Ebook Highway Engineering Laboratory2021
Ebook Highway Engineering Laboratory2021
Ebook Highway Engineering Laboratory2021
ENGINEERING
L A B O R AT O R Y
A F F I D A H M A R D Z I A H B I N T I M U K H TA R
H I G H W AY
ENGINEERING
L A B O R AT O R Y
Hak cipta terpelihara. Tidak ada bahagian dalam penerbitan ini yang
dapat diterbitkan semula, disimpan dalam bentuk apa pun atau dengan
cara apa pun, elektronik, mekanikal, fotokopi, rakaman atau sebaliknya
tanpa izin bertulis terlebih dahulu dari pemegang hak cipta.
Affidah Mardziah
References 94
The design policy standards used in the United States are typically based on
publications of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officers as well as research declared by the Transportation Research Board, the
Institute of Transportation Engineers, the Federal Highway Administration, and the
Department of Transportation.
Checking No.
AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE (AIV)
CIVIL ENGINEERING (Reference Standard: BS 812: Effective Date:
part 112 1990)
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 Amendment Date:
When a road aggregate has been manufactured to a specified grading it is stock piled,
loaded into trucks, transported, tipped, spread and compacted. If the aggregate is
weak, some degradation may take place and result in a change in grading and/or the
production of excessive and undesirable fines. Thus, an aggregate complying with a
specification at the quarry may fail to do so when it is in the pavement.
The standard amount of impact is produced by a known weight, i.e. a steel cylinder,
falling a set height, a prescribed number of times, onto an amount of aggregate of
standard size and weight retained in a mould. Aggregate Impact Values, (AIV’s) below
10 are regarded as strong, and AIV’s above 35 would normally be regarded as too weak
for use in road surfaces. Aggregate Impact Values and Aggregate Crushing Values are
often numerically very similar, and indicate similar aggregate strength properties. Then,
the aggregate impact value gives a relative measure of the resistance of an aggregate
to sudden shock or impact, which in some aggregates differs from its resistance to a
slowly applied compressive load. With aggregate or aggregate impact value higher
than 30 the result maybe anomalous.
3.0 EQUIPMENTS:
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS
DOCUMENT
i. The apparatus consists of a steel test mould with a falling
hammer as shown in Figure 1. The hammer slides freely between
vertical guides so arranged that the lower part of the hammer is
above and concentric with the mould.
iv. Remove, by rolling the tamping rod across and in contact with
the top of the container, any aggregate which impedes its
progress. Aggregate being added to fill any obvious
depressions.
vi. Fix and secure the cylindrical metal container containing the
whole of the test sample in it in position on the base of the
machine.
vii. The test sample is subjected to 15 blows of the hammer
dropping 381 mm, each being delivered at an interval not less
than one second.
ix. Sieve the whole of the sample in the tray on the 2.36 mm BS test
sieve until no further significant amount passes in 3 minutes.
Weight the fractions passing (M2) and retained (M3) on the
sieve to an accuracy of 0.1 g. And if total mass M2 + M3 is less
than the initial mass (M1) by more than 1g, discard the result
and make a fresh test.
NAME GROUP
CHECKED BY DATE
Sampleweightbeforeblows(W3)
Sampleweightpassingsieve
2.36mm (M2)
Sampleweightretained insieve
2.36mm (M3)
6.0 DISCUSSION :
7.0 CONCLUSION
*Give your conclusion from this experimental and explain the result you get.
8.0 REFERENCES:
*Give at least 5 references you refer
Checking No.
POLISHED STONE VALUE (PSV)
CIVIL ENGINEERING (Reference Standard: BS812 Effective Date:
Part1 14:1989)
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 Amendment Date:
The actual relationship between PSV and skidding resistance will vary with traffic
conditions, type of surfacing and other factors. All factors together with reproducibility of
the test should be taken into account when drawing up specifications for road works
which include test limits for PSV. The PSV test is carried out in two stages - accelerated
polishing of test specimens followed by measurement of their state of polish by a friction
test.
The actual relationship between PSV and skidding resistance will vary with the
traffic conditions, type of surfacing and other factors. All factors together with the
reproducibility of the test should be taken into account when drawing up specifications
for road-works which include test limits for PSV. The test is in two parts.
a) First part. Samples of stone are subjected to a polishing action in an accelerated
polishing machine.
b) Second part. The state of polish reached by each sample is measured by means of a
friction test and is expressed as a laboratory-determined PSV.
In order to evaluate the effects of different grades of calcined bauxite on the polishing
behaviour, six types of calcined bauxite, including grades 90, 85, 80, 75, 70, and 65, were
used in this study. The main chemical composition of calcined bauxite was tested
with X-ray fluorescence analysis and is shown in Table 1. As coarse aggregates
commonly
EQUIPMENTS:
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS
DOCUMENT
the scale. Ensure that the track of the slider is parallel to the
long edge of the specimen across the sliding distance.
