Ex Utero Mouse Embryogenesis From Pre-Gastrulation To Late Organogenesis
Ex Utero Mouse Embryogenesis From Pre-Gastrulation To Late Organogenesis
Ex Utero Mouse Embryogenesis From Pre-Gastrulation To Late Organogenesis
The mammalian body plan is established shortly after the embryo implants into the
maternal uterus, and our understanding of post-implantation developmental
processes remains limited. Although pre- and peri-implantation mouse embryos are
routinely cultured in vitro1,2, approaches for the robust culture of post-implantation
embryos from egg cylinder stages until advanced organogenesis remain to be
established. Here we present highly effective platforms for the ex utero culture of
post-implantation mouse embryos, which enable the appropriate development
of embryos from before gastrulation (embryonic day (E) 5.5) until the hindlimb
formation stage (E11). Late gastrulating embryos (E7.5) are grown in three-
dimensional rotating bottles, whereas extended culture from pre-gastrulation stages
(E5.5 or E6.5) requires a combination of static and rotating bottle culture platforms.
Histological, molecular and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses confirm that the
ex utero cultured embryos recapitulate in utero development precisely. This culture
system is amenable to the introduction of a variety of embryonic perturbations and
micro-manipulations, the results of which can be followed ex utero for up to six days.
The establishment of a system for robustly growing normal mouse embryos ex utero
from pre-gastrulation to advanced organogenesis represents a valuable tool for
investigating embryogenesis, as it eliminates the uterine barrier and allows
researchers to mechanistically interrogate post-implantation morphogenesis and
artificial embryogenesis in mammals.
Understanding the developmental processes that lead to the for- after culture initiation. Thus, stable and efficient protocols for extended
mation of tissues and organs represents a fundamental question in culturing of pre-gastrulating mouse embryos until advanced organo-
developmental biology. In mammals, this process takes place after the genesis are still required11.
embryo implants into the uterus, which makes it relatively inaccessible
for observation and manipulation3,4. Consequently, the sequence of
developmental events that takes place from pre-gastrulation to organo- Enhanced ex utero roller culture platform
genesis remains to be fully understood and is difficult to manipulate. We set out to test whether some of the newly established cell cul-
Establishing culture conditions that sustain the proper long-term ture supplements or biomechanical principles that have arisen in
development of post-implanted mouse embryos outside the uterine stem cell research could be helpful for addressing this challenge
environment remains a challenge. Several useful culture techniques (for example, pressure control, supplements or synthetic sera12–14).
have been proposed since the 1930s, including culturing the embryos We used the roller culture system on a drum and integrated it with a
in conventional static conditions5,6, in rotating bottles on a drum (‘roller customized, in-house-developed electronic gas regulation module
culture systems’)7 or in circulator systems8. However, these platforms that not only allows the precise and sensitive control of O2 and CO2
remain highly inefficient for normal embryo survival, use already gas- levels, but also allows atmospheric gas pressure to be controlled
trulating embryos and are limited to short periods of time9,10, as the (Fig. 1a, b, Extended Data Fig. 1, Supplementary Video 1). The latter
embryos begin to display developmental anomalies as early as 24 h was motivated by the ability of pressure to enhance oxygen delivery
1
Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. 3The Clinical
Research Institute at Ramban (CRIR), Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. 4Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology - Technion, Haifa, Israel. 5Department of
Life Sciences Core Facilities, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. 6Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. 7Department of Life
Sciences Core Facilities, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. 8Arad Technologies Ltd, Ashdod, Israel. 9Gastroenterology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. 10These
authors contributed equally: Alejandro Aguilera-Castrejon, Bernardo Oldak. 11These authors jointly supervised this work: Alejandro Aguilera-Castrejon, Rada Massarwa, Noa Novershtern, Itay
Maza, Jacob H. Hanna. 12Deceased: Rada Massarwa. ✉e-mail: alejandroac@weizmann.ac.il; i_maza@rambam.health.gov.il; jacob.hanna@weizmann.ac.il
b c
E7.5 EPC E8.5 E9.5 E10.5 E11.5
In utero
Epi 6–8 s 23–26 s 35–38 s >45 s
Rho Ms Ms
Ex utero
80 Fg
Epi 6–8 s 23–26 s 35-38 s 44 s
normally (%)
Ms Mt Ms
n = 163, 12x
n = 230, 15x
n = 185, 13x
40 Al Md Pro OlP
H Sc PN TB
20 HL
S
S FL
1 2 3 4
ay ay ay ay
+D +D +D +D f
NS E7.5 +Day 1 +Day 2 +Day 3 +Day 4
P = 0.1431 SOX2
e DAPI
**
P = 0.0048
6,000
Length (μm)
NS
P = 0.9321
4,000 NS
P = 0.9507 E7.5 +Day 1 +Day 2 +Day 3 +Day 4
2,000 SOX9
DAPI
E8.5 +Day 1 E9.5 +Day 2 E10.5 +Day 3 E11 +Day 4
Fig. 1 | Ex utero culture system for growing mouse late-gastrulating Whitney test. f, SOX2 and SOX9 whole-mount immunofluorescence of embryos
embryos until advanced organogenesis. a, Schematic of the E7.5 embryo ex developed ex utero from E7.5. Images represent a minimum of three biological
utero culture platform. b, Electronic gas and pressure regulation module replicates. Am, amnion; Al, allantois; Ch, chorion; D, diencephalon; Epi,
connected to the roller culture incubator system. c, Bright-field images of epiblast; EPC, ectoplacental cone; Fg, foregut pocket; FL, forelimb bud; H,
embryos developing in utero from E7.5 to E11.5 and equivalent embryos heart; HL, hindlimb bud; LV, lens vesicle; Md, mandibular arch; Ms,
cultured ex utero. d, Percentage of developmentally normal embryos per mesencephalon; Mt, metencephalon; Mx, maxillary arch; My, myelencephalon;
culture day. n, total number of embryos; x, number of experiments. All data are NF, neural folds; OlP, olfactory placode; OP, optic pit; OtP, otic pit; PN, posterior
mean ± s.e.m. e, Quantification of embryonic length for in utero and cultured neuropore; Pro, prosencephalon; Rho, rhombencephalon; S, somites; Sc,
embryos. Dots represent individual embryos. Numbers of embryos, left to spinal cord; T, telencephalon; TB, tail bud; UC, umbilical cord; YS, yolk sac; YSV,
right: in utero, 13, 19, 15, 38; ex utero, 32, 15, 43, 41; NS, not significant; Mann– yolk sac vessel. Scale bars, 500 μm.
