White Paper

Powering Automotive Cockpit Electronics

Introduction
The growth of automotive cockpit electronics has exploded over the past decade. Previously, self-contained
systems such as steering, braking, traction, and other safety devices, along with entertainment equipment
and navigation aids, have evolved into integrated infotainment systems, increasingly overlaid with advanced
driver assistance systems (ADAS). The latter in particular have become the latest consumer “must-have” and
a point of differentiation that’s helping car salesmen ratchet the buyer up the price ladder. And the evolution
doesn’t stop here; these systems are the first stepping-stones toward driverless cars.

What differentiates these much more sophisticated systems is the processing power they employ. For
example, smart forward looking cameras use DSPs to analyze their images, while infotainment head units
and instrument cluster displays feature GPUs, SOCs and FPGAs to implement specific functions.

All of these processors, logic devices, memory and interface circuits demand point-of-load (POL) power at
ever-lower voltages and higher currents. Figure 1 shows an electronic control unit’s typical power tree. The
car battery commonly specifies a full operation range from 9V to 18V, with short transients that can exceed
40V and dip below 5V DC. The varying load needs of entry level to luxury cars require flexible solutions
provided by secondary rail POL buck regulators that can deliver higher current power supply regulation at
lower voltages.

There are many different ways to implement a buck regulator. In order to determine which solution delivers
the performance and features needed for a given requirement, it is important for system designers to
understand the architectural choices that lie behind the various IC designs. This article examines the
asynchronous buck versus synchronous buck configuration. It also reviews the tradeoffs between the N-
channel or P-channel transistors used for the switches in a synchronous buck configuration. A family of fully
optimized 3A, 4A and 5A sync buck regulators is highlighted, and their wettable flank thin quad flat no-lead
(WFQFN) package is examined.

Figure 1. Typical automotive power supply architecture

The Asynchronous Buck Regulator

As can be seen in Figure 2, the asynchronous buck DC/DC converter has one switch (S1) that is driven on
and off to control the duty cycle ratio. The circuit includes a diode that acts as a secondary switch when the

White Paper—Automotive POL Regulator Requirements Page 1 of 6

potential across it causes forward biasing. When switch S1 is on, the input voltage is connected to the
inductor, causing current to build up in the inductor until switch S1 is shut off. When S1 is switched off, the
current flowing through the switch to the inductor is interrupted.

Figure 2. Asynchronous buck implementation

However, due to the nature of the inductor, the current flowing through it wants to continue flowing in the
same direction. For this to happen, the voltage polarity across the inductor changes, allowing the current to
flow through in the same direction. When this occurs, the diode is forward biased, allowing the pass through
current. Regulation of the output voltage is performed by feedback (not shown in Figure 2) to control the
duty cycle of switch S1.

The Synchronous Buck Regulator

The synchronous buck DC/DC converter is illustrated in Figure 3. In this configuration, the diode is replaced
with a switch. The switch is a FET, which is designed to have very low on-resistance (RDSon) that allows the
FET switch to exhibit lower voltage drop when current flows through it. This results in the circuit having much
higher efficiency in comparison to when a diode is used. For example, if the average current in the system is
5A, the power loss in the diode would be 0.5 volts x 5A = 2.5 watts (this assumes a Schottky diode with a
forward voltage of 0.5 volts at 5A), versus 5A x 5A x 0.011 ohms = 0.275 watts with a transistor having
11 mohm of on-resistance. The transistor achieves better than a 9x reduction in power dissipation.

However, with switch-2 integrated onto the die, the S2 losses will be on the die. This will require better
thermal design of the die, but the overall improvement in efficiency will result in less total heat generated.
The die will require more silicon area when switch S2 and its drive circuitry are included, but this will reduce
the board area and component count since the external diode is no longer required.

