide information in terms of a mean time between
failures under certain conditions. In general, the best indication of a product’s reliability is its
performance history. Ask the vendor for a few references. Comprehensive quality assurance procedures
and redundant sensors are two of the best ways to improve system reliability.
Page 5-12
Chapter 6
INSTALLATION
OF MONITORING
STATIONS
The installation phase of the monitoring program can proceed once the site selection process has
been completed and the necessary equipment acquired. This chapter provides installation guidelines on
equipment procurement, inspection and preparation, site layout, tower installation, sensor and equipment
installation, site commissioning, and documentation.
6.1 EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT
Items specific to the wind monitoring program that should be included or addressed in the
equipment procurement process are:
• Equipment and sensor specification list

• Sensor types and quantities, including spares
• Tower type and height
• Measurement parameters and heights
• Sampling and recording interval
• Data logger processing requirements: hourly average and standard
deviation, plus daily maximum and minimum values
• Sensor calibration documentation
• Environmental tolerance to expected conditions
• Data logger type: manual or telecommunication
• Soil type for proper anchor selection
• Warranty information
• Product support
• Date of delivery.
A list of equipment vendors is provided in Appendix A.
6.2 EQUIPMENT ACCEPTANCE TESTING AND FIELD PREPARATION
You should check the equipment shipment for broken or missing parts when you receive it. To
quickly identify and resolve problems, you should ensure that all system components are thoroughly
inspected and tested before they are installed. Document your inspection findings, and return components
that do not meet specifications to the manufacturer for replacement. To save valuable field
Page 6-1
Chapter 6 Installation of Monitoring Stations
installation time, assemble the appropriate components in-house. For example, sensors can be pre-wired
and mounted on their booms. It then becomes an easier task to install the pre-assembled sensor hardware
to the tower in the field. Installation time can be precious, especially when inclement weather is a factor.
The acceptance testing and field preparation procedures should include:
A. Acceptance Testing
1. Data Logger
• Power up the data logger and check the various system voltages
• If applicable, set up and activate a cellular phone account and test the logger’s
cellular phone system following the manufacturer’s instructions before actual field
installation
• Connect all sensors to data logger terminals with the shielded cabling to be used
• Verify that all sensor inputs are operational
• Verify the logger’s data collection and data transfer processes. Here is a simple test
scenario: Following the manufacturer’s instructions, connect a sensor to the data
logger and collect a sampling of one minute (or higher) averaging interval data.
Manually transfer the recorded data from the storage device (e.g., data card) to a
computer using the logger’s data management software. View the data and ensure
that (a) the data logger is functioning; (b) the data transfer was successful; (c) the
storage device is functioning; and (d) the reported values are reasonable. For cellular
type loggers, repeat the above steps using their remote transfer capabilities.
2. Anemometers and Wind Vanes
• Inspect each sensor to ensure that it spins freely through a full rotation. You may be
able to hear evidence of binding or dragging components.
• Using the shielded cabling and following the manufacturer’s instructions, connect
each sensor to the correct data logger terminal(s). Verify the reasonableness of each
sensor output as displayed by the data logger. For the anemometers, verify both a
zero and non-zero value by holding and then spinning the cups or propeller. For the
wind vanes, verify the values at the four cardinal points: north, south, east, and west.
3. Temperature Sensor
• Perform a two-point calibration check at room temperature and in an ice-bath. Once

stabilized, compare the sensor temperature readings to a known calibrated mercury
thermometer. Deviations between sensors should not exceed 1°C.
4. Solar Panel Power Supply
• Place in direct sunlight and confirm the output voltage.
5. Mounting Hardware
• Inspect the sensor mounting booms to ensure they are rugged and durable
• Inspect any welds or joints for soundness.
Page 6-2
B. Field Preparation Procedures
• Assign site designation numbers

• Enter all pertinent site and sensor information on a Site Information Log (refer to Section
6.9)
• If required, program the data logger with the site and sensor information (slopes and
offsets)
• Install the data logger’s data management software on a personal computer and enter the
required information
• Enter correct date and time into the data logger
• Insert data logger’s data storage card or applicable storage device
• Properly package all equipment for safe transport to the field
• Pack all proper tools needed in the field
• Include at least one spare of each component, when practical.
6.3 INSTALLATION TEAM
The installation team should consist of at least one experienced installer. The quality of the data
collected will largely depend on the quality of the installation. The team should consist of at least two
people, with one assigned a supervisory role. This will allow for a heightened degree of efficiency and
safety.
The personnel responsible for the site’s selection may not always be involved in the installation
process. If this is the case, it is important that the installation team leader obtain all pertinent site
information, including the latitude and longitude (verifiable with a GPS receiver), local magnetic
declination, prevailing wind direction, and road maps, as well as topographic maps and site photographs
that show the exact tower location.
6.4 SAFETY
The monitoring station installation process has inherent dangers, some of them life-threatening.
There are risks associated with falling towers, falling from towers, falling equipment, and electrocution.
Having experienced staff and following manufacturers’ recommendations will minimize these risks. The
team members should:
• Be trained in and abide by safety procedures, including first aid and CPR,
which should be enforced by the team leader
• Remain in constant communication
• Follow all safety guidelines provided by the tower manufacturer
• Use common sense during the installation process. For example, if there is
lightning activity, postpone work until the danger has passed.
• Be equipped with the proper safety equipment, including hard hats, protective gloves, a first
aid kit, and  if tower climbing is required  certified climbing belts and lanyards as well
as proper foot attire
• Locate the base of a tower at least one tower height away from overhead power lines
• Verify the use of all equipment found on towers. Are they energized, etc.?
Page 6-3
6.5 DETERMINATION OF TRUE NORTH
The determination of true north (not magnetic north), and thus the site bearings, is essential for
proper sensor orientation. It is also useful during the tower layout phase of the installation process. To
obtain true north from a compass reading (magnetic north),
Figure 6.1
the local magnetic declination (in degrees) must
Map of Magnetic Declination
first be known. This value, or correction
factor, can be found on topographic or isogonic
maps of the area (Figure 6.1).
How this correction factor is applied

depends on the site location with respect to
the magnetic north pole. The declination for
sites located east of the magnetic north pole
will be expressed as the number of degrees
that magnetic north is west of true north. For
this case the true north bearing is equal to the
magnetic north declination. The declination
for sites located west of the magnetic north pole
will be expressed as the number of degrees that magnetic north is east of true north. For this case the true
north bearing is equal to 360° minus the local magnetic declination. For example, if a site is located east
of the magnetic north pole and its local magnetic declination is 10° degrees, the bearing for true north is
simply 10°. If the site were west of the magnetic north pole, the bearing for true north would be 350°
(360° - 10°).
The possibility for error in determining true north from compass techniques can be reduced
through the use of a GPS receiver. In fact, a GPS receiver can indicate true north in the absence of a
compass or magnetic declination information. A hand-held receiver can be purchased for as little as
$200.
6.6 TOWER INSTALLATION
A. New Tilt Tower Installations
The tower should be laid out based on safety

considerations and ease of installation. Towers can be erected
almost anywhere, but the task is much easier if the terrain is
relatively flat and free of trees. If the tower is erected on a slope or
uneven ground, the guy wires may need to be adjusted often as the
tower is raised. If the tower is erected in a wooded area, enough clearance must exist for the guy wires as
the tower is raised. For a 40 m tower, the guy anchor radius is 23 m (75 ft).
The guy anchors should be located at each of the four cardinal directions and the tower raised
along one of these directions, preferably as near to the prevailing wind direction as possible. Bearing
reference stakes are useful to locate and then mark each direction. The advantages of this are:
Page 6-4
• The tilt-up tower will be outfitted in a horizontal position. To orient the sensors properly,
you will need to establish which position on the horizontal tower represents north, for
example. This will now be a simple task since north will be either straight up, straight
down, or directly left or right. If the tower cannot be laid out along a principal direction,
the angle of deviation must be determined and documented for the proper orientation of
the wind vane.
• Raising the tower into the principal wind direction (and lowering with the principal wind
direction) offers a welcomed degree of tower stability by maintaining the lifting guy
wires in constant tension.
Tilt-up towers are secured and controlled with an anchoring system and equal controlled tension
on the guy wires at all times. Anchors should be carefully selected and installed to ensure stability.
• Anchor Selection: Your Table 6.1