to tissues and by demonstrations that atmospheric pressure can alter of 6–7 psi (Extended Data Fig. 2b). This protocol yielded approximately
cell growth13,14. We established conditions that support the growth 77% normal embryo development after four days in culture in differ-
of E7.5 late-gastrulating embryos (neural plate and headfold stage15) ent mouse strains (Fig. 1d, Extended Data Fig. 2c). After four days, the
until the hindlimb formation stage (around E11) with high efficiency embryos started to show abnormalities, yolk sac circulation abrup-
(Fig. 1a–c, Supplementary Video 2, Extended Data Fig. 2a, b). First, a tion and pericardial effusion, and quickly died overnight. The latter
mixture of 25% Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), 50% rat effects are consistent with the development of hydrops fetalis due to
serum and 25% human umbilical cord blood serum (HCS) consistently insufficient oxygenation and nutrient supply by the ex utero system
supports embryo growth with much higher efficiency than rat serum (given the lack of maternal blood supply in this setting) that no longer
only (Extended Data Fig. 2b), and we designated this medium as ex utero matches the increased body size at E11.
culture medium (EUCM). Notably, supplementing EUCM with extra We evaluated previously defined morphological landmarks16 to
glucose every 24 h and until the end of the culture period was essential assess appropriate embryo development ex utero (Fig. 1c, Supple-
for overcoming developmental abnormalities after two days in culture mentary Video 3, Supplementary Methods). On the last day of culture,
(Extended Data Fig. 2b). The application of sequential increases in O2 maximum embryo growth was reached at about 44 somites, equivalent
levels every 24 h, from 5% O2 at E7.5, 13% at E8.5, 18% at E9.5, to 21% O2 at to approximately E11 (Theiler stage 18). The length of the cultured
E10.5 was most optimal (Extended Data Fig. 2b). In addition, normal and embryos was comparable to matched in utero embryos (Fig. 1e). We
efficient development depended on the maintenance of a gas pressure analysed eleven developmental markers, all of which showed consistent
Bright field
Al
Ch NF
ExE
AB H
VE PS Am
Static culture AC Fg S
Epi Epi
Ibidi plate EUCM 21% O2 98% 97%
c 15 d 15
Ex utero +Day 2 Extraembryonic Foregut
Mid-hindgut
In utero E8.5 endoderm
10 10
Extraembryonic
ectoderm
5 5 Blood Blood Somitic mesoderm
Amnion Placodes
UMAP-2
UMAP-2
0 0 Endothelial Amnion
Pharingeal
mesoderm Amnion
–5 –5 Endothelial
Extraembryonic
mesoderm
Cardiac
Presomitic/mixed
–10 –10 Neural tube
mesoderm
Neural tube
Mid-hindbrain
–10 –5 0 5 10 –10 –5 0 5 10
UMAP-1 UMAP-1
Fig. 2 | Defining conditions for recapitulating mouse gastrulation ex utero. dots). UMAP plot displaying individual cells (n = 6,358 ex utero +Day 2; n = 4,349
a, Static culture protocol for growing gastrulating embryos until in utero E8.5). d, Cell lineage annotation of clusters based on marker genes of
somitogenesis. b, Bright-field images of embryos developing ex utero from the major cell types identified in E8.5 mouse embryos19. Points are coloured
E6.5 until E8.5; bottom right, percentage of properly developed embryos. according to their assigned cell cluster. AB, allantoic bud; ExE, extraembryonic
n = 421 at +Day 1, n = 399 at +Day 2. c, scRNA-seq analysis of in utero E8.5 ectoderm; PS, primitive streak; VE, visceral endoderm. Scale bars, 100 μm.
