F\ ’

A r

tSIfc.

'W
-

&
>‘
&

ENVISION
SUS TAINABLE INFR A S TRUC TURE FR AME WORK

VER SION 3

<V&VfiE

ft
Institute for
Sustainable
. Infrastructure

i,

£
 Institute for
WA Sustainable
!dll Infrastructure

ACEC
APIVA

Envision: Sustainable Infrastructure Framework Guidance Manual

Copyright © 2018 by Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure

All rights reserved. This document or any portion thereof

may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever
without the express written permission of the publisher
except for the use of brief quotations in a book review.

Third Edition, 2018

ISBN 978-1-7322147-0-5

Published by Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure

Washington, DC

www.sustainableinfrastructure.org
e mv \s\on
 A

a *

*5=

m 'S
T;"
- •*r
•»
'---

• ^ Ji T
. *?& WR,

*-• r v.* * ' -,-ir ^

<• _*
'..
f SJg
£
*?v.

-'>

5r-
0S2
4S
)Jr

V*‘-

Credits Photos Courtesy Of: 77: Wayne County Airport Authority

The Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure Cover: CC0 87: HDR
would like to thank the numerous individuals who 7: Left to right; “Single Turbine” Portland General 90-91: City of Boynton Beach
contributed to this document including the ISI Board Electric / CC BY; “Dixon Wastewater Treatment 109: Metro Nashville Airport Authority
of Directors, the Envision Review Board, and the Facility” by Joe DiGiorgio / Stantec; “Waste” by 115: Kunia Country Farms
many members of the ISI technical committees and Anthony Kane; “Kansas City Streetcar” HDR; Kunia 122-123: HDR
workgroups. Country Farms; Pixabay CC0 128: HDR
26-27: @Steve Carrell 145 top: Alliant Energy
Images are referenced by page number. All
35: Skanska USA 145 bottom: Kansas City Water Services Department
photographs and illustrations copyright © by their
37: Skanska USA 156-157: Portland General Electric (PGE)
respective sources.
51: HDR 165: HDR
57: Alexandria Renew Enterprises 175 left and right: HDR
71: City of Surrey
Table Of Contents

INTRODUCTION RA1.3 Reduce Operational Waste 98

The Envision Framework 06 RA1.4 Reduce Construction Waste 100
Envision Design 11 RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site 102
RA2.1 Reduce Operational Energy Consumption 104
ENVISION RA2.2 Reduce Construction Energy Consumption 106
Envision Credit List 18 RA2.3 Use Renewable Energy 108
Navigating Credits 20 RA2.4 Commission & Monitor Energy Systems 110
Envision Organization and Scoring 21 RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources 112
Envision Points Table 23 RA3.2 Reduce Operational Water Consumption 114
Third-Party Verification and Award 25 RA3.3 Reduce Construction Water Consumption 116
RA3.4 Monitor Water Systems 118
QUALITY OF LIFE
RA0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements 120
QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life 30
QL1.2 Enhance Public Health & Safety 32
QL1.3 Improve Construction Safety 34 © NATURAL WORLD
NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value 126
QL1.4 Minimize Noise & Vibration 36
NW1.2 Provide Wetland & Surface Water Buffers 130
QL1.5 Minimize Light Pollution 38
NW1.3 Preserve Prime Farmland 132
QL1.6 Minimize Construction Impacts 40
NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land 134
QL2.1 Improve Community Mobility & Access 42
NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields 136
QL2.2 Encourage Sustainable Transportation 44
NW2.2 Manage Stormwater 138
QL2.3 Improve Access & Wayfinding 46
NW2.3 Reduce Pesticide & Fertilizer Impacts 140
QL3.1 Advance Equity & Social Justice 48
NW2.4 Protect Surface & Groundwater Quality 142
QL3.2 Preserve Historic & Cultural Resources 52
NW3.1 Enhance Functional Habitats 146
QL3.3 Enhance Views & Local Character 54
NW3.2 Enhance Wetland & Surface Water Functions 148
QL3.4 Enhance Public Space & Amenities 56
NW3.3 Maintain Floodplain Functions 150
QL0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements 58
NW3.4 Control Invasive Species 152
LEADERSHIP NW3.5 Protect Soil Health 154
LD1.1 Provide Effective Leadership & Commitment 64 NW0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements 156
LD1.2 Foster Collaboration & Teamwork 66
LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement 68 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE
LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies 70 CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon 162
LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan 72 CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions 164
LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities 74 CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions 166
LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring & Maintenance 76 CR2.1 Avoid Unsuitable Development 168
LD2.4 Plan for End of Life 78 CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability 170
LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity & Development 80 CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience 172
LD3.2 Develop Local Skills & Capabilities 82 CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies 176
LD3.3 Conduct a Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation 84 CR2.5 Maximize Resilience 178
LD0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements 88 CR2.6 Improve Infrastructure Integration 180
CR0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements 182
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
RA1.1 Support Sustainable Procurement Practices 94 GLOSSARY
RA1.2 Use Recycled Materials 96
Introduction

PURPOSE OF ENVISION®
The purpose of Envision is to foster the dramatic and necessary improvement in the sustainable
performance and resiliency of physical infrastructure by helping owners, planners, engineers,
communities, contractors, and other infrastructure stakeholders to implement more cost-
effective, resource-efficient and adaptable long-term infrastructure investments.

Envision is a framework that provides the guidance needed to initiate this systemic change
in the planning, design and delivery of sustainable and resilient infrastructure. Envision is a
decision-making guide, not a set of prescriptive measures. Envision provides industry-wide
sustainability metrics for all types and sizes of infrastructure to help users assess and measure
the extent to which their project contributes to conditions of sustainability across the full
range of social, economic, and environmental indicators. Furthermore, the Envision framework
recognizes that these sustainability factors are variable across a project’s life cycle. As such,
Envision helps users optimize project resilience for both short-term and long-term impacts.

Fundamentally, Envision is about supporting higher performance through more sustainable

choices in infrastructure development. The framework provides a flexible system of criteria
and performance objectives to aid decision makers and help project teams identify sustainable
approaches during planning, design, and construction that will carry forward throughout the
project’s operations and maintenance and end-of-life phases. Using Envision as a guidance
tool, owners, communities, designers, contractors, and other stakeholders are able to
collaborate to make more informed decisions about the sustainability of infrastructure.

Community infrastructure development is subject to the resource constraints of multiple departments

and agencies, each with different schedules, agendas, mandates, budget cycles, and funding sources.
Ratings systems and tools intended for buildings are not designed for this context and cannot
adequately assess the extensive external benefits and impacts infrastructure has on a community.
Envision assesses not only individual project performance, but how well the infrastructure project
contributes to the efficiency and long-term sustainability of the communities it serves. In this way,
Envision not only asks, “Are we doing the project right?” but also, “Are we doing the right project?”

BACKGROUND
Envision was developed in joint collaboration between the Zofnass Program for Sustainable Infrastructure
at the Harvard University Graduate School of Design and the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure
(ISI). ISI is a not-for-profit education and research organization founded by the American Public Works
Association, the American Council of Engineering Companies, and the American Society of Civil Engineers.

4 ENVISION V3
ISI is the hub of a unique community of organizations and individuals involved in the planning, design,
construction, and maintenance of infrastructure. Since the launch of the first version of Envision in
2012, this unique community has continued to push significant progress in the infrastructure industry
by applying Envision on billions of dollars’ worth of infrastructure projects. ISI has captured lessons
learned through the use of Envision and incorporated these key lessons into this third version.

THE NEED FOR ENVISION

Consider the importance of infrastructure in our daily lives. Infrastructure provides the basis
for personal security and public health, impacts the economic viability and competitiveness
of our communities, moves people and goods, provides us with drinking water and handles
our waste, creates spaces for us to enjoy, and allows us to effectively communicate with one
another. However, despite the obvious need for infrastructure and the many benefits it provides,
historically it is overlooked and underfunded until it breaks down or service is disrupted.

Decades of neglect mean that massive investments in infrastructure are now needed around
the world. In North America and Europe aging and outdated infrastructure needs to be replaced
and modernized, while in other regions entirely new infrastructure systems are being developed.
At the same time, population growth and climate change are stressing financial, material, and
technological resources and underscoring the need to adapt to a more sustainable and resilient
society. Infrastructure is at the heart of addressing this key challenge of the 21st century, and the
standards and methods of the past will not be adequate to meet the needs of the future. A new
paradigm is required. In 2017 United Nations Secretary General Antonio Gutteres stated,

“Infrastructure investment will be crucial. The world should adopt a simple rule: if
big infrastructure projects are not green [sustainable], they should not be given the
green light. Otherwise, we will be locked into bad choices for decades to come.”

But how do infrastructure developers know whether their decisions are contributing to sustainability
or not? How do they bring attention to the need for more sustainable infrastructure? How do they
communicate around a shared understanding of what sustainability means? Envision provides a consistent,
consensus-based framework for assessing sustainability and resilience in infrastructure. Envision:

• Sets the standard for what constitutes sustainable infrastructure;

• Incentivizes higher performance goals beyond minimum requirements;
• Gives recognition to projects that make significant contributions to sustainability; and
• Provides a common language for collaboration and clear communication both internally and externally.

ENVISION V3 5
The Envision Framework

1 Envision Guidance Manual 4 Envision Sustainability Professional Credential

The written framework. Professional training in Envision use.

2 Envision Pre-Assessment Checklist 5 Envision Verification

An early-phase high-level pre-assessment. Independent third-party project review process.

3 E
 nvision Online Scoresheet 6 E
 nvision Awards
The detailed online assessment tool and calculator. Recognition for qualifying verified projects.

WHAT IS ENVISION? practitioners better understand and recognize

their project’s contribution to sustainability.
Envision is a framework that includes 64 sustainability
Through an optional process offered by ISI,
and resilience indicators, called ‘credits’, organized
Envision can also be used to receive third-party
around five categories: Quality of Life, Leadership,
verification of a project assessment which gives
Resource Allocation, Natural World, and Climate
public recognition to infrastructure projects that
and Resilience. These collectively address
make exemplary progress toward sustainability.
areas of human wellbeing, mobility, community
Collectively the commitments of public agencies,
development, collaboration, planning, economy,
companies, and universities to use Envision draws
materials, energy, water, siting, conservation,
needed attention to the value and importance
ecology, emissions, and resilience. These indicators
of developing infrastructure more sustainably.
collectively become the foundation of what
constitutes sustainability in infrastructure. Perhaps most importantly, Envision is a shared
platform for effectively collaborating and
Each of the 64 credits has multiple levels of
communicating around the complex concepts and
achievement representing the spectrum of possible
challenges of sustainability. Successful use of the
performance goals from slightly improving beyond
framework in either self-assessments or third-
conventional practice, to conserving and restoring
party verifications necessitates collaboration,
communities and environments. By assessing
teamwork, and learning. The ENV SP credential is
achievement in each of the 64 credits, project
a tool for training these multi-disciplinary teams
teams establish how well the project addresses
to use Envision collaboratively. Envision’s easy-to-
the full range of sustainability indicators, and are
understand approach to sustainable infrastructure
challenged to pursue higher performance.
becomes a tool for facilitating project team
Through its Envision Sustainability Professional collaboration, inter-organizational cooperation,
(ENV SP) credential, Envision recognizes and brings and public engagement and communication.
attention to individuals trained and dedicated to
developing more sustainable infrastructure. When
used as a self-assessment tool Envision helps

6 ENVISION V3
Energy Water Waste Transportation Landscape Information

Distribution Treatment Solid waste Airports Public Realm Telecom

Hydroelectric Distribution Recycling Roads / Highways Parks Cables
Coal Capture / Storage Hazardous Bikes / Pedestrians Ecosystem Services Internet
Natural Gas Stormwater Waste Railways Natural Phones
Infrastructure
Wind Flood Control Collection & Transit Data Centers
Transfer Environmental
Solar Nutrient Ports Sensors
Remediation
Management
Biomass Waterways

HOW DOES ENVISION WORK? • Incentivizing

higher achievement
in project sustainability;
When addressing sustainability and resiliency in the
face of changing variables, it is difficult to assess • Identifying
and recognizing organizations
the full range of benefits and impacts across the committed to sustainability through
broad scope of social, environmental, and economic the procurement process;
factors. Envision’s framework provides a structure • Drawing public attention to positive infrastructure
in which users can more easily measure progress projects and sustainable outcomes;
and identify potential trade-offs amid this complex
• Strengtheninginter-agency and
mix of objective, subjective, quantifiable, and
project team collaboration; and
qualitative criteria. The rating scale presented for
each sustainability indicator helps users identify • Demonstrating good governance to
and align priorities against a common scale. voters, taxpayers, or ratepayers.

What constitutes the most sustainable solution is

often project and context specific and difficult, if WHERE DOES ENVISION APPLY?
not impossible, to prescribe in advance. For each Envision is designed as a holistic sustainability
sustainability indicator in the framework Envision rating system for all types and sizes of both
provides users with questions to guide decisions public and private infrastructure. A key value
and discussions at the project and system-wide of Envision is its universal applicability to
levels in order to arrive at the best choice. all infrastructure. Envision application has
ranged across all infrastructure sectors from
Whether using the Envision checklist, online
one million to multi-billion dollar projects.
scoresheet, self-assessment, or third-
party verification Envision users find it Envision is not intended to evaluate interior,
works for them in numerous ways: conditioned, buildings with the primary purpose of
human occupation, such as offices, schools, single
• Calibratinginternal accountability and assessment
family homes, or multi-unit residential buildings,
against a common set of sustainability criteria;
but can be used in conjunction with rating systems

ENVISION V3 7
“The purpose of Envision is to foster the dramatic
and necessary improvement in the sustainable
performance and resiliency of physical infrastructure...”

that address these types of spaces. For example, qualified to lead teams in project assessments
Envision is often applied to airports that contain or submit for third-party verification.
both infrastructure and human-occupied spaces.
As of this publication, Envision has been used on
Envision has been applied extensively hundreds of projects and tens of billions of dollars
throughout the US and Canada but is applicable, in infrastructure projects have pursued third-
and has been used, all over the world. party verification throughout the US, Canada, and
internationally. Thousands of individuals have
received the Envision Sustainability Professional
WHO USES ENVISION AND WHY?
credential including in every US state, Canadian
Envision was designed to help infrastructure
province, and over 40 countries. Envision is
stakeholders implement more sustainable
supported and applied by hundreds of companies,
projects. It offers benefits for each category of
and dozens of public agencies, and universities.
stakeholder: from owners and design teams,
to community and environmental groups, to
constructors, regulators, and policymakers. WHEN TO USE ENVISION?
Envision can and should be used throughout the
• Owners, regulators, and policy makers use entire life cycle of a project. However, the earlier
Envision to set standards for sustainable Envision is applied the greater the value it can deliver.
infrastructure and guide procurement. Sustainability begins with the earliest stages of
Envision references appear in RFPs, RFQs, planning and carries through to the end of a project’s
grants, and cost-share programs. useful life, but as the project timeline advances the
• Engineers, architects, landscape architects, ability to make effective changes decreases while
planners, operators, and constructors the cost of making changes increases. The false
use Envision to set higher performance perception that sustainability is more expensive
goals for projects and to collaborate and than conventional practice is often a result of adding
communicate on achieving those goals. sustainability ‘features’ at the end of a conventional
process. On the contrary, projects that incorporate
• Allinfrastructure stakeholders use Envision to
sustainable principles of efficiency, resourcefulness,
recognize both trained individuals through the
and multi-benefit use from the earliest planning
ENV SP credential and high performing projects
stages often find significant cost savings—even initial
through the third-party verified awards.
capital cost savings—over conventional projects.
• Community groups, environmental organizations,
and the general public use Envision to understand Planning: In the planning phase of the project,
and learn about sustainable infrastructure and Envision can be used to assess community values,
to more actively engage in its development. engage stakeholders, and build consensus around
the best project solution. It guides decisions
Anyone can use Envision. Those interested in when defining a project scope, prioritizing a list of
expert training can become ENV SPs through ISI’s projects, and comparing project alternatives.
online course and exam. These professionals are

8 ENVISION V3
Envision Leaders

Both the City of Los Angeles City Council and the

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors have
passed resolutions adopting the use of Envision.

According to City of Los Angeles City Engineer Gary

Lee Moore, “The Bureau of Engineering is proud to
be an early adopter of Envision, which provides our

«4
engineers and architects with nationally recognized

en
standards that work well within our city’s vast and

WIJm:.
varied landscape. Envision is key to advancing

U\iMl
our ability to deliver sustainable infrastructure,
f1;
■•■■■•
i:
* *:
open space and architecture projects as we
work toward our goal of transforming Los

/
Angeles into the world’s most livable city.” ■-
'’Vc
:s^
iv V

'V
2

In 2017 the Miami-Dade Board of County

Commissioners passed a resolution adopting
Envision and, “directing the County Mayor to
incorporate Envision into the planning, design,
construction, and operation of County-funded
Infrastructure Projects... [and] to develop a plan
to train the County staff who are responsible for
civil infrastructure projects in becoming Envision
!!!

r*'w«

Sustainability Professional (ENV SP) credentialed.”

in 'Hn"' Vfifluin
r>
auuucsc-
t »••......... -
: 'wrA

The resolution was inspired by the

pioneering work of the Miami-Dade
• vT

Department of Water and Sewer.

ENVISION V3 9
“Envision not only asks, ‘Are we doing the project
right?’ but also, ‘Are we doing the right project?’”

Design: In the design phase of a project, Envision measure sustainable performance. The Envision
guides a thorough evaluation of the design and framework provides key sustainable performance
aids identification of additional improvements indicators that can be monitored over the project
toward more sustainable development. The credit life. In this way, Envision supports evaluation of
levels of achievement benchmark the relative sustainable impacts across project life-cycles.
impact and encourage expanding the project goals
toward higher levels of sustainability. Integrating Communication and Education: The Envision
the Envision rating system assessment into the framework provides an organized system for
design process allows for sustainable-minded educating stakeholders and garnering support. The
decision making throughout the project. transparent nature of the system demonstrates the
relationship to the triple bottom line. Advertising
Construction: The construction phase of a sustainable project achievements and awards
project allows for creativity and innovation in is further supported by this transparency.
how the design is achieved. Envision can be used
to guide decisions in this phase for continuity Building Future Sustainability: The
between the sustainable intent in design and actual recommendations for sustainable development
project delivery. During this phase, sustainable in the Envision framework are used to shape
achievement is measured and documented. local design standards, construction codes,
The impact of the credits on the construction and development strategies. Adopting some or
process and costs can also be measured. all of these best practices recommendations
promotes the development of durable, high
Operations and Maintenance: During performance infrastructure for decades to come.
operations and maintenance, it is important to

BENEFITS OF USING ENVISION

The use of Envision can benefit projects
Planning Design Construction in numerous ways including:

• Long-term viability through increased

resiliency and preparedness;
• Lowercosts through management
and stakeholder collaboration;
Ab
ilit

es
yT

ng

• Reduced
negative impacts on the
oM

ha

ke
eC

k community and the environment;

a

Ch
an o Ma
ge st t
s Co • Potential
to save owners money
over time through efficiency;
• Credibility of a third-party rating system; and
• Increased
public confidence and
involvement in decision making.
PROJECT TIMELINE

10 ENVISION V3
Envision Design

The development of Envision is first based on “Development that meets

identifying and understanding what sustainability
and sustainable development are, and their key the needs of the present
challenges. This is underscored by a recognition that without compromising the
the social, environmental, and economic systems
within which sustainable development must occur
ability of future generations
are constantly changing due to factors like population to meet their own needs.”
growth, climate change, and resource constraints.
Therefore, increased resilience and adaptability must preserving and protecting the environment, but also
be added as a fourth pillar of sustainability. Next, it is about preserving the ability of society to sustain
critical to recognize the specific role and contribution itself. These two goals are inextricably linked.
of infrastructure in becoming a sustainable society
and a sustainable world. Achieving a sustainable
society will require contributions from every industry
WHAT IS INFRASTRUCTURE’S ROLE?
but infrastructure must first provide the foundation. Efficient infrastructure is an essential component
for a prosperous and growing economy. Effective
How can infrastructure achieve this goal? Through transportation systems bring goods to market,
the systematic prioritization of sustainable workers to jobs, children to schools, and families
choices, challenging conventional practice with to stores and recreation areas in a safe and timely
higher performance goals, fostering innovation, manner. Dependable water and wastewater
and investing in education and knowledge systems bring fresh water to industry, agriculture,
sharing to advance the industry and build public and people. Reliable electricity supplies allow
awareness. These are the strategies and principles businesses and factories to work unimpeded and
embedded within the Envision framework and bring a high level of convenience and productivity
applied to the full spectrum of sustainability to home life across the nation. Extensive
indicators: social wellbeing, environmental telecommunication networks connect people
stewardship, economic stability, and resilience. and businesses across the globe and enable the
fast flow of information essential to commerce.
WHAT IS SUSTAINABILITY AND
Infrastructure should deliver the required
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT?
services at affordable costs while conserving
The traditional definition of sustainable natural resources and energy. Moreover, these
development is taken from the 1987 UN World services must be continually maintained and
Commission on Environment and Development improved in order to remain competitive in the
report, also known as the Brundtland Commission global marketplace. Today, however, the design,
Report, “development that meets the needs of construction and operation of our infrastructure
the present without compromising the ability of systems have a substantial negative impact on
future generations to meet their own needs”. This our natural resources and ecological systems.
raises the critical point that our current quality If allowed to continue, this overuse of natural
of life cannot be bought at the expense of future resources will have devastating consequences.
generations. Sustainability is not only about

ENVISION V3 11
 Country Human Development Index and Ecological Footprint
Source: Global Footprint Network High Human Development

Ecological Footprint in Global Hectares

Canada and
United States

China

India
••
Sri Lanka
World Biocapacity
Per Person (1.69) Sustainability Quadrant

Human Development Index Value

WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES? The challenge faced by developed countries

worldwide is how to reduce our net environmental
Most developed countries enjoy a high quality of
footprint without sacrificing our quality of life.
life but do so by consuming materials and natural
Making a meaningful shift toward the sustainability
resources at a rate our planet cannot support.
quadrant is not a small challenge. Taken to its
This undermines the ability of future generations
logical conclusion, reaching the sustainable
to sustain that quality of life. Furthermore,
quadrant involves a complete overhaul of our
developing countries are rightfully seeking to
infrastructure, replacing old components with those
improve their own quality of life. In following
that are more effective and efficient. Progress
the model set by developed countries, they are
will be made incrementally by project owners,
consuming resources necessary to do so.
designers, and contractors delivering infrastructure
The human development index is a rough measure projects that make significant improvements
of quality of life developed by the United Nations. in performance across multiple dimensions of
As inputs, it factors life expectancy, education, and sustainability. These projects must also integrate
gross domestic product. The problems faced by the well with the infrastructure in the community, both
U.S., Canada, and other nations in preserving natural existing and planned. Lastly, the designers must
resources and ecological systems while maintaining take into account changes in the environment
or improving their quality of life is depicted in in which the delivered works must operate.
the graph. Here, the ecological footprint of each
country is plotted as a function of their human Changing Operating Environments
development index. The area of the circle represents
For engineers and designers, the primary
population size. Conditions of sustainability are
consequence of working in a non-sustainable
seen as the area bounded horizontally by the
operating environment is that many, if not most, of
world average available biocapacity and vertically
the normal project design assumptions and variables
by the threshold of high human development.
could change significantly over the design life of the
project. Assumptions about expected operating

12 ENVISION V3
conditions will change, requiring determinations of considering social impacts of a project it is just as
new averages, variances and possible extremes. important to first avoid adverse impacts as it is
New variables and new relationships among when considering environmental implications.
existing variables will appear and need to be taken
into account. Resource demands will drive up the Restoration
cost and scarcity of important materials and fuels.
Extreme weather events and atypical weather
Along with encouraging higher performance across
patterns may change the operating environment.
three dimensions, the Envision framework is unique in
In addition to the physical structure, the project may that it creates opportunities for projects to go beyond
need to incorporate “soft” engineering solutions, mitigation measures and restore the social, economic,
such as new forms of monitoring and data collection, and environmental assets of the community.
contingency plans, public education and training. “Restorative” becomes an achievable performance
Deteriorating infrastructure paired with a growing goal and is an explicit level of achievement within the
population yet struggling economy present serious Envision framework. This level may be aspirational
challenges to conventional thinking. The rating in many cases, but it highlights what is possible
system recognizes these changes and incorporates a for infrastructure projects, and it lays out the path
number of process-based objectives to ensure that for success. Likewise, when projects are able to
these matters are considered by the project team. implement practices that restore their community
and site, their efforts are recognized. Collectively,
these projects then help set a new bar for how
WHAT STRATEGIES DISTINGUISH sustainable infrastructure projects should perform.
ENVISION’S APPROACH?
Higher Performance
Mitigation Hierarchy
Envision promotes high performance
In taking practical steps toward sustainability, it can
across three dimensions:
be difficult to discern how to prioritize options or even
take the first step. Many sustainability best practices • SustainabilityAchievement: Envision recognizes
have roots in a mitigation hierarchy. For example, the that success in sustainability is incremental, not
“3 Rs” of material use include: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle; “all or nothing”. As such, the framework illustrates
and these practices are prioritized in this specific the incremental changes a project team can
order to optimize how materials are used. Expanding implement to reach higher levels of sustainability.
this example to a more general hierarchy becomes:
• Projectlife cycle: Credits in the Envision framework
• Avoidance:Measures taken to avoid address the full project life cycle, beyond planning
creating impacts from the outset and design through construction to operations
and maintenance. Users are also challenged to
• Minimization: Measures taken to reduce
consider the project’s end-of-useful-life, such as
the duration, intensity or extent of
the ability to disassemble and up-cycle materials.
impacts that cannot be avoided
• Stakeholder engagement: When an inclusive,
• Abatement: Measures taken to
representative group of stakeholders is engaged
rehabilitate degraded ecosystems
throughout the project, the results satisfy
• Offsetting:Measures taken to compensate the widest possible swath of the community.
for any residual adverse impacts Project team collaboration with stakeholders
also identify the widest practical array of
The Envision framework applies this hierarchy sustainability alternatives for consideration,
across a range of topics. For example, when including byproduct synergies and social benefits.

ENVISION V3 13
 Innovation the credits are intended to guide sustainable
project delivery. They are, however, more than a
The infrastructure industry can be understandably
prescriptive list of specifications. Project teams
risk averse. Project performance is accountable to
are able to determine the best path forward
the public, and failures are highly visible, sometimes
in implementing sustainable projects, building
catastrophic events, with lasting repercussions. Yet,
on the knowledge of what it takes to deliver a
in order to be responsive to changing operating
project that truly contributes to sustainability.
environments and fulfill their role in sustainable,
resilient development, project teams building In turn, project teams can learn from each other
tomorrow’s infrastructure should be prepared to take as the knowledge base grows. Many Envision
measured risks and innovate designs for the future. credits have the added goal of collecting industry
data. Successive Envision projects build this
The Envision framework encourages innovation
data set and help set the new sustainable
across all aspects of sustainability and resilience.
“standard” or baseline for infrastructure design.
Some topics and approaches provided in the
Furthermore, the Envision framework recognizes
Envision framework are aspirational, laying out the
projects that excel in sustainability to serve
best-case scenario and leaving it to project teams
as exemplary models for future projects.
to determine how to achieve it. Other approaches
are a blank slate, allowing room for innovation and Public attention is often only directed to
prompting project teams to pioneer solutions that infrastructure when there is a problem or failure.
suit the needs of the present and the future. By recognizing project successes through the
Envision framework, teams can begin to educate
Education and Knowledge Sharing the public on the value of their often overlooked
infrastructure systems. By understanding the
The Envision framework is designed to provide,
inherent value of an infrastructure project,
capture and disseminate knowledge. The process
communities are motivated to drive increasingly
and performance objectives included within
higher expectations in terms of sustainability.

HOW DOES ENVISION ADDRESS THE

PERFORMANCE ACHIEVEMENT
FULL RANGE OF SUSTAINABILITY?

Restorative
Social
Social wellbeing is comprehensively addressed. As
Conserving stated previously, Envision poses two questions:
“Are we doing the project right?” and, more critically,
Superior “Are we doing the right project?” For instance,
under Envision, a new highway might be designed
Enhanced with features that contribute to sustainable
STAKEHOLDER PROJECT
COLLABORATION PHASES performance (e.g., preserving wildlife corridors,
Improved treating and infiltrating stormwater runoff, and
P
Proje O
ct Tea wner Plann
ing incorporating recycled materials in construction).
Sec Stake rimary m
Desig
n
tructi
on
Stake ondary
holde
rs Cons tions However, if that highway contributes to significantly
holde Opera f-Life
rs End-o
greater traffic congestion and urban sprawl, its
SUSTAINABILITY
overall contribution to sustainability may not
be as high as an alternate solution such as an
extension of public transportation services.

14 ENVISION V3
Equity and social Justice refer to the responsibility community attractiveness and environmental
of a society to ensure that civil and human rights responsibility. The guidance provided in the
are preserved and protected for each individual, Envision framework balance these three aspects.
and that all persons are treated equally and
Return on Investment and upfront capital costs are
without prejudice. These issues are particularly
often the key drivers in planning decisions; however
relevant to infrastructure development, which
they omit the life-cycle costs of the project, risks and
often involves the provision of significant benefits
uncertainty, or the broader outcomes that impact the
as well as potentially significant impacts. Envision
environment and society. Envision quantifies these
addresses equity and social justice by encouraging
soft benefits and broader outcomes such that owners
active engagement from community stakeholders
are less likely to overlook the sustainable returns on
across the entire project life-cycle. Project teams
investment, such as lower utility costs, operations
develop two-way communication with impacted
and maintenance costs, or less replacement costs.
communities allowing them to holistically examine
a project’s impacts from all perspectives.
Resilience
Environmental Short- and long-term risks are reduced. Project
teams are guided to implement measures and
Restoration of natural resources and ecosystem
infrastructure that prevent committing the
services is an explicit goal within the Envision
community to high fixed costs or create a heavy
framework. While improving sustainable performance
reliance on resources that could become scarce
is an essential and immediate goal, long-term
and/or very expensive. Conversely, projects that
goals should be directed toward restoration where
create or increase vulnerability to extreme weather
practical. This is intended to reinforce the point
events, natural disasters, and/or economic conditions
that, to really contribute to sustainability, projects
are viewed as being conceptually deficient.
must do more than mitigate negative impacts.
Mitigation is important, but does not contribute Life-cycle considerations are addressed. Credit
to the restoration of economic, environmental, is given to project teams that extend design
and social conditions to sustainable levels. considerations to the full extent of the project life-
cycle. Designs that offer increased durability and
Economic flexibility to extend the useful life of the constructed
works are afforded additional recognition. Extending
Economic development conducted without
the useful life of constructed works means that
depleting social and natural resources is sustainable
replacement structures are needed less. More
development. While not all infrastructure projects
recognition is given for designs that incorporate
are directly connected to economic growth, they
deconstruction principles and enable reuse
are all connected to the economy by driving
and up-cycling of materials and equipment.

ENVISION V3 15
 ■

6
i
i 1-;
•V*

MS

***>-•
-r

■r

**-*v
• V■ ' _ •«, ■
Vr K -
••
- -*%
7
•Jt • -V >
1
^Vsti. ?■
r ^ X S ^ X

/v - ^*

|-*r; *»

-* fc
*5
-•

A
*>'X r

-V " •

/,
/
/
 m

nv ision
E

64
a t in cludes
iZ*
rk t h alled
is a f ramewo e in d ic ators, c t y of
Envisio
n
a n d resilien
c
e g o r ie s: Quali
y t
sustain
abilit five ca atural
r ga n ized into A ll o c a tion, N
’, o source
‘credits r s hip, Re ie n ce. The
se
a d e e s il g,
Life, Le te and
R wellbein n,
■> V
C lim a h u m a n
and of atio
World, r e s s areas t , c ollabor
ely a d d e n ing,
evelopm
T
collec tiv n it y d r g y, w ater, sit
u , en e
y, comm ce.
•-''A
mobilit m y , m aterials a n d resilien
g, econ
o
mission
s , tion
-<V
JO
plannin y , e h e founda
-■:

eco lo g e t
vation, becom ure.
ec tively astruc t
0*
conser r s c o ll in in f r
dicato abilit y
’tin* •7 ^ '
These in it u te s sustain
*£gi
cons t
^ni
*
*«> W of what
J2 n
I* %*4

,*'1j
>
-

'
 Envision Credit List

Quality Leadership Resource

III

WELLBEING
Of Life
14 Credits

COLLABORATION
12 Credits ©
MATERIALS
Allocation
14 Credits

QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life LD1.1 Provide Effective Leadership & Commitment RA1.1 Support Sustainable Procurement Practices
QL1.2 Enhance Public Health & Safety * LD1.2 Foster Collaboration & Teamwork RA1.2 Use Recycled Materials
QL1.3 Improve Construction Safety LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement RA1.3 Reduce Operational Waste
QL1.4 Minimize Noise & Vibration LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies RA1.4 Reduce Construction Waste
QL1.5 Minimize Light Pollution RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site
QL1.6 Minimize Construction Impacts PLANNING
LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan ENERGY
MOBILITY LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities RA2.1 Reduce Operational Energy Consumption
QL2.1 Improve Community Mobility & Access LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring & Maintenance RA2.2 Reduce Construction Energy Consumption
QL2.2 Encourage Sustainable Transportation LD2.4 Plan for End-of-Life RA2.3 Use Renewable Energy
QL2.3 Improve Access & Wayfinding RA2.4 Commission & Monitor Energy Systems
ECONOMY
COMMUNITY LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity & Development WATER
QL3.1 Advance Equity & Social Justice LD3.2 Develop Local Skills & Capabilities RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources <?_
QL3.2 Preserve Historic & Cultural Resources LD3.3 Conduct a Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation RA3.2 Reduce Operational Water Consumption
QL3.3 Enhance Views & Local Character RA3.3 Reduce Construction Water Consumption ®
QL3.4 Enhance Public Space & Amenities LD0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements RA3.4 Monitor Water Systems

QL0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements RA0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

^i

,*
■-
S=
*
*■■
—n
i -i. ■;*\
I " - _L ■
*r=i3
LP
V' "
’ T'
• f$
•■ i-VkJP £T

i* &
'•V * '. n- w •.-- ■*--
-■ r

-''

!r
.- • : V ~ --
*Jp
-

ST .t’

■:-V
18 ENVISION V3
i' >> -r-
1 +
j ■'.'V*V\ *
**;
«cJ
■V.
»;V?
l
: J ‘ f k i-;. . .

fJBTOff nfiKH! t r >

- Y
 Natural Climate and
World Resilience
14 Credits 10 Credits

SITING EMISSIONS
NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon

1^
NW1.2 Provide Wetland & Surface Water Buffers CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rewritten

I ©1^ I
NW1.3 Preserve Prime Farmland CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions
New
NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land
RESILIENCE
CONSERVATION CR2.1 Avoid Unsuitable Development

^1 © © ^1
NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
1^©

NW2.2 Manage Stormwater CR2.3 Evaluate Risk & Resilience

NW2.3 Reduce Pesticide & Fertilizer Impacts CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies
NW2.4 Protect Surface & Groundwater Quality CR2.5 Maximize Resilience
CR2.6 Improve Infrastructure Integration
ECOLOGY
NW3.1 Enhance Functional Habitats CR0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements
1^

NW3.2 Enhance Wetland & Surface Water Functions

NW3.3 Maintain Floodplain Functions
NW3.4 Control Invasive Species
NW3.5 Protect Soil Health

NW0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

.

M
f
1
'
m

T‘ '-
¥

,I
A*

1
.
► . • ■/- . . ■ -<
I yT -
m?

n•
Et.

'r’
-
•m

' St

•
S

v
I/

--
«.' -’■V *'
■ ■ S'

: ■■

i-*'
£ >

•■v-.-X.
Vr

1v
:
W

L-«;, . ■
'■ --.L

ENVISION V3 19
lili».'
*■■ T. . w -A 1- : .

/ J J■/
4 -
‘
/ l: •: ■

'k

r ,v
V£

■ r'■*- ■ * \.f. "L

'

-A V" ■

ffHi
*t

f
ter
1■

■
f

,r>
Navigating Credits

1 2 3 8 9

OUAUtV^F LIFE: WELLB El ! uperior: infrastructure projects often include difficult trade :. Has tne protect team addressed negative social impacts!
< tfs involving positive and negative impacts, and a protectshowing the extent to which options for mitigating
I. Evidence
QL1.1 Improvi e Community Quality ol Life < esigned to Benefit one community may have adverse
. on others. In addition, the needs or a community may
negative Imports were identified and prioritized, ond reasonaOle
changes to the project made. Strategies for mitigating
i onrtlct with their expressed goals. Because positive impacts negative impat Is should fnihnv a hiermt liy /uhuili/ing
all dimensions of performance may not be possible, the irvnirlume, rninimi/ntnm, ie\iiuninm. nnd nffwtting
edit seeks a net positive impact, importantly, the project
tjenefits and impacts should be equitably distritiuted Are the affected communities satisfied that
4 Improve the net quality of life of all
communities affected by the proiect and
Measures taken to assess community
needs and improve quality of life while
the project addresses their needs and goals
(Observing; Community satisfaction is the metric for as well as mitigates negative impacts!
mitigate negative impacts to communities. minimizing negative impacts.
< uality of kfc. it should tie evident that the community
t -uiy understands the run impact (positive and negative)
(f tne project and is satisfied that it addresses their needs
5
i no goals while appropriately mitigating negative impacts,
• LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT t locumencation of community endorsement should tie as tiroac 2. community Documentation of input ond agreement from key stakeholders,
leaders, and/or decision makers regarding the
possible and specific to the requested documentation. impact assessment ond planned ocoon(s) le g., community
satisfaction surveys, interviews with representatives of
A*B A*B»C*D A*B*C«D»I A*B*C»0*l*F A*B«C*D»I*F*6 affected communities, comments and reactions from social
mcoia platforms), specific statements ooout critical issues
(S) Community linkages (10) Broad Communrty (20) Holistic Assessment (2t) Protecting The future or actions token mthin tne project ore better indicators
Considerations 4 Collaboration (ommunity aspirations and addresses them in the project
of a true unaerstonamg of tne projects impacts than
i ppiicaonity: it is likely tnat an projects have the ability general enaorsements of the project as a whole, tmaence of
(A) The project seem identifes end takes mo accost communty needs, puts, and owes. For example. Die project team hat located and community satisfaction ond endorsement of puns includes:
'evened the met! recent community planning rtermabon and attested relevant tommjhty needs, flies, and/or issues. align project objectives with community needs and
through active engagement, in order to a. Community endowment of the project (Burris
(B) Tiie yujecl meets w suppex is ummurity needs endAx guv v. community satisfaction. It would therefore assessment uf Iheir needs or guoh per criterion A.
I e difficult to demonstrate that tne credit is not relevant
(() The protect assesses the social impacts it will have on the host and affected commjnoes' quality of ffe. ■ppRcable to a project seeking an Envision owotd. will address their needs or goals per criterion 0.
(D)Thr affn Ini lonwvlr. mr meaningful y rfigagnl vi idprCifjMlghan the [fur. | uqquts imminily net, and/lN gtidk c. Documentation that the community understands ond
accepts potential impacts of the project per criterion C.
(f) Based on the social assesaeent, potential neqatve impacts on the host crnearbt affected cm 0. Community endorsement of project strategies to
mitigate negative Imports per criterion D.
A.Has III** jirnjri 1 train klrnlifirtl anil
(F) Cownj-ity sat)sfacton is demonstrasd by ■ Does the project proactively address long­
term social, economic, or environmental
lending actions taken ncneerie A 8. C. and 0. 1. Documentation that the project team changes that imjjact quality of life?
the most recent community planning information and
7. Documentation of long-term social, economic, or environmental
assessed relevant community needs, goals, and/or issues. Tor
(6) The protect proactively cnonges/trenos tnot may impact community goals ana needs
example, meeting minutes with key stakeholders, co
leaders, ond decision makers; letters; ond memoranda. over time (e g , aging population, economic transitions, or
the aegroaoaon of the environment one ecosystem services).
Note tnat social, economic, ana environmental shifts ore
wffih the community in often connected. The degradation of the environment in
ensure a hi£i dually a coos lot community dependent on tourism ond fishing
of life over the lor* term.

6 ► DESCRIPTION
id affected cc
•I impact: ■e project
alily of-----
if life?
This credit addresses the extent to which a project contributes
to the quality of life of the host ond affected communities. I. Assessing identifying ond evaluating the positive ond negative
3 Dmumenluliun di
7 As this can be subjective, the credit criteria address how well social impacts of the project on affected communities' quaktyof
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT life leg. a social impoa assessment), expectations for the depth smart tong-term 1
ie project team has identified, assessed, and incorporated
community needs, goals, ond issues into the project. Relevant Improved: Tne project team can demonstrate an understanding ond breodth of documentation are commensurate with the scale
community plans arc assumed to be a viable expression or the community needs, goals, and issues, and communicate of the project ana its impact on the broader community, informal RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
of those needs, goals, objectives, ond aspirations. In a real now tne project meets or supports those goals. assessments ore acceptable for small projects, provided that Ql 1 7 Frlhaia e Public Heal I h A Safety
sense, they arc the community's desired quality of life. project teams present evidence supporting their conclusions.
enhanced: Communication ond interactions with community QL2.3 Improve Access & Wayfinding
Unfortunately, Infrastructure projects are often perceived stakeholders ore essential to reaffirm and improve the project h.Havr I la- affrt Ird t iirmnui.il irs brra meaningfully LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement
as Having negative Impacts on communities. This 'not In my objectives, l he project team works closely with community '■"gaged in identifying Imw llie piojn I merle
Imi t yard" (NIMBY) mentality «in In- oildirvwrd llimugli stakeholders to identify ond assess potential social impacts. . nmmuraty needs aralA.r grails? LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
Social impacts include the intended ond unintended social I. Documentation of processes for collecting, evaluating and I lit 1 Stimulate Fi nncmiit Pmsjrerily A Drvelnjim
tmntminily needy grails, and hum rraranunity uippnil consequences. Both positive and negative, of infrastructure incorporating community input into the planning and designCR2.S Maximize Resilience
ami engagement air uilkal In ensure Ihe ajijmiprialr and projects and any social changes Initiated By those projects. process le g , meetings, design charrettes. and communications
effective investment of resources in infrastructure. Project with representatives of affected communities!
teams ond owners should consider how aligning the project

1 
Credit Title and Identification Number 5 Levels of Achievement 8 Evaluation Criteria and
Includes the two-letter code Brief description of the requirements Documentation Guidance
identifying the category, and a necessary to meet each level of Specifies the questions that the project
number identifying the credit. achievement. Levels increase in their must address in order to meet the
contribution toward sustainability. requirements of a level of achievement.
2 Intent It also provides examples of the types
The purpose of the credit. 6 D
 escription of documents that may be submitted
Explanation of the sustainability for verification in order to demonstrate
3 M
 etrics issue addressed by the credit and its that requirements were met.
How the credit will be measured. significance in infrastructure projects.
9 R
 elated Envision Credits
4 Total Possible Points 7 Performance Improvement Envision credits which may share
Value of the highest level of achievement. Sets the benchmark for performance. documentation requirements, or may
It also provides general strategy for relate in a symbiotic way in order to meet
performance improvements. level of achievement requirements.

20 ENVISION V3
Envision Organization and Scoring

PROJECT SCORING Every infrastructure project impacts all five

Envision categories, often with complex trade-
Project performance is evaluated using a point
offs. For example, in an effort to avoid critical
system. Levels of achievement for each credit
habitats, projects may have to consume more
are assigned points weighted by three factors:
resources. Conversely, projects that reduce resource
1. The importance and impact of consumption may find they are also achieving the
the sustainability indicator; benefit of reducing harmful emissions. By grouping
2. The difficulty of the specific actions required; and the credits into broader categories of impact,
Envision helps users to navigate the complex
3. The demonstrable impact meeting
trade-offs or synergies across the credits.
the requirements will have.

Guidance is provided in each credit description LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

on how to determine the anticipated level of The Envision levels of achievement
achievement that may be attained by a given define the level and quality of project
project. Scores for each applicable credit are added performance in each credit as follows:
together to give the total Envision score. The final
Envision score is presented as a percentage of • Improved: Performance that is
the total achieved points compared to the total above conventional. Slightly exceeds
applicable points. Scores for each category are regulatory requirements.
always shown in order to emphasize the trade- • Enhanced: Sustainable performance that is
offs inherent in many project decisions. on the right track. There are indications that
superior performance is within reach.
CATEGORIES AND SUBCATEGORIES
• Superior: Sustainable performance
The Envision framework is comprised of 64
at a very high level.
sustainability indicators, called credits, that cover
the full dimensions of infrastructure sustainability. • Conserving: Performance that has achieved
Each credit in the Envision system includes an intent essentially zero negative impact.
statement and metric, levels of achievement, a • Restorative: Performance that restores
description, ways to improve performance, evaluation natural or social systems. Such performance
criteria and documentation guidance, and related receives the highest award possible and is
Envision credits. The credits are organized into five celebrated as such. The Restorative level is not
categories and 14 subcategories by subject matter. applicable to all performance objectives.

• Quality of Life: Wellbeing, Mobility, Community Not all credits have five levels of achievement. The
levels are determined by the nature of the credit
• Leadership: Collaboration, Planning, Economy
and the ability to make meaningful distinctions
• Resource Allocation: Materials, Energy, Water between levels. The level of achievement
• Natural World: Siting, Conservation, Ecology table clearly indicates the evaluation criteria
that must be addressed for each level.
• Climate and Resilience: Emissions, Resilience

ENVISION V3 21
 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND • Existing conditions or the existing
DOCUMENTATION system(s) the project will replace.

The evaluation criteria and documentation section • A seriously considered project alternative.
within each credit outline what is necessary to • Industry “standard practice” or existing
demonstrate that a level of achievement has been codes, standards, or regulatory requirements
met. Evaluation criteria, denoted by letters, include (e.g., for energy and water; greenhouse
both qualitative and quantitative requirements. gas and air pollution emissions).
All evaluation criteria are framed as questions, for
• A project of similar scope and size
which answers and supporting documentation
operating within the same geographical
(denoted by numbers beneath each evaluation
area or within a geographical area
criterion) needs to be provided if the project
with similar operating conditions.
submits for ISI’s third-party Envision verification
program. Examples of evaluation criteria are:
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
• Yes/No: An action taken or an outcome achieved Each Envision credit includes guidance on concrete
(e.g. the project is not located on sensitive sites). ways to incrementally improve performance
• Target: A specified outcome with above the baseline. Recognizing the leap in
discrete quantifiable levels (e.g. the achievement from “Improved” to “Restorative”,
project reduces energy use by 15%). each credit outlines the tangible steps, beginning
with how to get started. Guidance for performance
• Execution: A process conducted or a commitment
improvement is cumulative, such that successive
made to accomplish a stated objective (e.g.,
incremental steps become less of a leap to high
the project team has a comprehensive
performing projects. Text within the Performance
sustainability management plan in place).
Improvement section is not required for assessment
• Accomplishment: A process conducted but is intended to informally provide helpful
with a general or unspecified result (e.g. guidance and context for the evaluation.
the project team has ‘minimized’ the use of
fertilizers and pesticides on the project).
APPLICABILITY
BASELINES As a highly flexible and adaptable resource, Envision
recognizes that not all credits will be applicable to
A baseline references conventional performance
all projects or project types. Credits can be omitted
or “business-as-usual”. Many credits within the
from consideration by designating them as “not
Envision framework require the establishment
applicable”. This is reserved for cases where the
of a baseline against which to measure project
sustainability indicator addressed by the credit does
performance. Given Envision’s applicability to
not exist for the project. For example, on a project
all types and sizes of infrastructure projects,
that is entirely underground external light fixtures
and applicability across countries and regions,
would not exist and the project team would not be
baselines may vary regionally or even project to
able to assess credit QL1.5 Minimize Light Pollution.
project. Project teams must determine the most
In this example, the credit may be deemed “not
appropriate baseline for their project. In order to
applicable”. This means that the total point value
reach a level of achievement for any Envision credit,
associated with the credit is removed from the
projects must exceed the determined baseline.
total number of applicable points in the Envision
There are several options for identifying framework for the project. For projects pursuing
acceptable baselines. The following may be ISI’s third-party verification program, an explanation
used as baselines for measuring performance and supporting documentation as to why the
improvement (listed in order of preference): credit is not applicable to the project is required.

22 ENVISION V3
ENVISION POINTS TABLE
Improved Enhanced Superior Conserving Restorative Maximum Points
QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life 2 5 10 20 26
QL1.2 Enhance Public Health & Safety 2 7 12 16 20

Wellbeing
QL1.3 Improve Construction Safety 2 5 10 14 —
QL1.4 Minimize Noise & Vibration 1 3 6 10 12
QL1.5 Minimize Light Pollution 1 3 6 10 12
•w• QL1.6 Minimize Construction Impacts 1 2 4 8 —
■I
Mobility
QL2.1 Improve Community Mobility
QL2.2 Encourage Sustainable Transportation —
1 3
5
7
8
11
12
14
16
200
Quality of Life QL2.3 Improve Access & Wayfinding 1 5 9 14 —
QL3.1 Advance Equity & Social Justice 3 6 10 14 18

Community
QL3.2 Preserve Historic & Cultural Resources — 2 7 12 18
QL3.3 Enhance Views & Local Character 1 3 7 11 14
QL3.4 Enhance Public Space & Amenities 1 3 7 11 14
LD1.1 Provide Effective Leadership & Commitment 2 5 12 18 —
LD1.2 Foster Collaboration & Teamwork 2 5 12 18 —

m
Collaboration
LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement 3 6 9 14 18
LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies 3 6 12 14 18
LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan 4 7 12 18 —
Planning
LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring & Maintenance
4
2
6
5
9
8
12
12 —
16 182
Leadership LD2.4 Plan for End-of-Life 2 5 8 14 —
LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity & Development 3 6 12 20 —
Economy LD3.2 Develop Local Skills & Capabilities 2 4 8 12 16
LD3.3 Conduct a Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation 5 7 10 12 14
RA1.1 Support Sustainable Procurement Practices 3 6 9 12 —
RA1.2 Use Recycled Materials 4 6 9 16 —
Materials RA1.3 Reduce Operational Waste 4 7 10 14 —
RA1.4 Reduce Construction Waste 4 7 10 16 —
RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site 2 4 6 8 —
RA2.1 Reduce Operational Energy Consumption 6 12 18 26 —
RA2.2 Reduce Construction Energy Consumption 1 4 8 12 — 196

m
Energy
RA2.3 Use Renewable Energy 5 10 15 20 24
Resource RA2.4 Commission & Monitor Energy Systems 3 6 12 14 —
Allocation RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources 3 5 7 9 12
RA3.2 Reduce Operational Water Consumption 4 9 13 17 22
Water
RA3.3 Reduce Construction Water Consumption 1 3 5 8 —
RA3.4 Monitor Water Systems 1 3 6 12 —
NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value 2 6 12 16 22
NW1.2 Provide Wetland & Surface Water Buffers 2 5 10 16 20
Siting
NW1.3 Preserve Prime Farmland — 2 8 12 16
NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land 3 8 12 18 24
NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields 11 13 16 19 22
NW2.2 Manage Stormwater 2 4 9 17 24

©
Conservation
NW2.3 Reduce Pesticide & Fertilizer Impacts
NW2.4 Protect Surface & Groundwater Quality
1
2
2
5
5
9
9
14
12
20
232
Natural World NW3.1 Enhance Functional Habitats 2 5 9 15 18
NW3.2 Enhance Wetland & Surface Water Functions 3 7 12 18 20
Ecology NW3.3 Maintain Floodplain Functions 1 3 7 11 14
NW3.4 Control Invasive Species 1 2 6 9 12
NW3.5 Protect Soil Health — 3 4 6 8
CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon 5 10 15 20 —
Emissions CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions 8 13 18 22 26
CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions 2 4 9 14 18
CR2.1 Avoid Unsuitable Development 3 6 8 12 16
CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience
8
11
14
18
18
24
20
26
—
—
190
Climate and Resilience
CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies — 8 14 20 —
Resilience CR2.5 Maximize Resilience 11 15 20 26 —
CR2.6 Improve Infrastructure Integration 2 5 9 13 18
Maximum TOTAL Points 1,000

ENVISION V3 23
 The following are not acceptable justifications to think carefully about how strategies to
for deeming a credit ’not applicable’: achieve points in one credit may positively or
negatively impact achievement in another.
• The scope of a contract does not address the issue;

• Achieving the credit is deemed to be too INNOVATION

expensive, difficult, or time-consuming; The Envision framework strongly encourages
• Local laws or regulations prohibit innovative methods that advance sustainable
meeting the requirements; infrastructure practices or show exceptional
performance beyond the expectations of the
• Those conducting the Envision assessment
credit requirements. Each category includes an
do not have decision-making authority; or
“Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements” credit,
• Stakeholders have indicated that indicated by a “0.0”. Projects may achieve all or part
the issue is not a priority. of the points in these credits. The 0.0 credits are
In cases where local laws or regulations prohibit not required and these points act as bonus points
actions that would meet the credit requirements that are added to the category and total score.
project teams must comply with these laws and
Innovation credits include three options
regulations and pursue points in other credits.
to earn bonus points. The project team
However, conflicting local laws and regulations do
may submit for one or bundle multiple in a
not make the sustainability indicator nonexistent.
single category. The three options are:
For example, certain projects may be required by
regulations, or policies to use bright external lighting. • Innovation: Sustainability solutions that
This does not mean light pollution, or QL1.5 Minimize overcome significant problems, barriers,
Light Pollution, is not applicable to the project. and/or limitations or create scalable and/
or transferable solutions for the industry.
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
• Exceptional Performance: Performance
Many of the Envision credits are interrelated. Each in one or more credits that exceeds the
credit includes a list of potentially related credits, highest available level of achievement.
so the project team can leverage the synergies
created by these connections to improve the • Additional Aspects of Sustainability:
overall sustainability of their project. However, A sustainability indicator not already
for every project the interrelationship of credits included in the Envision framework.
may vary. Project teams are still encouraged

ENVISION VERIFICATION PATHWAYS

Pathway A: Design + Post-Construction

Post-
Create File Start Design
Register Award Construction Complete
Self Assess Verification Review
Review

Pathway B: Post-Construction

Post-
Create File Start
Register Construction Award Complete
Self Assess Verification
Review

24 ENVISION V3
Third-Party Verification and Award

ONLINE SCORESHEET primary responsibilities are to thoroughly review project

documentation submitted by the ENV SP, determine
The Envision Scoresheet is an online tool that allows
appropriate levels of achievement, and in cases where
project teams to collaboratively assess projects using
the verifier’s level of achievement selection differs from
Envision, upload documentation, describe key features
that of the ENV SP, provide guidance explaining their
of the project, and register the project for third-party
selection and what would be required to advance to a
verification. Scores are automatically tallied by credit
higher level of achievement. ISI staff provide oversight
category and for the whole project. An account is required
and quality control throughout the verification process.
to access the online scoresheet on ISI’s website.
Projects may choose to pursue verification either after
VERIFICATION PROCESS the design phase (at or after 95% design completion) or
Recognition is an important component of increasing after the construction phase (at or after 95% construction
awareness and initiating systemic change. ISI offers an optional completion). Projects pursuing verification after the design
third-party verification and awards program for recognizing phase will be required to complete an additional post-
sustainable project achievements. ISI’s independent construction review follow-up. In these cases, this post-
project verification program is a transparent process to construction review is required to maintain the Envision
confirm that a project meets Envision evaluation criteria. award earned after the design phase. The purpose
of the post-construction review is to validate that the
For projects seeking verification, users must provide a credit commitments made in the planning and design stages of
submittal for each credit being pursued. A credit submittal the project were carried through during construction.
includes both a narrative (or cover sheet), as well as supporting
documentation. The narrative must contain clear and direct Projects may choose to pursue one of
responses to the evaluation criteria required for the level of two verification pathways:
achievement being pursued. Supporting documentation—
• Path A: Design + Post-Construction
such as that described in the numbered items listed beneath
the evaluation criteria—also forms a crucial component of • Path B: Post-Construction
the credit submittal. Supporting documentation should be
referenced in the credit narrative, and relevant pages/sections
VERIFICATION AWARD LEVELS
should be annotated or highlighted for ease of reference.
To receive recognition, projects must achieve a minimum
The ENV SP, verifier, and ISI staff play central roles in the percentage of the total applicable Envision points.
verification process. The verifier is a qualified third-party Projects can be recognized at four award levels:
expert contracted by ISI. ISI hires verifiers from a range • Verified: 20%
of backgrounds to conduct peer reviews of infrastructure
• Silver: 30%
projects seeking formal recognition for their sustainable
attributes. Envision gives recognition to infrastructure • Gold: 40%
projects that make exemplary progress and contribute • Platinum: 50%
to a more sustainable future. To this end, the verifier’s

ENVISION V3 25
 "•

"V1
':»
J - »'»

S£i J

u >•'
r '?•* « 4N
* - ~~ - ■•- *
•r *.«• irj & .*-

¥
-V< mu ft* vr
.... .^ar

-dilillllH
v-V,'.

»T.
H? Uh. r. H'&ir*!!?-
v<
■

#tr
5*15
f
alt <-«.r

m i^-

9 , i
ii

ssrj> <? v,.

'--4
,’e
* 't1.
x.
■< ■»
■-
- r ,1 m . TV^4

M m m
»

%
3*
S';
I d.

fegR
•it ■'•It' . i.
-# X . , * V
!$ Sr*J

»S-- i,
I
-Tab

.. ■
SftB i m
*
i/
'
M. u
i mp-
:,r> -• r,i « r\
; •■; X'MhYb

$ //

d> ■*«

*
£
'.-
.,v<
m § 1
■■■

m :i» m .-,•;.. • - ?s ■ * > . ■K- m

 J&'it

Quality of Life
£ tJ«a

3! .(►>: ,♦

*■ *

- mil
MttgK u. m m
Ml/liMUliiMUDHii;

&
w. . ■-
-l ' - Quality of Life addresses a project’s impact on host
4 l..
«■ «.»•■-- Jt -

and affected communities, from the health and

if?-'a -
T-, wellbeing of individuals to the wellbeing of the larger
[TSLl . A social fabric as a whole. Quality of Life focuses
77
on assessing whether infrastructure projects
align with community goals, are incorporated into
?2U existing community networks, and will benefit the
community in the long term. Community members Til B
affected by the project are considered important
stakeholders in the decision-making process. The
category is further divided into three subcategories:
Wellbeing, Mobility, and Community.

6
■f ' '
rX-r.
a

14 / credits
*. ••<?t

•v: -

JV

Image
Historic Fourth Ward Park in Atlanta,
Georgia (Envision Gold, 2016)
 1 Does the project improve health and safety for the broader community?

2 Does the project preserve and enhance cultural resources?

3 Does the project meet the needs and goals of the community?

4 Does the project make a minimal negative impact on the surrounding community?

5 Was the development process fair, equitable, and inclusive?

6 Is the project located near public transportation?

2 3 4

*i
-M

y** > is m*r

■*>

,.Rf
■^ •“ I 5
6

■am

WELLBEING MOBILITY COMMUNITY

As integral parts of the community, This subcategory addresses the project’s It is important that the project maintain or
sustainable infrastructure projects impact on transportation in and around enhance strong and cohesive communities.
address individual comfort, safety and the community. Attention is given to While infrastructure primarily is driven
health. During construction and operation, encouraging sustainable modes of by engineering parameters, its impact
physical safety of workers and residents transportation and incorporating the on equity, culture, and the community
are ensured and nuisances minimized project with the larger community fabric should also be considered
(including light pollution, noise, and mobility network. Infrastructure owners during design and construction. While
vibration). These components align to are encouraged to enable access and the qualities and boundaries of what
heighten the community experience. mobility to enhance community livability. constitutes the affected community may
vary depending on whether the project
is located in a rural or urban setting
it is always important to consider the
project’s collective impact on society.

28 ENVISION V3
©

Quality of Life

WELLBEING
QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life
QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
QL1.3 Improve Construction Safety
QL1.4 Minimize Noise and Vibration
QL1.5 Minimize Light Pollution
QL1.6 Minimize Construction Impacts

MOBILITY
QL2.1 Improve Community Mobility and Access
QL2.2 Encourage Sustainable Transportation
QL2.3 Improve Access and Wayfinding

COMMUNITY
QL3.1 Advance Equity and Social Justice
QL3.2 Preserve Historic and Cultural Resources
QL3.3 Enhance Views and Local Character
QL3.4 Enhance Public Space and Amenities

QL0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

ENVISION V3 29
 QUALITY OF LIFE: WELLBEING

QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life

■

INTENT METRIC

26 Improve the net quality of life of all

communities affected by the project and
mitigate negative impacts to communities.
Measures taken to assess community
needs and improve quality of life while
minimizing negative impacts.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F A+B+C+D+E+F+G

(2) Community (5) Community Linkages (10) Broad Community (20) Holistic Assessment (26) Protecting The Future
Considerations Alignment & Collaboration

(A) The project team identifies and takes into account community needs, goals, and issues. For example, the project team has located and
reviewed the most recent community planning information and assessed relevant community needs, goals, and/or issues.
(B) The project meets or supports community needs and/or goals.

