Process Planning 2
Process Planning 2
Process Planning 2
ON COLUD COMPUTING
Janvi Kawtikwar1 , Swati Kesarwani1 , Vaishnavi Khedekar1 , Manoj Ghag2
1_
Student, 2_Assistant Professor
(Department of General Engineering, Usha Mittal Institute of Technology, SNDT Women’s University’s
Santacruz(W), Mumbai-49, India)
INTRODUCTION - Process planning is a crucial their manufacturing processes. This model involves
aspect of manufacturing that involves designing a centralized server that provides access to process
and optimizing the steps involved in producing a modeling, analysis, and optimization tools over the
product. It involves coordinating resources, internet, enabling businesses to collaborate on
identifying potential bottlenecks, and optimizing process planning in real-time. This model has
the production process to ensure maximum significant advantages over traditional process
efficiency and profitability. With the increasing planning approaches. It provides businesses with
complexity of manufacturing processes and the the flexibility and scalability needed to adapt to
growing demand for customized products, process changing market conditions and customer demands.
planning has become more challenging than ever. Additionally, it enables businesses to leverage
Cloud computing, on the other hand, has emerged advanced analytics capabilities to gain insights into
as a powerful technology that enables businesses to their manufacturing processes, identify potential
access virtualized resources over the internet, bottlenecks, and optimize their operations for
providing flexibility, scalability, and cost- maximum efficiency and profitability. In this
effectiveness. By leveraging cloud computing, context, the process planning service model design
businesses can reduce infrastructure costs, increase based on cloud computing offers a promising
operational efficiency, and gain access to advanced solution for businesses looking to improve their
analytics capabilities. The process planning service manufacturing processes and stay competitive in
model design based on cloud computing is a today's rapidly changing market.
promising approach that leverages the power of
cloud computing to enable businesses to optimize
CAD and the sharing of decentralized computing
resources became possible. Later on, web-based
Evolution of design and manufacturing systems CAD system based on the thin server–strong client
Engineering design architecture turned out to be hard to implement
because of the heavy-weighted client mechanism;
Engineering design is a social and technical process however, CAD systems based on the strong server–
in which products are designed by teams of people thin client architecture model are more effective
in single or multiple companies. Many researchers and efficient in distributed and collaborative
have proposed descriptive models that abstract the settings because of their light-weighted client
engineering design process. Among these models, mechanism [4–6]. One of the latest technological
one of the most widely known is perhaps the one advancements related to computer-aided product
proposed by Pahl and Beitz. It presents a development, often referred to as cloud-based
systematic engineering design approach including design (CBD), started to emerge at the beginning of
four core design phases: product planning and the 2010s. Because of the inherent characteristics
clarifying the task, conceptual design, embodiment of CBD systems as stated before based on cloud
design, and detail design [1]. Similarly, Ulrich and computing, virtualization, multi-tenancy,
Eppinger [2] introduce a more refined design ubiquitous access, software-as-a-service, pay-
process by incorporating prototype testing, peruse business model, and so on, it has the
refinement, and production ramp-up into the potential to become a game changer for the next
original Pahl and Beitz approach. Since these two generation distributed and collaborative design. In
well-accepted design approaches were first this paper, we focus on the system/tool-related
proposed and later on become common design aspects of engineering design as opposed to the
practice in industry, many similar models based on design process itself. A discussion of the potential
a similarly linear sequence of design phases have impact of CBD on the design process itself in the
been proposed. Interestingly, almost all of these broader context of social product development
models represent incremental variations or deserves a separate paper [5].
modifications of the before-mentioned two original
based models. In addition to systematic design Manufacturing systems
processes, product design also needs to be Similar to design systems, manufacturing systems
facilitated by computer-aided systems to assist have undergone a number of major transitions due
designers in the creation, analysis, and optimization to changing market demands and emerging
of a design. Design engineers have used Computer- technologies [3]. Table 3 shows a brief evolution of
Aided Design (CAD) systems to design products manufacturing paradigms from the assembly line,
since the 1960s. Table 2 briefly summarizes key to Toyota production systems (TPSs), to flexible
milestones of the evolution of computer-aided manufacturing systems (FMSs), to reconfigurable
design from centralized standalone systems, to manufacturing systems (RMSs), to web- and agent-
distributed web-based systems, and finally to CBD. based manufacturing systems, and finally to CBM.