embryos (purple dots) versus E6.5 +Day 2 ex utero developing embryos (green
spatio-temporal gene expression patterns between embryos that devel- distribution of cell states overlapped strongly between in utero and
oped in utero or ex utero (Fig. 1f, Extended Data Figs. 3, 4, Supplemen- ex utero embryos (Fig. 2c). The identity of each cluster was annotated
tary Video 4). Mouse transgenic lines expressing the GFP reporter for using specific marker genes of cell lineages that have been previously
imprinting erasure of the Dlk1–Dio3 intergenic differentially meth- defined by single-cell transcriptomics of early mouse embryos19,20
ylated region (DMR)17 in migrating primordial germ cells, or under (Extended Data Fig. 8c, e). We identified derivatives of the three germ
tissue-specific promoters (Wnt1-Cre and Isl1-Cre), showed that the layers as well as extraembryonic tissues, and the profile of cell types
GFP expression patterns in the cultured transgenic embryos resemble found in embryos developing ex utero was equivalent to that in utero
those of in utero embryos (Extended Data Fig. 5). These data suggest (Fig. 2c, d). In summary, the alternative static conditions generated
that the ex utero cultured embryos recapitulate development properly herein faithfully recapitulate embryo development ex utero from the
until approximately the 44-somite stage. onset of gastrulation until somitogenesis (E6.5 to E8.5).
c d
GATA4 MHC-II SOX2
42 somites
–10 –10
Osteoblasts
Epithelial cells
–10 –5 0 5 10 –10 –5 0 5 10
UMAP-1 UMAP-1
Fig. 3 | Extending the mouse embryo ex utero culture system from cultured for 6 days until the 42-somite stage. n ≥ 5 embryos. Scale bars, 50 μm
pre-gastrulation to advanced organogenesis. a, Schematic protocol for (E5.5), 500 μm (all others). e, Comparative scRNA-seq analysis of E6.5 +Day 4 ex
culturing mouse embryos from pre-gastrulation to organogenesis. utero embryos (green dots) and equivalent E10.5 embryos developing in utero
b, Bright-field images of embryos grown for five days ex utero from E6.5 to the (purple dots). UMAP plot depicting all cells considered in the analysis
44-somite stage. Embryos cultured beyond day two are shown without the (n = 39,374 ex utero; n = 24,107 in utero). f, Cell lineage annotation of clusters
yolk sac. The variation in somite number is indicated. n ≥ 65 embryos. based on the expression of marker genes described in the mouse
c, Immunostaining of early-gastrulating embryos grown ex utero for 3, 4 and organogenesis cell atlas21. Points are coloured according to their assigned cell
5 days. Images are representative of at least three biological replicates. cluster.
d, Representative bright-field images of pre-gastrulating E5.5 embryos
were located according to their expected expression patterns (Fig. 3c, organs and tissues derived from all three germ layers, consistent with
Extended Data Figs. 7, 9h). HCS could be replaced with serum isolated advanced organogenesis stages (Fig. 3f). Analysis of differentially
from human adult blood (HBS) to allow ex utero development until expressed genes revealed a high correlation (about 0.9) between ex
the hindlimb formation stage (44 somites), starting from E6.5 and E7.5 utero and in utero embryos for all cell states, with the most variable
(Extended Data Fig. 10). cluster showing only 0.4% (8 out of 2,000) differentially expressed
We characterized the transcriptional profiles of cells isolated from genes (Extended Data Fig. 8g). This minimal difference in blood and
embryos grown ex utero and in utero matched embryos by scRNA-seq cardiac gene expression signature at E10.5 (Extended Data Fig. 8g)
(Extended Data Fig. 8a, b). The cells profiled were grouped into 20 could be consistent with early signs of hydrops fetalis in the embryos.
clusters21 (Extended Data Fig. 8d, f). Our analysis confirmed that the Comparison of the relative cell proportions across cell types showed
composition of cell transcriptional states in the embryos that had devel- no significant differences in the majority of clusters, while minor dif-
oped ex utero until advanced organogenesis (E6.5 + 4 days) was equiva- ferences were found in only three clusters (Extended Data Fig. 8h).
lent to that of their in vivo counterparts (Fig. 3e). The annotated cell Collectively, these results show that embryos developing ex utero from
clusters identified represent lineage-committed cell types comprising pre-gastrulation stages, by a combination of static and rolling bottle
Embryo
culture Electroporation Back to culture Analysis Lentivirus injection Ex utero culture Analysis
GFP
GATA4 SOX2 GFP
TUJ1 SOX2 GFP
embryo
100
A P
D Ex utero culture Analysis 10
E7.5
h E7.5 E9.5–E11
tdT tdT
SOX2 TUJ1
Ventral
ntral
rsal
sal
Dorsal
a
r
Dors
rs
Vent
ent
en
e
Ventral Dorsal
Fig. 4 | Measuring functional outcomes of perturbations introduced into individual embryos; data are mean ± s.e.m. Embryos with no contribution are
ex utero whole-embryo culture platform. a, Schematic illustration of the not represented in the graph. Numbers of embryos analysed: EpiS cells, 21, 39,
ex utero electroporation protocol at E8.5. b, Immunofluorescence of 18, 8; EpiL cells, 22, 9; E7.5 epiblasts, 34, 12, 5, 7 (left to right); Mann–Whitney
electroporated embryos stained for GFP, SOX2 and TUJ1. n = 17, 15 and 11 test. ***P < 0.0001; **P = 0.001; *P = 0.0025. g, Immunostaining of chimeric
embryos (left to right). c, Lentiviral transduction of E6.5 mouse embryos. embryos injected at E7.5 with GFP–EpiS cells, GFP–EpiL cells or tdTomato
d, GFP, SOX2 and GATA4 immunostaining of E6.5 embryos transduced with GFP (tdT)–E7.5 epiblasts and cultured ex utero for 1–4 days. h, Top, generation of
using lentivirus and grown ex utero for 1–5 days. n = 15, 24, 19, 16 and 20 embryos human–mouse microglia chimeras. n = 11 embryos. Bottom, whole-mount
(left to right). e, Generation of post-implantation chimeras by microinjection immunostaining of chimeric embryos 3 days after injection. Scale bars,
of primed EpiS cells, EpiL cells and E7.5 in vivo epiblasts. A, anterior; D, distal; 500 μm.
