SDS 62

.
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY DIVISION

COMMISSION ON SOLUBILITY DATA
SOLUBILITY DATA SERIES
Volume 62
CARBON DIOXIDE IN WATER AND AQUEOUS

ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS
Editor-in-Chief
J.W. Lorimer
The University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, Canada
P.G.T. Fogg C.L. Young

Sub-editor Sub-editor
Gas/Liquid Systems Indexes
EDITORIAL BOARD
R. Battino (USA) M. Salomon (USA)

M . T. Saugier-Cohen Adad (France)
- D.G. Shaw (USA)
H. Gamsjager (Austria) A. Skrzecz (Poland)
F. W. Getzen (USA) R.P.T. Tomkins (USA)
A.F. Danil de Namor (UK) V.M. Valyashko (Russia)
J. Eysseltova (Czech Republic) J. Vanderdeelen (Belgium)
Managing Editor
P.O. Gujral
IUPAC Secretariat, Oxford, UK
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY

IUPAC SECRETARIAT: Bank Court Chambers, 2-3 Pound Way
Templars Square, Cowley, Oxford OX4 3YF, UK
Volume 62
CARBON DIOXIDE IN WATER AND AQUEOUS

ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS
Volume Editor
Pirketta Scharlin
University ofTurku
Turku, Finland
Contributors (*Evaluators)
Robert W. Cargill John J. Carroll* H. Lawrence Clever*

Dundee Institute of Technology SACDA Inc. Emory University
Dundee, UK London, Ontario, Canada Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Rosa Crovetto* J. Chr. Gjaldbaek lmre Labadi

BETZ Water Management Royal Danish School of Pharmacy Attila .Jc)zsef University
Trevose, Pennsylvania, VSA Copenhagen, Denmark Szeged, Hungary
David M. Mason Alan E. Mather* Pirketta Scharlin*

Institute of Gas Technology University of Alberta University of
. Turku
Chicago, Illinois, USA Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Turku, Finland
Kelly R. Thornton Toshihiro Tominaga Denis A. Wiesenburg*

University of Southern Mississippi Okayama University of Science University qfSouthern Mississippi
Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, USA Okayama, Japan Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, USA
Yuri P. Yampol'skii Colin L. Young

Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis University of Melbourne
Moscow, Russia Melbourne, Australia
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

IUPAC Solubility Data Series Rates for 1996
Subscriptions: UK and Europe Rest of World

Full subscription £280 $426
Single volume £80 $120
Reduced rates are available to members of IUPAC. Please apply directly to the publisher for
details.
Prices include postage by surface mail or, for subscribers in the USA and Canada by Airfreight
or in Japan, India, Australia and New Zealand by Air Speeded Post. Airmail rates are available
on request.
The IUPAC Solubility Data Series (ISSN 0191-5622) is published quarterly in March, June,
September and December by Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Annual subscription price is
US$426. The IUPAC Solubility Data Series is distributed by Mercury Airfreight International
Ltd., 10 Camptown Road, Irvington, New Jersey 07111-1105, USA. Second Class postage paid
at Newark, New Jersey, USA and additional entry points.
US POSTMASTER: send address corrections to IUPAC Solubility Data Series, c/o Mercury
Airfreight International Ltd., I 0 Camptown Road, Irvington, New Jersey 07111-1105, USA
This issue date is March 1996.
New subscriptions may be registered at any·time during the year but will be reckoned as running
from January I st of the year in which the subscription is received. Claims regarding non-receipt
of issues must be received within 4 months of publication or date of order, whichever is later.
· Back issues are available-for information contact Journals Customer Services Department,
Oxford University Press, Walton Street, Oxford OX2 6DP.
Order Information
Payment is required with all orders and may be made by the following methods:
Cheque (made payable to Oxford University Press)
National Girobank (Account 500 1056)
Credit Card (Access, Visa, American Express, Diners Club)
Direct Debit: Please send for further details
UNESCO Coupons
Bankers: Barclays Bank pic, PO Box 333, Oxford
Code 20-65-18. Account 00715654
Please send orders to: Journals Subscription Department, Oxford University Press, Walton
Street, Oxford OX2 6DP. Tel: +44(0)1865 56767, Fax: +44(0)1865 267485
Any enquires regarding this publication should be addressed to:

USA and Canada: Oxford University Press, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513, USA
Rest of World: Journals Customer Services Department, Oxford University Press, Walton Street,
Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
©1996 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. All rights reserved. No part of this publication
may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Copyright
owner.
Printed and bound in Great Britain by Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenhmn, Wiltshire
CONTENTS
Introduction to the Solubility Data Series;

Solubility of Gases in Liquids vi
Preface xvi
Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Pure Water
The Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Water at Low Pressure
Evaluation of Solubility Data of the System C�-H20

from 273 K to the Critical Point of Water 5
Experimental Data 13
Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Deuterium Oxide
The Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in D20 and in Mixtures of D20 and H20 67
Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Sea Water
An Evaluation of the Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Sea Water

at a Partial Pressure of 101.3 kPa 76
Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions
An Evaluation of the Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions 84
Experimental DCI.ta 1 34
System Index 370
Registry Number Index 374
Author Index 376
Solubility Data Series: Published and Forthcoming Volumes 382
v
INTRODUCTION TO THE SOLUBILITY DATA SERIES
SOLUBILITY OF GASES IN LIQUIDS
NATURE OF THE PROJECT
The Solubility Data project (SOP) has as it$ aim a comprehensive review of published data for
solubilities of gases, liquids and solids in liquids or solids. Data of suitable precision are compiled for
each publication on data sheets in a uniform format. The data for each system are evaluated and, where
data from independent sources agree sufficiently, recommended values are proposed. The evaluation
sheets, recommended values, and compiled data sheets are published on consecutive pages.
COMPILATIONS AND EVALUATIONS
The formats for the compilations and critical evaluations have been standardized for all
volumes. A description of these formats follows.
Compilations
The format used for the compilations is, for the most part, self-explanatory. Normally, a
compilation sheet is divided into boxes, with detailed contents described below.
Components: Each component is listed according to IUPAC name, formula, and Chemical
Abstracts (CA) Registry Number. The Chemical Abstracts name is also included if this differs from the
IUPAC name, as are trivial names if appropriate. IUPAC and common names are cross-referenced to
Chemical Abstracts names in the System Index.
The formula is given either in terms of the IUPAC or Hill (1) system and the choice of formula
is governed by what is usual for most current users: i.e., IUPAC for inorganic compounds, and Hill
system for organic compounds. Components are ordered on a given compilation sheet according to:
(a) saturating components;
(b) non-saturating components according to chemical families; within carbon compounds,
according to increasing carbon number;
(c) solvents according to chemical families; within carbon compounds, according to
increasing carbon number.
In each class, ordering follows the 18-column IUPAC periodic table. The same order is followed in
arranging the compilation sheets within a given volume.
Original Measurements: References are abbreviated in the forms given by Chemical Abstracts
Service Source Index (CASSI). Names originally in other than Roman alphabets are given as
transliterated by Chemical Abstracts. In the case of multiple entries (for example, translations) an
asterisk indicates the publication used for compilation of the data.
Variables: Ranges of temperature, pressure, etc. are indicated here.
Prepared by: The names of all compilers are given here.
Experimental Values: Components are described as (1), (2), etc., as defined in the
"Components" box. Data are reported in the units used in the original publication, with the exception
that modem names for units and quantities are used; e.g., mass per cent for weight per cent; mol dni3
for molar; etc. Usually, only one type of value (e.g., mass per cent) is found in the original paper, and
the compiler has added the mole fractions from calculations based on 1989 atomic weights (2) and
referenced sources of densities, where necessary. Temperatures are expressed as t/°C, t/°F or TIK as in
the original; if necessary, conversions to TIK are made, sometimes in the compilations, and always in
the critical evaluation. However, the author's units are expressed according to IUPAC
recommendations (3) as far as possible.
Errors in calculations, fitting equations, etc. are noted, and where possible corrected. Material
inserted by the compiler is identified by the word "compiler" or by the compiler's name in parentheses
or in a footnote. Details of smoothing equations (with limits) are included if they are present in the
original publication and if the temperature or pressure ranges are wide enough to justify this procedure
and if the compiler finds that the equations are consistent with the data.
The precision of the original data is preserved When derived quantities are calculated, if
necessary by the inclusion of one additional significant figure. In some cases, compilers note that
numerical data have been obtained from published graphs using digitizing techniques. In these
vi
cases, the precision of the data can be determined by the quality of the original graph and the
limitations of the digitizing technique.
Method: The apparatus and procedure are mentioned briefly. Abbreviations used in Chemical
Abstracts are often used here to save space, reference being made to sources of further detail if these
are cited in the original paper. Several reviews on experimental methods of determining gas solubilities
are given in (4-10).
Source and Purity of Materials: For each component, referred to as (1), (2), etc., the following
information (in this order and in abbreviated form) is provided if available in the original paper: source
and specified method of preparation; properties; degree of purity. The solubility is usually more
sensitive to impurities in the gaseous component than in the liquid component. However, the most
important source of impurities is traces of unwanted gas dissolved in the liquid. Inadequate preliminary
degassing of the absorbing liquid is probably the most often overlooked serious source of error in gas
solubility measurements.
Estimated Error: If estimated errors were omitted by the original authors, and if relevant
information is available, the compilers have attempted to estimate errors (identified by "compiler" or
the compiler's name in parentheses or in a footnote) from the internal consistency of data and type of
apparatus used. Methods used by the compilers for estimating and reporting errors are based on Ku and
Eisenhart (11).
Comments and/or Additional Data: Compilations may include this section, in which short
comments relevant to the general nature of the work or additional experimental and thermodynamic
data are included which are judged by the compiler to be of value to the reader.
Reftrences: The format for these follows the format for the Original Measurements box, except
that final page numbers are omitted. References (usually cited in the original paper) are given where
relevant to interpretation of the compiled data, or where cross-reference can be made to other
compilations.
Evaluations
The evaluator's task is to assess the reliability and quality of the data, to estimate errors where
necessary, and to recommend "best" values. The evaluation takes the form of a summary in which all
the data supplied by the compiler have been critically reviewed. There are only three boxes on a
typical evaluation sheet, and these are described below.
Components: The format is the same as on the Compilation sheets.

Evaluator: Name and affiliation of the evaluator(s); date up to which the literature was checked.
Critical Evaluation:
(a) Critical text. The evaluator checks that the compiled data are correct, assesses their
reliability and quality, estimates errors where necessary, and recommends numerical values based on all
the published data (including theses, reports and patents) for each given system. Thus, the evaluator
reviews the merits or shortcomings of the various data. Only published data are considered.
Documented rejection of some published data may occur at this stage, and the corresponding
compilations may be removed.
The solubilities in comparatively few systems are known with sufficient accuracy to enable a set
of recommended values to be presented, either for measurements near atmospheric pressure or at high
pressures. Although many systems have been studied by at least two independent groups of workers,
the range of pressures or temperatures is often sufficiently different to make meaningful comparison
impossible.
Occasionally, it is not clear why two groups of workers obtained very different but internally
consistent sets of results at the same temperature and pressure, although both sets were obtained by
reliable methods. In such cases, a decisive assessment may not be possible. In some cases, two or more
sets of data have been classified as tentative even though the sets are mutually inconsistent.
Many high pressure solubility data have been published in a smoothed form. Such data are
particularly difficult to evaluate, and unless specifically discussed by the authors, the .estimated error on
such values can be regarded only as an "informed guess".
As well, many high pressure solubility data have been obtained in a more general study of high
pressure vapor-liquid equilibrium. In such cases a note is included to indicate that additional
vapor-liquid equilibrium data are given in the source. Since the evaluation is for the compiled data, it is
possible that the solubility data are given a classification which is better than that which would
be given for the complete vapor-liquid data (or vice versa). As an example, it is difficult to
vii
determine coexisting liquid and vapor compositions near the critical point of a mixture using some
common experimental techniques which yield accurate high pressure solubility data. As another
example, conventional methods of analysis may give results with an expected error which would be
regarded as sufficiently small for vapor-liquid equilibrium data but an order of magnitude too large for
acceptable high pressure gas-liquid solubility.
Sometimes it is possible to judge the reliability of data for a particular gas-liquid system by
testing whether the data are consistent with the behavior of homologous gases or liquids.
(b) Fitting equations. If the use of a smoothing equation is justifiable the evaluator may provide
an equation representing the solubility as a function of the variables reported on all the compilation
sheets, stating the limits within which it should be used.
(c) Graphical summary. In addition to (b) above, graphical summaries are often given.
(d) Recommended values. Data are recommended if the results of at least two independent
groups are available and they are in good agreement, and if the evaluator has no doubt as to the
adequacy and reliability of the applied experimental and computational procedures. Data are reported as
tentative if only one set of measurements is available, or if the evaluator considers some aspect of the
computational or experimental method as mildly undesirable but estimates that it should cause only
minor errors. Data are considered as doubtful if the evaluator considers some aspect of the
computational or experimental method as undesirable but still considers the data to have some value
where the order of magnitude of the solubility is needed. Data determined by an inadequate method or
under ill-defined conditions are rejected. However, references to these data are included in the
evaluation together with a comment by the evaluator as to the reason for their rejection.
(e) References. All pertinent references are given here, including all those publications
appearing in the accompanying compilation sheets and those which, by virtue of their poor precision,
have been rejected and not compiled.
(f) Units. While the original data may be reported in the units used by the investigators, the
final recommended values are reported in SI units (3) when the data can be accurately converted.
QUANTITIES AND UNITS USED IN COMPILATION AND. EVALUATION OF SOLUBILITY

DATA
Mixtures, Solutions and Solubilities
A mixture (12) describes a gaseous, liquid or solid phase containing more than one substance,
where the substances are all treated in the same way.
A solution (12) describes a liquid or solid phase containing more than one substance, when for
convenience one of the substances, which is called the solvent, and may itself be a mixture, is treated
differently than the other. substances, which are called solutes. If the sum of the mole fractions of the
solutes is small compared to unity, the solution is called a dilute solution.
The solubility of a solute 1 (solid, liquid or gas) is the analytical composition of a saturated
solution, expressed in terms of the proportion of the designated solute in a designated solvent (13).
"Saturated" implies equilibrium with respect to the processes of dissolution and vaporization; the
equilibrium may be stable or metastable. The solubility ofa substance in metastable equilibrium is
usually greater than that of the same substance in stable equilibrium. (Strictly speaking, it is the activity
of the substance in metastable equilibrium that is greater.)
Either point of view, mixture or solution, may be taken in describing solubility. The two points
of view find their expression in the reference states used for definition of activities, activity coefficients
and osmotic coefficients. Note that the composition of a saturated mixture (or solution) can be
described in terms of any suitable set of thermodynamic components.
For gases, the solubility is quoted, where possible, as mole fraction of the saturating gaseous
component in the liquid phase at 1 bar partial pressure of gas. The distinction between vapor-liquid
equilibria and the solubility of gases in liquids is arbitrary. It is generally accepted that the equilibrium
at 300 K between a typical gas such as argon and a liquid such as water is gas liquid solubility
whereas the equilibrium between hexane and cyclohexane at 350 K is an example of vapor-liquid
equilibrium.
Physicochemical Quantities and Units
Solubilities of gases have been the subject .of research for a long time, and have been
viii
expressed in a great many ways, as described below. In each case, specification of the temperature and
either partial or total pressure of the saturating gaseous component is necessary. The nomenclature and
units follow, where possible, ref. {3). A few quantities follow the ISO standards (14) or the German
standard (15); see a review by CvitaS (16) for details.
A note on nomenclature. In the IUPAC Green Book (3), the solute is component B and the
solvent is component A In compilations and evaluations, the first-named component (component 1) is
the solute, and the second (component 2 for a two-component system) is the solvent. The reader should
bear these distinctions in nomenclature in mind when comparing equations given here with those in the
Green Book.
1. Mole fraction of substance 1, x1 or x(1) (condensed phases) or y1 (gases):
[1]
where n5 is the amount of substance of s, and c is the number of distinct substances present (often the
number of thermodynamic components in the system). Mole per cent of substance 1 is 100 x1•
2. Ionic mole fractions of salt i, xi+• xi_:

For a mixture of s binary salts i, each of which ionizes completely into v5+ cations and v5_ anions, with
v5 = v5+ + v5_, and a mixture of p non-electrolytes j, of which some may be solvent components, a
generalization of the definition in (17) gives:
vi+xi
xi+ = __
s __;___:_
__
l...s
[2]
l+_L(vi-l)xs
i=l
s j (s+l) p
...
[3]
l+_E (vi-l)xi
i=l
The sum of these mole fractions is unity, so that, with c = s + p,
s c
""(x. +x. )+"" 1

.L..J x- = 1 [4]
.L..J z+ r- r
i=l i=s+l
General conversions to other units in multicomponent systems are complicated. For a three
component system containing non-electrolyte 1, electrolyte 2 and solvent 3,
[5]
These relations are used in solubility equations for salts, and for tabulation of salt effects on
solubilities of gases (see below).
3. Mass fraction of substance 1, w1 or w{l):
[6]
where g5 is the mass of substance s. Mass per cent of substance 1 is 100 w1 • The equivalent terms
weight fraction, weight per cent and g (1)/100 g solution are no longer used.
ix
4. Molality of solute 1 in a solvent 2, m 1 :
[7]
1
SI base units: mol kg- . Here, M 2 is the molar mass of the solvent. The equivalent term weight
solubility, Cw, is no longer used.
5. Amount concentration of solute 1 in a solution of volume V, c1 :
c1 = [formula of solute] =
n1/V [8]
3
SI base units: mol m- . The symbol c1 is preferred to [formula of solute], but both are used. The old
terms molarity, molar and moles per unit volume are no longer used.
6. Mass concentration of solute 1 in a solution of volume V, p1 or y 1:
[9]
3
SI base units: kg m- .
7. Mole ratio, rA B (dimensionless) (16)

,
rA,B =
ntfnz [10]
Mass ratio, symbol SA,B• may be defined analogously (16).
8. Ionic strength, Im (molality basis), or /c (concentration basis):
[11]
where zi is the charge number of ion i. While these quantities are not used generally to express
solubilities, they are used to express the compositions of non-saturating components. For a single salt i
with ions of charges z+, z_,
[12]
Mole and mass fractions are appropriate to either the mixture or the solution point of view. The
other quantities are appropriate to the solution point of view only. Conversions between some pairs of
these quantities can be carried out using the equations given in Table 1 at the end of this Introduction.
Other useful quantities will be defined in the prefaces to individual volumes or on specific data sheets.
In addition to these well-defined SI-based units, other units have been used to express the
solubilities of gases. Units and nomenclature follow (4, 5, 7, 18), as modified by IUPAC
recommendations (3). The equations describing Bunsen, Kuenen, Ostwald and absorption coefficients,
as well as Henry's law constants, hold for ideal gases and perfect solutions only. Corrections for non
ideality should be made where possible. The corrections are less than 1 % for most gases near
atmospheric pressure (5).
In much published data, the reference pressure is 1 atm= 0.101325 MPa rather than 1 bar= 0.1
MPa.
9. Bunsen coefficient, a (dimensionless):

The volume of saturating gas, V1, reduced to yo= 273.15 K, p0= 1 bar, which is absorbed by
unit volume V2 • of pure solvent at the temperature of measurement and partial pressure p0= 1 bar. If
the gas is ideal, Henry's law (see below) holds, and the liquid is incompressible, then
X
vt [13]
v2·
10. Kuenen coefficient, S:

The volume of saturating gas, V(g), reduced to T' = 273.15 K, p0 = 1 bar, which is dissolved by
unit mass of pure solvent at the temperature of measurement and partial pressure 1 bar. Thus,
[14]
SI base units: m3 kg-l. Here, M2 is the molar mass of the solvent. The Kuenen coefficient is
proportional to the molality of the dissolved gas.
11. Ostwald coefficient, L (dimensionless) (18):

The volume of saturating gas, V1, absorbed by a volume V2* of pure solvent at the temperature
and pressure of the measurement. Thus,
L =
� =
(a.T)(po) [15]
2
v,* To P
The Ostwald coefficient is equal to the ratio of the amount concentrations in the gas and in the liquid.
12. Absorption coefficient, 13 (dimensionless):

The most common of several definitions of absorption coefficient is the volume of gas, reduced
to T' = 273.15 K, p0 = 1 bar absorbed per unit volume of pure solvent at a total pressure of 1 bar. The
absorption and Bunsen coefficients are therefore very similar, and are connected by
[16]
where p2 is the partial pressure of the vapor of the solvent.
13. Henry's Law constant, kH:
[17].
SI base units: Pa. Unfortunately, the definition is used often at finite mole fractions, even though this is
a limiting law. The following have also been defined as Henry's Law constants:
K2 = P1/c1 [18]
Kc = cNcl
where superscript g refers to the gas phase. K2 has SI base units Pa m3 mor1, and Kc is dimensionless.
The Henry's law constant has also been called the Henry coefficient and the Henry constant. Henry's
law can be used, with great caution, to convert ,data from the experimental pressure to 1 bar if the mole
fraction of the gas in the ·liquid is small, and the difference in pressures is small.
The relations between the mole fraction solubility and the various· quantities given above are as
follows. Note again that these relations hold for ideal gaseous and perfect solution phases only.
xi
1 1
xl
RT0 RT0
1+ 1 + ---
Ptv;,2a. PtM2S [19]
1 1
=
1+
RT RT0
1+
p1v;,2L pov;.2�
14. Salt Efficts on the Solubility of Gases (19)

These are often reported as Sechenov (Setchenow, Setschenow) salt effect parameters ks z
y•
which are defined in various ways. The general semi-empirical Sechenov equation is
log(zt/z1) = ksyz y [20]
where solubility is expressed in quantities z, with superscript o designating pure solvent, and salt
composition is expressed in quantities y. The quantities c2, m2, x2 ', /m and /c are used for y, and the
quantities c1 , m1, xl+, a, Sand L for z, giving 30 definitions of ks z· Here, components 1 and 2 are the
y
gaseous solute and electrolyte, respectively. The ratios of z-values are the same for z = c1, a and L and
for m1 and S, respectively, leaving 15 distinct definitions. If z is the same, the definitions of ks z are
y
related simply through 10 equations between pairs of c2, m2, x2', /m and /c. Some relations among the
definitions, in terms of kscc• ksmm and ksxx• are:
I
2k x2 m /c k
kscc = kSCI!. = kscL -
c sm c -
c
k sxc -
c slc
2 2 2 c
I
x2 c2 /m k
ksmm -
m
k sxm =ksmS -
m2
kscm -
m2 slmm
[21]
2
c m2 I
ksxx -2 k I sex
- k �ksl,r -/c,ksr�
I smx
x2 � x x 2 2
These relations hold when a single salt is present; note that the relations between ionic strength
and either molality or concentration are simple. If more than one salt is present, the ionic strength is
the only practical quantity to be used for y.
Conversions between pairs of k5CC' ksmm and k5xx are more complicated, and can be found using
eqn [5] and Table 1 at the end of this Introduction. For example,
[22]
where
j{m) [23]
Errors in the salt effect parameters, as defined above, can be large. If the relative standard
deviation in measurement of solubility is s(c1)1c1, then the relative standard deviation in kscc is
[24]
xii
For example, for kscc = 0.1 and c2 = 0.01 mol dm-3, s(kscc)/k5cc is 30% when s(c1)Jc 1 = 0.05 % and
1200 % when s(c1)1c1 = 2%. At c2 = 1 mol dm-3, the corresponding errors are 0.3 and 12%, ·
respectively.
If the solubility of a gas is greater than about X = 0.01 at partial pressure 1 bar, then several
other factors must be taken into account, such as the density of the solution or the partial molar volume
of the dissolved gas. In addition, corrections should be made for non-ideality of the gas. See (18) for
details.
In addition, the following definitions concerning density are useful in conversions between
concentrations and other quantities.
15. Density, p or y:
P = g/V [25]
SI base units: kg m-3. Here g is the total mass of the system.
16. Relative density, d = p/ p0: the ratio of the density of a mixture at temperature t, pressure p
to the density of a reference substance at temperature t', pressure p'. For liquid solutions, the reference
substance is often water at 4°C, 1 bar. (In some cases 1 atrn is used instead of 1 bar.) The term specific
gravity is no longer used.
Thermodynamics of Solubility (20)
Thermodynamic analysis of solubility phenomena provides a rational basis for the construction
of functions to represent solubility data, and thus aids in evaluation, and sometimes enables
thermodynamic quantities to be extracted. Both these aims are often difficult to achieve because of a
lack of experimental or theoretical activity coefficients. Where thermodynamic quantities can be found,
they are not evaluated critically, since this task would involve examination of a large body of data that
is not directly relevant to solubility. Where possible, procedures for evaluation are based on established
thermodynamic methods. Specific procedures used in a particular volume will be described in the
Preface to that volume.
Only one thermodynamic result is mentioned here: the temperature dependence of solubility.
Sometimes it is possible to fit the mole fraction solubility at various temperatures using the equation
lnx1 = A + B(K/ 1) + Cln(T/K) + D(T/K) [26]
where A, B, C and D are constants to be determined from least-squares fitting of the data. Sometimes,
to avoid singular matrices of the least-squares normal equations, T is scaled; e.g., T is replaced by
T/100.
If the gas and the solution of the dissolved gas are ideal, the coefficients can be used to find
standard thermodynamic functions for transfer of the gas from the vapor to the liquid phase at the
standard pressure (1 bar) and infinitely-dilute dissolved gas, as follows.
aG:.tfR = -A(T/K) - B - C(T/K)ln(T/K) - D(TfK)2 [27]
as:.tfR = A + Cln(T/K) + C + 2D(T/K) [28]
aH:.tfR = - B + C(T/K) + D(TfK)2 [2 9]
ac:,p/R = C + 2D(T/K) [30]
Alternatively (but equivalently), the standard state of infinitely-dilute dissolved gas can be described as
a hypothetical ideal dissolved gas at mole fraction x 1 = 1, p = 1 bar.
xiii
REFERENCES
1. Hill; E.A. J Am. Chern. Soc. 1900, 22, 478.

2. IUPAC Commission on Atomic Weights and Isotopic Abundances. Pure Appl. Chern. 1989, 63,
975.
3. Mills, 1.; et a/., eds. Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry (the Green Book).
Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford, UK. 1993.
4. Battino, R.; Clever, H. L. Chern. Rev. 1966, 66, 395.
5. Clever, H. L.; Battino, R. in Solutions and Solubilities (Techniques of Chemistry. Vol. VIII, Part
1). Ed. Dack, M. R. J. J. Wiley & Sons, New York. 1975. Chap. 7.
6. Hildebrand, J. H.; Prausnitz, J. M.; Scott, R. L. Regular and Related Solutions; Van Nostrand
Reinhold, New York; 1970; Chap. 8.
7. Markham, A. E.; Kobe, K. A. Chern. Rev. 1941, 28, 519.
8. Wilhelm, E.; Battino, R. Chern. Rev. 1973, 73, 1.
9. Wilhelm, E.; Battino, R.; Wilcock, R. J. Chern. Rev. 1977, 77, 219.
10. Kertes, A. S.; Levy, 0.;. Markovits, G. Y. in Experimental Thermochemistry, Vol. II, ed. Vodar,
B.; LeNaindre, B. Butterworths. London. 1974. Chap. 15.
11. Ku, H.H., p. 73; Eisenhart, C., p. 69; in Ku, H.H., ed. Precision Measurement and Calibration.
NBS Special Publication 300. Vol. 1. Washington. 1969.
12. Gold, V.; et al., eds. Compendium of Chemical Technology (the Gold Book). Blackwell
Scientific Publications. Oxford, UK. 1987.
13. Preiser, H.; Nancollas, G.H., eds. Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature (the Orange Book).
Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford, UK. 1987. Sect. 9.1.8.
14. Robinson, R.A.; Stokes, R.H. Electrolyte Solutions. Butterworths. London. 1959. 2nd ed.
15. ISO Standards Handbook, Quantities and Units, International Standards Organization, Geneva,
1993.
16. German Standard, DIN 1310, Zusammensetzung von Mischphasen, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 1984.
17. Cvita8, T. Chern. International 1995, 17, No. 4, 123.
18. Battino; R. Fluid Phase Equil. 1984, 15, 231.
19. Clever, H.L. in Battino, R. Nitrogen and Air. IUPAC Solubility Data Series, Vol. 10. Pergamon
Press. Oxford, UK, 1982. p. xxix.
20. Wilhelm, E. in Battino, R. Nitrogen and Air. IUPAC Solubility Data Series, Vol. 10. Pergamon
Press. Oxford, UK, 1982. p. xii.
R. Battino
Dayton, Ohio, USA
H. L. Clever
Atlanta, GA, USA
P.G.T. Fogg
Hertford, UK
C. L. Young
Melbourne, Australia
December, 1995
xiv
Table 1. Interconversions between Quantities Used as Measures of Solubility
c-component Systems Containing c - 1 Solutes i and Single Solvent c
mi ci
xi wi
xi= 1 1
l ·-r
1
e-1 C
xi e
m.
1- -+ -1 _l 1 ( ) M
( )
1+-- 1!..-Mi +E _L 1-__...1
rl
M I +L _e_1 ___}_ 1+- E
1+-' --1 m�e i"i mi Me ci j-•i ci Me
Me wi i"•i Mi wi
wi= 1 c�;
1
l ·-r
wi
-
1
(E ) p
rl
Me I 1+ -- 1+ m#i
1+- --1+1": __...1-:-1 _1 m�; i"i
X X;
< Mi xi j#i Me
m. =
' 1 1
l mi
1
{I
M --1-E _l
xi
<-I X
i"'i xi l (
M -I -1-E __
, W;
i"i W;
,_,
w _}_ l p-
C
;
( £ )
J"'
c#i -M;
C; = P W; p c
p i
e1
{I ·-r r l ..1_ _L
MI� (
_!_ 1+�- M1m +M;
i
)
M;+M --1+� __. 1 m; '"'
X; 1.,, Me X;
p - density of solution; Mi -molar masses of i. For relations for 2-component systems, set summations to 0.
PREFACE
The first description of carbon dioxide gas probably dates back to the beginning of the 17th century (1).
Jan B . Helmont (1577-1644) found that the gas he had detected in the fumes of a charcoal fire was able
"
to extinguish a lighted candle. He named the gas gas sylvestre" (in Latin sylvestris, of a wood). About
a hundred years later Joseph Black (1728- 1799) studied the gas liberated by heating calcium carbonate
(chalk) . He gave the gas the name "fixed air" since the "air" (gas) was fixed in the solid state in the
chalk. In 1772 Joseph Priestley showed that the gas was produced by the burning of charcoal and in
1774 Antoine Laurent Lavoisier proved that it was an oxide of carbon. Lavoisier proposed the name
"carbonic acid" because of the acidic properties of the gas. In 1 854 Auguste Laurent, recognizing that
the acid was essentially a solution of the oxide, proposed that the name carbonic acid should be reserved
for the solution and that the gas should be called "carbonic anhydride" . The term dioxide for an oxide
containing two atoms of oxygen came into use in the middle of the 19th century: (1)
Solubility measurements for carbon dioxide in water date back at least as far as to the work of William
Henry (1 803) in which he postulated his famous law of solubility. The first accurate solubility data,
however, began to appear in about the middle of the 19th century with the pioneering work of Robert
Bunsen (1 855) . Since then, the solubility of carbon dioxide in water and aqueous electrolyte solutions
has been the subject of intensive research. For this volume, the scientific literature starting historically
with Bunsen' s work (1 855) has been systematically searched. The coverage should include most articles
published up to the end of 1994. In spite of careful search, some published measurements may have been
missed. We would appreciate having our attention brought to any important source of data that has been
·
omitted so that we can include it in future volumes.
For many reasons the systems carbon dioxide + water and carbon dioxide + aqueous electrolyte systems
are of great importance in our natural environment as well as in physiology, biology, geology, and in
many industrial applications - virtually in all branches of science. The solubility of carbon dioxide in
water is an order of magnitude larger than that of many other simple gases. Carbon dioxide is one of
the naturally occurring atmospheric gases. It is also one of the greenhouse gases which has been
increasing steadily in our atmosphere due to human activity. Based on analyses of air trapped in polar
ice cores, it is apparent that the average global atmospheric carbon dioxide volume fraction has increased
from a pre-industrial level of around 270 X 1 Q-6 to a value of 355 x 1 Q-6 (2) .
Water is the most abundant component of the outer layers of the earth and is a constituent of the cells
of all plant and animal tissues. It is justifiable to say that the interaction of carbon dioxide and water
is a key to the functioning of living organisms. Approximately 97. 3 % of the world' s vast supply of
water is in the oceans. It is estimated that the oceanic carbon dioxide uptake is about 2 X 1015 g of carbon
per year (3) . The system water + sodium chloride + carbon dioxide is ther�fore one of the most
important fluid systems in geochemistry. On the basis of the literature search done for this volume, the
solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous sodium chloride solutions has been the subject of investigation
much' more often than the solubility of carbon dioxide in any other aqueous electrolyte solution.
Because of the large number of data, certain systems have been excluded from this volume. For
instance, solubility data were not searched for carbon dioxide in some biological fluids such as blood.
Beverages like beers, wines and soft drinks have been omitted. Alkaline systems were not included.
In this volume the total carbon dioxide dissolved is considered, regardless of the species present in
solution. With the higher pressure data there is always a problem of attempting to distinguish between
gas solubilities and vapor-liquid equilibria. We have striven to be reasonable in making this distinction.
About 85 % of the data sets presented in this volume are at pressures < 200 kPa.
Since 1982 the IUPAC recommendation for the standard pressure, p 8, is lOS Pa ( = 1 bar) . Prior to
1982 the standard pressure was usually taken to be p8 = 101 325 Pa ( = 1 atm, called the standard
atmosphere). In the majority of the original articles treated in this volume the standard pressure was
chosen to be 1 atm. Therefore, the same choice was adopted in this volume. The expression "STP"
used in many papers and data sheets of this volume thus means conditions wherep = 101 . 325 kPa ( =
1 atm) and T = 273. 15 K (t 0 °C).
=
In the original articles gas solubilities are presented in an almost bewildering number of units. In the
data pages we present the units given in the original papers with explanatory material where necessary.
Where it is feasible the compilers have converted these solubilities into the Ostwald coefficient and/or
the mole fraction solubility at 101 .325 kPa partial pressure of gas. These conversions were carried out
for the convenience of the user, and such compiler-generated conversions are·noted on the data sheets.
xvi
The molar volume of carbon dioxide gas differs from that of an ideal gas. The extent of the deviation
is customarily expressed in terms of the second virial coefficient B22• The second virial coefficient for
carbon dioxide varies smoothly with temperature, as shown in Figure 1 . The values used in the plot of
B22 vs. T are those of Angus et al. and were taken from Dymond and Smith (4).
20
-20
....
I
-40
0
E -60
..,
-80
E
.......
N
N -100
m
CD
0 -120
....-
-140
-160
-180
300 400 500 600 700 800
T/K
Figure 1 . Variation of the second virial coefficient of carbon dioxide with temperature.
The value of the molar volume, vm, is given by:
(1)
At 273 . 15 K B22 = - 1 5 1 . 4 cm3 mol-1 and at 298. 15 K B22 = - 125.5 cm3 mol-1 (4). Using equation (1)
for calculation of the molar volume of carbon dioxide the values presented in Table 1 are obtained at
p(C02) = 1 0 1 . 325 kPa. Ym values from the ideal gas equation are also listed in the table.
Table 1 .
TIK
273 . 15 22.262 22.414

298. 15 24. 340 24.466
The magnitude of the deviation from ideality is relatively small, but not negligible. The compilers have
used, as far as possible, the real gas molar volumes in the conversions.
For the solubility of carbon dioxide in water, recommended equations and tables of values are presented.
However, for systems which contain water and electrolytes, the experimental gas solubility in water from
that paper is given, even when it is at variance with our recommended value. These data of sometimes
poorer quality are presented because the author' s ratio of gas solubility in water to solubility in the
aqueous solution may be more accurate than the solubility itself.
xvii
As the title page shows, this volume is the product of the efforts of a number of people: contributors,
members of the Editorial Board past and present, and other members of the IUPAC Commission V.8.
I wish to acknowledge their combined contributions and to thank them all.
I wish to express my special thanks to Professor Rubin Battino for his continuously inspiring
encouragement during this project and for many helpful discussions as well as constructive criticism.
Acknowledgment is made to Professor H. Lawrence Clever, Dr Peter G.T. Fogg and Professor John W.
Lorimer for their useful comments and suggestions and for reading critically separate sections of this
volume. I am indebted to Dr Rosa Crovetto who did most of the literature search prior to 1988 and to
Dr Adam Skrzecz who did part of the word processing for the data sheets prior to 1992. I would also
like to thank Miss Xhiaohui Shen for her assistance in translating Chinese papers. Grateful
acknowledgment is made to the Foundation of Turku University, Acta Chemica Scandinavica and the
Academy of Finland for the travel grants which enabled me to participate in the annual meetings of the
IUPAC Commission V.8. Finally, I wish to express my sincere thanks to Professor Kalevi Pihlaja, the
present head of the Chemistry Department of the University of Turku, who has supported this project
by providing the computer and other facilities needed for the completion of this work.
Pirketta Scharlin
Turku, Finland
December 1995
1 . Flood, W.E. The Origins of Chemical Names Oldbourne Book Co. Ltd. , London .1.2QJ, p. 58.
2. Magrini, K.A. ; Boron, D . Chemistry & Industry 1994, 24, 997-1000 .
3. Siegenthaler, U. ; Sarmiento, J . L Nature 1993, 365, 119-25 .
.
4. Dymond, J.H. ; Smith, E.B. The Virial Coefficients of Pure Gases and Mixtures, Oxford University
Press, Oxford, 1980, p. 51.
xviii
1
COMPONENTS : EVALUATORS:
(1) Carbon dioxide; C02; [124-38-9] John J. Carroll and Alan E. Mather
Department of Chemical Engineering
(2) Water; H20; [7732-18-5] University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G6
October 199 1 , updated November 1 994
CRITICAL EVALUATION:
The Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Water at Low Pressure .
Measurements of the solubility of carbon dioxide in water date back to at least the beginning of the nineteenth
century. However, the first accurate measurements to appear are those of Bunsen (1). Since that time there have
been over 75 investigations of the solubility of C02 in water at low pressure.
Carroll et al. (2) reviewed all of the solubility data for C� in water for pressures below 1 MPa and for
temperatures from 273 to 433 K (0 oc to 160 °C}. They developed a model for calculating the solubility of C�
in water over this range of pressure and temperature using a Henry's law approach.
Most of the papers used in the review of Carroll et al. (2) are evaluated later in this volume. However, a few
papers report values which Carroll et al. (2) concluded were accurate, but contain only one or two points. Thus,
it was concluded that they did not warrant a thorough evaluation; however, they did deserve some mention.
They are: Just (3) , Christoff (4) , von Hammel (5), Essery and Gane (6) , Bartholome and Friz (7) , Enders et
al. (8) and Davies et al. (9) .
The model of Carroll et al. (2) was used to calculate the solubility of water when the C02 -partial pressure
was equal to 101 . 325 kPa ( 1 atm). That is, the product of the mole fraction of C� in the vapor and the total
pressure (y X P) equals 101 . 325 kPa. These values are tabulated in Table 1 (next page) and plotted on Fig. 1 .
1
The values o f the solubilities were then regressed to obtain the following correlation:
ln x = -32.5247 + 0.96017 T + 68.03 19/T + 12. 1522 ln T (1)

1
where x is the mole fraction of carbon dioxide in the liquid at a partial pressure of 1 atm, and T= T/ 100 where
1
T is in K. This equation is valid for temperatures between 273 and 433 K (0 oc and 160 °C}. The average
absolute deviation between the model and Eq. (1) is 6 x lo-s mol % . Values based on the correlation are also
included in Table 1. From Table 1 and Fig. 1 it can be seen that the solubility, as defined here, becomes a weak
function of the temperature for temperatures greater than about 373 K. I!l fact the solubility shows a shallow
minimum at about 421 K.
The solubilities calculated using the model of Carroll et al. (2) were then converted to Qstwald coefficients
(volume of gas per unit volume of solvent, both at the specified temperature) . For this conversion the density
of carbon dioxide was calculated using the truncated virial equation. Second virial coefficients were taken from
Angus et al. (10) . The density of water was taken from The Steam Tables (1 1). The Ostwald coefficients are
also listed in Table 1 . The average difference between the Ostwald coefficients listed in Table 1 and those that
would be obtained by assuming that C02 is an ideal gas is 0.33 % and the maximum error is 0.68 % .
It i s interesting to note that the minimum solubility, when expressed in Ostwald coefficients, occurs at about
408 K (0. 300 cm3 C02 I 1 cm3 H20). The difference in the location of the minima for the two solubility units
is largely due to the fact that the density of water is a function of temperature.
Using the procedure of Wilhelm et al. (12) , the change in enthalpy, entropy and heat capacity for solution were
derived from Eq. (1). These values are included in Table 1 as well. The minimum in the solubility noted above
is the point where the calculated enthalpy change on solution is zero. The change in the sign of the enthalpy
2
change on solution more clearly reveals the minimum solubility than the solubility values themselves. From
Table 1 it can be seen that mole fraction solubilities at temperatures from 413 K to 428 K are 1 . 72 X 10·5 (to three
significant figures) whereas the enthalpy change on solution clearly changes sign around 421 K. Finally, this
approach predicts that the �Cp is a linear function of temperature with (o [�Cp] /o 7) 0.08 kJ mol·' K-2 •
=
The effect of pressure on the solubility of C02 is shown in Fig. 2. The curves on this figure were calculated
using the model of Carroll et al. (2) . A few data points from the literature are plotted on this figure.
Table 1 . The solubility of carbon dioxide in water (P1 = 101 . 325 kPa 6)
Model (Ref. 2) Equation ( 1 )
TIK 1Qlx1 b L c 1Qlx1 b Mlf/kJ mol·' �S!IkJ mol·' K-1 �coP,l/kJ mol"1 K-1
273 . 15 1 . 355 1 . 676 1 . 360 -23.0 -0. 139 0. 145

278. 15 1 . 136 1 .43 1 1 . 137 -22.3 -0. 137 0. 145
283. 15 0.963 1 . 235 0.962 -21 . 6 -0. 134 0. 146
288. 15 0. 825 1 .076 0. 823 -20.8 -0. 1 3 1 0. 147
293. 15 0.713 0.946 0.71 1 -20. 1 -0. 129 0. 148
298. 15 0. 622 0. 839 0.621 -19.3 -0. 126 0. 149
303 . 15 0.548 0.750 0.547 -18.6 -0. 124 0. 149
308. 15 0.487 0.677 0.487 -17.8 -0. 121 0. 150
313.15 0.437 0.616 0.436 -17. 1 -0. 1 19 0. 1 5 1
318. 15 0.395 0.564 0.395 -16.3 -0. 1 17 0. 152
323 . 15 0.359 0.520 0.359 -15.6 -0. 1 14 0. 153
328. 15 0. 329 0.484 0.330 -14.8 -0. 1 12 . 0. 153
333. 15 0. 304 0.452 0.305 -14.0 -0. 1 10 0. 154
338. 15 0.283 0.426 0.283 -13.3 -0. 107 0. 155
343. 15 0.264 0.403 0.265 -12.5 -0. 105 0. 156
348. 15 0.249 0.384 0.249 - 1 1 .7 -0. 103 0. 157
353. 15 0.236 0. 367 0.236 -10.9 -0. 100 0. 157
358. 15 0.224 0.353 0.224 -10. 1 -0.098 0. 158
363 . 15 0.214 0.43 1 0.214 - 9.3 -0.096 0. 159
368. 15 0.206 0.331 0.206 - 8.5 -0.094 0. 160
373. 15 0.199 0.323 0. 199 - 7. 7 -0.092 0. 161
378. 15 0. 193 0 . 3 16 0. 193 - 6.9 -0.090 0. 161
383 . 15 0. 1 88 0.3 1 1 0. 187 - 6. 1 -0.087 0. 162
388. 15 0. 1 83 0.307 0. 183 - 5.3 -0.085 0. 163
393. 15 0. 1 80 0. 303 0. 1 80 - 4.5 -0.083 0. 164
398. 15 0. 177 0.301 0. 177 - 3.7 -0.081 0. 165
403. 15 0. 175 0.300 0. 175 - 2 .9 -0.079 0. 165
408. 15 0. 173 0.300 0. 173 - 2.0 -0. 077 0. 1 66
413. 15 0. 172 0.300 0. 172 - 1 .2 -0.075 0 . 1 67
418. 15 0. 172 0.301 0. 172 - 0.4 -0.073 0. 168
423 . 15 0. 172 0. 303 0. 172 0.5 -0.071 0. 169
428. 15 0. 172 0.306 0. 172 1.3 -0.069 0. 169
433 . 15 0. 173 0. 309 0. 173 2.2 -0.067 0. 170
" P1 = partial pressure of C02

b x1 = mole fraction of C02
c L = Ostwald coefficient [cm3 cm-3]
3
1 .4
1 .2 from [2]
[ 1 3]
1 .0 [ 1 4]
[ 1 5]
-
>< 0.8
..,
0
r-
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
273 293 313 333 353 373 393 4 1 3 433
T I K
Figure 1 . The Solubility of carbon dioxide in water. (P1 = 101 .325 kPa)
423. 1 5 K
398. 1 5 K
«<
a. 373. 1 5 K
� 0.1
......
a.. - from [2]
0 [ 1 6]
348. 1 5 K • [ 1 7]
0 [ 1 8]
• [ 1 9]
323. 1 5 K
298. 1 5 K
0.0 1
0.0 1 0.1 10
1 03 x 1
Figure 2. The solubility o f carbon dioxide i n water as a function of pressure an d temperature.

(For clarity this plot is presented using lg - lg axes.)
4
REFERENCES:
1 . Bunsen, R. Ann. Chem. Pharm .lBil, 93, 1 .

.
2 . Carroll, J.J. ; Slupsky, J.D. ; Mather, A.E. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data .1221, 20, 120 1 .
3. Just, G. Z. Phys. Chem. .1201 , 37, 342.
4. Christoff, A. Z. Phys. Chem. 12Q.S., 53, 321 .
5. von Hammel, A . Z. Phys. Chem. .1.2..U , 90, 121 .
6. Essery, R.E. ; Gane, J. J. Inst. Brewing 1952, 58, 129.
7. Bartholome, E. ; Friz, H. Chem. -Ing. -Tech. �. 28, 706.
8. Enders, C . ; Kleber, W. ; Paukner, E. Brauerei �. 9(1), 2 and 9(2), 50.
9. Davies, G.A. ; Ponter, A.B. ; Craine, K. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 12@, 45, 372.
10. Angus, S . ; Armstrong, B. ; de Reuck, K.M. Carbon Dioxide International Thermodynamic Tables ofthe Fluid
State - 3, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, .!21f!; de Reuck, K.M. , personal communication, 199 1 .
1 1 . Haar , L. ; Gallagher, J.S . ; Kell, G . S . NBS/NRC Steam Tables, Hemisphere Publishing Co. , Washington DC,
�-
12. Wilhelm, E. ; Battino, R. ; Wilcock, R.J. Chem. Rev. 1977, 77, 219.
13. Bohr, C. Ann. Phys. Chem. .1.822., 68, 500.
14. Morrison, T.J. ; Billett, F. J. Chem. Soc. lliZ, 3819.
15. Versteeg , G.F . ; Van Swaaij , W.P.M. J. Chem. Eng. Data .12.88, 33, 29.
16. Findlay, A. ; Creighton, H J.M. J. Chem. Soc. 1910, 536.

.
17. Zel'venskii, Ya.D. J. Chem. Industry (USSR) .1231, 14, 1250.
18. Zawisza, A. ; Malesinska, :8. J. Chem. Eng, Data .l2al., 26, 388.
19. Muller, G. ; Bender, E. ; Maurer, G. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 148.
NOTE: The present address of John J. Carroll is SACDA Inc.

Suite 500 , 343 Dundas St.
London, Ontario N6B 1 V5
Canada
5
COMPONENTS: EVALUATOR:
(1) Carbon dioxide; C02; [124-38-9] Rosa Crovetto

National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST)
(2) Water; H20; [7732-1 8-5] Thermophysics Division, B221
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-000 1 , USA
August 1990, updated June 1993
Evaluation of Solubility Data of the System COrH20 from 273 K to the Critical Point of Water
This evaluation covers all of the literature sources for the solubility of carbon dioxide in water through the
year 1989.
For describing the two-phase saturation solubility we select Henry's constant. From the equality of the
chemical potentials of the solute in the vapor and liquid phase, Henry's constant k� can be calculated from [see
O'Connell (1) and Alvarez et al. (2)]
p
�= (yPcf>t f'Yrx> exp I (-Vt fRT)dP. (1)
p;
From the equality of the chemical potentials of the solvent in the liquid and the vapor phase it follows that
p
(1-y) = hW-x).P;!/>; exp I (v;/RT)dPJ/(Pcf>J (2)
p;
where the symbols are defined at the end of this evaluation. To calculate k� from the experimentai data usually
available, namely P, T and x, eq�ations (1) and (2) must be solved simultaneously. The common assumptions
for low temperatures and low total pressures and concentrations are that the activity coefficients 'Yr and ,{
equal unity, and that the partial molar volume, V1 equals the infmite dilution partial molar volume, V1°
independent of pressure. Once an equation of state (EOS) is selected, eq. (2) is solved for y by an iterative
procedure described elsewhere (3). The explicit pressure dependence of the solubility can be accounted for either
by using information on experimental partial molar volumes or by semiempirical perturba,tion methods (4). For
this system experimental partial molar volumes (5,6) were used.
The virial EOS through the second virial coefficient was used for the mixed vapor phase for temperatures
between 273 and 353 K. For the higher temperatures, 353 K to the critical temperature of the solvent, the Peng
and Robinson (7) EOS was selected. The interaction parameter was chosen as 0.285 . [For details on the
sensitivity of the Henry' s constant to different EOS, smoothing equation selection, and adjustment procedures,
see Crovetto (8) .] Up to about 500 K all of the EOS tested gave variations of about 1 .5 % or less in the
calculated values of k� .
Another useful quantity in solubility and liquid/vapor equilibria is the isothermal distribution coefficient, K0,
defined as
K0 = y!x (3)
The infinite-dilution coefficient, .Kg, is defined as
Kg = lim y!x (4)

X�
and can be calculated from the same set of equations and assumptions already presented as
(5 )
where 4>� is calculated from the selected EOS. In principle, Kg will be known with the same precision as �.
but the effect of the selected EOS on the values of Kg and k� respectively, will be different.
6
Recently, Japas arid Levelt Sengers (9) predicted the limiting asymptotic thermodynamic behavior for k�
and Kg and their temperature dependence near the critical temperature of the solvent. They demonstrated that
asymptotically as T .... T. of the solvent, the following linear correlations will apply:
•
T ln(�l.fi") = A + B(p¥" - p•.J (6)
•
T In Kg = 2B(p¥" - p•.J (7)
where B(Rp�) = (aPJax)v.T. • - tfv.x-
The quantity av,x is the second derivative of the Helmholtz energy with re8pect to the volume and the
concentration. This relevant derivative can be related to the experimentally measurable initial critical-line slopes
of the dilute solution and the pure solvent [see Japas and Levelt Sengers (9)]. The fact that K8 must equal unity
for T = T., provides a valuable clue to whether the asymptotic behavior has been reached.
As stated by Harvey et al. (10), when dealing with experimental data the Kg factor, eq. (7), gives a better
estimate of the true asymptotic slope and a good agreement with the d'v,x from experimental critical-line data
whereas the slope from the Henry's constant, eq. (6), does not.
It is a fact that the hydration and dissociation of C02 in water cannot be separated from its dissolution. In
this treatment only the total C� dissolved is considered, regardless of the species present in solution. This
assumption can be made because any species other than C02(aq) [the not yet isolated, so-called "carbonic acid"
(H2C03)114, the H+, and the HCOi] in a solution of C02 in water exist in negligible amounts. These species can
be ignored because the ratio of the molalities of "(H2C03)114" and ions to C02 is about 3/1000 at 298. 15 K (1 1).
Also, experimental and theoretical arguments of Knise and Franck (12) indicate that (H2C03)114 is not an important
species at higher temperatures. The acidity constant of C02 goes through a maximum value of 6.3 x 10·7 mol kg"1
at 353 K and decreases at higher temperatures (13, 14), so that the quantity of ionic species should become smaller
as the temperature increases beyond 353 K.
Wherever necessary, values for the pure water properties, p, f;, P; were taken from Haar et al. (15).
The goal of this evaluation was to cover with one equation the solubility of C� in water for the liquid range
of water 273 to 647. 126 K. This was not possible within the precision of the available measurements. The data
for low temperature solubilities, 273 to 353 K, are always significantly more precise, i.e. , at least by a factor
of ten than the high temperature ones. For this system there are no data at low temperatures of very high
precision similar to those available for inert non-polar gases in water (16, 17).
At the present time equations for the temperature dependence of gas solubilities in water are only empirical
showing limiting asymptotic critical behavior and tendencies (9). The parameters for this equation (9) must be
adjusted from the data.
The original data were retrieved as mole fraction, total pressure in the system, and temperature. From these
data, the selected EOS, and equations (1) and (2), k� was calculated. For the low temperature data set (273 -
353 K), the equation is
2
ln(�lbar) = 4.800 + 3934.4(T/K)"1 - 941290.2(T/K)" • (8)
The standard deviation of the fit is 1 . 1 % in k�. The coefficients were calculated by a least squares method.
A further increase in the number of coefficients in eq. (8) was not statistically significant. The references used
for eq. (8) are listed alphabetically in Table 1, entitled "Sources of data". For the low-temperature set, the
correction for non-ideality of the vapor phase does not amount more than 0.5 % .
7
There is available a low-temperature low-pressure evaluation for the carbon dioxide/water system done by
Wilhelm et al. (18) . They made different choices for the number of sources considered and the smoothing
equation used. Differences between k� values calculated from eq. (8) and theirs are important only at the end
of the temperature interval of the fitting, i.e. , at 273 and 353 K, amounting to 2 % at 353 K.
Any formulation that attempts to cover the entire liquid range of the solvent should be consistent with the
facts that the derivative [d(ln k�)/d7]. diverges to - oo as T _. T. [Japas and Levelt Sengers (9)] , that the infinite
dilution solute partial molar isobaric heat capacity of dissolution in the saturated liquid, CP�, diverges to +, oo as
. · · .: ·f � -�
T -.. T., and that the value of k� at T. is a constant equal to P; times </If.
·'
' .
'
-�
For the high-temperature data set, 353 K to the critical temperature of water, the system was anchored at the
low temperature by adding to the sources used five k� values calculated from eq. (8) at 273 . 15, 293 . 15, 303. 15,
323 . 15 and 353 . 15 K. They were given the same weight as any other experimental points. However, they were
not used for eq. (7). For the C�/H20 system the linear relationship in eq. (7) is obtained starting at densities
which correspond to about 373 K.
The high-temperature data set is best represented in Kg by
(9)
which gave a standard deviation of 8.6 % (in Henry's constant), and in k: by
2
ln(k�/bar) = 1713 .53(1-T,)113 (T/K)·1 + 3 . 875 + 3680.09(T/K)·1 - 1 198506. 1(T/K)" (10)
with a standard deviation of 5 . 1 % in k�. In eq. (10) T, = TIT•. The asymptotic leading term is adjusted by the
results obtained from fitting the data to the form of eq. (7). Coefficients for eq. (10) were obtained from a least
squares procedure with no weighting applied. The list of sources used is given in Table 1 .
A group of sources exist that are at low temperatures, but higher pressures. This group consists of eight
different sources and is listed alphabetically in Table 1 . From the experimental data, 23 values of Henry's
constant were calculated at different temperatures. This group was difficult to evaluate because for some
experimental conditions C02 itself is very near its critical point. This group was not included in the fitting.
For this system we estimate an uncertainty in the fitting equations of l % for k� between 273 and 353 K,
and an uncertainty of about 5-10 % between 353 and 600 K. For temperatures above 600 K the uncertainty
increases rapidly to at least 20 % near the critical point of water.
A high-temperature deviation plot versus temperature shows that there may be some systematic errors between
experimental data from different sources.
Smoothed values for ln(k� /bar) calculated from eq. (8) , at 10 K intervals between 273 and 353 K are given
in Table 2.
Smoothed values for ln(k� /bar) between 353 and 647 K at 15 K intervals calculated from equations (9) and
(10) are given in Table 3 .
Recommended values for k� calculated from the selected fitting equation (8), considering all sources, at 5
K intervals from 273 . 15 to 353. 15 K are given in Table 4 .
8
List of symbols
av,x second derivative with respect to the volume and composition of the Helmholtz energy
kH Henry' s constant
X mole fraction of solute in the liquid phase
y mole fraction of solute in the vapor phase
f fugacity
Cp,l partial molar isobaric heat capacity for the solute
Ko isothermal distribution coefficient
p total pressure
R gas constant
T temperature
T. critical temperature of the solvent
T, = TIT. reduced temperature
v molar volume
� partial molar volume of i
Greek symbols:
p molar density
f/J; fugacity coefficient in the gaseous mixture of component i
'YH
activity coefficient in the liquid phase on the scale defining ideality by means of Henry' s law
'YR activity coefficient in the liquid phase on the scale defining ideality by means of pure solvent
behavior or Raoult' s law
Subscripts: 1 : solute, 2: solvent, c: critical
Superscripts: 0: infinite dilution, *: pure substance, g: vapor phase, liq: liquid phase, s: saturation, c: critical
TABLE 1 . Sources of data.
Group A (273 K < T < 353 K, P < 2 bar)
AUS(63): Austin, W.H. ; Lacombe, E. ; Rand, P.W. ; Chatterjee, M. J. Appl. Physiol. 12.6l, 18, 301 -4.
(5 :5)
B0(891): Bohr, C . ; Bock, J. Ann. Phys. Chern. , NF .l.B2l., 44, 3 1 8- 43.
(2:0)
B0(899): Bohr, C. Ann. Phys. Chern. 1899, 68, 500-25 .
(15: 15)
BU(855): Bunsen, R.W.E. Phil. Mag. 1 855, 9, 1 16-30, 181-201 ; Gasometrische Methoden, Braunschweig
1857. The same experimental points are also published in Bunsen, R. W.E. Justus Liebig 's Annalen
der Chemie (also Ann. Chern. ) �. 93, 1-50.
(6:5)
BUC(28): Buch, K. Nordiska KemistmOtet (Finland) 1926, 184-92.
(14:7)
CRA(82): Cramer, S . D . U.S. Bur. Mines Rep. Invest. 1982, RI 8706.
( 1 : 0)
CUR(38): Curry, J. ; Hazelton, C.L. J. Am. Chern. Soc. mR, 60, 2771-3.
(4:2)
HAR(43) : Harned, H. S . ; Davis, R. , Jr. J. Am. Chern. Soc. 1943, 65, 2030-7.
(18: 1 8)
KH(867): de Khanikof, M.M.N. ; Louguinine, V. Ann. Chim. Phys. (ser. 4) �. 1 1 , 412-33 .
(10: 1)
KOB(35) : Kobe, K.A. ; Williams, J.S. Ind. Eng. Chern. (Anal. Edition) 1935, 7(1), 37-8.
( 1 : 1)
KOC(49): Koch, H.A. , Jr. ; Stutzman, L.F. ; Blum, H.A. ; Hutchings, L.E. Chern. Eng. Prog. 1949, 45( 1 1),
677-82.
(6: 1)
9
TABLE 1 . Sources of data. (continued)
Group A (273 K < T < 353 K, P < 2 bar)
KUN(22): Kunerth, W. Phys. Rev. _1222 , 2, 512-24.

