Manuscript 2023
Manuscript 2023
Manuscript 2023
Agribusiness is characterized by recurring uncertainties that present farmers with various conditions
that affect their investment needs. This article tries to understand the financial problems of
agricultural entrepreneurs and examines the relationship between their agricultural finance
knowledge and financial problems. This study was carried out in Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh,
India. Approximately 45 farmers were reached at various sampling stages. The survey revealed that
the main cause of farmers' financial problems is poor storage and poor loan application procedures,
with 64% of farmers having agricultural understanding as private lenders use these funds to make a
difference. Cooperation between government agencies and farmers on private loans has led to more
debt. The analysis also shows that political interference can lead to NPA (non-performing loans)
resulting from farmers' failure to repay their loans. When the effect of the agricultural financial
information of the farmers on their financial problems is examined, it has been revealed that one of
the main problems is the lack of funds and the inadequacy of external resources. Therefore,
increasing the financial knowledge of farmers about agriculture can greatly reduce their financing
problems.
INTRODUCTION
Access to finance is critical to agricultural development. The transition from agricultural production
the livelihood of 86% of the rural population (International Finance Corporation [IFC], 2021),
refuse to accept risks such as flooding, flooding, pests, and diseases occurring in agriculture or
long-term transaction costs. Thus, despite the government's current efforts to encourage investment
in agriculture, there is a lack of understanding of the financial risks of agriculture and the resources
that lead to jobs of much-needed capital to support production, production, and trade. This policy
brief examines the financial needs of agriculture in developing countries and the means available to
meet them. We examine the challenges of investing in agricultural finance, the role of different
actors, and governments' options to strengthen fiscal laws and policies to support agricultural
development.
Investments in agriculture, as in other sectors, will need money from third parties, especially local
their job. However, in the current international financial system, many factors prevent the
First, renovation costs are higher in rural areas than in cities, due to more refugees and weak
infrastructure.
Secondly and more importantly, there are risks in agriculture that prevent financial institutions from
lending. These include production risks associated with natural disasters (such as flooding,
flooding, and pests), farmers' inability to provide guaranteed crops (because farmers do not have
land titles to provide credit collateral or land prices are too low). and price volatility.
Third, the financial markets of some developing countries may not be mature enough. The
availability and innovation of certain financial instruments and services is often poor. Also, when
financial services are available, they may not be suitable for all types of agriculture with different
of the production process require capital. At the same time, the supply of financial products is only
available to large farms with proven data and therefore cannot meet the specific needs of users'
goods.
Finally, the lack of agricultural data and statistics in developing countries makes it difficult for
financial service providers to assess their creditworthiness. This situation changes the necessary
conditions to obtain financial products and destroys the investment results obtained.
Rural Economy has a total of 215280 hectares of arable land, 138148 hectares of net arable land,
net irrigated area 124,000 people, small farmers 92.9% of the total population. small farmers have
The Variables on basis of which the research has been conducted are as follows:-
d. Agriculture Productivity.
LITERATURE REVIEW
(Sharma, 2012). Therefore, agriculture plays an imperative role in the socio-economic growth of the
(Yadav, 2013). These days, practicing agriculture is not only limited to a means of survival but has
become a source of livelihood and taking the direction of entrepreneurial activity. Such potency
leads to the creation of agricultural entrepreneurs which is defined by Chander (2016) as creative
farmers who are innovating and applying suitable technologies and practices developed by them or
activities demand a significant amount of capital that needs to be invested. Besides their saving,
they often have to rely on the outside source for acquiring funds.
Shanmugavadivel (2015) stated that credit facility enables the farmer to attain the required capital
for increasing agricultural production and it can boost other factors of production by making the
latent or underused capacities functional. Thus, agricultural financing performs a crucial role in the
Nath et al. (2016) found that lack of capital and unavailability of timely credit facilities act as major
(Ajayi et al. 2019). Daily agricultural life depends on the sustainability of financial power, which is
(Ulusoy, 2020). Several policy measures have been introduced by the government to boost the
(Subramaniam and Shivananjappa, 2021). The umbrella coverage of agricultural financing services
from banks allows the agricultural entrepreneurs to carry out their farming process in a smooth way.