Figure 3. Synchronous buck implementation

White Paper—Automotive POL Regulator Requirements Page 2 of 6

There is another benefit to the synchronous circuit over the asynchronous circuit that is not obvious to many
engineers. When the output load is very low, the inductor current may become discontinuous, meaning the
current falls to zero. In the asynchronous configuration, the discontinuous current can result in
electromagnetic interference (EMI) emissions. A minimum load may be required for the asynchronous circuit
to prevent discontinuous current operation. The synchronous configuration can be designed to enable switch
S2 to be turned on under light load conditions. This will allow negative inductor current to flow. While this
decreases efficiency at light loads, it allows continuous current flow and prevents EMI.

Therefore, the buck regulator, implemented as a synchronous buck, can provide higher efficiency and lower
EMI while occupying less board space than the asynchronous version using a diode. The synchronous buck
provides even more benefits if its implementation is optimized for the specific voltage regulation
applications.

A circuit implementation of the synchronous buck would use FET transistors for the upper and lower
switches. The lower FET is always an N-channel FET. N-channel devices offer higher electron mobility, and
therefore lower resistance for a given size. Nevertheless, the upper FET in a synchronous buck converter can
be implemented as either an N-channel or a P-channel. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.

N-Channel vs. P-Channel High-Side FET Switch

To examine why employing buck regulators using a P-channel device as the upper FET can be better in some
applications, it is necessary to look at the switching section of a synchronous converter with an upper
N-channel FET as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Synchronous buck with N-channel high-side FET switch

When an N-channel FET is used for the upper switch, there must be a voltage supply source greater than the
voltage supplying the drain of the upper switch. For the N-channel FET to turn on with its source voltage at
Vs, its gate voltage must be several volts higher than Vs. This higher voltage is typically generated by using a
boot capacitor. When the lower FET is on and the upper FET is off, the boot capacitor is charged by the Vc
supply. Note that Vs and Vc may be equal or different in the buck converter that uses an N-channel FET for
the upper switch. If Vs is higher than Vc, the IC will need to include a level shifter to level shift the PWM
signal up to the drive stage that operates at the higher Vc and boot voltage level.

When the lower FET turns off and upper FET turns on, the bottom side of the boot capacitor increases to the
Vs voltage on the inductor’s input. When this occurs, the top side of the boot capacitor has an approximate
voltage of Vs + Vc relative to ground. The upper FET’s gate and the voltage swing on the boot capacitor’s top
side both swing from ground at their lowest potential to Vs + Vc when the upper FET is switched on.

White Paper—Automotive POL Regulator Requirements Page 3 of 6

 Table 1. Upper high-side FET N-channel advantages vs. disadvantages

Advantages Disadvantages
Operates from higher supply voltage,
Lower RDSon for given FET size,
requires larger IC process geometry/die
enables lower losses with high current
size, adds cost
Needs boot capacitor, no 100% duty
ratio
Larger voltage swings, longer switching
times and higher potential for EMI

In some applications, it’s better to use a synchronous buck converter like the one shown in Figure 5. It uses
a P-channel FET as the upper switch. In this circuit, the gate of the upper FET needs only to switch between
ground when the upper FET is on, and Vc when the upper FET is off. There is no need for a boot capacitor
and the entire circuit can operate at the Vc supply voltage potential.

Figure 5. Synchronous buck with P-channel high-side FET switch

Table 2. Upper high-side P-channel FET advantages vs. disadvantages

Advantages Disadvantages
Operates from lower voltage supplies, Requires larger FET to achieve same
and smaller geometry silicon process RDSon as N-channel, results in higher
results in smaller transistors cost for FET area
Lower voltage swings enable faster
switching, lower voltage signals make
EMI less likely
Operates at higher frequency above AM
radio band
Operates at 100% duty ratio, and no
boot capacitor lowers cost/saves board
space

White Paper—Automotive POL Regulator Requirements Page 4 of 6

Automotive-Grade Buck Regulator Family
The ISL78233, ISL78234 and ISL78235 pin compatible devices use the P-channel configuration. They
integrate a low on-resistance P-channel (35mΩ, typical) high-side FET and N-channel (11mΩ, typical) low-
side FET to maximize efficiency. At 100% duty cycle operation, there is less than 250mV drop across the P-
channel FET at 5A output current. Most of the time, the devices will be converting 5 volts down to a voltage
as low as 0.6 volts, and the duty ratio will be below 50%. Therefore, even though the P-channel FET has
higher resistance than the N-channel FET, the P-channel will be switched on for much less time, and will
have less impact on efficiency.

