Draft Case 2
Draft Case 2
Draft Case 2
Quickfix Auto Parts is an automobile parts store located in a mid-sized city in the mid-western region of
the United States. It has been operating for 5 years and had picked up significantly well over the first 2
years. Furthermore, the business operating success, its’ sufficient cash flow and its’ ability to grow for
the next few years were fueled even more by the positive results of the auto parts industry and local
forecast in the coming periods; hence, Andre, the owner of Quickfix Auto Parts has used up most of his
available funds in expanding his store’s size and business by the third year of operations. He was well
aware that future growth would have to be funded now with external sources of funds. One of the
candidates for sources of fund would be through a bank loan. On the contrary, in order for a commercial
bank to grant such loan, they would want to assess first the credit worthiness of the business. However,
over the past 2 years, the store’s net income figures had been negative and its’ cash flow situation had
gotten pretty weak, thus, in order to raise funds for future growth, they should have to present some
pretty convincing arguments to the bank to acquire the loan. Andre’s knowledge to finance and
accounting was very limited, thereby, to efficiently assess his business circumstance and come up with
an effective alternative thereof, he hires Juan Plexo, a second semester MBA student, who had an
undergraduate degree in Accountancy and was interested in concentrating in Finance. The following
pages consists the financial data of Quickfix Auto Parts:
Table 1
Table 2
Balance Sheets, which list the Quickfix Auto Parts’ investments and sources of financing
using the accounting equation;
Income Statement, which reports the results of operations;
Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity, which details changes in owner financing,
and;
Statement of Cash Flows, which details the sources and uses of cash in terms of three
primary activities: Cash flow from operating activities, Cash flows from investing activities,
and Cash flow from financing activities.
With that, he can provide a better financial support and advises to Andre.
1. How would Juan Plexo maintain his objectivity in terms of providing a course of action based on
the available data for Quickfix Auto Parts by assessing the following:
a. How Quickfix Auto Parts is performing according to their liquidity ratios?
b. How Quickfix Auto Parts is performing according to their debt management ratios?
c. How Quickfix Auto Parts is performing according to their profitability ratios?
d. How Quickfix Auto Parts is performing according to their asset management ratios?
Means to an End
No one number can accurately capture the qualitative aspect of a business. Ratios cannot hope
to capture the innumerable transactions and events that occur each day between a company
and various parties. It cannot meaningfully convey a company’s marketing and management
philosophies and its human resource activities such as the skills of the employee of Quickfix
Auto Parts. Therefore, in the analysis of Juan Plexo, he should consider to look deeply on the
relationship of the numbers and ratios to better understand the operational factors that drive
financial results. Successful analysis seeks to gain insight into what the Quickfix Auto Parts is
really about and what its’ future portends. The main purpose of this analysis is to understand
the business’ past and present to better predict the future, address the underlying problems,
and provide contingencies. Computing and examining ratio is just one step in that process.
Competition
Industry
Common-sized Analysis
Findings on Common-sized
Balance Sheet
Quickfix Auto Parts’ Common-
sized Balance Sheet facilitates
the comparison of
accounts within the Balance
Sheet. The following are the
findings of this analysis:
TOTAL ASSETS
2000
For every dollar of assets
invested, $0.24 came from Cash
and Marketable Securities,
$0.02 from Accounts
Receivable, $0.39 from
Inventories, $0.39 from Land,
Buildings,
Plant, and Equipment, and
$0.04 from Accumulated
Depreciation- Land, Buildings,
Plant, and Equipment.
2001
For every dollar of assets
invested, $0.39 came from Cash
and Marketable Securities,
$0.02 from Accounts
Receivable, $0.34 from
Inventories, $0.32 from Land,
Buildings,
Plant, and Equipment, and
$0.06 from Accumulated
Depreciation- Land, Buildings,
Plant, and Equipment.
2002
For every dollar of assets
invested, $0.08 came from Cash
and Marketable Securities,
$0.02 from Accounts
Receivable, $0.50 from
Inventories, $0.50 from Land,
Buildings,
Plant, and Equipment, and
$0.10 from Accumulated
Depreciation- Land, Buildings,
Plant, and Equipment.