There are various schemes in India through which the agricultural loan is provided at a subsidized
rate. Besides that, with the introduction of the Kisan Credit Card (KCC), agricultural loans are
provided for consumption purposes, post- harvesting expenses, marketing expenses, the loan with
crop insurance and the agricultural entrepreneurs also get the option for social security schemes and
loans on warehouse receipt. It also gives the provision for the loan without collateral security.
Availing such facilities requires awareness among the agricultural entrepreneurs. However,
inadequate awareness of formal agricultural financial services would drive the agricultural
METHODOLOGY
agricultural entrepreneurs.
4- To determine the causes and effects of low agriculture productivity and its effect on finance.
The research design of the paper is descriptive followed by a cross-sectional study. In this study,
only those agricultural entrepreneurs were taken into consideration who produced for commercial
purpose, come within the purview of the agriculture and horticulture sector and engaged in the
business for at least 2 years. Since there was no record or list of the total population of agricultural
entrepreneurs in the study area, the population was considered as infinite this paper and from each
district, the samples of agricultural entrepreneurs were selected with the help of agricultural
extension officials assigned by the respective district agriculture office. Accordingly, 96 samples
were selected considering the minimum number of samples that needed to be present as per the
number of variables in the study, use of survey scale and to run the statistical test such as t-test,
ANOVA (Delice, 2010; Louanglath, 2017; Cohen et al., 2005). Multi-stage sampling was used.
The State of Uttar Pradesh falls under three agro-climatic zones viz. Agro Climatic Zone–IV:
Middle Gangetic Plains region Agro Climatic Zone–V: Upper Gangetic Plains region and Agro
Climatic Zone–VIII: Central Plateau and Hills region. The Agro-climatic zone- V is among the
larger and very thickly populated agro-climatic zones. It covers 32 districts of Uttar Pradesh. A
large part of the geographical area is cultivated and is well irrigated. This is the most developed
irrigated. The zone is characterized by semi-arid and sub-humid conditions. The mean Annual
rainfall varies between 700 and 1,000 mm. There are three sub-zones under this agro-climatic zone.
Central Plains - Allahabad, Fatehpur, Pratapgarh, Sultanpur, Rae- Bareili, Unnao, Lucknow, Bara
Banki, Sitapur, Hardoi, Kheri and Pilibhit districts fall under this sub-zone. The region receives on
an average 979 mm of rainfall; the climate ranges from dry sub-humid to semi-arid and the soil is
alluvium calcareous sandy loam. About 62% of the land is cultivated of which 56% is irrigated.
Based on prior research papers and pilot survey, seven items were considered to measure the causes
of financial problems of agricultural entrepreneurs. The items include inadequate savings, less source
of borrowing, high risk in borrowing, lack of awareness on applying for bank loan, cumbersome
process in applying for bank loan, high rate of interest and lack of collateral security. To quantify
the items of financial problems,7- point interval rating scale was used where 1 denoted least agree
and 7 referred to strongly agree to the causes of the financial problems. Subsequently, the mean
score was calculated based on ratings provided by the respondents on different financial problems.
The individual mean score of the items was calculated to compare the items causing the financial
problem and the overall mean score of the financial problem was ascertained to correlate it with the
The items that measured the awareness level of the agricultural entrepreneurs on agricultural
financing were grouped into five factors that were: awareness of basic banking services,
periodicity of loan, collateral security on loan, various agricultural financing schemes and facilities
on KCC (Kisan Credit Card). Each factor was represented with several items and the questions
were asked in the dichotomous form and scores were measured accordingly by segregating the
responses into ‘1’ for ‘aware’ and ‘0’ for ‘not aware’. The overall scores on the items were then
categorized into three different levels i.e. high, medium and low. If the score of the respondents
was considered medium when the score declined between (Mean ± Standard Deviation). If the
score was above (Mean ± Standard Deviation) the awareness was considered high
(Shanmugavadivel, 2021).
entrepreneurs was analyzed using One-Way ANOVA. The independent variable was the level of
awareness on agricultural financing and financial problem of the small- scale commercial farmers
was the dependent variable. Using this variable, the null hypothesis was constructed as:
There is no significant difference in the mean score of financial problems across the levels of awareness on
agricultural financing.
The reasons leading to the financial problem of the agricultural entrepreneurs are depicted.
