Download
Download
Download
How to cite this article: Kayacan AG, Özçelik AÖ. The effects of ıntuitive eating on body appreciation, body mass ındex, and
nutritional behaviors in adults: a sample of Türkiye. Rev Nutr. 2023;36:e220121. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202336e220121
ABSTRACT
Objective
Intuitive eating is an adaptive eating style that makes a strong connection with internal
physiological manifestations of hunger and satiety. This study was conducted to evaluate
the effects of intuitive eating on body appreciation, body mass index, and nutritional
behaviors in adults.
Methods
Sample consisted of 497 individuals. Data were collected online. The questionnaire form included
a general information and physical activity evaluation form, anthropometric measurements,
Intuitive Eating Scale-2, Body Appreciation Scale-2, and food frequency questionnaire.
Results
A statistically significant relationship was found between body mass index and eating for
physical rather than emotional reasons, reliance on internal hunger and satiety cues, body-food
choice congruence subscale scores, and total scale score. There was a correlation between body
appreciation and unconditional permission to eat, reliance on internal hunger and satiety cues,
body-food choice congruence subscale scores, and total scale score. The number of physically
active intuitive eaters was significantly higher than non-intuitive eaters. A significant correlation
was found between intuitive eating scores and frequency of consumption of fish, cake, biscuit,
chocolate, granulated sugar, honey, jam, molasses, pastries and dairy-based desserts, sunflower
oil, margarine, and sugary, carbonated drinks.
Conclusion
Intuitive eating can be an effective tool in sustaining and controlling weight loss, and with more
studies, it may be possible to further spread this practice
Keywords: Body dissatisfaction. Body mass index. Feeding behavior. Intuitive eating.
RESUMO
Objetivo
A alimentação intuitiva é um estilo alimentar adaptativo que faz uma forte conexão com as manifestações
fisiológicas internas de fome e saciedade. Este estudo foi realizado para avaliar o efeito da alimentação intuitiva
na apreciação corporal, índice de massa corporal e comportamentos nutricionais em adultos.
Métodos
A amostra foi composta por 497 indivíduos. Os dados foram coletados online. O formulário do questionário incluiu
um formulário de informações gerais e avaliação de atividade física, medidas antropométricas, Intuitive Eating
Scale-2, Body Appreciation Scale-2 e questionário de frequência alimentar.
Resultados
Uma relação estatisticamente significativa foi encontrada entre o índice de massa corporal e a alimentação com
base em razões fisiológicas em vez de razões emocionais, dependência de sinais de saciedade, pontuação da
subescala de adequação da escolha do alimento corporal e pontuação total da escala. Houve uma correlação
entre a apreciação do corpo e o consentimento incondicional para comer, confiança nos sinais de saciedade,
pontuação da subescala de adequação da escolha do alimento corporal e pontuação total da escala. A quantidade
de comedores intuitivos fisicamente ativos foi significativamente maior do que a dos comedores não intuitivos. Foi
encontrada correlação significativa entre o escore de alimentação intuitiva e a frequência de consumo de peixe,
bolo, biscoito, chocolate, açúcar granulado, mel, geleia, melado, doces e sobremesas lácteas, óleo de girassol,
margarina e refrigerantes açucarados.
Conclusão
A alimentação intuitiva pode ser uma ferramenta eficaz na sustentação e controle da perda de peso e, com mais
estudos, pode ser possível disseminar mais essa prática.
Palavras-chave: Insatisfação corporal. Índice de massa corporal. Comportamento alimentar. Comer intuitivo.