P, posterior. f, Quantification of GFP+ cells in chimeric embryos. Dots represent
cultures, are capable of proper symmetry breaking, establishment of The ability to perform genetic modifications by lentiviral transduc-
the germ layers and embryonic axis, and subsequently differentiation tion23 was also shown in E6.5 embryos by microinjecting lentivirus
and patterning of tissues and organs without maternal interaction harbouring a gene encoding enhanced GFP (EGFP) (Fig. 4c). Lentiviral
over a period of six days from the symmetric pluripotent epiblast to transduction yielded an embryo survival rate similar to that of con-
the advanced organogenesis stages. trols and did not affect morphology or tissue differentiation (Fig. 4d,
Extended Data Fig. 11d). After 24 h, GFP was detected throughout the
epiblast and extraembryonic tissues, and by the last culture day, GFP
Perturbation of post-implantation development expression was extensively spread over the embryo and yolk sac in more
One major advantage of this ex utero culture platform is the ability to than 90% of the embryos (Fig. 4d, Extended Data Fig. 11e).
apply manipulations in post-implanted mouse embryos, and to follow Next, we harnessed the ex utero culture platform to analyse chimeric
their effects on the same embryos after several days of further ex utero mouse embryos obtained after microinjection of primed pluripotent
development. We performed whole-embryo electroporation4,22 of a stem cells (PS cells) at post-implantation stages24. The ability to evaluate
fluorescent marker at early E8.5 (before neural tube closure) followed the chimeric potential of primed mouse PS cells has been limited by the
by long-term ex utero culture (72 h). Embryos at E7.5 were dissected lack of protocols that enable transfer of post-implantation embryos
and cultured for 24 h. Afterwards, a GFP plasmid vector was injected in utero or their ex utero culture for prolonged periods, which has now
into the neural tube and electroporated to label a population of neural been achieved herein. Thus, we microinjected clusters of GFP-labelled
cells. Electroporated embryos were then put back in culture for up to mouse epiblast stem cells (EpiS cells) or epiblast-like stem cells (EpiL
three days (Fig. 4a). Sixty-eight per cent of the embryos developed cells) into the anterior, distal or posterior epiblast of E7.5 embryos,
properly until the hindlimb stage after electroporation (Extended Data which were subsequently cultured ex utero (Fig. 4e, Extended Data
Fig. 11a). Cells that expressed GFP were widely distributed in the neural Fig. 11f, g, i–k). After 24 h, we observed chimerism efficiency of 50–60%
tissues after 1–3 days of culture in 75% of embryos (Fig. 4b, Extended for both EpiS cells (27 of 49 embryos) and EpiL cells (44 of 69 embryos)
Data Fig. 11b, c). injected into the posterior epiblast, with an estimated number of
Extended Data Fig. 2 | Establishment and optimization of a mouse embryo point. Embryos that were dissected, fixed or moved to other conditions are
ex utero culture from late gastrulation (E7.5) until advanced subtracted from the total. Representative bright-field images of embryos
organogenesis (E11). a, E7.5 embryo dissection overview (see Methods). cultured under certain conditions are shown to the right. c, Efficiency of
b, Percentage of normally developed embryos under different gas pressures normal embryonic development evaluated in different mouse genetic
and glucose or oxygen concentrations. Blue numbers indicate the conditions backgrounds. Parental mouse lines are indicated on the left (female: male).
that yielded the highest efficiency of embryo survival. Values in parentheses Values in parentheses show the numbers of embryos evaluated. PYS, parietal
denote the number of embryos assessed per condition at every sampled time yolk sac; RS, rat serum. Scale bars, 500 μm.
Extended Data Fig. 3 | Spatio-temporal expression patterns of ectoderm- SOX9, Brachyury, CDX2 and MHC-II (myosin heavy chain-II) at the indicated
and mesoderm-related lineage markers are recapitulated in ex utero stages. Blue, DAPI. Images are representative of a minimum of three
cultured embryos. Maximum intensity projections of embryos developed biological replicates. Scale bars, 100 μm (E7.5), 200 μm (E8.5, E9.5), and
in utero and ex utero, fixed and immunostained for SOX2, OTX2, TUJ1, PAX6, 500 μm (E10.5, E11.5).
Article
Extended Data Fig. 4 | In vivo spatio-temporal expression patterns of Representative immunohistochemistry (mid-section, sagittal plane) images
endoderm-related lineage markers are recapitulated in cultured embryos. are shown for FOXA2 and GATA4 at the last time point (far-right panels). Images
Maximum intensity projections of embryos developed in utero and ex utero, represent a minimum of three biological replicates. Scale bars, 100 μm (E7.5),
fixed and immunostained for SOX17, FOXA2 and GATA4 at the indicated stages. 200 μm (E8.5, E9.5), and 500 μm (E10.5, E11.5).