6.5
5.5
4.5
3.5
2.5
MEAN SOURCE
1.5
0.5
Inade- Cumber- High risk Lack of High Rate Less Lack of
quate some in Bor- Aware- of Inter- Source of Collateral
Saving Process in rowing ness on est Borrow- Security
applying applying ing
for bank for bank
loan loan
Source: Journal of Extension Education Vol. 32 No. 4, 2020 Author Name: N.Purnima & B.Anjan
leading to the financial problem is presented in the y-axis. A high mean score indicates more
financial problems for agricultural entrepreneurs. Here, it can be seen that inadequate savings
found in prior research papers on the financial-related problems faced by the entrepreneurs
(Swathy & Benazir, 2014; Jayadatta, 2017). However, it can be interpreted from Figure. 1 that
the cumbersome process in applying for a bank loan affected the financial requirement with an
average rating of 5.7 out of 7. This result also supports the findings of the study conducted by
Gichuki et al., in 2021 where 75.7% of entrepreneurs rarely apply for loans from banking
institutions due to strict terms. There was an almost equal rating on the high risk in borrowing,
lack of awareness on applying for a bank loan and high rate of interest.
The research design of the article is defined as a cross-sectional study. The study is conducted on
secondary data. The study was carried out in Lucknow. In this study, agricultural businessmen who
produce only for the market, who are in the agriculture and horticulture sector and who have been
operating for at least 2 years have been determined. Since there is no information or list regarding
the entire farmer population in the study area, the population is assumed to be infinite in this study
and a sample of the farmers was selected with the help of agricultural officers sent from each
province. Affiliated District Agriculture Department. Based on previous research and research,
seven items were considered to quantify the causes of farmers' financial problems. Insufficient
savings, some loans, high-risk loans, poor knowledge on applying for bank loans, application
process for bank loans, high interest rates and lack of loan guarantee. An average score is then
calculated based on participants' assessments of different financial questions. Calculate the average
individual score for each item, compare the items that cause financial problems, and determine the
overall average score of financial problems associated with people's agricultural knowledge of
agricultural finance.
75
65
55
45
35
Mean SCORE
25
15
5
Basic Banking Awareness of Security on Awarness on Awareness of
Awareness Agriculture Bank Loan Periodicty of KCC Facilities
Fianncing Bank Loan
Scheme
Source: Journal of Agriculture & Extension Education Research Vol. 12 No. 4, 2021 Author Name:
Items measuring the agricultural finance knowledge level of farmers are divided into five
categories: Banking services information, credit cycle, loan credit, various agricultural finance and
KCC (Kisan credit card) opportunities. According to Figure: 2 Everything is represented by several
items, and questions are asked in a binary form, and the score is measured by dividing the answer
by "1" for "I know" and "0" for "I don't know". Then the total score of the product is divided into
three different levels as high, medium, and low. If the respondent's score is low (meaning the
standard deviation), the level of knowledge is also low. If the score is between (mean ± standard
highest score (mean ± standard deviation). Analysis of variance was used to analyze the relationship
between farmers' agricultural finance knowledge and financial problems. The difference between
independence is the level of knowledge of agricultural finance, and the financial problems of small
farmers are different. Using this difference, the null hypothesis was formulated as follows. There is
no significant difference in the mean scores of financial problems at different levels of agricultural
finance knowledge.
Entrepreneurs.
In the process of examining the effect of the level of agricultural financing awareness on the
based on the assumption of the normal distribution thus the test of normality was conducted using
the Shapiro Wilk test. As mentioned by Ghasemi and Zahediasl (2012) on the excellence of the
Shapiro Wilk test over Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and a better choice fortesting the normality of
data. “If the p-value of Shapiro Wilk test is greater than the alpha value (0.05), the data is
normal” (Lund Research Ltd., 2018, p. 1). After conducting the Shapiro Wilk test, the result
showed the p-value 0.113 (greater than 0.05), consequently, the data were assumed to be normally
distributed. The data also met the criteria for homogeneity of variance which was tested with the
help of Levene’s test. The result of Levene’s test showed the p-value of 0.164 which was more
than 0.05 and indicated the equality of variance among the groups. Table 1 displays the summary
of ANOVA where it showed that p-value (Sig.) is 0.000 (<0.05), therefore the null hypothesis
‘there is no significant difference in the mean score of financial problems across the levels of
awareness on agricultural financing’ was rejected. This inferred that there was a statistically
significant difference in the mean score on financial problems of agricultural entrepreneurs having
score on the financial problems of agricultural entrepreneurs across the three levels of awareness
on agricultural financing. The data from table 2 revealed that the mean score on the financial
problem at the low level of awareness was 37.54, at medium level of awareness the mean score
reduced to 32.03 and for the respondents with high level of awareness on agricultural financing,
the respective mean score on finance problem was further reduced to 26.55. This indicated that the
financial problem of agricultural entrepreneurs decreased with the increase in the level of
awareness on agricultural financing. Similar observation was also made by Thakur and Barman
(2013).