(C) The project assesses the social impacts it will have on the host and affected communities’ quality of life.
(D) The affected communities are meaningfully engaged in identifying how the project supports community needs and/or goals.

(E) Based on the social assessment, potential negative impacts on the host or nearby affected communities
are mitigated following a hierarchy that prioritizes avoidance, minimization, restoration, and offsetting.

(F) Community satisfaction is demonstrated by

feedback from the stakeholder engagement process
verifying actions taken in criteria A, B, C, and D.

(G) The project proactively

addresses trends in changing
social, economic, and/or
environmental conditions
within the community in
order to ensure a high quality
of life over the long term.

DESCRIPTION with community goals reduces the risk of community

conflicts that disrupt project delivery and increase cost.
This credit addresses the extent to which a project contributes
to the quality of life of the host and affected communities.
As this can be subjective, the credit criteria address how well
the project team has identified, assessed, and incorporated
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
community needs, goals, and issues into the project. Relevant Improved: The project team can demonstrate an understanding
community plans are assumed to be a viable expression of the community needs, goals, and issues, and communicate
of those needs, goals, objectives, and aspirations. In a real how the project meets or supports those goals.
sense, they are the community’s desired quality of life.
Enhanced: Communication and interactions with community
Unfortunately, infrastructure projects are often perceived stakeholders are essential to reaffirm and improve the project
as having negative impacts on communities. This “not in my objectives. The project team works closely with community
back yard” (NIMBY) mentality can be addressed through stakeholders to identify and assess potential social impacts.
active engagement and the proper alignment of projects with Social impacts include the intended and unintended social
community needs, goals, and issues. Community support consequences, both positive and negative, of infrastructure
and engagement are critical to ensure the appropriate and projects and any social changes initiated by those projects.
effective investment of resources in infrastructure. Project
teams and owners should consider how aligning the project

30 ENVISION V3
Superior: Infrastructure projects often include difficult trade- E. Has the project team addressed negative social impacts?
offs involving positive and negative impacts, and a project 1. Evidence showing the extent to which options for mitigating
designed to benefit one community may have adverse negative impacts were identified and prioritized, and reasonable
effects on others. In addition, the needs of a community may changes to the project made. Strategies for mitigating
conflict with their expressed goals. Because positive impacts negative impacts should follow a hierarchy prioritizing
in all dimensions of performance may not be possible, the avoidance, minimization, restoration, and offsetting.
credit seeks a net positive impact. Importantly, the project
benefits and impacts should be equitably distributed
F. Are the affected communities satisfied that
throughout the host and affected communities.
the project addresses their needs and goals
as well as mitigates negative impacts?
Conserving: Community satisfaction is the metric for
quality of life. It should be evident that the community 1. Acknowledgments and endorsements by the community that the
truly understands the full impact (positive and negative) design participation process was helpful and that their input was
of the project and is satisfied that it addresses their needs appropriately assessed and incorporated into project design.
and goals while appropriately mitigating negative impacts.
2. Documentation of input and agreement from key stakeholders,
Documentation of community endorsement should be as broad
community leaders, and/or decision makers regarding the
as possible and specific to the requested documentation.
impact assessment and planned action(s) (e.g., community
satisfaction surveys, interviews with representatives of
Restorative: The project team proactively identifies
affected communities, comments and reactions from social
instances where long-term trends in socioeconomic
media platforms). Specific statements about critical issues
or environmental conditions may undermine existing
or actions taken within the project are better indicators
community aspirations and addresses them in the project.
of a true understanding of the project’s impacts than
Applicability: It is likely that all projects have the ability general endorsements of the project as a whole. Evidence of
to align project objectives with community needs and community satisfaction and endorsement of plans includes:
goals, identified through active engagement, in order to a. Community endorsement of the project team’s
achieve broad community satisfaction. It would therefore assessment of their needs or goals per criterion A.
be difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not relevant b. Community endorsement that the project as proposed
or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award. will address their needs or goals per criterion B.
c. Documentation that the community understands and
accepts potential impacts of the project per criterion C.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
d. Community endorsement of project strategies to
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
mitigate negative impacts per criterion D.
A. Has the project team identified and taken into
G. Does the project proactively address long-
account community needs, goals, and issues?
term social, economic, or environmental
1. Documentation that the project team has located and reviewed changes that impact quality of life?
the most recent community planning information and
1. Documentation of long-term social, economic, or environmental
assessed relevant community needs, goals, and/or issues. For
changes/trends that may impact community goals and needs
example, meeting minutes with key stakeholders, community
over time (e.g., aging population, economic transitions, or
leaders, and decision makers; letters; and memoranda.
the degradation of the environment and ecosystem services).
Note that social, economic, and environmental shifts are
B. Does the project meet or support the needs and
often connected. The degradation of the environment in
goals of the host and/or affected communities?
a coastal community dependent on tourism and fishing
1. Evidence showing a comparison of the project vision and negatively impacts the economy, which can lead to social
goals to the needs, goals, and/or issues of the community. impacts such as shrinking population. Consequently,
the quality of life of the community is put at risk.
C. Has the project team assessed the social impacts the project
2. Documentation demonstrating how the project will
will have on the host and affected communities’ quality of life?
proactively address one or more of these changes/trends.
1. Assessing, identifying and evaluating the positive and negative
social impacts of the project on affected communities’ quality of 3. Documentation demonstrating how the project represents a
life (e.g., a social impact assessment). Expectations for the depth smart long-term investment for the community’s future.
and breadth of documentation are commensurate with the scale
of the project and its impact on the broader community. Informal RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
assessments are acceptable for small projects, provided that
QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
project teams present evidence supporting their conclusions.
QL2.3 Improve Access and Wayfinding
D. Have the affected communities been meaningfully LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement
engaged in identifying how the project meets
community needs and/or goals? LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities

1. Documentation of processes for collecting, evaluating, and LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
incorporating community input into the planning and design CR2.5 Maximize Resilience
process (e.g., meetings, design charrettes, and communications
with representatives of affected communities).

ENVISION V3 31
 QUALITY OF LIFE: WELLBEING

QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety

■

INTENT METRIC

20 Protect and enhance community health

and safety during operation.
Measures taken to increase safety and
provide health benefits on the project
site, surrounding sites, and the broader
POINTS
community in a just and equitable manner.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F

(2) Understanding Impacts (7) Prioritizing (12) Improving (16) Shared Benefits (20) Protecting
Risk Reduction Health & Safety Communities

(A) The project meets all health and/or safety regulations and laws for operation.
(B) The project includes health and/or safety improvements beyond minimum requirements established by regulations and laws.

(C) The project improves health and/or safety for its immediate surroundings.

(D) The project demonstrates a net positive impact on health and/

or safety for the host or affected communities.

(E) The health and safety benefits and/or negative impacts

are equitably distributed within affected communities,
and the project team can demonstrate that the project
does not disproportionately burden one community
over another (i.e., social/environmental justice).

(F) The project provides

critical infrastructure services
to communities experiencing,
or at risk of experiencing,
imminent, negative health and/
or personal safety impacts

DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

Any Envision project must meet all safety and health regulations Documentation for this credit may include actions taken
as required by law. This credit recognizes the opportunities many in compliance with existing local, state/provincial, or
projects have to exceed minimum regulatory requirements, federal regulations or laws. However, to achieve points
or to improve health and/or safety within a project or for this credit, projects must first demonstrate that they
community in other ways. The credit assesses the degree to include health and/or safety improvements beyond
which infrastructure projects contribute to increased safety minimum requirements for project operations.
and health benefits on the project site, surrounding sites,
and the broader community. Envision does not in any way Improved: Envision assesses sustainable performance beyond
replace, supersede, or create exceptions for existing local, conventional practice. Therefore, meeting all applicable laws and
state/provincial, or national health and safety regulations. regulations is an overarching prerequisite. This credit requires
projects to demonstrate compliance in order to highlight the
Project teams and owners should consider how improving the value of these actions and to distinguish actions taken above
safety and health benefits of the project, its surroundings, and and beyond minimum requirements. The improved level focuses
the broader community, and communicating these benefits primarily on the scope of impact within the project boundary.
to stakeholders, can help combat negative perceptions that
lead to conflicts and project delays (e.g.,“NIMBY”). Enhancing Enhanced: Health and safety improvements expand from an
and emphasizing positive health and safety benefits can help internal focus to include the immediate surroundings. Examples
change public perception about the value of infrastructure. include features to improve safety when entering and exiting

32 ENVISION V3
the site; efforts to decrease violence and/or vandalism; and C. Does the project include health and safety
actions taken to prevent spills or local contamination. improvements for the immediate surroundings?
1. Index of health and safety improvements identifying
Superior: Health and safety improvements benefit improvements to the project’s immediate surroundings (e.g.,
not only the immediate surroundings but the broader protected areas or elevated walkways for pedestrians, clear
community, such as improving air quality and water quality, lines of sight to traffic, improved lighting, etc.). Improvements
providing access to walking and biking trails, removing or may include risk reduction strategies. Note that siting
repairing infrastructure at risk of failure, and more. the project to avoid or minimize risks to the immediate
surroundings may be included. However, documentation
Conserving: Project teams cannot always eliminate risks to
must demonstrate these siting decisions were intentional.
health and safety, but they can demonstrate that both the
benefits and exposure to risks associated with the project
are distributed in a fair and equitable manner and that one D. Does the project include health and safety improvements
community is not disproportionately burdened over another. for the broader host or affected communities?
When there is resistance to the placement of infrastructure 1. Index of health and safety improvements identifying
within a region due to potential or perceived negative impacts, improvements to the broader host or affected communities (e.g.,
it is often those communities least able or least empowered reduced pollution in surface waters, higher water quality, better
to voice their concerns that eventually receive the burden. air quality, access to healthy activities, access to health services,
Project teams and infrastructure owners should carefully etc.). Note that siting the project to avoid or minimize risks to the
guard against following this path of least resistance. broader affected communities may be included. Examples may
also include the project’s ability to reduce external risks (e.g., a
Restorative: Projects provide relief or critical infrastructure park that can be used for flood control). However, documentation
services to communities experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, must demonstrate these decisions were intentional.
imminent, negative health and/or personal safety impacts. This
is where existing conditions have dropped below minimum E. Can the project team demonstrate that health and
standards for health or safety. Examples include communities safety risks and impacts are not disproportionately
where drinking water quality has reached unhealthy levels, borne by one community over another?
where bridges are at imminent risk of collapse, or where critical
1. Documentation demonstrating that health and safety
infrastructure services are not available or no longer functioning.
risks and impacts are not disproportionately borne by
Applicability: It is likely that all projects, large and small, have a community. Examples may include site maps showing
the ability to positively impact health and/or safety in some way. areas of risk or impact overlaid with key demographic
Safety actions can be relative to the scale of the project, from data. This evaluation should consider historic factors of
repainting a crosswalk to preventing major chemical spills. It equity and social justice within the project context. This is
would therefore be difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not also commonly referred to as “environmental justice.”
relevant or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award. 2. Documentation that mitigation measures were proportionately
distributed to communities most impacted by the project.

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND F. Will the project provide critical infrastructure services
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE to communities experiencing, or at risk of experiencing,
imminent negative health and/or personal safety impacts?
A. Does the project meet all health and safety 1. Documentation of how the community is currently
regulations and laws for operations? experiencing or is at risk of experiencing health and/
1. Documentation that the design and operation of the or safety impacts (e.g., contaminated drinking water).
project are, or will be, compliant with all relevant
2. Documentation of how the project will provide the critical
health and safety regulations and laws.
infrastructure services necessary to resolve, or significantly reduce,
the impacts. The scale of impact must be at the community level
B. Has the project exceeded minimum legal health and safety
and commensurate with the scope and size of the project. Projects
requirements as established by regulations and laws?
cannot receive the Restorative level for eliminating or reducing
1. Documentation of actions taken, beyond what is minimally health and/or safety impacts solely within the project boundary.
required by law, to improve health and/or safety during project
operations. Project teams may include cases where the project
owner has implemented policies that exceed regulations.
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
Note that siting the project to avoid or minimize risks to QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life
health or safety may be included. However, documentation QL2.2 Encourage Sustainable Transportation
must demonstrate these siting decisions were intentional.
QL2.3 Improve Access and Wayfinding
2. Index of health and safety improvements identifying
QL3.1 Advance Equity and Social Justice
improvements to project operations.
NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields
3. Project teams may choose to include a detailed narrative of
decision making focused on critical health and safety risks NW2.3 Reduce Pesticide and Fertilizer Impacts
that represent the largest or most likely potential impacts NW2.4 Protect Surface and Groundwater Quality
for the project, supported by more general documentation
indicating how project features reduce these risks. CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions
CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies

ENVISION V3 33
 QUALITY OF LIFE: WELLBEING

QL1.3 Improve Construction Safety

■

INTENT METRIC

14 Enhance public and worker

safety during construction.
Commitments and measures to monitor
safety, provide feedback mechanisms,
train personnel, establish security plans,
POINTS
and make health programs available.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E Not Available

(2) Commitment to Safety (5) Risk Analysis, (10) Safe Work Practices (14) Health Beyond the Site
Training and Security and a Secure Site

(A) The owner and general contractor/construction manager have made strong commitments
to monitor and improve health and safety for onsite construction operations.
(B) The project execution plan requires internal documentation that tracks health and safety
performance and corrects deficiencies or promotes best practices during construction.

(C) Contractor implements safety and/or security competency training for all field personnel.
Contractor or owner provides minimum training requirements for health and safety programs.

(D) The owner and contractor have a specific

site and project security plan.
The plan includes physical security as well as
information security when appropriate.
The contractor provides minimum training requirements.

(E) The owner or contractor

provides programs that
promote health and well-
being, such as free health
screenings or workshops.

DESCRIPTION Days Away, Restrictions, or Transfers (DART) rates are a

mathematical calculation of the number of recordable incidents
This credit addresses the critical goal of improving health and
per 100 full-time employees that resulted in lost or restricted days
safety practices during construction. Having and promoting a
or job transfer due to work-related injuries or illnesses. From this
common focus on health and safety throughout the construction
data, many leading construction companies find that the return on
industry has benefits that extend beyond the individual project.
investment for implementing better health and safety standards is
Improved construction safety can also have benefits beyond the higher than the cost and lost time associated with job site incidents.
protection of health and human life. Companies that have a record
in job site safety attract better employees, have higher retention
rates, and are more competitive in the marketplace. The rigor of PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
applying, training, and adhering to health and safety procedures The levels of achievement for this credit address safety procedures
can also increase productivity by standardizing job site activities. for onsite workers, personnel training and development, and
site and information security. These themes not only protect the
Enhanced health and safety practices are encouraged beyond men and women working on the site, they help to maintain safe
industry norms. However, a novel approach may introduce risks and secure operations of the asset and provide a foundation
that were not present prior to instituting the new program or for proper operations and maintenance of the facility.
technology. Project teams should conduct hazard analyses and
develop construction safety plans to address risks associated Improved: Improved safety begins with commitment at the highest
with using new materials, technologies, and/or methodologies. levels and a plan to implement improvements, track performance,
and correct deficiencies. There are clearly documented efforts

34 ENVISION V3
 to assess onsite hazards and implement preve
ntative solutions, 2. Documentation of minimum training requirement
leveraging technology to identify and assess s for health and
hazards and safety programs such as occupational safety and
improving the health and well-being of the indus health, first aid,
try’s workforce. CPR, emergency response, active shooter trainin
g, or equivalent.
Enhanced: Education and training are critica
l to
achiev ing increased safety performance. D. Does the project include a comprehensive
security plan to
protect workers, the public , and sensitive
information?
Superior: Safety plans include the site and inform 1. Documentation that the owner and contractor
ation security. have a specif ic
site and projec t security plan. This plan may includ
Conserving: Consideration for health and safety e, but is
extends not limited to, contractor background checks on
beyond immediate job site hazards and consid personnel
ers working on the projec t, and 24-hour security monit
the broader health and well-being of workers. oring on
the projec t (physical/electronic). The security plan
should
be appropriate to the size and scope of the projec
Applicability : All projec ts that include constructio t.
n have
the ability to positi vely impac t construction 2. For small projec ts (under $5 million in cost),
safety. It would
therefore be difficult to demonstrate that the owner s and contractors may substitute genera
credit is not l site
relevant or applicable to a projec t seeking an security policies for the site-specific plan.
Envision award.

E. Does the project include health and/or well-b

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND eing programs?
1. Documentation that the projec t provides health
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE or well-being programs beyond the specif ic activit
and/
ies
associated with projec t delivery. This may includ
A. Have the project owner and contractor (GC/C e, but is
M) made strong not limited to, health screenings for workers, nutriti
commitments to monitoring and improving on
health and safety? or exercise workshops, and/or free vaccinations
.
1. Documentation that owner s and contractors
implemented a proac tive safety rewards progra RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
m
to support outstanding safety performance.
QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
2. Documentation that the contractors developed
a program/ LD3.2 Develop Local Skills and Capabilities
requirement s to ensure that their subcontractors
maintain a high level of safety per the contract.
3. Documentation that the contractor’s senior
managers are
engaged in the projec t safety program and condu
ct safety
observations and inspec tions as part of their standa
rd duties .
PROJECT EXAMPLE: BOS TON LANDING STAT
4. Documentation through commitments ION
that safety is a core concern. The construction of the Boston Landing Statio
n (Envision
Silver, 2017) in Brighton, Massachusetts requir
ed a fair amount
B. Does the project include reliable feedback of “foul time” work to be performed. “Foul time”
mechanisms occur s when
to identify risks, conduct hazard analyses, work is within 15 feet of active track. For safety
and reasons, work
communicate hazards to personnel? within this distance from the track must halt
until trains pass.
1. Documentation that the owner and contractors Upon further study, the contractor developed
developed a a safer approach
proac tive investigative process that focuses on to perform station construction: by temporarily
root cause and relocating
correc tive actions vs. disciplinary actions and track, foul time was reduced, and worker safety
financial penalties. enhanced.
2. Documentation that contractors have a proac
tive injury
management system that supports efficient, effecti
ve and
timely treatment of their employees injured on
the job site.
3. Documentation that owner s and contractors
have
r
an incident review process that involves all levels
of
management to validate correc tive measures to nnYpqnnnii1
minimize
future injuries and incidents on the job site llVIlllIIflllfllll!
4. Documentation that contractors develop “lesso
ns learned” report s
that allow other contractors and projec ts the oppor
tunity to
review the fact-finding of an incident and implem
ent processes
and procedures to minimize similar incidents on
the job site.

C. Does the project include safety or secur

ity
training requirements for personnel?
1. Documentation of safety and/or security compe
tency
training programs, either online or in person, for
field
personnel, including type of training provided
and how they
specif ically target health and safety. Training may * -mill
include
task-specific safety training or general awareness
training.

ENVISION V3 35
 QUALITY OF LIFE: WELLBEING

QL1.4 Minimize Noise and Vibration

■

INTENT METRIC

12 Minimize noise and vibrations

during operations to maintain and
improve community livability.
The extent that operational noise and
vibration is assessed and mitigated,
and target levels achieved.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E

(1) Noise Assessment (3) Target Noise Levels (6) Stakeholder Support (10) No Noise Increase (12) Noise Reductions

(A) The project team assesses the potential for operational noise impacts on the surrounding community and/or environment. This
assessment occurs when applicable vibrations are considered as a potential source of noise and/or disruption.
(B) Strategies are implemented to mitigate noise and/or vibrations during operations. Noise reduction follows a mitigation hierarchy
of avoidance/source elimination, minimization, abatement/receiver reduction, and offsetting/compensation.

(C) The project adopts existing, or works with the community to set, target project noise levels for the impacted community

(D) The stakeholder engagement process demonstrates community awareness of targets (i.e.
criterion C), mitigation strategies (i.e. criterion B), and noise impacts (i.e. criterion A).

(E) Noise reduction strategies (E) Noise reduction strategies

and controls are sufficient and controls are sufficient
to not increase noise within to reduce noise within the
the surrounding community surrounding community
beyond existing conditions. beyond existing conditions.

DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

This credit addresses noise and vibrations during project Improved: The project team assesses the impact of
operations. Credit QL1.6 Minimize Construction Impacts addresses operational noise and implements siting strategies and/
construction-related noise and vibrations. “Noise” is defined as or structural controls to minimize noise and/or vibrations.
an unwanted or disturbing sound. It becomes unwanted when When applicable, project teams should consider vibrations
it interferes with normal activities or diminishes quality of life. as a potential source of noise transmission. Mitigation
measures may include, for example, the use of soundproofing
Noise is a common complaint against a wide variety of or noise barriers, relocating sources away from populated
infrastructure projects. Noise can have significant negative areas, or pavements designed to reduce traffic noise.
health effects, including hearing impairment, hypertension,
and sleep disturbance. It can also reduce performance in Enhanced: The project team moves beyond unilateral
cognitive tasks. Residential property values may be improved implementation of noise controls and works with impacted
as a result of reduced ambient noise levels. Noise pollution stakeholders to establish or adopt existing target noise levels.
can also interfere with animal communication, predator-prey
relations, and mating habits, particularly among birds. Superior: Stakeholder engagement in noise mitigation is
comprehensive in terms of understanding noise sources, targets,
Addressing operational noise is an important step for and the choices and potential consequences of mitigation
incorporating infrastructure into communities and the measures (e.g.., a large sound barrier vs. source reduction).
environment. This is particularly true during stakeholder
engagement to demonstrate that community concerns are being Conserving: The project team eliminates or
heard. Setting noise reduction targets can often provide an completely mitigates noise impacts.
impetus to consider creative and innovative alternative solutions.
Restorative: The project involves actively removing
an existing source of noise or implements new
controls that reduce existing noise levels.

36 ENVISION V3
Applicability: Consideration is given to whether the project will C. Does the project set or adopt target noise levels?
have any operational noise. Noises generated by activities induced 1. Documentation that the project has adopted or set target noise
by the project, such as cars on roads, pedestrians in parks, and levels for communities potentially affected by project noise.
trucks accessing facilities, are applicable to this credit. Projects
that do not include any operational noise may apply to have this 2. Evidence that noise generated as a result of the project will
credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation. not exceed the target noise levels for impacted communities.
Note that these targets are the maximum acceptable noise
levels for the receiving communities (people or animals)
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND and should include existing ambient noise levels.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
D. Has the project team engaged impacted stakeholders
A. Has the project team assessed the potential for on issues of noise and vibration impacts,
operational noise impacts on the surrounding mitigation strategies, and target levels?
community and/or environment? 1. Evidence of community engagement in understanding
1. Index of all potential noise generation sources noise impacts and the development of operational
related to the project, including the potential for noise targets and mitigation strategies.
noise-generating vibrations when applicable.
E. To what extent will the project maintain
2. Assessment of impacts generated as a result of the project noise or reduce existing noise levels?
and vibrations. This should include, when applicable, increased
1. Analyses and documentation of baseline and anticipated
vehicle or pedestrian noise generated as a result of the project.
operational noise and vibration levels. In certain cases,
This should also include potential noise-generating vibrations.
project teams may demonstrate why a baseline noise level is
not necessary in order to determine credit achievement.
B. To what extent has the project mitigated noise
generated as a result of the project? 2. Documentation that mitigation measures implemented
1. Documentation of all noise mitigation measures used on the project are sufficient to have no noticeable (to
throughout the project. Examples may include drawings and the human ear) noise increase within the surrounding
specifications indicating equipment is inherently quieter than community beyond existing conditions.
typical (e.g., electric motors rather than combustion engines) or OR
equipment has been modified to reduce noise and vibrations
at their source. Noise mitigation may include a variety of Documentation that mitigation measures implemented on the
strategies, including but not limited to minimizing noise project are sufficient to noticeably (to the human ear) reduce noise
generation, siting to reduce noise impacts, natural vegetation within the surrounding community beyond existing conditions.
and landscaping buffers, and/or structural controls.
2. Narrative explaining how mitigation measures follow a RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
hierarchy that prioritizes avoidance, minimization, source LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement
abatement, receptor abatement, and compensation/offsetting. RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site
NW3.1 Enhance Functional Habitats

PROJECT EXAMPLE:
EXPO 2 LIGHT RAIL EXTENSION
Several sound recording studios operate in close proximity
to the Expo 2 Light Rail Extension project (Envision Platinum,
2017). Located in California, the project connects downtown
Los Angeles to Santa Monica. The project team identified
and applied non-standard technology to minimize the
Vv impact of sound decibels and vibration levels that light rail
trains emit through the track system that would negatively
impact studio operations. The specialized track was
constructed using spring elements under the floating track
bed. This allows noise and vibration to dissipate horizontally
across the track, rather than vertically, which impacts
n. the quality of the sound recordings in nearby studios.
dd ©

ENVISION V3 37
 QUALITY OF LIFE: WELLBEING

QL1.5 Minimize Light Pollution

■

INTENT METRIC

12 Reduce backlight, uplight, and glare without

jeopardizing safety during operations.
Lighting meets backlight, uplight, and
glare requirements for lighting zones.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+E A+E+F

(1) Light Pollution (3) Master Lighting Plan (6) Eliminating Uplight (10) Backlight, Uplight, (12) Night Sky Restoration
Reduction and Glare Reduction

(A) The project identifies lighting needs and sensitive community and environmental areas potentially impacted by light pollution during operations.

(B) The project reduces light pollution following a mitigation hierarchy

of avoidance, minimization, protection, and offsetting.

(C) The project implements a master lighting

plan establishing lighting zones.
For each zone, the plan outlines lighting goals, safety and
security needs, specifies environmental conservation,
and reduces lighting when no longer needed.

(D) Light emission beyond 90 (E) All project lighting meets backlight, uplight, and glare
degrees is prevented. All project requirements according to IES BUG rating standards.
lighting meets BUG rating
uplight requirements with no
light emitted above 90 degrees.

(F) The project involves

the removal or retrofitting
of existing lighting so as to
significantly reduce (>10%)
overall existing lighting.

DESCRIPTION exterior light directed upward into the sky because of

inappropriate lighting represents a massive waste of energy.
This credit follows the guidelines of the Model Lighting
Ordinance issued by the International Dark-Sky Association
Well-designed lighting can maintain adequate light levels on
and the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) of North
the ground while reducing light pollution by using lighting more
America. The Model Lighting Ordinance outdoor lighting
efficiently. Many cities and communities may be using more
template utilizes the IES TM-15-11 “BUG” (Backlight, Uplight,
light than is necessary and could benefit from a lighting-needs
and Glare) classification of outdoor lighting fixtures and is
audit and assessment. By directing light only to where it is
designed to help municipalities develop outdoor lighting
needed, project lighting can be more efficient and save costs.
standards that reduce glare, light trespass, and skyglow.

High levels of ambient light are undesirable for humans from

both an aesthetic and health perspective. Light pollution has
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
the potential to disrupt circadian rhythms and human sleep Improved: The Model Lighting Ordinance methodology includes
patterns, which may have numerous health implications. Light five lighting zones (LZ) to classify land use with appropriate
spillage also disturbs nocturnal animals and interferes with lighting levels. Project teams should identify potential impacts
sensitive environments, including open space, wilderness and reduce light pollution. Activities at this level can be informal.
parks and preserves, areas near astronomical observatories,
and other light-sensitive habitats. Finally, the cumulative

38 ENVISION V3
Enhanced: Lighting assessment is formalized and light Whereas criterion B may include isolated efforts to reduce light
pollution reduction strategies are coordinated and pollution, the intent of criterion C is to incorporate these actions
comprehensive. However, it is not required to demonstrate under a more comprehensive review of lighting needs in order to
total compliance with the ordinances IES TM-15-111 maximize performance.
“BUG” (Backlight, Uplight, and Glare) requirements.
D. Will luminaires prevent light emission above 90 degrees?
Superior: The project helps to preserve the night sky by
1. Location and type of each luminaire.
meeting the uplight requirements that limit lighting to below
90 degrees. This is considered an effective option for projects 2. Documentation that each luminaire type
where safety concerns do not permit lower light levels. restricts light to below 90 degrees.

Conserving: The project complies with the ordinance

E. Do all project lights meet backlight, uplight, and glare
requirements for backlight, uplight, and glare. As an industry
(BUG) requirements for their respective lighting zones?
standard, these ratings are often readily available by
suppliers and manufacturers. However, it is also acceptable 1. Location and BUG rating for each luminaire. If luminaires do
for project teams to submit their own BUG calculations. not have a BUG rating, projects may also provide calculations
demonstrating that luminaires meet BUG requirements for
Restorative: The project team eliminates or retrofits backlight, uplight, and glare based on IES and IDA standards.
preexisting sources of light pollution.
2. Worksheet demonstrating that BUG ratings
meet lighting zone requirements.
Applicability: This credit is not applicable if projects do not
include any exterior lighting. Certain types of projects may be
required to use lighting that is incompatible with the credit F. Does the project involve the removal or retrofitting of existing
requirements. This is not considered an acceptable reason lighting so as to significantly reduce overall existing lighting?
for designating the credit as not applicable. Projects that 1. Documentation that existing lighting will be removed or
are unable to demonstrate achievement in this credit are retrofitted as a result of the project. Significant reductions are
encouraged to pursue higher performance in other credits. generally considered to be greater than 10% of total lighting.

RELATED ENVISION CREDITS

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
QL3.3 Enhance Views and Local Character
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
RA2.1 Reduce Operational Energy Consumption
A. Has the project team conducted an assessment of NW3.1 Enhance Functional Habitats
lighting needs and impacts for the project?
1. A site map indicating lighting needs and potential impacts on
the project site and surrounding areas. Site map specifically
identifies populated areas and natural habitats.
2. Assessment of how lighting may impact people,
flora, and/or fauna in the area.

B. To what extent has the project implemented

Backlight Rating LZ 0 LZ 1 LZ 2 LZ 3 LZ 4
strategies to reduce light pollution?
1. Documentation indicating that light pollution Mounting height (MH) to property line and properly oriented
reduction strategies were assessed and considered > 2 MH B1 B3 B4 B5 B5
according to the following prioritization: 1-2 MH B1 B2 B3 B4 B4
a. Avoidance: identifying where lighting may not be needed.
0.5-1 MH B0 B1 B2 B3 B3
b. Minimization: determining the minimum lighting necessary
< 0.5 MH B0 B0 B0 B1 B2
to meet safety and performance requirements.
c. Protection: restricting light spillage to sensitive areas
Uplight Rating LZ 0 LZ 1 LZ 2 LZ 3 LZ 4
or directing light only to where it is needed.
d. Offsetting: compensating for lighting in one location Allowed Uplight Rating U0 U1 U2 U3 U4
by removing lighting in another location. Allowed % light emission above
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
90° for street or area lighting.
2. Site map indicating location and type of
each lighting strategy deployed.
Glare Rating LZ 0 LZ 1 LZ 2 LZ 3 LZ 4
C. Has the project developed a lighting plan Allowed Glare Rating G0 G1 G2 G3 G4
establishing lighting zones? Reduced Allowed Glare by mounting height (MH)*
1. A lighting plan for the project including the establishment 1-2 MH G0 G0 G1 G1 G2
of lighting zones, with each zone addressing at minimum
the following: lighting goals; safety and security 0.5-1 MH G0 G0 G0 G1 G1
needs; environmental conservation; energy efficiency; < 0.5 MH G0 G0 G0 G0 G1
and reducing lighting when no longer needed.
* Reduced allowed glare for any luminaire not mounted with its backlight perpendicular to any property line within
2x the mounting height.

ENVISION V3 39
 QUALITY OF LIFE: WELLBEING

QL1.6 Minimize Construction Impacts

■

INTENT METRIC

8 Minimize or eliminate the temporary

inconveniences associated with construction.
Extent of issues addressed through
construction management plans.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A + (B, C, D or E) A + (B, C, D or E) A + (B, C, D or E) + F A+B+C+D+E+F Not Available

(1) Initial Management Plan (2) Expanded Plan (4) Stakeholder Feedback (8) Complete Plan

(A) The project team implements a construction management plan or policies to address the temporary inconveniences
associated with construction. The plan or policies are informed by stakeholder engagement.

(B, C, D, or E) The (B, C, D, or E) The (B, C, D, or E) The (B, C, D, and E) The

management plan addresses management plan addresses management plan addresses management plan addresses
one (1) type of construction two (2) types of construction three (3) types of construction four (4) types of construction
impact: noise, safety/ impacts: noise, safety/ impacts: noise, safety/ impacts: noise, safety/
wayfinding, access/ wayfinding, access/ wayfinding, access/ wayfinding, access/
mobility, or lighting, mobility, or lighting, mobility, or lighting, mobility, and lighting,

(F) The construction management plan or policies

include robust feedback mechanisms and performance
monitoring and reporting for construction impacts.

DESCRIPTION Improved: the project team must implement a

construction management plan that addresses
Infrastructure projects are long-term projects that may
at least one type of construction impact.
take years to complete construction. During this time, it is
important for the project to have minimal negative impacts on
Enhanced: The construction management plan
the surrounding community. While completed infrastructure
includes mitigation of 2 construction impacts.
projects may go unseen by the public, the construction phase
is often a time when a new project is most visible. Project Superior: The construction management plan addresses
teams can harness this as an opportunity to exemplify best 3 construction impacts while adding a robust feedback
practices. In doing so, they instill trust in the community, mechanism and performance monitoring.
and can make further strides toward project acceptance.
Conserving: The construction management plan
There are a range of ways a project team can consider a addresses 4 construction impacts while adding a robust
community’s needs during the construction phase. Similar to the feedback mechanism and performance monitoring.
operational impacts on a community, project teams consider the
same impacts during construction because they may be elevated Applicability: Consideration is given to whether the project
in this phase. Noise, vibrations, and light pollution should be includes construction activities with the potential to impact
minimized during construction so as to reduce disturbances the quality of life of individuals. Projects that do not include
to surrounding communities. Further, projects in construction construction impacts (e.g. an internal refurbishment of a private
should never impede on a community’s safety or mobility. facility or extremely remote site) may apply to have this credit
deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
Assessment for this credit is measured by how many impacts are EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
addressed through the construction management plan. Negative DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
impacts during the construction of an infrastructure project
include: noise, safety/wayfinding, access/mobility, and lighting. A. Has the project implemented a construction management
plan or policies to address construction impacts?

40 ENVISION V3
 1. Documentation of a construction management plan or policies. b. Limit interruption of service
2. Documentation that the construction management c. Limit restrictions to public space and amenities
plan or policies address concerns of stakeholders. Note that moving access points and establishing detours is allowed
so long as a similar level of service is provided. Applicants may also
B. Does the construction management plan demonstrate that access to public space or amenities is not impacted
mitigate noise and/or vibrations? by the project.
1. Documentation of a management plan or policies to
mitigate impacts of construction noise and/or vibrations E. Does the construction management plan address
to the extent feasible. Specifications for minimizing distracting or intrusive lighting during construction?
construction noise and vibration should meet or exceed 1. Documentation that, to the extent feasible while
accepted local practices. Programs should include details maintaining safety, the project has sought to minimize
on the expected sources of significant noise and vibration, distracting or intrusive lighting during construction.
how the effects of those sources will be minimized, how
noise and vibration will be monitored, and what corrective
F. To what extent have feedback mechanism and
actions will be taken if specified levels are exceeded.
performance monitoring been incorporated
2. Documentation that the construction noise management into the construction management plan?
plan includes stakeholder engagement and mechanisms for 1. Documentation that there are feedback mechanisms in place
communities to report complaints. Documentation may include for receiving and responding to public and stakeholder concerns
corrective actions taken in response to stakeholder reporting. during construction. The construction contractor is expected
to work with affected neighbors to develop construction plans
C. Does the construction management plan address safety and as well as monitoring and corrective action programs.
wayfinding for pedestrians and vehicles during construction?
2. Documentation of programs to monitor and inform
1. Specifications of requirements and procedures for the contractor. impacted stakeholders on project performance
in addressing construction impacts.
D. Does the construction management plan maintain access
to public space and amenities during construction?
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
1. Documentation of strategies to:
QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
a. Limit disruption and maintain access to public space and
amenities during construction within the boundaries of safety LD3.2 Develop Local Skills and Capabilities

ENVISION V3 41
 QUALITY OF LIFE: MOBILITY

QL2.1 Improve Community Mobility and Access

■

INTENT METRIC

14 Plan the project as part of a connected

network that supports all transportation
modes for the efficient movement
The extent to which the project broadens
mode choices, reduces commute times,
reduces vehicle distance traveled,
POINTS
of people, goods, and services. and improves levels of service.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F

(1) Satisfactory (3) Controlled Access (7) Increased Access (11) Connected Networks (14) Restoring Community
Coordination and Flow Connections

(A) The project team demonstrates consistency with local and regional transportation plans.
(B) The project team obtains input from the community and key stakeholders (e.g., public officials and operators
of adjacent facilities, amenities, or transportation hubs) regarding improved access.

(C) The project includes strategies to increase capacity, manage congestion, reduce vehicle distance traveled, or lower accident rates

(D) The project team works with the community to expand mobility and
access options and/or incorporate complete streets policies.

(E) The project addresses long-term mobility

and access needs of the community.

(F) The project creates new or

restores previous connections
between communities.

DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

This credit addresses community mobility as a connected The assessment of mobility in this credit is scalable, and
network for all modes, including private automobile usage, expectations regarding the geographic scope of the assessment are
and focuses on the broader community benefits achieved relative to the scale of the project. For example, large rail projects
from the efficient movement of people, goods, and services. might assess mobility across an entire region, while a small park
It assesses quality-of-life benefits that mobility provides project may assess mobility to and from local neighborhoods.
through greater access to jobs, education, and critical
services. These include reducing commute times, reducing Improved: The project is consistent with local transportation
vehicle distance traveled, or improving levels of service. plans that were developed and adopted through an
inclusive public involvement process. Wherever possible,
Greater mobility provides freedom of choices when it comes the project should consider its relationship to nearby
to access to education, jobs, affordable housing, and even housing, employment, shops and community facilities. The
healthy food and activities. Congestion and impediments project team demonstrates a reasonable, inclusive, and
to mobility are also a key source of discontent within coordinated approach to addressing mobility impacts.
communities. Local studies can often be found calculating the
lost personal time or economic activity due to congestion. Enhanced: Overall mobility is enhanced with a connected network
that helps reduce congestion, improves traffic flow, and/or
Project teams should consider how even non-transportation contributes to community livability. Project teams implement
projects can become multi-benefit projects by contributing strategies to accommodate or support automobile, transit,
to more efficient mobility in the community. This may include and commercial vehicles while promoting complete streets
how site access is configured, the mode with which it is policies leading to more active, healthier lifestyles. With the
accessed, or the frequency of trips to and from the site. For increasing role of technology, project teams should consider
example, a park that incorporates a pedestrian overpass ways to utilize open data to enhance project performance.
can improve the mobility of both cars and pedestrians.

42 ENVISION V3
Conserving: The project team is proactive in identifying the D. Has the project team worked with the community
limitations and future mobility needs of the community and to expand mobility and access options and/
incorporating strategies to address these in the project. or incorporate complete streets policies?
1. Assessment of the availability, feasibility, and use
Restorative: The project creates or restores community of transportation options (e.g., rail, water, active
connections. Beyond improving existing performance, transportation, or mass transportation access).
the project has created new mobility opportunities
with potentially cascading benefits (e.g., better access 2. Documentation of how the project expands mobility
to schools, commercial districts, healthcare, etc.). and access options, including a rationale for making
or not making changes to transportation modes.
Applicability: Consideration is given to whether the project has
any potential to impact mobility. Non-transportation projects 3. When applicable, reports demonstrating the use
that do not include any mobility impacts (positive or negative), of complete streets policies and guidelines.
and can demonstrate no potential for positively impacting
mobility, may apply to have this credit deemed not applicable E. Has the project team considered the long-term
with supporting documentation. This credit is inherently mobility and access needs of the community?
applicable to all transportation infrastructure projects. 1. Documentation of the long-term mobility and access
needs of the community (e.g., existing studies,
reports, memoranda, and/or minutes).
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
2. Design components showing the extent to which long-
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE term mobility and access needs and issues were
incorporated into the constructed work. For example,
A. Is the project consistent with local transportation plans? expanding considerations to anticipated traffic flows
1. Documentation demonstrating consistency with local and and volumes, changes in technology, preferred modes
regional transportation plans. When applicable, documentation of access, and effects on mobility and connectivity.
may include an amendment to the transportation plan(s).
3. Documentation showing how the project addressed the
community as a connected network, including long-term
B. Has the project team obtained input from the community and
transportation infrastructure efficiency, walkability,
key stakeholders regarding issues of mobility and access?
and incentivized transportation efficiency.
1. Documentation (e.g., reports, memoranda, and/or minutes)
of meetings with the community and key stakeholders (e.g., F. Does the project create new or restore previous
community officials or managers and operators covering access connections between communities?
to adjacent facilities, amenities, and transportation hubs).
1. Documentation of meetings with community officials discussing
2. Records of decisions made and actions taken. the need for new connections/reconnections between
communities (e.g., reports, memoranda, and/or minutes).
C. Does the project include strategies to increase
2. Documentation of how the project provides new or
capacity, manage congestion, reduce vehicle
improved connections between communities in order to
distance traveled, or lower accident rates?
increase overall mobility. For example, connecting housing,
1. Reports documenting access and mobility principles, concepts, jobs, shops, and/or community facilities by utilizing or
requirements, and expected outcomes of the project. improving existing transportation infrastructure.
2. Documentation of how the project increases transportation
capacity, efficiency (e.g., reduced congestion and/or vehicle RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
distance traveled), or quality (lower accident rates). QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life
QL3.1 Advance Equity and Social Justice

ENVISION V3 43
 QUALITY OF LIFE: MOBILITY

QL2.2 Encourage Sustainable Transportation

■

INTENT METRIC

16 Expand accessibility to sustainable

transportation choices including active,
shared, and/or mass transportation.
The extent to which active, shared, or mass
transportation options are accessible,
encouraged, and supported as part of a
POINTS
larger integrated transportation network.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

Not Available A A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D

(5) Access to Transit or (8) Encourages Transit or (12) Transit or Active (16) New Connections
Active Transportation Active Transportation Transportation Programs

(A) The project creates or offers convenient access to shared/mass transportation OR active
transportation (e.g., extended contiguous trails and/or bicycle networks).

(B) Beyond proximity, the project is configured and designed to encourage

the use of active, shared, or mass transportation.

(C) The project provides programs and/or facilities that

support the use of active, shared, or mass transportation.

(D) The active and/or shared

transportation improvements
contribute to a larger integrated
transportation strategy for
the community or region.
The project creates new
connections or rehabilitates/
repurposes unused, underused,
or previously disconnected
pathways, bikeways, rail,
and/or other modes of
transportation to enhance the
efficiency, quality, or level of
service of the overall network.

DESCRIPTION support and improve these transportation networks by providing

better access, closer proximity, or other area enhancements.
This credit addresses the need to expand sustainable
transportation choices including active, shared, and/or mass
transportation, as a way to increase health, reduce emissions,
improve air quality, and increase community development.
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
Active transportation encompasses all forms of non-motorized When addressing this credit and designing for current uses,
transportation such as walking or bicycling. Shared transportation project teams should also consider how to accommodate
includes vehicle sharing such as ride-shares. Mass transportation, future transportation trends. In recent years, technology
or transit, includes traditional high-capacity transportation and access to data have dramatically changed mass
systems such as subways, buses, streetcars, and others. Project transportation and shared transportation systems.
teams should consider how a multi-benefit project that supports Transportation infrastructure, or infrastructure dependent
active, shared, and/or mass transportation can achieve greater on transportation systems, should plan for possible
acceptance by the community, have broader access to funding, technological shifts in order to be sustainable and resilient.
and deliver a better quality project for owners and operators. Even
non-transportation infrastructure often has the opportunity to

44 ENVISION V3
Enhanced: The credit assessment begins with locating d. Designs that promote security throughout the site
project within walking distance to pedestrian-accessible via well-lit and clearly visible pathways.
active transportation and public transit facilities. e. Topography that accommodates a network of walkways
and bikeways converging on or near the project.
Superior: Active, shared, or mass transportation choices
are encouraged through the physical characteristics f. Providing accessible options beyond regulatory requirements
that may enhance the quality of the amenity. to accommodate a range of mobility needs.
g. Protection from weather such as covered shelters or walkways.
Conserving: Active, shared, or mass transportation choices are
supported through the underlying logistical, managerial, or C. Does the project include programs and facilities that
operational programs that can incentivize greater use or ridership. support the use of active transportation and transit?

Restorative: The project understands the integrated 1. Documentation of programs and/or facilities designed to support
transportation system and leverages project enhancements the use of active, shared, or mass transportation options.
to have impacts beyond the project boundary by creating Programs intended to encourage active or shared transportation
new connections and new opportunities, or restoring can include but are not limited to bicycle sharing stations, mobile
unused, underused, or degraded infrastructure. apps, marketing programs, subsidy programs, maintenance
programs, or repair programs.
Applicability: Consideration is given to whether the project includes
transportation infrastructure, or includes the frequent dependence Facilities intended to encourage active or shared transportation
on transportation for access to the project. This credit is applicable can include but are not limited to secure bike lockers, covered bike
to all transportation infrastructure. Projects that do not include racks, and changing/showering facilities.
transportation infrastructure and are not accessible, unmanned,
Programs designed to encourage the use of mass transportation
or have very small maintenance crews, may apply to have this
can include but are not limited to subsidized fare programs,
credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
emergency ride home services, coordination with ride-sharing
companies, off-board ticketing, real-time arrival information, or
mobile apps. Support may also include coordinating with the local
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND transit agency for new transit services.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
D. Does the project contribute to a larger integrated
A. Does the project provide convenient access to active, shared, or mass transportation
active, shared, or mass transportation options? strategy for the community or region?
1. Map showing pedestrian proximity and accessibility to active, 1. Documentation that the project integrates the
shared, or mass transportation. The generally accepted standard transportation improvements with existing transportation
for walking distance is 0.5 mi/0.8 km, or a 10-minute walk. infrastructure and/or a larger transportation infrastructure
strategy (e.g., a transportation master plan).
B. Is the project configured and designed in such a way to
encourage active, shared, and/or mass transportation options? 2. Documentation that the project creates new connections or
rehabilitates/repurposes unused, underused, or previously
1. Documentation demonstrating that beyond the physical disconnected pathways, bikeways, rail, and/or other modes
proximity to active, shared, or mass transportation options, the of transportation to enhance the efficiency, quality, or level
project is configured and designed to encourage or facilitate of service of the overall network. This should include site
their use. Examples may include but are not limited to: plans or illustrative documents showing new connections.
a. Degree of pedestrian convenience and accessibility
encourages site users to utilize transit options.
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
b. Restricted parking that encourages choosing
QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
transit or active transportation.
c. Extended contiguous sidewalks, trails and/or bicycle QL2.1 Improve Community Mobility and Access
networks connected to the site and/or the project. CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions

ENVISION V3 45
 QUALITY OF LIFE: MOBILITY

QL2.3 Improve Access and Wayfinding

■

INTENT METRIC

14 Design the project to provide safe and

appropriate access in and/or around the
project in a way that integrates the project
Incorporating and providing clear access,
safety, and wayfinding measures to
accommodate emergency services and
POINTS
with the surrounding community. regular vehicular or pedestrian traffic.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D Not Available

(1) Emergency Management (5) Protecting Surroundings (9) Safety Audits (14) Public Access

(A) The project clearly accommodates incident management for users and emergency personnel.

(B) The project identifies and utilizes access routes, safety features, and clear signage to
reduce negative impact on its surroundings caused by vehicle or pedestrian traffic.
The project integrates well with its surroundings through clear signage and wayfinding.

(C) The project provides points for safe public access. Universal
design standards are used to ensure broad accessibility and safety.

(D) The project has a positive

and transformative impact on
community or neighborhood
access and/or wayfinding.

DESCRIPTION mindset. Rather than being a barrier, infrastructure can

often provide elevated pedestrian walkways, bike trails,
This credit encourages designing and operating the project
safer streets, improved intersections, more direct routes,
so that users of all ages and abilities can safely access the
convenient access to public amenities, and much more.
site and/or clearly and easily navigate around it. Wayfinding
encompasses all of the ways in which people orient themselves
in physical space and navigate from place to place. This includes,
but also extends beyond, signage. This credit is linked to
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
QL3.4 Enhance Public Space and Amenities; however, whereas Improved: The assessment begins with careful accommodation
QL3.4 addresses the broader social benefits and improved of emergency. While this is often standard it is an important
livability of public space, this credit focuses specifically on factor in protecting public safety and is relevant to the overall
providing access that is both safe and easy to navigate. sustainability of the project. Documentation for this credit
should extend beyond evidence of basic signage. Project teams
Completely walling off sites from the public contributes to should also consider, if applicable, the role critical infrastructure
community “dead zones” that become attractors for crime plays in emergency situations or risks to public safety.
and vandalism. Confusing signage or complicated site
access is a nuisance that can lead to accidents and injuries. Enhanced: The project addresses access, safety, and wayfinding
Projects that promote pedestrian-oriented communities for pedestrians and/or vehicles. Clear access, signage and
encourage active street life with the associated effect of wayfinding improves overall flow, efficiency, and aids in
reducing crime and vandalism. Providing clear and safe access incident management by reducing accidents. The application
whenever possible is helpful in gaining acceptance by local may vary depending on the project type. Publicly accessible
communities, reducing accidents and injuries, reducing crime, projects may encourage navigating through the site, while
and encouraging healthy and vibrant neighborhoods. restricted sites may focus on reducing negative impacts on
community access to adjacent sites and providing safe and easy
By addressing access and wayfinding infrastructure owners to identify alternatives for navigating around the project.
and project teams can help reintegrate infrastructure into
communities and infrastructure awareness into the public Superior: The project provides public access points. Environmental
or universal design makes visitors feel more secure and

46 ENVISION V3
accommodates users with disabilities. Universal design is the to populated areas or other development, adjacent to sensitive
design and composition of projects and sites so that they can be sites, or involving regular incoming or outgoing traffic.
accessed, understood and used to the greatest extent possible
by all people regardless of their age, size, ability or disability.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
Conserving: Consideration is also given to how the project DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
design can improve safety and security on and around
the site. Examples of strategies for improving physical
A. Has the project addressed access, safety, and
safety and reducing crime and vandalism include:
wayfinding for incident management including
evacuation and emergency personnel?
Physical Safety
1. Design documents showing plans for access and egress
• Improve the safety and accessibility of street crossings routes for emergency personnel, users, and occupants.
by providing universal access curb cuts, pedestrian
2. Documentation of the effectiveness of the
crossing signs, and high-visibility crosswalks. Or, for
design for emergency situations.
major roads, provide pedestrian over-/underpasses.

• Include traffic-calming measures in areas with B. Does the project utilize access, safety, and signage to
heavy pedestrian or bicycle traffic. protect or minimize impacts on the surroundings?
1. Documentation of how the project protects nearby
• Install physical barriers between sidewalks sensitive sites (wetland, cultural sites, etc.) or, in populated/
and street traffic exceeding 40 mph. developed areas, separates pedestrian and non-
pedestrian zones enhancing safety and security.
• Improve bike lane safety by separating bike lanes from
street traffic or the door swing radius of parked cars. 2. Documentation that clear signage and wayfinding techniques
are used to integrate the project with its surroundings. For
• Clearly distinguish between publicly accessible example, access roads, bikeways, or pedestrian paths are
space, where pedestrian traffic is encouraged, clearly marked in order to facilitate their proper use.
and restricted space, where it is not.
C. Does the project provide safe public access
Crime and Vandalism points for the benefit of the community?

• Locate publicly accessible space to be as visible as 1. Documentation indicating areas of the project site that are
possible from surrounding neighborhoods at night. accessible to the public. Public access may include restrictions.
2. Documentation that areas open to the public
• Design public space to have clear lines of sight are designed with universal design principles to
internally and from major pedestrian traffic zones. be inclusive of a broad range of users.
• Design public space to integrate to the urban
context and encourage pedestrian traffic. D. Does the project have a positive and transformative impact on
community neighborhood access, safety, and/or wayfinding?
• Design site for easy public access to, from, and around 1. Documentation demonstrating that beyond individual site
the project with clear signage and wayfinding signals. safety features addressed in criteria A, B, and C, the project
itself will improve broader community or neighborhood safety.
Applicability: Consideration is given to the potential for impacting For example, formerly abandoned or restricted areas prone
community access on or around the project site. Infrastructure to crime and vandalism are replaced by safe and accessible
that is inherently inaccessible (e.g., underground) or extremely spaces that increase community presence and self-monitoring.
remote (e.g., inaccessible by public roads) may apply to have this
credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
Default restrictions on public access are not considered
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
acceptable justification for marking the credit not applicable. QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
This credit is automatically applicable to any project in proximity QL3.4 Enhance Public Space and Amenities

ENVISION V3 47
 QUALITY OF LIFE: COMMUNITY

QL3.1 Advance Equity and Social Justice

■

INTENT METRIC

18 Ensure that equity and social justice

are fundamental considerations within
project processes and decision making.
Degree to which equity and social justice are
included in stakeholder engagement, project
team commitments, and decision making.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F A+B+C+D+E+F+G

(3) Understanding Equity (6) Mitigation (10) Empowerment (14) Equitable Access (18) Equitable Futures
to Benefits

(A) Stakeholder engagement is conducted early and informed by the historic context of equity, social justice, and environmental
justice. When projects impact, or potentially impact, indigenous communities, specific attention is given to developing a relationship
of respect and mutual understanding that supports the autonomy, authority, and rights of these communities.
(B) The project team assesses the social impacts the project will have on the host and affected communities. This includes mapping impacts and benefits across local communities.
(C) Key members of the project team make institutional commitments to equity and social justice, including non-discrimination; diversity and inclusion; and pay equity.
Large-scale projects make targeted and project-specific commitments.

(D) Based on the assessment of social impacts, the project addresses or mitigates social impacts.
Mitigation strategies are informed by stakeholder consultation and participation.

(E) The social, economic, and environmental benefits and impacts of the project
are shown to not disproportionately favor or disfavor any community.

(F) The project empowers communities to engage in the development

process. Qualified professionals identify unconscious biases and
barriers to inclusion. Programs target higher rates of engagement, and
include transparent grievance mechanisms to facilitate resolutions.

(G) The project positively

addresses or corrects
an existing or historic
injustice or imbalance.

DESCRIPTION and the distribution of benefits and impacts can be a potential

source of conflict. Conflicts can disrupt project development
“Equity and social justice” refer to the responsibility of a
or become sources for broader social disruption causing new
society to ensure that civil and human rights are preserved and
rifts or exacerbating existing rifts between communities,
protected for each individual, and that all persons are treated
organizations, and governments. Once a relationship of
equally and without prejudice regardless of race, color, wealth,
distrust is developed between the public and infrastructure
religion (creed), gender, gender expression, age, national origin
developers, it is difficult to overcome and future projects are
(ancestry), disability, marital status, sexual orientation, or
potentially impacted regardless of their individual merit.
military status. This includes “environmental justice,” which
refers to the fair treatment and meaningful engagement
Holding projects to a higher standard of stakeholder engagement
of all people with regard to environmental protection.
can earn a “social license to operate.” This unofficial license is
the acceptance (beyond regulations) of the local community
These issues are particularly relevant to infrastructure
and stakeholders that can build goodwill, speed projects, and
development, which often involves the provision of significant
smooth the way for future projects. Conflicts that arise in
benefits as well as potentially significant impacts (e.g.,
project delivery are often traced to misinformation and distrust.
disruption, cost, pollution, and/or consumption of resources).
Project teams can combat this mistrust when they invest in
Inequality, or the perception of inequality, in decision making
understanding and addressing equity and social justice.

48 ENVISION V3
Project teams should consider how community resilience is EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
impacted by social cohesion. Social conflict is a stressor that leaves DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
communities more vulnerable during an emergency. Equitable
and just systems of infrastructure development are opportunities
A. Does the stakeholder engagement process take
to strengthen social cohesion, raise awareness, and further
into account the historic context of equity and
develop the social support systems that increase resilience.
social justice within affected communities?
1. Documentation demonstrating an understanding
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT of the historic context of equity and social
justice within the affected communities.
Improved: Equity and social justice are complex as well as site and
project specific. The first step is to understand the project context 2. Documentation of how the equity and social justice context
from stakeholders and to identify potential social impacts. informed the stakeholder engagement process.

Equity, social justice, and environmental justice are rooted in 3. In cases where the project impacts sovereign peoples, especially
mutual respect. This is of particular concern when projects cross indigenous peoples, documentation of how the process
social or political boundaries and are international in nature, specifically addressed and prioritized engagement of these
impacting autonomous or semi-autonomous nations (e.g. stakeholders and how attention was given to developing a
First Nations, sovereign tribes, indigenous peoples, aboriginal relationship of respect and mutual understanding that supported
peoples, or native populations). All projects using Envision are the autonomy, authority, and rights of these communities.
required to meet all relevant laws and regulations regarding
cooperation with indigenous peoples. However, project teams B. Has the project team assessed the social impacts the
should consider opportunities to improve the relationship and project will have on the host and affected communities?
cooperation with indigenous peoples beyond requirements. 1. Documentation of both positive and negative social impacts
that specifically include equity and social justice. The
Organizations involved in the project have institutional assessment may be part of a larger environmental and social
policies that commit to nondiscrimination based on race, risk and impact assessment. The scope and level of effort
color, religion (creed), gender, gender expression, age, national of the process is relative to the type, scale, and location
origin (ancestry), disability, marital status, sexual orientation, of the project (e.g., proximity to population centers).
or military status. This should expand to a policy of active
diversity and inclusion. Policies of pay equity, especially as they 2. The assessment should include:
relate to gender, are a key indicator of inclusivity. If integrated
a. Direct impacts of the project and associated activities.
into the project team, these principles should also carry into
stakeholder engagement activities on individual projects. b. Impacts from independent secondary development or actions
that may occur as a result of the project.
Enhanced: The project team can demonstrate specific
actions taken to address social impacts. c. Indirect impacts on resources or services important to the local
community.
Superior: Project teams should demonstrate that critical decisions
3. The social context of the project regarding affected
regarding the distribution of project benefits and impacts were
communities should consider, but may expand upon,
not intentionally or unintentionally biased. One community should
demographic data, gender equality, health data, income rate,
not disproportionately receive the benefits of infrastructure
education, and level of historic infrastructure investment.
services while another disproportionately receives the burden.
When there is resistance to infrastructure development, it
is often communities least able or least empowered to voice C. Have key members of the project team made commitments
their concerns that receive the burden. Project teams should to equity and social justice within their organizations?
guard against following this path of least resistance. 1. Documentation of corporate/organizational policies
and commitments concerning equity and social
Conserving: Equity and social justice is not something justice. This should include, but not be limited to:
that can be “achieved” through good design. Rather,
the goal is to empower individuals to participate in the a. Nondiscrimination
process. This inclusivity should encompass the entire b. Diversity and inclusion
process rather than early consultations alone.
c. Pay equity
Restorative: Reserved for projects that have the rare opportunity
“Key members” of the project team refers to major decision
to correct or address an existing or historic injustice. For
makers involved in the project, as well as those who act as
example, removing a highway that divided a demographic
primary advisors, consultants, or specialists on behalf of decision
neighborhood, or providing parks for historically underserved
makers. This will almost always include the owner, those who act
communities. Underserved communities do not receive
as lead designers (engineers, architects, landscape architects,
adequate levels of infrastructure service due to economic
etc.), and those who manage and execute the project through
conditions, lack of political will, or barriers to access.
construction. Duplicative documentation is unnecessary when
more than one of these roles is held by a single entity.
Applicability: This credit can be designated as not applicable
for projects that do not impact the surrounding community. 2. In cases where the project may have notable social impacts (e.g., a
For example, the installation or refurbishment of systems new road going through a community), documentation of project-
internal to a facility that do not impact the quality or specific commitments to addressing equity and social justice.
level of service provided by the infrastructure.

