Antibiotic Therapy For Deep Neck Abscess
Antibiotic Therapy For Deep Neck Abscess
Antibiotic Therapy For Deep Neck Abscess
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: Objective: To evaluate the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of medical management for
Received 3 May 2012 deep neck abscesses in children.
Received in revised form 27 July 2012 Data sources: Pubmed and Embase databases accessed 3/27/2012.
Accepted 28 July 2012
Review methods: An a priori protocol defining inclusion and exclusion criteria was developed to identify
Available online 23 August 2012
all articles addressing medical therapy of pediatric deep neck abscesses where details regarding
diagnostic criteria, specifics of medical therapy and definitions of failure were presented. The search
Keywords:
included electronic databases to identify candidate articles as well as a manual crosscheck of references.
Deep neck abscess
Retropharyngeal abscess
The level of evidence was assessed and data extracted by three authors independently. Data were pooled
Parapharyngeal abscess using a random effects model due to significant study heterogeneity.
Pediatric Results: Eight articles met inclusion criteria. The overall level of evidence was grade C. There was
Airway significant heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 98.8%; p < .001). However, each article uniformly
Computed tomography presented cases suggesting that medical therapy may be a viable alternative to surgical drainage in some
Surgical management patients. The pooled success rate of medical therapy in avoiding surgical drainage in children with deep
Antibiotic management neck infections was 0.517 (95%CI: 0.335, 0.700). When patients taken immediately to surgery were
excluded and patients were placed on author defined medical protocols, the success rate increased to
0.951 (95%CI: 0.851, 1.051). Subgroup analysis by duration of intravenous antibiotic trial greater than
48 h demonstrated a pooled success rate of 0.740 (95%CI: 0.527, 0.953).
Conclusion: The current literature suggests medical management may be a safe alternative to surgical
drainage of deep neck abscesses in children. However, the level of evidence lacks strength and further
investigation is warranted.
Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
suggested an increased incidence [1,3,8]. Landers et al.’s analysis of March 27, 2012 and published after 1947. Both keywords and
the Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) in 2003 revealed 1321 medical subject headings (MESH) search strategies were used
admissions for retropharyngeal abscesses, of which 563 (43%) based on the following terms ‘‘retropharyngeal abscess,’’ ‘‘para-
patients had surgical drainage performed [9]. pharyngeal abscess,’’ ‘‘pharyngeal diseases,’’ ‘‘neck,’’ ‘‘abscess,’’
Traditional treatment of retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal ‘‘bacterial infection,’’ ‘‘deep neck infection,’’ ‘‘surgical drainage,’’
abscesses, which developed prior to the advances in antibiotics and ‘‘antibiotic therapy,’’ ‘‘infant,’’ ‘‘children,’’ ‘‘adolescent,’’ and
imaging involves early surgical incision and drainage [10]. ‘‘computed tomography.’’ Article titles and abstracts were then
Traditional external versus intraoral surgical approaches are reviewed to determine their relevance based on the stated
predicated upon the location of the fluid collection primarily with inclusion criteria. Full-text articles were retrieved from those
respect to the great vessels and both have been presented as viable deemed eligible by abstract review and were screened by each
surgical techniques [8]. As such, imaging is a cornerstone in the author independently. Manual crosschecks of the references were
evaluation of suspected deep neck space infections [3,5,11–13]. performed to further locate pertinent studies. Each selected article
Commonly obtained studies include lateral neck radiographs, was assigned a level of evidence by each author using guidelines
ultasonagraphy and contrast enhanced computed tomography published by Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (www.cebm.-
(CT) [12,14,15]. Each modality has limitations, however the net). An evidence table was constructed to display and analyze
superior anatomical detail provided by CT has made this modality results. Conflict resolution was achieved collectively by all three
the preferred imaging technique [2,7,11–13,16,17]. authors after discussion and mutual agreement.
One limitation of CT imaging is its specificity with regard to The primary outcome was the binary measure of resolution of a
differentiating cellulitis versus abscess. Specificity of CT imaging in deep neck abscess with parenteral antibiotics in children who had
predicting purulence at the time of surgical incision has high documented rim enhancement of a deep neck hypodensity on CT.
variability and has been reported between 0% and 92% [8,18]. Children who were effectively treated without undergoing surgical
While the standard CT criteria for diagnosing abscess is a management were considered successes.
homogenous area of low-attenuation with rim enhancement, this A limited meta-analysis and pooling of the data was performed
finding does not always correlate with surgical findings of pus [8]. using a random effects model given the heterogeneity of the source
Malloy et al. suggest that the finding of rim enhancement on CT data. Standard error was estimated as the inverse of sample size.
