1874-1495/20 Send Orders for Reprints to reprints@benthamscience.

net

402

The Open Civil Engineering Journal

Content list available at: https://opencivilengineeringjournal.com

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Minimum Depth-Span Ratio of Beams in order to Control Maximum

Permissible Deflection
Mereen H. Fahmi Rasheed1 and Ayad Zeki Saber Agha1,*
1
Erbil Technical Engineering College, Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil, Iraq

Abstract:
Background:
ACI code and other building codes and standards include the provisions for deflection control and depth-span limitations, also including the
maximum permissible deflection for specified concrete and steel reinforcement strength. In this study, the effects of applied load intensity, steel
reinforcement index amount as a ratio to the balancing reinforcement index (ρ/ρb), concrete strength (fc' ) and beam width on the depth-span ratio of
the beam with different types (simply supported, fixed ended, propped and cantilever) were investigated.
Objective:
This study aimed to study the effect of applied load intensity, steel reinforcement index amount as a ratio to the balancing reinforcement index
(ρ/ρb), concrete strength (fc' ) and beam width on the depth-span ratio of the beam of different types (simply supported, fixed ended, propped and
cantilever).
Methods:
This study theoretically investigates the effect of applied load intensity, steel reinforcement index amount as a ratio to the balancing reinforcement
index (ρ/ρb), concrete strength (fc' ) and beam width on the depth-span ratio of the beam of different types (simply supported, fixed ended, propped
and cantilever).
Results:
The results show that the effect of the ratio (ρ/ρb) is small on the depth-span ratio, and the required depth of the beam increased with increasing the
applied distributed load value and decreased with increasing the concrete strength for all beam types.
Discussion:
Deflection of slabs and beams can be controlled by the addition of steel reinforcement bars or using pre-stressing concrete, loading type and value,
material properties (E), section properties (I), and the type of the member. The results showed that the effect of the ratio (ρ/ρb) was small on the
depth-span ratio, and the required depth of the beam increased with increasing the applied distributed load value and decreased with increasing the
concrete strength for all beam types.
Conclusion:
- A modification of ACI Code span-depth ratio is suggested to include the effect of tension reinforcement area which is represented by the
reinforcement indices ratio (ρ/ρb), applied distributed load (w), concrete compressive strength (fc' ) and cross section width (b) in order to control
the maximum deflection of the beam within the ACI limit of the maximum permitted deflection.
- The value of span-depth ratio (N = L / h) is determined for four types of beam (simply supported, fixed ended, propped and cantilever) for
concrete strengths (fc' = 21, 28, 35, 42, 63 & 84 MPa), applied distributed load (w = 14.6, 29.2, 43.8 & 58.4 kN/m), cross width (b = 150, 200, 250
& 300 mm) and (ρ/ρb = 0, 0.5 & 1) in addition to (ρt /ρb & ρmax /ρb).
- The effect of the reinforced indicia ratio (ρ/ρb) is small on the span-depth ratio (N = L / h) for all values of applied load and concrete compressive
strength.
- The span-depth ratio (N = L / h) decreased with increasing the applied load, or in other words, the required depth increased with increasing the
applied load for all values of concrete strength and beam width.
- The span-depth ratio (N = L / h) increased with increasing the concrete strength (fc' ), i.e. the required depth decreased with increasing concrete
strength for all values of applied loads and beam width.
- The same behavior and conclusions are obtained for all beam types (simply supported, fixed ended, propped and cantilever).

Keywords: Deflection, Depth-span ratio, Deflection control, Concrete strength, Tension reinforcement area, Beam width.

Article History Received: August 07, 2020 Revised: November 02, 2020 Accepted: November 21, 2020

DOI: 10.2174/1874149502014010402, 2020, 14, 402-414

Minimum Depth-span Ratio of Beams The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 403

1. INTRODUCTION yielding strength other than (60000 psi) as shown below:

Deflection of slabs and beams can be controlled by the
addition of steel reinforcement bars in tension and compression 1  1.65  0.005 c  1.09 (1)
zones or using pre-stressing concrete. In addition to that,
deflection is influenced by different factors such as loading fy
2  0.4  (2)
type and value, material properties (E), section properties (I), 100000
type of the member i.e. type of the boundary condition (simply
supported, fixed or free), and time dependent or long term Generally, the deflection is a function of the load value and
deflection due to creep and shrinkage of concrete during the type applied on the member, span length, and beam cross-
life of the structure. section, which is represented by the moment of inertia (I),
material properties which are represented by the modulus of
Deflection control in different building codes and
elasticity (E) and support condition of both ends, that is the
standards is determined by two approaches,
member type (simply supported, fixed ended, propped and
cantilever).
[1] Indirect method, by assuming suitable upper limits on
the depth-span ratio which is satisfactory for many Islam Khan et al. [12], investigated the reinforced concrete
cases of spans, load distribution, member size and building by using three-dimensional finite element modeling to
properties. determine the minimum slab thickness to prevent undesirable
[2] Direct method by calculating the deflection for the vibration. The developed finite element model was applied in
actual case and comparing the results with the specific previous experiments which validated the applicability of the
limitations of the codes and standards. model for further parametric study. Different slab thickness,
span length and floor aspect ratio were studied. An empirical
Generally, the deflection is determined when the member equation is given which provides minimum slab thickness of a
is loaded by the normal full-service load to ensure that stresses short span reinforced concrete building.
in the stream fiber in both steel and concrete remain in elastic
Ho et al. [13], developed a simplified method for providing
range, i.e. the un-cracked section properties are used to
minimum flexural ductility and evaluation of maximum values
calculate the immediate deflection [1 - 7].
of tension steel ratio and neutral axis depth corresponding to
Lee et al. [8], compared provisions of different codes and the proposed minimum curvature ductility factor for various
standards about minimum thickness. They concluded that the concrete grades and steel yielding strengths. Akmaluddin [14],
CSA and ACI provisions have limited application and the presented an improved model of the effective moment of
proposed equation is recommended for calculation of the inertia to predict the short-term deflection of reinforced
minimum thickness. Beal and Thomasen [9], presented an lightweight concrete beam. The proposed model is verified and
approximated depth-span ratio for the preliminary design compared with experimental results of nine beams; good
specification in terms of (M/bd2) rather than (As/bd) to include agreement is obtained with the experimental results and in
the effect of steel design stress. Shehata et al. [10], presented a some cases, a similar trend was observed for the ACI and SNI
theoretical study for the minimum steel ratio required for provisions.
bending, shear and torsion for beams with different concrete The elastic deflection can be expressed in the following
strengths. form [2 - 7]:
Orvin and Anik [11], determined the minimum thickness
of reinforced concrete slabs to resist undesirable vibrations and f (load , span ,sup portcondition ) (3)
 max 
compared the results with other studies. They conclude that the EI
American Concrete Institute (ACI) minimum thickness limit is
not satisfactory for vibration. Three-dimensional finite element Table 1. Minimum thickness, ACI code limitation [1 - 7]
modelling was carried out to study the natural floor vibration,
and the results were verified by the ANSYS model and Etabs Support type One way slab Beam
modelling. Several parameters such as slab thickness, span Simply supported L/20 L/16
length and floor panel aspect ratio were taken into consi- One end continuous (propped) L/24 L/18.5
Ib 3 Two end continuous (fixed ended) L/28 L/21
deration (𝛾𝑐 = 145 𝑜𝑟 2320 kg/m
. ).
ft3 Cantilever L/10 L/8
ACI code [1] provides the minimum depth for one-way
slabs and beams shown in Table 1, for non-prestressed Where f is a function of the load type and value
3
members, normal concrete weight (γc = 145 lb/ft or 2320 (distributed load or concentrated load), span length and support
3 conditions, Table 2 shows the maximum deflection of different
kg/m ) and steel yielding strength (= 60,000 psi or 414 MPa).
type beams and loadings [15 - 17].
Correction factors are used for lightweight concrete with
density in the range 90-115 lb/ft3 or 1440-1840 kg/m3 and  w L4
Where:  max  EI For distributed load.
* Address correspondence to this author at Erbil Technical Engineering College,  P L3
Erbil Polytechnic University, Erbil-Iraq; Mob: 009647504454107; E-mail:  max  For concentrated load.
ayad.saber@epu.edu.iq EI
404 The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 Rasheed and Agha

