Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 16 views

    Cover-Appellants Brief-Sps Navarro

    Uploaded by

    Isse Nvrro
    Sps. Rolindo A. Navarro and Elvie P. Navarro (Petitioners-Appellants) filed an appeal with the Court of Appeals against the decision of the Regional Trial Court in favor of respondents Necitas Cayasan and Danilo Dinglasa. The brief for the appellants provides a prefatory statement, statement of the case, statement of facts, assignment of errors or issues, discussion and arguments citing several legal authorities, and a prayer for relief. The brief is in support of the petitioners-appellants' position in the land dispute case currently before the Court of Appeals.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Cover-Appellants Brief-Sps Navarro

    Uploaded by

    Isse Nvrro
    16 views3 pages
    Sps. Rolindo A. Navarro and Elvie P. Navarro (Petitioners-Appellants) filed an appeal with the Court of Appeals against the decision of the Regional Trial Court in favor of respondents Necitas Cayasan and Danilo Dinglasa. The brief for the appellants provides a prefatory statement, statement of the case, statement of facts, assignment of errors or issues, discussion and arguments citing several legal authorities, and a prayer for relief. The brief is in support of the petitioners-appellants' position in the land dispute case currently before the Court of Appeals.

    Original Title

    cover-appellants brief-sps navarro

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Sps. Rolindo A. Navarro and Elvie P. Navarro (Petitioners-Appellants) filed an appeal with the Court of Appeals against the decision of the Regional Trial Court in favor of respondents Necitas Cayasan and Danilo Dinglasa. The brief for the appellants provides a prefatory statement, statement of the case, statement of facts, assignment of errors or issues, discussion and arguments citing several legal authorities, and a prayer for relief. The brief is in support of the petitioners-appellants' position in the land dispute case currently before the Court of Appeals.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    16 views3 pages

    Cover-Appellants Brief-Sps Navarro

    Uploaded by

    Isse Nvrro
    Sps. Rolindo A. Navarro and Elvie P. Navarro (Petitioners-Appellants) filed an appeal with the Court of Appeals against the decision of the Regional Trial Court in favor of respondents Necitas Cayasan and Danilo Dinglasa. The brief for the appellants provides a prefatory statement, statement of the case, statement of facts, assignment of errors or issues, discussion and arguments citing several legal authorities, and a prayer for relief. The brief is in support of the petitioners-appellants' position in the land dispute case currently before the Court of Appeals.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

    COURT OF APPEALS
    Cebu City

    C.A.-G.R. CV No. 08617


    [RTC, Branch 62, Oslob, Cebu,
    Civil Case No. OS-15-223]

    SPS. ROLINDO A. NAVARRO and ELVIE P. NAVARRO,


    Petitioners-Appellants,

    -versus-

    NECITAS CAYASAN and DANILO DINGLASA,


    Respondents-Appellees.

    BRIEF FOR THE APPELLANTS

    ROLINDO A. NAVARRO
    NAVARRO & ASSOCIATES
    Counsel for Petitioners-Appellants
    Suite 507, Cebu Holdings Center
    Cardinal Rosales Avenue
    Cebu Business Park, Cebu City
    SUBJECT INDEX

    Prefatory Statement 1

    Statement of the Case 1

    Statement of Facts 2

    Assignment of Errors – Issues 5

    Discussion and Arguments 6

    PRAYER 13

    AUTHORITIES CITED

     Sps. Victor and Milagros Perez, et al. v. Antonio Hermano, GR No.


    147417, July 8, 2005.
     DPB v. Hon. Emmanuel C. Carpio, et al. v. GR No. 195450, February
    1, 2017.
     Swedish Match, AB, et al. v. Court of Appeals, et al., GR No. 128120,
    October 20, 2004.
     Severo Sales, et al. v. Court of Appeals, et al., GR No. L-40145, July
    29, 1992.
     Philippine Savings Bank v. Chowking Food Corporation, citing
    Caltex v. CA (1992), GR No. 177526, July 3, 2008.
     IRENE TAC-AN-DANO, et al. v. THE COURT OF APPEALS and
    ALFONSO G. TAC-AN, G.R. No. L-62251 July 29, 1985.
     MARCELINO TAN, et al. v. JOSE RENATO LIM, et al. G.R. No.
    128004, September 29, 1998.
     Philippine Nationai Bank v. Cast alloy Technology Corporation, 684
    Phil 438, 445 (2012) [Per J. Reyes, Second Divi5ion] citing Los
    Banos Rural Bank, Inc. v. Aj!·ica, 433 Phil. 930, 935 (2002) [Per J.
    Panganiban, Third Division]. See also Power Sites and Signs, Inc. v.
    United Neon, 620 Phil. 205, 217 (2009) [Per J. Del Castillo, Second
    Division].
     Bacolod City Water District v. The Hon. Emma C. Labayen, GR No.
    157494, December 10, 2004.
     BP Philippines, Inc. v. Clark Trading Corporation, GR No. 175284,
    September 19, 2012.
     BPI v. Hon. Judge Agapito L. Hontanosas, GR No. 157163, June 25,
    2014.
     Lim v. BPI Agricultural Development Bank, 628 Phil. 601, 607
    (2010).
     New Civil Code of the Philippines
     DENR ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2003-30
     Presidential Decree No. 1586

    You might also like