Socioecological Model Journal
Socioecological Model Journal
Socioecological Model Journal
Original Paper
Andrew Thomas Reyes1*, PhD; Reimund Serafica1*, MSN, PhD; Jennifer Kawi1*, MSN, PhD; Miguel Fudolig2*, PhD;
Francisco Sy2*, MD, DrPH; Erwin William A Leyva3*, PhD; Lorraine S Evangelista1*, PhD
1
School of Nursing, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States
2
School of Public Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States
3
College of Nursing, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
*
all authors contributed equally
Corresponding Author:
Andrew Thomas Reyes, PhD
School of Nursing
University of Nevada Las Vegas
4505 S Maryland Parkway Box 453018
Las Vegas, NV, 89154-3018
United States
Phone: 1 702 895 5094
Email: andrewthomas.reyes@unlv.edu
Abstract
Background: The Philippines’ primary care is delivered via local health centers called barangay health centers (BHCs). Barangays
are the most local government units in the Philippines. Designed to promote and prevent disease via basic health care, these BHCs
are staffed mainly by barangay health workers (BHWs). However, there has been limited research on the social and environmental
factors affecting underserved communities’ access to health care in underserved areas of the Philippines. Given the importance
of BHCs in disease prevention and health promotion, it is necessary to identify obstacles to providing their services and initiatives.
Objective: This study aimed to explore multilevel barriers to accessing and providing basic health care in BHCs.
Methods: We used a qualitative approach and the socioecological model as a framework to investigate the multilevel barriers
affecting basic health care provision. A total of 18 BHWs from 6 BHCs nationwide participated in focus group interviews.
Traditional thematic content analysis was used to analyze the focus group data. After that, we conducted individual semistructured
interviews with 4 public health nurses who supervised the BHWs to confirm findings from focus groups as a data source
triangulation. The final stage of thematic analysis was conducted using the socioecological model as the framework.
Results: Findings revealed various barriers at the individual (lack of staff motivation and misperceptions of health care needs),
interpersonal (lack of training, unprofessional behaviors, and lack of communication), institutional (lack of human resources for
health, lack of accountability of staff, unrealistic expectations, and lack of physical space or supplies), community (lack of
community support, lack of availability of appropriate resources, and belief in traditional healers), and policy (lack of uniformity
in policies and resources and lack of a functional infrastructure) levels.
Conclusions: Examining individual-, interpersonal-, institutional-, community-, and policy-level determinants that affect BHCs
can inform community-based health promotion interventions for the country’s underserved communities. Given the multidimensional
barriers identified, a comprehensive program must be developed and implemented in collaboration with health care providers,
community leaders, local and regional health care department representatives, and policy makers.
KEYWORDS
health care delivery; health care access; socioecological model; Philippines; community; barriers; health care; Asian and Pacific
Islander; focus group; Tagalog; thematic analysis; socioecological framework
and perspectives of BHWs in delivering basic health care at individual interviews had the same goals but focused on the
their BHCs and the obstacles they faced in providing health public health nurses’ perspectives of the BHWs’ attitudes and
care and using community resources for community members. work conditions and the community’s response to the BHWs’
The focus groups also explored how different levels of roles in the BHCs they served.
government-provided health care to the population. The
Textbox 1. The semistructured interview guide.
Sample questions for focus groups and individual interviews
• In your opinion, what was the situation of basic health care in your community, or how accessible was basic health care in your community?
Please explain.
• In your observation or experiences, how were you or people in your community using basic health care before the pandemic?
• Please share your experiences or efforts in delivering basic health care in your community. (Only ask health workers, female community health
volunteers, and local elected authorities.)
• In your observation or experiences, how are the different levels of governments responding to providing health care to community people?
• Please feel free to share if you have any suggestions or anything you would like to say or think you missed during our conversation.
a
BHW: barangay health worker.