Blue, DAPI. For SOX17, insets are enlargements of the dashed boxes.
Extended Data Fig. 5 | Ex utero culture of GFP-reporter transgenic confocal images of in utero E11.5 and ex utero +Day 4 transgenic mouse
embryos. a, Bright-field and GFP fluorescence images of ex utero embryos in embryos expressing GFP following activation by Wnt1-Cre and Isl1-Cre reporter
culture at the specified times expressing the GFP reporter following activation alleles. Scale bars, 1 mm. c, GFP fluorescence and bright-field images of in utero
by Wnt1-Cre and Isl1-Cre lineage-specific reporter alleles. n = 7 and 10 embryos E10.5 and ex utero +Day 3 IG-DMR–GFP reporter embryos. n = 7 in utero; n = 7 ex
for Wnt1-Cre and Isl1-Cre, respectively. Embryos dissected out of the yolk sac at utero. Scale bars, 500 μm.
+Day 4 are shown in the far-right panel. Scale bars, 500 μm. b, Representative
Article
Extended Data Fig. 6 | Devising a platform for culturing mouse embryos Embryos that were dissected, fixed or moved to other conditions are
from the onset of gastrulation until advanced organogenesis. subtracted from the total. Representative bright-field images of embryos
a–o, Schematic protocols indicating the percentages of E6.5 embryos that had cultured under certain conditions are shown to the right. Numbers in blue
developed properly per day in each condition. The medium composition, static indicate the protocol that yielded the highest efficiency of embryo survival and
or roller culture, and oxygen concentration are specified for each protocol. was subsequently used throughout the study. Scale bars, 500 μm.
Values in parentheses denote the number of embryos evaluated per condition.
Extended Data Fig. 7 | Embryos grown ex utero since early gastrulation time points. Blue, DAPI. Images are representative of a minimum of three
recapitulate the spatio-temporal expression profiles of lineage markers biological replicates. Scale bars, 50 μm (E6.5), 100 μm (+Day 1), 200 μm (+Day
seen in utero. a–c, Maximum intensity projections of embryos developed ex 2/3), 500 μm (+Day 4/5).
utero, fixed, and immunostained for eleven specific markers at the indicated
Article
Extended Data Fig. 9 | Changes in morphology and size in embryos since E5.5 exhibit a mild developmental delay of about 2–4 pairs of somites
developing ex utero from pre-gastrulation to the hindlimb formation when compared to those developed in utero; however, overall morphological
stage. a, Proportional increase in size of ex utero embryos grown from the development seemed to occur correctly. f, Percentages of normal embryos in
onset of gastrulation (E6.5) to the 44-somite stage. Representative bright-field cultures started at E5.5. g, Representative increase in size of embryos cultured
images of embryos cultured for 5 days are shown at each specific stage. from E5.5 to the hindlimb stage (6 days of culture). Embryos dissected at the
Embryos without yolk sac are shown from day 3 to day 5. n ≥ 119. b, Percentages beginning and end of culture are shown. h, Immunostaining of pre-gastrulating
of normal embryos in cultures started at E6.5. c, Diagram depicting the (E5.5) embryos cultured for 6 days until the 42-somite stage. LEFTY1 and OCT4
embryonic axis measured at each stage (length of the antero-posterior axis immunostaining on a section of an E5.5 embryo (left); GATA4, MHC-II and SOX2
(A-P) for E6.5 to E8.5 and crown–rump length for later stages). d, Measurements maximum intensity projection of an embryo at culture day 6 and stained
of embryonic length at the indicated time points. Dots represent individual (right). Scale bars, 50 μm (E5.5 embryos), 500 μm (all others). n, total number of
embryos; in utero, n = 72, 25, 13, 19, 15, 38 (left to right); ex utero, n = 68, 29, 8, 19, embryos; x, number of experiments; all data represent mean ± s.e.m. Images
24; **Mann–Whitney test; ns, not significant. e, Bright-field images of E5.5 are representative of a minimum of three embryos.
embryos grown ex utero for 6 days until the 42-somite stage. Embryos cultured
Extended Data Fig. 10 | Ex utero culture medium supplemented with HBS in-house-prepared and freshly isolated adult HBS. c, Percentages of normal and
supports embryo development from early/late gastrulation until the defective embryos in cultures started at E7.5 and E6.5. n, total number of
hindlimb stage (E11). a, b, Bright-field microscopy images of mouse embryos cultured embryos; x, number of experiments. Data represent mean ± s.e.m.
grown ex utero from E7.5 (a) or E6.5 (b) with HCS replaced by Scale bars, 500 μm.
Article
Extended Data Fig. 11 | Ex utero manipulation of mouse embryonic cells or EpiL cells at E7.5, cultured ex utero for 1–4 days and stained for GFP,
development. a, b, Percentages of developmentally normal (a) and SOX2 and GATA4. Insets are enlargements of the dashed boxes. n ≥ 8 embryos.