• Use the following procedure to ensure that the rubber slider is
correctly conditioned.
• NOTE It is possible to reverse the slider to make use of both
edges.
a) Maintain a stock of Criggion specimens for calibration
purposes. These shall be made from stone from Criggion
Quarry and shall be made and polished as in an actual
determination. When tested they shall yield a value in the
range58 to66. Record the values and air-dry the specimens
and store them in a sealed container for future use.
b) Before using a new slider, swing it five times over the dry
surface of a polished Criggion specimen following with a
further 20 swings on its wetted surface. Keep the Criggion
specimen used for this purpose apart from the Criggion
calibration specimens tested in it may be used repeatedly
provided its value (when wet) does not fall below55.
c) Before measuring the set of specimens polished on each test
run, check the performance of the slider by testing a
Criggion calibration specimen. Record the resulting value.
Additional polishing through repeated testing yields
progressively lower values and the control shall be discarded
when its value falls below 57. A new control shall then be
drawn from the stock. If a check value is more than 2 units
lower (or one unit higher) than the last recorded value for
the control, discontinue testing and rectify any fault in the
instrument or its operation or due to changes in the slider. It is
recommended that more than one slider be kept in use to
help differentiate between a faulty slider and a defective
instrument.
d) Discard any slider that develops excessive burring and
scoring through prolonged use.
• Rigidly locate the first test specimen with its longer dimension
lying in the track of the pendulum, and centrally with respect to
the rubber slider and to the axis of suspension of the pendulum.
Locate it in such a way that the slider of the pendulum will
traverse it in the same direction as the specimen travelled in the
polishing machine
• NOTE For this purpose it is advisable to mark one longitudinal
edge of each specimen. If this mark is on the side of the
specimen furthest from the operator during polishing, it should
be nearest to him during friction testing and vice versa.
• Adjust the height of the axis of suspension of the pendulum so
that in traversing the specimen the rubber slider is in contact
with it over the whole width of the slider and over a length of
76.0 mm, as accurately as can be visually gauged. Then wet
the surfaces of the specimen and the rubber slider with a
copious supply of clean water, being careful not to disturb the
slider from its set position. Release the pendulum and pointer
from the horizontal position and note the reading of the pointer
to the nearest whole number. Perform this operation five times,
rewetting the specimen each time, and record the mean of the
last three readings to the nearest 0.1 unit. Test the specimens in
the following order: 13, 1, 10, 3, 5, 12, 8, 7, 11, 6, 4, 9, 2, 14
5. Calculations
• Calculate the mean of the recorded values of the two PSV
control stone specimens for each test run. Record to the nearest
0.1 unit providing two
results for the complete duplicated test cycles.
• If the difference between the two mean values of the PSV
control specimens for each test run is greater than 4.7, the
results for the test shall be rejected. If the mean value of the two
PSV control specimens for either test run does not lie within the
range 49.5 to 55.5 the test results shall be rejected.
PSV = S + 52.5 – C
a If the PSV value results with different values, whether the decrease in alumina
.b. content will cause PSV weakening. Give a reason?
Give two experimentsfor polished stone value.
CONCLUSION
a. Give your conclusion from this experimental and explain the result you get.
Checking No.
FLAKINESS AND
ELONGATION INDEX TEST
Reference Standard: BS 812: Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Section 105.1 :1989
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 Amendment Date:
SAMPLE
Use the material retained on any of the following sieves: 50, 37.5,
28, 20, 14, 10, 6.3mm sieve and has been placed into separate
containers.
INSTRUCTION
Weight
Weight
SIEVE SIZE Retaine Flakiness
Weight Weight Passing
Weight d On Index (%)
of of Sieve On
of Flakiness (Individu
Retained Sieve + Flakiness
Sample Gauge al Size)
on Sieve (g) Sample Gauge
(g) (g) B
mm (g) (g) A
50
(33.9 mm slot)
37.5
(26.3 mm slot)
28
(19.7 mm slot)
20
(14.4 mm slot)
14
(10.2 mm slot)
10
10 (7.2 mm slot)
6.3
(4.9 mm slot)
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS
DOCUMENT
SAMPLE
Use the material retained on any of the following sieves: 37.5mm, 28mm,
20mm, 14mm, 10mm, 6.3mm sieve and has been placed into separate
containers.
INSTRUCTION
Sieve an aggregate amount of 2 kg using the BS Standard sieves
Sources :
Location :
Testes By : Date :
Weight
SIEVE SIZE Weight
Retaine
Weight Weight Passing
Weight d On
of of Sieve On Remarks
Retained of Elongati
Sieve + Elongati
on Sample on
(g) Sample on
Sieve (g) Gauge
(g) Gauge
mm (g) M3
(g) M2
37.5
28
20
14
10
6.3
QUESTION
1. What is the use of flakiness index and elongation index?
.