INTRODUCTION
Intuitive eating is defined as an adaptive eating style that makes a strong connection with
internal physiological manifestations of hunger and satiety [1,2]. The purpose of intuitive eating
is to guide individuals in such a way that they can trust their ability to recognize and differentiate
their physical and emotional feelings. The basic premise behind intuitive eating is that the body,
when rested, intrinsically knows the amount and type of food it will eat in order to both maintain
a healthy diet and maintain appropriate body weight [1]. Its basic principle is to respond to innate
hunger and satiety signals [2]. This concept is called body wisdom [3]. Examples of social cues that
invalidate this innate body wisdom are: diets, having a hard time finishing the plate as a child, eating
because it’s time to eat, advertisements that encourage people to eat regardless of hunger. The
basic principle of intuitive eating is to regain body wisdom so that a person may eat when they are
hungry and stops when they are full [2-5]. Unless forced due to certain health problems (diabetes,
food allergies, etc.), there is no restriction on the types of food a person can eat. Because it is thought
that the body will instinctively choose various foods that provide nutritional balance [6].
Body satisfaction is defined as accepting and respecting one’s own body, having a positive
view of the body, and rejecting unrealistic bodily ideals [7]. There is a bidirectional relationship
between intuitive eating and appreciating the body. More conscious individuals, who eat according
to hunger and satiety cues, are more likely to value, respect, and appreciate their body image. This
appreciation further promotes respect and dignity towards one’s physiological signals [8]. Strong
and consistent correlations between intuitive eating and body appreciation have been reported
in several cross-sectional studies [9-12]. Data from a systematic review determined that intuitive
eating is associated with less disordered eating, a more positive body image, greater emotional
functioning, and a range of other psychosocial conditions that have been less extensively
studied [13].
Given the impact of intuitive eating on body recognition, it is expected to be associated with
more positive dietary habits and a preference for foods with higher nutritional value [6]. A study
conducted in France reports that individuals with a high score of eating for physiological reasons
have a lower daily energy intake, and these individuals consume less sweet and fatty foods. It has
been determined that individuals with high confidence in hunger signals consume more fish, meat,
eggs, and dairy products and less whole-grain products [14]. In a study conducted with university
students by Smith and Hawks (2006), the relationship between intuitive eating and diet composition
was examined, and high intuitive eating was found to be associated with greater enjoyment of food
and diet variety [15]. In a study examining the relationship between intuitive eating and diet quality,
a program called “Health at Every Size”, which emerged against restrictive diet approaches, it was
stated that the intuitive eating scores of the intervention group increased and an improvement
in diet quality was observed compared to the control group [16]. A study by Madden et al. (2012)
with middle-aged female individuals shows that intuitive eating is associated with higher vegetable
intake [17]. On the other hand, as a result of a study by Carbonneau et al. (2017), no relationship was
found between intuitive eating and junk food intake. This indicates that intuitive eating without
intervention in the general population is not associated with diet quality but does not increase
consumption of low-nutrient foods either [16].
This study was planned and conducted to evaluate the effects of intuitive eating on body
image and nutritional behaviors in adults aged 19-64 years from Turkey, as currently there are no
studies in literature addressing this population.
METHODS
The research is a descriptive cross-sectional study. The sample of the study consists of 497
individuals between the ages of 19-64 years. In determining the number of people to be included
in the study, the study of Tylka and Kroon Van Diest (2013) was taken as reference [10]. As a result
of the power analysis, it was determined that at least 216 individuals were required to participate
in the study in order to have a Type I error (α)=0.05, effect size 0.5, and power 95%.
Attention was paid to the fact that the participants in the sample were between the ages
of 19-64 years and were literate, and those who volunteered to participate were also included. An
application was made to the Ankara University Rectorate Ethics Committee for the study and Ethics
Committee Approval nº. 43315 was obtained.
The research data were collected via a questionnaire form online between January and May of
2021. The questionnaire was distributed randomly on social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram,
Whatsapp, Telegram). The intelligibility of the questions was tested with 15 participants and the
questionnaire was finalized after the necessary corrections were made. With the first question
of the questionnaire, it was ensured that individuals were in the targeted age range and
voluntarily participated in the research. In the questionnaire form, there is general information
about individuals, nutritional habits, anthropometric measurements, Body Appreciation
Scale-2, Intuitive Eating Scale-2, physical activity evaluation form, and food consumption
frequency questions.