(8:6)
Ll(71): Li, Y.-H. ; Tsui, T.-F. J. Geophys. Res. 1211 , 76(18), 4203-8.
(5:5)
MAR(41): Markham, A. ; Kobe, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 12.H, 63, 449- 54.
(3:3)
MOR(30): Morgan, J.L.R. ; Pyne, H.R. J. Phys. Chem. 12JQ, 34, 1578- 82.
(2:0)
MOR(3 1): Morgan, O.M. ; Maass, 0. Can. J. Res. 1931 , 5, 162-99.
(19:4)
MOR(52): Morrison, T.J. ; Billett, F. J. Chem. Soc. 1.2ll, 3819-22.
(19: 19)
MUR(71): Murray, C.N. ; Riley, J.P. Deep-Sea Res. l211, 181 533- 4 1 .
(8: 8)
NOV(61): Novak, J. ; Fried, V. ; Pick, J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. �. 26, 2266-70.
Measurements at different pressures at 8 different constant temperatures. From the slope of kH vs.
x, k� is calculated.
(8:0)1
ORC(36): Orcutt, F.S . ; Seevers, M.H. J. Bioi. Chem. 123.!i, 11 7, 501-7.
(1 : 1)
. POW(70): Power, G.G. ; Stegall, H. J. Appl. Physiol. 121Q , 29, 145- 9.
(1: 1)
PR(895): Prytz, K. ; Holst, H. Ann. Phys. Chem. , NF m5., 54, 130- 8.
(2:0)
SHE(35): Shedlovsky, T. ; Macinnes, D.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1235:, 57, 1705-10.
(1: 1)
VAN(39): Van Slyke, D.O. J. Bioi. Chem. l.m, 130, 545-54.
(6:6)
VE(855): Verdet, M. ; report of Bunsen, M. Ann. Chim. Phys. �. 43, 496-508.
(21:0)1
YEH(64): Yeh, S.-Y. ; Peterson, R.E. J. Pha171UlC. Sci. �. 53, 822-4.
(4: 3)
1 See text for details about source rejection.
Group B (low-temperature, 273 K < T 353 K, P > 2 bar)

This group was run considered for data fitting.
KRI(35): Kritschewsky, I.R. ; Shaworonkoff, N.M. ; Aepelbaum, V .A. Z. physik. Chem. A �. 1 75, 232-8.
i, P = 5-30 bar, (2:0)
MAT(69): Matous, J. ; Sobr, J. ; Novak, J.P. ; Pick, J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. �. 34, 3982-5.
ii, P = 9-39 bar, (3:0)
SHA(82): Shaiachmetou, R.A. ; Tarzimanov, A.A. Deposited Doc. 1281, SPS'IL 200 khp-D81 1982.
ii, P= 100-400 bar, (1:0)
STE(70): Stewart, P.B. ; Munjal, P. J. Chem. Eng. Data 121Q , 15 , 67-71 .
ii, P1 • 10, 40 bar, (12:0)
VIL(67): Vilcu, R. ; Gainar, I. Rev. Roum. Chim. 1.2Q1, 12(2), 181- 9.
ii, P1 "" 25 , 70 bar, (20:0)
WIE(39): Wiebe, R. ; Gaddy, V.L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61 , 3 15- 8.
·
i, P = 25-700 bar, (2:0)

10
.- --------,
TABLE 1 . Sources of data. (continued)
Group B Oow-temperature, 273 K < T 353 K, P > 2 bar)

This group was not considered for data fitting.
WIE(40): Wiebe, R . ; Gaddy, V.L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. �. 62, 8 15- 7.

i, P = 25-500 bar, (5:0)
ZAW(8 1): Zawisza, A. ; Malesinska, B. J. Chem. Eng. Data 198 1 , 26, 388-9 1 .
ii, P1 = 25 bar, (9:0)
Group C (T > 373 K, any P)
B0(891): Bohr, C.; Bock, J. Ann. Phys. Chem. , NF 182.1, 44, 3 1 8- 43.
ii, T = 373 K, (1 :0)
CRA(82): Cramer, S.D. U.S. Bur. Mines Rep. Invest. �. R1 8706.
ii, T = 399-486 K, (6:2)
CR0(90): Crovetto, R. ; Wood, R.H. Fluid Phase Equil. �. 74, 271-88.
ii, T = 623-640 K, P = 170-220 bar, (3:3)
ELL(63): Ellis, A.J. ; Golding, R�M. Am. J. Sci. �. 261, 47-60.
ii, T = 450-607 K, (15: 14)
MAL(59): Malinin, S.D. Geokhimiya � (3) 235-45.
i, T = 473-603 K, P = 100-500 bar, (4:2)
SHA(82): Shaiachmetou, R.A. ; Tarzimanov, A.A. Deposited Doc. 128l, SPSTL 200 khp-D81 1.m.
i, T = 373-423 K, P = 100-800 bar, (2:2)
TAK(65): Takenouchi, S . ; Kennedy, G. Am. J. Sci. 1965, 263, 445- 54.
i, T = 423-623 K, P = 200-1400 bar, (5 :4)
WIE(39): Wiebe, R. ; Gaddy, V.L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61 , 3 15- 8.
i, T = 373 K, P = 25-700 bar, (1 : 1)
ZAW(8 1): Zawisza, A. ; Malesinska, B. J. Chem. Eng. Data 12.8.1, 26, 388-9 1 .
ii, T = 373-473 K , (9:0)
The meaning of the symbols used in the table follows:

For Groyp A: The numbers in parenthesis, (m:n), are m = the n1.1mber of experimental points given in the
source, and n = the number of points actually considered in the evaluation.
For Groups B and C : i: several isothermal solubility measurements are available for different pressures. When
feasible, a graphical extrapolation for Henry's constant, kH , to the solvent vapor pressure was performed. The
numbers in parenthesis, (m:n), are m = the number of �·s obtainable from the source, n = the number actually
considered.
ii: only one pressure, or a very small pressure range, was experimentally studied in the source. The numbers
in parenthesis, (m:n), are in this case m = the number of experimental points informed, n = the number of
points considered in the evaluation. The experimen_tal partial molar volume of the solute is considered for
calculating kPH in eq. (1).
In Group C the range of T and P of the measurements is given. In Group B, only the range of P is given.
There are also compiled data sources which were run used in the evaluation: (1) Setchenov, J. [Sechenov, I.M.]
Pflugers Arch. Gesamte Physiol. Menschen Tiere 1874, 8, 1-39; Mem. Acad. Imp. Sci. , St. Petersburg 1 879,
26, 1-62; Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mem. Acad. Imp. Sci. , St. Petersburg 1 887, 35, 1-59; Mosk. Obsh. Spyt. Prirody.
Nouv. Mem. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscow .!.882 , 15, 203-74; (2) Hantzsch, A . , Vagt, A. Z. Phys. Chem. 1901, 38,
705-40; (3) Sander, W. Z. Phys. Chem. 191 1-1912, 78, 513-49; (4) Findlay, A. , Shen, B. J. Chem. Soc. 1912,
101 , 1459-68; (5) Findlay, A. , Howell, O.R. J. Chem. Soc. 1915, 107, 282-84; (6) Wiebe, R. , Gaddy, V.L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62, 1055-74; (7) Shchennikova, M. K. , Devyatykh, G. G. , Korshunov, I. A. J. Appl.
Chem. USSR (Engl. Trans/.) 1957, 30, 881-6; (8) Ellis, A.J. Am. J. Sci. 1959, 257, 217-34; (9) Bartels, H. ,
Wrbitzky, R. Pjlugers Arch. 12®, 271 , 162-8; (10) Barton, J.R. , Hsu, C. C. J. Chem. Eng. Data 197 1 , 16, 93-
5; (1 1) Weiss, R.F. Marine Chemistry 1974, 2, 203-15; (12) Postigo, M.A. , Katz, M. J. Solution Chem. 1987,
1 6, 1015-24; and (13) Yuan, C . , Yang, J. Gaodeng Xuexiao Huoxue Xuebao 1993 , 14, 80-83 .
11
TABLE 2. Values for ln(k:/bar) calculated at several temperatures: from eq. (8) for all the sources; only for
Morrison and Billet, MOR(52), and Murray and Riley, MUR(71) • ; and from the equation of
Wilhelm et al. (Ref. 18).
ln(k:/bar) ln(k:/bar)
TIK Eq. (8) Eq. (8) . Ref. 18 TIK Eq. (8) Eq. (8) . Ref. 18
273. 15 6.588 6.594 6.600 323. 15 7.961 7.962 7.964

283. 15 6.955 6.958 6.962 333. 15 8. 129 8. 130 8. 127
293. 15 7.268 7.270 7.274 343. 15 8.272 8.274 8.262
303 . 15 7.536 7.537 7.542 353. 15 8.393 8.397 8.372
313. 15 7.765 7.766 7.771
TABLE 3. Smoothed values of In(.t:lbar) calculated from the Peng and Robinson EOS using eqs. 9 and 10.
ln(k&!bar) ln(k&/bar)
Eq. (10) Eq. (9) . Eq. (10) Eq. (9)
T/K PR PR T/K PR PR
353. 15 8.415 518. 15 8.445 8.397

368. 15 8.544 533 . 15 8.363 8.322
383 . 15 8.632 8.674 548. 15 8.271 8.239
398. 15 8.687 8.694 563. 15 8. 171 8. 149
413. 15 8.715 8.695 578. 15 8.060 8.050
428. 15 8.721 8.683 593 . 15 7.935 7.940
443. 15 8.708 8.658 608. 15 7.790 7.798
458. 15 8.679 8.623 623 . 15 7.61 1 7.632
473. 15 8.636 8.579 638. 15 7.344 7.381
488. 15 8.582 ·. 8.526 643. 15 7. 187 7.231
503. 15 8.518 8.465 647. 10 6.791 6.675
r. = 647. 126 K
TABLE 4. Recommended values for k: calculated from equation (8), considering all the sources, at 5 K intervals
from 273. 15 K to 353 . 15 K.
TIK k&/bar ± u/bar • T/K k:/bar ± u/bar •
273. 15 726 8 318. 15 2610 29

278. 15 879 10 323. 15 2868 32
283. 15 1048 12 328. 15 3 128 34
288. 15 1233 14 333. 15 3391 37
293. 15 1433 16 338. 15 3652 40
298. 15 1648 18 343. 15 3912 43
303. 15 1874 21 348. 15 4167 46
308. 15 2111 23 353. 15 4418 49
313. 15 2357 26
• u = standard deviation at each temperature.

12
References
1. O'Connell, J.P. Phase Equilibria Properties in the Chemical Industry, Ed . Storvick, T.S. and Sandler, S .l. ,
1977, ACS Symposia Series, 60, p. 450.
2. Alvarez, J. ; Crovetto, R. ; Femandez-Prini, R. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chern. 1988, 92, 935 .
3. Crovetto, R. ; Japas, M.L. ; Femandez-Prini, R. An. Asoc. Quim. Arg. .1283, 71 , 8 1 .
4 . Femandez-Prini, R. ; Japas, M.L. J. Phys. Chern. �. 93 , 3802.
5. Malinin, S.D. ; Savalyeva, N.J. Geochemistry Internatio1Ull 1972 (5) 410; Malinin, S.D. Geokhimiya 1959,
(3) 235.
6. Crovetto, R. ; Wood, R.H. Fluid Phase Equil. .1222, 74, 271 .
7. Peng, D.Y. ; Robinson, D.B. ACS Symposium Series 133 in Thermodynamics of Aqueous Systems with
Industrial Applications, Ed. Newman, S. American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1980, p. 393.
8. Crovetto, R. J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data .l.221 , 20, 575 .
9. Japas, M.L. ; Levelt Sengers, J.M.H. AIChE J. 1989, 35, 705.
10. Harvey, A. ; Crovetto, R. ; Levett Sengers, J.M.H. AIChE J. 122!l, 36, 1901 .
1 1 . Ellis, A.J. J. Chern. Soc. 1959, 4, 3689.
12. Kruse, R. ; Franck, E.U. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chern. 1983, 86, 1036. ·
13. Read, A.J. J. Solution Chern. 1975, 4, 52.
14. Barbero, J.A. ; Hepler, L.G. ; McCurdy, K.G. ; Tremaine, P.R. Can. J. Chern. 1983, 61 , 2509.
15. Haar, L. ; Gallagher, J.G. ; Kell, G.S. NBSINRS Steam Tables 1984, Hemisphere, Washington DC.
16. Benson, B.B. ; Krause, D . ; Peterson, M.M. J. Solution Chern. 1979, 8, 655 ;
Krause, D . ; Benson, B.B. J. Solution Chern. 1989, 18, 823 .
17. Rettich, T.R. ; Handa, Y.P. ; Battino, R. ; Wilhelm, E. J. Phys. Chern. 12.81, 85, 3230.
18. Wilhelm, E. ; Battino, R. ; Wilcock, R.J. Chern. Rev. 1977, 77, 2 19.
�: The present address of Rosa Crovetto is BETZ Water Management

Boiler Division
1 Quality Way
Trevose, PA 19053
USA
13
COMPONENTS : ORIGINAL MEASUREMENTS :
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Verdet , M . , report of Bunsen , M .
(2) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) Ann . Cbim . Pbys . 1 8 5 5 , 43 , 4 9 6-507 .
VARIABLES : PREPARED BY :
=
T/K 2 7 3 . 15-2 9 3 . 15
Pl f kPa =
101 . 3 25 Rosa Crovetto
EXPERIMENTAL VALUES :
t/ °C T/K a P / bar a Pl f cmHq a b 1 0 3xl a
--
0 2 7 3 . 15 1 . 019 76 1 . 7967 1 . 452

1 2 7 4 . 15 1 . 020 1 . 7 2 07 1. 391
2 2 7 5 . 15 1 . 02 0 1 . 6481 1 . 332
3 2 7 6 . 15 1 . 02 1 1 . 5787 1 . 276
4 2 7 7 . 15 1 . 02 1 1 . 5126 1. 223
5 2 7 8 . 15 1 . 02 2 1 . 4497 1 . 17 2
6 2 7 9 . 15 1 . 02 3 1 . 3901 1 . 12 4
7 280 . 15 1. 023 1. 3639 1 . 103
8 2 8 1 . 15 1 . 02 4 1 . 2 8 09 1 . 03 6
9 2 8 2 . 15 1 . 025 1. 2 3 11 0 . 9955
10 2 8 3 . 15 1 . 026 1 . 1847 0 . 9581
11 2 8 4 . 15 1. 0 2 6 1 . 1416 0 . 92 3 3
12 2 8 5 . 15 1 . 02 7 1 . 1018 0 . 8913
13 2 8 6 . 15 1 . 028 1 . 0653 0 . 8 6 19
14 2 8 7 . 15 1 . 02 9 1. 0321 0 . 8352
15 2 8 8 . 15 1 . 030 1. 0020 0 . 8 10 9
16 2 8 9 . 15 1 . 03 1 0 . 9758 0 . 7899
17 2 9 0 . 15 1 . 033 0 . 9649 0 . 7812
18 2 9 1 . 15 1 . 034 0 . 9 3 18 0 . 7545
19 2 9 2 . 15 1 . 035 0 . 9 15 0 o. 7411
20 2 9 3 . 15 1 . 037 0 . 9 0 14 0 . 7 3 02
a
Ca lculated by the compi ler .
b Bunsen coef ficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
AUXILIARY INFORMATION
METHOD/APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS :
A convent iona l al l-qlass Bunsen ' s (1) Not stated .
apparatus was used . It was not stated
if st irr inq was provided . (2) Distil led .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not qiven .
REFERENCES :
14
(1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Bunsen , R. w. E.
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Phil . Mag . 1 8 5 5 , 9 , 116-3 0 , 1 8 1 -2 0 1 .
also in : Gasometrische Methoden
1857 , Braunschweig .
T/ K = 2 7 7 . 55-2 9 5 . 5 5
P1 /kPa = 101 . 3 25 Rosa Crovetto
a b 4
t/ ° C T/K a P/ bar a PJ ! atm 1 0 xl a
--
4.4 2 7 7 55
0 1. 022 1. 0 0 1 . 4698 11 . 88
8.4 281 . 55 1 . 024 1 . 2426 1 0 . 05
13 . 8 286 . 95 1 . 02 9 1 . 0654 8 . 62 1
16 . 6 289 . 75 1 . 03 2 0 . 9692 7 . 846
19 . 1 292 . 25 1 . 035 0 . 8963 7 . 260
22 . 4 2 9 5 . 55 1 . 04 0 0 . 8642 7 . 005
a
Calculated by the compi ler .
b Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
METHOD/APPARATUS /PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS :
An al l-glass apparatus was used with ( 1 ) From marble , dried and purif ied
stirr ing . Liquid samples were from air .
analyzed volumetrically for their gas
content . ( 2 ) Not stated .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not given .
REFERENCES :
!
I
15
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) de Khanikof , M . M . N . ; Louguinine , v .
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ] Ann . Chi m . Phys . Ser . 4 1867 , 11 ,

4 12 - 3 3
T/K = 28 8 . 15
P1 / kPa = 9 0 . 6 - 4 14 . 6 Ros a Crovetto
PJ fmmHg b s c
P/ bar a 3
tt o c T/K a 1 0 xl a
---
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 . 947 697 . 7 1 0 . 9441 0 . 7641

1 . 09 6 809 . 03 1 . 1619 0 . 9402
1. 736 1289 . 4 1 1 . 8647 1 . 508
1 . 977 1469 . 95 2 . 1623 1. 748
2 . 686 2 002 . 06 2 . 9076 2 . 349
2 . 935 2 18 8 . 6 5 3 . 17 64 2 . 566
3 . 17 5 2 3 6 9 . 02 3 . 4857 2 . 8 15
3 . 422 2554 . 00 3 . 7 152 3 . 000
3 . 668 2738 . 33 4 . 00 3 1 3 . 232
4 . 163 3 1 09 . 5 1 4 . 5006 3 . 632
a
b The authors measured and c orrected for the dens ity of the pure
co2 gas at the same temperature and pressure .
c Solub i l ity as volume of gas reduced at STP per volume of water .

( At the equil ibrium pressure of the measurement and the real
volume of the gas . )
An a l l-glass apparatus was used . (1) From marble . Dried and air free .
It was not stated if stirring was
used . Thermostatted at ± 0 . 1 ° C . (2) Distil led , degassed .
The dissolved gas was measured as a
pressure difference in a known volume .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.1 ( by authors )

65 = ± 3 % ( by comp i ler )
REFERENCES :
16
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Setchenow , J . ( Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Water ; · H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ] Pflugers Arch . Gesamte Physiol .
Henschen Tiere 1 8 7 4 , 8 , 1-3 9 .
T /K = 288 . 35 , 290 . 25
p1 /kPa = 95 . 79 , 122 . 50 H . L . Clever
a a a f cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 b

t/ °C T/K P 1 /mmHg Pl fkPa
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 7 18 . 5 95 . 79
8 14 . 4 108 . 6 1 . 0090 Av .
875 . 2 117 . 7
15 . 2 288 . 35 72 1 . 1 9 6 . 14
804 . 9 107 . 3 1 . 0090 Av .
874 . 5 116 . 6
17 . 1 290 . 25 7 67 . 0 102 . 3
9 18 . 8 122 . 5 0 . 9619 Av .
a Added by the compi ler . b a = Bunsen coefficient .

The l iquid volumes ranged from 3 2 2 . 0 to 3 7 0 . 5 cm3 •
Setchenow ( Ref . 1 ) based his apparatus ( 1 ) Apparently generated from l ime
on those of Fernet ( 18 5 7 ) and of Meyer stone and sulfuric acid . Dried .
( 18 5 7 ) . The manometer was based on
ideas he learned from Regnault in ( 2 ) Not specified , assumed to be
18 6 1 . The one meter manometer had distil led .
three branches , two for measuring the
pressure and one a mercury reservoir .
The manometer was connected to the ab-
sorption cel l by a f lexible si lver ca-
pillary . The absorption cell was of
two bulbs with a mark in the con-
stricting connection . co2 gas was
generated , saturated with water vapor ESTIMATED ERROR :
and f i l led the bulbs and manometer to
a known pressure less than atmo The author makes a qual itative
spheric . The l iquid was degassed by statement that the results are good
heating and then passed by the pres to the second decimal .
sure difference into the lower bulb to r------;
the mark of known volume . The system REFERENCES :
was sealed , turned 9 0 degrees and sha
ken unti l equil ibrium was established . 1 . Setchenow , J .
The gas volume absorbed was reduced to
0 ° C and one meter Hg pressure . The Akad . Nauk . SSSR Mem . Acad . imp .
Bunsen coeff icient was calculated . Sci . St . Petersburg 1 8 8 7 , 3 5 ,
( Ser . No . 7 ] , 1 - 5 9 .
17
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ) Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 -5 ) Mem . Acad . Imp . Sci . St . Petersbourg .
.
[ 7th Ser . ] 1 8 7 9 , 2 6 ( 1 3 ) , 1-62 .
T/K = 3 1 0 . 2 - 3 10 . 7
p1/ kPa = 4 9 . 3 1 , 7 6 . 08 H . L . Clever
t/ ° C a a
T/K Pl /kPa
---
3 7 . 0- 3 10 . 2 - 432 . 55 57 . 6 8 0 . 569
37 . 5 3 10 . 7 5 7 0 . 68 7 6 . 08 0 . 57 3
3 7 . 0'- 3 10 . 2 - 3 69 . 8 5 49 . 3 1 0 . 569
37 . 5 3 10 . 7 474 . 95 63 . 32 0 . 569

The water volume was 5 0 . 179 cm3 •
The paper gives the results of nearly 1 0 0 measurements on the solu
bil ity of co2 in aqueous Na2 co3 , Na 3 Po4 and in cal f , dog and horse
blood , serum and various mixtures . The blood , serum and aqueous
base solutions did not obey Henry ' s law . The data were not comp iled .
Most of the experiments were done at 15 . 2 ° C .
METHOD/APPARATUS/ PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS :
Setchenow ( Ref . 1 ) based his apparatus ( 1 ) Apparently generated from lime
on those of Fernet ( 18 5 7 ) .and of Meyer stone and sulfuric acid . Dried .
( 18 57 ) . The manometer was based on
ideas he learned from Regnault in ( 2 ) Not specified , assumed to be
18 6 1 . The one meter manometer had distil led .
three branches , two for measuring the
pressure and one a mercury reservoir .
The manometer was connected to the ab-
sorption cell by a f lexible si lver ca-
pil lary . The absorption cell was of
two bulbs with a mark in the con-
stricting connection . co2 gas was
generated , saturated with water vapor ESTIMATED ERROR :
and f i l led the bulbs and manometer to
a known pressure less than atmo The author makes a qual itative
spheric . The l iquid was degassed by statement that the results are good
heating and then passed by the pres to the second decimal .
sure difference into the lower bulb to r------;
the mark of known volume . The system REFERENCES :
was sealed , turned 9 0 degrees and . sha
ken unti l equil ibrium was established . 1 . Setchenow , J .
The gas volume absorbed was reduced to
0 ° C and one meter Hg pressure . The Akad . Nauk . SSSR Mem . Acad . imp .
Bunsen coefficient was calculated . Sci . St . Petersburg 18 8 7 , 3 5 ,
[ Ser . No . 7 ] , 1- 5 9 .
18
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Setchenow ; J . [ Sechenov 1 I . M . ]
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ] Akad . Nauk . SSSR, Mem . Acad . Imp .
Sci . St . Petersbourg [ 7 th Ser . ]
18 8 7 1 3 5 1 1-59 •
T/K = 2 8 8 . 4 - 2 9 6 . 2
p1/ kPa = 7 5 . 15 - 1 2 2 . 5 0 H , L . Clever
Tf K a
15 . 2 288 . 4 5 6 3 . 67 7 5 . 15 1 . 0101
7 18 . 2 8 95 . 76 1. 0121
654 . 3 3 87 . 24 1 . 008
866 . 10 115 . 4 7 1 . 013
72 1 . 10 9 6 . 14 1 . 0112
804 . 90 107 . 3 1 1. 0069
874 . 50 1 16 . 59 1 . 0089
7 18 . 5 0 95 . 7 9 1. 0094
8 14 . 4 0 108 . 58 1 . 0087
875 . 20 1 1 6 . 68 1 . 008
Av . 1. 0 0 9 6 ± 0 . 0 0 2 0
17 . 1 290 . 3 7 67 . 0 0 102 . 2 6 ( 0 . 963 )

9 18 . 8 0 122 . 50 0 . 961
17 . 6 290 . 8 645 . 63 8 6 . 08 0 . 989

814 . 43 108 . 5 8 0 . 935
18 . 3 8 2 9 1 . 53 634 . 2 6 84 . 56 ( 0 . 896)
903 . 00 120 . 39 0 . 896
19 . 3 292 . 5 653 . 75 87 . 1 6 0 . 883

849 . 53 113 . 2 6 0 . 886
21. 0 294 . 2 764 . 3 1 101 . 9 0 ( 0 . 838 )

867 . 97 115 . 7 2 0 . 838
21. 7 2 94 . 9 673 . 50 89 . 7 9 0 . 823

8 12 . 7 5 10 8 . 3 6 0 . 827
23 . 0 296 . 2 774 . 39 103 . 2 4 0 . 79 6

8 8 9 . 17 118 . 5 5 0 . 798
777 . 68 103 . 6 8 0 . 796

880 . 29 117 . 8 6 0 . 800
Av . 0 . 7975 ± 0 . 0019

Liquid water volumes ranged from 3 2 2 . 0 to 4 5 8 . 4 cm3 •
Values in ( ) were calculated by the compiler from data
in the paper .
See other data sheets on J. setchenow papers .

19
(1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Mosk . Obsh . Spyt . Prirody .
Nouv . Mem . Soc . Imp . Nat . Moscow
1 8 8 9 , 15 , 2 0 3 -7 4 .
T/K = 2 88 . 35 H . L . Clever
P1 / kPa = 15 . 3 6 , 59 . 78
t/ °C T/K a P1 /mmHg P1 /kPa a a. f cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 b
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 1 15 . 2 15 . 3 6 1 . 004
448 . 35 59 . 7 8 1 . 016
a Added by the compi ler . b a. = Bunsen coefficient .

The water volume was 4 6 . 4 4 cm3 •

(1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ] Setchenow , J . ( Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ) Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 2 5 ,
2 2 6-70 .
T/K = 288 . 35 H . L . Clever
p 1 / kPa = 15 . 3 59-116 . 68
t/ ° C T/K a P1 / mmHg P1 /kPa a a. t cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 b
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 5 6 3 . 67 7 5 . 15 1 . 010
7 18 . 2 8 95 . 86 1 . 012
654 . 3 3 87 . 24 1 . 008
8 6 6 . 10 115 . 4 7 1 . 013
7 2 1 . 10 9 6 . 14 1 . 011
804 . 90 107 . 3 1 1 . 007
874 . 50 116 . 5 9 1 . 000
718 . 50 95 . 79 1 . 009
814 . 40 108 . 58 1 . 009
875 . 20 116 . 68 1 . 008
1 15 . 2 0 15 . 3 6 1 . 004
448 . 35 59 . 7 8 1 . 016
Av . 1 . 0 0 9 ± 0 . 0 0 4
a Added b y the compiler . b a. = Bunsen coefficient .
The l iquid volumes ranged from 3 6 . 6 5 to 4 6 . 4 4 cm3 .

Earl ier papers report liquid volumes up to 4 5 9 cm3 •
See other data sheets on J . Setchenow papers .

20
( 1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Bohr , c . ; Bock , J .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ] Ann . Phys . Ch em . 1 8 9 1 , 44 , 3 18 - 4 3 .
T/K = 3 10 . 4 4 and 3 7 3 . 15 Rosa Crovetto
P1 / kPa = 9 4 . 3 and 8 5 . 7 . .
t/ ° C T/K a
Pf bar a
Pi f mmHg a b 10 4x1 a
37 . 29 3 10 . 4 4 1 . 006 7 07 . 0 0 . 5629 4 . 58 4
100 . 00 3 7 3 . 15 1 . 871 643 . 0 0 .' 2 4 3 8 2 . 05 8
a
Calculated by the compiler .
b Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-·3 atm-1 ] .
An al l-glass apparatus was used . The ( 1 ) Not stated .
..
system was equil ibrated by bubbling
gas through thermostatted water . ( 2 ) Not stated .
Th·e solubil ity was measured in two
different ways : by cons idering the
amount of dissolved gas which dis- ESTIMATED ERROR :
appeared from the vapor phase , and by
volumetric analys is of the gas removed Not given .
from a l iquid solution sample .

(1) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Prytz , K . i Holst , H .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Ann . Phys . Chem . N . F . 1 8 9 5 , 54 ,
13 0-8 .
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 Rosa Crovetto
P 1 /kPa = 101 . 325
a
t/ o C T/K a P/bar P 1 /atm s b 1 0 4x1 a
0 2 7 3 . 15 1 . 019 1.0 1 . 7294 1 . 398

0 2 7 3 . 15 1 . 019 1 . 7322 1 . 400
Average : 1 . 7 3 08 1 . 399
a
b Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 atm- 1 ] .
An al l-glass apparatus was used . ( 1 ) From solid C02 , dried and
The temperature was kept constant purif ied from air .
us ing an ice bath . Good stirring
conditions were provided . The amounts ( 2 ) Distilled .
of water were determined by weighing .
ESTIMATED ERROR : Not given .

21
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Bohr , c .
(2) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) Ann . Phys . Chem . 1 8 9 9 , 68 , 5 0 0 -2 5 .
T/K = 273 . 25-334 . 55
P1 / kPa = 101 . 325 Rosa Crovetto
a a
t/ ° C T/K P/ bar P1 / atm s b 1 0 4xl a
0.1 273 . 25 1 . 019 1 . 00 1 . 7062 13 . 79

3.8 276 . 95 1 . 021 1. 4922 12 . 0 6
6.8 279 . 95 1 . 023 1. 3411 10 . 84
12 . 8 285 . 95 1 . 028 1 . 0985 8 . 887
14 . 8 287 . 95 1 . 030 1. 0232 8 . 281
18 . 9 292 . 05 1 . 035 0 . 9128 7 . 393
21. 2 294 . 35 1 . 038 0 . 8497 6 . 886
22 . 6 295 . 75 1 . 04 1 0 . 8137 6 . 596
26.2 2 99 . 3 5 1 . 04 7 0 . 7 3 14 5 . 935
31. 1 3 04 . 2 5 1 . 058 0 . 6487 5 . 272
37 . 3 3 10 . 4 5 1 . 077 0 . 5629 4 . 584
40 . 4 3 13 . 5 5 1 . 08 9 0 . 5304 4 . 325
43 . 9 3 17 . 0 5 1 . 104 0 . 4905 4 . 005
49 . 8 322 . 95 1 . 135 0 . 4382 3 . 588
61 . 4 3 3 4 . 55 1 . 226 0 . 3508 2 . 889
a
b Solubi l ity expressed as cm3 of gas at STP dissolved by 1 cm3
of solution at the temperature of the experiment and at a
partial pressure of gas of 1 atm .
An all-glass apparatus was used . The (1) Not stated .
gas was bubbled through water kept in
a constant temperature bath until (2) Not stated .
equilibrium was reached .
After equil ibration a l iquid sample
was volumetrically analyz ed for its
C02 content .
The volume of the solution was
pycnometrica l ly determined at the
temperature of the measurement .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
1 % in S . ( By the author . )
REFERENCES :
22
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Hantzsch , A . ; Vagt , A .
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) z. Phys . Chem . 1 9 0 1 , 3 8 , 7 0 5 -4 2 .
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 - 3 6 3 . 15 Rosa crovetto
T/K a ratio d
0 2 7 3 . 15 8 . 05 4 . 08 1 . 972
10 2 8 3 . 15 6 . 86 4 . 96 1 . 383
20 2 9 3 . 15 4 . 68 4 . 27 1 . 110
30 3 0 3 . 15 3 . 59 4 . 18 0 . 860
40 3 1 3 . 15 3 . 05 4 . 16 0 . 740
50 3 2 3 . 15 2 . 68 4 . 27 0 . 63 0
70 3 4 3 . 15 1 . 68 3 . 72 0 . 450
90 3 6 3 . 15 1 . 23 3 . 27 0 . 380
a Calculated by the compiler .

b c l liq = concentration of C02 (mol L 1 ) in the l iquid .
-
c c 1 a ir = concentration on C02 (mol L 1 ) in air .

-
d ratio = quotient of concentrations .

Although not stated , the compiler assumes the total pressure
was 1 atm .
An al l-glass apparatus was used . Good ( 1 ) Not stated .
stirring was provided during equil ib-
ration . (2) Not stated .
The authors measured the concentration
of co2 in both phases at equil ibrium .
They give the distribution coefficient
as the volume ratio .
The authors also give data for the
distribution coefficient of amines in
water and in different solvents .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not given .
REFERENCES :
23
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Findlay , A . i Creighton , H . J . M .
( 2 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ] J . Chem . Soc . 1 9 1 0 , 9 7 1 5 3 6 - 6 1 .
=
T/K 2 9 8 . 15
p1 / kPa =
99 . 1 - 180 . 1 Pirketta Scharlin
T/K Pl / kPa a L b 1 0 3 xl a T/K p1 /kPa a L b 1 0 3x l a
--- ---
2 9 8 . 15 99 . 1 0 . 816 0 . 5 89 2 9 8 . 15 139 . 3 0 . 817 0 . 829

100 . 3 0 . 8 17 0 . 597 14 1 . 8 0 . 8 19 0 . 854
106 . 7 0 . 815 0 . 633 153 . 7 Q . 818 0 . 916
1 12 . 1 0 . 8 17 0 . 667 165 . 7 0 . 819 0 . 988
127 . 3 0 . 8165 0 . 757 180 . 1 0 . 820 1 . 07 5
a Calculated by compiler ; b L =
Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 )
The apparatus was essentially s imilar ( 1 ) Purity 9 9 . 4 2 mole % .
to that of Geffcken ( Ref . 1 ) except
that the manometer tube was longer . ( 2 ) Degassed by boi l ing .
REFERENCES : ESTIMATED ERROR :

Geffcken , G . 6T/K =
± 0.1
z. Phys . Chem . , stoechiom . 6L =
± 0 . 25 %
Verwandtschafts1 . 1 9 0 4 , 4 9 , 2 5 7 .

( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Findlay , A . i Shen , B .
( 2 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) J . Chem . soc . 1 9 12 , 1 0 1 , 1 4 5 9 - 6 8 .
=
T/K 2 9 8 . 15
=
p 1 /kPa 100 . 7 - 180 . 0 Pirketta Scharl in
T/K pt f kPa a L b 1 0 3 xl a T/K P1 /kPa a L b 1 0 3 xl a
--- ---
2 9 8 . 15 100 . 7 0 . 826 0 . 606 2 9 8 . 15 142 . 5 0 . 82 3 0 . 854

101 . 2 0 . 825 0 .' 6 08 144 . 5 0 . 825 0 . 868
111 . 5 0 . 825 0 . 67 0 161 . 3 0 . 825 0 . 969
1 12 . 1 0 . 82 6 0 . 675 161 . 5 0 . 825 0 . 970
123 . 6 0 . 826 0 . 744 180 . 0 0 . 824 1 . 080
i24 . 5 0 . 824 0 . 747 180 . 0 0 . 82 6 1 . 080
a Calculated by compiler ; b L =
Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 ]
See above .
24
COMP ON E N TS : ORIGINAL MEAS UREMENTS :
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Sander , w .

( 2 ) water ; H2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ] Z. Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .
Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 1 1- 1 9 1 2 ,
7 8 , 5 1 3 -4 9 .
VARIABLES : P REPARED BY :
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15 - 3 7 5 . 15 C . L . Young
P/MPa = 2 . 45 - 16 . 67
EXPE RIMENTAL VALUES :

T/K P/ bar 10 2 x1 T/K Pjbar 1 0 2 x1
---
(a) ( b) (a) ( b)
2 9 3 . 15 24 . 5 - 0 . 547 3 3 3 . 15 88 . 3 1 . 53 5 1 . 321
29 . 4 - 0 . 608 98 . 1 1 . 764 1. 704
39 . 2 - 0 . 649 107 . 9 1 . 943 1 . 7 17
49 . 0 - 0 . 870 1 17 . 7 2 . 027 2 . 090
53 . 9 - 0 . 962
3 7 5 . 15 58 . 8 0 . 55 1 -
3 0 8 . 15 29 . 4 0 . 862 0 . 827 68 . 6 0 . 62 6 0 . 3 67
39 . 2 1 . 083 1. 306 78 . 5 0 . 695 0 . 537
49 . 0 1 . 381 1 . 604 88 . 3 0 . 794 0 . 621
58 . 8 1 . 663 1 . 430 98 . 1 0 . 861 0 . 710
68 . 6 1 . 968 1 . 824 1 07 . 9 0 . 938 0 . 931
78 , 5 - 2 . 12 7 1 17 . 7 1. 033 0 . 901
127 . 5 1 . 12 8 0 . 964
3 3 3 . 15 39 . 2 0 . 740 0 591
. • 137 . 3 1 . 229 0 . 974
49 . 0 0 . 831 0 . 825 147 . 1 1. 292 0 . 966
58 . 8 0 . 98 1 0 . 930 156 . 9 1. 385 -
68 . 6 1 . 13 8 1 . 075 166 . 7 1 . 429 -
78 . 5 1 . 357 1. 391
The two values ( a ) and ( b) are the result of dupl icate measurements .
AU X I L I ARY I N FO RMAT I O N
ME THOD /AP PARATUS / P RO C E D U RE : S OU R C E AN D P U R l TY OF MATE R I A L S ;
High pressure glass capillary ce l l . ( 1 ) Purif ied final purity

Amount of carbon dioxide absorbed 9 9 . 9 mo le % .
estimated from knowledge of total
amount of carbon dioxide and volume , ( 2 ) No deta ils given .
pres sure and temperature of
nonabsorbed carbon dioxide .
E S T I MATE D E RR O R :
oT/K = ± 0 . 1 ; oP/ bar = ± 0.5;

oxl = ± 0 . 0 0 1 .
REFE RENCES :
25
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Findlay , A . ; Wi l l iams , T .
( 2 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ) J . Chem . Soc . 1 9 1 3 , 1 03 , 6 3 6 -4 5 .
=
T/ K 2 9 8 . 15
p 1 /kPa =
3 5 . 1 - 102 . 4 Pirketta Scharlin
T/K P1 / kPa a L b 10 3xl a Tf K P1 /kPa a L b 1 0 3x l a
--- ---
2 9 8 . 15 35 . 1 0 . 817 0 . 2 09 298 . 15 66 . 0 0 . 816 0 . 392

36 . 1 0 . 816 0 . 2 15 86 . 8 0 . 816 0 . 516
50 . 9 0 . 8 14 0 . 3 02 88 . 9 0 . 8 17 0 . 529
52 . 3 0 . 811 0 . 3 09 10 0 . 3 0 . 818 0 . 5 97
63 . 9 0 . 816 0 . 380 102 . 4 0 . 8 17 0 . 609
a Calculated by compiler ; b L = Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 ]
The apparatus was essentially similar ( 1 ) Purity 9 9 . 4 2 mole % .
to that of Geffcken ( Ref . 1 ) except
that the manometer tube was longer . ( 2 ) Degassed by boi l ing .

Geffcken , G . 6TfK = ± 0.1
z. Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom . 6L = ± 0 . 25 %
Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 0 4 , 4 9 , 2 5 7 .

( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Findlay , A . ; Howell , O . R .
( 2 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ) J . Chem . Soc . 1 9 1 5 , 1 0 7 , 2 8 2 -8 4 .
=
T/ K 2 9 8 . 15
=
p 1 /kPa 3 6 . 3 - 131 . 7 Pirketta Scharl in
T/K p l f kPa a L b 10 3xl a T/K Pl /kPa a L b 1 0 3xl a
--- --
2 9 8 . 15 36. 3 0 . 823 0 . 2 18 2 9 8 . 15 82 . 9 0 . 824 0 . 498

39 . 4 0 . 824 0 . 236 84 . 4 0 . 824 0 . 507
39 . 7 0 . 824 0 . 238 86 . 0 0 . 82 4 0 . 516
49 . 6 0 . 824 0 . 298 101 . 0 0 . 824 0 . 606
51 . 1 0 . 823 0 . 3 07 101 . 7 0 . 824 0 . 610
53 . 7 0 . 824 0 . 322 101 . 8 0 . 824 0 . 611
71. 0 0 . 824 0 . 426 127 . 8 0 . 82 4 0 . 767
71 . 4 0 . 824 0 . 428 129 . 3 0 . 825 0 . 777
73 . 1 0 . 824 0 . 439 131 . 7 0 . 824 0 . 790
a Calculated by compi ler ; b L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 ]
"
See above .
26
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Kunerth , w.
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) Phys . Rev . 19 2 2 , 2 , 5 1 2 -2 4 .
T/K = 293-307
P = " atmospheric" Rosa crovetto
t/ ° C T/K a P/ bar a P1 /bar a L b 1 0 4xl a

--
20 2 9 3 . 15 1 . 013 0 . 990 0 . 900 6 . 627

22 2 9 5 . 15 0 . 987 0 . 872 6 . 360
24 2 9 7 . 15 0 . 983 0 . 836 6 . 03 8
26 2 9 9 . 15 0 . 980 0 . 800 5 . 720
28 3 0 1 . 15 0 . 975 0 . 765 5 . 4 12
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 . 97 1 0 . 729 5 . 102
32 3 0 5 . 15 0 . 966 0 . 693 4 . 795
34 3 07 . 15 0 . 960 0 . 656 4 . 486
a
b L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 ) .
McDaniel type apparatus . 1 ( 1 ) Obtained by heating NaHC0 3 •
Vigorous shaking was provided to Dried over cacl2 and stored in
obtain equil ibrium . The equil ibrium a glass bulb .
composition was determined by
volumetr ic analys is . The gas was ( 2 ) Distil led . Tested by boi l ing
saturated with solvent at the point and dens ity .
temperature of the measurement .
Total pressure in the system was equal
to the barometric pressure .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6L = ± 1%
REFERENCES :
1 . McDaniel , J .
J . Phys . Chem . 1 9 1 1 , 15 , 5 8 7 .
27
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Buch , K .
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] Nord . Kemistmotet (Finl and) 19 2 6 ,
184-9 2 .
T/K = 2 9 2 . 9 5 and 2 9 3 . 9 5
P1 /kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 Rosa Crovetto
4
T/K a P/ bar a a b 10 x1 a
19 . 8 292 . 95 1 . 036 1 . 00 0 . 859 6 . 959

0 . 858 6 . 951
0 . 853 6 . 910
0 . 855 6 . 926
20 . 8 293 . 95 1 . 038 1 . 00 0 . 84 6 . 81
0 . 85 6 . 89
0 . 85 6 . 89
0 . 84 6 . 81
0 . 94 7 . 62
0 . 89 7 . 21
0 . 84 6 . 81
0 . 72 5 . 83
0 . 75 6 . 08
0 . 79 6 . 40
b Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
Average values : Q
19 . 8 0 . 856
20 . 8 0 . 83
An al l-glass apparatus was used . (1) Not stated .
Vigorous stirring was used .
The amount of dissolved gas was (2) Not stated .
determined both volumetrically and
by titration .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.2 ( by author )
REFERENCES :
28
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Morgan , J . L . R . ; Pyne , H . R .
(2) Water ; H 2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ] J . Phys . Chem . 1 9 3 0 , 3 4 , 1 5 7 8 -8 2 .
T/K = 298 . 15
P 1 /kPa = 101 . 32 5 H . L . Clever
T/K
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 8265 6 . 13 5
0 . 8 2 67 6 . 13 7
a L = Ostwald coefficient
The two Ostwald coefficients reported by
the authors were the average values
reported from measurements using versions
3 and 4 of their apparatuses .
b Calculated by the compi ler .
A real gas co 2 volume of 2 4 . 3 4 0 dm3 mol- l

and a solution dens ity the same as for pure
water were assumed .
The authors were concerned that too ( 1 ) Prepared by the action of sulfuric
vigorous shaking might lead to super acid on an aqueous solut ion of
saturation because of local pressure sodium bicarbonate . The gas was
differences . They designed four passed through several wash
vers ions of an apparatus in which the bottles containing distil led
gas and so lvent would be contacted at water .
atmospheric pressure only .
( 2 ) Distil led .
In the final vers ion the gas is
circulated through the degassed
solvent in an all-glass apparatus by
a pumping system of mercury reservoirs �------_,
and bulbs activated by a rocking beam . ESTIMATED ERROR :
The so lvent was degassed by boil ing oL/L = ± 0 . 005 ( compi ler )
under reduced pressure for one hour .
REFERENCES :
29
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Morgan , o . M . ; Maass , o .
(2) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Can . J . Res . 1 9 3 1 , 5 , 1 6 2 -9 9 .
=
T/K 2 7 3 . 15-2 9 8 . 15
P1 / kPa =
7 . 6-113 . 7 Rosa Crovetto
t/ °C T/K a P/ bar a PJ / CmHg s b 10 4xl a
--
0 2 7 3 . 15 0 . 08 2 5 . 70 0 . 02 02 0 . 8270
0 . 2 19 16 . 0 0 0 . 0661 2 . 707
0 . 476 35 . 27 0 . 1412 5 . 785
0 . 713 5 3 . 02 0 . 2 14 3 8 . 783
0 . 914 68 . 13 0 . 2929 12 . 0 1
1 . 143 85 . 30 0 . 3676 15 . 08
10 2 8 3 . 15 0 . 12 1 8 . 17 0 . 0240 0 . 9826
0 . 287 2 0 . 61 0 . 0611 2 . 502
0 . 57 8 42 . 4 1 0 . 1297 5 . 3 13
0 . 872 64 . 4 8 0 . 1975 8 . 09 4
1 . 12 6 83 . 56 0 . 2475 10 . 15
18 2 9 1 . 15 0 . 144 9 . 23 0 . 0216 0 . 8843

0 . 327 22 . 98 0 . 0580 2 . 375
0 . 67 6 4 9 . 14 0 . 1140 4 . 67 0
1 . 013 74 . 4 5 0 . 1740 7 . 13 0
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 164 9 . 89 0 . 0200 0 . 8188

0 . 3 69 25 . 32 0 . 0502 2 . 056
0 . 752 54 . 0 0 0 . 1025 4 . 19 8
1 . 12 8 82 . 22 0 . 1559 6 . 388
a Calculated by the compi ler .
b co2 content in mass % .
The authors measured the vapor ( 1) Pure .
pressures and electrical conducti
vities of aqueous solutions of (2) Degassed conductivity water .
sulphur dioxide , carbon dioxide and
ammonia .
The apparatus was provided with good
stirring to attain equil ibrium .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not stated .
REFERENCES :
30
(1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Kobe , K . A . ' Wi l liams , J . s .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Ind . Eng . Cb em . 19 3 5 , 7 ( 1 ) , 3 7 -8 .
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 Rosa Crovetto
P1 / kPa = 101 . 3 25
4
tj o c T/K a P/ bar a Pl fmmHg a b 10 x1 a
--
25 2 9 8 . 15 1 . 045 760 0 . 754 6 . 11 6

a
b Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ) .
All-glass apparatus . The total ( 1 ) "Pure" . Saturated with water
pressure was kept constant during vapor .
equil ibration . The equil ibration cell ( 2 ) Distil led .
was shaken in a constant temperature
bath . After equil ibration , a liquid ESTIMATED ERROR :
sample was volumetrica l ly analyzed for
water and co2 content . lia = ± 0 . 0 0 5 ( by author )

(1) Carbon · dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Kritschewsky , I . R . i
Shaworonkoff , N . M . ; Aepelbaum , V . A .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) z . physik . Cb em . 1 9 3 5 , A 1 75 , 2 3 2 -8 .
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15 and 3 0 3 . 15 Rosa Crovetto
P/kPa = 4 9 0- 2 9 4 2
2 2
tj o c T/K a P/ bar a P/kg cm- a b 1 0 x1 a
--
20 2 9 3 . 15 4 . 903 5 3 . 97 0 . 3 2 08
9 . 807 10 7 . 81 0 . 6289
14 . 7 1 0 15 11 . 5 0 . 92 3 1
19 . 6 1 20 14 . 8 1 . 1846
29 . 42 30 20 . 6 1 . 64 1
30 3 0 3 . 15 4 . 903 5 3 . 42 0 . 2772
14 . 7 1 0 15 9 . 66 0 . 7786
19 . 6 1 20 12 . 4 0 . 9970
29 . 42 30 18 . 7 1 . 495
a
b Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ) .
A "conventiona l " high-pressure appara- Nothing specif ied .
tus was used . Equilibrium in the sys-
tem was attained by bubbl ing gas at
constant pressure . The equilibr ium ESTIMATED ERROR :
compos ition in the system was deter- 2 = ± 0.1
6T/K
mined by measuring the volume of wa- liP/kg cm- = ± 0 . 1
ter , and the pressure and volume of
the dissolved C02 in a buret that was
thermostatted . The solubil ities of REFERENCES :
the gas mixtures co2 -H2 were also
measured with the same experimental 1 . Jell inek , K . i
apparatus . Details are given in the Lebrbucb der Pbysikaliscben Cbemie ,
source . The authors calculated the Bd . 4 , 19 3 3 , 2 3 1 .
fugacity o f the pure gas from Ref . 1 .
31
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Shedlovsky , T ; Macinnes , D . A .
( 2 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 -5 ] J . Am . Cbem . Soc . 1 9 3 5 , 57 , 1705-10 .
T/K = 2 98 . 15 H . L . Clever
p 1 / kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5
2
t/ ° C T/K 10 K8 fmol dm- 3 atm- 1 a 10 4x1 b L / cm3 cm- 3 b , c
--
25 2 9 8 . 15 3 . 3 7 2 ± 0 . 005 6 . 08 9 0 . 8207
a Ka = Henry ' s constant

c L = Ostwald coefficient
A real gas volume of 24 . 3 4 0 dm3 mol- 1 at 2 9 8 . 15 and 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa

was used in the . calculations . The ideal gas volume would give
an Ostwald coefficient value of 0 . 8 2 5 0 .
It was assumed the solution had the same densi ty as pure water .
The Henry ' s constant value was ( 1 ) Tank . Analyzed to be 9 9 . 9 7 % C02 .
obtained by direct t itration of co2
saturated solutions , knowledge of the ( 2 ) Conductivity water .
solution vapor pressure and barometer
readings .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
See footnote 12 on page 1 7 0 8 of the
paper . 6Ka / Ka = ± 0 . 005 ( compi ler )

(1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Orcutt , F . S . ; Seevers , M . H .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) J . Biol . Cbem . 1 9 3 6 , 1 1 7 1 501-7 .
=
T/K 2 9 8 . 15 Rosa Crovetto
Pl f kPa = 101 . 3 25
t/ ° C T/K a P/bar a Pi f atm a b 1 0 4x1 a , c
--
25 2 9 8 . 15 1. 045 1 . 00 0 . 753 6 . 108

b a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ) .
c Assuming that Vm, l = 22 . 2 6 05 dm3 mol- l at STP .
A Van S lyke - Nei l l apparatus was ( 1 ) " Commercial tank" .
used to perform the experiments . 1
The authors present the method as ( 2 ) Not stated .
"qual itative" .
ESTIMATED ERROR : REFERENCES :
Not given . 1 . Van Slyke , D . D . ; Nei l l , J . M .
J . Biol . Cbem . 1 9 2 4 , 61 , 5 2 3 -3 5 .
32
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Zel ' venskii , Ya . D .
( 2 ) water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] Zh . Khim . Prom . 19 3 7 , 1 4 , 1 2 5 0-7 .
T/K = 273-373
P l /MPa = 1 . 084-9 . 446 Yu . P . Yampol ' skii
2 2
T/K a p1 / atm sl b 10 x1 T/K a p1 / atm sl b 10 x1
--- ---
273 . 10 . 7 0 16 . 79 1. 332 323 89 . 60 2 6 . 00 2 . 0611

15 . 7 4 22 . 93 1 . 810 9 1 . 50 2 5 . 68 2 . 03 63
29 . 47 3 3 . 72 2 . 639 92 . 00 25 . 86 2 . 0503
298 10 . 9 8 7 . 66 0 . 617 348 18 . 8 4 5 . 48 0 . 441

11 . 0 3 7 . 75 0 . 6234 19 . 0 0 5 . 38 0 . 434
22 . 92 15 . 51 1 . 2399 32 . 24 8 . 96 0 . 724
24 . 66 15 . 91 1 . 2 7 14 3 2 . 68 9 . 05 0 . 7272
24 . 77 16 . 08 1. 2849 46 . 61 12 . 2 6 0 . 983
2 6 . 00 16 . 81 1 . 3427 60 . 27 15 . 2 4 1 . 2 18 5
3 1 . 40 19 . 54 1 . 5570 60 . 92 15 . 0 6 1 . 2043
34 . 41 2 0 . 88 1 . 662 61 . 03 15 . 1 1 1 . 2 08 3
38 . 83 2 3 . 34 1 . 8541 61 . 22 15 . 2 5 1 . 2 19 3
3 9 . 18 23 . 46 1 . 8635 75 . 70 17 . 6 2 1 . 4062
4 4 . 10 2 5 . 66 2 . 0348 75 . 95 18 . 0 0 1 . 4360
4 5 . 05 25 . 70 2 . 0378 76 . 35 17 . 8 3 1 . 4227
5 6 . 10 2 9 . 05 2 . 2 97 9 2 . 05 2 0 . 17 1 . 6064
62 . 9 3 0 . 42 2 . 4032 93 . 22 20 . 33 1 . 6111
323 19 . 14 7 . 75 0 . 62 3 373 19 . 10 4 . 30 0 . 3477

3 2 . 58 12 . 3 1 0 . 987 19 . 2 7 4 . 29 0 . 3460
3 2 . 79 12 . 4 9 1 . 001 3 2 . 07 7 . 13 0 . 57 3 8
46. 80 15 . 93 1 . 2730 3 2 . 58 7 . 33 0 . 5898
46 . 88 16 . 32 1 . 3 04 3 2 . 69 7 . 23 0 . 582
57 . 0 0 19 . 11 1 . 52 3 3 32 . 78 7 . 18 0 . 5778
60 . 3 0 2 0 . 05 1 . 5970 4 6 . 10 9 . 98 0 . 8013
60 . 92 20 . 30 1 . 6166 46 . 75 10 . 1 3 0 . 813
61 . 10 2 0 . 39 1 . 6236 46 . 89 9 . 89 0 . 7942
62 . 0 0 2 0 . 52 1 . 6338 60 . 95 12 . 2 4 0 . 9810
73 . 22 2 2 . 59 1 . 7957 61 . 3 0 13 . 52 1 . 0825
73 . 82 23 . 27 1 . 8487 75 . 00 1 8 . 17 1 . 448
74 . 50 2 3 . 00 1 . 8277 9 0 . 00 1 8 . 17 1 . 448

b s 1 = solubi l ity of C02 in water [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 )
The saturation of water with co2 was Nothing specified .
achieved in a thermostatted rocking
autoclave with inner walls plated with r-------�
silver . co2 solubi l ity was deter- ESTIMATED ERROR :
mined by measuring the volume of the
gas desorbed from the solution under Nothing specified .
ambient conditions . The equipment was
similar to that used in Ref . 1 . �------�
REFERENCES :
1 . Wiebe , R . ; Gaddy , V . L . ;
Heins , Jr . c .
Ind . Eng . Chem . 1 9 3 2 , 2 4 , 8 2 3 .
33
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) curry , J . ; Haz elton , c . L .
(2) Water ; H20 ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ] J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 3 8 , 60 , 2 2 7 1-3 .
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 K
P1 / kPa = 9 4 . 57 - 9 7 . 09 H . L . Clever
t/ °C T/K a P/mmHg P1 /mmHg 10 4xl b Ljcm3 cm- 3 c
25 . 00 2 9 8 . 15 749 . 4 722 . 9 0 . 816

7 54 . 0 728 . 2 0 . 822
747 . 5 721 . 5 0 . 834
735 . 5 7 09 . 3 0 . 8 13
6 . 09 Av . 0 . 8 2 1 ± 0 . 007
a Added by the compi ler .

b The mole fraction solubil ity was calculated by the compiler for a
partial pressure of co2 of 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa ( 7 6 0 mmHg ) us ing a real gas
molar volume of 2 4 . 3 4 dm3 mol- 1 •
c L = Ostwald coefficient .
According to the authors the Ostwald coefficient corresponds to a
molal ity of 0 . 0 3 3 7 mol kg- 1 at a C02 partial pressure of 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa .
The apparatus was an Ostwald type ( 1 ) Commercial tank . Analyz ed by
using the " dry method" as described by reaction with KOH and found to be
Just (Ref . 1 ) . 99 . 8 % pure .
The apparatus was of smal l size ( 2 ) Distil led . Refluxed to remove

because it was to be used to determine dissolved gases .
the solubility of co2 in heavy water .
The buret was 1 0 cm3 graduated to
0 . 05 cm3 • The sample bulb had a vol
ume of 6 . 8 1 1 cm3 •
The four water samples ranged from
2 . 2 7 3 5 to 4 . 7 3 7 4 g . ESTIMATED ERROR :
o T/K = ± 0 . 01
oL/L = ± 0 . 01
REFERENCES :
1 . Just , G . z . physik . Chem . ( Leipzig)
19 0 1 , 3 7 , 3 4 2 .
34
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Wiebe , R. ; Gaddy , V . L .
(2) Water ; H2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ] J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 3 9 , 61 , 3 15-8 .
T/K = 3 2 3 . 15-3 7 3 . 15
P/MPa = 2 . 5 3 -7 0 . 9 Rosa Crovetto
s b
a a 2
t/ ° C T/K P/bar P/ atm 1 0 xl a
--
50 3 2 3 . 15 25 . 33 25 9 . 71 0 . 7797
50 . 66 50 17 . 2 4 6 1 . 377
75 . 99 75 22 . 534 1. 791
101 . 3 25 100 2 5 . 628 2 . 03 2
126 . 66 125 2 6 . 77 2 . 12 0
152 . 0 150 2 7 . 64 3 2 . 18 8
2 02 . 6 200 2 9 . 14 3 2 . 3 04
3 04 . 0 300 3 1 . 34 2 . 47 4
4 05 . 3 400 3 3 . 29 2 . 62 3
6 08 . 9 600 3 6 . 73 2 . 887
7 09 . 3 700 38 . 34 3 . 00 9
75 3 4 8 . 15 25 . 33 25 6 . 815 0 . 5485
50 . 66 so 1 2 . 59 1 . 009
75 . 99 75 17 . 0 4 4 1 . 361
101 . 3 25 100 20. 61 1 . 64 0
152 . 0 150 2 4 . 58 1 . 950
2 02 . 6 200 26 . 66 2 . 112
3 04 . 0 300 29 . 51 2 . 332
4 05 . 4 400 3 1 . 88 2 . 515
7 09 . 3 700 3 7 . 59 2 . 95 2
100 3 7 3 . 15 25 . 33 25 5 . 365 0 . 4323

50 . 66 50 10 . 179 0 . 8170
75 . 99 75 14 . 2 8 9 1 . 14 3
101 . 325 100 17 . 67 1 . 410
152 . 0 150 22 . 725 1 . 806
2 02 . 6 200 25 . 694 2 . 03 7
3 04 . 0 300 2 9 . 53 2 . 334
4 05 . 3 400 32 . 39 2 . 5 54
7 09 . 3 700 38 . 50 3 . 02 2
a Calculated by the comf iler .

b Solubil ity of co2 ( em at STP per gram of water ) .
Authors ' note : There is a change in solubi lity vs pressure in the low
temperature range and at 1 0 0 - 2 0 0 atm that could suggest the
coexistence of two liquid phases .
A high-pressure autoclave was used . ( 1 ) Purity 9 9 . 9 8 t.
Two flasks helped to maintain pressure
constant during sampl ing . Pressure ( 2 ) Not stated .
was read on a dead weight gauge .
The liquid sample was analyzed for
its C02 content by expansion into a ESTIMATED ERROR :
thermostatted gas buret .
It was not stated if stirring was Not given .
used .
35
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Van S lyke , D . O .
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 ) J . Biol . Chem . 19 3 9 , 1 3 0 , 54 5-54 .
T/K = 2 9 5 . 9 5 -2 9 8 . 65
P1 / kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 Rosa Crovetto
tt • c T/K a
P/ bar • Pl f atm a b > 1o 4xl a,c
22 . 8 295 . 95 1 . 04 1 1 . 00 0 . 806 6 . 53 4
22 . 8 295 . 95 1 . 04 1 0 . 807 6 . 54 2
24 . 7 297 . 85 1 . 044 0 . 764 6 . 197
24 . 8 297 . 95 1 . 04 5 0 . 758 6 . 14 8
25 . 4 2 9 8 . 55 1 . 046 0 . 752 6 . 101
25 . 5 2 9 8 . 65 1 . 04 6 0 . 753 6 . 109
..
b a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ) •
c
Assuminq that Vm, l = 2 2 . 2 6 05 dm3 mol- 1 at STP .
Measurements were made in a Van S lyke/ ( 1 ) 99 . 9 % .