GFP-expressing embryos (b) at 1–3 days after electroporation. c, Quantification j, Percentages of chimeric embryos (GFP+ or tdT+) after micro-injection and ex
of GFP+ cells in electroporated embryos at the indicated times. Dots represent utero culture. k, Immunostaining of +Day 1 cultured embryos injected with
individual embryos. d, e, Percentages of normally developed (d) and GFP+ EpiS cells and EpiL cells in the anterior or distal epiblast. Images represent a
embryos (e) after lentiviral transduction. Data represent mean ± s.e.m. minimum of three biological replicates. l, Representative confocal images of
f, Representative qPCR data showing the relative expression levels of mouse mouse post-implantation chimeras generated by tdT+ E7.5 in vivo epiblast
naive and primed markers in V6.5 mouse EpiS cells and formative EpiL cells, orthotopic transplantation followed by ex utero culture for 1–4 days, stained
normalized to isogenic naive 2i/Lif ES cells. n = 3. g, Overlap in the for tdTomato, GATA4 or SOX9 and SOX2 or TUJ1. n ≥ 10 embryos. m, tdT+
transcriptional signature of differentially expressed genes measured by bulk embryos explanted at E7.5 and subjected to in toto live imaging of neural tube
RNA-seq in EpiS cells and ES cells used herein, compared to previously closure at E9.0. n = 3. n, Embryos cultured ex utero since E7.5 and exposed to
published datasets26. n = 2. h, Top, generation of mouse chimeras using vehicle or 1 mM valproic acid (VPA) from E8.5 to E9.5. n = 6. Inset shows
isogenic naive ES cells. Bottom, GFP, SOX2 and GATA4 immunofluorescence magnification of the dashed box. Arrowheads, neural tube closure defects.
images of chimeric embryos generated with naive ESCs. i, Whole-mount Scale bars, 100 μm (m), 500 μm (all others). n, total number of embryos
immunostaining of GFP+ cells detected in embryos injected with mouse EpiS assessed; x, number of experiments.
Extended Data Fig. 12 | Generation of human–mouse microglia interspecies magnification of the dashed box at day 4 identifying human nuclei (hNUMA),
chimeric embryos. a, Protocol for differentiation of microglia progenitors GFP and TUJ1. n = 11 embryos (day 3); n = 8 embryos (day 4). e, Quantification of
from humans ES cells as previously described28. b, Flow cytometry dot plot to GFP+ cells detected in human–mouse microglia chimeric embryos (excluding
validate the identity of obtained microglia cells by co-expression of the GFP+ cells found in the yolk sac). Dots represent individual embryos; n = 11 and 8
microglia progenitor cell markers CD34+ and CD43+. n = 3 independent embryos for day 3 and day 4, respectively. f, Immunostaining for GFP and
experiments. c, Merged bright-field and fluorescence images of E7.5 embryos human TMEM119 in chimeric embryos. n = 3. g, Representative GFP
injected with GFP+ human microglia progenitors at day 0. d, Representative immunofluorescence of a human microglia chimeric embryonic yolk sac and
immunofluorescence images of ex utero human microglia chimeric embryos 3 yolk sac vessel with circulating human GFP+ cells. n = 3. Scale bars, 50 μm (f),
and 4 days after injection, labelled for GFP and TUJ1. The inset shows a 500 μm (all others).
nature research | reporting summary
Corresponding author(s): Jacob Hanna, Alejandro Aguilera, Itay Maza
Last updated by author(s): 17/02/21
Reporting Summary
Nature Research wishes to improve the reproducibility of the work that we publish. This form provides structure for consistency and transparency
in reporting. For further information on Nature Research policies, see our Editorial Policies and the Editorial Policy Checklist.
Statistics
For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section.
n/a Confirmed
The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement
A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly
The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one- or two-sided
Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted
Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.
For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings
For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes
Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated
Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.
Data analysis All statistical analysis besides single cell and bulk RNA-seq analysis were performed using the GraphPad Prism 8 software (La Joya, California).
Fiji/Image J (version 1.52p) was used to count cell numbers. 10X Genomics data analysis was performed with the Cell Ranger 3.1.0 software
(10x Genomics) and Seurat 3.0. The annotations were performed using the R package AUCELL 1.10.041, using parameters: aucMaxRank =100
(5% of the total gene count) under the AUCell_calcAUC function. To evaluate the probability of a certain cluster to be enriched to a certain
tissue, we utilized the annotated AUC predictions of each cell to a tissue to compare to our observed cluster annotation of each cell, thus
producing a p-value based on Mann-Whitney U statistics, this was performed using the R package roc.area v1.42 (CRAN.R-project.org).
Differential expression (DEGs) of compatible clusters between in utero and ex utero was performed using parameters : fold-change-threshold
of log(0.5) and with min.pct=0.25. DEGs with significant values were also enriched using the gene ontology database via R package limma
3.42.2 using function “goana”. For bulk RNA seq, reads were trimmed with TrimGalore 0.6.5 (flags --stringency 3 --paired) and aligned to
GRCm38 genome using STAR aligner (flags --runThreadN 64 --genomeLoad). Counts were estimated using HTSeq-count 0.7.2 (flags -q -f bam -
April 2020
r pos -s no -t exon -i gene_name). Normalization and differentially expressed genes were calculated using DESeq2 R package, with default
parameters. External gene signatures, based on mouse microarray data, were calculated from GSE60603 (PMID 25945737). Flow cytometry
was analyzed using FlowJo v10.7. Morphometric measurements were performed using the CellSens Entry 1.18 software (Olympus).
