SOCIAL Population Flooding Database

SOCIAL_Flooding_Population Database_Municipality of_________ Province of _______
HAZARD: FLOODING
SECTOR:SOCIAL
BARANGAY
Ecosystem TOTALLAND AREA (hectare) TOTAL POPULATION POPULATION DENSITY TOTAL HOUSEHOLD NUMBER
Likelihood of
Flood Susceptibility Occurrence Score
B
A
Thru Anecdotal Account
Low, Moderate, High (Score range 1-6)
Instructions:
1. List down the all the barangays in Column B.
2. Exposure, Column C. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each population exposure indicators.
3. Sensitivity, Column D. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each population sensitivity indicators.
4. In Column E, Summarize the findings and observation about EXPOSURE of all the barangays included in the analysis for this particular hazard. Take note of important quantitative and q
5. In Columns F, determine the DEGREE OF IMPACT/LEVEL OF THREAT based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential impacts, q
THREAT LEVEL
High (5)
High (5)
Medium High (4)

-4
Medium (3)
Medium Low (2)
Low (1)
6. In Column G, determine the ADAPTIVE CAPACITY of the affected communities/sector by supplying the information based on the given indicators.
Evaluate the adaptive capacity of the barangays using the following six dimensions:
8. In Column I, get the Relative Vulnerability by dividing the TL with AC (TL/AC). Evaluate the Relative Vulnerability following the category below:
9. In Column J, Summarize the findings and observation about AC and Vulnerability of the barangays.Take note of important quantitative and qualitative data and indicators.
10. In Column K, determine the level of risk by multiplying the likelihood of occurrence and severity of consequence following the category below:
Measure of Likelihood of
Occurrence
Likelihood Score
of the Hazard (Flood)
Frequent or very likely 6
Moderate or likely 5
Occasional, slight chance 4
Unlikely, rare event 3
Highly unlikely, rare event 2

Source: Draft
Very rare Reference
event 1
Manual on Mainstreaming
Disaster Risk Reduction and
Climate Change Adaptation in
the Comprehensive Land Use
Plans, NEDA-UNDP, HLURB,
2012
EXPOSURE INDICATORS
C
Total Residential Area Barangay Population Affected Population

Flood depth Affected HH
(hectares)
Total
Population
(sex Total # of families Population
Density
disaggregated
≤1m for moderate and Low Total Population of the brgy Fr CBMS, corresponds to the from CBMS corresponds to
≥1m for high No. of HH Heads the Family Members )
Take note of important quantitative and qualitative data and indicators.
ed units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively and using the suggested rating scales:
ors.
ors.
Vulnerability
Score ( TL /
AC = RV)
4.1 - 5
3.1 - 4.0
2.1 - 3.0
1.1 - 2.0
<1 - 1.0
alitative data and indicators.

Occurrence
Likelihood Score
of the Severe Wind

Occasional, slight chance 4
Unlikely, rare event 3
Highly unlikely, rare event 2
Very rare event 1

Source: Project NOAH
SENSITIVITY INDICATORS
% of households living
in dwelling units with % of families living % of families with Percentage % of young (<5 yrs old)- % of old (> 60 Yrs
% of informal settler walls made from Dependents old)- Dependents
below poverty no permanent Malnourished
households or families predominantly light, line/threshold source of income Individuals
salvaged and makeshift
type
Out of the affected HH: of materials
of the affected HH: No. of of the affected HH: May get data from
No. of HH accounted as of HH Living in No. of HH below CBMS and othe
IS divided affected HH makeshift/salvageable poverty threshold or in sources
% of affected multiply by 100 materials divide affected poor condition(fr
population/families HH multiply by 100 CBMS)divide affected
(over total population HH multiply by 100 out of the affected
of the brgy) Population: No. of
malnourished individuals
divided total affected
Pop'n multiply by 100
Adaptive Capacity
High (5)
Medium High (4)

Medium (3)
Medium Low (4)
Low (3)
SEVERE Wind: Measure
of Likelihood of Return Period in Years Likelihood Score
Occurrence
Frequent or very likely Below 20 years 6
Moderate or likely 20 years 5

Occasional, slight 50 years 4
chance
Unlikely, rare 100 years 3
Highly unlikely, rare 200 years 2
event
Very rare event 500 years 1
Summary of Findings
and Observations DEGREE OF IMPACT
% of population % of HH with no % of HH without % of HH without % of household with % of HH without Proportion of Proportion of

with no access to access to sanitary access to early awareness about no access to access to health children 0-5 years households whose
safe water supply toilet (health warning system CCA/DRR infrastructure services & old who are below members eat less
issue during information mitigation measures philhealth normal weight for than 3 full meals a
flooding) related to hazard their age (extent of day
malnutrition by
age group)
Social
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
By Barangay
SCORE
By Ecosystem SCORE
STORM Surge: Measure
of Likelihood of Return Period in Years Likelihood Score
Occurrence
Frequent or very likely Every 1-3 years 6
Moderate or likely Every 3-10 years 5

