Book Chapter Haider, Reid, Sharp
Book Chapter Haider, Reid, Sharp
Book Chapter Haider, Reid, Sharp
Summary
PAGE) is an efficient way of separating low molecular mass proteins. However, the
standard system is quite complicated and specifically may not be useful when the
separated proteins require to be recovered from the gel for quantitative analysis. Here
comparatively low percentage gels which have high compatibility with modern
1
1. Introduction
derived from enzymatic digestion, is a difficult task. To achieve such separations with
high resolution, slab SDS-PAGE based methods are frequently used and allow several
lanes to be run on a single gel under identical conditions. Thus it is easy to compare
and to determine the molecular masses of the separated species by calculating the
relative mobility of each band relative to standards run on the same gel The Laemmli-
SDS-PAGE method (1) is widely used for the separation of the proteins, however, for
the separation of low mass proteins this system requires a very high percentage gel
(>16%) or a gradient gel (2-3). Such gels have several disadvantages including
difficulties in casting, irreproducibility, fragility and short shelf life (4). Further, it is
background signals of sulphur and phosphorus in high percentage gel also make them
resolution. Usually, a 10% gel (with pH 8.45) is employed to separate proteins in the
range of 1-100 kDa using two running buffers: a cathode buffer, e.g. 100 mM Tris,
100 mM tricine and 0.1% (w/v) SDS, pH 8.25, and an anode buffer, e.g.100 mM Tris,
2
pH 8.9. However, to obtain highly resolved bands, this method requires three gels
(stacking, spacer and resolving gel) (8-10) and addition of urea (4) in the resolving
gel. The use of three gels is tedious, potentially troublesome and always requires a
freshly prepared gel mixture (10). Addition of urea may also create problems in amino
acid sequencing (11), and although it is useful for the analysis of low mass proteins, it
employing a simplified procedure which does not require two different electrode
buffers, a spacer gel or addition of urea (12). This modified system is well suited for
quantitative analysis and shows excellent compatibility with detectors such as ICP-
MS or UV. For such analysis (and where the retention of metals is desired), the softest
conditions are preferred, that is low percentage gels and low concentration buffers.
on the modified method reagent system and the original method reagent system.
These show that using the simplified approach of the modified system a different
buffer and pH are required and that the original reagent system does not work
efficiently under these conditions. The user does not need to follow the steps for the
3
2. Materials
Prepare all the solutions in ultra-pure water (18 M-Ω, e.g. from a Milli-Q water
1. 2.5 M Tris buffer, pH 8.8 for modified, and pH 8.45 for original system (see
water and adjust the pH using HCl. Make up to the 1 L with water. This gel
29:1 (Sigma Aldrich, Poole, UK) was used. This polyacrylamide solution
SDS. Dissolve 3.03 g Tris-base, 4.5 g tricine and 0.5 g SDS in 1-L of
4
deionized water (see Note 3). There is no need to adjust the pH. Store at 4-
4. Running buffer for original system: 100 mM Tris, 100 mM Tricine 0.1% (w/v)
SDS. Weigh 12.1 g Tris-base, 17.9 g tricine and 1 g SDS and dissolve in 1-L
of deionized water (see Note 3-5). There is no need to adjust the pH. Store at
containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) (see Note 6), 1% (w/v) SDS, 4% (v/v)
g of CBB in 100 mL of 10% (v/v) acetic acid solution (see Note 9).
5
9. Acetic acid (10% v/v) de-staining solution: Prepare 100 mL of 10%
(Sigma Aldrich, Poole, UK) (see Note 9). Both stock and diluted solutions
Protein mass ladder: (a) with a mass range of 2.5-200 kDa (Invitrogen
Limited, Paisley, UK) and (b) 1.0-26.6 kDa Ultra Low Molecular Weight
MarkerTM (Sigma Aldrich, Poole, UK). Store the protein mass ladder
(a) at 4-8 ºC and protein mass ladder (b) at -20 ºC (see Note 4). For the detail
6
2.3 Protein Digestion
3. Methods
7
Protein digestion in solution for a comparative study should be performed
NH4HCO3 and 1.5 µL of 100 mM DTT solution and incubate at 90 ºC for 5-10
min.
ºC for 4 hours.