The Turkish validity and reliability study of the Body Appreciation Scale-2 developed by
Tylka and Wood-Barcalow (2015) was conducted by Anlı et al. [18]. The scale consists of 10 items in
a five-point Likert type. The score range in the scale without reverse coded items ranges from 10
to 50. High scores obtained from the scale indicate that the individual’s body appreciation level is
high. In this study, the Cronbach α coefficient was found to be 0.951.
The Intuitive Eating Scale was developed by Hawks et al. (2004) and revised by Tylka and
Kroon Van Diest (2013) [4,10]. The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Bas et
al. [19]. Intuitive Eating Scale-2 consists of 23 questions of a five-point Likert type (1=Strongly
Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree). The scale addresses four main subscales of intuitive eating. Specifically,
unconditional permission to eat (6 items), eating for physical rather than emotional reasons (8 items),
reliance on internal hunger and satiety cues (6 items), and body-food choice congruence (3 items).
Higher scores indicate a higher tendency to eat intuitively. In addition, the scores of the questions
belonging to the four subgroups are added together and the final score is divided by the number
of items in each subscale. In this way, the score in each subgroup is calculated [14]. In addition, to
classify the participants as intuitive eaters and non-intuitive eaters, the median of the participants’
total score on intuitive eating was taken as the basis, those with values above the median and at the
median were evaluated as intuitive eaters, and those with values below the median were considered
as individuals who did not eat intuitively [4]. In this study, the Cronbach α coefficient was found to
be 0.867, the median of the study was found to be 3.39.
The physical activity level of the individuals was assessed with a three-question questionnaire.
As a result of scoring the answers to the questionnaire, individuals are divided into two groups:
those who score 4 points or more (sufficiently active) and individuals with 0-3 points (insufficiently
active) [20].
Nutritional behavior was evaluated by eating main and snack meals, the frequency of eating
these meals, water consumption, and food frequency questionnaire. Food frequency questionnaire
included seven sections and 56 foods consisting of meat/eggs/legumes, dairy, fresh vegetables and
fruits, bread/cereals, sugar and sugary products, oils, and beverages.
Anthropometric Measurements
The body weight and height of the individuals were obtained through the internet form based
on the participants’ statement. Body mass index, which is a good indicator of body fat amount,
obtained by height and body weight measurements, and frequently employed for the evaluation
of obesity, was calculated according to the equation [body weight (kg)/height (m 2)]. Body mass
index results were categorized according to the classification of the World Health Organization.
Specifically: below 18.5 kg/m², “underweight”; between 18.5–24.9 kg/m², “normal body weight”;
25.0-29.9 kg/m², “overweight”; and 30.0 kg/m² and above, “obese” [21].
Research data were evaluated using the SPSS®IBM® program. The mean (X ), standard deviation,
median, lower and upper values were calculated for the data obtained from the measurements of
the individuals participating in the study. The distribution of qualitative data is given with number
and percentage tables. The t-test was used to evaluate the means between two groups with normal
distribution, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the medians between two groups
that did not show normal distribution. Kruskal-Wallis Analysis of Variance was used to evaluate the
median between three groups that did not show normal distribution, and the Mann-Whitney U test
was used for post-hoc evaluation. The Pearson Correlation test was used to determine the strength
and direction of the linear relationship between two normally distributed continuous variables and
the Spearman Correlation test between not normally distributed continuous variables. In all statistical
tests, the confidence interval was accepted as 95.0% and p<0.05 was considered significant.
R E S U LT S
Three hundred eighty women (76.5%) and 117 men (23.5%) between the ages of 19-64
participated in the study. The average age of women was 29.9±9.14 years, and the average age of
men was 33.2±13.09 years. 0.4% of individuals were literate and primary school graduates, 1.8% were
secondary school graduates, 8.5% were high school or equivalent graduates, 66.4% were college/university
graduates, 22.5% had a postgraduate degree. 42.7% of the individuals participating in the
study were married and 57.3% were single. 65.8% of the individuals stated that they were
working (Table 1).