Figure 6. Typical application for ISL78235 5A sync buck regulator

The ISL7823x devices shown in Figure 6 are designed to operate from lower input voltages (5.5V down to
2.7V). As a result, most of their transistors use a smaller geometry, take up less die area and can switch at
higher speeds. And since the gate of the upper P-channel FET is driven with the same supply, the signal
swing is lower than if an N-channel arrangement is used. This also enables faster switching. The devices can
operate with a clock as high as 4MHz, and when set to switch at 2MHz, they can achieve a guaranteed
minimum on time of only 100ns. Since 2MHz has a period of 500ns, the devices can down convert with a
guaranteed 20% minimum duty ratio. This enables the regulators to output a wide range of voltages while
operating at a high frequency.

A 100% duty ratio is possible because no time is required to charge a boot capacitor (the ISL7823x devices
do not use one). Moreover, no boot capacitor equates to no radiated fields. The high 2MHz switching
frequency also enables the use of a smaller power inductor and lower valued capacitors on the regulator’s
input and output. It’s also above the AM radio band and helps prevent EMI at these frequencies.

Wettable Flank Package Allows Optical Inspections

The ISL7823x devices are available in 5mm x 5mm 16-lead WFQFN packages with an exposed pad for
improved thermal performance. Because they offer 3A, 4A or 5A output current options, it’s easy to upgrade
a design just by dropping in a new IC with no change in the PCB layout. This saves development costs and
time. In addition, the WFQFN shown in Figure 7 permits verification of automotive manufacturing quality by
allowing optical inspections to verify proper soldering joints.

White Paper—Automotive POL Regulator Requirements Page 5 of 6

 Figure 7. Magnification shows more prominent solder joints on the ISL78235 5x5mm WFQFN,
compared with the QFN version

Conclusion
The evolution of automotive cockpit electronics into highly integrated driver assistance systems provides
today’s drivers with more safety, comfort, and infotainment features than ever imagined. This is placing new
demands on secondary rail power supplies. The varying loads require flexible solutions that can deliver
higher current power supply regulation at lower voltages. System designers also want to be able to use the
same POL devices across a range of vehicle designs, from entry level to luxury cars.

This goal is met with a synchronous buck regulator design that uses high-side P-channel MOSFETs and other
architectural enhancements to deliver an optimized secondary power rail solution. As vehicle manufacturers
continue to innovate, they need to be able to rely on semiconductor suppliers to deliver the flexible, rugged
and higher performance ICs that help them realize their system design goals.

Next Steps
• Learn more about the ISL78233/34/35
• Get the datasheet
• Simulate an ISL78235

###

About Renesas Electronics Corporation

Renesas Electronics Corporation delivers trusted embedded design innovation with complete semiconductor solutions that enable
billions of connected, intelligent devices to enhance the way people work and live—securely and safely. A global leader in
microcontrollers, analog, power, and SoC products, Renesas provides the expertise, quality, and comprehensive solutions for a broad
range of Automotive, Industrial, Home Electronics, Office Automation and Information Communication Technology applications to
help shape a limitless future. Learn more at renesas.com

+1 408-432-8888 | © Renesas Electronics America. All rights reserved. Renesas (and design) are trademarks owned by Renesas
Electronics Corporation or one of its subsidiaries. All other trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners.

White Paper—Automotive POL Regulator Requirements Page 6 of 6