Occasional, slight Every 10-30 years 4
chance
Unlikely, rare Every 30-100 years 3
Highly unlikely, rare Every 100-200 years 2
event
Very rare event Every 200-300+ years 1
Summary of
AVERAGE Findings and Vulnerability
DEGREE OF IMPACT SCORE / THREAT LEVEL SCORE OF Observation ADAPTIVE CAPACITY (AC) Average AC Index
THREAT s
F G H I J K
AVERAGE SCORE May refer to parameters. List down all the ACs per Dimension (wealth, info, infra, tech,
Econ ENV INFRA INSTI OF THREAT: insti/gov, social capital TOTAL SCORE/5 TL x AC
TOTAL SCORE/5
INSTI & SOCIAL

WEALTH INFO INFRA TECH GOVERNANCE CAPITAL
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE LIST LIST LIST LIST LIST LIST
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE TOTAL SCORE/5
MAY refer to
Parameters of
Threat
Return
period or
Likelihood
Summary of
Findings and SEVERITY OF of
Observation CONSEQUENCE Occurrence Es
x Severity
s of
Consequen
ce
L M N POPULATION Critical Point Facility
RISK
FGD AVERAGE RISK CATEGO FGD AVERAG
LGU SCORE LGU SCORE E RISK RISK CATEGORY
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE
RY
ESTIMA
TING
ESTIMATING RISKS
RISKS BY BY
PARAMETER
PARAMETERS: 1-4
S: 1-6 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERAGING Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category
LGU & FGD GING
SCORE LGU &
6 X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= FGD
X SOC=
DISCUSS SCORE
DISCUSS 6 X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
6 X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
Estimation of Risk = LOO X SOC
LIFELINES NATURAL RESOURCE Urban Ecosystem
FGD AVERAG RISK FGD AVERAG RISK FGD

LGU SCORE E RISK CATEGO LGU SCORE E RISK CATEGO LGU SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE
RY RY
ESTIMA ESTIMA
TING TING
RISKS RISKS
BY BY
GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1
GING GING
LGU & LGU &
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= FGD X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= FGD X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
SCORE SCORE
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
TASK 5 Task 6 TASK 5 Task 6
N O N O
Implicati
ons
when Key Areas,
Implications when key Key Areas,
Decision key Challenges, Policy
rban Ecosystem Areas issues Opportunitie Measures
Decision Areas Challenges,
issues not addressed Opportunities
Policy Measures
not s
addresse Identify the major If LGU continues to What will be the key Legislations, programs or
d decion areas based on operate business as issues/challenges to projects that can address
the level of usual, what would be the achievement of or respond to key areas
vulnerbilitiess. This can the long-term sectoral the vision, goals and and challenges
be a unique contiguous development objectives of the
area of interest or this
AVERAG RISK may pertain to a implications if locality?
E RISK CATEGO specific site or sector vulnerbilities in the area
SCORE RY are not addressed? Are there possibe
Can be a barangay, opportunities?
whole ecosystmen or
specific locality
ESTIMA
TING
RISKS Identify If LGU What will be Legislations,
the major continues the key programs or
BY decion to issues/challen projects that can
AVERA Category areas operate ges to the address or
based on business achievement respond to key
GING the level of areas and
LGU & vulnerbiliti as usual, of the vision, challenges
FGD X SOC= ess. This what goals and
X SOC= be a would
X SOC=
can X SOC=be objectives of
SCORE unique the long- the locality?
X SOC= X SOC= contiguous
X SOC= term
X SOC=
area of sectoral Are there
X SOC= X SOC= interest
X SOC= or developm
X SOC= possibe
this may ent opportunities?
pertain toimplicatio
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
a specificX
nsSOC=
if
site or
sector vulnerbili
ties in the
Can be a area are
barangay, not
whole addressed
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=

HAZARD: FLOODING
SECTOR:SOCIAL
BARANGAY
Ecosystem TOTAL LAND AREA (hectare) TOTAL POPULATION POPULATION DENSITY TOTAL HOUSEHOLD NUMBER
No. of Private and

public health facilities
located in low-lying or
flooded areas (classify
B
A if hospitals, health
centers, lying in clinics,
puericulture center,
Hosp for the mentally
ill, etc.)
Instructions:
4. In Column E, Summarize the findings and observation about EXPOSURE of all the barangays included in the analysis for this particular hazard. Take note of important quantitative and qualitati
5. In Columns F, determine the DEGREE OF IMPACT/LEVEL OF THREAT based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitati
THREAT LEVEL
High (5)
Medium High (4)

-4
Medium (3)
Medium Low (2)
Low (1)
*Wealth – Financial resources
*Information – Level of knowledge to hazards, c
*Institution and Governance – Existing policies,
*Infrastructure – Structures to withstand climat
*Social capital – Capacities, organized groups, C
*Technology – Example: drought resistant crop t
Category of
Vulnerability
High
Medium High
Medium
Medium Low
Low
Occurrence
Return Period in Years
Frequent or very likely Every 1-3 years
Moderate or likely Every 3-10 years
Occasional, slight chance Every 10-30 years
Unlikely, rare event Every 30-100 years

