Session 3 Amplifiers and Oscillators
Session 3 Amplifiers and Oscillators
Session 3 Amplifiers and Oscillators
This session highlights advances in state-of-the-art amplifiers and oscillators for several applications. The first three papers focus on improving
DR in a Class-D amplifier, lowering the noise and input current in a chopper-stabilized opamp and generating a single tone with the lowest THD
for ADC testing. RC oscillators achieve high accuracy with a high-resolution trimming and aging compensation scheme, and crystal oscillators
with reduced startup time and low energy, a wide acceptable injection clock frequency error, and low power sensitivity to temperature are
demonstrated. A PLL-less BAW-based oscillator with digital calibration achieves high frequency stability and low jitter.
1:30 PM
3.1 A 120.9dB DR, -111.2dB THD+N Digital-Input Capacitively-Coupled Chopper Class-D Audio Amplifier
Huajun Zhang, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
In Paper 3.1, Delft University of Technology and Goodix Technology present a digital-input capacitively-coupled Class-D amplifier.
It achieves 120.9dB DR and -111.2dB peak THD+N, and can deliver 13W/23W at 10% THD into an 8Ω/4Ω load with 90%/86%
efficiency.
2:00 PM
3.2 A Chopper-Stabilized Amplifier with a Relaxed Fill-In Technique and 22.6pA Input Current
Thije Rooijers, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, now at Broadcom, Bunnik, The Netherlands
In Paper 3.2, Delft University of Technology presents a chopper-stabilized amplifier with a relaxed fill-in technique. By introducing
a duty-cycled non-chopped fill-in OTA and a ripple reduction loop, this work achieves a 25× reduction in input current, while
achieving a flat noise floor of 12nV/√Hz.
2:15 PM
3.3 Bandpass Filter and Oscillator ICs with THD < -140dBc at 10Vppd for Testing High-Resolution ADCs
Subha Sarkar, Texas Instruments, Bangalore, India, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India
In Paper 3.3, Texas Instruments and IIT Madras present bandpass filter and oscillator ICs with a new-benchmark THD performance
at 10Vppd swing for testing high-resolution ADCs. It is achieved by incorporating capacitor nonlinearity cancellation and opamp
output conductance nonlinearity suppression techniques into an active-RC bandpass filter and oscillator.
2:30 PM
3.4 A 0.01mm2 10MHz RC Frequency Reference with a 1-Point On-Chip-Trimmed Inaccuracy of ±0.28% from
-45°C to 125°C in 0.18μm CMOS
Hui Jiang, Silicon Integrated, Eindhoven, The Netherlands 3
In Paper 3.4, Delft University of Technology, Silicon Integrated B.V. and Tsinghua University present a 0.01mm2 10MHz RC
frequency reference with high-resolution on-chip trimming of both its temperature coefficient and absolute frequency. This
work achieves a ±0.28% inaccuracy from −45°C to 125°C after 1-point trim.
3:15 PM
3.5 A 1.4μW/MHz 100MHz RC Oscillator with ±1030ppm Inaccuracy from -40°C to 85°C After Accelerated Aging
for 500 Hours at 125°C
Kyu-Sang Park, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
In Paper 3.5, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign presents a 100MHz RC oscillator in 65nm CMOS that achieves
±1030ppm frequency inaccuracy from -40°C to 85°C after accelerated aging for 500 hours at 125°C. This performance is
achieved with aging compensation by periodically locking the oscillator to a less-aged reference oscillator.
3:45 PM
3.6 A 12/13.56MHz Crystal Oscillator with Binary-Search-Assisted Two-Step Injection Achieving 5.0nJ Startup
Energy and 45.8µs Startup Time
Haihua Li, University of Macau, Macau, China
In Paper 3.6, the University of Macau and Instituto Superior Tecnico present a 12/13.56MHz crystal oscillator with 45.8μs
startup time and 5nJ startup energy. It is achieved by introducing binary-search-assisted frequency locking to a 2-step injection
method, implemented using a resettable fast-settling auxiliary DCO, edge aligner, frequency comparator, and control logic.