2
Nei l l apparatus . 1 • In thi s kind of
apparatus the equil ibration and ( 2 ) Not specif ied . Deqassed .
analys is were done in the same
chamber . Shakinq was done durinq
saturation and deqass inq . Once
equil ibration was achieved the
undissolved qas was removed and the
solution ana lyzed for absorbed qases
manometrically in a known volume .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not stated .
REFERENCES :
1 . Van S lyke , D . O . ; Nei l l , J . M .

J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 4 , 61 , 5 2 3 -3 5 .
2 . Van S lyke , D . D .
J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 7 , 73 , 12 1-3 4 .
36
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Wiebe , R . ; Gaddy , V . L .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 4 0 , 62 , 8 15-7 .
T/K = 2 9 1 . 15- 3 1 3 . 15
P/MPa = 2 . 5 3 -50 . 6 6 Rosa Crovetto
s b
2
t/ ° C T/K a P/ bar a P/ atm 10 xl a
---
18 2 9 1 . 15 25 . 33 25 19 . 5 1 1 . 554
5 0 . 66 50 3 2 . 03 2 . 52 7
25 2 9 8 . 15 50 . 66 50 27 . 23 2 . 15 6
3 1 . 04 3 04 . 19 25 . 33 25 14 . 18 1 . 13 4
50 . 66 50 2 4 . 15 1 . 917
35 3 08 . 15 25 . 33 25 12 . 9 5 1 . 037
50 . 66 50 22 . 21 1 . 766
75 . 99 75 27 . 84 2 . 2 03
10 1 . 3 3 100 2 9 . 13 2 . 303
152 . 0 150 3 0 . 52 2 . 410
2 02 . 6 200 3 1 . 83 2 . 511
4 05 . 3 400 35. 73 2 . 810
506 . 6 500 37 . 99 2 . 983
40 3 13 . 15 25 . 33 25 1 1 . 62 0 . 9316
50 . 66 50 20. 35 1 . 620
75 . 99 75 25 . 81 2 . 04 6
10 1 . 3 3 100 27 . 81 2 . 201
12 6 . 7 125 28 . 71 2 . 271
152 . 0 150 29 . 39 2 . 323
2 02 . 6 200 3 1 . 74 2 . 5 04
4 05 . 3 400 34 . 87 2 . 744
506 . 6 500 36. 73 2 . 88 7
a Calculated by the comr i ler .

b Solubi l ity of co2 ( em at STP per gram of water ) .
At each temperature : Only data at a pressure lower than the

corresponding vapor pressure of co2 can be cons idered as gas
liquid solubil ity measurements .
Authors ' note : At 12 o c and 18 o c and above 3 0 0 atm as ide from

formation of solid carbon dioxide hexahydrate , the compos ition
of both phases is the same .
METHOD/APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND · PURITY OF MATERIALS :
Apparatus and procedure are descr ibed ( 1 ) 99 . 98 % .

in ref . 1 . A high-pressure autoclave
was used with stirring . ( 2 ) Not stated .
Note that some measurements were done

at pressures higher than the ESTIMATED ERROR :
corresponding vapor pressure of C02 •
In these conditions l iquid-l iquid Not given .
equi l ibria wi l l exist .
For reference , for co2 Tc = 3 04 . 2 K REFERENCES :

and Pc = 7 2 . 8 atm .
1 . Wiebe , R . ; Gaddy , V . L .
J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 3 9 , 61 , 3 15-8 .

37
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Markham , A . E . ; Kobe , K . A .
(2) Water ; H2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 4 1 , 63 , 4 4 9 -54 .
T/K = 2 7 3 . 3 5 - 3 1 3 . 15
P1 /kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 Rosa Crovetto
t/ ° C T/K a P/ bar a Pj /mmHg a b 1 0 4xl a
0.2 273 . 35 1 . 019 760 1 . 7023 13 . 76

25 2 9 8 . 15 1 . 04 5 0 . 7565 6 . 118
40 3 13 . 15 1 . 087 0 . 5133 4 . 15 2

b a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
The results in a were obtained from an average of 8 , 12

and 5 experimental points at each temperature , respectively .
The apparatus was a thermostatted ( 1 ) From commercial cyl inder . 99 . 8 %.

all-glass absorption flask provided
with stirring . The solubi l ity was ( 2 ) Freshly distil led and degassed .
calculated from the change in volume
of the gas before and after
equil ibration at constant pressure .
The partial pressure was maintained
at 7 6 0 mmHg once a l l the corrections
including solvent vapor pressure were
done .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
At 0 . 2 o c 6t/ ° C = ± 0.1 %
&a = ± 0.2 %
At 2 5 and 4 0 o c 6t/ ° C = ± 0 . 03 %
&a = ± 0 . 06 %
REFERENCES :
38
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Wiebe , R . ; Gaddy , V . L .
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 4 1 , 63 , 4 7 5-7 .
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15-3 4 8 . 15
P/MPa = 0 . 1 - 70 . 9 Rosa Crovetto
Vapor phase composition a
P/ atm t/ ° C
25 3 1 . 04 50 75
1 0 . 02 3 0 . 03 2 0 . 09 3 0 . 242
25 0 . 00132 0 . 00183 0 . 00498 0 . 00855
50 0 . 00104 0 . 00129 0 . 0 0 3 08
60 0 . 00287
75 0 . 0 02 8 1
100 0 . 00267 0 . 002 9 3 0 . 003 61 0 . 00666
110 0 . 00652
125 0 . 00687
150 0 . 00289 0 . 00490 0 . 00768
200 0 . 00303 0 . 003 38 0 . 00544 0 . 00910
400 0 . 00383 0 . 00610 0 . 01060
450 0 . 00322
475 0 . 003 2 1
500 0 . 0 0 3 19 0 . 00386
525 0 . 00382
550 0 . 00384
600 0 . 00637 0 . 01120
700 0 . 00544 0 . 01125
a Vapor phase composition in equil ibrium , expressed in grams of

water per l iter of expanded gas at STP .
Note : Whenever the total pressure is larger than the corresponding
vapor pressure of co2 , there wil l be a possibility of l iquid
l iquid equilibria instead of gas- liquid .
The apparatus used was the same high ( 1 ) Not stated .
pressure autoclave as in Ref . 1 .
After equil ibration , samples were ( 2 ) Not stated .
taken from the gas phase . No pressure
stabil ity was provided during
sampl ing . The authors could not
discard completely the possibi lity of
spray formation in the sampl ing
procedure . The samples were analyzed ESTIMATED ERROR :
by weighing .
For C02 , Tc = 304 . 20 K ( 3 1 . 05 ° C )
Pc = 7 2 . 8 atm
REFERENCES :
1 . Wiebe , R . ; Gaddy , V . L .
J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 3 9 , 61 , 3 15-8 .

39
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Harned , H . S . ; Davis , R . Jr .
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) J . Am . Cbem . Soc . 1 9 4 3 , 65 , 2 0 3 0-7 .
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15- 3 2 3 . 15
PJ ikPa = 101 . 325 Rosa Crovetto
t/ oC T/K 4 P/ bar 4 1o2s b 10 3xl 4
0 2 7 3 . 15 1 . 019 7 . 72 6 1 . 390
7 . 67 6 1 . 381
5 2 7 8 . 15 1 . 022 6 . 402 1 . 152
10 2 8 3 . 15 1 . 02 6 5 . 359 0 . 9 64 5
5 . 3 67 0 . 9 65 9
15 2 8 8 . 15 1 . 03 0 4 . 554 0 . 8197
20 2 9 3 . 15 1 . 03 7 3 . 92 3 0 . 7062
3 . 928 o. 7071
25 2 9 8 . 15 1 . 04 5 3 . 438 0 . 6190
3 . 458 0 . 6226
30 3 0 3 . 15 1 . 05 6 3 . 02 6 0 . 5448
3 . 02 1 0 . 54 3 9
35 3 08 . 15 1 . 07 0 2 . 67 8 0 . 4822
40 3 13 . 15 1 . 08 7 2 . 4 07 0 . 4334
2 . 4 07 0 . 4334
45 3 18 . 15 1 . 109 2 . 19 2 0 . 3947
50 3 2 3 . 15 1 . 13 7 1 . 982 0 . 3 5 69
1 . 969 0 . 3546
4 Calculated by the compiler .

b S = m1 / P1where m1 is the molality of co2 ( mol kq- 1 ) .
The S values are at P1 = 1 atm .
The same apparatus and method were ( 1 ) From commercial tank .
used for measurements of solubi lity Purity 9 9 . 67 % ± o . os %.
and electromotive force . A detailed
description of the experimental ( 2 ) Qual ity not stated .
procedure is available in the source . Deqassed by co2 bubbl inq and
evacuation .
Equilibrium in the cell was attained
by bubbl inq co2 throuqh the solvent
while qently rockinq the thermostatted
cell . Pressure was maintained
constant at 1 atm . The concentration
was determined by titratinq about
90 cm3 of solution with excess ESTIMATED ERROR :
standard Ba ( OH ) 2 solution and back-
titratinq the excess . 6S = ± 0 . 2 % ( By authors )
REFERENCES :
40
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Koch , H . A . ; Stutzman , L . F . ;
Blum , H . A . ; Hutchings , L . E .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
Chem . Eng . Prog . 1 94 9 , 45 ( 11 ) ,
6 7 7 -8 2 .
T/K = 2 9 1 . 45-295 . 05
P1 /kPa = 1 2 . 4 6- 17 . 6 3 Rosa Crovetto
t/ ° C T/K a P/bar a PJ i atm Y1 b 1 0 4xl c
21.7 294 . 85 0 . 163 0 . 135 0 . 1461 1 . 000

20 . 5 293 . 65 0 . 177 0 . 151 0 . 1514 1 . 261
18 . 3 291. 45 0 . 145 0 . 12 3 0 . 12 3 0 0 . 9930
21. 7 294 . 85 0 . 180 0 . 152 0 . 1569 1 . 04 5
21 . 9 2 9 5 . 05 0 . 17 6 0 . 148 0 . 1490 1 . 17 2
21. 1 294 . 25 0 . 202 0 . 174 0 . 17 8 1 1 . 263

b Mole fraction of co2 in gas phase .
c
Mole fraction of co2 in l iquid phase .
Also , gas-liquid transfer coefficients were determined
and they are given in the original paper .
Only equilibrium values are given here .
METHOD/APPARATUS/PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS :
Equil ibration was obtained by flowing (1) Not stated .
the gas through a column of water
packed with Raschig rings . (2) Disti l led .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6x = ± 3 % ( estimated by compiler)
REFERENCES :
41
( 1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Morrison , T . J . ; B i llett , F .
(2) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ] J . Chem . soc . � , 3 8 19 -2 2 .
T/K = 2 8 6 . 45-347 . 85
P1 / kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 Rosa crovetto
T/K a P/ bar a P1 / atm s b 1 0 4xl a
13 . 3 286 . 45 1 . 029 1 . 00 1 . 059 8 . 563

14 . 9 2 8 8 . 05 1 . 03 0 1 . 010 8 . 16 7
17 . 6 290 . 75 1 . 03 3 0 . 927 7 . 496
19 . 8 292 . 95 1 . 03 6 0 . 873 7 . 060 '
25 . 8 298 . 95 1 . 04 6 0 . 7447 6 . 02 3
29 . 8 3 02 . 9 5 1 . 055 0 . 6622 5 . 356
30 . 3 3 03 . 4 5 1 . 056 0 . 6600 5 . 338
33 . 2 3 06 . 35 1 . 064 0 . 6152 . 4 . 976
34 . 3 3 07 . 4 5 1 . 067 0 . 6067 4 . 907
34 . 6 3 07 . 7 5 1 . 068 0 . 5998 4 . 852
42 . 5 3 15 . 65 1 . 097 0 . 5020 4 . 061
46 . 4 3 19 . 5 5 1 . 116 0 . 4650 3 . 762
48 . 4 3 2 1 . 55 1 . 127 0 . 4550 3 . 68 1
51 . 1 324 . 25 1 . 144 0 . 4256 3 . 443
54 . 3 327 . 45 1 . 166 0 . 4046 3 . 273
63 . 1 3 3 6 . 25 1 . 243 0 . 3491 2 . 824
68 . 2 341 . 35 1 . 302 0 . 3273 2 . 648
72 . 4 3 4 5 . 55 1 . 359 0 . 3 06 9 2 . 483
74 . 7 347 . 85 1 . 394 0 . 3006 2 . 432
a Calculated by the compi ler

b s = Kuenen coefficient at a qas partial pressure of 1 atm
( cm3 ( STP ) q- 1 ] .
An improved apparatus for solvent (1) Prepared from marble .
pretreatment was used ( Ref . 1 ) . The systen was sealed to prevent
The qas content in the solution was contamination with air .
analyzed with a qas burette .
The solvent was equil ibrated by (2) Pure . Deqassed .
flowinq a l iquid film throuqh the qas .
No supersaturation was observed .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not stated .
REFERENCES :
1 . Morrison , T . J . ; Billett , F .
J . Chem . soc . 1 9 4 8 , 2 0 3 3 -8 .
42
(1) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8-9 ) Shchennikova , M . K . ; Devyatykh , G . G . ;

Korshunov , I . A .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) Zh . Prikl . Khim . (Leningrad) 1957 ,
3 0 , 8 3 3 -8 ; * J . Appl . Chem . USSR
( Engl . Trans l . ) 1 9 5 7 , 3 0 ( 6 ) ,
8 8 1-6 .
T/K = 2 9 3 - 348
P 1 / kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 Pirketta Schar l in
b b ,
t t oc T/K a a amean L a,c Lme an a c
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 . 88 0 . 94
0 . 90 0 . 97
0 . 88 0 . 94
0 . 91 0 . 98
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 . 892 0 . 957
28 3 0 1 . 15 0 . 72 o . 72 0 . 79 0 . 79
40 3 13 . 15 0 . 55 0 . 63
0 . 54 0 . 62
40 3 13 . 15 0 . 54 5 0 . 62 5
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 . 441 0 . 441 0 . 52 2 0 . 52 2
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 . 336 0 . 409
0 . 341 0 . 416
0. 333 0 . 406
0 . 329 0 . 401
0 . 324 0 . 395
0 . 313 0 . 382
0 . 349 0 . 425
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 . 356 0 . 434
0 . 330 0 . 4 02
60 3 3 3 . 15 0. 335 0 . 409
75 3 4 8 . 15 0 . 235 0 . 235 0 . 300 0 . 300
a
b a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 { STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
c L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 ] .
4
Isotopic dilution method , with c 1 (1) Not specified .
radioactive carbon isot'ope as a
tracer . Experimental procedure (2) Redistil led .
described in detai l in the original
source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not given .
REFERENCES :
43
COMPONENTS : ORIGINAL MEAS UREMENTS :
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Ellis , A . J .
( 2 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] Am . J . Sci . 1959 , 257 , 2 17 - 3 4 .
=
T/K 387 - 621 c . L . Young
=
p/MPa 0 . 506 - 16 . 4 0
t/°C T/K p/ atm pt f atm pt fkPa p2; atm KHf atm- 1 a 10 3x 1
--- --
series A
114 387 5 . 00 3 . 41 346 1 . 59 4800 0 . 710
128 401 6 . 00 3 . 53 358 2 . 47 4640 0 . 761
147 420 8 . 25 3 . 80 385 4 . 45 4940 0 . 769
175 448 12 . 8 5 4 . 17 423 8 . 68 4960 0 . 841
182 455 14 . 1 3 . 89 394 10 . 2 1 4680 0 . 831
192 465 16 . 7 3 . 93 398 12 . 7 7 3890 1 . 01
195 468 17 . 5 3 . 87 392 13 . 6 3 4040 0 . 958
2 08 481 22 . 0 4 . 14 4 19 17 . 8 6 3770 1 . 10
227 500 30 . 1 4 . 45 451 25 . 65 4080 1 . 09
228 501 30.7 4.4 446 26 . 3 4 16 0 1 . 06
228 501 30 . 3 4.0 405 26 . 3 3750 1 . 07
231 504 32 . 3 4.2 426 28 . 1 3840 1 . 09
232 505 32 . 6 4.3 436 28 . 3 3980 1. 08
255 528 47 . 1 4.9 496 42 . 2 4060 1.2
257 530 48 . 5 4.9 496 43 . 6 3980 1.2
291 564 78 . 5 4.8 486 73 . 7 3 15 0 1.5
298 571 85 . 9 4.4 446 81 . 5 2690 1.6
305 578 94 . 5 4.6 466 89 . 9 2780 1.7
3 14 587 105 . 8 3.9 395 10 1 . 9 2030 1.9
322 595 1 17 . 1 4.0 405 11 3 . 1 2250 1.8
343 616 152 . 3 4.2 426 148 . 1 187 0 2.2
348 621 161 . 9 4.3 436 15 7 . 6 1860 2.3
( continued next page )
AUX I L I ARY I N FORMAT ION
METHOD /AP PARATUS / P ROCEDU RE : S OURCE AN D PURI TY OF MATE R I ALS :

static bomb of approximately 100 cm3 Carbon dioxide generated in
capacity . Heated in electric tube apparatus by reaction of sodium
furnace . Liquid volume of approx bicarbonate and hydrochloric acid .
imately half to two thirds bomb
volume . Samples of mixture analysed Two series studied :
by absorbing water in Anhydrone and
carbon dioxide in carbsorb . Details Series A : 0 . 0 2 moles NaHC03 ; 0 . 0 0 7 9 7
in source . moles HCl ; 4 2 o r 52 cm3 o f
water .
Series B : 0 . 0 0 7 moles NaHC03 ; 0 . 0 0 3 0 2
moles HCl ; 55 cm3 of water .
E S T I MATED E RROR :
oT/K = ± 2 . 0 ; ox 1 ± 4 % =
( estimated compiler ) .
REFE RENCES :
44
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Ellis , A . J .
( 2 ) water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) Am . J . Sc:i . 1959 , 257 , 2 17 - 3 4 .
( continued)
a
t rc T/K pj atm p 1 / atm p1 /kPa p2 ; atm KH / atm- 1 1 0 3xl
--- --
Series B
163 436 7 . 85 1 . 31 133 6 . 54 4730 0 . 28

179 452 11 . 25 1 . 64 166 9 . 61 4530 0 . 36
197 . 5 4 7 0 . 7 14 . 7 1 . 55 157 13 . 15 4220 0 . 37
199 472 16 . 3 1 37
. 139 14 . 9 3 3760 0 . 36
222 495 25 . 2 1 . 58 160 2 3 . 62 3640 0 . 43
224 497 26 . 0 1 . 47 149 24 . 53 3890 0 . 38
227 500 27 . 5 1 . 56 158 2 5 . 94 3900 0 . 40
233 506 30 . 4 1 . 44 14 6 28 . 96 3550 0 . 41
242 . 5 5 15 . 7 3 6 . 0 1.7 172 34 - 3 3730 0 . 46
244 517 36. 8 1.6 162 35 . 2 3530 0 . 45
287 560 71 . 6 1.8 182 69 . 8 3 3 10 0 . 54
288 561 72 . 5 1.7 172 70 . 8 3250 0 . 52
3 17 590 106 . 7 1.7 172 105 . 0 2600 0 . 65
3 19 592 111 . 1 1.8 182 10 9 . 3 2680 0 . 67
a
KH = Henry ' s law coefficient .
45
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Mal inin , S . D .

( 2 ) Water ; H 2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Geokhimiya 1959 , ( 3 ) , 2 3 5 -45 .
T/K = 4 7 3 . 15 - 6 0 3 . 15 C . L . Young
P/MPa = 9 . 8 - 49 . 0
2
T/K P/ bar T/K P/bar 10 xl a
4 7 3 . 15 98 1 . 22 4 7 3 . 15 490 . 4 . 56
98 1 . 21 490 4 . 36
98 1 . 22 490 4 . 38
196 2 . 47 490 4 . 45
196 2 . 44 490 4 . 32
196 2 . 35 490 4 . 28
196 2 . 38
196 2 . 40 5 2 3 . 15 98 1 . 07
196 2 . 41 98 1 . 07
294 3 . 28 98 1 . 08
294 3 . 24 196 2 . 77
294 3 . 17 196 2 . 74
294 3 . 29 19 6 2 . 56
294 3 . 26 196 2 . 74
294 3 . 26 196 2 . 71
392 3 . 84 196 2 . 79
392 3 . 93 2 94 4 . 34
392 4 . 00 294 4 . 34
392 4 . 05 294 4 . 17
392 3 . 76 294 4 . 30
392 3 . 76 294 4 . 40
490 4 . 44 392 5 . 69
490 4 . 39 392 5 . 61
490 4 . 56 392 5 . 53
490 4 . 36 392 5 . 60
490 4 . 38 392 5 . 53
( continued next page)
AUXI L I ARY I N FO RMAT ION
METHOD /APPARATUS / P ROCEDURE : S OURCE AND· PURI TY OF MATE RI ALS ;
Rocking static equil ibrium cell . ( 1 ) Distilled into f i l l ing vessel .

Temperature measured with
cromelalumel thermocouple . Pressure ( 2 ) No details given .
measured with Bourdon gauge . Liquid
phase analysed by dissolving carbon
dioxide in alkal i and estimating
both water and dissolved carbon
dioxide gravimetrica l ly . Details
in source .
E S T I MATED E RROR:
6T/K = ± 2 ; 6Pf bar = ± 2 ;
6x1 = ± 1 % .
( estimated by compiler ) .
RE F E REN CES :
46
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Mal inin , S . D .

( 2 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ) Geokhimiya 1 9 5 9 , ( 3 ) , 2 3 5-45 .
( continued )
b
T/K Pf bar 1 0 2�1 a T/K P/ bar Y1
---
5 2 3 . 15 392 5 . 58 4 7 3 . 15 196 0 . 849

392 5 . 54 196 0 . 851
490 6.5 196 0 . 847
490 6.6 196 0 . 834
196 0 . 850
5 7 3 . 15 157 1. 7 6 196 0 . 842
157 1 . 81 588 0 . 818
157 1. 7 3
196 2 . 85 5 2 3 . 15 196 0 . 644
196 2 . 78 196 0 . 63 0
196 2 . 74 196 0 . 656
196 2 . 71 196 0 . 615
294 5 . 45 490 0 . 673
294 5 . 38 490 0 . 674
294 5 . 59 490 0 . 669
294 5 . 57 490 0 . 694
294 5 . 32
294 5 . 40 5 7 3 . 15 196 0 . 382
294 5 . 30 196 0 . 3 67
294 5 . 49 196 0 . 370
392 8 . 06 196 0 . 360
392 8 . 38 196 0 . 359
392 8 . 31 294 0 . 452
392 8 . 03 294 0 . 460
392 8 . 29 294 0 . 450
490 12 . 8 294 0 . 466
294 0 . 465
6 0 3 . 15 294 6.1 392 0 . 4 51
294 5.9 392 0 . 458
294 6.0 392 0 . 445
392 0 . 4 34
392 0 . 470
490 0 . 403
490 0 . 411
490 0 . 413
490 0 . 4 10
6 0 3 . 15 294 0 . 2 65
294 0 . 290
294 0 . 287
a � = mole fraction of carbon dioxide in l iquid

1
b =
Y1 mole fraction of carbon dioxide in vapor
..
47
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Bartels , H ; Wrbitzky , R .
( 2 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] Pflugers Arch . 19 6 0 , 2 71 , 1 6 2 - 8 .
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 1 1 . 15
P = " atmospheric" Pirketta Scharl in
t/ °C T/K a a/ [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] b n c

-- --
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 . 9891 ± 0 . 006 8
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 . 8533 ± 0 . 003 8
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 7431 ± 0 . 004 5
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 . 6483 ± 0 . 014 8
35 3 0 8 . 15 0 . 5796 ± 0 . 004 5
38 3 1 1 . 15 0 . 5439 ± 0 . 003 11

b a = Bunsen coefficient . The values given are mean
values of several measurements . The error is
standard deviation .
c Number of measurements .
Water was saturated with co 2 in ro ( 1 ) From cyl inder ; purity 9 9 . 8 %.
tating tonometer . The technique is
described in Ref . 1 . ( 2 ) Distilled .
The co2 contents of the equilibrated
solutions was determined in the mano
metric gas apparatus ( Ref . 2 ) .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 1
0 . 004 < l 6a / a l < 0 . 02
REFERENCES :
1 . Laue , D .
Pfl ugers Arch . ges . Physiol . 1951 ,
254 , 1 4 2 .
2 . Van Slyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr . ;

Hastings , A . B . ; Nei l l , J . M .
J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 8 , 78 , 7 6 5 .
48
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Novak , J . P . ; Fried , v ; Pick , J .
(2) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Coll ect . Czech . Chem . Commun . 19 6 1 ,
2 6 , 2 2 66-7 0 .
T/K = 2 8 4 . 6 5 - 3 5 0 . 15
P/kPa = 12 . 8 - 9 7 . 5 Rosa Crovetto
4
T/K a P/mmHg P/ bar a 1 0 x1
11 . 5 284 . 65 96 0 . 128 1 . 059

125 0 . 167 1 . 411
2 11 0 . 281 2 . 409
237 0 . 3 16 2 . 716
489 0 . 652 5 . 641
7 14 0 . 952 8 . 262
20. 0 2 9 3 . 15 127 0 . 169 0 . 982
225 0 . 3 00 1 . 948
391 0 . 52 1 3 . 429
599 0 . 799 5 . 359
678 0 . 904 6 . 17 9
620 0 . 931 6 . 400
30 . 0 3 0 3 . 15 110 0 . 14 7 0 . 519
126 o ; 168 0 . 724
246 0 . 328 1 . 538
261 0 . 348 1 . 579
471 0 . 628 3 . 10 1
696 0 . 928 4 . 758
( continued )
METHOD/APPARATUS/ PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS : . .
Saturation method . Five cyl inders (1) Tank qual ity . Light gases were
containing water were saturated with distil led .
C02 in a thermostat at the pressure
of measurement . No stirring was (2) Distilled .
provided . Samples were withdrawn at
constant pressure and titrated .
Details in source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 1; ox = ± 1 %
6P/kPa = ± 0 . 07
REFERENCES :
49
( 1) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Novak , J . P . i Fried , V ; P i ck , J .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Col l ect . Czech . Chem . Commun . 19 6 1 ,
2 6 , 2 2 6 6 -7 0 .
EXPERIMENTAL VALUES : ( continued )
4
t/ ° C T/K a P/mmHg P/ bar a 1 0 x1
40 . 0 3 1 3 . 15 132 0 . 17 6 0 . 458
274 0 . 365 1 . 203
490 0 . 653 2 . 422
490 0 . 653 2 . 433
696 0 . 928 3 . 52 6
7 02 0 . 936 3 . 596
50 . 0 3 2 3 . 15 176 0 . 235 0 . 352
345 0 . 460 1 . 137
520 0 . 693 2 . 053
527 0 . 703 2 . 059
583 0. 777 2 . 303
589 0 . 785 2 . 358
687 0 . 916 2 . 834
60 . 0 3 3 3 . 15 200 0 . 2 67 0 . 264
296 0 . 395 0 . 585
508 0 . 677 1 . 358
699 0 . 932 2 . 12 3
731 0 . 975 2 . 274
69 . 0 3 4 2 . 15 310 0 . 413 0 . 368
325 0 . 433 0 . 388
333 0 . 444 0 . 462
408 0 . 544 0 . 654
429 0 . 572 0 . 695
453 0 . 604 0 . 834
564 0 . 752 1 . 231
670 0 . 893 1 . 554
7 10 0 . 947 1 . 669
721 0 . 961 1 . 730
77 . 0 3 5 0 . 15 466 0 . 62 1 0 . 433
468 0 . 624 0 . 491
573 0 . 764 0 . 794
583 o. 777 0 . 834
654 0 . 872 0 . 982
699 0 . 932 1 . 162
699 0 . 932 1 . 13 7
701 0 . 935 1 . 157
a Calculated by the compiler

50
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Aust in , W . H . ; Lacombe , E . ;
Rand , P . W . ; Chatterj ee , M .
( 2 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
J. Appl . Physiol . 1 9 6 3 , 1 8 , 3 0 1-4 .
VARIABLES : P RE PARED BY :
T/K = 2 9 3 . 2 - 3 11 . 2 C . L . Young
Bunsen coe f f i c ient , a
T/K No . of determinations Mean Range a a

---
2 93 . 2 4 0 . 8568 0 . 0037 0 . 0015

297 . 2 3 0 . 7641 0 . 0005 0 . 0003
303 . 2 3 0 . 6503 0 . 0039 0 . 0015
3 08 . 2 5 0 . 5825 0 . 0038 0 . 0018
3 11 . 2 4 0 . 5453 0 . 0021 0 . 0014
a a = Standard deviation .
1
Unit for a is cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm-
AU X I L I ARY I N FORMATION
METHOD /AP PARATUS / P ROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURl TY OF MAT E R I ALS :
Humid i f ied gas disso lved in water . ( 1 ) Commerc i a l samp l e , no other

After equ i l ibr ium estab l i shed 1 cm3 deta i l s g iven .
sample withdrawn and analysed with
manometr ic Van S lyke apparatus . ( 2 ) D i s t i l led acidi f i ed with
It was cla imed that deionised , hydrochloric acid ( 0 . 0 1 mo l dm-3 ) .
dist i l led water gave the same
results as acidi f i ed water .
E S T I MATED E R RO R :
oT/K = ± 0.1.
REFE RENCES :
51
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Ellis , A . J . ; Golding , R . M .
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Am . J . Sci . 1 9 6 3 , 2 61 , 4 7 - 6 0 .
T/K = 4 5 0 . 15-607 . 15
P1 /MPa = 1 . 59-7 . 65 Rosa Crovetto
t/ ° C T/K a P/ bar a PJ i atm 1 o 3s b 2
1 0 xl a
177 4 5 0 . 15 25 . 254 15 . 7 2 . 24 0 . 2235

2 02 4 7 5 . 15 34 . 132 17 . 7 2 . 84 0 . 2832
2 04 4 7 7 . 15 53 . 458 36 . 1 5 . 85 0 . 58 1 6
229 5 0 2 . 15 74 . 355 46 . 3 7 . 73 0 . 7671
7 1 . 518 43 . 5 7 . 60 0 . 7543
235 508 . 15 60 . 6 9 7 29 . 7 4 . 75 0 . 4728
261 5 3 4 . 15 101 . 4 6 3 53 . 1 10 . 9 1 . 07 8
9 7 . 9 17 49 . 6 10 . 2 1 . 010
· 2 65 5 3 8 . 15 74 . 227 23 . 1 4 . 74 0 . 4 7 18
7 1 . 492 20 . 4 4 . 28 0 . 4262
3 09 5 8 2 . 15 173 . 7 6 75 . 5 21. 6 2 . 114
17 0 . 3 1 72 . 1 19 . 6 1 . 922
166 . 2 6 68 . 1 18 . 6 1 . 82 6
334 607 . 15 198 ; 7 0 62 . 6 21.7 2 . 12 4
195 . 2 6 59 . 2 20 . 3 1 . 990

n 1 ;mol
b s = . (Mole ratio of C02 and water . )
n2 ;mol
A static all-metal high-pressure ( 1 ) Not stated .
autoclave was used . There was no
stirring . Long equil ibration times ( 2 ) Degassed .
were used . The amounts of water and
carbon dioxide in the , l iquid sample
were determined by weighing . The H20
was absorbed by anhydrone and the co2
in Carbosorb .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not given .
REFERENCES :
52
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Takenouchi , S . ; Kennedy , G .
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] Am . J . Sci . 1 9 6 4 , 2 62 , 1 0 5 5 -7 4 .
T/K = 3 8 3 . 15-598 . 15
P/MPa = 10-160 Rosa Crovetto
t/ ° C T/K a KH , a/ atm b
110 3 8 3 . 15 5010 5500 28 . 4

150 4 2 3 . 15 5560 6300 30 . 0
200 4 7 3 . 15 4840 6000 27 . 0
250 5 2 3 . 15 4170 5250 4.0
275 5 4 8 . 15 4400
300 5 7 3 . 15 3800
325 5 9 8 . 15 2950

b Henry ' s constants KH a and KH ' b were calculated by the authors
from vapor-liquid equ il ibria data . KH a is obtained from KH b
us inq the Kr ichevsky and Kasarnovsky equation 1 with the partial
molar volume . Comparison with reliable partial molar volume
data shows those volumes to be too low and unreal istic ,
especially at hiqh temperatures . The authors state that the
Henry ' s constants are valid to 2 5 0 ° C ( 5 2 3 . 15 K ) .
The apparatus was a hiqh-pressure ( 1 ) Not stated .
autoclave with sampl inq valves for
both phases . No stirrinq was used . ( 2 ) Distil led . Deqassed by boi l inq .
Samples of the dense and liqht phases
were extracted and analyzed for their
co2 content by titration .
The Henry ' s constants were obtained
by qraphical methods from the vapor
liquid equil ibrium data .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 1 . 5 or larqer
6P/ bar = ± 5 ( by comp iler)
REFERENCES :
1 . Krichevsky , I . R . ; Kasarnovsky , J . S .
J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 3 5 , 5 7 ,
2 1 6 8 -7 1 .
53
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Yeh , S-Y . ; Peterson , R . E .
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] J . Pharm . Sci . 1 9 6 4 , 53 , 8 2 2 -4 .
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15-3 18 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 Rosa crovetto
t/ °C T/K a P/ bar b P1 / bar a L c 1 0 4xl a

--
25 2 9 8 . 15 1 . 013 0 . 982 0 . 8129 5 . 84 2

30 3 0 3 . 15 0 . 971 o. 7264 5 . 08 4
37 3 10 . 15 0 . 950 0 . 6282 4 . 2 .1 5
45 3 18 . 15 0 . 917 0 . 5453 3 . 15 3

b Experiments were done at a total pressure equal to
atmospheric pressure .
c
L = Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 ] .
The method and apparatus used are ( 1 ) Research grade Matheson Co .
described in Ref . 1 with two minor Minimum purity 9 9 . 7 % .
modifications : the mercury seal ing
cup was el iminated in the new vers ion ( 2 ) Redisti l led from all glass stil l .
and the gas was presaturated with Degassed .
water vapor .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; oP/mmHg = ± 2
6L = ± 1 % ( authors )
( oPf bar = ± o . 0 0 3 )
REFERENCES :
1 . Yeh , s-Y . ; Peterson , R E . .•
J . Pharm . Sci . 1 9 6 3 , 53 , 4 5 3 - 6 .
54
(1) carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Takenouchi , s • .; Kennedy , G .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] Am . J . Sci . 1 9 6 5 , 2 63 , 4 4 5-54 .
T/K = 4 2 3 . 15-6 2 3 . 15
P/bar = 1 0 0 - 1 4 00 Rosa Crovetto
b
2
t/ ° C T/K P/bar S a 10 xl
--- ---
150 4 2 3 . 15 100 3.1 1 . 293

200 5.1 2 . 15 2
300 6.1 2 . 59 0
400 6.9 2 . 944
500 7.5 3 . 212
600 8.0 3 . 437
200 4 7 3 . 15 100 3.2 1 . 335
200 6.1 2 . 59 0
300 7.9 3 . 392
400 9.5 4 . 12 0
500 10 . 8 4 . 722
600 11 . 8 5 . 19 2
800 13 . 2 5 . 860
1000 14 . 2 6 . 345
1200 15 . 0 6 . 737
1400 15 . 6 7 . 03 4
250 5 2 3 . 15 100 2.8 1 . 165
200 6.0 2 . 54 6
300 9.6 4 . 16 6
400 12 . 1 5 . 334
500 14 . 3 6 . 394
600 16 . 4 7 . 433
800 20 . 4 9 . 495
1000 24 . 2 11 . 56
1200 27 . 2 13 . 2 6
1400 28 . 8 14 . 2 1
300 5 7 3 . 15 100 1.0 0 . 4 118
200 6.4 2 . 72 3
300 12 . 2 5 . 382
400 18 . 2 8 . 347
500 26 . 4 12 . 8 0
350 6 2 3 . 15 200 3.6 1 . 506
3 00 14 . 3 6 . 394
a Solubil ity of co2 , expressed as mass % of co2 in water .
b Ca lculated by the compi ler .
The experimental equipment and ( 1 ) Not stated .
apparatus are the same as used in
previous experimental work . 1 ( 2 ) Not stated .
After equil ibration , the liquid
samples are analyzed for the amounts
of co2 • The composition of the co- ESTIMATED ERROR :
existing gas phase was not determined .
6T/K = ± 0 . 8 % ( by authors )
( The authors also present data for the 6S = ± 2 % ( by authors )
solubil ity of co 2 in aqueous
solutions of NaCl . )
REFERENCES :
1 . Takenouchi , S . ; Kennedy , G .
Am . J . Sci . 1 9 6 4 , 2 62 , 1055-7 4 .
55
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Vilcu , R . ; Gainar , I .
(2) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) Rev . Roum . Chim . 1 9 6 7 , 12 ( 2 ) , 18 1-9 .
T/K = 2 9 3 . 1 6 - 3 0 8 . 16
PfMPa = 2 . 53-6 . 08 Rosa Crovetto
2
T/K Pf bar a Pj atm s b 1 0 x1 a
---
2 9 3 . 16 25 . 33 25 0 . 0130 1 . 300
30 . 40 30 0 . 0145 1 . 450
40 . 53 40 0 . 0174 1. 740
4 5 . 60 45 0 . 0188 1 . 880
50 . 66 50 0 . 0204 2 . 04 0
298 . 16 35. 46 35 0 . 0127 1 . 270

4 0 . 53 40 0 . 0134 1 . 340
4 4 . 58 44 0 . 0155 1 . 550
50 . 66 50 0 . 0172 1. 7 2 0
55 . 7 3 55 0 . 0187 1 . 870
60 . 80 60 0 . 0203 2 . 03 0
3 08 . 16 35 . 46 35 0 . 0081 0 . 810
40 . 53 40 0 . 0099 0 . 990
4 5 . 60 45 o . 0112 1 . 120
50 . 66 50 0 . 0131 1 . 3 10
55 . 7 3 55 0 . 0148 1 . 480
60 . 80 60 0 . 0163 1 . 63 0
65 . 8 6 65 0 . 0181 1 . 810
70 . 93 70 0 . 0196 1 . 960
75 . 99 75 0 . 02 1 4 2 . 14 0
a Calculated by the comf i ler .

b Solubil ity of co2 ( em at STP per cm3 of water at the
pressure of experiment ) .
Compi ler : The vapor pressure of C02 at the temperature of the measurements :
T/K Pj atm
293 . 16 56 . 5
2 9 8 . 16 63 . 5
Data at pressures larger than the vapor pressure of C02 are not
cons idered gas-l iquid equilibria .
A conventional high-pressure cel l was ( 1 ) Pure .
used . During equil ibration the system
was constantly stirred . The amount of ( 2 ) Not given .
co2 in the l iquid was determined by
gas chromatografic ana lysis . A good
temperature control and measurement
system was bui lt into the system .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not stated .
56
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Matous , J . ; Sobr , J . ; Novak , J . P . ;
Pick , J .
( 2 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ] Collect . Czech . Chem . Commun . 1 9 6 9 ,
34 , 3982 - 5 .
T/K = 3 0 3 . 15 - 3 5 3 . 15 c . L . Young
P 1 /MPa = 0 . 99 - 3 . 90
EXPERIMENTAL VALUES : 2
T/K P1 /bar 10 x2
---
3 0 3 . 15 9.9 0 . 507
19 . 3 0 . 932
30 . 3 1 . 364
38 . 9 1 . 697
3 2 3 . 15 9.9 0 . 334
19 . 2 0 . 606
29 . 9 0 . 938
39 . 0 1 . 19 8
3 5 3 . 15 8.8 0 . 19 7
9.8 0 . 2 18
18 . 8 0 . 407
29 . 8 0 . 62 0
38 . 8 0 . 794
Cell charged with components , equili ( 1 ) Lachema , Novy Bohumin purity
brated and pressure measured with better than 99 mole % .
Bourdon gauge . Liquid sampled and ( 2 ) Deionised sample .
analysed by stripping with nitrogen
and absorbing dried carbon dioxide on
absorbent containing sodium hydroxide . ESTIMATED ERROR : ( by comp i ler )
oT/K = ± 0 . 1 ; 4 o P 1 / bar = ± o . 5
ox1 = ± 0 . 2 x 10-

( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Power , G . G . ; Stegall , H .
( 2 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] J. Appl . Physiol . 19 7 0 , 2 9 , 1 4 5 - 9 .
T/K = 3 1 0 . 15 c . L . Young
T/K a a (J b No . of measurements
3 10 . 15 0 . 5485 0 . 0011 4
1
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- ]
b (J
= Standard deviation
5 to 12 cm3 samples placed in a stir- ( 1 ) Matheson sample , purity better
rer cel l and gas , saturated with water than 9 9 . 7 mole % .
vapor , passed through water for 3 0-60 ( 2 ) Nothing stated .
min . Samples of saturated l iquid
withdrawn and transferred to Van Slyke ESTIMATED ERROR :
apparatus . Dissolved gas removed
under reduced pressure . oT/K ± 0.1 -
57
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Stewart , P . B . ; Munj al , P .
( 2 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 0 , 1 5 , 6 7 -7 1 .
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 - 2 9 8 . 15 c . L . Young
P/MPa = 1 . 013 - 4 . 560
2 2 2 2
T/K P/ bar 1 0 x1 10 m 1 /m2 a T/K P/ bar 1 0 x1 1 0 m 1 /m2 a
--- --- ---
2 7 3 . 15 10 . 13 1 . 267 3 . 133 2 8 3 . 15 10 . 1 3 0 . 8535 2 . 1 02

25 . 33 2 . 394 5 . 988 20. 26 1 . 533 3 . 8 01
30 . 40 2 . 637 6 . 614 38 . 50 2 . 18 5 5 . 455
2 7 8 . 15 10 . 13 1 . 055 2 . 603 285 . 55 45 . 60 2 . 2 04 5 . 503
20 . 26 1 . 806 4 . 492 2 9 8 . 15 20 . 26 1 . 026 2 . 403
38 . 50 2 . 532 6 . 342 45 . 60 1 . 655 4 . 110
a ml fm2 = solubil ity of carbon dioxide ; m 1 = mass of co2 ; m2 = mass of H20
Rocking equil ibrium cell fitted with ( 1 ) Matheson research grade , purity
Bourdon-type pressure gauges . carbon 9 9 . 9 9 mole % .
dioxide gas admitted to cell contain-
ing water . After equilibrium estab- ( 2 ) Degassed and distil led .
lished samples of l iquid withdrawn
and analyzed by stripping out carbon ESTIMATED ERROR : ( by compi ler )
dioxide , absorbing in excess barium
hydroxide and back-titrating . oT/K = ± 0 . 0 6 ; oP/kPa = ± 2 below
3 . 6 MPa , ± 3 . 4 above 3 . 6 MPa ;
oxl fxl = ± 1 %

( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Barton , J . R . ; Hsu , c . c .
( 2 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 1 , 1 6 , 9 3 -5 .
T/K = 2 7 3 . 3 5 - 3 13 . 15 Pirketta Schar l in
P1 /kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5
t/ ° C T/K a P 1 / atm P1 /kPa a af [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ) b
--
0.2 273 . 35 1 101 . 3 2 5 1 . 699 ± 0 . 003

25 2 9 8 . 15 1 101 . 3 2 5 0 . 758 ± 0 . 001
40 3 13 . 15 1 101 . 3 2 5 0 . 53 0 ± 0 . 002
a Added by the compiler ; b a = Bunsen coefficient
The Ostwald type apparatus used in the ( 1 ) Matheson Co . The Coleman grade
measurements was based on the original C02 . Minimum purity of 9 9 . 9 9 % .
des ign of Markham and Kobe (Ref . 1 )
but also included the modifications (2) Distil led . Refractive index of
suggested by Yen and McKetta ( Ref . 2 ) . 1 . 3 3 3 2 at 1 9 . 5 o c .
1 . Markham , A . E . i Kobe , K . A . oT/K = ± 0 . 05 ; The maximum error in
J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 4 1 , 63 ' 4 4 9 . determination of a gas volume was es-
timated to be ± 0 . 0 5 % .
2 . Yen , L . c . ; McKetta , J . J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 6 2 , 7 , 2 8 8 . oafa = ± 0 . 18 % at 0 . 2 o c
± 0 . 13 % at 2 5 o c
± 0 . 3 8 % at 4 0 o c
58
(1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Li , Y . -H . ; Tsui , T . -F .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] J . Geophys . Res . 1 9 7 1 , 7 6 , 4 2 0 3 -7 .
T/K = 2 7 3 . 8 5 - 3 0 3 . 15 Rosa Crovetto
P1 / kPa = 101 . 325
2
t/ °C T/ K a P/ bar a P1 / atm 10 5 /Se b 10 3 x1 a
---
0.7 273 . 85 1 . 020 1 . 00 7 . 501 1 . 350

4.0 2 7 7 . 15 1 . 02 1 6 . 603 1 . 188
10 . 2 283 . 35 1 . 02 6 5 . 3 02 0 . 9545
20. 0 2 9 3 . 15 1 . 037 3 . 9 11 0 . 7053
30 . 0 3 0 3 . 15 1 . 056 2 . 997 0 . 54 2 0
b s = solubi l ity of co2 ; se = 1 mol L- 1 atm- 1 •
Equil ibration was achieved by bubbl ing ( 1 ) Pure , ( 9 9 . 9 9 ± 0 . 0 1 ) % .
gas through thermostatted water over-
night . ( 2 ) Distilled .
A liquid sample was analyzed for co2
us ing an IR technique . ESTIMATED ERROR :
Temperature control led to ± 0 . 0 2 K .
oP/mmHg = ± 0 . 0 0 5 ( by authors ) .

(1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Murray , c . N . ; Ri ley , J . P .
(2) ·water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] Deep-Sea Res . 1 9 7 1 , 1 8 , 5 3 3 -4 1
' T/K = 2 7 4 . 1 9 - 3 0 8 . 15 Rosa crovetto
P 1 / kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5
4
t/ ° C T/ K a P/ bar a PJ ! atm a b 1 0 x1 a
1 . 04 2 7 4 . 19 1 . 020 1 . 000 1 . 6471 13 . 3 1
5 . 00 2 7 8 . 15 1 . 022 1 . 4 19 9 11 . 48
10 . 0 0 2 8 3 . 15 1 . 026 1 . 19 2 6 9 . 64 5
15 . 0 0 2 8 8 . 15 1 . 03 0 1 . 0100 8 . 17 4
20 . 00 2 9 3 . 15 1 . 037 0 . 8652 7 . 009
2 5 . 00 2 9 8 . 15 1 . 045 0 . 7519 6 . 099
32 . 00 3 05 . 15 1 . 061 0 . 63 3 6 5 . 15 0
35 . 00 3 0 8 . 15 1 . 070 0 . 5905 4 . 805
b Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ·( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
The results are the mean of at least three measurements .
Equil ibrated solutions were prepared ( 1 ) 9 9 . 9 % , tested by mass spectre-
by bubbl ing gas through magnetically metry .
stirred water t i l l equilibrium was
reached . ( 2 ) Conductivity water , degassed .
The co2 content was determined by
acidifying the solutions and after ESTIMATED ERROR :
degassing them , precisely weighing
the evolved co2 • 6T/K = ± 0 . 02 ( by authors )
59
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Weiss , R . F .
(2) Water ; H20 ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) Mar . Chem . 1 9 7 4 , 2 , 2 0 3 - 1 5 .
T/K = 293 . 8 Rosa Crovetto
T/K a
2 0 . 61 293 . 76 3 . 848
2 0 . 63 293 . 78 3 . 843
2 0 . 60 293 . 75 3 . 867
2 0 . 59 293 . 74 3 . 834
2 0 . 61 293 . 76 3 . 840

b Solubi l ity of co2 • Only the gaseous co2 i s
cons idered . Ionized dissolved C02 has been
deducted from this quantity . There are not
enough data in the source to convert to total
dissolved molar fraction . No raw experimental
data are given .
Bes ides the experimental values given , the
author corrected and f itted Murray ' s et a l
data 1 and provides a table of smoothed data .
2
Microgasometric tecnique . ( 1 ) High purity co2 • Tank . Matheson .
The paper also reports on solubilities Purity better than 9 9 . 9 9 % .
in seawater .
( 2 ) Distil led water .
Very careful corrections were
performed . The data were corrected
for change of volume of water due to
dissolution , real gas behavior , and
dissociation .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
The overal l accuracy in Ko is
estimated as ± 0 . 2 t by author .
REFERENCES :
1 . Murray , c . N . ; Ri ley , J . P .
Deep-Sea Res . 1 9 7 1 , 1 8 , 5 3 3 -4 1 .
2 . Weiss , R . F .
Deep-Sea Res . 19 7 0 , 1 7 , 7 2 1-3 5 .
60
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Shagiakhmetov , R . A . ; Tarz imanov , A . A .
(2) Water ; H2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) Deposi ted Doc . 1 9 8 1 , SPSTL 2 0 0 khp -
D 81 , 1 9 8 2 .
T /K = 3 2 3 . 15-4 2 3 . 15
P/MPa = 10-80 Rosa Crovetto
b
T/ K a P/bar a 2
P/MPa s 1 0 xl a
--- ---
50 3 2 3 . 15 100 10 25 . 2 1 . 999
200 20 29 . 0 2 . 293
400 40 33 . 7 2 . 655
600 60 36 . 3 2 . 854
100 3 7 3 . 15 100 10 18 . 1 1 . 444

2 00 20 25 . 6 2 . 03 0
400 40 31. 8 2 . 5 09
600 60 37 . 0 2 . 907
800 80 45 . 1 3 . 52 1
150 4 2 3 . 15 100 10 14 . 5 1 . 160

200 20 26 . 4 2 . 09 2
400 40 38 . 7 3 . 03 7
600 60 55 . 4 4 . 291
800 80 76 . 4 5 . 823

b Solubil ity of co 2 ( cm3 of gas at STP per gram of water ) .
A static method with sampl ing and (1) Not stated .
analys is of the l iquid phase was used .
To attain equil ibrium , the cel l was (2) Not stated .
gently rocked over 1 6 0 degrees .
( The authors also did measurements at
2 9 8 . 15 K , but as the experimental
pressures are greater than the co 2
vapor pressure at that temperature ,
the data at 2 9 8 . 1 5 K are not given
here . )
ESTIMATED ERROR :
65 = ± ( 3 - 5 ) % ( by authors )
REFERENCES :
61
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Zawisza , A . ; Malesinska , B .
(2) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 8 1 , 2 6 , 3 8 8 -9 1 .
T/K = 3 2 3 . 15-4 7 3 . 15
PfMPa = 0 . 154-5 . 3 89 Rosa Crovetto
x2 = 0 . 9 9 2 4 -0 . 9 9 9 5
a
T /K Pf bar a , b xl a T/K Pf bar a , b xl
3 2 3 . 15 2 . 54 0 . 0005 4 2 3 . 15 7 . 69 0 . 0005
4 . 88 0 . 0016 15 . 5 6 0 . 0016
7 . 62 0 . 0025 21. 24 0 . 0025
8 . 92 0 . 0030 24 . 99 0 . 0030
14 . 4 1 0 . 0046 3 6 . 09 0 . 0046
25 . 05 0 . 0076
4 4 8 . 15 11 . 97 0 . 0005
3 4 8 . 15 2 . 37 0 . 0005 19 . 7 7 0 . 0016
2 1 . 00 0 . 0046 25 . 96 0 . 0025
35 . 91 0 . 0076 3 0 . 37 0 . 0030
40. 80 0 . 0046
3 7 3 . 15 3 . 56 0 . 0005
27 . 10 0 . 0046 4 7 3 . 15 18 . 4 4 0 . 0005
45 . 60 0 . 0076 25. 39 0 . 0016
3 1 . 75 0 . 0025
3 9 8 . 15 5 . 27 0 . 0005 35 . 85 0 . 003 0
11 . 45 0 . 0016 4 6 . 16 0 . 0046
17 . 7 3 0 . 0025
21. 38 0 . 003 0
32 . 35 0 . 0046
53 . 89 0 . 007 6

b Bubble point pressure .
The authors calculated Henry ' s constants from the data using the virial
equation of state . Various corrections were appl ied . The values of
Henry ' s constants at different temperatures , given as they are in the
original source , are l isted in the following table :
T/K 3 2 3 . 15 3 4 8 . 15 3 7 3 . 15 3 9 8 . 15 4 2 3 . 15 4 4 8 . 15 4 7 3 . 15
Hp /MPa 3 03 . 4 449 . 6 52 5 . 6 588 . 9 632 . 8 631 . 8 593 . 7
A static method was used to determine ( 1 ) Prepared from Na2co 3 treated with
the dew and boi l ing points of C02 /H2o 10 % aqueous H2so4 • Dried over
mixtures at several pressures and P20 s .
temperatures 1 . The apparatus and the
method were checked by measuring the ( 2 ) Distil led twice .
vapor pressure of pure water .
Also given are gas phase compos itions , ESTIMATED ERROR :
dew points , and molar volume of the
gas phase over a l l the concentration 6T/K = ± 0 . 005 ( by authors )
range of both components . 6P = ± 0 . 0 3 % ( by authors)
REFERENCES :
1 . Aftienj ew , J . ; Zawisz a , A .
J . chem . Thermodyn . 1 9 7 7 , 9 , 153 .

