Microsoft Introduction
Microsoft Introduction
Microsoft Corporation...........................................................................................................................2
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................2
Human resource Management at Microsoft Corporation.......................................................................3
Recruitment and Selection.................................................................................................................3
Training and Development................................................................................................................3
Performance Management- Culture Model........................................................................................3
Compensation and Benefits...............................................................................................................3
Employee Motivation, Loyalty and Satisfaction................................................................................3
Performance Appraisal and Feedback................................................................................................4
Labor Relations.................................................................................................................................4
Safety, Health, and Wellness.............................................................................................................4
Critical review of the behavioral and the contingency theory of leadership, and discussing the
Behavioral leadership theory in Microsoft Corporation.........................................................................5
References.............................................................................................................................................7
Microsoft Corporation
Introduction
Theories of leadership encompass a diverse range of perspectives and models that seek to
understand and explain the dynamic and multifaceted nature of leadership in various contexts
and settings. Two of those theories are the Behavioral and the contingency.
The first theoretical approach is the behavioral theory of leadership, which is a prominent
approach that emerged in the mid-20th century, aiming to understand and define leadership
based on observable behaviors rather than inherent traits. This theory focuses on what
effective leaders do and how their actions impact their followers and organizational
outcomes. The behavioral theory of leadership can be broadly categorized into two major
leadership styles: Task-Oriented Leadership that focuses on achieving goals and objectives
and focus on the effectiveness overall; and people-oriented leadership that focuses on
promoting collaboration and positivity. One of the foundational models in behavioral
leadership theory is the Ohio State Studies, which identified two key dimensions of
leadership behavior: consideration and initiating structure. Consideration refers to a leader's
ability to build positive relationships, show empathy, and provide support. Initiating
structure, on the other hand, relates to a leader's capacity to set clear objectives, establish
roles, and maintain a well-organized work environment.
Another significant model is the University of Michigan Studies, which distinguished
between employee-oriented and production-oriented leadership behaviors. Employee-
oriented leaders emphasize the well-being and job satisfaction of their team, while
production-oriented leaders prioritize efficiency and productivity. (Harrison, 2018)
The second theoretical approach is the contingency theory of leadership Developed in the
1960s and 1970s by scholars such as Fred Fiedler and Paul Hersey, posits that there is no
one-size-fits-all approach to leadership. Instead, effective leadership styles depend on the
specific context or situation.
At its core, contingency theory suggests that the most suitable leadership style varies
according to a multitude of factors, including the leader's personality, the followers'
attributes, and the circumstances in which leadership is exercised.
This theory encourages leaders to adapt their leadership styles to match the specific demands
of a given situation. By doing so, they can enhance their effectiveness and positively
influence their teams or followers. (Kerr, et al., 1974)
The major contingency model of leadership includes:
Fiedler's contingency theory emphasizes that the favorability of a leadership situation
is contingent upon the leader's compatibility with the specific circumstances and the
quality of the leader-follower relationship.
Vroom and Yetton's decision-making model, and Vroom and Jago, underscores that
the quality and acceptance of a leader's decision are influenced by the level of
participation and input from subordinates, with leaders choosing their decision-
making style based on the situation.
Path-Goal Theory by House posits that effective leadership involves a leader's
adaptation of their leadership style to the specific needs and circumstances of their
followers in order to facilitate goal achievement, while House and Dessler's
Contingency Theory extends this concept by emphasizing that the most appropriate
leadership style is contingent on the situation and the characteristics of the followers.
Hersey and Blanchard's Contingency Theory centers on the concept of follower
maturity, highlighting that a leader's most effective leadership style is contingent on
the maturity level of their followers.
Furthermore, and based on the above the we can clearly distinguish the Behavioral
leadership theory in Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft's history is a case study in how
different leadership approaches can contribute to the success and transformation of a tech
giant.
The company's co-founder, Bill Gates, demonstrated transformational leadership by inspiring
a shared vision of personal computing and fostering innovation. His ability to set high
standards and motivate employees was instrumental in Microsoft's early growth. (Shah &
Mulla, 2013). Gates was known for his relentless pursuit of innovation and his willingness to
take risks. In the 1980s, when personal computing was still in its infancy, Bill Gates had a
vision of making computers accessible to the masses. He saw the potential for a graphical
user interface (GUI) that would allow users to interact with computers in a more intuitive
way, rather than solely relying on text-based commands. This vision led to the development
of Microsoft Windows, which he championed.
Steve Ballmer, as CEO, provided directive leadership, offering clear guidance and motivation
through his enthusiasm and energy. Under his leadership, Microsoft adapted to changing
market dynamics and challenges. For instance, when Microsoft was facing challenges from
competitors, Ballmer made the decision to launch Windows 8 and didn't hesitate to push for
this strategic move, even in the face of initial criticism.
Satya Nadella, the current CEO, embodies servant leadership by emphasizing empathy,
humility, and a commitment to serving employees and customers. This approach has led to
cultural shifts within the company, fostering collaboration, and driving Microsoft's success in
areas like cloud computing. (Fox, 2019)
These leaders have created an environment where employees are encouraged to think
creatively and take calculated risks to develop new products and solutions.
The leaders have shown adaptability in response to changing market conditions. This
adaptability demonstrates a willingness to adjust leadership behaviors and strategies in
response to external factors.
References
Cusmano, M. & Selby, R., 1998. Microsoft Secrets: How the World's Most Powerful
Software Company Creates technology, shapes markets, and manages people. 1 ed. New
York: Touchstone Rockefeller center.
Flores, J. & Cruz, J., 2020. Human Resource Management Practice in Microsoft Corporation.
ResearchGate, Volume 1, pp. 5-15.
Fox, M., 2019. Examining the Leadership Style of Microsoft CEO, Satya Nadella. [Online]
Available at: https://ideas.bkconnection.com/examining-the-leadership-style-of-microsoft-
ceo-satya-nadella
[Accessed 4 November 2023].
Harrison, C., 2018. Leadership Research and Theory. In: Leadership Theory and Research. 1
ed. s.l.:Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 15-32.
HR Management Training GURU, 2013. The HR Training GURU. [Online]
Available at: https://management-training-guru.com/2013/10/human-capital-strategy-at-
microsoft/
[Accessed 31 October 2023].
Ivy Panda, 2023. Human Resource Management at Microsoft Essay. [Online]
Available at: https://ivypanda.com/essays/human-resource-management-at-microsoft/
[Accessed 31 October 2023].
Kerr, S., Schriesheim, C. & Murphy, C., 1974. Toward a contingency theory of leadership.
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12(1), pp. 62-82.
Shah, T. & Mulla, Z., 2013. Leader Motives, Impression Management, and Charisma: A
Comparison of Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Management and Labour Studies, 38(3), pp. 155-
1894.
Texas HR Law, 2022. Human Resource Management at Microsoft. [Online]
Available at: https://texashrlaw.com/human-resource-management-at-microsoft/
[Accessed 31 October 2023].