2. Why flaky or elongated particles are avoided in pavement construction?
Checking No.
SOUNDNESS TEST OF
AGREGATE
Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING (Reference Standard: BS
812-121:1989 ) Amendment Date:
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021
The definitive method is based on finding the degree of degradation that occurs when test
portions of an aggregate in the size range 10.0 mm to 14.0 mm are subjected to cycles of
immersion in saturated magnesium sulphate solution followed by oven-drying. The degree
of degradation is expressed as the magnesium sulphate soundness value. Appendix A
recommends procedures for carrying out the test on test portions of aggregate in size
ranges other than the one used in the definitive method.
The sulphate soundness test has a long history. It is reported that it first appeared in France
around 1818 as a test for classifying the resistance of building stone to deterioration under
freeze-thaw conditions. In North America it has been incorporated in the ASTM book of
standards, designation C88, since 1931. It did not come into widespread use in the United
Kingdom until the late 1970s. Current experience of the use of the test in the UK relates
mainly to aggregates in materials forming the surfacing of airfields/airports and of highway
pavements. It is intended that advice on the applicability of this test for given situations
and on the selection of limits will be included in future Parts of this standard. Similarly it is
intended that advice on calibration will be included in Part 1001)
It is intended that other British Standards should call up BS 812 test methods as the basis for
compliance. Nevertheless it is not intended that all aggregates should be subjected
regularly to all the listed tests. Specifications in other standards should call up only relevant
test methods. Reference should be made to BS 812-101 for general guidance on testing
aggregates, precision of test methods and variance arising from sampling errors.
The sample to be used for the test (the laboratory sample) shall be taken in accordance
with the procedure described in clause 5 of BS 812-102:1984.
4.0 APPARATUS
1. Test sieves,
- with square hole perforated plate of sizes 14.0 mm, 10.0 mm and 6.3 mm, and a
woven wire 3.35 mm test sieve. The test sieves shall comply with BS 410.
2. Balance
- A balance, of at least 10 kg capacity, accurate to 5 g and A balance, of at
least 500 g capacity, accurate to 0.05 g
3. At least two brass or stainless steel mesh baskets
4. Containers, of diameter such that the baskets listed in 5.5
5. Water bath / tank at 20 ± 2 °C
6. Oven
7. Density hydrometer
8. A desiccator
9. Reagent : A supply of distilled water or deionized water,
Barium chloride, 5 % solution, Dissolve 5 g of barium chloride in 100 mL of distilled or
deionized, water, 6.3 A saturated solution of magnesium sulphate
5.0 PROCEDURE
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS
DOCUMENT
PREPARATION OF TEST PORTIONS AND SPECIMENS
1. Reduce the laboratory sample by the procedures described
in clause 6 of BS 812-102:1984 to produce two test portions of
sufficient mass such that each will produce a minimum mass
of 500 g of the 10.0 mm to 14.0 mm size range when
processed as described in 3.
2. Dry each test portion in the oven at 105 °C to 110 °C to
constant mass and allow to cool in the desiccator to
laboratory temperature.
3. Sieve each dried test portion using the 14.0 mm and 10.0
mm test sieves to obtain two test specimens of material, of
500 g approximate mass, in the size range 10.0 mm to 14.0
mm.
4. Wash the test specimens with distilled water until they are
seen to be free from dust, allow to drain and dry in the oven
at 105 °C to 110 °C for at least 24 h. Remove from the oven
and allow to cool in the desiccator.
PROCEDURE
1. Immerse the basket, containing the specimen under test, in a
container holding the saturated solution of magnesium
sulphate, so that the aggregate is completely immersed, for a
period of 17 h ± 30 min. Suspend each basket so that there is
a minimum of 20 mm of solution above the specimen and 20
mm separation from any salt cake accumulation or from any
other basket. Take particular care during the process of
immersion to ensure that no whole piece of aggregate is lost
from the basket. Cover the container holding the solution and
the test specimen to reduce evaporation and to prevent
ingress of foreign matter. NOTE Clock glasses are suitable
covers.
2. At the end of the immersion period remove the basket from
the solution, cover the container and leave the basket to
drain for a period of2h ± 15 min. Place the basket in the oven
maintained at a temperature of 105 °C to 110 °C for at least
24 h. Remove the basket from the oven and leave to cool to
laboratory temperature for5h ± 15 min.
3. Prior to the next immersion break up any salt cake which may
have accumulated at the bottom of the container, stir the
solution thoroughly with a glass rod and allow to settle for 30
min. Check that the density of the solution in the container is
still in the required range and if it is not replace it with unused
saturated solution of magnesium sulphate. NOTE In cases
where severe disintegration of the aggregate occurs during
the course of the test the relative density recorded may not
accurately reflect the degree of saturation of the solution,
because of the suspended fines or ion-exchange effects.