ENVISION V3 49
D. Has the project addressed social impacts G. Does the project positively address or correct an
related to equity and social justice? existing or historic injustice or imbalance?
1. Documentation of a management program(s) to 1. Documentation that the project positively addressed
address equity and social justice impacts identified or corrected an existing or historic injustice or
in the assessment of social impacts. imbalance. This may include, but is not limited to:
2. Documentation of specific decisions, programs, strategies, a. The provision or improvement of infrastructure
etc., that were implemented to address social impacts. services to historically underserved communities.
b. The removal of existing infrastructure that historically
3. Documentation of how impacts and mitigation strategies were
divided or created barriers within a community.
prioritized (e.g., a typical mitigation hierarchy would include
avoidance, minimization, restoration, and compensation). c. Addressing historic inequality where one community
was disproportionately burdened with negative
infrastructure impacts while not receiving the benefits.
E. Will the impacts and benefits of the project be distributed
equitably throughout affected communities? d. Addressing historic socioeconomic trends in infrastructure
design, development, and operation related to inclusion.
1. Documentation of how the project does not overly burden
one or more communities with risk or negative impacts while
other communities receive the majority of project benefits. RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
2. Maps showing the key demographic data identified in QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
the assessment of social impacts overlaid with areas QL2.1 Improve Community Mobility and Access
likely to receive benefits or impacts of the project.
QL2.2 Encourage Sustainable Transportation

F. Has the project team empowered communities QL3.2 Preserve Historic and Cultural Resources
to engage in the development process? LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement
1. Documentation that the project team identified, analyzed, and LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
addressed barriers to inclusion in the stakeholder engagement
process. The comprehensiveness of the analysis will be assessed LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
relative to the scope and scale of the project. For large projects, LD3.2 Develop Local Skills and Capabilities
documentation should include the qualifications of individuals
responsible for managing the stakeholder engagement process.
2. Documentation of how the project specifically
targeted underrepresented communities and higher
rates of participation and/or inclusion.

50 ENVISION V3
 Historic Fourth Ward Park: Atlanta, Georgia
Atlanta’s Historic Fourth Ward Park project (Envision Gold, 2016) In doing so this project met high standards of sustainability
was developed in partnership between Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. (ABI) while also improving community livability in Atlanta.
and the Atlanta Department of Watershed Management (DWM).
Historic Fourth Ward Park was one of the first components Notable achievements for the Historic Fourth Ward
in the BeltLine Project―a comprehensive effort providing a Park within the Envision categories include:
network of public parks, multi-use trails and transit along a
historic 22-mile railroad corridor circling downtown Atlanta. Quality of Life: The park restored an unusable land parcel
into a functional community park and provided stimulus for
Direction for this project originated from conversations neighboring development. Following project completion,
among citizens discussing local stormwater issues. As part the influx of housing and retail has noticeably changed
of the development effort, the stormwater management the economic and social condition of the community.
was enhanced, from what was originally a series of
underground pipes, into a community amenity. The project Leadership: From the early stages of the project, collaboration
team worked closely with the community to design a park on every level inspired the creation of a park that now
that features a stormwater retention pond, while serving provides a sustainable resource, spurs development and
multiple purposes for the adjacent neighborhood. solves an engineering problem. The project team deliberately
took into account the relationships to and among other
The park, which is designed to provide much needed stormwater elements of community infrastructure, including physical
drainage relief within a 300-acre drainage basin, uses artistic and visual connectivity to adjacent properties.
elements to aerate and recycle pond water in a dramatic
contrast to traditional discharge pipes. The stormwater pond Resource Allocation: Resource conservation was
serves as the park’s centerpiece, surrounded by walking trails, designed into the project, including supplying 100 percent
urban plazas, native plantings and an amphitheater. The of the park’s irrigation demand from the pond.
project has generated adjacent development and revitalization,
Natural World: Pre-development conditions allowed storm
providing the cornerstone for a sustainable, high-density and
drainage from the connected watershed to discharge
high-quality urban environment along with an outstanding
directly into the combined sewer. The park now captures
design solution for a combined sewer overflow problem.
and contains stormwater following rain events, and the
The Fourth Ward Park project started as a typical stormwater water has been used to establish newly planted native
management/flooding problem, and turned into a solution that landscape – introducing biodiversity to the area.
addressed the problem and resulted in economic and community
Climate and Resilience: The pond’s capacity provides
development, environmental restoration and creation of a park.
relief to the combined sewer, allowing the system to
manage a rain event in excess of a 100-year storm.
IL&m J~ xmmwA M i l l W i l l I I I I ! r « l 4
- .. -. -ii. >i L :C
$
■A'-
5? I
■
55
r
..y a.
F_ .
'
' .fe
••
r- m fm
YA i > rV
+-*■ mm^
warn
r« V
M H
* 1 rEarrsii
n
? •
,y .
Ai <1
--.
.
4
V
m
L,
 QUALITY OF LIFE: COMMUNITY

QL3.2 Preserve Historic and Cultural Resources

■

INTENT METRIC

18 Preserve or restore significant historical

and cultural sites and related resources.
Steps taken to identify, preserve,
or restore cultural resources.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

Not Available A+B A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F

(2) Stakeholder (7) Expanded Search (12) Conservation (18) Restoration

Consultation

(A) The project team works with the community and required regulatory and resource agencies
to identify historic and cultural resources in and around the project site.
(B) The project implements strategies to document, protect, or enhance historic and cultural resources.

(C) The assessment of cultural resources intentionally extends beyond national

or subnational registries to identify important parts of the community culture
such as places, events, natural features, oral traditions, or local skills.
(D) Stakeholders of the historic/cultural resources are consulted early in the project’s
development and contribute to developing a sensitive design approach.

(E) For historic and/or cultural resources identified in criteria

A and C the project is designed to fully preserve/protect
the character-defining features of those resources.

(F) The project enhances

or restores a threatened or
degraded historic/cultural
resource or results in a
historical resource being added
to a protected registry.

DESCRIPTION The significance of cultural resources can scale with the size
of the community. Outsiders may view locally cherished
This credit addresses the historic and cultural resources that
cultural resources as unimportant, which is why community
make communities unique and that, once lost, cannot be truly
engagement is necessary to fully understand local values.
replaced. Cultural resources can drive community attractiveness,
Project teams that engage communities in understanding their
livability, and tourism that in turn supports economic activity
culture and history indicate a level of respect and consideration
and a strong tax base. While protection is a necessary first step,
that builds trust, reduces conflict, and facilitates effective
there are often opportunities to highlight, enhance, or facilitate
project delivery. Community engagement and understanding
the continuance or utilization of historic and cultural resources.
local culture can also help project teams better understand
Project teams are encouraged to think outside traditional underlying behavioral patterns, allowing for a higher quality
concepts of historic preservation. Cultural resources go project that better meets the community’s needs. There are
beyond those specifically protected in state/provincial, also occasions where insight into historic methods of meeting
national, or international registries and may include places, infrastructure needs can lead to innovative modern solutions.
events, natural features, oral traditions, or local skills that are
important parts of the community culture. For example, in
communities seeking to preserve indigenous languages, the PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
erection of multilingual infrastructure signage can help. Enhanced: The assessment begins with the identification of
protected historic resources in and around the project site.

52 ENVISION V3
In addition to the project team investigations, this involves Note that only documenting cultural resources is only acceptable
some level of engagement with community stakeholders. when resources no longer have the integrity to be preserved.
Otherwise project actions must also include strategies for protection
Measures are taken to protect resources. Strategies should or enhancement.
prioritize avoiding impacts whenever possible, minimizing
the impacts that cannot be avoided, restoring resources from C. Does the identification of historic/cultural
impacts that cannot be further minimized, and providing resources extend beyond registries to identify
compensation for impacts that cannot be restored. important parts of the community culture?

Superior: Beyond historic and cultural registries, project teams 1. Documentation that the identification of historic/cultural
engage with the community in order to identify places, events, resources extended beyond registries of historic sites.
natural features, oral traditions, or local skills that are important 2. Index of historic or cultural resources not included in
parts of the community culture. Stakeholders are no longer historic registries that may still be significant to the culture
passive advisors but are actively engaged in developing project of the community. These should be identified in criterion
solutions that preserve or enhance cultural resources. While A and may include, but are not limited to, places, events,
project teams may consider themselves capable of safeguarding natural features, oral traditions, or local skills.
cultural resources, it is often the cultural stakeholders
themselves who are best able to identify the culturally 3. When applicable, documentation of the level of effort that
significant aspects of the resource that need protection. was deployed to identify important cultural resources of the
community even if no relevant cultural resources were found.
Conserving: The project fully avoids, protects, or maintains
the critical features of historic and/or cultural resources. D. Has the project team worked with stakeholders
to develop a sensitive design and approach?
Restorative: Beyond passive avoidance or protection, the
1. Documentation that the stakeholder engagement process included
project actively supports, enhances, or restores resources.
the identification and discussion of historic/cultural resources.
Applicability: Project teams that are unable to identify any historic 2. Documentation of how the project plans were
or cultural resources relevant to the project may apply to have this informed or approved during stakeholder engagement,
credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation. specifically relating to historic/cultural resources.
Supporting documentation should demonstrate how stakeholder
engagement activities, cultural resource studies, or equivalent, E. Does the project avoid all historic/cultural resources or
were implemented in an effort to identify possible historic or fully preserve/protect their character-defining features?
cultural resources. This credit is applicable to all infrastructure
projects that impact a historic or cultural resource identified in 1. Documentation of how efforts were sufficient to
state/provincial, national, or international registries, or identified avoid all historic/cultural resources or fully preserve/
through stakeholder engagement. This credit is also applicable, and protect their character-defining features.
no points achieved, for projects that cannot demonstrate a serious
effort was made to identify potential historic or cultural resources. F. Does the project enhance or restore threatened or
degraded historic/cultural resources in the community,
or add a resource to a protected registry?
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND 1. Documentation of efforts to enhance or restore existing historic
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE and cultural resources. Examples may include, but are not limited
to, rehabilitation in accordance with the government standards,
A. Has the project team worked with the community restoration of lost features such as a historic landscape or
and required regulatory and resource agencies green spaces, upgrade and expansion of facilities used for
to identify historic and cultural resources? cultural events, or publicly accessible educational/museum
sites in accordance with historic/cultural stakeholder wishes.
1. Documentation of meetings with the community and required
regulatory and resource agencies to identify historic and 2. Documentation that work was done in collaboration
cultural resources (e.g., reports, memoranda, and/or minutes). with historic or cultural preservationists to ensure
that restoration does not damage the quality of the
2. Index of all historic and/or cultural resources
existing historic and/or cultural resource.
that may be impacted by the project.
OR
B. Has the project team developed strategies
3. Documentation that a resource was added to a
to document, protect, or enhance historic
protected registry as a result of the project.
and cultural resources to the project?
1. Location and design drawings of efforts to mitigate impacts or
demonstrating that the site avoids any historic or cultural impacts
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
QL3.1 Advance Equity and Social Justice
2. Design documents of all strategies to document,
protect, enhance or mitigate impacts. Mitigation efforts LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement
should prioritize, in order: avoidance, minimization, NW1.3 Preserve Prime Farmland
restoration, and offsetting/compensation.
NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land

ENVISION V3 53
 QUALITY OF LIFE: COMMUNITY

QL3.3 Enhance Views and Local Character

■

INTENT METRIC

14 Preserve or enhance the physical,

natural, and/or community character of
the project site and its surroundings.
Steps taken to assess valued community
resources, implement preservation measures,
and determine overall satisfaction.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F

(1) Value Identification (3) Alignment With (7) Preservation And (11) Connections And (14) Restoring
Community Values Enhancement Collaboration Community Character

(A) The project team identifies community values and concerns regarding protection and enhancement of views and local character.
(B) Specific design features preserve or enhance views and local character, and are informed by the stakeholder consultation process.

(C) Guidelines are adopted or developed to preserve or enhance views and local character. The aesthetic quality of the project is important.

(D) A construction management plan protects character features, high-

value landscapes, or landscape features during construction.

(E) Community feedback from the stakeholder engagement

process verifies actions taken in criteria A, B, and C.

(F) The project restores

previously lost or degraded
views or community features
OR enhances the community by
creating new features of local
character. Actions are supported
through the stakeholder
engagement process.

DESCRIPTION surroundings. In urban settings, projects can maintain important

views and be designed to reflect the local streetscapes,
This credit addresses a project’s visual impact on the
material choices, height limitations, and other criteria.
community and its surroundings. Communities may value
views of natural settings (e.g., bodies of water, mountains,
Sometimes, enhancing views and local character is not about
parks, forests) or manmade structures (e.g., iconic/historic
fitting in, but about standing out. Project teams should consider
buildings, avenues, skylines). A project must consider its
when infrastructure has the potential to, or already has, become
relationship to the viewing public and the community feature.
a visible symbol of the community. Water towers, bridges,
A project may block views of a community feature or, if located
and other infrastructure often become a prominent part of a
within the same view of the feature, may diminish the quality
community’s identity. If not approached carefully, replacement or
of the view. In the latter case, projects can adopt the local
refurbishment may unintentionally lose the defining characteristics
character of its surroundings in order to minimize its impact.
of the resource. Conversely, thoughtful consideration has
Beyond its function, infrastructure often has the potential to
the potential to provide lasting benefit to a community.
enhance the beauty and attractiveness of a community.
For example, many water towers are painted blue in order to
Context sensitive design, or context sensitive solutions, includes
camouflage their visibility against the sky. Others stand out with
not only preserving views and fitting in with local character,
colorfully painted designs as identifying landmarks. Water towers
but also enhancing local character when appropriate. The
in New York City became so iconic that many non-functioning
criteria may change depending on the context, but the goals
towers are still preserved as part of the city’s identity.
remain the same. In a rural setting, a project might address
views, or vistas, of natural landscapes and prominent features.
Design features fit or camouflage the project in its natural

54 ENVISION V3
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT 2. An inventory of all natural landscape or man-
made features to be protected.
Improved: The credit begins with understanding the project
context and engaging local stakeholders to identify areas of 3. An inventory of all view resources to be protected.
local value and concern. Designs take into account either the
natural, or urban, local character in terms of landform or levels, AND
materials, plantings, style/detailing, scale, and landscape/ 4. A plan for addressing public views in the project design.
townscape. Designs should be in accordance with the community’s Plans include identifying and locating the areas to be
goals and plans to protect view corridors, views from public or protected, identifying compatible land use, setting
open spaces, and views of features strongly associated with development standards, and establishing policies
the identity of the city or community. Special consideration for inappropriate development and land use.
is given to identify and prevent negative impacts to views.
OR
Enhanced: Identified goals are translated into design guidelines
5. Design guidelines adopted or written for the project to
to ensure they are carried through to project delivery and to
preserve public views and important natural landscape
demonstrate the importance of the aesthetic quality of the project.
features, and to generally fit with the local character and
Superior: Additional care is taken in higher levels to protect against context of its surroundings, whether urban or rural.
the accidental damage or removal of character features, high-
value landscapes, or landscape features during construction. D. Does the project include a construction management plan
to protect important natural or man-made features?
Conserving: Projects often involve difficult trade-offs of 1. Documentation of the construction management plan
losses and benefits to views and local character, therefore that identifies important natural or man-made features
the credit assesses net benefit to the community. An action deemed important to views or local character and how
is a net benefit if it results in the overall enhancement of the they will be protected during construction. This may
viewshed or local character. As these determinations are often include temporary relocation and restoration.
qualitative and subjective, achievement relies on community
engagement and support of the project to demonstrate
E. Does the community support actions taken to
that views and local character were indeed enhanced.
preserve or enhance views and local character?
Restorative: The project includes restoring 1. Documentation that the stakeholder engagement
degraded features or creating new features. process specifically addressed issues of views and local
character. Documentation should include evidence
Applicability: Projects that have no public visibility or impact of stakeholder engagement in two key areas:
on views, such as underground utilities or the refurbishment of
a. The identification of important views and elements of local
equipment within an existing facility, may submit to have this
character per criterion A.
credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
Reviewers are unlikely to accept arguments that a publicly b. Approving or informing design features or guidelines to preserve
visible project has no impact on views or local character. or enhance views and local character per criteria B and C.
Note that the aesthetic quality of a project is highly subjective.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND Project teams should seek to provide honest reporting of
both supporting and dissenting opinions on the project.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE Assessment is not based on unanimous support but rather on
whether stakeholders were meaningfully engaged and given
A. Has the project team made a reasonable determination the opportunity to voice their acceptance or concerns.
of community values and concerns regarding protection
and enhancement of views and local character?
F. Will the project result in the restoration or
1. Plans, drawings, and reports identifying important elements enhancement of views or local character?
of the site character including landform or levels, views,
1. Beyond preservation, the project either restores previously
natural landscape features, materials, planting, style/
lost or degraded views and elements of local character, or it
detailing, scale, and landscape/townscape pattern.
enhances the community by creating new features of local
2. Existing policies and regulations regarding public views character. For example, the construction of an iconic bridge
and design guidelines relevant to the project. intended to support the local community’s sense of identity and
local pride. Alternatively, the project may involve the removal
B. Has the project team implemented specific strategies of degraded infrastructure generally considered to be an
to preserve or enhance views and local character? eyesore on the natural landscape or blocking valuable views.

1. Documentation that the strategies take into consideration the

preservation of natural landscape features and balance the RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
need for safety measures and barriers against the desire for QL1.5 Minimize Light Pollution
protection or enhancement of views and local character.
LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement

C. Has the project team developed or adopted existing NW1.3 Preserve Prime Farmland
guidelines to preserve views and local character? NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land
1. Documentation demonstrating that the aesthetic quality of
the project in its context was an important consideration.

ENVISION V3 55
 QUALITY OF LIFE: COMMUNITY

QL3.4 Enhance Public Space and Amenities

■

INTENT METRIC

14 Improve amenities and publicly accessible

spaces to enhance community livability.
Plans and commitments to preserve,
conserve, enhance, and/or restore the
defining elements of the amenity.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D A+B+C+D

(1) No Net Loss (3) Community Involvement (7) Improvement (11) Overall Net Benefit (14) Substantial Restoration
And Enhancement

(A) The project assesses impacts to existing public amenities and implements mitigation strategies. The project will not result in the net loss of public amenities.
(B) The stakeholder engagement process specifically includes issues of public space and amenities.

(C) The project team can demonstrate stakeholder support for aspects of the project related to public space/amenities.

(D) The project involves (D) The project creates a new (D) The project restores lost,
significant enhancements public resource or amenity degraded/unusable, or at-risk
to existing public space or to the community that did public space or amenities.
amenities (e.g., not minor not previously exist.
The public space/amenity
resurfacing or component
The scope of the new is an asset of significance
replacements).
public space/amenity is to the local community
commensurate with the scope commensurate with the scope
and scale of the project. and scale of the project.

DESCRIPTION into the public mindset. When sports fields sit atop wastewater
treatment facilities (Alexandria, VA, USA), stormwater treatment
This credit addresses the potential for infrastructure to create
ponds double as wetland parks (Los Angeles, CA, USA), and
or enhance public space and amenities. Public amenities can
ports provide community bike trails (Vancouver, BC, Canada),
be in urban or natural settings and may include, but are not
public perception about the value of infrastructure changes.
limited to, parks, plazas, trails, playgrounds, recreational
facilities, and wildlife refuges. Enhancing public space can
also include beautification of streets, sidewalks, or right of
ways. For natural settings such as parks and wildlife refuges,
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
“public” refers to space accessible for human recreation and Project teams may include any publicly owned and accessible
enjoyment. The preservation of habitats and species biodiversity resource, or privately owned resources where there is significant
is addressed by credits in the Natural World category. and formalized public access. Public access does not necessarily
mean 24-hour access or “no cost” access. However, projects
Opening space for community activity whenever possible is that limit access or charge fees must make a reasonable
helpful in gaining acceptance by local communities, educating argument as to why they qualify as public resources.
the public about sustainable infrastructure, reducing crime,
and encouraging healthy and vibrant neighborhoods. For many Improved: Impacts to existing public space and/or amenities
decades, the approach for locating infrastructure has been “out of are assessed and mitigated. Concepts of public space and
sight, out of mind.” The majority of infrastructure is underground, amenities are addressed during stakeholder engagement.
relocated to the periphery, or even hidden in plain sight. This has
contributed to the public’s “not in my back yard” stance and the Enhanced: Projects often involve difficult trade-offs of replacing
lack of public will to make necessary infrastructure investments. In the loss of a public amenity with a new resource; therefore,
addition, completely restricting sites from the public contributes the credit assesses net benefit to the community. An action
to community “dead zones” that become attractors for crime is a net benefit if it results in the overall enhancement of the
and vandalism. By incorporating public space into projects, significant activities, features, and attributes of the resource, or
infrastructure owners and project teams can help to reintegrate if it replaces an underutilized resource with a more beneficial
infrastructure into communities and infrastructure awareness resource. As these determinations are often qualitative and
subjective, assessment of this credit relies on community

56 ENVISION V3
 engagement and suppor t of the project to demonstrate
that D. To what extent does the project involve
public space and/or amenities were indeed enhanced.
significantly enhancing, creating, or restoring
Superior: The project enhances or expands existing amenit public space and/or amenities?
ies.
1. Plans and drawing s showing the scope and extent of
Conser ving: The project provides new efforts for new or enhanced public space/amenities.
amenities not previously available.
2. Evidence that the new or newly enhanced public space/a
menity is
Restorative: The project restores previously a significant asset to the local community. For example, the
project
degraded or unusable amenities. contributes to long-term community goals by providing a
public
park in a neighborhood identified as lacking sufficient park
space.
Applicability: This credit is applicable to project s that are
publicly
accessible or that impact , adjoin, or otherwise connec
t to RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
existing public spaces or amenities. This represents the
large QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life
majorit y of infrastructure project s. Designating this credit
as not
applicable can be difficult. Project s that by their nature QL2.3 Improve Access and Wayfinding
preclude
the possibility of addressing public space or amenities LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement
may
submit to have this credit deemed not applicable with
suppor ting
documentation (e.g., mechanical system refurbishmen LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
ts,
offshore wind farms, etc.). Not addressing the potenti NW2.2 Manage Stormwater
al for
public space or amenities is not sufficient alone to designa
te this NW3.2 Enhance Wetland and Surface Water Functions
credit not applicable. Infrastructure project s, especially
those
traditionally viewed as inaccessible, are encouraged to
consider
how they can benefit their surrounding community throug
h
the enhancement or provision of public space and amenit
ies.

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND

DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE

A. Has the project team assessed and mitigated impact

s
to existing public space and/or amenities? PROJECT EXAMPLE:
1. Assessment of the impact of the project on NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FACILITY
existing public space and/or amenities.
2. Documentation of the mitigation strategies The Alexandria, Virginia -based Nutrient Management
Facility
used and how they were prioritized. (Envision Platinum, 2016) is a water resource recover y
facility
designed to meet some of the strictes t wastewater treatm
ent
3. Evidence that the project will not result in a net loss of public standards in the world. The project includes 18 million
gallons
space and amenities in quantit y or quality. In cases of offsetti in tank capacit y with associated pumps , chemical analysi
ng, s
demons trate that the offsets are of similar or better type equipment, and an extensive odor control system. The
and
quality and will serve the same community as the lost resourc project also restored previously inaccessible land by buildin
es. g
a lit, multi-purpose athletic field for the community on
top
B. Does the stakeholder engagement process specifi of the facility ’s process tanks which is operated by the
cally city’s
address issues of public space and amenities? Department of Recreation, Parks, and Cultural Activiti
es.
1. Documentation that public space and amenities were specific
ally
included in the stakeholder engagement process . Examples
include, but are not limited to, letters, memoranda, and meeting
minutes with stakeholders showing stakeholder involvem
ent.

C. Are public stakeholders satisfied with the project

plans involving public space and amenities?
1. Evidence of stakeholder approval of how the project will
address
impacts to public space/amenities including, when applica
ble, the I
design and access to new or enhanced public space/amenitie
s.
'-iiiiaiill

2. Evidence of stakeholder understanding and acceptance +? “-a

■L- —Pivn
A ' S
of construction impacts to public space/amenities,
specifically access, during construction. HHfl
3. Written approval from officials , if relevant, regarding mrnmmmm
the project plans related to public space/amenities.
■-
riri-

ENVISION V3 57
 QUALITY OF LIFE: INNOVATION

QL0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

■

INTENT METRIC

+10 To reward exceptional performance beyond

the expectations of the system and application
of innovative methods that advance state-
Whether project sustainability performance
qualifies as innovation, exceptional
performance, or is not otherwise
POINTS
of-the-art sustainable infrastructure. recognized in existing credits.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

INNOVATION
A or B or C

(+1-10) Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

(A) Implement innovative methods, technologies, or processes that are novel either in their use, application, or within the local regulatory or cultural context.
OR
(B) Implement measures that exceed the highest existing requirements within one or more Quality of Life credits.
OR
(C) Address additional aspects of sustainability not currently recognized in Envision

DESCRIPTION Projects may demonstrate they implement innovative

methods, technologies or processes in several ways:
This credit addresses instances in which projects:
• The project is an early adopter of new technology
1. Implement innovative methods, resources, technologies, or
or methods that can demonstrably improve project
processes that are novel in their use, application, or within
performance without negative trade-offs;
the local regulatory or cultural context of the project;
• The project uses technologies or methods that may be general
2. Exceed the performance requirements
practice in other regions or parts of the world, but within the
of one or more credits; and/or
context of the project (whether climate, regulations, policies,
3. Address additional aspects of sustainability political support, public opinion, etc.) have not yet gained
not currently recognized in Envision acceptance. Significant efforts are taken to demonstrate
the effectiveness of the technology or method within the
Points for this credit are not calculated in the overall applicable context and provide a precedent for future adoption.
points and, therefore, act as bonus points. Given the nature of
the credit, the broad format of which is intended to encourage • The project team takes significant steps to include
creative infrastructure solutions, thorough documentation research goals within the project’s development, or
is expected. Project teams may pursue more than one of the work with a university or research organization to
three possible options for this credit, or pursue multiple for advance the general knowledge of the profession.
the same option, for a total of up to ten (10) bonus points. Proprietary research that is not made publicly available
cannot count toward achieving this credit.

Project teams must also demonstrate that the innovation

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
serves a purpose. This can be done in one of two ways:
Innovation: To qualify for innovation points, projects must
implement innovative methods, resources, technologies, or • Overcoming significant problems, barriers, or limitations—
processes (e.g., the use of a pre-existing technology in a new Project teams demonstrate that the innovation reduces
way or the successful application of a technology or methods in or eliminates significant problems, barriers, or limitations
regions or locales where existing policies, regulations, or general that previously hampered the use of the new methods,
opinion have prevented their use). In these circumstances, it technologies, or processes implemented on the project.
is imperative to prove that the application of the technology
does, and will continue to, meet performance expectations • Creating scalable and/or transferable solutions—Project teams
and that it does not have a corresponding negative impact on demonstrate that new methods, technologies, or processes
the local or global environment, economy, or community. implemented on the project are scalable across a wide range

58 ENVISION V3
 of project sizes and/or are applicable and transferable across • Establishing an endowment fund to fund scholarships and/or
multiple kinds of infrastructure projects in multiple sectors. student internship programs for an extended period of time.

Exceptional Performance: To qualify for exceptional

performance points, projects must meet the highest level EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
of achievement for one or more Quality of Life credits. For DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
example, projects seeking additional points in credit QL3.2
Preserve Historic and Cultural Resources must already be
A. To what extent does the project implement innovative
achieving a restorative impact on existing cultural resources.
methods, technologies, or processes that overcome
In this instance, exceptional performance may be pursued by
significant problems, barriers or limitations, or
projects whose magnitude of preservation and investment
create scalable and transferable solutions?
in restoration represent a significant percentage of the
project budget and a primary objective of the project. 1. Documentation of the application of innovative technologies
or methods. Detailed description of how this application will
Possible areas of achievement in exceptional performance for improve existing conventional practice either globally or within
Quality of Life may include, but are not limited to, the following: the unique context of the project. Provide justification as to
why this application should be considered innovative either as
• Projects where the owner or contractor’s commitment to a technology, a method, or within the project context (climate,
construction health and safety results in a new industry political, cultural, etc.).
standard through procedures, processes, or equipment;
2. Documentation that the project reduces or eliminates
• Projects for which net positive impact on public space exceeds significant problems, barriers, or limitations that previously
small-scale parks and plazas to include large parks or reserves, hampered the use or implementation of certain resources,
recreational facilities, or urban spaces that represent a technologies, processes, or methods that improve the
significant contribution to the quality of the community; sustainability of the project.
Alternatively, documentation that the new methods, technologies,
• Project whose impact will fundamentally change the or processes implemented on the project are scalable across a
ability of community residents to access and use wide range of project sizes and/or are applicable and transferable
sustainable means of transportation on a large scale. across multiple kinds of infrastructure projects in multiple sectors.
Address Additional Aspects of Sustainability: To qualify for bonus
points under this approach, project teams must demonstrate B. To what extent does the project exceed the highest
that they are addressing one or more aspect of sustainability levels of achievement for a given credit?
not currently recognized in Envision. Sustainability performance 1. Detailed documentation of how the project exceeds the existing
must be related to Quality of Life. Addressing an aspect of requirements currently within a given Quality of Life credit.
sustainability not currently covered by the Envision system
might sometimes be considered innovative, in which case C. To what extent does the project address a sustainability
the requirements for the Innovation path may be followed. aspect that is not currently addressed by the Envision system?
For example, a project may earn bonus points for: 1. Detailed documentation of how the project addresses a
sustainability aspect that is not currently addressed by the
• Implementing community education programs to foster public
Envision system.
awareness of the functions and benefits of the project;
2. Documentation showing how this aspect relates to the Quality
of Life category.

ENVISION V3 59
 \\ JW :
-wB;
S574C —

3* r
(. iv i\ ,ses-vf

L r
a
/• - 1!!l
...

' & W*.

& # f .iilM > ■I
* W
V -r-'
£ to fV tC
Mr
TCj
Se
Vi
i>_. kgj £
\r •
m i!
-

I m

t mat
•«»»i

.•
* Vi"
em

I'll!
;■« k jjj ■ijjiijj

siiiini
niililJi 111
jp UB
■i-i i
4 i V* •.«■•« * ‘ r « <.
B6
WiNiwH xtszL
1 V^V^Hi^Vvi^v^.i
- i^v w1 !i;i::s
;■■■■■■“i

i N
raffira,™ pfjjjn:
!;ss. 11 a i 11 a i i i i i i mini ajiuiini.
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■*Jillllllllfi
■■■■■■■■■■VVVIlVRIttVJ I f «I I 13 x x

M
■ V: i»>!rauuiiii:= - 5
• ML
II IIIU
11
Ml
»U
i
lauauaaa

*
I 11

I mlp
diMUuM
amt; ! UfflW
■ tlihhWtWii
auf.u'ritt ■■••■■nil ■

IT
»I
■
- !l»
■ • - * ViV#Vwii.u i !,i:,!
i:f . tiiiliibUiiiiliUJ
r . ■ 5*i
\ W**t* IMliiMMi
i ^sssr-«?w MStli lif ®:i!
--
■■ i a i\SE‘r' ; - - - - - M) JIIIM M
fc ' j a .»\J» . - if--
,nnn\
i <r •■ i 11 P
>- w—I
h —. n«
Hi mi wi; m: <i
(nun run ' S=H--»
........................... .......
21IIII Mill g
■ai 3i
nillllin :•
ii ii a -/; S)
-.^ aaaag. i:.
\ .r^Nm Vlk ‘If:-:.:
 Leadership
Successful sustainable projects require a new
way of thinking about how projects are developed
and delivered. Project teams are most successful
1111111111111111111'

uimiiimmiiiii
-..IIIIIIIII

if they communicate and collaborate early on,

illllflilfIlliiiifI
WIEIEIEimmU'
'= EISIIIEIIillllli,
'VEiiiSiimsmitl

i'TT

involve a wide variety of people in creating ideas

U
■ IS,

! r
for the project, and understand the long-term,
«*■ :=

holistic view of the project and its life cycle.

*!■
_

This section encourages and rewards these

*»
v-.rrS:. •
r.l

actions with the perspective that, together with

IrBPEPSS
l=i
-

jfc, '£**£*' :

traditional sustainability actions such as reducing

■■■■■■
uni ears
\

■ I- SI-'-H
~-

* i .'=■»;

energy and water use, effective and collaborative

HU
•.ffl
i'l

leadership produces a truly sustainable project

i
?

fflfi

that contributes positively to the world around it.

EF
IHHR
SEES
-FRF
-FF

This category is divided into three subcategories:

Collaboration, Planning, and Economy.

IP
» *-A

I'l
a
b
* "i
;
V"

4
X
X
▼v

VV-<
12 / credits

L F
.
c.

* •-
,
»-
 1 Are there sustainability commitments from the project developers?

2 Is there a sustainability management plan in place?

3 Are stakeholders engaged?

4 Will the project stimulate economic development?

5 A re local residents employed on the project?

6 Is the project located near public transportation?

•••
1 2 3

■
? ••• *

6
. m
*- 5

COLLABORATION PLANNING ECONOMY

Sustainable projects must include input Taking a long-term view of the project A broader comprehensive understanding
from a wide variety of stakeholders to can greatly increase the sustainability of the project includes examination of
fully capture synergies, savings, and of the project. Understanding planning direct and indirect economic factors such
opportunities for innovation. This type issues, such as future growth trends in the as growth, development, job creation,
of collaboration requires a new level of area and the impacts of a project at the and the general improvement of quality
leadership and commitment from the end of its life, can lead to a project that of life. Positive results from infrastructure
project team and new ways of managing avoids pitfalls and plans effectively for projects can include community
the process. Rather than each part of the its own future. This can reduce costs and education, outreach, knowledge creation,
team working alone on their own piece streamline the entire project process. and worker training, among others.
of the project, teams should meet and
communicate, allowing stakeholders to
contribute ideas and perspectives.

62 ENVISION V3
( 0)
Leadership

COLLABORATION
LD1.1 Provide Effective Leadership and Commitment
LD1.2 Foster Collaboration and Teamwork
LD1.3 Provide For Stakeholder Involvement
LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies

PLANNING
LD2.1 Establish A Sustainability Management Plan
LD2.2 Plan For Sustainable Communities
LD2.3 Plan For Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance
LD2.4 Plan For End-of-Life

ECONOMY
LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
LD3.2 Develop Local Skills and Capabilities
LD3.3 C onduct a Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation

LD0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

ENVISION V3 63
© LEADERSHIP: COLLABORATION

LD1.1 Provide Effective Leadership and Commitment

INTENT METRIC

18 Provide effective leadership and commitment

to achieve project sustainability goals.
The degree to which the project owner and
project team have made general, and project-
specific, sustainability commitments and
POINTS
instituted sustainability management policies.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D Not Available

(2) Initial Commitment (5) Strong Commitment (12) Strong Commitment (18) Sustainability
As A Core Value

(A) A written commitment by the owner and project team to address the social, environmental, and economic aspects of the project.
Commitments to sustainability are clearly articulated at the project level in a project chartering session and/or contract documents.

(B) Commitments are supported by a sustainability management policy that is

commensurate with the scope, scale, and complexity of the project.

(C) Sustainability commitments, and progress

toward their achievement, are revisited periodically
through meetings or written reports.

(D) Key members of the

project team have made
clear commitments to
sustainability, as evidenced by:
• Organizational sustainability
policies and/or reports.
• Examples of projects, or
initiatives, to improve
sustainable performance.
• Sustainability strategies
embedded into their
business strategy.
• Third-party organizational
recognition or commitments.

DESCRIPTION goals. Conversely, project performance is most at risk when

sustainability is considered an add-on or lower-priority objective.
This credit addresses establishing strong leadership to adequately
and competently address issues surrounding sustainability in all
Many Leadership credits reference the importance of decision
phases of the project. This credit assesses the degree to which
making and collaboration within the “project team.” The nature
various members of the project team have committed to making
of the project team will depend on several factors, including
sustainability a priority within their respective organizations
the project delivery method. The intention of referencing the
as well as the project itself. Project teams will be able to better
project team is to capture major decision makers involved
serve the community when they are led and managed by
in the project, as well as those who act as primary advisors,
people and organizations that have a strong commitment to the
consultants, or specialists on behalf of decision makers. This
principles of sustainability and have demonstrated the ability
will almost always include the project owner, those who act
to effectively incorporate these principles into projects.
as lead designers (engineers, architects, landscape architects,
etc.), and those who manage and execute the project through
Projects are more likely to achieve sustainable outcomes when
construction, but ideally would also include those responsible
owners, designers, contractors, and all involved in the project
for funding, operating, regulating, subconsulting, or otherwise
team make strong commitments to achieve sustainability
utilizing the project (e.g., community groups). Those with the

64 ENVISION V3
responsibility and authority to implement sustainability efforts stakeholders, health and safety commitments, environmental
should coordinate to ensure their effectiveness. Envision commitments, and social/community commitments.
users should take time to review the organizational hierarchy
Owner sustainability management policies may be project- or
of the project in order to identify at which levels key decisions
program-specific or agency/department-wide. However, they must
regarding project sustainability are being made. This will
establish requirements that a project address sustainability and
constitute the starting point of defining the project team.
meet performance targets. Sustainability management policies are
more general than a sustainability management plan, referenced
in LD2.1. For example, a sustainability management plan would
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
include the processes and strategies by which a sustainability
Improved: Project-specific commitments are in place. management policy would be implemented on a specific project.

Enhanced: A project sustainability management policy is in place

C Has the project team periodically revisited project
that defines the scope of the project and the project team’s
sustainability commitments throughout project delivery?
commitment to sustainable performance improvement. The
policy commits the project team to meeting or exceeding all 1. Project-specific sustainability report(s), or meeting
health and safety standards and improving environmental, social minutes, detailing how the project will achieve its
and ethical performance. This policy can be a pre-established goals and which key performance indicators will
policy created by the project owner, agreed to by the project be used to measure and manage initiatives.
team, and customized for the project to the extent required.
D. Have key members of the project team made
Superior: Commitments go beyond initial or organizational commitments to sustainability?
singular statements and are revisited, with progress
1. Identification and description of key members of the project team.
reviewed, throughout project development.
2. Documentation of each of the following
Conserving: Sustainability commitments are supported by a commitments to sustainability:
documented history of achievement in sustainable performance.
a. Organizational sustainability principles and policies.
Sustainability is a core value of the organizations involved.
For example, sustainability reports, preferably either
verified or partially verified by an independent third
Applicability: It is likely that all projects can benefit from effective
party, with clearly expressed targets and associated
leadership and strong commitments to sustainability. It would
performance (e.g., Global Reporting Initiative, corporate
therefore be difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not
GHG emissions reduction targets, corporate energy
relevant or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award.
reduction targets, corporate waste reduction targets).
b. Recognition of past or ongoing projects, or significant
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND initiatives undertaken, to improve sustainable performance
(e.g., project write-ups, awards, or third-party recognition
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
received for sustainable performance, efforts or initiatives
to train and/or credential staff in sustainability).
A. Have the project owner and project team made written
commitments to address the social, environmental, c. Evidence that the organizations involved in the project
and economic aspects of the project? have sustainability strategies that are embedded into
their business strategy, or evidence of a clear link
1. Written commitments to address social, environmental, and
between the strategies. For example, illustration or
economic aspects of the project (i.e., sustainability). For example,
description of the governance of sustainability within the
contract documents clearly articulating commitments to address
organizations and clear demonstration of support and
the social, environmental, and economic aspects of the project,
commitment from senior management to sustainability.
and/or evidence of a chartering, value engineering, or other
relevant design sessions that included key members of the project d. Third-party organizational recognition or commitments
team that clearly expressed commitments to sustainability. related to sustainability (e.g., signatory to the UN Global
Compact, listed on the CDP Climate Performance Leadership
Index, listed on the Jantzi Social Index, listed on the Dow Jones
B. Is the project supported by a sustainability
Sustainability Index, BCorp certification, JUST Label, etc.).
management policy commensurate with the
scope, scale, and complexity of the project?
1. A sustainability management policy that includes commitments RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
to achieving improvements in sustainable performance with LD1.2 Foster Collaboration and Teamwork
clear objectives and targets. The policy references project LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies

ENVISION V3 65
© LEADERSHIP: COLLABORATION

LD1.2 Foster Collaboration and Teamwork

INTENT METRIC

18 Enhance project sustainability through

interdisciplinary collaboration and teamwork.
The breadth and inclusivity of interdisciplinary
and collaborative meetings and the resulting
sustainability performance enhancements.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D Not Available

(2) Early Collaboration (5) Achieving Goals (12) Ongoing Collaboration (18 ) Life-Cycle
Collaboration

(A) Sustainability goals are defined early during interdisciplinary collaborative project kickoff meetings among project staff at all levels.

(B) The project team can demonstrate sustainability performance enhancements that
resulted from the interdisciplinary collaborative process. Performance enhancements should
result from a whole-systems design approach, rather than sustainability add-ons.

(C) Ongoing collaboration meetings are conducted throughout

design with the owner and the interdisciplinary project team
to clarify expectations, discuss potential opportunities,
and identify potential barriers to integrated design.
Meetings involve a broad set of project participants.

(D) The interdisciplinary

collaboration or integrated
design process specifically
includes stakeholders from
later construction, operations,
and/or maintenance phases.
Important considerations
over the project life are
understood and incorporated
into the project.

DESCRIPTION by assumptions or lack of awareness and can often lead to

innovative solutions or higher performance targets. Project
This credit encourages owner and project team collaboration in the
teams should consider holding meetings where each of the
delivery of more sustainable projects. Integrated project delivery
Envision criteria are discussed and each party is able to offer
brings project team members together early in the planning
feedback on how they can contribute to achieving project goals.
and design stages to understand how their design assumptions
and decisions positively or negatively affect the work of others.
This includes members of the project team who are traditionally
involved later in the project (e.g., constructor, operator). Working
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
separately, performance is suboptimal, confined to individual The credit assesses the breadth and inclusivity of interdisciplinary
project components. Working together as an integrated team, and collaborative meetings and the resulting sustainability
performance can be optimized across the entire project. performance enhancements. The nature of the documentation
provided for this credit will vary depending on project delivery type.
Owners and project teams should consider how investing in
early and regular collaboration between designers, contractors, Improved: Design charrettes, value engineering sessions, or
and operators can prevent design conflicts, reduce change similar meetings are used during design development to foster
orders, and result in projects that are easier, faster, and less an environment for project innovation. Note that project design
expensive to construct. Meetings, where each party is able to meetings or value engineering sessions are not inherently about
bring their expertise and knowledge, can prevent errors caused improved sustainability, and therefore Envision users should clearly

66 ENVISION V3
identify how these sessions were used to address sustainability B. To what extent has project sustainability performance been
(environmental, social, and economic goals) for the project. enhanced as a result of the interdisciplinary collaboration?
Written commitments that specify the use of integrated design 1. Documentation of project improvements or
and how it will be used to improve the sustainable performance increased performance that can be attributed to
of the project can be helpful supporting documentation. the interdisciplinary collaborative process.

Enhanced: The project team works together to improve

C. To what extent did the project team establish
sustainable performance and can demonstrate achievement.
regular interdisciplinary and collaborative meetings
Superior: Collaboration extends beyond initial to set and achieve sustainability goals?
meetings throughout project development. 1. Documentation of the interdisciplinary project team’s business
processes and management controls in the form of procedures,
Conserving: Collaboration extends in scope to include flowcharts, checklists, and other documented control measures
stakeholders from later phases of construction or operation. to achieve more sustainable outcomes for the project.

Applicability: It is likely that all projects can benefit 2. Documentation demonstrating that interdisciplinary
from better collaboration and teamwork in pursuit collaborative meetings extended beyond initial kick-off
of more sustainable projects. It would therefore be meetings and were regularly occurring throughout the process.
difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not relevant or Documentation should clearly demonstrate that meetings
applicable to a project seeking an Envision award. were held regularly and beyond initial kick-off meetings.

D. Does the process include construction, operations, or

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND maintenance stakeholders, for better incorporation
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE of considerations in later project phases?
1. Documentation that construction, operations and/or maintenance
A . Was an interdisciplinary collaborative kickoff meeting representatives have participated in the integrated design process.
held early in the project to define sustainability goals?
2. Documentation that the integrated process has improved
1. Identification of the various disciplines or project team roles sustainability performance in later phases of the project.
involved in the interdisciplinary collaborative process.
2. Documentation of design charrettes, value engineering sessions, or
other meetings to identify opportunities for improving sustainable
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
performance and reducing design conflicts. Documentation should LD1.1 Provide Effective Leadership and Commitment
clearly demonstrate that meetings were held early in the process. LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies

PROJECT EXAMPLE: GRAND BEND AREA

WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY

The Grand Bend Area Wastewater Treatment Facility

(Envision Platinum, 2015), serving the municipalities of
Lambton Shores and South Huron in Ontario, provides an
excellent example of community relationship building. Local
volunteers and non-profit organizations are involved in the
restoration and ongoing maintenance of the natural features
on the site, including a constructed wetland and tall grass
prairies. The project team also forged relationships with
local educational professionals to develop activity books for
students about the plant’s functions, and about the turtle,
bird, small mammal, and insect species that inhabit the site.

ENVISION V3 67
© LEADERSHIP: COLLABORATION

LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement

INTENT METRIC

18 Early and sustained stakeholder engagement

and involvement in project decision making.
Establishment of sound and meaningful
programs for stakeholder identification,
early and sustained engagement, and
POINTS
involvement in project decision making.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F

(3) Active Engagement (6) Direct Engagement (9) Community Involvement (14) Community Satisfaction (18) Stakeholder Partnerships

(A) Primary and secondary stakeholders are identified through a stakeholder mapping process. Stakeholder concerns and specific objectives for stakeholder engagement are defined.
(B) A proactive stakeholder engagement process is established with clear objectives. This occurs at the earliest stages of planning and is sustained through project construction.
Engagement moves beyond education into active dialogue. Stakeholder views are monitored, and a two-way line of communication is established to reply to inquiries. Sufficient
opportunities are provided for stakeholders to be involved in decision making. The participation process is transparent with opportunities to provide meaningful input.

(C) A lead person from the project team, in addition to any public involvement lead or manager, works with
stakeholder groups to understand communication needs and the desire for and scope of involvement.

(D) There are specific cases in which public input influenced or validated project outcomes.
Potentially conflicting stakeholder views were evaluated and addressed equitably during decision making.

(E) Feedback is sought from stakeholders as to their

satisfaction with the engagement process, and the
resulting decisions were made based on their input.

(F) One or more stakeholders,

having mutual interests
or interdependencies,
are identified and
engaged as partners.

DESCRIPTION engagement process and how incorporating these criteria into the
stakeholder engagement plan can meet multiple requirements.
This credit addresses the public input process established by
the owner and the project team. Relationship building among
the public and key stakeholders is an important component PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
of the engagement process. Stakeholder engagement is a
Improved: A public participation process is set up to identify
critical component of any infrastructure project. While many
and engage key stakeholders in project decision making.
projects incorporate some level of stakeholder engagement,
Project stakeholders may include local communities,
this credit assesses the degree to which stakeholder
customers, employees, governments and regulators, non-
engagement was proactive, early, and sustained.
governmental organizations (NGOs), etc. For this credit,
Project teams that do not proactively engage stakeholders risk stakeholders are categorized as primary or secondary.
failing to notice demographic, socioeconomic, or cultural shifts Primary stakeholders are individuals or groups directly
within the community that may impact the overall success of the impacted by the project, and secondary stakeholders are
project. Proactive, early, and sustained stakeholder engagement individuals or groups indirectly affected by the project.
helps owners and project teams earn a social license to operate.
The stakeholder engagement process includes informing
Social license to operate is the acceptance of the community
stakeholders of the scope of the project, identification
developed through mutual respect and can build goodwill,
of stakeholder issues and concerns, collecting feedback,
speed projects, and smooth the way for future projects.
and incorporating that feedback into the design,
Project teams should consider how a significant number of construction, and operation of the project.
Envision credits rely on documentation from a robust stakeholder

68 ENVISION V3
Enhanced: A member of the project team is 2. Documentation of engagement, which may include letters,
directly engaged with stakeholders. meeting minutes, or memoranda with stakeholders.
Documentation shows the issues that were addressed with
Superior: The project can demonstrate that the two-way stakeholders and their concerns/feedback specific to the project.
communication established with stakeholders was successful and
resulted in benefits to the project. Project teams demonstrate C. Was a lead member of the project team directly involved
that consideration was given even to conflicting stakeholder with stakeholder groups to understand their needs?
feedback (i.e., the project team was not biased toward feedback
1. Documentation that a lead person from the project team, in
that supported or reinforced their initial assumptions).
addition to any public involvement lead or manager, worked
Conserving: Engagement becomes an opportunity to learn with stakeholder groups to understand communication
and improve for future projects. Stakeholder feedback is needs and the desire for and scope of involvement.
sought regarding their satisfaction with the process.
D. To what extent has stakeholder engagement
Restorative: Stakeholders are engaged as partners in the project. feedback been incorporated into project
plans, design, and/or decision making?
Applicability: It is likely that all projects can benefit from 1. Documentation showing that feedback raised by stakeholders was
stakeholder engagement. Although the types and scope of evaluated and prioritized and how feedback changed/impacted/
stakeholders may vary depending on the project, it would altered the project plans, design, and/or decision making.
be difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not relevant
or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award. OR
Documentation showing how feedback raised by
stakeholders was already incorporated into the
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
project plans, design, and/or decision making.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
2. Supporting evidence that stakeholder feedback was treated
A. To what extent has the project team undertaken a fairly and equitably, according to principles of social and
stakeholder mapping exercise to determine stakeholders? environmental justice, regardless of race, color, wealth, religion
(creed), gender, gender expression, age, national origin (ancestry),
1. Comprehensive list of potential stakeholders identified,
disability, marital status, sexual orientation, or military status.
with stakeholder classification (primary or secondary)
and a statement or rationale for selection.
E. Has the project team sought feedback from stakeholders as
a. Primary stakeholders are individuals or groups directly to their satisfaction with the engagement process and the
impacted by the project, such as the communities crossed and resulting decisions that were made based on their input?
served by a new road. This should include stakeholders who
1. Letters or other documentation showing
could be impacted or affected by the project during its life-cycle.
support from stakeholders for the engagement
b. Secondary stakeholders are individuals or process undertaken for this project.
groups indirectly affected by the project.
2. Letters or other documentation showing
2. Evidence that stakeholders were identified and support from stakeholders for the decisions
prioritized in a fair and equitable fashion. that were made based on their input.

B. To what extent has the project team analyzed, planned, and 3. In certain cases, documentation may also demonstrate an
executed the engagement for key project stakeholders? absence of significant new stakeholder issues arising as
the project advances to final design and construction.
1. Engagement plans for each stakeholder that consider the
issues the project team needs to address and the method(s)
F. Has the project engaged one or more
of engagement (e.g., some stakeholders may require
stakeholders as partners?
only one-way communication, while others may require
dialogue and partnership-building engagement such as 1. Documentation that one or more stakeholders,
consultations, hosting stakeholder advisory panels, soliciting having mutual interests or interdependencies,
online feedback, hosting multi-stakeholder forums and are identified and engaged as partners.
partnerships, and/or convening networks of stakeholders).
a. Stakeholder engagement plans should be proactive. This RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
would be characterized by outreach and a determination QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life
to involve those who will be affected by, or are very likely
to have an active interest in, the project, as opposed to QL1.4 Minimize Noise and Vibration
passive invitations to participation such as public notices QL2.1 Improve Community Mobility and Access
with little or no follow-up to ensure a robust response.
QL3.1 Advance Equity and Social Justice
b. Engagement moves beyond education into active dialogue.
Stakeholder views are monitored, and a two-way line of QL3.2 Preserve Historic and Cultural Resources
communication is established to reply to inquiries. QL3.3 Enhance Views and Local Character
c. Sufficient opportunities are provided for stakeholders to be QL3.4 Enhance Public Space and Amenities
involved in decision making. The participation process is
transparent with opportunities to provide meaningful input. LD2.4 Plan for End-of-Life

ENVISION V3 69
© LEADERSHIP: COLLABORATION

LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies

INTENT METRIC

18 Critically reconsider whether traditional

waste streams can be beneficially reused.
The extent to which the project team works
with external groups to find beneficial use
of waste, excess resources, or capacity.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+D A+B+D A+B+E

(3) Initial Investigation (6) Synergy Pursued (12) Short-Term (14) Long-Term (18) Circular Economy
Byproduct Reuse Byproduct Reuse

(A) The project team conducts an assessment of the availability and viability of excess resources (i.e., waste) or capacity, including but not
limited to waste materials, heating or cooling, financial capacity, land area/space, or management/personnel capacity.
(B) Candidates for byproduct synergies or reuse are identified. This can include finding a beneficial reuse for the project’s waste or excess
resources, or the project’s beneficial reuse of external waste or excess resources. Project teams should also consider ecosystem services where
project waste or excess resources can support natural systems, or where natural systems can process and remove project waste.

(C) The project team (D) The project successfully (D) The project successfully (E) The project is fully engaged
demonstrates an active includes a byproduct includes a byproduct in a “circular economy”
attempt to incorporate at synergy or reuse. synergy or reuse. system whereby the majority
least one byproduct synergy of its operational waste is
or reuse into the project. Execution is a short-term or Execution is a long-term beneficially reused OR the
one-time byproduct synergy/ regularly recurring byproduct majority of its operational
reuse (e.g., during construction). synergy/reuse throughout resources are sourced from
project operations. external waste streams.

DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

Though byproducts are most commonly thought of as solid Improved: Creating byproduct synergy begins with
waste, they may include a wide variety of excess resources. understanding the value of a system’s excess resources.
True byproduct synergy, or reuse, involves identification Project teams identify excess resources within the project
and cost-effective use of unwanted waste or excess and assess their viability for reuse, as well as the opportunity
resources (e.g., materials, energy/heat, gas emissions, to reuse excess resources within the project. Potential
effluent, water, services, capacity). Byproduct synergies can candidates to receive or provide byproducts are identified.
be accomplished in two ways: finding opportunities for a
project’s excess resources to be beneficially reused off site, Enhanced: Byproduct synergies involved a complex matching
or incorporating off-site excess resources into the project. of supply and demand. As a project is only one side of
the arrangement, it is not always possible to successfully
The term “byproduct synergy” may also be known as “industrial implement. However, there is value in actively attempting
ecology,” through its expression in “eco-industrial parks,” or a byproduct reuse even if unsuccessful. Lessons learned
by the broader concepts of “circular economy.” Whatever the can often carry over into other projects, increase general
preferred terminology, the classification of excess resources awareness, and improve the chances of future success.
or services as “waste” is inherently inefficient. Everything has
value. In a circular economy, all excess resources or services Superior: While the ideal byproduct synergy creates
are directed to local beneficial use. These interconnected a closed-loop system of perpetual renewal, this level
systems are more resilient by eliminating waste and reducing recognizes the benefits when only short-term or one-
dependence on external sources. True circular economies are time byproduct synergies are possible. For example, the
rare, but every project can contribute toward growing circular beneficial reuse of a waste product during construction.
economies by investigating opportunities for beneficial reuse.
Conserving: Projects achieve a true byproduct synergy
whereby ongoing excess resources are beneficially reused.

70 ENVISION V3
Restorative: Projects are integrated into a circular b. Long-term/regularly recurring (e.g., ongoing
economy. This is determined by the amount of excess reuse throughout project operations).
resources beneficially reused and/or the number of
byproduct synergy connections in the network. E. Is the project part of a circular economy, whereby the
majority of operational byproducts are beneficially
Applicability: It is likely that all projects that use materials or repurposed or the majority of operational resources
product waste can benefit from byproduct synergies. It would consumed are beneficially repurposed?
be difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not relevant
1. Documentation that the project includes multiple
or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award.
byproduct synergies that constitute a majority of its waste
streams or feedstock. Documentation should demonstrate
that these are part of a broader network of byproduct
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
reuse and not isolated independent activities.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE

A. Has the project team assessed the availability of either

RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
internal or external excess resources or capacity? LD1.2 Foster Collaboration and Teamwork
1. Documentation of efforts to identify available resources LD2.4 Plan for End-of-Life
or capacity within the project, or project needs that could
RA1.2 Use Recycled Materials
be met by external resources or capacity. Excess resources
or waste may include more than physical waste streams. RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site
Consideration should include but not be limited to waste RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources
materials, heating or cooling, financial capacity, land
area/space, or management/personnel capacity. NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields
CR2.6 Improve Infrastructure Integration
B. Has the project team identified opportunities
for byproduct synergies or reuse?
1. Documentation that the project team identified opportunities
for byproduct synergies or reuse. This can include finding a
beneficial reuse for the project’s waste or excess resources, or the
project’s beneficial reuse of external waste or excess resources.
Project teams should also consider ecosystem services where
project waste or excess resources can support natural systems, PROJECT EXAMPLE: SURREY BIOFUEL FACILITY
or where natural systems can process and remove project waste. The Surrey Biofuel Facility (Envision Platinum, 2017)
located in the Port Kells industrial area of Surrey, British
C. Has the project team actively pursued Columbia, is the first fully integrated closed-loop organics
a byproduct synergy or reuse? waste management system in North America. This facility
1. Documentation that serious overtures were made to potential processes the city’s unwanted kitchen and garden waste
candidates. Achieving byproduct synergies is not always into biomethane gas which is used to fuel the city’s fleet of
possible. The intent of this criterion is to recognize projects that waste collection trucks. The facility also produces a compost
attempted to implement a byproduct reuse into the project product suitable for landscaping and agricultural applications.
but were unable due to unavoidable external factors.

D. Does the project include a byproduct synergy by utilizing

unwanted excess resources or finding destinations for
the beneficial reuse of unwanted excess resources?
1. Documentation that the project includes a byproduct
synergy, which is a direct exchange of otherwise unwanted
resources. Byproducts may be physical waste streams,
emissions, or even energy (heat/electricity).
2. Determination of the nature of the byproduct reuse:
a. Short-term/one-time (e.g., during construction
or for a limited period of time).
&

✓SURflfr BIOFUEL

f*. *■'
1 ’
ft.

r
Vii

ENVISION V3 71
© LEADERSHIP: PLANNING

LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan

INTENT METRIC

18 Create a project sustainability management

plan that can manage the scope, scale,
and complexity of a project seeking to
Extent of organizational policies,
authorities, mechanisms, education,
and business processes put in place.
POINTS
improve sustainable performance.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E Not Available

(4) Plan (7) “Plan-Do-Check-Act” (12) Full Implementation (18) Managing Change

(A) Roles and responsibilities for addressing sustainability are assigned to key members of the
project team. Their authority on the project to affect change is sufficient and clear.
(B) The project team develops a sustainability management plan, or adopts existing sustainability management
plans or policies sufficient in scope and scale to address the sustainable performance of the project.
The plan includes an index of all project features related to sustainability, and an assessment
of the environmental, social, and economic aspects of the project.
Sustainability goals and performance objectives are established and prioritized to reduce the
project’s impact. They are aligned with community needs and issues.

(C) The project management plan contains sufficient processes, action plans, and
management controls to achieve its sustainability goals and performance targets.

(D) Implementation of the sustainability management

plan, and progress toward established goals, is revisited
periodically through meetings or written reports.

(E) The plan is adaptable,

flexible, and resilient
enough to manage changes
in environmental, social,
or economic conditions of
the project over time.

DESCRIPTION A sustainability management plan enables an organization to

set goals, objectives, and policies; instigate plans and programs;
This credit addresses the importance of supporting the
review performance against a plan; and take corrective actions
achievement of sustainability goals through the structure
across the full dimensions of sustainability. The International
of plans and policies. Given the long timelines, complex
Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14004 standard
interorganizational cooperation, and varied consultants and
for social and environmental management plans provides
contractors, it is critical to have a sustainability management plan
guidance on developing a sustainability management plan.
to establish expectations and ensure that sustainability goals
and objectives are communicated and carried through project
delivery. When time and budgets are limited, sustainability
criteria must have this level of institutional support in order to
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
be successful. By clearly establishing roles, responsibilities, and Sustainability management plans may be stand-alone or
expectations, project owners and project teams realize efficiencies incorporated into larger management plans. For smaller
in avoided conflicts, duplications, or miscommunication. projects, sustainability management policies may be sufficient.
Having a clear prioritization of goals helps consultants and Documentation should focus on demonstrating that key
contractors correctly devote their time and resources in environmental, social, and economic performance targets are set,
order to deliver the best possible project for their client. plans implemented, and progress tracked as described above.

72 ENVISION V3
Sustainability management plans should include the design, 4. Prioritized list of project goals, objectives, performance
construction, and operations and maintenance of the project. targets that take into account project importance and the
consequences of change. Alignment of goals, objectives,
Improved: The project includes a sustainability management and targets to community needs and issues.
plan that can manage the scope, scale, and complexity of the
project’s sustainable performance goals. This assessment C. Does the project include a sustainability management plan
is based on the organizational policies, authorities, that contains sufficient processes and management controls
mechanisms, education, and business processes that have to address the sustainability goals, objectives, and targets?
been put in place and a determination of their sufficiency.
1. Documentation of the project’s business processes
To create the sustainability management plan, the project and management controls in the form of procedures,
team should develop a list of all the environmental, flowcharts, checklists, audits, corrective action reports,
economic, and social aspects of the project that relate and other documented control measures.
to sustainability. Once established, the list of aspects is 2. Documentation of a robust plan-do-check-act methodology to
prioritized by the project team based on the importance identify priorities, evaluate progress, and make adjustments
of meeting both project and sustainability goals. to continually improve project sustainability performance.