Table 2. Maximum deflection of different types of beams As = Area of tensile steel reinforcement in the section
and loadings [15 - 17]. (mm2)
b = Width of the section (mm)
Support type Loading type α
Simply supported Uniform distributed load 5/384 h = Total depth of the section (mm)
One end continuous Taking As = pbd and d = 0.85h, equation (5) can be
Uniform distributed load 1/185
(propped)
simplified to:
Two ends continuous (fixed
Uniform distributed load 1/384
ended) y t  h (6)
Cantilever Uniform distributed load 1/8
Simply supported Concentrated load at midspan 1/48 0.5  0.7225(n  1) 
Where:   (7)
One end continuous
Concentrated load at midspan 1/(48√5) 1  0.85(n  1) 
(propped)
Two ends continuous (fixed The total moment of inertia of the transformed un-cracked
Concentrated load at midspan 1/192
ended) section is equal to:
Cantilever Concentrated load at free end 1/3
bh 3 h
Ig   bh ( y t  ) 2  (n  1)A s (d  y t ) 2 (8)
12 2
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
This equation simplified to the following form:
The effective moment of inertia (Ie) is used, which lies
bh 3
between cracking and uncracked section; the moment of inertia Ig   (9)
can be determined from the following equation [1 - 6]: 12
Where:   [1  12(  0.5)2  10.2(n  1)  (0.85  ) 2 ] (10)
M M
I e  ( cr )3 I g  [1  ( cr )3 ]I cr (4)
Ma Ma The cracking moment of inertia (Icr) is determined for the
cracked transformed section:
where:
Ie = Effective moment of inertia (mm4). bc 3
I cr   (nA s )(d  c ) 2 (11)
Icr = Moment of inertia of cracked transformed section 3
(mm4).
Where (c) is the depth of the compressive zone at the
Ig = Moment of inertia of un-cracked transformed section cracked condition, and determined as follows:
(mm4).
c
bc ( )  nA s d
Ma = Maximum bending moment due to the service load bc 2
c 2 Or  n .As .c  n .A s .d  0 (12)
(kN.mm). bc  nA s 2
Mcr = Cracking bending moment due to service load and
This equation is solved by the quadratic equation method
equal to to find the value of (c).

fr = Modulus of rupture of the concrete (MPa). The effect of the reinforcement and concrete compressive
strength (fc' ) are included to find the modified correction factor
yt = Distance from the neutral axis of the section to the based on the results of ACI-Code minimum thickness shown in
extreme fiber at the Table 1, and based on the maximum allowable deflection
tension face (mm) and calculated from the following permitted by ACI-Code shown in Table 3.
equation: In this study, the allowable maximum deflection ratio
(δmax/L) is taken to be not greater than the ACI-limit (1/360),
h
bh ( )  (n  1)A s .d that is:
2 (5)
yt   max 1
bh  (n  1)A s  (13)
L 360
Es According to eq. (3) and results of Table (2), the maximum
Where: n  deflection for beams or one way slabs subjected to uniform
E
distributed load can be determined as:
Es = Modulus of elasticity of steel reinforcement (MPa) =
200,000 MPa wL4
Ec = Modulus of elasticity of the concrete (MPa) = 4730 f c '  max   (14)
EI
d = Effective depth of the cross-section which is assumed
to be equal to (0.85h), (mm) Where α is constant, depending on the type of supports, as
Minimum Depth-span Ratio of Beams The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 405

shown in Table 2. simply supported beam for concrete compressive strength (fc' =
Substituting (δmax) from eq. (14) into eq. (13), the required 21, 28, 35, 42, 63 and 84 MPa), applied distributed load (w=
14.6, 29.2, 43.8, and 58.4 KN/m) and cross section width (b=
moment of inertia (Ireq) is determined as:
150, 200, 250 and 300 mm).
wl 3 Table 5, shows the results of (L/h) for fixed ended beam.
I req .  360
Ec (15) Table 6 shows the results of propped beam and Table 7 shows
cantilever beam for different values of the variables (, w and b).
bh 3
Taking I req .   Value of (λ) is determined from eq. (10), for different
12 values of reinforcement index (ρ) taking (ρ/ρb) varying from
12(360 ) wl 3 (16) 0for section without reinforcement to (1), in addition to ρt and
(bh 3 ) req .  ρmax.
 Ec
The depth-span (h/L) ratio can be determined from the next Where
equation:
f c' 0.003
Where; b  (0.851 )( )
h 4320  w 1
fy f (18)
( )( ) 3
(17) 0.003  y
L  b Ec Es

f c' 0.003 (19)

The depth-span ratio calculated from eq. (17) is the  max  (0.851 )( )
f y 0.003  0.004
minimum ratio in order to control the limit of maximum
deflection within the ACI-maximum deflection limit.
f c' 0.003
Taking and from eq. (17), the value of (N) is determined
t  (0.851 )( ) (20)
f y 0.003  0.005
for different values of applied load (w), concrete compressive
strength (fc' ) that is used to find (Ec) and cross section width The effects of the reinforcement indices ratio (ρ/ρb),
(b) for simply supported, fixed ended, propped and cantilever concrete compressive ratio (fc' ) and the applied load (w) on the
beams. span-depth ratio (N = L / h) for simply supported, fixed ended,
Table 4, show the results of span-depth ratio (N = L / h) for propped and cantilever beams are shown in the following
figures.

