ISM TN-17-2015-IsM Code and Planned Maintenance System
ISM TN-17-2015-IsM Code and Planned Maintenance System
ISM TN-17-2015-IsM Code and Planned Maintenance System
ISM 1. General
Code
As required by the International Standard of Safety Management
(ISM) Code, the ship owner and ship management company should
ensure that the ship hull structures, machinery and equipment are
maintained and operated in conformity with the applicable rules,
regulations, requirements, procedures and standards established by
the company.
It is important to remember that these requirements apply as much
to the maintenance of the hull, the deck machinery and the life-
saving and fire-fighting equipment as they do to engine room items.
How this is achieved will depend on the size and complexity of the
company and the types of ships that it operates. The system may be
entirely electronic, entirely paper-based, or a combination of the two
and the level of shore-based supervision will vary from one Company
to another.
Essential element of an effective PMS is the adequate resources to
enable prompt and satisfactory maintenance to be carried out.
An effective maintenance management system will be the result of
an assessment by the Company of the associated risks. In
undertaking such an assessment, the Company should take into
account the following:
i. the maintenance recommendations and specifications of the
equipment manufacturer;
ii. the history of the equipment, including failures, defects and
damage, and the corresponding remedial action;
iii. the results of third-party inspections;
iv. the age of the ship;
v. identified critical equipment or systems;
vi. the consequences of the failure of the equipment on the safe
operation of the ship.
Page 1 of 4
No.
Clause 10.2 of the ISM Code states that the company should ensure
that any non-conformity (defect) is reported, with its possible cause, if
known, and that appropriate corrective action is taken.
Problems reported may be discovered during routine technical
inspections or maintenance, following a breakdown or an accident, or
at any other time.
The Company’s responses should be aimed not only at the
rectification of the immediate technical deficiency, but also at
addressing the underlying maintenance management system failures
(non-conformities) that led to the problem in the first place.
Any lessons learned from the investigation of these failures should be
examined for their applicability to other ships in the fleet, and the
resulting trends and patterns should be used to identify opportunities
for continual improvement.
3. Permit-to-work systems
Page 2 of 4
No.
Essential elements
Class survey dates and items dealt with
Does it cover all equipment? (Deck- Engine- LSA/FFE)
Maintenance schedules/planning charts
Monitor machinery running hours
Details of jobs done, dates and references
Condition monitoring procedures
Details of unscheduled maintenance
Preventative and corrective maintenance
Details of overdue items
- Why overdue
- When they are to be done
- Reasons why they can’t be done, if any (lack of
spares/time)
History of components, breakdowns/defects
Manufacturers’ service instructions and job instructions
Comprehensive and clear instructions for use available
Spare part information
Reporting PMS status/records regularly to office
Defect list
What kind of problems is the ship having
Is the office being notified
Are repairs agreed/authorised immediately
Are office replies kept/recorded
Page 3 of 4
No.
B. Internally-generated records
Records of routine shipboard inspections
Records of maintenance work carried out
Records of the testing of stand-by and other critical equipment
Records of the testing of alarms and emergency shut-downs
Superintendents’ visit and inspection reports
Internal and third party audit reports
Reports of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous
occurrences
- Records of the implementation and verification of
corrective action
- Spare part requests, delivery notes etc.
P. Klavdianos
Marine Management
Systems Certification Division
Page 4 of 4