Highly unlikely, rare event Every 100-200 years
Very rare event Every 200-300+ years
Source: Draft Reference Manual on Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation in the Comprehensive Land Use Plans, NEDA-UNDP, HLURB, 2012
No. of health-
Floor area and bed % of health
Total # of families related personnel Barangays with % of health Barangays with Barangays lacking
capacity of health No. of drugstores or individuals % of health facilities below
(specify: nurses, consistent facilities with wall health staff
facilities (specify if or pharmacies in facilities with 2 or magerials and construction Health Personnel
with health midwives, incidence of (midwives,
primary, secondary low-lying or more storey design standard below population nurses,
insurance doctors, etc.) who water-borne flooring not in doctors,
and tertiary health flooded areas buildings and low ratio
coverage live in flooded diseases good condition technology etc.)
care) used
areas
te of important quantitative and qualitative data and indicators.
and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively and using the suggested rating scales:
h – Financial resources Adaptive Capacity
ation – Level of knowledge to hazards, climate change and disaster, info dissemination High (5)
tion and Governance – Existing policies, plans and programs Medium High (4)
ructure – Structures to withstand climate projections Medium (3)
capital – Capacities, organized groups, CSO, trained staff Medium Low (4)
ology – Example: drought resistant crop types being tested, research conducted Low (3)
Vulnerability
Score ( TL / AC =
RV)
4.1 - 5
3.1 - 4.0
2.1 - 3.0
1.1 - 2.0
<1 - 1.0
data and indicators.
Measure of Likelihood
of Occurrence
SEVERE Wind:
Likelihood Score Return Period in Years Likelihood Score Measure of Likelihood Return Period in Years Likelihood Score
Severe
of the of Occurrence
Wind
6 Frequent or very likely Below 20 years 6 Frequent or very likely Below 20 years 6
5 Moderate or likely 20 year return 5 Moderate or likely 20 years 5

Occasional, slight Occasional, slight
4 50 years 4 50 years 4
chance chance
3 Unlikely, rare event 100 years 3 Unlikely, rare 100 years 3
Highly unlikely, rare Highly unlikely, rare
2 200 years 2 200 years 2
event event
1 Very rare event 500 years 1 Very rare event 500 years 1
AVERAGE Summary of
SCORE OF Findings
Summary of Findings and
DEGREE OF
D IMPACT SCORE / THREAT LEVEL
and Observations Observation
THREAT s
F G H
Proportion of
children who died
Barangays lacking Barangays lacking
% of HHs with no diseases/illnes %
of water-borne of HH without
equipment- or with no EMTs access to health
medicines for first access to health E
(Emergency (Note: City to services &
aid, ambulance, Medical Teams) services determine philhealth
etc.) coverage of AVERAGE SCORE
report) Social Econ ENV INFRA INSTI OF THREAT:
TOTAL SCORE/5

MAY refer to
Parameters of
Threat
STORM Surge:
Measure of Likelihood Return Period in Years Likelihood Score
of Occurrence
Moderate or likely Every 3-10 years 5

Occasional, slight Every 10-30 years 4
chance
Unlikely, rare Every 30-100 years 3
Highly unlikely, rare Every 100-200 years 2
event
Very rare event Every 200-300+ years 1
Return
period or
Likelihood
Summary of of
Vulnerability Findings and SEVERITY OF Occurrence
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY (AC) Average AC Index Observation CONSEQUENCE x Severity
s of
Consequen
ce
I J K L M N POPULATION
May refer to parameters. List down all the ACs per Dimension (wealth, info, infra, tech,
insti/gov, social capital TOTAL SCORE/5 TL x AC LGU SCORE
INSTI & SOCIAL PARAMETER

WEALTH INFO INFRA TECH GOVERNANCE CAPITAL
PARAMETERS: 1-4
S: 1-6 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1
LIST LIST LIST LIST LIST LIST DISCUSS

6 X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=




LIST LIST LIST LIST LIST LIST DISCUSS 6 X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=


LIST LIST LIST LIST LIST LIST 6 X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE TOTAL SCORE/5
POPULATION Critical Point Facility LIFELINES NATURAL R
RISK FGD AVERAG FGD AVERAG RISK

FGD AVERAGE RISK CATEGO LGU SCORE E RISK RISK CATEGORY LGU SCORE E RISK CATEGO LGU SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE
RY RY
ESTIMA ESTIMA
TING TING
ESTIMATING RISKS RISKS
RISKS BY BY BY
AVERAGING Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category GROUP 1
LGU & FGD GING GING
X SOC= SCORE X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= XLGU
SOC= & X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= XLGU
SOC= & X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= FGD

X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= FGD X SOC=
X SOC=
SCORE SCORE
TASK 5 Task 6
N O
Implicati
ons
when Key Areas,
NATURAL RESOURCE Urban Ecosystem Areas issues Opportunitie Measures
not s
addresse
d
FGD AVERAG RISK FGD AVERAG RISK

LGU SCORE E RISK CATEGO LGU SCORE E RISK CATEGO
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE
RY RY
ESTIMA ESTIMA
TING TING
RISKS RISKS
BY BY Identify If LGU What will be Legislations,
GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category the major continues the key programs or
GING GING decion to issues/challen projects that can
X SOC= X SOC= XLGU
SOC= & X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= SOC= & X SOC= areas
XLGU X SOC= operate
X SOC= ges to the address or
based on business achievement respond to key
X SOC= X SOC= FGD X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC= FGD X SOC= the
X SOC= X
level of
SOC= as usual,
X SOC= of the vision,
areas and
vulnerbiliti challenges
SCORE SCORE ess. This what goals and
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X
canSOC=
be a would
X SOC=be objectives of
unique the long- the locality?
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= contiguous
X SOC= term
X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= interest
X SOC= or developm
X SOC= possibe
pertain to implicatio
a specific ns if
site or
sector vulnerbili
ties in the
Can be a area are
barangay, not
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
TASK 5 Task 6
N O