Table 3. Maximum allowable computed deflections [1 - 6]

Deflection
Type of Member Deflection to be considered
Limitation
Flat roofs not supporting or attached to nonstructural elements likely to
Immediate deflection due to the live load L 1/180
be damaged by large deflection
Floors not supporting or attached to nonstructural elements likely to be
Immediate deflection due to the live load L 1/360
damaged by large deflection
Roof or floor construction supporting or attached to nonstructural The part of the total deflection occurring after 1/480
elements likely to be damaged by large deflection attachment of the nonstructural element (sum of the
Roof or floor construction supporting or attached to nonstructural long-time deflection due to all sustained loads and the
immediate deflection due to any additional live load) 1/240
elements not likely to be damaged by large deflection

Table 4. Depth - Span ratio (h / L) for Simply Supported members, N = L / h.

α = 0.0130"
- fc' = 3000 (psi) = fc' = 4000 (psi) = fc' = 5000 (psi) = fc' = 6000 (psi) = fc' = 9000 (psi) = fc' = 12000 (psi) =
21 (MPa) 28 (MPa) 35 (MPa) 42 (MPa) 63 (MPa) 84 (MPa)
b (in) 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12
b (mm) 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300
- w = "1 kips/ft = 14.6 kN/m"
ρ=0 15.9 17.5 18.8 20.0 16.6 18.3 19.7 21.0 17.3 19.0 20.5 21.8 17.8 19.6 21.1 22.4 19.1 21.0 22.6 24.0 20.0 22.0 23.7 25.2
ρ = 0.5 16.4 18.0 19.4 20.7 17.3 19.0 20.5 21.8 17.9 19.7 21.3 22.6 18.5 20.4 21.9 23.3 19.6 21.6 23.3 24.7 20.6 22.7 24.5 26.0
ρb
ρ = ρmax 16.5 18.2 19.6 20.8 17.4 19.2 20.6 21.9 18.1 19.9 21.4 22.8 18.6 20.4 22.0 23.4 19.8 21.8 23.5 24.9 20.9 23.0 24.7 26.3
=
0.634ρb
406 The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 Rasheed and Agha

α = 0.0130"
- fc' = 3000 (psi) = fc' = 4000 (psi) = fc' = 5000 (psi) = fc' = 6000 (psi) = fc' = 9000 (psi) = fc' = 12000 (psi) =
21 (MPa) 28 (MPa) 35 (MPa) 42 (MPa) 63 (MPa) 84 (MPa)
b (in) 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12
ρ = ρt = 16.6 18.3 19.7 20.9 17.5 19.3 20.8 22.1 18.2 20.0 21.5 22.9 18.7 20.5 22.1 23.5 19.9 21.9 23.6 25.1 21.0 23.1 24.9 26.4
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 16.8 18.5 19.9 21.2 17.8 19.5 21.1 22.4 18.4 20.3 21.9 23.2 19.0 21.0 22.6 24.0 20.1 22.1 23.8 25.3 21.2 23.3 25.1 26.7
Avg. = 16.4 18.1 19.5 20.7 17.3 19.1 20.5 21.8 18.0 19.8 21.3 22.7 18.5 20.4 21.9 23.3 19.7 21.7 23.3 24.8 20.7 22.8 24.6 26.1
- w = "2 kips/ft = 29.2 kN/m"
ρ=0 12.6 13.9 14.9 15.9 13.2 14.5 15.7 16.6 13.7 15.1 16.3 17.3 14.1 15.6 16.8 17.8 15.1 16.6 17.9 19.1 15.9 17.5 18.8 20.0
ρ = 0.5 13.0 14.3 15.4 16.4 13.7 15.1 16.2 17.3 14.2 15.7 16.9 17.9 14.7 16.2 17.4 18.5 15.6 17.1 18.5 19.6 16.4 18.0 19.4 20.6
ρb
ρ = ρmax 13.1 14.4 15.5 16.5 13.8 15.2 16.4 17.4 14.4 15.8 17.0 18.1 14.7 16.2 17.5 18.6 15.7 17.3 18.6 19.8 16.6 18.2 19.6 20.9
=
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 13.2 14.5 15.6 16.6 13.9 15.3 16.5 17.5 14.4 15.9 17.1 18.2 14.8 16.3 17.6 18.7 15.8 17.4 18.7 19.9 16.6 18.3 19.7 21.0
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 13.4 14.7 15.8 16.8 14.1 15.5 16.7 17.8 14.6 16.1 17.4 18.4 15.1 16.6 17.9 19.0 15.9 17.5 18.9 20.1 16.8 18.5 19.9 21.2
Avg. = 13.0 14.4 15.5 16.4 13.7 15.1 16.3 17.3 14.3 15.7 16.9 18.0 14.7 16.2 17.4 18.5 15.6 17.2 18.5 19.7 16.5 18.1 19.5 20.7
- w = "3 kips/ft = 4.08 kN/m"
ρ=0 11.0 12.1 13.0 13.9 11.5 12.7 13.7 14.5 12.0 13.2 14.2 15.1 12.4 13.6 14.6 15.6 13.2 14.5 15.7 16.6 13.9 15.3 16.4 17.5
ρ = 0.5 11.4 12.5 13.5 14.3 12.0 13.2 14.2 15.1 12.4 13.7 14.7 15.7 12.8 14.1 15.2 16.2 13.6 15.0 16.1 17.1 14.3 15.8 17.0 18.0
ρb
ρ = ρmax 11.5 12.6 13.6 14.4 12.1 13.3 14.3 15.2 12.5 13.8 14.9 15.8 12.9 14.2 15.3 16.2 13.7 15.1 16.3 17.3 14.5 15.9 17.1 18.2
=
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 11.5 12.7 13.6 14.5 12.1 13.4 14.4 15.3 12.6 13.9 14.9 15.9 12.9 14.2 15.3 16.3 13.8 15.2 16.4 17.4 14.5 16.0 17.2 18.3
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 11.7 12.8 13.8 14.7 12.3 13.6 14.6 15.5 12.8 14.1 15.2 16.1 13.2 14.5 15.7 16.6 13.9 15.3 16.5 17.5 14.7 16.2 17.4 18.5
Avg. = 11.4 12.5 13.5 14.4 12.0 13.2 14.2 15.1 12.5 13.7 14.8 15.7 12.8 14.1 15.2 16.2 13.7 15.0 16.2 17.2 14.4 15.8 17.0 18.1
- w = "4 kips/ft = 58.4 kN/m"
ρ=0 10.0 11.0 11.9 12.6 10.5 11.5 12.4 13.2 10.9 12.0 12.9 13.7 11.2 12.4 13.3 14.1 12.0 13.2 14.2 15.1 12.6 13.9 14.9 15.9
ρ = 0.5 10.3 11.4 12.2 13.0 10.9 12.0 12.9 13.7 11.3 12.4 13.4 14.2 11.7 12.8 13.8 14.7 12.4 13.6 14.7 15.6 13.0 14.3 15.4 16.4
ρb
ρ = ρmax 10.4 11.5 12.3 13.1 11.0 12.1 13.0 13.8 11.4 12.5 13.5 14.4 11.7 12.9 13.9 14.7 12.5 13.7 14.8 15.7 13.1 14.5 15.6 16.6
=
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 10.5 11.5 12.4 13.2 11.0 12.1 13.1 13.9 11.4 12.6 13.6 14.4 11.8 12.9 13.9 14.8 12.5 13.8 14.9 15.8 13.2 14.5 15.7 16.6
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 10.6 11.7 12.6 13.4 11.2 12.3 13.3 14.1 11.6 12.8 13.8 14.6 12.0 13.2 14.2 15.1 12.7 13.9 15.0 15.9 13.3 14.7 15.8 16.8
Avg. = 10.4 11.4 12.3 13.0 10.9 12.0 12.9 13.7 11.3 12.5 13.4 14.3 11.7 12.8 13.8 14.7 12.4 13.7 14.7 15.6 13.1 14.4 15.5 16.5