General Characteristics n %
Education status
Literate 2 00.4
Primary school graduate 2 00.4
Secondary school graduate 9 01.8
High school graduate and equivalent 42 08.5
College/University graduate 330 66.4
Post-graduate degree 112 22.5
Marital Status
Married 212 42.7
Single 285 57.3
Working Status
Working 327 65.8
Unemployed 170 34.2
The correlation between the BMI of participants and the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 total and
subscale scores was examined. A statistically significant relationship was found between body mass
index and eating for physical rather than emotional reasons, reliance on internal hunger and satiety
cues, body-food choice congruence subscale scores, and total scale score (p<0.05). Compared to
underweight individuals, the unconditional permission to eat subscale score increased in individuals
with normal weight (p<0.05). Compared to the underweight participants, as BMI increased, the eating
for physical rather than emotional reasons subscale score increased. The subscale score of reliance
on internal hunger and satiety cues was higher in underweight and normal-weight individuals than
in obese individuals (p<0.05). The subscale score of reliance on internal hunger and satiety cues of
the participants with normal weight was higher than the participants with overweight (p<0.05).
Body-food choice congruence subscale score and a total scale score of individuals with normal
weight and overweight were higher than those of obese individuals (p<0.05) (Table 2).
Intuitive eaters constituted 46.9% of the general sample, 47.1% of females, and 46.2% of men
were intuitive eaters. When the physical activity levels of the individuals were evaluated according
to the intuitive eating status, it was determined that 29.6% of the intuitive eaters and 18.9% of the
individuals who did not eat intuitively were active enough. In other words, there was a significantly
higher statistical number of intuitive eaters that were active enough than those who did o not
eat intuitively (p<0.05) (Table 3).
The correlation between the total score and subcategory scores of the Body Appreciation
Scale-2 and the Intuitive Eating Scale was evaluated. There was a positive, weak, statistically significant
correlation between body appreciation and unconditional permission to eat (p<0.05). A positive,
moderately strong, statistically significant correlation was found between body appreciation and
intuitive eating total score, the score of relying on hunger and satiety cues to determine when to eat
and how much to eat, and body-food choice congruence subscale scores (p<0.05). The relationship
between body appreciation and eating for physical rather than emotional reasons subscale score
was not statistically significant (p>0.05) (Table 4).
The correlation between the intuitive eating score of the individuals participating in the study
and the frequency of consumption of various foods was evaluated. An inverse, weak, statistically
significant correlation was found between intuitive eating score and frequency of consumption
of fish, cake, biscuit, chocolate, granulated sugar, honey, jam, molasses, pastries and dairy-based
desserts, sunflower oil, margarine, and sugary, carbonated drinks (p<0.05) (Table 5). No significant
correlation was found between other foods and intuitive eating score (p>0.05; data not shown).
Table 2 – Differences between Intuitive Eating Scale-2 and subscale scores according to body mass indexes of individuals.
Note: Kruskal-Wallis test.The differences between medians shown with different letters on the same line are statistically significant. Statistically significant p-values
are in bold. Mdn: Median.
Table 4 – Correlation of Body Appreciation Scale-2 and Intuitive Eating Scale-2 variables.
Table 5 – Correlation between individuals’ intuitive eating score and frequency of consumption of some foods.
Intuitive Eating
Foods
r p
Fish -0.129 0.004
Cake, biscuit -0.163 <0.001
Chocolate -0.189 <0.001
Granulated sugar -0.168 <0.001
Honey, jam, molasses -0.108 <0.001
Pastries -0.199 <0.001
Dairy-based desserts -0.179 <0.001
Sunflower oil -0.096 0.032
Margarine -0.135 0.003
Sugary, carbonated drinks -0.232 <0.001
DISCUSSION
The sample of this study, which was conducted to evaluate the effect of individuals’ intuitive
eating situations on body appreciation and nutritional behaviors, consisted of 497 individuals
aged between 19-64 years. The general characteristics, nutritional habits, physical activity levels,
anthropometric measurements, and body appreciation of the individuals were determined and
the relationship between the results obtained from these data and their intuitive eating status
was evaluated.
