Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Barroso Abstract

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Simulation and Experimental Validation of the Core

Temperature Distribution of a Three-Phase


Transformer
R. Barroso 1

1 Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

Abstract
Introduction
This paper presents an application of COMSOL Multiphysics® software in the study of the
temperature distribution of a 5kVA three-phase air-cooled transformer. The 3D model utilized on
the simulations in shown on Figure 1.

The service life of the materials that are used to build a transformer depend heavily on their
operating temperature, so prior information about the location hot spots are useful from the design
stage to the prevention of failures.

Use of COMSOL Multiphysics


The transformer is considered in thermal equilibrium with the surrounding media. A stationary
study was used.

The core and the windings are considered heat sources with constant power density. The value
of the power densities were derived from the equivalent circuit model obtained in short-circuit
and open-circuit tests. In reality the thermal source power density varies with the current density
distribution on the windings and the magnetic flux density on the core, but the comparatively high
thermal conductivity of the metallic materials permits a good approximation by considering the
power density constant.

For modeling the interface with the air, two possible approaches are viable. One can model the
transformer and the surrounding air, then use one of the Conjugate Heat Transfer physics
interfaces to solve for the temperature distribution of the transformer and surrounding air, as well
for the velocity distribution of the air. Otherwise, one can model only the solid structure of the
device and model the interface to the surrounding air and use an analytical expression to account
for the heat flux leaving the transformer using the Heat Transfer in Solids physics interface. A
theoretical analysis of the fluid flow problem revealed that most of the boundary layer is
turbulent. The second option is simpler and provided good results with a remarkable short amount
of processing time.

Results
Figure 2 shows the resultant temperature distribution in the core of the transformer, as obtained
with the mentioned methods. To validate the model, the simulation results are compared to
practical measurements. As shown in [1], five sensors were inserted into the core, then the device
was kept supplying power to three 830W monophasic resistive charges for twelve hours until
complete thermal stabilization. A mean temperature of 37.0C was measured in the interior of the
core, while the simulation assign a mean temperature of 34.7C. The simulation time is less than a
minute.

Conclusion
The results agreed with the experimental results with a margin of 2.3C in a short amount
simulation time.
The presented method needs the equivalent circuit data to determine the thermal power of the
sources of heat, but a coupled problem with an electromagnetic simulation to determine Joule
and core losses could allow the analyst to find a transformer`s characteristics in the design
stage.
Given the fact that the time constants associated with the heat flow are greater than the simulation
time, real-time control strategies could be implemented in the future.

Reference
[1] Saraiva, Nicholas V., Desenvolvimento de um Sistema de Monitoramento Térmico Aplicado a
Transformadores a Seco. 2013. Trabalho de conclusão de curso de graduação - Universidade
Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará.

Figures used in the abstract

Figure 1: Transformer model.


Figure 2: 3D Temperature distribution at the core.

Figure 3: Temperature distribution at center of the core.

You might also like