choice of anchoring system Soil Type and Recommended Anchoring System
will depend on the sub- Soil Type Anchor Type Installation Method
Loose to firm
surface characteristics at sand, gravel, or clay Screw-in Screw-in with crowbar
each site. This should have Soil with rocks Arrowhead Sledge or jack-hammer
been determined during the Solid Pin / Rock Drill hole and secure with epoxy/
initial site investigation. A Rock Anchors expand with crowbar
mismatch between the anchor type and soil conditions could cause the anchor to fail and
tower to collapse. Table 6.1 provides guidelines for the selecting and installing an anchor
system. Consult with the tower manufacturer if you require additional guidance.
• Anchor Installation: The installation of each guy anchor and lifting station anchor
should adhere to the manufacturer’s instructions. The lifting station anchor warrants
special attention. Normally a winch and pulley system is connected to this anchor to
service a tower. During tower lifting and lowering, this anchor will carry all of the tower
load and is thus under great stress. The greatest loads occur when the tower is just raised
above the ground. The carrying capacity of the soil will vary with a change in soil
consistency. For example, saturated soil from a winter thaw will exhibit a much reduced
carrying capacity. If the holding capacity of this anchoring system is insufficient, the
anchor will creep and the tower will fall. For this reason, the lifting anchor station should
be secured with at least twice as many anchors as used at the guy anchor stations. As an
added precaution, secure these anchors to a vehicle bumper.
• Guy Wires: Under proper tension the guy wires keep the tower system in equilibrium
and thus vertical. This is essential to properly align the wind speed and direction sensors.
As a rule, you should ensure that all guy wire tension adjustments are coordinated and
are made smoothly. Refer to the manufacturer’s instructions for guy wire tension
recommendations. It is advisable to clearly marked with a reflective material at each
anchor station to alert pedestrians or vehicle operators. If animals graze at the site, a
fence may be necessary to protect the guy stations and tower.
B. Use of Existing Towers
The use of existing fixed or tilt towers offer installation challenges that must be addressed. The
following points should be considered:
Page 6-5
• Sensor Mounting and Exposure: Custom mounting schemes may have to be designed
and fabricated for lattice tower installations. The design needs must be determined
during the initial site investigation; this is not a “day-of-installation”
task. In addition, each design should adhere to the sensor mounting and
exposure specifications presented in Section 6.7. For example, to
minimize potential tower wake effects associated with wide towers,
much longer mounting booms fabricated from heavier stock may be
required.
• Tower Climbing: Fixed towers will require staff to climb to install

equipment and perform operation and maintenance tasks. Before
climbing is permitted qualified personnel should evaluate the structural
integrity of the tower, especially the climbing pegs, ladder, climbing
safety cable, and guy wires (if present). Personnel must be properly
trained and equipped. Because work will be performed aloft, the weather
must be given special consideration when scheduling tower work. The
wind causes complications when raising mounting hardware aloft. When
wind chill is a factor, the danger of frostbite is great, and tasks involving
manual dexterity become very difficult.
6.7 SENSOR AND EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
Wind sensors must be mounted onto the tower with support hardware in a manner that minimizes
any influence on the measured parameter caused by the tower, mounting hardware, and other equipment
and sensors. This can be achieved by adhering to the following guidelines, consulting specific
manufacturers’ instructions, and referring to the sample installation configuration shown in Figure 6.2.
A. Wind Speed and Direction Sensors
• Mount the upper-level sensors at least 0.3 m (1 ft) above the tower top to minimize
potential tower shading effects
• Mount sensors on independent mounting booms. For sensors positioned off the side of
the tower, use mounting hardware that is horizontally level and long enough to position
the sensor at least three tower widths out from lattice-type towers and six tower
diameters out from tubular towers. For triangular lattice towers, the tower width is
measured as the length of one face.
• Orient sensors mounted off the tower side into the prevailing wind direction, or, if there
is more than one prevailing direction, in a direction that minimizes the probability of
tower and sensor shadow effects
• Locate sensors above the horizontal mounting hardware at a height equal to at least eight
diameters of the mounting hardware. For square stock hardware, the diameter equals the
length of the vertical side.
• Sensor drainage holes must not be blocked by the vertical mounting hardware to prevent
internal freezing damage during cold weather. Tubing, not solid stock masts, should be
used.
Page 6-6
Figure 6.2
Sample Installation
• The wind vane must be oriented so its deadband position is not directed towards the
prevailing wind. The deadband should be positioned at least 90° away from the
prevailing wind direction, preferably in a principle direction. The deadband orientation
must be known and documented for the data logger or analysis software to report the
correct wind direction. Consult the data logger manufacturer’s requirements for reporting
the deadband position.
• Verify the deadband position of the wind vane once the tower is raised. If it has been
aligned with the mounting boom arm, verification can be accomplished with a sighting
compass to a high degree of accuracy.
Page 6-7
B. Temperature Sensor
• Mount the shielded sensor at least one tower diameter away from the tower face to
minimize tower heating effects
• Orient the sensor on the tower for maximum exposure to the prevailing wind direction to
ensure adequate ventilation.
C. Data Logger and Associated Hardware
• Place the desiccant packs n the data logger enclosure to absorb moisture
• House the data logger, as well as cabling connections, telecommunication equipment,
etc., in a weatherproof and secure (locked) enclosure
• Mount the enclosure at a sufficient tower height to allow for above average snow depth
and to deter vandalism
• If applicable, position the solar panel above the enclosure to avoid shading, oriented
south and near vertical to minimize dirt build-up and maximize power during the
winter’s low sun angle.
• Ensure that all cabling that enters the equipment enclosure has drip loops
• Seal all openings in the enclosure, such as knock-outs, to prevent damage from
precipitation, insects, and rodents
• If applicable, orient the cellular communication antenna at an easily accessible height.
D. Sensor Connections and Cabling
• Refer to the manufacturer’s instructions for the proper sensor and data logger wiring
configurations
• Seal sensor terminal connections with silicone caulking and protect from direct exposure
with rubber boots
• Wrap sensor cabling along the length of the tower and secure it with UV resistant wire
ties or electrical tape
• If not installed by the manufacturer, consider installing MOVs across each anemometer’s
and wind vane’s terminals for added transient protection
• Where chafing can occur between the sensor wire(s) and the support structure (e.g., tilt-
up tower anchor collars), wrap tape around the sensor wire and leave sufficient slack.
E. Grounding System
Þ Basic Guidelines
• Investigate the incidence of lightning activity in the site’s locale. For high frequency
areas, take the conservative approach and increase the grounding system capabilities.
• For existing tower installations, tie the data logger’s ground into the grounding
system (if adequate)
• Install an air terminal above the tower top and connected via the down conductor
wire to earth ground
• Ensure that single strand bare copper down conductor is ≤10 gauge
• Ensure that the grounding rod(s) is free from non-conducting coatings, such as paint
or enamel
Page 6-8
• Use at least one 12.5 cm (½-in) diameter, 2.4 m (8 ft) long grounding rod to provide the
minimum soil contact surface area
• Wire all grounding rods together to provide electrical continuity
• Drive all grounding rod(s) below surface. Where rock is encountered, drive the rod
at a 45° angle, or bury it in a trench at least 0.6 m (2 ft) deep, the deeper the better.
The key here is to maximize the soil contact area.
• Protect the above-soil end of the rod and its electrical conductor attachment against
damage
• Where the soil can become frozen, drive grounding rods below the frost line
• Use a single point grounding system as described in Section 5.9
• Determine the soil type and classify its resistivity. In general, the lower the
resistivity, the better the earth ground provided.
• Ensure that the resistance between the grounding system and the earth is less than
100 ohms
• Apply a de-oxidation agent to all grounding connections.
Þ Additional Transient Protection Measures

• Connect the sensor wires to an additional bank of spark gaps (or surge arrestors) before
they are connected to the data logger input terminals
• Use longer grounding rods. Two benefits are: (a) generally, the soil’s conducting
properties improve with increasing depth, and (b) additional contact surface area is
gained. Rods can be purchased that fit together to reach greater soil depths.
• Install additional grounding rods
• Use high compression or copper-clad fittings at all conductor/rod connections
• Use multi-strand down conductor wire to increase the current carrying capacity (e.g., 28
strands of 14 gauge wire)
• Secure the ground conductor to the tower’s metal surface with band clamps (use de-
oxidizing gel), one per tower section. Install a buried copper ground plate or ground ring
at the recommended depths. All grounding rods and/or rings must be electrically
connected.
• Install a multi-point air terminal (or streamer retardant air terminal). The more points the
better to reduce the accumulation of a static ground charge.
• Install horizontally mounted air terminals at various levels and directions on the tower to
provide additional points for charge dissipation. Tie each rod to the down conductor so as
to not adversely affect any sensor readings.
• Ensure that any side mounted sensors at the tower top are within the theoretical 45°
“cone-of-protection”. A longer air terminal rod may be required.
6.8 SITE COMMISSIONING
The equipment must be tested for proper operation on the tower before a tilt-up tower is raised,
or while personnel are still aloft on towers. These functional tests should be repeated once the installation
is complete. Having spare equipment on hand makes repairs easy if problems are found during these
functional tests. Site commissioning tasks should include the following:
• Ensure that all sensors are reporting reasonable values