In a study conducted with university students to examine the relationship between intuitive
eating and physical activity, it was reported that participants with high intuitive eating scores were
more likely to engage in physical activity regularly for their own pleasure [22]. A positive relationship
between intuitive eating and physical activity in a two-year follow-up study was reported [23]. In a
review that aimed to examine the relationship between intuitive eating and health markers, it was
argued that there is no strong relationship between intuitive eating and physical activity unless an
intuitive eating intervention to improve health focuses on physical activity [6]. In this study, while
29.6% of intuitive eaters were active enough, this rate was found to be 18.9% in non-intuitive eaters
(p<0.05). The result of this study is in agreement with the literature.
In a study conducted in Germany, it was determined that individuals with underweight and
normal body weight had higher intuitive eating scores than overweight and obese individuals [24].
In a study evaluating the relationship between intuitive eating and BMI, it was determined that
as BMI increased, the intuitive eating score decreased [25]. A high intuitive eating score has
been associated with low BMI in some cross-sectional studies [2,26]. In a review in which 11
cross-sectional studies were evaluated in order to examine the relationship between intuitive eating
and BMI; it has been stated that individuals with a high level of intuitive eating have a lower BMI [6].
In the NutriNet-Sante study examining the relationship between intuitive eating and body weight,
a negative relationship was found between intuitive eating and body weight. In the same study, it
was reported that there was a negative relationship between BMI and unconditional permission to
eat, eating for physical rather than emotional reasons, and reliance on internal hunger and satiety
cues [27]. In this study, it was determined that individuals with normal body weight had higher
intuitive eating scores than overweight and obese individuals (p<0.05). The result of this study is
in agreement with the literature.
Low body appreciation is closely associated with low intuitive nutrition scores for both sexes
[28]. A study conducted with undergraduate students shows that body appreciation and eating
disorders account for 19.6% of the variance of intuitive eating and are important determinants of
intuitive eating [29]. In the study of Cole and Horacek (2010) with adult women, after a ten-week
intuitive eating intervention, it was determined that the intervention group had lower eating
disorder behaviors and body dissatisfaction, higher body appreciation, and awareness compared
to the control group [30]. In another study, a strong negative relationship was found between the
total score of intuitive eating and body shame; a strong positive correlation was found with body
appreciation [10]. After a 90-120 minute interactive nutrition intervention with university students,
it was observed that intuitive eating increased and body dissatisfaction decreased [31]. In another
study with adult individuals, a negative relationship was reported between body appreciation and
rules-based nutrition [32]. In a study conducted with mostly female adults, it was determined that
intuitive eating was associated with a low rate of body dissatisfaction [33]. In a cross-sectional study
conducted with type 2 diabetes patients, it was stated that the body satisfaction rate of individuals
who rely on hunger and satiety cues is twice as high [34]. In this study, the Body Appreciation Scale-2
scores of individuals who eat intuitively were found to be higher than those who do not. In addition,
a positive correlation was found between the Body Appreciation Scale-2 and the intuitive eating
total score, the unconditional permission to eat score, the score of relying on hunger and satiety
cues to determine when and how much to eat, and the body-food congruence score. The result of
this study is in agreement with the literature.
Considering that intuitive eating includes the concept of body wisdom, individuals with a high
level of intuitive eating are expected to have a more adequate and balanced diet and more positive
eating habits. Some studies indicate the existence of this relationship [30,35], while some studies state
that this relationship does not exist [17,36]. In a study conducted with adults in Türkiye, a negative
relationship was found between the frequency of consumption of foods with high energy density
and the intuitive eating score [37]. In a study conducted to determine the changes that the Health
at Every Size intervention made on dietary intake and eating habits in overweight females, it was
reported that although participants had a reduced sense of hunger and overall energy intake, this
had no effect on the rate of energy intake from breakfast, alcohol, or snacks [36]. After a ten-week
intuitive eating intervention, individuals’ nutrient intake, as measured by their diet quality score,
has been reported to improve [35]. One study found no association between intuitive eating and
fruit consumption and various types of foods that contain high levels of saturated/trans fats and/or
refined carbohydrates [17]. In another study conducted with university students, it was determined
that there was no statistically significant relationship between the level of intuitive eating and the
consumption of foods with high sugar and fat content [15]. In this study, a negative correlation was
found between the intuitive eating score and the frequency of consumption of fish, sunflower oil,
margarine, sugar and sugary products, sugary and carbonated drinks. Differences between these
studies may be due to cultural factors as well as demographic characteristics such as age.