Enhanced: The sustainability management plan has clear processes 3. Documentation showing tracking and implementation of
and controls in place to achieve the stated goals (i.e., the plan is the sustainability management plan during construction.
not solely aspirational in nature). The project team creates an
4. The sustainability goals are communicated throughout the team
action plan consisting of objectives and performance targets.
through methods such as construction plans, daily job briefings,
Superior: Implementation of the plan is revisited periodically subcontractor orientations, or on-site field training sessions.
and progress reviewed throughout project development.
D. Was the sustainability management plan
Conserving: Sustainability recognizes that changes in implemented and periodically revisited?
socioeconomic and environmental conditions have the potential 1. Documentation that regular monitoring and reporting
to significantly impact projects. Sustainability management of progress against the plan’s goals and objectives
plans and their subsequent sustainability performance occurred (e.g., meetings or written reports).
goals take these changing conditions into account.
E. Is the project sustainability management plan
Applicability: It is likely that all projects can benefit
adaptable, flexible, and resilient enough to manage
from a sustainability management plan. It would be
changes in the environmental, social, or economic
difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not relevant or
conditions of the project over its life?
applicable to a project seeking an Envision award.
1. Identification of potential areas where changes in key
design variables may impact project performance over
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND time related to sustainability. Evidence that the plan
accounts for these potential changes and is adaptable.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE

A. Are roles and responsibilities for addressing sustainability RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
assigned to key members of the project team? LD1.1 Provide Effective Leadership and Commitment
1. Organizational charts and documentation showing the LD1.2 Foster Collaboration and Teamwork
persons responsible for project sustainability issues, their
position in the project organization, and their authority LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance
to make project decisions and affect change. LD2.4 Plan for End-of-Life
RA1.1 Support Sustainable Procurement Practices
B. Has a sustainability management plan been developed
to assess and prioritize the environmental, economic, CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
and social aspects of the project and set project CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions
sustainability goals, objectives, and targets?
CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies
1. Documentation of a sustainability management plan for the
project. The plan may be formal or informal and comprise
existing organizational or programmatic sustainability
management plans or policies that were applied to the
project, so long as they are sufficient in scope and scale to
address project performance. If a project-specific plan does
not exist, documentation should clearly link higher-level
plans and policies to their application on the project.
2. An index of all project features related to sustainability.
3. Assessment of the project’s environmental, economic, and
social impacts. This may include the potential for existing non-
sustainable conditions to further deteriorate environmental,
economic, or social conditions if left unaddressed.

ENVISION V3 73
© LEADERSHIP: PLANNING

LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities

INTENT METRIC

16 Incorporate sustainability principles

into project selection/identification in
order to develop the most sustainable
The degree to which project selection/
identification includes sustainability
performance assessments and is part of
POINTS
project for the community. a larger sustainable development plan.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E

(4) Sustainability (6) Alternative Analysis (9) Sustainability (12) Sustainable Planning (16) More Sustainable
Indicators Assessment Communities

(A) Sustainability indicators or outcomes are considered in project selection/identification and planning.

(B) Sustainable performance is included in alternative analyses during project identification.

Alternatives include the sustainability of a “no-build” option.

(C) During project identification, the project’s potential impact to broader external systems
is assessed, such as growth patterns, congestion, energy and water demand/production,
and how these impact the overall long-term sustainability of the community or region.

(D) The project is part of a comprehensive sustainable

development plan at the level of the infrastructure
system, municipality/community, or region.
The project demonstrates a direct connection
and contribution to achieving specific sustainable
development goals identified in the plan.

(E) The project addresses

an inherently unsustainable
condition within the community.

DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

Envision is not only about doing the project right, it is Improved: The potential sustainability (social, economic,
about doing the right project. Choosing the right project is environmental) impacts of the project were considered
a critical first step toward ensuring a sustainable project. during project selection/identification.
These decisions are often made very early in the planning
process during project selection/identification. This credit Enhanced: The sustainability performance of project alternatives
recognizes projects where social, economic, and environmental were evaluated and considered. Consideration was given
considerations were incorporated into the selection criteria. to the relative sustainability of a no-build scenario.

Most infrastructure projects have very long life spans and, once Superior: Beyond the project itself (energy efficiency, reduce
constructed, can commit communities to a certain range of emissions, etc.), consideration was given to the project’s
performance outcomes for decades. Furthermore, communities broader impacts to the overall sustainability of the community
that grow and develop around this infrastructure may face or interrelated systems. For example, asking whether a
limited choices in the future. This exists today, with communities transportation project will drive density or lead to urban sprawl.
burdened and limited in their choices for modifying existing
infrastructure because of choices made decades ago. Owners Conserving: Achieving a sustainable society requires a coordinated
and project teams should consider how infrastructure planning plan. This level is for communities that have invested in developing
impacts the future of a community or region, especially in comprehensive sustainability plans that can leverage the co-
regards to sustainability and operational or replacement costs. benefits and efficiencies achieved from integrating infrastructure
systems. In most cases, infrastructure development occurs
within the context of existing infrastructure systems.

74 ENVISION V3
Restorative: As mentioned, many communities are limited C. Was an assessment conducted of the project’s impacts to
in their sustainability performance by the infrastructure broader long-term community or regional sustainability?
development of the 20th century. In this level, projects correct 1. Documentation that early planning assessments
or mitigate an existing unsustainable condition (for example, a considered the broader impacts of the project on the
determination to replace an unsustainable energy plant at the long-term sustainability of the community or region.
end of its life with a sustainable source of energy generation).
D. Is the project part of a comprehensive
Applicability: Consideration is given to the scope and scale of
sustainable development plan?
the project and whether it has the potential to more broadly
impact community sustainability. For example, small projects 1. Documentation that the project is part of a broader community-
that involve the retrofitting or refurbishment of components or wide sustainable development plan. If not clearly identified
systems within an existing facility may contribute to improved as a sustainable plan, documentation should include how
sustainability performance but may struggle to demonstrate an the development plan advances sustainability objectives.
impact beyond the project site. Small projects that do not impact
the broader community sustainability, and do not have the E. Does the project address an inherently unsustainable
potential to impact community sustainability, may apply to have condition within the community or region?
this credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation. 1. Documentation that the project addresses or corrects an
existing unsustainable condition within the community
(e.g., nonrenewable resource consumption, water
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND overuse, or environmental contamination).
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
A. Was sustainability considered during
project selection/identification? QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life

1. Documentation that sustainability indicators or outcomes QL2.1 Improve Community Mobility and Access
were factors in considering project alternatives during project LD1.2 Foster Collaboration and Teamwork
selection/identification in the earliest phases of project planning.
LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
B. Were alternative analyses conducted on sustainability RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources
performance during project identification?
NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
1. Documentation that the project selection/identification
NW1.3 Preserve Prime Farmland
process included alternative analyses that included
sustainability performance assessments. NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields
2. Documentation that alternative analyses included the
sustainability performance of a no-build option in order to
determine whether new infrastructure construction was necessary.

ENVISION V3 75
© LEADERSHIP: PLANNING

LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance

INTENT METRIC

12 Put in place plans, processes, and personnel

sufficient to ensure that long-term sustainable
protection, mitigation, and enhancement
Comprehensiveness of long-term
monitoring and maintenance plans,
implementation goals, and commitment
POINTS
measures are incorporated into the project. of resources to fund the activities.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E Not Available

(2) Reduced Maintenance (5) Maintenance Plan (8) Securing Resources (12) Ongoing Improvement

(A) The project includes strategies to reduce maintenance impacts. This may include better design, durable longer-lasting
materials, or ease of access for maintenance and repair with minimal disruption to users and affected communities.

(B) A monitoring and maintenance plan is developed with specific sustainability performance
targets and an implementation schedule with clear goals and milestones.
It addresses any unique challenges of monitoring or maintaining the project’s sustainability features.
(C) The project team meets with operations, monitoring, and maintenance
staff to explain and discuss the operations plan.

(D) Owner identifies the key personnel to carry out the plan,
funding sources, and other resources to cover associated costs.
This includes training for the operation, monitoring, and
maintenance staff, and provisions for necessary future training.

(E) A schedule is developed

for future re-evaluation and
modification of the maintenance
plan based on monitored data.

DESCRIPTION implemented, to reduce the long-term costs of maintenance.

Infrastructure owners should also ensure that the resources
Sustainably designed and constructed projects can fail if they are
are available to properly maintain a project over its life.
not operated to maintain, or even enhance, their performance
targets. Sustainability is also about reducing the social,
environmental, and economic impacts of ongoing maintenance.
The maintenance of existing infrastructure systems can be an
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
economic burden on many communities. The frequent repair and Improved: The project is intentionally designed and constructed
replacement of poorly designed components can be wasteful to facilitate efficient and low-impact operations and maintenance
of natural resources and disruptive to communities. However, while achieving high levels of performance. Designers and
failure to adequately maintain and monitor infrastructure can also contractors work to ensure that the project anticipates and
lead to degraded performance with significant environmental, addresses key operations and maintenance activities.
social, and/or financial consequences. For example, the cost
to repair and maintain roads exponentially increases the Project teams should consider the new opportunities provided by
further they degrade. In addition, poorly maintained roads the proliferation and accessibility of data and technology. Smart
lead to increased congestion, increased vehicle maintenance, systems can reduce operations and maintenance costs, avoid
accidents, and personal injury, which all create a financial burden disruptions, improve service, and enhance safety. Providing real-
on individuals and the community as a whole. The failure to time information to infrastructure operators, key stakeholders,
properly plan or coordinate maintenance activities can also result or the general public can create numerous advantages.
in inefficiencies and waste. Therefore, project teams should
consider how a project can be designed, and a maintenance plan Enhanced: A comprehensive long-term plan is prepared and
in place before the end of construction. Clear and concise

76 ENVISION V3
maintenance requirements and specifications are provided E. Is there a plan in place to re-evaluate and modify the
to prevent sustainable performance degradation resulting maintenance plan based on monitored data?
from the failure to follow specified operations or maintenance 1. Schedule for re-evaluating the monitoring and maintenance plan.
procedures required to maintain system performance. Without
clear guidance on what is required to maintain sustainable
performance, future owners and operators may unknowingly RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
rely on old approaches, processes, and replacement parts. LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
Superior: Skills and resources are available to ensure that
sustainability features are properly maintained. This ensures LD3.2 Develop Local Skills and Capabilities
that the design performance will be maintained throughout
RA2.4 Commission and Monitor Energy Systems
the life of the project so long as sufficient resources and
personnel are provided to implement the plan. RA3.4 Monitor Water Systems
CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon
Conserving: The maintenance plan is treated as a
living document with plans to reassess and improve
performance over the life of the project.

Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that

include ongoing monitoring and maintenance. In rare cases
where projects do not include operation or maintenance
activities, projects may apply to have this credit deemed
not applicable with supporting documentation.

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND

DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE

A. Has the project team considered how to

reduce ongoing operational impacts? PROJECT EXAMPLE: RUNWAY 4L/22R AND
1. Documentation of strategies intended to reduce the negative
ASSOCIATED TAXIWAYS RECONSTRUCTION
impacts of ongoing operations and maintenance. This may The project team for the Runway 4L/22R and Associated
include but are not limited to better design, durable longer- Taxiways Reconstruction project (Envision Silver, 2016)
lasting materials, ease of access for maintenance and repair, at the Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport in
or minimal disruption to users and affected communities. Michigan realized that extending the useful life of a
project can significantly impact the long-term monitoring
B. Is there a clear and comprehensive plan in place for long-term and maintenance of the completed works. To this
monitoring and maintenance of the completed project? end, the team sought to increase the durability of the
1. Plans for long-term monitoring and runway pavement to meet a longer than typical design
maintenance of the completed project. life. Additionally, the team used pre-framed joints to
enable easier repairs and reduce maintenance. These
C. To what extent has the monitoring and maintenance plan design decisions, considered early on, will minimize the
been communicated with operations and maintenance staff? maintenance requirements over the life of the project

1. Documentation that the monitoring and maintenance plan

has been communicated and delivered to the staff responsible
for ongoing operations, monitoring, and maintenance.

D. To what extent have sufficient resources been allocated for

long-term monitoring and maintenance of the completed
project and appropriate training been conducted?
1. Designations of the persons or organizations assigned
to monitor and maintain the completed project.
n
2. Explanation of how funding will be allocated, set
aside, and maintained at sufficient levels to fund .

necessary monitoring and maintenance.

3. Documentation or plans showing that these resources
will be in place following delivery of the project.
4. Documentation of meetings and/or training sessions
intended to ensure a successful transition into operations.
■

ENVISION V3 77
© LEADERSHIP: PLANNING

LD2.4 Plan for End-of-Life

INTENT METRIC

14 Ensure that the project team is informed

by an understanding of the full impacts
and costs of the project’s end-of-life.
The degree to which the project team analyzes,
and communicates with stakeholders, the
end-of-life impacts, cost, and value.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E Not Available

(2) End-of-Life Plan (5) Enhancements (8) Pushing Boundaries (14) Extending Boundaries

(A) The project team develops an end-of-life plan, including the necessary replacement/refurbishment of major components over the project
life and its ultimate decommissioning, deconstruction, or replacement. Consideration is given to recyclability of materials and components
and/or the ease of deconstruction or replacement (e.g., components or materials that can be easily separated for recycling or reuse).
The plan is included in operations and maintenance documents.
(B) Relevant future demands, loads, or other requirements on the infrastructure system are estimated over
the anticipated project life. The project extends useful life by providing opportunities for reconfiguration,
future expansion, flexibility, or to beneficially repurpose the project after end-of-life.

(C) End-of-life impacts are assessed, including the environmental, social,

and economic conditions of the site and surrounding community.

(D) The project includes an analysis of end-of-life costs

and salvage value associated with deconstruction,
decommissioning, or replacement.

(E) The project team

demonstrates proactive
stakeholder engagement
in end-of-life planning and
can demonstrate that the
community understands
the full life-cycle costs and
benefits of the project.

DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

This credit encourages project teams to consider the costs Improved: replacement or refurbishment for major
and impacts associated with a project’s end-of-life. In doing project components and the ultimate decommissioning,
so, consideration should be given to extending the useful life deconstruction, or replacement of the project. This is
of the project by enabling reconfiguration, future expansion, the foundation for developing an end-of-life plan.
or flexibility, or by finding a beneficial use for the project. This
credit also addresses minimizing end-of-life costs by designing There are many instances where infrastructure is currently
projects to increase their end-of-life value, or the value of operating under conditions that exceed its original design
their components, including whether materials can be easily parameters. This causes accelerated degradation of the asset
disassembled/deconstructed, recycled, or repurposed. and speeds its end-of-life. Project teams should anticipate future
loads and incorporate them into the project in order to prolong
LD2.4 Plan for End of Life completes the series of life-cycle planning the project life. This can be achieved through incorporating
credits that include sustainable project selection (i.e., LD2.2 Plan capacity for reconfiguration, future expansion, or flexibility.
for Sustainable Communities) and efficient low-impact operations
and maintenance (i.e., LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring Enhanced: Project teams should also consider the ultimate
and Maintenance). Given the long life of infrastructure, careful end-of-life impacts of the project (for example, whether
consideration should be given to the project’s end of useful life.

78 ENVISION V3
decades of operation will render the site contaminated B. Has the project team evaluated opportunities
or otherwise environmentally damaged). to extend the project’s useful life or beneficially
repurpose the project after end-of-life?
Superior: The next step is applying a monetary value to 1. Estimates of the relevant future demands, loads, or
the project at the end of its life. This includes the positive other requirements on the infrastructure system.
values associated with repurposing components, and the
costs associated with replacing/refurbishing, or removal and 2. Documentation of how the overall design will allow for
site mitigation. Understanding end-of-life costs and values expansion, reconfiguration, and/or multiple uses
can and should inform project planning and delivery.
OR
Conserving: Project teams actively engage stakeholders in Documentation of how the project can feasibly and beneficially be
end-of-life planning and impact assessment. Communities repurposed at the end of its useful life.
should clearly understand the timeline and future burden of
replacing or deconstructing infrastructure. In addition, end-of-
C. Has the project team assessed potential social,
life planning is more effective when the full range of needs of
environmental, and economic end-of-life impacts?
the community is taken into consideration. An infrastructure
project or its components may no longer be suitable for their 1. Documentation estimating potential impacts
intended purpose at the end of their life. However, they may still associated with the project. Assessment should cover
retain value in meeting other community needs. For example, social, environmental, and economic impacts.
the very common repurposing of old rail lines as community
bike and pedestrian trails, or the High-Line in New York City, D. Has the project team evaluated the costs and
which repurposed an elevated rail line as a public park. salvage value of the project’s deconstruction,
decommissioning, or replacement?
Applicability: It is likely that all projects can benefit from end-of- 1. Results of the analysis identifying end-of-life costs and
life planning. It would be difficult to demonstrate that the credit is ultimate salvage value. Submission should indicate whether
not relevant or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award. costs are calculated in future or present values.

E. Has the project team proactively engaged

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND stakeholders in end-of-life planning?
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
1. Documentation demonstrating that end-of-life costs
and impacts were incorporated into the stakeholder
A. Has the project team developed an end-of-life plan? engagement process and that the community was engaged
1. Base case for project useful life (in years). in considering end-of-life options for the project.
2. Documentation of operations and maintenance documents
including the end-of-life plan. The plan includes at minimum the RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
timeline and frequency for replacement or refurbishment of all LD1.3 Provide for Stakeholder Involvement
major components, as well as considerations for the ultimate
decommissioning, deconstruction, or replacement of the project. LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies
LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
LD3.3 Conduct a Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation
CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon

ENVISION V3 79
© LEADERSHIP: ECONOMY

LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development

INTENT METRIC

20 Support economic prosperity and

sustainable development, including job
growth, capacity building, productivity,
The extent of job creation, increased
operating capacity, access, quality, and/
or improved socioeconomic conditions.
POINTS
business attractiveness, and livability.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E Not Available

(3) New Capacity (6) Improved Choices (12 ) Business Attraction (20) Development Rebirth

(A) Jobs are created during design, construction, and/or operation. The project team determines
the number, type, and duration of jobs created as a result of the project.
(B) The project adds new operating capacity. Capacity additions can apply to business, industry, or the public.

(C) The project provides additional access, increases the number

of choices, and/or increases the quality of services.
The project team can demonstrate that the addition of choices will drive competitiveness, efficiency,
or improved productivity for business, industry, or cultural and recreational facilities.

(D) The project contributes to the host community’s

attractiveness for businesses, industries, or their workforce
by improving the overall business or community environment
(i.e., people want to live and/or work in the community).

(E) The project will stimulate

local, regional, or national
economic development.
The economic projections
take into account changing
social, economic, and/or
environmental conditions.

DESCRIPTION Economic prosperity and sustainable development are

not synonymous with expansion. Because of economic
This credit recognizes contributions to long-term economic
downturns, changes in demographics, and other factors, many
prosperity and sustainable development for the community
communities face shrinking populations and an eroding tax
that are aligned with established community goals. Economic
base. In these situations, it may be more desirable to reduce
prosperity is the state of a thriving community that supports the
the quantity of unused and abandoned housing, commercial
needs of the community and businesses, and where people want
buildings, and industrial facilities to reduce the associated
to live, work, and play. Sustainable development is economic
burden of infrastructure operations and maintenance.
development that is conducted without the depletion of social
or natural resources. While not all infrastructure projects are
directly connected to economic growth, they are connected to
the economy by driving livability and community attractiveness
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
to businesses and the workforce. In this way, infrastructure Economic development takes into account what is realistic
can contribute to socioeconomic vitality, with infrastructure and affordable, and expectations for Envision assessments
costs offset by increased economic activity in the community, are based on the relative scale and scope of the project.
region, or country. Demonstrating the broader economic
benefits of the project provides significant advantages in Improved: The project team quantifies job creation
acquiring project approval, funding, and community support. associated with the project. The project results in increased
capacity. This capacity increase is generally due to projected
growth in commercial, industrial, and/or residential

80 ENVISION V3
demand. By increasing capacity, infrastructure meets economy, e.g., reduced congestion, lower operating costs,
the fundamental requirements for future growth. increased efficiency, and new operating alternatives.

Enhanced: The project provides increased access, choices, D. Does the project improve community attractiveness for
or quality of service. This results in increased efficiency, business, industry, or the public by generally improving
competitiveness, or improved productivity. For example, the socioeconomic conditions of the community?
communities that provide access to high-quality multimodal
1. Documentation of how the project improves community
transportation options can realize economic benefits
attractiveness for business, industry, or the public by generally
in reduced productivity loss due to congestion.
improving the socioeconomic conditions of the community.
Superior: The project increases community attractiveness to 2. Analyses showing how improved community attractiveness
businesses due to improved socioeconomic conditions (for to business, industry, or their workforce as a result of
example, a downtown street revitalization program that makes the project will benefit local economic development.
the community more attractive to businesses and residents).
E. Will the project stimulate economic prosperity
Conserving: Projects leverage their limited funding to drive
and further economic development?
systemic change throughout the local, regional, or national
economy. However, project teams should consider that long-term 1. Documentation of how the project will have economic impacts
economic prosperity and sustainable development require an beyond its own scope. For example, a port expansion that will
ability to adapt to changing economic, social, and environmental provide benefits to industries throughout a region, or public
conditions and the resulting changing operating environment. spaces that will revitalize community property values.
2. Analyses showing how the project is likely to cause systemic
Applicability: The scope of this credit is broad, covering
change in the local economy. Note that while the scale of economic
commercial, industrial, cultural, and recreational aspects
impact is considered relative to the size of the project, broader
of community development. In determining whether this
economic impacts beyond the project design, construction, and
credit is applicable to a project assessment, it is likely that all
operation may not be demonstrable for very small projects.
projects have the ability to support and stimulate economic
prosperity and sustainable development. It would therefore 3. Documentation that the project’s projected impact on
be difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not relevant future economic development has factored into changing
or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award. social, economic, and environmental trends. This may
include, but is not limited to, changing demographics
of the community, growing or shrinking tax bases, and
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND environmental degradation or climate change.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
A. Does the project create a significant number of new QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life
jobs during its design, construction, and operation?
QL3.1 Advance Equity and Social Justice
1. Calculations showing the number and type of new jobs
created during the design, construction, and operation QL3.4 Enhance Public Space and Amenities
of the project that benefit the local economy. In this case,
LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
“local’ is relative to the project scale and may even be “state/
provincial” or “national” for large projects. Calculations LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance
should distinguish between direct and indirect jobs. LD3.3 Conduct a Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation
2. Explanation of the impact of these jobs on the NW1.3 Preserve Prime Farmland
local economy relative to the project size.
NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields
B. Does the project provide new operating capacity
for business, industry, or the public?
1. Documentation showing how the project expands, or increases
the quality of, operating capacity for business, industry, or
the public (e.g., cultural and/or recreational facilities). PROJECT EXAMPLE: LOW LEVEL ROAD
2. Official documents such as community plans,
assessments, meeting minutes, or letters from community The impetus for the Low Level Road project (Envision
leaders or decision makers that confirm the project Platinum, 2015) in North Vancouver, British Columbia was
benefits to business, industry, or the public. to improve the quality of existing infrastructure to increase
the capacity of Port terminal operations, leading to greater
trade opportunities for the province, and the country as a
C. Does the project provide additional access, increase
whole. The project team estimated that economic impacts
the number of choices, and/or increase the quality of
generated by the port terminals are expected to rise from
infrastructure services for business, industry, or the public?
providing 25,996 direct and indirect jobs and $1.68 billion
1. Documentation of how the project provides additional in GDP in 2007, to 30,823 direct and indirect jobs and $2
access, increases the number of choices, and/or billion in GDP by 2020 as a result of improving the port’s
increases the quality of infrastructure services. capacity and the quality of associated infrastructure.
2. Analyses showing how additional access, choices, or
quality of services will provide benefits to the local

ENVISION V3 81
© LEADERSHIP: ECONOMY

LD3.2 Develop Local Skills and Capabilities

INTENT METRIC

16 Expand the knowledge, skills, and capacity

of the community workforce to improve
their ability to grow and develop.
The inclusion of current and future training
programs, informed by skill or capability
gaps, and targeted to economically depressed
POINTS
or underemployed communities.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A+B A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D

(2) Gaining Skills (4) Growing Capacity (8) Building Communities (12) Long-Term (16) Community
Opportunities Revitalization

(A) The project includes training programs for local skill development. This may include designers, contractors, subcontractors, or operators.

(B) Beyond general skill (B) The project team works with, or is informed by, community and local/state workforce
development, the project development agencies to assess local employment and educational needs.
team identifies specific
Training programs target these gaps to improve local capacity. Skills
skill or capability gaps in
are transferable beyond the end of the project.
the local workforce.
Skills developed are likely to provide the local workforce, agencies, and/
Training programs target these
or companies with a competitive advantage in the future.
gaps to improve local capacity.
Skills are transferable beyond
the end of the project.

(C) Education, skill development programs and/or opportunities

will continue after project delivery. This may include community
education and awareness training. Programs may be at the
organizational level but must be relevant to the project.

(D) Training and skill

development programs
specifically target economically
depressed, underemployed, or
disadvantaged communities.

DESCRIPTION Consultants and contractors should consider how capacity building

increases marketability and competitiveness that provides an
This credit addresses the degree to which the project expands the
advantage in securing future projects. Infrastructure owners
knowledge, skills, and capacity of the community workforce during
should consider how capacity building within their community
the project design, construction, and operation and maintenance
could drive competition and decrease future project costs.
phases in order to improve their ability to grow and develop.
Most businesses recognize the value of investing in workforce
development. Transitioning to a sustainable society will require
significant growth and education throughout the infrastructure
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
industry and the broader public. Sustainable infrastructure This assessment is based on the inclusion of current
development can often include new or uncommon materials, and future training programs, informed by skill
methodologies, or technology, which require new or uncommon or capability gaps, and targeted to economically
skills and capabilities within the workforce. A lack of capacity to depressed or underemployed communities.
deliver these project objectives creates uncertainty that can lead
to higher costs, slower delivery, or lower-quality results. Building Improved: The project includes training programs. The scope of
local skills and capabilities helps ensure a successful project. training is relative to the scale of the project. Note that standard
More broadly, skills and capacity building within a workforce internship does not qualify as a providing local skill development.
can create systemic change that carries over to future projects.

82 ENVISION V3
Enhanced: The project team identifies opportunities to that the infrastructure owner has extensive or notable training
align project needs with gaps in the local workforce. programs. Documentation must still demonstrate relevance of these
training programs to the project.
Superior: Beyond the project team’s own assessment, identification
of skills and/or training gaps is informed by engagement B. Has the project team identified skill or capability
with the community or workforce development agencies. gaps in the local workforce and targeted
training programs to address them?
Conserving: Training programs associated with the project will
be ongoing or there will be future training that extends beyond 1. Documentation of the skill or capability gaps identified
the end of construction. These activities may be provided by (for example, inexperience in deploying sustainable
the project owner or other organizations committed to the technologies, best practices, or new methods).
long-term operation of the project. Education and training 2. Evidence of training programs that
activities may also expand beyond workforce training to include specifically target identified gaps.
broader community education and awareness. Expectations
of the level of community education and awareness training Alternative compliance path for small projects for which it is
are relative to the scope and scale of the project. impractical to have independent training program: demonstrate that
the infrastructure owner has extensive or notable training programs.
Restorative: Projects target skill development and training Programs must still meet criteria requirements.
programs to communities that are economically depressed
or underemployed. In this way, the project supports the C. Will training, education, or skill development
restoration of the economic prosperity of the community programs continue after project delivery?
with the goal of sustained and inclusive economic growth,
1. Documentation of commitments or programs by the project
as well as higher rates of productive employment.
owner or operator to deliver training, education, or skill
development programs after construction is completed.
Applicability: For this credit, an alternative compliance path
This may include, but is not limited to, community
is provided in the Evaluation Criteria and Documentation
education and/or awareness training programs.
Guidance for projects that are too small to include independent
training and skill development. It is therefore unlikely that a
project could demonstrate no opportunity for education at D. Will training and skill development programs
any point during its planning, design, or construction. When specifically target economically depressed,
organizational-level training programs are referenced, project underemployed, or disadvantaged communities?
teams must demonstrate a relevance to the project. 1. Documentation of how economically depressed, underemployed,
or disadvantaged communities were determined
relative to the local/regional economic conditions.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
2. Evidence that efforts were made to specifically target these
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE communities for participation in training programs.

A. Will the project include training programs

for local skill development?
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
QL1.3 Improve Construction Safety
1. Evidence of training programs associated with the project.
Note that pre-existing internships or internships of limited QL3.1 Advance Equity and Social Justice
scope (1-3 people) do not qualify as training “programs.”
LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance
Alternative compliance path for small projects for which it is LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
impractical to have independent training programs: demonstrate

ENVISION V3 83
© LEADERSHIP: ECONOMY

LD3.3 Conduct a Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation

INTENT METRIC

14 Utilize economic analyses to identify the full

economic implications and the broader social
and environmental benefits of the project.
The comprehensiveness of the economic
analyses used to determine the net impacts
of the project, and their use in assessing
POINTS
alternatives to inform decision making.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A+B A+B+C A+C+D A+C+D+E

(5) Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (7) Life-Cycle Cost (10) Benefit Mapping (12) Sustainability Cost (14) Sustainability CBA
Alternatives Analysis Benefit Analysis Alternatives Analysis

(A) A life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is conducted on the whole project to identify the total economic impacts of the project and provide additional insight into decision making.

(B) LCCA is used to compare and assess alternatives

for at least one major design component.

(C) The project team maps the social, environmental, and financial costs and benefits of
the project. Costs and benefits must be quantified but not necessarily monetized.

(D) The LCCA in criterion A is expanded into a

comprehensive sustainability cost benefit analysis based
on monetizing the social, environmental, and financial
costs and benefits identified in criterion C.

(E) The sustainability cost

benefit analysis is used
to compare and assess
alternatives for at least one
major design component.
The selected alternative
produces a net positive present
value including social and
environmental benefits.

DESCRIPTION Using rigorous economic analysis to more fully assess investments

can help organizations best use its funds among competing capital
This credit provides incentives for, and recognition of, the use
projects. By using a life-cycle approach, design alternatives can
of sound, industry-accepted economic analysis to provide a
be compared on a present value basis, which may ultimately
better measurement of the value of a project and ultimately
prove the business case for more sustainable projects.
encourage greater levels of sustainability. Taking a life-cycle
economic approach to project evaluation can enhance decision
Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is one of several evaluation
making by encouraging the effective management of resources
techniques commonly used to compare and evaluate the financial
and assets that ultimately lead to more sustainable projects.
feasibility of various design alternatives over an assumed service
Life-cycle economic evaluations allow for a comprehensive
life cycle. LCCA provides a more informed perspective of the
assessment to better understand the trade-offs of upfront
total financial costs of the project and allows a more direct
capital costs and the longer-term anticipated operational savings
comparison of competing projects. At a minimum it is necessary
that may accrue from sustainable design. An intended outcome
to make sure the project is assessing capital, operations and
of infrastructure is often to generate benefits and/or reduce
management, replacement cost, and any residual value over a
negative impacts to the community, the environment, and broader
consistent time period for all alternatives, while incorporating
society. Economic analysis can be used to measure and value
discounting techniques to factor in the time-value-of-money
these benefits, which are typically assessed only qualitatively.
to compare multiple different projects on a common basis.

84 ENVISION V3
While life-cycle cost analysis provides greater rigor and insight in used, well-documented methodology for assessing the net
the planning process, it does not assess the social and environment economic effects of investments or policies. For a sustainability
benefits generated by the project. A comprehensive sustainability assessment, it is expanded to include social and environmental
cost benefit analysis measures the broader financial, social, and factors. The approach provides a systematic process for
environmental benefits of the project. This extended analysis calculating, monetizing, and comparing the economic benefits
further quantifies those impacts and then monetizes them. A and costs of a particular project, by putting benefits and costs in
sustainability cost benefit analysis adds the monetary values a common metric. It allows a direct assessment of the trade-offs
of social and environmental impacts to the life-cycle financial for varying levels of financial costs, environmental quality, social
results (LCCA) to comprehensively measure the sustainability impacts, and resiliency, and allows decision makers to identify
impacts. It allows a direct assessment of the trade-offs for those projects that are the most beneficial and cost-effective.
varying levels of financial costs, environmental quality, social
impacts, and resiliency, and allows decision makers to identify Typically, a “base case” is compared to one or more alternatives
those projects that are the most-beneficial and cost-effective. (which have some significant improvement compared to the base
case). The analysis evaluates incremental differences in order
Often, upfront capital costs are the key driver in planning to identify additional benefits that will result if the alternative
decisions; however this omits the life-cycle costs of the project, is undertaken, and what additional costs are needed to bring it
risks and uncertainty, or the broader outcomes that impact about. To compare different projects or alternatives of the same
the environment and society. As a result, owners may overlook project that may have costs and benefits occurring in different
sustainability-related investments with higher upfront capital years, discounting is used to convert future benefits and costs to
costs, but which ultimately produce cost savings over the a current year perspective. The standard criterion for deciding
life-cycle of the project from lower utility costs, operations whether a project can be justified is whether the net present value
and maintenance costs, or less replacement costs. is positive. The net present value is the discounted monetized
value of expected net benefits (i.e., benefits minus costs). Impacts
There is significant guidance that can be found are quantified and monetized through the use of statistical and/
regarding the specific steps to follow in conducting or engineering data, and peer-reviewed valuation research.
a life-cycle economic evaluation. There is no one
prescribed approach that is recommended for this Restorative: Beyond retroactive assessments, project
credit; however, a general approach is as follows: teams can demonstrate that the results of the analysis
actively informed decisions on project selection or the
1. Define the base case design of at least one major project component.
2. List feasible alternatives including no-build—these
Applicability: It would be difficult to demonstrate that this credit is
can be design elements or entire projects
not relevant or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award.
3. Specify categories of costs and benefits
4. Quantify costs and benefits as incremental to the base case
5. Monetize costs and benefits EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
6. Identify and incorporate risks into the analysis
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
7. Discount future cash flows to calculate net present value
A. Has a life-cycle cost analysis been conducted to
identify the financial impacts of the whole project?
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT 1. A narrative description that is clearly and concisely written
Improved: The credit begins with conducting a life-cycle cost for reviewers with limited economic expertise to understand.
analysis. LCCA is one of several evaluation techniques commonly Project teams should describe the proposed project and
used to compare and evaluate the financial feasibility of various expected costs. To the greatest extent possible, it should identify
design alternatives over an assumed service life-cycle. LCCA evidence-based practices as the basis for the analysis.
provides a more informed perspective of the total financial costs of
the project. At a minimum it is necessary to make sure the project 2. Documentation of the life-cycle cost analysis, including
is assessing capital, operations and management, replacement assumptions, data sources, and methodology. The methodology
cost, and any residual value over a consistent time period, while is to follow best practices, including national or international
incorporating discounting techniques to factor in the time-value-of- guidance where appropriate/available. The analysis must be
money to compare multiple different projects on a common basis. conducted over a consistent time period for all alternatives, while
incorporating discounting techniques to factor in the time-value-
Enhanced: LCCA is used for a more direct comparison of-money in order to make comparisons on a common basis. The
of competing projects or design alternatives. analysis should at minimum include the following information:
• Project/investment costs (capital costs)
Superior: Project teams map and quantify the social and
environmental impacts of the project. While life-cycle cost • Replacement costs
analysis provides greater rigor and insight in the planning
• Annual or reoccurring operations and maintenance costs
process, it also omits the explicit assessment of the social
and environmental benefits generated by the project. • Residual value

Conserving: A comprehensive sustainability cost benefit analysis • Adding financial benefit streams, such
(CBA) is used to quantify and measure the broader financial, as revenues, which offset costs
social, and environmental benefits of the project. This may also
be known as a “triple bottom line costs benefit analysis” (TBL-
CBA) or sustainable return on investment (SROI). CBA is a widely

ENVISION V3 85
B. Have life-cycle cost analyses been used to compare • Resiliency value – value of protection from the effects of
alternatives for at least one major project component? future/repeat disasters or enhanced reliability that reduces
1. Documentation of the planned use of the financial analysis future cost such as damage, displacement, or loss of service.
and how it impacted the decision-making process or
alternative selected. This should include specific reference D. Has a cost benefit analysis been conducted to
to the inherent design features, technologies, or other identify the financial, social, and environmental
elements that differ from the base case. The base case is impacts of the whole project?
not necessarily always a “do nothing” alternative, but it is 1. Documentation of the cost benefit analysis, including
generally the “lowest” capital cost alternative that achieves assumptions, data sources, and methodology. The methodology
some basic utility to the project. In the case of a new design, is to follow best practices, including national or international
the base case could mean a more basic facility design or guidance where appropriate/available . The analysis must be
one with fewer sustainability-related components. conducted over a consistent time period for all alternatives, while
incorporating discounting techniques to factor in the time-value-
C. Has the project team mapped the social, environmental, of-money in order to make comparisons on a common basis.
and financial costs and benefits of the project? Note that a cost benefit analysis includes all data that would
1. Index and quantification of project costs and impacts. In have been collected as part of a life-cycle cost analysis in criterion
addition to the data that would have been collected as part A. There is no one prescribed approach that is recommended
of the life-cycle costs analysis in criterion A, project teams for conducting a cost benefit analysis comparison; however,
may consider but are not limited to the following topics to project teams may use the following sample generic approach:
guide and structure the social and environmental impacts: • Define base case
• Reductions in mortality, morbidity/ • List feasible alternatives
injuries – safety improvements • Specify categories of costs and benefits
• Benefit to low- and moderate-income persons and/ • Quantify costs and benefits (as incremental to the base case)
or households – distributional impacts
• Monetize costs and benefits
• Enhanced recreational values – increased
biking or walking, exercising, etc.
• Identify and incorporate risks into the analysis (this is a best-
practice approach to cost benefit analysis, and is optional)
• Enhanced aesthetics or streetscape – light pollution,
general aesthetics, streetscape enhancements
• Discount future cash flows to calculate NPV and other metrics

• Productivity improvements – enhanced thermal comfort,

E. Have cost benefit analyses, including financial,
reduction in respiratory diseases, allergens, air quality, etc.
environmental, and social benefits, been used to compare
• Reduced car or truck mileage – congestion, safety, the alternatives for at least one major project component?
emissions, road damage, vehicle operating costs
1. Documentation of the planned use of the economic
• Noise/odor levels analysis and how it impacted the decision-
• Ecosystem and biodiversity effects (e.g., from making process or alternative selected.
wetlands restoration or reforestation)
• Air quality – reduced criteria pollutants from RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
reduced energy use, vehicle use, embedded energy QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life
in materials, solid waste, among others.
LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance
• Water quality – reduced stormwater
runoff, reduced effluent flows LD2.4 Plan for End-of-Life
• Water quantity – reduced demand for freshwater LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
• Climate change – reduced greenhouse gas emissions CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
(CO2 equivalents) from reduced energy use, vehicle use,
embedded energy in materials, solid waste, among others. CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience
CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies

86 ENVISION V3
Kansas City Streetcar: Kansas City, Missouri
other
2016) residential uses. It provides “last mile” connec tivity to
The Kansas City Streetcar project (Envision Platinum,
zation regional transit services, and integrates with bicycle and
was developed to suppor t the city’s downtown revitali public
sustain able funding throug h local pedestrian facilities. Designers took care to enhance
after voters approved orhood
of spaces while preser ving urban aesthetics and neighb
taxes in 2011. The area within two blocks on either side to further improv e the overall quality of life.
to 65,000 employ ees and 4,600 charac ter
the streetcar route is home
tions of
residents; and more than 10 million people visit destina Leadership: The project scored highly in Leader ship
due to its
r annual ly. Since the streetc ar project was
interes t in the corrido deeply collaborative plannin g and design proces ses and long-
pment
announced, the area has welcomed more than 40 develo term visioning approach. This included its strateg y for
sustainable
.
project s totaling about $1.8 billion in economic activity growth and economic development , and long-term manag
ement
ilding.
Kansas of stakeholder processes and community relationship-bu
Propelled by an active partnership between the City,
ortation
City Streetcar Authority (KCSA), Kansas City Area Transp Resource Allocation: The project was designed and constru
cted
(KCATA ), Mid-Am erica Region al Counci l (MARC ), Jackson
Authority to minimi ze waste genera ted by the project , re-use or divert
pment
County, Kansas City Downtown Transportation Develo waste from landfills, and to implement green infrastr
ucture
the
District , and HDR (as the lead planning and design firm), solutio ns where possibl e. For examp le, approx imately 47 percent
s phase to
streetcar project moved from the alternatives analysi of the streetcar maintenance facility contain s recycle d content
ted in March
final design in less than two years. Design was comple and nearly 90 percen t of the facility ’s constru ction waste was
followed
2014, and construction was completed at the end of 2015, diverted from the landfill. Furthe rmore, all 845 tons of steel
of testing before openin g to the public in May 2016. metal
by a period used for the streetcar tracks were made with recycled
minimize
rtation scrap. The project team also took several measures to
The project was designed as a fully integrated transpo t of excava ted materi al that had to be taken off-site.
city’s focus on Main Street as a key corridor the amoun
system to suppor t the ction (from sidewa lks, driveways
a sense of Concrete removed during constru
for sustainable economic development , and to foster ent) was crushe d into recycle d aggreg ate and reused
significant and pavem
community and identit y. The success is evidenced in the scrap metal was recycle d.
of the in project construction, and all
economic development that has initiated in the vicinity
ip.
streetcar corridor and the higher than expected ridersh Natural World: The project carefully considered water
ar
management and stormwater runoff for both the streetc
Notable achievements for the Kansas City Streetcar and the streetc ar tracks themse lves.
maintenance facility
within the Envision categories include: ent
Strategies to control erosion, minimize post-developm
site runoff and encour age ground water recharg e were
Analysis,
Qualit y of Life: The Downtown Corridor Alternatives
Street, implemented. In fact, the post-development stormwater
that ultimately recommended a streetcar along Main
objecti ves runoff levels are below pre-development levels.
was built around goals directly tied to the needs and
tive
of the local community. The streetcar provides an alterna
that reduce s conges tion and improv es Climate and Resilience: The project scored highly in
mode of transportation
area, Climate and Risk [now Climate and Resilience] due largely
mobilit y and accessibility for a heavily developed urban
and to the system ’s resilient design for winter weather.
within walking distance to a mix of commercial, office,

is -

J'
© LEADERSHIP: INNOVATION

LD0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

INTENT METRIC

+10 To reward exceptional performance beyond

the expectations of the system and application
of innovative methods that advance state-
Whether project sustainability performance
qualifies as innovation, exceptional
performance, or is not otherwise
POINTS
of-the-art sustainable infrastructure. recognized in existing credits.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

INNOVATION
A or B or C

(+1-10) Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

(A) Implement innovative methods, technologies, or processes that are novel either in their use, application, or within the local regulatory or cultural context.
OR
(B) Implement measures that exceed the highest existing requirements within one or more Leadership credits.
OR
(C) Address additional aspects of sustainability not currently recognized in Envision

DESCRIPTION and that it does not have a corresponding negative impact on

the local or global environment, economy, or community.
This credit addresses instances in which projects:
Projects may demonstrate they implement innovative
1. Implement innovative methods, resources, technologies, or
methods, technologies or processes in several ways:
processes that are novel in their use, application, or within
the local regulatory or cultural context of the project;
• The project is an early adopter of new technology
or methods that can demonstrably improve project
2. Exceed the performance requirements
performance without negative trade-offs;
of one or more credits; and/or
• The project uses technologies or methods that may be general
3. Address additional aspects of sustainability
practice in other regions or parts of the world, but within the
not currently recognized in Envision
context of the project (whether climate, regulations, policies,
Points for this credit are not calculated in the overall applicable political support, public opinion, etc.) have not yet gained
points and, therefore, act as bonus points. Given the nature of acceptance. Significant efforts are taken to demonstrate
the credit, the broad format of which is intended to encourage the effectiveness of the technology or method within the
creative infrastructure solutions, thorough documentation context and provide a precedent for future adoption.
is expected. Project teams may pursue more than one of the
• The project team takes significant steps to include
three possible options for this credit, or pursue multiple for
research goals within the project’s development, or
the same option, for a total of up to ten (10) bonus points.
work with a university or research organization to
advance the general knowledge of the profession.
Proprietary research that is not made publicly available
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
cannot count toward achieving this credit.
Innovation:
Project teams must also demonstrate that the innovation
To qualify for innovation points, projects must implement serves a purpose. This can be done in one of two ways:
innovative methods, resources, technologies, or processes
(e.g., the use of a pre-existing technology in a new way or the • Overcoming significant problems, barriers, or limitations—
successful application of a technology or methods in regions Project teams demonstrate that the innovation reduces
or locales where existing policies, regulations, or general or eliminates significant problems, barriers, or limitations
opinion have prevented their use). In these circumstances, it that previously hampered the use of the new methods,
is imperative to prove that the application of the technology technologies, or processes implemented on the project.
does, and will continue to, meet performance expectations

88 ENVISION V3
 • Creating scalable and/or transferable solutions—Project teams • Establishing an endowment fund to fund scholarships and/or
demonstrate that new methods, technologies, or processes student internship programs for an extended period of time.
implemented on the project are scalable across a wide range
of project sizes and/or are applicable and transferable across • Working with officials to identify and address conflicting
multiple kinds of infrastructure projects in multiple sectors. laws, standards, regulations, or policies that run counter
to sustainability goals, objectives, and practices.
Exceptional Performance:

To qualify for exceptional performance points, projects EVALUATION CRITERIA AND

must meet the highest level of achievement for one or more DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
Leadership credits. For instance, projects seeking additional
points in credit LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities must
A. To what extent does the project implement innovative
already be achieving a restorative impact on conditions within
methods, technologies, or processes that overcome
a community. In this instance, exceptional performance may
significant problems, barriers or limitations, or
be pursued by projects whose magnitude of investment in
create scalable and transferable solutions?
restoring inherently unsustainable conditions within the host
and affected communities represents a significant percentage 1. Documentation of the application of innovative technologies
of the project budget and a primary objective of the project. or methods. Detailed description of how this application
will improve existing conventional practice either globally
• Projects in which a sustainability management plan or within the unique context of the project. Provide
was the dominant approach to managing the scope, justification as to why this application should be considered
scale, and complexity of the project seeking to improve innovative either as a technology, a method, or within
sustainable performance. This approach must have the the project context (climate, political, cultural, etc.).
potential to be adopted in other related projects;
2. Documentation that the project reduces or eliminates
significant problems, barriers, or limitations that previously
• Projects for which job development and training far exceed
hampered the use or implementation of certain resources,
the Restorative achievement expectations, demonstrating
technologies, processes, or methods that improve the
that the project will fundamentally revitalize the communities’
sustainability of the project. Alternatively, documentation that
economy through job creation and skills training.
the new methods, technologies, or processes implemented
Address Additional Aspects of Sustainability: on the project are scalable across a wide range of project
sizes and/or are applicable and transferable across multiple
To qualify for bonus points under this approach, project teams kinds of infrastructure projects in multiple sectors.
must demonstrate that they are addressing one or more
aspects of sustainability not currently recognized in Envision. B. To what extent does the project exceed the highest
Sustainability performance must be related to Leadership levels of achievement for a given credit?
Addressing an aspect of sustainability not currently covered by 1. Detailed documentation of how the project exceeds the existing
the Envision system might sometimes be considered innovative, requirements currently within a given Leadership credit.
in which case the requirements for the Innovation path may be
followed. For example, a project may earn bonus points for:
C. To what extent does the project address a sustainability
aspect that is not currently addressed by the Envision system?
• Providing ongoing public reporting of specific
metrics related to the project’s environmental 1. Detailed documentation of how the project
performance over the life of the project. addresses a sustainability aspect that is not
currently addressed by the Envision system.
• Implementing community education programs to foster public
2. Documentation showing how this aspect
awareness of the functions and benefits of the project.
relates to the Leadership category.

ENVISION V3 89
 ..a

•*
< ■

•<

RECYCLED BRINE
 Resource Allocation

f*

Resources are the assets that are needed to

build infrastructure and keep it running. This
category is broadly concerned with the quantity,
source, and characteristics of these resources
and their impacts on the overall sustainability
of the project. Resources addressed include
physical materials (both those that are consumed

L
~u
and that leave the project), energy, and water
use. These resources are finite and should
be treated as an asset to use respectfully.

i Materials, Energy, and Water comprise the

three subcategories of Resource Allocation.

14 / credits

Image
Ion Exchange Resin Plant and East Water
Treatment Plant Upgrades City of Boynton
Beach, Florida (Envision Bronze, 2017).
 1 Is the project constructed from sustainable materials?

2 Does the project manage construction and operational waste?

3 Does the project reduce energy consumption and source renewable energy?

4 Does the project reduce water consumption and protect water resources?

5 Does the project monitor energy and water use?

i* V * *
1 2
sr-' 5

:!!!!'!£ iiinj, 4

MATERIALS ENERGY WATER

Minimizing the total impact of material Energy from nonrenewable fossil fuel Between a growing population, increasing
use should be a primary consideration sources is finite. Therefore, use of consumption, and a changing climate,
for infrastructure projects. This renewable energy is encouraged as a the future availability of water resources
begins with sourcing more sustainably means to minimize fossil fuel consumption. is uncertain. Therefore, it is critical that
manufactured materials, using recycled Reducing overall energy use is crucial infrastructure projects reduce overall water
materials, and reducing waste. Always and, ideally, projects will both reduce use, particularly potable water. Alternative
sourcing sustainable materials must overall energy use and meet the remaining water sources, such as stormwater runoff,
be balanced with safety, stability, and energy needs through renewable sources can be captured and reused for many
durability. The life-cycle of a project whenever possible. Commissioning and functions without reducing the overall
and its materials should always be monitoring energy systems is critical to water resource. Monitoring water use is an
considered: where materials have come ensure projects function as planned and important step in using water efficiently
from and what waste is created. These maintain the intended level of efficiency and reducing water loss through leaks.
factors help to minimize the total amount throughout the life of the project.
of natural resources consumed.

92 ENVISION V3
 ri

Resource Allocation

MATERIALS
RA1.1 Support Sustainable Procurement Practices
RA1.2 Use Recycled Materials
RA1.3 Reduce Operational Waste
RA1.4 Reduce Construction Waste
RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site

ENERGY
RA2.1 Reduce Operational Energy Consumption
RA2.2 Reduce Construction Energy Consumption
RA2.3 U se Renewable Energy
RA2.4 Commission and Monitor Energy Systems

WATER
RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources
RA3.2 Reduce Operational Water Consumption
RA3.3 R educe Construction Water Consumption
RA3.4 Monitor Water Systems

RA0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

ENVISION V3 93
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: MATERIALS

RA1.1 Support Sustainable Procurement Practices

INTENT METRIC

12 Develop sustainable procurement policies

and programs to source materials and
equipment from manufacturers and suppliers
The extent of sustainable procurement
programs, and the percentage of materials
sourced from manufacturers and/or suppliers
POINTS
that implement sustainable practices. that implement sustainable practices.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B A+B A+B Not Available

(3) 5% Sustainable (6) 15% Sustainable (9) 25% Sustainable (12) 50% Sustainable
Procurement Procurement Procurement Procurement

(A) A written sustainable procurement policy/program is in place.

The program includes a well-defined process for selecting suppliers and/or manufacturers of materials, supplies,
and equipment, including selection criteria focused on environmental practices and social responsibility.

(B) At least 5% of all (B) At least 15% of all (B) At least 25% of all (B) At least 50% of all
project materials, supplies, project materials, supplies, project materials, supplies, project materials, supplies,
and equipment meet the and equipment meet the and equipment meet the and equipment meet the
sustainable procurement sustainable procurement sustainable procurement sustainable procurement
policy/program requirements. policy/program requirements. policy/program requirements. policy/program requirements.

DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

This credit encourages choosing suppliers that incorporate Improved – Conserving: Levels in this credit are distinguished
sustainability into their policies and daily practices and by the percentage of total materials the project procures from
operations. Project teams should give preference to manufacturers that are protective of human health and the
suppliers that have taken into account the environmental, environment. For example, project teams may make efforts to use
economic, and social impacts of their products and have products certified under a recognized third-party sustainability
active programs in place for performance improvement. certification program, utilize products with environmental product
declarations, or choose suppliers based on the incorporation of
Infrastructure projects are major consumers of materials, sustainability policies and practices to their operations. As there
and owners should consider their ability to influence is no single standard for determining sustainable and ethical
higher sustainability performance upstream in the material manufacturing practices, a variety of indicators are permitted.
manufacturing chain. As owners and project teams request
and require sustainability disclosures, this information will Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects
become increasingly available and easier to obtain. Such that include the use or consumption of physical
changes have already occurred in the material supply chains materials in construction or operation.
for buildings. While this credit is linked to CR1.1 Reduce
Net Embodied Carbon, it expands beyond the impacts of
per unit material production to include the environmental EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
impacts of the entire manufacturing process. DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
Supplier integrity and ethical behavior are important
A. Has the project team implemented a sustainable
considerations. Establishing policies for the procurement
procurement policy or program?
of sustainably manufactured products and materials
helps safeguard the reputation and achievements of the 1. Documentation of a sustainable procurement policy that
project, and all organizations involved, from the possibility includes commitments to identify and select manufacturers
of future disclosures that project materials were produced and/or suppliers that implement sustainable practices.
in unsafe or environmentally damaging conditions. Program documentation includes a well-defined process
for selecting suppliers and/or manufacturers of materials,
supplies, and equipment, including selection criteria focused
on environmental practices and social responsibility. Examples
of qualifying requirements include but are not limited to:

94 ENVISION V3
 • Environmental management systems consistent with ISO sustainable procurement policy/program requirements
(International Organization for Standardization) 14001 on social and environmental impacts.
• Product-specific type III Environmental Product Documentation of the total weight, volume, or cost of materials.
Declaration (EPD) conforming to ISO 14025, 14044.
An inventory for all materials being tracked for sustainable
• Third-party verified sustainability program (e.g.,
procurement practices, including a description of the material and
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), Green Seal, EcoLogo,
the manufacturer or supplier of the material, along with evidence
Underwriters Laboratory, National Biosolids Partnership
of the disclosure requirements.
(NBP), Concrete Sustainability Council (CSC), etc.)
• Third-party verified corporate sustainability report Documentation indicating the sustainable procurement
consistent with the Global Reporting Initiative requirements were met.
(GRI) Sustainability Report or equivalent.
2. Material/supplier tracking forms and/
Note that, given the complex nature of infrastructure or spreadsheets; receipts/invoices.
procurement, some flexibility is given to project teams to develop
additional sustainable procurement best practices that are RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
equivalent to, or exceed, the examples listed above. However, the
QL3.1 Advance Equity and Social Justice
project team must then justify how their requirements meet the
intent of the credit and maintain parity. LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
RA1.2 Use Recycled Materials
B. To what extent do materials, supplies, equipment,
manufacturers, and suppliers meet sustainable CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon
procurement policy/program requirements?
1. Calculations of the percentage of the total project
materials by cost, weight, or volume that meet the

ENVISION V3 95
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: MATERIALS

RA1.2 Use Recycled Materials

INTENT METRIC

16 Reduce the use of virgin natural resources

and avoid sending useful materials to landfills
by specifying reused materials, including
Percentage of project materials that are
reused or recycled. Plants, soil, rock, and
water are not included in this credit.
POINTS
structures, and material with recycled content.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A A A Not Available

(4) At Least 5% (6) At Least 15 % (9) At Least 25% (16) At Least 50%
From Recycled From Recycled From Recycled From Recycled

(A) At least 5% (by weight, (A) At least 15% (by weight, (A) At least 25% (by weight, (A) At least 50% (by weight,
volume, or cost) of recycled volume, or cost) of recycled volume, or cost) of recycled volume, or cost) of recycled
materials including materials materials including materials materials including materials materials including materials
with recycled content with recycled content with recycled content with recycled content
and/or reused existing and/or reused existing and/or reused existing and/or reused existing
structures or materials. structures or materials. structures or materials. structures or materials.

DESCRIPTION be considered “reused,” the project team must demonstrate

some intention or effort to reclaim, salvage, or repurpose the
The purpose of this credit is to reduce the use of virgin natural
materials or structures in keeping with the credit intent.
resources and avoid sending useful materials to landfills. Using
recycled, reused, and renewable materials and products, including
Natural materials such as soil and rock when used as backfill do
existing structures and materials on site, reduces demand
not count toward this credit but are addressed in RA 1.5 Balance
for virgin materials and the embodied carbon emissions and
Earthwork On Site. If natural resources on the site are harvested
environmental degradation attributed to their extraction and
and manufactured in order to take the place of new or primary
processing. Using these materials also reduces waste and supports
materials, such as pulverizing stone in order to produce aggregate,
the market for recycled and reused materials. Project teams
project teams are responsible for demonstrating that the actions
should consider how salvaging or repurposing existing materials or
truly replace a new primary material. Likewise, when claiming
structures can significantly reduce demand for new construction
the reuse of existing structures or materials, project teams must
materials as well as project costs. The reuse of existing materials
clearly demonstrate that a conscious decision was made to salvage
or elements may also have a significant cultural or aesthetic
those materials from demolition and disposal. Materials cannot
value, such as street lamps, sidewalk pavers, bridges, and more.
be counted as recycled if, in standard practice, they would not
otherwise have been removed. For example, when repairing a road,
project teams cannot claim the entirety of the remaining road as
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT “recycled,” as that material would not typically have been removed.
Improved – Conserving: Levels in this credit are distinguished by
the percentage of total materials that are reused or recycled. Project teams must always ensure that all project materials
Calculations of recycled materials can be done by weight, volume, meet the necessary quality and performance criteria required
or cost, but must remain consistent within the credit. Calculations for the intended application, whether recycled or not.
should compare the total quantity of recycled materials and reused Materials must also meet all state or local solid waste agency
structures with the total quantity of materials on the project. requirements for using recycled materials in construction.
Products that contain a percentage of recycled material should be Any recycled materials used must not pose unacceptable
factored according to the percentage of material that is recycled. risks to human health and safety or the environment.

Recycled content is defined in accordance with ISO 14021 as Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects
the portion of materials used in a product that have been that include the use or consumption of physical
diverted from the solid waste stream and used in part or materials in construction or operation.
whole in place of a new primary material. Material eligible for
consideration can also be defined as pre-existing material on
site, or from another site, that was previously a product or
piece of equipment that is now being repurposed or reused. To

96 ENVISION V3
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND Calculations do not include plants, soils, rocks, or water.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE 4. Inventory of existing materials or structures that have been
reused.
A. To what extent has the project team used recycled
materials, including materials with recycled content Design documents showing the location and weight, volume,
and/or reused existing structures or materials? or cost of reused structures or materials. In determining
weight, volume, or cost, the project team may refer to standard
1. Total quantity of materials used on the equivalents.
project by weight, volume, or cost.
In order to meet the intent of this credit, the project team must be
2. Inventory of specifications for materials containing recycled able to demonstrate an intentional choice to salvage materials or
content. Inventory should include the name of the product, structures that might otherwise have been sent to landfills and/or
the name of the manufacturer, the weight, volume, or cost of replaced. In addition, they must demonstrate that such action is
the material, and the percentage of recycled content (either within the scope of the project. For example, a project to resurface
post-industrial or post-consumer recycled content). an airport runway cannot claim the entirety of the surrounding
3. Calculations of percentage of reused or recycled airport as “reused” materials. However, a project that intentionally
materials by weight, volume, or cost. chooses to refurbish an existing bridge, rather than replace it, may
count the retained components of the existing bridge as “reused.”
To calculate materials with recycled content, multiply the material
weight, volume, or cost by the percentage of recycled content.
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
Mechanical, electrical, water equipment, and their components LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies
may be excluded from the calculations. In these instances, the
most efficient equipment should be specified. NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land
CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon

ENVISION V3 97
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: MATERIALS

RA1.3 Reduce Operational Waste

INTENT METRIC

14 Reduce operational waste and divert waste

streams from disposal to recycling and reuse.
Percentage of total operational waste or
byproducts diverted from disposal.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B A+B A+B Not Available

(4) Recycle/Reuse (7) Recycle/Reuse (10) Recycle/Reuse (14) Recycle/Reuse 95%

At Least 25% At Least 50% At Least 75%

(A) Develop an operational waste management plan that, at a minimum, identifies the materials to be
diverted from disposal and whether the materials will be sorted on site or commingled.

(B) The project team identifies (B) The project team identifies (B) The project team identifies (B) The project team identifies
waste streams or byproducts waste streams or byproducts waste streams or byproducts waste streams or byproducts
that will occur as a result of that will occur as a result of that will occur as a result of that will occur as a result of
the operation of the project. the operation of the project. the operation of the project. the operation of the project.
The project is planned or The project is planned or The project is planned or The project is planned or
designed to divert at least 25% designed to divert at least 50% designed to divert at least 75% designed to divert at least 95%
of operational waste. Diversion of operational waste. Diversion of operational waste. Diversion of operational waste. Diversion
may be a combination of waste may be a combination of waste may be a combination of waste may be a combination of waste
reduction measures and/ reduction measures and/ reduction measures and/ reduction measures and/
or sourcing waste to other or sourcing waste to other or sourcing waste to other or sourcing waste to other
facilities for recycling or reuse. facilities for recycling or reuse. facilities for recycling or reuse. facilities for recycling or reuse.

