The Extensible Business Reporting Language and Fraudulent Financial Statement in Indonesia
The Extensible Business Reporting Language and Fraudulent Financial Statement in Indonesia
The Extensible Business Reporting Language and Fraudulent Financial Statement in Indonesia
1 Introduction
The increase in the number of capital market investors will be in line with the increasing
need for information. Complete information can be obtained from the company's financial
statements. Investors are looking for profit information. A rising or stable profit will look
more attractive. Not a few companies do various ways to enhance profits. Erick Tohir [1],
said that many BUMNs are doing window dressing. This act can be categorized as a criminal
act. Several cases of fraud that occurred among them were PT Asuransi Jiwasraya, which
reported false profit since 2006, as well as allegations of corruption in it [2]. The OJK
sanctioned PT Hanson (MYRX) for not disclosing PPJB to its auditors, resulting in material
overstated income [3], Garuda Indonesia's net profit is considered odd. Gains were obtained,
thanks to soaring other operating income of U.S. $ 306.88 million [4], and Bank Bukopin
modified credit card data. These frauds cause commission-based income to increase
inappropriately [5].
According to The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners [6], financial statement fraud
is an act of deliberate misstatement of material in the financial statements of an organization.
Fraudulent actions in financial reporting can be caused by pressures and expectations of
performance [7]. The efforts made by the Indonesia Stock Exchange to minimize this
problem is by developing a reporting system based on Extensible Business Reporting
2 Theoretical Review
3 Research Method
The data in this study financial reports of related companies. Data were obtained from
the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (www.idx.co.id), and the company's
official website. The type of data, secondary data in the form of financial reports. The
population of this research is 674 companies, and 81 companies were obtained as the
research sample, through purposive sampling technique. The research object is something
that will be used as material research. The research object in this study was fraudulent
financial statements, while the research subjects were all variables used in the study.
The data is divided into two parts, namely three years before (2012-2014) and three
years after the implementation of XBRL (2016-2018). Financial statement fraud will be
proxied through earnings management. The earnings management model used is the
Modified Jones Model. The influence of the XBRL variable on Financial Statement Fraud is
supported by the existence of 5 control variables in the form of firm size (SIZE), return on
assets (ROA), debt to asset ratio (DAR), gross domestic product (GDP), and price to book
value (PBV). This study uses multiple linear regression analysis techniques with the help of
SPSS software. To test the hypotheses, if the significant value is < 5%, then the hypotheses
are accepted.
The classical assumption test is carried out to ensure that the data for multiple linear
regression are for Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE).
The application of XBRL affects fraudulent financial statements (H1 is accepted), with
the XBRL coefficient being minus, meaning that the implementation of XBRL will cause a
decrease in financial statement fraud). The only control variable that affects financial
statement fraud is the firm size (SIZE).,
4.4 Differences of fraudulent financial statements before and after implementing XBRL
The paired T-test results show that there are differences in fraudulent financial statements
before and after implementing XBRL. The positive mean value indicates that financial
statement fraud before the implementation of XBRL is higher than financial statement fraud
after XBRL. Several indicators of risk that can trigger fraudulent financial statements include
the recording of more bad debts in a profitable year. The company lost market share and
reduced its bad debt expense in the loss year to smooth profit. The company is less profitable
than its competitors—the accounting policies that generate relatively high income. The
company is experiencing temporary performance problems and low taxable income
accounting policy with a high proportion of off-balance sheet transactions. Frequent changes
in auditors or delays in issuing financial statements [21], These risks can be reduced by
implementing XBRL. The business and financial information collected in the XBRL format
is machine-readable and operable, thereby increasing the ease of dissemination and public
analysis to determine whether there is a fraud.
The results of this study are supported by research conducted by Kim et al. [17], that
states that the post XBRL period has a lower discretionary accrual rate than the pre-XBRL
implementation period. Liu et al. [18] prove XBRL can reduce earnings management by
reducing the company's discretionary accruals. Also, XBRL can reduce information
asymmetry so that it can minimize an agent acting fraudulently or harming the principal and
other parties.
4 Conclusions
The research results prove that the application of Extensible Business Reporting
Language (XBRL) has a negative effect on fraudulent financial statements. The more the
company implemented XBRL, the lesser the fraudulent financial reporting. There are
differences in fraudulent financial statements before and after implementing XBRL. The
fraudulent financial statement is higher before than after the implementation of XBRL Even
though the empirical result of this study supports the hypotheses, at least two limitations
should be carefully considered. First, the data were collected only in Indonesia that may have
different capital market characteristics with other countries.
These differences may include the capital market regulation, economics condition, tax
law, or investment opportunity. Hence, the present result should not be assumed to represent
the general case in the world. However, this study may provide a primary reference for other
countries whose environment and type of industries are similar to those in Indonesia. Second,
even though this study controls the hypothesis testing with five control variables, the result
indicates that these control variables may not influence the relationship among variables.