• Verify that all system power sources are operating
Page 6-9
• Verify required data logger programming inputs, including site number, date, time, and
sensor slope and offset values
• Verify the data retrieval process. For cellular phone systems, perform a successful data
download with the homebase computer, and compare transmitted values to on-site readings.
• Ensure that the data logger is in the proper long-term power mode
• Secure the equipment enclosure with a padlock
• Document the departure time and all pertinent observations.
6.9 DOCUMENTATION
A complete and detailed record of all site characteristics, as well as data logger, sensor, and
support hardware information, should be maintained in a Site Information Log; a detailed example is
provided on the next page. The following main topics should be included:
• Site Description: Include a unique site designation number, a copy of a USGS map showing
the location and elevation of the site, the latitude and longitude, the installation date, and the
commission time. The coordinates of the site should be determined or confirmed using a GPS
receiver during the site selection or installation process. Typically, coordinates should be
expressed to an accuracy of less than 0.1 minute (at least 100 m) in latitude and longitude
and at least 10 m in elevation. This should eliminate errors caused by inadvertently marking
sites in the wrong place on a map and recording incorrect coordinates taken from the map.
• Site Equipment List: For all equipment (data logger, sensors, and support hardware),
document the manufacturer, model, and serial numbers as well as the mounting height and
directional orientation (including direction of deadbands, cellular antenna, and solar panel).
Sensor information should include slope and offset values and data logger terminal number
connections.
• Telecommunication Information: Include all pertinent cellular phone programming

information.
• Contact Information: Include all pertinent land owner and cellular phone company contact
information.
Page 6-10
SAMPLE SITE INFORMATION LOG

(Cellular Site)
Form Revision Date:
Site Description
Site Designation
Location
Elevation
Installation/Commission Date
Commission Time
Soil Type
Surroundings Description
Prevailing Wind Direction
Declination
Site Equipment List
Equipment Mounting Serial Sensor Sensor Logger Boom
Terminal Direction
Description Height Number Slope Offset
Number (Vane Deadband)
Telecommunication Information Contact Information

ESN # Land Owner Name
Carrier • Address
Phone Number
SYSID
LOCAL • Phone Number
MINMARK Cellular Company
IPCH • Phone Number
ACCOLC • Contact Person
PRESYS • Contact’s Extension
GROUP
Activation Date
Page 6-11
Chapter 7
STATION OPERATION
AND MAINTENANCE
During the course of a wind resource assessment project, the integrity of all system components
must be maintained and documented to ensure smooth and continuous data collection. Meteorological
instruments, for example, require periodic calibration, preventive maintenance, and on-site visual
inspections if the data are to be accurate and complete. To achieve this, a simple but thorough operation
and maintenance plan that incorporates various quality control and quality assurance measures and
provides procedural guidelines for all program personnel should be developed. Personnel must be
thoroughly trained in all aspects of the operation and maintenance program. This includes a working
knowledge of all monitoring system equipment.
The success of any operation and maintenance program depends on the plan and on the field
personnel assigned to carry out the prescribed tasks. They should be conscientious and dedicated
individuals determined to keep the network in optimum working order. They will be the direct link with
all field-related events. In essence, they will be the eyes of the wind resource network and responsible for
documenting and explaining any periods of lost data. They must therefore be observant note takers and
have good problem-solving abilities.
Key elements of this program should include scheduled and unscheduled site visits, procedures,
checklists and logs, calibration checks, and a spare parts inventory. Guidelines to develop such a program
are provided in this section.
7.1 SITE INSPECTIONS
A regular schedule of site visits must be developed and conducted over the project duration. Site
visit frequency will also depend on the data recovery format. If data are retrieved remotely and received
at least weekly, then quarterly scheduled site visits are sufficient. If data retrieval is manual, site visits
should be conducted at least bi-weekly. The appropriate frequency is recommended to meet the 90% data
recovery objective. The data retrieval process is detailed in Chapter 8.
Situations will likely arise in which additional inspections are warranted. These unscheduled
events are important, as they are usually in response to data loss. Examples include suspected sensor
malfunctions found during the data validation process or an investigative response from site-threatening
weather-related events, such as gale-force winds or severe ice loading. To minimize potential data loss,
these functions should be carried out within 72 hours. With this in mind, both types of operation and
maintenance needs must be accounted for during your program development from a cost and personnel
Page 7-1
Chapter 7 Station Operation and Maintenance
availability basis. At least one unscheduled operation and maintenance visit should be anticipated for
each monitoring site per year.
7.2 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES
The operation and maintenance program should be documented in an Operation and

Maintenance Site Manual. The goal of this document is to provide field personnel with thorough and
clear procedures for scheduled and unscheduled operation and maintenance needs. Of the many manual
formats available, a step-by-step approach in conjunction with task completion checklists and site visit
logs is a proven and preferred choice. Specifically, the manual should provide each component described
below:
A. Project Description and Operation and Maintenance Philosophy
This section should describe the project and its overall goals. The importance of the technician’s
role in the project’s success through maintaining data quality and completeness should be highlighted.
B. System Component Descriptions
The technician must understand the fundamentals of all system components to ensure proper
installation and to perform system checks and operation and maintenance procedures. A brief description
of all instruments (anemometers, wind vanes, temperature probes, data logger, etc.) and how they work
should be provided. Detailed component information, such as manufacturer’s manuals, should be
provided in an appendix.
C. Routine Instrument Care Instructions
All instruments that require routine maintenance should be identified and instructions provided.
For example, the optional solar sensor (pyranometer) should be cleaned and leveled as part of each visit.
Some anemometer models require periodic bearing replacement. If sensors are replaced, all pertinent
information, including serial numbers and calibration values, should be recorded.
D. Site Visit Procedures
The field visit can be divided into three categories: the in-house preparation, the on-site
procedures, and the site departure procedures.
1. In-House Preparation
• Establish the reason for the inspection and the specific needs. Is it a scheduled
inspection or is it in response to a potential problem? Will a tower be lowered or is
climbing required?
• If necessary, notify the landowners of each site you are to visit. This can be a
courtesy call, a simple and effective public relations tool.
• Ensure that field personnel have a complete set of tools, supplies, equipment
manuals, and spare parts to accomplish all tasks. Develop a site visit checklist that
specifies the required tools and supplies. This list should include all equipment
Page 7-2
necessary to download the site data, such as laptop computers, tape recorders, and
data storage cards.
• Perform an in-house functionality test on each memory card before field installation.
This is especially important when swapping memory cards is your primary method
of data retrieval. This will require a spare in-house data logger to record dummy data
to the memory card.
• Determine the number of people required for the site visit. Sensor servicing will
require at least two people.
• Have field personnel inform another staff member of where they plan to be and when
they expect to return.
2. On-Site Procedures
• Retrieving the raw data from the data logger upon arrival and before conducting any
other work is essential. This will minimize the risk of potential data loss from
operator error, static discharges, or electrical surges during handling or checking of
system components.
• The basic visit includes a thorough visual inspection (with binoculars) of all system
components, and testing when applicable. The results of the visual inspection on a
checklist must be recorded (see sample at the end of this chapter). It should include
the following:
à Data logger
à Sensors
à Communication system
à Grounding system
à Wiring and connections
à Power supply(s)
à Support booms
à Tower components (for guyed tower systems this includes anchors, guy wire
tension, and tower vertical orientation).
• Scheduled component replacement (e.g., batteries), calibration, and troubleshooting
(develop general guidelines before the first site visit).
• To ensure that all operation and maintenance tasks have been completed and the
necessary information documented, a Site Visit Checklist should be added to the
Operation and Maintenance Site Manual.
• As an added check, instantaneous data should be examined to verify that all
measured values are reasonable.
3. Site Departure Procedures
• The data retrieval process should be confirmed before leaving a site. This involves
completing a successful data transfer with the homebase computer (for remote
systems) or in-field laptop computer (for manual systems). This simple but valuable
test will ensure the system is operating properly and the remote communication
system (antenna direction and phone connections) was not inadvertently altered.
• Ensure the data logger has been returned to the proper long-term system power
mode. Some models have a low-power mode for normal operation to conserve
Page 7-3
system power. Neglecting to invoke this mode will significantly reduce battery life
and increase potential data loss.
• Protect your investment. Always secure the data logger enclosure with a good quality
padlock. The monitoring stations may attract visitors and increase the likelihood of
vandalism.
• Record the departure time and all work performed and observations in the Site Visit
Checklist.
7.3 DOCUMENTATION
A Site Visit Checklist that sequentially follows the procedures outlined in the Operation and
Maintenance Site Manual is a helpful tool for the field technician. It ensures that all required operation
and maintenance tasks are successfully completed, and serves as an historical record of a site’s quality
control, quality assurance, and operational activities. These are directly related to your claims of data
validity. The value of this document becomes evident when a reconstruction of past events becomes
necessary. A precise, detailed information record can help explain any periods of questionable data and
may prevent significant data from being discarded.
For these reasons, a standardized Site Visit Checklist should be developed, completed for each
site visit, and kept on file. Example information and activities to detail in the checklist include:
• General Information: Site name, technicians, date and time of site visit, and work to be
performed.
• In-House Preparation: List of necessary tools, equipment and supplies (including

spares), documentation, maps, and safety items.
• On-site Activities: A sequential list of the various site activities, including equipment
checks, data retrieval, tower-related work (raising and lowering procedures), and
departure activities.
• Findings and Recommendations: A detailed account of the work performed, findings,