DESCRIPTION This credit recognizes decisions that minimize the generation of

waste or maximize the opportunities to recycle and/or reuse waste.
The goal of this credit is to reduce operational waste and divert
Minimizing the generation of waste may involve early planning
waste streams or byproducts from disposal to recycling and
decisions or design features that increase efficiency. For collecting
reuse. Opportunities exist within the planning, design, and
and diverting waste from landfills, project teams are encouraged
construction of projects to reduce the estimated operational
to think beyond just the collection of recyclables in office or
waste produced. Additionally, project teams should consider
public spaces. While this is important, for large infrastructure
the ability of the remaining waste generated by the project
projects this activity can be orders of magnitude smaller than
to be recycled or beneficially reused. Decisions made
the process waste generated by the operation of the project.
throughout the project delivery process can either enhance
or limit the project’s ability to reduce and divert waste.
Maximizing opportunities for waste to be recycled or reused
requires identifying potential sources and destinations for
recycling. If material is sent to a recycling facility, project teams
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT should consider whether the facility is certified for meeting
Improved – Conserving: Levels in this credit are distinguished acceptable recycling rates. The final application/destination of
by the percentage of total operational waste diverted from diverted or reused materials should not pose risks to human
disposal. As industry standards on waste generation do not health and safety or the environment, and should be in compliance
exist for most infrastructure projects, project teams are with all state/provincial and local solid waste requirements.
required to provide calculations for an appropriate base case Waste deemed hazardous should not be included in the total
from which to determine percentage reductions. Accepted waste calculations and should be disposed of according to local,
methodologies for establishing baseline performance data state/provincial, and federal law. Methods of diversion should
are explained in detail in the front of this manual and include meet the spirit and intent of the credit to reduce the social
existing conditions, a seriously considered alternative, and environmental impacts of waste generation. Acceptable
standard practice, or a comparable existing project/facility. means of diversion may include but are not limited to:

98 ENVISION V3
 • Waste reduction; B. To what extent has the project team reduced
waste or diverted waste from landfills?
• Reuse or recycle materials on site;
1. Identification of waste streams that will occur during the
• Materials sent to recycling or reclamation facilities;
operations of the project (e.g., sludge produced from the
• Materials sent to manufacturers to be used treatment of wastewater, byproduct or residual materials
as post-consumer recycled content; produced as a result of waste to energy facilities).
• Materials composted on site or sent to a composting facility; 2. Documentation of how the project was planned or designed
• Land application of biosolids;
in order to reduce the generation of waste during operations
or to divert operational waste from landfills. Documentation
• The use of material, if appropriate, as infill; includes waste type and methods to reduce waste generation.
Unacceptable means of diversion include: 3. Calculations of estimated total waste reduction measures
and percentage of materials diverted to recycling or reuse.
• Burying waste material unsuited for infill.
The percentage of diverted waste should be calculated as
the ratio of material diverted from landfills against the
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that
total waste generated during construction or operations.
produce operational waste or byproducts. Projects that do not
Calculations may be done by weight, volume, or cost
include any operational waste may apply to have this credit
but must remain consistent throughout the credit.
deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
Waste deemed hazardous should not be included in the total waste
calculations and should be disposed of according to local, state/
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND provincial, and federal law.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
A. Has the project team developed a waste LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
management plan to decrease project waste and
divert waste from landfills during operation? CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon
1. Documentation of the operational waste management plan,
OR;
Policies, specifications, or contract documents sufficient to
address the diversion/recycling of the project’s operational waste.

ENVISION V3 99
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: MATERIALS

RA1.4 Reduce Construction Waste

INTENT METRIC

16 Divert construction and demolition waste

streams from disposal to recycling and reuse.
Percentage of total waste
diverted from disposal.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B A+B A+B Not Available

(4) Recycle/Reuse 25% (7) Recycle/Reuse 50% (10) Recycle/Reuse 75% (16) Recycle/Reuse 95%

(A) Implement a construction waste management plan that, at a minimum, identifies the materials to be
diverted from disposal and whether the materials will be sorted on site or commingled.

(B) The project team sets a (B) The project team sets a (B) The project team sets a (B) The project team sets a
target goal for construction target goal for construction target goal for construction target goal for construction
waste diversion. waste diversion. waste diversion. waste diversion.
During construction at least 25% During construction at least 50% During construction at least 75% During construction at least 95%
of waste materials are recycled, of waste materials are recycled, of waste materials are recycled, of waste materials are recycled,
reused, and/or salvaged. reused, and/or salvaged. reused, and/or salvaged. reused, and/or salvaged.
Diversion may be a combination Diversion may be a combination Diversion may be a combination Diversion may be a combination
of waste-reduction measures of waste-reduction measures of waste-reduction measures of waste-reduction measures
and sourcing waste to other and sourcing waste to other and sourcing waste to other and sourcing waste to other
facilities for recycling or reuse. facilities for recycling or reuse. facilities for recycling or reuse. facilities for recycling or reuse.

DESCRIPTION include efforts to minimize construction waste generation

if sufficient supporting documentation is provided.
The goal of this credit is to reduce construction waste and
divert waste streams from disposal to recycling and reuse.
Diversion requires a management plan and identification of
Project teams can improve performance by considering
potential sources and destinations for recycling. Identification
the ability of waste generated during construction to
and evaluation of options for recycling and reuse are the first
be recycled or beneficially reused, implementing waste
steps in development of effective plans for handling, segregation,
management plans to capture waste, and identifying
and storage of materials. It is important to determine which
possible recycling centers with appropriate capabilities.
materials must be separated versus which can be commingled.
When considering the extra time or effort involved in collecting
The final application/destination of diverted or reused
and diverting construction waste, consideration should be
materials should not pose risks to human health and safety or
given to cost savings in dumping fees. Additionally, some
the environment, and should be in compliance with all state/
recycled materials such as scrap metal have a positive value.
provincial and local solid waste agency requirements. Material
Achieving high rates of construction waste diversion is often
sent to landfills for use as cover is still being disposed of in
about the institutional training and operating procedures of the
landfills and therefore does not meet the spirit or intent of this
organizations and companies involved. Infrastructure owners
credit. If material is sent to a recycling facility, project teams
should consider these capabilities when choosing project teams.
should consider whether the facility is certified for meeting
acceptable recycling rates. Waste deemed hazardous should
not be included in the total waste calculations and should be
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT disposed of according to local, state/provincial, and federal law.
Improved – Conserving: Levels in this credit are distinguished Soils and rocks are not included in this credit, but are addressed
by the percentage of total construction waste diverted from in RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site. Methods of diversion should
disposal. This is calculated as the ratio of material diverted meet the spirit and intent of the credit to reduce the social
from landfills against the total waste generated during and environmental impacts of waste generation. Acceptable
construction. Calculations must be done by weight or volume. means of diversion may include but are not limited to:
Though often more difficult to quantify, projects may also

100 ENVISION V3
 • Waste reduction; 2. Documentation that the construction
management plan was implemented.
• Reuse or recycle materials on site;
• Materials sent to recycling or reclamation facilities; B. To what extent has construction waste
• Materials sent to manufacturers to be used been diverted from landfills?
as post-consumer recycled content; 1. Policies, specifications, contract documents, or
• Materials composted on site or sent to a composting facility; commitments by the project team to achieve a
target construction waste diversion rate.
• The use of material, if appropriate, as infill;
2. Provide a general description of each type/category of
Unacceptable means of diversion include: construction and demolition materials generated, location
of receiving agent, and quantity of waste diverted (by
• Burying waste material unsuited for infill.
category) in weight (tons) or volume (cubic yards/meters).
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that 3. Calculations of total waste reduction measures and percentage of
produce construction waste. Projects that do not include materials diverted to recycling or reuse. The percentage of diverted
any construction waste may apply to have this credit waste should be calculated as the ratio of material diverted from
deemed not applicable with supporting documentation. landfills against the total waste generated during construction.
Calculations may be done by weight (tons) or volume (cubic yards/
meters) but must remain consistent throughout the credit.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
Waste deemed hazardous should not be included in the total waste
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
calculations and should be disposed of according to local, state/
A. Has the project team developed a comprehensive provincial, and federal law.
waste management plan to decrease project waste and
divert waste from landfills during construction?
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
1. Documentation of the construction waste management plan, LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon
OR;
Policies, specifications, or contract documents indicating
a construction management plan will be developed and
implemented.

ENVISION V3 101
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: MATERIALS

RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site

INTENT METRIC

8 Minimize the movement of soils and other

excavated materials off site to reduce
transportation and environmental impacts.
Percentage of excavated material
retained on site or nearby.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A A A Not Available

(2) Reuse At Least (4) Reuse At Least (6) Reuse At Least (8) Fully Balanced Site
30% On Site 50% On Site 80% On Site

(A) Excavated material moved (A) Excavated material moved (A) Excavated material moved (A) The site is fully balanced.
off site and/or fill brought onto off site and/or fill brought onto off site and/or fill brought onto No earthwork is removed
the site does not exceed 70% the site does not exceed 50% the site does not exceed 20% from the site and no
of total site soil handling. of total site soil handling. of total site soil handling. earthwork is imported.
OR OR OR
100% of fill and excavated 100% of fill and excavated 100% of fill and excavated
materials are sourced or reused materials are sourced or reused materials are sourced or reused
within 25 mi/40 km of the site. within 10 mi/16 km of the site. within 5 mi/8 km of the site.

DESCRIPTION included in the total calculations and should be disposed

of according to local, state/provincial, and federal law.
Modern construction equipment and methods have made the
leveling of large sites a possibility. However, the large-scale
An alternative approach is available for projects to source all
removal and/or replacement of soils and excavated materials has
fill, and find beneficial reuse for all excavated material, within
impacts that span the categories of Quality of Life, Leadership,
a limited radius of the project. Distances should be calculated
Resource Allocation, Natural World, and Climate and Resilience.
as a radius extended from the project boundary. For long,
Impacts include but are not limited to increased noise and
linear infrastructure projects, the center of the distance radius
congestion, loss of landscape characteristics, increased fuel
moves along the site (e.g., the center of the radius will be at the
consumption, increased equipment use, degraded soil health,
beginning of the project and move as the project progresses).
loss of microbial biodiversity, introduction of invasive species,
disrupted hydrology, and increased greenhouse gas and air Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that involve
pollutant emissions. Project teams should consider how finding the excavation of qualifying earthwork. Projects that do not
beneficial uses of excavated soils and rocks on site can reduce include any earthwork, or only involve the excavation of excluded
social environmental impacts, lead to co-benefits, and save costs. material considered contaminated or hazardous, may apply
to have this credit deemed not applicable with supporting
documentation. In rare cases, where the amount of excavated
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT soil is insignificant in comparison to the scale of the project,
Improved – Conserving: Levels in this credit are distinguished teams may apply to have this credit deemed not applicable with
by the percentage of soil handling retained on site. During supporting documentation. However, the reviewer may exercise
planning, design, and construction, project teams should identify his/her discretion in determining what constitutes an insignificant
opportunities to minimize grading, retain soil on site, and/or quantity of excavated material in the context of the project.
eliminate the need to transport additional soil to the site.

For the purpose of this credit, earthwork includes excavation of EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
naturally occurring materials such as soil, rocks, and grubbed DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
plant material. It does not include manufactured materials
such as asphalt, concrete pavement, or other manufactured
A. To what extent has the project team designed
in-ground man-made structures. Excavated materials, such
the project to balance cut and fill to reduce
as soils, deemed contaminated or hazardous should not be
the excavated material taken off site?

102 ENVISION V3
1. Documentation showing how the project balanced RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
cut and fill on site and calculations of the percentage
QL1.4 Minimize Noise and Vibration
of excavated materials remaining on site.
LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies
2. Documentation showing the destination of any materials
transported off site and their proximity to the project site. For RA2.2 Reduce Construction Energy Consumption
long, linear infrastructure projects, the center of the radius NW2.2 Manage Stormwater
moves along the site (i.e., the center of the radius will be at the
beginning of the project and move as the project progresses). NW2.4 Protect Surface and Groundwater Quality
NW3.5 Protect Soil Health
Excavated materials deemed hazardous should not be included in
the total calculations and should be disposed of according to local, CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon
state/provincial, and federal law.
CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions

ENVISION V3 103
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: ENERGY

RA2.1 Reduce Operational Energy Consumption

INTENT METRIC

26 Conserve energy by reducing overall

operational energy consumption
throughout the project life.
Percentage of operational energy
reductions achieved.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B A+B A+B Not Available

(6) 10% Energy Reduction (12) 30% Energy Reduction (18) 50% Energy Reduction (26) 70% Energy Reduction

(A) The project team determines the estimated annual energy consumption of the project. If annual energy
consumption varies, the project team submits the range of estimated performance over the project life.

(B) Operational energy is (B) Operational energy is (B) Operational energy is (B) Operational energy is
reduced at least 10%. reduced at least 30%. reduced at least 50%. reduced at least 70%.

DESCRIPTION Engineers) are available for the project type, they can be used
in calculating the project’s anticipated energy consumption
This credit addresses the important need to reduce overall
as well as the industry base case. Calculations should
energy consumption. Energy generation is the primary source of
include energy purchased from the grid, energy generated
greenhouse gas emissions and numerous other pollutants harmful
and used on site, and fuels used on site by the project.
to the environment and human health. While use of renewable
energy reduces impacts, the primary goal of all projects should be
Energy generation projects should use energy conversion
to minimize the overall energy consumed as much as possible.
efficiency as the measure of energy efficiency, with the goal
of increasing the capture of electrical, mechanical, or thermal
There are significant and compounding cost savings to reducing
energy output of the system. Similarly, energy distribution
operational energy use. Project teams should take a whole-systems
projects should calculate reductions in energy loss, with the
design approach when considering options in order to maximize
goal of achieving better efficiency in energy delivery.
achievement. While single actions like replacing fluorescent
lights with light emitting diodes (LEDs) are a positive first step,
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that consume
large energy savings can be achieved when considering project
energy during their operation. Projects that do not include
alternatives and the design of major energy consuming systems.
operational energy may apply to have this credit deemed
not applicable with supporting documentation. In rare cases,
where the amount of operational energy use is insignificant
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT in comparison to the scale of the project, teams may apply
Improving – Conserving: Levels in this credit are distinguished by to have this credit deemed not applicable with supporting
the percentage of operational energy reductions. As industry documentation. However, the reviewer may exercise his/her
standards on operational energy use do not exist for most discretion in determining what constitutes an insignificant
infrastructure projects, project teams are required to provide quantity of operational energy use in the context of the project.
calculations for an appropriate base case. Accepted methodologies
for establishing baseline performance data are explained in
detail in the front of this manual and include existing conditions, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
a seriously considered alternative, standard practice, or a DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
comparable existing project/facility. It is the intent of Envision to
support data collection in order to eventually provide this baseline
A. Has the project team determined the estimated annual
data for project teams and the industry as a whole. This is why it
energy consumption of the project during operations?
is required to submit calculations in acceptable standard units.
1. Estimates of the annual energy consumption of the project
Calculations should include the anticipated annual energy during operations. Energy data should be presented in standard
consumption during the operational life of the project. If units. If annual energy consumption varies, the project
industry standards such as ASHRAE (formerly American team submits the range of estimated performance over the
Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning project life. Energy consumption of the project includes:

104 ENVISION V3
 • Energy purchased from the grid 2. Submit calculations for the project’s estimated annual
• Energy generated on site energy consumption over the life of the project. Document
the percentage reduction over the baseline. All energy
• Fuels used on site by the project sources should be converted into standard units.
Note that energy generation projects should use energy
conversion efficiency as the measure of energy efficiency, with RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
the goal of increasing the capture of electrical, mechanical, or
QL1.5 Minimize Light Pollution
thermal energy output of the system. Similarly, energy distribution
projects should calculate reductions in energy loss, with the goal
QL2.2Encourage Sustainable Transportation
of achieving better efficiency in energy delivery.
LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
B. To what extent has the project reduced
operational energy consumption? RA2.4 Commission and Monitor Energy Systems
1. Calculation of the baseline energy consumption. All energy
sources should be converted into standard units. CR1.2Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

CR1.3Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions

PROJECT EXAMPLE:
SOUTH LOS ANGELES WETLAND PARK
The South Los Angeles Wetland Park (Envision Platinum,
2014) in California reduced operational energy use by 77%
by disconnecting all lighting associated with the project
from the electrical grid and using solar powered lighting
instead. The project team also designed the pump systems
to further reduce operational energy requirements;
two smaller sump pumps requiring less energy operate
throughout the majority of the year when stormwater
discharge rates are low. Only during rain events will three
large process pumps that consume more energy operate.

ENVISION V3 105
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: ENERGY

RA2.2 Reduce Construction Energy Consumption

INTENT METRIC

12 Conserve resources and reduce greenhouse

gases and air pollutant emissions by reducing
energy consumption during construction.
The number of strategies implemented on
the project during construction that reduce
energy consumption and emissions.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A+B A+B A+B Not Available

(1) Identify Reduction (4) At Least Two (8) At Least Four (12) At Least Six
Opportunities Reduction Strategies Reduction Strategies Reduction Strategies

(A) The project team conducts one or more planning reviews to identify and analyze
options for reducing energy consumption during construction.

(B) The project implements, (B) The project implements, (B) The project implements,
or has written requirements or has written requirements or has written requirements
to implement, at least two (2) to implement, at least four (4) to implement, at least six (6)
energy reduction strategies. energy reduction strategies. energy reduction strategies.

DESCRIPTION the metric for achievement. Strategies that meet the credit
requirements are listed under criterion B. These activities may
This credit addresses the important need to reduce construction
be more or less difficult to achieve depending on the project type
energy consumption. As construction energy use is closely
and context, which is why a wide range of options are available.
linked to emissions, many actions in this credit address energy
efficiency, energy reduction, renewable energy use, and
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that consume
reduced emissions. Therefore, in addition to other Resource
energy during construction. It would therefore be difficult to
Allocation credits, RA2.2 Reduce Construction Energy
demonstrate that the credit is not relevant or applicable to a
Consumption is also connected to CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied
project seeking an Envision award. In rare cases, where the
Carbon, and CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
amount of energy used during construction is insignificant
in comparison to the scale of the project, teams may apply
Significant cost savings can be achieved by reducing fuel
to have this credit deemed not applicable with supporting
consumption during construction. Project teams should
documentation. However, the reviewer may exercise his/her
consider the secondary and tertiary benefits of reduced
discretion in determining what constitutes an insignificant
truck trips, improved air quality, and support for renewable
quantity of construction energy use in the context of the project.
energy systems. While single actions like replacing fluorescent
lights with light emitting diodes (LEDs) is a positive first step,
large energy savings can be achieved when considering
broader construction logistics and coordination.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT A. Has the project team conducted planning reviews to

Improved: Project teams begin with a thorough review of the means reduce energy consumption during construction?
and methods of constructing the project, including a review of how 1. Documentation that one or more planning reviews were
energy is to be consumed during construction and opportunities conducted to identify and analyze the potential for
for energy reduction. The list of energy reduction strategies reducing energy consumption during construction.
should be used as a guide to identify and analyze options.
B. To what extent have energy conservation strategies
Enhanced – Conserving: Conducting detailed calculations of been implemented during construction?
construction energy consumption can be burdensome if not
1. Documentation that the project has implemented, or has
impossible. Additionally, like other Resource Allocation credits,
policies to implement, energy conservation strategies during
industry standards on construction energy use do not exist.
construction. Strategies that meet the credit requirements include:
Therefore, this credit assesses the number of energy-conserving
and emission-reducing strategies deployed on the project as

106 ENVISION V3
a. Tier IV construction equipment or Tier III with Best Available i. Reduce overall fuel consumption by 10% through improved
Technology (BAT) for at least 75% of non-road equipment fleet planning and logistics. Specific strategies may include:
greater than 50 horsepower;
i. Reduce number of deliveries;
b. Alternative fuels in heavy equipment such as biodiesel for at
ii. Reduce idle times;
least 5% of total fuel consumption;
iii. On-site reuse of soils or other materials to decrease truck
c. Hybrid or fully electric project vehicles for at least 50% of fleet;
traffic to and from site (ties into Reduced Excavated
d. Electrified equipment for at least 20% of equipment (vs. gas or Material taken off site);
diesel engines);
iv. Reduce on-site trucking – proper logistics planning such as
e. Employee commuting programs with incentives (shuttles to staging material in close proximity to installation location;
transit, ride-share programs, biking facilities, etc.);
v. Schedule acceleration without additional resource
f. Reduce purchased energy for workstations (construction trailer/ consumption;
office energy) by 30% for two of the following: (1) lighting; (2)
vi. Waterborne/rail transportation of materials versus trucking
HVAC; (3) plug loads;
(third-party distribution or logistics);
g. Purchase green power (RECs) for 30% of workstation energy
vii. On-site plants (concrete plant/asphalt plant) in lieu of
consumption;
trucking material to the site; and
h. Offset electrical consumption by generating 5% renewable
viii. Prefabrication of design elements.
energy on site (e.g., solar panels on trailer complex, solar-
powered temporary light plant, solar-powered cameras and
variable message sign boards); and RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site
CR1.2Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
CR1.3Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions

PROJECT EXAMPLE: HIGHWAY I-4 ULTIMATE

On the Highway I-4 Ultimate project (Envision Platinum, 2017),
a 21 mile stretch of highway between Orange County and
downtown Orlando in Florida, the contractor deployed state-
of-the-art equipment monitoring technologies and software
to reduce environmental impacts during construction. Fuel
management technologies to monitor fuel dispensing into
each piece of equipment and to track consumption were
deployed. Also, auxiliary air conditioning units on crawler
cranes were implemented. These measures led to a 20%
reduction of machine hours and associated fuel consumption.

ENVISION V3 107
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: ENERGY

RA2.3 Use Renewable Energy

INTENT METRIC

24 Meet operational energy needs

through renewable energy sources.
Extent to which renewable energy
sources are incorporated.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A A A A

(5) At Least 5% (10) At Least 15% (15) At Least 30% (20) At Least 50% (24) Net Positive

(A) The project meets: (A) The project meets: (A) The project meets: (A) The project meets: (A) The project generates
a net positive amount of
5% of energy needs 15% of energy needs 30% of energy needs 50% of energy needs
renewable energy.
(electricity and fuel) from (electricity and fuel) from (electricity and fuel) from (electricity and fuel) from
renewable sources. renewable sources. renewable sources. renewable sources.

DESCRIPTION Projects may only count Renewable Energy Credits (RECs)

purchased or under contract at the time of assessment.
While reducing energy use is the primary goal, a net-zero energy
Nonbinding commitments for future REC purchases cannot
society will require significant investment in renewable energy
be counted toward achievement in this credit. Purchased
sources. When appropriate, renewable energy can be generated
RECs must be annualized over the life of the project. For
on site to help reduce the need for fossil fuel sources. However,
example, if a project with a 20-year life purchases RECs for
it is important to note that large-scale off-site renewable energy
100% of its energy consumption for one year, this would
sources, such as wind farms, large hydroelectric facilities, or
translate to 5% of its overall energy consumption.
solar arrays, are often more efficient. It can be challenging to
demonstrate a direct connection to these sources and ensure that
On-site generation put back onto the grid is accounted for
their energy generation is not double-counted by other projects.
in determining percentage of electricity used. For example,
Project teams should evaluate the feasibility of renewable energy,
in a case with 100 kWh of electricity used on site, 20 kWh of
including nontraditional energy sources, to effectively increase the
renewables purchased from the grid, 10 kWh of renewables
portion of operational energy that comes from renewable sources.
generated and used on site, and 5 kWh of renewables returned
to the grid, the result is a level of 35% renewables attained.
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that consume
Improved – Conserving: Levels in this credit are distinguished energy (fuel or electricity) during their operation. Projects
by the percentage of total energy use from renewable that do not include operational energy may apply to have this
sources. Unlike energy consumption in buildings, which credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
are almost always dominated by electricity, infrastructure In rare cases, where the amount of operational energy use is
operational energy use can include both electricity and fuel insignificant in comparison to the scale of the project, teams may
consumption. For this credit, project teams should consider apply to have this credit deemed not applicable with supporting
both electricity and fuel consumption in their calculations. documentation. However, the reviewer may exercise his/her
discretion in determining what constitutes an insignificant
Renewable energy can be sourced from on-site generation, quantity of operational energy use in the context of the project.
purchased in fuels, or purchased from the grid through a
direct purchase agreement (e.g., renewable energy power
purchase agreement). For purchased renewable energy from EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
the grid, the electricity service provider sources power from DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
a renewable energy source and sells that power directly to
the project. Renewable energy sources must be in the same
A. To what extent does the project meet electricity
power grid as the project in this type of transaction. Project
or fuel needs from renewable sources?
teams cannot attribute latent renewable energy within
the grid to the project without a purchase agreement. 1. Documentation of the anticipated annual output of all renewable
sources, direct renewable electricity purchases, or exports to the
grid, and the resulting overall percentage of renewable energy

108 ENVISION V3
 to total energy consumption. The latent renewable energy mix Common Fuel Conversions
within the grid does not contribute to achievement in this credit.
Calculations should be in standard units of energy (Btu or kJ).
Fuel Imperial Unit Btu Metric Unit kJ
2. Breakdown of renewable energy sources by Electricity 1 Kilowatt-hour 3,412 1 Kilowatt-hour 3,600
type. Renewable energy may include:
Gasoline 1 Gallon 120,476 1 Litre 33,579
• solar energy (thermal heating, both active
and passive, and photovoltaic); Diesel 1 Gallon 137,452 1 Litre 38,310
• wind (electricity generation); Natural Gas 1 Cubic foot 1,037 1 Cubic Meter 38,638
• water (hydro or tidal for electricity generation); Propane LPG 1 Gallon 91,333 1 Litre 25,456

• biomass (electricity generation or as fuels); Propane Gas 1 Cubic Foot 2,550 1 Cubic Meter 95,011

• geothermal (electricity generation or heating and cooling); and Ethanol 1 Gallon 76,330 1 Litre 21,275

• hydrogen/fuel cells (used as a fuel). Source: US Energy Information Administration

• renewable transportation fuel or electric vehicle use.

RELATED ENVISION CREDITS

CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions

PROJECT EXAMPLE:
WATER SOURCE GEOTHERMAL
A lake formed in an abandoned quarry near the Nashville
International Airport in Tennessee, long considered a liability
for the Airport Authority, was turned into a beneficial resource
with the implementation of a Water Source Geothermal
project (Envision Silver, 2017). By harnessing the chilled water
of the quarry lake, the Airport Authority was able to save more
than $430,000 in electricity costs per year, a 50% improvement
over the baseline that was established for the project.

v; ■ .
i
m
' nan

ENVISION V3 109
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: ENERGY

RA2.4 Commission and Monitor Energy Systems

INTENT METRIC

14 Ensure efficient functioning and extend

useful life by specifying commissioning
and monitoring of energy systems.
The inclusion of monitoring equipment and
software, the extent of commissioning,
and the commissioning agent’s
POINTS
independence from the project.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B A+B+C A+B+C Not Available

(3) Basic Initial (6) Extensive Initial (12) Long-Term (14) Advanced Initial And
Commissioning Commissioning Commissioning Long-Term Commissioning

(A) The project includes energy (A) The project includes (A) The project includes integrated energy management systems.
monitoring capabilities. energy monitoring capability.
Energy management software is incorporated to allow for detailed
Equipment and/or software Equipment and/or software and centralized monitoring and reporting of performance.
are incorporated to allow are incorporated to allow
The equipment is capable of independently
detailed monitoring of detailed monitoring of
monitoring all primary project functions, accounting
performance during operation. performance during operation.
for at least 90% of energy use/consumption.
The equipment is capable of The equipment is capable of
independently monitoring independently monitoring
all primary project functions, all primary project functions,
accounting for at least 50% of accounting for at least 75% of
energy use/consumption. energy use/consumption.

(B) The project conducts an (B) The project conducts an (B) The project conducts an (B) The project conducts an
initial commissioning of energy initial commissioning of energy initial commissioning of energy initial commissioning of energy
systems accounting for at systems accounting for at systems accounting for at systems accounting for at
least 50% of the total energy least 75% of the total energy least 90% of the total energy least 90% of the total energy
consumption/generation. consumption/generation. consumption/generation. consumption/generation.
Commissioning includes a Commissioning includes a Commissioning includes a Commissioning includes a
detailed log of issues. detailed log of issues. detailed log of issues. detailed log of issues.
The owner engages a third party The owner engages an
or in-house commissioning independent third-party
agent not involved in the commissioning agent.
planning/design of the project.

(C) A comprehensive plan is developed for ongoing

periodic re-commissioning/review of energy systems
throughout the expected life of the project.

DESCRIPTION identify efficiency loss. In addition, monitoring equipment allows

operators to identify high-energy processes and target them in
Planning, designing, and constructing projects to reduce energy
their own sustainability efforts. Higher-resolution monitoring
use is the first step toward achieving energy efficiency goals.
increases the likelihood that projects will achieve and maintain
However, commissioning and ongoing monitoring are necessary
high levels of energy efficiency throughout their useful life.
to ensure the proper operation of the energy system in order to
realize those goals. Systems designed to be energy efficient can
fail because of installation errors or degradation over time during
operations. Commissioning ensures systems are functioning
as intended from the start of operations. Installing advanced
monitoring equipment and software better allows operators to

110 ENVISION V3
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT and type of monitoring equipment installed. Documentation
that the equipment installed is capable of monitoring all
Improved: The assessment is based on the scope of the energy
primary project functions, accounting for the required
monitoring capabilities and initial commissioning. The intent is to
percentage of energy consumption (e.g., 50%, 75%, 90%).
focus on important or primary sources of energy consumption.
2. Rationale as to how the monitoring equipment may enable
Enhanced: The project team expands the scope of more efficient operations over the industry norm.
monitoring capabilities and commissioning.
3. Documentation that energy management systems and associated
Superior: The project team can demonstrate that the software are incorporated into the project accounting for the
commissioning agent was independent from the project, though required percentage of energy consumption (e.g., 50%, 75%, 90%).
the commissioning may still be conducted within the same
organization. Energy management systems include detailed B. To what extent has a commissioning been conducted?
performance monitoring and management capabilities. An 1. Documentation that the project has undergone or
operations plan is developed for ongoing performance reviews. will undergo a commissioning (e.g., specification,
tender document, contract document).
Conserving: The commissioning was conducted
by an independent third-party agent. 2. Documentation that the commissioning was executed and
covered systems responsible for using or generating the
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that consume required percentage of energy (e.g., 50%, 75%, 90%).
energy during their operation. Projects that do not include
operational energy may apply to have this credit deemed 3. Documentation of the relationship between the
not applicable with supporting documentation. In rare cases, owner and the commissioning agent depending
where the amount of operational energy use is insignificant on the level of achievement being pursued.
in comparison to the scale of the project, teams may apply Note that for Superior, the owner may engage an in-house
to have this credit deemed not applicable with supporting commissioning agent so long as they are independent
documentation. However, the reviewer may exercise his/her of the planning/design of the project. For Conserving,
discretion in determining what constitutes an insignificant an independent third-party agent must be used.
quantity of operational energy use in the context of the project.
4. Documentation of the commissioning log of issues.

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND C. Is there a plan for ongoing commissioning of the

DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE energy systems throughout the project’s life?
1. Documentation of a plan for ongoing recommissioning/review
A. Does the design incorporate advanced integrated monitoring of these systems throughout the expected life of the project.
systems in order to enable more efficient operations?
1. Documentation that equipment and/or software are incorporated RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
in the design to allow detailed monitoring of performance. Design LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance
documents and specifications showing the location, purpose,
RA2.1 Reduce Operational Energy Consumption

ENVISION V3 111
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: WATER

RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources

INTENT METRIC

12 Assess and reduce the negative net impact

on fresh water availability, quantity, and
quality at a watershed scale to positively
The extent to which the project
considers and contributes to positively
addressing broader watershed issues.
POINTS
impact the region’s water resources.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F

(3) Increased Awareness (5) Good Water Resource (7) Wise Water Resource (9) Total Water (12) Positive Impact
Of Watershed Issues Management Management Management

(A) Assess the project’s watershed context and the watershed-scale fresh water issues, including location, type, quantity, rate of recharge,
and quality of water resources, as well as source and impacts of water used and the destination and impacts of wastewater.
(B) Estimates of water usage and wastewater generation over the life of the project.

(C) The project has features intended to reduce the identified negative impacts of water usage, and/or improve watershed-scale issues.

(D) The project has a net-zero impact on the quantity and availability of fresh surface
water and groundwater supplies without compromising water quality.

(E) The project is part of, or contributes to, a

watershed or regional water plan.

(F) The project makes a direct

and significant net-positive
improvement to the watershed.

DESCRIPTION reused through the natural water cycle. While social taboos
are often a barrier to wastewater reuse, the reality is that
Water quality and availability is a major concern affecting
water is continuously reused. Too frequently, water is treated
communities and regions all over the world. While water
to levels exceeding its ultimate use, representing a huge waste
conservation is a critical first step (addressed in RA3.2
of finances, energy, and resources. New efficiencies and cost
Reduce Operational Water Consumption and RA3.3 Reduce
savings can be achieved if project teams are permitted to view
Construction Water Consumption), all projects that impact
water as a recyclable resource rather than disposable waste.
water quantity or quality should consider the opportunity
to positively contribute to the greater watershed.

This credit addresses the increasing demands for fresh water PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
by agricultural, municipal, and industrial users, and encourages Improved: Positively addressing broader watershed issues
project teams to consider regional water resources holistically. begins with understanding the unique watershed conditions in
In addition, the generation of wastewater and how it is managed the context of the project. The scope of the watershed assessed
has the potential to either positively or negatively impact should be commensurate with the scale of the project and
natural hydrology. These demands, combined with the typical its potential impacts. The next step is quantifying water use
variability in the hydrologic cycle, can affect water availability, and determining whether the project has meaningful impact
quantity, and quality. In many areas, fresh water sources are on either water availability or the generation of wastewater.
used at a faster rate than they are being naturally replenished. In If so, reducing consumption should be a primary concern.
certain coastal areas, groundwater mining is allowing saltwater
intrusions to groundwater sources. Other land use practices Project teams should be careful and thorough in assessing
affect the quality of surface water and groundwater supplies. water usage, including process water consumption
associated with the project operation. The assessment
This credit is inspired by the concept of “one water.” This should account for irrigation, vehicle or equipment
refers to the increasing awareness that water is continuously washing operations, facility cleaning, and other usage.

112 ENVISION V3
Enhanced: The project deploys strategies to minimize negative C. Does the project include features to minimize the negative
impacts of water usage. How is water used, diverted, treated, impacts of water usage, and/or watershed-scale issues?
and disposed of? Where does it go and how does it impact the 1. Documentation of design features that will reduce negative
hydrologic cycle as it relates to water resources? Many factors impacts of water usage and/or watershed-scale issues.
impact water resources beyond quantity of water use. Project teams should also consider the indirect ways in which
the project may impact water resources. For example, a
Superior: Mitigation measures are sufficient project may not consume water itself but may include the
to achieve a net-zero impact. addition of recycled water lines (“purple pipe”) to support
water-recycling systems beyond the project boundary.
Conserving: The project positively contributes
to the broader watershed. 2. Documentation of how the design features
specifically address issues identified in the
Restorative: The project is part of a broader coordinated watershed comprehensive water assessment in criterion A.
plan. Degradation of water resources is often non-point source,
meaning there is no single primary source but rather hundreds or D. Does the project have a net-zero impact on the quantity
thousands of small sources that accumulate impact. Addressing and availability of fresh surface water and groundwater
this environmental impact may require the concerted action supplies without compromising water quality?
of hundreds of communities and thousands of projects.
1. Calculations demonstrating that the project’s water usage
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that consume will have no impact on the quantity and availability of
water or impact receiving waters. Projects that do not include fresh surface water and groundwater supplies.
any impacts to water quantity or quality may apply to have this 2. Documentation clarifying that the project does not
credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation. compromise water quality in the watershed.
In rare cases, where the impact to water quantity or quality is
insignificant in comparison to the scale of the project, teams may
E. Is the project part of a watershed-level or regional plan?
apply to have this credit deemed not applicable with supporting
documentation. However, the reviewer may exercise his/her 1. Documentation that the project is part of, or
discretion in determining what constitutes an insignificant impact contributes to, a larger watershed level or regional
to water quantity or quality use in the context of the project. plan intended to improve the watershed.

F. Does the project make a direct net-positive

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND improvement to the watershed?
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE 1. Documentation that the project has a net-positive impact
to the watershed in terms of water quantity and availability
A. Has the project team conducted a watershed assessment? or water quality. Examples of watershed improvements
may include improved water quality, better hydrologic
1. Documentation demonstrating that the project team
connectivity, or water storage and availability.
assessed and understands the project’s watershed context.
Examples include watershed plans, regional water and
wastewater utility plans, climate change reports, etc. The RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
scope of the watershed assessed should be commensurate LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
with the scale of the potential impacts of the projects.
RA3.2 Reduce Operational Water Consumption
2. Documentation of the location, type, quantity, rate of
RA3.3 Reduce Construction Water Consumption
recharge, and quality of water resources in the watershed.
NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
3. Identification of the source and impacts of water used
and the destination and impacts of wastewater. NW1.2 Provide Wetland and Surface Water Buffers
NW2.2 Manage Stormwater
B. Has the project team estimated the water usage and
wastewater generation over the life of the project? NW2.4 Protect Surface and Groundwater Quality

1. Calculations showing the estimated water usage and wastewater NW3.2 Enhance Wetland and Surface Water Functions
generation over the life of the project (gallons/liters). CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability

ENVISION V3 113
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: WATER

RA3.2 Reduce Operational Water Consumption

INTENT METRIC

22 Reduce overall water consumption while

encouraging the use of greywater, recycled
water, and stormwater to meet water needs.
Percentage reduction in potable
water use and overall water use.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C A+B+C A+B+C+D

(4) At Least 25% Reduction (9) At Least 50% Reduction (13) At Least 75% Reduction (17) 95% Reduction (22) Water Purification

(A) The project team conducts planning or design reviews to identify potable water reduction strategies during operation of the project.
The team has considered using alternatives such as nonpotable water, reused water, recycled water, and stormwater.

(B) The project reduces potable (B) The project reduces potable (B) The project reduces potable (B) The project reduces potable (B) The project reduces
water use by at least 25%. water use by at least 50%. water use by at least 75%. water use at least 95%. potable water use by 100%.

(C) Overall water use (C) Overall water use (C) Overall water use (C) Overall water use
(potable and nonpotable) is (potable and nonpotable) is (potable and nonpotable) is (potable and nonpotable) is
reduced by at least 20%. reduced by at least 30%. reduced by at least 40%. reduced by at least 50%.

(D) The project not only

reduces potable water
consumption to zero, but also
provides water that can be
used by the community.

DESCRIPTION entirely eliminating the need for irrigation systems includes the
added benefits of reduced construction costs, maintenance
This credit addresses reducing both potable water consumption
costs, and labor costs associated with maintaining the system.
and overall water consumption. Around the world, countries
are increasingly becoming embroiled in water-related conflicts.
However, these disputes are not limited to international conflicts
and often pit community against community. This will be
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
exacerbated by climate change with increasing water evaporation Improved – Conserving: Levels in this credit are distinguished
rates, and changes to the quantity, intensity, and timing of by percentage reductions in potable and overall water use.
precipitation. Increases in mean temperatures can also affect In the context of this credit, potable water refers to water
the amount and duration of snow cover and, in turn, affect the that is treated to the level of drinking water. In the majority
average and peak rates of streamflow. All of these issues have of projects, this will be municipal drinking water.
important implications to agricultural irrigation, hydropower,
flood management, fisheries, recreation, and navigation. As industry standards on operational water use do not exist
for most infrastructure projects, project teams are required
The treatment and distribution of water also consumes large to provide calculations for an appropriate base case. Accepted
amounts of energy. In many cases, it is not necessary to use methodologies for establishing baseline performance data are
potable (i.e., drinkable) water for the intended task. Greywater explained in detail in the front of this manual and include existing
(e.g., water that has been used for cleaning or other purposes conditions, a seriously considered alternative, standard practice,
and has not come into contact with feces), recycled water, or a comparable existing project/facility. It is the intent of Envision
and stormwater are alternatives to potable water use. This to support data collection in order to eventually provide this
credit recognizes the added benefit of reducing overall water baseline data for project teams and the industry as a whole.
consumption as well as reducing potable water consumption.
Reductions may be accomplished through design, construction,
Reducing water consumption can have direct cost savings for and operational changes for conservation and the ability to
many projects. In some circumstances, such as landscaping, use, treat, and/or reuse nonpotable water. Advanced recycling
and reuse of wastewater are encouraged. Condensate and

114 ENVISION V3
 sump water can be included as pote
ntial sources for water
recycling. If recycled water is prov 2. Calculations of estimated annu
ided by a third part y, project al total water consumption
teams mus t verif y water supply over the life of the project, and the
and replenishment. If projects percentage reduction
choose to “upc ycle” water through over the industry baseline. Calculati
on-site treatment, they ons should be converted
should take into consideration pote into standard units such as gallons
ntial risks and energy or cubic meters.
trade-of fs. Use of treated wastewa
ter for groundwater Note that water treatment projects
recharge may also be counted as should address this credit
recycled/reused water. through reducing process water and
improved process efficiency.
The use of untreated surface wate
r and groundwater in lieu D. Does the project have a net posi
of potable water should not be cons tive impact on water use?
idered if use of these
waters will have a negative impa 1. Design documents demonstratin
ct on water availability or g that the project achieves
quality (see credit RA3.1 Preserve a 100% reduction in potable wate
Water Resources). Similarly, r use, using no water
stormwater capture/reuse shou or meeting water needs entirely thro
ld consider potential impacts ugh nonpotable
to receiving waters and the natu sources, and provides an available
ral water cycle of the area. source of usable
water (potable or nonpotable) for
Water treatment projects should neighboring projects
address this credit through or communities to offset their own
reducing process water and impr water needs.
oved process efficienc y.
Water distribution projects are not
the water that flow s through main
considered to consume REL ATED ENVISION CREDITS
s and pipelines. However, in RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources
cert ain circumstances , such as syst
em refurbishment, projects
that include water distribution syst CR1. 2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emis
ems may consider water sions
conservation through locating and
stopping or preventing leak s.
Applicability: This credit is applicab
le to all projects that consume
water during operations. Projects
that do not include any
operational water consumption
may appl y to have this credit
deemed not applicable with supp
orting documentation. In rare
cases, where the amount of wate
r consumption is insignificant
in comparison to the scale of the
project, teams may appl y
to have this credit deemed not appl
icable with supporting
documentation. However, the revie PROJEC T EXAMPLE:
wer may exercise his/her
discretion in determining what cons
quantity of operational water use
titutes an insignificant KUNIA COUNTRY FARMS
in the context of the project.
The Kunia Country Farms project
(Env ision Gold, 2016), one
of the largest commercial aquaponi
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND cs farms and producer s
of leafy greens in Hawaii, focuses
on the development and
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE implementation of “Zero Impact
Farming” which minimizes
energy and water use, soil degradat
ion, pollution, and other
A. Has the project team conducte impacts associated with commer
d planning and cial farming prac tices and
design reviews to identify pota aims to maximize land efficienc y
ble water reduction and labor productiv ity.
strategies during operation of the This project, a first-of-its-kind for
project? appl ying the Envision
framework, reduced potable wate
1. Documentation the project team r consumption over
conducted planning and design industry norms by 75% by incorpor
reviews to identify potable water redu ating a number of water
ction strategies during reduction strategies including mee
operation of the project. Example ting irrigation needs with
documents may include captured stormwater, minimizing
reports, memoranda, and minutes evaporation by covering all
of meetings with project of the irrigation water and storing
teams and owners regarding wate any excess underground,
r reduction strategies . and maximizing the efficienc y of
harvesting operations
to reduce the number of days work
B. To what extent has the project ers would need to use
reduced potable water use? potable water for sanitation and
hand washing purposes.
1. Calculation of the industry base
line for potable
water use to be used as a baseline.
2. Calculations of estimated annu
al potable water consumption flfe
over the life of the project. Documen
t the percentage reduction >;

over the industry baseline. Calculati

ons should be converted X*
into standard units such as gallons
or cubic meters. Note, w
water treatment projects should addr
ess this credit through
reducing process water and improved
process efficiency.

C. To what extent has the project

reduced overall water
use (including potable and non
potable water)? -

1. Calculation of the industry base

line for overall water use to
be used as a baseline. In some case
s, this may be the same SS -JS
calculation as the baseline for pota «r«
ble water use in criterion B. 5F k-
krj&Lz£i Z- ■'■
2- =S
«n>-i
■*< jn
2

ENVISION V3 115
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: WATER

RA3.3 Reduce Construction Water Consumption

INTENT METRIC

8 Reduce potable water consumption

during construction.
The number of strategies implemented
during construction that reduce
potable water consumption.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B A+B A+B Not Available

(1) Identify Consumption (3) At Least Three (5) At Least Five Strategies (8) No Potable Water
And Reduction Options Strategies Consumption

(A) The project team conducts one or more planning reviews to identify and analyze options for reducing water consumption during construction.

(B) At least one (1) potable (B) At least three (3) potable (B) At least five (5) potable (B) No potable water
water conservation strategy water conservation strategies water conservation strategies consumption, except for human
is implemented. are implemented. are implemented. consumption and hygiene,
by means of implementing as
many strategies as necessary.

DESCRIPTION treatment. However, the direct use of groundwater or surface

water would be included in the calculations for overall water use.
This credit addresses the potential to reduce water consumption
during construction. Overuse of water not only depletes
In fulfilling this credit, project teams should begin with a
waterbodies and lowers groundwater levels, but the treatment of
thorough review of the means and methods of constructing
water consumes large amounts of energy. In many cases, it is not
the project, including a review of how water is to be consumed
necessary to use potable (i.e., drinkable) water for the intended
during construction. The list of water reduction strategies
task. Greywater (e.g., water that has been used for cleaning or
should be used as a guide to identify and analyze options.
other purposes and has not come into contact with feces), recycled
The use of surface water and marginal groundwater in lieu
water, and stormwater are alternatives to potable water use,
of potable water should not be considered if use of these
especially in construction. Reducing water consumption during
waters will have a negative impact on water availability or
construction can reduce the environmental impact of the project.
quality (see credit RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources).

Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that consume

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT water during construction. Projects that do not include any
Improved – Conserving: The levels in this credit are distinguished operational water consumption may apply to have this credit
by the water conservation strategies implemented during deemed not applicable with supporting documentation. In cases
construction. Conducting detailed calculations of construction where the amount of water consumption during operations is
potable water consumption can be burdensome if not insignificant in comparison to the scale of the project, teams may
impossible. Additionally, like other Resource Allocation credits, apply to have this credit deemed not applicable with supporting
industry standards on construction water use do not documentation. However, the reviewer may exercise his/her
exist. Therefore, this credit assesses the number of water discretion in determining what constitutes an insignificant
conserving strategies deployed on the project as the metric quantity of operational energy use in the context of the project.
for achievement. Strategies that meet the credit requirements
are listed under criterion B. These activities may be more or
less difficult to achieve depending on the project type and EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
context, which is why a wide range of options are available. DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
In the context of this credit, potable water refers to water that is
A. Has the project team conducted planning reviews to
treated to the level of drinking water. In the majority of projects,
reduce water consumption during construction?
this will be municipal drinking water. This is not intended to refer to
natural sources of water that are of drinking water quality without

116 ENVISION V3
 1. Documentation that one or more planning reviews were f. Alternatives for truck tire wash stations (show 50% reduction in
conducted to identify and analyze the potential for water usage due to alternative controls)
reducing water consumption during construction.
g. Reduced embodied water through material selection
(permanent and temporary materials) (Demonstrate how
B. To what extent have water conservation strategies product selection has contributed to reduced potable water
been implemented during construction? consumption by more than 25%)
1. Documentation that the project has implemented water
conservation strategies during construction. Strategies h. Stormwater harvesting (show 40% savings by using harvested
that meet the credit requirements include: stormwater)

a. High-efficient fixtures in construction trailers or offices i. Greywater or wastewater effluent reuse (show 40% reuse)
(demonstrate a 40% reduction in usage) j. Dewatering reuse (show 40% reuse/recycling)
b. Monitoring and management (demonstrate team’s ability to 2. Calculation of potable water saved (gallons/liters) for each
detect leaks and respond to inefficiencies in the system) strategy as compared to not implementing the strategy over
c. Reduce embodied water of materials by reducing waste material the construction duration. Note that projects may wish to
(calculate a 10% reduction in material quantities entering the also calculate their cost savings for reduction measures.
site as new material)
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
d. Use alternatives to dust suppression such as dry agents (show
50% reduction in water usage due to alternative controls) RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources

e. Alternatives for curing concrete (show 50% reduction in water CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
usage due to alternative controls)

ENVISION V3 117
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: WATER

RA3.4 Monitor Water Systems

INTENT METRIC

12 Improve operational performance by

including monitoring capabilities.
Extent and capability of water monitoring
equipment and inclusion of response plans.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A A A+B Not Available

(1) One-Time Monitoring (3) Operations Monitoring (6) Long-Term Monitoring (12) Responsive Monitoring

(A) The project includes (A) The project includes (A) The project includes monitoring capabilities. Equipment
monitoring capabilities. monitoring capabilities. and/or software are incorporated in the design to allow
Equipment and/or software Equipment and/or software detailed monitoring of performance (quantity or quality).
are incorporated in the are incorporated in the
The equipment is capable of monitoring all primary project
design to allow detailed design to allow detailed
functions, accounting for at least 95% of water use.
monitoring of performance monitoring of performance
(quantity or quality). (quantity or quality).
The equipment is capable of The equipment is capable of
monitoring all primary project monitoring all primary project
functions, accounting for at functions, accounting for at
least 50% of water use. least 75% of water use.

(B) The project demonstrates

that real-time water monitoring
equipment and/or software
has been incorporated along
with a plan for using this data
to improve water quality and
efficiency, reduce leakage,
and/or conserve water.

DESCRIPTION waste of potable water and the embodied energy and

emissions associated with its treatment and distribution.
Planning, designing, and constructing projects to reduce water
use is the first step toward achieving water conservation
goals. However, ongoing monitoring is necessary to ensure
the proper operation of the water system in order to realize
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
those goals. Systems designed to be water efficient can fail Improved – Superior: Project teams increase the scope of water
because of installation errors or degradation over time during monitoring capabilities to 50%, 75%, or 95%, respectively, for water
operations. Monitoring ensures systems are functioning as consuming functions. Integrated monitoring systems may be used
intended from the start of operations. Installing advanced to mitigate negative impacts by shifting water demand to off-peak
monitoring equipment also better allows operators to identify hours and/or by discharging water to groundwater recharge or
leaks and water intensive processes and target them in their constructed wetlands or other best management practices, instead
own sustainability efforts. Higher resolution monitoring of through direct surface water connections or other means.
increases the likelihood that projects will achieve and maintain
high levels of water efficiency throughout their useful life. Conserving: The project implements real-time
water monitoring equipment and software to
Monitoring water systems and ensuring their proper and increase performance of water systems.
efficient operation helps both businesses and the environment.
Systems capable of monitoring flows and usage and detecting Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that consume
leaks early save money in operations and prevent the needless water during their operation or include the conveyance of large
quantities of water. Projects that do not include operational

118 ENVISION V3
water use or water conveyance may apply to have this credit type of monitoring equipment installed. This may include design
deemed not applicable with supporting documentation. In documents and specifications identifying the installation of easily
rare cases, where the amount of operational water use, or accessible and clearly labeled water sub-meters. Documentation
conveyance, is insignificant in comparison to the scale of the that the equipment installed is capable of monitoring all primary
project, teams may apply to have this credit deemed not applicable project functions, accounting for the required percentage
with supporting documentation. However, the reviewer may of water consumption or effluent (e.g., 50%, 75%, 95%).
exercise his/her discretion in determining what constitutes an
Rationale as to how the monitoring equipment
insignificant quantity of water use in the context of the project.
may enable improved performance.

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND B. Does the project include real-time water monitoring?
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE 1. Documentation that water monitoring equipment is
capable of delivering real-time data on water use.
A. Does the design incorporate advanced integrated 2. Documentation of a plan for using this data to improve water
monitoring systems in order to improve performance? efficiency, reduce leakage, and conserve water overall.
1. Documentation that equipment and/or software are incorporated
in the design to allow detailed monitoring of performance. RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
Performance may include water quality and/or quantity
depending on the function/purpose of the project. Design LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance
documents and specifications showing the location, purpose, and RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources

PROJECT EXAMPLE:
HARDEEVILLE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
The Hardeeville Water Reclamation Facility (Envision Bronze,
2016) is located in the Town of Hardeeville, South Carolina,
with close proximity to the Savannah River. The facility
has a SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition)
system that provides an overview of the entire facility from
a central computer terminal, where operators are able to
monitor facility performance in real-time and can make
adjustments if any deficiencies are detected. For example,
operators can respond to surges in incoming flow (e.g.,
after heavy rain storms) by diverting to the plant’s 1.5
million gallon flow equalization tank and then gradually
releasing the stored flow over time for treatment.

ENVISION V3 119
 RESOURCE ALLOCATION: INNOVATION

RA0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

INTENT METRIC

+10 To reward exceptional performance beyond

the expectations of the system and application
of innovative methods that advance state-
Whether project sustainability performance
qualifies as innovation, exceptional
performance, or is not otherwise
POINTS
of-the-art sustainable infrastructure. recognized in existing credits.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

INNOVATION
A or B or C

(+1-10) Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

(A) Implement innovative methods, technologies, or processes that are novel either in their use, application, or within the local regulatory or cultural context.
OR
(B) Implement measures that exceed the highest existing requirements within one or more Resource Allocation credits.
OR
(C) Address additional aspects of sustainability not currently recognized in Envision

DESCRIPTION and that it does not have a corresponding negative impact on

the local or global environment, economy, or community.
This credit addresses instances in which projects:
Projects may demonstrate they implement innovative
1. Implement innovative methods, resources, technologies, or
methods, technologies or processes in several ways:
processes that are novel in their use, application, or within
the local regulatory or cultural context of the project;
• The project is an early adopter of new technology
or methods that can demonstrably improve project
2. Exceed the performance requirements
performance without negative trade-offs;
of one or more credits; and/or
• The project uses technologies or methods that may be general
3. Address additional aspects of sustainability
practice in other regions or parts of the world, but within the
not currently recognized in Envision
context of the project (whether climate, regulations, policies,
Points for this credit are not calculated in the overall applicable political support, public opinion, etc.) have not yet gained
points and, therefore, act as bonus points. Given the nature of acceptance. Significant efforts are taken to demonstrate
the credit, the broad format of which is intended to encourage the effectiveness of the technology or method within the
creative infrastructure solutions, thorough documentation context and provide a precedent for future adoption.
is expected. Project teams may pursue more than one of the
• The project team takes significant steps to include
three possible options for this credit, or pursue multiple for
research goals within the project’s development, or
the same option, for a total of up to ten (10) bonus points.
work with a university or research organization to
advance the general knowledge of the profession.
Proprietary research that is not made publicly available
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
cannot count toward achieving this credit.
Innovation:
Project teams must also demonstrate that the innovation
To qualify for innovation points, projects must implement serves a purpose. This can be done in one of two ways:
innovative methods, resources, technologies, or processes
(e.g., the use of a pre-existing technology in a new way or the • Overcoming significant problems, barriers, or limitations—
successful application of a technology or methods in regions Project teams demonstrate that the innovation reduces
or locales where existing policies, regulations, or general or eliminates significant problems, barriers, or limitations
opinion have prevented their use). In these circumstances, it that previously hampered the use of the new methods,
is imperative to prove that the application of the technology technologies, or processes implemented on the project.
does, and will continue to, meet performance expectations

120 ENVISION V3
 • Creating scalable and/or transferable solutions—Project teams • Strategies to reduce construction energy
demonstrate that new methods, technologies, or processes consumption not already addressed in RA2.2
implemented on the project are scalable across a wide range Reduce Construction Energy Consumption.
of project sizes and/or are applicable and transferable across
multiple kinds of infrastructure projects in multiple sectors.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
Exceptional Performance: DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
To qualify for exceptional performance points, projects must
A. To what extent does the project implement innovative
meet the highest level of achievement for one or more Resource
methods, technologies, or processes that overcome
Allocation credits. For example, projects seeking additional
significant problems, barriers or limitations, or
points in credit RA2.2 Use Renewable Energy must already
create scalable and transferable solutions?
be generating a net positive amount of renewable energy. In
this instance, exceptional performance may be pursued by 1. Documentation of the application of innovative technologies
projects where the magnitude and investment in renewable or methods. Detailed description of how this application
energy generation represents a significant percentage of the will improve existing conventional practice either globally
project budget and a primary objective of the project. or within the unique context of the project. Provide
justification as to why this application should be considered
Possible areas of achievement in exceptional innovative either as a technology, a method, or within
performance for Resource Allocation may include, the project context (climate, political, cultural, etc.).
but are not limited to, the following:
2. Documentation that the project reduces or eliminates
• Projects for which the use of recycled materials significant problems, barriers, or limitations that previously
far exceeds the Conserving requirements in hampered the use or implementation of certain resources,
credit RA1.3 Use Recycled Materials; technologies, processes, or methods that improve the
sustainability of the project. Alternatively, documentation that
• Projects for which reducing operational energy consumption the new methods, technologies, or processes implemented
far exceeds the Conserving requirements in credit on the project are scalable across a wide range of project
RA2.1 Reduce Operational Energy Consumption; sizes and/or are applicable and transferable across multiple
kinds of infrastructure projects in multiple sectors.
• Projects that achieve significant water efficiency by
creatively re-examining water delivery or treatment. B. To what extent does the project exceed the highest
levels of achievement for a given credit?
Address Additional Aspects of Sustainability:
1. Detailed documentation of how the project exceeds the existing
requirements currently within a given Resource Allocation credit.
To qualify for bonus points under this approach, project teams
must demonstrate that they are addressing one or more
aspects of sustainability not currently recognized in Envision. C. To what extent does the project address a sustainability
Sustainability performance must be related to Resource Allocation. aspect that is not currently addressed by the Envision system?
Addressing an aspect of sustainability not currently covered by 1. Detailed documentation of how the project
the Envision system might sometimes be considered innovative, addresses a sustainability aspect that is not
in which case the requirements for the Innovation path may be currently addressed by the Envision system.
followed. For example, a project may earn bonus points for:
2. Documentation showing how this aspect relates
• Implementing sustainable procurement policies not already to the Resource Allocation category.
addressed in RA1.1 Support Sustainable Procurement Practices.

ENVISION V3 121
&

n
■

*
/

IP «*

m
.*■ '/
v
■>
: 'f _-.
S-I . Vx (

1 VV
z>

'

T^
-r
1?
1 v ’
✓
K >• Va> ' > 7

1 v ., s^B
H' ' w^w-vV> ”

i 2P
Ssw* *v c
\
iai N

p:j W6
H'r ,v
*
§T. t > \\
%
M, rv

t r '' v\.>:;.
l 4'

X
*
i•
y
j \ V
*

/
I
s
s*

Natural World

H tot
I
Infrastructure projects have an impact on the
natural world around them, including habitats,
species, and nonliving natural systems. The natural
systems around us perform critical functions called
ecosystem services that provide us with clean air,
clean water, healthy food, and hazard mitigation.
K The way a project is located within these systems
and the new elements they may introduce to a
system can create unwanted impacts on these
ecosystem services. This section addresses how
to understand and minimize negative impacts
while considering ways in which the infrastructure
can interact with natural systems in a synergistic,
positive way. These types of interactions and
impacts have been divided into three subcategories:
Siting, Conservation, and Ecology.

jc

#5

14 / credits
17 ■

H
■

•••?

<*»

◄ Image
The William Jack Hernandez Sport Fish Hatchery
in Anchorage, Alaska (Envision Gold, 2013)

—s
 1 Does the project avoid sites of high ecological value?

2 Does the project protect wetland and surface water quality?

3 Does the project maintain hydrological functions?

4 Does the project manage stormwater?

5 Does the project protect soil health?

6 Does the project manage or eliminate invasive species?

1 c
mi
*
2 /
k
6

3
4

SITING CONSERVATION ECOLOGY

Infrastructure should be sited to avoid Special care should also be taken to Infrastructure projects should minimize
impacts on important ecological areas avoid the introduction of contaminants, impacts on complex natural systems
including farmland and areas that serve whether through stormwater runoff or such as hydrologic and nutrient cycles,
as a diverse habitat, such as waterbodies pesticides and fertilizers. With proper and habitats. Through careful design
or wetlands. When the nature of the foresight, infrastructure can avoid infrastructure projects can minimize
infrastructure project makes it impossible these harmful disruptions and even habitat fragmentation and promote
to avoid sensitive sites, mitigation remediate previously contaminated connectivity and animal movement.
measures should be taken to minimize sites. It is important to remember that Projects should avoid introducing invasive
disruption of systems. Previously the impact of contamination is often species or inadvertently facilitating
developed or disturbed land is ideal cumulative, and that each project and their spread. Species of new vegetation
for preventing further damage to the site shares responsibility for protecting should be carefully selected and be
environment and improving land value. the quality of the larger system. appropriate for the location. Infrastructure
should not adversely impact wetlands,
floodplains, or soil health, which
provide critical ecosystem functions.