4:15 PM
3.7 A 16MHz XO with 17.5μs Startup Time Under 104ppm-ΔF Injection Using Automatic Phase-Error Correction
Technique
Xin Wang, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China
In Paper 3.7, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications and Hefei University present a 16MHz crystal oscillator in
40nm CMOS, which uses an automatic phase-error correction technique to achieve a 17.5μs startup time with an injection
clock frequency error of up to 104 ppm. The startup energy is 9.2nJ, and the startup time variation over temperature is ±4.5%.
4:30 PM
3.8 A 0.954nW 32kHz Crystal Oscillator in 22nm CMOS with Gm-C-Based Current Injection Control
Yihan Zhang, Peking University, Beijing, China
In Paper 3.8, Peking University and the Advanced Institute of Information Technology of Peking University present a crystal
oscillator with a Gm-C-based regulated current-injection technique, achieving very low power sensitivity to temperature of
0.017nW/°C.
4:45 PM
3.9 A 0.5-to-400MHz Programmable BAW Oscillator with Fractional Output Divider Achieving 4ppm Frequency
Stability over Temperature and <95fs Jitter
Subhashish Mukherjee, Texas Instruments, Bangalore, India
In Paper 3.9, Texas Instruments and IIT Madras present a 0.5-to-400MHz programmable BAW-based oscillator employing a
new temperature/supply-insensitive Dual-Slope Fractional Output Divider architecture. It achieves ±4ppm frequency stability
over -40°C to 85°C with <95fs rms phase jitter.
Class-D amplifiers (CDAs) are widely used in audio applications where a high power Unit-element mismatch within the two sub-DACs is addressed with real-time (RT) DEM
efficiency is required. As most audio sources are digital nowadays, implementing digital- [6], which produces no idle tones and achieves better SNDR at the chosen OSR (=19.2)
input CDAs results in higher levels of integration and lower cost. However, prior than data-weighted averaging (DWA). Furthermore, since the DAC elements are driven
open-loop digital-input CDAs suffer from high jitter sensitivity and output-stage by a PWM-like signal, their individual mismatch contribution is reduced at small input
distortion. In [1], jitter sensitivity at small signal levels is mitigated using a buck-boost levels as the dutycycle of their PWM inputs approaches 50%. With RTDEM, however,
converter that adaptively lowers the supply at the expense of extra external components code changes larger than 1 may cause nonlinear ISI [6], which will happen quite often
and reduced power efficiency. Prior closed-loop digital-input CDAs employing multi-bit since the DAC input is chopped. In this work, this source of nonlinearity is also eliminated
current-steering [2] or resistive [3] DACs are less sensitive to jitter, but their DR is limited by the DB. The timing control scheme to align RTDEM, DB, and chopping in both LV and
to about 115dB. DAC non-idealities and intermodulation distortion are also challenges, HV domains is shown in Fig. 3.1.3. A 49.92MHz (=65fS) master clock (MCLK) is
and prior works only achieved a peak THD+N of about −98dB [2,3]. This paper presents employed to define the DB and control the timing of RTDEM, where 1 MCLK cycle is
a digital-input CDA that achieves high DR by combining a low-noise capacitive DAC allocated to the DB and 64 cycles to RTDEM. The number of transitions in the remaining
(CDAC) with dedicated techniques to mitigate DAC mismatch, ISI, and intermodulation time is signal-independent and thus distortion-free. RTDEM is realized using a cyclic
distortion. A prototype implemented in a 0.18μm BCD process achieves 120.9dB DR and shift register that loads thermometer-coded input data in parallel, which is then rotated
−111.2dB peak THD+N. Furthermore, it can deliver 13W/23W at 10% THD into an 8Ω/4Ω to ensure that every DAC element is used equally outside the DB. Since the CDA has a
load with a 90%/86% efficiency. nominal full-scale output of ±14.4V, the feedback chopper is realized with LDMOS
switches that must be driven through level shifters, which have ~2ns delay. To avoid
To avoid the thermal and/or 1/f noise of current-steering or resistive DACs, a CDAC can high-voltage transients, timing skew between the feedback chopper and DAC is
be used to drive a closed-loop CDA based on the capacitively-coupled chopper-amplifier minimized using a replica level shifter [4]. As a result, the DAC code transition (φDAC),
(CCCA) topology presented in [4]. Potential intermodulation between the DAC output HV, and LV chopping transitions (φCHHV and φCHLV) are aligned and fully covered by the
waveform, which contains DAC images around multiples of fS as well as shaped DB.
