Criticism (Plato and Aristotle)
Criticism (Plato and Aristotle)
Criticism (Plato and Aristotle)
Literary Criticism
Department of English Language and Literature
2020-2021
Fourth Year
Evening Studies
Literary criticism is thought to have existed as long as literature. In the 4th century BC, Plato and
Aristotle were the critics who gave guidelines of good literature without themselves being
creative writers. Plato’s attacks on poetry as imitative, secondary and false were formative as
well. Aristotle wrote the Poetics, which developed for the first time the concepts of mimesis and
catharsis.
Plato was the first ancient philosopher who had given a systematic shape to criticism. Plato’s
ideas are expressed in several books, chief among them being the Dialogues, Ion, Crito and The
Republic.
Plato's philosophy asserts that there are two realms: the physical realm and the spiritual
realm. The spiritual realm exists beyond the physical realm. Plato's Theory of Forms asserts that
the physical realm is only a shadow, or replica or image of the true reality of the Realm of
Forms.
Plato’s Attack on Poetry
Plato is famous for having banished poetry and poets from the ideal city of The Republic. In
his opinion, poetry or art in general is a copy of a copy. It is twice removed from reality. The
creations of poets and artists, being mere copies of copies of ‘ideal’ reality, are distortions of
truth, valueless and indeed potentially misleading. The example he actually uses is of a bed:
God created the ‘idea’ of the bed; the carpenter creates an actual bed from his imperfect
perception of the ‘idea’; the poet or artist only produces a superficial imitation (mimesis) of the
carpenter's bed. For Plato, the highest truth is strict, mathematical, intellectual; poetry does
not deal in such truth and may distract us from truth. For Plato, poets depend on inspiration,
which is a form of madness instead of reason and knowledge. Plato suggests that poets are liars.
In Homer’s epics, the Iliad and Odyssey, for example, the gods lie and cheat and are one of the
main causes of suffering among humans. Even the mortals (human beings) in these works steal,
complain and hate each other. Such writings, argues Plato, set a bad example for Greek citizens
He was Plato’s pupil. He rejected some of Plato’s beliefs about the nature of reality because he
was more concerned with the physical world. Applying his scientific methods of investigation to
the study of literature, Aristotle answers Plato’s accusations against poetry in a series of lectures
Aristotle compares a poet to a historian in terms of the truth each tries to convey in his writing.
While history records actual, particular facts, poetry is concerned with universal truths, by
imaginatively, speculating on the possibilities of human experience. Poets deal in a different kind
of truth, not factual, technical or historical truth, but ‘universal truth’, something superior and
Aristotle agrees with Plato that all arts are imitations. But unlike Plato, Aristotle does not
consider the poet’s imitations of life as being twice removed from reality. Poetry reveals
universal truths. The act of imitation itself, according to Aristotle, gives us pleasure.
Aristotle defines tragedy as ‘dramatic’ poetry which portrays noble men performing noble deeds
expressed in a high artistic language; it represents men in action instead of narrating (as in the
epic form), and through pity and fear, it causes the proper catharsis (or purgation of these
emotions). Art possesses form – that is, tragedy has a defining beginning, a middle and an end. A
Comedy, writes Aristotle, is an imitation of the actions of the base or inferior men. It is