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors and
reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.
1
Data
The single cell RNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data sets generated in this study have been deposited and publicly-available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) under accession number GSE149372. Source data are provided with this paper.
Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.
Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences
For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf
Data exclusions For scRNA-seq, to filter out low expressing single cells, possible doublets produced during the 10X sample processing or single cells with
extensive mitochondrial expression, we filtered out cells with under 200 expressing genes, over 4000 expressing genes or over 10%
mitochondrial gene expression.
Replication The exact number of replicate independent experiments and embryos is indicated in the figure or in the figure legend. All data refer to
biological replicates. Single cell RNA-seq was performed in 2 biological replicates for E8.5/Day 2 and 5 &7 biological replicates for E10.5/+Day
4. All the attempts at replication were successful.
Randomization Embryos were chosen randomly when placed in different culture conditions. Other experiments were not randomized.
Blinding The investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment. We had no relevant scientific reasons to
conduct blinding.
Antibodies
Antibodies used Rabbit monoclonal anti-Brachyury (D2Z3J) (Cell Signaling Cat# 81694); Rabbit polyclonal anti-Cdx2 (Cell Signaling Cat# 3977); Mouse
monoclonal anti-Cdx2 (Biogenex Cat# MU392A-UC); Goat polyclonal anti-Gata4 (Santa Cruz Cat# SC-1237); Rabbit polyclonal anti-
Gata4 (Abcam Cat# Ab84593); Rabbit monoclonal anti-Foxa2 (Abcam Cat# Ab108422); Mouse monoclonal anti-Myosin Heavy Chain II
(clone MF-20) (R&D Cat# MAB4470); Goat polyclonal anti-Otx2 (R&D Cat# AF1979); Rabbit polyclonal anti-Pax6 (Covance; Cat#
PBR-278P); Goat polyclonal anti-Sox2 (R&D Cat# AF2018); Rabbit polyclonal anti-Sox9 (Millipore Cat# AB5535); Goat polyclonal anti-
Sox17 (R&D Cat# AF1924); Mouse monoclonal anti-TUBB3 (Tuj1) (Covance Cat# MMS-435P); Chicken polyclonal anti-GFP (Abcam
2
Cat# Ab13970); Mouse monoclonal anti-Oct4 (clone C-10) (Santa Cruz Cat# SC-5279); Goat polyclonal anti-Lefty 1 (R&D Cat# AF746);
Goat polyclonal anti-mCherry/Tomato (SiCGEN Cat# AB0040-200); Rabbit anti-hNUMA (Abcam Cat# ab84680); Rabbit polyclonal anti-
Validation All the antibodies have been validated by the companies from which they were offered. Details of the validation statements,
antibody profiles and relevant citations can be found on the manufacturer's website.
Antibodies for immunofluorescence: All antibodies were validated herein by immunofluorescence on mouse embryos, based on their
well described expression patterns.
Rabbit monoclonal anti-Brachyury (Cell Signaling Cat# 81694). The antibody has been referenced in 5 publications: https://
www.cellsignal.com/products/primary-antibodies/brachyury-d2z3j-rabbit-mab/81694
Rabbit polyclonal anti-Cdx2 (Cell Signaling Cat# 3977). The antibody has been referenced in 13 publications: https://
www.cellsignal.com/products/primary-antibodies/cdx2-antibody/3977
Mouse monoclonal anti-Cdx2 (Biogenex Cat# MU392A-UC). The antibody has been referenced in more than 49 publications: https://
store.biogenex.com/us/anti-cdx-2-clone-cdx2-130.html
Goat polyclonal anti-Gata4 (Santa Cruz Cat# SC-1237). The antibody has been referenced in 176 publications: https://www.scbt.com/
p/gata-4-antibody-c-20
Rabbit polyclonal anti-Gata4 (Abcam Cat# Ab84593). The antibody has been referenced in 45 publications: https://www.abcam.com/
gata4-antibody-ab84593.html
Rabbit monoclonal anti-Foxa2 (Abcam Cat# Ab108422). The antibody has been referenced in 42 publications: https://
www.abcam.com/foxa2-antibody-epr4466-ab108422.html
Mouse monoclonal anti-Myosin Heavy Chain II (clone MF-20) (R&D Cat# MAB4470). The antibody has been referenced in 50
publications: https://www.rndsystems.com/products/myosin-heavy-chain-antibody-mf20_mab4470
Goat polyclonal anti-Otx2 (R&D Cat# AF1979). The antibody has been referenced in 37 publications: https://www.rndsystems.com/
products/human-otx2-antibody_af1979
Rabbit polyclonal anti-Pax6 (Covance; Cat# PBR-278P). The antibody has been referenced in 169 publications: https://
www.biolegend.com/en-us/products/purified-anti-pax-6-antibody-11511
Goat polyclonal anti-Sox2 (R&D Cat# AF2018). The antibody has been referenced in 93 publications: https://www.rndsystems.com/
products/human-mouse-rat-sox2-antibody_af2018
Rabbit polyclonal anti-Sox9 (Millipore Cat# AB5535). Anti-Sox9 Antibody is a well characterized affinity purified Rabbit Polyclonal
Antibody that reliably detects Transcription Factor Sox-9. This highly published antibody has been validated in IHC & WB: https://
www.merckmillipore.com/INTL/en/product/Anti-Sox9-Antibody,MM_NF-AB5535?ReferrerURL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%