124 ENVISION V3
Natural World

SITING
NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
NW1.2 Provide Wetlands and Surface Water Buffers
NW1.3 Preserve Prime Farmland
NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land

CONSERVATION
NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields
NW2.2 Manage Stormwater
NW2.3 Reduce Pesticide and Fertilizer Impacts
NW2.4 Protect Surface and Groundwater Quality

ECOLOGY
NW3.1 Enhance Functional Habitats
NW3.2 Enhance Wetland and Surface Water Functions
NW3.3 Maintain Floodplain Functions
NW3.4 Control Invasive Species
NW3.5 Protect Soil Health

NW0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

ENVISION V3 125
 NATURAL WORLD: SITING

©NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value

INTENT METRIC

22 Avoid placing the project and temporary

works on a site that has been identified
as being of high ecological value.
Avoidance of high ecological value sites and
establishment of protective buffer zones.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B A+C (A + C + D) or E A+C+D+F

(2) Improved Siting (6) Full Mitigation (12) Total Avoidance (16) Habitat Protection (22) Habitat Expansion

(A) The project team identifies areas of high ecological value.

(B) Mitigation measures, (B) Mitigation measures (C) The project avoids developing or disturbing 100% of areas of high ecological value located on site.
including avoidance, including avoidance,
minimization, restoration, minimization, restoration,
and offsets, fully compensate and offsets, fully compensate
for project impacts to sites for project impacts to sites
of high ecological value. of high ecological value.
Mitigation may occur off site. Mitigation is on site or an
adjacent contiguous parcel of
equal or higher ecological value.
Temporary impacts from
construction activities do
not decrease the capacity
of preserved land.

(D) The project establishes effective protective buffer

zones around areas of high ecological value.

OR (F) The project increases the

area of high ecological value.
(E) The project team can
demonstrate that the site was This involves the restoration
intentionally chosen to avoid of areas of high ecological
development on or near sites value or conservation of
of high ecological value. surrounding areas, as
determined by a licensed or
similarly qualified professional.

DESCRIPTION Through construction, noise, light pollution, removal of

vegetation, and other practices, infrastructure projects
Some areas are especially important in protecting wildlife
can have negative impacts on these areas as well as the
biodiversity because of their size, location, diversity of habitat
local biodiversity. Therefore, siting infrastructure projects
types, or presence of a particular type of habitat for plant or
to prevent and minimize direct, indirect, and cumulative
animal species. Some of these areas are large and already
impacts is crucial. For example, a project with a small initial
protected (for example, national parks, national forests, or
footprint should consider the potential for disruption caused
national wildlife refuges). However, other habitat areas, such
by future roads, utilities, and other development. Problems
as areas of old-growth forest amid a patch of younger trees,
associated with a poorly sited project are difficult to correct
may be smaller and undocumented. All play important roles in
after construction. Preventing impacts by selecting appropriate
maintaining biodiversity by providing crucial habitats for wildlife.
sites during planning is significantly more effective.

126 ENVISION V3
‑‑Project teams unsure of whether their site is of high • Restoration (e.g., enhancement or restoration
ecological value should consider the following factors: of degraded or a former habitat)
• Offsetting (e.g., creation of new habitats)
1. Biodiversity
Enhanced: Mitigation is accomplished on or adjacent to the
a. Rarity impacted site. Mitigation measures can be achieved on site
i. Sites with a concentration of endemic flora or fauna species through the dedication of a conservation easement that provides
restrictions on access and limits, or through the acquisition of an
ii. Sites containing rare or threatened flora or fauna species adjoining contiguous parcel of equal or higher quality. Offsets must
iii. Sites containing rare or threatened habitat types equal or exceed the area disturbed by the project and cannot be
iv. Sites containing habitat or species of part of an existing conservation easement. Only in rare cases can
limited distributional range project teams petition that remote offsetting be considered when
it results in positive environmental improvements for the region.
b. Richness
i. Sites concentrating high numbers of flora or fauna species Superior: The project site contains areas of high
ecological value but all impacts are avoided.
ii. Sites concentrating high numbers of habitat types
iii. Sites seasonally concentrating significant Conserving: Project teams may meet criteria A, C, and D, or meet
population of migratory species criterion E demonstrating that the site was intentionally chosen
to avoid development on or near sites of high ecological value.
2. Ecosystem Functions This includes evidence that impacting a site of high ecological
value was a seriously considered option and that decisions made
a. Size during planning or design led to avoiding a sensitive site.
i. Sites embedded into large areas preserving good
environmental conditions (e.g., “core forest”) Restorative: The project expands the area of high ecological value.
As it is rarely possible to “create” areas of high ecological value,
ii. Sites embedded into a large and project teams may increase the contiguous area surrounding sites
connected landscape matrix of high ecological value—providing better protection, wider range
b. Ecological Processes of species movement, or future opportunities for expansion.

i. Sites maintaining good soil conditions for Applicability: Projects that do not contain areas of high
high-quality habitat development ecological value, and cannot demonstrate they actively avoided
ii. Sites maintaining good regeneration areas of high ecological value, may apply to have this credit
conditions for dominant species deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
iii. Sites significant to the hydrologic system,
including groundwater recharge
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
c. Age/Maturity DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
i. Sites maintaining old-growth forests or
similar undisturbed habitats A. Has the project team identified whether the site
ii. Sites containing a variety of age classes of fauna contains areas of high ecological value?
ii. Multilayer forest sites with indicator species for each layer 1. Documentation of research undertaken to identify areas of
high ecological value on the site. Research may include, but
should extend beyond, references to local, state/provincial,
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT or federal agencies or organizations indicating areas of
Improved: The credit assessment begins with identifying high ecological value on site. Examples may include but are
areas of high-ecological value. Not every undeveloped or not limited to: old growth forest; habitats important for
vegetated site is considered an area of high ecological value, threatened or endangered species; areas within ecosystems
and the qualifications of what constitutes a site of high that support significant diversity of species, habitats (native,
ecological value can be subjective. These include all areas migratory, breeding, and foraging), and/or important/rare/
designated by municipal, state/provincial, or federal agencies unusual geomorphological features/processes; and areas that
but may also include undocumented areas containing rare are “pristine” or not adversely affected by human activity.
or significant habitat, species, or geologic formations.
2. Index of areas of high ecological value on or near the site.
After identifying sites of high ecological value, projects should
follow a mitigation hierarchy prioritizing the avoidance of B. Has the project mitigated any areas of high
sensitive sites to the extent possible. Mitigation measures are ecological value that are disturbed?
actions that reduce or address potential adverse impacts of a 1. A mitigation plan including:
project on an area of high ecological value. They address specific
a. an assessment of impacts to areas of high ecological
needs of the site and species involved and are manageable and
value including a calculation of area impacted;
measurable. Mitigation measures may take many forms, such as:
b. measures the project will undertake to monitor,
• Avoidance (e.g., preservation of existing habitat) minimize, and mitigate impacts;
• Minimization (e.g., establishment of buffer c. the resources that will be made available
areas around existing habitats) to implement such measures;

ENVISION V3 127
 d. alternative actions that the project analyzed, and the 1. Documentation showing that no existing areas of high
reasons why the project did not adopt such alternatives; ecological value will be developed as a result of the project.
e. additional measures that may be required by 2. Documentation demonstrating that areas of high
regulatory agencies, as necessary or appropriate. ecological value will be protected during construction
2. The plan is appropriately designed to meet mitigation goals. (e.g., contract documentation, specifications,
The plan should be prepared by a licensed or similarly qualified contractor standard operating procedures).
professional with expertise in ecological, natural resources
and environmental habitat. Depending on the context of the D. Does the project preserve an effective protective
project, this requirement may alternatively be met by regulatory buffer zone around areas of high ecological value?
approval of the mitigation plan or by demonstrating that the plan 1. A site map illustrating a protective zone for
meets guidelines set out by the appropriate regulatory body. areas of high ecological value.
3. Site plan showing temporary works and their 2. Documentation demonstrating that the zone
proximity to sites of ecological value. provides effective protection. This should include
4. Documentation that the capacity of ecological sites was the nature and makeup of the buffer zone.
not diminished as a result of construction activities.
E. Was the project intentionally sited to avoid
C. Does the project avoid developing or disturbing areas of high ecological value?
areas of high ecological value on site? 1. Documentation demonstrating to what extent areas of
high ecological value were intentionally avoided.
2. Documentation must show that the owner and the project
team made meaningful efforts to avoid disturbing areas of
high ecological value during the site selection process.
PROJECT EXAMPLE: Note that meeting criterion E is an alternative achievement path
MARSHALLTOWN GENERATING STATION for the Conserving level. Achieving Conserving by meeting criterion
E does not require meeting criteria A, C, and D, and vice versa.
The Marshalltown Generating Station (Envision Platinum,
2017) in Marshalltown, Iowa avoided development on land
F. Does the project significantly increase
considered to be of high ecological value. When assessing
the area of high ecological value?
the best place to construct the new combined-cycle power
plant, the project team undertook a comprehensive siting 1. Documentation of how areas of high ecological value were
study to identify the most viable location. In total more increased or restored. The habitat produced can be part
than 140 potential locations for the plant were considered of a protective buffer zone. Documentation should include
based on a number of considerations such as minimum a site map outlining locations and a technical summary
transmission line, natural gas pipeline, and substation describing the methods and materials of restoration.
infrastructure requirements. This long list of possible sites 2. The documentation must be signed by a qualified natural
was narrowed down to 36 locations and environmental resource professional who attests to the functionality of the
considerations—such as avoiding impacts to sensitive restoration, or approved by a similarly qualified regulatory body.
species and avoiding impacts to protected areas—were
included in the assessment criteria. Ultimately, the RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
project team chose a site for the plant that avoided the
development of land judged to be of high ecological value. QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life
LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
NW1.2 Provide Wetlands and Surface Water Buffers
NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land
NW3.1 Enhance Functional Habitats
NW3.4 Control Invasive Species
NW3.5 Protect Soil Health

tz"A1

.A
i-
ii n

128 ENVISION V3 ENVISION 128

Sheldon Avenue Stormwater Management:
Staten Island, New York

New York City’s Sheldon Avenue Stormwater Management city’s agency responsible for the construction of civic facilities,
project (Envision Silver, 2017) on Staten Island, executed by the including the Sheldon Avenue project. Both agencies have
Department of Design and Construction (NYCDDC) on behalf made strong commitments to designing projects that adhere
of the Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP), to the principles of sustainability, and both also have many
involves the creation of a natural wetland to more effectively in-house Envision Sustainability Professionals (ENV SPs).
and sustainably manage and filter stormwater captured from
the local community. Additionally, installation of sanitary sewers Resource Allocation: The original concept called for an all-pipe
will allow almost 600 local homeowners to be taken off septic network for managing stormwater on Staten Island, which would
systems, improving water quality, increasing home values, and have destroyed existing wetlands. The Bluebelt program, and by
eliminating the headaches for homeowners associated with extension the Sheldon Avenue project, instead aims to use existing
managing these systems. This project is the largest expansion to drainage corridors and wetlands as a natural conveyance for
date of the Staten Island Bluebelt, an award-winning, ecologically stormwater that requires no energy and less water treatment.
sound and cost-effective stormwater program created in
response to frequent flooding on the island during rain events Natural World: Wetland restoration is another key component of
that were caused by a lack of sufficient stormwater drainage. the project. A badly degraded wetland, overrun with non-native
and invasive species, was restored. The project team undertook
Key organizations involved in the planning, design, and a comprehensive assessment of potential risks and impacts to
construction of the project include NYCDDC, which was responsible existing wetlands, and took steps to mitigate and avoid impacts
for both the design of the storm and sanitary sewers as well as to the extent possible. Also, the replacement of an existing
construction management; NYCDEP; Hazen and Sawyer, which was manmade stormwater pond with stormwater best management
responsible for the design of the stormwater Best Management practices such as the wetlands is expected to have a significant
Practice (BMP) wetland; and Arcadis, which provided construction positive impact on wildlife by improving habitat conditions.
oversight services and steered the Envision application process.
The project team also included an assessment of the area to
Notable achievements for the Sheldon Avenue stormwater determine the presence of any adverse geological formations
management project within the Envision categories include: and aquifers. In designing the project, the project team took
care to avoid impacting the ground water by installing pipes
Quality of Life: This project is part of a much larger program—the at a maximum depth of 12 feet below the surface, more than
Staten Island Bluebelt program—designed to address flooding 45 feet above the groundwater levels. Additionally, silt fences
issues and improve water quality throughout the community and other sediment control measures were installed during
in a sustainable manner. The overall integration of the existing construction to prevent runoff into nearby water features.
community wetland infrastructure is well documented in an
Environmental Impact Statement document, a holistic evaluation of Climate and Resilience: Wetlands play a vital role in reducing the
the wetlands in the Bluebelt system. Beyond integrated wetlands, effects of global warming by absorbing carbon, thereby mitigating
this project also integrates well with existing transportation the long-term consequences of climate change and helping
infrastructure, and the existing residential and commercial building to make the community more resilient under altered climate
infrastructure. This project will improve sewerage, drainage, and conditions. The Sheldon Avenue stormwater projects addresses
water quality in the Bluebelt area, without adversely impacting the a range of potentially severe short-term hazards that could
existing population and associated community infrastructure. affect the area, including flooding, coastal storms, and extreme
temperatures, all of which are alleviated by the implementation
Leadership: New York City has demonstrated a significant of green infrastructure solutions for stormwater management,
commitment to sustainability from the Mayor’s office through such as the use of wetlands and natural stormwater conveyance
to its many agencies and offices, including the NYCDEP—the systems, as opposed to more traditional “grey infrastructure”.
city’s agency that manages its water supply, and NYCDDC—the
 NATURAL WORLD: SITING

© NW1.2 Provide Wetland and Surface Water Buffers

INTENT METRIC

20 Protect, buffer, enhance, and restore

wetlands, shorelines, and waterbodies
by providing natural buffer zones,
Type and quality of natural buffer
zone established around all wetlands,
shorelines, and waterbodies.
POINTS
vegetation, and soil-protection zones.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B+C A+B+C A+B+C (A + B + C) or D A+B+C+E

(2) Buffers (5) Managed Buffers (10) Mixed Buffers (16) Natural Buffers (20) Buffer Restoration

(A) The project team identifies wetlands and surface water on or near the site, or with the potential to be impacted by the project.
(B) The project team identifies the appropriate type and width of buffer zones for wetlands and surface waters.

(C) The project provides (C) The project provides a (C) The project provides a (C) The project provides a buffer of natural zones
vegetated or natural buffer buffer of managed vegetated mixed buffer of managed around all wetlands and surface waters.
zones around at least 90% zones around all wetlands vegetation and natural
The buffer is of sufficient width to slow surface runoff,
of wetlands and surface and surface waters. Managed zones around all wetlands
and trap sediments, pesticides, and other pollutants.
waters on site. The remaining zones may include grass. and surface waters. Natural
areas (<10%) are protected areas are not managed and Minimum width is 200 ft/60 m unless
The buffer is of sufficient width
with engineered controls. consist of natural habitat. otherwise justified under criterion B.
to slow surface runoff, and
Together they are sufficient trap sediments, pesticides, The buffer is of sufficient width
to slow surface runoff, and and other pollutants. to slow surface runoff, and
trap sediments, pesticides, trap sediments, pesticides,
Minimum width is 100
and other pollutants. and other pollutants.
ft/30 m unless otherwise
Minimum buffer width is 50 justified under criterion B. Minimum width is 150
ft/15 m unless otherwise ft/45 m unless otherwise
justified under criterion B. justified under criterion B.

OR (E) The creation of the

protective buffers includes
(D) The project team can
returning previously
demonstrate the site was
developed or disturbed
intentionally chosen to avoid
areas to a natural state.
development on or near
wetlands or surface waters. Project teams may alternatively
demonstrate the recovery of
pre-existing buffer zones that
have degraded in quality.

DESCRIPTION • Regulating water temperature—Shade from vegetation

in buffer areas maintains water temperatures. Increased
Wetlands, shorelines, and waterbodies provide a number
water temperatures can harm aquatic life;
of important ecological services, including mitigating
flooding, improving water quality, and providing wildlife • Maintaining water quality—Buffer areas provide erosion
habitat. Buffer zones maintain the integrity of these control and filter excess nutrients and pollutants from runoff;
elements while playing important roles in the following:
• Protecting hydrology—Buffer areas regulate the
flow of stormwater runoff and help preserve surface
• Protecting wildlife habitats, providing connected habitat
water and groundwater levels and flows;
corridors, and maintaining biodiversity—Many wetland and
aquatic-dependent species also require access to riparian or • Protecting against human disturbance—Providing
upland habitats for feeding, nesting, breeding, and hibernation; a buffer helps protect wetlands and surface waters

130 ENVISION V3
 from impacts in nearby areas, including destroying 4. Documentation that the project team has considered the
vegetation, compacting soils, debris, noise, and light. cumulative impacts of acidification and/or eutrophication
of the water bodies in the project design.
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
C. To what extent has the project implemented protective
Improved: The project provides full protections around buffer zones around wetlands and surface waters?
all wetlands and surface waters. However, in areas where
vegetated or natural buffers of the minimum distance are 1. A site plan showing the final site design, the boundaries of the
not possible, engineered controls are permitted. Total area buffer zone, and the minimal buffer zone width calculated
requiring engineered controls is not to exceed 10%. as the shortest point between the buffer zone boundary
and the identified wetland, waterbody, or shoreline.
Enhanced: Managed vegetated areas (i.e., mowed lawns 2. Minimum widths are followed unless justified
or managed landscaping) of the minimum distance by documentation in criterion B.
fully buffer wetlands and surface waters.
3. Documentation that the buffer design matches the level of
Superior: A mix of managed vegetated areas and natural areas of achievement requirements. Note that as levels increase, the
the minimum distance fully buffer wetlands and surface waters. credit requires that more of the protective buffer be natural area
rather than managed areas (e.g., mowed grass). For exceptions,
Conserving: Project teams have two options. The first is to project teams can demonstrate in criterion B how a larger-
provide fully natural buffers of the minimum distance. The managed vegetated buffer might meet the same performance
second option is to submit documentation for criterion D requirements as a natural buffer of the minimum required width.
demonstrating that the site was intentionally chosen to avoid
development on or near wetlands or surface waters. This includes D. Was the project intentionally sited to avoid
evidence that developing on or near wetlands or surface waters wetlands and surface waters?
was a seriously considered option and that decisions made
1. Evidence that the project team intentionally avoided siting
during planning or design led to avoiding a sensitive site.
the project on or within the minimum buffer widths of
Restorative: The project restores previously developed areas into wetlands and surface waters. Evidence should include
vegetated buffers or restores existing degraded vegetated buffers. alternative sites that were seriously considered.
Note that meeting criterion D is an alternative achievement path
Applicability: Projects that do not contain wetlands or for the Conserving level. Achieving Conserving by meeting criterion
surface waters, and for which no siting options containing D does not require meeting criteria A, B, and C, and vice versa.
wetlands or surface waters were possible or seriously
considered, may apply to have this credit deemed
E. Will the project involve returning previously developed or
not applicable with supporting documentation.
disturbed sites within the buffer zone to a natural state?
1. Maps and plans of developed areas of the project site that will
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND be returned to a natural state within the protective buffer zones.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE Developed areas include man-made surfaces (e.g., pavement)
and/or structures (e.g., facilities). Project teams may not count
returning existing vegetated landscape (whether constructed or
A. Has the project team identified wetlands and
natural) to a natural state as evidence of restorative actions.
surface waters on or near the site?
1. Map of wetlands and surface waters in and around the site. Note that project teams may alternatively demonstrate the
recovery of pre-existing buffer zones that have degraded in
quality.
B. Has the project team determined the type and width of buffer
zones necessary to protect wetlands and surface waters?
1. Calculation of the proposed buffer type and minimum width RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
or acceptance of Envision minimum width requirements. RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources

2. Documentation that the project team has considered site NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
conditions including soil type, slope, land use, and vegetation NW2.2 Manage Stormwater
mix in determining the appropriate buffer width and type.
NW3.2 Enhance Wetland and Surface Water Functions
3. Documentation that the proposed buffer width and type are
CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
sufficient to address: pesticide retention; bank stabilization;
sediment control; nutrient retention; litter and debris; water
temperature; terrestrial wildlife; and aquatic wildlife.

ENVISION V3 131
 NATURAL WORLD: SITING

© NW1.3 Preserve Prime Farmland

INTENT METRIC

16 Identify and protect soils designated

as prime farmland, unique farmland,
or farmland of importance.
Percentage of farmland avoided or
preserved during development.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

Not Available A+B+C A+B+C (A + B) or D A+B+E

(2) Less than 10% (8) Less than 5% (12) 100% Avoidance (16) Restore Productive
Disturbance Disturbance Farmland

(A) The project team identifies soils designated as prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of importance.

(B) Less than 10% of the (B) Less than 5% of the (B) The project avoids developing or disturbing
project site is developed or project site is developed or any prime farmland located on site.
disturbed prime farmland. disturbed prime farmland.

(C) Farmland permanently damaged or disturbed as a result of OR (E) In addition to 100%

the project is mitigated through offsets. Any farmland temporarily avoidance, the project
(D) The project team can
disturbed as a result of construction impacts is restored to a level includes protecting farmlands
demonstrate the site was
that does not decrease the capacity of the preserved land. for posterity against future
intentionally chosen to avoid
disturbance, or restoring
areas of prime farmland.
previously developed areas to
a contiguous, functional, and
productive farmland state.

DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

Prime farmland possesses a combination of soil properties, Designations of prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland
growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce sustained of local significance by municipal, state/provincial, or federal
high yields of crops economically if the farmland is treated and agencies can be used in documentation for this credit. In
managed according to acceptable farming methods. Soil properties the United States, prime farmland is designated by the U.S.
are only one of several criteria that are necessary for land to be Department of Agriculture (USDA); in Canada, it is classified
designated as prime farmland. In general, prime farmland has by the Canada Land Inventory (CLI). Farmland designations
an adequate and dependable water supply from precipitation for most of the United States can now be accessed from the
or irrigation, a favorable temperature and growing season, an USDA Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) soil surveys database.
acceptable level of acidity or alkalinity, and an acceptable content Similar information for Canada can be accessed through the
of salt or sodium. Its soils are permeable to water and air. Prime Canadian Soil Information Service (CanSIS) and the Agricultural
farmland is not excessively eroded or saturated with water for Census. Many states and provinces also have classifications
long periods of time, and it either does not flood frequently for farmland of significance. In countries or regions that lack
during the growing season or is protected from flooding. official designations, project teams can use the description of
prime farmland above to make their own determinations.
Farmland supports the economic base of many rural and
suburban communities. Agricultural land is vital to achieving local Enhanced: After identifying prime farmland, project teams
and national food, health, and economic security. While some follow a mitigation hierarchy including avoidance, minimization,
communities may not consider farming a significant contributor restoration, and offsetting. Project teams must demonstrate
to the local economy now, they should look to trends in organic that they prioritized the avoidance of developing farmland
farming, local food sourcing, urban agriculture, and “slow food”/ to the extent possible, that remaining temporary impacts
regional cuisine movements that are changing the economic were minimized and restored, and that any permanent
viability of small and local farming. Agricultural land can also be development on farmland was offset. Disturbed farmland
sources of significant cultural and ecological importance, such as cannot constitute more than 10% of the project site.
social heritage, scenic views, open space, and community character.

132 ENVISION V3
Mitigation must be accomplished on or adjacent to the impacted 1. Documentation showing how the disturbed farmland has
site. Mitigation measures can be achieved on site through the been mitigated on site per local jurisdiction standards.
dedication of a conservation easement that provides restrictions
2. For areas permanently disturbed by the constructed
on access and limits, or through the acquisition of an adjoining
project, offsetting criteria for farmland include:
contiguous parcel of equal or higher quality. Offsets must equal
or exceed the area permanently disturbed by the project and • Preservation of adjacent or contiguous
cannot be part of an existing conservation easement. Remote farmland of similar quality or better.
offsetting does not contribute to achievement in this credit. • Preserved area must equal or exceed
area disturbed by the project.
Superior: Disturbed farmland cannot constitute
• Preserved land cannot be part of an
more than 5% of the project site.
existing conservation easement.
Conserving: Projects fully avoid disturbing farmland on site, 3. Documentation that a construction management plan
or the site was intentionally chosen to avoid development includes provisions for protecting farmland during
on prime farmland. This must include evidence that construction. Documentation includes the full restoration
developing on or near prime farmland was a seriously of sites disturbed as a result of temporary works.
considered option and that decisions made during
planning or design led to avoiding a sensitive site. 4. For projects that involve temporary disturbance
to farmland, documentation that protection and
Restorative : The project includes the preservation of restoration activities were carried out.
farmland for posterity such as conservation easements.
D. Was the project intentionally sited to avoid prime farmland?
Applicability: Projects that do not contain prime farmland, and
1. Evidence that the project team intentionally avoided siting
for which no siting options containing prime farmland were
the project on prime farmland. Evidence should include
possible or seriously considered, may apply to have this credit
alternative sites that were seriously considered.
deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
Note that meeting criterion D is an alternative achievement path
for the Conserving level. Achieving Conserving by meeting criterion
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND D does not require meeting criteria A and B, and vice versa.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
E. Does the project preserve existing farmland for
A. Has the project team assessed the project site posterity or restore previously disturbed farmland?
for soils identified as prime farmland, unique 1. Documentation that farmland has been preserved for
farmland, or farmland of importance? posterity against future disturbance or development.
1. Results of government studies and/or soil surveys Proposed preserved land cannot be part of an existing
designating areas of prime farmland, unique farmland, conservation easement. In certain cases, projects may submit
or farmland of special importance (e.g., USDA, or CLI). the inclusion of urban agriculture for the Restorative level
if it is of a scale commensurate with the project size.
B. To what extent will the project protect or preserve prime Note that Restorative cannot be achieved if any farmland of
farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of importance? importance, as defined in criterion A, is permanently impacted
1. Provide calculations and plans showing that less than the by the project. In addition, Restorative cannot be achieved by
required percentage of the project site includes development converting previously undeveloped natural areas into farmland.
on farmland. The remaining avoided farmland must be
contiguous and functionally viable to support farming. RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
Note that previously developed land (i.e., structures or paved QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life
surfaces) can be excluded from the calculations.
QL3.2 Preserve Historic and Cultural Resources
2. Documentation showing that during construction no soils QL3.3 Enhance Views and Local Character
will be stripped from areas to be preserved as farmland.
LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
C. Has the project team mitigated any damage or disturbance to LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of importance?
NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value

ENVISION V3 133
 NATURAL WORLD: SITING

© NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land

INTENT METRIC

24 Conserve undeveloped land by locating

projects on previously developed land.
Percentage of project development that is
located on previously developed land.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A A A A+B

(3) At Least 25% (8) At Least 50% (12) At Least 75% (18) 100% Previously (24) Restore Natural Areas
Previously Developed Previously Developed Previously Developed Developed

(A) At least 25% of the (A) At least 50% of the (A) At least 75% of the (A) 100% percent of the developed area of the project
developed area of the project developed area of the project developed area of the project is located on previously developed land.
is located on previously is located on previously is located on previously
developed land. developed land. developed land.

(B) Return developed areas

to a condition that supports,
or could support, open space,
habitat, or natural hydrology.

DESCRIPTION • Under the Quality of Life category, these projects

may positively impact historically and economically
This credit addresses conserving undeveloped land (greenfields) by
disadvantaged urban populations;
locating project on previously developed land (greyfields). Projects
located on previously developed land often have fewer impacts on
• Under the Resource Allocation category, projects
wildlife by minimizing the likelihood of new habitat fragmentation.
located on greyfield sites may provide for the reuse of
existing underground and above-ground structures,
Developing on previously developed land is often an investment
including buildings, utilities, and roadways.
in community prosperity. Infrastructure owners that can locate
projects on abandoned, underutilized, or degraded properties
can remove eyesores that degrade property values and replace
them with beneficial projects. Project teams should consider the
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
advantages of locating projects in areas designated or recognized While the term “greyfield” in some contexts may refer to
as urban core/desired development zones. Such projects often: underutilized or abandoned sites, this credit defines all previously
developed land as greyfields. This also includes contaminated
• Promote urban development and channel development sites referred to as “brownfields .” Developed area consists of
to urban areas, resulting in reduced pressure on paving or construction, while undeveloped area consists of
undeveloped land and conservation of resources; natural or managed vegetation. For the purpose of this credit,
vegetated areas of public parks are considered undeveloped
• Promote socioeconomic urban and neighborhood land, whereas paved areas are considered developed. In urban
revitalization. This includes safety improvement, creation areas these vegetated open spaces serve an important function.
of short- and long-term local jobs, and the creation or
preservation of parks and other recreational property. Improved – Conserving: Levels for this credit are
distinguished by the percentage of project development
In choosing greyfield sites, projects may realize located on previously developed areas.
the following additional benefits:
Restorative: In addition to locating project development entirely on
• Under the Natural World category, projects may already developed sites, the project results in a net positive return
provide for the restoration of impaired drainageways of previously developed area back into natural or vegetated areas.
and other damaged or stressed natural resources;
Applicability: Assessment of this credit is determined by the extent
to which the project is located on previously developed land or

134 ENVISION V3
previously undeveloped land. As all land falls within these two with historic development that have since returned to a natural state
classifications, it would be difficult to demonstrate that the credit do not qualify as previously developed or greyfield sites.
is not applicable. Inability to locate the project on developed land is
not sufficient justification to remove this credit from consideration. B. Has the project returned developed areas to a condition that
supports natural open space, habitat, or natural hydrology?
1. Documentation showing previously developed areas
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND that have been returned to a natural state.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
A. To what extent is the project located on
previously developed land? QL3.2 Preserve Historic and Cultural Resources
1. Documentation showing the percentage of the developed QL3.3 Enhance Views and Local Character
area of the site that was developed prior to project RA1.2 Use Recycled Materials
construction and may be classified as a greyfield.
NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
Note that this credit considers all previously developed land
as greyfields. This includes contaminated sites referred to as NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields
“brownfields.” Developed land consists of pre-existing paving or NW3.1 Enhance Functional Habitats
construction. Land dedicated to current agricultural use, forestry
NW3.3 Maintain Floodplain Functions
use, or use as a preserved natural area does not qualify as a
greyfield even if it contains pre-existing paving or construction. Sites NW3.5 Protect Soil Health
CR2.6 Improve Infrastructure Integration

ENVISION V3 135
 NATURAL WORLD: CONSERVATION

© NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields

INTENT METRIC

22 Locate projects on sites

classified as brownfields.
The extent of remediation of
the brownfield site.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A B+C B+C B+C B+C+D

(11) Reuse Former (13) Mitigate Exposure (16) Passive Remediation (19) Active Remediation (22) Complete Remediation
Brownfield

(A) The project is located (B) The project is located on a site classified as a brownfield, or is known to contain contamination.
on a site classified as a
brownfield that has been
remediated by others.

(C) Minimum required (C) Passive remediation is (C) Active remediation, (C) Active remediation,
capping and remediation is performed to reduce human or a combination of active or a combination of active
performed to reduce human exposure and to gradually and passive remediation, and passive remediation,
exposure to safe levels. remove or break down is performed to reduce is performed to restore the
Contaminants remain generally contamination on the site. human exposure and to entirety of site soils and/
on site at levels that can be remove or break down or groundwater back to
addressed by engineering contamination on the site. regional background or
and/or institutional controls. unrestricted use levels.

(D) The site is closed/

deregulated by regulators,
or is in the process of closing
and has a long-term site
management, monitoring,
and inspection plan.

DESCRIPTION Environmental benefits of brownfield development include

cleanup or containment to prevent exposure, thereby reducing
This credit recognizes the incredible benefit and service
the threat to human and ecological health. It can also reduce the
that projects provide when located on brownfields.
runoff of toxics into nearby water bodies, leading to improvements
A brownfield is a property for which the expansion,
in overall water quality and habitat. As with greyfield development
redevelopment, or reuse may be complicated by the presence
(NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land), brownfield development
of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant.
reduces sprawl by promoting development into urban areas,
Developing on brownfields comes with certain risks and resulting in reduced pressure on undeveloped land. In some
responsibilities that may increase the cost of a project. cases, brownfield development may also involve the remediation
Developers and property owners will need to manage past and and restoration of damaged or stressed natural resources.
future environmental liabilities associated with the property’s
Socioeconomic benefits to brownfield development include
environmental history. Private lenders are often reluctant
increased local tax revenue both directly from the site as well as
to give loans for potentially impaired lands. In some cases,
neighboring properties. Development improves safety and creates
cleanup costs for a property may ultimately be more than
jobs. This type of development can create a catalyst effect that
the property’s value. Brownfield projects may take longer
spurs other investment and transformation in communities.
than typical development due to environmental assessment
and cleanup activities and a more complex permitting and
regulatory environment. However, there are often funding
sources available to support or offset these costs.

136 ENVISION V3
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT Examples include completed American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) or Canadian Standard Association (CSA)
The assessment is based on the degree of remediation
Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA),
of the brownfield. Projects advance to higher levels for
appropriate Voluntary Cleanup Program documentation, or site
sites that require increasing levels of remediation.
assessments completed under applicable provincial regulations.
Improved: Sites are classified as brownfields but have been 3. Submit any deed restrictions, record of decision (ROD), or other
previously remediated or contained. This may include legally binding agreements between the site owners or potentially
a former landfill that has been capped and closed. responsible parties and regulatory authorities for the mitigation
or remediation of contaminants associated with the property.
Enhanced: Contamination remains on the site but is capped
and remediated to the necessary levels for the intended use.
C. To what extent has the project mitigated
Superior: Less-intensive passive measures are sufficient. Passive or remediated the site?
remediation is defined as methods and improvements that 1. Submit a mitigation and remediation plan that has been
stimulate or focus on natural attenuation in the ground. Examples approved by the appropriate regulatory agencies.
include promoting microbial growth or installing a permeable
2. Documentation showing that the plan meets the target level
reactive barrier that relies on natural groundwater flow.
of achievement in terms of passive and/or active remediation.
Examples of documentation could include but are not limited to:
Conserving: Sites require active, or a combination of active and
passive measures. Active remediation is defined as methods a. Identify sampling completed for contaminants of concern
that trap and remove contamination from the site. Examples identified during the ASTM/CSA Phase I and II ESAs.
include soil vapor extraction or “pump and treat” methods. b. Identify containment, mitigation and/or remediation
methods for all remaining contaminants of concern
Restorative: Projects successfully close a contaminated in excess of regulatory or site-specific concentration
site. This ensures the site is no longer a potential thresholds, either on site or with the potential to
risk for future generations. Often the type or degree migrate into the proposed development area.
of contamination requires years of remediation so
c. If the contaminants of concern include potentially volatile
achievement of this level may not always be possible.
compounds, include an evaluation of the vapor intrusion
Applicability: Project teams that were unable to identify pathway, if applicable, and a mitigation approach, as needed.
a suitable site may apply to have this credit deemed not 3. If applicable, include construction and post-construction
applicable with supporting documentation that efforts were phase monitoring and remediation plans to ensure
made. If no evidence is provided that any consideration contaminant mobilization is minimized and in compliance
was given to locating the project on a brownfield, the with applicable federal, state/provincial, and local
credit is considered applicable and no points achieved. exposure requirements and the planned development.

D. Has the brownfield site been closed or deregulated?

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
1. Documentation that the site has been closed, or is in the
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
process of being closed/deregulated, by the appropriate
regulatory agencies (e.g., a closure report).
A. Is the project located on a site currently
identified as a closed brownfield? 2. If applicable, the site management, monitoring, and inspection
1. Provide documentation showing that the site is closed or plan that will take the site to closure/deregulation.
an already remediated site according to federal or state/
provincial programs. For example, in Canada according RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
to the Federal Contaminated Sites Inventory or provincial QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
brownfields program, or in the United States as a federal or
state brownfield or Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) site. LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies
LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
B. Is the project located on a site currently
LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
identified as an active brownfield?
1. Provide documentation showing that the site is already NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
designated as an active (non-remediated) brownfield NW2.4 Protect Surface and Groundwater Quality
according to federal or state/provincial programs.
NW3.5 Protect Soil Health
2. For sites not already designated as a “brownfield”
under state/provincial or federal definitions, project
teams may provide evidence of contamination.
a. Qualifying sites may include, for example, sites classified
as “Suspected” in the Canadian Federal Contaminated Sites
Inventory or provincial brownfields program, or property
under a state-managed Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP).
b. Documentation of contamination should include information
delineating the lateral and vertical extents of impact and
concentrations of the identified contaminants of concern.

ENVISION V3 137
 NATURAL WORLD: CONSERVATION

© NW2.2 Manage Stormwater

INTENT METRIC

24 Minimize the impact of development on

stormwater runoff quantity, rate, and quality.
Degree to which the project infiltrates,
evapotranspirates, reuses, and/or
treats stormwater while not exceeding
POINTS
rate or quantity runoff targets.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B+C A+B+C A+B+C A+B+C A+B+C+D

(2) Expanded Options (4) 85th percentile/ (9) 90th percentile/ (17) 95th percentile/ (24) 95th percentile/
2-year event 10-year event 50-year event 100-year event

(A) Detain and treat 100% of the (A) Infiltrate, evapotranspirate, (A) Infiltrate, evapotranspirate, (A) Infiltrate, evapotranspirate, (A) Infiltrate, evapotranspirate,
85th percentile local 24-hour and/or reuse 100% of 85th and/or reuse 100% of 90th or reuse 100% of 95th percentile or reuse more than
event. Ensure compliance with percentile local 24-hour event. percentile local 24-hour event. local 24-hour event. 100% of 95th percentile
local requirements if stricter. local 24-hour event.
OR OR OR OR
If infiltration, If infiltration, If infiltration, If infiltration,
evapotranspiration, or reuse are evapotranspiration, or reuse are evapotranspiration, or reuse are evapotranspiration, or
not permitted or impracticable not permitted or impracticable not permitted or impracticable reuse are not permitted or
detain and treat 150% of 85th detain and treat 150% of 90th detain and treat 150% of 95th impracticable detain and
percentile 24-hour event. percentile 24-hour event. percentile 24-hour event. treat more than 150% of 95th
percentile 24-hour event.

(B) Do not exceed rate or (B) Do not exceed rate (B) Do not exceed rate or (B) Do not exceed rate or (B) Do not exceed rate or
quantity of runoff for the or quantity of runoff for quantity of runoff for the quantity of runoff for the 2-, 5-, quantity of runoff for the 2-, 5-,
2-year 24-hour rainfall the 2- and 5-year 24-hour 2-, 5-, and 10-year 24-hour 10-, 25-, and 50-year 24-hour 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year 24-
event relative to the existing rainfall event relative to the rainfall event relative to the rainfall event relative to the hour rainfall event relative to the
condition (greenfield, existing condition (greenfield, existing condition (greenfield, existing condition (greenfield, existing condition (greenfield,
greyfield, or brownfield). greyfield, or brownfield). greyfield, or brownfield). greyfield, or brownfield). greyfield, or brownfield).

(C ) The project includes an erosion, sedimentation, and pollutant control plan for construction activities.

(D) The project manages or

treats stormwater from other
sites according to criterion A,
OR returns the site
to a predevelopment
hydrological condition.

DESCRIPTION on wastewater treatment prolongs the ability of existing facilities

to provide sufficient capacity without need for expansion.
Stormwater is an increasing concern and source of risk for
communities. Climate change is making precipitation rates
Improperly managed stormwater can have serious environmental
increasingly unpredictable, with more intense storms becoming
impacts. Increased surface runoff typically leads to increased
common. Historic design standards and regulations may not be
stream and channel erosion, downstream flooding, water
sufficient to prepare communities for the future. Infrastructure
temperatures (and thereby lowered dissolved oxygen in
owners should consider how taking opportunities to improve
receiving waters), and concentration of pollutants reaching
stormwater management systems reduces their risk exposure.
surface waters. It can deposit sediment and pollutants into
There are significant cost savings in addressing stormwater
waterways and warm historically cold-water streams. This
outside wastewater treatment facilities. Reducing the demand
can negatively impact aquatic life as native species are
replaced with more pollutant-tolerant warm-water species.

138 ENVISION V3
Natural systems for stormwater management, often referred to 2. Calculations showing that stormwater management
as “green infrastructure,” provide multiple benefits. Bioswales systems meet the relevant requirements for storm
and rain gardens can provide community beautification, events as laid out in the level of achievement table.
reduce heat islands, and present an opportunity to educate
the public on the importance of stormwater management. B. To what extent does the completed project limit rate or
Project teams should consider how incorporating low-impact quantity of runoff compared to existing conditions?
development measures can reduce and mitigate potential
1. Site plan, documentation, and calculations of the
negative impacts associated with increased runoff.
existing site and stormwater runoff patterns.
2. Site plan, documentation, and calculations of the designed
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT project site and stormwater runoff patterns.
Assessment of this credit begins with ensuring the project 3. Calculations showing that the project does not exceed
does not result in an increase in the quantity and rate of rate or quantity of runoff for the relevant 2-, 5-, 10-,
stormwater runoff from a project site nor does it result in a 25-, 50-, and/or 100-year 24-hour rainfall event.
decrease in the quality of the stormwater exiting the site.

All projects must implement an erosion, sedimentation, C. Does the project include an erosion, sedimentation, and
and pollutant control plan during construction and meet pollution control plan for all construction activities?
all regulations pertinent to stormwater management. 1. Documentation of an erosion, sedimentation, and pollutant
control plan—commonly referred to as Stormwater Pollution
Improved – Conserving: The levels of achievement for this credit Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or Erosion and Sedimentation
are distinguished by the degree to which the project reduces Control Plan (ESCP)—for all construction activities associated
the amount of pollution discharged from the site through the with the project. The plan (SWPPP or ESCP) conforms to all
use of infiltration, evapotranspiration, reuse, or treatment applicable erosion and sedimentation requirements. If the
while not exceeding rate or quantity runoff targets. project is located in a region where construction erosion and
sedimentation are not regulated, the plan is demonstrated
Teams address the stormwater quality by infiltrating, to comply with industry-accepted best practices.
evapotranspirating, reusing or treating increasing amounts
of runoff from a local 24-hour event. Additionally, teams D. Does the project treat stormwater from other sites or does it
address rate and quantity of runoff by meeting the existing function as part of a larger stormwater management plan?
conditions for increasingly intense rainfall events.
1. Documentation of stormwater strategies in the project that
Restorative: Reserved for projects that not only meet the infiltrate, evapotranspirate, reuse, or treat water from other sites.
requirements for the project site but can demonstrate OR
how the project manages stormwater from other sites,
addresses needs of the larger watershed, or returns the 2. Documentation of how the site hydrology has
site to a predevelopment hydrological condition. been returned to a predevelopment state.
Note that criterion D has two compliance paths. It is only necessary
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that impact
to meet one set of requirements.
stormwater runoff. In rare cases, where the impact on stormwater
runoff is insignificant in comparison to the scale of the project,
teams may apply to have this credit deemed not applicable with RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
supporting documentation. However, the reviewer may exercise QL3.4 Enhance Public Space and Amenities
his/her discretion in determining what constitutes an insignificant
impact on stormwater runoff in the context of the project. RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site
RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources
RA3.2 Reduce Operational Water Consumption
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
NW1.2 Provide Wetland and Surface Water Buffers
A. To what extent does the project infiltrate, evapotranspirate,
NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land
reuse, and/or treat stormwater on site?
1. Site plan and documentation of all stormwater CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
management strategies in the project and their function CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience
in infiltrating, evapotranspirating, reusing, or treating.
CR2.4Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies
Note that beginning with the Enhanced level,
criterion A has two compliance paths; it is only
necessary to meet one set of requirements.

ENVISION V3 139
 NATURAL WORLD: CONSERVATION

© NW2.3 Reduce Pesticide and Fertilizer Impacts

INTENT METRIC

12 Reduce non-point-source pollution by reducing

the quantity, toxicity, bioavailability, and
persistence of pesticides and fertilizers.
Reductions in quantity, toxicity, bioavailability,
and persistence of pesticides and fertilizers
used on site, selection of plant species, and use
POINTS
of integrated pest management techniques.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D C C

(1) Application (2) Less Pesticide (5) Better Selection, (9) No Pesticide Or (12) Pesticide Or
Management Or Fertilizer Lower Use Fertilizer Use Fertilizer Elimination

(A) Operational policies and programs are designed to control the application
of pesticides and fertilizers so they are not over-applied.

(B) Runoff controls are put in place to minimize contamination of groundwater and surface water.

(C) Landscaping is designed to incorporate plant species (C) Landscaping is designed (C) Landscaping is designed
that require fewer fertilizers and pesticides. with plant species that do not with plant species that do not
require pesticides or fertilizers. require pesticides or fertilizers.
This includes eliminating the
need for pesticides and/or
fertilizers on sites with prior
use of pesticides or fertilizers.

(D) When needed, pesticides

and fertilizers with low
toxicity, persistence, and/or
bioavailability are specified.

DESCRIPTION addressing pests that includes the selection of hardier pest-

resistant plants and natural prevention and control measures.
This credit addresses reducing the quantity, toxicity,
bioavailability, and persistence of pesticides and fertilizers
Project teams should also consider the socioeconomic
used on site, including the selection of plant species and the
benefits of reduced fertilizer and pesticide use. Direct costs
use of integrated pest management techniques. Pesticides are
are saved in both materials and labor. Plants chosen to
toxic substances released intentionally into the environment
be soil tolerant and pest resistant are inherently hardier
to kill living things. The family of pesticides includes fungicides,
and less prone to replacement. Plants that do not require
herbicides, insecticides, rodenticides, and others.
fertilizer or pesticides are often native or naturalized plants
that enhance the regional character of a community.
Pesticides and fertilizers are a significant non-point-source
pollutant and, whenever possible, their use should be
reduced or eliminated. Overapplication of pesticides and
fertilizers can contaminate runoff and pollute streams,
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
rivers, lakes, and groundwater. If chemicals are necessary, The intent of this credit is to address long-term operational
licensed applicators and appropriate protocols should be application of pesticides and fertilizers. Projects are permitted
used to source less-toxic pesticides and fertilizers. Improper an initial use of pesticides for the purpose of eradicating or
application of pesticides can also pose risks to human health. controlling invasive species found on site per credit NW3.4
Control Invasive Species. Similarly, the controlled initial use of
Project teams should consider how better suited plants can fertilizers is permitted when necessary to establish vegetation.
be chosen to grow without fertilizers and to resist pests.
Integrated pest management is a low-impact approach to Improved: Project teams focus on application control
and reducing runoff and contamination.

140 ENVISION V3
Enhanced: Project teams specifically choose landscaping 2. Design specifications showing that fewer, little, or
that requires less pesticides or fertilizers. no fertilizers or pesticides will be used on the project
site during construction and operation.
Superior: When absolutely necessary, pesticides and a. Exceptions are allowed for the controlled use of fertilizer for
fertilizers are selected based on reduced impacts. This initial landscaping establishment. Provide documentation
may include toxicity, persistence (i.e., how long it remains indicating the necessity, benefits, and term of use.
in the environment), and/or bioavailability (i.e., how
readily it is absorbed by biological organisms). b. Exceptions are allowed for the controlled use of
pesticides for removal of existing invasive species
Conserving: No pesticides or fertilizers are during project delivery. Provide documentation
necessary for landscaping maintenance. indicating the necessity, benefits, and term of use.
3. Documentation and details about any integrated
Restorative: The project eliminates the need for the application
and pest management approaches demonstrating
of pesticides and fertilizers in areas where it was previously
pesticides will not be required.
applied. For example, an existing landscaped site is redesigned
to use plants that do not require pesticides or fertilizers. 4. Documentation and details of any natural fertilizer
management approaches (e.g., composting) demonstrating
Applicability: Consideration is given as to whether the scope no chemical fertilizers will be required.
of the project includes exterior vegetated areas. Projects that
do not include exterior vegetated areas may apply to have this Note that project teams are encouraged to consider related issues
credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation. in landscaping choices, including but not limited to: noninvasive
species, drought-tolerant species, native species, low-maintenance
species, and species with targeted performance goals (e.g.,
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND pollutant reductions).
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
D. To what extent has the project team selected
pesticides and fertilizers that have lower
A. Have operational policies and programs been put in place
toxicity, persistence, and bioavailability?
to control the application of fertilizers and pesticides?
1. Documentation showing the pesticides and
1. Operational policies and programs for
fertilizers to be used on the finished project.
applying fertilizers and pesticides.
2. Measurements of pesticide and fertilizer toxicity,
B. Have runoff controls been put in place to minimize persistence, and bioavailability along with
contamination of groundwater and surface water? recommended application rates and procedures.
1. Plans and drawings showing how runoff controls 3. Documentation showing how lower toxicity,
will be designed, installed, and maintained. persistence, and bioavailability were incorporated
into the choice of pesticides and fertilizers.
C. To what extent has the project team designed landscaping
to require fewer pesticides and fertilizers? RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
1. Documentation of plans for landscaping showing the mix QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
of plant species emphasizing noninvasive plant species.
NW2.4 Protect Surface and Groundwater Quality
NW3.5 Protect Soil Health

ENVISION V3 141
 NATURAL WORLD: CONSERVATION

© NW2.4 Protect Surface and Groundwater Quality

METRIC

20 Preserve water resources by preventing

pollutants from contaminating surface water
and groundwater and monitoring impacts
Designs, plans, and programs instituted
to prevent and monitor surface water
and groundwater contamination during
POINTS
during construction and operations. construction and operations.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F

(2) New Pathway Avoidance (5) Community Support (9) Risk Reduction (14) Public Reporting (20) Quality Improvement

(A) The project team determines potential impacts to surface water or groundwater quality, including temperature, during construction and operations.
(B) The project includes spill and leak diversion systems, spill prevention plans, and cleanup. The project does not
create new direct pathways for surface water and/or groundwater contamination such as:
• Direct runoff into karst terrain;
• Untreated industrial or chemical discharge to unlined industrial ponds or lakes;
• Reinjection water wells unless water is treated to secondary levels, or local regulations, whichever is more stringent; or
• Chemical, byproduct, or fracking water, injection.

(C) Based on the types of impacts identified in criterion A, the project reduces the risk of quality
degradation to surface water and/or groundwater. This should include water temperature.

(D) Adequate measures enable responsive surface water and/or groundwater quality
monitoring and reporting mechanisms to provide the public with water quality data.

(E) The project has actively eliminated at least one source of

hazardous and/or potentially polluting substances, or replaced
them with nonhazardous or nonpolluting substances or materials.

(F) The project improves

surface water and/or
groundwater quality beyond
existing conditions.

DESCRIPTION always being more economical than cleanup. Contamination

takes many forms but can kill flora and fauna, destroy
The goal of this credit is to preserve water resources by
habitats, and cause illness or premature death in humans.
incorporating measures to prevent pollutants from contaminating
surface water and groundwater and monitor impacts during
Concerns regarding equipment and facilities containing
construction and operations. Groundwater is a widely used
potentially polluting substances include fuel and chemical
source of drinking water. Protecting wellheads and groundwater
storage, pipelines, piles of raw materials, and process areas.
recharge areas reduces the chances of groundwater contamination
At the construction stage, potential sources of groundwater
and protects natural water purification processes. In addition,
and surface water contamination include spills and leaks from
aquatic ecosystems depend on a particular set of water
tanks, pipes, and construction vehicles; leaching of pollutants
conditions. Changes to any of these factors can adversely affect
from raw or waste materials; and releases of pollutants
aquatic life and groundwater quality. Aquatic ecosystems are
from the demolition of previously completed projects.
threatened by changes in pH, decreases in water clarity, and
increases in temperature, dissolved solids, coliform bacteria, toxic
substances, and nutrients (especially phosphorus and nitrogen).
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
Leaks, spills, and other sources of contamination have serious Improved: Project teams begin by not introducing
environmental, social, and economic costs with prevention almost new pathways for contamination.

142 ENVISION V3
Enhanced: Project teams focus on significantly reducing risk 3. If applicable, documentation showing the placement
of contamination with a priority on reducing or eliminating of materials storage piles and handling of potentially
potentially polluting substances from operations. If unable polluting runoff (e.g., plans and drawings).
to do so, they seek to recycle the substances, keeping them
within the operation, or sending them off site for use in other C. To what extent does the project reduce the risk
applications. Project teams continue to address prevention of surface water and/or groundwater quality
measures by identifying equipment and facilities containing degradation during construction and operations?
potentially polluting substances and locating them away from
1. Documentation of project planning, design, or
sensitive environments. Runoff interceptors and drainage
construction decisions intended to reduce the risk of
channels should be designed to accommodate pollutants in
surface water and/or groundwater quality degradation.
stormwater runoff or ice melt, potential spills, and leakage.
These actions may include but are not limited to:
Water temperature is considered as a potential contaminate.
a. Siting the project to avoid important groundwater
Superior: Active monitoring of surface water, groundwater, recharge areas (e.g., Karst topography).
and/or the potential sources of contamination b. Locating equipment and facilities containing potentially
support prevention and response plans. polluting substances away from sensitive environments.
c. Installing runoff interceptors and drainage channels
Conserving: Actions have resulted in the elimination
designed to accommodate pollutants in stormwater
or replacement of a hazardous substance or
runoff or ice melt, potential spills, and leakage.
potential source of pollution in the project.
d. Installing natural systems to capture or prevent
Restorative: Projects improve surface water or groundwater potentially polluting substances from reaching
quality, for example, by cleaning up previously contaminated surface water and/or groundwater sources.
land, restoring wellhead and groundwater recharge area e. Significantly reducing or eliminating potentially
protection, and installing land-use controls to prevent polluting substances from operations.
future contamination. Restoration also may include
f. Recycling potentially polluting substances, including
removal of materials storage piles, rerouting of surface
keeping them within the operation or sending
runoff, or restoring groundwater infiltration patterns.
them off site for use in other applications.
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that contain 2. For projects situated in areas where groundwater is used
or use hazardous and/or potentially polluting substances as a source of drinking water, documentation of wellhead
with the potential to contaminate water sources. In addition and groundwater recharge area protection plans and
to chemical use, project teams should consider how chemical other requirements including protection areas.
leaching from materials may be a source of contamination.
D. Have adequate and responsive surface water and/
or groundwater quality monitoring and reporting
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND systems been incorporated into the project?
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE 1. Documentation of surface water and/or groundwater quality
monitoring programs or contaminant source monitoring.
A. Has project team determined the potential for This may include documentation that discharges to receiving
surface water and/or groundwater contamination waters and/or the receiving waters themselves are monitored
during construction and operations? to verify pollutant loading, biological impact, water
1. Documentation of hydrologic and/or hydrogeologic delineation temperature, and the impact on receiving water flow.
studies, taking into consideration the complexity of the aquifers.
2. Documentation that the frequency and level of
Note that local authorities may already have done delineation.
monitoring is sufficient to address the potential
2. Documentation explaining potential impacts to surface water water quality impacts provided in criterion A.
and/or groundwater quality, their risk, and consequences.
Note that exceptions can be made for criterion D if the project
Water temperature should be included as a potential impact.
team has reduced/addressed the potential for surface water
or groundwater contamination to such a degree that ongoing
B. Does the project include spill and leak prevention and monitoring is unnecessary. For example, if the project was able to
response plans, and avoid creating new pathways for eliminate the need for potentially polluting materials.
contamination during construction and operations?
1. Documentation that the project does not E. Has the project actively eliminated at least one
involve any of the following: source of hazardous and/or potentially polluting
a. No direct runoff into karst terrain substances, or replaced them with nonhazardous
b. No untreated industrial or chemical discharge or nonpolluting substances or materials?
to unlined industrial ponds or lakes 1. Documentation that the project team actively designed the
c. No reinjection water wells unless water project to eliminate the need for a hazardous or potentially
is treated to secondary levels polluting substance or material. Project teams may also
demonstrate that they have replaced potential sources of
d. No chemical or fracking water injection
pollution or contamination with nonhazardous or nonpolluting
2. Documentation demonstrating that spill and leak substances. In some cases, project teams may demonstrate that
prevention and response plans are in place. a replacement, while still technically hazardous, has substantially
reduced or eliminated the potential for groundwater or surface
water contamination, thereby meeting the intent of the credit.

ENVISION V3 143
F. Does the project improve surface water e. Installing systems to prevent existing (non-project-
and/or groundwater quality? related) contamination from entering receiving
1. Documentation of water quality baseline waters or altering receiving water flow.
prior to the project’s development.
2. Documentation demonstrating that the project improves
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
overall water quality on site, or in the watershed, compared QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
to the pre-existing baseline. Examples of improving RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site
water quality may include but are not limited to:
RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources
a. Implementing land use controls.
NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
b. Restoring degraded natural systems.
c. Installing systems to clean or remove contaminants NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields
from surface water and/or groundwater. NW2.3 Reduce Pesticide and Fertilizer Impacts
d. Cleaning up contaminated areas. NW3.2 Enhance Wetland and Surface Water Functions

144 ENVISION V3 ENVISION 144

 PROJECT EXAMPLE:
DUBUQUE SOLAR
Hi

.. . '

The Dubuque Solar project (Envision

<
w&

1I
| II

Platinum, 2018) in Iowa increased the

!' *

quantity and connectivity of terrestrial

habitats by planting native prairie grasses
\\

and forbs on the areas beneath the solar

panels and surrounding the array. These
native plants replace cultivated row crops
!!i!

II! I

on one part of the site, and non-native

smooth brome, with patches of invasive
species on another portion of the site.
mill
ii1

Given the project’s location within the

lllliil
iliiiii
!!!»IS

I!
lull!!

Upper Mississippi River migration corridor,

it is expected that once established, these
Iliiii!
■
Iiiuii

plantings will provide good foraging habitat

M

for migratory birds and butterflies, and

the area will be attractive to pollinators as
I

1
I!
1!

II

well. The project owner also collaborated

ii*'-
1!
II
II
ii

with a local apiary to install several

1

honey bee hives on the property.

ffl

'

'
PROJECT EXAMPLE:
MIDDLE BLUE RIVER
The Middle Blue River (Envision Platinum,
2016) green infrastructure project created

X
'V
functional habitats within the park portions
of the site by converting conventionally

-
maintained turf into native landscaping
to support local fauna. Furthermore, the
smaller right-of-way stormwater BMPs
within a residential neighborhood setting
were designed to provide additional
habitat connectivity than the pre-project
conditions. The native grasses and forbs
included in the project provide food and
t

shelter for a variety of species including

butterflies, other insects, and birds.

&
n
.

‘l \ \
S , -■

.''£■!
“ vrf
f,
ENVISION V3 145
 NATURAL WORLD: ECOLOGY

© NW3.1 Enhance Functional Habitats

INTENT METRIC

18 Preserve and improve the functionality

of terrestrial (land) habitats.
The number of habitat functions addressed
in order to preserve or enhance the net
area and quality of functional habitat.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A + B + (C, D, or E) A + B + (C, D, or E) A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F

(2) Mitigate Impacts (5) One Ecosystem Function (9) Two Ecosystem (15) Three Ecosystem (18) Restore And
Functions Functions Create Habitats

(A) The project team identifies existing habitat types on or near the project site. Efforts are made to avoid and minimize impacts to existing terrestrial habitats.

(B) Mitigation measures ensure that existing habitat functions as defined in (B) The project ensures that no existing
criteria C, D, and E are maintained (i.e., not degraded or lost). habitats are disturbed or damaged.
Mitigation must occur on or adjacent to the site and follow a hierarchy that
prioritizes avoidance, minimization, restoration, and compensation.

(C, D, or E) Enhance one (C, D, or E) Enhance two (C, D, and E) Enhance all three ecosystem
or more ecosystem functions or more ecosystem functions functions compared to existing conditions:
compared to existing conditions: compared to existing conditions: • Quantity (C)
• Quantity (C) • Quantity (C) • Quality (D)
• Quality (D) • Quality (D) • Connectivity (E)
• Connectivity (E) • Connectivity (E)

(F) The project returns

developed land to natural
habitat, or sets aside existing
habitat for permanent
conservation and protection.