Where the density falls outside the range given in 6.3.3 the
test procedure calls for replacement with a fresh solution of
magnesium sulphate.
4. Immerse the basket in the saturated solution of magnesium
sulphate and repeat the process of immersion, drainage,
oven-drying, cooling and agitation described in 8.1 to 8.3 until
five cycles have been completed, each cycle taking 48 ± 2 h.
When scheduling the tests, a nominal value of 24 h is used for
the oven-drying period.
DISCUSSION :
a) Sample identification and sample description including rock type and aggregate size.
b) Aggregate size fractions.
c) The magnesium sulphate soundness value and the individual soundness values of the
two specimens.
CONCLUSION
a. Give your conclusion from this experimental and explain the result you get.
REFERENCES: Give at least 5 references you refer
Checking No.
PENETRATION OF
BITUMINOUS MATERIALS Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Reference Standard:
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 BS 2000: Part 49: 1983 Amendment Date:
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS
DOCUMENT
Penetration (mm)
Sample Mean
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Highest Lowest
Sample Penetration (mm) Penetration(mm) Difference (mm)
1
2
3
a. Give the good value for the average mean penetration in this
experimental. Compare the standard result and your experiments result
value. How much value notachieves suitable penetration.
b. Explain what is bituminous penetration grade 80/100?
CONCLUSION
a. Give your conclusion from this experimental and explain the result you get
Checking No.
SOFTENING POINT OF
BITUMEN Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
(Reference Standard:
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 AASHTO T 53-84) Amendment Date:
To determine the softening point of bitumen with range 30oC to 157oC by means of the
Ring and Ball apparatus..
Unlike some substances (e.g. water which changes from solid to liquid at 0 °C) bituminous
materials do not have a definite melting point. Instead, as the temperature rises, these
materials slowly change from brittle or very thick and slow-flowing materials to softer and less
viscous liquids. Being very simple in concept and equipment, the Ring-and-Ball Test has
remained a valuable consistency test for control in refining operations, particularly in the
production of air-blown bitumen. It is also an indirect measure of viscosity or, rather, the
temperature at which a given viscosity is evident. Softening Point (SP) together with
Penetration Value(P) are used to determine the Penetration Index (IP). IP can indicate the
properties of bitumen tested and its suitability. IP can be determined using nomograph or the
following equation (BS 4987):
Thermometer
Support Frame
(Shouldered Brass Ring)
Heat Resistance
GlassBeaker
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS
DOCUMENT
1. Specimens are prepared in precisely dimensioned brass rings
and maintained at a temperature of not less than 10°C below
the expected softening point for at least 30 minutes before the
test.
2. The rings and assembly, and two ball bearings, are placed in a
liquid bath filled to a depth of 105 ± 3 mm and the whole
maintained at a temperature of 5 ± 1°C for 15 minutes. (Freshly
boiled distilled water is used for bitumen with a softening point
of 80 °C or below, and glycerin is used for softening point
greater than 80°C).
3. A 9.5 mm steel ball bearing (weighing 3.50 ± 0.05 g) is centered
on each specimen and heat is then applied to the beaker so as
to raise the
4. temperature by 5 ± 0.5 °C per minute.
5. The temperature at which each bitumen specimen touches the
base plate is recorded to the nearest 0.2°C.
NAME GROUP
CHECKED BY DATE
6.0 RESULTS
The mean temperature of the two specimens (which shall not differ by more than as
shown as Table 1) is recorded as the softening point.
Table 1: Maximum Difference for the Mean Temperature of the Two Specimens
TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE
30°C below 30°C - 80°C 2°C
80°C above 1°C
2°C
This temperature is to be used in conjunction with the penetration value to obtain the
Penetration Index (PI). (Figure 5.3: Nomograph for Penetration Index of Bitumen) . Asphalt
cement with PI between –1 to +1 is suitable to be used in asphalt paving works.
Checking No.
VISCOSITY TEST AND FLASH
& FIRE POINT
(Reference Standard: Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
BS 2000 Part 170)
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 Amendment Date:
To determine the flash point and fire point of asphaltic bitumen, fluxed native asphalt,
blown type bitumen, or cutback bitumen.
Flash and fire point test of bitumen sample is one of the important tests of bitumen to be
conducted before road construction. Flash and fire point measures the temperature at
which the material is at risk of catching fire. The temperature at which the vapour of the
bituminous material catches an instant fire or the material burns for some seconds is
different for different types and grades of bitumen binders. Bituminous materials are
primarily hydrocarbons and hence at high temperatures, they release various volatile
materials. These liberated volatile compounds catch fire with a flash. And this can prove
hazardous. Bitumen is heated for its application as bitumen binder for road pavements.
While dealing with hot bitumen during the processes like heating, mixing, or application,
the temperature should be kept well below the critical temperatures determined by
flash and fire point.