Decision Areas issues not addressed Challenges, Policy Measures
Opportunities
Identify the major If LGU continues to What will be the key Legislations, programs or
decion areas based on operate business as issues/challenges to projects that can address
the level of usual, what would be the achievement of or respond to key areas
vulnerbilitiess. This can the long-term sectoral the vision, goals and and challenges
may pertain to a implications if locality?
specific site or sector vulnerbilities in the area
are not addressed? Are there possibe
whole ecosystmen or
specific locality
HAZARD: FLOODING
SECTOR:SOCIAL
BARANGAY TOTAL LAND AREA TOTAL HOUSEHOLD

Ecosystem (hectare) TOTAL POPULATION POPULATION DENSITY NUMBER
EXPO
No. of public education

facilities located in low-
B lying or flooded areas
(specify if Day Care
Centers, elementary,
secondary, SUCs)
Instructions:
4. In Column E, Summarize the findings and observation about EXPOSURE of all the barangays included in the analysis for this particular hazard. Take note of important quantitative and
5. In Columns F, determine the DEGREE OF IMPACT/LEVEL OF THREAT based on the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential impacts,
THREAT LEVEL
High (5)
Medium High (4)
-4
Medium (3)
Medium Low (2)
Low (1)

*Information – Level of knowledge to ha
*Institution and Governance – Existing p
*Infrastructure – Structures to withstand
*Social capital – Capacities, organized gr
*Technology – Example: drought resistan
Category of Vulnerability
High
Medium High
Medium
Medium Low
Low
Occurrence
Frequent or very likely Every 1-3 years
Occasional, slight chance Every 10-30 years
Highly unlikely, rare event Every 100-200 years
Source: Draft Reference Manual on Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation in the Comprehensive Land Use Plans, NEDA-UNDP, HLURB, 2012
EXPOSURE C SENSITIVITY INDICATO
No. of public
Number of school education facilities
Floor area of school buildings used as with walls and
evacuation
facilities (specify if centers (specify if flooring not in good
DCCs, primary, condition (specify if
DCCs, primary,
secondary and SUCs) secondary Day Care Centers,
and elementary,
SUCs) Number of pupils, secondary, SUCs)
students
attending schools No. of public sports Student-classroom
ratio (Average
in flooded areas and recreation Pupil-classroom ratio number of students
(specify if nursery, facilities located in (Average number of per classroom in
elementary, HS or low-lying or flooded pupils per classroom secondary
graduate areas but used for in elementary in a education in a given
students) evacuation given school year) school year)
note of important quantitative and qualitative data and indicators.
ts, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively and using the suggested rating scales:
Adaptive Capacity
alth – Financial resources
rmation – Level of knowledge to hazards, climate change and disaster, info dissemination High (5)
tution and Governance – Existing policies, plans and programs Medium High (4)
astructure – Structures to withstand climate projections Medium (3)
Medium Low (4)

al capital – Capacities, organized groups, CSO, trained staff
Low (3)
hnology – Example: drought resistant crop types being tested, research conducted
Vulnerability
Score ( TL / AC = RV)
4.1 - 5
3.1 - 4.0
2.1 - 3.0
1.1 - 2.0
<1 - 1.0
ve data and indicators.
STORM Surge:
Measure of Likelihood Measure of Likelihood Return Period in Years Likelihood Score
of Occurrence
of Occurrence
Likelihood Score Return Period in Years Likelihood Score
Severe
of the
Wind
6 Frequent or very likely Below 20 years 6 Moderate or likely Every 3-10 years 5
Occasional, slight
5 Moderate or likely 20 year return 5 Every 10-30 years 4
chance
Occasional, slight
4 50 years 4 Unlikely, rare Every 30-100 years 3
chance
Highly unlikely, rare
3 Unlikely, rare event 100 years 3 Every 100-200 years 2
event
2 200 years 2 Very rare event Every 200-300+ years 1
event
1 Very rare event 500 years 1
Same category for

liquefaction, ground
shaking
SENSITIVITY INDICATORS D
Number of school
% of school Proportion of
Barangays with buildings with 2
facilities below Barangays lacking % of pupils, population with Proportion of the Proportion of 7 - 12 Proportion of 13 - Proportion of 16 –
Teachers, or more storey year old children 15 year old who are 18 year old who are
construction equipment- desks, buildings (specify students with no primary level
education population who who are not in
design standard personnel below teaching facilities, if DCCs, primary, access to educational elementary school, not in junior high not in senior high
are illiterate school, by sex school, by sex
and low etc.) education services attainment and by sex)
technology used population ratio secondary and below
SUCs)
AVERAGE Summary of
SCORE OF Findings
Summary of Findings and
D DEGREE OF IMPACT SCORE / THREAT LEVEL ADAPTIVE CAPACITY (AC)
and Observations Observation
THREAT s
F G H I
Social Econ ENV INFRA INSTI OF THREAT: insti/gov, social capital
TOTAL SCORE/5
INSTI &
WEALTH INFO INFRA TECH GOVERNANCE
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE LIST LIST LIST LIST LIST
MAY refer to
Parameters of
Threat
Return
period or
Likelihood
Summary of of
ACITY (AC) Average AC Index Observation CONSEQUENCE x Severity
s of
Consequen
ce
J K L M N POPULATION Critical Poin
RISK
per Dimension (wealth, info, infra, tech, FGD AVERAGE RISK CATEGO
TOTAL SCORE/5 TL x AC LGU SCORE LGU SCORE
capital SCORE SCORE RY
ESTIMATING
RISKS BY
SOCIAL PARAMETER
CAPITAL
PARAMETERS: 1-4
S: 1-6 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERAGING Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1
LGU & FGD
SCORE
LIST 6 X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
DISCUSS