quantization noise, and the various chopping and PWM tones must then be carefully
mitigated. Figure 3.1.1 (top) shows an architectural overview of this capacitively-coupled The capacitively-coupled digital-input CDA is prototyped in a 0.18μm BCD process and
chopper digital-input CDA. A 24-bit digital input is up-sampled to fS=768kHz (16×48kHz), occupies an area of 7.5mm2 (Fig. 3.1.7). An Audio Precision APx555 audio signal analyzer
reduced to 8 bits by a 6th-order digital ΔΣ modulator (DSM1), and then converted into provides the 24-bit digital input and captures the CDA output. For flexibility, the
the analog domain by a CDAC. The latter drives a closed-loop CDA with an embedded interpolation filter and digital DSMs are implemented in an FPGA. The RTDEM and timing
CCCA front-end, a 14.4V 3-level PWM-based output stage, and feedback after the LC logic (Fig. 3.1.3) is implemented on-chip and consumes about 460μW from a 1.8V
filter, enabling low noise and suppressing LC filter nonlinearity [4]. To compensate for supply. Figure 3.1.4 (top) plots the output spectrum when the CDA drives an 8Ω load
the LC filter’s phase shift, the loop filter must implement at least one zero, which with a −10dBFS sinewave input at 1kHz, corresponding to 1W of output power. The
inevitably causes some overshoot in its response to DAC transitions. At large signal measured THD+N is −108.6dB. The output spectrum at −60dBFS is shown in Fig. 3.1.4
levels, this will saturate the output stage and thus reduce the CDA’s linear output range. (bottom), where an SNR of 60.9dB is achieved, indicating that this CDA has a DR of
To keep the overshoot small, an 8-bit DAC is used, resulting in only a 0.5dB loss in the 120.9dB. Figure 3.1.5 (top) shows the measured THD+N across output power for a 1kHz
CDA’s linear output range. Together with DSM1, the DAC achieves an SQNR of 136dB, input. The peak THD+N is −111.2dB and −106.6dB for 8Ω load and 4Ω load, respectively.
a maximum stable amplitude (MSA) of 0.99FS, and a signal-to-jitter-noise ratio (SJNR) The output power at 10% THD is 13W and 23W for 8Ω load and 4Ω load, respectively.
of 131.5dB when driven by a 768kHz clock with 100ps of white clock jitter. Figure 3.1.5 (bottom) plots the THD+N vs. input frequency.
Chopping mitigates the CDA’s 1/f noise and is performed at fCHOP=fS/2 to exploit the Figure 3.1.6 compares the performance of this work with other state-of-the-art digital-
spectral nulls in the shaped quantization noise at multiples of fS and, thus, avoid noise input CDAs. It is the only capacitively-coupled digital-input CDA. Compared to other
folding. As shown in Fig. 3.1.1 (bottom), the chopping and DAC input transitions are high-voltage (>10V) CDAs, it achieves the best peak THD+N (14B lower than [3]), the
aligned. After each transition, the CCCA will slew briefly before settling. To eliminate the highest dynamic range (5.4dB higher than [3]), and the lowest A-weighted integrated
resulting nonlinearity and DAC ISI, a dead-band (DB) is introduced, which starts just output noise (2× lower than [3]).
before the chopping and DAC code transitions. During the DB, the CCCA is briefly
disconnected from the rest of the loop filter. However, the resulting sample-and-hold Acknowledgement:
operation also folds down (thermal) noise around integer multiples of fS. A 20ns DB is The authors would like to thank Z. Chang, L. Pakula, and R. van Puffelen from the Delft
chosen as a compromise between CCCA settling and noise folding. The loop filter output University of Technology for measurement assistance.
is re-modulated by a 3-level analog PWM modulator switching at fPWM=4.992MHz, which
is an odd (13th) harmonic of fCHOP. This avoids intermodulation distortion between the References:
chopping and PWM sidebands [4]. However, this also means that fPWM (=6.5fS) is not [1] W. H. Sun et al., “A 121dB DR, 0.0017% THD+N, 8× Jitter-Effect Reduction Digital-
located at a multiple of fS, so some quantization noise folding will occur. Fortunately, the Input Class-D Audio Amplifier with Supply-Voltage-Scaling Volume Control and
quantization noise around fPWM is attenuated by the sinc roll-off of the DAC spectrum Series-Connected DSM,” ISSCC, pp. 486-487, Feb. 2022.
and the lowpass characteristics of the CDA’s STF, so the folded noise is negligible [2] A. Matamura et al., “An 82mW ΔΣ-Based Filter-Less Class-D Headphone Amplifier
(< −150dBFS). with -93dB THD+N, 113dB SNR and 93% Efficiency,” ISSCC, pp. 432-433, Feb. 2021.