Only one control variable (SIZE) can change the effect.
References
[1] S. Ferry, “Erick: BUMN Suka ‘Mempercantik’ Lapkeu, Bisa Masuk Kriminal!,” 2020.
[Online]. Available: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20200110094444-17-
129058/erick-bumn-suka-mempercantik-lapkeu-bisa-masuk-kriminal.
[2] S. Makki, “Kronologi Kasus Jiwasraya, Gagal Bayar Hingga Dugaan Korupsi,” 2020.
[Online]. Available: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20200108111414-78-
463406/kronologi-kasus-jiwasraya-gagal-bayar-hingga-dugaan-korupsi.
[3] A. Wicaksono, “Sulap Lapkeu, Mantan Dirut Hanson International Didenda Rp5 M,” 2019.
[Online]. Available: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190809145515-92-
419879/sulap-lapkeu-mantan-dirut-hanson-international-didenda-rp5-m.
[4] H. R. Pratiwi, “Kronologi Kisruh Laporan Keuangan Garuda Indonesia,” 2019. [Online].
Available: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190430174733-92-390927/kronologi-
kisruh-laporan-keuangan-garuda-indonesia.
[5] F. F. Rachman, “Bank Bukopin Permak Laporan Keuangan, Ini Kata BI dan OJK,” 2018.
[Online]. Available: https://finance.detik.com/moneter/d-3994551/bank-bukopin-permak-
laporan-keuangan-ini-kata-bi-dan-ojk.
[6] Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), “Report to the nations on occupational
fraud and abuse on occupational fraud and abuse,” 2014. [Online]. Available:
https://www.scribd.com/document/233877975/Www-acfe-Mexico-com-Mx- Archivos-2014-
Report-to-Nations.
[7] D. Priantara, Fraud Auditing & Investigation, 1st ed. Mitra Wacana Media, 2013.
[8] XBRL International Inc, “An Introduction to XBRL.” [Online]. Available:
https://www.xbrl.org/the-standard/what/an-introduction-to-xbrl/.
[9] R. Astria, “BEI Luncurkan Sistem Pelaporan Emiten Berbasis XBRL,” 2015. [Online].
Available: https://market.bisnis.com/read/20150622/7/445822/bei-luncurkan-sistem-
pelaporan-emiten-berbasis-xbrl.
[10] Bursa Efek Indonesia, “XBRL,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://idx.co.id/perusahaan-
tercatat/xbrl/. [Accessed: 20-Sep-2011].
[11] M. Jensen and W. Meckling, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and
Ownership Structure,” J. financ. econ., 1976.
[12] A. W. Manggau, “Pengaruh Asimetri Informasi Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Manajemen
Laba Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan Yang Terdapat Di Bursa Efek Indonesia,”
AKUNTABEL J. Ekon. dan Keuang., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 103–114, 2016.
[13] C. V. Ruiz, “Literature review of earnings management : Who , why , when , how and what
for ?,” Finnish Bus. Rev., pp. 1–13, 2016.
[14] E. K. Ghani, J. Said, and K. Muhammad, “Enhancing Corporate Governance via XBRL:
Preparers’ Perception on Compatibility Expectation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 145,
pp. 308–315, 2014.
[15] X. C. Leow, “The Impact of XBRL on Earnings Management,” no. August, pp. 1–72, 2012.
[Online]. Available:
https://www.softwarepakketten.nl/upload/xbrl/2014_Xian_Cheng_Leow_MASTER_THESIS_
XBRL_EarningsManagement_XC_14082012_v2.pdf.
[16] W. Kaidi, “Does XBRL reduce the level of earnings management ?,” pp. 1–57, 2015. [Online].
Available: https://scripties.uba.uva.nl/download?fid=635269.
[17] J. B. Kim, J. W. Kim, and J. H. Lim, “Does XBRL Adoption Constrain Earnings
Management? Early Evidence from Mandated U.S. Filers,” Contemp. Account. Res., vol. 36,
no. 4, pp. 2610–2634, 2019.
[18] C. Liu, X. (Robert) Luo, and F. L. Wang, “An empirical investigation on the impact of XBRL
adoption on information asymmetry: Evidence from Europe,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 93,
no. 2017, pp. 42–50, 2017.
[19] Y. Chen, “A comparative study of e-government XBRL implementations : The potential of
improving information transparency and ef fi ciency,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 553–
563, 2012.
[20] P. Company, C. Jensen, and H. Meckling, “Theory of The Firm : Managerial Behavior ,
Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” vol. 3, pp. 305–360, 1976.
[21] D. M. Boyle, J. F. Boyle, and B. W. Carpenter, “The SEC’s Renewed Focus on Accounting
Fraud: Insights and Implications for Auditors and Public Companies,” CPA J., no. February,
pp. 68–72, 2014.