Interpersonal-Level Factors
Individual-Level Factors
Participants frequently brought up interpersonal concerns such
Participants shared several individual-level factors that they
as a lack of training, unprofessional behavior among peers, and
deemed were barriers to providing basic health care at the BHCs.
poor communication. BHWs, for instance, have reported feeling
These individual characteristics were BHW’s self-motivation
unprepared for their roles because of a lack of formal training.
and community members’ misperceptions of their health care
The nurses confirmed this BHW’s concern that they could not
needs. In addition, individual-level characteristics reported by
support the BHWs as much as possible because of their scope
participants were influenced by determinants at all other
of responsibilities of managing more than one BHC. During the
socioecological model levels, particularly those linked to
confirmatory interviews, nurses also expressed their need to
interpersonal and institutional factors.
provide closer supervision of the BHWs to help the BHWs
develop more confidence in performing basic health care
services. Other BHWs reported the opposite, citing informal
training with more seasoned peers (BHWs) in their BHCs as selection of services and items they could avail themselves of
the source of a better understanding of their roles and a renewed during their visit to the BHC. Free access to essential medical
sense of motivation to perform at their best within the limits of items such as medication, contraception, and water was only
their job. However, BHWs voiced concerns that not all nurses offered at a select number of BHCs.
(considered as their supervisors) could be contacted for advice
when necessary. As a result, the nurses’ lack of access to
Community-Level Factors
supervise and mentor the BHWs contributed to the BHWs’ At the community level, thematic clusters emerged with
ongoing frustration and decreased job satisfaction. Lastly, the environmental elements such as the lack of community support,
BHWs rarely had someone check in on their progress because usually demonstrated by informal networks like community
the nurses were often unavailable to supervise them and oversee leaders influencing basic health care delivery. For example,
their performance at the clinics. During the confirmatory some BHCs benefited from donations from wealthier community
individual interviews with the nurses, it was evident that there members, but this was uncommon. Another environmental
were differences in perceived priorities between the nurses and consideration was the availability of community resources.
the BHWs. For example, BHWs prioritized improving their Furthermore, despite efforts to encourage community members
ability to provide basic health care services. At the same time, to seek basic treatment at BHCs, affluent members would go
the nurses wanted to expand the BHWs’ scope of responsibilities to city or provincial hospitals related to the lack of appropriate
so they could function even without the presence of the nurses health resources available at the BHC level. On the other hand,
in the clinics. Nurses often found resistance from BHWs in their the poorer members sought treatment from traditional healers
attempts to expand BHW’s scope of practice; this perceived such as an herbalist or quack doctors.
resistance often resulted in more distant communication between
Policy-Level Factors
the BHWs and the nurses. Therefore, this poor (often
nonexistent) communication was detrimental to their functions Policy topics that emerged were a lack of uniformity in policies
as primary health care providers. governing the provision of essential health care by individual
local government bodies. Different towns have varied
Institutional-Level Factors requirements for providing citizens with basic medical care.
Participants said that a BHC’s ability to provide basic health Another theme evident among the participants’ interviews was
care primarily depends on the availability of health workers and the lack of functional health infrastructure. The health care
the quality of care delivered by staff. Despite this, there was a resources made accessible by each jurisdiction influence the
lack of accountability among BHWs such as only a handful of accessibility of basic health care services (such as personnel,
dedicated BHWs working at the BHCs, with some employees supplies or equipment, and medications). Consequently, there
regularly missing work and others complaining about how much was an inadequate understanding of the benefits and expected
they had to do and how little help they got. In addition, basic health care coverage offered by the public and private health
health care was difficult to deliver for various reasons, such as care sectors.