Table 5. Depth - Span ratio (h / L) for Fixed Ended members, N = L / h.

α = 0.0026
- fc' = 3000 (psi) = fc' = 4000 (psi) = fc' = 5000 (psi) = fc' = 6000 (psi) = fc' = 9000 (psi) = fc' = 12000 (psi) =
21 (MPa) 28 (MPa) 35 (MPa) 42 (MPa) 63 (MPa) 84 (MPa)
b (in) 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12
b (mm) 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300
- w = "1 kips/ft = 14.6 kN/m"
ρ=0 27.1 29.9 32.2 34.2 28.5 31.3 33.8 35.9 29.5 32.5 35.0 37.2 30.5 33.5 36.1 38.4 32.6 35.9 38.6 41.1 34.2 37.6 40.5 43.1
ρ = 0.5 28.0 30.9 33.2 35.3 29.5 32.5 35.0 37.2 30.7 33.8 36.4 38.6 31.6 34.8 37.5 39.8 33.5 36.9 39.8 42.3 35.3 38.8 41.8 44.5
ρb
ρ = ρmax 28.2 31.1 33.5 35.6 29.8 32.8 35.3 37.5 30.9 34.0 36.7 39.0 31.7 34.9 37.6 40.0 33.9 37.3 40.1 42.7 35.7 39.3 42.3 44.9
=
0.634ρb
Minimum Depth-span Ratio of Beams The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 407

α = 0.0026
- fc' = 3000 (psi) = fc' = 4000 (psi) = fc' = 5000 (psi) = fc' = 6000 (psi) = fc' = 9000 (psi) = fc' = 12000 (psi) =
21 (MPa) 28 (MPa) 35 (MPa) 42 (MPa) 63 (MPa) 84 (MPa)
b (in) 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12
ρ = ρt = 28.4 31.2 33.6 35.8 29.9 32.9 35.5 37.7 31.1 34.2 36.8 39.1 31.9 35.1 37.8 40.2 34.0 37.5 40.4 42.9 35.9 39.5 42.5 45.2
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 28.8 31.7 34.1 36.2 30.4 33.4 36.0 38.3 31.5 34.7 37.4 39.7 32.6 35.8 38.6 41.0 34.3 37.8 40.7 43.3 36.2 39.8 42.9 45.6
Avg. = 28.1 30.9 33.3 35.4 29.6 32.6 35.1 37.3 30.7 33.8 36.5 38.7 31.7 34.8 37.5 39.9 33.7 37.1 39.9 42.4 35.4 39.0 42.0 44.7
- w = "2 kips/ft = 29.2 kN/m"
ρ=0 21.5 23.7 25.5 27.1 22.6 24.9 26.8 28.5 23.5 25.8 27.8 29.5 24.2 26.6 28.7 30.5 25.9 28.5 30.7 32.6 27.1 29.9 32.2 34.2
ρ = 0.5 22.2 24.5 26.4 28.0 23.4 25.8 27.8 29.5 24.3 26.8 28.9 30.7 25.1 27.6 29.8 31.6 26.6 29.3 31.6 33.5 28.0 30.8 33.2 35.3
ρb
ρ = ρmax 22.4 24.7 26.6 28.2 23.6 26.0 28.0 29.8 24.5 27.0 29.1 30.9 25.2 27.7 29.9 31.7 26.9 29.6 31.9 33.9 28.3 31.2 33.6 35.7
=
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 22.5 24.8 26.7 28.4 23.8 26.1 28.2 29.9 24.7 27.1 29.2 31.1 25.3 27.9 30.0 31.9 27.0 29.7 32.0 34.0 28.5 31.3 33.7 35.9
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 22.8 25.1 27.1 28.8 24.1 26.5 28.6 30.4 25.0 27.5 29.7 31.5 25.8 28.4 30.6 32.6 27.3 30.0 32.3 34.3 28.7 31.6 34.1 36.2
Avg. = 22.3 24.6 26.5 28.1 23.5 25.9 27.9 29.6 24.4 26.9 28.9 30.7 25.1 27.7 29.8 31.7 26.7 29.4 31.7 33.7 28.1 31.0 33.4 35.4
- w = "3 kips/ft = 4.08 kN/m"
ρ=0 18.8 20.7 22.3 23.7 19.7 21.7 23.4 24.9 20.5 22.5 24.3 25.8 21.1 23.2 25.0 26.6 22.6 24.9 26.8 28.5 23.7 26.1 28.1 29.9
ρ = 0.5 19.4 21.4 23.0 24.5 20.5 22.5 24.3 25.8 21.3 23.4 25.2 26.8 21.9 24.1 26.0 27.6 23.3 25.6 27.6 29.3 24.5 26.9 29.0 30.8
ρb
ρ = ρmax 19.6 21.6 23.2 24.7 20.6 22.7 24.5 26.0 21.4 23.6 25.4 27.0 22.0 24.2 26.1 27.7 23.5 25.8 27.8 29.6 24.7 27.2 29.3 31.2
=
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 19.7 21.7 23.3 24.8 20.8 22.8 24.6 26.1 21.5 23.7 25.5 27.1 22.1 24.3 26.2 27.9 23.6 26.0 28.0 29.7 24.9 27.4 29.5 31.3
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 19.9 22.0 23.6 25.1 21.1 23.2 25.0 26.5 21.9 24.1 25.9 27.5 22.6 24.8 26.8 28.4 23.8 26.2 28.2 30.0 25.1 27.6 29.8 31.6
Avg. = 19.5 21.5 23.1 24.6 20.5 22.6 24.3 25.9 21.3 23.5 25.3 26.9 21.9 24.2 26.0 27.7 23.3 25.7 27.7 29.4 24.6 27.0 29.1 31.0
- w = "4 kips/ft = 58.4 kN/m"
ρ=0 17.1 18.8 20.3 21.5 17.9 19.7 21.3 22.6 18.6 20.5 22.1 23.5 19.2 21.1 22.7 24.2 20.5 22.6 24.3 25.9 21.5 23.7 25.5 27.1
ρ = 0.5 17.7 19.4 20.9 22.2 18.6 20.5 22.1 23.4 19.3 21.3 22.9 24.3 19.9 21.9 23.6 25.1 21.1 23.3 25.1 26.6 22.2 24.5 26.4 28.0
ρb
ρ = ρmax 17.8 19.6 21.1 22.4 18.8 20.6 22.2 23.6 19.5 21.4 23.1 24.5 20.0 22.0 23.7 25.2 21.3 23.5 25.3 26.9 22.5 24.7 26.6 28.3
=
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 17.9 19.7 21.2 22.5 18.9 20.8 22.4 23.8 19.6 21.5 23.2 24.7 20.1 22.1 23.8 25.3 21.4 23.6 25.4 27.0 22.6 24.9 26.8 28.5
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 18.1 19.9 21.5 22.8 19.1 21.1 22.7 24.1 19.9 21.9 23.6 25.0 20.5 22.6 24.3 25.8 21.6 23.8 25.6 27.3 22.8 25.1 27.0 28.7
Avg. = 17.7 19.5 21.0 22.3 18.7 20.5 22.1 23.5 19.4 21.3 23.0 24.4 19.9 21.9 23.6 25.1 21.2 23.3 25.1 26.7 22.3 24.6 26.5 28.1

