Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Assessment Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Quyen Huong Vinh
    The document provides several rubrics for evaluating presentations, writing, products, and self/peer participation. The presentation rubric rates aspects like organization, explanation, body language, visual aids, and response to questions on a scale of 1 to 5. The writing rubric evaluates ideas, organization, word choice, sentence fluency, and conventions on a scale of 1 to 3. The product rubric rates goal achievement, creativity, aesthetics, effort, and overall quality from 1 to 5. Finally, the self/peer assessment rubric allows rating peers on a 1 to 5 scale for contribution to tasks, feedback, effort, and overall helpfulness.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Assessment Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Quyen Huong Vinh
    11 views5 pages
    The document provides several rubrics for evaluating presentations, writing, products, and self/peer participation. The presentation rubric rates aspects like organization, explanation, body language, visual aids, and response to questions on a scale of 1 to 5. The writing rubric evaluates ideas, organization, word choice, sentence fluency, and conventions on a scale of 1 to 3. The product rubric rates goal achievement, creativity, aesthetics, effort, and overall quality from 1 to 5. Finally, the self/peer assessment rubric allows rating peers on a 1 to 5 scale for contribution to tasks, feedback, effort, and overall helpfulness.

    Original Title

    Assessment rubrics

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides several rubrics for evaluating presentations, writing, products, and self/peer participation. The presentation rubric rates aspects like organization, explanation, body language, visual aids, and response to questions on a scale of 1 to 5. The writing rubric evaluates ideas, organization, word choice, sentence fluency, and conventions on a scale of 1 to 3. The product rubric rates goal achievement, creativity, aesthetics, effort, and overall quality from 1 to 5. Finally, the self/peer assessment rubric allows rating peers on a 1 to 5 scale for contribution to tasks, feedback, effort, and overall helpfulness.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    11 views5 pages

    Assessment Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Quyen Huong Vinh
    The document provides several rubrics for evaluating presentations, writing, products, and self/peer participation. The presentation rubric rates aspects like organization, explanation, body language, visual aids, and response to questions on a scale of 1 to 5. The writing rubric evaluates ideas, organization, word choice, sentence fluency, and conventions on a scale of 1 to 3. The product rubric rates goal achievement, creativity, aesthetics, effort, and overall quality from 1 to 5. Finally, the self/peer assessment rubric allows rating peers on a 1 to 5 scale for contribution to tasks, feedback, effort, and overall helpfulness.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    Presentation rubric

    https://my.pblworks.org/resources
    Rate the presentation in 5 scales:

    5 – Excellent 4 – Good 3 – Average 2 – Poor 1 – Very poor

    Descriptors

    Criteria 1 2 3 4 5

    1. Organization

    2. Explanation of ideas and information

    3. Eyes and Body language

    4. Voice

    5. Visual aids

    6. Response to audience questions

    7. Participation in team presentation

    Writing rubric
    https://www.aur.edu/sites/default/files/University-Writing-Rubric-Approved-by-
    Curriculum-Committee-Feb-2010.pdf
    Rate the writing in 3 scales:

    3 – Good 2 – Average 1 – Poor

    Criteria Descriptors

    1 2 3

    Ideas and Few details and no Some interesting ideas Fascinating topic
    content new information with rich ideas
    and clear focus

    Organization No beginning, middle Missing some transitions A clear


    and end and no and some ideas are out beginning, middle
    transitions of order and end with
    good transitions

    Word choice Your words aren’t Still need and add more Vivid description
    helping me to see and description and be more language. I can
    feel what you are specific see what you are
    describing writing.

    Sentence Sentences are all the Need more variation of Varied and
    fluency same length and lack sentence length and interesting
    interest, all starting patterns. sentences that
    the same way. begin in diverse
    ways.

    Convention Lots of error that it Some mistakes Correct spelling,


    hard to read grammar and
    punctuation

    Product rubric
    Rate the product in 5 scales:
    5 – Excellent 4 – Good 3 – Average 2 – Poor 1 – Very poor

    Descriptors
    Criteria
    1 2 3 4 5
    5. Goal-based
    (How the product meets the goal)
    2. Creativity
    (How imaginative and creative the designers
    are)
    3. Aesthetics
    (How beautiful and attractive the product is)
    4. Effort
    (How much effort I can feel the designer put on
    this)

    Self and peer assessment rubric


    https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=cehsgpirw
    Rate your participation on a scale of 1-5 (points)
    1 2 3 4 5
    5 – Excellent 4 – Good 3 – Average 2 – Poor 1 – Very poor
    Rank your peer participation.
    5 – Excellent 4 – Good 3 – Average 2 – Poor 1 – Very poor
    Remember, all other grades for this project are group grades so if you don’t feel as
    though a person contributed enough, this is the place to inform me.
    Peer names and items for making Descriptors
    assessment

    Peer name: 1 2 3 4 5

    1. Helped with idea development and


    problem solving

    2. Gave positive (rather than negative)


    comments or suggestions.

    3. Accepted positive comments or


    suggestions

    4. Gave best effort in helping with the project

    5. Overall: Was helpful and positive

    Peer name: 1 2 3 4 5

    1. Helped with idea development and


    problem solving

    2. Gave positive (rather than negative)


    comments or suggestions.

    3. Accepted positive comments or


    suggestions

    4. Gave best effort in helping with the project

    5. Overall: Was helpful and positive

    Peer name: 1 2 3 4 5

    1. Helped with idea development and


    problem solving
    2. Gave positive (rather than negative)
    comments or suggestions.

    3. Accepted positive comments or


    suggestions

    4. Gave best effort in helping with the project

    5. Overall: Was helpful and positive

    Peer name: 1 2 3 4 5

    1. Helped with idea development and


    problem solving

    2. Gave positive (rather than negative)


    comments or suggestions.

    3. Accepted positive comments or


    suggestions

    4. Gave best effort in helping with the project

    5. Overall: Was helpful and positive

    Other comments:

    …………………………………………………………………………………………

    …………………………………………………………………………………………

    …………………………………………………………………………………………

    …………………………………………………………………………………………

    …………………………………………………………………………………………

    You might also like