2003
For every dollar of assets
invested, $0.03 came from Cash
and Marketable Securities,
$0.08 from Accounts
Receivable, $0.53 from
Inventories, $0.51 from Land,
Buildings,
Plant, and Equipment, and
$0.16 from Accumulated
Depreciation- Land, Buildings,
Plant, and Equipment.
2004
For every dollar of assets
invested, $0.02 came from Cash
and Marketable Securities,
$0.09 from Accounts
Receivable, $0.58 from
Inventories, $0.52 from Land,
Buildings,
Plant, and Equipment, and
$0.21 from Accumulated
Depreciation- Land, Buildings,
Plant, and Equipment.
The findings from 5 consecutive
years reveal that the decrease in
Cash and Marketable
Securities in the third operations
was due to the increase in Land,
Buildings, Plant, and
Findings on Common-sized Balance Sheet
Quickfix Auto Parts’ Common-sized Balance Sheet facilitates the comparison of accounts within the
Balance Sheet. The following are the findings of this analysis:
TOTAL ASSETS
2000
For every dollar of assets invested, $0.24 came from Cash and Marketable Securities, $0.02 from
Accounts Receivable, $0.39 from Inventories, $0.39 from Land, Buildings, Plant and Equipment, and
$0.04 from Accumulated Depreciation- Land, Buildings, Plant and Equipment.
2001
For every dollar of assets invested, $0.39 came from Cash and Marketable Securities, $0.02 from
Accounts Receivable, $0.34 from Inventories, $0.32 from Land, Buildings, Plant and Equipment, and
$0.06 from Accumulated Depreciation- Land, Buildings, Plant and Equipment.
2002
For every dollar of assets invested, $0.08 came from Cash and Marketable Securities, $0.02 from
Accounts Receivable, $0.50 from Inventories, $0.50 from Land, Buildings, Plant and Equipment, and
$0.10 from Accumulated Depreciation- Land, Buildings, Plant and Equipment.
2003
For every dollar of assets invested, $0.03 came from Cash and Marketable Securities, $0.08 from
Accounts Receivable, $0.53 from Inventories, $0.51 from Land, Buildings, Plant and Equipment, and
$0.16 from Accumulated Depreciation- Land, Buildings, Plant and Equipment.
2004
For every dollar of assets invested, $0.02 came from Cash and Marketable Securities, $0.09 from
Accounts Receivable, $0.58 from Inventories, $0.52 from Land, Buildings, Plant and Equipment, and
$0.21 from Accumulated Depreciation- Land, Buildings, Plant and Equipment. The findings from 5
consecutive years reveal that the decrease in Cash and Marketable Securities in the third operations was
due to the increase in Land, Buildings, Plant, and Equipment. Furthermore, the data also reveals the
increase in inventory every period that it constitutes already mostly of the assets.
2000
For every dollar of assets invested, it owes $0.08 to Short-term Bank Loans, $0.02 to Accounts Payable,
$0.01 to Accruals, $0.10 to Long-term Bank Loans, $0.27 to Mortgage, and $0.53 to its’ shareholders.
2001
For every dollar of assets invested, it owes $0.18 to Short-term Bank Loans, $0.01 to Accounts Payable,
$0.01 to Accruals, $0.12 to Long-term Bank Loans, $0.22 to Mortgage, and $0.45 to its’ shareholders.
2002
For every dollar of assets invested, it owes $0.14 to Short-term Bank Loans, $0.02 to Accounts Payable,
$0.01 to Accruals, $0.20 to Long-term Bank Loans, $0.27 to Mortgage, and $0.36 to its’ shareholders.
2003
For every dollar of assets invested, it owes $0.15 to Short-term Bank Loans, $0.02 to Accounts Payable,
$0.01 to Accruals, $0.19 to Long-term Bank Loans, $0.27 to Mortgage, and $0.35 to its’ shareholders.
2004
For every dollar of assets invested, it owes $0.15 to Short-term Bank Loans, $0.02 to Accounts Payable,
$0.01 to Accruals, $0.19 to Long-term Bank Loans, $0.27 to Mortgage, and $0.36 to its’ shareholders.