2.0 EQUIPMENT
1. Bituminous material
2. Solvent for cleaning
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS DOCUMENT
1. Clean all the parts of the cup and its accessories thoroughly and
allow them to dry.
3. Fill the melted bitumen in the cup up to the filling mark indicated
on the cup.
4. Close the cup with the help of the lid. Ensure that the
locating devices of the cup and lid are properly engaged.
10. Operate the device to apply the test flame by controlling shutter
and test flame burner in such a way that the flame is lowered in
0.5 seconds for. It remains in the lowered position for a second
and is raised quickly to the higher position.
2. Fill the space between the cup and the interior of the air bath with
the same temperature to remove the air.
5. Then the test flame is applied and the other steps are followed as
described previously except for the interval at which test flame is
applied. Instead of applying test flame at intervals of 1 °C, the test
flame is applied at every 0.5 °C rise in temperature.
DATA :
NAME GROUP
CHECKED BY DATE
Observation:
Observation Table:
(A sample observation table for flash and fire point test is drawn
below)
READINGS
CONCLUSION
a. Giveyourconclusion fromthis experimental and explain the result you get.
3. What is the purpose of laboratory tests using flash point and fire point?
Checking No.
DUCTILITY TEST OF BITUMEN
(Reference Standard: Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
BS EN 13589)
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 Amendment Date:
The Ductility Test of Bitumen is one of the important tests of bitumen which is essential
before using it in road construction. The Ductility Test of Bitumen used to measure the
adhesive and elastic properties of any bitumen sample.
The bituminous binder used in the pavement should be ductile enough to take up the
deformations acting upon it without exceeding the deflection limit. Ductile bitumen can
form a thin ductile film around the aggregate particles. Thus, it does not crack at low
temperatures. However, the films of brittle bitumen are not ductile and crack may easily
develop in lower temperatures.
Ductility of Bitumen: The amount in centimeter by which the bitumen can stretch before
breaking is called ductility of bitumen.
Grade of Bitumen: There are five grades of bitumen on the basis of penetration value.
They are demonstrated as S-35, S-45, S-55, S-65, S-90, and S-200.
4.0 MATERIALS:
3. 0 DETAILED PROCEDURE :
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS DOCUMENT
The ductility test of bitumen is carried out in two steps:
Testing of the Specimen: In this step, the bitumen sample taken in the
mold is tested for its ductility in the ductility testing machine.
A. Sample Preparation:
1. Fix the sides, clip over the base plate, and tighten the screw of the
clip with the help of a screwdriver.
3. Pour the melted bitumen in the briquette mold until they are full.
5. Place the whole assembly with brass plate and mold in a water
bath, which is maintained at 27 °C for about 30 minutes.
6. Cut the excess bitumen on the surface with the help of hot,
straight-edged putty knife or spatula and level the top surface. The
dimension of the briquette thus formed is exactly 1 sq. cm.
1. Place the brass plate along with mold containing the specimen
again in the water bath at 27 °C for 85-95 minutes.
2. Remove the briquette from the base plate, unscrew the clips, and
remove the sides of the briquette mold.
3. Attach the assembly of bitumen sample with a base plate with the
help of rings of the clips to the pins or hooks in the ductility
machine. One clip of the mold is attached to the moving part
while the other clip is attached to the fixed part of the ductility
machine.
4. Tighten the screw of the clips of the mold with the help of a
screwdriver.
6. Switch on the ductility machine and adjust the gear so that the
movable part moves at the speed of 50 mm/minute. (The pull rate
of the machine is to be maintained 50 mm/min).
7. Thus, the two clips are pulled apart horizontally at uniform speed
until the briquette specimen ruptures.
Observation:
DATA :
Ductility (b-a) in mm
Ductility of the sample = Average value of ductility of 1, 2, 3.
S – 35 50
S – 55 75
S – 65 75
S – 90 75
S – 200 75
CONCLUSION
a. Giveyourconclusion fromthis experimental and explain
the result you get.
Checking No.
FLOAT TEST OF BITUMEN
(Reference Standard:
ASTM D139 – 16) Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
A Float test of Bitumen is generally used to determine the consistency of a highly viscous
bitumen sample. The consistency of bitumen is an important property of bitumen to find
out before using. The float test of bitumen gives us an idea about how the bitumen sample
behaves in temperature changes and resistance to flow.
The float test of Bitumen measures the consistency of the bitumen when it is not possible to
determine the consistency by penetration test or viscosity test. Consistency of Highly
viscous bitumen is tested by float test. The distillation residues and residues from emulsion
are tested by float test. Consistency of bitumen is an essential parameter to analyze the
quality of bitumen.
The apparatus used in the float test of bitumen are described below:
4.0 MATERIAL
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS DOCUMENT
The procedure to carry out the float test of bitumen is described
below:
A. Sample Preparation :
4. Take the brass plate and coat it with the mixture prepared in the
above step. Then place the smaller end of the brass collar on the
2. Then place the specimen in the water bath for 5 minutes and
maintain the temperature of 5 °C.