Table 6. Depth - Span ratio (h / L) for Propped members, N = L / h.

α = 0.0054
- fc' = 3000 (psi) = fc' = 4000 (psi) = fc' = 5000 (psi) = fc' = 6000 (psi) = fc' = 9000 (psi) = fc' = 12000 (psi) =
21 (MPa) 28 (MPa) 35 (MPa) 42 (MPa) 63 (MPa) 84 (MPa)
b (in) 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12
b (mm) 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300
- w = "1 kips/ft = 14.6 kN/m"
ρ=0 21.3 23.4 25.2 26.8 22.3 24.6 26.5 28.1 23.2 25.5 27.5 29.2 23.9 26.3 28.3 30.1 25.5 28.1 30.3 32.2 26.8 29.5 31.8 33.8
ρ = 0.5 22.0 24.2 26.1 27.7 23.1 25.5 27.4 29.2 24.0 26.5 28.5 30.3 24.8 27.3 29.4 31.2 26.3 28.9 31.2 33.1 27.7 30.5 32.8 34.9
ρb
ρ = ρmax 22.1 24.4 26.2 27.9 23.3 25.7 27.7 29.4 24.2 26.7 28.7 30.5 24.9 27.4 29.5 31.3 26.5 29.2 31.5 33.4 28.0 30.8 33.2 35.2
=
0.634ρb
408 The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 Rasheed and Agha

α = 0.0054
- fc' = 3000 (psi) = fc' = 4000 (psi) = fc' = 5000 (psi) = fc' = 6000 (psi) = fc' = 9000 (psi) = fc' = 12000 (psi) =
21 (MPa) 28 (MPa) 35 (MPa) 42 (MPa) 63 (MPa) 84 (MPa)
b (in) 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12
ρ = ρt = 22.2 24.5 26.4 28.0 23.5 25.8 27.8 29.6 24.4 26.8 28.9 30.7 25.0 27.5 29.6 31.5 26.7 29.4 31.6 33.6 28.1 30.9 33.3 35.4
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 22.5 24.8 26.7 28.4 23.8 26.2 28.2 30.0 24.7 27.2 29.3 31.1 25.5 28.1 30.3 32.2 26.9 29.6 31.9 33.9 28.4 31.2 33.6 35.8
Avg. = 22.0 24.3 26.1 27.8 23.2 25.6 27.5 29.2 24.1 26.5 28.6 30.4 24.8 27.3 29.4 31.3 26.4 29.1 31.3 33.3 27.8 30.6 32.9 35.0
- w = "2 kips/ft = 29.2 kN/m"
ρ=0 16.9 18.6 20.0 21.3 17.7 19.5 21.0 22.3 18.4 20.2 21.8 23.2 19.0 20.9 22.5 23.9 20.3 22.3 24.0 25.5 21.3 23.4 25.2 26.8
ρ = 0.5 17.4 19.2 20.7 22.0 18.4 20.2 21.8 23.1 19.1 21.0 22.6 24.0 19.7 21.7 23.3 24.8 20.9 23.0 24.7 26.3 22.0 24.2 26.0 27.7
ρb
ρ = ρmax 17.6 19.3 20.8 22.1 18.5 20.4 22.0 23.3 19.2 21.2 22.8 24.2 19.7 21.7 23.4 24.9 21.1 23.2 25.0 26.5 22.2 24.4 26.3 28.0
=
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 17.7 19.4 20.9 22.2 18.6 20.5 22.1 23.5 19.3 21.3 22.9 24.4 19.8 21.8 23.5 25.0 21.2 23.3 25.1 26.7 22.3 24.6 26.4 28.1
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 17.9 19.7 21.2 22.5 18.9 20.8 22.4 23.8 19.6 21.6 23.3 24.7 20.3 22.3 24.0 25.5 21.4 23.5 25.3 26.9 22.5 24.8 26.7 28.4
Avg. = 17.5 19.3 20.7 22.0 18.4 20.3 21.8 23.2 19.1 21.1 22.7 24.1 19.7 21.7 23.4 24.8 21.0 23.1 24.8 26.4 22.1 24.3 26.1 27.8
- w = "3 kips/ft = 4.08 kN/m"
ρ=0 14.7 16.2 17.5 18.6 15.5 17.0 18.3 19.5 16.1 17.7 19.0 20.2 16.6 18.2 19.6 20.9 17.7 19.5 21.0 22.3 18.6 20.5 22.0 23.4
ρ = 0.5 15.2 16.8 18.1 19.2 16.0 17.7 19.0 20.2 16.7 18.3 19.8 21.0 17.2 18.9 20.4 21.7 18.2 20.1 21.6 23.0 19.2 21.1 22.7 24.2
ρb
ρ = ρmax 15.4 16.9 18.2 19.3 16.2 17.8 19.2 20.4 16.8 18.5 19.9 21.2 17.3 19.0 20.5 21.7 18.4 20.3 21.8 23.2 19.4 21.3 23.0 24.4
=
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 15.4 17.0 18.3 19.4 16.3 17.9 19.3 20.5 16.9 18.6 20.0 21.3 17.3 19.1 20.6 21.8 18.5 20.4 21.9 23.3 19.5 21.4 23.1 24.6
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 15.6 17.2 18.5 19.7 16.5 18.2 19.6 20.8 17.1 18.9 20.3 21.6 17.7 19.5 21.0 22.3 18.7 20.5 22.1 23.5 19.7 21.7 23.3 24.8
Avg. = 15.3 16.8 18.1 19.3 16.1 17.7 19.1 20.3 16.7 18.4 19.8 21.1 17.2 18.9 20.4 21.7 18.3 20.1 21.7 23.1 19.3 21.2 22.8 24.3
- w = "4 kips/ft = 58.4 kN/m"
ρ=0 13.4 14.7 15.9 16.9 14.1 15.5 16.7 17.7 14.6 16.1 17.3 18.4 15.0 16.6 17.8 19.0 16.1 17.7 19.1 20.3 16.9 18.6 20.0 21.3
ρ = 0.5 13.8 15.2 16.4 17.4 14.6 16.0 17.3 18.4 15.1 16.7 18.0 19.1 15.6 17.2 18.5 19.7 16.6 18.2 19.6 20.9 17.4 19.2 20.7 22.0
ρb
ρ = ρmax 13.9 15.4 16.5 17.6 14.7 16.2 17.4 18.5 15.3 16.8 18.1 19.2 15.7 17.3 18.6 19.7 16.7 18.4 19.8 21.1 17.6 19.4 20.9 22.2
=
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 14.0 15.4 16.6 17.7 14.8 16.3 17.5 18.6 15.3 16.9 18.2 19.3 15.8 17.3 18.7 19.8 16.8 18.5 19.9 21.2 17.7 19.5 21.0 22.3
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 14.2 15.6 16.8 17.9 15.0 16.5 17.8 18.9 15.6 17.1 18.5 19.6 16.1 17.7 19.1 20.3 17.0 18.7 20.1 21.4 17.9 19.7 21.2 22.5
Avg. = 13.9 15.3 16.5 17.5 14.6 16.1 17.3 18.4 15.2 16.7 18.0 19.1 15.6 17.2 18.5 19.7 16.6 18.3 19.7 21.0 17.5 19.3 20.8 22.1

