Step 4 - CCVA

Table 7.
Impact Area and Climate Stimuli,______________,___________
Climate Stimuli Impact Area

A B
Instructions:
1. In column A, based from the scoping in step 2, list down all the identified climate stimuli.
Climate change stimuli refer to the general changes expected in the climate. These include changes in seasonal tem
of dry days, sea level rise, and number of days with extreme temperatures.
2. In column B, determine the estimated impact area where the climate stimuli will manifest. Impact area could be the
areas (purok/sitio). The impact area map generated in this Step can provide a better view of the extent of impact of the
3. In column C, list down the potential Systems of Interest and Development Sectors that can be affected by the climat
may or may not affect all the systems of interests and the development sectors.
*Systems of Interest: Natural Resources, Population, Critical Facilities, Urban Use, Lifeline Facilities
*Development Sectors: Social, Environment, Infrastructure, Institution, Economic
a and Climate Stimuli,______________,___________
Areas of Concerns
C
System/s of Interest Development Sectors
n all the identified climate stimuli.
xpected in the climate. These include changes in seasonal temperature and rainfall, number
treme temperatures.
ere the climate stimuli will manifest. Impact area could be the whole barangay or specific
s Step can provide a better view of the extent of impact of the cimate stimuli.
t and Development Sectors that can be affected by the climate stimuli. The climate stimuli
e development sectors.
tion, Critical Facilities, Urban Use, Lifeline Facilities
astructure, Institution, Economic
Table 8.1. Population CCVA, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Climate Stimuli:
BARANGAY
Total Exposed Total No. of exposed Total No. of exposed No. of exposed Male
Residential (HAS) Population Households Population
Instructions:
1. In Columns B-C, using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and compute values for each population exposure
2. In colum D, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.
3. In column E, based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential impa
High (3) - Estimated direct impacts in terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of property damage w
Moderate (2) - Moderate direct impacts in terms of terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of prop
Low (1) - Estimated direct and indirect impacts are low to negligible which can be felt within a short term p
4. In column F, Evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the system being studied by referring to the adaptive capacity indic
High (1) - The system is able to accommodate changes in climate. There are adaptation measures in place t
Moderate (2) - Addressing the impacts will require signicant cost but it is still within the capacity of the syst
Low (3) - The system is not exible to accommodate changes in the climate. Addressing the impacts will be c
5. In column G, Compute for the vulnerability index by multiplying the Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, base
High (3): > 6 - 9
Moderate (2): > 3 - 6
Low (1): < 3
EXPOSURE INDICATORS
SOCIAL
Percentage of Exposed
No. of exposed Female Percentage of exposed Percentage of exposed Percentage of exposed
of teachers &
Population agriculture farmers municipal fisherfolk commercial fishermen
personnel per school
ute values for each population exposure and sensitivity indicators.

y.
posed units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively determine the degree of impact score using the suggested rating scale.
injuries and value of property damage will be disastrous given the extent of exposure and current sensitivity of the system.
er of fatalities, injuries and value of property damage are expected given the extent of exposure and current sensitivities of the system.
e which can be felt within a short term period.
y referring to the adaptive capacity indicators in the exposure database. These indicators of adaptive capacities can describe whether the
here are adaptation measures in place to address impacts.
ut it is still within the capacity of the system to adapt to potential impacts.
climate. Addressing the impacts will be costly. The LGU and property owners will require external assistance to address the impacts.
aptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, based on the computed vulnerability index, categorize the index scores into categories:
E INDICATORS
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
health workers per
Students (Elementary) Students(HS) Students (College) Students (Graduate)
center
sing the suggested rating scale.

t sensitivity of the system.
nd current sensitivities of the system.
tive capacities can describe whether the system is able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very minimal disruption or short to
assistance to address the impacts.
ex scores into categories:

ECONOMIC
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of exposed
Farming Dependent Livestock Farming Fisheries Dependent
Population of Households
HH Dependent HH HH
with very minimal disruption or short to long term detrimental effects/impacts.