3. Remove the sample from the water and trim the sample from the
top of the collar with the help of a slightly-heated steel knife or a
spatula.
4. Place the collar and base plate with the sample again in the water
bath for at least 15 minutes at 5°C. Care should be taken that the
duration does not exceed 30 minutes.
C. Tar Product :
2. Remove the sample from the water and trim the sample from the
top of the collar with the help of a slightly-heated steel knife or a
spatula.
3. Place the collar and base plate with the sample again in the water
bath for at least 15 minutes at 5°C. Care should be taken that the
duration does not exceed 30 minutes.
1. Heat the water bath to the temperature required for testing of the
sample- 50 °C.
1. Remove the collar along with the sample from the base plate.
2. Place the sample along with the collar to the aluminum float and
fix it with a screw.
4. Take out the assembly from the water and remove the water from
inside of the float, if present inside.
7. Note the time in seconds at which the water breaks through the
specimen with the help of a stopwatch. This time gives the float
value.
DATA :
Following observations are to be recorded during the float test of
bitumen
(A sample observation table for float test of bitumen is drawn
below)
Time in Second
CONCLUSION
a. Give your conclusion from this experimental and explain the result you get.
Checking No.
MARSHALL STABILITY TEST
(Reference Standard:
ASTM D6927 - 06) Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
1.0 OBJECTIVE
To determine the optimum bitumen content in the mix wearing course and binder
course in designing the pavement structural of flexible pavement
2.0 THEORY
Flexible pavement design consists of two main elements that is design thickness and mix
design. The design thickness is related to the semester 6 syllabus, which is designedbased on
Road Note
29.Mix design is focused on a mixture of substances used as binder layers and wear layers.
These materials must be through a proper mix design. There are various methods of mix
design, but the Marshall Mix design method is the most popular.
Apart from determining the optimum bitumen content, this method can also specify
aggregate grading on the most suitable mix design. The Marshall method outlines the
procedure beginning with specimen preparation until the determination of optimum
bitumen content.
2. Aggregate Blending
3. Preparation of mixedgroups
4. Compaction
VIM
VF
Flo
% Bitumen
Themean optimumbitumencontentshallbedeterminedbyaveragingfiveoptimum
bitumen contents so determined as follows;
3.0 EQUIPMENT
6. While preparing the mixture, the ram and Marshall mold should be
cleaned and heated to 137 C
7. Put the mold on the table and put a piece of filter paper into the
mold. Pour the hot mix into the mold and smoothen the top
surface. Then put another piece of filter paper.
9. Remove the collar; leave the specimen for a while as the second
mixture is prepared and take out the specimen using an extrusion
jack. Let the specimen cool before testing it.
Bitumen content used : 4.0 %, 4.5%, 5.0%, 5.5, 6.0% and 6.5%
- Stability vs BinderContent
3.
- Flow vs BinderContent
DISCUSSION
a. Apart from the stability, discuss of the important characteristics of a bituminous
pavement mixture
b. Discuss the factors that influence the stability of bituminous pavement mixture
1.0 OBJECTIVE
TodeterminetheCaliforniabearingratiobyconductingaload penetrationtestin
thelaboratory.
2.0 THEORY
The California bearing ratio test is penetration test meant for the evaluation of
subgrade strength of roads and pavements. The results obtained by these tests are used
with the empirical curves to determine the thickness of pavement and its component
layers. This is themost widely used method for the design of flexible pavement.
This instruction sheet coversthelaboratorymethod forthedetermination of C.B.R. of
undisturbed and remoulded /compacted soil specimens, both in soaked as well as
unsoaked state.
3.0 EQUIPMENTS
1. Cylindrical mould with inside dia 150 mm and height 175 mm,
provided with a detachable extension collar 50 mm height and a
detachable perforated base plate 10 mm thick.
2. Spacerdisc148mmindia and47.7mminheightalong with handle.
3. Metal rammers. weight 4.5 kg a drop 450 mm. Weights. One annular
metal weight and several slotted weights weighing 2.5 kg each, 147
mm in dia, with a central hole 53 mm in diameter.
4. Loading machine with a capacity of at least 5000 kg and
equipped with a movable head or base that travels at an uniform
rate of 1.25 mm/min. Complete with loading dicatingdevice.
5. Metal penetration piston 50 mm dia and minimum of 100 mm in
length.
6. Two dial gauges reading to 0.01 mm. Sieves 20 mm B.S. Sieves.
7. Miscellaneous apparatus, such as a mixing bowl, straight edge, scales soaking
tank or pan,drying oven, filter paper and containers.
4.0 PROCEDURE:
3. 10.1.