DISCUSS

DISCUSS
DISCUSS

DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
LIST DISCUSS
6 X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
LIST DISCUSS 6 X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
LIST DISCUSS 6 X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
DISCUSS
SCORE TOTAL SCORE/5
Critical Point Facility LIFELINES NATURAL RESOURCE
FGD AVERAG FGD AVERAG RISK FGD AVERAG RISK

LGU SCORE E RISK RISK CATEGORY LGU SCORE E RISK CATEGO LGU SCORE E RISK CATEGO LGU SC
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE
RY RY
ESTIMA ESTIMA ESTIMA

TING TING TING
RISKS RISKS RISKS
BY BY BY
GROUP 1 AVERA Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category GROUP 1
GING GING GING
LGU & LGU & LGU &
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
FGD X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
FGD X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
FGD X SOC= X SOC=
SCORE SCORE SCORE
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
TASK 5 Task 6 TASK 5 Task 6
N O N O
Implicati
ons
when Key Areas,
Urban Ecosystem Areas issues Opportunitie Measures
Decision Areas Challenges,
issues not addressed Opportunities
not s
addresse
d
Identify the major If LGU continues to What will be the key
decion areas based on operate business as issues/challenges to
the level of usual, what would be the achievement of
vulnerbilitiess. This can the long-term sectoral the vision, goals and
implications if locality?
FGD AVERAG RISK may pertain to a
LGU SCORE E RISK CATEGO specific site or sector vulnerbilities in the area
SCORE SCORE are not addressed? Are there possibe
RY
whole ecosystmen or
specific locality
ESTIMA
TING
RISKS Identify If LGU What will be Legislations,
BY the major continues the key programs or
GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category decion to issues/challen projects that can
areas operate ges to the address or
GING based on business respond to key
achievement
LGU & the level of
as usual, of the vision,
areas and
X SOC= FGD X SOC= vulnerbiliti
X SOC= X SOC= X
ess. This what
SOC= goals and
challenges
SCORE can be a would be objectives of
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= unique
X SOC= the
X SOC= the locality?
long-
contiguous term
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= interest
X SOC= or developm
X SOC= possibe
pertain to implicatio
a specific ns if
site or
sector vulnerbili
ties in the
Can be a area are
barangay, not
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=


Task 6
Policy Measures
Legislations, programs or
projects that can address
or respond to key areas
and challenges
HAZARD: FLOODING
SECTOR:SOCIAL
TOTAL
BARANGAY TOTAL LAND TOTAL POPULATION
Ecosystem HOUSEHOLD EXPOSURE
AREA (hectare) POPULATION DENSITY NUMBER
No. of OUTDOOR
infrastructure for
public recreation,
cultural and sports
facilities located in
low-lying or
flooded areas
B
Instructions:
2. Exposure, Column C. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each population ex
3. Sensitivity, Column D. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each population s
4. In Column E, Summarize the findings and observation about EXPOSURE of all the barangays included in the ana
5. In Columns F, determine the DEGREE OF IMPACT/LEVEL OF THREAT based on the estimated exposure, the degre
THREAT LEVEL
High (5)
Medium High (4)

-4
Medium (3)
Medium Low (2)
Low (1)
6. In Column G, determine the ADAPTIVE CAPACITY of the affected communities/sector by supplying the informati
7. In Column G, determine the ADAPTIVE CAPACITY of the affected communities/sector by supplying the informati
*Information – Level of knowledg
*Institution and Governance – Ex
*Infrastructure – Structures to wi
*Social capital – Capacities, organ
*Technology – Example: drought
8. In Column I, get the Relative Vulnerability by dividing the TL with AC (TL/AC). Evaluate the Relative Vulnerability
Category of
Vulnerability
High
Medium High
Medium
Medium Low
Low
9. In Column J, Summarize the findings and observation about AC and Vulnerability of the barangays.Take note of i
10. In Column K, determine the level of risk by multiplying the likelihood of occurrence and severity of consequen
Measure of
Likelihood of
Occurrence
of the Hazard
(Flood)
Frequent or very
Every 1-3 years
likely

Occasional, slight
Every 10-30 years
chance
Highly unlikely,
Every 100-200 years
rare event
Source: Draft Reference Manual on Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation in the Comprehensive Land Use Plans, NEDA-
UNDP, HLURB, 2012
_______
URE
C D
No. of INDOOR No. of public No. of open % of OUTDOOR % of INDOOR %. of public

infrastructure for library/museum spaces used for infrastructure for infrastructure for libraries and
public recreation, and archives, parks and public recreation, public recreation, heritage sites not
cultural and historical, heritage recreation areas cultural and sports cultural and in good condition
sports facilities sites preservation (area in facilities located in sports facilities (specify if museum
located in low- located in low- hectares) low-lying or flooded located in low- and archives,
lying or flooded lying or flooded areas not in good lying or flooded historical
areas areas (specify) condition areas preservation)
lues for each population exposure indicators.
alues for each population sensitivity indicators.
rangays included in the analysis for this particular hazard. Take note of important quantitative and qualitative data and indicators.
timated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively and using the suggested rati
r by supplying the information based on the given indicators.
r by supplying the information based on the given indicators.
th – Financial resources
mation – Level of knowledge to hazards, climate change and disaster, info dissemination
ution and Governance – Existing policies, plans and programs
structure – Structures to withstand climate projections
l capital – Capacities, organized groups, CSO, trained staff
nology – Example: drought resistant crop types being tested, research conducted
e the Relative Vulnerability following the category below:
Vulnerability
Score ( TL / AC
= RV)
4.1 - 5
3.1 - 4.0
2.1 - 3.0
1.1 - 2.0
<1 - 1.0
he barangays.Take note of important quantitative and qualitative data and indicators.