[3] E. Cope et al., “A 2×20W 0.0013% THD+N Class-D Audio Amplifier with Consistent
To reduce the complexity of the DEM scheme needed to achieve high linearity, the 8-bit Performance up to Maximum Power Level,” ISSCC, pp. 56-57, Feb. 2018.
DAC is segmented. As shown in Fig. 3.1.2, the input of the MSB segment (D1) is produced [4] H. Zhang et al., “A 121.4dB DR, -109.8dB THD+N Capacitively-Coupled Chopper
by a second digital modulator (DSM2), while the LSB segment is driven by the shaped Class-D Audio Amplifier,” ISSCC, pp. 484-485, Feb. 2022.
quantization error (D2) [5]. Ideally, no input-related content should be present in D2 such [5] R. Adams et al., “A 113 dB SNR Oversampling DAC with Segmented Noise-Shaped
that the gain mismatch of the two DAC segments contributes only shaped noise. In [2,5], Scrambling,” IEEE JSSC, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1871-1878, Dec. 1998.
a 1st-order DSM is used, which could produce idle tones at small signal levels, leading [6] S. -H. Wen et al., “A -117dBc THD (-132dBc HD3) and 126dB DR Audio Decoder
to harmonic content in D2. The gain mismatch between the segments will then allow with Code-Change-Insensitive RT-DEM Algorithm and Circuit Technique for Relaxing
some of this content to leak into the output. In this work, a 2nd-order DSM is used to Velocity Saturation Effect of Poly Resistors,” ISSCC, pp. 482-483, Feb. 2022.
alleviate the idle tone issue. This also reduces quantization noise leakage by about 20dB
compared to a 1st-order DSM2. A 2-bit overlap is introduced between the 2 segments to
accommodate the extra swing caused by the shaped quantization noise of DSM2. D1 and
D2 thus drive two sub-DACs with 8× and 1× weights, respectively. The (digitally) chopped
DAC output DINφCHVREF is applied to a CCCA, which forms the loop filter’s error amplifier.
Figure 3.1.1: Architecture of the proposed capacitively-coupled digital-input Figure 3.1.2: Simplified schematic of the 8-bit CDAC with noise-shaped segmentation
Class-D audio amplifier. and the capacitively-coupled summing node of the loop filter.
Figure 3.1.3: (top) Timing control circuitry of the CDAC, RTDEM, and chopping, and
(bottom) its timing diagram (for a 9-level sub-DAC, the actual implementation uses
two 33-level sub-DACs). Figure 3.1.4: Measured output spectra (256k-point FFT, 4× averaged).
Figure 3.1.5: Measured THD+N (top) at 1kHz across output power, and (bottom) Figure 3.1.6: Performance summary and comparison with state-of-the-art monolithic
across input frequency. high-voltage (>10V) digital-input CDAs.
Figure 3.2.1: Fill-in implementation with two chopped OTAs and multiplexing
switches (top left), the chopping signals and the resulting output current with spikes Figure 3.2.2: Simplified block diagram of the proposed Chopper-Stabilized
(bottom) and the timing diagram for two implementations of multiplexing (top right). Operational Amplifier.
Figure 3.2.3: Voltage noise density vs frequency (top left) and input current vs input Figure 3.2.4: Measured amplitude spectrum (10 Averages) with a single-tone test
voltage (top right). Histogram of the offset and input current at 2.5V for 15 samples for Fin = 79kHz (Top) and Fin = 39kHz (bottom) without and with fill-in (left & right
(bottom). respectively).
Figure 3.2.5: Two-tone test all in a non-inverting buffer configuration for un-chopped
(top left), chopped without fill-in (top right) and chopped with fill-in (bottom right).
Power breakdown (bottom left). Figure 3.2.6: Performance summary and comparison with previous works.
Figure 3.3.5:, Measured output spectrum and performance summary of the Sixth- Figure 3.3.6: Oscillator schematic, measured output spectrum and performance
order BPF. summary.