4. Choose one of six methods for soil compaction. For this test
method No. 5 is recommended for soil compaction. According
to this method, compact the soil in the CBR mold with the
rammer. The soil should be poured into the mold in FIVE layers. Each
layer should be given distributed blows 62 times over the surface.
5. Remove the detachable collar and trim the top of the mold.
6. Measure the mass of the mold with the base plate containing the
specimen.
7. Place the mold with the specimen in the testing machine. Apply
a surcharge over the specimen corresponding to the mass of the
pavement.
8. Seat the plunger on the surface of the specimen under a small
load. Set the load and
13. Redo the steps listed above for the bottom part of the sample.
i. Draw and plot a graph of force after calibration (Load) against penetration of
ii. plunger. Calculate the CBR value for the penetration 2.5mm and 5.0mm.
Bottom
NAME GROUP
CHECKED BY DATE
Top Bottom
Penetration
Force on Force after Force on Force after
of Plunger dial dial
calibration calibration
( mm ) Gauge Gauge
(kN) (kN)
(mm) (mm)
a [(a) x 0.025kN/mm] b [(b) x 0.025kN/mm]
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
Top Bottom
CBR2.5 mm
CBR5.0 mm
NAME GROUP
CHECKED BY DATE
DATA
NAME GROUP
CHECKED BY DATE
WATER CONTENT
Mass of container(M1) g
a. Give the good value for the CBR 2.5 mm and 5.0 mm in this experimental. Compare
the standard result and your experiments result value. How many value over than
5% CBR value.
b. Explain why this experimental is more important to highway testing material. Give
3 suitable reason from this testing.
CONCLUSION
a. Give your conclusion from this experimental and explain the result you get.
Checking No.
ROAD SKID RESISTANCE TEST
(Reference Standard: Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
BS 7941-1: 2006)
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 Amendment Date:
To measure texture depth and skid resistance of a road surface using the BS Pendulum Skid
Resistance Tester
2.0 THEORY
One of the surface requirementsfor a road pavementis it should possess a adequate skid
resistancevalue.Skid resistanceis importantfor road users safety.A good skid resistanceallows
for better grip between tire and road pavement surfaces. A new constructed road will
provide road users excellent skid resistancevalue,but the value willdecrease along theaging
of the road pavement surface caused by a few factors. Most of the road surfaces provide
a good skid resistance value in dry condition compared to wet condition. The presence
of water between the tire and road surface reduces the sufficient contact area which are
needed to create the 'grip'. This situation describes the procedure for determining the
frictional properties (skid resistancevalue) of a pavement surface using a PortableSkid
Resistance Tester.The equipment willmeasure the friction betweena skidding tireand wet
road surface in low speed situation <60 km/h).
2. Perspective rule
3. Brush
4. Thermometer
4.0 PROCEDURE:
2. Place the skid resistance tester on the road surface and level
the base according the Leveler bubble
Set up the equipment to zero reading according the following
3.
procedure :
i. Raise up theposition of thependulum using theadjuster
knob until thependulum can make a free swing
ii. Place the Pendulum at its bracket
iii. Make sure thereis no obstaclealong thependulum swing
path,set up the reading pointer position equal to the
position of the pendulum.
iv. Repeat the procedure below until the reading pointer
produce a zero reading
NAME GROUP
CHECKED BY DATE
READINGS
LOCATION AVERAGE
1 2 3 4 5
4. Compare the result of this test with the requirement and do some
discussion on it.
Checking No.
CORING TEST
(Reference Standard: Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
ASTM D5361/D5361M – 16)
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 Amendment Date:
2.0 THEORY :
The standard test procedure is used for collecting samples of asphalt concrete by
coring methods. Samples of asphalt concrete collected using the coring method may
be used to evaluate various characteristics of an asphalt concrete pavement for
construction quality control testing, quality assurance testing and product
acceptance testing. Core samples may also be used for research testing purposes.
The standard core sample diameter for purposes of this test procedure will be 101.6 mm
or 152.4 mm. Generally, the maximum thickness of asphalt concrete pavement to be
sampled will be 250 mm.
3.0 EQUIPMENT
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS DOCUMENT
DATA
NAME GROUP
CHECKED BY DATE
= D X measured of compressive
1.5 + 1/λ strength of core
CONCLUSION
a. Give your conclusion from this experimental and explain the
result you get.
85
Page :
WORK INSTRUCTION
Edition :
Checking No.
SPOT SPEED STUDY
(Reference Standard:
Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING AASHTO. 2001)
1.0 OBJECTIVE :
2.0 THEORY:
Prior to planning and designing a traffic system it is necessary to collect traffic data to
be analyzed, and studied in depth. Field surveys are needed to make a detailed plan.