and observations, and if applicable, further required or recommended actions.
A sample Site Visit Checklist is presented at the end of this chapter.
7.4 EQUIPMENT FUNCTIONAL CHECKS
All sensors should be inspected and their functionality tested before being installed and when
applicable, as part of the scheduled operation and maintenance requirements. Generally, tower lowering
or climbing should not be necessary to perform these tasks. Unless the data validation process (presented
in Chapter 9) has detected potential problems, the scheduled anemometer and wind vane checks should
be visual with binoculars, with attention directed toward physical damage. Damaged or suspect
equipment should be replaced or repaired. The results of all functional checks must be documented.
General sensor quality control procedures are described below:
Page 7-4
• Anemometers: Ensure that the sensors are rotating freely and that the mounting hardware
and sensors are intact and oriented correctly. Ensure that the sensor inputs to the data logger
are reasonable.
• Wind Vanes: Ensure that the sensors are rotating freely and that the mounting hardware and
sensors are intact and oriented correctly. Ensure that the sensors inputs to the data logger are
reasonable. If there are discrepancies, check the deadband position.
• Temperature Sensor: Compare the temperature sensor readings to a calibrated

thermometer at the same location annually. The test duration should be at least one-half hour
with readings taken at 5-minute intervals. Deviations between sensors should not exceed 1°C.
• Support Tower: For tilt-up towers, ensure that the tower is vertical. Make any necessary
adjustments to guy wire tensions.
7.5 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY
Projected operation and maintenance functions must anticipate potential equipment malfunction
and breakage. To minimize downtime, an adequate spare parts inventory must be maintained and
included with all site visits. The basic inventory should consist of all items necessary to outfit one
monitoring station. Additions to specific inventory items may be appropriate. You should consider the
following points when determining your specific inventory needs:
• Size of the Monitoring Network: As the size of your monitoring network increases, a
corresponding increase in your spare parts inventory may be warranted. As a guide, networks
consisting of six or more monitoring stations should have a parts inventory sufficient to
outfit two stations. For networks of this size it is also advisable to have a spare data logger on
hand.
• Environmental Conditions: Weather-related events, such as severe thunderstorms and

icing, pose a significant risk to a site’s operation. Networks in geographical areas prone to
either type of event should be equipped appropriately. Mechanical failures from ice loading
or extreme wind gusts, as well as electrical failures from nearby or direct lightning
discharges, can occur. Recommended additions to specific inventory items include spare
anemometers, wind vanes, and sensor mounting booms. The need to maintain an additional
data logger in your inventory, at significant expense, can be reduced by selecting high
reliability models that include transient protection and internal shielding.
• Equipment Availability: The availability of inventory items from each supplier should be
considered, and their in-stock inventory determined in advance. Items that require an
extended lead time for delivery should be identified and inventory numbers adjusted
accordingly. The turn-around time for critical items, such as data loggers and sensors, is
particularly important.
• Operation and Maintenance History: The servicing needs of a site should be closely
monitored. If warranted, specific item inventories should be adjusted based on experience at
each site to maintain a high level of service preparedness.
Page 7-5
SAMPLE SITE VISIT CHECKLIST

(Tilt-Tower / Cellular System)
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Site Designation
Site Location
Crew members
Date(s)
Time (LST) Arrival: Departure:
Visit Type (Check) Scheduled o Unscheduled o
Work
Scheduled
B. IN-HOUSE PREPARATION
Check each box to denote the items have been acquired.

o In-house support person:______________________________
o Copy of Site Information Log.
o Acquire necessary tools, equipment, and supplies.
o Electrical supplies: voltmeter, fuses, tape, connectors, cable ties, batteries, crimpers, etc.
o Wrenches, pliers, screwdrivers, nut drivers, hex set, sledgehammer, wirecutters, etc.
o Misc. equipment: silicon, magnetic level, binoculars, camera, GSP, etc.
o Spare equipment: cabling, anchors, booms and mounting hardware, etc.
• Sensors:
(1) Sensor:__________ Serial #_________ Slope/Offset:______/______
• Data logger: Serial Number_________
o Road and topographic site maps.
o Rental equipment: jackhammer w/compressor, truck/trailer, etc.
o Winch with 12V battery and battery charger.
o Gin pole and associated hardware.
o Safety equipment: Hard hats, gloves, appropriate clothes, first aid kit, etc.
o Manufacturer’s manuals for installation and troubleshooting (sensors, datalogger, etc.)
Additional Information/Comments:___________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
Page 7-6
Site Designation:______________ Page 2
C. GENERAL ON-SITE ACTIVITIES
Check the appropriate box. If No, provide an explanation below.

• General Visual Inspection
Yes o No o Area free of vandalism?
Yes o No o Tower straight?
Yes o No o Guy wires taut and properly secured?
Yes o No o Solar panel clean and properly oriented?
Yes o No o Wind sensors intact, oriented correctly, and operating?
Yes o No o Ice or snow on sensors, solar panel, antenna?
Yes o No o Grounding system intact?
Yes o No o Cellular antenna correctly orientated?
Findings/Actions:_________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
• Data Retrieval
Manual o Remote o Download method
Yes o No o Successful download? If No, provide explanation belos.
________________________________________________________________________________
• Datalogger Inspection (Check when completed)

Yes o No o Data logger operational? If No, provide explanation below.
o Record system voltages:_____________________________________
o Date displayed:_ _______ Actual:_________ Corrected? (Circle) Yes / No
o Time displayed:_________ Actual:_________ Corrected? (Circle) Yes / No
Yes o No o Check sensor values, are they reasonable? If No, provide explanation below.
________________________________________________________________________________
• Tower Lowering Activities

Yes o No o Check all anchors, signs of movement?
Yes o No o Winch secured to anchor and safety line connected to vehicle bumper?
Yes o No o Gin pole assembled with safety cable and snaplinks taped?
Yes o No o Tower base bolt tight?
Yes o No o Gin pole safety rope attached and tensioned properly (gin pole straight)?
Yes o No o Weather conditions safe?
Yes o No o Note start time of tower lowering. ______________(CST)
Yes o No o Winch battery connected and terminals covered?
Yes o No o Lifting guy wire attachments to gin pole checked?
________________________________________________________________________________
• On-Ground General Activities

Yes o No o Sensor and ground wires securely attached?
Yes o No o Grounding system intact and secure?
Yes o No o Sensor boom clamps secure?
Page 7-7
Site Designation:______________ Page 3

C. GENERAL ON-SITE ACTIVITIES (Continued)
• On-Ground General Activities (Continued)

Yes o No o Boom orientation OK?
Yes o No o Boom welds OK?
Yes o No o Vane deadband orientation as reported on Site Information Log?
Yes o No o Sensors level and oriented correctly?
Yes o No o Sensor wire connections secure and sealed with silicon?
Yes o No o Signs of sensor damage?
Yes o No o Sensor outputs checked and functioning properly?
Yes o No o Sensor serial numbers as reported on Site Information Log?
Yes o No o Sensor and/or data looger replacement? If Yes:
• Sensors:
(1) Sensor:______ Serial #:______ Slope/Offset:______/______ Height:______
(2) Sensor:______ Serial #:______ Slope/Offset:______/______ Height:______
(3) Data Logger:______ Serial #:______
________________________________________________________________________________
• Tower Raising Activities

Yes o No o Guy wire collars positioned correctly?
Yes o No o Lifting lines and anchor lines properly attached?
Yes o No o Gin pole secure, lines tensioned, gin pole straight, snap links taped?
Yes o No o Weather conditions safe?
Yes o No o Guys properly tensioned?
Yes o No o Tower straight?
• Note on-line time:__________(LST)
• Site Departure Activities

Yes o No o Successful data transfer with office computer?
Yes o No o Check antenna and phone connections?
Yes o No o Is datalogger date/time correct?
Yes o No o Secure datalogger enclosure with lock?
Yes o No o Clean area?
Yes o No o Guy wires clearly marked?
________________________________________________________________________________
E. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Yes o No o Further actions required? If Yes, describe below:

_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Page 7-8
Chapter 8
DATA COLLECTION
AND HANDLING
The data collection and handling elements of the monitoring system must incorporate procedures
that offer a high level of data protection. In general, the procedures should comply with those specified
by the data logger manufacturer and reflect good common sense. This chapter highlights the key aspects
of this task, including in-field data storage (raw data), data retrieval and frequency, data protection, and
documentation.
8.1 RAW DATA STORAGE
Data that have not been subjected to a validation or verification process are commonly referred
to as raw data which are typically stored by the data logger in binary format. The storage device should
be non-volatile, whereby the ability to store data is not affected by a loss of system power.
A. Data Storage Types
Each available data storage type and corresponding data transfer method has specific
requirements with different advantages and disadvantages.
• Solid State Devices: The data may be read at the central computer using software
provided by the manufacturer
• Data Card: Special software and a data card reading device may be required to transfer
data
• Magnetic Media: Special software and equipment are required to read and transfer the
data from the tape to the central computer
• EEPROM Data Chip: Manufacturer’s software and an EEPROM reading device are
required for data transfer
• Portable Computer: Special cabling, interface device, external power supply, and/or
software may be required.
Page 8-1
Chapter 8 Data Collection and Handling
B. Data Storage Capacity