Percentage of Exposed households living
young dependent (0- old dependents (>60 Persons with
Informal Settlers (HH) below the poverty
15 yo) yo) disabilities
threshold
SENSITIVITY INDICATORS
SOCIAL
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed

Population without population without
Malnourished Children Malnourished Old population without
regular income/ access to hazard
individuals individuals access to PhilHealth
employment information
SENSITIVITY INDICATORS
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed RHUs without basic
farming families
farmers without access fishers without access RHU without qualified health
dependent to
to hazard information to hazard information health personnel equipment/facilities /
commercial input
medicine
ECONOMIC

Percentage of Exposed farmers without access fisherfolk without
Farming Areas without fisherfolk without own
ndigneous Peoples to alternative access to alternative
technical support boats & fishing nets
livelihood livelihood
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Percentage of Exposed Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional

fisherfolk without
direct access to market
DEGREE OF ADAPTIVE
IMPACT SCORE CAPACITY SCORE
VULNERABILITY
E F G
Vulnerability Vulnerability
Social Capital Score Score
Index Score
Table 8.2. Natural Resources CCVA, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Climate Stimuli:
Barangay
Environmen
Percentage of Percentage of
Percentage of Exposed species of Exposed species of Percentage of
Exposed LGU Forest Exposed CADT /CADC
Area in Hectares endemic flora in the endemic fauna in the in Hectares
forest area forest area
Instructions:
1. In columns B-C, using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and compute values for each natural resources
3. In column E, based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential im
High (3) - Estimated direct impacts in terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of property dama
Moderate (2) - Moderate direct impacts in terms of terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of p
Low (1) - Estimated direct and indirect impacts are low to negligible which can be felt within a short ter
D4 In column F, Evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the system being studied by referring to the adaptive capacity
High (1) - The system is able to accommodate changes in climate. There are adaptation measures in pla
Moderate (2) - Addressing the impacts will require signicant cost but it is still within the capacity of the
Low (3) - The system is not exible to accommodate changes in the climate. Addressing the impacts will
5. In column G, Compute for the vulnerability index by multiplying the Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, b
High (3): > 6 - 9
Moderate (2): > 3 - 6
Low (1): < 3
EXPOSURE
Environment
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of

Exposed Protected Exposed Agricultural Exposed Mangrove Exposed Fish
Area Exposed CBFMS Area Areas Sanctuaries
te values for each natural resources exposure and sensitivity
y.
er of fatalities, injuries and value of property damage are expected given the extent of exposure and current sensitivities of the system
by referring to the adaptive capacity indicators in the exposure database. These indicators of adaptive capacities can describe whether
aptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, based on the computed vulnerability index, categorize the index scores into categories:
EXPOSURE
Economic
Percentage of Exposed Area Percentage of Percentage of Exposed Area
Exposed Declared Exposed Ave. Output
Watershed Area Allocation for Exposed Crop Types per ha per crop (PHP) Devoted to Crop
Farming Farming

tive capacities can describe whether the system is able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very minimal disruption or sho

Economic
Percentage of Exposed Area Ave. Output per ha Percentage of Exposed Area
Exposed Livestock per livestock (peso) Exposed Aquaculture
Types devoted to livestock (PHP) Types devoted to
farming Aquaculture
with very minimal disruption or short to long term detrimental effects/impacts.

SENSITIVITY
Social
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of

Exposed persons Exposed persons Exposed persons Exposed persons Exposed Area
dependent to dependent to
living within the forest/watershed for living within the forest/watershed for Susceptible to Forest
forest area survival watershed survival Fires
SENSITIVITY
Environment
Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of

Percentage of Exposed areas Exposed areas Percentage of Exposed areas
Exposed hectares affected by Exposed areas where affected by
where kaingin exists indiscriminate cutting susceptible to forest kaingin exists indiscriminate cutting
of trees fires of trees
Adaptive Capacity
Percentage of Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional

exposed HH without
proper waste
seggregation
ADAPTIVE
DEGREE OF
CAPACITY
IMPACT SCORE VULNERABILITY
SCORE
E F G
Social Capital Score Score
Index Score
Table 8.3. Critical Facilities CCVA, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Climate Stimuli:
BARANGAY
A
Economic

post harvest facilities Parks and Recreation
evacuation centers multipurpose halls
/processing plants Facilities
Instructions:
A. In columns B-C, using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and compute values for each critical facility exposu
D. In column F, evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the system being studied by referring to the adaptive capacity indic
minimal disruption or short to long term detrimental effects/impacts.
E. In column G, compute for the vulnerability index by multiplying the Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, base
High (3): > 6 - 9
Moderate (2): > 3 - 6
Low (1): < 3
EXPOSURE
B
Infrastructure
Material Recovery
Irrigation facilities fishports storage facilities school buildings
Facilities
ute values for each critical facility exposure and sensitivity

y.

ptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, based on the computed vulnerability index, categorize the index scores into categories:
OSURE
B
Infrastructure

School (kindly specify School Classification Percentage of Exposed
classrooms per school health centers and type
Name and Type (wood, (Primary, Secondary, hospitals
bldg.. (wood, steel, mixed)
steel, mixed)) Tertiary)

tive capacities can describe whether the system is able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very