62
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Cramer , s. D.
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Rep . Invest . - u . s . , Bur . Mines 1982 ,
RI 8 7 0 6 .
T/K = 3 0 6 . 15-4 8 6 . 2 5
P/MPa = 0 . 8 - 5 . 8 Rosa Crovetto
tt oc T/K a P/ bar a P/MPa K8 /MPa b 1 0 3x l a
---
33 3 0 6 . 15 8.0 0.8 206 3 . 760

126 . 3 399 . 45 20 . 0 2.0 602 2 . 865
132 . 5 4 05 . 65 20 . 0 2.0 617 2 . 716
146 . 0 4 1 9 . 15 28 . 0 2.8 565 4 . 15 8
153 . 5 4 2 6 . 65 31. 0 3.1 58 0 4 . 356
198 . 1 471 . 25 41. 0 4.1 537 4 . 758
2 13 . 1 486 . 25 58 . 0 5.8 484 7 . 17 2

b
Henry ' s constant as given by the author , equals partial
pressure of co2 times fugacity coefficient from genera l i z ed
chart divided by the composition in the liquid phase .
(K8 = P1� 1 t x1 ) . The author assumes P 1 = P-P2 , where P2 is
the vapor pressure of water at the corresponding temperature .
METHOD/APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURI TY OF MATERIALS :
· A two l iter , 3 1 6 stainless steel (1) 99 . 5 % .
stirred reactor was used .
Water was degassed " in s itu" . (2) Demineral i z ed .
The concentration of the gas in the
liquid was determined by desorption
from a known volume of liquid followed
by volumetric analys is of the evolved
gas .
Equil ibration times were of the order
of five hours at 1 5 0 ° C and above .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
In Henry ' s constant 5 . 8 % ( by author) .
( Detailed analys is of experimental
contribut ions to the total error is
given in the source . )
REFERENCES :
63
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Postigo , M � A . ; Katz , M .
(2) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) J . Sol ution Chem . 1 9 8 7 , 1 6 , 1015-2 4 .
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15-3 08 . 15
p/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 R.W. cargill
a,c a
t/ ° C T/K a KH/MPa b L 1 0 3xl
15 2 8 8 . 15 123 . 7 1 . 075 0 . 8 19
20 2 9 3 .• 1 5 143 . 3 0 . 94 3 0 . 707
25 2 9 8 . 15 165 . 5 0 . 829 0 . 612
30 3 0 3 . 15 188 . 8 0 . 738 0 . 53 7
35 3 08 . 15 2 11 . 7 0 . 668 0 . 479
a Calculated by compi ler .

b KH = Henry ' s law constant .
c L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 ] .
Known volumes of gas and solvent were ( 1 ) carbon dioxide : no information
introduced into 2 5 0 cm3 flask , then
initial and f inal pressures were ( 2 ) Water : degassed by boi l ing ;
measured by a transducer connected to compos ition checked by refractive
a digital multimeter . The flask was index measurement at 2 9 8 K .
submerged in a thermostatic bath .
Ful l details given in Ref . 1 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 02 ;
6P1 / Pa = ± 1 0 ;
6L/L = 1 %
REFERENCES :
1 . Postigo , M . A . ; Pedrosa , G . C . ;
Katz , M .
Anal . Asoc . Quim . Argentina , 19 7 8 ,
66, 2 5 .
64
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Mul ler , G . ; Bender , E . ; Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Chem . 1988 ,

92 , 1 4 8 - 6 0 .
T/ K = 3 7 3 . 15 - 4 7 3 . 15
p/MPa = 0 . 3 2 5 - 8 . 11 Pirketta Scharl in
T/ K pfMPa T/K p/MPa
3 7 3 . 15 0 . 325 0 . 045 71. 2 ± 1.1 4 3 3 . 15 2 . 18 3 0 . 249 67 . 7 ± 0 . 9

0 . 600 0 . 09 8 84 . 5 ± 0.7 2 . 58 8 0 . 3 08 72 . 5 ± 0 . 9
0 . 92 0 0 . 159 89 . 3 ± 0.5 3 . 48 0 . 434 78 . 9 ± 0 . 7
1 . 19 1 0 . 208 92 . 3 ± 0.4
1 . 452 0 . 261 93 . 1 ± 0.3 4 5 3 . 15 1 . 439 0 . 08 1 27 . 2 ± 0.7
1 . 816 0 . 328 94 . 6 ± 0.2 2 . 10 1 0 . 18 6 47 . 8 ± 0.9
2 . 3 07 0 . 4 14 95 . 5 ± 0.2 2 . 615 0 . 270 56 . 9 ± 0.9
3 . 28 0 . 374 64 . 1 ± 0.9
3 9 3 . 15 0 . 59 9 0 . 07 1 66 . 3 ± 1.1 4 . 07 0 . 493 70 . 0 ± 0.8
0 . 93 9 0 . 12 7 79 . 5 ± 0.8 4 . 91 0 . 615 74 . 3 ± 0.7
1 . 2 65 0 . 18 1 84 . 0 ± 0.7 6 . 27 0 . 783 79 . 3 ± 0.6
1 . 631 0 . 239 87 . 8 ± 0.6
1 . 995 0 . 298 89 . 8 ± 0.5 4 7 3 . 15 2 . 000 0 . 068 23 . 3 ± 0.7
2 . 4 12 0 . 363 91 . 7 ± 0.4 2 . 494 0 . 156 37 . 1 ± 1.0
2 . 848 0 . 428 92 . 6 ± 0.3 3 . 10 0 . 257 48 . 6 ± 1.0
3 . 76 0 . 374 57 . 4 ± 0.9
4 1 3 . 15 0 . 650 0 . 047 43 . 1 ± 1.2 4 . 57 0 . 500 63 . 5 ± 0.8
0 . 92 6 0 . 092 59 . 4 ± 1.2 6 . 04 0 . 712 70 . 8 ± 0.6
1 . 19 3 0 . 13 3 68 . 3 ± 1.1 7 . 80 0 . 932 75 . 6 ± 0.6
1 . 603 0 . 197 75 . 8 ± 0.9
2 . 010 0 . 258 80 . 0 ± 0.8 2 . 02 7 0 . 09 1 24 . 5 ± 0.7
2 . 489 0 . 325 83 . 9 ± 0.6 2 . 63 8 0 . 19 6 40 . 8 ± 0.9
3 . 247 0 . 430 87 . 2 ± 0.5 3 . 40 0 . 320 52 . 9 ± 0.9
4 . 20 0 . 448 60 . 8 ± 0.8
4 3 3 . 15 0 . 878 0 . 039 26.8 ± 0.9 5 . 12 0 . 58 6 66 . 8 ± 0.8
1 . 144 0 . 084 42 . 1 ± 1.1 6 . 52 0 . 789 72 . 4 ± 0.6
1 . 4 17 0 . 13 1 52 . 4 ± 1.1 8 . 11 1 . 03 2 76 . 2 ± 0.6
1 . 777 0 . 18 6 61 . 2 ± 1.1
a x1 = mole fraction of co2 in the liquid phase

b y1 = mole fraction of co2 in the vapor phase
A static hiqh-pressure apparatus was ( 1 ) Linde , Hol lrieqelskreuth ;
used . A schematic diaqram of the 99 . 9 9 9 6 vol . %
apparatus and details of the method
are in the oriqinal source . ( 2 ) Double distil led and deqassed . 1
Conductivity K = 1 . 2 x 1 0 - 4 s m-
( The authors also present data for the
vapor-liquid equilibria in the binary �------4
system NH3 + H2o , and in the ternary ESTIMATED ERROR :
system NH3 + co2 + H2 0 . )
6T/K < ± 0 . 1
6pfp = ± 0 . 01
6x1 tx1 < 0 . 0 1 8
65
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Versteeg , G . F . ; van swaaij , W . P . M .
( 2 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ) J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 8 8 , 3 3 , 2 9- 3 4 .
T/K = 291 - 3 60 . 1 Pirketta Scharl in
2
P/kPa � 10
T/K
291 4 . 05
292 4 . 15
292 3 . 89
293 3 . 80
298 3 . 37
298 3 . 29
303 2 . 80
308 2 . 54
3 11 . 4 2 . 44
313 2 . 37
3 13 . 4 2 . 38
3 18 2 . 06
323 1 . 94
333 1 . 63
343 . 5 1 . 40
350 . 2 1 . 32
3 55 . 2 1 . 20
360 . 1 1 . 08
a
Ka = Henry ' s law constant
The solubil ity was measured in a glass ( 1 ) Nothing specified .
vessel which was f i lled with a cali
brated volume of solvent . The solvent ( 2 ) Disti l led . Degassed .
was degassed , and the vapor-liquid
equil ibrium was established . Equili-
brium pressure was recorded by a pres- �------�
sure transducer . The gas was fed to ESTIMATED ERROR :
the vessel unt i l an arbitrary pressure
5
(P � 10 Pa ) was reached . The pres The reproducibility between the vari
sure was recorded again . The vessel ous experiments was within 3 % .
was closed , and the magnetic stirrer
was started to agitate the l iquid .
After the equil ibrium pressure was REFERENCES :
reached the solubil ity was calculated ,
based on Henry ' s law .
In the paper the authors report solu
bil ity and diffus ivity of C02 and N2o
in water and aqueous a lkanolamine so
lutions .
66
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Yuan , C-B . ; Yang , J-Z .
( 2 ) water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Gaodeng Xuexiao Huaxue Xuebao 1993 ,
14 , 8 0 - 3 .
T/K = 2 7 8 . 15 - 3 18 . 15 Pirketta Scharl in
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 Xiaohui Shen
Table 1 . Solubil ity of co2 in water
2
T/K 1 0 s1 tmol kg- 1 a
2 7 8 . 15 6 . 11
2 8 8 . 15 4 . 29
2 9 8 . 15 3 . 13
3 08 . 15 2 . 56
3 18 . 15 2 . 10
a s 1 = solubil ity of co2
The experimental solubilities from Table 1 were f itted to an equation

lg S 1 = A/T + B + CT (1)
The coefficients o f eq . ( 1 ) and the standard deviation i n l g s 1 are l isted

in Table 2 .
Table 2 . Coefficients of eq . ( 1 ) for smoothed results
for solubility of C02 in H2o
A B c a a
4 608 . 8 -28 . 953 0 . 04018 0 . 02

a
a = standard deviation in lg s 1
Static-state method . The authors ( 1 ) Purity of co2 9 9 . 9 5 % .
des igned a solubil ity apparatus which
is composed of three isothermal pre ( 2 ) Double deioni z ed . Conductivity of
saturators , saturator and sampler . A H20 was < 1 . 5 x 1 0 - 4 s m- 1
schematic diagram of the apparatus is
in the original source . C02 was in
troduced ( 1 0 hours ) through the pre ESTIMATED ERROR :
saturators and the saturator which
contained about 1 2 0 g of solvent . The oT/K = ± 0 . 02
equil ibrated sample ( about 100 g) was
transferred from the saturator into When fitting the data to the equation
the weighed sampler which contained a lg S 1 = A/T + B + CT , the standard
weighed amount of standard NaOH solu deviation was a = 0 . 0 2 . ( Table 2 . )
tion . The sampler was weighed again
and shaken to complete the reaction
between C02 and NaOH . The excess of NaOH and the NaHco 3 was t itrated poten
tiometrica l ly with standard HCl solution . The mass of dissolved co2 was
calculated from the equation
where w = mass of dissolved C02 , cHcl = concentration of HCl ; v1 and v2

are volumes of the HCl solution to the f irst and second end point ,
respectively , and M = molar mass of co2 •
(The authors also report solubi lities of C02 in 15 mass % glucosetH2o and
in NaCl + 15 mas s % glucose/H2o . )
67
COMPONENTS: EVALUATOR:
(1) Carbon dioxide; C02; [ 124-38-9] Pirketta Scharlin

Department of Chemistry
(2) Water�; D20; [7789-20-0] University of Turku
FIN-20500, Turku, Finland
(3) Water; H20; [7732-18-5]
August 1995
The Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in D10 and in Mixtures of D10 and H20.
The system C02-D20 has not been studied by many workers. The first solubility measurements were made
by Curry and Hazelton (1) in 1938, a few years after the discovery of deuterium. Since then only three research
groups have reported solubility data for C02 in heavy water. Salomaa et al. (3) measured the solubility of C�
in pure H20, pure D20 and in mixtures of H20 and D20 at 298. 15 K and atmospheric pressure using the same
method as Curry and Hazelton. Kratochvil et al. (5) report solubility values in pure �0 at three temperatures
(303 . 15 , 323 . 15 , and 353 . 15 K) and partial pressures of C� between 55 and 3972 kPa. The data from
references (1), (3) and (5) are used in this evaluation. At high temperatures and pressures there exists one set
of measurements by Kapitanov et al. (6) . Unfortunately, there is not enough information in Kapitanov's paper
for the calculation of mole fraction solubilites, and these data will not be handled further in this evaluation.
To represent the temperature dependence of the mole fraction solubility of C� in D20 at 101 .325 kPa partial
pressure of gas the data from references (1), (3) and (5) were fitted to equation 1 .
ln x1 = A + B I (TI 100 K) + C ln(TI 100 K) (1)
The best fit for the five points in the temperature range 298 - 353 K gave equation 2,
ln x1 = -34.0577 + 49.6909 I (TI100 K) + 9. 1455 ln(TI100 K) (2)
where x1 is the mole fraction solubility of C02 at 101 .325 kPa partial pressure of gas. The fit in ln x1 gave a
standard deviation of 1 . 1 % . Smoothed values of the mole fraction solubility and changes in the thermodynamic
functions on solution are shown in Table 1 at 5 K intervals. The thermodynamic properties were calculated
from the smoothing equation according to the following equations:
A5f = R [A + C ln(TI100 K) + C ) (3)
Jllif = R (-100B + CT) (4)
Table 1. Smoothed values of the solubility of carbon dioxide in water�tlz. and thermodynamic
functions a at 5 K intervals using equation 2 at 101 .325 kPa partial pressure of gas.
TIK 16lx1 Jlliflkl mot' A5NJ K'1 mot'

-- --
298. 15 0.61 1 -18.6 124
303 . 15 0.540 -18.3 123
308. 15 0.481 -17.9 122
3 1 3 . 15 0.43 1 -17.5 120
3 1 8 . 15 0. 388 -17. 1 1 19
323 . 15 0.351 -16.7 1 18
328. 15 0.320 -16.4 1 17
333 . 15 0.293 -16.0 1 16
338. 15 0.269 -15.6 1 14
343 . 15 0.248 -15.2 1 13
348. 15 0.230 -14.8 1 12
353 . 15 0.214 -14.5 111
a For the calculation of ..1CP�1 an equation ..1CP�1 = RC can be derived from equation 1 .
This gives a value of 76 J K'1 mot·' for ..iCp�-
68
Figure 1 shows the temperature dependence of the mole fraction solubility for carbon dioxide in �0 at
101 .325 kPa partial pressure of gas. The curve was obtained from the smoothing equation 2. For comparison,
the temperature dependence of the mole fraction solubility for C� in H20 is presented in the same figure as
a dotted curve which was obtained from the smoothing equation given by Carroll and Mather in the C�-H20
section of this volume ("The Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Water at Low Pressure" , Eq. (1)) .
0.6
P1= 1 0 1 .325 kPa

0.5
-
><
..,
0 0 .4
r"
-- C02+D20; Eq. ( 1 )
0 .3 o Ref. ( 1 ), Curry & Hazelton ( 1 938)
o Ref. (3), Salomaa et al. ( 1 969)
b. Ref. (5), Kratochvil et al. ( 1 970)
0.2
293 303 313 323 333 343 353
T/K
Figure 1. Mole fraction solubility of carbon dioxide in �0 at 298. 15 to 353 . 15 K

and 101 . 325 kPa partial pressure of gas. For comparison, the mole
fraction solubility of C� in H20 in the same temperature interval is
presented as the dotted curve.
In Figure 2 the pressure dependence of the mole fraction solubility of carbon dioxide in �0 at three different
temperatures is presented.
2.0
l co2 0201 + T=303. 1 5 K
1 .5
•. • and '" ar e
data points from Ref. (5)
T=323.1 5 K
-
>< 1 .0
N
0
T=353.1 5 K
0.5
o, o, A from Ref. (4) and o• from Ref. (7)

are data points for system C02+H20, and
0 are included here for comparison (· · · · ·)
0 1 .0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
P 1 /MPa
ty
Figure 2 . Mole fraction solubili of C� vs. partial pressure of C02 at different
temperatures. Data points 0 are from calculated values obtained using
•
the model outlined in Ref. (7).

69
The only reported data for the solubility of C(h in mixtures of D20 and H20 are the data of Salomaa et al.
(3). In the original paper the Ostwald coefficients are given. To calculate the molality of C(h in mixed
solutions the H20-D20 density data are needed. Salomaa has unpublished density data which are worth
publishing in this connection. In his measurements, Salomaa used the procedure described by Kirshenbaum (2).
The values for the density of �0 (L = H,D) at 298. 15 K are listed in Table 2.
Table 2. Density of H20-D20 mixtures at 298. 15 K.
x(D;�O) a p�O)Ig cm·3 (L = H,D)

0.4524 1.045974
0.4695 1 .048081
0.6156 1 .063921
0.9373 1.098754
0.9399 1 .099030
0.9881 1 . 104246
0.9980 1 . 1053 12
a x(D;�O) = deuterium isotope mole fraction of water, (L = H,D)
By the method of least squares equation (5) is obtained from the data of Table 2. The linear correlation
between p�O) and x(D;�O) is excellent (correlation coefficient r = 0.999995), and at x(D;�O) = 0 the
density values extrapolate well to the density of pure H20 at 298. 15 K, as they should.
p�O)Ig cm·3 = (0. 10852 ± 0.000 1 5) X x(D;�O) + (0.99704 ± 0.000 12) (5)
Using a real gas molar volume of 24.34 dm3 moi-1 and the �0 densities obtained from equation (5), the
evaluator calculated the molalities of C(h in the mixtures of H20 and D20 from the Ostwald coefficients given
in (3). In Figure 3 the molality of C(h at 298. 15 K and 101 . 325 k:Pa partial pressure of C(h is presented as
a function of the deuterium isotope mole fraction x(D;�O) in the solvent water.
3.4
lco2 + L20 (L=H.o) l

3.3 T = 298.1 5 K
P1 = 1 0 1 .325 kPa
I
C)
..:.::
0
E 3.2
.......
E
N
0
..-
3.1
1
1 02m1/mol kg- = 3.3763 - 0.3510x(D;l20)
correlation coefficient r = -0.9999
3.0
0 0.1 0 .2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0 .7 0 .8 0.9 1 .0
x(D;L20)
Figure 3. Molality of C(h vs. the deuterium isotope mole fraction of solvent water.
Comparison of the smoothed mole fraction solubilities of C(h in D20 (from Table 1) with corresponding
solubilities of C02 in H20 (Carroll & Mather, C02-H20 section, "The Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Water
at Low Pressure" , Table 1 , Equation ( 1)) shows that between 298. 15 and 323. 15 K the solubility of C(h in D20
is 1 . 5 - 2 % lower than the solubility of C02 in H20. The difference increases with increasing temperature,
and at 353 . 15 K the mole fraction solubility of C02 in D20 is about 9 % lower than in H20 (see also Fig. 1).
This differs from most simple nonpolar gases for which the mole fraction solubility in D20 is higher than in
H20 by about 5 - 15 % at 288. 15 to 318. 15 K and 101 .325 k:Pa partial pressure of gas (8, 9).
70
The experimental values of Kratochvil et al. (5) predict a higher value for the solubility of C02 in D20 at
298. 15 K and 101 .325 kPa than the value for the solubility of C� in H20. However, the two independent
measurements ( 1 , 3) at 298. 15 K and 101 . 325 kPa, which are in good agreement with each other, support the
value of x1 = 0.61 1 · 10·3 for the solubility of C02 in D20, which is 1 . 6 % lower than the solubility in H20.
The systematic solubility measurements of Salomaa et al. (3) in both isotopically pure waters and in their
mixtures show that the solubility of C02 decreases with increasing deuterium content of water (Fig. 3)
supporting the result that C� is more soluble in H20 than in D20 at 298. 15 K and 1 0 1 . 325 kPa. The
measurements of Kratochvil et al. (5) at 323 . 15 and 353. 15 K and at higher pressures also indicate a higher
solubility of C� in H20 than in D20.
Because of the rather small number of measurements on the solubility of carbon dioxide in DzO, the results
are classed as tentative until confirmed by additional measurements.
References:
1 . Curry, J. ; Hazelton, C. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 227 1 .
2. Kirshenbaum, I . Physical Properties and Analysis ofHeavy Water, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc . , New
York, .12.U, pp- 2-17 and pp. 249-25 1 .
3 . Salomaa, P. ; Vesala, A. ; Vesala, S. Acta Chem. Scand. ,1262, 23, 2107.
4. Matou!, J. ; Sobr, J. ; Novak, J. P. ; Pick, J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. .12Q2 , 34, 3982.
5. Kratochvil, J. ; Sobr, J. ; Matou§, J. ; Pick, J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1970, 35, 3761 .
6. Kapitanov, V. F. ; Shcherbakova, 0. M. Zh. Fiz. Khim. 128J, 57, 1785; "Russ. J. Phys. Chem. (Engl.
Transl.) .1283., 57(7), 1080.
7. Carroll , J. J. ; Slupsky, J. D. ; Mather, A. E. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data .1221 , 20, 120 1 .
8 . Scharlin, P. ; Battino, R . J. Solution Chem. 1992, 21 , 67.
9. Scharlin, P. ; Battino, R. Fluid Phase Equil. �. 94, 137.

71
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Curry , J . ; Haz elton , c. L.
(2) Water-d2 ; D2o ; [ 7 7 8 9 -2 0-0 ] J . Am . Chem . soc . 19 3 8 , 60 , 2 2 7 1-3 .
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 K
P1 /kPa = 9 4 . 62 - 9 7 . 4 9 H . L . Clever
4
t/ ° C T/K a P/mmHg P1/mmHg 10 x1 b L/cm3 cm- 3 c
25 . 00 2 9 8 . 15 741 . 2 7 18 . 6 0 . 8 17
743 . 7 720 . 4 0 . 8 18
749 . 9 726 . 6 0 . 8 1.7
732 . 8 7 09 . 7 0 . 831
735 . 9 7 12 . 6 0 . 82 3
7 54 . 5 731 . 2 0 . 810
6 . 10 Av . 0 . 8 19 ± 0 . 005

b The mole fraction solubility at a carbon dioxide partial pressure of
1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa ( 7 6 0 mmHg ) was calculated
1 by the compi ler using a real
gas molar volume of 2 4 . 3 4 dm3 mol- and a heavy water density of
1 . 1 0 4 2 g cm- 3 at 2 9 8 . 15 K .
According to the authors the 1 Ostwald coefficient . corresponds to a
molal ity of 0 . 0 3 0 4 mol kg- at a co2 partial pressure of 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa .
The apparatus was an Ostwald type ( 1 ) Commercial tank . Analyz ed by
us ing the " dry method" as described by reaction with KOH and found to be
Just ( Ref . 1 ) . 9 9 . 8 . % . pure .
The apparatus was of small size (2 ) Commercial source . Distil led from
because of a smal l sample of heavy wa alkal ine permanganate , then from
ter avai lable . The buret was 10 cm3 phosphoric anhydride , then without
graduated to 0 . 05 cm3 • The sample reagents . Average composition for
bulb had a volume of 6 . 8 1 1 cm3 • the solubil ity measurements was
99 . 8 % .
The s ix water samples ranged in weight
from 2 . 6 0 0 3 to 4 . 04 2 9 g . r-------�
ESTIMATED ERROR :
The physical properties of water-d2
at 2 9 8 . 15 K were estimated from data 6T/K = ± 0 . 0 1
of Wahl and Urey ( Ref . 2 ) . The au 6L/L = ± 0 , 0 1
thors used a vapor pressure of 2 0 . 7
mmHg and a dens ity of 1 . 1 0 4 2 g cm- 3
for the 9 9 . 8 percent water-d2 . REFERENCES :
1 . Just , G . z . physik . Chem . ( Leipzig)
1901 , 3 7 ' 3 4 2 .
2 . Wahl , M . H . ; Urey , H . C .
J . Chem . Phys . 1 9 3 5 , 3 , 4 1 1 .
.
72
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Salomaa , P . ; Vesala , A . ; Vesala , s.
(2) Water-d2 ; D20 ; [ 7 7 8 9 - 2 0-0 ) Acta Chem . Scand . 1 9 6 9 , 2 3 , 2 107-15 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 1 5
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 Pirketta Scharl in
x ( D ; L20) = 0 . 0 0 0 - 0 . 9 9 7
2 a,e
T/K a
x ( D ; L20) b L / cm3 cm- 3 c p ( L20) /g cm- 3 d 1 0 m 1 /mol kg- 1
0 . 000 0 . 8196 (20) 0 . 99705 f 3 . 377

2 9 8 . 15
0 . 4985 0 . 8 18 9 (20) 1 . 05113 3 . 201
0 . 83 3 0 . 8 154 (23) 1 . 08743 3 . 08 1
0 . 997 0 . 8 14 9 ( 18 ) 1 . 10523 3 . 02 9
a
b x ( D ; L2 0 ) is the deuterium mole fraction of solvent water ( L = H , D ) .
The f igure in the parentheses after each L is the number of
measurements made in the corresponding solvent compos it ion .
d p ( L20) = density of solvent water ( L = H , D ) . Dens ities were calculated
by the compi ler using equation ( 5 ) in the evaluation section .
e
m 1 = . molal ity of carbon dioxide
Density for pure H20 at 2 9 8 . 15 K was taken from Recommended Reference

Materials for the Real ization of Physi cochemical Properties , Edited by
K . N . Marsh , Blackwell , 1987 , p . 2 7 .
The equipment employed for the solu ( 1 ) From commercial tank .
bility measurements
2 on co2 was of the
1
Ostwald type . • Before each mea ( 2 ) Norsk Hydro-Elektri sk Kvaelstof
surement , the water was freed from aktieselskab , Norway . Analyz ed
dissolved air by boi l ing under ref lux . and purif ied as d�scribed in
The co2 which was passed into the ab Ref . 3 .
sorption apparatus was purified by
passing it subsequetly through acidic ( 3 ) Distil led , degassed .
ferric sulfate , iodine , potassium per-
manganate , and water . The gas was r-------�
finally dried carefully with magnes ium ESTIMATED ERROR :
perchlorate .
6L � ± 0 . 2 % ( estimated by compi ler)
REFERENCES :
1 . Just , G . z . physik . Chem . ( Leipz ig)
1901 , 3 7 , 342 .
2 . curry , J . ; Haz elton , c . L .
J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 3 8 , 6 0 , 2 7 7 1 .
3 . Salomaa , P . Acta Chem . Scand . 1966 ,

2 0 , 12 6 3 .
73
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Kratochvil , J . ; Sobr , J . ; Matous , J. ;
Pick , J .
( 2 ) Water-d2 ; D20 ; [ 7 7 8 9 -2 0-0 ]
Coll ect . Czech . Chem . Commun . 19 7 0 ,
35 , 3 7 6 1 - 4 .
T/K = 3 03 . 15 - 3 5 3 . 15
P 1 /MPa = 0 . 055 - 3 . 9 7 c . L . Young
2
T/K P1 /bar 10 x2
---
3 0 3 . 15 0 . 94 0 . 051
11 . 1 0 . 57 3
20 . 6 0 . 998
30 . 0 1 . 386
39 . 7 1 . 731
3 2 3 . 15 0 . 87 0 . 02 9
10 . 5 0 . 344
20 . 3 0 . 62 1
30 . 3 0 . 922
39 . 5 1 . 118
3 5 3 . 15 0 . 55 0 . 012
10 . 2 0 . 210
20 . 0 0 . 400
30 . 0 0 . 589
39 . 2 0 . 761
Cel l charged with components , equili ( 1 ) Lachema , Novy Bohumin sample
brated and pressure measured with purity better than 9 9 . 8 mole % .
Bourdon gauge . Liquid sampled and
analysed by stripping with nitrogen (2) Redistil led sample , purity
and absorbing dried carbon dioxide on probably better than 99 mole % .
absorbent containing sodium hydroxide . ( compiler )
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 1; &P1 / bar = ± 0.5
6x1 = ± 0 . 2 x 10- 4
( estimated by compiler )
REFERENCES :
74
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Kapitanov , v . F . ; Shcherbakova , o . M .

( 2 ) Water-d2 ; ( deuterium oxide) ; D20 ; Zh . Fiz . Khim . 19 8 3 , 5 7 , 1 7 8 5 - 7 ;
[ 7 7 8 9 - 2 0-0 ) *Russ . J . Phys . Chem . ( Engl . Transl . )
1983 , 5 7 ( 7 ) , 1 0 8 0 - 1 .
T/K = 3 03 -473
P/MPa = 1 - 20 P irketta Scharlin
Tbe solub i l ity ( 9 4a-3 ) of co2 i n D 2 o as a funct ion of P and T.
P/MPa 303 K 313 K 323 K 333 K 343 K 353 K

---
1 14 . 5 10 . 5 7.5 5.5 4.9 3.5

2 22 . 8 18 . 0 14 . 5 12 . 1 10 . 4 9.2
3 31.7 25 . 5 21 . 0 17 . 8 15 . 4 13 . 7
4 38 . 9 31. 0 26 . 5 22 . 7 19 . 9 17 . 9
5 44 . 9 37 . 0 3 1. 2 27 . 0 23 . 9 21.6
6 50 . 0 41 . 6 35 . 4 30 . 9 27 . 5 25 . 0
7 54 . 6 45 . 7 39 . 2 34 . 5 30 . 9 28 . 3
8 49 . 5 42 . 8 37 . 8 34 . 1 31.4
9 53 . 0 46 . 0 40 . 9 37 . 1 34 . 3
10 57 . 0 49 . 2 43 . 9 40 . 0 37 . 1
11 60 . 0 53 . 0 46 . 8 43 . 0 39 . 3
12 63 . 5 55 . 4 49 . 7 45 . 5 42 . 5
13 66 . 0 58 . 5 52 . 5 48 . 0 45 . 0
14 69 . 0 61 . 6 56 . 0 51 . 5 48 . 0
15 72 . 1 63 . 5 58 . 5 54 . 0 50 . 3
16 75 . 3 66 . 5 60 . 5 56 . 5 53 . 0
17 78 . 4 70 . 0 63 . 0 59 . 0 55 . 5
18 80 . 5 73 . 0 66 . 5 62 . 3 57 . 5
19 83 . 2 76 . 2 70 . 5 66 . 2 62 . 1
20 86 . 0 78 . 5 73 . 5 69 . 0 65 . 3
( continued on the next page )
The solubility was studied by a static ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . Al imentary grade
method ( 1 ) i n a n autoclave thermo ( GOST 8 0 5 0 - 6 4 ) freed beforehand
statted at the required temperature . from moisture and o i l with the aid
The autoclave was f i l led with D2o , of ultraf ine glass f ibre f ilters ,
constant speci fied temperature and NaA zeolites , and BAU activated
pressure were attained , and the auto charcoal .
clave was bubbled with carbon dioxide .
( 2 ) Water-d2 • 9 9 . 7 8 %
The co2 dissolved in D2o was absorbed
by baryta water and the excess of the
latter was then titrated with a solu ESTIMATED ERROR :
tion of oxalic acid ( 2 ) . The co2
which remained dissolved in water was According to the authors the error of
titrated with a solution of alkali the determination of the composition
using phenolphthalein as an indicator of the phases is 5 % .
(3) •
REFERENCES :
1 . Ts iklis , D . S . "Tekhnika Fiz iko-Khimicheskikh Isseledovani i poi Vysokikh i
Sverkhvysokikh Davleniyakh" , tzd . Khimiya , Moscow , 19 7 6 .
2 . Blazhenova , A . N . ; I l ' inskaya , A . A . ; Rapoport , F . M . "Ana l i z Gaz ov v Khimi
cheskoi Promyshlennosti " , Goskhimizdat , Moscow , 1 9 6 4 , pp . 1 1 8 -2 2 .
3 . Godovskaya , K , I . ; Ryabina , L . V . ; Novik , E . Yu . ; Gerner , M . M . "Tekhnicheskii
Anal i z " , I z d . Vysshaya Shkola , Moscow , 1967 , p. 7 0 .
75
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Kapitanov , v . F . ; Shcherbakova , o . M .
( 2 ) Water-d2 ; ( deuterium oxide ) ; o2o ; Zh . Fiz . Khim . 1 9 8 3 , 5 7 , 1785-7 ;
[ 7 7 8 9 -2 0-0 ] * Russ . J . Phys . Chem . ( Engl . Transl . )
1983 , 57 ( 7 ) , 1080-1 .
EXPERIMENTAL VALUES : ( continued)
The solub i l ity ( g da-3 ) of co2 in o2o as a function of P and T .
P /MPa 363 K 373 K 383 K 393 K 403 K 4 13 K

---
1 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7

2 8.4 7.7 5.5 4.9 4.7 4.5
3 12 . 5 11 . 6 10 . 3 9.9 9.0 8.5
4 16 . 4 15 . 3 14 . 9 13 . 3 12 . 8 12 . 0
5 19 . 9 18 . 7 17 . 5 14 . 8 16 . 0 15 . 0
6 23 . 2 21.9 20 . 0 19 . 0 18 . 5 18 . 0
7 26 . 4 24 . 9 23 . 5 22 . 3 21. 5 20. 5
8 29 . 4 27 . 8 26 . 5 25 . 5 24 . 0 23 . 5
9 32 . 2 30 . 7 28 . 7 27 . 6 27 . 0 26 . 0
10 35 . 0 33 . 7 31. 2 30 . 0 29 . 0 28 . 5
11 37 . 0 35 . 0 33 . 5 32 . 5 31. 0 30 . 0
12 39 . 5 37 . 5 36 . 1 34 . 3 33 . 5 32 . 0
13 42 . 3 39 . 5 38 . 3 36 . 5 35 . 0 34 . 0
14 44 . 9 41. 8 40 . 0 38 . 2 37 . 0 36. 1
15 47 . 0 44 . 0 42 . 9 40 . 7 39 . 0 38 . 0
16 49 . 5 46 . 5 44 . 3 42 . 5 41 . 0 39 . 5
17 51 . 9 49 . 0 46 . 5 44 . 9 43 . 0 41 . 3
18 54 . 7 51 . 5 48 . 5 47 . 0 45 . 0 43 . 5
19 57 . 5 54 . 0 51 . 5 49 . 0 47 . 0 45 . 8
20 60 . 5 56 . 5 54 . 3 51 . 2 49 . 5 48 . 0
P/MPa 423 K 433 K 443 K 453 K 463 K 473 K

---
1 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3

2 4.2 4.0 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.2
3 8.1 7.5 7.2 7.0 6.8 6.7
4 11 . 6 11 . 0 10 . 5 10 . 2 9.8 9.6
5 14 . 5 14 . 0 13 . 8 13 . 6 13 . 4 13 . 0
6 17 . 5 17 . 0 16 . 5 16 . 0 15 . 5 15 . 0
7 19 . 5 18 . 6 18 . 0 17 . 5 18 . 0 17 . 5
8 22 . 5 21 . 5 21. 0 20 . 5 20 . 0 19 . 0
9 25 . 0 24 . 0 23 . 0 22 . 5 22 . 0 21. 5
10 27 . 2 26.5 25 . 7 25 . 0 24 . 0 24 . 0
11 29 . 2 28 . 0 27 . 5 27 . 0 26 . 5 26. 0
12 31.5 30 . 5 29 . 7 29 . 2 28 . 5 27 . 7
13 33 . 5 32 . 5 32 . 0 31. 0 30 . 5 30 . 0
14 35 . 5 34 . 0 33 . 0 32 . 5 32 . 0 31. 0
15 37 . 0 36 . 0 35 . 5 35 . 0 34 . 8 34 . 0
16 38 . 5 37 . 5 37 . 0 36 . 5 36 . 0 35 . 5
17 40 . 0 39 . 0 38 . 5 38 . 0 37 . 5 36 . 0
18 42 . 0 41 . 5 40 . 8 40 . 0 39 . 6 39 . 4
19 44 . 3 43 . 0 42 . 0 41 . 5 41 . 0 4C L 6
20 46 . 5 45 . 0 44 . 0 43 . 5 43 . 0 42 . 5
76
COMPONENTS : EVALUATOR:
(1) Carbon dioxide; C02; [124-38-9] Denis A. Wiesenburg

Center for Marine Sciences
(2) Sea Water University of Southern Mississippi
Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 USA
January, 1995
AN EVALUATION OF THE SOLUBILITY OF CARBON DIOXIDE IN SEA WATER AT A PARTIAL

PRESSURE OF 101 .3 kPa
In spite of the importance of carbon dioxide in the ocean, only a few measurements have been made of
the solubility of carbon dioxide in sea water at a partial pressure of gas of 101 . 3 kPa. References 1 - 6 are
considered to be of historical interest. They were not used in the present evaluation although they contain some
data of value. Since the early measurements, most authors have chosen to extrapolate from data based on the
solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous sodium chloride solutions. This situation persisted until the 1970's when
four independent solubility data sets for carbon dioxide in sea water were produced using a variety of
techniques.
These four sets of modem measurements were considered for this evaluation. Three of these are of
carbon dioxide solubility in natural sea water and one in synthetic or artificial sea water. Two of the
independent data sets are extensive enough to allow evaluation and computation of a smoothing equation. Li
and Tsui (9) analyzed compositions of equilibrium solutions using infrared spectroscopy, while Murray and
Riley (10) used a gravimetric determination. Unfortunately, the agreement between the two sets of
measurements is poor : the data of Murray and Riley are as much as 3. 8 % lower than those of Li and Tsui at
higher temperatures and salinities. The agreement is better at lower temperatures and in distilled water. Weiss
(11) examined both data sets and made measurements of his own to determine which were most accurate. Weiss
also noted that neither Murray and Riley nor Li and Tsui made corrections for the non-ideal behavior of carbon
dioxide. For carbon dioxide, the departure from the ideal gas approximation is much larger than the precision
with which its solubility can be measured. Also, neither Murray and Riley nor Li and Tsui made corrections
for the dissociation of dissolved hydrated carbon dioxide to form bicarbonate in distilled water. Making these
corrections reduces the distilled water values for both of the published data sets by - 0. 1 8 % at 273 . 15 K to
- 0.46 % at 3 1 3 . 15 K. The 15 measurements that Weiss (1 1) made confirmed the accuracy of the
measurements of Murray and Riley (10). The values of Li and Tsui (9) were shown to be in error by as much
as 4 % at the higher temperatures and salinities. The data of Murray and Riley ( 10), after correction for the
effects of non-ideal behavior and for dissociation in the distilled water measurements (1 1), are believed to be
accurate enough to develop a smoothing equation.
Stewart and Munjal (7) made measurements of the solubility of carbon dioxide in synthetic sea water
which the evaluator calculated to have a salinity of 34.42 %o . The compiler estimated the error of these
measurements to be ± 1 % , which is greater than the error of the better methods. A comparison of their data
with the measurements of Murray and Riley (10) and Weiss (1 1) revealed their artificial sea water solubility
values to be low by an average of 6 % . For this reason, the data of Stewart and Munjal (7) were not considered
further.
Solubilities of carbon dioxide are generally used in calculations of chemical equilibria and are given
typically as amount concentration (c1 = n1 1V) or amount per unit mass of solution or as mass fractions. Weiss
(1 1) evaluated the solubility of carbon dioxide in sea water in terms of the equilibrium constant Ko, defmed as
the amount of solute per liter or kilogram of solution, when the fugacity (/) of the solute and the total pressure
are both 1 atm. According to the modified form (11) of Henry's law, Tnt = Ko.f, where m1 is the concentration
of dissolved gas in molar or gravimetric units and f is the fugacity. In terms of the Bunsen coefficient, Ko =
al v• in molar units, or K0 = aiV •p in gravimetric units, where v • is the molar volume of the pure real gas
at standard temperature and pressure and p is the density of the solution. Weiss (1 1) fitted the corrected Murray
and Riley (10) data to the smoothing equation:
3
ln (Ko I mol dm· atm-1) = -58.093 1 + 90.5069 (100 K I 1) + 22.2940 ln (T 1100 K)
2
+ (SI%o)[ 0.027766 - 0.025888 (T 1100 K) + 0.0050578 (T 1100 K) ] (1)
where S is the salinity (%o) and T is the Kelvin temperature. Weiss (1 1} also fitted the same data to an equation
that represented the solubility in terms of mass of the solution rather than volume,
77
ln (Ko I mol kg·1 atm-1) = -6(>-2409 + 93.45 17 (100 K I 1) + 23.3585 ln (T /100 K)

2
+ (S/ r'oo )[ 0.0235 17 -0.023656 (T /100 K) + 0.0047036 (T /100 K) ]. (2)
The Murray and Riley (10) data show a standard error of estimate of about 0.3 % , or 1 .4 x 104 mol dm·3
atm·1 in terms of KQ. Weiss (1 1) gives extensive tables of the carbon dioxide solubility in sea water at various
temperatures and salinities from both of the above equations. These equations are recommended for calculation
of the solubility of carbon dioxide in sea water.
Although the solubility coefficients of carbon dioxide in sea water are well defined by the above
equations, for practical purposes oceanographers and atmospheric scientists require the atmospheric equilibrium
solubility for their work. Weiss (8) has proposed equations similar to the above which express the atmospheric
equilibrium solubility from moist air at 1 atm total pressure in units of volume (STP), as a function of
temperature and salinity. In working with samples from depths iri the ocean , it is also advantageous to express
atmospheric solubilities in terms of mol kg·1 , which are pressure and temperature independent (8). Weiss and
Price (12) produced a smoothing equation for carbon dioxide solubility in sea water from the Murray and Riley
(10) data in terms of the function F, for a total pressure of 1 atm where 171t = x1F and·x1 is the mole fraction
·
of carbon dioxide in dry air:

3
ln (F I mol dm- atm-1) = - 16o.7333 + 215.4152 (100 K I 1) + 89. 8920 1n (T /100 K)
2
- 1 .47759 (T /100 K) + (S/ %o)[ 0.029941 - 0.027455 (T /100 K) (3)
2
+ 0.0053407 (T /100 K) ]
Weiss and Price (12) also fitted the Murray and Riley (10) data to an equation that represented the solubility
in terms of mass of the solution rather than volume:
ln (F I mol kg·1 atm-1 ) = -162. 8301 + 218.2968 (100 K I 1) + 90.9241 ln (T / 100 K)

- 1 .47696 (T / 100 Ki + (S/ %o)[ 0.025695 - 0.025225 (T /100 K) (4)
2
+ 0.0049867 (T /100 K) ]
These two equations can be used to calculate accurately the atmospheric equilibrium solubility of carbon dioxide
in sea water between 272. 15 K and 313. 15 K and salinities between 0 and 40 %o .
In the following table some numerical values, calculated from equations (1), (2) and (4), are presented
for the solubility coefficient KQ. More extensive tables can be found in references 1 1 and 12.
TIK Salinity Sf %o
0 34 35 36 38
Eq. (1). 3
Solubility Coefficient 10ZKo I mol dm· atm·1
273 . 15 7.758 6.498 6.465 6.43 1 6.364

283 . 15 5.366 4.529 4.507 4.485 4.440
293 . 15 3.910 3.337 3.322 3 .306 3.275
303 . 15 2.983 2.583 2.572 2.561 2.540
3 1 3 . 15 2.370 2.090 2.082 2.074 2.059
Eq. (2). Solubility Coefficient lOZKo I mol kg-1 atm·1
273 . 15 7.758 6.325 6.287 6.249 6. 175

283 . 15 5.367 4.413 4.328 4.363 4.313
293 . 15 3.916 3.258 3.241 3.223 3 . 1 89
303 . 15 2.995 2.530 2.517 2.505 2.480
3 1 3 . 15 2.389 2.054 2.045 2.036 2.018
Eq. (4) . Function F for moist air at 1 atm, 10ZF I mol kg-1 atm·1
273 . 15 7.681 6.264 6.226 6. 1 89 6. 1 15

283 . 15 5.280 4.342 4.3 18 4.293 4.244
293 . 15 3.814 3. 174 3. 157 3 . 140 3 . 106
303 . 15 2. 862 2.419 2.407 2.395 2.371
3 1 3 . 15 2.209 1.902 1 . 894 1 . 886 1 . 869
78
Added by the editor:
Note that Weiss (1 1) defined the Bunsen coefficient as the volume of gas (STP) absorbed per unit
volume of the solution at the temperature of the measurement, when the total pressure and the fugacity are both
1 atm. According to the usual definition, Bunsen coefficient is the volume of gas (STP) absorbed per unit
volume of the solvent at the temperature of measurement and 1 atm partial pressure of gas.
Concerning the thermodynamics of the carbon dioxide system in sea water, there exist several articles
in the literature. See for instance the recent paper of Millero (18) and the references therein.
The definitions of salinity and chlorinity have been changed during the years. For these definitions and
the salinity - chlorinity relationship, see for instance references 13, 14, 15, and 16.
In 1981 the Joint Panel of Experts on Oceanographic Tables and Standards proposed a new definition
of salinity and recommended the use of a new salinity scale - the Practical Salinity Scale 1978 (PSS 78) (13).
The Practical Salinity 1978 was defined for the salinities within the salinity range 2 - 42. An extension of the
Practical Salinity Scale 1978 to salinities up to 50 is given in reference 17.
REFERENCES:
1. McLeod, H . J. Chem. Soc. .1..8@ , 22, 307.

2. Hamberg, A. J. Prakt. Chem. �. [2] 33, 433.
3. Krogh, A. Medd. om Grsnland 12!M, 26, 33 1 .
4. Fox, C. J. J. Trans. Faraday Soc. .1.202, 5, 68.
5. Coste, J. H. J. Soc. Chem. Ind .l211 , 36, 846.
.
6. McClendon, J. F. J. Bioi. Chem. 1917, 30, 259.

7. Stewart, P. B. ; Munjal, P. J. Chem. Eng. Data 121Q, 15, 67.
8. Weiss, R. F. Deep-Sea Res. 121Q, 1 7, 721 .
9. Li, Y-H. ; Tsui, T-F. J. Geophys. Res. 121.1, 76, 4203.
10. Murray, C. N. ; Riley, J. P. Deep-Sea Res. 1971 , 18, 533.
11. Weiss, R . F . Mar. Chem. 1974, 2, 203.
12. Weiss, R. F.; Price, B. A. Mar. Chem. 1980, 8, 347.
13. UNESCO Technical Papers in Mar. Sci. 198 1 , 37, 1 .
14. Lewis, E.L. ; Perkin, R.G. Deep-Sea Res. 198 1 , 28A, 307.
15. Millero , F .J. Ocean Sci. Eng. 1982, 7, 403.
16. Grasshoff, K. ; Ehrhardt, M. ; Kremling, K. , Editors, Methods of Seawater Analysis, 2nd Edition,
Verlag Chemie, .1.2.8l.
17. Poisson, A. ; Gadhoumi, M.H. Deep-Sea Res. .1.22l, 40, 1689.
18. Millero, F .J. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta �. 59, 661 .
79
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] stewart , P . B . ; Munj a l , P .
( 2 ) Synthetic sea water J . Cbem . Eng . Data 19 7 0 , 1 5 , 6 7 -7 1 .
T/K = 2 68 . 15 - 2 9 8 . 15 c . L . Young
P/MPa = 0 . 101 - 4 . 560
A. synthetic s ea water a B. synthetic sea water concentrate a
2
( Salts content 3 times normal )
T/K P/ bar 1 0 m1 tm2 b 2
--- T/K P/ bar 1 0 m 1 tm2 b
2 6 8 . 15 1 . 01 0 . 3 10 ---
5 . 07 1 . 446 2 7 3 . 15 10 . 13 2 . 14 9
10 . 13 2 . 7 52 20 . 26 3 . 892
20. 26 4 . 78 1 34 . 45 5 . 451
30 . 40 5 . 604 285 . 55 10 . 1 3 1 . 351
2 7 3 . 15 1 . 01 0 . 265 20. 26 2 . 4 11
5 . 07 1 . 248 45 . 60 4 . 05 2
1 0 . 13 2 . 358 2 9 8 . 15 1 0 . 13 0 . 907
15 . 2 0 3 . 3 12 20. 26 1 . 612
20. 26 4 . 152 45 . 60 2 . 751
30 . 40 5 . 604
34 . 45 6 . 007
2 7 8 . 15 1 . 01 0 . 220 c. Synthetic sea water concentrate a
5 . 07 1 . 04 3 ( Salts content 5 times normal )
1 0 . 13 2 . 004 2
20 . 26 3 . 548 T/K P/ bar 1 0 m1 tm2 b
30 . 40 4 . 843 ---
38 . 50 5 . 601 2 7 3 . 15 10 . 1 3 2 . 04 3
2 8 3 . 15 1 . 01 0 . 19 1 20. 26 3 . 55 2
5 . 07 0 . 889 34 . 45 5 . 253
1 0 . 13 1 . 701 285 . 55 10 . 13 1 . 2 14
20 . 26 3 . 04 2 20 . 26 2 . 19 2
30 . 40 4 . 14 0 45 . 60 3 . 672
38 . 50 4 . 801
285 . 55 1 . 01 0 . 17 3
5 . 07 0 . 790 a composition o f sea water is given in the
1 0 . 13 1 . 558 following table . m i = mass of component i .
20 . 26 2 . 8 05
3 0 . 40 3 . 8 05 mi / g
45 . 60 4 . 852
2 8 8 . 15 1 . 01 0 . 155 NaCl MgCl2 MgS04 CaC12
5 . 07 0 . 740 A 2 6 . 518 2 . 447 3 . 305 1 . 14 1
10 . 13 1 . 411 B 7 9 . 554 7 . 341 9 . 9 15 3 . 423
20 . 26 2 . 53 1 c 132 . 590 12 . 2 3 5 16 . 525 5 705
. •
30 . 40 3 . 453
4 5 . 60 4 . 379 KCl NaHC0 3 NaBr H20
2 9 8 . 15 1 . 01 0 . 110 A 0 . 725 0 . 2 02 0 . 08 3 965 . 579
5 . 07 0 . 551 B 2 . 17 5 0 . 606 0 . 249 896 . 737
1 0 . 13 1 . 023 c 3 . 625 1 . 010 0 . 4 15 827 . 895
20 . 26 1 . 822
3 0 . 40 2 . 397
45 . 60 3 . 090 b m l fm2 = solubil ity of carbon dioxide ;
m l = mass of C02 ; m 2 = mass of solvent
METHOD/APPARATUS / PROCED�E : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS :
Rocking equilibrium cel l fitted with ( 1 ) Matheson research grade , purity
Bourdon-type pressure gauges . carbon 9 9 . 9 9 mole % .
dioxide gas admitted to cell contain
ing sea water . After equil ibrium es ( 2 ) Degassed
tablished samples of l iquid withdrawn
and analy z ed by stripping out carbon
dioxide , absorbing in excess barium ESTIMATED ERROR : ( by compi ler )
hydroxide and back-titrating .
6T/K = ± 0 . 06 ;6P/kPa = ± 2 below
3 . 6 MPa , ± 3 . 4 above 3 . 6 MPa ;
6 ( 10 m 1 / m2 ) = ± 1 %
2
80
(1) Carbon dioxide ; c o2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ] Murray , C . N . ; R i l ey , J . P .
(2) Sea water ; Deep-sea Res . 19 7 1 , 1 8 , 5 3 3 -4 1 .

(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 7 4 . 2 0 - 3 08 . 1 6
P/kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
Mass % o f salt = 0 - 3 . 735
t / °C T/K Sal inity a Chlorinity b a c
1 . 04 2 7 4 . 19 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 6471
6 . 58 3 . 64 1 . 5883
19 . 6 0 10 . 8 5 1 . 4943
24 . 50 13 . 5 6 1 . 4463
36 . 40 2 0 . 07 1 . 3 64 1
5 . 00 2 7 8 . 15 o . oo o . oo 1 . 4 19 9
9 . 75 5 . 40 1 . 3446
20 . 60 11 . 4 0 1 . 2785
28 . 00 15 . 5 0 1. 2 2 9 0
36 . 75 2 0 . 34 1 . 1690
10 . 0 0 2 8 3 . 15 o . oo 0 . 00 1 . 192 6
16 . 9 0 9 . 35 1 . 0962
20 . 40 1 1 . 13 1 . 0768
28 . 45 15 . 7 5 1 . 0330
35 . 25 19 . 5 1 o. . 9 9 3 1
15 . 0 0 2 8 8 . 15 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 0100
10 . 15 5 . 62 0 . 9563
19 . 0 5 10 . 54 0 . 9173
2 6 . 55 14 . 7 0 0 . 8852
35 . 30 19 . 5 4 0 . 8470
( cont inued next page )
AU X I L I ARY I N FO RMATION
METHOD iAPPARATUS / P ROCEDU RE : SOURCE AND P U R l TY OF MAT E R I ALS :
In a constant .temperature bath , a (1) D i st i l l ers Co . , Ltd ; 9 9 . 9 %

2 . 5 � samp l e of water or sea water by supp l ier , confirmed by
solution was saturated with water mass spectrometry .
saturated carbon dioxide in 3 - L
round bottom f lask f itted with a (2) canary I s l ands vicinity ,
magnet ic st irrer and dip tube . After f i ltered , acidi f i ed to pH 2.2
saturat ion , 2 5 0 mL of the so lut ion and bo i l ed . ·
was transferred to a volumetr ic

flask also f itted with a dip tube
and magnet ic stirrer . The carbon
dioxide was stripped from the samp l e
b y pass ing carbon dioxide-free a i r
through it . Water a n d carbon dioxide E S T I MATED ERRO R :
were removed from the air by pass ing
it through a freeze-out trap coo led N o t given .
to -8 0°C and then through three
absorpt ion tubes , the f irst of wh ich
conta ined magnes ium perchlorate and
the other two soda asbestos and REFE RENCES :
magnes ium perchlorate . The we ight
increase of the second absorption
tube gave the amount of disso lved
carbon dioxide .
81
(1) carbon d ioxide ; co2 ; ( 124-3 8-9 ] Murray , C . N . ; R i l ey , J . P .
(2) Sea water ; Deep-Sea Res . 19 7 1 , 18 , 5 3 3 -4 1 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
t i °C TI K Sal in ity a Ch lorinity b a c

---
2 0 . 00 2 9 3 . 15 0 . 00 o . oo 0 . 8652
1 1 . 15 6 . 17 0 . 8230
16 . 60 9 . 19 0 . 8081
24 . 20 13 . 4 0 0 . 7779
35 . 65 19 . 7 3 0 . 7345
2 5 . 00 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 7519
8 . 40 4 . 65 0 . 7238
13 . 90 7 . 69 0 . 7088
2 0 . 95 11 . 60 0 . 6841
35 . 50 19 . 65 0 . 6406
3 2 . 00 3 05 . 15 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 6336
8 . 55 4 . 73 0 . 6042
15 . 4 5 8 . 55 0 . 5876
27 . 40 1 5 . 17 0 . 5589
35 . 40 19 . 57 0 . 5412
3 5 . 00 3 08 . 15 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 5905
9 . 50 5 . 25 0 . 5651
19 . 05 10 . 54 0 . 5440
29 . 35 16 . 25 0 . 5258
37 . 35 2 0 . 67 0 . 5068
a
S a l inity = m salt ( g ) I 1 0 0 0 g o f so lut ion
b Chlorinity = m el I 1 0 0 0 g of so lut ion ( ca l culated as
s a l inityl 1 . 8 0 6 5 5 )
c a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ) �
82
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Li , Y . -H . ; Tsui , T . -F .
( 2 ) Sea water J . Geopbys . Res . 19 7 1 , 7 6 , 4 2 0 3 -7 .
T/K = 2 7 3 . 8 5 - 3 0 3 . 15
P 1 / kPa = 101 . 325 Kelly R . Thornton
Chlorinity = 0 . 0 - 2 9 . 0 ° / 00
T/ K a
0/
Chlor inity/ 00
0.7 273 . 85 0 7 . 501

4.0 277 . 15 6 . 603
10 . 2 283 . 35 5 . 3 02
20. 0 2 9 3 . 15 3 . 911
30. 0 3 0 3 . 15 2 . 997
10 . 2 283 . 35 10 . 0 4 . 863
4.0 2 7 7 . 15 20. 0 5 . 5 2-6

10 . 2 283 . 35 4 . 482
20. 0 2 9 3 . 15 3 . 359
30. 0 3 0 3 . 15 2 . 614
4.0 2 7 7 . 15 29 . 0 5 . 08 6
10 . 2 283 . 35 4 . 162
20 . 0 2 9 3 . 15 3 . 13 8
30 . 0 3 0 3 . 15 . 2 . 463
4.0 2 7 7 . 15 0 . 6 4 1 3 m NaCl 5 . 547

20 . 0 2 9 3 . 15 3 . 358
30 . 0 3 0 3 . 15 2 . 618
a Calculated by the compiler

b s = solubil ity of co2
Water-saturated co2 gas was bubbled ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . Source not given .
overnight through sea water in an Purity of 9 9 . 9 9 ± 0 . 0 1 % .
equi l ibration chamber in a constant
temperature bath . A sample was re ( 2 ) sea water . Source not given .
moved with an a irtight glass syringe
and inj ected into a co2 -extraction
system . Infra-red analysis was done
on liberated co2 . Sea water samples
were acidif ied with 8 M HCl to a pH
below 3 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 02
6P1 /mmHg = ± 0 . 005
REFERENCES :
83
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Weiss , R . F .
( 2 ) Sea water Mar . Cbem . 1 9 7 4 , 2 , 2 0 3 - 1 5 .
T/K = 279 . 74 - 293 . 78
P 1 /kPa = 101 . 325 Kel ly R . Thornton
Sal inity/ 0 / 00 = 0 . 0 0 and 3 5 . 3 3 0
T/K a Sal inity I 0 I oo
2 0 . 61 293 . 76 0.0 3 . 848

2 0 . 63 293 . 78 3 . 843
2 0 . 60 293 . 75 3 . 867
2 0 . 59 293 . 74 3 . 834
2 0 . 61 293 . 76 3 . 84 0
6 . 59 279 . 74 35. 330 5 . 07 1

6 . 60 279 . 75 5 . 063
6 . 60 279 . 75 5 . 068
6 . 59 279 . 74 5 . 04 1
2 0 . 62 293 . 77 35 . 330 3 . 24 5
2 0 . 63 293 . 78 3 . 272
2 0 . 63 293 . 78 3 . 245
2 0 . 63 293 . 78 3 . 255
2 0 . 63 293 . 78 3 . 254
2 0 . 63 293 . 78 3 . 252
a
Calculated by the compiler
b K0 = solubil ity of co2
Measurements of co2 solubil ity were ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . Matheson Gas
carried out by the microgasometric products . High purity ( certified
technique used previous ly to measure � 99 . 99 % ) .
He and Ne solubi l ities ( Ref . 1 ) . The
amount of degassed water added to the ( 2 ) sea water . surface sea water col
equil ibration chamber was reduced to lected at La Jol la , California .
about one third of the total gas vo Sal inity increased by � 2 ° / 00 ,
lume . Six to ten minutes were allowed fi ltered with 0 . 4 5 �m f i lter , poi
for equil ibration . The pH of sea wa soned with 1 mg/ L HgC12 , sal inity
ter was brought to 2 . 2 with addition determined to 0 . 0 0 4 ° / 00 •
of sulfuric acid , and the sal inity was
adj usted by gravimetric determination 1------l
of the amount of H20 added in the ESTIMATED ERROR :
acid solution .
The overa l l accuracy of solubil ity
measurements estimated as ± 0 . 2 % by
author .
REFERENCES :
1 . Weiss , R . F .
J . Cbem . Eng . Data 19 7 1 , 1 6 ,
235 - 41.
84
COMPONENTS : EVALUATOR:
(1) Carbon dioxide; C02 ; [124-38-9] H. Lawrence Clever

Department of Chemistry
(2) Electrolyte Emory University
Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
(3) Water; H20; [7732-1 8-5]
August 1995
AN EVALUATION OF THE SOLUBILITY OF CARBON DIOXIDE IN AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE

SOLUTIONS .
The solubility of a gas in an aqueous electrolyte solution often approximates the behavior pointed out
by Sechenov over 100 years ago ( 1 , 2, 4, 5). It obeys the equation, (1/cJlg (Sl/S) = k..,., where SJ, S rep
resent the solubility of the gas in pure water and in the aqueous electrolyte solution, respectively, lg is the base
10 logarithm, c2 is the concentration of the electrolyte, and k..,. , the Sechenov salt effect parameter when both
the gas an4 electrolyte concentrations are in volume units.
Other gas and electrolyte measures lead to slightly different values of the salt effect parameter. The
commonly used forms are:
k...fL mol·' = ( l/(c2/mol L·')) lg (c?/mol L"1)/(c /mol L"1)

1
k....lkg
.. mol·' = (11(�/mol kg-1)) lg (mY/mol kg-1)/(m/mol kg-1)
k../L mol·' = (1/(cimol L"1)) lg (xYix )
1
kcmx/kg mol"1 = (V(m2/mol kg-1)) lg (x?lx )
1
where subscript l represents the nonelectrolyte gas, and subscript 2 the electrolyte.
The gas solubility ratio in pure water and electrolyte solution, cNc, will be numerically the same using
the Bunsen coefficient ratio, ol!a, or the Ostwald coefficient ratio, L0/L, as well as the mol L-1 ratio. The
molality ratio, m?lm" is the same as the Kuenen coefficient ratio, SJ/S, or the solvomolality ratio, A0/A. The
mole fraction ratio, i'!x, is the same as the inverse Henry's constant ratio, KHIK�, when the Henry's constant
is of the form,(KH/kPa) = (p/kPa)/x • The gas mol fractions are usually calculated treating each electrolyte
1 '
ion as an entity. A more detailed description of these units and the · interconversions among them is in the
introductory material of Volume 10 of the Solubility DaJa Series (47).
A useful graphical test of salt effect data of either a particular worker or to compare different workers
data is to put the Sechenov equation in the form:
and plot lg S vs. 0, the linear slope will be the negative of the salt effect parameter in what ever set of units
is used for S and c2 • A number of such figures follow in this evaluation.
Many workers use electrolyte ionic strength instead of volume concentration, and the salt effect
parameter is given in electrolyte ionic strength. There are valid reasons to do this, and we have used the ionic
strength designation for most systems except 1-1 electrolytes where ionic strength and electrolyte concentration
or molality is numerically the same. The conversion of molar units to ionic strength basis requires dividing
by the small whole number of one for 1-1 electrolytes, three for 1-2 and 2-1 electrolytes, four for 2-2
electrolytes, six for 1-3 and 3- l electrolytes and and 15 for 2-3 and 3-2 electrolytes. The solubilities in the
mixed electrolyte solutions are plotted as a function of ionic strength. The salt effect parameters in ionic
strength are symbolized k,1<•>• and k,1<m>m for ionic strength in volume concentration and molality units, ·
respectively.
For electrolytes other than 1 - 1 and for mixtures of electrolytes we have generally used ionic strength
in this evaluation. For electrolytes of higher valent ions the equation becomes lg S = lg SJ - ksi(c,mJ• l(c,mb
and for mixed electrolytes lg s lg SJ - k,l(c,m)• l(c,m)klUl- Often k,I(c,m)s
= ={ksl(c,m)s2 + . . . + k,l(c,m)si} , the sum
of the individual salt effect parameters 2 to i. I(c,m) means express ionic strength in either volume
concentration or molality depending on the data available. The approach was probably first suggested by van
Krevelen and Hoffijzer (23) .
The evaluator would be among the first to point out the simple Sechenov approach is not the best way
to treat salt effect data. However, it is fast and convenient to use and gives a simple common basis for the
85
comparison of the many data we have here. The user of this evaluation should always consult the original
paper, when available, to find what approach the original authors used to explain their data. Some other
approaches the user may want to consider are discussed by Markham and Kobe (18, 19), and by the Japanese
school of workers
(36, 37, 39, 4 1 , 42, 43) who suggest extensions of the Sechenov equation. More recently
workers have started to use the Pitzer equation and examples are Rumpf, Maurer and coworkers (56, 59, 60)
and He and Morse (57).
Two or more groups of workers have measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in several of the same
aqueous electrolyte solutions. Unfortunately often they report values of the solubility of carbon dioxide in water
at 298 K which differ by several percent. The difference makes for some difficulty in comparing their results
by a plot of lg L vs. c2 as we have used here. There are data on over 100 systems containing either one
electrolyte, one electrolyte and a non-aqueous nonelectrolyte or two or more electrolytes with water. In general
the data for carbon dioxide solubility in aqueous electrolyte solutions show better consistency than the data for
less soluble gases reviewed in previous Solubility Data Series volumes.
The term salt effect means to many the effect of a strong electrolyte on a pJ.:operty, solubility in this
evaluation. However, nonelectrolytes often have a similar magnitude effect on a property. This review contains
weak electrolytes, some nonelectrolytes in combination with electrolytes, some inorganic substances in colloidal
form and some miscelle forming electrolytes in addition to strong electrolytes.
The systems are given in the order of the standard arrangement for inorganic compounds used by the
U. S . National Institute of Science and Technology. The NBS (NIST) Table of Thermodynamic Properties (48)
gives a recent description of the standard order and the table is a good example of its use. 'J'he number before
each system is the standard order number for the electrolyte atom of largest order number.
9 (1) Carbon dioxide + Hydrofluoric acid [7664-39-3] + Water
Cox and Head (28) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in 0, 2.5 and 5.0 mol L"1 aqueous HF at
293.02, 298.07, 303 .02 and 308.00 K. Partial pressures of C� ranged from 94. 64 to 107.00 kPa. Results
were reported as Henry constants with units mol L"1 atm·• . The salt effect parameter is based on two
measurements of the solubility at each of the two HF concentrations. There is a small salting in by the HF.
The salt effect parameters are in the table below.
Table 1.
HF Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, c�mol L·• Parameter of Slope
k'"IL mot·•
293 .02 2.5, 5.0 -0.013 0.0007 CH (28)

298.07 2.5, 5.0 -0.0096 0.0018 CH (28)
303 .02 2.5, 5.0 -0.008 1 0.000 8 CH (28)
At 308. 00 K measurements were made at only one ct>ncentration and no calculation of the salt effect
parameter was made. The negative sign on the salt effect parameter means salting in. Recall that HF is a weak
acid.
10 (1) Carbon dioxide + Hydrochloric acid [7647-01-0] + Water
Geffcken (6) made seven measurements of the solubility of C� in 0 to 2 . 1 8 mol L" 1 aqueous HCl at
288. 15 and 298. 15 K and atmospheric pressure. Wolf and Krause (12) made several solubility measurements
in 0 - 4 vol % HCl at 293 K. Van Slyke, Sendroy, Hastings and Neill (13) made nine measurements of the
solubility of C02 in 0.01 to 0.300 mol L" 1 HCl at 3 1 1 . 2 K and atmospheric pressure. Robb and Zimmer (34)
made eight measurements of the solubility of C02 in 0 to 10 mol L"1 HCl at 298. 15 K and up to three
measurements each at 293 . 15 and 303. 15 K and atmospheric pressure. He and Morse (57) made five
measurements of the solubility of C� in 0.01 to 3.0 mol kg·• HCl at temperatures of 273 .2, 298.2, 323 .2,
348.2 and 363 .2 K and a total pressure near one atmosphere. The actual carbon dioxide partial pressures were
0.927, 0.954, 0. 865, 0.61 1 and 0. 305 bru; , respectively at the five temperatures.
The measurements of Wolf and Krause (12) were considered doubtful and were not used. Salt effect
parameters were calculated from the other data and are given in Table 2 (next page) . Figure 1 (next page)
shows lg 01 vs. � at 298. 15 K from the data of Geffcken , Robb and Zimmer, and He and Morse. The data
of He and Morse were converted to Bunsen coefficients using their density and partial pressure values and
86
assuming ideal gas behavior. The data of Geffcken and of Robb and Zimmer show a modest salting-out to about
1 .25 mol L-1 , then a salting-in as the HCl concentration increases. The data of He and Morse show a regular
salting-out up to 3.0 mol kg·1 (2. 82 mol L·1) HCl of a magnitude almost as large as the salting out by sulfuric
acid at the same molalities. The differences between the data of Geffcken and Robb and Zimmer and of He
and Morse are serious. The evaluator prefers the data of Geffcken and of Robb and Zimmer because the
solubility of carbon dioxide in other aqueous strong acid (HC104 and H2S04) solutions show similar trends of
salting out and salting in (Figure I), but only further experimental studies can resolve the differences.
Table 2.
HCl Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, czfmol L-1 Parameter of Slope
k,,jL moi·1
288. 15 0.499 - 2. 1 8 0.013 0.002 Gf (6)

298. 15 0.0 - 1 .25 0.01 1 0.003 Gf (6)
0.0 - 1 .26 0.014 0.001 RZ (34)
0.01 - 2.82 0.026 0.001 HM (57)
[ 0.0 - 1 .26 0.013 0.002 Comb. Gf & RZ]
3 1 1 .2 0.01 - 0.300 0.023 0.002 VSHN (13)
0 06 .. . .
· · · · · · · · ·
•
298. 1 5
-
.
. · T ; K
.·
.
.
·
.
.
-0. 1 0
· .•. ·
.
HCI04
·.
-0. 1 4 ·· . . . . . . . . . . . . •
�
0)
-0.1 8 0
- 0 .2 2
0
- 0 .26
0 4.0 8.0 1 2.0 1 6 .0 2 0 .0 2 4 .0
Figure 1 . Logarithm of Bunsen coefficient vs. acid molality at 298. 15 K.