Table 8.1
The storage capacity required depends on the
256 kB Card Storage Capacity in Days
averaging interval, the number of active data logger Averaging Number of Active Channels
channels, and any additional logger processing such Interval (min) 6 7 8 9
as the supplemental parameters presented in Section 10 65 58 53 49
4.4. Manufacturers usually provide tables or methods 60 337 308 284 264
to calculate the approximate available storage capacity in days for various memory configurations. Table
8.1 presents examples of storage capacity information for a 256 KB data card for recording intervals of
either ten-minutes or hourly. According to the table, a monitoring station configuration of seven active
channels (three for wind speed, three for wind direction, and one for temperature) processed at a ten-
minute averaging interval has an approximate storage capacity of 58 days. If an optional pyranometer and
one redundant anemometer are included, the storage capacity decreases to 49 days. Remember these are
approximate storage capacities; do not arrive on day 48 to download data. To be safe, consult with the
data logger manufacturer as to your capacity needs and assume a reduction in the expected storage
capacity of at least one week.
The minimum storage capacity requirements depend on the maximum time span between data
transfers. Capacity estimates should also provide for delays in retrieving a site’s raw data. The minimum
data logger storage capacity should be 40 days. This reflects a one-month data transfer interval (31 days)
with an additional nine day cushion to respond to and correct problems. Plan accordingly and wisely.
8.2 DATA RETRIEVAL
The selection of a data transfer and handling process (manual or remote), and thus the data
logger model, will depend on your requirements. The following points should be considered during the
selection process:
• Personnel availability
• Travel time to site
• Year-round site accessibility
• Availability of cellular phone service
• Equipment cost
• On-site power needs
• Ease of use
• Support systems required (computers, modems, analysis and presentation software, etc.).
8.3 DATA RETRIEVAL FREQUENCY
A key factor in achieving a high level of data completeness is the ability to identify potential
problems and to quickly initiate a response. Data transfer and review are the first-order means of
achieving this end. A schedule of regular site data transfers, or downloads, should be developed and
maintained. The maximum recommended manual download interval is bi-weekly. For remote data
transfer systems, a weekly retrieval rate may suffice but a shorter interval, such as two-day, may be
required to successfully transfer the large datasets associated with ten-minute data averaging.
Page 8-2
Situations may arise that warrant additional data transfers. For example, sensor data irregularities
may become apparent during the review of site data. Weather patterns, such as icing or severe
thunderstorms, which pose a risk to a site, merit a follow-up data transfer and review. To better assess
each situation a field crew could be dispatched to conduct a visual inspection or, if using cellular phone
systems, a current data set could be remotely downloaded for inspection to determine whether a problem
has arisen.
8.4 DATA PROTECTION AND STORAGE
There is a risk of data loss or alteration during the measurement program. The following
components and procedures are highlighted to offer guidance on minimizing the risk.
A. Electronic Data Collection Subsystem
Aside from the data logger programming requirements, the actual data collection process requires
minimal technician input. Data are protected by following installation procedures, including grounding
all equipment and the use of spark gaps.
B. Computer Hardware
Field data will eventually be transferred to a personal computer for analysis. This will be the
primary location of the working database, but should not be the storage area for the archived database.
Electrical surges and static discharges may damage hard drives and floppy disks. Follow the
manufacturer’s instructions and recommendations for all electrical connections.
C. Data Handling Procedures
Improper data handling procedures may represent the highest risk for data loss. The technical
staff will be the handling medium and in constant contact with significant numbers of raw and processed
databases. Ensure that all personnel are fully trained and understand the following:
• Data retrieval software and computer operating system (be aware of all instances in
which data can be accidentally over-written or erased)
• Good handling practices of all data storage media including RAM cards, tapes,
EEPROMs, and floppy disks (protect from static charge, magnetic fields and temperature
extremes)
• Computer operations and safety practices, including grounding requirements.
To reduce the risk of data loss, maintain multiple copies of the database, or backups, and store
each copy in a separate location (not in the same building). Back up the data on a schedule equal to the
data retrieval interval. The three common data backup media available are floppy disk, tape, and CD
ROM. The manufacturers provide guidelines for backup strategies that will best suit specific needs.
Based on ease of use and price, the tape backup system is the method of choice.
Page 8-3
8.5 DOCUMENTATION
Additional paperwork is not a welcome task, but detailed database related records must be
maintained. A Site Data File Log should be developed to serve as the master raw data file log for each
site. With the selection of pertinent information, the log’s function can be expanded to allow personnel to
track the success of data transfers, especially those that use telecommunication technology, and
document the data protection plan (file backups) as presented in the preceding section. The basic
information to include in the Site Data File Log, an example of which is presented at the end of this
chapter, follows:
• Site designation
• File names of binary and ASCII data sets
• Start and end dates and times of the data set
• Date and time of data transfer
• Data transfer method: manual or remote
• Confirmation of a valid data transfer: are data present?
• Confirmation that data file was appended to archived database
• Date of database backup
• Comments: problems, actions taken, etc.
In addition to the obvious organizational benefits, this documentation will provide valuable and
almost immediate quality control feedback on equipment performance and data completeness. For
example, suppose a Site Data File Log entry indicates that the next data set should start on June 1 at 1300
hours. After downloading the data, the time and date stamp of the first data record indicates 1000 hours
on June 6. The discrepancy shows an obvious problem. Or, suppose recent entries show that, although
data have been successfully retrieved, establishing and maintaining site communication are becoming
increasingly difficult. This may be the first indication of an impending failure of the system’s
telecommunication or power supply. It is time to visit the site and investigate before data are lost.
Page 8-4
Page 8-5
Chapter 9
DATA VALIDATION,
PROCESSING, AND
REPORTING
After the field data are collected and transferred to your office computing environment, the next
steps are to validate and process data, and generate reports. The flow chart presented in Figure 9.1
illustrates the sequence and roles of these steps.
Figure 9.1
Data Validation Flowchart
Raw Data Files
Develop Data Validation Routines

General System and Measured Parameter Checks
• Range tests
• Relational tests
• Trend tests
Fine-tune Routines with Experience
Validate Data
• Subject all data to validation
• Print validation report of suspect values
• Manually reconcile suspect values
• Insert validation codes
• Alert site operator to suspected measurement problems
Create Valid Data Files
Process Data and Generate Reports
Data validation is defined as the inspection of all the collected data for completeness and
reasonableness, and the elimination of erroneous values. This step transforms raw data into validated
data. The validated data are then processed to produce the summary reports you require for analysis. This
Page 9-1
Chapter 9 Data Validation, Processing, and Reporting
step is also crucial to maintaining high rates of data completeness during the course of the monitoring
program. Therefore data must be validated as soon as possible, within one - two days, after they are
transferred. The sooner the site operator is notified of a potential measurement problem, the lower the
risk of data loss.
9.1 DATA VALIDATION METHODS
Data can be validated either manually or automatically (computer-based). The latter is preferred
to take advantage of the power and speed of computers, although some manual review will always be
required. Validation software may be purchased from some data logger vendors, created in-house using
popular spreadsheet programs (e.g., Microsoft Excel, Quatro Pro, Lotus 123), or adapted from other
utility environmental monitoring projects. An advantage of using spreadsheet programs is that they can
also be used to process data and generate reports. These programs require an ASCII file format for
imported data; the data logger's data management software will make this conversion if binary data
transfer is used.
There are essentially two parts to data validation, data screening and data verification.
• Data Screening: The first part uses a series of validation routines or algorithms to screen all
the data for suspect (questionable and erroneous) values. A suspect value deserves scrutiny
but is not necessarily erroneous. For example, an unusually high hourly wind speed caused
by a locally severe thunderstorm may appear on an otherwise average windy day. The result
of this part is a data validation report (a printout) that lists the suspect values and which
validation routine each value failed.
• Data Verification: The second part requires a case-by-case decision on what to do with the
suspect values  retain them as valid, reject them as invalid, or replace them with
redundant, valid values (if available). This part is where judgment by a qualified person
familiar with the monitoring equipment and local meteorology is needed.
Before proceeding to the following sections, you should first understand the limitations of data
validation. There are many possible causes of erroneous data: faulty or damaged sensors, loose wire
connections, broken wires, damaged mounting hardware, data logger malfunctions, static discharges,
sensor calibration drift, and icing conditions, among others. The goal of data validation is to detect as
many significant errors from as many causes as possible. Catching all the subtle ones is impossible. For
example, a disconnected wire can be easily detected by a long string of zero (or random) values, but a
loose wire that becomes disconnected intermittently may only partly reduce the recorded value yet keep it
within reasonable limits. Therefore, slight deviations in the data can escape detection (although the use of
redundant sensors can reduce this possibility). Properly exercising the other quality assurance
components of the monitoring program will also reduce the chances of data problems.
To preserve the original raw data, make a copy of the original raw data set and apply the
validation steps to the copy.
The next two subsections describe two types of validation routines, recommend specific
validation criteria for each measurement parameter, and discuss the treatment of suspect and missing
data.
Page 9-2
A. Validation Routines
Validation routines are designed to screen each measured parameter for suspect values before
they are incorporated into the archived database and used for site analysis. They can be grouped into two
main categories, general system checks and measured parameter checks.
1. General System Checks
Two simple tests evaluate the completeness of the collected data:
• Data Records: The number of data fields must equal the expected number
of measured parameters for each record.
• Time Sequence: Are there any missing sequential data values? This test should
focus on the time and date stamp of each data record.
2. Measured Parameter Checks: These tests represent the heart of the data validation
process and normally consist of range tests, relational tests, and trend tests.
• Range Tests: These are the Table 9.1