Economic

of lying-in clinics with government owned
Hospital (kindly specify Areas without irrigation production areas
birthing facilities and halls (please specify
name and Type (wood, coverage (rain fed) in without Post Harvest
type (wood, steel, names) and type
steel, mixed) hectares Facilities
mixed) (wood, steel, mixed)
Economic
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Sports and Recreation
production areas livestock and poultry livestock and poultry Facilities that are
SRF without toilet
without post harvest houses wihtout houses wihtout dilapidated, need
facilities
faciliies slaughter houses slaughter houses renovation etc. (please
specify names)
SENSITIVITY
(c)
C
Infrastructure

areas without access public market. that are school bldgs. that are
SRF used as Areas without water
to transportation & dilapidated, needs dilapidated, needs
Evacuation centers impoundment in
animal evacuation renovation, etc.(specify renovation, etc.(specify
(specify name) hectares
centers in hectares names) names)
structure
Schools, used as Names of health
Evacuation Center centers that are Percentage of Exposed
one-storey school school building without
(please specify names, dilapidated, needs one-storey RHUs
buildings toilet facilities
no. of classrooms, and renovation, etc.
type of structure)
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Percentage of Exposed Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional

health centers without
toilet facilities
ADAPTIVE
DEGREE OF CAPACITY VULNERABILITY
IMPACT SCORE SCORE
E F G
Social Capital Vulnerability Vulnerability

Score Score
Index Score
Table 8.4. Lifeline Facilities CCVA, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Climate Stimuli:
Barangay EXPO
A
Social
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposedf
Area with electricity & Percentage of Exposed
Farm to Market Road bridges (per type of
water supply in rrigation system
(specify kms) construction)
hectares
Instructions:
A. In columns B-C, using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and compute values for each lifeline facility exposu
4. In column F, evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the system being studied by referring to the adaptive capacity indic
minimal disruption or short to long term detrimental effects/impacts.
5. In column G, compute for the vulnerability index by multiplying the Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Accordingly, base
High (3): > 6 - 9
Moderate (2): > 3 - 6
Low (1): < 3
EXPOSURE
B
Infrastructure
of Roads (per road Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
drainage systems (per
classification. Please flood control dikes sea walls electric towers
type of construction)
specify name)
ute values for each lifeline facility exposure and sensitivity

TelCom Towers households without households without schools without access
Power lines
(Company) access to water electricity to electricity

tive capacities can describe whether the system is able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very

Social
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
schools without access schools without access schools without access health centers without health centers without
to electricity to water supply to water supply access to water supply access to water supply
SENSITIVITY
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed
health centers without hospitals without hospiltals without public markets without Public markets without
access to electricity access to electricity access to water supply access to water supply access to electricity
Infrastructure
Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of areas
government owned Percentage of Exposed
cemented / asphalt areas without road without upgraded
facilities without access rough road
road access drainage system
to water supply
ADAPTIVE
Infrastructure
Road leading to
Percentage of Exposed Wealth
roads leading to health Percentage of Exposed roads leading to health
schools, school
centers (please specify wooden electric post centers (please specify
buildings (please
name and type) name and type
specify name and type)
DEGREE OF ADAPTIVE
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY IMPACT CAPACITY
SCORE SCORE
D E F
Technology Infrastructure Institutional Social Capital Score Score

VULNERABILITY
G
Index Score
Table 8.5. Urban Use CCVA, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Climate Stimuli:
BARANGAY EXPOSU
A B
Social
Total Percentage Percentage