Upper dotted line: Perchloric acid;
Middle solid line: Hydrochloric acid;
Lower solid line: Sulfuric acid;
Upper dashed line: Geffcken (6), Sulfuric acid;
Lower dashed line: He and Morse (57), Hydrochloric acid.
Symbols: • Ref. (6), V Ref. (16), • Ref. ( 19) ,
0 Ref. (25), 0 Ref. (34) , T Ref. (57).
He and Morse (57) report their results in mol kg·1 of HCl and of C02• Table 3 (next page) gives values
of the salt effect parameters, k,mm/kg mol·1 , from their data. There is modest salting out over the 0.01 to 3.0
molal HCl range at all temperatures. Until the discrepancy among the results of the three laboratories (6, 34
and 57) is resolved all the data are classed tentative, but use with caution.
87
Table 3 .
HCl Molality Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, m/mol kg·1 Parameter of Slope
komm/L mol"1
273 . 15 0.01 - 3.00 0.017 0.0015 HM (57)

298. 15 O.Oi - 3.00 0.016 0.0009 HM (57)
323 . 15 0.01 - 3 .00 0.0090 0.0004 HM (57)
348. 15 0.01 - 3 .00 0.0060 0.0013 HM (57)
363 . 15 0.01 - 3 .00 0.0059 0.0023 HM (57)
10 (2) Carbon dioxide + Perchloric acid [7601-90-3] + Water
Markham and Kobe (19) measured the solubility of C� at 12 molalities between 0 and 22. 84 mol kg-1
HC104 at 298. 1,5 K. The perchloric acid salts in and the Sechenov salt effect shows a definite curvature which
is slightly different for concentration (mol L"1) and for molal (mol kg-1) unit gas solubility values (Figure 1).
Limiting slopes were determined up to molalities of 4.00 and 6.00 HC104• Results are in Table 4 below.
Table 4.
HC104 Molality Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, �/mol kg·1 Parameter of Slope
kw.fL mol"1
or k�kg mol·1
298. 15 0 - 6.00 -{).0103 (c) 0.0005 MK (19)

0 - 6.00 -{).027 1 (m) 0.0006 MK (19)
0 - 4.00 -{).0128 (c) 0.0012 MK (19)
0 - 4.00 -{).0301 (m) 0.001 1 MK (19)
The evaluator has a small preferance for the k,mm/mol kg·1 values which appear to give a better fit.
14 (1) Carbon dioxide + Sulfuric acid [7664-93-9] + Water
At least seven papers report the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous sulfuric acid. Sechenov (2)
reports five solubility values for 8.6 to 100 mass % H2S04 at 290 K, Geffcken (6) reports ten solubility values
for 1 . 0 to 7.6 mol L"1 acid at 288. 15 and 298. 15 K, Christoff (7) reports four solubility values for 0 - 95.6 mass
% acid at 293 . 15 K, Wolf and Krause (12) report five solubility values for 0 to 4 volume percent acid at 293.2
K, Kobe and Williams (16) report solubility values over 0 to 10 mass % acid at 298. 15 K, Markham and Kobe
(19) report twenty solubility values for 0 to 100 mol % acid at 298. 15 K and Shchennikova, Devyatykh, and
Korshunov (25) report solubility values for 9.25, 30.5 , 36.9, 42, 61 .6, 77.6, 78. 8 and 84.48 mass % acid over
the 288 to 350 K temperature interval.
Results of Wolf and Krause (12) were judged doubtful and were not included in the evaluation. The
evaluator judges the Markham and Kobe (19) data at 298. 15 K to be the most reliable. Their data shows salting
out up to 4 mol kg·1 acid, salting in between 4 and 14 mol kg·1 acid, salting out bewteen about 15 and 38 mol
kg·1 acid and then an increasing solubility ,until the composition reaches pure sulfuric acid. Geffcken's data are
usually reliable, however, for this system Geffcken's data do not reproduce the minimum at 4 mol kg·1 found
by Markham and Kobe. Geffcken's data appear to merge with the Markham and Kobe data as they approach
the second minimum (Figure 2) . The data of Shchennikova et al. (25) scatter badly and do not resolve the
discrepancy, agreeing sometimes with Markham and Kobe and other times with Geffcken data. The evaluator
prefers the data of Markham and Kobe and has drawn the curves in both figures 1 and 2 with respect to their
data.
Figure 1 shows lg Bunsen coefficient vs. the sulfuric acid molality up to 20 mol kg·1 at 298. 15 K. The
Geffcken data are nearly linear from 0 to 10 mol kg·1 acid with a salt effect parameter of kame 0.0107. The
=
Markham and Kobe data are linear to only 2 mol kg·1 acid with a salt effect parameter of kame 0.0284. The
=
Markham and Kobe result is preferred.
Figure 2 (next page) shows the the entire sulfuric acid + water composition range by a plot of lg Bunsen
coefficient vs. 0 to 1 . 00 mass fraction acid at 298. 15 and 290 ± 2 K. There are enough independent data at
the lower temperature that parallel the Markham and Kobe data at 298. 15 K to give confidence in . the reliability
of the Markham and Kobe data.
88
Markham and Kobe fitted their data over the 0 to 1 0 mol kg·1 sulfuric acid range to the equation:
SIS! = 0.0885 m2 + 11(1 + 0.2 159 m2)
where S and s> represent the carbon dioxide Kuenen coefficient in acid solution and in pure water, respectively
and � the sulfuric acid molality up to 10 mol kg'1 at 298. 15 K. The authors state the maximum error of their
equation to be about 1 % .
0.02
Ref.
-0.02 2 Sechenov ( 1 877) •

6 Geftcken ( 1 904) •
7 Christoff ( 1 906) A A
1 6 Kobe & Williams ( 1 935) v
1 9 Markham & Kobe ( 1 9 4 1 l •
25 Shchennikova et al. ( 1 957) o
-0.06
-0 . 1 0
T = (290 ± 2) K
-0.1 4
- 0. 1 8
-0.22
-0.26
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0 .8 1 .0
Figure 2. Logarithm of Bunsen coefficient vs. mass fraction of sulfuric acid at 298. 15 and 290 ± 2 K.
18 (1) Carbon dioxide + Nitric acid; [7697-37-2] + Water
Geffcken (6) reports ten solubility values between 0 and 2.5 mol L·1 HN03 at both 288. 15 and 298. 15
K. Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36) report the solubility in water and one solution at 298. 15 K. Nitric
acid salt in. The salt effect parameters are given below.
Table 5.
HN03 Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, c/mol L·1 Parameter of Slope
kac/L mol·1
288. 15 0.472 - 2.54 -0.0075 0.0006 Gf

(6)
298. 15 0.472 - 2.54 -0.0120 0.0005 Gf
(6)
0, 1 .482 -0.0119 OSKKI (36)
0 - 2.54 -0.01 19 0.0004 combined]
The combined value at 298. 15 K is a recommended value. The others are tentative.
89
19 (1) Carbon dioxide + ottho-Pbosphoric acid [7664-38-2] + Water
Sada, Kito and Ito (39) report six solubility values in 0 - 2.06 mol L-1 aqueous phosphoric acid at 298. 15
K. A linear regression gives a salt effect parameter k� = 0.0577 L mot·• with a standard deviation about the
slope of 0.0032. Van Slyke, Sendroy, Hastings and Neill (13) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in
0, 0. 150 and 0.300 mol L-1 H3P04 at 3 1 1 .2 K. The salt effect parameter from their data is (0.0376 ± 0.003 1)
L mot·• . The salt effect parameter is given in the molar concentration unit since it is assumed most of the acid
is in an undissociated form. The results are classed as tentative.
18 (2) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium chloride [12125-02-9] + Water
The solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous ammonium chloride has been measured by Mackenzie (3)
at four concentration up to almost 6 mol L-1 NH4Cl at temperatures of 28 1 , 288 and 295 K, by Sechenov (5)
at eight concentrations between 0 and 4 . 8 mol L-1 NH4Cl at 288. 35 K, by Findlay and Shen (9) at six
concentration bewteen 0 and 3 . 19 mol L-1 �Cl at 298. 15 K, by Gerecke (35) five concentration between 0
and 5 mol L-1 NH4Cl at five degree intervals between 288. 15 and 333. 15 K, by Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) at
up to 23 concentration between 0.24 and 5.65 mol L-1 NH4Cl at temperatures of 288. iS, 298. 1 5 and 308. 15 K
and by Burmakina, Efanov and Shnet (45) at 1 1 concentrations between 0 and 1 .0 mol L-1 NH4Cl at 298. 15 K .
A measurement o f Passauer (14) o f carbon dioxide i n saturated aqueous ammonium chloride at 293 . 15 K was
not used in the evaluation.
Table 6.
NH4Cl Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, c2/mol L-1 Parameter of Slope
koc.fL mot·•
281 1 .23 - 2.51 0.0364 0.0062 Mac (3)

288 1 .23 - 4.86 0.0124 0.0020 Mac (3)
288. 15 0 - 4.2 0.03 17 0.001 8 yy (42)
0 - 5.00 0.0319 0.008 1 G (35)
288.35 0 - 1 .6 0.03 16 0.0014 s (5)
295 1 .23 - 4.86 0.0217 0.0022 Mac (3)

298 . 15 0 - 5.65 0.0242 0.0007 yy (42)
0 - 5.0 0.0266 0.0086 G (35)
0 - 3 . 19 0.0289 0.0020 FS (9)
0 - 1 .00 0.0329 0.0131 BES (45)
308 . 15 0 - 5 .0 0.0080 0.0029 G (35)

3 1 8 . 15 0 - 5.0 -0.0069 0.0048 G (35)
328 . 15 0 - 5.0 -0.0263 0.01 14 G (35)
The data of Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) are probably the most reliable. At 298 . 15 K they report 24 data
points over the 0 to 5 . 65 mol L-1 range of �Cl. The data show a definite curvature (see Figure 3 , next page)
and do not extrapolate to a good value of the solubility of carbon dioxide in water. If one uses the nine data
between 0.0 and 1 . 16 mol L-1 one obtains a salt effect parameter of 0.0373 with std. dev. of 0.0012 that
extrapolates to the carbon dioxide solubility in water. The Findlay and Shen data show a similar trend. If the
data between 0 and 0.944 mol L-1 are used the salt effect parameter is 0.0414 with a standard deviation about
the slope of O.OOO l and good extraploation to the solubility of carbon dioxide in water. The two papers are good
evidence of a larger salting-out in dilute solution than in over the full range of salt concentration. The data of .
Burmakina et al. (45) show a pronounced curvature over even the 0 - 1 . 00 mol L-1 range. Between 0 and
0.005 mol L-1 the salt effect parameter is 1 . 06 and between 0.25 and 1 . 00 mol L-1 it is 0.0392. These are inter
esting results, but until they are confirmed by other workers they are classed doubtful. Yasunishi and Yoshida
(42) , Findlay and Shen (9) and Sechenov (5) data are classed as tentative with the Yasunishi and Yoshida data
preferred.
The data of Mackenzie (3) is doubtful. It shows more scatter and gives smaller salt effect parameters
for a given temperature than the results discussed above. The work of Gerecke (35) is difficult to judge. Here,
as with other salts, it shows more scatter and salting in at the higher temperatures which is not confirmed for
carbon dioxide by other workers. Gerecke's data should be used with caution.
Rumpf, Nicolaisen and Maurer (60) have measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in 4 and 6 mol kg·•
NH4Cl at six temperatures between 3 1 3 . 14 and 433. 10 K and pressures between 0.04 and 9.35 MPa. The
90
results are similar to the results above at lower temperatures and atmospheric pressure. The solubility data were
plotted and values of the solubility taken at 5 MPa at four temperatures. Salt effect parameters calculated from
the two molalities at 5 MPa are:
TIK 313 353 393 433

k,,.,ufkg mot·• -0.005 0.005 0.005 0.017
The results appear to be consistent with Figures 1 and 2 of the original paper which show a cross over in
solubility between 4 and 6 molal salt at 333 K (a change from salting out at low pressure to salting in at high
pressure), and a larger salting out at 433 K than at other temperatures. It would be desirable to have the salting
in at higher pressures confirmed by additional experimental work. The authors use of the Pitzer equations to
correlate their results is of interest.
0.06
ReL
5 Sechenov ( 1 892) v
9 Findlay & Shen ( 1 9 1 2) •
35 Gerecke ( 1 969) •
42 Yasunishi & Yo s hid a ( 1 979) o
0 45 Burmakina et aL ( 1 982) o
•
-0.06
....J T=288.35 K
C) ·v
T=288. 1 5 K
-0.12 •
0
0
-0.18
I C 02 + N H4C I +
-0.2 4
0 1 .0 2 .0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
c2/ m o l L - l
Figure 3 . Logarithm of Ostwald coefficient vs. ammonium chloride concentration.

Dotted line, data of Sechenov (5); solid lines, data of Yasunishi and Yoshida (42).
18 (3) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium bromide [12124-97-9] + Water
Gerecke (35) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous ammonium bromide at four
concentrations between 0 and 2.0 mol V at five degree intervals between 288. 15 and 333. 15 K. The results
show salting in at 0.5 and 1 .0 mol L-1 NH4Br and salting out at 2.0 mol L'1 at temperatures of 288. 15 to 328. 15
K. There are no other data to compare with these data so the effect cannot be confirmed. We suggest caution
in using the Gerecke data. No salt effect parameters are given from these data.
18 (4) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium sulfate [7783-20-2] + Water
Sechenov (1) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous (�)2S04 up to 1 . 09 mol L'1 at
29 1 .53 K, Gerecke (35) from 0 to 2.0 mol L-1 salt at five degree intervals from 288. 15 to 333 . 15 K, Yasunishi
and Yoshida (42) from 0 to 3 . 87 mol L'1 salt at 288. 15, 298. 15 and 308. 15 K, and Rumpf and Maurer (56) at
91
near 2.0 and 4.0 mol kg·1 salt at six temperatures between 333. 13 and 433 . 15 K over a total pressure range of
about 0.018 to 9.9 MPa. The Rumpf and Maurer data will be treated separately below.
The data of Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) show a small but well defined curvature on the lg L vs. c2 plot.
Thus, the Sechenov approach is probably valid to only about 1 mol 1;1 (ionic strength 3) of ammonium sulfate.
Their data were treated over several concentration ranges in Table 7.
Only the data over the 0 1 salt concentration range extrapolate back to the value of the carbon dioxide
-
solubility in pure water. We suspect this is common for many salt solutions, we just do not have reliable data
to show the effect for most systems.
Table 7.
(�)2S04 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

T/K Range, c2/mol L-1 Parameter of Slope
k,1<*/L mol-1
288. 15 0 - 0.99 0.0629 0.0009 yy (42)

0 - 3. 35 0.053 1 0.0013 yy (42)
0.99- 3 .35 0.0506 0.0015 yy (42)
298. 15 0 - 0.85 0.0609 0.0015 yy (42)

0 - 3.36 0.0518 0.0012 yy (42)
1 .24 - 3.36 0.0459 0.0020 yy (42)
308. 15 0 - 1 .01 0.0577 0.0009 yy (42)

0 - 3.87 0.0487 0.0014 yy (42)
1 .32 - 3 . 87 0.0430 0.0015 yy (42)
The ionic salt effect parameters are compared in Table 8 from the work of Yasunishi and Yoshida, of
Sechenov and of Gerecke.
Table 8.
(NH4)2S04 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

T/K Range, c2/mol L-1 Parameter of Slope
k11<c>.fL mol·1
288. 15 0 - 2.0 0.0541 0.0029 G (35)

0 - 0.99 0.0629 0.0009 yy (42)
29 1 .53 0 - 1 .09 0.0584 0.0013 s (1)
298. 15 0 - 2.0 0.0534 0.0033 G (35)

0 - 0.85 0.0609 0.0015 yy (42)
308. 15 0 - 2.0 0.053 1 0.0022 G (35)

0 - 1 .01 0.0577 0.0009 yy (42)
3 1 8 . 15 0 - 2.0 0.0513 0.0022 G (35)

328. 15 0 - 2 .0 0.0530 0.001 1 G (35)
The salt effect paramaters in ionic strength of Yasunishi and Yoshida and of Sechenov are classed as
tentative. The values from Gerecke show more scatter about. the regression line and show little temperature
dependence. They are also classed as tentative, but should be used with caution.
Rumpf and Maurer (56) made molal solubility measurements of carbon dioxide at about 2.0 and 4.0 mol
kg·1 (NH4)2S04 up to a total pressure near 9.5 MPa at six temperatures bewteen 3 1 3 . 15 and 433 . 15 K. The
evaluator has interpolated solubility values at total pressures of 2.0, 5.0 and 8.0 MPa at four temperatures and
calculated a salt effect parameter based on the slope between the two ammonium sulfate molalities. The results
are shown in Table 9 (next page) .
92
Table 9.
TIK p..../MPa
. k...,/kg mot·• kal(m)m/kg mot·•
313.15 2.0 0.0654 0.02 1 8

5.0 0.0666 0.0222
8.0 0.0702 0.0234
353 . 15 2.0 0.0579 0.0193

5.0 0.0651 0.0217
8.0 0.0645 0.0215
393 . 15 2.0 0.0732 0.0244

5.0 0.0699 0.0233
8.0 0.0708 0.0236
433 . 15 2.0 0.0888 0.0296

5.0 0.0852 0.0284
8.0 0.0792 0.0264
The increasing pressure has a relatively small influence on the salt effect parameter. The salt effect
parameter appears to increase with increasing temperature which is contrary to observations at lower tempera
tures and atmospheric pressure. The salt effect parameters were obtained in an approximate way by the
evaluator from the data of Rumpf and Maurer. The authors give a detailed discussion of their results which
should be consulted by anyone making use of their data.
18 (S) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium chloride [12125-02-9] + Ammonium sulfate [ 7783-20-2] + Water
Yasunishi, Tsuji and Sada (43) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous mixed electrolyte
of �Cl and (�)2S04 at 298. 15 K. The solutions were:
Mole Fraction NH4Cl 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1 .00

Ionic Strength
Fraction NH4Cl 0.00 0.20 0.25 0.50 1 . 00
Ionic strength Factor 3 2.5 2.0 1 .5 1
The ionic strength factor multiplied by the total concentration converts the value to ionic strength.
The evaluator has treated this paper as an entity to itself. Each data set has been fit to a linear equation
lg L vs. c2• The negative of the slope is taken as the salt effect parameter which has been put on an ionic
strength basis by dividing by the ionic strength factor given above. Salt effect parameters have been calculated
using the values for pure �Cl and pure �)2S04 and the respective ionic strength fractions. Thus,
k,1<c>c(calc) = (Ionic strength fraction NH4CI)(0.0299) + (Ionic strength fraction (NH4)2S04)(0.0536) . Results
at 298. 15 K are in Table 10 below. See also Figure lOB following section 100 (10).
The data for pure ammonium chloride and pure ammonium sulfate are from Yasunishi and Yosihida (42),
the present authors hav(! selected 7 of 22 values for ammonium chloride and 7 of 1 1 values for ammonium
sulfate from the earlier paper with no indication as to why this selection was made. Other data from the earlier
paper may give different results than observed below.
Table 10.
Total Concentration Ionic Strength Salt Effect Parameter, k,1(c)c

Range, (c2 + c3) Fraction, NH4Cl Experimental Calculated
0.25 - 2. 87 0.0 0.0536
0.28 - 2. 8 1 0.20 0.0488 0.0489
0.33 . - 2.67 0.25 0.0465 0.0476
0.25 - 2. 86 0.50 0.0397 0.04 1 8
0.38 - 2.82 1 .00 0.0299
The salt effect parameter for �Cl seems large (see Table 6), a value o f 0.0258 gives calculated values
of 0.0480, 0.0467, and 0.0397, which are in much better agreement with the experimental values.
93
18 (6) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium nitrate [6484-52-2] + Water
Sechenov (5) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous NH4N03 at 0 to 10. 13 mol L"1 at
288.35 K, Gerecke (35) at 0 to 4 mol L"1 at five degree intervals from 288. 15 to 328. 15 K and Onda, Sada,
Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36) at 0 to 3.63 mol L-1 at 298. 15 K. A measurement of carbon dioxide solubility in
aqueous saturated ammonium nitrate at 293. 15 K by Passauer (14) was not used in the evaluation. Evaluation
results are in Table 1 1 below.
Table 1 1 .
NH4N03 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, cimol L-1 Parameter of Slope
k11<c>/L mol-1
288 . 15 0 - 4.0 0.0474 0_0017 G (35)
288.35 0 - 10. 13 0.0213 0.0006 s (5)
298. 15 0 - 4.0 0.0488 0.0024 G (35)

0 - 3.63 0.0187 0.0025 OSKK.I (36)
308 . 15 0 - 4.0 0.0526 0.005 1 G (35)
3 1 8 . 15 0 - 4.0 0.0558 0.0090 G (35)

0 - 2.0 0.0224 0.0040 G (35)
328 . 1 5 0 - 4.0 0.0570 0.0093 G (35)

0 - 2.0 0.0223 0.0026 G (35)
The values above are classed tentative, but we suggest the values from Gerecke be used with caution.
They show high scatter about the regression line and an increase with temperature not ordinarily observed. The
value of 0.0187 L mol-1 at 298. 15 K has been used in later sections to calculate a mixed salt effect parameter
with CaC12 and BaC12 with fair success.
20 (1) Carbon dioxide + Arsenic trioxide [1327-53-3] + Water

20 (2) Carbon dioxide + Arsenic pentoxide [1303-28-2] + Water
20 (3) Carbon dioxide + Arsenic trioxide + Arsenic pentoxide + Water
20 (4) Carbon dioxide + Arsenic trioxide + Arsenic pentoxide + Hydrochloric acid [7647-01-0] + Water
Robb and Zimmer (34) report carbon dioxide solubility data in the four systems above plus the carbon
dioxide + hydrochloric acid + water system discussed earlier (Section 10 (1)). The authors report
measurements at 293. 15, 298. 15 and 303. 15 K in three A�03 solutions up to 0. 1 1 13 mol L-1 and three A�Os
solutions up to 0. 1330 mol L-1 • They also report measurements in one system containing the two oxides and
two systems containing the two oxides and HCl.
There are several inconsistencies in the original paper. No meaurements of carbon dioxide solubility
in water at 293. 15 and 303. 15 K are tabulated, but water solubility values at all three temperatures are shown
on the figures. Some carbon dioxide solubility values in the mixtures of oxides and HCI are larger than in pure
water, but these are ignored in later data treatment. The authors give salt effect parameters with no statement
as to the temperature or the effect of temperature.
The following salt effect parameters were determined from the data assuming a water solubility from the
small figures in the paper.
Table 12.
Arsenic Trioxide Arsenic Pentoxide

TIK k,m/kg mol-1 Std Dev kame/kg mol-1 Std Dev
Slope Slope
293 . 15 0.207 0.058 0. 132 0.014

298 . 1 5 0. 196 0.014 0.095 0.012
303 _ 15 0.219 0.016 0. 148 0.013
94
The authors reported salt effect parameters of 0. 180 for ASz03 and 0, 129 for As205• The averages of
the evaluator' s values are 0.207 and 0. 125 , respectively, assuming no temperature effect. The difference be
tween molality and concentration in these solutions is negligable. The data are classed as tentative.
20 (5) Carbon dioxide + Arsenic trisulfide [1303-33-9] + Water
Findlay and Creighton (8) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in four solutions of 0 - 0.0930 mol
L·1 ASzS3 at 298. 15 K. The gas pressure ranged from 0. 1005 to 0. 1707 MPa (754 to 1281 mrnHg) without
appreciable change in solubility. The salt effect parameter is k ...0.069 ± 0.005 L mol·1 • The salt effect
=
parameter is about the magnitude one would expect for a molecular solute. The enhanced solubility seen in
many colloid systems is not observed. The result is classed tentative.
23 (1) Carbon dioxide + N, N-Dimethylmethanamine hydrochloride [593-81-7] + Water
Gerecke (35) has measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in the N, N-dimethylmethanamine
hydrochloride (trimethylamine hydrochloride) at 6 concentrations between 0 and 4 mol L·1 at five degree
intervals between 288. 15 and 333 . 15 K. Plots of lg L vs. c2 are well defined smooth curves. The first three
points (0, 0.25 and 0.50 mol L·1 salt) and the entire salt concentration range have been fitted to straight lines.
The resulting salt effect parameters are in Table 13 below.
Table 1 3 .
C3H 0NC1 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

1
TIK Range, c2/mol L"1 Parameter of Slope
k,1(cl.IL mol·1
288. 15 0 - 0.50 0.068 0.013
0 - 4.0 0.0210 0.0034 G (35)
298 . 15 0 - 0.50 0.085 0.032

0 - 4.0 0.0154 0.0056 G (35)
308. 15 0 - 0.50 0. 1 1 8 0.048

0 - 4.0 0.0194 0.0069 G (35)
3 1 8 . 15 0 - 0.50 0.145 0.0145

0 - 4.0 0.0 199 0.0084 G (35)
328 . 15 0 - 0.50 0. 1 82 0.057

0 - 4.0 0.0198 0.0107 G (35)
The increase in the salt effect parameter with temperature in the 0 - 0.50 mol L·1 salt concentration range
is contrary to most other observations, so too is the salt effect parameter for the entire salt concentration range
which goes through a minimum value. The values are classed as tentative. The system is briefly mentioned ·
in the carbon dioxide in aqueous nonelectrolytes volume.
23 (2) Carbon dioxide + N, N, N-Trimethylmethanaminium iodide [75-58-1] + Water
Gerecke (35) has measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in the N, N , N-trimethyl-methanarninium iodide
(tetramethylamonium iodide) at ·concentrations of 0, 0. 1 and 0. 19 mol L·1 at five degree intervals between
288. 15 and 333 . 15 K. At the lower temperatures the solubility data show salting in at 0. 10 mol L"1 and salting
out at 0. 19 mol L"1 which does not seem likely. Salt effect parameters are calculated and given below at ten
degree intervals between 298. 15 and 328. 15 K, temperatures at which both salt concentrations show salting out.
Table 14.
C4H 2Nl Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

1
TIK Range, c2/mol L·1 Parameter of Slope
k,,<•>•/L mot·1
298. 15 0 - 0. 19 0.085 0.038 G (35)
308. 15 0 - 0. 19 0. 167 0.090 G (35)
3 1 8 . 15 0 - 0. 1 9 0.258 0.073 .G (35)
328. 15 0 - 0. 19 0.370 0. 1 15 G (35)
95
The results above are out of the ordinary in that they increase rapidly . with increasing temperature and
that they are of an unusually large magnitude for a 1-1 electrolyte. Past experience with inert gases is that tetra
alkyl ammonium salts salt-out little or even salt-in. Carbon dioxide interacts with water and that may in some
way account for the different behavior. There are no other data to compare with these. They are classed as
tentative, but use with caution until confirmed. The system is also briefly discussed in the carbon dioxide in
aqueous nonelectrolytes volume.
23 (3) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium citrate [3012-65-S] + Water
Lloyd (33) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in water and in 0.053 mol L"1 aqueous ammonium
citrate solutions adjusted to pH of 4, 5, 6 and 7 between 299.8 and 333 .2 K. The citrate ion ranged from -1
anion, -2 anion and -3 anion at pH's of 4, 5 and 7, respectively. At 299 . 8 K carbon dioxide was salted out at
pH 4 and 5 and salted in a pH 6 and 7. At 333.2 K carbon dioxide was salted in at all pH's. The evaluator
suggests the user refer to the data sheet and original paper. No salt effect parameters were calculated by the
evaluator. The data are classed as tentative.
24 (1) Carbon dioxide + Silicic acid [1343-98-2] + Water
Findlay and Creighton (8) and Findlay and Williams (10) report carbon dioxide solubility in this system.
Findlay and Creighton report measurements in four solutions from 0 to 0.466 mol L·1 lf..Si04 at 298. 15 K and
pressures between 0.0975 and 0. 1 805 MPa (73 1 and 1354 mmHg). To the evaluator the change in solubility
with pressure appears to be within experimental error. Findlay and Williams report measurements in four solu
tions from 0 to 0.208 mol L"1 acid at 298. 15 K and pressures between 0.0.0349 to 0� 1020 MPa (262 to 765
mmHg). In this set of experiments there is a definite decrease in Ostwald solubility between the lowest and
second lowest (ca. 0.052 MPa) gas pressure. The system "salts-in" slightly. The values in the table below are
classed tentative.
Table 15.
lf..Si04 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, cimol L·1 Parameter About Slope
k,.:c/kg mol"1
298. 15 0.0 - 0.466 -0.0085 0.0035 FC (8)
298. 15 0.0 - 0.208 -0.0020 0.0008 FW (10)
298. 15 0.0 - 0.466 -0.0087 0.0035 Combined t(JI)(10)
Suspensions in water of colloidal silica, SiDz, have negligible effect on the solubility of carbon dioxide
(8, 10) .
29 (1) Carbon dioxide + Aluminum oxide [1333-84-2] + Water
The solubility of carbon dioxide was measured in three dilute solutions of hydrated aluminum oxide at
293. 15, 303 . 15 and 3 1 3 . 15 K by Shk:ol'nikova (27). The nature of these solutions is not known. The evaluator
has calculated salt effect parameters on the basis of 0.0098, 0.0345 and 0.0414 moles of Al203 per kilogram
of water. Carbon dioxide is salted out with salt effect parameters that have a magnitude about that observed
for 1-1 electrolytes.
Table 16.
Alp3 Molality Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, �/mol kg·1 Parameter About Slope
k,.,/kg mol·1
293 . 15 0.0098 - 0.0414 0. 153 0.086 Sh (27)
303 . 15 0.0098 - 0.0414 0. 103 0.064 Sh (27)
3 1 3 . 15 0.0098 - 0.0414 0. 100 0.063 Sh (27)
Measurements in such dilute solutions are difficult. The results are classed tentative, but they should
be used with caution.
96
29 (2) Carbon dioxide + Alumimun chloride [7446-70-0] + Water
Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at six concentrations between 0
and 2.57 mol L·1 A1Cl3 at 298. 15 K. Multiplication by 6 converts the concentrations to ionic strength. The
ionic strength basis salt effect parameter is k.1<•>• = 0.041 1 L moi-1 with a standard error about the slope of
0.0004 . The result is classed as tentative. Kobe and Williams (16) made measurements in water and in 25 mass
% (2.32 mol L-1 ) at 298. 15 K. The two points give an ionic strength salt effect parameter of 0.0380 which is
in reasonable agreement with the Yasunishi and Yoshida result.
29 (3) Carbon dioxide + Aluminum sulfate [10043-01-3] + Water
Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at five concentrations between 0
and 0.85 mol L-1 Al2(S04)3 at 298 . 15 K. Multiplication by 15 converts the concentrations to ionic strength.
The ionic strength basis salt effeet parameter is k,1<•>• = 0.0504 L mol-1 with a standard error about the slope
of 0.0008 . The result is classed tentative. Kobe and Williams (16) made measurements in water and 20 mass
% (0.717 mol L-1) at 298. 15 K. The ionic strength salt effect parameter from the two points is 0.053 1 which
is within reasonable agreement with the Yasunishi and Yoshida result.
33 (1) Carbon dioxide + Zinc chloride [7646-85-7] + Water
Passauer (14) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in saturated zinc chloride at 293 . 15 K. No salt
effect parameter was calculated because of uncertainty of the solubility of zinc chloride in water. Kobe and
Williams (16) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in 50 mass % (7. 34 mol kg1 ; 5 .74 mol L-1) ZnC12 at
298. 15 K. The salt effect parameters are k,1<111)c = 0.0149 and k,1<•>c = 0.019 1 . The results are classed tentative.
33 (2) Carbon dioxide + Zinc sulfate [7733-02-0] + Water
Sechenov (5) measured the solubility at five concentrations between 0 and 2.48 mol L-1 ZnS04 at 288.35
K. Multiplication by 4 converts the concentrations to ionic strength. The ionic strength salt effect parameter
is k,1<•>c = 0.0691 with a standard deviation about the slope of 0.0009 . The result is classed as tentative.
36 (1) Carbon dioxide + Copper (II) sulfate [7758-98-7] + Water
Nahoczky (15) reported a single measurement of the solubility of carbon dioxide in saturated aqueous
copper sulfate at 288. 15 K. Vb.quez, Chenlo and Pereira (61) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in five
solutions between 0 and 1 .002 mol L-1 CuS04 at 298. 15 K and 0. 1013 MPa. Vb.quez, Chenlo, Pereira and
Peaguda (64) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in four solutions between 0.25 1 and 1 . 002 mol L-1
CuS04 at five degree intervals between 293 . 1 and 313. 1 K at a pressure of 0. l013 MPa.
No salt effect parameter was calculated from Nahoczky's data because of uncertainty in the saturation
concentration of the copper sulfate. Ionic strength salt effect parameters were calculated from the Vazquez et
al. (61 , 64) data. It was assumed the salt concentration values valid at 298. 1 K could be used at the other
temperatures with negligible error. The concentration salt effect parameters will be four times larger than the
values in the table below.
Table 17.
CuS04 Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, c:zfmol L-1 Parameter About Slope
k,1<•>c/L mol"1
293 . 1 0.25 1 - 1 .002 0.0595 0.0007 VCPP (64)
298 . 1 0.0 - 1 .002 0.0650 0.0029 VCP (61)

0.25 1 - 1 .002 0.0601 0.001 1 VCPP (64)
303 . 1 0.25 1 - 1 .002 0.0564 0.0038 VCPP (64)

308. 1 0.25 1 - 1 .002 0.0585 0.0028 VCPP (64)
313. 1 0.251 - 1 .002 0.0522 0.0048 VCPP (64)
The Vb.quez et al. solubilities show curvature on the lg L vs. c2 plot. Much of the curvature comes
between 0 and 0.25 mol L-1 salt. The temperature coefficient of the salt effect parameters does not decrease
smoothly as expected. The data are classed tentative, but use with caution.
97
41 (1) Carbon dioxide + Ferric oxide [12259-21-1) + Water
The solubility of carbon dioxide was measured in three dilute solutions of hydrated ferric oxide at
293. 15, 303 . 15 and 3 1 3 . 15 K by Shkol'nikova (27). The nature of these solutions is not known. The evaluator
has calculated salt effect parameters on the basis of 0.0063, 0.03 15 and 0.0505 moles of Fez03 per kilogram
of water. Carbon dioxide is strongly salted in. Salt effect parameters are below.
Table 1 8 .
F�03 Molality Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, 171/mol kg·' Parameter About Slope
k...,lkg mol·'
293. 15 0.0063 - 0.0505 -0.73 0.02 Sh (27)
303 . 15 0.0063 - 0.0505 -0.83 0. 14 Sh (27)
3 1 3 . 15 0.0063 - 0.0505 -0.63 0. 15 Sh (27)
Measurements in such dilute solutions are difficult. The results are classed as tentative, but they should
be used with caution.
41 (2) Carbon dioxide + Iron hydroxide oxide [20344-49-4), [1309-33-7] + Water
Gatterer ( 1 1) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in six solutions of 0 to 0.322 mol L"1 Fe(OH)3
at five degree intervals between temperatures of 278. 12 and 298. 15 K. The author reported eq L·' , the evaluator
has used mol L·' . The carbon dioxide solubility is enhanced by the presence of the colloidal solution. However,
the lg L vs. c2 plot is curved with slope decreasing as the iron compound concentration increases. Both Findlay
and Creighton (8) and Findlay and Williams (10) report carbon dioxide solubilities in Fe(Ollh solutions at
298. 15 K. The first paper reports solubilities at pressures between 0.0995 and 0. 1 808 MPa (746 and 1356
mmHg) and the second paper at pressures between 0.03 1 1 and 0.0995 MPa (233 and 746 mmHg). At the
higher pressure range the Ostwald solubility appears to be independent of pressure, at the lower pressure range
there is a noticible decrease in Ostwald solubility as the pressure increases. The solubility at the common
pressure of about 0.0995 MPa differs by 7 to 12 % in the two experiments. These differences may be due to
variations in the colloidal nature of these systems.
The evaluator has used only the first three points of Gatterer (0, 0.0237 and 0.0480 mol L·' Fe(OH1)
to determine the initial salt effect parameter, The values are in Table 19. The Findlay and Creighton data over
the higher pressure range showed much less salting in than the data at 0.0995 MPa from the Findlay and
Williams paper. The nature of these colloidal solutions depends on method of preparation, aging and other
treatment. It appears difficult to obtain solutions of the same stoichimetric concentration with reproducuble
properties.
Table 19.
Fe(OH)3 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

T/K Range, czfmol kg·' Parameter About Slope
k...lkg mol"1
278. 12 0.0 - 0.0480 -0.700 0.0 1 1 Ga (1 1)
283 . 10 0.0 - 0.0480 -0.813 0.014 Ga (1 1)
288. 1 1 0.0 - 0.0480 -0. 875 0.016 Ga (11)
293 . 1 3 0.0 - 0.0480 -0.960 0.003 Ga (1 1)
298. 15 0.0 - 0.0480 -1 .07 1 0.068 Ga (1 1)
298. 15 0.0 - 0. 1554 -0.273 0.007 FC (8)
298. 15 0.0 - 0. 1 179 -0.701 0.022 FW (10)
41 (3) Carbon dioxide + Ferrous ammonium sulfate [7783-85-9) + Water
Findlay and Shen (9) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at four concentrations between 0 and
0.573 mol L"1 (NH4hS04FeS04 (dissoloved as the hexahydrate) at 298. 15 K. Multiplication by 7 converts the
concentration to ionic strength. The electrolyte salts in. The molar salt effect parameter is -0.442 with a
stanadard deviation about the slope of 0.004, the ionic strength salt effect parameter is k.t<•l• -0.0632 L mol"'
=
with a standard error about the slope of 0.0005 . The values are classed as tentative.
98
41 (4) Carbon dioxide + Ferriferrocyaoide {other names : lron(lll)hexacyanoferrate(ll) and
Iron(3 + )hexacyanoferrate(4-) , also Prussian Blue} [14038-43-8]] , [12240-15-2)
+ Water
Gatterer (1 1) has measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in six solutions between 0 and 0.0747 mol
L-1 Fe4[Fe(CN)J3 at five degree intervals between temperatures 278. 12 and 298. 15 K. The original paper gives
the concentrations as equivalents per liter, the equivalent being 1112 the molecular weight. The solution is
described as colloidal. The salt effect parameters are given on a molar basis since the nature of the solution
is not known. The solutions show salting in, but the solubility goes through a maximum and then decreases to
a value near the value in water at the highest concentration (0. 896 eq L-1 , 0.0747 mol L-1). The lg L vs. c2
plots are linear over only the first three concentrations, and the salt effect parameters are based on the initial
slope defined by those three points (0, 0.0105 and 0.0148 mol L-1).
Table 20.
Fe4[Fe(CN)J3 Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, cimol kg-1 Parameter About Slope
k...lkg mol-1
278. 12 0.0 - 0.0148 -0.526 0.013 Ga (1 1)
283. 10 0.0 - 0.0148 -0.644 0.046 Ga (1 1)
288. 1 1 0.0 - 0.0148 -0.752 0.023 Ga (11)
293. 13 0.0 - 0.0148 -0.841 0.013 Ga (1 1)
298. 15 0.0 - 0.0148 -0.937 0.029 Ga (1 1)
The results are classed as tentative.
ALKALINE EARm METAL SALTS
A number of measurements have been made on the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of
alkaline earth metal salts. An interesting set of values is the Sechenov salt effect parameters for the alkaline
earth chlorides at 298. 15 K. Values for k.J<•>c and R;, the cation crystallographic radii (63), are given below:
k,I(.JL moi-1 Cation 1010R;fm Coordination number

2
MgC12 0.0581 ± 0.0005 Mg + 0.72 6
CaC12 0.0626 ± 0.0008 Cal + 1 . 12 8
SrC12 0.065 ± 0.004 sr+ 1 .26 8
BaC12 0.0715 ± 0.0006 Ba2 + 1 . 42 8
Thus, salting out of carbon dioxide by the alkaline earth chlorides increases as the size of the divalent alkaline
earth cation increases. These and other salt effect parameters are evaluated below.
93 (1) Carbon dioxide + Magnesium chloride [7786-30-3] + Water
The system was studied by Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) at 288. 15, 298. 15 and 308. 15 K, by Kobe and
Williams (16) in water and 30 mass % (3.92 mol L-1) MgC12 , and in saturated aqueous MgC12 by Nahoczky (15)
at 288. 15 K and by Passauer (14) at 293 . 15 K. In addition He and Morse (57) at 273. 15, 298.15, 323. 15,
348. 15 and 363. 15 K using molality units. The work from references (42) and ( 1 6) is considered the most
useful, but the two data sets are treated separately because one is in mol L-1 units and the other in mol kg-1 units.
The ionic strength salt effect parameters from the data of Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) are:
TIK 288. 15 298. 15 308. 15

k,1<•>c/L mol-1 0.0637 0.0581 0.0547
Std. dev. slope 0.0019 0.0005 0.0008
The salt effect parameters, which decrease with increasing temperature as expected,_ are classed as tentative.
The two points of Kobe and Williams (16) give a salt effect parameter of 0.0595 at 298. 15 K which agrees well
with the Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) result. The saturated solution data were not treated because of uncertainty
. in the saturated MgCl2 concentration.
The salt effect parameters from the data of He and Morse are in Table 2 1 next page.
99
Table 2 1 .
MgCl2 Molality Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

T/K Range, �/mol kg·• Parameter of slope
k,t<m)m/kg mot·•
273 . 15 0. 1 - 5.0 0.0565 0.0017 HM (57)
298. 15 0. 1 - 5.0 0.0455 0.0043 HM (57)
323 . 15 0.2 - 5.0 0.0236 0.0032 HM (57)
348. 15 0. 1 - 5.0 0.0090 0.0007 HM (57)
363 . 15 0. 1 - 5.0 0.0094 0.0002 HM (57)
The He and Morse data show somewhat more scatter than do the Yasunishi and Yoshida data. The
values at 348 . 15 and 363 . 15 do not seem to carry the same temperature dependence as the lower temperature
values. The data set is classed tentative until more information becomes available.
93 (2) Carbon dioxide + Magnesium sulfate [7487-88-9] + Water
The system was studied by Sechenov (5) at 288.35 K, Markham and Kobe (18) at 273.35, 298. 15 and
313. 15 K, Gerecke (35) at 5 degree intervals bewteen 288. 15 and 333. 15 K, Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) at
298. 15 K, Nahoczky (15) in aqueous saturated magnesium sulfate and He and Morse (57) at five temperatures
bewteen 273. 15 and 363. 15 K. The ionic strength salt effect parameters fiom the first four workers are given
in Table 22.
The value in [ ] at 298. 15 K is a recommended value from the combined data of Markham and Kobe
and of Yasunishi and Yoshida. The values of Gerecke show fair standard deviation of the slope, but they show
very little change with temperature, thus they are classed doubtful. The other values are classed tentative. The
concentration range can be changed to an ionic strength range by multiplication by four.
Table 22.
MgS04 Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

T/K Range, c/mol L·1 Parameter of slope
k,1<cJL mot·•
273.35 0.0 - 1 .96 0.0788 0.0009 MK (18)
288. 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0717 0.0038 G (35)

288.35 0.0 - 2.617 0.0701 0.0005 s (S)
298. 15 0.0 - 1 .96 0.0673 0.0007 MK (18)

0.0 - 2.0 0.0718 0.0020 G (35)
0. 1 1 8 - 2.274 0.0669 0.0007 yy (42)
[298. 15 0.0 - 2.27 0.067 1 0.0004 MK & YY]
3 1 3 . 15 0.0 - 2.7 0.0625 0.001 1 MK (18)

0.0 - 2.0 0.0729 0.0028 G (35)
323 . 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0724 0.0032 G (35)

328. 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0724 0.0042 G (35)
The data of He and Morse (57) are reported as molal values for both salt and gas. They report C<lz
solubility values up to 4.0 molal MgS04, but the lg m1 vs. m2 lines do not extrapolate well to the solubility
value in water. Use of only the first three data point extrapolate better, but the standard deviation about the
slope is little changed except for the 273 K slope. The salt effect parameters are in Table 23 (next page).
93 (3) Carbon dioxide + Magnesium nitrate [10377-60-3] + Water
Solubility data are reported on the system by Markham and Kobe (18) at 273 .35 , 298. 15 and 3 13. 15 K
and by Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) at 298. 15 K. The salt effect parameters from the slope of lg L vs. 12 plots
are given in Table 24 (next page). The individual values are classed as tentative, but the combined data of the
two papers at 298. 15 K given in [ ] in Table 24 is classed as recommended. Multiplication of the concenration
range by three will give the ionic strength range.
1 00
Table 23.
MgS04 Molality Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, �/mol kg·' Parameter of slope
kol(m)m/kg mol-l
273 . 15 0. 10 - 1 .00 0.0521 0.0018 HM (57)
298. 15 0. 1 - 1 .0 0.0305 0.0068 HM (57)
323 . 15 0. 1 - 1 .00 0.0205 0.003 1 HM (57)
348. 15 0. 1 - 2.0 0.0129 0.0009 HM (57)
363 . 15 0. 1 - 2.0 0.01 1 1 0.00003 HM (57)
Table 24.
Mg(N03)2 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

T!K Range, c/mol L·' Parameter of slope
k,1<•>/L mot·'
273.35 0.0 - 2.70 0.0599 0.0007 MK (18)
298. 15 0.0 - 2.70 0.0459 0.0003 MK (18)

0.203 - 3 .372 0.0468 0.0003 yy (42)
[298. 15 0.0 - 3 .37 0.0465 0.0003 MK & YY]
313. 15 0.0 - 2.70 0.0415 0.0003 MK (18)
94 (1) Carbon dioxide + Calcium chloride [10043-52-4] + Water
Eight papers report the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous calcium chloride solution at atmospheric
pressure and four papers report the solubility at pressures of 48 to over 3000 bars. The low and high pressure
values will be treated separately.
Mackenzie (3), Sechenov (5), Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36), Yasunishi and Yoshida (42),
Wolf and Krause (12), Passauer (14), Kobe and Williams (16) and Eremina, Efanov and Sorokina (53) report
the atmospheric pressure experimental measurements. The Wolf and Krause data were not used because the gas
was a carbon dioxide/air mixture. The Passauer data was a single point in saturated salt solution and was not
used because of uncertainty in the concentration of calcium chloride in saturated solution. Eremina et al. made
1 1 to 12 solubility measurements over the 0 to 0.025 mol L-1 CaCl2 range. Their data show linear segments
ranging in slopes from -2.2 to -3.4 which the evaluator judges to be doubtful. Measurements in such dilute
solutions are difficult and subject to large error [(49) and this volume preliminary material] . The large salt
effect parameters from their work are classed doubtful unless confirmed by future work. The Kobe and
Williams measurements were in water and in 40 mass % CaC12 (5.02 mol L·'). A salt effect parameter was
calculated from the two solubilities. It and other values are in Table 25 (next page) .
The data at 288.35/289.4 and 298. 15 K are shown on a logarithm of Bunsen coefficient vs. calcium
chloride ionic strength plot in Figure 4 (next page) . The data of He and Morse were included after conversion
of their values to Bunsen coefficient and calcium chloride concentration ionic strength using the author' s density
and partial pressure data, and assuming ideal gas behavior and Henry' s law. The 288.35 K line was drawn with
respect to the data of Sechenov (5) and the 298. 15 K line with respect to the data of Yasunishi and Yoshida
(42). The curvature of the 298 . 15 K line at ionic strength greater than about 6 mol L·' appears to be confirmed
by the points of Onda et al. (36) and Kobe and Williams (16), but not the fmal value of He and Morse (57).
The differences in the curves at 288.35 and 298. 15 K can be resolved only with further experimental work.
Mackenzie's results are classed doubtful. The salt effect parameters from his solubility values are
smaller than those reported by other workers, they show more scatter about the slope and they do not show a
regular change with temperature.
Sechenov's value at 288.35 K is classed tentative. Yashunishi and Yoshida' s measured the solubility of
carbon dioxide up to 4.53 mol L·' calcium chloride at 298. 15 K. Above about 2 mol L-1 calcium chloride there
is a definite curvature to the lg L vs. c2 data. Thus, we have fitted the salt effect parameter to the near linear
part of the data. The data of Onda et al. go to 2. 17 mol L·' calcium chloride. Both data sets are classed
tentative. The combined result given in [ ] (fable 25) uses four data points from Yasunishi and Yoshida and
eight data points from Onda et al. It is the recommended value at 298. 15 K.
1 01
Yashunishi and Yoshida' s data at 308. 15 K and the resulting salt effect parameter are classed as tentative.
Table 25.
CaC12 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, c/mol L"1 Parameter of slope
k,1cc>c/L mot-1
281 0.41 - 1 .62 0.0452 0.0048 Mac (3)
288.35 0 - 4.34 O.o700 0.0013 s (5)
289.4 0.41 - 1 .62 0.0449 0.0004 Mac (3)
295 0.41 - 1 .62 0.0398 0.0044 Mac (3)
298. 15 0. 1 8 - 2. 17 0.0616 0.0004 OSKKI (36)

0.23 - 4.53 0.0521 0.0024 yy (42)
0.23 - 2.0 0.0606 0.0013 yy (42)
0.0, 5.02 0.0476 KW (16)
0.0 - 0.025 1 .01 0.21 EES (53)
[298. 15 0. 1 8 - 2. 17 0.0626 0.0005 OSKKI & YY]
303 0.41 - 1 .62 0.0433 0.0068 Mac (3)
308. 15 0.30 - 2. 14 0.0548 0.0009 yy (42)
3 1 3 . 15 0.0 - 0.025 0.724 0. 154 EES (53)
0
289.4 3 Mackenzie ( 1 877) •
288.35 5 Sechenov ( 1 892) •
298. 1 5 1 6 Kobe et al. ( 1 935) •
36 Onda et al. ( 1 970) •
-0.2 42 Yasunishi et al. ( 1 979) o
53 Eremina et al. ( 1 989) v
57 He & Morse ( 1 993) o
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
•
+ CaCI 2 +
0 4.0 12.0 1 6.0
Figure4. Logarithm of Bunsen coefficient vs. calcium chloride ionic strength.