At the end of 2004, 64.37 % of total assets were financed with liabilities---up from 47.40% in 2000. This
change was largely due to an increase in Short-term Bank Loans and Long-term Bank Loans from 7.81 %
and 9.90 % of total assets in 2000 to 15.28 % and18.90 % respectively, in 2004. This increasing debt
levels becomes a concern on the part of Quickfix Auto Parts because of its profits and cash flows that are
not growing fast enough to cover the rising debt payments
Quickfix Auto Parts’ Common-sized Income Statement facilitates the comparison of accounts within the
Income Statement. The following are the findings of this analysis:
2000
For every dollar that Quickfix Auto Parts had sold, $0.80 was Cost of Goods Sold and only $0.20 was
Gross Profit. From that $0.20 of Gross Profit, $0.10 was Operating Expenses, $0.06 was Total Interest,
and $0.02 was Taxes, thus, yielding a Net Income of $.03 for every dollar that Quickfix Auto Parts had
sold.
2001
For every dollar that Quickfix Auto Parts had sold, $0.82 was Cost of Goods Sold and only $0.18 was
Gross Profit. From that $0.18 of Gross Profit, $0.07 was Operating Expenses, $0.05 was Total Interest,
and $0.02 was Taxes, thus, yielding a Net Income of $.04 for every dollar that Quickfix Auto Parts had
sold.
2002
For every dollar that Quickfix Auto Parts had sold, $0.84 was Cost of Goods Sold and only $0.16 was
Gross Profit. From that $0.16 of Gross Profit, $0.09 was Operating Expenses, $0.06 was Total Interest,
and $0.0018 was Taxes, thus, yielding a Net Income of $.0027 for every dollar that Quickfix Auto Parts
had sold.
2003
For every dollar that Quickfix Auto Parts had sold, $0.85 was Cost of Goods Sold and only $0.15 was
Gross Profit. From that $0.15 of Gross Profit, $0.13 was Operating Expenses, $0.05 was Total Interest,
and ($0.01) was Taxes, thus, incurring a Net Loss of $0.02 for every dollar that Quickfix Auto Parts had
sold.
2004
For every dollar that Quickfix Auto Parts had sold, $0.85 was Cost of Goods Sold and only $0.15 was
Gross Profit. From that $0.15 of Gross Profit, $0.10 was Operating Expenses, $0.05 was Total Interest,
and ($0.0001) was Taxes, thus, incurring a Net Loss of $0.0001 for every dollar that Quickfix Auto Parts
had sold.
The data for the past 5 years reveals that mostly of the sales were Cost of Goods Sold and only 15-20 %
are Gross Profit. This shows that the high figures in Cost of Goods Sold could be due to a number of
causes, including unexpected increases of cost of raw materials, and production inefficiencies. While
further analysis would be necessary to determine the exact cause of this change, common-size income
statement reveals the primary source of the drop in Net Income which is the rising Cost of Goods Sold as
a percentage of Net Sales.
Financial Ratios
A ratio greater than 1.0 implies liquidity. Therefore, based on the data in Figure 1, the current ratio of
Quickfix Auto Parts for the year 2000 is 6.38 which indicates that for every dollar of Current Liabilities,
the aforesaid business has a 6.38 Current Asset on hand. However, in 2001 the ratio fluctuates to 3.68. It
indicates that Quickfix Auto Parts has 3.68 of Current Assets on hand for every dollar of their Current
Liabilities. This range of ratio has been maintained for the next 3 consecutive years. Even though with
the declining of the aforementioned ratio in the past 4 years, the figures never fall less than one which is
a good indicator that the business has considerable Current Assets relative to its Current Liabilities. On
the contrary, most of its liquid assets were coming from its’ inventory which would imply that Quickfix
Auto Parts may not be efficiently managing its’ inventory, therefore, the management should be mindful
in some aspect like their inventory quality and asset utilization.
This ratio measures the number of times, on average; the inventory is sold during the period. Generally,
the faster the inventory turnover, the less cash a company has tied up in inventory, and the less chance
of inventory obsolescence. In the case of Quickfix Auto Parts during the 5 consecutive years of
operations, the number of times the inventory is sold annually range only between 1.31 – 1.99 times
which means that there are still many inventories that needs to be turned. This indicates that the
inventory is not being managed efficiently. Businesses need inventories to avoid loss sales opportunities;
however, on the part of Quickfix Auto Parts they could conform to the former approach but the
management should also adapt some ways to minimize inventory needs.
