Lecture 9 - Cognitive Radio Networks
Lecture 9 - Cognitive Radio Networks
Lecture 9 - Cognitive Radio Networks
I. Introduction
3
Exponential Growth in Number of
Wireless Applications Over 5G Networks
Increasing Demand For Spectrum
Use
More and more people
subscribe to one or many
of the wireless services
Most of the
spectrum is
unused
Evidence of
overcrowding
54 MHz to 88 MHz (TV broadcasting), 24 hour period starting during Sep. 01 to Sep. 09 2009
Examples of the Spectrum Opportunities
Most of the
spectrum is
unused
Evidence of
overcrowding
2390 MHz to 2500 MHz (mobile satellite), 24 hour period starting during Sep. 01 to Sep. 09 2009
Example of the Spectrum Opportunities
Solutions?
15
Why So Many
Definitions Definitions?
FCC:
“A radio that can change its transmitter parameters based on
interaction with the environment in which it operates.”
ITU (Wp8A):
“A radio or system that senses and is aware of its operational
environment and can dynamically and autonomously adjust its
radio operating parameters accordingly.”
IEEE USA
“A radio frequency transmitter/receiver that is designed to
intelligently detect whether a particular segment of the radio
spectrum is currently in use, and to jump into (and out of, as
necessary) the temporarily-unused spectrum very rapidly,
without interfering with the transmissions of other authorized
users.”
Our cognitive radio definition
• Cognitive radio is an intelligent wireless communication
system that is aware of its surrounding environment and
uses methodology of understand-by-building to learn from
environment and adapt its internal states to statistical
variations by making corresponding changes in
its operating parameters.
18
19
Underlay
Cognitive radios constrained to cause minimal interference
to PUs
Interweave
Cognitive radios find and exploit spectral holes to avoid Knowledge
and
interfering with PUs Complexity
Spectrum Sharing Modes (1)
Type 1: Overlay
SUs may use a part of their energy to assist communications of
PUs through cooperative communication techniques and the rest
of energy to transmit their own signals.
Interference from SUs' signals can be compensated with gain for
PUs' signal quality through cooperation of SUs.
It requires SUs to know PUs' packets before PUs begin their
transmissions
SU
R2
SU
R1
PU PU
S D
Spectrum Sharing Modes (2)
Type 2: Underlay
SUs transmit signals in such a low-power level that interference
caused by SUs is below noise floor of the spectrum.
In the view point of PUs, transmissions by SUs are nothing but
noise with low-level power.
SUs and PUs can co-exist in same spectrum
If PUs’ topology and transmission power do not change
• No need to sense the channel
• Do not cause packet collision for PUs for both synchronous and
asynchronous cognitive networks
Spectrum Sharing Modes (3)
Type 3: Interweave
Listen first and talk later
Exclusive utilization
SUs frequently sense channel
SUs do not need to worry about interference temperature constraint
of PUs
• Relax power constraints imposed onto SUs as compared with
underlay spectrum sharing mode.
No interference to PUs in synchronous CRNs
Inevitable interference to PUs in asynchronous CRNs due to half-
duplex nature of wireless radios