Table 7. Depth - Span ratio (h / L) for Cantilever members, N = L / h.

α = 0.0054
- fc' = 3000 (psi) = fc' = 4000 (psi) = fc' = 5000 (psi) = fc' = 6000 (psi) = fc' = 9000 (psi) = 63 fc' = 12000 (psi) =
21 (MPa) 28 (MPa) 35 (MPa) 42 (MPa) (MPa) 84 (MPa)
b (in) 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12
b (mm) 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300 150 200 250 300
- w = "1 kips/ft = 14.6 kN/m"
ρ=0 7.5 8.2 8.9 9.4 7.8 8.6 9.3 9.9 8.1 8.9 9.6 10.2 8.4 9.2 9.9 10.6 9.0 9.9 10.6 11.3 9.4 10.4 11.2 11.9
ρ = 0.5 ρb 7.7 8.5 9.1 9.7 8.1 8.9 9.6 10.2 8.4 9.3 10.0 10.6 8.7 9.6 10.3 11.0 9.2 10.2 10.9 11.6 9.7 10.7 11.5 12.2
ρ = ρmax = 7.8 8.6 9.2 9.8 8.2 9.0 9.7 10.3 8.5 9.4 10.1 10.7 8.7 9.6 10.4 11.0 9.3 10.3 11.0 11.7 9.8 10.8 11.6 12.4
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 7.8 8.6 9.3 9.8 8.2 9.1 9.8 10.4 8.5 9.4 10.1 10.8 8.8 9.7 10.4 11.1 9.4 10.3 11.1 11.8 9.9 10.9 11.7 12.4
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 7.9 8.7 9.4 10.0 8.4 9.2 9.9 10.5 8.7 9.5 10.3 10.9 9.0 9.9 10.6 11.3 9.4 10.4 11.2 11.9 10.0 11.0 11.8 12.5
Minimum Depth-span Ratio of Beams The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 409

α = 0.0054
- fc' = 3000 (psi) = fc' = 4000 (psi) = fc' = 5000 (psi) = fc' = 6000 (psi) = fc' = 9000 (psi) = 63 fc' = 12000 (psi) =
21 (MPa) 28 (MPa) 35 (MPa) 42 (MPa) (MPa) 84 (MPa)
b (in) 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12 6 8 10 12
Avg. = 7.7 8.5 9.2 9.7 8.1 9.0 9.7 10.3 8.5 9.3 10.0 10.7 8.7 9.6 10.3 11.0 9.3 10.2 11.0 11.7 9.8 10.7 11.6 12.3
- w = "2 kips/ft = 29.2 kN/m"
ρ=0 5.9 6.5 7.0 7.5 6.2 6.8 7.4 7.8 6.5 7.1 7.7 8.1 6.7 7.3 7.9 8.4 7.1 7.8 8.4 9.0 7.5 8.2 8.9 9.4
ρ = 0.5 ρb 6.1 6.7 7.3 7.7 6.4 7.1 7.6 8.1 6.7 7.4 7.9 8.4 6.9 7.6 8.2 8.7 7.3 8.1 8.7 9.2 7.7 8.5 9.1 9.7
ρ = ρmax = 6.2 6.8 7.3 7.8 6.5 7.2 7.7 8.2 6.8 7.4 8.0 8.5 6.9 7.6 8.2 8.7 7.4 8.1 8.8 9.3 7.8 8.6 9.2 9.8
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 6.2 6.8 7.3 7.8 6.5 7.2 7.7 8.2 6.8 7.5 8.0 8.5 7.0 7.7 8.3 8.8 7.4 8.2 8.8 9.4 7.8 8.6 9.3 9.9
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 6.3 6.9 7.4 7.9 6.6 7.3 7.9 8.4 6.9 7.6 8.2 8.7 7.1 7.8 8.4 9.0 7.5 8.3 8.9 9.4 7.9 8.7 9.4 10.0
Avg. = 6.1 6.8 7.3 7.7 6.5 7.1 7.7 8.1 6.7 7.4 8.0 8.5 6.9 7.6 8.2 8.7 7.4 8.1 8.7 9.3 7.7 8.5 9.2 9.8
- w = "3 kips/ft = 4.08 kN/m"
ρ=0 5.2 5.7 6.1 6.5 5.4 6.0 6.4 6.8 5.6 6.2 6.7 7.1 5.8 6.4 6.9 7.3 6.2 6.8 7.4 7.8 6.5 7.2 7.7 8.2
ρ = 0.5 ρb 5.3 5.9 6.3 6.7 5.6 6.2 6.7 7.1 5.9 6.4 6.9 7.4 6.0 6.6 7.2 7.6 6.4 7.0 7.6 8.1 6.7 7.4 8.0 8.5
ρ = ρmax = 5.4 5.9 6.4 6.8 5.7 6.3 6.7 7.2 5.9 6.5 7.0 7.4 6.1 6.7 7.2 7.6 6.5 7.1 7.7 8.1 6.8 7.5 8.1 8.6
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 5.4 6.0 6.4 6.8 5.7 6.3 6.8 7.2 5.9 6.5 7.0 7.5 6.1 6.7 7.2 7.7 6.5 7.1 7.7 8.2 6.8 7.5 8.1 8.6
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.9 5.8 6.4 6.9 7.3 6.0 6.6 7.1 7.6 6.2 6.8 7.4 7.8 6.6 7.2 7.8 8.3 6.9 7.6 8.2 8.7
Avg. = 5.4 5.9 6.4 6.8 5.6 6.2 6.7 7.1 5.9 6.5 7.0 7.4 6.0 6.6 7.2 7.6 6.4 7.1 7.6 8.1 6.8 7.4 8.0 8.5
- w = "4 kips/ft = 58.4 kN/m"
ρ=0 4.7 5.2 5.6 5.9 4.9 5.4 5.9 6.2 5.1 5.6 6.1 6.5 5.3 5.8 6.3 6.7 5.6 6.2 6.7 7.1 5.9 6.5 7.0 7.5
ρ = 0.5 ρb 4.9 5.3 5.8 6.1 5.1 5.6 6.1 6.4 5.3 5.9 6.3 6.7 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.9 5.8 6.4 6.9 7.3 6.1 6.7 7.3 7.7
ρ = ρmax = 4.9 5.4 5.8 6.2 5.2 5.7 6.1 6.5 5.4 5.9 6.4 6.8 5.5 6.1 6.5 6.9 5.9 6.5 7.0 7.4 6.2 6.8 7.3 7.8
0.634ρb
ρ = ρt = 4.9 5.4 5.8 6.2 5.2 5.7 6.2 6.5 5.4 5.9 6.4 6.8 5.5 6.1 6.6 7.0 5.9 6.5 7.0 7.4 6.2 6.8 7.4 7.8
0.724ρb
ρ = ρb 5.0 5.5 5.9 6.3 5.3 5.8 6.2 6.6 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.9 5.6 6.2 6.7 7.1 6.0 6.6 7.1 7.5 6.3 6.9 7.4 7.9
Avg. = 4.9 5.4 5.8 6.1 5.1 5.6 6.1 6.5 5.3 5.9 6.3 6.7 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.9 5.8 6.4 6.9 7.4 6.1 6.8 7.3 7.7