DESCRIPTION • Preserves basic and natural ecosystem processes and

components that provide the life-cycle requirements
This credit addresses the protection of ecosystem functions of
to satisfy the needs of a range of living organisms;
terrestrial (land) habitats. It is distinguished from NW3.2 Enhance
Wetland and Surface Water Functions that includes the protection
• Provides sufficient habitat for large-range species
of ecosystem functions of aquatic (water) habitats. Consideration
(some animals require a large home range);
for the impacts of infrastructure development on habitat is too
often limited to direct land development. However, development • Promotes genetic diversity and connectivity
fragments and shrinks areas of suitable habitat. When patches between patches, allowing separate populations
are not individually large enough to support the population of of the same species to interact and breed.
a species, connectivity between patches becomes critical for
survival. Infrastructure projects should prioritize protecting Project teams should consider how maintaining biodiversity
and enlarging habitats, connecting patches, and promoting and functional habitats adds value to regions. Functional
safe movement between patches to create a functional habitat. habitats enrich the quality of a community, making
Functional habitat supports the fundamental requirements of them more desirable places to live and visit. Project
native organisms during all stages of their life-cycle and provides sites can become destinations for educational school
the habitat connectivity necessary to support plants and animals. trips, bird watchers, or other wildlife enthusiasts.
Preserving and linking habitats is critical to biodiversity because it:

146 ENVISION V3
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT 2. Acceptable mitigation must be on site, on a contiguous
adjacent parcel, or within the affected landscape. Mitigation
Improved: The project does not result in the net loss in quantity
measures must maintain net habitat quality, quantity,
or quality of existing habitat. Project teams follow a mitigation
and connectivity to provide a means for animals to access
hierarchy demonstrating that they prioritized avoiding the
pre-development habitat after development is complete.
disturbance of existing habitat to the extent possible, that
Mitigation plans that impact sensitive or protected habitats
remaining temporary impacts were minimized and restored,
must be prepared by a trained, certified or licensed habitat
and that any permanent disturbance to habitat was offset.
professional, or approved by a relevant regulatory body.
Mitigation offsets can be achieved on site through the dedication 3. A monitoring plan to ensure that mitigation measures are
of a conservation easement that provides restrictions on effective for preserving habitat quality and connectivity.
access and limits, or through the acquisition of an adjoining
contiguous parcel of equal or higher quality. Offsets must
C. Does the project increase the quantity of terrestrial habitat?
equal or exceed the area disturbed by the project and cannot
be part of an existing conservation easement. Remote 1. A site plan and documentation illustrating the
offsetting does not contribute to achievement in this credit. measures taken to provide new habitat.
2. Identification of the species that will benefit from the new habitat.
Mitigation plans must be approved by a habitat professional.
Habitat professionals may include, but are not limited to,
D. Does the project improve the quality of any
conservation scientists, professional foresters, environmental
existing or proposed new terrestrial habitat?
scientists/ecologists, wildlife biologists, certified wetland
scientists, professional hydrologists, or professional geologists. 1. A site plan and documentation illustrating the measures
taken to improve the quality of the existing habitat on the
Enhanced-Conserving: Levels are distinguished by project. If new habitat is proposed for the project, document
the number of enhanced ecosystem functions: measures taken to improve the quality of proposed habitat.
quantity, quality, and/or connectivity.
2. Documentation of habitat improvement efforts and
Restorative: The project reverts existing development the intended impact they will have on site species.
back into natural habitat or sets aside existing 3. A monitoring or maintenance plan, if applicable, to
habitat for permanent conservation. ensure the measures put in place to improve habitat
quality are meeting their performance targets.
Applicability: Consideration is given to whether the project
contains or impacts natural habitat. Projects that do not
E. Does the project facilitate movement between
contain or impact natural habitat may apply to have this credit
terrestrial habitats, provide new connections, or remove
deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
barriers, in order to improve habitat connectivity?
1. Documentation of new connections provided between
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND habitats and their appropriateness for the local wildlife,
and/or documentation of the removal of existing
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
barriers to movement and habitat connectivity.
A. Has the project team identified existing terrestrial 2. A monitoring plan to confirm improved habitat connectivity.
habitats and sited the project to minimize impact?
1. Documentation showing areas of important habitat on site F. Does the project return developed land to
and in the surrounding region, identifying potential and/ natural habitat, or set aside existing habitat for
or likely movement corridors between habitat areas, and permanent conservation and protection?
potential existing barriers to these corridors on site. 1. Documentation of previously developed land being returned
to a natural state that supports habitat development.
2. The assessment of habitat must be prepared by a
Alternatively, documentation that habitat has been set
trained, certified or licensed habitat professional.
aside for permanent conservation and protection.
3. Documentation of collaboration with local
and state/provincial agencies.
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
QL1.4 Minimize Noise and Vibration
B. Does the project mitigate all disturbances to
functional terrestrial (land) habitats? QL1.5 Minimize Light Pollution
1. Documentation identifying new impacts or barriers that NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
will result from development and the specific actions
NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land
that will be taken to minimize or to mitigate them.
NW3.4 Control Invasive Species

ENVISION V3 147
 NATURAL WORLD: ECOLOGY

© NW3.2 Enhance Wetland and Surface Water Functions

INTENT METRIC

20 Maintain and restore the ecosystem

functions of streams, wetlands,
waterbodies, and their riparian areas.
Number of functions maintained and restored.

POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A + B + (C, D, E or F) A + B + (C, D, E or F) A + B + (C, D, E or F) A+B+C+D+E+F A+B+C+D+E+F

(3) Enhance One (7) Enhance Two (12) Enhance Three (18) Enhance Four (20) Restore Ecosystem
Ecosystem Function Ecosystem Functions Ecosystem Functions Ecosystem Functions Function

(A) Project team identifies project impacts to hydrologic connection, water quality, aquatic habitat, and sediment transport.

(B) Efforts are made to avoid and minimize negative impacts to wetland and surface (B) The project ensures that no existing wetlands or surface water
water functions and to compensate for remaining unavoidable losses. functions are disturbed or damaged as a result of the project.
Mitigation measures must maintain net aquatic habitat quality and quantity and follow a
hierarchy that prioritizes avoidance, minimization, restoration, and compensation.

(C, D, E or F) Actively protect (C, D, E or F) Actively protect (C, D, E or F) Actively protect (C, D, E and F) Actively protect (C, D, E and F) Actively protect
one ecosystem function. two ecosystem functions. three ecosystem functions. four ecosystem functions. four ecosystem functions.
• Hydrologic Connection (C) • Hydrologic Connection (C) • Hydrologic Connection (C) • Hydrologic Connection (C) • Hydrologic Connection (C)
• Water Quality (D) • Water Quality (D) • Water Quality (D) • Water Quality (D) • Water Quality (D)
• Aquatic/Riparian Habitat (E) • Aquatic/Riparian Habitat (E) • Aquatic/Riparian Habitat (E) • Aquatic/Riparian Habitat (E) • Aquatic/Riparian Habitat (E)
• Sediment Transport/ • Sediment Transport/ • Sediment Transport/ • Sediment Transport/ • Sediment Transport/
Sedimentation (F) Sedimentation (F) Sedimentation (F) Sedimentation (F) Sedimentation (F)
In addition to protecting all
existing wetland and surface
water functions, the project
can demonstrate it has
restored at least one previously
degraded wetlands and/
or surface water function.

DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

This credit addresses the protection and restoration of the Assessment of this credit begins with ensuring that the project
ecosystem functions of streams, wetlands, waterbodies, does not result in the net loss in quantity or quality of wetlands or
and their riparian areas. Project teams should prioritize surface waters. Project teams must follow a mitigation hierarchy
implementing controls and safeguards in order to maintain including avoidance, minimization, restoration, and offsetting.
any existing natural hydrologic functions and consider
opportunities to enhance previously degraded functions. Mitigation offsets can be achieved on site through the dedication
of a conservation easement that provides restrictions on
The socioeconomic benefits of protecting or restoring access and limits, or through the acquisition of an adjoining
natural wetland and surface water functions. This can contiguous parcel of equal or higher quality. Offsets must equal
include improved water quality, higher diversity of aquatic or exceed the area disturbed by the project and cannot be
species, more visible and natural water flow, and reduced part of an existing conservation easement. Remote offsetting
need for engineered sediment controls. These all increase does not contribute to achievement in this credit. Wetland
the recreational value, sport fishing value, aesthetic value, mitigation plans must be approved by a licensed professional.
and property value of the site and surrounding areas
while reducing maintenance and remediation costs.

148 ENVISION V3
Improved – Conserving: Priority is placed on protecting 1. Documentation showing how the project will protect or
existing ecosystem functions. Levels are distinguished restore hydrologic connection. This may include:
by the protection of four ecosystem functions: a. For streams, rivers, and lakes, documentation showing
how the waterway is connected, or proposed to be
• Hydrologic Connection – When addressing hydrologic
connected, to its riparian floodplain. Project teams may
connectivity, project teams should consider that many use a six-month to two-year frequency flow event.
healthy waterways and wetlands receive much of
their normal flow from underground sources. b. For wetlands, documentation showing that
structures that drain wetlands will be removed and/
• Water quality – This may be documented by showing the or appropriate sources of groundwater or surface
current source of the waterway’s normal flow, the water waters are reconnected, diverted, or maintained.
quality of its source water, and how the water quality
will be protected or enhanced. In some areas, this may D. Does the project protect or restore water quality?
mean disconnecting direct surface water discharges and 1. Documentation showing the current source of the waterway’s
constructing infiltration best management practices that normal flow, the water quality of its source water, and
will help remove pollutants and cool stormwater, by means how the water quality will be protected or restored.
of discharging to the waterbody through groundwater.
E. Does the project protect or restore aquatic habitat?
• Aquatic/Riparian Habitat – To protect or enhance aquatic
and riparian habitats, consider past infrastructure 1. A habitat survey of the waterbody and reference areas
projects may have removed the natural riffle, pool, conducted by a recognized professional, and a plan to protect
and meander sequence of rivers and streams that or restore the habitat for aquatic and riparian species by
are important in providing a healthy ecosystem. plantings and appropriate physical modifications. This
survey may include the location and proposed mitigation
• Sediment Transport/Sedimentation – Waterways not only of existing obstructions to habitat connectivity such as
move water but sediment as well, and in-waterway sediment dams, roadway structures, and other infrastructure that
transport is important for a healthily functioning ecosystem. may block aquatic or shoreline species migration.

In the context of this credit, protecting wetland and surface F. Does the project protect sediment transport
water functions is not synonymous with avoidance. Projects and reduce sedimentation?
must include strategies, controls, safeguards, or other
1. Documentation demonstrating that sediment transport
measures to demonstrate active protection of one or more
will not be disrupted by the proposed project.
functions. Avoiding wetlands and surface waters is recognized
Projects should also consider sedimentation.
in credit NW1.2 Provide Wetland and Surface Water Buffers.
2. Documentation that existing sources of sediment
Restorative: This credit prioritizes protecting the existing obstruction or sedimentation will be removed or mitigated,
natural ecosystem functions of wetlands and surface and, if appropriate, sediment will be removed.
waters. However, on occasion, projects have the opportunity
to restore one or more degraded functions. 3. Reports from qualified resource professionals are required
as part of the documentation (e.g., an engineer with
Applicability: Consideration is given to whether the project contains sediment transport knowledge and experience).
or impacts wetlands or surface waters. This includes direct,
indirect, and/or cumulative impacts. Projects that do not contain RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
or impact natural wetlands or surface waters may apply to have
QL3.4 Enhance Public Space and Amenities
this credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources
NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE NW1.2 Provide Wetland and Surface Water Buffers
NW2.4 Protect Surface and Groundwater Quality
A. Has the project team identified impacts to
wetland and surface water functions?
1. Documentation identifying all potential impacts to wetland
and surface water functions, including hydrologic connection, PROJECT EXAMPLE: SHELDON AVENUE
water quality, aquatic habitat, and sediment transport.
For the Sheldon Avenue stormwater management project
B. Does the project minimize and mitigate disturbance (Envision Silver, 2017) on Staten Island, New York a
to wetland and surface water functions? comprehensive assessment revealed that the poor water
1. Documentation of strategies implemented to minimize disturbance quality of the streams was due to failed septic systems,
to wetland and surface water functions: hydrologic connection, malfunctioning private wastewater treatment plants, and
water quality, aquatic habitat, and sediment transport. illegal storm sewer connections. By combining sanitary
sewers with the extended detention pond of the stormwater
2. Documentation of mitigation measures to compensate for BMP, the project greatly improved water quality standards.
unavoidable losses in wetland and surface water functions. Replacing an existing stormwater pond with green
infrastructure wetlands also improved habitat in the area.
C. Does the project protect or restore hydrologic connection?

ENVISION V3 149
 NATURAL WORLD: ECOLOGY

© NW3.3 Maintain Floodplain Functions

INTENT METRIC

14 Preserve floodplain functions by

limiting development and impacts of
development in the floodplain.
Efforts to avoid floodplains or maintain
natural-acting floodplain functions.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C (A + B + C) OR D A+B+C+E

(1) 75% Avoidance (3) 85% Avoidance (7) 95% Avoidance (11) Floodplain Preservation (14) Floodplain Restoration

(A) The project team identifies the 100-year or design frequency floodplain. Consideration is given to future floodplain scenarios.

(B) The project site maintains (B) The project site maintains (B) The project site maintains (B) The project site maintains (B) The project avoids
a net quantity of at least 75% a net quantity of at least 85% a net quantity of at least 95% a net quantity of 100% of developing any existing
of natural/vegetated area of natural/vegetated area of natural/vegetated area natural/vegetated area natural/vegetated zones
within the floodplain. within the floodplain. within the floodplain. within the floodplain. within the floodplain.

(C) Project mitigates impacts to floodplain functions including conveyance and storage. Overall floodplain functions are not
diminished as a result of the project. Functions should be maintained both above and below the 10-year flood.

OR (E) Structures are removed

from the floodplain, or
(D) The project team can
previously developed areas
demonstrate the site was
are restored to natural/
intentionally chosen to
vegetated zones in order to
avoid development on or
improve floodplain functions.
near the 100-year or design
frequency floodplain.

DESCRIPTION should be designed to minimize waterway crossings and floodplain

impacts. The goal of all projects should be to maintain or
Floodplains are hydrologically important, environmentally
enhance floodplain storage and to not increase flood elevations.
sensitive, and ecologically productive areas, and flooding
Infrastructure owners and project teams should consider how
is a naturally occurring process in every river and coastal
these measures can protect assets and the broader community.
area. Development within floodplains that does not account
for these ecosystem functions often limits or restricts the
natural benefits of flooding while simultaneously putting
people and property at greater risk. Project teams should
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
consider how maintaining natural floodplains can provide Improved – Superior: The assessment begins with identifying
environmental benefits, protect human health and safety, the 100-year or design frequency floodplain. Floodplain data
and reduce risks and costs from flood damage. may be inconsistent or out of date. Project teams should factor
how climate change will impact flood levels in their designs.
Climate change is making precipitation rates increasingly
unpredictable, with more intense storms becoming Infiltrating floodwater is one of the most critical floodplain
common. This in turn impacts the frequency and severity functions and is addressed in criterion B by quantifying the
of flooding. Historic design standards and regulations may amount of vegetated area that remains on the site. This is based on
be insufficient to prepare communities for the future. existing conditions prior to the project development. Maximizing
impervious surfaces is important and included under criterion C.
Project teams should avoid developing in floodplains if possible. In
addition, infrastructure planning should direct community growth Conserving: The project retains the net vegetated area on the
and development away from floodplains. Some infrastructure project site within the floodplain and mitigates project impacts,
projects may be unable to avoid the floodplain (e.g., roadway or is intentionally sited to avoid floodplain development.
and utility crossings, wastewater treatment facilities, ports, and
other water-dependent structures). However, these structures Restorative: Projects return developed impervious
surfaces to a natural vegetated state.

150 ENVISION V3
Applicability: Projects that are not within the floodplain and do C. Does the project mitigate impacts to floodplain functions?
not impact floodplain functions, may apply to have this credit 1. Documentation that the project preserves floodplain
deemed not applicable with supporting documentation. conveyance and floodplain storage. For projects with
larger sites, documentation should also demonstrate that
Some projects that are not directly within the floodplain may still conveyance and storage are maintained both above and
have an impact on flooding and floodplain functions through below the 10-year flood (i.e., the project does not shift net
their handling of stormwater runoff. These projects may also storage capacity from lower to higher elevations, thereby
pursue achievement in this credit if they can demonstrate removing storage capacity from higher-frequency floods).
a direct connection to the floodplain. There are strong links
between this credit and NW2.2 Manage Stormwater, and some 2. Documentation of any additional efforts to
project components and strategies may apply to both credits. mitigate impacts to floodplain functions. Mitigation
efforts may include but are not limited to:
a. Maintain or increase floodplain storage capacity.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
b. Maintain pre-development floodplain infiltration, such
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE as amount of impervious surfaces, vegetation and soil
protection zones, and other approaches that allow for
A. Has the project team identified the 100-year or design natural floodwater infiltration and filtration of pollutants.
frequency floodplain in relation to the project location?
c. Maintain or enhance habitat such as riparian buffers
1. Documentation showing the location of the project within and along waterways in the floodplain.
relative to the 100-year or design floodplain (whichever is
more stringent). Projects are encouraged to use existing D. Was the project intentionally sited to avoid floodplains?
information. If the 100-year flood is not demarcated, project
teams may use the flood of record plus 3 feet/1 meter. 1. Documentation demonstrating that the project was
intentionally sited to avoid a floodplain. Documentation
2. Determination whether climate change predictions must show that the owner and the project team made
may significantly impact the floodplain map meaningful efforts to avoid developing or impacting
and potential impacts to the project. a floodplain during the site selection process.
Note that meeting criterion D is an alternative achievement path
B. To what extent does the project preserve
for the Conserving level. Achieving Conserving by meeting criterion
vegetated zones within the floodplain?
D does not require meeting criteria A, B, and C, and vice versa.
1. Site maps indicating the area of natural/vegetated zones
within the floodplain before the project development. E. Does the project remove structures from the floodplain or
2. Site maps indicating the area of natural/vegetated zones return previously developed areas to a vegetated state?
within the floodplain after the project development. 1. Site maps indicating the location of structures
or impervious/vegetated zones within the
3. Calculations of the percentage of existing
floodplain before the project development.
vegetated areas after development.
2. Site maps indicating the location of structures
Note that for Restorative, the project avoids developing any
or impervious/vegetated zones within the
existing vegetated areas within the floodplain.
floodplain after the project development.
OR
4. Documentation that no project development will occur within the RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
floodplain. This alternative documentation option for criterion B NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
should be pursued only by projects located outside a floodplain
NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land
that still contribute to maintaining floodplain functions.

ENVISION V3 151
 NATURAL WORLD: ECOLOGY

© NW3.4 Control Invasive Species

INTENT METRIC

12 Use appropriate noninvasive species, and

control or eliminate existing invasive species.
Degree to which invasive species have
been reduced or eliminated.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F

(1) Prevention (2) Assessment (6) Program Controls (9) Minor Infestation (12) Major Infestation
And Prevention Control Control

(A) Best practices should be used to prevent unintentional introduction of known invasive species to the site.
Landscaping utilizes only species known to be noninvasive.
A construction management plan, or policies, includes provisions for preventing the introduction of invasive species (plant or animal).

(B) Identify, map and/or document invasive species infestations on site, or collaborate with local, state/provincial, and/or federal agencies.

(C) Establish and implement a program that controls minor infestations of

invasive species on site before and throughout construction.

(D) The project guards against future infestations by supporting

the establishment of native and/or noninvasive species.
(E) Long-term controls are in place through a minimum
three-year management plan to prevent the introduction
or reintroduction of invasive species and perform
follow-up control actions if populations persist.

(F) Additionally, the

project implements similar
programs for controlling
major infestations on site, or
aquatic invasive species.

DESCRIPTION plant species may affect fauna by altering available food

systems and degrading habitats. Invasive species can have
Invasive species include nonindigenous or non-native flora,
direct operations and maintenance costs for projects or, if left
fauna, insects, and aquatic life that adversely affect the habitats
unchecked, communities as a whole. In some cases, entire
or bioregions they invade. Invasive species may dominate the
industries dependent on ecosystem services (fishing, forestry,
new region, forcing out existing species by outcompeting native
agriculture, etc.) may be impacted by invasive species.
species for nutrients, light, physical space, water, or food. Invasive
species may invade and overcome native species through several
mechanisms, including rapid reproduction and dispersal, direct
competition and/or suppression, and the ability to quickly adapt
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
to a wide range of environmental conditions and food types. Improved: Often, invasive species are introduced through
Two of the primary methods of limiting the spread of invasive transportation pathways and disturbed sites during construction.
species include protecting existing healthy habitats from A construction management plan is developed in order to
disturbance and avoiding the introduction of invasive species. prevent accidentally introducing invasive species to the site.
In addition, species common in one region or climate may
Non-native invasive species can lead to the decline or extinction be invasive when introduced to another. Landscaping plans
of native species or change the function of an ecosystem, should be checked to make sure they do not inadvertently
altering fire regimens, nutrient cycling, and hydrology. Invasive include species that are invasive in the local context.

152 ENVISION V3
Enhanced: The project team identifies and maps 1. Documentation of plans for the removal of minor
locations of invasive species on site. infestations of invasive species before and throughout
construction to prevent their growth into major
The assessment methodology for this credit distinguishes infestations. Plans may include specifications, contract
between major and minor infestations and the different language, or operational management plans.
approaches to addressing infestations. Minor infestations are
those that can be fully eradicated during project delivery or 2. Documentation of plans for a post-construction follow-
through a three-year eradication, monitoring, and management up to remove any invasive species that re-emerges after
plan. Major infestations are those that will likely require initial control. Plans may include specifications, contract
indefinite ongoing management on the part of the owner. language, or operational management plans.
3. Documentation of control, containment or suppression
Superior: The project addresses any minor activities during construction for any major
infestations of invasive species on site. infestations of invasive species found on site.
Conserving: The project protects existing healthy habitats
from disturbance. It is more difficult for invasive species to D. Does the project guard against future
gain a foothold in dense, natural, and healthy ecosystems. infestations by supporting the establishment
While this does not always require native indigenous of native and/or noninvasive species?
plants, project teams should consider the value of 1. Documentation of the inclusion of native species in the project
reintroducing or expanding the use of native plants. landscaping. Project teams should recognize that the intent of
this criterion is to prevent the future introduction of invasive
Restorative: The project includes plans for the ongoing species by establishing or protecting healthy systems of
management of major infestations. Projects take initial native or naturalized species. Documentation should focus
control steps and develop a long-term management plan. on how landscaping or maintenance plans are intentionally
designed to increase the site resilience to infestation.
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects with
sites that contain invasive species. Project teams that 2. Plan showing areas of existing noninvasive
conduct site investigations and do not identify existing species that will remain undisturbed.
invasive species may apply to have this credit deemed
not applicable with supporting documentation. E. Does the project provide long-term controls to
prevent the reintroduction of invasive species?
1. A minimum three-year plan that addresses:
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND a. Prevention strategies for reducing the potential
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE for invasive species to become re-established and
spread at the site after initial removal.
A. Does the project avoid introducing invasive species to the site? b. Early detection and management strategies that monitor for
1. Documentation showing the type and quantity of and remove invasive species emerging on site in the future.
all species introduced to the site. For example, a c. Rehabilitation and restoration methods to support long-term
landscaping plan that includes all species of vegetation re-establishment of native or naturalized species on the site.
showing that no invasive species will be planted.
2. Documentation that species used on the site are noninvasive. F. Does the project include the ongoing control,
suppression, or containment of major infestations
3. A construction management plan, or policies, to prevent
of invasive species after construction?
the introduction of invasive species. The plan includes best
practices to ensure that construction materials and equipment 1. Documentation of ongoing control, containment or suppression
used on site are free of invasive species and seeds. plans for major infestations of invasive species.

B. Has the project team conducted a site assessment RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
to determine if invasive species are present? NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
1. Mapping of all invasive species populations found on the site. NW3.1 Enhance Functional Habitats
a. The documentation should identify populations of
minor or major infestations. Infestations over one
hectare (2.5 acres) can generally be considered major.
However, exceptions can be made with justification of PROJECT EXAMPLE: INTEGRATED PIPELINE
the type and level of establishment of the infestation.
b. The documentation should include the assessment of a trained Only locally appropriate grasses were used to restore the right
biologist, ecologist, or environmental professional whether of way along the Tarrant Regional Water District’s 150-mile long
the populations can be eradicated or only controlled. Integrated Pipeline Project (Envision Platinum, 2016), a water
transmission system in Texas. Several invasive species were
2. Documentation of collaboration with state or local agencies OR identified and extensive studies were conducted to establish a
the qualifications of the biologist, ecologist, or environmental long-term management, control, and elimination plan for these
professional who conducted the site assessment. species. Strategies included barrier methods; special coatings
to discourage mussels from adhering; and a monitoring
C. Does the project implement controls for existing infestations program with sampling at intake structures and reservoirs.
of invasive species before, during and post-construction?

ENVISION V3 153
 NATURAL WORLD: ECOLOGY

© NW3.5 Protect Soil Health

INTENT METRIC

8 Preserve the composition, structure

and function of site soils.
Degree to which the disruption of soil
health has been minimized and restored.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

Not Available A+B A+B+C A+B+C A+B+C+D

(3) Restore Soils (4) Special Feature Plan (6) Best Management (8) Soil Restoration
Practices

(A) The project limits the area that is disturbed by development activities.
(B) 100% of post-construction vegetated areas disturbed during construction are restored for
appropriate soil type, structure, and function to support healthy plant and tree growth.

(C) A soil protection plan, or (C) A soil protection plan, or policies, are prepared and implemented.
policies, are prepared and The plan/policies specifically include any special landscape features.
implemented. The plan/
The plan is expanded to comply with best management
policies specifically include any
practices from a local soil conservation agency, or is reviewed
special landscape features.
or prepared under the guidance of a certified soil scientist.

(D) All areas disturbed

by previous development
and planned as vegetated
areas have been restored
for appropriate soil type,
structure, and function to
support plant and tree growth.

DESCRIPTION caused by construction equipment can kill surrounding

plants and trees, and prevent future plant growth.
Climate, organisms, relief, parent material, and time (CORPT)
are the factors of soil formation. Given enough time, if all other
factors are held constant, soils that have been mechanically
disturbed can naturally restore themselves. However, because
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
soil formation is slow, the natural process of soil recovery can This credit assesses the ability of the soil in vegetated areas
take millennia. Various human activities can be used to enhance to support healthy plants and trees. This refers to areas
the ability of mechanically disturbed soils to function as they that remain as vegetated areas after construction. It does
did before being disturbed. This process is referred to as “soil not include soil located under paving or construction.
restoration.” The details of which activities should be used
are highly dependent on the original soil type, the factors that Enhanced: The project fully restores any disturbed soils.
formed it, and the functions that land managers wish to recover. This may include areas used for temporary staging, access
In the context of this credit, soil restoration refers to the quality for construction equipment, material storage, or others.
and condition of the soil and does not refer to keeping soil on
site (this is addressed in RA1.5 Balance Earthwork on Site). Superior: Protection plans are in place to prevent disturbance
whenever possible, especially around special landscape features.
Construction activities can disturb soil health in many
ways, the most common being compaction. Disturbed Conserving: The soil protection plan is based on established
soils cannot hold water, nutrients, or carbon as well as best practices from a local soil conservation agency or
natural, undisturbed soils. Disturbed soil is less capable of is reviewed/prepared by a certified soil scientist.
absorbing floodwaters or sustaining vegetation. Compaction

154 ENVISION V3
Restorative: Sites where soils disturbed by previous 4. Documentation that disturbed natural soils in vegetated areas
development are restored to a healthy vegetated state. were conserved and reused on site to the extent possible.

Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that impact C. Has the project team implemented a
soils during construction. Projects that do not impact soil (e.g. the soil protection plan or policies?
internal refurbishment of an existing facility) may apply to have
1. Documentation that the soil protection plan, or policies,
this credit deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
at minimum identify special landscape features
and include best management practices to prevent
soil disruption within their protective zones.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE 2. Documentation that the soil protection plan, or
policies, are comprehensive and compliant with
A. Has the project team limited the area that is best management practices according to a local soil
disturbed by development activities? conservation agency, or have been reviewed or prepared
under the guidance of a certified soil scientist.
1. Site plans and documentation showing total vegetated
areas and percentage that will be disturbed.
D. Has the project restored appropriate soil type,
2. Documentation of how development plans will structure, and function to vegetated areas
limit soil disturbance either through the project disturbed by previous development?
design or construction management. 1. Plans and documentation showing the existing condition of the site
and clearly identifying areas previously disturbed by development.
B. Have vegetated areas disturbed by development activities
been restored for appropriate soil type, structure, and 2. Documentation that the project involves restoring
function to support healthy plant and tree growth? previously disturbed areas to a condition that can
support healthy plant and tree growth.
1. Plans and specifications indicating that at least 95% of
post-construction vegetated areas on site, including areas 3. A soil restoration plan has been reviewed or prepared for
disturbed by development, will be restored to a condition designated non-hardscape areas under the guidance of a certified
that can support healthy plant and tree growth. Soils soil scientist. Soils must demonstrate functionality (e.g., restored
must be reused for functions comparable to their original soils have appropriate water holding capacity, nutrient retention
function (i.e., topsoil is used as topsoil, subsoil as subsoil, capability, and erosion prevention capability as reference soils).
or subsoil is amended to become functional topsoil).
2. Documentation that disturbed natural soils in vegetated areas RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
will be conserved and reused on site to the extent possible. RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site
3. Documentation, including site plans, showing how soil type, NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value
structure and function have been restored. Calculations
NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land
that soil restoration activities constitute at least 95% of
the post-construction vegetated areas on site. Soils must NW2.1 Reclaim Brownfields
be reused for functions comparable to their original NW2.3 Reduce Pesticide and Fertilizer Impacts
function (i.e., topsoil is used as topsoil, subsoil as subsoil,
or subsoil is amended to become functional topsoil).

ENVISION V3 155
 NATURAL WORLD: INNOVATION

© NW0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

INTENT METRIC

+10 To reward exceptional performance beyond

the expectations of the system and application
of innovative methods that advance state-
Whether project sustainability performance
qualifies as innovation, exceptional
performance, or is not otherwise
POINTS
of-the-art sustainable infrastructure. recognized in existing credits.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

INNOVATION
A or B or C

(+1-10) Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

(A) Implement innovative methods, technologies, or processes that are novel either in their use, application, or within the local regulatory or cultural context.
OR
(B) Implement measures that exceed the highest existing requirements within one or more Natural World credits.
OR
(C) Address additional aspects of sustainability not currently recognized in Envision

DESCRIPTION and that it does not have a corresponding negative impact on

the local or global environment, economy, or community.
This credit addresses instances in which projects:
Projects may demonstrate they implement innovative
1. Implement innovative methods, resources, technologies, or
methods, technologies or processes in several ways:
processes that are novel in their use, application, or within
the local regulatory or cultural context of the project;
• The project is an early adopter of new technology
or methods that can demonstrably improve project
2. Exceed the performance requirements
performance without negative trade-offs;
of one or more credits; and/or
• The project uses technologies or methods that may be general
3. Address additional aspects of sustainability
practice in other regions or parts of the world, but within the
not currently recognized in Envision
context of the project (whether climate, regulations, policies,
Points for this credit are not calculated in the overall applicable political support, public opinion, etc.) have not yet gained
points and, therefore, act as bonus points. Given the nature of acceptance. Significant efforts are taken to demonstrate
the credit, the broad format of which is intended to encourage the effectiveness of the technology or method within the
creative infrastructure solutions, thorough documentation context and provide a precedent for future adoption.
is expected. Project teams may pursue more than one of the
• The project team takes significant steps to include
three possible options for this credit, or pursue multiple for
research goals within the project’s development, or
the same option, for a total of up to ten (10) bonus points.
work with a university or research organization to
advance the general knowledge of the profession.
Proprietary research that is not made publicly available
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
cannot count toward achieving this credit.
Innovation:
Project teams must also demonstrate that the innovation
To qualify for innovation points, projects must implement serves a purpose. This can be done in one of two ways:
innovative methods, resources, technologies, or processes
(e.g., the use of a pre-existing technology in a new way or the • Overcoming significant problems, barriers, or limitations—
successful application of a technology or methods in regions Project teams demonstrate that the innovation reduces
or locales where existing policies, regulations, or general or eliminates significant problems, barriers, or limitations
opinion have prevented their use). In these circumstances, it that previously hampered the use of the new methods,
is imperative to prove that the application of the technology technologies, or processes implemented on the project.
does, and will continue to, meet performance expectations

156 ENVISION V3
 • Creating scalable and/or transferable solutions—Project teams • Urban agriculture programs,
demonstrate that new methods, technologies, or processes
implemented on the project are scalable across a wide range • Composting programs;
of project sizes and/or are applicable and transferable across
multiple kinds of infrastructure projects in multiple sectors. • Establishing pollinator habitat.

Exceptional Performance:
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
To qualify for exceptional performance points, projects must DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
meet the highest level of achievement for one or more Natural
World credits. For example, projects seeking additional points A. To what extent does the project implement innovative
in credit NW1.1 Preserve Sites of High Ecological Value must methods, technologies, or processes that overcome
already be expanding the area of high ecological value for significant problems, barriers or limitations, or
ongoing conservation. In this case, exceptional performance create scalable and transferable solutions?
may be pursued by projects whose magnitude of positive
impact and investment in high-value land conservation or 1. Documentation of the application of innovative technologies
habitat expansion warrants additional points. Exceptional or methods. Detailed description of how this application
performance may not be pursued by projects that have a will improve existing conventional practice either globally
basic primary function that meets the requirements. For or within the unique context of the project. Provide
example, unless extensive restoration was necessary, a justification as to why this application should be considered
nature reserve providing prime habitat may not qualify. innovative either as a technology, a method, or within
the project context (climate, political, cultural, etc.).
Possible areas of achievement in exceptional 2. Documentation that the project reduces or eliminates
performance for Resource Allocation may include, significant problems, barriers, or limitations that previously
but are not limited to, the following: hampered the use or implementation of certain resources,
technologies, processes, or methods that improve the
• Projects for which significant efforts were made to
sustainability of the project. Alternatively, documentation that
preserve important natural resources in perpetuity;
the new methods, technologies, or processes implemented
on the project are scalable across a wide range of project
• Projects in which efforts to control invasive species
sizes and/or are applicable and transferable across multiple
represent a significant aspect of the project;
kinds of infrastructure projects in multiple sectors.
• Projects for which the avoidance of terrestrial or
aquatic habitats required exceptional effort and/ B. To what extent does the project exceed the highest
or the implementation of innovative methods. levels of achievement for a given credit?
1. Detailed documentation of how the project exceeds the existing
Address Additional Aspects of Sustainability: requirements currently within a given Natural World credit.

To qualify for bonus points under this approach, project teams

C. To what extent does the project address a sustainability
must demonstrate that they are addressing one or more
aspect that is not currently addressed by the Envision system?
aspects of sustainability not currently recognized in Envision.
Sustainability performance must be related to Natural World. 1. Detailed documentation of how the project
Addressing an aspect of sustainability not currently covered by addresses a sustainability aspect that is not
the Envision system might sometimes be considered innovative, currently addressed by the Envision system.
in which case the requirements for the Innovation path may be 2. Documentation showing how this aspect
followed. For example, a project may earn bonus points for: relates to the Natural World category.
• Calculating new or future floodplain conditions;

ENVISION V3 157
 I

jil nik'jK;
,-

e«3et
••*
-* m •V
* • ~ <*

*•»

*/»
. ugfSsu;
r*”.-. - ■ • .. .,- — r:
 fc>
i lit
FI

Climate and
Resilience

The scope of the Climate and Resilience category is

two-fold: minimizing emissions that may contribute
to climate change and other short- and long-term
risks, and ensuring that infrastructure projects
are resilient. In order to be resilient, infrastructure
must be informed, resourceful, robust, redundant,
flexible, integrated, and inclusive. The Climate
and Resilience category is divided into two
subcategories: Emissions and Resilience.

.6^

10 / credits

Image
Portland General Electric’s Tucannon River Wind Farm
near Dayton, Washington (Envision Gold, 2015).
1 Does the project reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

2 Does the project reduce air pollutant emissions?

3 Does the project avoid unsuitable sites?

4 Does the project reduce climate change vulnerability?

5 Is the project resilient and adaptable?

1 2

•«
w

5
4

EMISSIONS RESILIENCE
The goal of this subcategory is to promote Resilience includes the ability to withstand
the understanding and reduction of short-term risks, such as flooding or
dangerous emissions and the impact of fires, and the ability to adapt to changing
carbon, during all stages of a project’s life long-term conditions, such as changes
cycle. While reducing emissions, pollutants, in weather patterns, sea-level rise, or
and embodied carbon may not have a changes in climate. Understanding the
direct impact on the consequences of the types of risks and probability of risks
particular project, it can help to reduce allows the project team to deliver an
overall global risk and may contribute far informed project design that anticipates
beyond the site borders of the project. and withstands these risks, minimizing
its overall vulnerability. Maximizing
resilience ensures a longer useful life and
primes the project to more fully meet
the future needs of the community.

160 ENVISION V3
Climate and Resilience

EMISSIONS
CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon
CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions

RESILIENCE
CR2.1 Avoid Unsuitable Development
CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience
CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies
CR2.5 Maximize Resilience
CR2.6 Improve Infrastructure Integration

CR0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

ENVISION V3 161
 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE: EMISSIONS
Hiian
CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon
U<>|a

INTENT METRIC

20 Reduce the impacts of material

extraction, refinement/manufacture,
and transport over the project life.
Percentage of reduction in net
embodied carbon of materials.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B+C A+B+C A+B+C A+B+C Not Available

(5) At Least 5% Reduction (10) At Least 15% Reduction (15) At Least 30% Reduction (20) At Least 50% Reduction

(A) The project team identifies primary materials to be used on the project during construction and operation.
The team determines which materials are the primary contributors to net embodied carbon (collectively >80%).

(B) Embodied carbon is calculated, or acquired by a validated source, for the primary materials identified in criterion A. Calculations include:
• Embodied carbon of production, including raw material extraction, refinement, and manufacture.
• Embodied carbon of transporting materials to the project site.
• The replacement, repair, or refurbishment of materials over the life of the project.

(C) The project team (C) The project team (C) The project team (C) The project team
demonstrates at least a 5% demonstrates at least a 15% demonstrates at least a 30% demonstrates at least a 50%
reduction in total embodied reduction in total embodied reduction in total embodied reduction in total embodied
carbon of materials over the carbon of materials over the carbon of materials over the carbon of materials over the
life of the project compared life of the project compared life of the project compared life of the project compared
to the baseline. Calculations to the baseline. Calculations to the baseline. Calculations to the baseline. Calculations
should be in tons CO2. should be in tons CO2. should be in tons CO2. should be in tons CO2.

DESCRIPTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

This credit addresses the embodied carbon of materials used Improved – Conserving: Levels are distinguished by the percentage
over the life of the project. This combines concepts of sourcing reduction in embodied carbon of materials over a baseline. As
local materials, using materials more efficiently, and using lower- industry standards on carbon intensity of materials do not exist for
impact materials in order to reduce the combined environmental most infrastructure projects, project teams are required to provide
impacts of material use. In the calculations, carbon is used as calculations for an appropriate base case. Accepted methodologies
a proxy unit of measure to compare various impacts across for establishing baseline performance data are explained in detail
the entire supply chain of material consumption. One stage of in the front of this manual and include (1) existing conditions, (2)
this supply chain involves raw material extraction/harvesting, a seriously considered alternative, (3) standard practice, or (4) a
refinement, and manufacturing into products. The second comparable existing project/facility. Envision intends to support
involves transportation of the materials from the manufacturer data collection in order to eventually provide this baseline data
to their final destination on site. By designing projects to use less for project teams and the industry as a whole. This is why it is
material, use material efficiently, or specifying materials with lower required to submit calculations in acceptable standard units.
embodied carbon, as well as reducing transportation distances,
project teams can reduce the overall impact of the project. Availability of data on the carbon intensity of materials is
often limited, and some projects may involve hundreds or
Material use is specifically addressed over the life of the thousands of products. Therefore, ISI accepts a streamlined
project, including the necessary replacement or renewal method for conducting calculations on this credit. Project teams
of materials. Often, materials with slightly higher initial may identify a select list of primary materials/products that
embodied carbon will have a lower net embodied carbon collectively make up greater than 80% of the total embodied
over the life of the project if they are more durable carbon. If data on embodied carbon or material intensity is
and less likely to require repair or replacement. not available from the manufacturer, project teams may use
averages or generalized data from studies or material databases.
Project teams should track, document, and clearly explain their
methodology for calculating material intensity in this credit.

162 ENVISION V3
Transportation of materials to project sites can be a significant 1. Index of the embodied carbon calculations of the
contributor to the embodied carbon of materials. Local or regional primary contributors to carbon intensity over the
materials—even materials sourced or processed on site—reduce life of the project (construction and operations)
the impact of long transport and support local economies. It identified in criterion A. This should include:
is important to note that while it is generally desirable to use a. Carbon emissions to produce the material, including
locally sourced materials for the aforementioned reasons, use raw material extraction, refinement, and manufacture
of local materials could have negative impacts on performance including secondary or tertiary processing.
if those materials result in reduced durability, safety, or service
b. Carbon emissions from transporting the material from the
life. Carbon emissions associated with the transportation of
manufacturer to the project site, including intermediary points.
materials to the project site are specifically broken out as they
are often simpler to calculate based on distance; quantity; and Embodied carbon data may come from the manufacturer,
standard truck, air, rail, or shipping fuel consumption. They reputable databases, reputable embodied energy software,
are also calculated separately in order to show the possible or from project team calculations. If the source or specific
conflicts that exist of sourcing a lower-intensity material type of materials is not known at the time of assessment,
from farther away. Project teams should consider choices calculations may present a range of values or rely on likely
that reduce the overall net embodied carbon of materials. material choices. Calculations should be in tons CO2.

Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects

C. To what extent does the project reduce the net embodied
that include the use or consumption of physical
carbon of materials used in construction and operation?
materials in construction or operation.
1. Documentation that the project has set targets
for reducing net embodied carbon.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND 2. Documentation of strategies/plans to reduce net embodied
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE carbon. These may include but are not limited to:
a. Sizing the project to require less material;
A. Has the project team determined materials that are
b. Designing the project to use less material;
the primary contributors to embodied carbon for
the project during construction and operation? c. Choosing materials that have lower embodied carbon;
1. Documentation of the primary materials to be used in d. Reducing material needed for repair and maintenance;
the construction and ongoing operation of the project e. Reducing material waste during construction;
over its life. Documentation should include: f. Reducing material waste during operation;
a. The materials used. g. Sourcing local materials to reduce transportation emissions;
b. General estimates of the quantities of materials used. Note h. Utilizing lower-carbon transportation modes.
that operations materials may need to be multiplied by the
frequency of use over the project life. Material estimates should 3. Calculations of reductions in embodied carbon achieved.
include anticipated repairs/upkeep (e.g., road resurfacing). Calculations should compare total carbon intensity of
c. Estimates of the embodied carbon of materials. materials for the project against the total carbon intensity
Estimates may use readily available public information of the baseline. Calculations should be in tons CO2.
such as regional, national, or global averages.
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
2. Identification of the select materials that collectively will make up
over 80% of the total estimated embodied carbon of the project. LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance
LD2.4 Plan for End-of-Life
B. Has the project team calculated the primary
CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
contributors to overall embodied carbon?
CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions

ENVISION V3 163
 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE: EMISSIONS
Hiian
CR1.2 Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
U<>|a

INTENT METRIC

26 Reduce greenhouse gas emissions during

the operation of the project, reducing
project contribution to climate change.
Percentage of reduction in operational
greenhouse gas emissions.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B A+B A+B A+B

(8) At Least 10% Reduction (13) At Least 25% Reduction (18) At least 50% Reduction (22) 100% Reduction (26) Carbon Negative

(A) The project team (A) The project team (A) The project team (A) The project team (A) The completed project
demonstrates at least a demonstrates at least a demonstrates at least a demonstrates a 100% is carbon negative (i.e.,
10% reduction in total CO2e 25% reduction in total CO2e 50% reduction in total CO2e reduction in total CO2e sequesters/removes more
over the operational life of over the operational life of over the operational life of over the operational life of CO2e than it produces over
the project compared to the project compared to the project compared to the project compared to the operational life).
the baseline. Calculations the baseline. Calculations the baseline. Calculations the baseline. Calculations
should be in tons CO2e. should be in tons CO2e. should be in tons CO2e. should be in tons CO2e.

(B) The project team maps and calculates the total annual greenhouse gas emissions of the final project design for reporting purposes. This includes
direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions and sequestration associated with project operations. Calculations must be in CO2e.

DESCRIPTION emissions do not exist for many infrastructure projects, project

teams are required to provide calculations for an appropriate
This credit addresses greenhouse gas emissions during
base case. Accepted methodologies for establishing baseline
operations and the project’s contribution in reducing the
performance data are explained in detail in the front of this
impacts of climate change. The embodied carbon of materials
manual and include existing conditions (or no-build alternative),
is specifically addressed in CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon.
a seriously considered alternative, standard practice, or a
Emission of greenhouse gases during construction is addressed
comparable existing project/facility. Envision intends to support
in RA2.2 Reduce Construction Energy Consumption.
data collection in order to eventually provide this baseline data
The increased release of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other for project teams and the industry as a whole. This is why it is
greenhouse gases (GHGs) has caused a significant increase required to submit calculations in acceptable standard units.
in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, enhancing the
Greenhouse gases are factored according to their global warming
greenhouse effect. The subsequent increase in the average
potential (GWP), resulting in a CO2 equivalency (CO2e). All
temperature of the earth’s surface causes various cascading
greenhouse gas emissions calculations should be quantified in
effects, including melting glaciers, arctic sea ice loss, sea level
tons of CO2e. Unavoidable CO2e emissions can be offset by carbon
rise, increased ocean temperatures, increased ocean acidity,
sequestration, in which CO2 is removed from the atmosphere
changing vegetation patterns, increased range of disease
(e.g., planting trees that absorb and use CO2 for their growth).
vectors, decreased snowmelt, changing precipitation patterns,
increased flooding, increased storm intensity, and increased
Project teams should take care not to double count greenhouse
storm frequency, to name a few. This can have many unintended
gas reductions as offsets. For example, if a project will produce
consequences such as flooding when historic periods of snowfall
50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions than the baseline
change to rain, drought from increased evaporation and lack
over its 25-year life, then it has achieved a 50 percent reduction.
of snowmelt, loss of coral reefs and aquatic biodiversity from
This project would not be able to claim that because produced
ocean acidification, and food scarcity as increased temperatures
emissions (50%) equal displaced emissions (50%), so it has
reduce crop production. Reducing the emission of GHGs now
achieved ‘net-zero’ carbon emissions (i.e., 100% reduction).
will help mitigate the effects of climate change in the future.
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that consume
energy, fuel, or otherwise produce greenhouse gas emissions
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT during their operation. Projects that do not include greenhouse
Improved – Restorative: Levels in this credit are distinguished gas emissions during operations may apply to have this credit
by the percentage of reduction in greenhouse gas emissions deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
over a base case. As industry standards on greenhouse gas However, projects that do not produce greenhouse gas

164 ENVISION V3
emissions because of intentional planning decisions may apply B. Has the project team calculated and reported the
for the Conserving level with supporting documentation. annual greenhouse gas emissions of the project?
1. Calculation of annual greenhouse gas emissions over the life
of the project. All greenhouse gas emissions should be in tons
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND of CO2e (tCO2e). Calculations include all sources of emissions
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE from facilities, processes, or vehicles owned or controlled within
the project boundary, as well as indirect emissions from the
A. To what extent does the project reduce greenhouse off-site generation of energy used by the project. Emissions
gas emissions during its operational life? should be classified by the following categories if applicable:
1. Calculations of the baseline greenhouse gas a. Off-Site Energy Generation
emissions over a period equivalent to the b. Stationary Fuel Combustion Emissions (non-
operational life of the project (e.g., 25 years). vehicular combustion occurring at the facility
2. Submit calculations for: intended for energy production)

a. the project’s estimated annual greenhouse gas c. Operations Transportation Emissions

emissions over the life of the project; d. Waste Emissions
b. the operational life of the project over which the e. Wastewater Emissions
calculations are made (e.g., 2025-2050); and f. Biomass Emissions
c. Calculations of the percentage reduction compared g. Industrial Process Emissions
to the baseline used over the same period. h. Fugitive Emissions
Calculations should include any natural or mechanical methods of
carbon sequestration. Purchased carbon offsets may be included RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
in the calculations. QL2.2 Encourage Sustainable Transportation
In certain cases where a demand or volume increase is anticipated LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
over the life of the project, project teams may choose to calculate
emissions reductions on a per unit basis (passenger miles traveled, CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon
millions of gallons of water treated, etc.). RA1.5 Balance Earthwork On Site
RA3.2 Reduce Operational Water Consumption
RA3.3 Reduce Construction Water Consumption

PROJECT EXAMPLE:
HOLLAND ENERGY PARK
The Holland Board of Public Works in
Michigan considered a number of ways
to meet the community’s need for more
local power and in 2012, they conducted
a comprehensive Sustainable Return on
Investment (SROI) study to determine
whether less expensive and less carbon-
intensive alternatives could be pursued
rather than the original plan to build a
coal-fired power plant. In part through
this SROI, the decision was made to build a
natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power
plant, known as the Holland Energy Park
(Envision Platinum, 2016). The project team
undertook a life-cycle assessment (LCA)
of greenhouse gas emissions to compare
the emissions from the NGCC and the
emissions from a coal-fired plant. The
LCA revealed the NGCC would result in a
more than 50% reduction of greenhouse
gas emissions over the life of the project.

ENVISION V3 165
 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE: EMISSIONS
Hiian
CR1.3 Reduce Air Pollutant Emissions
U<>|a

INTENT METRIC

18 Reduce emissions of air pollutants: particulate

matter (including dust), ground-level ozone,
carbon monoxide, sulfur oxides, nitrogen
Reduction of air pollutants
compared to baseline.
POINTS
oxides, lead, and volatile organic compounds.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E

(2) Exceeding Requirements (4) Ongoing Monitoring (9) VOC Minimization (14) Air Pollutant (18) Air Quality
Elimination Improvement

(A) The project meets all applicable air quality standards and regulations for air pollutants.

(B) The project implements (B) The project reduces (B) Air pollution controls are (B) The project eliminates air pollutant sources in the design,
strategies to reduce air pollutant emissions through the use of within the 95th percentile, chooses a non-polluting alternative, or achieves at least a 98% net
emissions during operations. best available control systems or represent the lowest reduction in air pollution emissions compared to the baseline.
or best management practices. levels possible compared to
projects of similar type.

(C) Systems are in place for the ongoing monitoring of any direct sources of air pollution.
Processes are in place to identify and address changes in emissions in order to maintain performance targets.

(D) The project team assesses whether volatile organic compounds harmful to human
health are material to the project and, if so, implement strategies to reduce their use
during construction and/or within occupied spaces of the completed project.

(E) The project includes the

direct removal of previously
existing air pollutant sources,
or captures and safely stores/
disposes of air pollutants
for a net positive impact.

DESCRIPTION Project teams are only required to provide supporting

documentation for air pollutants relevant to the project. If
The criteria pollutants include carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides,
a project does not emit certain air pollutants listed in the
sulfur dioxide, suspended particulate matter smaller than PM-10,
credit intent they can clarify this in their documentation.
ozone, lead, and volatile organic compounds. These pollutants
damage human health, property, and the environment. Those most
Improved: Projects can demonstrate strategies were implemented
at risk are children, the elderly, and people with lung diseases such
to reduce air pollutants emissions during operations.
as asthma, chronic bronchitis, and emphysema. Dust and odors
also can cause a nuisance for nearby residents, reduce property Enhanced: Modeling life-cycle air pollutant emissions can be
values, and aggravate the aforementioned lung conditions. challenging for some types of infrastructure. This level recognizes
project teams that have utilized the best available control
systems, technologies, or methods to reduce emissions with
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT the assumption that, if properly monitored and maintained,
The credit assessment begins with demonstrating attainment these will significantly reduce air pollutants emissions over the
of applicable air quality standards and/or regulations. Note project life. Project teams are required to provide documentation
that use of the terms, or variations of the terms “best available as to how controls represent industry best practices.
control technology” and “lowest achievable emissions rates”
within this credit have no relationship to US EPA guidelines with Superior: Completely eliminating air pollutant emissions
similar names. These terms should be interpreted at face value. may not be possible for certain projects. However, this level

166 ENVISION V3
recognizes projects that have achieved ‘best-in-class’ status by c. Documentation that the project eliminates all air pollutant
reducing air pollutant emissions to the lowest possible levels sources, chooses a non-polluting alternative, or achieves
or within the 95th percentile compared to similar projects. This at least a 98% net reduction in air pollution emissions
may include, for example, replacing old or outdated systems compared to the baseline (Conserving and Restorative).
with state-of-the-art systems. Project teams are required to
determine and provide supporting documentation for what C. Does the project include the ongoing monitoring and
constitutes best-in-class status for their project type. management of direct air pollutant emissions?
1. Documentation that the project includes systems for monitoring
Conserving: The project completely eliminates air pollutant
any air pollutants directly emitted during operations.
emissions. Often this is because a non-polluting alternative
was chosen. Projects that can demonstrate at least a 98% 2. Documentation of processes, procedures, or
reduction compared to the baseline are included in this level. systems designed to identify and address changes in
emissions in order to maintain performance.
Volatile organic compounds have negative health
impacts on building/facility occupants and, in Note that monitoring is not necessary if the project does not
certain conditions, construction workers. produce air pollutants. Documentation that the project does not
produce air pollutants emissions is sufficient to satisfy criterion
Restorative: Reserved for rare cases where the project eliminates C for certain projects pursuing Conserving or Restorative. If the
existing sources of air pollutants or captures and safely stores/ project produces air pollutants but achieves zero emissions
repurposes air pollutants. Note that replacing existing sources through control systems, the project is still required to meet the
of air pollutants with less polluting sources would count monitoring requirements.
toward a reduction and not an ‘elimination’ of air pollutants.
D. Has the project team assessed the materiality
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects that directly of volatile organic compounds to the health of
produce any of the criteria pollutants. Projects that do not include construction workers and the project operators?
air pollutant emissions may apply to have this credit deemed not
1. Documentation that the use of products and materials
applicable with supporting documentation. However, projects
containing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and their
that do not produce air pollutant emissions because of intentional
potential impact on human health over the project life
planning decisions to choose non-polluting alternatives may
was assessed. If VOCs will be present during construction
apply for the Conserving level with supporting documentation.
or operations documentation must include:
a. Specifications limiting the use of, or controlling the exposure
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND to, volatile organic compounds during construction.
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE b. For projects/facilities with interior occupied
Note that use of the terms, or variations of the terms, “best available spaces, documentation of steps taken to
control technology” and “lowest achievable emissions rates” within this reduce VOCs in material choices.
credit have no relationship to US EPA guidelines with similar names. For
Envision use of these terms should be interpreted at face value. E. Does the project remove existing air pollutant sources?
1. Documentation of how the project includes the direct removal of
A. Does the project meet all relevant minimum existing air pollutant sources or the capture and sequestration
air quality standards and regulations? of air pollutants in order to achieve a net positive impact.
1. Documentation indicating the local, regional, or national
standards and regulations relevant to the project. RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
2. Documentation demonstrating that the project has met QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
or will meet all relevant standards and regulations.
QL2.2 Encourage Sustainable Transportation

B. To what extent does the project reduce air LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
pollutant emissions during operations? RA2.1 Reduce Operational Energy Consumption
1. Estimates of total annual air pollutant RA2.3 Use Renewable Energy
emissions over the life of the project.
2. Documentation of all strategies deployed
to reduce air pollutant emissions.
a. Documentation demonstrating that the project
uses best available control systems or best
management practices (Enhanced).
OR
b. Documentation demonstrating that air pollution controls
are within the 95th percentile, or represent the lowest levels
possible compared to projects of similar type (Superior)
OR

ENVISION V3 167
 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE: RESILIENCE
Hiian
CR2.1 Avoid Unsuitable Development
U<>|a

INTENT METRIC

16 Minimize or avoid development

on sites prone to hazards.
The degree to which the project is
designed and/or sited to avoid or
mitigate site-related risks.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+E A+B+C+F

(3) Alternative Assessment (6) Risk Mitigation (8) Lowest Risk Alternative (12) Unsuitable (16) Strategic Retreat
Development Avoided

(A) During planning and project siting, the project team identifies potential siting hazards and determines both the vulnerability of the project to the hazard and the potential for the
project to exacerbate the hazard (e.g., creating impervious surfaces in a floodplain, building on potentially unstable hillsides). Potentially adverse sites include but are not limited to:
• Steep slopes (> 20 degrees)
• Permafrost
• Adverse geology (e.g., risk of liquefaction, subsidence, or sinkholes)
• Flood-prone areas
• At-risk coastline (coastal surges, coastal erosion)
(B) The project team assesses siting alternatives that avoid or minimize hazard exposure and/or project alternatives less vulnerable to, or likely to exacerbate, site hazards.

(C) The project includes specific strategies to mitigate the impact of site hazards on the project (e.g., elevating
structures and equipment above flood levels), as well as the project development impacts on the site hazard
(e.g., erosion controls on steep slopes). This may include monitoring and response plans.

(D) Based on alternatives (E) The project is intentionally (F) The project intentionally
identified in criterion C, the sited to completely modifies or removes existing
project team can demonstrate avoid site hazards. structures from areas prone
the selected project and to frequent damage and/or
site resulting in the lowest at high risk of future damage
exposure to site risk while still in order to prevent losses.
meeting project objectives
and requirements.

DESCRIPTION systematic withdrawal and removal of development from areas

prone to damage (e.g., frequent flood zones) or at risk of future
This credit addresses how infrastructure siting can significantly
damage (e.g., low-lying coastal areas impacted by sea-level rise).
reduce risk and improve project resilience. Certain sites such
as steep slopes, permafrost, or flood-prone areas should be
avoided if possible. Project teams must consider how certain
sites not only expose the infrastructure asset to increased
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
risk, but how the development of the project on these sites Improved: The first step is to identify potential hazards and
can lead to additional environmental, social, or economic consider alternatives. Siting risks are a combination of the
risks for the surrounding area. For example, a project located vulnerability of both the site and the project. In addition to
on a steep slope is not only at risk itself, but may contribute analyzing the site, project teams should consider whether project
to erosion or the potential for landslides. Project teams alternatives would reduce or eliminate the exposure to site risks.
should also consider how infrastructure development may
lead to additional development within the at-risk areas. Enhanced: Infrastructure siting choices are often
limited. However, project teams can implement
Whenever possible, infrastructure should avoid developing, or strategies to reduce the impact of site hazards.
driving development, in areas prone to hazards. Many communities
may even consider strategic or managed retreat. This is the

168 ENVISION V3
Superior: Site selection can be a tradeoff, with each site D. Can the project team demonstrate that the chosen
having potential risks. Project teams can demonstrate that project and site resulted in the lowest exposure to site
the selected project and site resulted in the least exposure hazards while still meeting project requirements?
to risk compared to the considered alternatives. 1. Based on the alternative sites and projects identified in criterion
B, the project team presents evidence that the chosen project
Conserving: The project is intentionally sited to avoid site hazards. and site represent the lowest exposure to site hazards while still
meeting project requirements. In certain cases, project teams can
Restorative: The project involves the strategic retreat from hazard-
present evidence that the nature of the infrastructure requires
prone areas, removing structures, development, or activities
its location in hazard-prone areas. Similarly, in certain cases,
from areas prone to damage or at risk of future damage.
project teams can present evidence that a lower-risk alternative
would not meet project requirements. The objective of this
Applicability: Projects that are not located within regions at
criterion is for project teams to demonstrate that the project
risk of site hazards, and therefore cannot demonstrate they
and site were chosen intentionally with full understanding of
actively avoided site hazards, may apply to have this credit
the risk exposure and to justify why that was the best decision
deemed not applicable with supporting documentation.
within the context of the project’s reasonable constraints.

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND E. Was the site chosen to intentionally avoid known site hazards?
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE 1. Evidence that the project team intentionally avoided siting
the project in proximity to site hazards. Evidence should
A. Has the project team identified potential siting hazards, include alternative sites that were seriously considered.
the vulnerability of the project to the hazard, and the
potential for the project to exacerbate the hazard? F. Does the project remove or modify structures
subject to frequent damage?
1. Documentation of identified site hazards.
1. Documentation of structures, or other development, removed from
2. Documentation of the vulnerability of the project the site. This may include structures at high risk of future damage
and project alternatives to siting hazards. or failure. Evidence should be clear that removal or modification
3. Documentation that the project team considered the potential of the structures will prevent or reduce the risk of future damage
for the project to exacerbate potential siting hazards. For or loss. Replacing existing structures or other development with
example, the potential for a project developed on a hillside to similarly at-risk structures does not qualify for this criterion.
increase erosion, contribute to landslide risk, or to increase
damage to downhill development in the event of a landslide. RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
B. Can the project team demonstrate that siting and
project alternatives were seriously considered CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience
in order to minimize exposure to risk? CR2.5 Maximize Resilience
1. Documentation that project and siting alternatives NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land
were considered in order to minimize exposure to
siting hazards as much as practicable (e.g., review NW3.3 Maintain Floodplain Functions
meetings, alternative analyses, siting studies).