The data collected will be sufficient to represent and actual situation on the
characteristics of traffic in the area. Information is often collected in the field by
3.0 EQUIPMENTS :
4.0 LOCATION :: Make sure the location is away from the intersection
1. Select a suitable area at Politeknik Mukah. (Make sure the site chosen is not dangerous
and does not interfere with existing traffic)
2. For the purpose of this study, an observer is appointed to observe vehicle speeds using
radar gun. The radar gun send out a radio signal, then receive the same signal back as it
bounces off target object. However, due to a phenomenon called the Doppler Effect,
if the object is moving, the frequency of the radio waves is different when they come
back, and from that difference the radar gun can calculate the object’s speed.
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS DOCUMENT
observation : .............................................................................
RESULT :
i. Construct a frequency histogram % against speed class.
ii. Construct a cumulative frequency curve % against an average speed of local.
iii. From the graph determine the percentage speed of 15th, 50th and 85th.
iv. Recommendation on the studied road?
Average Frequency of %
Class Speed speed in Vehicle Cumulative
% Frequency Cumulative
(km/h) class(xi) (fi) frequency
frequency
Checking No.
TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY
(Reference Standard:
Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING AASHTO. 2001)
The various volume counts taken over different lengths of time are usually expressed in
vehicles per hour (vph). Other traffic volume characteristics obtained are average
annual daily traffic (AADT), average daily traffic (ADT), peak hour volume (PHV), and
vehicle miles of travel (VMT). The documentation of volume trends, critical flow time
periods and the influence of heavy and slowvehicles or motorcyclists or
pedestrians on overall vehicular traffic flow can be illustrated.
The sampling period depends very much on the intended use of the data recorded,
the resources available to the counting agency, the nature of the location being
studied and the type of count. Counting can be done from as low as 5-minute
intervals to as much as a year. In these studies, both manual and automatic counts
are included in Part 1 and Part II respectively
A) TRAFFIC VOLUME
VEHICLE
CLASSIFICATION
1st Trial
2nd Trial
3rd Trial
Car/ Taxi
Average
Total
Hourly volume
Rof =
= (volume (veh) x 60):15
Hourly volume :
= Rate of Flow):4
= ( Total
= volume (veh)/ 60
= Total
c Throughout the observation, find the highest and lowest vehicle volume
. and make a comparison.
Flow rate of vehicles per hour was calculated to estimate the peak hour factor
(PHF) which are presents the ratio of total hourly volume to the maximum flow rate
within 1 hour. Average vehicles volume per hour was calculated in order to
estimate the average daily traffic (ADT)to measure present demand of traffic flow
per hour and per day.
CONCLUSION
a. Give your conclusion from this experimental and explain the result you get.
Checking No.
SPEED AND DELAY STUDY
(Reference Standard: Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
AASHTO. 2001)
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 Amendment Date:
This study helps to determine the amount of time required to travel from one point to
another on a given route
The information assembled as part of this travel time and delay study forms a baseline for
future assessment.. Often, information may also be collected on the locations, durations,
and causes of delays. Good indication of the level of service and identifying problem
locations.
A travel time study determines the average time required and also the amount of delay
caused on a given route. Delay is the extra time spent by drivers against their
expectation. Data obtained from travel time and delay studies give a good indication of
the level of service on the study section. These data aids the traffic engineer in
identifying locations like presence of intersections, which may require special attention in
order to improve the overall flow of traffic on the route.
REFERENCE
WORK PROCESS DOCUMENT
4. The number of vehicles that overtake the test car while it is traveling
west from Y-Y to X- X, that is, traveling in the westbound direction
(Ow)
5. The number of vehicles that the test car passes while it is traveling
west from Y-Y to X-X, that is, traveling in the westbound direction (Pw)
CONCLUSION
a. Give your conclusion from this experimental and explain the result you get.
Checking No.
PARKING STUDIES
(Reference Standard: Effective Date:
CIVIL ENGINEERING
AASHTO. 2001)
JKA/ DCC30112/ 2021 Amendment Date:
Parking is one of the major problems that is created by the increasing road traffic. It is an
impact of transport development. The availability of less space in urban areas has
increased the demand for parking space especially in areas like Central business district.
This affects the mode choice also. This has a great economical impact.
3.0 EQUIPMENTS:
CONCLUSION
a. Give your conclusion from this experimental and explain the result you get.
ASTM D139 – 16 (2016). Standard Test Method for Float Test for Bituminous
Materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.
ASTM D6927-06 (2006), Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability and Flow of
Bituminous Mixtures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.
BS 2000: Part 49: (1983). Methods of tests for petroleum and its products.
Bitumen and bituminous binders. Determination of needle
penetration. British Standards Institution, London.
BS 2000 Part 170 (1995). Methods of test for petroleum and its products -
Petroleum products. Determination of flash point. Abel closed cup
method. British Standards Institution, London.
BSI (1990). British Standard BS 812: Part 114:1989 Testing aggregates -Method
for determination of the polished-stone value. British Standards Institution,
London.