Technology For Hold Baggage Screening
Technology For Hold Baggage Screening
Technology For Hold Baggage Screening
Regulators Challenge
Balance the conflicting demands
Efficiency: Bag delay Time Cost: Procure, Install, Operate & Maintain Passenger Privacy
Against the nonnegotiable demand to find the bomb that may be in the bag
Physical Search
Manpower Intensive Slow Invades passenger privacy Not effective unless complemented by trace Can be effective if supplementing other approaches
Trace
Trace Detection
Trace Detection
Collect Separate Detect Residues or vapors of explosives False Alarms can be caused by innocent contamination
Conventional X-Ray
Dual energy may indicate explosives Bomb components may be recognized Detection depends on operator training and vigilance Threat Image Projection will motivate and measure screener performance Testing has identified problems in maintaining acceptable screener detection performance
Automated X-Ray
High Processing Speed Automated explosive detection Some explosives ignored Level one technology High false alarms Human alarm resolution
Bag
Conveyor Belt
46 31. 5
711
46
CT for HBS
Passed rigorous certification testing process Procurement and Installation cost Limited throughput, up to ~ 400 B/H Requires false alarm resolution Integrateable into baggage handling systems Detects all explosives of interest
Cost
$600,000 $825,000 $800,000 $850,000 $1,200,000 $900,000 $37,500 $37,500 $45,000
BPH
120 180 180 250 425 425 36 36 36
Technology EDS EDS EDS EDS EDS EDS ETD ETD ETD
Deployed
145 534 384 2 121 66 2625 3723 573