e and severity of consequence following the category below:
Measure of
Likelihood of
Occurrence
Severe
of the
Wind
Frequent or very
6 Below 20 years 6
likely
5 Moderate or likely 20 year return 5

Occasional, slight
4 50 years 4
chance
Unlikely, rare
3 100 years 3
event
Highly unlikely,
2 200 years 2
rare event
1 Very rare event 500 years 1
mprehensive Land Use Plans, NEDA-
Summary of
Findings and DEGREE OF IMPACT SCORE / THREAT LEVEL
D Observations
% of public % of public % of
sports and sports and residents
recreation recreation accessing
facilities located facilities in one the sports
used for storey buildings and F
evacuation but but used for recreation
lacking basic evacuation facilities
facilities (toilets
and baths,
cooking areas,
etc.)
Social Econ ENV
SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
tive data and indicators.

atively and using the suggested rating scales:
Adaptive Capacity
High (5)
Medium High (4)
Medium (3)
Medium Low (4)
Low (3)
STORM Surge:
Measure of Return Period
Likelihood Score
Likelihood of in Years
Occurrence
Frequent or very Every 1-3

6
likely years
Every 3-10
years
Occasional, slight Every 10-30 4
chance years
Unlikely, rare Every 30-100 3
years
Highly unlikely, Every 100-200 2
rare event years
Every 200-
Very rare event 1
300+ years
AVERAGE Summary of
SCORE OF Findings and
ACT SCORE / THREAT LEVEL ADAPTIVE CAPACITY (AC)
Observation
THREAT s
F G H I
INFRA INSTI OF THREAT: insti/gov, social capital
TOTAL SCORE/5
INSTI &
SCORE SCORE LIST LIST LIST LIST LIST


MAY refer to
Parameters of
Threat
Return
period or
Likelihood
Summary of of
AC) Average AC Index Observation CONSEQUENCE x Severity
s of
Consequen
ce
J K L M N PO
sion (wealth, info, infra, tech,

TOTAL SCORE/5 TL x AC LGU SCORE
SOCIAL PARAMETER
CAPITAL
PARAMETERS: 1-4
S: 1-6 GROUP 1
LIST DISCUSS 6 X SOC= X SOC=
LIST 6 X SOC= X SOC=

DISCUSS
LIST DISCUSS
6 X SOC= X SOC=

DISCUSS
DISCUSS
SCORE TOTAL SCORE/5
POPULATION Critical Point Facility
RISK
FGD AVERAGE RISK CATEGO FGD AVERAG
LGU SCORE LGU SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE E RISK
RY SCORE
ESTIMA
TING
ESTIMATING RISKS
RISKS BY BY
GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERAGING Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA
LGU & FGD GING
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=
SCORE LGU &
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= FGD
X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= XSCORE
SOC=


Facility LIFELINES NATURAL RESO
FGD AVERAG RISK

RISK CATEGORY LGU SCORE E RISK CATEGO LGU SCORE
SCORE
SCORE RY
ESTIMA
TING
RISKS
BY
Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1
GING
LGU &
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= FGD X SOC=
X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= XSCORE
SOC= X SOC=


NATURAL RESOURCE Urban Ecosystem
FGD AVERAG RISK FGD AVERAG RISK

U SCORE E RISK CATEGO LGU SCORE E RISK CATEGO
SCORE SCORE
SCORE RY SCORE RY
ESTIMA ESTIMA
TING TING
RISKS RISKS
BY BY
GROUP 1 AVERA Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 AVERA Category
GING GING
LGU & LGU &
X SOC= X SOC= FGD X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC= FGD X SOC=
X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC= XSCORE
SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= XSCORE
SOC= X SOC=


TASK 5 Task 6 TASK 5
N O N
Implicati
ons
when Key Areas,
Decision key Challenges, Policy Implications when key
Decision Areas
Areas issues Opportunitie Measures issues not addressed
not s
addresse
d
Identify the major If LGU continues to
decion areas based on operate business as
the level of usual, what would be
vulnerbilitiess. This can the long-term sectoral
be a unique contiguous development
may pertain to a implications if
specific site or sector vulnerbilities in the area
are not addressed?
Can be a barangay,
whole ecosystmen or
specific locality
Identify If LGU What will be Legislations,