represents a continuum between cellulitis and abscess and Potential publication bias was evaluated using funnel plot
concluded that there is no significant correlation between rim techniques in the method of Egger. All analyses were performed
enhancement and incidence of purulence at surgical drainage [19]. using STATA IC version 10.1, College Station, TX. For all analyses,
Kirse et al. study concluded that abscess wall scalloping was found the null hypothesis was rejected with a probability less than 0.05.
to be more specific in predicting pus than rim enhancement [8]. Pooled data results were generated for the following analysis
Despite the poor specificity of this modality to differentiate abscess groups:
from cellulitis and lymphadenitis, it is commonly accepted that CT
provides clinical utility in directing therapy [2,5,13,20]. (1) all children presenting with documented rim enhancement of a
Surgical drainage for both retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal deep neck hypodensity on CT.
abscesses has been a topic of controversy in recent literature and (2) children with documented rim enhancement of a deep neck
numerous studies suggest conservative treatment with intrave- hypodensity on CT who were initially provided a trial of
nous antibiotics together with close observation may represent an intravenous antibiotic treatment, excluding those taken for
acceptable first line of therapy [1–5,10,12–14,16,17,21–23]. immediate surgical drainage.
Unfortunately there are no well-controlled trials confirming this (3) all children with documented rim enhancement of a deep neck
hypothesis. With the advent of improved antibiotics and CT hypodensity on CT when an adequate trial of intravenous
imaging, it seems plausible that an evidence based treatment antibiotic treatment was defined as greater than 48 h.
algorithm using clinical findings and CT imaging could be
developed that includes conservative treatment with intravenous 3. Results
antibiotics as an acceptable initial option [12,23]. The primary
objective of this review is to ascertain the evidence behind a The primary medical literature search resulted in 302 potential
conservative medical approach toward the management of articles (Fig. 1). 13 additional articles were further identified from
pediatric deep neck abscesses. manual reference cross-checks. Screening of these titles resulted in
127 articles for abstract review. 25 papers were then selected for
2. Methods full article screening to determine whether or not they met
inclusion criteria. Eight articles met inclusion criteria
This study is exempt from formal review per our institutional [2,3,5,10,12,14,17,22]. Table 1 summarizes the general findings
review board. Prior to accessing the medical literature, a priori of the selected articles. Publication dates were between 1992 and
article inclusion criteria were developed for article selection. 2009. One article was prospective in design and seven were
Inclusion criteria were developed that sought to identify all papers retrospective. The overall level of evidence was grade C.
presenting a series of children with deep neck abscesses in the Sample sizes ranged from 4 to 27 patients. Antibiotic regimens
parapharyngeal or retropharyngeal space that (1) underwent a CT varied among the studies, however all medical treatment regimens
examination prior to treatment with reported findings, (2) were clinically appropriate. Although outcome measures were
received a documented inpatient intravenous antibiotic regimen, variable for each study, sufficient detail was available to extract the
and (3) the clinical response to the antibiotic regimen was data required for this systematic review. The duration of
documented or could be clearly inferred. Exclusion criteria were intravenous antibiotic therapy before determination of success
defined as: (1) papers that did not involve children under the age of or failure of medical therapy ranged from 24 h to 72 h.
18, (2) single case reports, (3) the presence of immunocompro- When all patients including those that underwent immediate
mised patients, and (4) the article was not available in the English surgery were included in the analysis, there was significant
language. heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 98.8%; p < .001). However,
The medical literature was accessed using MEDLINE and each article uniformly presented cases suggesting that medical
EMBASE medical databases to search for articles indexed as of therapy may be a viable alternative to surgical drainage in some
P.N. Carbone et al. / International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 76 (2012) 1647–1653 1649
Idenficaon
Records idenfied through Addional records from manual
database searching reference crosscheck
(n = 302) (n = 13)
Studies included in
quantave synthesis
(meta-analysis)
(n = 8)
First author/year Study design CEBM level N CT criteria Exclusion criteria Significant findings Complications Overall conclusion
Pelaz AC, 2009 Retrospective 4 7 Lucency located in the No exclusion criteria 7/7 (100%) were successfully None reported Intravenous antibiotic
parapharyngeal or specified treated with antibiotics treatment with steroids is a safe
retropharyngeal space with alternative to surgical drainage
ring enhancement in cases of a localized abscess
McClay JE, 2003 Retrospective 4 11 Rim enhancement around a Clinically unstable or 10/11 (90.9%) were successfully None reported In clinically stable children,
hypodensity measuring > 1 cm airway compromise treated with antibiotics abscesses diagnosed on CT
Fig. 2. Forest plot of the random effects model of the success rate of intravenous antibiotic therapy in all children presenting with documented rim enhancement of a deep
neck hypodensity on CT demonstrating a pooled success rate of 52% (95%CI: 33%, 70%). The effect size (success rate) estimate with confidence intervals is presented for each
study. The overall pooled estimate based on study weight is represented by the diamond at the bottom of the figure.
