This document compares GREENITIO to 10 competitors in the bioplastics/biopolymers industry. It provides information on each competitor's location, products/services, differences from GREENITIO, similarities, website, and total funding amount (if available). The competitors focus on various areas like biodegradable plastics, packaging solutions, waste upcycling, and manufacturing equipment, while GREENITIO specifically aims to use green chemistry and simulations to design cost-effective biopolymer ingredients for healthcare products.
This document compares GREENITIO to 10 competitors in the bioplastics/biopolymers industry. It provides information on each competitor's location, products/services, differences from GREENITIO, similarities, website, and total funding amount (if available). The competitors focus on various areas like biodegradable plastics, packaging solutions, waste upcycling, and manufacturing equipment, while GREENITIO specifically aims to use green chemistry and simulations to design cost-effective biopolymer ingredients for healthcare products.
This document compares GREENITIO to 10 competitors in the bioplastics/biopolymers industry. It provides information on each competitor's location, products/services, differences from GREENITIO, similarities, website, and total funding amount (if available). The competitors focus on various areas like biodegradable plastics, packaging solutions, waste upcycling, and manufacturing equipment, while GREENITIO specifically aims to use green chemistry and simulations to design cost-effective biopolymer ingredients for healthcare products.
This document compares GREENITIO to 10 competitors in the bioplastics/biopolymers industry. It provides information on each competitor's location, products/services, differences from GREENITIO, similarities, website, and total funding amount (if available). The competitors focus on various areas like biodegradable plastics, packaging solutions, waste upcycling, and manufacturing equipment, while GREENITIO specifically aims to use green chemistry and simulations to design cost-effective biopolymer ingredients for healthcare products.
What is the difference between our company and other?
How much is their funding? Where they’re located? What are their web addresses? What are the similarities between them? What is the motive behind GREENITIO ? • To make changes in health care industry by using green chemistry and computer simulations to design and produce high-performance cost-effective biopolymer ingredients • Maintaining the clean environment for future • Help other MNCs to convert their use of chemicals to cost-effective biopolymer ingredients • Everyone is doing their best to save environment from getting polluted, we have that crucial step for the better future C1 (Competitor 1) Danimer scientific • Location - Danimer Scientific Headquarters 140 Industrial Boulevard Bainbridge, GA 39817 • Products – Using technology to make biodegradable plastics • Difference – We’re using technology to make changes in the composition of products, whereas they provide others with biodegradable plastics for their use • Similarities – Both are doing for the betterment of the nature • Web address- https://danimerscientific.com/ • Funding - $8.43M C2 (Competitor 2) Earth Renewable Technologies
• Location- 112 Commerce Street Bldg. 2 Unit 4 Brevard, North Carolina, 28712, United States • Products- petroleum-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles • Difference- Our domain is totally different, as we’re in health care products, whereas they only manufacture HDPE bottles • Similarities- Both are doing for the betterment of the nature • Web address- https://ertbio.com/ • Funding- $44.34M C3 (Competitor 3) Applied Bioplastics • Location - 1503 East 13th Street Unit A, Austin, Texas, 78702, United States • Products - bioplastic solutions for the retail, packaging, and medical industries • Difference – They aims to reduce petroleum dependency, pollution, and habitat destruction, where as we aims to reduce the dependents of chemical in health products • Similarities – Both wants the betterment of nature • Web address - https://appliedbioplastics.com/ C4 (Competitor 4) Plaxin • Location - Sveavagen 60 Stockholm, 111 57, Sweden • Products - biodegradable and compostable packaging material, enabling people to use a more economical, sustainable, and ecological material • Difference – Our domain is more inclined towards health care, whereas they are more inclined towards the use of more economical, sustainable, and ecological material • Similarities – Doing better for the costumers, give them high value at low price • Web address - https://plaxin.bio/ C5 (Competitor 5) PolyFerm Canada • Location - Ontario, Canada • Products - renewable & biodegradable alternatives to petrochemical-based elastomers • Difference – They provide renewable & biodegradable alternatives whereas we provides customer with solutions to make changes in the way they make products • Similarities – Both companies are moving towards nature • Web address - https://polyfermcanada.com/ C6 (Competitor 6) GENECIS • Location - 633 Coronation Drive Unit 10 Scarborough, Ontario, M1E 2K4, Canada • Products - The company develops microbes and a fermentation process to upcycle waste into high-value materials, such as bioplastics • Difference – They mainly works to develop processes to upcycle waste into high-value materials • Similarities – This is quite similar to us as we provide others the way they can make changes, they provide biotechnology services • Web address - https://genecis.co/ • Funding - $13.19M C7 (Competitor 7) Blupha • Location - Floor B-3, Yingtai Jiahe, Building 1, Yard 27, Shengshengyuan Road, Shigezhuang Street Beijing, Beijing, 102206, China • Products - Disposable cutlery & straw, rigid packaging, flexible packaging, coated paper, agricultural material, fiber & Nonwoven, foam forming and many more • Difference – We’re just in industry, whereas they works multidimensionally • Similarities – They’re engaged in chemical and material innovation as we’re also innovating the way how to make the product more towards nature • Web address - https://www.bluepha.bio/ • Funding - $373.16M C8 (Competitor 8) Ecovative • Location - 70 Cohoes Avenue Green Island, New York, 12183, United States • Products - renewable or recycled materials, enabling users to reduce waste and their carbon footprint • Difference – They provides packaging solutions whereas as we provides • Similarities – Both provides environment friendly solutions • Web address - https://ecovative.com/ • Funding - $143.21M C9 (Competitor 9) Tipa • Location - Hod Hasharon, 4524079, Israel • Products - biodegradable and recyclable packaging solutions • Difference – Both the companies are different the way provide solutions to their customers • Web address - https://tipa-corp.com/ • Funding - $131.5M C10 (Competitor 10) Nature Works • Location - 15305 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota, 55345, United States • Products – 2 Series for Extrusion & thermoforming, 3 series for injection modeling, and etc • Difference – They manufactures machines but we provides solutions for health care • Web address - https://natureworksllc.com/ • Funding - $150M