1. Prepare all stacking (4% w/v) and resolving gels mixture for 7, 9 and 10%
(w/v) gels for both the original and modified methods as shown in Table 2
8
2. Cast all the gels in gel cassettes at 7.3 cm height x 8 cm width and 0.75 mm
3. Firstly, inject the resolving gel mixture into the gel cassette (see Note 17-18).
4. Do not fill the resolving gel mixture to the top of the gel plates. Leave a space
of approximately 1-2 cm from the top. Quickly fill this space with butanol or
5. The resolving gel usually takes 10-15 minutes for polymerization. Check the
polymerization of the gel in the centrifuge tube and if the gel has been
polymerized then pour off the butanol (or 70% ethanol) form the top of the
resolving gel. Start injecting the stacking gel mixture onto the polymerized
resolving gel in the gel cassette and fill up to the top of the short plates and
then quickly insert the gel combs for the loading wells. Check the
lifting the combs, and if the stacking gel is polymerized then remove the gel
cassette sandwiche from gel casting frame and set this into the electrode
assembly. The short plates must be pointing inward in the dual plate electrode
9
3.3 Sample Preparation
Mix 10 µL of the sample buffer with 10 µL of the digest mixture. Dilute 20-
fold the protein mass ladder (b) with the 1 x sample buffer and heat at 65 ºC
(see Note 21). There is no need to dilute or heat the protein mass ladder (a).
1. Place the electrode assembly containing the 2 gel cassettes in the running
buffer tank.
2. Fill the tank with the running buffer and gently remove the combs. Wash the
loading wells with the running buffer using 1 mL pipette tips to remove any
un-polymerized acrylamide.
3. Load 7 µL of protein mass ladder (a), 5 µL of protein mass ladder (b), and 10
µL of β-casein digest (as prepared above) in each well of the 7, 9 and 10%
(w/v) slab gels for the modified and original tricine-SDS-PAGE methods.
4. Apply a constant voltage of 125-150 V. Do not stop until the dye front touches
10
1. Fix the gels for 25 minutes (using a shaker) with the fixing solution of 5%
(v/v) glutaraldehyde.
2. Stain each gel for 20 minutes (using a shaker) using CBB staining solution.
3. Perform de-staining for 20 minutes (using a shaker) using 10% (v/v) acetic
acid solution (see Note 24-25). See Fig. 2, 3 and 4 for typical results.
4. Notes
PAGE and “modified method” (12) refers to the modification here described.
tris-base whilst the modified method uses 2.5 M so here, for the comparative
study the concentration of the gel buffer was kept to 2.5 M for both systems.
accordingly.
11
5. For comparative study between the modified and original tricine SDS-PAGE
it.
11. Sequencing grade modified trypsin does not suffer from self autolysis and
12. We prefer a 10-50 mL centrifuge tube for preparing the gel mixture.
12
14. TEMED and APS must be added last in the gel mixture which requires
quick injection into the gel cassettes, otherwise gel will be polymerized in the
tube.
the time and the work must be done in a properly ventilated area.
16. For the purpose of comparing the original and modified methods the same
17. Inject the gel mixture slowly into the gel cassettes using 5 mL pipette tips and
18. In case of direct contact of the gel mixture with the skin wash the skin
20. The butanol or 70% ethanol must be removed before casting the stacking gel
13
21. For example, Sigma Aldrich (Poole, UK) provides 10 mL of 2x sample buffer
22. Do not overfill the wells otherwise they will contaminate the neighbouring
wells.
23. For rapid separation, a higher voltage of 200-250 can be applied, however, it is
not preferred because it increases the temperature of the buffer which may
cause a significant change in the pH of the running buffer and/or resolving gel.
24. Wash the gel with deionized water after each of the fixing, staining and de-
staining steps.
25. For best results, do not reuse fixing, staining and de-staining solutions.
elution and ICP-MS detection of 31P (for detail, see reference 12).
Acknowledgments
14
References
2. Hashimoto, F., Horigome, T., Kanbayashi, M., Yoshida, K., and Sugano, H.
3. Bothe, D., Simonis M., and Dohren, H. (1985) A sodium dodecyl sulphate-
4. Okajima, T., Tanabe, T., and Yasuda, T., (1993) Nonurea sodium dodecyl
5. Marshall, P., Heudi, O., Bains, S., Freeman, H.N., Abou-Shakra, F., and
15
6. Elliot, V.L., McLeod, C., and Marshall P. (2005) Combination of gel
7. Wind, M., Feldmann, I., Jakubowski N., and Lehmann, W.D. (2003) Spotting
Electrophoresis 7, 1276-1280.
9. Schägger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1987) Tricine sodium dodecyl sulfate-
10. Yim, S.K., Ahn, T., Kim, J.K., and Yun, C. H. (2002) Polyacrylamide gel
11. Hames, B.D. (1998) Gel Electrophoresis of Proteins. Oxford University Press,
New York.
16
12. Haider, S.R., Reid, H.J., and Sharp, B.L. (2010) Modification of tricine-SDS-
17