Figure 3.4.3: Temperature sensitivity and hysteresis of the frequency reference (112 Figure 3.4.4: Averaged frequency of 112 samples before and after aging (top) and
samples). Transient response after VCTRL reset (bottom).
Additional References:
[7] P. Park et al., “A Thermistor-Based Temperature Sensor for a Real-Time Clock
with ± 2 ppm Frequency Stability,” IEEE JSSC, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1571-1580, July
2015.
[8] A. Andrei et al., “Reliability Study of AlTi/TiW, Polysilicon and Ohmic Contacts for
Piezoresistive Pressure Sensors Applications,” IEEE SENSORS, pp. 1125-1128, May
2004.
[9] Microchip Technology Inc., “AN8002 - AVR055: Using a 32kHz XTAL for Run-
Time Calibration of the Internal RC,” [Online]. Available:
https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/Appnotes/doc8002.pdf.
Accessed Sept. 2022.
Given the forgoing drawbacks, we present a temperature- and aging-compensated RC A prototype TACO, with the flexibility to use p-poly, n-poly, and via resistors as the
oscillator (TACO) in which the long-term drift of the main oscillator is compensated by reference resistors, was fabricated in a 65nm CMOS process and packaged in a plastic
periodically locking its frequency to that of the less-aged reference oscillator (see Fig. QFN package. The measured aging behavior is summarized in Fig. 3.5.4. The long-term
3.5.1). The main and reference oscillators are identical except that the reference oscillator frequency drift of the always-on n-poly-based TCO is significantly higher than when it is
is heavily duty-cycled to prevent it from aging. TACO’s salient features include (i) duty-cycled (0.1%), indicating that duty-cycling reduces the aging effect. Similar behavior
resistors with higher activation energy (Ea), such as the n-poly or metal type, that have was also observed for VIA-resistor-based TCOs. Given these learnings, R0 and R1 in main
a longer lifetime based on Black’s model [4], (ii) switched dual RC-branches to reduce and reference TCOs were implemented using n-poly and VIA resistors, respectively. After
the stress caused by DC-current-induced electromigration (EM) [5], and (iii) duty-cycling two-point trim at 85°C and -40°C, an accelerated aging test was performed. The results
to slow down the aging rate of the reference oscillator used to calibrate the main oscillator obtained from 11 samples are shown on the right in Fig. 3.5.4. The always-on main TCO
[6]. Thanks to these key innovations, the prototype oscillator achieves better than is compensated by locking its frequency to a 0.1% duty-cycled reference TCO at one-
±1030ppm inaccuracy after it is subjected to accelerated aging, representing more than hour intervals. After 500 hours of aging at 125°C, the frequency inaccuracy of
3.2× improvement compared to the uncompensated oscillator. uncompensated main TCOs degrades by 740ppm. With compensation, the degradation
is only 230ppm, and the inaccuracy over -40°C to 85°C including aging effects is
Figure 3.5.2 shows the details of the proposed architecture. It comprises two RC
±1030ppm. The aging test is also performed when R0 of the main TCOs is implemented
branches (R0C0/R1C1), a GM−C integrator, a voltage-controlled ring oscillator (VCRO), a
using a p-poly resistor, and the results are shown in Fig. 3.5.5. This test provides a fair
divider, differential voltage DACs (VDACs), a phase generator, and a ΔΣ modulator. The
comparison to the state-of-the-art, as a majority of the reported TCOs used p-poly
VCRO clock is divided by N (=25) and fed to the phase generator, which generates clocks
resistors [1,2]. After 500 hours of aging, the inaccuracy of uncompensated main TCOs
ΦCHG, ΦRST, ΦBUF, and ΦINT. These clock phases are used to control the switching
sequence in the RC branch such that the difference between the track-and-held voltage degrades by 3450ppm. With compensation, the degradation is reduced to 410ppm. The
VRC generated from the RC branch and VREF provided by VDAC represents the error measured output period jitter and Allan deviation are 5.1psrms and 8.1ppm, respectively
between the desired and VCRO (FOUT) frequencies. The error voltage (VERR) is integrated (see Fig. 3.5.5). Figure 3.5.6 summarizes the performance of the TACO and compares it
by the integrator and used to drive the VCRO toward the frequency lock. The ΔΣ to state-of-the-art RC oscillators. The proposed TACO achieves a power efficiency of
modulator generates mux-select signal SEL that enables path0 (R0C0 branch/VDAC0) when 1.4μW/MHz and a frequency inaccuracy comparable to the state-of-the-art even in the
SEL=0 and path1 (R1C1 branch/VDAC1) when SEL=1 to perform temperature presence of aging. The die micrograph is shown in Fig. 3.5.7, and the active area is
compensation, as described later. TACO operates in four phases, illustrated by the 0.22mm2.