Existing exposed Exposed of Exposed Percentage
of Exposed
Land Use Area/Land Area (%) school of Exposed Parks and
use (Has) buildings Health
Recreation
Centers
facilities
A. In columns
B-C, using the
gathered data
and maps,
indicate
2. In colum D,
information
provide
and compute
existing
values
adaptive fororeach
urban use
preventive
facility
Instructions:
measures of
exposure
the and
sensitivity
muncipality/cit
y.
3. In column E, based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed p
High (3) - Estimated direct impacts in terms of number of fatalities, injuries and value of prope
Moderate (2) - Moderate direct impacts in terms of terms of number of fatalities, injuries and
Low (1) - Estimated direct and indirect impacts are low to negligible which can be felt within a
4. In column F, evaluate the various adaptive capacities of the system being studied by referring to the adaptive
able to accommodate or cope with the impacts with very minimal disruption or short to long term detrimental e
High (1) - The system is able to accommodate changes in climate. There are adaptation measu
Moderate (2) - Addressing the impacts will require signicant cost but it is still within the capac
Low (3) - The system is not exible to accommodate changes in the climate. Addressing the im
5. In column G, compute for the vulnerability index by multiplying the Impact and Adaptive Capacity Scores. Acco
High (3): > 6 - 9
Moderate (2): > 3 - 6
Low (1): < 3
EXPOSURE
B
Infrastructure
Percentage
Percentage Percentage
of Exposed
Percentage Percentage of Exposed of Exposed Percentage Percentage
buildings
of Exposed of Exposed buildings buildings of Exposed of Exposed
(others,
Public evacuation for for hospital governmen
please
Markets center industrial commercial buildings t buildings
specify
use use
names)
posed units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively determine the degree of impact score using the suggested rating s
er of fatalities, injuries and value of property damage are expected given the extent of exposure and current sensitivities of
y referring to the adaptive capacity indicators in the exposure database. These indicators of adaptive capacities can describe
to long term detrimental effects/impacts.
climate. Addressing the impacts will be costly. The LGU and property owners will require external assistance to address the
SENSITIVITY
C
Infrastructure
Percentage of
Percentage of Percentage of Exposed areas
Exposed Exposed
Exposed Exposed with no access
structures not structures not
Replaceme buildings with buildings in to
employing employing
nt Cost walls with light dilapidated/co infrastructure -
hazard- hazard-
to salvageable ndemned related hazard
resistant resistant
materials condition mitigation
building design building design
measures
ore using the suggested rating scale.

urrent sensitivity of the system.
ure and current sensitivities of the system.
daptive capacities can describe whether the system is
ernal assistance to address the impacts.
e index scores into categories:

DEGREE OF
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY IMPACT SCORE
D E
Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional Social Capital Score

ADAPTIVE
CAPACITY
SCORE VULNERABILITY
F G
Score
Index Score
Table 4.6 Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Summary Matrix
Social Env
Decision Area Implications when

(B) Observed Conditions Causes Policy Options Observed Conditions
unresolved
(B) (C) (E) (b)
(D)
Instructions:
1. Based on the risks maps generated for the various exposure units, highlight and identify decision areas or elements. Decision areas can be the barangay or specific sites in the b
2. In columns B and C, list down the significant findings/observed conditions and causes by describing the area or element in terms of the level of vulnerability, highlighting the v
3. In column D, list down the planning/development implications when the identified vulnerabilities in the various decision areas are not addressed.
4. Identify various policy interventions that should seek to reduce the level of vulnerability by addressing the exposure, sensitivity, with consideration to the current adaptive cap
Environment Infrastructure
Implications when Implications when

Causes Policy Options Observed Conditions Causes
unresolved unresolved
(c) (e) (b) (c)
(d) (d)
e barangay or specific sites in the barangay such as coastal area, mountain sides, and riverbanks.
of vulnerability, highlighting the various contributing factors such as exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity.
ssed.
ration to the current adaptive capacities (Columns E).
Economic
Implications when
Policy Options Observed Conditions Causes Policy Options
unresolved
(e) (b) (c) (e)
(d)

Step 4 - CCVA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Step 4 - CCVA

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Step 4 - CCVA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Table 7.

Impact Area and Climate Stimuli,______________,___________

Climate Stimuli Impact Area

n all the identified climate stimuli.

ute values for each population exposure and sensitivity indicators.

sing the suggested rating scale.

assistance to address the impacts.

ex scores into categories:

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed

with very minimal disruption or short to long term detrimental effects/impacts.

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed

Percentage of Exposed Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional

2. In colum D, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.

Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of

te values for each natural resources exposure and sensitivity

sing the suggested rating scale.

assistance to address the impacts.

ex scores into categories:

with very minimal disruption or short to long term detrimental effects/impacts.

Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of

Percentage of Percentage of Percentage of

Percentage of Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed

ute values for each critical facility exposure and sensitivity

here are adaptation measures in place to address impacts.

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed

sing the suggested rating scale.

assistance to address the impacts.

ex scores into categories:

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed

Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed Percentage of Exposed

Percentage of Exposed Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional

Social Capital Vulnerability Vulnerability

ute values for each lifeline facility exposure and sensitivity

here are adaptation measures in place to address impacts.

sing the suggested rating scale.

assistance to address the impacts.

ex scores into categories:

Technology Infrastructure Institutional Social Capital Score Score

Total Percentage Percentage

ore using the suggested rating scale.

daptive capacities can describe whether the system is

ernal assistance to address the impacts.

e index scores into categories:

Wealth Technology Infrastructure Institutional Social Capital Score

Decision Area Implications when

Implications when Implications when

You might also like

Impact Area and Climate Stimuli,____,_