C. Has the project team implemented strategies

to mitigate the impact of site hazards?
1. Documentation identifying strategies and controls
implemented to reduce risk. For certain hazards, this
may include monitoring and response plans. PROJECT EXAMPLE: RIDGEWOOD VIEW
2. Documentation that the project team specifically PARK RESERVOIR AND PUMP STATION
determined whether the project has the potential to
The siting of the Ridgewood View Park Reservoir and Pump
exacerbate site hazards and, if so, mitigation measures
Station (Envision Gold, 2016) in Portland, Oregon was
were implemented to reduce the project’s impact.
determined after a significant amount of geotechnical work
was conducted to find the ideal location for the project, and
to ensure the pump station and reservoir facilities would
be fully operational in the event of a seismic event. Steep
slopes were also avoided; the reservoir could have been
constructed on the south end of the park near a steep slope
that led to an ephemeral stream, or it could have been
constructed within an existing reservoir situated on a steep
slope. Neither of these options were selected. Instead, the
reservoir was constructed on the north end of the park
away from these areas, thus avoiding site-related risks.

ENVISION V3 169
 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE: RESILIENCE
Hiian
CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
U<>|a

INTENT METRIC

20 Develop a comprehensive climate

change vulnerability assessment.
Scope and comprehensiveness of climate
change vulnerability assessment.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E Not Available

(8) Project Vulnerability (14) System Vulnerability (18) Community Vulnerability (20) Knowledge Sharing

(A) The project team conducts, or relies on, an existing, comprehensive threat/hazard identification
study, or assessment, due to climate change. Threats/hazards are classified by:
• Duration: acute shocks over hours and days, or chronic stressors over years and decades.
• Extent of effects: project site (e.g., localized stormwater overflow), infrastructure system wide, or community wide (e.g., changes in climate).
The assessment should account for climate change’s impact on the frequency, duration, and severity of threats/hazards.
(B) The project team determines vulnerabilities and increased risk to the project, or performance, over its operational life due to
climate change-related threats. This should include whether current design variables will continue to meet performance goals over the
life of the project under changing operating conditions (i.e., climate, weather patterns, natural hazard frequency and intensity).

(C) The project team determines vulnerabilities and increased risk to the connected/
related infrastructure system or network due to climate change-related threats.
This should include how project vulnerabilities may impact system performance
and how system vulnerabilities may impact the project. This should include
direct and indirect impacts such as resource and service availability.

(D) The project team determines vulnerabilities and increased

risk to the broader community due to climate change threats.
This should include how project vulnerabilities may
impact the broader community and how community
vulnerabilities may impact the project.

(E) The project team or owner

shares climate threat findings in
order to support and facilitate
community awareness and their
inclusion in future projects.

DESCRIPTION Many low-lying coastal areas are directly at risk, with others facing
devastating erosion. Inland areas dependent on snowmelt for
The credit addresses the project team’s understanding of
freshwater have seen consistent decreases in water availability,
potential climate change impacts. This begins with identifying
and many mountains around the world, once perpetually
climate change threats and determining project vulnerabilities.
snowcapped, are now seasonal. Entire permafrost ecosystems
The results of this credit assessment may overlap with CR2.3
collapse as they shift into freeze-and-thaw cycles. Ocean
Evaluate Risk and Resilience, which addresses all potential
temperatures influence the entire global weather system, and
project risks. Project teams are encouraged to consider
as temperature rises, the frequency, intensity, and pattern of
the synergies of addressing both CR2.2 and CR2.3.
storm systems changes and becomes more unpredictable. The
Climate change is a serious threat to global development extent of climate change impacts is far-reaching and not entirely
and security for current and future generations. Increased understood. Many impacts exacerbate each other; for example,
temperatures are increasing glacier loss and raising sea levels. increased storm intensity and rising sea levels compound to make
storm surges even more devastating to coastal communities.

170 ENVISION V3
Infrastructure development relies heavily on standards that 3. Documentation that the climate threat analysis expands
are often based on historic trends that may no longer be an beyond infrastructure systems and includes threats to the
accurate predictor of future conditions. Infrastructure built to broader community. For example, how water-dependent
the standards of 70 years ago will not provide the level of service infrastructure in a region at risk of drought would be
needed for the next 70 years. Infrastructure owners and project competing with the community for limited resources.
teams must consider how to make wise economic investments in
order to ensure the prosperity, safety, and economic advantages B. Has the project team determined the vulnerability
of their community in the face of long-term climate change. of the project to climate change threats?
1. Identification of project vulnerabilities to climate
change threats reported in criterion A.
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
A comprehensive climate change threat and vulnerability 2. Documentation that a review was conducted of
assessment is expected for all levels of achievement. key design or performance standards to determine
Levels in this credit are distinguished by the scope of whether they would be impacted by changes in
the assessment, beginning with the project (Improved) operating conditions due to climate change.
and expanding to include the infrastructure system
(Enhanced) and broader community (Superior). C. Has the project team determined the vulnerability of
the infrastructure system to climate change threats?
Improved: This credit follows the standard methodology of 1. Mapping of the interdependencies between the project and
identifying threats and vulnerabilities that is explained in greater its connected infrastructure system. For example, a light rail
detail in credit CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience. The assessment station and its connected network of stations and rail lines, or
should specifically address changing design variables. a pump station and its connected water treatment system.
Enhanced: While project resilience is important, project teams 2. Identification of system vulnerabilities to climate
should consider the interdependencies of a project and its change threats reported in criterion A.
connected system. Islands of functionality/operability in a
3. Documentation that specific consideration was given to the
failed system may be of limited value. Infrastructure systems
dependence on resources or services such as materials, energy,
often rely on an interconnected network, or resources and
water, transportation access, etc., and the future reliability
services in order to function. Climate change may not directly
or cost of these resources due to climate change impacts.
impact the project, but it may impact the chain of resources
and services a project needs in order to function efficiently.
D. Has the project team determined the vulnerability
Superior: Resilience is best applied at a community level. of the community to climate change threats?
Infrastructure is inherently connected to vast arrays of physical 1. Mapping of the interdependencies between the project and
(other infrastructure) and nonphysical (socioeconomic) systems, community systems. This can include physical systems like
and the purpose of resilient infrastructure is to support the health, energy, water, transportation, communication systems,
safety, and functions of the broader community as a whole. waste removal, and/or food supply. It may also include
nonphysical systems like emergency services, funding,
Conserving: The assessment of climate change impacts, regulations, workforce, and/or community/political support.
infrastructure vulnerability to climate change, and how to
incorporate climate change considerations into infrastructure 2. Identification of community systems’ vulnerabilities
project delivery are still relatively new and unevenly applied to climate change threats reported in criterion A.
concepts. There is significant value in project teams sharing their
knowledge and experience in order to facilitate incorporating E. Has the project team or owner shared
climate change considerations into future projects. their climate threat findings?
1. Documentation that the project team or owner have shared, or
Applicability: This credit is applicable to all projects
will share, their climate threat findings with a broader audience.
potentially impacted by climate change, which
Information is shared publicly in order to increase general
is the vast majority of infrastructure.
knowledge of climate threats, advance awareness, and support/
facilitate the inclusion of climate threats into future projects.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
LD1.2 Foster Collaboration and Teamwork
A. Has the project team determined climate change LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
threats to the project and its surroundings?
LD3.3 Conduct a Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation
1. Documentation that the project team has conducted
a climate threat analysis or that an existing climate RA3.1 Preserve Water Resources
change study was available for the community. NW1.2 Provide Wetland and Surface Water Buffers
2. Documentation that the climate threat analysis expands NW2.2 Manage Stormwater
beyond direct impacts to the project and includes threats to
CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience
the connected infrastructure system or related infrastructure
network. For example, a water treatment facility outside the range
of heightened storm surges from sea level rise may be disrupted
by loss of pump stations located within the heightened range.

ENVISION V3 171
 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE: RESILIENCE
Hiian
CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience
U<>|a

INTENT METRIC

26 Conduct a comprehensive, multihazard

risk and resilience evaluation.
Scope and comprehensiveness of the
multihazard risk and resilience evaluation.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E A+B+C+D+E+F NOT AVAILABLE

(11) Project Evaluation (18) System Evaluation (24) Community Evaluation (26) Integrated and
Inclusive Approach

(A) The project team draws (A) The project team draws (A) The project team draws the assessment boundary for
the assessment boundary the assessment boundary subsequent criteria (B, C, D, and E) around the interdependencies
for subsequent criteria for subsequent criteria (B, of the project, its associated/connected infrastructure
(B, C, D, and E) around C, D, and E) around the system/network, and the broader community.
the project and its site. interdependencies of the project
and its associated/connected
infrastructure system/network.

(B) Understand the Asset: The project team identifies the objectives and performance goals of the project and related
systems. It also identifies the critical assets, systems, and networks that are essential to meeting objectives and
performance goals. This should include the associated dependencies and interdependencies within the system.
(C) Identify Threats/Hazards: The project team identifies threats/hazards (natural hazards and human-induced threats). Project teams may
reference existing studies or assessments if relevant to the project and its context. Threats should include both acute shocks and chronic stressors.
(D) Identify Vulnerability: The project team identifies the vulnerabilities of the critical functions and dependencies of the
infrastructure asset and its primary components identified in criterion B to the threats/hazards identified in criterion C.
(E) Evaluate Risk: The project team evaluates the project risk by determining the likelihood/probability of a threat/hazard occurring and the
associated consequences/impacts. Consequences and impacts should be classified as social, environmental, and/or economic/financial.

(F) The project team conducts

the risk evaluation with
the owner and a diverse
and integrated team of
key stakeholders.

DESCRIPTION • Hazards/threats are events that have the potential

to cause damage or harm, whether naturally
This credit requires a comprehensive risk evaluation in order
occurring (hazards) or human-induced (threats).
to understand potential hazards/threats and the project’s
vulnerability. As climate change is an overarching threat to • Vulnerability is a condition whereby a threat has the
many projects, CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability potential to disrupt or damage a project or system.
can be considered a subcomponent of this broader credit
• Risk is the probability of a threat exploiting a vulnerability
addressing all potential risks. In turn, CR2.3 Evaluate Risk can
and the associated impacts and consequences.
form the foundation for credits CR2.4 Establish Resilience
Goals and Strategies and CR2.5 Maximize Resilience. For example, flooding might be a threat to a project, critical
systems located below flood levels would be vulnerable to that
Different disciplines and industries often use different threat, and risk would be an evaluation of the probability and
terminology when discussing risk; however, the severity of a flood event as a factor of the associated losses if
principles and processes are largely similar. the critical systems were flooded. Below is a list of common
hazards/threats classified as acute shocks or chronic stressors.

172 ENVISION V3
 • Determine the associated consequences/impact of
Acute Shocks Chronic Stressors
the occurrence in each category of social (people,
(Short-term Duration/ (Long-term Duration/ community), environmental (contamination, destruction),
Lower Predictability) Higher Predictability) or economic (cost of repair, financial losses).
Hurricanes Aging Population
Earthquakes Environmental Degradation PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
Improved: A comprehensive and thorough risk evaluation
Wildfires Sea Level Rise is required for all levels of achievement in this credit.
Heat Waves Drought/Water Shortage Levels are distinguished by the scope of the assessment
boundary. This begins with the project and site.
Blizzards Species Extinction
Health Epidemics Aging Infrastructure Enhanced: Expands the assessment to the
integrated infrastructure system.
Flooding Shrinking/Growing Population
Superior: Expands the assessment to the broader network
Tornadoes Global Warming
of interdependent systems throughout the community.
Terrorism Increased Pollution/Contamination
Conserving: Additional points are given in Conserving for
Infrastructure Failure/Collapse Food Availability conducting the risk evaluation through an integrated and
Subsidence and Liquefaction Overtaxed/Inefficient Infrastructure diverse process. Often, individuals with diverse backgrounds,
perspectives, or skill sets can add value by bringing attention to
Chemical Spills Financial Shortages threats and vulnerabilities that might otherwise be overlooked.

Applicability: It is likely that all projects would benefit from a

Risk Evaluation Steps thorough investigation of potential risks. It would, therefore,
be difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not relevant
1. Draw the Boundary: establish the boundary or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award. Risks
and scope of the assessment (criterion A). are not always major catastrophic events; small and large
• Project (assessment includes risks to the project). (Improved) projects alike may consider how crime/vandalism or personal
injury are also potential risks with associated impacts.
• System (assessment includes risks associated
with the interdependencies of the project to
its connected system) (Enhanced).
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND
• Community (assessment includes risks associated with DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
the interdependencies of the project to its connected
infrastructure system, as well as the interdependencies
A. To what extent does the project team’s risk assessment
of the project and infrastructure system to their external
include the project, infrastructure system, and community?
network of systems) (Superior and Conserving).
1. Evidence that the documentation in criteria B, C, D, and
2. Understand the Asset (criterion B): E sufficiently addresses the scope required in the level of
achievement: project (Improved), infrastructure system
• Identify the objectives and performance goals (Enhanced), and community (Superior and Conserving).
of the project and related systems.
• Identify the critical assets, systems, and networks that are B. Has the project team identified the critical
essential to meeting objectives and performance goals. functions and dependencies of the infrastructure
• Identify associated dependencies and asset and its primary components?
interdependencies within the system. 1. Documentation that project teams conducted a review
to identify critical functions and dependencies of the
3. Identify Threats/Hazards: Identify potential natural infrastructure asset and its primary components. Note
hazards or human-induced threats that have the potential to that documentation for B, C, D, and E can be submitted
impact the project, system, and community (criterion C). together as part of the comprehensive risk evaluation.
• Identify Short-Term Threats (Acute Shocks) 2. Mapping of the interdependencies between the project
• Chronic Stressors and its connected infrastructure system (for example, a
light rail station and its connected network of stations
4. Identify Vulnerability: Identify the critical assets, and rail lines, or a pump station and its connected
systems, and/or networks essential to meeting water treatment system (Enhanced and above).
objectives and performance goals that are susceptible 3. Mapping of the interdependencies between the project and
to the identified threats/hazards (criterion D). community systems. This can include physical systems like energy,
water, transportation, communication systems, waste removal,
5. Evaluate Risk: Risk is the potential for loss or damage
and/or food supply. It may also include nonphysical systems
resulting from a threat/hazard exploiting a vulnerability.
like emergency services, funding, regulations, workforce, and/
It is a product of the likelihood of occurrence and
or community/political support (Superior and Conserving).
the associated consequences (criterion E).
• Determine the likelihood/probability of
a threat/hazard occurrence.

ENVISION V3 173
C. Has the project team identified the threats or 1. Documentation of the potential for loss or damage resulting
hazards to the project and its surroundings? from the threats and hazards identified in criterion C exploiting
1. Documentation that the project team has identified vulnerabilities identified in criterion D. This should be presented
threats/hazards or that existing threat/hazard studies as a product of the likelihood of occurrence and the associated
were available and are sufficient and comprehensive for consequences. Consequences and impacts should be classified
the project. Projects that pursue CR2.1 may provide that as social, environmental, and/or economic/financial.
documentation for climate threats. However, documentation
in this credit should extend beyond climate threats. F. Did the risk evaluation conducted by the project
include the participation of the owner and a diverse
Note that project teams can and should augment existing and integrated team of key stakeholders?
threat/hazard studies in their documentation if the studies
do not fully capture all potential threats to the project. 1. Documentation of the risk evaluation process and evidence of
participation by the owner and key stakeholders. Applicants
should explain how the stakeholders represented a diverse
D. Has the project team identified the
set of perspectives appropriate to the scope of the project.
vulnerabilities of the critical functions and
dependencies of the infrastructure asset?
1. Identification of the vulnerabilities of the critical
RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
functions and dependencies of the infrastructure asset LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
and its primary components identified in criterion B LD3.3 Conduct a Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation
to the threats/hazards identified in criterion C.
CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
E. Has the project team evaluated risks by CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies
determining the probability of a threat or hazard
CR2.5 Maximize Resilience
occurring and the associated impacts?

PROJECT EXAMPLE: OHIO RIVER

BRIDGES-EAST END CROSSING
The Ohio River Bridges-East End Crossing (Envision Platinum,
2016) resulted from a long-planned collaboration between
the State of Indiana and the Commonwealth of Kentucky. It
is designed to address cross-river mobility challenges in the
Louisville Metropolitan Area, improve safety and reduce traffic
congestion, stimulate the local economy and integrate with
existing highways. It has also been designed to be resilient to
significant potential climate change risks such as heat wave
intensity and flooding, both of which were identified as risks in
the region’s climate change assessment and adaptation plans.

174 ENVISION V3
 Marshalltown Generating Station: Marshalltown, Iowa

Alliant Energy’s Marshalltown Generating Station (Envision As the largest development project in the City of Marshalltown
Platinum, 2017) in Iowa advances clean energy for customers in more than twenty years, the USD $700 million facility
and communities, while significantly reducing its environmental is expected to bring millions of dollars in tax revenue
footprint. The project is a natural gas combined cycle facility with benefits to Marshall County and to the state of Iowa.
a 650-megawatt capacity, providing enough electricity to power
500,000 Iowa homes and businesses. Compared to traditional Natural World: Alliant Energy, working in conjunction with
coal-fired generation, the Marshalltown generating station the project team and local stakeholders, restored a significant
emits less than half the carbon dioxide, about two-thirds less portion of the project site to create a new nature trail, consisting
nitrogen oxide, and roughly 99 percent less sulfur and mercury. of natural habitats located near the project. Prairie and pollinator
The project team credits Envision for helping them design and habitats replace previously planted monoculture row crops, and
deliver more sustainability and economic benefits in the project. the habitats are accessible to the public. The seven acres of new
public space provides visitors with the opportunity to learn more
Notable achievements for the Marshalltown Generating about the benefits of natural prairie and pollinator habitats. A
Station within the Envision categories include: walking trail with educational signage is open to visitors daily.

Quality of Life: The project provides a number of additional Climate and Resilience: Alliant Energy completed several
benefits for the local community, including improved quality detailed studies to understand potential climate change and
of existing electric and gas capacity for businesses, industry other risks to the project. For example, the firm undertook
and the public. The new gas pipeline connecting the existing a detailed analysis to understand the extent to which the
Northern Border Power pipeline and the Marshalltown Marshalltown Generating System would reduce greenhouse gas
Generating Station was sized to meet expected future (GHG) emissions from the originally-proposed coal-fired facility
population growth and increased demand for natural gas in that was formerly planned to be constructed in the area. The
the Marshalltown area. Improving the natural gas delivery GHG assessment revealed that the station is expected to reduce
system in the city will also lower the long-term delivery cost emissions by more than 40 percent over a 25-year period.
of natural gas to the community, thereby saving residents
and businesses an estimated $1 million annually. In addition, Alliant Energy conducted an assessment of resource
demands and supplies, and resource and infrastructure
Leadership: The Marshalltown Generating Station created a vulnerabilities. Seven specific risks to the project were proactively
significant number of jobs during the design, construction and identified by the company and intentionally mitigated by
operational phases. During construction, an average of 650 jobs the design, including potential shortages in fuel and water
were created with nearly 40% of these workers from Marshalltown, resources; flooding and spills; and changes in heat, snow
and the remainder commuting from nearby cities and towns. loads, and wind speeds. Ultimately the generating station was
These new jobs brought significant revenue to local businesses, designed to be resilient and adaptive to potential changes
including hotels, restaurants, and other stores. The completed in the operating environment over the course of its life.
generating station now employs roughly 20 permanent employees.

-V &
1
100
m
J

r\n 60
: ‘•o 70
30 >SEI^
20 * / •
Si
‘A>
s £ m

i
 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE: RESILIENCE
Hiian
CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies
U<>|a

INTENT METRIC

20 To support increased project and community

resilience through the establishment
of clear objectives and goals.
The degree to which resilience goals expand
from initial commitments to quantifiable
project objectives, long-term operating plans,
POINTS
and community-wide development plans.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

Not Available A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D Not Available

(8) Strategy Development (14) Stakeholder Input (20) Shared

Community Goals

(A) The project team determines the performance goals of the

project and the owner’s acceptable level of risk.
(B) The project team uses the results of a risk evaluation (e.g., CR2.3) to develop risk management
strategies that meet project performance goals and budget, and increase project resilience. The project
team prioritizes strategies that result in the greatest reduction of risk within project cost constraints.

(C) The project team engages the owner and key stakeholders
in developing or reviewing resilience goals and strategies.

(D) The project team aligns

project resilience goals with
broader community- or region-
wide resilience goals and plans.
OR
If community resilience goals
are lacking, the project team
publicly shares its resilience
goals in support of developing
broader community goals.

DESCRIPTION development, combined with the increased frequency and

intensity of extreme weather events, means that more people
This credit addresses expanding resilience goals from initial
are being exposed to greater risks. Studies from the reinsurance
commitments to quantifiable project objectives, long-term
company Swiss Re indicate that global insured losses due to
operating plans, and community-wide development plans.
natural catastrophes have increased dramatically over the past
Projects are more likely to achieve resilience outcomes
four decades. Infrastructure owners should consider the cost
when owners, designers, contractors, and all involved in the
savings and benefits of developing more resilient systems.
project team establish clear and quantifiable performance
targets. Conversely, achieving increased resilience is unlikely
According to the Rockefeller Foundation’s City Resilience
when efforts are piecemeal and uncoordinated. While
Framework, characteristics of a resilient system include being
every project contributes to the overall resilience of the
resourceful, inclusive, integrated, robust, flexible, redundant,
infrastructure system, the ultimate objective is always a more
and reflective. Ultimately, the objective is to be as resilient
resilient community as a whole. This requires coordination
as possible while being as resource efficient (resourceful) as
and cooperation beyond the boundaries of the project.
possible. This necessitates an inclusive (people) and integrated
(systems) approach. Risk is a factor of the probability of a
The benefits of increased resilience include avoided losses of
threat/hazard occurring, the project’s vulnerability, and
life, health, assets, and/or operating time and their associated
the associated impacts/consequences (R = T x V x I).
costs. Most studies estimate that every dollar spent on
preparedness and prevention saves four dollars in recovery and
There are many ways to classify or organize resilience strategies.
relief. The increase in global population and spread of human
Below is one way of classifying resilience strategies:

176 ENVISION V3
• Vulnerability Reduction • Identification of the objectives and performance
goals of the project and related systems.
·· Eliminate/Avoid: The project eliminates
or avoids the potential threat. • Identification of the critical assets, systems, and networks
essential to meeting objectives and performance goals.
·· Accommodate: The project is designed to overcome the threat.
• Threats/hazards identification
·· Durability/Robustness
• Vulnerability assessment
·· Adaptability/Flexibility • Likelihood/probability of threat/hazard occurrence.
• Impact/Consequence Reduction • Consequences/impact of the occurrence
·· Minimize: The project is designed to 2. List or matrix of potential risk management strategies that
minimize the impact of a failure. could be implemented to reduce project risk and increase
·· Redundancy/Diversity resilience. Strategies should be prioritized according to
their risk reduction potential and any extenuating factors
·· Preparedness
(cost, availability, reliability, effectiveness, etc.)
·· Restore: The project is designed to quickly
or more easily recover from losses. C. Have key stakeholders been engaged
·· Recovery/Response in developing resilience goals?
1. Evidence of participation by the owner and key stakeholders in
• No Action
developing or reviewing resilience goals. Applicants should explain
·· Accept: The likelihood and impacts are how the stakeholders represented a diverse set of perspectives
deemed an acceptable risk. appropriate to the scope of the project. Evidence should indicate
that stakeholder engagement was meaningful and produced
useful feedback on establishing or prioritizing resilience goals.
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
Enhanced: A comprehensive and thorough risk evaluation
D. Is the project part of, or does it support, larger community
is required as a prerequisite for all levels of achievement
resilience or climate change adaptation goals?
in this credit. It is not possible to establish resilience goals
without first understanding the risks. Levels in this credit are 1. Documentation of broader community or regional
distinguished by the inclusivity of the goal setting process. resilience goals (for example, as stated in existing resilience
or climate change adaptation or preparedness plans).
Superior: The process for establishing goals and Documentation may include a pre-existing plan developed
strategies extends beyond the project team to include independently of the project or a plan developed by the
the owner and key stakeholders (operators, contractors, project and shared with relevant government agencies.
interdependent facilities, or community stakeholders).
2. Documentation of a direct connection between the project and the
broader community resilience goals it supports. Documentation
Conserving: While projects can take steps to increase their own
explains how the project contributes to or supports these goals.
resilience, resilience is most effective when considered at the
community, city, or regional scale. Therefore, project teams OR
should consider the advantage of engaging with stakeholders
to align project goals with those of the broader community. If the community- or region-wide resilience goals are lacking, the
project team can alternatively submit documentation that the
Applicability: All projects that are exposed to risks would benefit project’s resilience goals were shared publicly in order to support
from establishing resilience goals and strategies. It would development of broader resilience goals within the community.
therefore be difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not
relevant or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award. RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND LD1.1 Provide Effective Leadership and Commitment
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
LD3.3 Conduct a Life-Cycle Economic Evaluation
A. Has the project team identified the project
performance goals and risk appetite of the owner? CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
1. Documentation identifying key performance objectives of the CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience
project that will form the foundation of the risk assessment.
CR2.5 Maximize Resilience
2. Documentation explaining the owner’s approach
to risk management on the project. This is the
guide for separating “acceptable risks” from risks
that require mitigation and management.

B. Has the project team developed risk management

strategies based on a comprehensive risk evaluation?
1. Documentation that the project team has conducted
a risk evaluation, including at minimum:

ENVISION V3 177
 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE: RESILIENCE
Hiian
CR2.5 Maximize Resilience
U<>|a

INTENT METRIC

26 Increase resilience, life-cycle system

performance, and the ability to withstand
hazards by maximizing durability.
The degree to which the project incorporates
elements that increase durability, the ability
to withstand hazards, and extend useful life.
POINTS

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E Not Available

(11) Improved Resilience (15) Thorough (20) Ongoing Resilience (26) Quantifying
Performance Implementation Monitoring Improvement

(A) The project team develops resilience goals and strategies (e.g., CR2.4) based on a detailed risk evaluation of the project (e.g., CR2.3).
(B) The project team takes a comprehensive approach to implementing resilience strategies.

(C) The project team periodically monitors the implementation of resilience strategies and
revisits their effectiveness in addressing project risk throughout project development.

(D) Resilience strategies are incorporated into the operations

and maintenance of the project. Organization(s) responsible
for the ongoing operation of the project have systems in
place to maintain, grow, learn, and continually improve
resilience capabilities (i.e., “plan, do, check, act”).

(E) The project team

establishes methods for
measuring/quantifying
the benefits of resilience
strategies implemented
(e.g., monetary savings from
avoided damage or service loss,
accelerated recovery time).

DESCRIPTION Enhanced: Consideration of resilience cannot be limited

to early conceptual design. Projects change during
This credit addresses the implementation of strategies and
development, and as such the implementation of
systems to increase the resilience of the project. While it
resilience strategies should be regularly monitored and
can be assessed independently, it should be considered as a
revisited in order to ensure their continued effectiveness
continuation of the previous resilience credits. After identifying
and to capture new opportunities as they arise.
vulnerabilities and risk (CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
and CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience), and establishing
Superior: Implementation of resilience strategies should also not
resilience goals and strategies (CR2.4), it is time to implement
end with project delivery. While better-designed projects have
the strategies on the project. This credit is independent because
an advantage, the ultimate test of project resilience will occur
successful and effective implementation requires a range
during operations. Therefore, operators should be engaged to
of actions beyond the resilience strategies themselves.
develop systems of continual learning and improvement.

Conserving: Quantifying the benefits of resilience

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT performance validates project decisions, provides a basis for
Improved: Resilience is critical to a project’s long-term success future operational improvements, and generates valuable
and cannot be parsed in partial achievements. Therefore, the knowledge for future projects and the industry as a whole.
credit begins with a comprehensive implementation of resilience
strategies sufficient to address identified risks. The levels in this Applicability: All projects that are exposed to risks would
credit are distinguished by the rigor in implementing the strategies. benefit from increased resilience. It would therefore be

178 ENVISION V3
difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not relevant or during project development to ensure their continued effectiveness
applicable to a project seeking an Envision award. in the face of potential changes in project design or parameters.

D. Will resilience goals and strategies be incorporated into

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND the ongoing operations and maintenance of the project?
DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE 1. Documentation of operations and management plans, or
coordinated efforts with organizations responsible for project
A. Has the project team developed resilience goals and operations, that establish plan-do-check-act systems that
strategies based on a comprehensive risk evaluation? learn and continually improve resilience capabilities.
1. Documentation of a comprehensive risk evaluation. Projects 2. Documentation that any relevant resilience features
pursuing CR2.2 may submit their credit documentation. provide sufficient operations and maintenance guidance
Applicants may refer to CR2.2 for guidance on conducting to ensure their effectiveness during operations.
a risk evaluation and relevant documentation.
Note that for this criterion, documentation must be relevant
2. List or matrix of resilience goals and risk management strategies and specific to resilience goals. Project teams are encouraged
prioritized according to their risk reduction potential and any to share their resilience strategies, as well as their performance
extenuating factors (cost, availability, reliability, effectiveness, etc.) and effectiveness over time during operations. Actions and
Note that for this criterion, documentation must commitments to do so may qualify for innovation points
be relevant and specific to resilience goals. under CR0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements.

B. Has the project team implemented resilience E. Does the project include methods for measuring or
strategies sufficient to address major project quantifying resilience performance targets?
risks and improve project resilience? 1. Documentation of the calculations and methodology
1. Documentation that strategies implemented in the project increase the project team used to quantify resilience goals and
resilience. Project teams should explain how the strategies outcomes. Many risk management strategies are justifiable
address one or more of the core principles of resilient systems: through qualitative assessments or do not require
justification. However, when possible, quantifying the
• Reflective (learning and improving)
benefits of increased resilience through objective measure
• Resourceful (resource efficient, creative) (e.g., cost savings, improved service) can support their
• Inclusive (shared action and responsibilities) implementation on the project and benefit the knowledge
• Integrated (diverse systems, institutions, and people) and understanding of the broader resilience community.

• Robust (durable, well constructed)

RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
• Redundant (diverse, fault tolerant)
LD2.3 Plan for Long-Term Monitoring and Maintenance
• Adaptable (flexible, changeable)
LD2.1 Establish a Sustainability Management Plan
C. Has the project team periodically monitored the LD3.1 Stimulate Economic Prosperity and Development
implementation of project resilience strategies and reviewed
their continued effectiveness throughout project delivery? LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies

1. Project-specific report(s), or meeting minutes, detailing how QL1.1 Improve Community Quality of Life
the project will carry out the implementation of resilience QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety
strategies through construction and which key performance
indicators will be used to measure and manage initiatives. CR2.2 Assess Climate Change Vulnerability
CR2.3 Evaluate Risk and Resilience
2. Project-specific sustainability report(s), or meeting minutes,
detailing how the project team revisited resilience strategies CR2.4 Establish Resilience Goals and Strategies

ENVISION V3 179
 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE: RESILIENCE
Hiian
CR2.6 Improve Infrastructure Integration
U<>|a

INTENT METRIC

18 Enhance the operational relationships

and strengthen the functional integration
of the project into connected, efficient,
The degree to which the project is integrated
into other connected systems, where
beneficial and appropriate, in order to increase
POINTS
and diverse infrastructure systems. resilience and systems performance.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVED ENHANCED SUPERIOR CONSERVING RESTORATIVE

A A+B A+B+C A+B+C+D A+B+C+D+E

(2) Internal Integration (5) Risk Reduction (9) Systems Integration (13) Community/ (18) Information
Network Integration Integration

(A) The project increases internal systems integration in order to achieve efficiency or system diversity.

(B) Integration strategies increase resilience and reduce the risk of systemic or cascading failures.

(C) The project leverages its relationship within a larger infrastructure

system in order to achieve efficiency or system diversity.

(D) The project integrates networks of infrastructure systems

(e.g., water and transportation) in order to achieve efficiency or
system diversity. In certain cases, projects may substitute the
community integration of non-physical social or economic systems.

(E) The project integrates data

or monitoring systems with
reporting or preparedness
systems in order to learn and
improve performance over time.

DESCRIPTION • Efficiency – An integrated systems approach can identify

conflicts, achieve higher efficiency, or leverage co-benefits.
This credit assesses the degree to which the project is
integrated into other connected systems, where beneficial
• Diversity – Integrated systems can often function
and appropriate, in order to increase resilience and system
in a variety of ways, under various conditions, or in
performance. Optimal infrastructure performance integrates all
multiple configurations. This increases resilience and
infrastructure elements at the community level. Therefore, each
can reduce the need for redundant backups.
new or renovated element of infrastructure ideally is designed
and constructed to take into account how that element will
link with, support, and act in harmony with other existing and
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
planned infrastructure elements. While historic infrastructure
development focused on a “one problem, one solution” model, Improved: The project team focuses on integration
increasingly communities are realizing cost savings and improved of internal systems within the project.
performance from layering and integrating infrastructure goals.
Enhanced: The project team focuses on ensuring
The ubiquitous availability and access to smart technology integration increases resilience and does not introduce
and data also presents a new opportunity for infrastructure vulnerabilities such as cascading or systemic failures.
integration. However, project teams should guard against
introducing vulnerabilities, and, rather, integrate systems Superior: The project team considers the role of the project within
and technology in order to increase resilience and reduce its larger infrastructure system. This may include networks of water
the risk of systemic or cascading failure. Integrated systems treatment, roads, transit, energy, solid waste, parks, and more.
can provide multiple benefits, including but not limited to:
Conserving: The project contributes to the beneficial integration
of multiple infrastructure systems. For example, how improved
stormwater design can decrease traffic accident morbidity,

180 ENVISION V3
how access across a facility can increase community mobility, internal or external systems will decrease rather than
or how transportation design can benefit and enhance waste increase the risk of system or cascading failures.
diversion and recycling collection. Infrastructure systems
support each other in order to achieve higher performance. C. Does the project increase external systems integration?
1. Documentation that the project improves the
Restorative: The project team integrates data or monitoring
efficiency, redundancy, or system diversity of the larger
systems in order to achieve higher performance beyond
infrastructure system beyond the project boundary.
project delivery. Integrating systems is not only about physical
connections, since integrated systems are often effective only
when monitored, maintained, and operated as intended. D. Does the project integrate infrastructure networks?
1. Documentation that the project team made efforts to identify
Applicability: It is likely that all infrastructure would, and should, and leverage opportunities to integrate infrastructure
benefit from the application of an integrated systems approach. It networks in order to achieve efficiency, redundancy, or
would therefore be difficult to demonstrate that the credit is not system diversity. The project may demonstrate that it is
relevant or applicable to a project seeking an Envision award. part of a larger program, policy, or initiative to improve
cross-sector performance and sustainability.

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND E. Does the project integrate data or monitoring

DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE systems in order to improve performance?
1. Documentation that the project includes integrated
A. Does the project increase internal systems integration? monitoring or data gathering systems in order to
1. Documentation of how systems within the project improve performance during operations.
were integrated or coordinated in order to achieve
efficiencies, redundancies, or system diversity. RELATED ENVISION CREDITS
QL2.2 Encourage Sustainable Transportation
B. Will the infrastructure integration reduce the
risk of systemic or cascading failures? LD2.2 Plan for Sustainable Communities
1. Documentation that the project team understands NW1.4 Preserve Undeveloped Land
critical failure points and that efforts to integrate
LD1.4 Pursue Byproduct Synergies

ENVISION V3 181
 CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE: INNOVATION
Hiian
CR0.0 Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements
U<>|a

INTENT METRIC

+10 To reward exceptional performance beyond

the expectations of the system and application
of innovative methods that advance state-
Whether project sustainability performance
qualifies as innovation, exceptional
performance, or is not otherwise
POINTS
of-the-art sustainable infrastructure. recognized in existing credits.

LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT

INNOVATION
A or B or C

(+1-10) Innovate or Exceed Credit Requirements

(A) Implement innovative methods, technologies, or processes that are novel either in their use, application, or within the local regulatory or cultural context.
OR
(B) Implement measures that exceed the highest existing requirements within one or more Climate and Resilience credits.
OR
(C) Address additional aspects of sustainability not currently recognized in Envision

DESCRIPTION and that it does not have a corresponding negative impact on

the local or global environment, economy, or community.
This credit addresses instances in which projects:
Projects may demonstrate they implement innovative
1. Implement innovative methods, resources, technologies, or
methods, technologies or processes in several ways:
processes that are novel in their use, application, or within
the local regulatory or cultural context of the project;
• The project is an early adopter of new technology
or methods that can demonstrably improve project
2. Exceed the performance requirements
performance without negative trade-offs;
of one or more credits; and/or
• The project uses technologies or methods that may be general
3. Address additional aspects of sustainability
practice in other regions or parts of the world, but within the
not currently recognized in Envision
context of the project (whether climate, regulations, policies,
Points for this credit are not calculated in the overall applicable political support, public opinion, etc.) have not yet gained
points and, therefore, act as bonus points. Given the nature of acceptance. Significant efforts are taken to demonstrate
the credit, the broad format of which is intended to encourage the effectiveness of the technology or method within the
creative infrastructure solutions, thorough documentation context and provide a precedent for future adoption.
is expected. Project teams may pursue more than one of the
• The project team takes significant steps to include
three possible options for this credit, or pursue multiple for
research goals within the project’s development, or
the same option, for a total of up to ten (10) bonus points.
work with a university or research organization to
advance the general knowledge of the profession.
Proprietary research that is not made publicly available
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
cannot count toward achieving this credit.
Innovation:
Project teams must also demonstrate that the innovation
To qualify for innovation points, projects must implement serves a purpose. This can be done in one of two ways:
innovative methods, resources, technologies, or processes
(e.g., the use of a pre-existing technology in a new way or the • Overcoming significant problems, barriers, or limitations—
successful application of a technology or methods in regions Project teams demonstrate that the innovation reduces
or locales where existing policies, regulations, or general or eliminates significant problems, barriers, or limitations
opinion have prevented their use). In these circumstances, it that previously hampered the use of the new methods,
is imperative to prove that the application of the technology technologies, or processes implemented on the project.
does, and will continue to, meet performance expectations

182 ENVISION V3
 • Creating scalable and/or transferable solutions—Project teams • Managing urban heat island effects through
demonstrate that new methods, technologies, or processes significant shading, or SRI requirements for both
implemented on the project are scalable across a wide range vertical and horizontal hardscape areas.
of project sizes and/or are applicable and transferable across
multiple kinds of infrastructure projects in multiple sectors. • Anticipating and addressing security
risks from quantum computing.
Exceptional Performance:

To qualify for exceptional performance points, projects EVALUATION CRITERIA AND

must meet the highest level of achievement for one or more DOCUMENTATION GUIDANCE
Climate and Resilience credits. For example, projects seeking
additional points in credit CR1.1 Reduce Net Embodied Carbon
A. To what extent does the project implement innovative
must already be achieving at least a 50% reduction in total
methods, technologies, or processes that overcome
embodied carbon of materials over the life of the project. In
significant problems, barriers or limitations, or
this case, exceptional performance may be pursued by projects
create scalable and transferable solutions?
whose design and operations achieves a significantly higher
percentage than the minimum called for in the Conserving 1. Documentation of the application of innovative technologies
level of achievement. Exceptional performance may not be or methods. Detailed description of how this application
pursued by projects that have a basic primary function that will improve existing conventional practice either globally
meets the requirements (e.g., a decommissioning project). or within the unique context of the project. Provide
justification as to why this application should be considered
Possible areas of achievement in exceptional innovative either as a technology, a method, or within
performance for Climate and Resilience may the project context (climate, political, cultural, etc.).
include, but are not limited to, the following:
2. Documentation that the project reduces or eliminates
significant problems, barriers, or limitations that previously
• Projects that exceed 50% reductions in net embodied carbon;
hampered the use or implementation of certain resources,
• Projects that go beyond carbon negative to become large- technologies, processes, or methods that improve the
scale carbon sinks for greenhouse gas emissions; sustainability of the project. Alternatively, documentation that
the new methods, technologies, or processes implemented
• Projects for which climate change preparedness and on the project are scalable across a wide range of project
resilience is critical for protecting public safety, availability sizes and/or are applicable and transferable across multiple
of services, or long-term community finances at a scale kinds of infrastructure projects in multiple sectors.
beyond project boundaries (e.g., including long-term
weather prediction in levees protecting communities). B. To what extent does the project exceed the highest
levels of achievement for a given credit?
Address Additional Aspects of Sustainability: 1. Detailed documentation of how the project
exceeds the existing requirements currently within
To qualify for bonus points under this approach, project teams
a given Climate and Resilience credit.
must demonstrate that they are addressing one or more aspects
of sustainability not currently recognized in Envision. Sustainability
performance must be related to Climate and Resilience. C. To what extent does the project address a sustainability
Addressing an aspect of sustainability not currently covered by aspect that is not currently addressed by the Envision system?
the Envision system might sometimes be considered innovative, 1. Detailed documentation of how the project
in which case the requirements for the Innovation path may be addresses a sustainability aspect that is not
followed. For example, a project may earn bonus points for: currently addressed by the Envision system.
2. Documentation showing how this aspect relates
to the Climate and Resilience category.

ENVISION V3 183
Glossary

ACTIVE REMEDIATION by living systems. “Bioavailability” refers to the

Methods that trap and remove contamination difference between the amount of a substance such
from the site. Examples include soil vapor as a drug, herb, or chemical to which a living system
extraction or “pump and treat” methods. is exposed and the actual dose of the substance
the living system receives. Bioavailability accounts
ADAPTATION for the difference between exposure and dose.
The collective set of actions taken to respond to
climate change and variability. These actions include BIODIVERSITY
alterations in behavior and changes in the use of The degree of variation of life forms in an environment
resources and the application of technologies. such as an ecosystem or biome. Biodiversity
is one measure of the health of ecosystems.
AFFECTED COMMUNITY Biological diversity can include species diversity,
Any community that may experience positive ecosystem diversity, and genetic diversity.
or negative effects from the project’s
design, planning, construction, operation, or BIOME
demolition. This may include communities A significant regional or global community produced
beyond the host or benefited communities. or caused by living organisms, such as a grassland
or desert, characterized chiefly by the dominant
AQUIFER forms of plant life and the prevailing climate.
A permeable geological formation, group of
formations, or part of a formation that contains BIORETENTION
sufficient saturated permeable material to yield The process in which contaminants and sedimentation
significant quantities of water to wells and springs. are removed from stormwater runoff. Stormwater
is collected into the treatment area, which consists
ASHRAE of a grass buffer strip, sand bed, ponding area,
A global building technology society. ASHRAE was organic or mulch layer, planting soil, and plants.
formerly called the American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers. BMP
See “best management practice”.
BACKSLIDING
The process by which sustainability performance of BPS
a given system is degraded, resulting from failure See “byproduct synergy”.
to follow the specified operations and maintenance
procedures needed to maintain performance, using BROWNFIELDS
conventional but more familiar procedures instead. Former industrial and commercial sites typically
containing low levels of environmental pollution
BENCHMARK such as hazardous waste or industrial byproducts.
A standard by which something can be measured Brownfield sites have the potential to be reused
or judged. For Envision, instructions for identifying once they are cleaned up, but cleaning the
“benchmarks” are provided in the front of the manual. contamination may pose regulatory and monetary
challenges. Brownfield sites are typically located
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMP) in areas with existing infrastructure and/or
A technique, process, activity, or structure used transportation, which makes them more sustainable
to reduce the pollutant content of a stormwater sites for development than greenfield sites.
discharge. They include simple, nonstructural
methods such as good housekeeping and BUFFER ZONES
preventive maintenance and also may include An area that lies between two or more other areas to
structural modifications such as the installation of segregate them to enhance the protection of areas
bioretention measures. Best management practices under management, typically for the importance
are most effective when used in combination with of their biodiversity. Buffer zones may be around
each other and customized to meet the specific the periphery of an area or may connect two or
needs (drainage, materials, activities, etc.) of a more protected areas. Buffer zones are intended
given operation. Best management practices to mitigate negative environmental or human
also can function as treatment controls. influences in areas of greater ecological value.

BIOAVAILABILITY BYPRODUCT SYNERGY (BPS)

The fraction of a substance existing in the The matching of undervalued waste or byproduct
environment that reaches and can be absorbed streams from one facility with potential uses at

184 ENVISION V3
another facility to create new revenues or savings CONCRETE SUSTAINABILITY COUNCIL (CSC)
with potential social and environmental benefits. The The Concrete Sustainability Council (CSC) is a global
resulting collaborative network creates new revenues, initiative running a responsible sourcing certification
cost savings, energy conservation, reductions in the system for concrete, cement & aggregate. The
need for virgin-source materials, and reductions in CSC system provides insight about to which level
waste and pollution, including potentially climate- a company is operating in an environmentally,
changing emissions. These are quantifiable benefits socially and economically responsible way. The CSC
to the environment, economy, and communities. certification covers raw materials, their source or
origin; the concrete manufacturing process and
CARBON DIOXIDE EQUIVALENT (CO2E) a range of social and environmental matters.
A measure used to compare the emissions
of different greenhouse gases based on Certificate holders demonstrate responsible
their global warming potential. sourcing. The independent certification system
awards concrete at Bronze, Silver, Gold and Platinum
CARBON SEQUESTRATION level. The certificate also applies to aggregates,
The capture of carbon dioxide, including its cement and cementitious materials. The concrete
removal from the atmosphere and deposit in a certificate is a weighted average of the scores in
reservoir. This long-term storage of carbon dioxide the supply chain of the producer and the score
can help mitigate or defer global warming, avoid of the concrete producer himself. The scope of
climate change, and slow the atmospheric and certification are concrete plants, cement plants
marine accumulation of greenhouse gases. and quarries and aggregate quarries. The product
certified is the concrete supplied from a plant.
CHANGING DESIGN VARIABLES
Projects delivered according to design CONFIGURATION TRAP
standards and methodologies that are not in Characteristics built into an infrastructure
alignment with changing environmental or project that create configurations that are
operating conditions or other concerns. highly vulnerable to extreme weather events,
natural disasters, or economic conditions.
CIRCULAR ECONOMY
An alternative to a traditional linear economy COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
(make, use, dispose) in which resources are kept A widely used, well-documented
in use for as long as possible, the maximum value methodology for assessing the net economic
extracted from them whilst in use, and then effects of investments or policies.
recovered and regenerated into new products
and materials at the end of each service life. DARK SKY
The night sky without artificial light pollution.
CLIMATE
The average weather or the statistical description DECONSTRUCTION
in terms of the mean and variability of relevant Selective dismantling of building components,
quantities over a period of time. The relevant typically for reuse, recycling, and waste
quantities are most often surface variables such management. Differs from “demolition”, whereby
as temperature, precipitation, and wind. a site is cleared by the most expedient means,
which creates significant waste and does not
CLIMATE CHANGE recapture the value of building components.
A change in the state of the climate that persists
for an extended period, typically decades or longer. DISASSEMBLY
Climate change may result from natural factors such Dismantling or taking something apart. In this context,
as changes in the sun’s intensity or slow changes in the similar to “deconstruction”, implying the maintenance
earth’s orbit around the sun; natural processes within of subsequent parts for value extraction through reuse
the climate system (e.g., changes in ocean circulation); or recycling. Differs from “deconstruction”, in which
human activities that may have the potential to change building or construction are not designed to be taken
the atmosphere’s composition (e.g., through burning apart. Disassembly is used when the system, building,
fossil fuels); and the land surface (e.g., deforestation, or construction are designed to be taken apart.
reforestation, urbanization, desertification, etc.).
DURABILITY
COMMUNITY The ability to resist wear and decay. Implies a longer
See “host community” and “affected community”. life cycle, reducing the need for replacement with
new goods and waste from worn-out goods.

ENVISION V3 185
 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GREENHOUSE GASES
Efforts that seek to improve the economic Greenhouse gases are chemical compounds in the
wellbeing and quality of life for a community by earth’s atmosphere that absorb and emit radiation,
creating and/or retaining jobs and supporting which causes the greenhouse effect that affects
or growing incomes and the tax base. regulation of the earth’s temperature. Water
vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide
ECOSYSTEM (N2O), methane (CH2), and flourinated gases.
A system that includes all living organisms
(biotic factors) in an area as well as its physical GREENHOUSE EFFECT
environment (abiotic factors) functioning together The earth’s surface absorbs solar radiation and
as a unit. An ecosystem’s abiotic (non-biological) emits infrared radiation. Some of the infrared
constituents include minerals, climate, soil, water, radiation passes through the atmosphere and
sunlight, and all other nonliving elements; its biotic some is absorbed and re-emitted in all directions
constituents consist of all of its living members. by greenhouse gases. This effect helps regulate the
temperature of the earth’s surface and the lower
EMBODIED CARBON atmosphere. Increases in these gases raise the heat
The sum of greenhouse gas emissions for trapped in the earth’s surface and atmosphere.
a material or product that was used in the
production of the material or product, including GREYFIELD
raw material extraction, transport, manufacture, Previously developed land. Distinct from
and all the undertaken processes until the brownfields in that they typically do not require
material or product is completed and ready. remediation to redevelop, but offer value through
existing infrastructure and by minimizing the
ESCP environmental impact on greenfields.
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
HABITAT
FLEXIBILITY An ecological or environmental area that is
Ability of a system to adapt itself to new inhabited by a particular species of animal, plant,
circumstances, enabling easy reconfiguration or other organism. It is the natural environment
and refurbishment, increasing the possibilities in which an organism lives or in which a species
for alternative future uses, and, as a result, population influences and is utilized by.
allowing the system to extend its useful life.
HEAT ISLANDS (HEAT ISLAND EFFECTS)
FLOODPLAIN An area that is significantly warmer than its
Flat or nearly flat land adjacent to a stream or river surrounding rural areas because of materials that
that experiences flooding during periods of high cause heat accumulation and lack of vegetation,
discharge. Floodplains are formed by the natural which cools through evapotranspiration. It
meandering and flooding of streams and rivers and can increase the need for air conditioning and
represent areas likely to experience regular flooding. other forms of cooling that require energy.

GLOBAL WARMING HOST COMMUNITY

Global warming is an average increase in the The community in which the project is located.
temperature of the atmosphere near the earth’s
surface and in the troposphere (i.e., lowest HYDROLOGIC CYCLE
layer of the atmosphere). Global warming can The continuous movement of water on, above, and
occur from a variety of natural causes and below the surface of the earth and throughout
may also be human induced. Global warming various states of liquid, vapor, and solid.
represents one aspect of climate change.
INDUSTRY NORMS
GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL (GWP) Current industry regulatory and/or operational
An index based on the radiative characteristics standards for a particular industrial activity.
of well-mixed greenhouse gases; represents
the combined effect of the differing times these INFRASTRUCTURE
gases remain in the atmosphere and their relative Infrastructure projects deliver the technical and
effectiveness in absorbing outgoing infrared radiation. physical structures (roads, bridges, water supplies
Approximates the time-integrated warming effect and treatment works, dams, and more) required to
of a unit mass of a given greenhouse gas in today’s support the community economy and contribute
atmosphere relative to that of carbon dioxide. to the wellbeing of a community. Typically, they
are expected to last 30–70 years, depending on
GREENFIELD the type of structure and how it is maintained.
Undeveloped land in a city or rural area Infrastructure performance efficiency and
being considered for urban development. effectiveness depend to a large degree on their fit
May contain natural landscape, natural and harmony with other elements of infrastructure
amenities, or agricultural land. and their collective ability to adapt to change.

186 ENVISION V3
INFRASTRUCTURE TRAPS OFFICIAL(S) WITH JURISDICTION
Characteristics built into an infrastructure project The official or officials with authority over the
that may create difficult conditions within the location or system that is affected by the project.
life of the constructed works, such as excess
consumption of money, energy, or increased ONE WATER
vulnerability to changing conditions. The three The recognition that all water has value and is part of
types of infrastructure traps are resource traps, a natural water cycle that continually recirculates.
configuration traps, and standards traps.
PASSIVE REMEDIATION
INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM) Methods and improvements that stimulate or
An effective and environmentally sensitive focus on natural attenuation in the ground
approach to pest management that relies on a
combination of common-sense practices. Integrated PERSISTENCE
pest management programs use comprehensive The measure of resistance to degradation
information on the life cycles of pests and their through chemical, biological, and photolytic
interaction with the environment. This information, processes of pesticides and other pollutants.
combined with available pest control methods,
is used to manage pest damage by the most PEST
economical means and with the least possible Organisms that cause problems in crops or livestock,
hazard to people, property, and the environment. compete with humans for food and fiber, or otherwise
cause economic or other problems for humans. Pests
INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY include insects, nematodes, mites, plant pathogens,
A project delivery approach that integrates people, vertebrate pests, and weeds. Their distribution
systems, business structures, and practices to and economic effects depend on a wide range of
collaboratively harnesses the talents of all participants factors that include changes in farming patterns
early in a project’s conceptualization and design and agroclimatic and ecological conditions.
to optimize results and maximize efficiency.
PEST MANAGEMENT
KARST TOPOGRAPHY Aims to manipulate pests and their environment in
A geologic formation such as limestone or dolomite such a way as to maintain populations below levels
that is shaped by the dissolution of layers of bedrock. that cause economic crop losses, thereby protecting
Karst regions often display distinctive surface features crops from pest damage and/or destruction.
such as sinkholes or caves, and may have limited
surface water because of subterranean drainage. PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT (PDCA)
“Management by fact” or scientific method approach
KEY STAKEHOLDERS to continuous improvement. Plan-do-check-act
Those people who are directly influential to, or will creates a process-centered environment involving the
be directly influenced by, the outcome of the project study of the current process, collection, and analysis
and whose input must be taken into account if the of data to identify causes of problems, planning
process is to be considered complete and transparent. for improvement, and decisions regarding how to
measure improvement (“plan”). The plan is then
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) implemented on a small scale if possible (“do”). The
A technique to assess environmental impacts next step is to determine what happened (“check”).
associated with all stages of a product’s life, from raw If the experiment was successful, the plan is fully
material extraction through disposal or recycling. implemented (“act”). The cycle is then repeated
using what was learned from the preceding cycle.
LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS (LCCA)
One of several evaluation techniques commonly PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS
used to compare and evaluate the financial feasibility Individuals or groups directly impacted by
of various design alternatives over an assumed the project, such as the communities crossed
service life-cycle including primarily initial capital and served by a new road. This should include
costs and operations and maintenance costs. stakeholders who could be impacted or
affected by the project during its life-cycle.
LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID)
A method for managing Stormwater runoff PRIME FARMLAND
emphasizing conservation and the use of onsite Land that has the best combination of physical and
natural features to protect water quality. Low- chemical characteristics for producing food, feed,
impact development uses small-scale controls to forage, fiber, and oilseed crops and that is available for
replicate the pre-development hydrologic regime these uses. In the United States, the U.S. Department
of watersheds through infiltrating, filtering, storing, of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation
evaporating, and detaining runoff close to its source. Service determines prime farmland. In Canada, it is
classified by the Canadian Land Inventory (CLI).
MITIGATION HIERARCHY
A structure that guides users in prioritizing PRIME HABITAT
and limiting as far as possible the negative The most ideal habitats for protecting wildlife
impacts from development projects. biodiversity caused by their size, location, diversity

ENVISION V3 187
 of habitat types, or presence of a particular SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND
type of habitat for plant or animal species. COUNTER-MEASURE (SPCC)
Includes requirements for oil-spill prevention,
PROJECT TEAM preparedness, and response to prevent oil discharges
Major decision makers involved in the project, to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines.
as well as those who act as primary advisors,
consultants, or specialists on behalf of decision SOLAR REFLECTANCE INDEX (SRI)
makers. This will almost always include the project A measure of a material’s ability to reject solar
owner, those who act as lead designers (engineers, heat, as shown by a small temperature rise,
architects, landscape architects, etc.), and those which incorporates both solar reflectance and
who manage and execute the project through emittance in a single value. Solar reflectance index
construction, but ideally would also include those is defined such that standard black (reflectance
responsible for funding, operating, regulating, 0.05, emittance 0.90) is “0” and standard white
subconsulting, or otherwise utilizing the project (e.g., (reflectance 0.80, emittance 0.90) is “100”.
community groups). Those with the responsibility
and authority to implement sustainability efforts STAKEHOLDER
should coordinate to ensure their effectiveness. A person, group, or organization that has a direct
Envision users should take time to review the or indirect stake in an organization because it can
organizational hierarchy of the project in order to affect or be affected by the organization’s actions,
identify at which levels key decisions regarding project objectives, and/or policies. Key stakeholders in
sustainability are being made. This will constitute an infrastructure project may include the project
the starting point of defining the project team. owners, public works officials, the project design
team, federal and local regulators, elected
PUBLIC SPACE representatives, community groups, and members
A social space such as a commons, town square, or of the community directly affected by the project.
public park that is open and accessible to the public.
STEEP SLOPES
RAINWATER HARVESTING In general, land with a slope angle of 20% or greater.
Accumulating and storing rainwater for reuse
before it reaches the aquifer. This stormwater STORMWATER
can be used for irrigation, flushing toilets, and Water that originates during precipitation
other uses depending on the level of treatment. events. Stormwater that does not soak into
Rain collected directly from rooftops is referred the ground becomes surface runoff.
to as “rainwater harvesting”; water collected from
the ground is called ”stormwater harvesting”. SURFACE WATER
Water collecting on the ground or in a stream, river,
RENEWABLE ENERGY lake, wetland, or ocean that is naturally replenished
Energy that comes from natural resources such as by precipitation and lost through evaporation
sunlight, wind, rain, tides, and geothermal heat; and subsurface seepage into the ground.
these sources can be naturally replenished over
short periods of time and do not diminish. SUSTAINABILITY
A set of environmental, economic, and social
RESILIENCY conditions in which all of society has the capacity and
The ability to successfully adapt to and/or opportunity to maintain and improve its quality of life
recover readily from a significant disruption. indefinitely without degrading the quantity, quality,
or availability of natural resources and ecosystems.
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY (RISK)
Characteristics built into an infrastructure project SUSTAINABILITY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
that increase community dependence on resources An economic assessment methodology based on
that could become scarce and expensive. cost-benefit analysis used to quantify and measure
the broader financial, social, and environmental
SECONDARY STAKEHOLDERS benefits of the project. This may also be known
Individuals or groups indirectly affected by the as a triple bottom line costs benefit analysis (TBL-
project, such as; national and local government, CBA) or sustainable return on investment (SROI).
public utilities, licensing and inspecting organizations
that are not directly involved in the project. SUSTAINABILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
A plan or system for managing an organization’s
SOCIAL CAPITAL environmental, social, and economic issues,
Structures, institutions, networks, and relationships priorities, and programs in a comprehensive
that enable individuals to maintain and develop and systematic manner. It serves as a tool for
human capital; includes families, communities, managing and improving sustainable performance.
businesses, educational and voluntary It is also the means by which an organization can
organizations, and legal and political systems. address the impacts of its products, processes,
and services on the environment and on society.

188 ENVISION V3
STORMWATER POLLUTION EPA
PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
A plan for storm water discharge that includes
erosion prevention measures and sediment VEGETATION AND SOIL PROTECTION ZONE (VSPZ)
controls that will decrease soil erosion and The ground area that must be protected and
decrease off site nonpoint pollution. incorporated into the overall landscaping of
a site being subdivided or developed.
TOXICITY
The degree to which a substance can WASTE STREAMS (SIGNIFICANT WASTE STREAMS)
damage living organisms. The flow of varied types of waste from the point
of generation to final disposal (i.e., landfill).
TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE Can be used to describe waste materials that
The concept that business, traditionally concerned are either of a particular type (e.g., paper
with the financial (economic) bottom line, should waste stream) or produced from a particular
also be concerned with other performance source (e.g., construction waste stream).
metrics, such as environmental and social. The
economic- environmental-social concept is often WAYFINDING
referred to as the “three pillars of sustainability”. Means of orienting oneself in the physical environment
and navigating from place to place using signs,
UNIQUE FARMLAND maps, and other graphic or audible methods.
Land other than prime farmland that is used for
production of specific high-value food and fiber WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA
crops. It has the special combination of soil quality, According to the U.S. Environmental Protection
location, growing season, and moisture supply Agency, the surface or subsurface area surrounding
needed to economically produce sustained high a water well or wellfield supplying a public water
quality or high yields of specific crops when treated system through which contaminants are reasonably
and managed according to acceptable farming likely to move toward and reach such the well or
methods. Examples of such crops include citrus, tree wellfield; a groundwater recharge area for a well.
nuts, olives, cranberries, fruits, and vegetables.
WETLAND
UPCYCLING An area of land where the soil is saturated with
The process of converting waste materials or water, either permanently or seasonally. Wetlands
unused products into new materials or products of are typically categorized by characteristic vegetation
better quality or a higher environmental value. and provide a unique ecosystem for flora and fauna
that may not be found in other ecosystems.

ENVISION V3 189
 Institute for
Sustainable
Infrastructure

Washington, DC 20005
www.sustainableinfrastructure.org