waveforms depicted in Fig. 3.5.2. Starting with SEL=0 and ΦCHG=0, C0 is reset to VDD Acknowledgement:
during the first phase (ΦRST=1). In the second phase (ΦBUF=1), which lasts for TP=N/FOUT The authors thank Stefano Pietri, John Pigott and Domenico Liberti of NXP and Danielle
duration, C0 discharges to VRC0,DCHG= VDD∙ exp(-TP/R0C0). If FOUT is higher than the desired Griffith of Texas Instruments for useful discussion and critical feedback. This work was
output frequency, then VRC (=VRC0,DCHG)>VREF (=α0VDD), and vice versa. The third phase supported by Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC) under GRC TASK 2810.036.
provides time for the redistribution of the charge stored in the resistor’s parasitic
capacitor. In the final phase (ΦINT=1), VERR is integrated for TP duration, producing VCRO’s References:
control voltage, VC. In the next cycle with ΦCHG=1, C0 is reset to VSS, allowed to charge [1] K.-S. Park et al., “A Second-Order Temperature Compensated 1μW/MHz 100MHz RC
up for TP, reaching VRC0,CHG=(1-exp(-TP/R0C0))VDD, and VERR (=VRC0,CHG-(1-α0)VDD) is Oscillator with ±140ppm Inaccuracy from -40°C to 95°C,” IEEE CICC, pp. 1-2, Apr. 2021.
integrated for TP duration. Alternating between resetting C0 to VDD and VSS reverses the [2] Ç. Gürleyük et al., “A 16MHz CMOS RC Frequency Reference with ±90ppm Inaccuracy
current direction in R0, reducing EM-induced stress and improving long-term stability from -45°C to 85°C,” IEEE JSSC, pp. 2429-2437, Aug. 2022.
compared to when the current only flows in one direction. In the steady state, the [3] S. Jose et al., “Reliability of Integrated Resistors and the Influence of WLCSP Bake,”
feedback loop forces VRC0,DCHG=α0VDD and VRC0,CHG=(1-α0)VDD, resulting in IEEE IIRW, pp. 69-72, Oct. 2016.
FOUT=FOUT0=N/(R0C0ln(1/α0)). Assuming the TC and aging of C0 and α0 are negligible, the [4] J. Gambino, “BEOL Reliability for More-Than-Moore Devices,” IEEE IPFA, pp. 1-7,
frequency TC is entirely determined by the TC and aging properties of R0. To compensate July 2018.
for R0’s TC, an R1C1 branch with a different TC is added. When SEL=1, path1 is [5] E. I. Cole et al., “OBIC Analysis of Stressed, Thermally-Isolated Polysilicon Resistors,”
selected, and the four-phase operation described earlier ensues, resulting in IEEE IRPS, pp. 234-243, Apr. 1995.
Figure 3.5.1: RC oscillator aging with a p-poly resistor, proposed aging calibration
scheme, and FLL-based TCO architecture. Figure 3.5.2: Detailed TCO architecture and two-point trimming scheme.
Figure 3.5.4: Measured frequency drift of a TCO using n-poly resistors when always-
Figure 3.5.3: Details of key building blocks: On-chip aging calibration logic, GM-C on and with 0.1% duty-cycle (left); frequency inaccuracy of main TCOs using n-poly
integrator, and VDAC. and VIA resistors before and after aging (right).
Figure 3.5.5: Measured frequency inaccuracy of main TCOs using p-poly and VIA
resistors before and after aging (left) and output clock performance (right). Figure 3.5.6: Performance summary and comparison to state-of-the-art.
Additional References:
[6] C. Kendrick et al., “Polysilicon Resistor Stability Under Voltage Stress for Safe-
Operating Area Characterization,” IEEE IRPS, pp. P-RT.4-1 to P-RT.4-5, Mar. 2018.