hospitalization or morbidity rates directly related to infection No clear complications of medical therapy and few complica-
[2,23,24]. tions of surgical therapy were reported in this review. No child was
A concern raised against conservative management is the reported to have progressed to neurovascular complications or
progression of the disease process and subsequent increased emergent loss of their airway. While the sample size remains small,
morbidity or mortality necessitating close observation for clinical this is an encouraging finding.
deterioration. Although not suitably addressed in this review, It should be noted that none of the articles discuss which, if any,
several reports have failed to identify a difference in hospital stay of the patients with a rim enhancing lesion on CT that went to
duration for children treated surgically or medically. A potential surgery as first-line treatment may have been treated successfully
additional concern in the current state of increasing antibiotic with conservative management. As such, no significant conclu-
resistance is the risk of not tailoring therapy to cultured organisms sions are reached in any of the articles as to which patients were
and thus potentially contributing to overall resistance patterns. more likely to fail conservative treatment. Two articles report
Fig. 3. Forest plot of the random effects model of the success rate of intravenous antibiotic therapy excluding children undergoing immediate surgery demonstrating a pooled
success rate of 95% (95%CI: 85%, 100%). The effect size (success rate) estimate with confidence intervals is presented for each study. The overall pooled estimate based on study
weight is represented by the diamond at the bottom of the figure.
1652 P.N. Carbone et al. / International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 76 (2012) 1647–1653
Fig. 4. Forest plot of the random effects model of the success rate of intravenous antibiotic therapy in all children with documented rim enhancement of a deep neck
hypodensity on CT when an adequate trial of intravenous antibiotic treatment was defined as greater than 48 h demonstrating a pooled success rate of 74% (95%CI: 53%, 95%).
The effect size (success rate) estimate with confidence intervals is presented for each study. The overall pooled estimate based on study weight is represented by the diamond
at the bottom of the figure.
failures of conservative management. McClay et al. report one concerns for airway obstruction, septicemia or further complica-
failure out of 11 patients, in which the patient had another abscess tions of deep neck abscesses. Symptoms of airway obstruction are
(submandibular) and unspecified signs clinical decline [10]. Zahara highly variable and subject to differential interpretation by
et al. report two failures (2/4) of conservative management that clinicians. Furthermore, in series where patients underwent
went on to surgical drainage, however specific details are not immediate surgical drainage, there is certainly selection bias as
described [22]. the children who underwent medical management generally had
This systematic review supports notion that conservative less severe disease.
therapy may be safely be used to manage deep neck abscesses In conclusion, data proposing medical therapy as an alternative
in children in the absence of airway distress or neurovascular to surgical intervention in deep neck abscesses is available but
compromise, but clearly shows that the available data is not robust limited in quality. In cases where medical therapy is coupled to CT
or well defined. However, the overall variability of the patient findings, intravenous antibiotics appear to be a reasonable
populations and consistent findings by each reviewed article’s alternative to immediate surgical incision and drainage in children
authors suggest that the conclusions are reliable and generalizable. with uncomplicated deep neck abscesses. Unfortunately, at this
Although surgery is considered the gold standard, it is not without time, recommendations beyond using the surgeon’s clinical
risk to the patient due to the complexity of regional anatomy. judgment regarding the clinical picture and surgical accessibility
Medical therapy offers a potential alternative that may be to determine the maximal severity of children who may be treated
successful in avoiding future surgical drainage. Given these medically is lacking. Therefore, further research is crucial to
findings, it seems reasonable to conclude that empiric antibiotics determine the appropriate selection of patients with deep neck
can be considered a first line therapy when treating deep neck abscesses who may be best served by a conservative therapeutic
infections in the pediatric population while reserving surgery for approach.
cases of failed medical therapy, large abscesses, or when a high risk
of morbidity is inevitable. However, the supporting data has References
significant limitations and precludes strong supporting statements
until the available data significantly improves. [1] C.E. Cabrera, E.S. Deutsch, S. Eppes, S. Lawless, S. Cook, R.C. O’Reilly, et al.,
This systematic review has notable limitations. The overall level Increased incidence of head and neck abscesses in children, Otolaryngol. Head
Neck Surg. 136 (2007) 176–181.
of evidence on this subject lacks strength, which may question the [2] A.C. Pelaz, A.V. Allende, J.L. Llorente Pendas, C.S. Nieto, Conservative treatment of
validity of the study. The typical weaknesses of systematic reviews retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal abscess in children, J. Craniofac. Surg. 20
also plague this data, such as selection and publication bias. More (2009) 1178–1181.