conflicting and unrealistic expectations from community leaders
and members, supervisors, and local government entities. For Discussion
example, BHCs were promised by community leaders (eg, city
mayors and barangay leaders) more funding, but BHWs Principal Findings
continued to wait for these plans to be realized; therefore, basic The provision of primary health care in low- and middle-income
medical supplies were limited, resulting in challenges with countries has been the subject of prior research that used the
delivering basic health care services. In another example, nurses socioecological model [21-24]. However, no study has examined
and BHWs were expected to deliver more community outreach the perspectives of BHWs and public health nurses who work
programs by local government entities; however, they expressed in BHCs to provide basic health care in underserved regions in
frustration with the incongruence between the lack of public the Philippines using the socioecological model as a framework
funding and the increasing expectation to deliver more outreach [12]. Our research indicates that basic health care provision in
programs. BHWs voiced that they largely depended on BHCs across the Philippines is influenced by factors at all levels
volunteers from private organizations for their outreach of the socioecological model. The premise of the socioecological
programs, and they also articulated that the support they received model is that health policy decisions and practices affect not
from these private volunteers was inconsistent and infrequent. only individuals but also the social networks in which they
participate and the institutions and communities in which they
During the group sessions, accessibility to the BHCs (ie, the
reside [25].
physical distance between the center and the people it serves)
and transportation costs determined whether community There are several similarities between this study’s findings and
members would come for basic health care. It was also other studies on primary health care services provided by CHWs
emphasized that the infrastructure and resources varied from in low- and middle-income countries. Findings from our study
center to center. Patients frequently had to wait outside the that are consistent with previous research include the influence
center in the heat and occasionally rainy weather due to a lack of the lack of physical space and adequate ventilation on the
of physical space within the BHCs. Individuals were less quality of health care services provided by the CHWs [26], the
inclined to seek preventative treatment at the BHCs because of impact of the quality of the partnership between the local health
the absence of functioning fans and air conditioning. When the system and the CHWs on the community perceptions of the
patients obtained the help they needed, there was a limited quality of services provided by the health centers [27], the
https://apinj.jmir.org/2023/1/e45669 Asian Pac Isl Nurs J 2023 | vol. 7 | e45669 | p. 6
(page number not for citation purposes)
XSL• FO
RenderX
ASIAN/PACIFIC ISLAND NURSING JOURNAL Reyes et al
relationship between the community’s pervasive traditional Our research reveals that poor working conditions and limited
beliefs of non-Western medical care and the lack of trust of resources significantly hinder providing high-quality basic health
CHWs [9,28], lack of consistent funding from local health care in underserved areas. These findings are consistent with
systems [29,30], variability of basic and supplementary training earlier research examining health care delivery in underserved
of CHWs among health centers [8], and inconsistent and areas in the country [1,5,9,11,25]. Given the magnitude of the
infrequent funding from private and nongovernmental problems afflicting the health care system in the Philippines,
organizations [8]. an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral approach is required to
improve the quality of health care provided in BHCs by
However, the area in which our findings are distinct from
enhancing their staffing, clinical resources, and access to
previous studies on primary health care services provided by
life-saving drugs [33,34]. The vital role of BHWs within the
CHWs in low- and middle-income countries is the interactional
larger health system should be reflected in resource allocation
processes between the BHWs and the public health nurses who
as the Philippines and other contexts make strides toward
oversee the work of the BHWs. Although previous studies
universal health coverage.
highlighted the importance of a collaborative working
relationship between CHWs and higher-level health workers The absence of supervision and proper training for BHWs
[15,31-33], these studies did not specifically explore the prevented them from playing their full role in providing primary
supervisory role of public health nurses in the work of the care to their communities. BHWs are employed and trained by
CHWs. Our findings specifically demonstrate that the local government units to support various health programs.
collaboration between the public health nurses and the BHWs Unfortunately, not all BHWs get the training they need. Some
is crucial in providing health care services to the BHWs. BHWs claim that they were not provided with a formal training
Because the scope of responsibilities of BHWs is mostly based program and were educated by experienced BHWs on how to
on nursing functions, supervision, training, and mentoring of perform their duties; if the training was provided at all, its scope,
BHWs by public health nurses are imperative. Nursing depth, and duration varied across different local communities.
perspectives in the partnership between public health nurses Given the disparity in training, BHWs may have difficulty
and BHWs are incumbently necessary. The lack of confidence understanding and consistently carrying out their tasks.