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION the same moment of inertia, that is why the value of (N) is
increased.
Fig. (1) shows the effect of the ratio of (ρ/ρb) on the span-
depth ratio (N = L / h) for simply supported beam. The value of Fig. (2) shows the effect of the applied load (w) on the
(N) increased linearly at a low rate, or in other words, the effect ratio (N) for simply supported beam. As shown, the value of
of (ρ/ρb) was small on the ratio (N), which also increased with (N) decreased with increasing the applied load (w); this means
increasing the width of the section (b). The same conclusions that the required depth increased with increasing the applied
were obtained for other values of (fc' ) concrete compressive load value. The same conclusions were obtained for other
strength and applied load (w), because when reinforcement values of (ρ / ρb = 0, 0.5 and 1.0). Also the behavior was same
area is increased, we need smaller equivalent thickness to give for other values of (ƒ'c and b).

24
23
22
21
N=L/h

20
19
18
17 b=150 mm
16 b=200 mm
15 b=250 mm
b=300 mm
14
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
ρ/ρb

Fig. (1). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus reinforcement ratio (ρ/ρb) for simply supported member (=28 MPa) and (w =14.6 kN/m).
410 The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 Rasheed and Agha

22
ρ/ρb= 0
20 ρ/ρb= 0.5
ρ/ρb= 1
18
N=L/h

16

14

12

10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
w (kN/m)
Fig. (2). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus load w (kN/m) for simply supported member (=28 MPa) and (b = 250 mm).

Fig. (3) shows the effect of concrete compressive strength shown in Tables 4 - 7. Also, when the cross-section width b is
(fc' ) on (N) for the simply supported beam for (ρ / ρb= 0, 0.5 increased, the value of (N) also increases, that is, smaller depth
and 1.0). As shown, the value of (N) increased with increasing is required to obtain the same moment of inertia and same
(fc' ) because as the concrete became more robust, the modulus maximum deflection within the ACI-limit.
of elasticity increased. Therefore, we need smaller equivalent The same behavior and conclusions are obtained in other
depth to obtain the same maximum deflection within the ACI- type of beams, as shown in Figs. (4-6) for fixed ended beam,
maximum deflection limit. The same behavior is obtained for Figs. (7-9) for propped beam and Figs. (10-12) for a cantilever
other values of applied load (w) and cross-section depth (b), as beam.
26

24
N=L/h

22

20 ρ/ρb= 0
ρ/ρb= 0.5
ρ/ρb= 1
18
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
fc' (MPa)

Fig. (3). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus compressive strength (MPa) for simply supported member (w =14.6 kN/m) and (b = 250mm).

40
38
36
34
N=L/h

32
30
28 b=150 mm
26 b=200 mm
24 b=250 mm
22 b=300 mm
20
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
ρ/ρb

Fig. (4). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus reinforcement ratio (ρ/ρb) for fixed ended member (=28 MPa) and (w =14.6 kN/m).
 Minimum Depth-span Ratio of Beams The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 411

38
ρ/ρb= 0
36
ρ/ρb= 0.5
34 ρ/ρb= 1
32
N=L/h

30
28
26
24
22
20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
w (KN/m)
Fig. (5). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus load w (kN/m) for fixed ended member (=28 MPa) and (b = 250mm).

44

42

40
N=L/h

38

36
ρ/ρb= 0
34 ρ/ρb= 0.5
ρ/ρb= 1
32
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
fc' (MPa)
Fig. (6). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus compressive strength fc'(MPa) for fixed ended member (w =14.6 kN/m) and (b = 250mm).

32 b=150 mm
b=200 mm
30 b=250 mm
b=300 mm
28
N=L/h

26

24

22

20
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
ρ/ρb

Fig. (7). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus reinforcement ratio (ρ/ρb) for propped member (fc' =28 MPa) and (w =14.6 kN/m).
412 The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 Rasheed and Agha

30
ρ/ρb= 0
28 ρ/ρb= 0.5
ρ/ρb= 1
26
N=L/h

24
22
20
18
16
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
w (KN/m)

Fig. (8). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus load w (kN/m) for propped member (fc' =28 MPa) and (b = 250mm).

34

32
N=L/h

30

28

26 ρ/ρb= 0
ρ/ρb= 0.5
ρ/ρb= 1
24
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
fc' (MPa)

Fig. (9). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus compressive strength fc'(MPa) for propped member (w =14.6 kN/m) and (b = 250mm).