This ratio is used to assess the effectiveness of the Quickfix Auto Parts’ credit and collection policies. The
general rule is that the collection period should not greatly exceed the credit term period (the time
allowed for payment) in which case is not available in the data given for the case study. According to the
data presented, during the first 3 years of operations the receivables are collected less than 10 days
whereas for the past 2 years it took quite a long time to collect the money from their customers
compared from the former years. Even though the latter years’ Days Sales Outstanding Ratio are still
within the time frame of 30 – 90 days yet still Quickfix Auto Parts should not allow this to continually
climbed higher but instead find a way in converting it quickly into cash.
This ratio assesses the Quickfix Auto Parts’ Land, Buildings, Plant, and Equipment productivity and how
efficiently the business operates given its production technology. Based on the data presented, it reveals
that the business is efficiently utilizing its’ long term assets by means of increasing sales. For every dollar
that the fixed asset was utilized, it generates an increasing number of sales in the range of 1.95 – 3.38
for the last 5 years of operation. To continue to increase the Fixed Assets Turn Over Ratio of Quickfix
Auto Parts more, effective maintenance practices should be done.
This ratio measures how Quickfix Auto Parts efficiently uses its assets to generate sales. As presented on
Figure 6, in 2005 there is an increase in the productivity of the Total Assets compared from the past
years. Based on the data, it shows that for every dollar invested in assets 1.05 of Sales was produced.
Thus, the business is being efficient in generating revenues from its assets.
Findings about Total Debt to Total Assets For every dollar of asset, $0.47 was financed by liability in
2000, $0.55 in 2001, $0.64 in2002, $0.65 in 2003, and $0.64 in 2004. This indicates that there is an
increase in the percentage of assets being financed with liability in 2000 – 2004.
For every dollar of asset, $0.53 was financed with equity in 2000, $0.45 in 2001, $0.36in 2002, $0.35 in
2003, and $0.36 in 2004. This indicates that there is a decline in the percentage of assets being financed
with equity in 2000 – 2004.
Quickfix Auto Parts has more liabilities compared to its total shareholder’s equity for the past 5 years as
portrayed by its’ financial statements. Thus, most of the business financing comes from its’ creditors
which would also specify that the business is more on debt financing rather than equity financing.
Probably because of its declining performance in the last 3 years that it seek extra debt financing.
This ratio measures the ability of Quickfix Auto Parts to meet interest payments as they come due by
using the income before income taxes and interest expense. For every dollar of interest, the Quickfix
Auto Parts has a $1.79 in 2000, $2.06 in 2001, $1.07 in2002, $0.42 in 2003, and $1.00 in 2004 of income
before income taxes and interest expense to cover thereof. Thus, to compare in the previous years, in
2004 there is a decrease in the number of times the EBIT can cover its’ interest.
Based on the data presented, for the 5 consecutive years, Quickfix Auto Parts were able to maintain the
necessary days on which they need to repay the suppliers. This however indicates that the business was
not able to keep cash to itself for a longer period of time that could be instead invested in some other
productive purposes for a short period of time to earn interest (Borad, 2021).
Table 8. Profitability Ratio from Year 2000-2004
Based on the data presented, it reveals that for every dollar of sales, Quickfix Auto Parts generate a
Gross Profit of $0.20 in 2000, $0.18 in 2001, $0.16 in 2002, $0.15 in 2003,and $0.15 in 2004. This
indicates that the business has larger sales than its Gross Profit because of the deduction of Cost of
Goods Sold. This may imply that Quickfix Auto Parts is experiencing some difficulty in controlling their
cost.
Based on the data presented, it reveals that for every dollar of sales, Quickfix Auto Parts generate an
EBIT of $0.11 in 2000, $0.11 in 2001, $0.07 in 2002, $0.02 in 2003, and$0.05 in 2004. This indicates that
the business has larger sales than its EBIT, considering that interest and taxes are not deducted yet, this
may imply that Quickfix Auto Parts is experiencing some difficulty in controlling their cost.