simplest and most commonly used Sample Range Test Criteria
validation tests. The measured data *Sample Parameter Validation Criteria
Wind Speed: Horizontal
are compared to allowable upper • Average offset < Avg. < 25 m/s
and lower limiting values. Table 9.1 • Standard Deviation 0 < Std. Dev. < 3 m/s
presents examples of range test • Maximum Gust offset < Max. < 30 m/s
criteria. A reasonable range for Wind Direction
• Average 0° < Avg. ≤ 360°
most expected average wind speeds
• Standard Deviation 3° < Std. Dev. < 75°
is 0 to 25 m/s. However, the • Maximum Gust 0° < Max. ≤ 360°
calibration offset supplied with Temperature (Summer shown)
many calibrated anemometers will • Seasonal Variability 5°C < Avg. < 40°C
prevent zero values. Negative values Solar Radiation (Optional: Summer shown)
• Average offset ≤ Avg. < 1100 W/m²
clearly indicate a problem; speeds Wind Speed: Vertical (Optional)
above 25 m/s are possible and • Average **(F/C) offset < Avg. <± (2/4) m/s
should be verified with other • Standard Deviation offset < Std. Dev.<± (1/2) m/s
information. The limits of each • Maximum Gust offset < Max. < ± (3/6) m/s
Barometric Pressure (Optional: sea level)
range test must be set so they • Average 94 kPa < Avg. < 106 kPa
include nearly (but not absolutely) ∆T (Optional)
all of the expected values for the • Average Difference > 1.0° C (1000 hrs to 1700 hrs)
site. Technicians can fine-tune these • Average Difference < -1.0° C (1800 hrs to 0500 hrs)
∗ All monitoring levels except where noted.
limits as they gain experience. In ** (F/C): Flat/Complex Terrain
addition, the limits should be
adjusted seasonally where applicable. For instance, the limits for air temperature
and solar radiation should be lower in winter than in summer.
If a value meets a criterion, that check considers the value valid. However, most
parameter values should have several criteria checks, because a single criterion is
unlikely to detect all problems. For example, if a frozen wind vane reports an
average direction of exactly 180° for six consecutive ten-minute intervals, the
Page 9-3
values would pass the 0°-360° range test, but the stationary vane would report a
standard deviation of zero and be
Table 9.2
flagged as suspect.
Sample Relational Test Criteria
*Sample Parameter Validation Criteria
• Relational Tests: This comparison is Wind Speed: Horizontal
based on expected physical • Max Gust vs. Average Max Gust ≤ 2.5 * Avg.
relationships between various • 40 m/25 m Average ∆** ≤ 2.0 m/s
• 40 m/25 m Daily Max ∆ ≤ 5 m/s
parameters. Table 9.2 gives examples • 40 m/10 m Average ∆ ≤ 4 m/s
of relational test criteria. Relational • 40 m/10 m Daily Max ∆ ≤ 7.5 m/s
checks should ensure that physically Wind Speed: Redundant (Optional)
improbable situations are not reported • Average ∆ ≤ 0.5 m/s
• Maximum ∆ ≤ 2.0 m/s
in the data without verification; for
Wind Direction
example, significantly higher wind • 40m/25 m Average ∆ ≤ 20°
speeds at the 25 m level versus the ∗ All monitoring levels except where noted.
40 m level. ** ∆: Difference
• Trend Tests: These checks are based on the rate of change in a value over time.
Table 9.3 lists sample trend test criteria. An example of a trend that indicates an
unusual circumstance and a potential problem is a change in air temperature greater
than 5°C in one hour.
The examples of validation criteria in Tables 9.1, 9.2, and 9.3 are not exhaustive, nor do they
necessarily apply to all sites. With use, technicians will
Table 9.3
learn which criteria are most often triggered and under
Sample Trend Test Criteria
which conditions. For example, some criteria may *Sample Parameter Validation Criteria
almost always be triggered under light wind conditions, Wind Speed Average (All sensor types)
yet the data are valid. This occurrence may argue for • 1 Hour Change < 5.0 m/s
one set of criteria under light wind conditions (below Temperature Average
4 m/s) and another set for stronger winds. Therefore the •Barometric
1 Hour Change
Pressure Average
≤ 5°C
(Optional)
technician(s) should modify criteria or create new ones • 3 Hour Change ≤ 1 kPa
as needed. ∆ Temperature (Optional)
• 3 Hour Change Changes sign twice
∗ All monitoring levels except where noted.
A secondary benefit of the data validation
process is that the person(s) directly involved in the validation process will become very familiar with the
local wind climatology. The behavior of the wind under various weather conditions will become
apparent, as will the relationship between various parameters. This is an invaluable experience that
cannot be appreciated solely by poring over monthly summary tables, and may be important for
evaluating the impact of the local meteorology on wind turbine operation and maintenance.
Special Note: Some data loggers and their data retrieval software record the system battery voltage for
each averaging interval. Range and relational tests can be incorporated into your wind data validation
routines to check for a reduction in battery voltage that may indicate a system problem.
B. Treatment of Suspect and Missing Data
After the raw data are subjected to all the validation checks, what should be done with suspect
data? Some suspect values may be real, unusual occurrences while others may be truly bad. Here are
some guidelines for handling suspect data:
Page 9-4
1. Generate a validation report (printout or computer-based visual display) that lists all
suspect data. For each data value, the report should give the reported value, the date and
time of occurrence, and the validation criteria that it failed.
2. A qualified person should examine the suspect data to determine their acceptability.
Invalid data should be assigned and replaced with a
validation code. Table 9.4 gives some examples. A Table 9.4
common designation for data rejection is assigning Sample Validation Codes
Code Rejection Criteria
a -900 series validation code, with numbers that -990 Unknown event
represent various rejection explanations. Operation -991 Icing or wet snow event
and maintenance logs or site temperature data -992 Static voltage discharge
-993 Wind shading from tower
should be reviewed to determine the code.
-995 Wind vane deadband
-996 Operator error
3. If redundant sensors are used, replace a rejected -997 Equipment malfunction
value from the primary sensor with a substitute one -998 Equipment service
-999 Missing data (no value possible)
from the redundant sensor as long as the redundant
sensor’s data passed all the validation criteria.
4. Maintain a complete record of all data validation actions for each monitoring site in a
Site Data Validation Log, an example of which is provided at the end of this chapter.
This document should contain the following information for each rejected and
substituted value:
• File name
• Parameter type and monitoring height
• Date and time of flagged data
• Validation code assigned and explanation given for each rejected datum
• The source of the substituted values.
Important: Maintain raw and validated data files separately. Differentiate the files by assigning
different extensions to the file names. For example, the file extension for the raw data file could be
designated as “.raw” and the verified data file as “.ver.” Valid data can then be compiled into a master
data file for further data reporting and archiving.
C. Data Recovery
The data recovery rate is defined as the number of valid data records collected versus that
possible over the reporting period and should be determined for each primary wind sensor (for all levels
at each site). The method of calculation is as follows:
Data Records Collected
Data Recovery Rate =
Data Records Possible
(100 )
where
Data Records Collected = Data Records Possible - Number of Invalid Records
For example, the total possible number of ten-minute records in December is 4,464. If 264 records were
deemed invalid, the number of valid data records collected would be 4200 (4,464 - 264). The
Page 9-5
data recovery rate for this example would be:

æ 4 ,200 ö
Data Recovery Rate = ç ÷ (100 ) = 94.1%
è 4 ,464 ø
9.2 DATA PROCESSING AND REPORTING
When the data validation step is complete, the data set must be subjected to various data
processing procedures to evaluate the wind resource. This typically involves performing calculations on
the data set, as well as binning (sorting) the data values into useful subsets based on your choice of
averaging interval. From this, informative reports can be produced, such as summary tables and
performance graphs. Data processing and reporting software are available from several sources, including
certain data logger manufacturers and vendors of spreadsheet, database, and statistical software.
Hourly averages are normally used for reporting purposes. Compiling validated ten-minute data
subsets into an hourly average data base can be performed using available data processing and reporting
software. Whatever method is used, care must be taken to not include a flagged data point or -900 series
flag code when computing the hourly average.
The basic parameter set allows for the determination and presentation of many valuable wind
characterization tools. Table 9.5 presents
the recommended monthly data reports. Table 9.5
Examples of selected reports are provided Sample Monthly Data Reporting
Report Products Presentation Reporting Heights
at the end of this chapter. Mean hourly diurnal wind speed Graph/Table All
Joint wind speed and direction
Table All
Except for fully programmable frequency distribution (16 sectors)
data loggers, the wind shear exponent, Wind speed frequency distribution:
Graph/Table All
0.5 m/s (1 mph) bins
turbulence intensity, and wind power
Mean hourly diurnal temperature Graph/Table 3m
density are typically not internal Mean hourly wind shear Graph/Table Between all heights
processing functions of most data loggers. Mean turbulence intensity Graph/Table All
These parameters can be easily calculated Wind rose Graph All
using a spreadsheet software application Mean hourly wind power density Graph/Table All
to obtain hourly and monthly averages. A

description of each parameter and calculation method is presented in detail below.
1. Vertical wind shear exponent: Wind shear is defined as the change in horizontal wind
speed with a change in height. The wind shear exponent (α) should be determined for each site, because
its magnitude is influenced by site-specific characteristics. The 1/7th power law (as used in the initial
site screening) may not be applied for this purpose, as actual shear values may vary significantly from
this value. Solving the power law equation for α gives
év ù
Log10 ê 2 ú
α= ë v1 û
éz ù
Log10 ê 2 ú
where ë z1 û
v2 = the wind speed at height z2; and
v1 = the wind speed at height z1.
Page 9-6
2. Turbulence intensity: Wind turbulence is the rapid disturbances or irregularities in the wind
speed, direction, and vertical component. It is an important site characteristic, because high turbulence
levels may decrease power output and cause extreme loading on wind turbine components. The most
common indicator of turbulence for siting purposes is the standard deviation (σ) of wind speed.
Normalizing this value with the mean wind speed gives the turbulence intensity (TI). This value allows
for an overall assessment of a site’s turbulence. TI is a relative indicator of turbulence with low levels
indicated by values less than or equal to 0.10, moderate levels to 0.25, and high levels greater than 0.25.
TI is defined as
σ
TI =
V
where
σ = the standard deviation of wind speed; and
V = the mean wind speed.
3. Wind power density: Wind power density (WPD) is a truer indication of a site’s wind
energy potential than wind speed alone. Its value combines the effect of a site’s wind speed distribution
and its dependence on air density and wind speed. WPD is defined as the wind power available per unit
area swept by the turbine blades and is given by the following equation:
WPD =
1 n
2n i= 1
( )
å ( ρ ) vi (W/m²)
3
where
n = the number of records in the averaging interval;
ρ = the air density (kg/m³); and
vi3 = the cube of the ith wind speed (m/s) value.
As is evident by the summation sign (Σ), this equation should only be used for all wind speed
values (n>1) during an averaging period and not for a single long term average (e.g., monthly, yearly).
The reason is based on the normal variability of the wind and the cubic wind speed relationship. The
following example is provided to illustrate this point.
Assume that over a two hour period the average wind speed at a site is 6.7 m/s (15 mph); 4.5 m/s (10 mph)
the first hour and 8.9 m/s (20 mph) the next. Calculate the WPD using the combined two hour average
(n=1) and then with the two distinct hourly average values (n=2). Applying standard temperature and
pressure (101,325 Pa and 288 °K) to the above equation, the calculated WPD using the overall average
value is 184 W/m2 while that using the two average values is 246 W/m2.. The latter value represents the
average of that calculated for 4.5 m/s (55 W/m2) and 8.9 m/s (438 W/m2). There is actually 34% more
power available at the site than would have been realized if the equation was used incorrectly.
The air density term in the WPD must be calculated. It depends on temperature and pressure
(thus altitude) and can vary 10% to 15% seasonally. If the site pressure is known (e.g., measured as an
optional parameter), the hourly air density values with respect to air temperature can be calculated from
the following equation:
P
ρ= (kg/m³)
RT
Page 9-7
where
P = the air pressure (Pa or N/m²);
R = the specific gas constant for air (287 J/kg⋅K); and
T = the air temperature in degrees Kelvin (°C+273).
If site pressure is not available, air density can be estimated as a function of site elevation (z) and
temperature (T) as follows:
æ − g⋅ z ö
ρ = æç Po ö÷ exp è
ç ÷
RT ø
(kg/m³)
è RT ø
where
Po = the standard sea level atmospheric pressure (101,325 Pa), or the actual sea level-
adjusted pressure reading from a local airport;
g = the gravitational constant (9.8 m/s²); and
z = the site elevation above sea level (m).
Substituting in the numerical values for Po, R, and g, we get:
æ zö
−0 .034 ç ÷
æ 353.05 ö èTø
ρ=ç ÷ exp ( kg/m³).
è T ø
This air density equation can be substituted into the WPD equation for the determination of each hourly
average value.
9.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTING
A component of your monitoring program documentation should be a periodic report on the

program’s adherence to the quality assurance plan (described in Section 2.4). The field and/or data
analysis staff should prepare the report and submit it to the project manager (or quality assurance
coordinator) monthly or quarterly. The report should address the following topics:
• Dates of operation and maintenance site visits: activities and findings

• Description of monitoring problems and corrective actions taken
• Record of equipment calibration activities (if applicable)
• Data validation findings and actions taken
• Data recovery rate.
A sample Quality Assurance Report Form is provided at the end of this chapter.
Page 9-8
SAMPLE SITE DATA VALIDATION LOG
Site Designation: _____________ Page:____ of ____
Date & Explanation Source

File Parameter Sensor Flag
Time of of
Name Type Height Code Substituted
Stamp Flag
Value
Page 9-9
Chapter 10 Costs And Labor Requirements for a Wind Monitoring Program
Chapter 10
COSTS AND LABOR

REQUIREMENTS FOR A
WIND MONITORING PROGRAM
What are the cost and labor implications of conducting a wind resource assessment program?
This chapter identifies the major cost elements and outlines the main labor tasks to be considered. Also
presented is a discussion on the roles of a nominal staff to carry out a measurement program.
10.1 COST AND LABOR ESTIMATES
Program costs can be divided into three main categories: labor, equipment, and expenses.
• Labor: Table 10.1 lists a series of tasks to be accounted for when budgeting for labor. The
work will be performed by different levels of staffing. Some tasks, especially those that deal
with equipment installation and maintenance, will at times require a team of two or three.
• Equipment: Equipment costs can be easily Table 10.1

obtained from vendors once the measurement Labor Tasks to Account
specifications are determined. Other items to for When Budgeting
include in the budget are shipping charges, A. Administration
taxes, insurance, spare parts, and the tools • Program oversight
needed to install and service the tower. The • Measurement plan development
• Quality assurance plan development
estimated total equipment cost for a single
B. Site Selection
site that uses a 40 m tilt-up tubular guyed • In-house remote screening
tower equipped with three levels of sensors is • Field survey & landowner contacts
$7,500 to $9,000. • Obtain land use agreement & permit
C. Equipment
• Expenses: Related expenses include travel, • Specify and procure
land lease fees, cellular phone fee (if • Test and prepare for field
applicable), and sensor calibration. Travel • Installation (two to three people)
costs should account for the anticipated D. Operation & Maintenance
• Routine site visits (one person)
number of field trips required to select,
• Unscheduled site visits (two people)
install, maintain, and decommission a site.
• Calibration at end of period
Some field trips may require overnight • Site decommissioning (two people)
lodging and meals. The land lease fee is the E. Data Handling & Reporting
reimbursement to the landowner for the use • Validation, processing & report generation
of his or her land for the monitoring tower. • Data and quality assurance reporting
This fee is negotiable and may run $300 to
$500 per year. Remote data transfer using a cellular or telemetered phone link can add costs,
typically $30 to $50 per month, depending on the number of calls and the distance.
Page 10-2
Chapter 10 Costs And Labor Requirements for a Wind Monitoring Program
The re-calibration of anemometers, assuming they are done by the original vendor, is
estimated to cost $150 per anemometer.
The estimated total cost for a single 40 m monitoring station operated for two years will likely be
$25,000 to $40,000. Your actual costs will of course depend on the specific tower type and equipment
selected, the site's proximity to operation and maintenance staff, and the number of site visits.
Economies of scale can be achieved with multiple sites. Most savings are realized in the labor
category, where staff time and travel can be used more efficiently. In general, labor expenses for each
additional site should be 50% to 70% that of a single site, depending on the number of sites and their
mutual proximity. Travel expenses can be economized if more than one site is visited when making most
field trips. Equipment cost savings can be realized via quantity discounts (typically 5% to 10%) offered
by vendors and by sharing installation equipment (e.g., gin pole, winch kit) among sites. Overall, the total
cost to operate a second site is estimated to be 10% to 15% less than the cost for the first site. The
average site cost for a five-station monitoring network will be about 25% less than for a single site, or
$19,000 to $30,000 per site.
10.2 STAFFING RECOMMENDATIONS
A resource assessment program should have a project manager, a field manager, and a data
manager, plus additional support staff such as field technicians. These roles are preferably performed by
separate individuals but this need not be the case.
A. Project Manager
The project manager manages the overall project and ensures that human and material resources
are available in a timely manner to meet the program's objectives. The project manager should also
oversee the design of and adherence to the measurement and quality assurance plans.
B. Field Manager
The field manager installs and maintains the monitoring equipment and transfers the data to the
home office. This person, and/or an assistant, should be available to promptly service a site whenever a
problem arises. Installing and decommissioning sites, as well as service visits that require the tower to be
lowered or climbed, demand at least two people.
C. Data Manager
The data manager is responsible for all data-related activities, including data validation and
report generation. Familiarity with meteorology and the monitoring site and equipment, and a close
working dialogue with the field manager, are essential to properly validate the data.
Page 10-2
APPENDIX A
WIND RESOURCE
ASSESSMENT
EQUIPMENT VENDORS
Belfort Instrument NovaLynx Corporation Teledyne Geotech

727 S. Wolfe St. P.O. Box 240 3401 Shiloh Rd.
Baltimore, MD 21231 Grass Valley, CA 95945 Garland, TX 75046-9007
(410) 342-2626 (916) 477-5226 (214) 271-2561
Campbell Scientific, Inc. NRG Systems, Inc. Tower Systems

815 W. 1800 N. 110 Commerce St. P.O. Box 1474
Logan, UT 84321-1784 Hinesburg, VT 05461 Watertown, SD 57201
(801) 753-2342 (802) 482-2255 (605) 886-0930
Climatronics Corporation Qualimetrics, Inc. Vaisala Inc.