the major continues the key programs or
decion to projects that can
X SOC=
areas X SOC= issues/challen address or
operate ges to the
based on business respond to key
X
theSOC= X SOC= achievement
level of areas and
as usual, of the vision,
vulnerbiliti challenges
X SOC=
ess. Thiswhat
X SOC= goals and
can be a would be objectives of
X SOC=
unique X SOC=
the long- the locality?
contiguousterm
X SOC=
area of X SOC= Are there
sectoral
interest or
developm possibe
this
X may
SOC= X SOC= opportunities?
ent
pertain toimplicatio
a specificns if
X SOC=
site or X SOC=
sector vulnerbili
X SOC= ties
X SOC=in the
Can be a area are
X SOC= not
barangay, X SOC=
whole addressed
X SOC= ?X SOC=
ecosystme
n or
specific
X SOC= X SOC=
locality
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
Task 6
Key Areas,
Challenges, Policy Measures
Opportunities
What will be the key Legislations, programs or

issues/challenges to projects that can address
the achievement of or respond to key areas
the vision, goals and and challenges
objectives of the
locality?
Are there possibe

opportunities?
SOCIAL_Flooding_Population Database_Municipality of_________ Province of ________
HAZARD: FLOODING
SECTOR:SOCIAL
TOTAL
BARANGAY TOTAL LAND TOTAL POPULATION
Ecosystem HOUSEHOLD
AREA (hectare) POPULATION DENSITY NUMBER
B
A
Instructions:

2. Exposure, Column C. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each populatio
3. Sensitivity, Column D. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each populati
4. In Column E, Summarize the findings and observation about EXPOSURE of all the barangays included in the
5. In Columns F, determine the DEGREE OF IMPACT/LEVEL OF THREAT based on the estimated exposure, the d
THREAT LEVEL
High (5)
Medium High (4)

-4
Medium (3)
Medium Low (2)
Low (1)
6. In Column G, determine the ADAPTIVE CAPACITY of the affected communities/sector by supplying the info
7. In Column G, determine the ADAPTIVE CAPACITY of the affected communities/sector by supplying the info
8. In Column I, get the Relative Vulnerability by dividing the TL with AC (TL/AC). Evaluate the Relative Vulnerab
9. In Column J, Summarize the findings and observation about AC and Vulnerability of the barangays.Take note
10. In Column K, determine the level of risk by multiplying the likelihood of occurrence and severity of conseq
Measure of Likelihood
of Occurrence
of the Hazard
(Flood)
Frequent or very likely
Moderate or likely
Occasional, slight
chance
Unlikely, rare event
event
Very rare event
Source: Draft Reference Manual on Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation in the Comprehensive Land Use Plans, NE
of ________
SENSITIVITY INDICATO
Exposure
No. of Police No. of Barangay Tanods Police Percent occupancy of Proportion of

Stations outposts municipal cemetery households
located in low- and/or with members
Flood depth lying or prisoners or victimized by
flooded area detention crime to total
cell households
≤1m for moderate

and Low
≥1m for high
and values for each population exposure indicators.
n and values for each population sensitivity indicators.
the barangays included in the analysis for this particular hazard. Take note of important quantitative and qualitative data and indicators.
the estimated exposure, the degree of sensitivities of the exposed units, and identifed potential impacts, qualitatively and using the sugges
s/sector by supplying the information based on the given indicators.

ns:
s/sector by supplying the information based on the given indicators.

ns:
*Information – Level of knowledge to hazards, climate change and disaster, info dissemination
*Institution and Governance – Existing policies, plans and programs
*Infrastructure – Structures to withstand climate projections
*Social capital – Capacities, organized groups, CSO, trained staff
*Technology – Example: drought resistant crop types being tested, research conducted
Evaluate the Relative Vulnerability following the category below:
Category of Vulnerability
Vulnerability
Score ( TL / AC = RV)
High 4.1 - 5
Medium High 3.1 - 4.0
Medium 2.1 - 3.0
Medium Low 1.1 - 2.0
Low <1 - 1.0
ity of the barangays.Take note of important quantitative and qualitative data and indicators.
urrence and severity of consequence following the category below:
Occurrence
Return Period in Return Period in
Likelihood Score
Years Years
Severe
of the
Wind
Below 20
Every 1-3 years 6 Frequent or very likely
years
Every 3-10 years 5 Moderate or likely 20 year return
Every 10-30 years 4 Occasional, slight chance 50 years

Every 30-100
3 Unlikely, rare event 100 years
years
Every 100-200
2 Highly unlikely, rare event 200 years
years
Every 200-300+
1 Very rare event 500 years
years
n the Comprehensive Land Use Plans, NEDA-UNDP, HLURB, 2012
SENSITIVITY INDICATORS Summary of
Findings and DEGREE OF IMPACT SCORE / THREAT L
D Observations
Police- % of % of Policemen, staff No. of police

population Barangay with no trainings on outposts
ratio below Tanods CCA-DRRM and/or
national with no prisoners or E F
standards trainings detention
on CCA- cells in 1
DRRM storey
building
Social Econ ENV
SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
What are
your findings
from the
exposure and
sensitivity?
Wrtie
impportant
notes in
bullet
statements
SCORE SCORE SCORE
SCORE SCORE SCORE
ualitative data and indicators.