1 02
The data of He and Morse (57) were measured under somewhat different conditions. They report both
the salt and gas in molal units. They used different carbon dioxide pressures at each temperature. The
temperatures and pressures of their measurements are (temperature, K)/(pressure/bar) : 273 . 15/0.954,
298. 15/0.930, 323 . 15/0.843 , 348. 15/0.595 and 363 . 15/0.297. The measurements are reported for the gas
solubility up to 5.0 molal CaC12, but better straight lines that extrapolate to the water solubility value are
obtained if the 5.0 molal value is omitted. The salt effect parameters from their data are below.
Table 26.
CaC12 Molality Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, 171/mol kg"1 Parameter of slope
kal(m)a/kg mol·l
273. 15 0. 10 - 4.00 0.0527 0.0018 HM (57)
298. 15 0. 1 - 4.0 0.0559 0.0009 HM (57)
323. 15 0. 1 - 2.71 0.0446 0.0025 HM (57)
348. 15 0. 1 - 3.0 0.0075 0.001 1 HM (57)
363. 15 0. 1 - 3.0 0.0057 0.0003 HM (57)
There are several inconsistencies in the salt effect parameters. The 273. 15 K value is suspected to be
low, and the 348. 15 and 363 . 15 K values do not seem to carry on the expected temperature dependence of the
lower temperature values. The values are classed as tentative, but use with caution. The evaluator does not
believe there is much change with pressure, see the pressure dependent data in Table 27.
Table 27.
CaCl2 Cone. Total Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

Range, Pressure Parameter of slope
TIK c,tmol L-1 p,lbar k,1<c.,..L mo1"1
(�/mol kg-1 ) or k,1<m>xfkg mol"1
293 . 1 5 0 - 3.44 48 0.0532 0.0008 MS (38)
323 . 15 0 - 1 .94 48 0.0536 0.0008 MS (38)
349 0 - 3.91(m) 48 0.0365 (m) 0.0013

300 0.0478 0.0013
600 0.0499 0.0015 PS (22)
363. 15 0 - 2. 10 48 0.0528 0.0012 MS (38)
373. 15 0 - 1 .98 48 0.0522 0.0034 MK (40)
374.2 0 - 3.91(m) 48 0.0562 (m) 0.0028

300 0.0488 0.0014
600 0.0505 0.0019 PS (22)
393/ 0 - 3.91(m) 48 0.0541 (m) 0.0038

394 300 0.0504 0.0026
600 0.0513 0.0036 PS (22)
423 . 15 0 - 2.60 48 0.0487 0.0039 MK (40)
The papers of Malinin and Savelyeva (38) and Malinin and Kurovskaya (40) report the solubility of
carbon dioxide in aqueous calcium chloride at temperarures of 293. 15, 323. 15, 353. 15, 373 . 15 and 423. 15 K
at a pressure of 47.95 bars. The calcium chloride concentration ranges from 0.0 to as high as 6.95 mol L-1 •
All of the data sets show a definite similar curvature in the lg m vs. c2 plots. They appear nearly linear up to
1
about 2 mol L·' CaC12 and this range is used to obtain a limiting salt effect parameter. The salt effect
parameters are given as k,1<c>m values with the CaCl2 ionic strength in mol L·' and the solubility in mol kg·' . The
evaluator calculated approximate molal carbon dioxide solubilities at 293. 15 K assuming the solution densities
were the same as the aqueous CaCl2 densities at this temperature. All of the values are classed as tentative.
Prutton and Savage (22) measured the mole fraction solubility of carbon dioxide in water and in 10. 1 ,
20.2 and 30.2 mass percent (0, 1 .0 1 , 2.28, and 3.91 molal) CaCl2 at temperatures of 349, 374, and 393/94 K
over a pressure range of 15.2 to 703 bar. The evaluator interpolated mole fraction solubility values at pressures
1 03
of 47.3 , 300 and 600 bar. The slopes of lg x1 vs. n1z were determined by a linear regression at each of the
temperatures. The negative of the slopes was converted to an ionic strength scale in molality to give k,.1(m).fkg
mol·1 values. The salt effect parameter at 349 K and 47.3 bar appears to be too small and is classed doubtful,
the other values are classed tentative.
Plyasunova and Shmulovich (55) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at 773 K in 10 and 20 mass
% CaC12 at pressures of 1000 , 2000 and 3000 bar. The evaluator calculated molalities of both C� and CaCl2
from the mass % data and estimated salt effect parameters from the carbon dioxide solubility at the two salt
concentrations. The results are:
P-iMPa 100 200 300

k....lkg
.. mol"1 0.291 0.056 0.024
k,l(m)m/kg mol"1 0.097 0.019 0.008
The change of the salt effect parameter with pressure is much larger than at pressures below 10 MPa where little
pressure dependence is noted. There are no other data to compare with these and they are classed as tentative.
All of the high pressure salt effect parameters are given in the table above. The results of ,Malinin and
coworkers and of Prutton and Savage cannot be directly compared nor can either set be compared with the
.
atmospheric results without knowledge of the solution density. They appear to be of similar magnitude. There
appears to be little effect of pressure on the salting out parameter as one increases the pressure from about 50
to over 600 bars. At 100 to 300 MPa the salt effect parameters decrease (55).
94 (2) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium nitrate [6484-52-2] + Calcium chloride [10043-52-4] + Water
Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36, 37) have measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous
calcium chloride and in aqueous ammonium nitrate + calcium chloride where the salt mol ratio is 1 mole
calcium chloride to 3 moles ammonium nitrate (ionic strength ratio 1 : 1). At 298. 15 K and atmospheric pressure
the salt effect parameter for the mixed aqueous electrolyte is k,1(c)c 0.0372 L mol·1 with a standard deviation
==
about the slope of 0.0010 for the total ionic strength range of 1 . 66 - 6.33.
If the salts act independently the predicted salt effect parameter would be the average of the calcium
chloride and the ammonium nitrate ionic strength salt effect parametrs 0.5(0.0187) + 0.5(0.0616) 0.0402.
==
The fact that the calculated value is 8 % larger than the experimental value indicates the possibility of some
specific interaction between the salts or salts and solvent.
94 (3) Carbon dioxide + Calcium chloride [10043-52-4] + Methanol [67-56-1] + Water
Sada, Kito and Ito (41) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in methanol-water mixed solutions of
calcium chloride at atmospheric pressure at 298. 15 K. For comparison with aqueous calcium chloride solutions
we used the data of Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36). The ionic strength salt effect parameters are
summarized below.
Table 28.
Calcium chloride Methanol Salt Effect Std. Dev.

Ionic strength Mole Parameter of slope
TIK Range, Mmol L·1 Fraction k,1<*/L mol"1
298. 15 0.54 - 6.51 0.0 0.0616 0.0004
0.0 - 2. 10 0.280 0.0607 0.0007
0.0 - 2.25 0.389 0.0585 0.0010
0.0 - 2. 19 0.587 0.0635 0.0017
0.0 - 2.60 0.800 0.0669 0.0003
0.0 - 2.89 1 .000 0.0721 0.0013 .
The results indicate a minimum in the salting out effect someplace in the methanol mole fraction range
between 0.280 and 0.587, probably near mole fraction 0.4 (see also Figure 5 following section 98 (2)). The
salt effect parameters are classed as tentative.
94 (4) Carbon dioxide + Calcium nitrate [10124-37-S] + Water
Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36) and Yashunishi and Yoshida (42) have measured the solubility
of carbon dioxide in aqueous calcium nitrate solutions at 298. 15 K and atmospheric pressure. Their results
1 04
compare well and an ionic strength salt effect parameter from their combined data is recommended. The
concentration (ange can be made the ionic strength range of 0.69 - 10.74 by multiplying by three .
Table 29.
Ca(N03)2 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, c/mol L-t Parameter of slope
k,t(cJefL mol-t
298.15 0.30 - 2. 1 1 0.0504 0.0004 OSKKI (36)
0.23 - 3 .58 0.0503 0.0006 yy (42)
0.23 - 3 .58 0.0504 0.0005 OSKKI & YY]
95 (1) Carbon dioxide + Strontium chloride [10476-85-4] + Water
Mackenzie (3) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous strontium chloride at atmospheric
pressure and temperatures of 281 , 289.4, 295 and 303 K. His data are the only results we are aware of with
this salt. Mackenzie's data often show more scatter than more modem data, however, these data are consistent
for the system and are classed as tentative. Note that at 303 K there is considerable improvement in the
standard deviation about the slope when the value at 0. 868 mol L-t SrC12 is omitted. The ionic strength salt
effect parameters are in the table below. The concentration range can be converted to an ionic strength range
by multiplication by three .
Table 30.
SrC12 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, c/mol L-t Parameter of slope
k,1<c.,JL mol-t
281 0.65 - 2.64 0.0750 0.0043 Mac (3)
289.4 0.65 - 2.64 0.0720 0.0007 Mac (3)
295 0.65 - 2.64 0.0667 0.0033 Mac (3)
303 0.65 - 2.64 0.0643 0.0093 Mac (3)
0.0590 • 0.0043 Mac (3)
• solubility value at 0. 868 mol L-t SrC12 was omitted from fit.
96 (1) Carbon dioxide + Barium chloride [10361-37-2] + Water
The solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous barium chloride (usually dissolved as the dihydrate) at
atmospheric pressure is reported by Mackenzie (3) at 281 , 285.7, 288, 289.4, 295 and 303 K, by Sechenov (4)
at 288. 35 K, by Findlay and Shen (9) at 298. 15 K, by Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36) at 298. 15 K,
by Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) at 298. 15 K and by Eremina, Efanov and Sorokina (53) at 298. 15 and
313. 15 K.
The data of Mackenzie are not consistently reliable and the measurements of Sechenov include only one
barium chloride solution, thus both data sets are classed as doubtful. Eremina et al. (53) measured ten
solubilities over the 0.0 to 0.050 mol L-1 BaC12. Measurements in such dilute solutions are difficult and subject
to large error [(49) and this volume preliminary material] . The salt effect parameters from their data in the table
below are classed as doubtful until confirmed by future new work. The data from the other three papers are
classed as tentative. The result at 298 . 15 K from the combined data of references (36) and (42) is the preferred
tentative salt effect parameter. Results are summarized in Table 31 (next page) .
96 (2) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium nitrate [6484-52-2] + Barium chloride [10361-37-2] + Water
Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36, 37) have measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous
barium chloride and in six aqueous mixtures of ammonium nitrate and barium chloride in the ratio of l mol
BaCl2 to 2.60 mole NH..N03 (ionic strength ratio 3.00 BaC12 to 2.60 NJI..N03). The ionic strength salt effect
parameter is, k,1<clc =0.044 1 with a standard deviation about the slope of 0.0006 for the 0.33 to 1 . 69 ionic
strength range at 298. 15 K.
If the two salts act independently one would predict from the salt effect parameters of BaC12 and NJI..N03
a salt effect parameter of [3(0.0715) + 2.60(0.0187)]/5 .60 = 0.0470 which is 6.6 % larger than the
experimental value. The result suggests the possibility of a specific interaction in the system.
1 05
Table 3 1 .
BaCl2 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

T/K Range, c�mol L-1 Parameter of slope
k,1(c)c/L mol-1
281 0.38 - L54 Mac (3)
285.7 0.766 Mac (3)
288 0. 1 .541 Mac (3)
288.35 0 - 1 .59 0.068 s (4)
289.4 0.38 - 0.766 Mac (3)
295 0.38 - 1 .54 0.069 0.006 Mac (3)
298. 15 0. 1 15 - 0.408 0.0747 0.0037 FS (9)

0. 155 - 1 .564 0.0703 0.0006 yy (42)
0.371 - 1 .082 0.0715 0.0030 OSKKI (36)
0.0 - 0.050 0. 124 0.045 EES (53)
[298. 15 0. 155 - 1 .564 0.0715 0.0006 YY & OSKKI]
303 0.38 - 1 .54 0.0740 0.0023 Mac (3)
313 0.0 - 0.050 0.041 0.056 EES (53)
98 (1) Carbon dioxide + Lithium chloride [7447-41-8] + Water
The solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous lithium chloride solutions is reported in four papers.
Sechenov (5) reports the solubility in seven solutions between 0 and 1 1 . 83 mol L-1 LiCl at 288. 35 K and atmos
pheric pressure, Gerecke (35) reports the solubility in five solutions between 0 and 3. 75 mol L-1 LiCl at five
degree intervals between temperatures of 288. 15 and 333 . 15 K. Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36)
report the solubility in six solutions between 0 and 5.05 mol L-1 LiCl at 298. 15 K. Sada, Kito and Ito (41)
report the solubility in four solutions between 0 and 1 . 18 mol L·1 LiCl at 298. 15 K.
The results of Sechenov, of Onda et al. and of Sada et al. give good straight lines on lg L vs. � plots
and the slopes show fair agreement. Their results are classed tentative. The data of Gerecke presents problems.
At the lower temperatures the solubility of carbon dioxide is greater than in water at the concentrations of 0.43,
0. 77 and 1 .42 mol L'1 LiCl, at the higher temperatures the solubility is greater than in water in the first two
solutions. Thus, the initial salt effect is a salting in. There is no hint of any such behavior in the other three
papers. If the water value is excluded from the fitted straight line the Gerecke data gives satisfactory slopes
for salting out, but the salt effect parameters increases with increasing temperature which has not been
confirmed in the work of others. Note that the salt effect parameters from Gerecke's data extrapolate to a
solubility in pure water that is 27 % larger than the actual solubility. Gerecke's results are classed doubtful,
·
use with caution. Salt effect parameters are in the table below.
Table 32.
LiCl Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, c�mol L'1 Parameter of Slope
k�«/L mol'1
288. 15 0.43 - 3 .75 0.0673 0.0018 G (35)
288.35 0 - 1 1 .38 0.0779 0.0002 s (5)
298. 15 0.43 - 3 .75 0.0666 0.0015 G (35)

0 - 5.05 0.0749 0.0014 OSKKI (36)
0 - 1 . 18 0.0824 0.0012 SKI (41)
308. 15 0.43 - 3 .75 0.0736 0.0041 G (35)

3 1 8 . 15 0.43 - 3 .75 0.082 1 0.0051 G (35)
328. 15 0.43 - 3 .75 0.1026 0.003 1 G (35)
1 06
98 (2) Carbon dioxide + Lithium chloride [7447-41-8] + Methanol [67-56-1] + Water
Sada, Kito and Ito (41) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in methanol-water mixed solvent at
the four mixed solvents, pure water and pure methanol in the table below. are
four concentrations between 0 and as much as 2.29 mol L·1 LiCl at 298. 15 K. The salt effect parameters for
Table 33.
Lithium Chloride Methanol Salt Effect Std. Dev.

Concentration Mole Parameter of Slope
TIK Range, cjmol L·1 Fraction k,..fL mot-1
x3
298. 15 0 - 1 . 19 0 0.0824 0.0012
0 - 1 .39 0.280 0.0992 0.0032
0 - 1 . 13 0.389 0. 1066 0.0019
0 - 2.23 0.587 0. 1068 0.0005
0 - 2.29 0.800 0. 1 165 0.0019
0 - 2.26 1 .000 0.1243 0.0017
The salting out increases as the mole fraction of methanol increases, but it is not a regular increase, there
may be a point of inflection near the 0.389 to 0.587 mole fraction methanol range. Compare the behavior here
with the system where calcium chloride (Section 94 (3)) is the electrolyte. See also Figure 5.
0.1 4 I I I I I I I I I I I
-
0.1 3
0.1 2
:I C02 + Li C I + C H3 0 H + H20 I �-
E)
LiCI
-
, (Y
�
- �
-
,
_
o- �
,
0.1 1 r
- , ----- --�
,-
L 0.1 0 r D
0 ,
,
,
E 0.09 r ,
,
'
..... -�'
e-
.......
u 0.08 � Ca CI2
� T=298. 1 5 K
.. 0.07 r ��·
�
-
0.06 r · - - - - - - - - ·
_
_
_
.. -
----- · ---
-
--
-
•
0.05 � --
0.04 �
I C 02 + CaCI 2 + CH30 H + H 20 I
I I I I I I
0.03
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0 .4 0 .5 0 .6 0.7 0.8 0 .9 1 .0
x3
Figure 5. C� + (LiCl, CaClJ + CH30H + H20. Salt effect parameter vs. mole
. fraction of methanol. Symbols: 0 LiCl, Ref. (41); e CaC12, Ref. (41)
98 (3) Carbon dioxide + Lithium bromide [7550-35-8] + Water
Gerecke (35) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in five solutions of 0 to 1 . 45 mol I;1 LiBr at five
degree intervals at temperatures between 288. 15 and 333. 15 K. There no other data on the system. The
data show similarities to Gerecke's results in the aqueous LiCl solutions. The solubilities at the first two
are
concentrations (0.2 and 0.4 mol L·1) are
larger than in water. The value of the solubility in water fits the lg
L vs. c2 poorly. Omitting the solubility in water value improves the fit, but the scatter is still greater than
average. Several values are given in Table 34 (next page) to show trends in the data.
1 07
Table 34.
LiBr Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, czfmol L·• Parameter of Slope
k_IL mot·•
288. 15 0.20 - 1 .45 0. 1 12 0.002 G (35)
298. 15 0.20 - 1 .45 0. 121 0.01 1 G (35)
308. 15 0.20 - 1 .45 0.109 0.009 G (35)
3 1 8 . 15 0.20 - 1 .45 0.097 0.009 G (35)
Note that the values above extrapolate to solubility in water values that are too large by 13 to 19 %.
The data are classed tentative, but u se with caution.
98 (4) Carbon dioxide + Lithium sulfate [10377-48-7] + Water
Lagarote (20) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in seven solutions between 0 to 2.29 mol L"1
Li2S04 at 290. 15 K. Gerecke (35) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in five solutions from 0 to 2 mol
L·1 Li2S04 at five degree intervals between temperatures of 288. 15 and 333 . 15 K. The salt effect parameters
in Table 35 have been calculated on an ionic strength basis. For the molar salt effect parameters multiply the
values by 3. Agreement betwen the two workers is poor with the I.agarote salt effect parameter being ca. 10
% larger than the Gerecke value at either 288. 15 or 298. 15 K.
Table 35.
Li2S04 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, czfmol L·1 Parameter of Slope
k..(c)c/L mol·•
288. 15 0 - 2.0 0.0890 0.0018 G (35)
290. 15 0 - 2.29 0. 1036 0.0009 L (20)
298. 15 0 - 2.0 0.0936 0.0042 G (35)
308. 15 0 - 2.0 0.0933 0.0083 G (35)
3 1 8 . 15 0 - 2.0 0.0949 0.01 1 1 G (35)
328. 15 0 - 2.0 0.0954 0.0370 G (35)
The Gerecke salt effect parameters show little change with temperature. The lg L vs. c2 plots reproduce
the Gerecke solubility in water poorly being low by 2.5 to 10 % except the 328. 15 value which is low by 18.5
%. The standard error of the slope increases at the higher temperatures. The I.agarote line reproduces the
water solubility to better than 0.2 % . There is no sure way to decide between the results from the data of
Lagarote and of Gerecke until future work resolves the nearly 10 % difference in salt effect parameters. The
evaluator has a preferance for the data of Lagarote. The Gerecke data are classed as tentative, use with caution.
99 (1) Carbon dioxide + Sodium fluoride [7681-49-4] + Water
Gerecke (35) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in water and in 0.5 mol L"1 NaP at five degree
intervals between temperatures of 288. 15 and 333 . 15 K. Salt effect parameters based on only the two
experimental points are given in the table below.
Table 36.
· NaP Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, czfmol L·• Parameter of Slope
k.,.IL mot·•
288. 15 0, 0.5 0.185 G (35)
298. 15 0, 0.5 0.230 G (35)
308. 15 0, 0.5 0.327 G (35)
3 1 8 . 15 0, 0.5 0.400 G (35)
328 . 15 0, 0.5 0.471 G (35)
The results show a strong salting out and a large positive coefficient of temperature. Both properties
are unusual for a 1-1 electrolyte. The evaluator knows of no other system showing this behavior. The results
are classed as tentative, but use with extreme caution until confirmed by other workers.
1 08
99 (2) Carbon dioxide + Sodium chloride [7647-14-S] + Water
The papers on the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous sodium chloride are divided into three parts.
1) Measurements at or near atmospheric pressure in which both NaCl and C01 are reported in mol L-1 or other
volume units, i1) measurements at or near atmospheric pressure in which both NaCl and C� are reported in
mol kg-1 or other mass units, and iii) measurements at high pressures regardless of the units used for NaCl and
co1•
I) Mackenzie (3) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in four solutions between 1 .23 and 4.86 mol
L-1 NaCl at temperatures of 281 , 288 and 295 K; Sechenov (4, 5) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide
in ten solutions between 0 and 5.40 mol L-1 NaCl at 288.35 K; Nahoczky (15) and Passauer (14) measured the
solubility of carbon dioxide in water and in saturated NaCl solution at 288/293 K; Kobe and Williams (16)
measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in four solutions between 0 and 5.07 mol e1 at 298. 15 K; Rosenthal
(24b) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in four solutions between 0 and 5.06 mol L-1 NaCl at 293 . 15
K; Yeh and Peterson (3 1) measured the solubility in two solutions at 0 and 0. 155 mol L-1 NaCl at four
temperatures between 298. 15 and 318. 15 K; Gerecke (35) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in five
solutions between 0 and 4.3 mol L-1 at five degree intervals between 288. 15 and 333 . 15 K; Onda, Sada,
Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in nine solutions between 0 and 3.01
mol L-1 NaCI at 298. 1 5 K; Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in eight or
more solutions between about 0.45 and up to 5 . 10 mol L-1 NaCl at temperatures of 288. 15, 298. 15 and 308. 15
K; and Burmakina, Efanov and Shnet (45) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at 298. 15 K in nine
solutions between 0 and 0.200 mol e1 NaCl. Vazquez, Chenlo and Pereira (61) measured the solubility of
carbon dioxide at 298. 15 K and 0. 1013 MPa in five solutions between 0 and 2.738 mol e1 NaCl. Vazquez,
Chenlo, Pereira and Peaguda (64) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at 5 degree intervals from 293 . 1
to 308. 1 K an d 0. 1013 MPa in four solutions from 0.684 to 2.738 mol L-1 NaCl. Wolf and Krause (12) made
seven measurements up to saturated NaCI at 293 K. Their data were not used because the gas was a carbon
dioxide/air mixture.
Table 37.
NaCl Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, clmol L-1 Parameter of Slope
k,../L moi-1
279.6 1 .23 - 4.86 0.1004 0.0092 Mac (3)
288. 15 1 .23 - 4.86 0.097 1 0.0057 Mac (3)

0 - 4.3 0.0858 0.063 G (35)
0.48 - 4.72 0. 1010 0.001 1 yy (42)
0, 5.45 (est) 0.0840 - N (15)
288.35 0 - 5.4 0.1038 0.0012 s (4, 5)
293 . 15 0 - 5.06 0. 1022 0.0020 R (24b)

0 - 4.3 0.0912 0.036 G (35)
0.68 - 2.74 0.0961 0.0023 VCPP (64)
295. 15 1 .23 - 4.86 0.0897 0.0029 Mac (3)
298. 15 0 - 5.07 0. 1000 0.0013 KW (16)

0 - 4. 3 0.0889 0.0024 G (35)
0 - 3.01 0. 1005 0.001 1 OSKKI (36)
0.46 - 5. 10 0.0979 0.0007 yy (42)
0 - 0.200 0. 1 16 0.017 BES (45)
0 - 2.74 0.0998 0.0008 VCP (61)
0.68 - 2.74 0. 1013 0.0013 VCPP (64)
[298. 15 0 - 5. 10 0.0995 0.0007 (16)(36)(42)(61)]
303. 15 0 - 4.3 0.085 1 0.0030 G (35)

0.68 - 2.74 0.087 1 0.0043 VCPP (64)
308. 15 0 - 4.3 0.0859 0.0035 G (35)

0.45 - 4. 86 0.093 1 0.0004 yy (42)
0.68 - 2.74 0.0926 0.0027 VCPP (64)
313. 15 0 - 4.3 0.0836 0.0063 G (35)

318.15 0 - 4.3 0.0798 0.0075 G (35)
323 . 15 0 - 4.3 0.0782 0.0078 G (35)
328. 15 0 - 4.3 0.0833 0.0122 G (35)
333 . 15 0 - 4.3 0.0814 0.01 10 G (35)
1 09
The value of 0.0995 L mol·1 at 298. 15 K from the combined data of Kobe and Williams (16), Onda et
al. (36) , Yasunishi and Yoshida (42), and Vazquez et al. (61) is the only recommended value in Table 37. All
of the other data in Table 37 are classed as tentative, but the evaluator prefers the data of Yasunishi and Yoshida
as a consistent set of data over a 20 degree temperature interval. The data of Vazquez et al. (61 , 64) arrived
too late to process with the other data. Their data appear to agree well with the earlier data for this system.
The mass percent data of Kobe and Williams (16) were converted to mol L"1 NaCl using density data
from the International Critical Tables. The solubility of NaCl at 288. 15 was estimated to be 6.20 mol kg"1 or
5.45 mol L"1 in the calculation from the data of Nahoczky (15).
In addition to the data in Table 37, salt effect parameters were calculated from the data of Yeh and
Peterson (3 1). They report solubilities for water and for 0.9 mass % NaCl which the evaluator calculated to
be 0. 155 mol L"1 NaCl. The salt effect parameters from the two measurements ranged from 0. 199 to 0. 186
which is about two times the magnitude of the salt effect parameter values in Table 37. We have no confirming
evidence this is a real effect in dilute solutions, so we class the result doubtful unless confirmed by future work.
Burmakina et al. (45) made nine measurements in the 0 - 0.200 mol L"1 NaCl range. Measurements in the very
dilute solutions are difficult and subject to large error [(49) and this volume introductOry material] . They did
obtain a somewhat larger salt effect parameter with a relatively large standard error of the slope. This may be
an important observation, but until it is confirmed by other workers it also is classified as doubtful.
Figure 6 shows logarithm of Ostwald coefficient vs. sodium chloride concentration (ionic strength) at
288. 15 and 298 . 15 K. The experimental values come from papers published over the last 1 17 years and show
a linear relationship to over 5 mol L"1 sodium chloride. The data of He and Morse (57) were converted from
molal to volume units assuming ideal gas behavior and Henry's law using density and partial pressure data from
their paper. Their results show considerable scatter. This is not surprising in that they made the 298. 15 K
measurements at a carbon dioxide partial pressure of 0.039 atm and reported the measured solubilities to only
two significant figures.
0.1
Ref.
0.0 3 MacKenzie ( 1 877) •
5 Sechenov ( 1 892) v
16 Kobe & Williams ( 1 935) <>
21 Harned & D a vi s ( 1 943) "'
-0.1 35 Gerecke ( 1 969) o
36 Onda et a l . ( 1 970) •
42 Yasunishi & Yo s h i da ( 1 979) o
57 He & M or s e ( 1 993) .a.
-0.2 61 Vazquez e t al. ( 1 994) •
_J
C) -0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.6
-0.7
0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Figure 6. Logarithm of Ostwald coefficient vs. sodium chloride concentration.

The Sechenov data (Ref. 5, symbol V) are at 288. 35 K.
iz) The data of He and Morse (57) are reported in molality for both NaCl and C�. They measured the
solubility of carbon dioxide in five to seven solutions between 0. 1 or 0.5 to 6. 14 mol kg·1 NaCl at five tem
peratures between 273 . 15 and 363 . 15 K and carbon dioxide partial pressure between 0.0395 and 0.979 bar (a
different pressure at each temperarure, see Table 38 next page). The salt effect parameters are in Table 38 (next
page).
1 10
Table 38.
NaCI Molality Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Ptlbar Range, Parameter of Slope
mJmol kg·• k....,/kg mot·•
273 . 15 0.979 0.5 - 6.0 0.0835 0.0017 HM (57)
298. 15 0.0395 0.5 - 6. 14 0.0853 0.0029 HM (57)
323 . 15 0. 865 0.5 - 6. 14 0.0598 0.0032 HM (57)
348. 15 0.61 1 0. 1 - 6.0 0.0204 0.0008 HM (57)
363 . 15 0.305 0. 1 - 6.0 0.0195 0.0010 HM (57)
The salt effect parameters from the data of He and Morse are classed as tentative, but there are several
concerns about the results. It is unlikely that the 273. 15 K value is smaller than the 298. 15 K value. The sharp
decrease in salt effect parameter magnitude between 323. 15 and 363. 15 K needs confirmation. There are
nonelectrolyte and salt solutions that show a change from salting out to salting in at about this temperature
range, but we have seen no indication of this behavior for carbon dioxide and any salt in this review.
iii) There are several papers that report the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous NaCI solution at
elevated temperatures and pressures. Ellis and Golding (30) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in four
solutions between 0 and 2.0 mol L-1 NaCI at temperatures between 445 and 607 K and partial pressures between
L59 and 9.31 MPa C�; Takenouchi and KeMedy (32) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at 0, 1 .09
and 4.28 mol kg·• NaCl at 50 degree intervals between 423 . 15 and 723. 15 K and total pressures between 10.0
and 140.0 MPa; Malinin and Savelyeva (38) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in up to seven solutions
of 0 to 4.46 mol L"1 NaCl at temperatures of 298. 15, 323. 15 and 358. 15 K and a total pressure of 4. 795 MPa;
Malinin and Kurovskaya (40) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in up to seven solutions between 0 and
5.92 mol L"1 NaCI at temperatures of 298. 15, 373 . 15 and 423 . 15 K and a total pressure of 4.80 MPa; Cramer
(46) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in 0, 0.49 and 1 . 86 mol L"1 NaCI at temperatures between 298. 15
and 5 1 1 . 8 K and pressures between 0.8 and 6.2 MPa; and Nighswander, Kalogerakis, and Mehrotra (52)
measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in water and in 1 weight percent (0. 173 mol kg1) NaCI at
temperatures of about 353.65, 393. 15, 433 and 470 K and pressures between about 2. 1 and 10.2 MPa. Rumpf,
Nicolaisen, Ocai and Maurer (59) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in 4 and 6 mol kg1 NaCI between
.3 13 and 433 K and up to 10 MPa total pressure. There is also a 1981 Ph.D. Thesis of Drummond (44) that
contains additional data.
All of the papers above contain useful information on the solubility of carbon dioxide as a function of
temperature and pressure. However, not all of the experimental studies above are suitable for the evaluation
of the effect of electrolyte ionic strength (salt effect parameter) on the carbon dioxide solubility. The paper of
Nighswander, Kalogerakis ancl Mehrotra (52) reports carbon dioxide solubility in water and one mass percent
(0. 173 mol kg"1 ) NaCI. The two solubility values over such a small molality range do not lead to reliable salt
effect parameters and the paper was not used further. The paper of Takenouchi and Kennedy (32) presented
problems. The evaluator converted mass percent data to molality values and made estimates of the salt effect
parameter, k,_/kg mol"1 at 423, 523 and 623 K. The salt effect parameters ranged from 0.023 to 0.26 and
showed a high scatter. The data were not treated further. We agree with Dr. R. Crovetto (private
communication) who questioned the data treatment in the Drummond (44) thesis for the solubility of carbon
dioxide in water because no equation of state could be used with the data as presented.
The evaluator has made calculations from graphically smoothed data from Ellis and Golding (30) and
of Cramer (46) under several conditions of temperature and pressure. The salt effect parameters obtained are
of larger magnitude and show more scatter about the regression line than other values. From Ellis and Golding
at 450 K and 1 .59 MPa k,.m/L mot·• 0. 105 ± 0.005, at 500 K and 4.5 MPa 0.091 ± 0.01 1 , at 540 K and
=
6.5 MPa 0. 128 ± 0.02 1 and at 580 K and 6.5 MPa 0. 153 ± 0.028. From Cramer (46) at 300 K and 1 .0 MPa
k,/L mol"1 = 0. 1 15 ± 0.037, at 420 K and 2.0 MPa 0. 135 and at 500 K and 6 MPa 0. 145.
The most self consistent high temperature and pressure carbon dioxide solubility data appear to be the
data of Malinin and Savelyeva (38) and of Malinin and Kurovskaya (40). Most of the plots of lg m1 vs. c2
showed a slight concave curveture. A straight line through the data extrapolates to a carbon dioxide solubility
in water that is too small by 2.5 to 5.0 % when the full NaCI concentration range of 0 to > 5.0 mol L"1 is used.
When the NaCI concentration range is 0 to .about 2.0 the line extrapolates satisfactorily to the carbon dioxide
solubility in water. Salt effect parameters from several NaCI concentration ranges from the Malinin et al. data
at 47.95 and 48.0 MPa are in Table 39 (next page).
111
Table 39.
NaCl Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, c2/mol L-1 Parameter of Slope
kscm/L mol·1
298. 15 0 - 2.60 0.0918 0.001 1 MS (38)

0 - 5.04 0.0808 0.0034 MK (40)
0 - 2. 1 0.0922 0.0012 (38 & 40)
4.04, 5,04 0.0697 MK (40)
323 . 15 0 - 2.74 0.079 1 0.0026 MS (38}

0 - 1 .79 0.0845 0.0019 MS (38)
358. 15 0 - 4.46 0.069 1 0.0026 MS (38)

0 - 2.2 0.078() 0.0032 MS (38)
373 . 15 0 - 5.92 0.0616 0.0032 MK (40)

0 - 2.0 0.0814 0.003 1 MK (40)
3 .98 - 5.92 0.0477 MK (40)
423 . 15 0 - 5.65 0.0622 0.0042 MK (40)

0 - 2.52 0.0743 0.0043 MK (40)
2.52, 5.65 0.054 MK (40)
The evaluator prefers the values from treatment of the 0 - 2 mol L-1 NaCl range . There are
inconsistencies in the data at the 373 and 423 K temperatures that require further study.
The data of Rumpf et al. (59) was treated graphically to obtain smoothed solubility values at 2, 5 and
8 MPa total pressure. The solubility values in 4 and 6 mol kg·1 were used to calculate a kiiiiJD salt effect
parameter. The results based on just the two solubility values are in Table 40.
Table 40.
T!K kanunt'kg mol·1
at 2 MPa at 5 MPa at 8 MPa
313 0.052 0.059

353 0.055 0.047 0.046
393 0.03 1 0.046 0.037
433 O.o35 0.034 0.037
The Malinin and Kurovskaya values at the high concentrations of NaCl can be compared with the Rumpf
et al. values remembering that k.. m1 . 15 k,mm. The values are of similar magnitude which gives increased
=
confidence in the reliability of the two sets of data.
99 (3) Carbon dioxide + Hydrochloric acid [7647-01-0] + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Water
Van Slyke, Sendroy, Hastings and Neill (13) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in solutions of
0.01 mol L·1 HC1 and 0, 0. 150 and 0.300 mol L·1 NaCl at 3 1 1 .2 K. The effect of the HCl was considered
negligible and the system treated as if only NaCl were present. The NaCl salt effect parameter is k.. (0.093 1
c =
± 0.0036) L mol·1 which agrees well with the value from Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) at 308. 15 K. The result
is classed tentative. Kobe and Williams (16) made measurements in water and in a mixture which was 2 mass
% HCl (0.703 mol kg-1) and 20 mass % NaCl (4.388 mol kg-1) at 298. 15 K. The ionic strength salt effect
parameter in molality units is 0.0725 . It is classed tentative.
99 (4) Carbon dioxide + Nitric acid [7697-37-2] + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Water
Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (37) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous mixed
electrolyte of ionic strength ratio NaCl/HN03 0.3988/0. 6012 and 0.6458/0. 3542 at 298. 15 K. Plots of lg L
vs. /_,_ were reasonably linear (std error about slope of 0.0014 for both mixtures) . The ionic strength salt
effect parameters are in Table 4 1 (next page) .
1 12
Table 4 1 .
Ionic Strength Ionic Strength Salt Effect Salt Effect Difference

Ratio Range Parameter Q, Parameter,
NaCl/HN03 Ito/mol L-1 k11(c)/L mol-1 Calculated
0_40/0.60 0, 1 _40, 2-95 0.0289 0.0399 38 %
0.65/0.35 0 - 2. 16 0.0587 0.0644 9.7 %
a Std dev about slope 0.0014 and 0.0014.
The calculated values use the single salt effect parameters of 0.0004 for HN03 and 0.0995 for NaCl.
The difference indicates some specific interaction or solution structural change. The effect is definitely not
additive. See Figure 1 1A following section 100 (10).
99 (5) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium chloride [12125-02-9] + Sodium chloride [7647-14-S] + Water
Yasunishi, Tsuji and Sada (43) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in the mixed electrolyte of 0.0,
0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1 .00 mole fraction NaCl at 298. 15 K. There were eight or nine solutions at each mole
fraction. The NH4Cl values were a selection of the 23 solubility values of Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) and the
NaCl values were from the same source (42). The ionic strength salt effect parameters are in Table 42.
The experimental and the calculated salt effect parameters agree well assuming additivity of the salt
effects. See also Figure 1 1A following section 100 (10).
Table 42.

Ratio Range Parameter a, Parameter,
NaCl/NJI.Cl Ito/mol L-1 k,1<c>/L mol·1 Calculated
0.00/ 1 .00 0 - 5.48 0.0252
0.25/0.75 0 - s.os 0.0424 0.0436 2.8 %
0.50/0.50 0 - 5.18 0.0588 0.0620 SA %
0.75/0.25 0 - 5.28 0.0786 0.0803 2.2 %
1 .00/0.00 0 - 5. 10 0.0987
a Std. dev. about slopes are 0.0015, 0.001 1 , 0.001 1 , 0.001 1 and 0.0009 , respectively.
99 (6) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium nitrate [6484-52-2] + Sodium chloride [7647-14-S] + Water
Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (37) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in mixed electrolyte
of 0.335, 0.500 and 0. 635 mole fraction NaCl at 298. 15 K. There were five to seven solutions at each mole
fraction. To test the additivity of the salt effects salt effect parameters of 0.0995 and 0.0187 were used for
NaCl and NJI.N03, respectively.
Table 43.

Ratio Range Parameter a, Parameter,
NaCl/NJI.N03 Ito/mol L-1 ksi(cl/L mol·1 Calculated
0.335/0.665 0 - 2.97 0.0412 0.0458 11 %
0.50/0.50 0 2.78
- 0.0551 0.0591 7.3 %
0.635/0.365 0 - 3 .05 0.0657 0.0701 6.7 %
a Std. dev. about slope of 0.0006 , 0.0009 and 0.0016, respectively.
The salt effects are not additive. All results are classed as tentative. See also Figure 1 1B following
section 100 (10).
99 (7) Carbon dioxide + Magnesium sulfate [7487-88-9] + Sodium chloride [7647-14-S] + Water
Yasunishi, Tsuji and Sada (43) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in mixed electrolyte of 0.0,
0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1 .00 mole faction NaCl [0.0, 0.077, 0.260, 0.428 and 1 .00 ionic strength fraction NaCl]
at 298. 15 K. Six solutions were measured at each mole fraction. The results are in the Table 44 (next page).
1 13
Table 44.

Ratio Range Parameter a , Parameter,
NaCl/MgS04 1..,/mol L·1 k,1<•l/L mol·1 Calculated
0.00/1 .00 0 - 9. 10 0.0665

0.077/0.923 0 - 6.68 0.0683 0.069 1 1 .2 %
0.260/0.740 0 - 5.46 0.0726 0.0755 4.0 %
0.428/0.572 0 - 3.81 0.0804 0.0863 1.1 %
1 .00/0.00 0 - 2.49 0. 1010
a Std. dev. of slopes are 0.0007 , 0.0007 , 0.0005 , 0.001 1 , 0.0018, respectively.
The electrolytes act with near additively. The results are classed tentative. See also Figure l lB
following section 100 (10).
99 (8) Carbon dioxide + Calcium chloride [10043-52-4] + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Water
Malinin and Savelyeva (38) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in water and in one mixture of
CaC12 and NaCl at a total ionic strength of 2.65 at 298. 15 K and 47.95 bar. The solubility in water and in the
one solution gives salt effect parameters k,1(clm = 0 . 032 and k,1<•l• = 0.040. The results are classed tentative.
99 (9) Carbon dioxide + Calcium sulfate [7778-18-9]] + Sodium t:hloride [7647-14-5] + Water
He and Morse (57) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in six solutions of 0. 1 to 6.0 mol kg·1 NaCl
and 0.01 mol kg·1 CaS04 at temperatures of 273. 15, 298. 15, 323. 15, 348. 15 and 363. 15 K. In other mixed
electrolyte studies the electrolytes have been at some constant ionic strength ratio. In this study the calcium
sulfate is near its saturation value at 0.01 mol kg·1 (ionic strength 0.04) in all solutions.
The data were treated to obtain k,1(m)m/kg mol·1 values in the table below.
Table 45 .
Ionic Stren Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

T/K p /bar gth Range, Parameter of Slope
1
12/mol kg·1 k,[(m)mlkg mol"1
273 . 15 0.979 0 . 1 4 - 6.04 0.0866 0.0083 HM (57)
298 . 15 0.954 0. 14 - 6.04 0.0852 0.0024 HM (57)
323 . 15 0.865 0. 14 - 6.04 0.0623 0.0007 HM (57)
348 . 15 0.61 1 0. 14 - 6.04 0.0286 0.0020 HM (57)
363 . 15 0.305 0. 14 - 6.04 0.0227 0.001 1 HM (57)
The results parallel within 0. 1 to 4.2 % the results for sodium chloride alone at the first three
temperatures. At 348 and 363 K the calcium sulfate containing solutions show higher salt effect parameters by
40 and 16 % , respectively. The results are not reliable enough to draw conclusions about the effect of the
calcium sulfate in the mixed electrolyte.
99 (10) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium nitrate [6484-52-2] + Barium chloride [10361-37-2]

+ Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Water
Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (37) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in five solutions
of a mixed elctrolyte of �NO/BaC12/NaCl of mole ratio 3/113 which is ionic strength ratio 1 1 1 1 1 . A plot
of lg L vs. 12 over the 0 - 0.633 ionic strength range gives the salt effect parameter of k,1<•l• = 0.06 1 2 with a
standard error about the regression line of 0.0010. A calculated salt effect parameter obtained by summing one
third values of each pure elctrolyte salt effect parameter gives 0.0632 which is 3.3 % larger than the
experimental value. The result is classed as tentative.
99 (11) Carbon dioxide + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Glucose [50-99-7] + Water
Yuan and Yang (58) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in six solutions of 0 to 3 . 00 mol kg·1
sodium chloride in a 15 mass % glucose- water mixture at ten degree intervals between 278. 15 and 318. 15 K.
The salt effect parameters on a molality basis are in Table 46 (next page).
1 14
Table 46.
NaCl Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference-

T/K Range, �/mol kg-1 Parameter about Slope
ksmm/kg mol-l
278 . 1 5 0 - 3.00 0.086 0.007 YuYa (58)

288. 15 0 - 3.00 0.064 0.01 1 YuYa (58)
298 . 15 0 - 3.00 0.063 0.009 YuYa (58)
308 . 15 0 - 3.00 0.048 0.008 YuYa (58)
3 1 8 . 15 0 - 3.00 0.042 0.004 YuYa (58)
The data show more than an average amount of scatter on the lg m vs. � plot. Our values of the salt
1
effect parameter differ from the author' s values especially at temperatures of 288 and 308 K. The results show
smaller magnitude salt effect parameters in the glucose solution than in pure water. The data are classed as
tentative.
99 (12) Carbon dioxide + Sodium chlorate [7775-09-9] + Water
Sechenov (5) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at four concencentrations between 0 and 6.57
mol L-1 NaC103 at 288. 35 K. The salt effect parameter is k�« = 0.0874 L mol-1 with a standard error of the
slope of 0.0020. The value is classed tentative.
99 (13) Carbon dioxide + Sodium perchlorate [7601-89-0] + · Water
Gerecke (35) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at five concentrations between 0 and 1 . 6 mol
L-1 NaCl04 at five degree intervals between the temperatures of 288. 15 and 333. 15 K. The salt effect prameters
are below.
Table 47.
NaC104 Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

k,,jL mol-1
288 . 1 5 0 - 1 .6 0. 103 0.006 G (35)
298. 15 0 - 1 .6 0. 1 10 0.012 G (35)
308 . 15 0 - 1 .6 0. 125 0.015 G (35)
3 1 8 . 15 0 - 1 .6 0. 156 0.022 G (35)
328. 15 0 - 1 .6 0. 190 0.022 G (35)
It is important to point out that the trend more commonly seen for inorganic gases that do not have a ·
special interaction with water in aqueous electrolytes is a small salt effect parameter that decreases with
increasing temperature. The relatively large salt effect parameter that increases with temperature is unusual.
The results are classed as tentative, but use with caution until confirmed by other workers.
99 (14) Carbon dioxide + Sodium bromide [7647-15-6] + Water
Sechenov (5) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at four concentrations between 0 and 6. 71 mol
L-1 NaBr at 288.35 K. Rosenthal (24b) measured the solubility at five concentrations between 0 and 7.08 mol
L-1 at 293 . 15 K. Gerecke (35) measured the solubility at five concentrations between 0 and 4.50 mol L-1 at five
degree intervals between temperatures of 288. 15 and 333. 15 K. Salt effect parameters from these papers are
compared in Table 48 (next page) . Vazquez, Chenlo, Pereira and Peaguda (64) measured the solubility at seven
concentrations between 0.389 and 2.721 mol L-1 NaBr at 298. 1 K and 0. 1013 MPa. In an earlier paper (6 1)
they reported the solubility of carbon dioxide in water at the same conditions of temperature and pressure.
Their (61 , 64) values of the salt effect parameter fitted with and without the solubility in water are in Table 48.
This is one of only a few systems for which the salt effect parameters from the data of Gerecke show
the expected magnitude and temperature coefficient. However, the data do show more scatter than the data of
Sechenov and of Rosenthal. The data of Vazquez et al. (6 1 , 64) show a defmite curvature on a lg L vs. c2 plot
with much of the curvature between 0 and 0.4 mol L"1 NaBr; At 298. 15 K the solubility values of Vazquez et
al. are significantly lower than the values of Gerecke for a given NaBr concentration. [See also Figure 10
following section 100 (7)] . All of the results are classed tentative with a slight preferance for the values of
Sechenov and of Rosenthal at 288.5 and 293. 15 K, respectively. At 298. 15 K we cannot make a choice between
the data of Gerecke and of Vazquez et al. , both data sets should be used with caution.
1 15
Table 48.
NaBr Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

T/K Range, cimol L-1 Parameter of Slope
k.,JL mol-1
288. 15 0 - 4.50 0.0875 0.0059 G (35)
288.35 0 - 6. 7 1 0.0981 0.0005 s (5)
293 . 15 0 - 7.08 0.0874 0.0006 R (24b)

0 - 4.50 0.083 1 0.0044 G (35)
298. 15 0 - 4.50 0.0779 0.0041 G (35)

0 - 2.72 0.0905 0.0043 VCPP (64)
0.39 - 2.72 0.0842 0.0029 VCPP (64)
308 . 1 5 0 - 4.50 0.0709 0.0025 G (35)

3 1 8 . 15 0 - 4.50 0.0680 0.0010 G (35)
328. 15 0 - 4.50 0.0520 0.0037 G (35)
99 (15) Carbon dioxide + Sodium iodide [7681-82-5] + Water
Rosenthal (24b) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at four concentrations between 0 and 6.01 mol
L-1 Nal at 293. 15 K. Gerecke (35) measured the solubility at five concentrations bewteen 0 and 4.0 mol L-1
at five degree intervals between temperatures of 288. 15 and 333. 15 K. Salt effect parameters from their data
are in the table below.
Table 49.
Nal Concentration Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

k,,)L mol-1
288 . 15 0 - 4.00 0.0792 0.0033 G (35)

293 . 15 0 - 6.01 0.0726 0.0023 R (24b)
0 - 4.00 0.0779 0.0025 G (35)
298. 15 0 - 4.00 0.0774 0.0017 G (35)

308 . 1 5 0 - 4.00 0.0750 0.0046 G (35)
3 1 8 . 15 0 - 4.00 0.0577 0.0101 G (35)
328 . 15 0 - 4.00 0.0400 0.0161 G (35)
The results are classed as tentative. There seems little reason to pick one result over the other at 293 . 15
K. The difference could be due to the smaller Nal concentration range used by Gerecke since with some
systems the slope decreases at the higher concnetrations (ionic strengths) . Gerecke' s results at 318. 15 and
328. 15 K scatter badly and these two results should be used with caution .
99 (16) Carbon dioxide + Sodium hydrogen sulfite [7631-90-5] + Water
Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at four
concentrations between 0 and 2.02 mol L-1 NaHS03 at 298 . 15 K. The salt is not 100 per cent dissociated so
the molar concentration salt effect parameter is reported. It is k.,. = 0. 1434 L mol-1 with a standard deviation
of the slope of 0.003 1 . The result is classed as tentative. If the salt was 100 % dissociated the ionic strength
salt effect parameter, k,1<•>•• would be the value above divided by 3.
99 (17) Carbon dioxide + Sodium sulfate [7757-82-6] + Water
The evaluation of the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of sodium sulfate is divided into
three parts. 1) Papers reporting measurements at or near atmospheric pressure in which both Na2S04 and C02
are reported in mol L-1 or other volume units; ii) papers reporting measuremnts at or near atmospheric pressure
in which both Na2S04 and C02 are reported in mol kg-1 or other mass units; and iii) papers which report
measurements at high pressures and temperatures regardless of the units used for Na2S04 and C02•
i) Sechenov (5) reported the solubility of carbon dioxide in eight solutions from 0 to 2.00 mol L-1
sodium sulfate at 288.35 K, Markham and Kobe (18) reported the solubility of carbon dioxide in five �lutions
from 0 to 1 .435 mol L-1 sodium sufate at 298. 15 and 313. 15 K, Shchennikova, Devyatykh and Korshunov (26)
1 16
reported the solubility of carbon dioxide in six solutions of 0.20 to 1 . 6 8 mol L·1 sodium sulfate at one to five
temperatures between 298. 15 and 348. 15 K, Gerecke (35) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in four
solutions between 0 and 1 .0 mol L"1 sodium sulfate at five degree intervals between 288. 15 and 333 . 15 K, Onda,
Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (36) reported the solubility of carbon dioxide in four solutions from 0 to 1 .44
mol L"1 sodium sulfate at 298. 15 K and Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) reported the solubility of carbon dioxide
in up to fifteen solutions from 0 to 2.21 mol L"1 sodium sulfate at 288. 15, 298. 15 and 308. 15 K. The
concentrations have been changed to ionic strength by multiplying by 3 . The ionic strength salt effect
parameters from the papers are given in the table below.
Table 50.
Na2S04 Cone. Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

TIK Range, c/mol L·1 Parameter of Slope
k,1<c>/L mol"1
288. 15 0 - 1 .00 0.0829 0.0102 G (35)

0 - 1 .06 0. 1072 0.0049 yy (42)
288.35 0 - 2.00 0. 1063 0.0004 s (5)
298. 15 0.2 - 1 .68 0. 1001 0.0062 SDK (26)

0 - 1 .00 0.0836 0.0132 G (35)
0 - 1 .435 0.0991 0.0006 MK (18)
0 - 1 .44 0.0982 0.0009 OSKKI (36)
0 - 2.21 0.0981 0.0004 yY (42)
0 - 2.2 0.0983 0.0005 (1 8)(36)(42)
combined ]
308 . 15 0 - 1 .00 0.0826 0.0188 G (35)

0 - 1 .76 0.0894 0.0009 yy (42)
3 1 3 . 15 0 - 1 .435 0.09 13 0.0004 MK (18)

3 1 8 . 15 0 - 1 .00 0.0869 0.0195 G (35)
323 . 15 0.42 - 1 .68 0. 1 108 0.0057 SDK (26)
328 . 1 5 0 - 1 .00 0.0904 0.0199 G (35)
Shchennikova, Devyatykh and Korshunov (26) reported salt effect parameters from their smoothed data
on a natural logarithm mol fraction basis. The evaluator converted their values to our k,1<c>.IL mol·1 values. The
results are:
TIK 298 303 313 323 338

kal(c)x 0.094 0.097 0. 104 0. 124 0.22 1
The values at 298 and 303 K seem reasonable, but the steady increase in salt effect parameter with temperture
is contrary to our experience and the values at the higher temperatures are classed doubtful.
Gerecke's (35) data give smaller slopes than other data, show more scatter about the regression line and
extrapolate to a carbon dioxide in water value that is 5 to 8.5 % low. The data are classed doubtful.
The combined data of Markham and Kobe (18), Onda et al. (36) and of Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) give
a recommended salt effect parameter at 298. 15 K of 0.0983 ± 0.0005 L mol·1 •
Figure 7 (next page) shows logarithm of Bunsen coefficient vs. the sodium sulfate ionic strength at
288. 15 and 298. 15 K and one atm. The data are best fitted by a straight line. The data of He and Morse were
converted from their molality values to Bunsen coefficients and concentration ionic strength using their density
and partial pressure values and assuming ideal gas behavior and Henry' s law. Their results at 298. 15 K deviate
considerably from the other 298. 15 K values.
il) He and Morse (57) report the molality solubility of carbon dioxide in 4 or 5 solutions ranging from
0.01 up to 3 . 00 mol kg·1 sodium sulfate at temperatures of 273. 15, 298. 15, 323 . 15, 348. 15 and 363 . 15 K and
carbon dioxide partial pressures of 0. 305 to 0.979 bar. In addition Markham and Kobe ( 1 8) and Gerecke (35)
report their data so values of the salt effect parameter, ka�<m>m• can be obtained . Salt effect parameters from these
data are given in Table 5 1 (next page) .
Agreement in Table 5 1 is not good. The evalator prefers the values from the data of Markham and Kobe
since their results agree well with other reliable workers when mol L·1 units are used.
1 17
0.1
T = 288. 1 5 K Ref.
0 5 Sechenov ( 1 892) •
1 6 Kobe & Williams ( 1 935) v
1 8 Markham & Kobe ( 1 94 1 ) o
-0.1 35 Gerecke ( 1 969) o
36 Onda et al. ( 1 970) •
42 Yasunishi & Yoshida ( 1 979) •
- 0 .2 57 He & Morse ( 1 993) "'
- 0 .3
�
C)
- 0 .4
·.
- 0 .5 · ..
.
...
·.
- 0 .6
- 0 .7 l co2 + Na 2so. + H20 I

- 0 .8
0 1 .0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
12/mol L _ ,
Figure 7. Logarithm of Bunsen coefficient vs. sodium sulfate ionic strength.
Table 51.
Na2S04 Molal Salt Effect Std. Dev. Reference

T/K p /bar Range Parameter of slope
1
�/mol kg·' k,l(m)./kg mol'1
273 . 15 0.979 0.01 - 0.3 0.0663 0.0129 HM (57)

0.979 0.01 - 0. 1 0. 106 0.065 HM (57)
298. 15 0.954 0. 1 - 2.0 0.0619 0.0047 HM (57)

0.954 0. 1 - 1 .0 0.0654 0.0033 HM (57)
0- 1 .5 0.09 1 1 0.0016 MK (18)
0- 1 .05 0.0754 0.0132 G (35)
3 1 3 . 15 0 - 1 .5 0.0835 0.00 1 1 MK (1 8)
0 - 1 .05 0.0776 0.0199 G (35)
323. 15 0. 865 0. 1 - 3.0 0.0287 0.0044 HM (57)

0. 865 0. 1 - 1 .0 0.0466 HM (57)
348. 15 0.6 1 1 0. 1 - 3.0 0.0134 0.0028 HM (57)

0.6 1 1 0. 1 - 1 .0 0.0295 0.0027 HM (57)
363 . 15 0. 305 0. 1 - 3.0 0.0223 0.0006 HM (57)
iiz) Corti, Krenzer, de Pablo and Prausnitz (54) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in solutions
of 0.95 to 2. 72 mol kg·' sodium sulfate at temperatures of 323 . 15 and 348. 15 K and total pressures between
37.9 and 145 . 1 bar. Rumpf and Maurer (56) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in two solutions of about
1 and 2 mol kg-1 sodium sulfate at seven temperatures between 313 and 433 K over a total pressure interval of
0.019 to 9.71 MPa.
1 18
The evaluator has interpolated data from both papers at several temperatures and pressures. There are
really solubility measurements at only two molalities of sodium sulfate. Therefore any salt effect parameters
derived from these data are of limited value. The values obtained this way are in the table below.
Table 52.
TIK Pto�a�IMPa k,mm/kg mot·t k,l(m)m/kg mol"1 Reference
3 1 3 . 15 2 .0 0.202 0.067 RM (56)

5.0 0.230 0.077
8.0 0.232 0.077
323 . 15 10.0 0.225 0.075 CKPP (54)

348 . 1 5 10.0 0.202 0.067 CKPP (54)
353 . 1 5 2.0 0.202 0.067 RM (56)

5.0 0.202 0.067
8.0 0.208 0.069
393 . 15 2.0 0. 156 0.052 RM (56)

5.0 0. 158 0.053
8.0 0. 168 0.056
433 . 15 2.0 0. 123 0.041 RM (56)

5 .0 0. 165 0.055
8.0 0. 163 0.054
The data in these two papers deserve better treatment than we have time to give them in this brief
review. The salt effect parameters above should be used between 1 .0 and 2.0 molal (3 .0 and 6.0 ionic strength)
sodium sulfate. The results indicate only a small effect of pressure on salting out and a slight decrease in the
salting out as temperature increases.
99 (18) Carbon dioxide + Sulfuric acid [7664-93-9] + Sodium sulfate [7757-82-6] + Water
Kobe and Kenton (17) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in one solution which was 0.90 molal
H2S04 and 1 . 76 molal Na2S04 at 298. 15 K. The total ionic strength is 7.98 mol kg·1 • The evaluator used the
solubility of carbon dioxide in water from Markham and Kobe ( 1 8) to calculate an ionic strength salt effect
parameter of 0.0609. The value is less than the contribution of sodium sulfate alone in a solution to which it
contributes 0. 662 fraction ionic strength. The sulfuric acid is contributing an apparent salting in effct. The
result is classed tentatve. Kobe and Williams (16) measured the solubility in water and in a solution that was
5 volume % H2S04 and 20 mass % Na2S04• The solubility values are classed tentative, but no effort was made
to calculate a solubility parameter.
Shchennikova, Devyatykh and Korshuhov (26) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in solutions
which ranged between 0.2 to 1 . 3 mol L·1 sodium sulfate and 0.24 to 5 . 66 mol L" 1 (2. 3 to 42 mass %) sulfuric
acid at temperatures between 298. 15 and 348. 15 K. In all 1 1 solutions were studied. Assuming 100 %
dissociation of both salt and acid the total ionic strength ranged from 1 . 3 1 to 1 8. 84 mol L"1 • All eleven
solutions were studied at 298. 1 5 K and only up to three solutions studied at the other temperatures. At 298. 15
K the five data points between ionic strength 3.6 and 6.9 fitted well a Sechenov plot with a salt effect parameter
of k,1<•>•
= 0.0993 , but the linear portion extrapolated to a water solubility value that was twice its normal
value. The salt effect parameter was only 0.016 over the 0 to 3.6 ionic strength range and about 0.01 over the
1 1 . 8 to 1 8 . 8 ionic strength range. This is a complex system that deserves further analysis.
99 (19) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium sulfate [7783-20-2] + Sodium sulfate [7757-82-6] + Water
Rumpf and Maurer (56) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in a solution that was 1 molal in
(�)�04 and 1 molal in Na2S04 at six temperatures between 3 1 3 and 433 K over a total pressure range of
0.0084 to 9 . 67 MPa. Thus, the total ionic strength is about 6 mol kg·1 • Since we have only a single
concentration it is not possible to calculate a salt effect parameter. The solubility data are probably quite good
and are classed as tentative.
99 (20) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium nitrate [6484-52-2] + Sodium sulfate [7757-82-6] + Water
Onda, Sada, Kobayashi, Kito and Ito (37) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in seven solutions
of 0 to 2. 8 1 mol L·1 total ionic strength in which the ionic strength ratio of ammonium nitrate and sodium sulfate
was 1 at 298. 15 K. The salt effect parameter is k,1(c)c = (0.0557 ± 0.0009) L mol·1 • The value is 4 . 8 % less
than one would calculate from the pure salt parameters. The value is classed as tentative.
1 19
99 (21) Carbon dioxide + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5) + Sodium sulfate [7757-82-6] + Water
Yasunishi, Tsuji and Sada (43) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in six solutions with a total
concentration of 0 to 2 . 49 mol L-1 NaCl + Na2S04 with NaCl salt mole fraction of 0, 0.25 , 0.50, 0.75 and
1 .00 at 298. 15 K. The ionic strength fractions are NaCl/Na2S04 = 0/ 1 .0, 0. 10/0.90, 0.25/0. 75 , 0.50/0.50 and
1 .0/0. The ionic strength salt effect parameters are in the table below.
Table 53.
Ionic Strength Ionic Strength Salt Effect Std. Dev. Calc. Salt Difference
Ratio Range Parameter about slope Effect Par. %
NaCI/Na2S04 /zfmol L-1 k,1(cljL moi-1
0/1 .0 0 - 6.62 0.0988 0.0006

0. 10/0.90 0 - 4.36 0.0947 0.0013 0.0990 4.5
0.25/0.75 0 - 4. 12 0.0950 0.0010 0.0993 4.5
0.50/0.50 0 - 3. 1 1 0.0985 0.0018 0.0998 1.3
1 .0/0 0 - 2.49 0.1007 0.0017
The experimental result ranges from 4.5 to 1 . 3 % less than the result calculated assuming indepenedent
action of the electrolytes. The results are classed as tentative. See Figure l lA following section 100 (10).
99 (22) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium chloride [12125-02-9] + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5]