This study has some limitations. The study is of the cross-sectional type and does not clearly
reveal the effect of intuitive eating on body image and eating behaviors. The fact that the frequency
of food consumption was taken, but the amount was not questioned, prevented the clear
determination of the food intake of the individuals. Another limitation of the study is querying
the data online.
CONCLUSION
The number of studies on intuitive eating in Türkiye is limited. In addition, we have not found
any studies examining the effect of intuitive eating on weight control. It is thought that intuitive
eating can be an effective tool in sustaining and controlling weight loss. In the future, it would be
beneficial to conduct the study by taking more anthropometric measurements and food consumption
records. More studies are needed on these issues. As a result of these studies, it may be possible
to further spread the practice of intuitive eating.
REFERENCES
1. Tribole E, Resch E. Intuitive eating: a revolutionary program that works. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 2012.
2. Tylka TL. Development and psychometric evaluation of a measure of intuitive eating. J Couns Psychol.
2006;53(2):226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.2.226
3. Gast J, Hawks SR. Weight loss education: the challenge of a new paradigm. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(4):464-73.
https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819802500405
4. Hawks S, Merrill RM, Madanat HN. The intuitive eating scale: development and preliminary validation.
Am J Health Educ. 2004;35(2):90-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2004.10603615
5. Mathieu J. What should you know about mindful and intuitive eating? J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(12):1985.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.023
6. Van Dyke N, Drinkwater EJ. Relationships between intuitive eating and health indicators: literature review.
Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(8):1757-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980013002139
7. Quittkat HL, Hartmann AS, Düsing R, Buhlmann U, Vocks S. Body dissatisfaction, importance of appearance,
and body appreciation in men and women over the lifespan. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:864. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00864
8. Avalos LC, Tylka TL. Exploring a model of intuitive eating with college women. J Couns Psychol. 2006;53(4):486.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.4.486
9. Avalos L, Tylka TL, Wood-Barcalow N. The body appreciation scale: development and psychometric
evaluation. Body Image. 2005;2(3):285-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.06.002
10. Tylka TL, Kroon Van Diest AM. The Intuitive Eating Scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation
with college women and men. J Couns Psychol. 2013;60(1):137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030893
11. Tylka TL, Wood-Barcalow NL. The Body Appreciation Scale-2: item refinement and psychometric evaluation.
Body Image. 2015;12:53-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.09.006
12. Tylka TL, Calogero RM, Daníelsdóttir S. Is intuitive eating the same as flexible dietary control? Their links
to each other and well-being could provide an answer. Appetite. 2015;95:166-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
appet.2015.07.004
13. Bruce LJ, Ricciardelli LA. A systematic review of the psychosocial correlates of intuitive eating among adult
women. Appetite. 2016;96:454-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.012
14. Camilleri GM, Méjean C, Bellisle F, Andreeva VA, Kesse-Guyot E, Hercberg S, et al. Intuitive eating dimensions
were differently associated with food intake in the general population-based NutriNet-Santé study. J Nutr.
2017;147(1):61-9. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.234088
15. Smith T, Hawks SR. Intuitive eating, diet composition, and the meaning of food in healthy weight promotion.
Am J Health Educ. 2006;37(3):130-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2006.10598892
16. Carbonneau E, Bégin C, Lemieux S, Mongeau L, Paquette M-C, Turcotte M, et al. A Health at Every Size
intervention improves intuitive eating and diet quality in Canadian women. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(3):747-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.06.008
17. Madden CE, Leong SL, Gray A, Horwath CC. Eating in response to hunger and satiety signals is related to
BMI in a nationwide sample of 1601 mid-age New Zealand women. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(12):2272-79.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980012000882
18. Anlı G, Akın A, Eker H, Özçelik B. Bedeni beğenme ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. J Soc Stud Res.
