Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 64 views

    Non-Digital Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool

    Uploaded by

    Riza Venancio
    This document provides an evaluation tool to assess non-digital instructional materials. It contains 4 parts that evaluate the instructional material's content, format, presentation/organization, and accuracy/currency. Each part has criteria rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with comments required for lower ratings. To pass, materials must meet minimum point thresholds in each part. The tool is used to examine how well materials meet objectives, develop skills/values, engage learners, have proper design elements, and contain accurate information.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Non-Digital Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool

    Uploaded by

    Riza Venancio
    64 views2 pages
    This document provides an evaluation tool to assess non-digital instructional materials. It contains 4 parts that evaluate the instructional material's content, format, presentation/organization, and accuracy/currency. Each part has criteria rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with comments required for lower ratings. To pass, materials must meet minimum point thresholds in each part. The tool is used to examine how well materials meet objectives, develop skills/values, engage learners, have proper design elements, and contain accurate information.

    Original Title

    NON-DIGITAL INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS EVALUATION TOOL

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides an evaluation tool to assess non-digital instructional materials. It contains 4 parts that evaluate the instructional material's content, format, presentation/organization, and accuracy/currency. Each part has criteria rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with comments required for lower ratings. To pass, materials must meet minimum point thresholds in each part. The tool is used to examine how well materials meet objectives, develop skills/values, engage learners, have proper design elements, and contain accurate information.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    64 views2 pages

    Non-Digital Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool

    Uploaded by

    Riza Venancio
    This document provides an evaluation tool to assess non-digital instructional materials. It contains 4 parts that evaluate the instructional material's content, format, presentation/organization, and accuracy/currency. Each part has criteria rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with comments required for lower ratings. To pass, materials must meet minimum point thresholds in each part. The tool is used to examine how well materials meet objectives, develop skills/values, engage learners, have proper design elements, and contain accurate information.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    NON-DIGITAL INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS EVALUATION TOOL

    Instructional Material’s Title:

    Group Members:

    Discipline:

    Grade Level:

    Instructions: Examine the material carefully and for each evaluation criterion consider the extent to which the
    resource meets the criteria. Check the appropriate number with 4 being Very Satisfactory (VS); 3 - Satisfactory (S); 2 -
    Poor; and 1 – Not Satisfactory]. For a rating below 4, write your comments/justifications on each evaluation criterion.
    If an evaluation criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the material is rated 3 on that criteria. (Not Applicable means that the
    criteria is not relevant to the resource being evaluated. It is given the score of 3 so that the evaluation score for each
    factor reflects only the performance against criteria that are relevant to the nature of the resource being evaluated).

    Part I. Instructional Material Content


    4 3 2 1
    Statements
    (VS) (S) (P) (NS)
    1. Content is suitable to the student's level of development.
    2. Material contributes to the achievement of specific objectives
    of the subject area and grade/year level for which it is
    intended.
    3. Material provides for the development of higher cognitive skills
    such as critical thinking, creativity, learning by doing, inquiry,
    problem solving, etc.
    4. Material is free of ideological, cultural, religious, racial, and
    gender biases and prejudices.
    5. Material enhances the development of desirable values and
    traits.
    6. Material has the potential to arouse interest of target learners.
    7. Adequate warning/cautionary notes are provided in topics and
    activities where safety and health are of concern.
    Total points
    Note: Instructional material score at least 21 points out of a maximum 28 points to pass this criterion.

    Part II. Instructional Material Format


    4 3 2 1
    Statements
    (VS) (S) (P) (NS)
    1.
    Size of letters is appropriate to the intended user.
    2.
    Simple and easily recognizable.
    3.
    Clarify and supplement the text.
    4.
    Properly labelled or captioned (if applicable)
    5.
    Attractive and appealing
    6.
    Culturally relevant.
    7.
    Harmonious blending of elements (e.g., illustrations and text).
    8.
    Easy to handle.
    9.
    Durable
    10.
    Realistic / use appropriate colors.
    Total points
    Note: Instructional material score at least 32 points out of a maximum 40 points to pass this criterion.
    Part III. Instructional Material Presentation and Organization
    4 3 2 1
    Statements
    (VS) (S) (P) (NS)
    1. Presentation is engaging, interesting, and understandable.
    2. There is logical and smooth flow of ideas.
    3. Vocabulary level is adapted to target learner’s likely experience
    and level of understanding.
    4. Length of sentences is suited to the comprehension level of the
    target learners.
    5. Sentences and paragraph structures are varied and interesting
    to the target learner.
    Total points
    Note: Instructional material score at least 15 points out of a maximum 20 points to pass this criterion.

    Part IV. Instructional Material Accuracy and Up-to-datedness of


    Information
    3 2
    (Present (Present & 1
    4
    but very requires (Do not
    Statements (Not
    minor & major evaluate
    present)
    must be redevelop further.)
    fixed) ment)
    1. Conceptual errors.
    2. Factual Errors
    3. Grammatical Errors
    4. Obsolete Errors
    5. Typographical and other minor errors
    (e.g., inappropriate or unclear
    illustrations, missing labels, wrong
    captions, etc.)
    Total points
    Note: Instructional material score at least 15 points out of a maximum 20 points to pass this criterion.

    General Comments and Suggestions:

    Name and Signature of Evaluator

    You might also like