+ Sodium sulfate [7757-82-6] + Water
Yasunishi, Tsuji and Sada (43) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in six solutions of five different
mole ratios of the three salts; �Cl/NaCl/Na2S04 = 0/0.50/0.50, 0. 125/0.50/0. 375, 0.25/0.50/0.25,
0.325/0.500/0. 125 , and 0.50/0.50/0 at 298. 15 K. Each was fitted to a lg L vs. c2 line to obtain the salt effect
parameters below. The calculated ionic strength salt effect parameters are based on the values for each salt in
pure water. There is a small departure from additivity for the mixed eleCtrolyte solutions.
Table 54.
Ionic Strength Ionic Strength Salt Effect Std. Dev. Calc. Salt Difference
Ratio Range Parameter about slope Effect Par. %
�Cl/NaCI/Na2S04 ]z/mol L-1 k,1(c)JL mol-1
0/0.250/0.750 0 - 4. 12 0.0950 0.0010 0.0985 3.7
0.07 1 /0.286/0.643 0 - 3.46 0.0901 0.0009 0.0933 3.6
0. 167/0.333/0.500 0 - 3.73 0.0844 0.0012 0.0863 2.3
0.300/0.400/0.300 0 - 3. 19 0.0724 0.0012 0.0765 5.7
0.500/0.500/0 0 - 3.45 0.062 1 0.0015 0.0619 -0.3
99 (23) Carbon dioxide + Sodium thiosulfate [7772-98-7] + Water
Both Passauer (14) and Nahoczky (15) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in saturated aqueous
sodium thiosulfate, the first at 293 K the second at 288 K. The solubility measurements are classed tentative,
but no salt effect parameters were calculated from the data because of uncertainty in the solubility of sodium
thiosulfate and concern about the reliablity of a salt effect parameter based on just one salt concentration.
99 (24) Carbon dioxide + Sodium nitrate [7631-99-4] + Water
The system was studied by Sechenov (5) at 288.35 K, Markham and Kobe (18) at 273. 35 and 298. 15
K, Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) at 288. 15, 298. 15 K and 308. 15 K and by Gerecke (35) at five degree intervals
between 288. 15 and 333 . 15 K. In general the results accord well. Gerecke's results show by far the most
scatter and largest standard deviation of the slope of lg L vs. � plots. . Salt effect parameters are in Table 55
(next page) .
Gerecke (35) reports values at 293 , 303, 313, 318 and 328 K in addition to his values above. His
solubility values scatter much more than the data of the other workers and a simple straight line slope does not
show the expected variation with temperature. The data are classed doubtful.
The values in [ ] in Table 55 (next page) are combined data sets and are recomended. The recommended
salt effect parameters are (0.0874 ± 0.0010) at 288 .2 K and (0.0777 ± 0.0.0002) at 298. 15 K.
1 20
Table 55.
T/K Concentration Salt Effect Reference

Range, c2/mol L·' Parameter
k,.,IL mot·'
•
273 .35 0 - 6.300 0.0989 MK (18)

288. 15 0-4 0.0677 G (35)
0.382 - 5.929 0.0847 yy (42)
288.35 0 - 7.356 0.089 1 s (5)
[288.2 0 - 7 .356 0.0874 (5) & (42)]
298. 15 0 - 6.300 0.0770 MK (18)
0-4 0.0677 G (35)
0.382 - 7.256 0.0781 yy (42)
[298. 15 0 - 7.256 0.0777 (18) & (42)]

308. 15 0-4 0.0649 G (35)
0.346 - 5 . 1 86 0.0723 yy (42)
323. 15 0-4 0.0647 G (35)
333 . 15 0-4 0.0649 G (35)
99 (25) Carbon dioxide + Phosphoric acid [7664-38-2]

+ Sodium dihydrogen phosphate [7558-80-7] + Water
Van Slyke, Sendroy, Hastings and Neill (13) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in 0. 150 and
0.300 mol L·' H3P04 and in mixtures of 0.0375 to 0.300 mol L"1 NaH2P04 and 0.01 1 to 0.030 mol L"1 H3P04
at 3 1 1 .2 K. The solubility was corrected for the effect of phosphoric acid, which changed the solubility 0.3
% or less, and the corrected solubility treated as if only the sodium salt was present. The salt effect parameter
for the NaH2P04 alone was k... = (0. 184 ± 0.005) L mol·' . See section 19 (1) for the result for phosphoric
acid.
99 (26) Carbon dioxide + Sodium formate [141-53-7] + Water

99 (27) Carbon dioxide + Sodium acetate [127-09-3] + Water
Gerecke (35) reports carbon dioxide solubility data between 0 and 4 mol L·' sodium formate and 0 and
2 mol L·' sodium acetate at five degree intervals between 288. 15 and 333. 15 K. The solubility of carbon
dioxide in sodium formate shows salting in at concentration of 0. 1 , 0.2 and 0.5 mol L"1 , salting out at 1 and
2 mol L"1 and salting in at 4 mol L·'. A similar variation is observed in the sodium acetate solutions.
Both formate and acetate ions are the anions of weak acids and thus themselves bases. We would expect
an apparent salting in because of the reaction of the basic anions with the acidic carbon dioxide. Reactions
C02(aq) + H20 + HCOO·(aq) = HC03·(aq) + HCOOH(aq)
C02(aq) + H20 + 2 Hcoo-(aq) = cot(aq) + 2 HCOOH(aq)
contribute to the effect. We have not tried to analyze the data beyond the suggestion of an acid base interaction
being responsible for the apparent salting in.
99 (28) Carbon dioxide + Sodium phenoxide [139-02-6] + Water
Kimura and Takeuchi (29) report the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous sodium phenoxide as
functions of temperature, pressure and electrolyte concentration. The data show the effect of an acid base
reaction between the acidic carbon dioxide and the basic phenoxide anion. At 293. 15 K there is strong salting
in at all concentrations between 0. 805 and 3.04 mol L"1 sodium phenoxide which is described by a salt effect
parameter of -0.237, at 323 . 15 the salt effect parameter is -0.40. The salt effect parameters were calculated
for the solubility values at 0.98/0.99 atm partial pressure carbon dioxide. The values are classed tentative.
99 (29) Carbon dioxide + Sodium 4-[{4-(dimethylamino)pheynl}azo]benzenesulfonic acid salt
(Methyl orange) [547-58-0] + Water
Findlay and Shen (9) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in dilute solutions of methyl orange at
298. 15 K. The evaluator treated the solubility data at 122 - 124 kPa and obtained a salt effect parameter
of -3.00 L mol·' for the 0.0101 to 0.0281 mol L"1 methyl orange solutions with a standard deviation of the slope
of 0. 15. The methyl orange salts-in strongly. The result is classed tentative, but use with caution.
121
99 (30) Carbon dioxide + Lactic acid [50-21-5] + Sodium lactate [920-49-0] + Water
Van Slyke, Sendroy, Hastings and Neill (13) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in 0. 100 to 0.300
mol L-1 lactic acid and in mixtures of 0. 150 and 0.300 mol L'1 0. 100 to 0.300 mol L-1 lactic sodium lactate and
acid at 3 1 1 . 2 K. The effect for the lactic acid is scattered and small. Its molar parameter is k,.. (0.006 ± =
0.006) L mot·• . The lactic acid was assumed to have a negligible effect in the mixture and the data were treated
as if sodium lactate alone was present. The resulting salt effect parameter is k... (0. 125 ± 0.006) mol L-1 • =
The sodium lactate salts out and the result is classed tentative.
99 (31) Carbon dioxide + Sodium monododecyl sulfuric acid ester (or SDS); [151-21-3] + Water
99 (32) Carbon dioxide + Sodium 1-heptylsulfonate (or SHSo) ; [22767-50-6] + Water
99 (33) Carbon dioxide + Sodium perfluoro-octanoate (or SPFO) ; [335-95-5] + Water
23 (4) Carbon dioxide + N,N,N-Trimethyl-1-hexadecanaminium bromide (or CTAB) ; [57-09-0] + Water
NOTE: This sytem belongs with the carbon number, 23 . It is better considered
here with other micelle forming solutions.
Ownby, Prapaitrakul and King (50) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide-in the four systems listed
above at either 298. 2 or 299.2 K over a small pressure range. The solutions appear to obey Henry' s law. At
salt concentrations above the critical micelle concentration (CMC) the carbon dioxide is salted in, below the
CMC the gas is salted out. The salt CMC ' s are: SDS 0.008 1 ; SPFO 0.032; CTAB 0.00092; and SHSo 0.28
mol kg·• . Only the sodium 1 -heptyl sulfonate (SHSo) has a large enough CMC to see the salting out effect
(Figure 8). Both the salting out and salting in parameter are given for the SHSo, and only salting in parameters
are given for the other salts in the table below.
Table 56.
Salt Molality Salt Effect Std Dev of

Range, �/mol kg·' Parameter Slope
k...,lkg mot·•
SHSo 0.0 - 0.4 0.091 0.004

0.6 - 1 .2 -0.060 0.003
SDS 0.0 - 0.6 -0. 1 16 0.006
SPFO 0.0 - 0.6 -0.164 0.007
CTAB 0.0 - 0.4 -0. 179 0.008
- 1 .3 8 0
. ..
T/K
. ..
..
o SPFO 298. 1 5
..
- 1 .4 0 .. . o CTAB 299. 1 5
.. • SDS
·
·
298. 1 5
SHSo
-
- e
- 1 .42
298. 1 5
,•'
I
Cl
.:.1!
- 1 .44
0
E
.......
- 1 .4 6
€
- 1 .48 · · ·
..--
··
•..
Cl
. .-
. . -
- 1 .5 0 -.. _ ·
·
·
-. .· · · -
. ... ··
.• . . .•. . . . .-
- 1 .52
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 .0 1 .2
Figure 8. Logarithm of carbon dioxide molality vs. salt molality . The four salts are
sodium perfluoro-octanoate (SPFO) , cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) ,
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) , and sodium 1 -heptylsulfonate (SHSo). These salts are
micelle forming substances. The carbon dioxide is " salted in " above the CMC
(critical micelle concentration). Only one of the four salts (SHSo) has a large enough
CMC to show the effect of salting out below the CMC salting in above the CMC .
1 22
99 (34) Carbon dioxide + Sodium trifluoroacetate [2923-18-4] + Water
Castellani and Berchiesi (62) report one solubility measurement of carbon dioxide in 19.0 mol kg·1
sodium trifluoroacetate at 294.65 K and 0.936 atm of 0.0077 mol L-1 • The evaluator estimated a solubility of
carbon dioxide in water under these conditions of 0.0353 mol L"1 • The two values give a salt effect parameter
of k,mc 0.035 . The value is classed tentative, but use with caution.
=
100 (1) Carbon dioxide + Potassium chloride [7447-40-7] + Water:
The system has been studied by Sechenov (5) at 288.35 K, by Geffcken (6) at 288. 15 and 298. 15 K, by
Findlay and Shen (9) at 298. 15 K, by Passauer (14) at 293. 15 K, by Markham and Kobe (18) at 273.35, 298. 15
and 313. 15 K, Gerecke (35) at five degree intervals between 288. 15 and 333 . 15 K, by Yasunishi and Yoshida
(42) at 298. 15 and 308. 15 K, by Burmakina, Efanov, and Shnet (45) at 298. 15 K and by He and Morse (57)
at five temperatures between 273. 15 and 363. 15 K. Each workers data have been fitted to a linear lg L vs.
c2 line with the exception of He and Morse whose data was fitted to a linear lg m1 vs. m2 line and Passauer (14),
whose measurement in saturated aqueous potassium chloride, was not used. The concentration results are
below.
Table 57.
KCl Concentration Salt Effect Standard Reference

TIK Range, c2/mol L"1 Parameter Deviation
k,.JL· mol·1 of Slope
273 .35 0-3 0.0768 0.0017 MK (18)
288 . 1 5 0.423 - 1 .058 0.073 1 0.0022 Gf (6)
0-1 0.08 17 0.0012 G (35)
288.35 0.0 - 2.564 0.0935 0.0041 s (5)
298. 15 0.423 - 1 .058 0.0705 0.0029 Gf (6)
0.247 - 1 .000 0.0680 0.0052 FS (9)
0.0 - 3.558 0.0622 0.0015 MK (18)
0.0 - 2.0 0.0650 0.0029 G (35)
0.498 - 4. 1 3 1 0.0569 0.0015 yy (42)
0 - 0.200 0.0755 O.ot l9 BES (45)
[298 . 1 5 0.0 - 2.0 0.0664 0.0009 all except (45)]
308. 15 0-2 0.0694 0.0135 G (35)

0.420 - 4. 1 10 0.0567 0.001 1 yy (42)
3 1 3 . 15 0-3 0.0597 0.0043 MK (18)
0-2 0.0755 0.0134 G (35)
323 . 15 0-2 0.0776 0.0135 G (35)
333 . 15 0-2 0.0854 0.0214 G (35)
The value at 298. 15 in [ ] is based on the 21 values from all papers between 0.0 and 2.0 mol L"1 KCI.
It is the only recommended value. A plot of all the data to 4.3 mol L·1 KCl shows a small curvature at
concentrations above 2.0 mol L-1 KCI. Gerecke's value at 4.3 mol L·1 is off from the pattern of the other data
and is rejected. Burmakina et al. (45) made nine measurments in the 0 - 0.200 mol L·1 KCl range. Measure
ments in dilute solutions are difficult and subject to large error [(49) and this volume preliminary material].
Their data scatters badly and their results were not included in the general average of 298. 15 K data. The data
of He and Morse (57) are treated separately below.
Table 58.
KCl Molality Salt Effect Standard Reference

T/K p1 /bar Range, m2/mol kg·1 Parameter Deviation
kiOUD/kg mol·1 of Slope
273 .35 1 . 049 0. 1 - 3.51 0.0403 0.0037 HM (57)
298. 15 0.954 0. 1 - 4.0 0.0375 0.0072 HM (57)
323 . 15 0. 865 0. 1 - 5.0 0.0248 0.0015 HM (57)
348. 15 0.61 1 0. 1 - 5.0 0.0174 0.0019 HM (57)
363. 15 0. 305 0. 1 - 5.0 0.0170 0.0013 HM (57)
The values appear to be slightly lower than expected from the other data on the system. They are classed
as tentative.
1 23
Figure 9 shows logarithm of Bunsen coefficient vs. the potassium chloride concentration (ionic strength)
at 288 and 298 K. Only the data of Gerecke (35) deviates significantly from the other data. The data of He
and Morse (57), calculated as Bunsen coefficients from the author's data assuming ideal gas and Henry's law
behavior, show more scatter than the other data.
0.00 Ref.
5 Sechenov ( 1 892) •
6 Geffcken ( 1 904) o
9 Findlay & Shen ( 1 9 1 2) v
18 Markham & Kobe ( 1 94 1 ) "'
35 Gerecke ( 1 969) <>
42 Yasunishi et al. ( 1 979) o
-0.08 57 He & Morse ( 1 993) •
· �.
-0.1 6
·�
- 0.24
· · · · - . . ... ¢
.
- 0 .3 2 T = 298_ 1 5 K
-0.40
0 1 .0 2 .0 3 .0 4 .0 5 .0
Figure 9. Logarithm of Bunsen coefficient vs. potassium chloride concentration (ionic strength).
100 (2) Carbon dioxide + Hydrochloric acid [7647-01-0] + Potassium chloride [7447-40-7] + Water
Van Slyke, Sendroy, Hastings and Neill (13) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in solutions that
were 0.01 mol L-1 in HCl and 0 to 0.300 mol L-1 in KCl at 3 1 1 .2 K. The very small concentration of HCl was
assumed to have a negligible effect on salting out and the data were treated as if KCl alone was present. The
result for the KCl is kocc = (0.0691 ± 0.0032) mol L-1 and it is cla8sed tentative.
100 (3) Carbon dioxide + Calcium chloride [10043-52-4] + Potassium chloride [7447-40-7] + Water
Yasunishi, Tsuji and Sada (43) studied this system at 298. 15 K and mole ratios of KCl/CaCl2 of
0.0/ 1 .00, 0.25/0.75, 0.50/0.50, 0.75/0.25 and 1 .00/0.0. As an ionic strength ratio the values are 0.0/ 1 .00,
0. 10/0.90, 0.25/0.75, 0.50/0.50 and 1 .0/0. The resulting salt effect parameters assuming a linear lg L vs. 12
are shown in Table 59 (next page) . The calculated values assume the pure KCl and pure CaC12 salt effect
parameters are additive as the sum of the products of ionic strength fraction times the salt effect parameter for
each electrolyte. See also Figure l lB following section 100 (10).
The pure KCl and CaC12 values i n Table 59 do not agree well with values given earlier. Another
problem is that the regression lines give solubility in water values that range from 1 .4 to 4. 1 % low. In spite
of these problems, the pure salt effect parameters have been used to calculate the salt effect parameters for the
mixtures and the results appear satisfactory. The data deserve a more detailed treatment than we can give it
here. They are classed as tentative.
1 24
Table 59.
Ionic Strength Concentration Salt Effect Salt Effect Difference

Ratio Range Parameter Parameter %
KCl/CaC12 c/mol L·' k,1<cl/L mot·' Calculated
1 .00/0.00 0.498 - 3 .505 0.0605

0.50/0.50 0.429 - 3 .501 0.0586 0.0588 0.3
0.25/0.75 0.512 - 3.401 0.0594 0.0580 2.3
0. 10/0.90 0.426 - 3 .233 0.0572 0.0574 0.4
0.00/ 1 .00 0.558 - 3.801 0.057 1
100 (4) Carbon dioxide + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Potassium chloride [7447-40-7] + Water
Yasunishi, Tsuji and Sada (43) studied this system at 298. 15 K and mole ratios of (same as ionic strength
ratios) NaCl/KCl of 0.0/1 .0, 0.25/0. 75, 0.50/0.50, 0. 75/0.25 and 1 .0/0.0. The resulting salt effect parameters
assuming a linear lg L vs. /2 are below. The calculated values assume the pure NaCl and pure KCl salt effect
parameters are additive as the sum of the products of mol fraction times the salt effect parameter for each
electrolyte.
Table 60.

NaCl/KCl c/mol L·1 k,1<cl/L mol·1 Calculated
1 .00/0.00 0.498 - 3 .505 0.0986

0.75/0.25 0.545 - 4.3 1 1 0.0873 0.0882 1 .0
0.50/0.50 0.479 - 4.396 0.0766 0.0778 1 .6
0.25/0.75 0.537 - 4. 125 0.0677 0.0673 -Q.6
0.00/ 1 . 00 0.498 - 4. 131 0.0569
The mixed electrolyte systems appear to have no specific interaction within experimental error. The data
are classed tentative. See Figure 1 1A following section 100 (10) .
1 00 (5) Carbon dioxide + Calcium chloride [10043-52-4] + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5]

+ Potassium chloride [7447-40-7] + Water
The system was studied by Yasunishi, Tsuji and Sada (43) at 298. 15 K and several ratios of
CaCl/NaCl/KCl. The salt effect parameters are in the table below.
Table 61 .

CaCl2/NaCl/KCl c2/mol L·' k,1(cl/L mot-' Calculated
0.00/0.50/0.50 0.479 - 4.396 0.0766 0.0778 1 .6
0.50/0. 167/0.333 0. 386 - 2. 762 0.0643 0.0669 4.0
0.75/0.00/0.25 0.512 - 3 .401 0.0580 0.0561 3.3
The calculated salt effect parameter is probably within experimental error of the measured parameter.
The values are classed tentative.
100 (6) Carbon dioxide + Potassium bromide [7758-02-3] + Water
Three laboratories report data on the system. Sechenov (5) studied the system at 288.35 K, Geffcken
(6) at 288. 15 and 298. 15 K and Gerecke (35) at ten temperatures between 288. 15 and 333 . 15 K.
The data of both Sechenov and Geffcken at 288 K are linear in lg L vs. c2, but the slopes do not agree
well. Gerecke' s data shows salting in at 4 mol L"1 KBr at temperatures of 298 K and above. Plots of Gerecke's
data as lg L vs. c2 are linear to either 0 - 1 or 0 - 2 mol L·' KBr. The slopes do not agree with the values of
Sechenov and Geffcken. The salt effect parameter is not a regular increase or decrease with increasing
temperature. Gerecke's data are classed doubtful.
1 25
The salt effect parameters of Sechenov and Geffcken and a sampling of Gerecke' s values are below.
Geffcken' s values are preferred, but use with caution.
Table 62.
KBr Concentration Salt Effect Standard Reference

T/K Range, czfmol L-1 Parameter Deviation
k IL mol·1
... of Slope
288 . 1 5 0.550 - 1 .064 0.0635 0.0012 Gf (6)
0.0 - 2.0 0.0499 0.0044 G (35)
288.35 0.0 - 4.228 0.0567 0.0017 s (5)
298 . 15 0.550 - 1 .064 0.0672 0.0030 Gf (6)

0.0 - 4.0 0.0074 0.0146 G (35)
0.0 - 2.0 0.0394 0.0080 ·a (35)
0.0 � 1 .0 0.0602 0.0022 G (35)
303 . 15 0.0 - 1 .0 0.0506 0.0016 G (35)

3 13 . 15 0.0 - 1 .0 0. 1 17 0.037 G (35)
323 . 15 0.0 - 1 .0 0. 150 0.002 G (35)
333 . 15 0.0 - 1 .0 0. 136 0.048 G (35)
100 (7) Carbon dioxide + Potassium iodide [7681-11-0] + Water
In addition to the same three workers (5 , 6, 35) that report on the KBr systems, Onda Sada, Kobayashi,
Kito and Ito (36) report carbon dioxide solubility meausrements at 0, 1 and 2 mol L-1 KI at 298 . 1 5 K and 0. 1013
MPa, Passauer (14) reports a measurement in saturated aqueous KI at 293 . 15 K, and Vazquez, Chenlo, Pereira
and Peaguda (64) report seven measurements between 0.24 1 and 1 . 687 mol L-1 KI at 298. 1 K and 0. 1013 MPa.
In an earlier paper (61) they report the solubility in water at the same temperature and pressure. Passauer's
value was not used. At 298. 15 K there is fair agreement among the results of Geffcken (6), Gerecke (35) and
Onda et al. (36) to 2 mol L"1 KI. The results are classed tentative. The data of Vazquez et al. (64) are about
7 % smaller than the other data for any given KI concentration and their data are classed doubtful. Their data
shows a definite curvature which is emphasized more when the water value is used. See also Figure 10 (next
page). The salt effect parameters are below.
Table 63 .
KI Concentration Salt Effect Standard Reference

TIK Range, czfmol L-1 Parameter Deviation
k ..fL mol-1
. of Slope
288 . 15 0.559 - 1 . 1 19 0.0624 0.0029 Gf (6)
288.35 0.0 - 5 .767 0.0516 0.0027 s (5)
298 . 15 0.559 - 1 . 1 19 0.0540 0.0006 Gf (6)

0.0 - 4.0 0.0208 0.0057 G (35)
0.0 - 2.0 . . 0.0453 0.0013 G (35)
0.0 - 1 .0 0.0483 0.0017 G (35)
0.0 - 2.002 0.0520 0.0036 OSK (36)
0.0 - 1 .69 0.0505 0.008 1 VCPP (64)
0.24 - 1 .69 0.0375 0.0040 VCPP (64)
0.0 - 1 .0 0.0541 0.0023 (6, 35, 36)
3 1 3 . 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0581 0.0082 G (35)

323 . 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0659 0.0083 G (35)
333 . 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0830 0.01 i9 G (35)
Sechenov' s data at 288.35 K are classed tentative although the salt effect parameter is smaller than
expected from other data at 288 and 298 K. Gerecke' s data at the higher temperatures shows a salting out effect
that increases with temperature. This is contrary to normal expectations and the data should be used with
caution.
1 26
Kl
(A,o,v,o)
0
l c o2 + Kl
T =
+
298. 1 5 K
H2o l Ref.
6
35
Geffcken
Gerecke
( 1 904) "
(KI)
( 1 969) o (KI)
36 Onda et al. ( 1 970) v (KI)
···· 64 Va z q ue z et al. ( 1 994) D (KI)
-0.1 · (6. · ·-� NaBr
0
0 · . .
£•.•)
0 o [:i"o·9. ..
- 0 .2 . ..
· · . . ... . ...
0 0
•
.
..
. .. ..
- 0 .3
r1 •
.
.. . .
-0. 1
- 0.4
•
• •
-.0 2
•
•
lcoz + NaBr + H 2o !
- 0 .5 • T = 298. 1 5 K - 0 .3
Ref. •
- 0.6 35 Gerecke ( 1 969) • (NaBr) - 0.4

64 Vazquez et al. ( 1 994) • (NaBrl •
- 0.7
0 1 .0 2.0 3.0 4 .0 5 .0
Figure 10. Logarithm of Ostwald coefficient vs. potassium iodide and sodium bromide concentrations.
100 (8) Carbon dioxide + Potassium sulfate [7778-80-5] + Water
Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide at four concentrations of potassium
sulfate between 0.093 and 0.454 mol L·1 (0.279 and 1 . 362 ionic strength) at 298. 15 K. The salt effect
parameter as a function of ionic strength is k,t(c)c (0.0777 ± 0.0003) L mol·1 and it is classed as tentative.
=
Passauer (14) reports the carbon dioxide solubility in saturated aqueous potassium sulfate at 293 . 15 K. No salt
effect parameter was calculated from his measuremnet.
He and Morse (57) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in 0.01 to as high as 0.9 mol kg1 K2S04
at five temperatures between 273 . 15 and 363 . 15 K. The carbon dioxide partial pressure was different at each
from their data are in the table below. The values

salt effect parameters on a molal basis.
are
temperature. They reported both salt and gas in molality. Ionic strength salt effect parameters in molality units
classed tentative. Multiplication by three will put the
Table 64.
K2S04 Molal Salt Effect Standard Reference

TIK pt fbar Range, Parameter Deviation
m2/mol kg-1 k11<ml.,/kg mol-t of Slope
273 . 15 1 .049 0.01 - 0.4 0.0734 0.007 1 HM (57)
298 . 1 5 0.954 0. 1 - 0.6 0.0568 0.005 1 HM (57)
323 . 15 0. 865 O.Q2 - 0.81 0.0377 0.0028 HM (57)
348 . 15 0.6 1 1 0. 1 - 0.9 0.0260 0.003 1 HM (57)
363 . 15 0.305 0 . 1 - 0.9 0.0226 0.0024 HM (57)
100 (9) Carbon dioxide + Potassium nitrate [7757-79-1] + Water
A number of workers have studied this system. Sechenov (4) at 288.35 K, Geffcken (6) at 288. 15 and
298. 15 K, Markham and Kobe (18) at 273.35, 298. 15 and 3 1 3 . 15 K, Gerecke (35) at five degree intervals be
tween 288. 15 and 328. 15 K and Yasunishi and Yoshida (42) at 298. 15 and 308. 15 K. The salt effect parameters
obtained by fmding the slope of lg L vs. c2 plots of each workers data at each temperature are given in Table
65 (next page). The data are classed tentative, but the Markham and Kobe data are preferred.
1 27
Table 65 .
Concentration Salt Effect Reference

T/K Range, c2/mol L-1 Parameter
k""'IL moi-1
273 .35 0.0 - 0.961 0.0682 MK (18)

288. 15 0.536 - 1. 033 0.0527 Gf (6)
0.0 - 2.0 0.0425 G (35)
288.35 0.0 - 2.325 0.0486 s (4)
293 . 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0412 G (35)
298. 15 0.536 - 1 .033
0.0 - 2.664
0.0 - 2.0
0.0435
0.0429
0.0389
MK
Gf
G
(6)
(18)
(35)
0.275 - 1 . 768 0.0419 yy (42)
303 . 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0365 G (35) -
308. 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0365 G (35)
0.275 - 1 .768 0.0392 yy (42)
3 1 3 . 15 0.0 - 2.664
0.0 - 2.0
0.0372
0.0379
MK
G
(18)
(35)
3 1 8 . 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0348 G (35)
323 . 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0348 G (35)
328. 15 0.0 - 2.0 0.0361 G (35)
100 (10) Carbon dioxide + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Potassium nitrate [7757-79-1] + Water
Yasunishi, Tsuji and Sada (43) have studied this system at 298. 15 K. They report the solubility of
carbon dioxide in aqueous NaCl, KN�, and three mixed electrolyte solutions of mole fraction ratio NaCVKN�
0.25/0.75, 0.50/0.50 and 0.75/0.25 . The salt effect parameters for the five solutions
the next page.
given in Table 66 on are
The calculated salt effect parameters assume the two electrolytes act independently. It is probably true
within the experimental error of these experiments. The values classed tentative. See Figure l lA. are
0
NaCI
Na2SO" ci o
· · · - . . . . .o · ·
. .
····· ······
co
0
c) .
·
.
. . ··
.. · .
.. ·
>··--
....
I
co
0 �
E KCI 0
.....J
.......
u "'t
KN03 �
]: 0
....
�
NH4CI C\1 ·
• ·
� ·· ·· ·
0 ···
... T = 298. 1 5 K
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 .0
Ionic Strength Fract ion
Figure l lA. C02 + Binary salts + H20. A test of the additivity of salt effect parameters as
a function of ionic strength fraction, 298. 15 K.
1 28
In Figure 1 1 A systems from top to bottom are: 99 (21) C02 + Na2S04 + NaC1 + H20
100 (4) C02 + KCl + NaCl + H20
100 (10) C02 + KN03 + NaCl + H20
99 (5) C02 + �Cl + NaCl + H20
99 (4) C02 + HN03 + NaCl + H20
Table 66.

NaCl/KN03 c2/mol L-1 k,.,,/L mol-1 Calculated
0.00/ 1 .00 0.288 - 1 .630 0.0419
0.25/0.75 0.298 - 1 .664 0.0576 0.0564 2.1
0.50/0.50 0.289 - 2. 173 0.0698 O.o708 1 .4
0.75/0.25 0.264 - 1. 723 0.0838 0.0853 1.8
1 .00/0.00 0.455 - 3.400 0.0997
0
NaCI
0
co
�
0
.-
L M9so4 CD
0
�
E CaCI2 0
_.
.......
0 "'it
� �
... 0
� NH4CI
N
NH4N03
�
0
T = 298. 1 5 K
0 0 .2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 .0
I o n i c S t r e n g t h F r a c ti o n
Figure 1 1B. C02 + Binary salts + H20. A test of the additivity of salt effect parameters as
a function of ionic strength fraction, 298 . 1 5 K.
Systems from right top to bottom:

99 (7) C02 + MgS04 + NaCl + H20
99 (6) C02 + �N� + NaCl + H20
100 (3) C02 + CaC12 + KCl + H20
18 (5) C02 + �Cl + �)z804 + H20
100 (11) Carbon dioxide + Magnesium sulfate [7487-88-9] + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5]
+ Potassium nitrate [7757-79-1] + Water
The system was studied by Yasunishi, Tsuji and Sada (43) at 298. 15 K. The results are in Table 67
(next page).
1 29
Table 67.

MgSOiNaCl/KN03 12/mol L"1 kll(e)c/L mot·' Calculated
0. 80/0.20/0.0 0 - 5.46 0.0725 0.0736 1 .5
0.57 1 10.286/0. 143 0 - 3.96 0.0667 0.0729 9.3
0.0/0.50/0.50 0 - 2. 17 0.0707 0.0712 0.70
The results indicate additivity of salt effects when two salts are present, but some specific effect when
three salts are present. The standard errors about the regression line are 0.0004 , 0.0005 and 0.0014,
respectively for the three values in the order they appear in the table above. The results are classed as tentative.
100 (12) Carbon dioxide + Potassium dihydrogen phosphate [7778-77-0) + Water
Gerecke (35) studied the system at five degree intervals between 288. 15 and 333 . 15 K at electrolyte
concentrations of 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mol L·1 • We did not try to calculate an ionic strength for the KH2P04
electrolyte. The C02 solubility at 1 . 0 mol L·1 electrolyte shows a lower solubility than expected from the
behavior shown at lower electrolyte concentrations. Salt effect parameters based on the solubilities at 0.0, 0.25
and 0.50 mol L-1 are given below:
TIK 288. 15 298. 15 313. 15 323 . 15 333 . 15

k"/L mot·' 0. 192 0. 175 0.206 0.204 0.239
Std. dev. slope 0.013 0.010 0.009 0.035 0.008
The salt effect parameter shows several unusual effects. It is larger than seen for other electrolytes.
There is no indication of an acid-base interaction between the carbon dioxide and the anions present in solution.
If the electrolyte is mainly K+, H+ and HPOl- the salt effect parameters need be divided by 3 to put them on
an ionic strength basis. The values would then be consistent with values for other electrolytes. The temperature
coefficient of the salt effect parameter is doubtful until confirmed by other work.
100 (13) Carbon dioxide + Phosphoric acid [7664-38-2)

+ Potassium dihydrogenphosphate [7778-77-0) + Water
0.300 mol L-1 H�04 and in mixtures of O to 0.300 mol L-1 KH2P04 and 0.015 to 0.030 mol L-1 H3P04 at 3 1 1 .2
K. The phosphoric acid data were analysed separately, see section 19 (1). In the mixed system the solubility
was corrected assuming the phosphoric acid acted independently. The correction was 0.3 % or less. The
corrected solubility was treated as if the potassium dihydrogen phosphate was present alone. The resulting salt
effect parameter is k"" = (0. 151 ± 0.003) mol L-1 • See section 99 (25) for the treatment of the sodium salt
system.
100 (14) Carbon dioxide + P-D-Fructofuranosyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (sucrose) [57-50-1)

+ Potassium dihydrogenphosphate [7778-77-0) + Water
de Molineri, de Cozzitorti, Sosa and Katz (5 1) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in five sucrose
solutions from S to 15 mass fraction sucrose each containing 0 to 15 mass fraction potassium dihydrogen
phopsphate at temperatures of 288. 15, 298. 15 and 308. 15 K. The evaluator calculated the salt effect parameters
in Table 68 (next page). The lg L vs. m3 plots showed a small concave curvature and extrapolated to a carbon
dioxide solubility in the aqueous sucrose solutions that was usually about 1 % low.
There are small, but consistent increases in the salt effect parameter with increasing temperature; and
decreases in the parameter with increasing sucrose content. It is interesting to compare these results with the
results of the aqueous KH2P04, System 100 (12) above. The results from the aqueous sucrose solutions would
represent the sucrose + water system, but no calculations were made for the system.
100 (15) Carbon dioxide + Potassium hydrogen oxalate [127-95-7) + Water
Van Slyke, Sendroy, Hastings and Neill (13) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in 0.300 and
0. 600 mol L-1 KHC204 at 3 1 1 .2 K. The molar salt effect parameter is k"" = (0.0683 ± 0.0003) mol L-1 and
is classed tentative.
1 30
Table 68.
Sucrose KH2P04 Molality Salt Effect Std. Dev.

TIK 1 Qlw2 Range, my'mol kg-• Parameter of slope
k_/kg moi-1
288. 15 5 0- 1 .378 0. 1299 0.0029
298. 15 5 0- 1 .378 0. 1305 0.0028
308. 15 5 0- 1 .378 0. 1310 0.0034
288 . 15 7.5 0- 1 .422 0. 1263 0.0034
298. 15 7.5 0- 1 .422 0. 1284 0.0026
308. 15 7.5 0- 1 .422 0. 1285 0.0033
288. 15 10 0- 1 .469 0. 1257 0.0027
298 . 15 10 0- 1 . 469 0.1269 0.0026
308. 15 10 0- 1 . 469 0. 1270 0.0034
288 . 1 5 12.5 0- 1 .520 0. 1245 0.0030
298. 15 12.5 0- 1 .520 0. 1257 0.0026
308. 15 12.5 0- 1 .520 0. 1263 0.0035
288. 15 15 0- 1 .575 0. 1236 0.0028
298. 15 15 0- 1 .575 0. 1259 0.0028
308. 15 15 0- 1 .575 0.1263 0.0035
100 (16) Carbon dioxide + Lactic acid [S0-21-5] + Potassium lactate [996-31-6] + Water
0.300 mol L-1 lactic acid and in mixtures of 0. 150 and 0.300 mol L-1 potassium lactate and 0. 100 to 0.300 mol
L-1 lactic acid at 3 1 1 .2 K. The lactic acid alone shows a small and scattered effect (see section 99 (30)) and
is considered to contribute negligible effect in the mixture. The data were treated as if potassium lactate alone
was present. The result is k'" = (0.0959 ± 0.0004) mol L-1 • The value is classed tentative.
100 (17) Carbon dioxide + Potassium thiocyanate [333-20-0] + Water
The system was studied by Sechenov (5) at 288. 35 K in water and three aqueous solutions to over 10
mol L-1 KSCN. The salt effect parameter, k'" = (0.041 ± 0.03) L mot-1 , is classed tentative.
100 (18) Carbon dioxide + Potassium alumimum sulfate [10043-67-1] + Water
Only Rosenthal (24b) reports measurements on this system, and he reports on only one dilute solution
at 293 . 15 K. The salt effect parameter has been calculated on both a concentration and ionic strength basis.
The values are: k_ = 0.84 and k•,<•)c = 0.094. The values are classed as tentative. Ionic strength was
calculated assuming 100 % dissociation into potassium, aluminum and sulfate ions.
101 (1) Carbon dioxide + Rubidium chloride [7791-11-9] + Water

102 (1) Carbon dioxide + Cesium chloride [7647-17-8] + Water
Oeffcken (6) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in both RbCl and CsCl aqueous solutions at
temperatures of 288. 15 and 298. 15 K. Oerecke (35) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous solu
tions of CsCl at temperatures of 288. 15, 293. 15, 298. 15 and 303 . 15 K at concentrations up to 2 mol e• . The
salt effect parameters from . these data are:
Table 69.
Electrolyte No. of Concentration Salt Effect Reference

TIK Detn. Range Parameter
ciL mol-1 k IL mol-1
...
288. 15 RbCl 4 0 - 1 .012 0.060 Of (6)

298. 15 RbCl 4 0 - 0.55 0.058 Gf (6)
288. 15 CsCl 2 0 - 0.55 0.045 Of (6)
4 0-2 0.036 0 (35)
293 . 15 CsCl 4 0-2 0.030 0 (35)
298. 15 CsCl 2 0 - 0.55 0.044 Of (6)
4 0-2 0.032 0 (35)
303 . 15 CsCl 4 0-2 0.03 1 G (35)
131
The CsCl salt effect parameters at 288. 15 and 298. 15 K from the two papers show fair agreement
considering the small effect and the fact that all the Geffcken (6) measurements were made at low electrolyte
concentrations. The evaluator has a slight preference for the results of Gerecke (35) except for the 293 K value
which appears to be too small.
MISCELLANEOUS
The papers of Passauer (14), Nahoczky (15) and Kobe and Williams (16) contain a number of
measurements in just one electrolyte solution for each system studied. A number of these have already been
cited under the appropriate system. Other systems, for which these papers are the only data, are listed below.
Both Passauer (14) and Nahoczky (15) made measurements in water and in electrolyte solutions at or
near saturation. They did not give an electrolyte saturation concentration, although Nahoczk:y (15) did give the
saturated solution density. The evaluator did calculate a few salt effect parameters based on the carbon dioxide
solubility in water and in the saturated salt solution using handbook values of the salt solubility. The values
appear reasonable and it would seem that the data have some value. The systems not referenced earlier are
listed below. However, no salt effect parameters are given because of uncertainty in the electrolyte solubility
and a hesitation not to give salt effect parameters based on only one salt concentration.
The work of Kobe and Williams (16) is more complete. They did not work at electrolyte saturation, and
they give the salt mass % composition. Salt effect parameters were calculated using lnte17Ullio111ll Critical Table
densities except for mixed electrolyte solutions.
Passauer (14). Solubilities measured at or near salt saturation at 293 K and one atm.
33 (3) Carbon dioxide + Zinc iodide [10139-47-6] + Water
37 (1) Carbon dioxide + Silver nitrate [[7761-88-8] + Water
41 (5) Carbon dioxide + Iron (11) chloride [7758-94-3] + Water
96 (3) Carbon dioxide + Barium iodidie [13718-50-8] + Water
99 (35) Carbon dioxide + Sodium nitrite [7632-00-0] + Water
99 (36) Carbon dioxide + Sodium hydrogen carbonate [144-55-8] + Water
99 (37) Carbon dioxide + Sodium dichromate [10588-01-9] + Water
Nahoczky (15) . Solubilities measured at or near salt saturation at 288 K and one atm.
Solution densities were given.
48 (1) Carbon dioxide + Manganese sulfate [7785-87-7] + Water
52 (1) Carbon dioxide + Ammonium molybdate [12027-67-7]
93 (4) Carbon dioxide + 115 ethanol [64-17-5] + Magnesium sulfate [7487-88-9] + Water
99 (38) Carbon dioxide + 112 Magnesium chloride [7786-30-3] + 112 Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Water
99 (39) Carbon dioxide + 112 Magnesium sulfate [7487-88-9] + 112 Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Water
99 (40) Carbon dioxide + 113 Manganese sulfate [7785-87-7] + 1/3 Magnesium chloride [7786-30-3]
+ Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Water
99 (41) Carbon dioxide + 113 Manganese sulfate [7785-87-7] + 1/3 Magnesium sulfate [7487-88-9]
+ 113 Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Water
99 (42) Carbon dioxide + 112 Glycerine [56-81-5] + Sodium thiosulfate [n72-98-7] + Water
99 (43) Carbon dioxide + 112 Magnesium sulfate [7487-88-9] + 112 Sodium thiosulfate [7772-98-7] + Water
100 (19) Carbon dioxide + Potassium oxalate [583-52-8] + Water
100 (20) Carbon dioxide + Potassium ferrocyanide [13746-66-2] + Water
100 (21) Carbon dioxide + Potassium dichromate [7778-50-9] + Water
Kobe and Williams (16). Solubilities measured at one stated concentration at 298. 15 K and one atm pressure.
99 (44) Carbon dioxide + Sulfuric acid [7664-93-9] + Sodium chloride [7647-14-5] + Water
The aqueous solution was 5 mass % H2S04 (0.680 mol kg-1) and 20 mass % NaCl (4.562 mol kg"1) The • .
molal ionic strength salt effect parameter assuming complete dissociation of the acid is k.t(ID)c = 0.0605.
99 (45) Carbon dioxide + ottho-Pbosphoric acid [7664-38-2] + Trisodium phosphate [7601-54-9] + Water
The aqueous solution was 7 mass % (0. 861 mol kg-') H3P04 and 10 niass % (0.735 mol kg"1 ) Na3P04•
The molal salt effect parameter is k...., 0.293.
=
99 (46) Carbon dioxide + Aerosol OT [577-11-7] + Water

99. (47) Carbon dioxide + Teepol CH 53 [50642-03-0] + Water
Gjaldba:k (24a) measured the solubility of carbon dioxide in Aerosol OT, and Rosenthal (24b) in a single
dilute Teepol - water mixture. The values are classed tentative as there are no other data with which to compare
them.
1 32
REFERENCES
1 . Sechenov, J. Akad Nauk SSSR, Mem. Acad. Imp. Sci. , St. Petersburg 1 877, 35 , 1-59. (In German).
.
2. Sechenov, J. Akad Nauk SSSR, Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. , St. . Petersburg [6] 1 877, 22, 102-107.
.
(In German).
3. Mackenzie, J. J. Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) [3] 1877, I, 438-45 1 .
4 . Sechenov, J . Nouv. Mem. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscow .1.88.2 , 15, 203-274. (In German) .
5. Sechenov, J. Ann. Chim. Phys. [6] 1 892, 25, 226-270. (In French).
6. Geffcken, G. Z. Phys. Chem. Stoechiorn. Verwandtschaftsl. 1904, 49, 257-302.
7. Christoff, A. Z. Phys. Chem. Stoechiom. Verwandtschaftsl. 1.2Q6, 55, 622-634.
8. Findlay, A. ; Creighton, H. J. M. J. Chern. Soc. .1.2.10, 97, 536-6 1 .
9. Findlay, A . ; Shen, B. J. Chem. Soc. .1212, 101 , 1459-68.
10. Findlay, A. ; Williams, T. J. Chern. Soc. 12U, 103, 636-45.
1 1 . Gatterer, A. J. Chem. Soc. (London) �. 129, 299-3 16.
12. Wolf, 0.; Krause, A. Arch. Waennewirtsch. Dampjkessewes. 1927, 8, 2 16-1 8 .
13. Van Slyke, D. D. ; Sendroy, J. , Jr. ; Hastings, A. B. ; Neill , J. M. J. Bioi. Chem. 1928, 78, 765-99.
14. Passauer, H. Feuerungsteck. .l.2ll , 19, 142-45.
15. Nahoczky, A. B4ny6szati Koh6szati Lapok llli, 66, 332-35 .
16. Kobe, K. A. ; Williams , J. S. Ind. Eng. Chern. � 7, 37 .
17. Kobe, K. A. ; Kenton, F. H. Ind. Eng. Chern. , Anal. Ed. �. 10, 76-77.
18. Markham, A. E. ; Kobe, K. A. J. Am. Chern. Soc. 194 1 , 63, 449-454.
19. Markham, A. E. ; Kobe, K. A. J. Am. Chern. Soc. 194 1 , 63, 1 165-66.
20. Lagarote, L. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. lli.l, 10, 416-17.
21. Harned, H. S . ; Davis, R. Jr. J. Am. Chern. Soc. �. 65 , 2030-37.
22. Prutton, C. F. ; Savage, R. L. J. Am. Chern. Soc. .00 , 67, 1550-54.
23. van Krevelen, D. W. ; Hoffijzer, P. J. Chirn. Ind. XXI Congr. Int. Chirn. Ind. �. 168-73.
[Not cited in Chem. Abstr.]
24. a. Gjaldbzk, J. Chr. Acta Chern. Scand. �. 7, 537-44 .
b. Rosenthal, W. 'Jhes. Fac. sci. Univ. Strasbourg (France) �.
25. Shchennikova, M. K. ; Devyatykh, G. G.; Korshunov, I. A. Zh. Prikl. Khim. Leningrad) 1957, 30,
833-38; J. Appl. Chem. USSR (Engl. Trans/.) .1.221 , 30, 881-86.
26. Shchennikova, M. K. ; Devyatykh, G. G. ; Korshunov, I. A. Zh. Prikl. Khim. Leningrad) 1957, 30,
1080-04; J. Appl. Chern. USSR (Engl. . Transl.) 1957, 30, 1 149-52.
27. Shkol'nikova, R. I. Uch. Zap. Leningr. Gos. Univ. , Ser. Khirn. Nauk. �. Nr. 1 8, 64-86;
Chem. Abstr. .l.26..1 , 55, 25443b.
28. Cox, J. D . ; Head, A. J. Trans. Faraday Soc. �. 58, 1 839-45.
29. Kimura, H. ; Takeuchi, T. Kagaku Kogaku .1.263., 27, 2-6.
30. Ellis, A. J . ; Golding, R. M. Am. J. Sci. �. 261 , 47-60.
3 1 . Yeh, S-Y. ; Peterson, R. E. J. Phann. Sci. �. 53, 822-24.
32. Takenouchi, S . ; Kennedy, G. Am. J. Sci. 1965, 263, 445-54.
33. Lloyd, R. AEC Accession No. 8890, Rept. No. WAPD-TM-511 �. 10 pp.
34. Robb, R. A. ; Zimmer, M. F. J. Chern. Eng. Data �. 1 3, 200-203.
35. Gerecke, J. Diss. Dr. rer. Nat. 1969, Hochsch. "Carl Schorlemmer" , Leuna-Merseburgh, Germany.
36. Onda, K. ; Sada, E. ; Kobayashi, T. ; Kito, S . ; Ito, K. J. Chern. Eng. Jpn. 1970, 3, 1 8-24.
37. Onda, K. ; Sada, E. ; Kobayashi, T. ; Kito, S . ; Ito, K. J. Chern. Eng. Jpn. 1970, 3, 1 37-142.
38. Malinin, S. D. ; Savelyeva, N. I. Geokhirniya 1972, 6, 643-653 ;
Geochern. Int. (Engl. Transl.) 1972, 9, 410-18.
39. Sada, E. ; Kito, S.; Ito, Y. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1974, 7, 51-59.
1 33
40. Malinin, S . D. ; Kurovskaya, N. A. Geokhimiya �. 4, 547-550;
Geochem. Int. (Engl. Trans/.) 1975, 12 (2), 199-201.
41. Sada, E. ; Kito, S . ; Ito, Y. Adv. Chern Ser. 1976, No. 155, 374-380.
.
42. Yasunishi, A. ; Yoshida, F. J. Chern. Eng. Data .1.212, 24, 1 1-14.

43. Yasunishi, A. ; Tsuji, M. ; Sada, E. Adv. Chern. Ser. 1.212, 1 77, 189-203.
44. Drummond, S. E. , Jr. Ph. D. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, .1.2Rl.
45. Burmak:ina, G. V. ; Efanov, L. N. ; Shnet, M. A. Zh. Fiz. Khim. 1282, 56, 1 159-61;
Russ. J. Phys. Chern. (Engl. Trans/.) .1.282 , 56, 705-707.
46. Cramer, S . D. Rep. Invest. - U. S. Bur. Mines .1.282 , RI 8706.
47. Kertes, A. S . , Editor-in-Chief, Solubility Data Series .1.2.82 10, Battino, R. , Editor, NITROGEN and
AIR, pp.xxix-xliii.
48. Wagman, D. D . ; Evans, W. H. ; Parker, V. B. ; Schumm, R. H. ; Halow, I. ; Bailey, S. M. ; Churney,
K. L. and Nuttal, R. L. The NBS tables of chemical themwdynamic properties: Selected values for
inorganic and C1 and C2 organic substances in Sf units, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
and American Institute of Physics, New York, NY 1982. J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data .12.82, 11,
Supplement No. 2.
49. Clever, H. L. J. Chern. Eng. Data 1.28l, 28, 340-43.
50. Ownby, D. W. ; Prapaitrakul, W. ; King, A. D. Jr. J. Coli. Interface Chern. .1288., 125, 526-533.
5 1 . de Molineri, N. A. ; de Cozzitori, P. A. ; Sosa, A. B. ; Katz, M. An. Asoc. Quim. Argent. .1.282, 77,
333-40.
52. Nighswander, J. A. ; Kalogerak:is, N, ; Mehrotra, A. K. J. Chern. Eng. Data 1.282, 34, 355-60.
53. Eremina, A. 0. ; Efanov, L. N. ; Sorokina, N. A. Zh. Fiz. Khim. .12.82, 63, 2491-94;
Russ. J. Phys. Chern. (Engl. Trans/.) 1989, 63, 1361-63.
54. Corti, H. R. ; Krenzer, M. E. ; de Pablo, J. J. ; Prausnitz, J. M. Ind. Eng. Chern. Res. .1220 , 29,
1043-50.
55. Plyasunova, N. V. ; Shmulovich, K. I. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 122! , 319, 738-42;
Chern. Abstr. 199 1 , 115, 260106d.
56. Rumpf, B. ; Maurer, G. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chern 122J , 97, 85-97.
.
57. He, S. ; Morse, J. W. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 122J , 57, 3533-54.

58. Yuan, C . ; Yang, J. Gaodeng Xuexiao Huoxue Xuebao 1223. , 14, 80-83.
59. Rumpf, B. ; Nicolaisen, H. ; Ocal, C . ; Maurer, G. J. Solution Chern. 1994, 23, 43 1-48.
60. Rumpf, B. ; Nicolaisen, H. ; Maurer, G. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chern. �. 98, 1077-81 .
6 1 . Vazquez, G. ; Chenlo, F. ; Pereira, G . A.finidad �. 51 (No. 453), 369-74.
62. Castellani, F . ; Berchiesi, G. Anal. Proc. (London) 1994, 31 , 293-94.
63. Lide, D. R. , Editor-in-Chief, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1994-1995, 75th Ed. ,
CRC Press, Inc. , 1994.
64. Vazquez, G. ; Chenlo, F . ; Pereira, G. ; Peaguda, J. An. Quim. .lm, 90, 324-28.
1 34
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] cox , J . D . ; Head , A . J .
( 2 ) Hydrof luoric acid ; HF ; [ 7 6 6 4 - 3 9 - 3 ) Trans . Faraday Soc . 19 6 2 , 58 ,

1 8 3 9 -4 5 .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 2 9 3 . 02 - 3 0 8 . 0 0
P 1 /kPa = 9 4 . 6 3 8 - 107 . 8 10 Pirketta Scharl in
c2 /mo l L- 1 = 0 - 5.0
T/K a P1 /kPa a KHf mol L- 1 atm- 1 b
19 . 8 7 2 9 3 . 02 0 1 . 0092 102 . 2 5 7 0 . 03986

1 . 0406 105 . 4 3 9 0 . 0 3 9 42
2 4 . 92 2 9 8 . 07 1 . 0279 104 . 15 2 0 . 0 3 4 57
1. 0303 104 . 3 9 5 0 . 03440
2 9 . 87 3 03 . 02 1 . 0640 107 . 8 1 0 0 . 0 3 040
0 . 9581 9 7 . 079 o . o3 040
19 . 87 2 9 3 . 02 2.5 1 . 0561 107 . 009 0 . 04049

1 . 0344 104 . 8 1 1 0 . 03989
2 4 . 92 2 9 8 . 07 0 . 9975 101 . 07 2 0 . 03586
1 . 0550 1 0 6 . 89 8 o . o 3 570
2 9 . 87 3 0 3 . 02 0 . 9874 100 . 04 8 0 . 0 3 1 93
1 . 0348 104 . 8 5 1 0 . 0 3 2 03
3 4 . 85 3 08 . 00 0 . 9713 9 8 . 4 17 0 . 0 2 8 00
0 . 9991 101 . 2 3 4 0 . 02816
19 . 8 7 2 9 3 . 02 5.0 0 . 9973 1 0 1 . 05 1 0 . 0 4 3 14
1 . 0085 102 . 18 6 0 . 0 4 3 04
2 4 . 92 2 9 8 . 07 1 . 0167 1 0 3 . 017 0 . 03798
0 . 9340 94 . 638 0 . 03729
1 . 0295 104 . 3 1 4 0 . 03831
2 9 . 87 3 0 3 . 02 1 . 0106 102 . 3 9 9 0 . 03336
0 . 9597 97 . 2 4 2 0 . 0 3 3 65
a Added by the comp iler .

b Henry ' s law constant KH is defined as the amount of co2 (mo l ) dissolved
in 1 L of solvent under a partial pressure of 1 atm of co2 •
The principle of the experimental me ( 1 ) Prepared by vapori z ing the commer
thod was to transfer a known amount of cial solid co2 and passing the
co2 into a gold-plated copper cylin gas through anhydrous Mg ( C l04 ) 2 •
der containing a known volume of sol
vent , to stir at constant temperature ( 2 ) Not specified .
until equi librium had been attained ,
and to measure the equilibrium pres ( 3 ) Not specified .
sure with the aid of a sensitive
diaphragm . The latter was used as a
null-detector , the pressure within ESTIMATED ERROR :
the solubil ity vessel being balanced
against an external pressure of N2 • 6T/K = ± 0 . 01 ( authors )
6PfmmHg = ± 0.1 ( authors )
6KHfKH = ± 0 . 01 ( authors )
The details are given in the source ,
and also in Ref . 1 .
REFERENCES :
1 . Ambrose , D .
Trans . Faraday Soc . 1 9 5 6 , 52 , 7 7 2 .
1 35
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 a -9 ] Geffcken , G .
( 2 ) Hydrochloric acid ; HCl ; z. Phys . Chem . , stoechiom .
[ 7 64 7-01-0 ) Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 0 4 , 4 9 ,
--
257-302 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 and 2 9 8 . 15
c2 /mol dm- 3 = 0 - 2 . 18 0 c . L . Young
T/K c2 jmol dm- 3 L a
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 07 0
0 . 499 1 . 04 1
0 . 511 1 . 04 2
1 . 2 12 1 . 02 0
1 . 249 1 . 02 3
2 . 08 0 0 . 9864
2 . 18 0 1 . 009
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8255
0 . 499 0 . 8047
0 . 511 0 . 8074
1 . 2 12 0 . 7973
1 . 249 0 . 7984
2 . 08 0 0 . 7951
2 . 18 0 . o . 7951
a L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 )
Volumetric method us ing simple absorp- ( 1 ) Obtained by the subl imation of
tion pipet and buret . Diagram and de- solid carbon dioxide . Dried .
tailed description given in original
paper . ( 2 ) Not specified .
( 3 ) Degassed .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
oT/K = ± 0.1; oL = ± 1 %.
( estimated by compi ler )
REFERENCES :
1 36
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8-9 ) Van Slyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr . ;

( 2 ) Hydrochloric acid ; HCl ;
[ 7 647-01-0] J . Biol . Chem . 192 8 , 78 , 7 65-99 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 3 11 . 2
c2 /mol L- 1 = 0 . 0 1 - 0 . 3 00 Pirketta Scharl in
P = " atmospheric"
e
t/ °C T/K a Method b P1 /mmHg c c2 /mol L- 1 a d s1
-- ---
38 . 0 3 11 . 2 T 7 15 . 1 0 . 01 0 . 5452 0 . 5468
B 7 00 . 8 0 . 54 5 0 0 . 54 6 6
T 7 12 . 0 0 . 5444 0 . 5460
B 721 . 8 0 . 5453 0 . 5469
T 723 . 0 0 . 5453 0 . 5469
B 7 19 . 3 0 . 5459 0 . 5475
0 . 01 0 . 5452* 0 . 5468*
B 721 . 8 0 . 256 0 . 5384 0 . 54 2 7

B 723 . 7 0 . 300 0 . 5364 0 . 5407
b B : saturation by bubbl ing ; T : saturation in rotating tonometer .

c 1 mmHg = 1 3 3 . 3 2 2 Pa = 1 . 3 3 3 2 2 x 10- 3 bar
d a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]

• s1 = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 atm- 1 ]
* Average of six measurements .
Two procedures were used for saturat- (1) From a Kipp co2 generator .
ing solutions with co2 :
(2) Not specified .
Saturation by bubbl ing (B) . The solu
tion was placed in the saturating (3) Distil led .
tube , the lower end of which was con
nected through a wash bottle with a
Kipp co2 generator . The tube and
wash bottle were immersed in a con
stant temperature bath . co2 gas was ESTIMATED ERROR :
bubbled through it rapidly for 3 0 mi
nutes . The wash bottle was replaced 6T/K = ± 0.1
by a mercury reservoir and the free 6aja = ± 0 . 005
gas was driven completely out of the
saturating tube by admitting mercury
underneath the solution . The co2 REFERENCES :
contents of the solutions were deter
mined in the manometric gas apparatus 1 . Van Slyke , D . D . ; Nei l l , J . M .
(Refs 1 and 2 ) . J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 4 , 61 , 5 2 3 .
Saturation in rotating tonometer (T) . 2 . Van Slyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr .
The technique used was that described J . Biol . Chem . 1 9 2 7 , 73 , 1 2 7 .
by Austin et al . ( Ref . 3 ) .
3 . Austin , J . H . ; Cul len , G . E . ;
Hastings , A . B . ; McLean , F . C . ;
Both procedures gave identical results Peters , J . P . ; Van S lyke , D . D .
with solutions of acids . J . Biol . Chem . 1 9 2 2 , 54 , 1 2 1 .
1 37
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) He , S . ; Morse , J . W .
( 2 ) Hydrochloric acid ; HCl ; Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 1 9 9 3 , 5 7 ,
[ 7 647-01-0 ) 3 5 3 3 -5 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 - 3 6 3 . 15
P/MPa = 0 . 1032 Pirketta Scharl in
m2 ;mo l kg- 1 = 0 . 0 1 - 3 . 00
T/K a m2 /mol kg- 1 b p/g cm- 3 c

2
10 p1 ; atm d 1 0 3m 1 ;mol kg- 1 e 'Yl f
--
2 7 3 . 15 0 . 01 1 . 0011 96 . 6 74 . 9 1 . 01
0 . 10 1 . 0027 74 . 2 1 . 02
1 . 00 1 . 0189 70 . 7 1 . 07
2 . 00 1 . 0358 68 . 7 1 . .1 0
3 . 00 1 . 0520 . 66 . 6 1 . 13
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 01 0 . 9977 94 . 2 31.9 1 . 01
0 . 10 0 . 9992 31. 8 1 . 01
1 . 00 1 . 0144 30 . 9 1 . 04
2 . 00 1 . 0303 29 . 4 1 . 09
3 . 00 1 . 0452 28 . 6 1 . 12
3 2 3 . 15 0 . 01 0 . 9888 85 . 4 16 . 6 1 . 00
0 . 10 0 . 9903 16 . 6 1 . 01
1 . 00 1 . 0050 16 . 3 1 . 02
2 . 00 1 . 0204 16 . 0 1 . 04
3 . 00 • 1 . 03 4 7 15 . 6 1 . 06
3 4 8 . 15 0 . 01 0 . 9760 60 . 3 8.1 1 . 00
0 . 10 0 . 9775 8.0 1 . 01
1 . 00 0 . 9924 7.9 1 . 02
2 . 00 1 . 0079 7.9 1 . 03
3 . 00 1 . 0244 7.7 1 . 05
3 6 3 . 15 0 . 01 0 . 9656 30 . 1 3.5 1 . 00
0 . 10 0 . 9724 3.4 1 . 00
1 . 00 0 . 9896 3.4 1 . 01
2 . 00 0 . 9975 3.4 1 . 02
3 . 00 1. 0214 3.3 1 . 03
a Calculated by compi ler b m2 = molal ity of HCl

I c p dens ity of solvent d p1 partial pressure of co2
e m 1 = molal ity of co2
f r = activity coefficient of co2
1
Either pure C02 gas or C02 -N2 mixtu ( 1 ) commercial ; purity 9 9 . 9 % .
res were used in the experiments to
maintain a constant P ( C02 ) . The co2 - ( 2 ) Hydrochloric acid solutions were
N2 mixtures were made by pumping pre prepared by di luting concentrated
determined amounts of co2 and N2 into HCl and standardi z ing the solution
a gas tank and their compos ition was by titration . HCl was analytical
verif ied by gas chromatography . reagent-grade which met ACS speci
co2 or co2 -N2 gas mixtures were equi fications .
librated with the aqueous solutions in
a series of stirred water-j acketed ( 3 ) 18 MO water obtained from a
reaction vessels with condensers . The Mi ll i-Q super-Q water system .
gas was premoistured by first pass ing
it through distil led water at the tem ESTIMATED ERROR :
perature of experiment . Fine bubbles
were obtained by us ing gas-dispers ion 6T/K = ± 0.1
tubes . The bubbling rate was 90 to 9 5 6m 1 ;m 1 = ± 0 . 012
mL min- 1 • &n / n = ± o . o4
The mole fraction of co2 in the co2 -
N2 mixture was determined us ing a REFERENCES :
Hewlett Packard ( 5 7 9 0A) gas chromato
graph .
1 38
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Markham , A . A . ; Kobe , K . A .