140 Wilbur Pl. 1165 National Dr. 100 Commerce Way
Bohemia, NY 11716 Sacramento, CA 95834 Woburn, MA 01801-1068
(516) 567-7300 (916) 928-1000 (617) 933-4500
Coastal Environmental R. M. Young Yankee Environmental

Systems 2801 Aero Park Dr. Systems, Inc.
316 Second Ave. S. Traverse City, MI 49684 101 Industrial Rd.
Seattle, WA 98104 (616) 946-3980 P.O. Box 746
(206) 682-6048 Turners Falls, MA 01376
Unarco Rohn (413) 863-0200
Kipp & Zonen P.O. Box 2000
390 Central Ave. Peoria, IL 61656 Zond Systems, Inc.
Bohemia, NY 11716 (309) 697-4400 13000 Jameson Rd.
(516) 589-2885 P.O. Box 1910
Scientific Sales Tehachapi, CA 93581
Licor, Inc. P.O. Box 6725 (805) 822-6835
P. O. Box 4426 Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
Lincoln, NE 68504 (609) 844-0055
(402) 467-3576 (609) 844-0466
Met One Instruments Second Wind Inc.

1600 Washington Blvd. 366 Summer St.
Grants Pass, OR 97526 Somerville, MA 02144
(503) 471-7111 (617) 776-8520
Page A-1
APPENDIX B
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Landowner’s Guide to Wind Energy in the Upper Midwest

(N. Lange and W. Grant, Izaak, 1995 Walton League of America; available from
Midwest Office, Izaak Walton League of America, 5701 Normandale Rd., Suite 317,
Minneapolis, MN 55424)
The Meteorological Aspects of Siting Large Wind Turbines

(T. Hiester and W. Pennell, Report No. PNL-2522, 1981; available from National
Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22151)
Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems

(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised 1989, Atmospheric Research and
Exposure Assessment Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711)
Recommended Practice for the Siting of Wind Energy Conversion Systems

(American Wind Energy Association, AWEA Standard 8.2-1993: available from AWEA,
122 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20001)
A Siting Handbook for Small Wind Energy Conversion Systems

(H. Wegley, J. Ramsdell, M. Orgill and R. Drake, Report No. PNL-2521 Rev.1, 1980;
available from National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Rd.,
Springfield, VA 22151)
Siting Guidelines for Utility Application of Wind Turbines

(W. Pennell, Report No. EPRI AP-2795, 1983; available from Electric Power Research
Institute, Research Reports Center, Box 50490, Palo Alto, CA 94303)
Standard Procedures for Meteorological Measurements at a Potential Wind Turbine Site

(American Wind Energy Association, AWEA Standard 8.1-1986: available from AWEA,
122 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20001)
Wind Characteristics: An Analysis for the Generation of Wind Power

(J.S. Rohatgi and V. Nelson, 1994, West Texas A&M University, Box 248, Canyon, TX
79016)
Page B-1
Appendix B Bibliography
Wind Energy Comes of Age

(P. Gipe, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1995.)
Wind Energy Resource Atlas of the United States

(D. Elliott et al., 1987, Pacific Northwest Laboratory: available from the American Wind
Energy Association, 122 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20001)
Wind Turbine Technology: Fundamental Concepts of Wind Turbine Engineering

(D.A. Spera, Editor; ASME Press, New York, 1994: available from The American
Society of Mechanical Engineers, 345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017)
Page B-2
Form Approved
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB NO. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson
Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
April 1997 Subcontractor Report
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

5. FUNDING NUMBERS
Wind Resource Assessment Handbook C: TAT-5-15283-01

TA: WE717020
6. AUTHOR(S)
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION

REPORT NUMBER
3 Washington Square
Albany, NY 12205
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING

National Renewable Energy Laboratory AGENCY REPORT NUMBER
1617 Cole Blvd.
Golden, CO 80401-3393 SR-440-22223
DE97000250
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

National Technical Information Service
U.S. Department of Commerce UC-1212
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22161
13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)
This handbook gives industry-accepted guidelines for planning and conducting a wind resource measurement program in
support of the user’s wind energy feasibility initiative. These guidelines, which are detailed and highly technical, emphasize the
tasks of selecting, installing, and operating wind measurement equipment, as well as collecting and analyzing the associated
data, once one or more measurement sites are located. The handbook’s scope encompasses state-of-the-art measurement
and analysis techniques at multiple heights on tall towers (e.g., 40 m) for a measurement duration of at least one year. While
these guidelines do not represent every possible method of conducting a quality wind measurement program, they do address
the most important elements based upon field-proven experience. The intended audience for this handbook is any
organization or individual desiring the planning framework and detailed procedures for conducting a formally structured wind
measurement program. Personnel from the management level to field technicians will find this material applicable.
15. NUMBER OF PAGES

14. SUBJECT TERMS
renewable energy; wind energy; wind resource assessment; wind resource
measurement 16. PRICE CODE
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT
Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UL
NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)

Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18
298-102

Wind Energy Assessment-R1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Wind Energy Assessment-R1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Wind Energy Assessment-R1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Wind Energy Assessment

Course No: M06-002

Steven Liescheidt, P.E., CCS, CCPR

Continuing Education and Development, Inc.

NREL Subcontract No. TAT-5-15283-01

Chapter 2: GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF A WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Chapter 3: SITING OF MONITORING SYSTEMS

Chapter 4: MEASUREMENT PARAMETERS

Chapter 5: MONITORING STATION INSTRUMENTATION

Chapter 6: INSTALLATION OF MONITORING STATIONS

Chapter 7: STATION OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Chapter 8: DATA COLLECTION AND HANDLING

Chapter 9: DATA VALIDATION, PROCESSING, AND REPORTING

Chapter 10:COSTS AND LABOR REQUIREMENTS FOR A WIND MONITORING

Appendix A: WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT EQUIPMENT VENDORS A-1

Appendix B: BIBLIOGRAPHY B-1

1.1 OVERVIEW OF CHAPTERS

Chapter 2: Guiding Principles of a Wind Resource Assessment Program

Chapter 3: Siting of Monitoring Systems

Chapter 4: Measurement Parameters

Details the recommended measurement parameters and offers guidelines for

Chapter 5: Monitoring Station Instrumentation

Describes the instrument components (sensors, data loggers, towers, peripherals) of a

Chapter 6: Installation of Monitoring Stations

Chapter 7: Station Operation and Maintenance

Chapter 8: Data Collection and Handling

Chapter 9: Data Validation, Processing, and Reporting

A. Wind Resource Assessment Equipment Vendors

2.1 APPROACHES AND OBJECTIVES

A. Preliminary Area Identification

B. Area Wind Resource Evaluation

2.2 MEASUREMENT PLAN

This handbook provides guidance on all these features.

2.3 MONITORING STRATEGY

2.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN

• Equipment procurement tied to the program’s specifications

2.5 MONITORING DURATION AND DATA RECOVERY

• Identification of potential wind development areas;

• Recommended Practice for the Siting of Wind Energy Conversion Systems

See Appendix B for ordering information.

3.1 USE OF WIND DATA SOURCES

A. Regional Wind Resource Data

• The abundance and quality of wind data

B. Site-Specific Wind Data

3.2 TOPOGRAPHIC INDICATORS

The analysis of topographic maps is an effective means of

screening should attempt to identify features that are likely to experience a

• Ridges oriented perpendicular to the prevailing wind direction

• Highest elevations within a given area

• Locations where local winds can funnel.

• Available land area

3.3 FIELD SURVEYS AND SITE RANKING

• Available land area

3.4 TOWER PLACEMENT

Figure 3.1 Obstruction Effects on Airflow

3.5 LAND LEASING AND PERMITTING

• The tower location

4.1 BASIC PARAMETERS

• 10 m: This is the universally standard meteorological measurement height. However, in

Air temperature is an important descriptor of a wind farm’s operating environment and is