2F&bd=1
Goat polyclonal anti-Sox17 (R&D Cat# AF1924). The antibody has been referenced in 163 publications: https://
www.rndsystems.com/products/human-sox17-antibody_af1924
Mouse anti-TUBB3 (Tuj1) (Covance Cat# MMS-435P). The antibody has been referenced in 436 publications. https://
www.biolegend.com/en-us/products/purified-anti-tubulin-beta-3-tubb3-antibody-11580
Chicken polyclonal anti-GFP (Abcam Cat# Ab13970). The antibody has been referenced in 2036 publications: https://
www.abcam.com/gfp-antibody-ab13970.html
Mouse monoclonal anti-Oct4 (clone C-10) (Santa Cruz Cat# SC-5279). The antibody has been referenced in 1905 publications:
https://www.scbt.com/p/oct-3-4-antibody-c-10
Goat polyclonal anti-Lefty 1 (R&D Cat# AF746). Validated in for IHC in mouse tissues by a previous study. The antibody has been
referenced in 1 publication: https://www.rndsystems.com/products/human-mouse-lefty-antibody_af746
Goat polyclonal anti-mCherry/Tomato (SiCGEN Cat# AB0040-200). This antibody (AB0040) recognizes very well tdTomato and does
not recognize GFP (green fluorescent protein). The antibody has been referenced in 15 publications: https://www.origene.com/
catalog/antibodies/primary-antibodies/ab0040-200/mcherry
Rabbit anti-hNUMA (Abcam Cat# ab84680). The antibody has been referenced in 6 publications: https://www.abcam.com/numa-
antibody-ab84680.html
Rabbit polyclonal anti-human TEMEM119 (Invitrogen Cat# PA562505). This antibody has been validated by the manufacturer to react
with human human cerebral cortex microglia. https://www.thermofisher.com/antibody/product/TMEM119-Antibody-Polyclonal/
PA5-62505
Antibodies for immunohistochemistry:
Rabbit monoclonal anti-Foxa2 (Abcam Cat# Ab108422). Validated by the manufacturer using Formalin/PFA-fixed paraffin-embedded
sections of mouse liver tissue. The antibody has been referenced in 42 publications: https://www.abcam.com/foxa2-antibody-
epr4466-ab108422.html
Goat polyclonal anti-Gata4 (Santa Cruz Cat# SC-1237). Validated by the manufacturer for IHC in mouse tissues. The antibody has
been referenced in 176 publications: https://www.scbt.com/p/gata-4-antibody-c-20
Antibodies for flow cytometry: All the antibodies guarantee covers the use of the antibody for flow cytometry applications.
Mouse monoclonal anti-human CD34-PE (BioLegend, Cat# 561). Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by
immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. The antibody has been referenced in 8 publications: https://
www.biolegend.com/en-us/products/pe-anti-human-cd34-antibody-6036
Mouse monoclonal anti-human CD43-APC (ebioscience, Cat# 84-3C1). This eBio84-3C1 (84-3C1) antibody has been pre-titrated and
tested by flow cytometric analysis of human peripheral blood monocytes. The antibody has been referenced in 7 publications:
https://www.thermofisher.com/antibody/product/CD43-Antibody-clone-eBio84-3C1-84-3C1-Monoclonal/17-0439-42
Authentication Karyotype and sequencing data cofirmed expected sex, karyotype, gene reporters and SNPs.
3
Mycoplasma contamination All cell lines tested negative for mycoplasma contamination by using the MycoAlert plasma Detection Kit (Lonza, Cat#
Field-collected samples The study did not involve samples collected from the field
Ethics oversight All animal experiments were performed according to the Animal Protection Guidelines of Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot,
Israel. All animal experiments described herein were approved by relevant Weizmann Institute IACUC (#01390120-1, 01330120-2,
33520117-2).
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.
Recruitment Research donors in the study were recruited from the prenatal clinic at the Rambam Medical Center were asked to give their
informed consent to have blood collected from their umbilical cord. Adult blood samples were collected from the authors of
the study.
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.
Flow Cytometry
Plots
Confirm that:
The axis labels state the marker and fluorochrome used (e.g. CD4-FITC).
The axis scales are clearly visible. Include numbers along axes only for bottom left plot of group (a 'group' is an analysis of identical markers).
All plots are contour plots with outliers or pseudocolor plots.
A numerical value for number of cells or percentage (with statistics) is provided.
Methodology
Sample preparation Cells were incubated for half an hour with CD34-PE (BioLegend, 561) and CD43-APC (ebioscience, 84-3C1) antibodies (1:50)
on PBS/0.5% BSA.
Cell population abundance Only one cell population was analyzed and the purity was verified
Gating strategy FSC and SSC singlets were gated to remove debris and aggregated cells, and only single cells were considering for all analyses.
To determine the gating for positive of negative populations, an unstained control was employed, making sure that 100% of
the unstained population was allocated on the negative area of the histogram/dot plot. Gating strategies are shown in
4
Extended Data Fig. 12b.
April 2020