[7] Y. Ji et al., “A Second-Order Temperature-Compensated On-Chip R-RC Oscillator
Achieving 7.93ppm/°C and 3.3pJ/Hz in -40°C to 125°C Temperature Range,” ISSCC,
pp. 64-65, Feb. 2022.
[8] H. Jiang et al., “A 0.14mm2 16MHz CMOS RC Frequency Reference with a 1-Point
Trimmed Inaccuracy of ±400ppm from -45°C to 85°C,” ISSCC, pp. 436-437, Feb. 2021.
[9] A. Khashaba et al., “A 34µW 32MHz RC Oscillator with ±530ppm Inaccuracy from
-40°C to 85°C and 80ppm/V Supply Sensitivity Enabled by Pulse-Density Modulated
Resistors,” ISSCC, pp. 66-67, Feb. 2020.
Figure 3.6.1: The proposed fast-startup XO innovates a binary-search-assisted two- Figure 3.6.2: Block diagram of the proposed fast-startup XO and its timing waveform.
step injection. After the 1st injection raises iM in (i), the system calibrates the DCO A state machine counting the clock pulses from the DCO without external control
using the XO’s signal in (ii), and injects the signal with tuned and accurate fINJ again (except ENXO, the enabling of XO) regulates the entire operation, rendering the XO
in (iii) to expedite the process to steady state (iv). autonomous.
Figure 3.6.3: Detailed block diagram of the edge aligner and frequency comparator
with their operation sequences (top). Jitters from each block, simulated probability Figure 3.6.4: Schematic of the DCO with the delay cell (top) and the layout of the
distribution of 6-/8-bit DC with jitter (100k runs), and the average probability of final sandwich capacitor (bottom right). The replica NAND gate U6 and CC facilitate the
Δf>500ppm for different number of bits (bottom). settling of the DCO frequency after each reset (bottom left).
Figure 3.6.5: Measured transient frequency on VPO (top left), the associated error
between fDCO during 2nd injection and fXO of 49 runs (top right), the startup current
profile (bottom left), and ts over the temperature (bottom right). Figure 3.6.6: Performance summary and comparison to the prior art.
Figure 3.6.7: Die micrograph (left) and simulated breakdown of ES of the 13.56MHz
XO (right), with 35.7% of energy delivered to the crystal core, illustrating the energy
efficiency of the proposed fast-startup XO.
Figure 3.7.1: Motional current envelopes of the 16MHz crystal for different ΔF (top
left). Simplified block diagram of the proposed XO (top right). Transient waveform Figure 3.7.2: Block diagram of the proposed XO and details of Johnson Counter and
of XOOUT for different Δφ using APEC technique (bottom). Peak detector.
Figure 3.7.5: Startup measurement results of the conventional injection and this
work. Start-up time over temperature at ΔF=104 ppm (top). Start-up time sensitivity
to ΔF (bottom). Figure 3.7.6: Performance summary and comparison with prior arts [1-5].
Figure 3.7.7: Environment setup and Die micrograph (top). Energy consumption
(bottom).
Figure 3.8.1: Challenges in pulse-injection XOs and the top-level schematic of this Figure 3.8.2: Schematic of the Gm-C-based clock-slicer (with simulated frequency
work. response) (top), the PTAT current source, and the VCMSET generator (bottom).
Figure 3.8.3: Schematic and simulation results of the amplitude regulator, which Figure 3.8.4: Measured power and frequency deviation across different temperatures
includes two gm-C-cell-based current integrators. (with VDD=0.46V) (left) and supply voltage VDD (with temperature = 25°C) (right).
Figure 3.8.5: Measured power and frequency deviation across different VAMPSET
(top), and measured Allan deviation (bottom). Figure 3.8.6: Comparison with the state-of-the-art low power XOs.
Figure 3.9.1: Functional block diagram and Oscillator stacked dies. Figure 3.9.2: BAW oscillator core (left), Peak detector (right).
Figure 3.9.3: Fractional Output Divider (FOD) architecture with Relaxation Oscillator Figure 3.9.4: Frequency control scheme and measured frequency change for 1°C/min
loop for INL correction. temperature ramp.
Figure 3.9.5: Measured PN/Jitter for 156.25MHz (top left) and 400MHz outputs (top
right), and measured INL pre- and post-correction (bottom). Figure 3.9.6: Comparison table.