Case Study - Fake Accounts
Case Study - Fake Accounts
Case Study - Fake Accounts
headquartered in San Francisco, California with main offices throughout the country. By this point in
time many citizens have become familiar with the scandal that has occurred at Wells Fargo Bank;
however, the astonishing part of this scandal is that the company has acted fraudulently and unethically.
Recent reports as of late 2017 demonstrated that Wells Fargo now says that it has found a total of up to
3.5 million potential fake bank accounts and credit card accounts which is 1.4 million more than
originally estimated. Additionally, approximately 190,000 accounts received unnecessary fees which is
60,000 more than originally estimated. The unethical behavior does not end here. It has been found that
528,000 customers were enrolled in unauthorized online bill pay, and up to 570,000 borrowers were
forced into unnecessary auto insurance; about 20,000 of these customers potentially had their cars
repossessed due to these insurance costs. The primary motive behind the millions of fake accounts can
be traced all the way up to the CEO and higher-level management. John Stumpf, former CEO of Wells
during the time, and senior executives put tremendous sales pressure on the employees of Wells Fargo
setting a target for the creation of eight accounts per customer. This tremendous sales pressure was
forced upon lower-level employees at Wells Fargo resulting in the creation of millions of fake accounts
which was done out of a fear that the average employee would lose his or her job if the demands of
management were not met.
There have been key governmental actions against Wells Fargo since the fake account scandal has taken
place. First, the company has been fined $185 million. Secondly, there has been a growth cap placed on
Wells. The bank has dealt with the currently faces investigations as well as class action lawsuits. These
are steps in the right direction to mitigate the effects of Wells Fargo's actions; however, they are not
enough. Individuals who hold the most responsibility including John Stumpf and senior management
who oversaw the fraud must be appropriately indicted. While the employees as Wells who carried out
the actions hold some level of responsibility, the ultimate responsibility must be targeted at Stumpf and
high-level management, those individuals who essentially forced the employees and coached them to
continually open fake accounts in the names of Wells Fargo customers. When the statistics pertaining to
profit is analysed, the unethicality associated with this case becomes even more gruelling. John Stumpf
and top-level management profited millions because of the surged stock price during the scandal of fake
accounts.