It is argued that the first CAD system, For example, Henry Ford created the first assembly
SKETCHPAD, was developed at MIT by Ivan line, in which interchangeable parts can be added to
Sutherland in the early 1960s [2]. SKETCHPAD a product in a sequential manner to produce
was a centralized standalone system which finished products more efficiently and cost-
consisted of a large and at the time expensive effectively. In the 1960s, to reduce manufacturing
computer with 306 kilobytes of core memory, an costs, TPSs, also known as just-in-time production
oscilloscope display screen, a light pen for input, systems, were devised. TPSs are characterized by a
and a pen plotter for output [4]. The first number of principles that assist in eliminating
commercial applications of CAD systems were waste by reducing waiting time, inventory, and the
found in large enterprises, mainly in the automotive number of defective products. In the 1980s, to yield
and aerospace industries. Back then, those were the new product variants, FMSs were developed,
only ones who could afford and justify the allowing for a high degree of functional flexibility.
extremely high operation and maintenance costs of Specifically, the major advantage of an FMS is that
the early-day CAD systems. With the advancement it allows for variation in both parts and assemblies;
of computer hardware and geometric modeling, however, its implementation is usually costly.
CAD systems could be run on more affordable According to Koren et al., ‘‘in order to quickly
personal desktop computers and allowed for 3D adjust production capacity and functionality within
solid modeling. With the advancement of the a part family in response to sudden changes in
Internet and the client–server model, distributed market or in regulatory requirements,
reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs) are technology to enhance the efficiency and
designed at the outset for rapid change in structure, effectiveness of process planning.
as well as in hardware and software components’’ .
The key features of RMS include modularity,
integrability, customization, convertibility, and
diagnosability [1].
Fig-1 Fig-3
Fig-5
Fig-8
Fig-9
The following are some of the key features of a DATA ANALYTICS CAPABILITIES - Data
cloud-based process modeling and analysis tool: analytics capabilities refer to the ability of a system
1. Process modeling: The tool should allow users to or software to collect, process, analyze, and
create process models using a range of modeling interpret data in order to generate insights, identify
techniques such as flowcharts, activity diagrams, patterns, and make data-driven decisions. In the
and BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation) context of process planning service model design
diagrams. These models should be easy to create, based on cloud computing, data analytics
visualize, and modify, and should provide users
capabilities are crucial for optimizing business manufacturing process based on the insights
processes and improving operational efficiency. generated from the analysis. This helps to optimize
the process and improve operational efficiency.
Fig-10
Fig-11
The following are some of the key data analytics
capabilities that a process planning service model LIMITATION AND ASSUMPTIONS - The
should have: following are some of the limitations and
1. Data collection and integration: The model assumptions that could apply to a study on process
should be able to collect data from various sources planning service model design based on cloud
such as manufacturing equipment, sensors, and computing:
other data sources. The data should be integrated
into the model to provide a complete view of the
manufacturing process
3. Selection bias: The participants in the study may 3. Improved flexibility: Cloud computing
not be representative of the broader population, technology could provide greater flexibility in
which could limit the generalizability of the results. process planning service model design by enabling
organizations to quickly adapt to changing business
4. Assumptions about cloud computing: The study needs and customer demands.
may assume that cloud computing technology is
widely adopted and accessible, which may not be 4. Security concerns: The use of cloud computing
the case for all organizations. technology could raise security concerns around the
storage and management of sensitive data.
5. Technological limitations: The study may Organizations would need to implement
assume that the technology used for process appropriate security measures to address these
planning service model design based on cloud concerns.
computing is fully developed and functional, which
may not be the case in practice. 5. Adoption challenges: The adoption of cloud
computing technology could be challenging for
6. Environmental factors: The study may not some organizations due to factors such as limited
consider external factors such as economic, social, resources, lack of technical expertise, and
and political factors that could impact the design of resistance to change.
process planning service models based on cloud
computing.
Fig-13
CONCLUSION - Process planning is a critical The adoption of cloud computing technology can
component of manufacturing and production also be challenging for some organizations due to
processes that involves the design and optimization
factors such as limited resources, lack of technical REFRENCES –
expertise, and resistance to change. Organizations
need to carefully consider these factors and develop 1. Cloud computing made easy by Carly
strategies to overcome them when adopting cloud landis and dan blacharski
computing technology in their process planning 2. Cloud computing principles and
service model design processes. paradigms by wiely
3. https:///www.computerscijournal.org
Cloud computing technology has the potential to 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/h.promfg
transform process planning service model design 5. https://www.zvei.org
and help organizations to stay competitive in an
increasingly dynamic and complex business 6. Recent applications of internet of
environment. By embracing cloud computing things (iot) in manufacturing sector-a
technology and addressing the challenges review Muhammad Hafidz Fazli Md Fauadi,
associated with its adoption, organizations can Amis Abdullah Muhamad Damanhurt, Ruzy
unlock new opportunities for innovation, growth, HaryatiHamball, Ahamad Zaki Mohamed
and success. Noor, NurulIzah Anusr