2015(36):505-11. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2906
19. Bas M, Karaca KE, Saglam D, Arıtıcı G, Cengiz E, Köksal S, et al. Turkish version of the intuitive eating Scale-2:
validity and reliability among university students. Appetite. 2017;114:391-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
appet.2017.04.017
20. Marshall AL, Smith BJ, Bauman AE, Kaur S. Reliability and validity of a brief physical activity assessment
for use by family doctors. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(5):294-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.013771
21. World Health Organization. Body mass index-BMI. Geneve: Organization; 2018 [cited 2022 Mar 20].
Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-
lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi
22. Gast J, Madanat H, Nielson AC. Are men more intuitive when it comes to eating and physical activity?
Am J Mens Health. 2012;6(2):164-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988311428090
23. Bacon L, Stern JS, Van Loan MD, Keim NL. Size acceptance and intuitive eating improve health for obese,
female chronic dieters. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(6):929-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2005.03.011
24. Ruzanska UA, Warschburger P. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Intuitive Eating
Scale-2 in a community sample. Appetite. 2017;117:126-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.018
25. Saunders JF, Nichols-Lopez KA, Frazier LD. Psychometric properties of the intuitive eating scale-2 (IES-
2) in a culturally diverse Hispanic American sample. Eat Behav. 2018;28:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
eatbeh.2017.11.003
26. Herbert BM, Blechert J, Hautzinger M, Matthias E, Herbert C. Intuitive eating is associated with interoceptive
sensitivity. Effects on body mass index. Appetite. 2013;70:22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.06.082
27. Peschel SK, Tylka TL, Williams DP, Kaess M, Thayer JF, Koenig J. Is intuitive eating related to resting state
vagal activity? Auton Neurosci. 2018;210:72-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2017.11.005
28. Tylka TL, Homan KJ. Exercise motives and positive body image in physically active college women and
men: exploring an expanded acceptance model of intuitive eating. Body Image. 2015;15:90-97. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.07.003
29. Gan WY, Yeoh WC. Associations between body weight status, psychological well-being and disordered
eating with intuitive eating among Malaysian undergraduate university students. Int J Adolesc Med Health.
2020;32(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2017-0095
30. Cole RE, Horacek T. Effectiveness of the My Body Knows When intuitive-eating pilot program. Am J Health
Behav. 2010;34(3):286-97. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.34.3.4
31. Wilson RE, Marshall RD, Murakami JM, Latner JD. Brief non-dieting intervention increases intuitive eating
and reduces dieting intention, body image dissatisfaction, and anti-fat attitudes: a randomized controlled
trial. Appetite. 2020;148:104556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104556
32. Pinto C, Ferreira C, Mendes AL, Trindade IA. Social safeness and disordered eating: Exploring underlying
mechanisms of body appreciation and inflexible eating. Eat Weight Disord. 2017;22(2):303-9. http://doi.
org/10.1007/s40519-017-0384-y
33. Linardon J, Mitchell S. Rigid dietary control, flexible dietary control, and intuitive eating: evidence for their
differential relationship to disordered eating and body image concerns. Eating Behaviors. 2017;26:16-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.01.008
34. Ramos MH, Silva JM, De Oliveira TAV, da Silva Batista J, Cattafesta M, Salaroli LB, et al. Intuitive eating
and body appreciation in type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2020:1359105320950791. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1359105320950791
35. Hawley G, Horwath C, Gray A, Bradshaw A, Katzer L, Joyce J, et al. Sustainability of health and lifestyle
improvements following a non-dieting randomised trial in overweight women. Prev Med. 2008;47(6):593-99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.08.008
CONTRIBUTORS
AG KAYACAN and AÖ ÖZÇELİK designed the research and collected the data. AG KAYACAN analyzed
the data. Both authors had contributions in preparing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the
final manuscript.