ualitatively and using the suggested rating scales:
Adaptive Capacity
info dissemination High (5)
Medium High (4)
Medium (3)
Medium Low (4)
Low (3)
STORM Surge: Measure Return Period Likelihood

of Likelihood of in Years Score
Occurrence
Likelihood
Score
Every 1-3
years
Every 3-10
6 Moderate or likely 5
years
Every 10-30
5 Occasional, slight chance 4
years
Every 30-100
4 Unlikely, rare 3
years
Highly unlikely, rare Every 100-200
3 2
event years
Every 200-
2 Very rare event 1
300+ years
1
AVERAGE Summary of
SCORE OF Findings and
ACT SCORE / THREAT LEVEL ADAPTIVE CAPACITY (AC)
Observation
THREAT s
F G H I
INFRA INSTI OF THREAT: insti/gov, social capital
TOTAL SCORE/5
INSTI &

MAY refer to
Parameters of
Threat
Return
period or
Likelihood
of
Occurrence
Summary of x Severity
Vulnerability Findings and of
AC) Average AC Index Observation SEVERITY OF Consequen
s CONSEQUENCE ce
J K L
M N PO
sion (wealth, info, infra, tech,

TOTAL SCORE/5 TL x AC
LGU SCORE
SOCIAL PARAMETER
CAPITAL PARAMETERS: 1-4 S: 1-6 GROUP 1
DISCUSS
DISCUSS
SCORE TOTAL SCORE/5
POPULATION Critical Point Facility
ESTIMA
TING
RISKS
BY
ESTIMATING AVERA
RISK AVERAG
RISKS BY
FGD AVERAGE RISK CATEGO FGD GING
E RISK
LGU SCORE SCORE AVERAGING
SCORE RY LGU SCORE LGU
SCORE SCORE &
LGU & FGD FGD
GROUP 1 GROUP 1 SCORE Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 SCORE

Facility LIFELINES NATURAL RESO
ESTIMA
TING
RISKS
BY
AVERA
AVERAG RISK
FGD GING
E RISK CATEGO
RISK CATEGORY LGU SCORE LGU
SCORE SCORE & RY LGU SCORE
FGD
Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 SCORE Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1

NATURAL RESOURCE Urban Ecosystem
ESTIMA ESTIMA
TING TING
RISKS RISKS
BY BY
AVERA AVERA
AVERAG RISK AVERAG RISK
FGD GING
E RISK CATEGO FGD GING
E RISK CATEGO
U SCORE LGU
SCORE SCORE & RY LGU SCORE LGU
SCORE SCORE & RY
FGD FGD
GROUP 1 SCORE Category GROUP 1 GROUP 1 GROUP 1 SCORE Category

TASK 5 Task 6 TASK 5
NImplicati O N
ons
Identify when
the major If LGU key
decion continues
issues Key Areas,
areas to not Challenges,
based on
Decision operate
addresse Opportunitie Policy Implications when key
the level of business
Areas
vulnerbiliti d s Measures Decision Areas issues not addressed
as usual,
ess. This what
can be a would be
unique
contiguousthe long-
area of term
sectoral What will be
interest or Identify the major
this may developm the key decion areas based on If LGU continues to
pertain toent issues/challen the level of operate business as
a specificimplicatio ges to the vulnerbilitiess. This can usual, what would be
site or be a unique contiguous the long-term sectoral
ns if achievement area of interest or this
sector vulnerbili of the vision, may pertain to a
development
ties in the goals and specific site or sector implications if
Can be a area are objectives of Legislations, vulnerbilities in the area
barangay, programs or are not addressed?
whole not the locality? projects that can Can be a barangay,
ecosystme addressed address or whole ecosystmen or
n or ? Are there respond to key specific locality
specific possibe areas and
locality opportunities? challenges
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
X SOC= X SOC=
Task 6
Key Areas,
Challenges,
Opportunities Policy Measures
What will be the key

issues/challenges to
the achievement of
the vision, goals and
objectives of the
locality? Legislations, programs or
projects that can address
Are there possibe or respond to key areas
opportunities? and challenges

SOCIAL Population Flooding Database

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SOCIAL Population Flooding Database

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SOCIAL Population Flooding Database

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SOCIAL_Flooding_Population Database_Municipality of_________ Province of _______

Medium High (4)

Medium Low (2)

of the Hazard (Flood)

Frequent or very likely 6

Occasional, slight chance 4

Unlikely, rare event 3

Highly unlikely, rare event 2

Total Residential Area Barangay Population Affected Population

alitative data and indicators.

of the Severe Wind

Occasional, slight chance 4

Unlikely, rare event 3

Highly unlikely, rare event 2

Very rare event 1

Medium High (4)

Medium Low (4)

Frequent or very likely Below 20 years 6

Moderate or likely 20 years 5

% of population % of HH with no % of HH without % of HH without % of household with % of HH without Proportion of Proportion of

Frequent or very likely Every 1-3 years 6

Moderate or likely Every 3-10 years 5

INSTI & SOCIAL

LIFELINES NATURAL RESOURCE Urban Ecosystem

FGD AVERAG RISK FGD AVERAG RISK FGD

X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=

X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=

X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=

X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=

X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=

X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=

X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=

X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=

X SOC= X SOC= X SOC= X SOC=

No. of Private and

Medium High (4)

Medium Low (2)

of the Hazard (Flood)

Frequent or very likely Every 1-3 years

Moderate or likely Every 3-10 years

Occasional, slight chance Every 10-30 years

Unlikely, rare event Every 30-100 years

Very rare event Every 200-300+ years

data and indicators.

5 Moderate or likely 20 year return 5 Moderate or likely 20 years 5

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE

Frequent or very likely Every 1-3 years 6

SOCIAL_Flooding_Population Database_Municipality of___ Province of _