and competence of BHWs in performing their assigned nursing Moreover, lack of adequate training may lead to the
tasks in the clinics was attributed to the lack of formal training, communities’ lack of trust and hesitancy to seek care from
supervision, and mentoring by their nursing supervisors (ie, the BHWs, as revealed in our findings. Our results are consistent
public health nurses). with other studies performed in the Philippines [1,9] and
elsewhere [35] on BHW initiatives in low- and middle-income
Additionally, our study’s findings show that community
countries. For this reason, the Philippine Department of Health
members were not maximizing the use of the services offered
must attempt to standardize the training of BHWs throughout
by the clinics because the services provided by the BHWs were
the country. The effectiveness of BHC programs and safe,
limited. The limited scope of practice of BHWs was mainly
quality health care in the communities depend on BHWs
related to the lack of availability and limited accessibility of
receiving high-quality initial and continuous training.
public health nurses to train, supervise, and monitor the progress
of their performance. The BHWs required the supervision of In addition to standardizing the initial and ongoing training of
the public health nurses to carry out their nursing tasks to expand BHWs, another widely discussed option in the country is to
their scope of responsibilities and be able to perform nursing accredit BHW programs that can significantly improve the
functions more independently, especially when the nurses are usefulness of BHC programs, both for their communities and
not able to promptly respond to the needs of the clinics (eg, the BHWs. The Philippines’ BHW Act (1995) demanded BHW
public health nurses were responsible for overseeing several accreditation as a viable tool to increase BHWs’ morale, job
clinics or health centers). Our findings provide the basis for security, career chances, legitimacy, and social standing [8].
developing nursing-specific standards and policies in monitoring Accreditation for BHW programs has been shown to protect
the progress of BHWs’ performance and expanding their scope them from acquiescing to the agenda of local political leaders,
of responsibilities to perform more independent functions and ensuring their continued existence [8]. Furthermore,
respond to rapidly changing and complex clinical situations. accreditation can increase reliability in executing BHW
Our findings also demonstrate the need to integrate nursing programs in various settings by improving oversight and
perspectives in training CHWs to deliver point-of-care health standardizing BHW performance [8]. However, previous
care programs to the communities. For example, the type of initiatives to support the accreditation of BHW programs were
services and coordination provided by the BHWs are mainly unsuccessful at the local level in the Philippines.
based on nursing; therefore, public health nurses are the most
More research is needed to explore the governance challenges
appropriate supervisors, mentors, and coaches for the BHWs.
and opportunities of BHW programs in various decentralized
More importantly, the limited resources provided to the BHCs
health systems to realize the full role BHW programs can play
and the increasing scope of responsibilities of public health
in achieving universal health care. This includes the ability of
nurses in managing multiple health centers require BHWs to
programs to extend the reach of formal health care providers,
expand their scope of practice; the public health nurses are the
enhance access and equity of health care, and improve
main drivers in the professional development of BHWs to
individual- and community-level health outcomes. In the
provide timely and safe health care services to the populations
decentralized Philippines, BHWs could be “local” health experts
they serve.
in multistakeholder talks on planning, financing, implementing,
https://apinj.jmir.org/2023/1/e45669 Asian Pac Isl Nurs J 2023 | vol. 7 | e45669 | p. 7
(page number not for citation purposes)
XSL• FO
RenderX
ASIAN/PACIFIC ISLAND NURSING JOURNAL Reyes et al
managing, and monitoring community health care. Our research underserved communities in the Philippines. Our findings can
indicates that BHC programs and BHWs can be more effectively be used to develop comprehensive and effective interventions
leveraged in efforts to achieve universal health care by to address the various barriers to health care access and
increasing the capacity of local governments to provide provision and to inform “task shifting” programs and policies
sufficient resources to BHC programs and BHWs [8]. Providing in the Philippines and other low- and middle-income countries
BHWs a voice in policy decisions that pertain to their work that aim to encourage and empower communities to take a more
might increase transparency and accountability by involving active role in health management with the help of BHWs.
more government agencies (ie, local communities and regional
or national health authorities) [36].