12
11
10
N=L/h

9
8
7 b=150 mm
b=200 mm
6 b=250 mm
b=300 mm
5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
ρ/ρ

Fig. (10). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus reinforcement ratio (ρ/ρb) for cantilever member (fc' =28 MPa) and (w =14.6 kN/m).
Minimum Depth-span Ratio of Beams The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 413

12
ρ/ρb= 0
ρ/ρb= 0.5
ρ/ρb= 1
10
N=L/h

4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
w (KN/m)

Fig. (11). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus load w (kN/m) for cantilever member (fc' =28 MPa) and (b = 250mm).

12
N=L/h

10

ρ/ρb= 0
ρ/ρb= 0.5
ρ/ρb= 1
8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
fc' (MPa)

Fig. (12). Minimum thickness ratio (N = L / h) versus compressive strength fc'(MPa) for cantilever member (w =14.6 kN/m) and (b = 250mm).

CONCLUSION of applied load and concrete compressive strength.

4- The span-depth ratio (N = L / h) decreased with
1- A modification of ACI code span-depth ratio is increasing the applied load, or in other words, the
suggested to include the effect of tension reinfor- required depth increased with increasing the applied
cement area, which is represented by the reinforcement load for all values of concrete strength and beam
width.
indices ratio (ρ/ρb), applied distributed load (w),
5- The span-depth ratio (N = L / h) increased with
concrete compressive strength (fc' ) and cross section
increasing the concrete strength (fc' ), i.e. the required
width (b) in order to control the maximum deflection
depth decreased with increasing concrete strength for
of the beam within the ACI limit of the maximum
all values of applied loads and beam width.
permitted deflection.
6- The same behavior and conclusions were obtained
2- The value of span-depth ratio (N = L / h) is for all types (simply supported, fixed ended, propped
determined for four beam types (simply supported, and cantilever).
fixed ended, propped and cantilever) for concrete 7- Different numerical examples are solved to verify
strengths (ƒ'c = 21, 28, 35, 42, 63 & 84 MPa), applied the results of the proposed equations and tables for all
distributed load (w = 14.6, 29.2, 43.8 & 58.4 kN/m), types of beams (simply supported, fixed ended,
cross width (b = 150, 200, 250 & 300 mm) and (ρ / ρb propped and cantilever).
= 0, 0.5 & 1) in addition to (ρt /ρb & ρmax /ρb). 8- For a simply supported beam with an amount of
3- The effect of the reinforced indicia ratio (ρ/ρb) is reinforcement equal to balance ratio (ρ = ρb), the
small on the span-depth ratio (N = L / h) for all values equivalent depth is reduced by (6.23%) to provide the
414 The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, Volume 14 Rasheed and Agha

same deflection within the maximum permissible limit [1] ACI 318-19, Building code requirements for structural concrete and
commentary, American concrete institute: ACI, USA, 2019, p. 523.
(L/360). [2] D. Darwin, C.W. Dolan, and A.H. Nelson, Design of concrete
9- For a fixed ended beam with an amount of structures, 15th edition MC Grow Hill, Inc.: USA, 2017, p. 786.
reinforcement equal to half of the balance ratio (ρ = [3] J.K. Wight, and J.G. Mac Gredar, Reinforced concrete mechanics and
ρb), the equivalent depth is reduced by (3.66%) to design, 5th edition Pearson prentice Hall: USA, 2009, p. 1128.
[4] A. Ghali, R. Favre, and M. Elbadry, Concrete Structures., 3rd ed E &
provide the same deflection within the maximum FN Epson London, 2002.
permissible limit (L/360). [5] J.C. MCcormac, and J.k. Nelson, Design of Reinforced concrete, 7th
10- For propped beam (one end is simply supported edition John wiley & Sens: USA, 2006, p. 721.
and the other end is fixed) with an amount of [6] M. Setareh, and R. Darvas, Concrete Structures., 2nd ed Springer,
2017.
reinforcement equal to balance ratio (ρ = ρb), the [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24115-9]
equivalent depth is reduced by (6.44%) to provide the [7] C.D. Buckner, “Concrete Design for the PE Civil and SE Exams”,
same deflection within the maximum permissible limit PPI, PPI2PASS., 3rd ed COM, 2018.
[8] Y.H. Lee, and M.S. Kim, "Lec, J. and Scanion, A; ‘ comparison of
(L/360). minimum thickness provisions for concrete beams in building codes
11- For a cantilever beam with an amount of and standard’", Can. J. Civ. Eng., vol. 6, no. May, 2013.
reinforcement equal to the balance ratio (ρ = ρb), the [9] A.N. Beal, and R.H. Thomason, "span/ Depth ratio for Concrete beams
and slabs, ", The Structural Engineer, vol. 61A, no. 4, 1983.
equivalent depth is reduced by (6.267%) to provide the
[10] I.A.E.M. Shehata, L.C.D. Shehata, and S.L.G. Garcia, "Minimum steel
same deflection within the maximum permissible limit ratios in reinforced concrete beams made of concrete with different
(L/360). strength theoretical approach", Mater. Struct., vol. 63, no. January, pp.
3-11, 2003.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02481565]
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION [11] M.M. Orvin, and K.A. Anik, "Minimum slab thickness requirement of
RCC Slab in order to prevent undesirable floor vibration", Int. J. Adv.
Not applicable. Mechan. Civi. Engineer, vol. 3, pp. 2394-2827, 2016.
[12] M.R. Islam khan, z. hakimkhan, M.F. Raiyan, and K.M. Amanat,
AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS "Minimum slab thickness of RC slab to prevent undesirable floor
vibration", In: the 2013 world conference on Advances in Structural
Not applicable. Engineering and Mechanics (ASEM13), Jeju, Korea, 2013, pp.
1886-1899.
[13] J.C.M. Ho., A.K.H. Kwan, and H.J. pam, "Minimum Flexural ductility
FUNDING design of high strength concrete beams", Mag. Concr. Res., vol. 56,
None. no. 1, pp. 13-22, 2004.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/macr.2004.56.1.13]
[14] A. Akmaladdin, "Effect of tensile reinforcement ratio on the effective
CONFLICT OF INTEREST moments of inertia of reinforced light weight concrete beams for short
term deflection calculation", ITB J. Engineeri. Sci., vol. 43, no. 3, pp.
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or 209-226, 2011.
otherwise. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5614/itbj.eng.sci.2011.43.3.4]
[15] R.C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 6th edition Pearson prentice Hall:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS USA, 2006, p. 644 pp..
[16] R.C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Material, 3rd edition prentice Hall: USA,
Declared none. 2006, p. 855.
[17] J.M. Gere, Mechanics of Material, 5th edition Brooks: USA, 2001, p.
REFERENCES 926.

© 2020 Rasheed & Agha.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is
available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.