dependent on their level of awareness of agricultural financing and both the variables share a
substantial negative relationship with each other. is suggested that along with the involvement of
bank officials there should be active engagement of agricultural extension officials to increase
EFFECT ON FINANCE
Agricultural knowledge level is divided according to the total score of each dimension of
agricultural financial knowledge. According to figure:3 the cause and effects of the low agriculture
income is having an adverse effect on the understanding of what farmers know about, the chart
shows a data comparison based on the average score for each factor in knowledge farm finance. 2.
The average score of each factor of agricultural finance information is calculated by dividing the
Comparison of average scores on various factors related to agricultural finance knowledge shows
that banking services knowledge has the highest value (72.75). Banking services include familiarity
with deposit types, interest calculations, ATM cards and online banking services. On the other hand,
the average score of knowledge of credit security is quite low (39.67). The security of the loan is
shown in terms of secured loans, unsecured loans, and maximum unsecured loans. After analyzing
the reasons for the average credit score, it turned out that only 22 of the 96 respondents knew about
unsecured loans and only one participant knew the maximum loan amount. Among them, KCC
(Kisan credit card) site has the lowest average score (19.75). Information on the KCC site was
evaluated, and in addition to information on the availability of KCC-subsidized crop loans; Of the
96 respondents, only 29 were aware of the availability of agricultural equipment, while 33 were
aware of the potential use. KCC provides loans to joint ventures. Surprisingly, none of the
respondents are aware of the validity of Kisan credit card (KCC), on-demand credit availability,
marketing of agricultural products, return fees and credit card (KCC) using Kisan credit card.
The empirical analysis of this study shows that farmers face many problems that hinder their
investment in agricultural business. There are seven problems faced by the agriculture entrepreneur
Saving, Cumbersome Process in applying for bank loan, High risk in Borrowing, Lack of
Awareness on applying for bank loan, High Rate of Interest, Less Source of Borrowing, Lack of
Research shows that most agricultural entrepreneurs have an average level of knowledge of
agricultural finance, but the main factors affecting the knowledge are the availability of unsecured
loans and maximum unsecured loans. Security, credit, and additional opportunities offered by Kisan
credit card.
When the financial problems of commercial farmers were examined, it was determined that they
had a negative relationship with agricultural finance knowledge. Therefore, the conclusion of this
study is that more efforts should be made to increase the level of knowledge on agricultural finance
to meet the financing needs of farmers. Although there are many important strategies to promote
agricultural finance knowledge (also in the form of financial literacy), the fundamentally positive
impact has not been seen. For this reason, it is recommended that agricultural extension technology
employees be included in the process, as well as the participation of bank employees, to raise
REFERENCES
Ajayi, M.A, Nageri, K.I, & Akolo, C.S. (2017). Impact of agricultural financing policy and deposit
money bank loan on agricultural sector productivity in Nigeria. Amity Journal of Agribusiness,
2(1), 1-11.
Chander, M. (2016). Agripreneurs: The emerging role models. Global Forum on Agricultural
theemerging-role-models/
education-5th-cohen.pdf
Delice, A. (2010). The sampling issues in quantitative research. Educational Sciences: Theory and
Ghasemi, A, & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality test for statistical analysis: guide for non-
10.5812/ijem.3505
Gichuki, J, Njeru, A, & Tirimba, O. (2014). Challenges Facing Micro and Small Enterprises in
Accessing Credit Facilities in Kangemi Harambee Market in Nairobi City County, Kenya.
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4 (12), 1-25. Retrieved from
http://www.ijsrp.org/ research-paper-1214/ijsrp-p3614.pdf.