During the first two years, Quickfix Auto Parts was able to maintain their ROA with a value of $.03 for
every dollar of Total Assets invested but there is a sudden drop in the succeeding years. This indicates
that the business encountered some difficulties in utilizing their assets from the year 2002 – 2004.
During the first two years, Quickfix Auto Parts was able to maintain their ROE with a value of $.05 and
$0.06 for every dollar of Total Assets invested but there is a sudden drop in the succeeding years. This
implies that the business encountered some difficulties in generating profit to fund their investors more
effectively from the year 2002– 2004.
The Equity Multiplier of Quickfix Auto Parts has been increasing for the last 5 years. This implies that the
business is starting to rely more on debt financing compared to equity financing.
DuPont Analysis
Table 9. DuPont Analysis from Year 2000-2004 (Source: Quickfix Auto Parts Annual Report: 2000-2004)
Quickfix Auto Parts ROA and ROE are currently negative because of the decline in the Profit Margin for
the last 3 years.
1. Based on the quantitative data, it is reveal that Quickfix Auto Parts is having a hard time in
managing their inventory. The sales continue to increase for the past5 years but the Net Income
were declining because of the Cost of Goods Sold that is reciprocating the increase of Sales. It is
also reveal in the Inventory Turnover Ratio that Quickfix Auto Parts are having a difficulty in
selling their inventory faster on an average period. With that, reducing inventory might be a
possible alternative to elevate the Net Income. This probable solution could be adapting some
asset utilization strategy like the Just-in-time process and Demand-pull production wherein, only
raw materials that are needed in the production line are acquired from the supplier and only
when final goods are demanded by customers that raw materials are released into the
production process. Furthermore, given with the cash situation, the business should be more
cautious when it comes to unexpected increase in inventories; they should limit first their
purchases until the older inventory are sold. In addition, Quickfix Auto Parts could also try to
assess their product cost and try to improve product design to eliminate costly features not
valued by customers to increase turnover.
2. In the Days Sales Outstanding Ratio and Receivable Turnover, it is revealed that for the last 2
years, the receivables collection period and number of times it is collected, rises and decline,
respectively. Given this data, the management should be mindful in their collection policy
especially with the current status of cash that more operating inflows are very necessary. It is to
be noted that extension of credit is an important tool in the marketing of products, often as
important as advertising and promotion but there are some methods available to speed up
collection from customers:
a. Assess the customers’ liquidity to whom the credit will be extended.
b. Negotiate advance or progress payments from customers.
c. Make sure products are sent as ordered to reduce disputes.
d. Improve the administration of past due accounts to provide for more timely notices of
delinquencies and better collection procedures.
3. Quickfix Auto Parts under quick ratio have now the difficulty of meeting its current liabilities.
Hence, extending the payments and negotiating with the suppliers for the short term liabilities
maybe an option for the circumstance but the management should be more focus and cautious
on the liability and be efficient with the operations to provide more cash inflows in the business
because possible risk might arise with the supplier if the payments is not meet within the
negotiable terms.
4. Fixed Assets Turn Over Ratio of Quickfix Auto Parts reveals the continuing increase of sales
generated for every fixed asset invested; thus, to continue to increase the aforementioned ratio
more, improvement of the efficiency of the fixed asset should be done. This would be possible
through effective maintenance practices of the aforesaid asset, proper assessment and
identification of unproductive and inefficient utilized assets and taking a step unto liquidating it
quickly, and focusing on increasing of sales.
5. In terms of the strong arguments that Quickfix Auto Parts’ needed to obtain a loan necessary for
its’ growth, they should consider on increasing their credit worthiness in terms of liquidity and
solvency by reducing inventory to generate operating cash inflows which is the main problem in
the declining of Net Income. Furthermore, they should also continue to increase sales by
utilizing assets efficiently, and improving collection policy to yield an improved credit worthiness
compared from the past 3 years. Based on the debt ratio and equity ratio, the former is
increasing while the latter is declining; hence, Quickfix Auto Parts should try to increase the
value of stocks by means of fundamental factors such as increasing the business earnings and
profitability from selling goods in order to recapitalize debt with stock in terms of the entity’s
ventures to investing activities in order to reduce debt and increase the solvency of the
business.