Module in 105lesson 3
Module in 105lesson 3
Learner-Centered Teaching
Chapter 1
UNDERSTANDING LEARNING
This chapter deals with identifying the three types of learning and differentiating one from the
other. One of the outcomes of the learning process is the acquisition of knowledge. As will be seen
later, acquired knowledge comes in different levels depending on the kind of learning experiences
learners are exposed to.
Intended Learning Outcome (ILO) Categorize knowledge according to type: declarative, procedural, and
functional knowledge.
ENGAGE
ENGAGE
One of the outcomes of the learning process is the acquisition of knowledge. The other outcomes
are concerned with the acquisition and development of skills, attitudes, values, and a variety of other factors.
Knowledge, on the other hand, is fundamental. Before one can develop specific attitudes or skills, one must
first have knowledge.
It refers to what one can perform and what one is able to do, as opposed to declarative
knowledge. Knowing how to ride a bike is an example of procedural knowledge. Automatic or
habitual learning, often known as motor learning and/or procedural learning, are two further
notions connected to procedural learning ("Declarative Learning" n. d.). Procedural knowledge,
unlike declarative knowledge, may or may not have a linguistic component; it can be executed
without conscious thinking or attention; and it is sometimes acquired implicitly rather than
formally ("Declarative Learning" n. d.). When opposed to declarative learning, it is typically less
conscious.
Dimensions of Knowledge
Following are the dimensions of knowledge as identified by Anderson & Krathwohl (2001).
Acquisition of knowledge is a continuum from gathering and putting together basic content
to being able to discriminate when to use or apply content and process. The level or quality of the
knowledge acquired expectedly will improve with experience and with appropriate interventions,
according to experts.
Santrock (2011) claimed that mental processes of experts can help the teachers guide the
students into becoming more effective learners.
Studies have shown that experts are better than novices along the following
a. Detecting features and meaningful patterns of information
b. Accumulating more content knowledge and organizing it in a manner that indicates
understanding of the topic
c. Retrieving important aspects of knowledge with little effort situations
d. Adapting an approach to new e. Using effective strategies
Knowing the above approaches that experts use in dealing with knowledge or information,
teachers would be able to determine appropriate strategies to help students also apply these
approaches that experts use.
a. Detecting Features and Meaningful Patterns of
Organization. Experts are better able to detect
important features of problems and context not
noticed by novices. When confronted with
information or data, experts engage in
chunking of information where, they deduce
hierarchical structures, making them recall the
more important information therein.
Recall an experience in English class, then list down episodes where your teacher imparted or
developed among the students, the procedural knowledge and declarative knowledge.
Declarative Knowledge
Episodes Procedural Knowledge
Suggest one strategy or method (apart from those mentioned in this chapter) to improve the quality
of knowledge that your have acquired.