Chapter 8 (Strategic Management)
Chapter 8 (Strategic Management)
Chapter 8 (Strategic Management)
✓ Fifty years ago, national markets were isolated due to significant trade and
investment barriers.
✓ Managers focused on analyzing only their company's domestic markets.
✓ Few global competitors entered national markets, and foreign market entry
was expensive.
✓ Today, barriers to international trade and investment have decreased, leading
to the creation of huge global markets.
✓ Companies from different nations are now entering each other's home
markets, intensifying competition.
✓ Rivalry cannot be understood solely within national boundaries; managers
must consider the impact of globalization on their company's competitive
environment.
✓ Strategies must be adapted to exploit opportunities and counter competitive
threats in this new global landscape.
✓ The section will explore changes brought about by falling trade barriers and
present a model for analyzing the competitive situation in different nations.
• The Globalization of Production and Markets
✓ Globalization of Production and Markets refers to the integration and
interconnectedness of production processes and markets on a global scale.
✓ Companies now source materials, components, and labor from various
countries to optimize cost and efficiency.
✓ Global supply chains have become common, where different stages of
production occur in multiple countries.
✓ Advancements in transportation and communication technologies have
facilitated this global integration.
✓ Companies can now reach a broader customer base across borders through
e-commerce and online platforms.
✓ Globalization has led to increased competition as companies from different
countries enter each other's markets.
✓ Multinational corporations have expanded their operations globally to tap
into new markets and resources.
✓ Globalization has led to the rise of emerging markets, such as China and India,
as significant players in the global economy.
✓ However, globalization has also sparked concerns about job displacement and
income inequality in some countries.
✓ Governments and policymakers must adapt to the challenges and
opportunities posed by the globalization of production and markets.
✓ The trend toward the globalization of production and markets has several
important implications for competition within an industry:
o First, industry boundaries do not stop at national borders. Because,
- Many industries are now global in scope.
-Competitors and potential future competitors exist in various national
markets.
-Analysing only the home market may lead to unpreparedness for efficient
foreign competitors.
-Companies' home markets are under attack from foreign competitors due
to globalization.
o Second, the shift from national to global markets has intensified
competitive rivalry in many industries.
o Globalization increases the threat of entry and rivalry in protected
national markets.
3.transnational strategy
-A business model that simultaneously achieves low costs, differentiates the
product offering across geographic markets, and fosters a flow of skills
between different subsidiaries in the company’s global network of operations.
-What happens, however, when the company simultaneously faces both
strong cost pressures and strong pressures for local responsiveness? How can
managers balance out such competing and inconsistent demands?
✓ According to some re searchers, pursuing what has been called a
transnational strategy is the answer.
✓ Transnational strategy aims to respond to both cost reductions and local
responsiveness in a global environment.
✓ Companies seek to achieve location economies, economies of scale, and
transfer skills within the global network of operations.
✓ Flow of skills and product offerings should not be one-way but should occur
between home country and foreign subsidiaries and between foreign
subsidiaries.
✓ Implementing a transnational strategy is challenging due to conflicting
demands of cost reduction and product differentiation.
✓ Few companies have perfected this strategy, but some examples like
Caterpillar demonstrate successful implementation.
✓ Caterpillar redesigned products with identical components and invested in
large-scale component-manufacturing facilities for scale economies while
having assembly plants in major global markets for local product features.
✓ Building an organization capable of supporting a transnational strategy is
complex and challenging due to organizational structure and control system
issues.
4. International Strategy
✓ International strategy is suitable for multinational companies facing low
cost pressures and low pressures for local responsiveness.
✓ Companies selling products that serve universal needs without significant
competition may adopt this approach.
✓ Xerox found itself in this position in the 1960s after its invention and
commercialization of the photocopier.
✓ Xerox did not face competitors—it had a monopoly.
- Because the product was highly valued in most developed nations,
- Xerox was able to sell the same basic product all over the world and
charge a relatively high price for it.
✓ At the same time, because it did not face direct competitors, the company
did not have to deal with strong pressures to minimize its costs.
✓ Companies following this strategy tend to centralize product development
(e.g., R&D) at home and establish manufacturing and marketing functions
in major countries or regions.
✓ Limited local customization of product offering and marketing occurs in
international companies; head office retains control over marketing and
product strategy.
✓ Examples of companies pursuing this strategy include P&G and Microsoft,
with significant product development in their home locations and some
localization for foreign markets.
3. Alliance Structure
✓ Having selected a partner, the alliance should be structured so that the
company’s risk of giving too much away to the partner is reduced to an
acceptable level.
✓ First, alliances can be designed to make it difficult (if not impossible) to
transfer 26technology not meant to be transferred.
✓ Second, contractual safeguards can be written into an alliance agreement to
guard against the risk of opportunism by a partner.
✓ Third, both parties in an alliance can agree in advance to exchange skills and
technologies that the other covets, thereby ensuring a chance for equitable
gain.
✓ Fourth, the risk of opportunism by an alliance partner can be reduced if the
firm extracts a significant credible commitment from its partner in advance.