Conclusions
Health professionals, communities, and stakeholders must think
Our study has some limitations. Using a convenience sample, outside conventional medicine to improve health [8]. This
for example, increases the possibility of selection bias. In comprehensive approach must encourage multisectoral
addition, the findings represent the viewpoints of numerous cooperation to improve public policy and long-term health care
BHWs and nurses working in underserved areas in the delivery [10]. National, state, and local institutions must
Philippines. However, they were mainly from Luzon and coordinate health policy making [4]. In the decentralized
Visayas (the northern and mid-regions of the country), making Philippines, BHWs could be “local” health experts in
generalization difficult. Moreover, our participants were female, multistakeholder dialogues on planning, financing,
highlighting a crucial gendered aspect of BHWs in the implementing, managing, and monitoring community health
Philippines. In societies where care is feminized, it is crucial to care [9]. Underserved areas need better health education so
recognize and address gender inequalities to ensure that the community members can adopt healthier lifestyles. BHWs need
work and time of BHWs are adequately appreciated [8]. superior training and supervision to provide basic services,
Nevertheless, the study has numerous merits, such as the health education, and patient referrals. The Philippine
iterative process of developing a framework of barriers that Department of Health must provide greater resources to reduce
hamper the delivery of basic health care to BHCs in the local health promotion barriers [6]. These elements are crucial
Philippines. Furthermore, this is the first known and documented to health promotion, which creates personal accountability to
study to use the socioecological model to investigate how social improve people’s health. Individual and community efforts must
and environmental factors at different ecological levels modify people’s ideas and habits to enhance health outcomes
(individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy) [9].
influence the provision or lack thereof of basic health care in
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
References
1. Siongco KLL, Nakamura K, Seino K, Moncatar TJRT, Tejero LMS, De La Vega SAF, et al. Improving community health
workers' attitudes toward collaborative practice in the care of older adults: an in-service training intervention trial in the
Philippines. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(19):9986 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.3390/ijerph18199986] [Medline:
34639285]
2. Lakshminarayanan R. Decentralisation and its implications for reproductive health: the Philippines experience. Reprod
Health Matters 2003;11(21):96-107 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(03)02168-2] [Medline: 12800707]
3. Banaag MS, Dayrit MM, Mendoza RU. Health inequity in the Philippines. In: Batabyal AA, Nijkamp P, Higano Y, editors.
Disease, Human Health, and Regional Growth and Development in Asia. Singapore: Springer; 2019:163-174
4. Siongco KLL, Nakamura K, Seino K. Reduction in inequalities in health insurance coverage and healthcare utilization
among older adults in the Philippines after mandatory national health insurance coverage: trend analysis for 2003-2017.
Environ Health Prev Med 2020;25(1):17 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12199-020-00854-9] [Medline: 32517677]
5. Dela Rosa JGL, Ornos EDB, Sianoya AC, Tantengco OAG, Guinaran RC. Social determinants of health inequities in
indigenous children in the Philippines. J Paediatr Child Health 2022;58(8):1493-1494 [FREE Full text] [doi:
10.1111/jpc.16103] [Medline: 35770475]
6. Philippine health facility development plan 2020-2040: investing in resilient and sustainable health facilities towards
universal health care. Philippine Department of Health. URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eahmozW6PYADnBfm57cc
M0XhKN19HXp7/view?ths=true [accessed 2022-08-01]
7. Matsumoto-Takahashi ELA, Kano S. Evaluating active roles of community health workers in accelerating universal access
to health services for malaria in Palawan, the Philippines. Trop Med Health 2016;44:10 [FREE Full text] [doi:
10.1186/s41182-016-0008-7] [Medline: 27433129]
8. Dodd W, Kipp A, Nicholson B, Lau LL, Little M, Walley J, et al. Governance of community health worker programs in a
decentralized health system: a qualitative study in the Philippines. BMC Health Serv Res 2021;21(1):451 [FREE Full text]
[doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06452-x] [Medline: 33980209]
9. Mallari E, Lasco G, Sayman DJ, Amit AML, Balabanova D, McKee M, et al. Connecting communities to primary care: a
qualitative study on the roles, motivations and lived experiences of community health workers in the Philippines. BMC
Health Serv Res 2020;20(1):860 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05699-0] [Medline: 32917203]
10. Katigbak C, Van Devanter N, Islam N, Trinh-Shevrin C. Partners in health: a conceptual framework for the role of community
health workers in facilitating patients' adoption of healthy behaviors. Am J Public Health 2015;105(5):872-880 [doi:
10.2105/AJPH.2014.302411] [Medline: 25790405]
11. Dodd W, Brubacher LJ, Kipp A, Wyngaarden S, Haldane V, Ferrolino H, et al. Navigating fear and care: the lived experiences
of community-based health actors in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Soc Sci Med 2022;308:115222 [FREE
Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115222] [Medline: 35930848]
12. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q
1988;15(4):351-377 [doi: 10.1177/109019818801500401] [Medline: 3068205]
13. Zulu JM, Perry HB. Community health workers at the dawn of a new era. Health Res Policy Syst 2021;19(Suppl 3):130
[FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00761-7] [Medline: 34641904]
14. Angwenyi V, Aantjes C, Kondowe K, Mutchiyeni JZ, Kajumi M, Criel B, et al. Moving to a strong(er) community health
system: analysing the role of community health volunteers in the new national community health strategy in Malawi. BMJ
Glob Health 2018;3(Suppl 3):e000996 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000996] [Medline: 30498595]
15. Kok MC, Dieleman M, Taegtmeyer M, Broerse JEW, Kane SS, Ormel H, et al. Which intervention design factors influence
performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review. Health Policy Plan
2015;30(9):1207-1227 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu126] [Medline: 25500559]
16. Zulu JM, Kinsman J, Michelo C, Hurtig AK. Integrating national community-based health worker programmes into health
systems: a systematic review identifying lessons learned from low- and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health
2014;14:987 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-987] [Medline: 25245825]
17. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for
interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19(6):349-357 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042]
[Medline: 17872937]
18. Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs
Forum 2014;41(5):545-547 [doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547] [Medline: 25158659]
19. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 1999;34(5 Pt 2):1189-1208 [FREE
Full text] [Medline: 10591279]
20. Soratto J, de Pires DEP, Friese S. Thematic content analysis using ATLAS.ti software: potentialities for research in health.
Rev Bras Enferm 2020;73(3):e20190250 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0250] [Medline: 32321144]
21. Soola AH, Davari M, Moghaddam HR. Determining the predictors of self-management behaviors in patients with type 2
diabetes: an application of socio-ecological approach. Front Public Health 2022;10:820238 [FREE Full text] [doi:
10.3389/fpubh.2022.820238] [Medline: 35462803]
22. Khuzwayo N, Taylor M. Exploring the socio-ecological levels for prevention of sexual risk behaviours of the youth in
uMgungundlovu district municipality, KwaZulu-Natal. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2018;10(1):e1-e8 [FREE Full
text] [doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1590] [Medline: 29781679]
23. Uchendu C, Windle R, Blake H. Perceived facilitators and barriers to Nigerian nurses' engagement in health promoting
behaviors: a socio-ecological model approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(4):1314 [FREE Full text] [doi:
10.3390/ijerph17041314] [Medline: 32085607]
24. Zulkiply SH, Rosliza AM. Application of socio-ecological model in developing preventive strategies against suicidal
ideation and suicidal attempt among youth in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Med J Malaysia
2022;77(6):755-763 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 36448396]
25. Duante CA, Austria REG, Ducay AJD, Acuin CCS, Capanzana MV. Nutrition and health status of Indigenous Peoples
(IPs) in the Philippines: results of the 2013 national nutrition survey and 2015 updating survey. Philipp J Sci
2022;151(1):513-531 [doi: 10.56899/151.01.39]