[3] F.W. Craig, J.E. Schunk, Retropharyngeal abscess in children: clinical presentation,
importantly, the heterogeneity of the data is evident and, despite utility of imaging, and current management, Pediatrics 111 (2003) 1394–1398.
strict inclusion criteria developed by the authors, obviates further [4] J.Y. Sichel, P. Attal, E. Hocwald, R. Eliashar, Redefining parapharyngeal space
conclusions from being reached. Unfortunately, this review leaves infections, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 115 (2006) 117–123.
[5] J.Y. Sichel, I. Dano, E. Hocwald, A. Biron, R. Eliashar, Nonsurgical management of
the reader with many unanswered questions. Most notably it failed
parapharyngeal space infections: a prospective study, Laryngoscope 112 (2002)
to define a clear threshold of clinical, radiologic or laboratory 906–910.
findings where surgical therapy might be favored over medical [6] A.K. Lalawani, Current Diagnosis and Treatment. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck
Surgery, second ed., The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008, pp. 86–87.
therapy. Given the frequency that otolaryngologists treat these
[7] S. de Marie, A.T.R.T. Tjon, A.G. van der Mey, G. Meerdink, R. van Furth, J.W. van der
infections, it is imperative that future research addressing the Meer, Clinical infections and nonsurgical treatment of parapharyngeal space
shortcomings be answered in future investigative endeavors. infections complicating throat infection, Rev. Infect. Dis. 11 (1989) 975–982.
Caution must be exercised in interpretation of the results of this [8] D.J. Kirse, D.W. Roberson, Surgical management of retropharyngeal space infec-
tions in children, Laryngoscope 111 (2001) 1413–1422.
review. In particular, the papers uniformly provided exclusion [9] L. Lander, S. Lu, R.K. Shah, Pediatric retropharyngeal abscesses: a national per-
criteria for conservative therapy that generally centered on spective, Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 72 (2008) 1837–1843.
P.N. Carbone et al. / International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 76 (2012) 1647–1653 1653
[10] J.E. McClay, A.D. Murray, T. Booth, Intravenous antibiotic therapy for deep neck [18] R.F. Wetmore, S. Mahboubi, S.K. Soyupak, Computed tomography in the evalua-
abscesses defined by computed tomography, Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. tion of pediatric neck infections, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 119 (1998)
129 (2003) 1207–1212. 624–627.
[11] WDea. Miller, A. Prospective, Blinded comparison of clinical examination and com- [19] K.M. Malloy, T. Christenson, J.S. Meyer, S. tai, E.S. Deutsch, P.C. Barth, et al., Lack of
puted tomography in deep neck infections, Laryngoscope 109 (1999) 1873–1879. association of CT findings and surgical drainage in pediatric neck abscesses, Int. J.
[12] M. Nagy, M. Pizzuto, J. Backstrom, L. Brodsky, Deep neck infections in children: a Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 72 (2008) 235–239.
new approach to diagnosis and treatment, Laryngoscope 107 (1997) 1627–1634. [20] M. Lalakea, A.H. Messner, Retropharyngeal abscess management in children:
[13] R. Eliashar, J.Y. Sichel, J.M. Gomori, D. Saah, J. Elidan, Role of computed tomogra- current practices, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 121 (1999) 398–405.
phy scan in the diagnosis and treatment of deep neck infections in children, [21] B. Al-Sabah, H. Bin Salleen, A. Hagr, J. Choi-Rosen, J.J. Manoukian, T.L. Tewfik, et al.,
Laryngoscope 109 (1999) 844. Retropharyngeal abscess in children: 10-year study, J. Otolaryngol. 33 (2004)
[14] R.A. Broughton, Nonsurgical management of deep neck infections in children, 352–355.
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 11 (1992) 14–18. [22] J.N. Zahara, Acute retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal abscesses in children,
[15] P.W. Gidley, B.Y. Ghorayeb, C.M. Stiernberg, Contemporary management of deep Saudi Med. J. 23 (2002) 899–903.
neck space infections, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 116 (1995) 16–22. [23] D. Johnston, R. Schmidt, P. Barth, Parapharyngeal and retropharyngeal infec-
[16] H. Daya, S. Lo, B.C. Papsin, A. Zachariasova, H. Murray, J. Pirie, et al., Retro- tions in children: argument for a trial of medical therapy and intraoral drainage
pharyngeal and parapharyngeal infections in children: the Toronto experience, for medical treatment failures, Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 73 (2009)
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 69 (2005) 81–86. 761–765.
[17] V.A. Flanary, S.F. Conley, Pediatric deep space neck infections: the Medical College [24] C.W. Yen, C.Y. Lin, L.Y. Tsao, S.C. Yang, H.N. Chen, M.Y. Chang, Children’s deep neck
of Wisconsin experience, Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 38 (1997) 263–271. infections in central Taiwan, Acta Paediatr. Taiwan 48 (2007) 15–19.