26. Olaniyan A, Isiguzo C, Hawk M. The socioecological model as a framework for exploring factors influencing childhood
immunization uptake in Lagos state, Nigeria. BMC Public Health 2021;21(1):867 [FREE Full text] [doi:
10.1186/s12889-021-10922-6] [Medline: 33952252]
27. Kowitt SD, Emmerling D, Fisher EB, Tanasugarn C. Community health workers as agents of health promotion: analyzing
Thailand's village health volunteer program. J Community Health 2015;40(4):780-788 [doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-9999-y]
[Medline: 25744815]
28. Sacks E, Morrow M, Story WT, Shelley KD, Shanklin D, Rahimtoola M, et al. Beyond the building blocks: integrating
community roles into health systems frameworks to achieve health for all. BMJ Glob Health 2018;3(Suppl 3):e001384
[FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001384] [Medline: 31297243]
29. Burnett-Zieman B, Abuya T, Mwanga D, Wanyugu J, Warren CE, Sripad P. Community-based postnatal care services for
women and newborns in Kenya: an opportunity to improve quality and access? J Glob Health 2021;11:07006 [FREE Full
text] [doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.07006] [Medline: 33763220]
30. Chipokosa S, Pattnaik A, NEP Malawi Technical Task Team, Misomali A, Mohan D, Peters M, et al. How strong are
Malawi's family planning programs for adolescent and adult women? Results of a national assessment of implementation
strength conducted by Malawi's National Evaluation Platform. J Glob Health 2019;9(2):020901 [FREE Full text] [doi:
10.7189/jogh.09.020901] [Medline: 33282227]
31. Kok MC, Ormel H, Broerse JEW, Kane S, Namakhoma I, Otiso L, et al. Optimising the benefits of community health
workers' unique position between communities and the health sector: a comparative analysis of factors shaping relationships
in four countries. Glob Public Health 2017;12(11):1404-1432 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1174722]
[Medline: 27133127]
32. Mundeva H, Snyder J, Ngilangwa DP, Kaida A. Ethics of task shifting in the health workforce: exploring the role of
community health workers in HIV service delivery in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Med Ethics 2018 04;19(1):71
[FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0312-3] [Medline: 29973217]
33. LeBan K, Kok M, Perry HB. Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 9. CHWs' relationships with the health
system and communities. Health Res Policy Syst 2021;19(Suppl 3):116 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00756-4]
[Medline: 34641902]
34. Vaughan C, Gill-Atkinson L, Devine A, Zayas J, Ignacio R, Garcia J, et al. Enabling action: reflections upon inclusive
participatory research on health with women with disabilities in the Philippines. Am J Community Psychol
2020;66(3-4):370-380 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12468] [Medline: 33078846]
35. Plowright A, Taylor C, Davies D, Sartori J, Hundt GL, Lilford RJ. Formative evaluation of a training intervention for
community health workers in South Africa: a before and after study. PLoS One 2018;13(9):e0202817 [FREE Full text]
[doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202817] [Medline: 30248100]
36. Abimbola S, Baatiema L, Bigdeli M. The impacts of decentralization on health system equity, efficiency and resilience: a
realist synthesis of the evidence. Health Policy Plan 2019;34(8):605-617 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz055]
[Medline: 31378811]
Abbreviations
BHC: barangay health center
BHW: barangay health worker
CHW: community health worker
COREQ: Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research
Edited by H Ahn; submitted 12.01.23; peer-reviewed by A Nguyen, EG Oh; comments to author 10.05.23; revised version received
29.06.23; accepted 10.07.23; published 22.08.23
Please cite as:
Reyes AT, Serafica R, Kawi J, Fudolig M, Sy F, Leyva EWA, Evangelista LS
Using the Socioecological Model to Explore Barriers to Health Care Provision in Underserved Communities in the Philippines:
Qualitative Study
Asian Pac Isl Nurs J 2023;7:e45669
URL: https://apinj.jmir.org/2023/1/e45669
doi: 10.2196/45669
PMID:
©Andrew Thomas Reyes, Reimund Serafica, Jennifer Kawi, Miguel Fudolig, Francisco Sy, Erwin William A Leyva, Lorraine
S Evangelista. Originally published in the Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal (https://apinj.jmir.org), 22.08.2023. This is an
open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work, first published in the Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic
information, a link to the original publication on https://apinj.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be
included.