( 2 ) Perchloric acid ; HC104 ; J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 4 1 , 63 , 1 1 6 5 -6 .
[ 7 6 0 1- 9 0 - 3 )
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
2
10 x2 = 0 - 2 9 . 15
2
T/K m2 ;mol kg- 1 10 x2 a a s b
2 9 8 . 15 o.o 0 . 0000 0 . 7565 0 . 7587

0 . 25 0 . 4484 0 . 753 0 . 764
0 . 50 0 . 8928 0 . 759 0 . 778
0 . 75 1 . 3332 0 . 765 0 . 793
0 . 100 1 . 7679 0. 772 0 . 809
1 . 50 2 . 6313 0 . 785 0 . 84 0
2 . 00 3 . 4779 0 . 798 0 . 865
4 . 00 6 . 7220 0 . 835 0 . 984
6 . 00 9 . 7551 0 . 863 1 . 09 1
10 . 00 15 . 2 6 6 0 . 866 1 . 239
15 . 4 7 2 1 . 79 0 . 762 1 . 2 64
2 2 . 84 2 9 . 15 0 . 718 1 . 426
a a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm-1 ) .

b S = Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) g· 1 (H2o ) atm" 1 ) .
The authors fitted their data up to 6 molal with the equation :
Sm/S0 = 0 . 107 m2 + 1/ ( 1 + 0 . 04 2 8 2 m2 )
Maximum error of the equation was about 1 % .
METHOD /APPARATUS /PROCEDURE : S OURCE AND PURI TY OF MATE R I ALS :

The principle of the Ostwald method ( 1 ) Commercial cylinder , 9 9 . 8 t ·
was used in which the gas is agitated pure .
with a measured quantity of gas-free
liquid and the decrease in volume of ( 2 ) Baker , cp analyz ed ( ACS ) .
solution-saturated gas is measured in
a burette over mercury . The pressure ( 3 ) Distil led .
was adj usted to yield one atmosphere
partial pressure of carbon dioxide .
The volume of gas was reduced to 0 °C
by the ideal gas law . Experiments wer
conducted to show that the agitation
did not cause supersaturation .
E S T I MATE D ERRO R :
oT/K = ± 0 . 0 3 ( authors ) ,
oaj a , oS/S = ± 0 . 0 0 2 ( authors ) .
REFE RENCES :
1 . Markham , A . A . ; Kobe , K . A .
J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 4 1 , 63 ,
4 4 9-54 .
1 39
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 124-38-9 ] Setschenow , J .
(2) Sulfuric acid ; H2so4 ; Akad . Nauk SSSR, Bull . Acad . Imp .
[ 7 6 6 4 -9 3 - 9 ) Sci . , St . Petersbourg 1 8 7 7 , 22
[ Ser . No . 6 ] , 102 -7 .
(3) water ; H2o ; [7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 0 . 15 Pirketta Scharl in
P1 / kPa
2 85 . 9 - 129 . 5 H . L . Clever
1 0 w2 = 8 . 58 - 100
t = 17 . 0 ° C
T/K a Solvent a c
2 9 0 . 15 H20 0 0 0 . 9519
2 9 0 . 15 670 . 76 89 . 42 1 mol acid 8 . 58 0 . 92 4 0 . 857
8 15 . 3 5 108 . 7 0 58 mol H20 0 . 857
2 9 0 . 15 686 . 46 9 1. 5 2 1 mol acid 73 . 1 12 . 3 0 . 706
750 . 77 100 . 09 2 mol H2o 0 . 703
9 5 3 . 59 127 . 13 0 . 705
2 9 0 . 15 699 . 33 93 . 24 1 mol acid 84 . 5 15 . 3 0 . 665
7 5 2 . 67 100 . 3 5 1 mol H2o 0 . 666
971 . 05 129 . 46 0 . 667
2 9 0 . 15 6 8 0 . 67 90. 75 92 g acid 92 . 0 17 . 1 0 . 719
8 6 2 . 15 114 . 9 4 8 g H20 0 . 7 18
2 9 0 . 15 658 . 51 87 . 79 92 g acid 96 . 8 18 . 1 0 . 851
7 08 . 2 6 94 . 43 3 g H20 0 . 852
9 17 . 4 7 122 . 32 0 . 852
2 9 0 . 15 656 . 39 87 . 51 100 18 . 7 0 . 932
774 . 56 103 . 2 7 0 . 932
2 9 0 . 15 644 . 20 85 . 89 100 18 . 7 0 . 929
797 . 77 106 . 3 6 0 . 936
concentration estimated from 2 5 o c Handbook data .
b w2 = mass fraction of H2so4 in solvent .
c a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
Setchenow based his apparatus on those ( 1 ) Apparently generated from lime-
of Fernet ( 18 5 7 ) and of Meyer ( 18 57 ) . stone and sulfuric acid . Dried .
The manometer was based on ideas he
learned from Regnault in 1 8 6 1 . The ( 2 ) Not specified .
one meter manometer had three
branches , two for measuring the pres ( 3 ) Not specif ied , assumed to be
sure and one a mercuty reservoir . The distil led .
manometer was connected to the absorp
tion cel l by a f lexible s ilver capil-
lary . The absorption cell was of two
bulbs with a mark in the constricting
connection . co2 gas was generated ,
saturated with water vapor and fil led ESTIMATED ERROR :
the bulbs and manometer to a known
pressure less than atmospheric . The The author makes a qual itative
liquid was degassed by heating and statement that the results are good
then passed by the pressure difference to the second decima l .
into the lower bulb to the mark of r------1
known volume . The system was sealed , REFERENCES :
turned 9 0 degr�es and shaken until
equil ibrium was established . The gas 1 . These data appear also in
volume absorbed was reduced to 0 ° C Setchenow , J .
and one meter Hg pressure . The Bunsen Mosk . Obsh . Spyt . Prirody .
cofficient was calculated . Nouv . Mem . Soc . Imp . Nat . Moscow,
1889 , 1 5 , 2 0 3 - 7 4 .
1 40
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Geffcken , G .

( 2 ) Sulfuric acid ; H2 so4 ; [ 7 6 64 - 9 3 -9 ) Z . Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .
Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 0 4 , 4 9 ,
----
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ) 257-302 .
T/K = 2 8 8 . 1 5 and 2 9 8 . 15
c2 tmol dm- 3 = 0 - 7 . 600 c . L . Young
L a
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 07 0
1 . 02 4 1 . 016
1. 034 1 . 016
1 . 990 0 . 9772
2 . 07 8 0 . 9775
2 . 13 4 0 . 9756
3 . 912 0 . 9175
4 . 17 6 0 . 9143
7 . 58 0 0 . 8 3 54
7 . 6 00 0 . 8385
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8255
1 . 024 0 . 7923
1 . 034 0 . 7936
1 . 990 0 . 7693
2 . 07 8 0 . 7685
2 . 13 4 0 . 7672
3 . 912 0 . 7 3 02
4 . 17 6 0 . 7273
7 . 58 0 0 . 6736
7 . 6 00 0 . 6747
a L = Ostwald coefficient
Volumetric method using simple absorp- ( 1 ) Obtained by the subl imation of
paper . ( 2 ) Not specif ied .
( 3 ) Degassed .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.1; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
141
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Christoff , A .
( 2 ) Sulfuric acid ; H2 so4 ; [ 7 6 6 4 - 9 3 -9 ] z. Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .
Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 0 6 , 55 , 6 2 2 - 3 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15
P 1 / kPa = atmospheric H . L . Clever
2
1 0 w2 = o - 95 . 6
2
t/ ° C T/K 10 w2 a m2 ;mol kg- 1 b
--
20 2 9 3 . 15 0.0 o.o 0 . 9674

35 . 82 5 . 69 0 . 652 1
6 1 . 62 16 . 37 0 . 7191
95 . 6 222 0 . 9924
a w2 = mass fraction of sulfuric acid

b m2 = molality ; calculated by the compiler .
c L = Ostwald coefficient
The apparatus was an Ostwald type 1 ( 1 ) No information .
with a lead capillary tube through
which the gas flows to the absorption ( 2 ) Merck . Relative density 1 . 2 7 1 ,
flask , gas buret , and gasometer . 1 . 52 3 , and 1 . 8 3 9 for the 3 5 . 8 2 ,
6 1 . 6 2 , and 9 5 . 6 mass % acid ,
The acid solution was degassed by respectively .
boi ling under reflux . The author
estimates a one percent change in the ( 3 ) Disti l led .
acid concentration due to the degas
sing procedure . The absorption flask
was filled with solvent , the gas was
introduced , and the system shaken
until equil ibrium was reached . ESTIMATED ERROR :
oT/K = ± 0 . 02 for solvent
± 0 . 5 for gas
Barometric f luctuations were

stated to be negl igible .
REFERENCES :
1 . Ostwald , w.
Lehrbuch der allgem . Chemie

( 2 . Auf l . ) , 1 , 6 15 .
1 42
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 -3 8 -9 ] Markham , A . A . ; Kobe , K . A .

( 2 ) Sulfuric acid ; H2so4 ; [ 7 6 64 - 9 3 -9 ] J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 4 1 , 63 , 1 1 6 5 - 6 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa
2 = 101 . 32 5 D . M . Mason
10 x2 = 0 - 100
T/K a a s b
2 9 8 . 15 0.0 0 . 0000 0 . 7565 0 . 7587

0.5 0 . 8928 0 . 6983 0 . 7127
1.0 1. 7679 0 . 6650 0 . 6911
2.0 3 . 4779 0 . 6132 0 . 6610
3.0 5 . 12 7 7 0 . 5854 0 . 6546
4.0 6. 7220 0 . 5740 0 . 6659
6.0 9 . 7551 0 . 5878 0 . 7332
8.0 12 . 597 0 . 6159 0 . 8238
10 . 0 15 . 2 6 6 0 . 6337 0 . 9053
14 . 15 20 . 32 0 . 6404 1. 0372
18 . 8 6 25. 37 0 . 6225 1 . 1453
28 . 29 3 3 . 77 0 . 5840 1. 3386
37 . 72 40 . 48 0 . 5659 1 . 5573
5 6 . 58 50 . 49 0 . 5741 2 . 12 3 2
94 . 3 0 62 . 9 5 0 . 64 5
188 . 6 77 . 26 0 . 753
282 . 9 83 . 60 0 . 813
565 . 8 9 1 . 07 0 . 880
113 1 . 6 95 . 32 0 . 92 0
100 0 . 960
• a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

b s = Kuenen coeffi c ient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ] .
The . authors fitted their data up t o 1 0 molal with the equation :
Sm/S0 = 0 . 0 8 8 5 m2 + 1 / ( 1 + 0 . 2 15 9 m2)
Maximum error of the equation was about 1 % .
The principle of the Ostwald method ( 1 ) Commercial cylinder , 9 9 . 8 %
liquid and the decrease in volume of ( 2 ) Baker , cp analyz ed ( ACS ) .
a burette over mercury . The pressure ( 3 ) Distil led .
by the ideal gas law . Experiments
were conducted to show that the
agitation did not cause super-
saturation . ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 0 3 ( authors ) ,
oa f a , oS/S = ± 0 . 0 0 2 ( authors ) .
REFERENCES :
1 . Markham , A . A . ; Kobe , K . A .
J . Am . Chem . Soc . 194 1 , 63 ,
4 4 9-54 .
1 43
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ] Shchennikova , M . K . ; Devyatykh , G . G . ;
Korshunov , I . A .
(2) Sulfuric acid ; H2so4 ; Zh . Prikl . Khim . (Leningrad) 1957 ,
[ 7 6 6 4 - 9 3 -9 ] 3 0 , 8 3 3 -8 ; * J . Appl . Chem . USSR
(3) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] ( Enql . Trans ! . ) 1 9 5 7 , 3 0 ( 6 ) ,
--
8 8 1-6 .
T� K = 2 8 8 . 15- 3 5 0 . 15
1 0 w2 = 9 . 2 5 -84 . 4 8 Pirketta Scharl in
P1 /kPa = 101 . 32 5
T/K a a c L a,d
2 9 2 . 15 6 . 78 0 . 82 0 . 88
7 . 00 0 . 85 0 . 91
25 2 9 8 . 15 5 . 94 0 . 72 0 . 79
27 3 0 0 . 15 5 . 57 0 . 67 0 . 74
38 3 1 1 . 15 4 . 36 0 . 52 5 0 . 59 8
4 . 41 0 . 53 1 0 . 605
45 3 18 . 1 5 3 . 65 0 . 438 0 . 510
50 3 2 3 . 15 3 . 47 0 . 415 0 . 491
3 . 44 0 . 412 0 . 487
56 3 2 9 . 15 2 . 98 0 . 355 0 . 42 8
2 . 89 0 . 345 0 . 416
60 3 3 3 . 15 2 . 83 0 . 337 0 . 411
2 . 76 0 . 329 0 . 401
18 . 5 2 9 1 . 65 30. 5 6 . 22 0 . 71 0 . 76
19 2 9 2 . 15 6 . 10 0 . 69 0 . 74
26 2 9 9 . 15 4 . 95 0 . 56 0 . 61
4 . 88 0 . 55 0 . 60
41 3 14 . 15 3 . 77 0 . 423 0 . 486
52 3 2 5 . 15 2 . 96 0 . 329 0 . 392
64 3 3 7 . 15 2 . 33 0 . 258 0 . 3 18
77 3 5 0 . 15 1 . 99 0 . 2 19 0 . 281
19 . 5 292 . 65 36 . 9 6 . 20 0 . 68 0 . 73
6 . 49 0 . 71 0 . 76
24 2 9 7 . 15 5 . 88 0 . 65 0 . 71
33 3 0 6 . 15 4 . 54 0 . 497 0 . 557
20 2 9 3 . 15 42 6 . 70 0 . 72 0 . 77
6 . 52 0 . 70 0 . 75
24 . 5 2 9 7 . 65 5 . 83 0 . 62 0 . 68
26 2 9 9 . 15 5 . 60 0 . 60 0 . 66
30 3 0 3 . 15 5 . 41 0 . 58 0 . 64
5 . 34 0 . 57 0 . 63
31 3 3 4 . 15 5 . 39 0 . 57 0 . 70
40 3 1 3 . 15 4 . 43 0 . 47 0 . 54
4 . 38 0 . 464 0 . 53 2
4 . 43 0 . 47 0 0 . 539
( continued)
4
Isotopic di lution method , with c 1 (1) Not specif ied .
radioactive carbon isotope as a
tracer . Experimental procedure (2) Chemical ly pure .
described in detail in the oriqinal
source . (3) Redistilled .
The purity of the H2 S04-H20-
solutions was ver if ied
polaroqraphical ly .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not qiven .
1 44
(1) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Shchennikova , M . K . ; Devyatykh , G . G . ;
Korshunov , I . A .
(2) Sulfuric acid ; H2 S04 ; Zh . Prikl . Khim . (Leningrad) 1957 ,
[ 7 6 64-93-9 ] 3 0 , 8 3 3 -8 ; * J . Appl . Chem . lffis.SR
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ] ( Engl . Transl . ) 1 9 5 7 , 3 0 ( 6 ) ,
--
8 8 1-6 .
2
T/K a 10 w2 b a c L a,d
44 3 17 . 15 42 4 . 13 0 . 436 0 . 506
50 3 2 3 . 15 3 . 55 0 . 374 0 . 442
54 3 2 7 . 15 3 . 33 0 . 350 0 . 4 19
70 3 4 3 . 15 2 . 38 0 . 248 0 . 3 12
76 3 4 9 . 15 2 . 08 0 . 2 16 0 . 276
15 2 8 8 . 15 61 . 6 9 . 12 0 . 85 0 . 90
9 . 27 0 . 87 0 . 92
8 . 78 0 . 82 0 . 87
17 2 9 0 . 15 8 . 20 0 . 76 0 . 81
8 . 08 0 . 75 0 . 80
18 2 9 1 . 15 8 . 17 0 . 76 0 . 81
7 . 91 0 . 74 0 . 79
7 . 86 0 . 73 0 . 78
7 . 87 0 . 73 0 . 78
21 2 9 4 . 15 7 . 38 0 . 69 0 . 74
25 2 9 8 . 15 7 . 58 0 . 70 0 . 76
7 . 34 0 . 68 0 . 74
7 . 37 0 . 68 0 . 74
7 . 53 0 . 70 0 . 76
7 . 75 0 . 72 0 . 79
6 . 88 0 . 64 0 . 70
6 . 80 0 . 63 0 . 69
6 . 90 0 . 64 0 . 70
6 . 74 0 . 63 0 . 69
6 . 82 0 . 63 0 . 69
6 . 79 0 . 63 0 . 69
6 . 90 0 . 64 0 . 70
7 . 30 0 . 68 0 . 74
26 2 9 9 . 15 6 . 72 0 . 62 0 . 68
31 3 04 . 15 6 . 20 0 . 57 0 . 64
37 3 10 15
•. 5 . 82 0 . 54 0 . 61
51 . 5 3 2 4 . 65 4 . 47 0 . 409 0 . 486
61 3 3 4 . 15 3 . 66 0 . 333 0 . 407
75 3 4 8 . 15 2 . 70 0 . 243 0 . 3 10
21 2 9 4 . 15 77 . 6 8 . 09 0 . 62 0 . 67
25 2 9 8 . 15 8 . 11 0 . 62 0 . 68
26 2 9 9 . 15 8 . 05 0 . 62 0 . 68
42 3 15 . 1 5 6 . 43 0 . 488 0 . 563
46 3 19 . 15 6 . 23 0 . 473 0 . 553
32 3 05 . 15 78 . 8 6 . 58 0 . 497 0 . 555
40 3 1 3 . 15 6 . 34 0 . 473 0 . 54 2
50 3 2 3 . 15 5 . 98 0 . 444 0 . 525
60 3 3 3 . 15 4 . 78 0 . 352 0 . 429
20 2 9 3 . 15 84 . 48 9 . 33 0 . 63 0 . 68

b w2 = Mass fraction of sulfuric acid in the solvent .
c a = a·unsen coeff icient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
d L = Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 ] .
1 45
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Geffcken , G .
( 2 ) Nitric acid ; HN0 3 ; [ 7 697-3 7-2 ] z. Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 0 4 , 4 9 ,
2 57 - 3 0 2 .
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 and 2 9 8 . 15 c . L . Young
c2 jmol dm- 3 = 0 - 2 . 539
T/K c2 /mol dm- 3 L a T/K c2 jmol dm 3 - L a
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 070 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8255
0 . 472 1 . 07 3 0 . 472 0 . 8382
0 . 475 1 . 07 5 0 . 475 0 . 8366
0 . 557 1 . 069 0 . 557 0 . 8387
0 . 704 1 . 08 0 0 . 704 0 . 8447
1 . 382 1 . 093 1 . 382 0 . 8620
1 . 387 1 . 09 3 1 . 387 0 . 8622
1 . 860 1 . 105 1 . 860 0 . 8752
2 . 519 1 . 109 2 . 519 0 . 8839
2 . 53 9 1 . 111 2 . 539 0 . 8865
Volumetric method using s imple absorp- ( 1 ) Obtained by the subl imation of
tailed description given in original (2) Not specified .
paper . (3) Degassed .
ESTIMATED ERROR : &T/K = ± 0.1; &L = ± 1 % ( estimated by comp iler )

( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -38-9 ] Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Nitric acid ; HN03 ; [ 7 6 9 7 - 3 7 -2 ] Kito , s . ; Ito , K .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 1 9 7 0 , 3 , 18-2 4 .
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 Pirketta Scharl in
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 ; c2 jmol dm- 3 = 1 . 4 8 2
T/K c2 jmol dm- 3 a a L b, c
298 . 15 0 0 . 7595 0 . 8290
1 . 482 0 . 7910 0 . 8634
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm
3 ( STP1 cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
b L = Ostwald coeff icient [ cm3 em- )
c Calculated by the compi ler . P = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
Solution was made up by weight . Con- ( 1 ) From commercial cyl inder .
centration of solution was verif ied by Purity 9 9 . 8 % .
measuring the dens ity . ( Density was
not reported in paper . ) A measured ( 2 ) Analytical grade .
volume of gas was brought into contact
with a measured quantity of gas-free ( 3 ) Distil led and degassed .
solvent . Equil ibrium was established
by agitation us ing a magnetic stirrer .
The volume of remaining gas was mea- ESTIMATED ERROR : ( by compi ler)
sured . The amount of gas absorbed was
estimated from change in volume of 6T/K = ± 0.2; oa = ± 2 %
gas . Detai l s in original paper .
1 46
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Sada , E ; Kito , S . ; Ito , Y .
( 2 ) Phosphoric acid ; H 3 P04 ; J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 1 9 7 4 , 7 , 57-9 •
. [ 7 6 6 4 - 3 8 -2 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 c . L . Young
c2 jmol L- 1 = 0 - 2 . 0573
T/K c2 fmol L- 1 a a
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 0000 0 . 7597
0 . 7 0 13 0 . 6714
1 . 0923 0 . 6405
1 . 6024 0 . 6076
1 . 7 4 12 0 . 5958
2 . 0573 0 • 57 3 1
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]

P = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
Equil ibrium established between a ( 1 ) Showa Denko Co . sample ,
measured volume of gas and a measured purity better than 9 9 . 8 mole % .
volume of gas-free liquid in a cell
fitted with a magnetic stirrer . ( 2 ) Reagent grade of guaranteed
Amount of gas absorbed estimated from purity .
change in volume of gas . concentra
tion of acid determined by titration . ( 3 ) Distil led and degassed .
Details in source and Ref . 1 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.2; 6a = ± 2 %
( Estimated by the comp i ler . )
REFERENCES :
1 . Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
Kito , s . ; Ito , K .
J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 197 0 , 3, 18-2 4 .
1 47
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Setchenow , J. ( Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Ammonium chloride ; NH4Cl ; Ann . Chim . Phys . ( 6 ] 1892 , 25 ,
[ 12 12 5 - 0 2 - 9 ) 2 2 6-7 0 .
(3) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )

T/K = 2 8 8 . 3 5
c2 fmo l dm- 3 = o - 4 . 8 2 3 Pirketta Scharl in
ttoc T/K a D i lution c2 tmol dm- 3 a a b k scc / dm3 mol- l a , c

X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 00 0 1 . 009 -
6 0 . 8039 0 . 95 6 0 . 0292
5 0 . 9646 0 . 94 1 0 . 0 3 14
4 1 . 206 0 . 93 0 0 . 0294
3 1 . 608 0 . 896 0 . 03 2 1
2 2 . 412 0 . 858 0 . 0292
1.5 3 . 2 15 0 . 8 19 0 . 0282
1 4 . 823 0. 7705 0 . 0243

b a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
c k scc = Setchenow salt effect parameter ;
Initial solution : 2 5 . 8 0 g NH4Cl + 8 0 . 9 2 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of

solution .
Setchenow ( Ref . 1 ) based his appara ( 1 ) Apparently generated from l ime
tus on those of Fernet ( 18 5 7 ) and of stone and sulfuric acid . Dried .
Meyer ( 18 5 7 ) . The manometer was
based on ideas he learned from ( 2 ) Not specified .
Regnault in 1 8 6 1 . The one meter ma
nometer had three branches , two for ( 3 ) Not specified , assumed to be
measuring the pressure and one a disti l led .
mercury reservoir . The manometer was
connected to the absorption cell by a
flexible s i lver capil lary . The ab-
sorption cell was of two bulbs with a
mark in the constricting connection . �------�
co2 gas was generated , saturated ESTIMATED ERROR :
with water vapor and f i lled the bulbs
and manometer to a known pressure The author makes a qual itative
less than atmospheric . The liquid statement that the results are good
was degassed by heating and then to the second decimal .
passed by the pressure difference in- r-------�
to the lower bulb to the mark of REFERENCES :
known volume . The system was sealed ,
turned 9 0 degrees and shaken until 1 . Setchenow , J .
equil ibrium was established . The gas
volume absorbed was reduced to 0 ° C Akad . Nauk . SSSR Mem . Acad . imp .
and one meter H g pressure . The Sci . St . Petersburg 1 8 8 7 , 3 5 1
Bunsen coefficient was calculated . ( Ser . No . 7 ] , 1-59 .
1 48
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Findlay , A ; Shen , B .
( 2 ) Ammonium chloride ; NH4Cl ; J . Chem . Soc . 1 9 1 2 , 1 0 1 , 1459-68 .
[ 12 12 5 -02-9 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
2 =
10 n / g cm- 3 2 . 3 5 - 17 . 09 c. L. Young
2 4
T/K 1 0 -y2 / g cm- 3 4 pfg cm- 3 s b 10 x1 (p = 1 atm) .c
2 9 8 . 15 2 . 35 1 . 005 0 . 791 5 . 92
5 . 05 1 . 013 0 . 754 5 . 70
8 . 24 1 . 02 2 0 . 732 5 . 61
1 0 . 02 1 . 027 0 . 7 12 5 . 49
17 . 09 1 . 045 0 . 665 5 . 29
mass concentration of salt

concentration of gas in l iquid phase
con c entration of gas in gaseous phase
Solubil ity was stated to be independent of pressure ( over 1-2 atm
pressure range ) ; value quoted is the mean .
c ·calculated by compi ler assuming Vm, 1 = 2 4 . 3 x 10- 3 m3 mol- 1 at l atm .
Solubi l ity in water : Ostwald coefficient L = 0 . 8 2 5 cm3 cm- 3 •
Gas buret and absorption pipet . Ma- ( 1 ) Purity 9 9 . 9 5 mole % .
nometer tube was of such length 5 as to
al low measurements up to 2 x 10 Pa ( 2 ) No details given .
( about 2 atm) •
( 3 ) No details given .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
ST/K = ± 0.1; SS = ± 1 t:
( estimated by compiler )
REFERENCES :
1 49
COMPONENTS : ORIGINAL ME ASUREMENTS :
{1) Carbon diox ide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Gerecke , J .
{ 2 ) Ammonium chloride ; NH4Cl ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

[ 12 12 5 - 0 2 -9 ] " Carl Schor l emmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
{ 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/ K= 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
c2 ; mol dm-3 = 0 - 5
t / °C T/K c2 ; mol dm-3 a
a s b
0 0 . 990 -
15 2 8 8 . 15
0.5 1 . 03 1 . 052
1 0 . 907 0 . 942
2 0 . 780 0 . 843
5 0 . 686 -
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0.5 0 - 887 0 . 906
1 0 . 800 0 . 831
2 0 . 724 0 . 784
5 0 . 62 9 -
25 2 98 . 15 0 0 . 758 0 . 5173
0.5 0 . 804 0 . 8 2 15
1 0 . 706 0 . 7345
2 0 . 658 0 . 7135
5 0 . 57 6 -
30 3 03 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0.5 0 . 713 0 . 729
1 0 . 639 0 . 665
2 0 . 64 8 0 . 704
5 0 . 5675 0 - 711
AU XIL I ARY I N FO RMATION
METHOD /APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AN D P UR I TY OF MATERI ALS :

The principle of the Ostwa ld method { 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vol % ;
was used in which a measured volume the impurity was mostly
of gas-free l iquid is st irred in the water ( author ) .
presence of the gas , and its decrease
in volume i s measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro analys i s grade
over mercury . The vo lume of l iquid by DDR Standard TGL 5 0 2 1 .
was measured at the exper imental
temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Double d i st i l l ed .
Kuenen coe f f i c i ent , the dens ity of
the so lut i on was obta ined from
Lando lt-Bornstein extant 1 9 6 9 . The
molar concentration of salt in the
l iquid was standardi z ed at 2 0°C . E S T I MA TED ER RO R :
These data are ana lyzed and discussed
further in Ref . 1 . Not g iven .
REFERENCES ;
1 . Gerecke , J . ; B ittr ich , H _ J _
Wiss - z . Tech . Hochsch . Chem .
" Carl Schorl emmer" Leuna
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 1 3 { 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
1 50
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C 02 ; [ 1 2 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Gerecke , J .
(2) Ammonium chloride ; NH4C l ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

[ 12 12 5 - 0 2 -9 ] " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna-
Merseburg , DDR .
(3) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
( continued )
t;oc T/K c2/mol dm"3 a a s b

--
35 3 08 . 1 5 0 0 . 605 -
0.5 0 . 612 0 . 62 7
1 0 . 5815 0 . 607
2 0 . 607 0 . 660
5 0 . 5 5 15 -
-
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 546
0.5 0 . 554 0 . 568
1 0 . 507 0 . 52 8 5
2 0 . 597 0 . 650
5 0 . 54 3 -
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0.5 0 . 465 0 . 478
1 0 . 466 0 . 487
2 0 . 519 0 . 565
5 0 . 5065 -
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0.5 0 . 4 13 0 . 4245
1 0 . 425 0 . 445
2 0 . 5165 0 . 5635
5 0 . 503 0 . 635
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0.5 0 . 335 0 . 346
1 0 . 3795 0 . 3985
2 0 . 463 0 . 5065
5 0 . 484 -
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
0.5 0 . 3 18 5 0 . 328
1 0 . 3 57 0 . 375
2 0 . 445 0 . 4875
5 0 . 483 -
a a =
1
Bunsen coe f f i c ient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm- ]
b s =
3 l 1
Kuenen coeff i c ient [ cm ( STP ) g· ( H20 ) atm- ] .
1 51
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Ammonium chloride ; NH4Cl ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 2 4 , 11-14 .
[ 12 12 5- 0 2 - 9 )
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 08 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 32 5 c . L . Young
c2 fmol L- 1 = 0 - 5 . 645
T/K L a T/K L a
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 0634 2 9 8 . 15 2 . 816 0 . 6721

0 . 244 1. 0386 3 . 006 o. 6677
1. 724 0 . 9055 3 . 15 2 0 . 6610
2 . 356 0 . 8716 3 . 682 0 . 6452
2 . 59 0 0 . 8599 4 . 1 04 0 . 6358
3 . 772 0 . 7980 4 . 421 0 . 6258
4 . 209 0 . 7863 4 . 97 3 0 . 6 12 1
4 . 99 5 0 . 6126
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8 2 64 5 . 480 0 . 6 0 15
0 . 375 0 . 7958 5 . 64 5 0 . 5979
0 . 476 0 . 7892
0 . 501 0 . 7880 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 6675
0 . 760 0 . 7678 0 . 59 0 0 . 6 3 13
0 . 811 o. 7704 1 . 165 0 . 6030
0 . 980 0 . 7576 1 . 54 1 0 . 5903
1 . 14 7 0 . 7460 2 . 17 9 0 . 5660
1 . 163 o. 7472 2 . 285 0 . 5547
1 . 508 0 . 7328 3 . 12 9 0 . 5358
1 . 923 0 . 7059 4 . 012 0 . 5142
1 . 973 0 . 7 102 4 . 14 7 0 . 5160
2 . 338 0 . 6915 4 . 475 0 . 5069
2 . 353 0 . 6879 4 . 477 0 . 4976

P = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
METHOD/APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND · PURITY OF MATERIALS :
Volumetric apparatus with multibulb ( 1 ) High purity grade sample ,
buret and magnetic stirrer . Amount of purity 9 9 . 9 6 mole % .
solution and gas absorbed determined.
volumetrica l ly . Dens ity and compos i ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
tion of solution determined after ab degassed by boi l ing .
sorption . Detai l s in Ref . 1 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
1 52
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Burmakina , G . V . ; Efanov , L . N . ;
Shnet , M . A .
( 2 ) Ammonium chloride ; NH4Cl ;
[ 12 12 5 - 0 2 - 9 ) * zh . Fiz . Khim . 1 9 8 2 , 5 6 , 1 1 5 9 - 6 1 ;
Russ . J . Phys . Chem . ( Engl Transl . )
•
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ) 1 9 8 2 , 56 , 7 0 5 - 7 .
. VARIABLES : PREPARED BY :
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
pjMPa = 0.1 Yu . P . Yampol ' skii
10 3 c2 ;mol L- l = 0 - 1000
Solubil ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of NH4Cl at 2 9 8 . 1 5 K. a
T/K
2 9 8 . 15 0 33 . 90
1 3 3 . 85
2 3 3 . 70
5 3 3 . 50
10 3 3 . 00
25 3 2 . 50
50 3 2 . 00
100 3 1 . 00
250 30. 20
500 2 9 . 15
1000 2 8 . 15
a Data taken from a graph by comp i ler .

b c2 = concentration of NH4Cl
c c1 = concentration of C02
Attainment of the equil ibrium was ( 1 ) Source not given . Before contact
checked by the constancy of co2 con ing with water solutions co2 was
tent in 3 -5 subsequent samples of gas allowed to pass through the ves
after saturation of the solution . sels with NaHC0 3 , glass beads ,
The concentration of carbon dioxide glass wool and distil led water .
was determined by titration .
( 2 ) Nothing specif ied .
( 3 ) Distil led .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
oc 1 / c 1 = ± 0 . 06 - 0 . 2 %
o T /K = ± 0 . 05
REFERENCES :
1 53
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1·2 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Rumpf , B . ; Nicolaisen , H . ; Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Ammonium chloride ; NH4cl ; .
Ber . Bunsenges . Pbys . Cbem . 1994 ,
[ 12 12 5 - 0 2 - 9 ) 98 ' 1 0 1 7 -8 1 .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )
T / K = 3 13 . 14 - 4 3 3 . 10
p/MPa = 0 . 4 8 2 - 9 . 6 92 Pirketta Scharl in
m2 /mol kg- l = near 4 . 0 0 and 6 . 0 0
EXPERIMENTAL VALUES i
The authors used Pitzer ' s semiempirical model to correlate the data .
The model has been described in detail in Ref . 1 . The dissociation of co2
can be neglected at. the concentrations here . The system was treated as con
taining a non-dissociating gas , G and a completely dissociating electrolyte ,
MX . A temperature dependent interaction parameter , B 0co2 , N84 c1 , and a tem-
perature independent interaction parameter , rc02 , NH4c1 , NH 4c1 , were derived
from the experimental data .
For the co2 + NH4Cl + H2o system the values are :
2
B0co2 , NH4 cl = 0 . 2 8 3 4 - 1 2 3 . 2 7 ( T/K) - l + 1 5 5 1 . 2 9 ( T/K) - + 3 5 4 3 · 1 0 3 (T/K) - J
The interaction parameters were also predicted from earl ier measurements on
the solubi l ity of co2 in aqueous solutions of Na2so4 , ( NH4 ) 2so4 ( Ref 1 . )
and NaCl ( Ref . 2 ) . The predicted values are :
B0co2 , NH 4 c l = 0 . 4 2 0 6 - 1 8 7 . 4 8 ( T/K) - l + 6 9 1 . 2 8 7 ( T/K) - 2 + 6 3 1 2 · 1 0 3 ( T/K ) - J
( continued on the next page)
The experimenta l equipment has been (1) Carbon dioxide . Messer Griesheim,
described in Ref . 1 . It cons ists of a Ludwigshafen , > 9 9 . 9 9 5 mol % ,
high pressure optical cel l , thermo- used as received •
. stat , magnetic stirrer , thermocouples

and Pt res istance thermometer , pres (2) Ammonium chloride . Riedel de Haen
sure transducers and tanks for aqueous AG , Seel z e , > 9 9 . 5 mass % .
solutions , rinse water and solute gas . Degassed and dried under vacuum .
The thermostated about 3 0 mL high ( 3 ) Water . Deionized and degassed by
pressure optical cell is fil led with vacuum distil lation .
carbon dioxide . Pressure and tempera-
ture of the gas are measured after �-------4
equil ibration . A known amount of ESTIMATED ERROR :
aqueous solvent is added which is
sl ightly greater than that needed to 6T/K = ± 0 . 1
completely dissolve the gas . The opfp < ± 0 . 0 4 ( at p up to 6 MPa )
pressure in the cel l is reduced step opfp < ± 0 . 0 5 ( at higher pressures )
wise by removing very smal l amounts
of the l iquid unt i l the f irst stable REFERENCES :
bubble appears .
The mas s of carbon dioxide is calcu 1 . Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .
lated from the Bender equation ( 3 ) . Ber . Bunsenges . Pbys . Cbem . 1 9 9 3 ,
The volume of the cell is known within 9 7 , 85-97 .
0 . 0 6 mL . The solvent dens ity is from 2 . Rumpf , B . ; Nicolaisen , H . ; ocal , c .
the l iterature . Maurer , G .
J . Solu tion Cbem . 1 9 9 4 , 2 3 , 4 3 1-48 .
3 . Bender , E . 5th Proc . Symp .
Thermophys . Prop . , ASME , NY , 19 7 0 , --
2 2 7 -3 5 .
1 54
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Rumpf , B. ; Nicolaisen , H . ; Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Ammo nium chloride ; NH4cl ; Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Chem . 1994 ,
[ 12 12 5- 0 2 - 9 ) 9 8 , 1 0 7 7 -8 1 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )
Solubil ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous ammonium chloride .
m2 = 3 . 9 9 4 mol kq- 1 a m2 = 5 . 9 9 2 mol kq- 1 a
T/K p/MPa T/K p/MPa
3 13 . 3 3 0 . 482 0 . 0980 3 13 . 15 0 . 606 0 . 1263

3 13 . 2 2 1 . 157 0 . 2 3 58 3 13 . 14 1 . 231 0 . 2553
3 13 . 2 1 2 . 64 8 0 . 5086 3 13 . 14 2 ; 847 0 . 5461
3 13 . 2 1 4 . 320 0 . 7600 3 13 . 14 4 . 67 4 0 . 8 162
3 13 . 2 2 5 . 52 3 0 . 9050 3 13 . 16 4 . 666 0 . 8171
313 . 21 7 . 354 1 . 0744 3 13 . 16 6 . 52 1 1 . 0255
3 13 . 3 3 8 . 82 3 1 . 1519
3 3 3 . 12 0 . 689 0 . 0973 3 3 3 . 14 0 . 756 0 . 1043

3 3 3 . 10 2 . 17 3 0 . 2 9 18 3 3 3 . 15 2 . 305 0 . 3 15 1
3 3 3 . 11 3 . 897 0 . 4878 3 3 3 . 16 4 . 14 5 0 . 5265
3 3 3 . 11 3 . 92 0 0 . 4906 3 3 3 . 12 6 . 507 0 . 7406
3 3 3 . 11 5 . 997 0 . 6879 3 3 3 . 13 8 . 94 9 0 . 9010
3 3 3 . 08 8 . 803 0 . 8856
3 5 3 . 13 0 . 0426 0. 0 353 . 11 0 . 0398 o.o

3 5 3 . 08 1 . 018 0 . 0995 353 . 10 1 . 078 0 . 1070
3 5 3 . 10 2 . 504 0 . 2502 353 . 11 2 . 688 0 . 2 684
353 . 11 5 . 547 0 . 5034 3 5 3 . 12 6 . 12 1 0 . 5404
3 5 3 . 13 9 . 692 0 . 7583 353 . 11 9 . 13 9 0 . 72 3 2
393 . 00 0 . 17 3 0.0 3 9 3 . 05 0 . 1606 0.0
3 9 3 . 09 1 . 970 0 . 1273 3 9 3 . 04 1 . 54 3 0 . 0977
3 9 3 . 07 3 . 43 3 0 . 2275 393 . 06 3 . 8 17 0 . 2450
3 9 3 . 13 6 . 487 0 . 4064 393 . 06 6 . 355 0 . 3932
3 9 3 . 12 8 . 458 0 . 5112 3 9 3 . 07 9 . 346 0 . 5398
4 1 3 . 05 0 . 3 14 0.0 4 1 3 . 05 0 . 294 o.o
4 1 3 . 09 1 . 92 1 0 . 1005 4 13 . 0 7 1 . 901 0 . 0979
413 . 06 4 . 413 0 . 2525 4 13 . 05 3 . 94 7 0 . 2 17 0
4 1 3 . 05 7 . 276 0 . 4036 413 . 06 7 . 401 0 . 3936
4 13 . 08 9 . 276 0 . 5046 4 13 . 05 9 . 4 68 0 . 4909
4 3 3 . 08 0 . 53 7 0.0 4 3 3 . 09 0 . 5039 o.o
4 3 3 . 07 2 . 13 7 0 . 0998 433 . 06 2 . 2 66 0 . 0990
4 3 3 . 07 2 . 2 12 0 . 0999 4 3 3 . 04 4 . 15 3 0 . 2 000
4 3 3 . 04 4 . 937 0 . 2510 4 3 3 . 07 4 . 14 8 0 . 1991
4 3 3 . 10 6 . 67 6 0 . 3498 4 3 3 . 09 6 . 05 1 0 . 2955
4 3 3 . 08 8 . 792 0 . 4516 433 . 06 8 . 205 0 . 3937
4 3 3 . 08 9 . 245 0 . 4421
a m2 = molal ity of NH4Cl

b m1 = solubil ity of co2
1 55
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 124-3 8-9 ) Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Ammonium bromide ; NH4Br ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

[ 12 12 4 -97-9 ) " Carl Schor l ernrner " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 77 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 1 5 - 3 3 3 . 1 5
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
c2 tmol dm-3 = 0 - 2
b
t rc T/K c2 fmol dm-3 a a s
--
-
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990
0.5 1 . 23 1 . 26
1 1 . 003 1 . 050
2 0 . 964 1 . 062
-
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860
0.5 1 . 11 1 . 13 5
1 0 . 881 0 . 924
2 0 . 830 0 . 913
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 -
0.5 1 . 00 1 . 026
1 0 . 784 0 . 82 3
2 0 . 72 8 0 . 802
30 3 03 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0.5 0 . 887 0 . 916
1 0 . 705 0 . 7415
2 0 . 657 0 . 725
35 3 0 8 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0.5 0 . 813 0 . 8355
1 0 . 634 0 . 668
2 0 . 588 0 . 65 1
AUXI L I ARY I N FORMATION
METHOD /APPARATUS /PROCEDU RE : SOURCE AND P U R I TY OF MATE R I ALS :

The princ iple of the Ostwa ld method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vol % ;
was used in which a measured vo lume the impur ity was mostly
in vo lume is measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro analys i s grade
temperature . For calcu lation of the ( 3 ) Doubl e d i s t i l led .
Kuenen coeff i c i ent , the dens ity of
the s o lut ion was obtained from
molar concentrat ion of s a lt in the
l iquid was standard i z ed at 2 0 � C . E S T I MATED ERRO R :
Thes e data a r e ana lyzed and d�scussed
further in Ref . 1 . Not given .
REFERENCES :
1 . Gerecke , J . ; B ittr ich , H . J .
Wiss . z . Tech . Hochsch . Chem .
" Carl Schorlemmer" Leuna
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 1 3 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 - 2 2 .
1 56
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Gerecke , J.

(2 ) Ammonium bromide ; NH4Br ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 12 12 4 - 9 7 -9 ] " Carl Schor l emmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
( cont inued )
a
t ;oc T/K c2jmol dm-3 a s b
--
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0.5 0 . 7 1 15 0 . 732
1 0 . 553 0 . 58 3
2 0 . 52 5 0 . 5825
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0.5 0 . 638 0 . 6575
1 0 . 495 0 . 5225
2 0 . 473 0 . 526
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0.5 0 . 600 0 . 619
1 0 . 469 0 . 496
2 0 . 422 0 . 4685
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0.5 0 . 551 0 . 569
1 0 . 406 0 . 432
2 0 . 3899 0 . 434
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
0.5 0 . 482 0 . 498
1 0 . 362 0 . 384
2 0 . 356 0 . 397
a
Q = Bunsen coeff i c i ent [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ]
b s = Kuenen coe f f i ci ent [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ] .
1 57
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Setchenow , J. [ Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Ammonium sulfate ; (NH4 ) 2 so4 ; Akad . Nauk . SSSR, Mem . Acad . Imp .
[ 7 7 8 3 -2 0-2 ) Sci . , St . Petersbourg 1 8 7 7 , 3 5 ,
1-59 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 1 . 53
c2 tmo1 dm- 3 = 0 - 1 . 093 Pirketta Scharl in
ttoc T/K a
Di lution c2 fmol dm- 3 a
a b k scc / dm3 mol- l a,c
X
---
18 . 3 8 2 9 1 . 53 co 0 0 . 896 -
2 0 . 5464 0. 711 0 . 184
0 . 7 13 0 . 182
1 1 . 093 0 . 57 0 0 . 18 0
0 . 580 0 . 172
a
b a = Bunsen coeff icient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ) .
c
k scc = Setchenow salt effect parameter ; k scc = ( 1 / c2 ) lg ( a0 / a ) .
Initial solution : 14 . 4 4 g ( NH4 ) 2so4 + water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of solution .
based on ideas he learned from ( 2 ) Not specif ied .
nometer had three branches , two for ( 3 ) Not specif ied , assumed to be
measuring the pressure and one a distilled .
flexible s i lver cap i l lary . The ab-
mark in the constricting connection . t-----i
C02 gas was generated , saturated ESTIMATED ERROR :
with water vapor and f i l led the bulbs
passed by the pressure difference in- t------i
volume absorbed was reduced to 0 oc Akad . Nauk . SSSR Mem . Acad . imp .
·
and one meter Hg pressure . The Sci . St . Petersburg 1 8 8 7 , 3 5 ,

1 58
( 1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 124-3 8-9 ] Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Ammonium sul fate ; ( NH4 ) 2 so4 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

[ 7 7 8 3 -2 0-2 ] " Carl Schorl emmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/ K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 10 1 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
c2 ; mo l dm·3 = o -" 2

t / °C T/K c2 ; mo l dm-3 a
a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0 . 25 0 . 915 0 . 928
0.5 0 . 825 0 . 850
1 0 . 648 0 . 688
2 0 . 477 0 . 54 8
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0 . 25 0 . 811 0 . 823
0.5 0 . 73 8 0 . 761
1 0 . 574 0 . 611
2 0 . 424 0 . 4875
25 298 . 15 0 0 . 758 0 . 5173

0 . 25 0 . 7 18 o . 7295
0.5 0 . 669 0 . 690
1 0 . 515 0 . 549
2 0 . 374 0 . 431
30 3 03 . 15 0 0 . 671 -
0 . 25 0 . 634 0 . 645
0.5 0 . 579 0 . 598
1 0 . 465 0 . 4965
2 0. 331 0 . 383
( cont inued next page)
AU X I L I ARY I N FO RMAT ION
ME THOD /AP PARATUS / P ROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURl TY OF MATE R I ALS :

The principle of the Ostwa ld method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vol % ;
was used in which a measured volume the impur ity was most ly
of gas- free l iquid is stirred in the water ( author ) .
temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Double d i st i l l ed .
Kuenen coeffic i ent , the dens ity of
the so lut ion was obta ined from
Lando lt-Bornste in extant 1 9 6 9 . The
mo lar concentration of salt in the
l iquid was standardi z ed at 2 0°C . E S T I MATED ERRO R :
These data are ana lyz ed and di scussed
RE F E RENCES :
1 . Gerecke , J. ; B ittr i ch , H . J .
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 1 3 { 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
1 59
{1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Ammonium sulfate ; ( NH4 ) 2so4 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat .1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 7 8 3 -2 0-2 ] " Carl Schorlemmer" , Leuna
Merseburq , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
( continued )
T/K c2 fmol dm"3 a a s b
-
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605
0 . 25 0 . 564 0 . 57 4
0.5 0 . 516 0 . 53 3
1 0 . 409 0 . 4375
2 0 . 296 0 . 3425
-
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6
0 . 25 0 . 502 0 . 512
0.5 0 . 461 0 . 47 7
1 0 . 3 62 0 . 388
2 0 . 262 0 . 3035
-
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482
0 . 25 0 . 448 0 . 4575
0.5 0 . 409 0 . 4245
1 0 . 327 0 . 351
2 0 . 241 0 . 2793
-
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436
0 . 25 0 . 396 0 . 405
0.5 0 . 3 68 0 . 383
1 0 . 299 0 . 3 2 15
2 0 . 215 0 . 250
-
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392
0 . 25 0 . 356 0 . 3645
0.5 0 . 334 0 . 348
1 0 . 272 0 . 2927
2 0 . 18 9 0 . 220
-
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0 . 25 0 . 323 0 . 331
0.5 0 . 3 08 0 . 321
1 0 . 252 0 . 273
2 0 . 17 5 0 . 2043
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm" 1 ]

b s = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) q·1 ( H2o ) atm"1 ] .
1 60
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ) Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .

( 2 ) Ammonium sulfate ; (NH4 ) 2so4 ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 9 , 2 4 , 1 1 - 14 .
[ 7 7 8 3 -2 0-2 ]
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 08 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 c . L . Young
c2 fmol L- 1 = 0 - 3 . 8 67
T/K c2 fmol L- 1 L a T/K c2 fmol L- 1 L a
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 0634 2 9 8 . 15 2 . 08 9 0 . 3 62 2
0 . 322 0 . 9174 2 . 48 6 0 . 3 16 1
0 . 69 0 0 . 78 3 0 2 . 87 3 0 . 2 8 02
0 . 99 3 0 . 6903 3 . 351 0 . 2 4 65
1 . 442 0 . 5764 3 . 358 0 . 2495
1 . 838 0 . 4930
2 . 360 0 . 4085 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 6675
2 . 766 0 . 3575 0 . 276 0 . 5974
3 . 10 6 0 . 3228 0 . 611 0 . 5196
3 . 349 0 . 3 04 2 1 . 011 0 . 4468
1 . 324 0 . 3961
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8 2 64 1 . 669 0 . 3 508
0 . 253 0 . 7378 1 . 965 0 . 3 14 5
0 . 519 0 . 6572 2 . 09 0 0 . 3 009
0 . 845 0 . 5794 2 . 703 0 . 2507
1 . 235 0 . 4978 2 . 82 5 0 . 2 4 15
1 . 474 0 . 4529 3 . 19 5 0 . 2 19 8
1 . 836 0 . 3 9 52 3 . 867 0 . 1865

p = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
METHOD/APPARATUS/PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND · PURITY OF MATERIALS :
solution and gas absorbed determined
volumetrica l ly . Density and composi ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
sorption . Details in Ref . 1 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
oT/K = ± 0 . 05 ; oL = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
161
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Ammonium sulfate ; ( NH4 ) 2 so4 ; Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Chem . 1993 ,
[ 7 7 8 3 -2 0-2 ] 9 7 , 85-97 .
( 3 ) water ; H2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 3 13 . 13 - 4 3 3 . 18
p/MPa = 0 . 0181 - 9 . 868 H . L . Clever
1
m2 /mol kg - = near 2 . 0 0 and 4 . 0 0
The authors used Pitzer ' s semiempirical model to correlate the data . The
dissociation of the carbon dioxide can be neglected at the concentrations
here . The system was treated as containing a non-dissociat ing gas , G and
a completely dissociating electrolyte , MX . A temperature dependent inter
action parameter , B0c02 , ( NH4 1 2 504 , and a temperature independent interac-
tion parameter , r co2 , ( NH4 1 2 504 , ( NH4 ) 2 s04 , were derived from the experimen
tal data .
For the co2 + ( NH4 ) 2 so4 + H20 system the values are :
2
B0co2 , ( NH 4 ) 2 s04 = 0 . 7 7 9 0 - 4 4 6 . 7 ( T/K) - l + 7 8 9 0 0 ( T/K) -
which gives values :

T/K 3 13 . 15 3 5 3 . 15 3 9 3 . 15 4 3 3 . 15
Boco2 , ( NH 4 ) 2 S04 0 . 157 1 0 . 1467 0 . 15 3 3 0 . 1683
( continued o n the next page )
The apparatus is a modification of one ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . Messer Griesheim,
used in ear l ier work ( 1 ) . It consists Ludwigshafen , > 9 9 . 9 9 5 mol % ,
of a high pressure optical cel l , ther used as received .
mostat , magnetic stirrer , thermo
couples and Pt resistance thermometer , ( 2 ) Ammonium sulfate . Merck GmbH ,
pressure transducers and tanks for Darmstadt , > 9 9 . 5 mass % .
aqueous solutions , rinse water and Degassed and dried under vacuum .
solute gas .
ture of the gas are measured after r-------�
equilibration . A known amount of ESTIMATED ERROR :
sl ightly greater than that needed to 6T/K = ± 0 . 1
completely dissolve the gas . The 6m2 / m2 = ± 0 . 0 0 3
pressure in the cell is reduced step 6m1 tm1 = ± 0 . 0 1 t o 0 . 03
wise by removing very smal l amounts
of the l iquid until the first stable REFERENCES :
bubble appears .
The mass of carbon dioxide is calcu 1 . Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .
lated from the Bender equation ( 2 ) . Fluid Phase Equilib . 1 9 9 2 , 81 ,
The volume of the cell is known within 2 4 1- 6 0 .
0 . 0 6 mL . The solvent density is from 2 . Bender , E . 5th Proc . Symp .
the l iterature . Thermophys . Prop . , ASME , NY , 19 7 0 ,
2 2 7 -3 5 .
1 62
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ) Rumpf , B. ; Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Ammonium sulfate ; ( NH4 ) 2so4 ; Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Chem . 1993 ,
[ 7 7 8 3 -2 0-2 ) 9 7 , 85-97 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
Solubil ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous ammonium sulfate .
T/I< p/MPa
3 13 . 15 0 . 4060 2 . 015 0 . 0537

3 13 . 15 0 . 626 2 . 015 0 . 0808
3 13 . 14 1 . 594 2 . 015 0 . 1992
3 13 . 14 2 . 54 5 2 . 015 0 . 3 07 5
3 13 . 15 3 . 607 2 . 015 0 . 4 10 4
3 1 3 . 13 4 . 783 2 . 015 0 . 5130
3 1 3 . 13 6 . 370 2 . 015 0 . 6210
3 13 . 13 8 . 104 2 . 015 0 . 7073
3 13 . 16 8 . 968 2 . 015 0 . 7272
3 13 . 16 0 . 707 3 . 98 9 0 . 0646
3 13 . 14 1 . 138 3 . 98 9 0 . 1061
3 13 . 15 2 . 235 3 . 98 9 0 . 2 005
3 13 . 14 3 . 619 3 . 98 9 0 . 3 009
3 13 . 14 5 . 294 3 . 98 9 0 . 4021
3 13 . 13 7 . 716 3 . 989 0 . 5022
3 13 . 15 8 . 966 3 . 98 9 0 . 5453
3 3 3 . 13 0 . 0185 2 . 00 0 o.o
3 3 3 . 15 0 . 518 2 . 015 0 . 0494
3 3 3 . 16 1 . 08 6 2 . 015 0 . 0988
3 3 3 . 15 2 . 297 2 . 015 0 . 2 008
3 3 3 . 13 3 . 6 18 2 . 015 0 . 3 0 16
3 3 3 . 15 5 . 07 5 2 . 015 0 . 3984
3 3 3 . 14 6 . 876 2 . 015 0 . 4993
3 3 3 . 13 7 . 965 2 . 015 0 . 5511
3 3 3 . 14 9 . 346 2 . 015 0 . 5983
3 3 3 . 13 0 . 0181 3 . 934 o.o
3 3 3 . 15 0 . 79 6 3 . 989 0 . 0584
3 3 3 . 13 1 . 42 0 3 . 989 0 . 1006
3 3 3 . 15 3 . 114 3 . 98 9 0 . 2 009
3 3 3 . 15 5 . 13 8 3 . 989 0 . 3 013
3 3 3 . 16 7 . 789 3 . 989 0 . 4032
3 3 3 . 18 9 . 395 3 . 98 9 0 . 4482
3 5 3 . 10 0 . 0445 1 . 999 o.o
3 5 3 . 15 0 . 7 15 2 . 015 0 . 0495
3 5 3 . 19 1 . 437 2 . 015 0 . 1002
3 53 . 15 2 . 992 2 . 015 0 . 2008
3 5 3 . 15 4 . 720 2 . 015 0 . 3 02 5
3 5 3 . 15 6 . 775 2 . 015 0 . 4023
3 5 3 . 15 7 . 99 1 2 . 015 0 . 4524
3 5 3 . 15 9 . 343 2 . 015 0 . 5 0 12
3 5 3 . 15 0 . 0420 3 . 934 0.0
3 5 3 . 16 0 . 885 3 . 989 0 . 0 5 17
3 53 . 14 1 . 848 3 . 989 0 . 1012
3 5 3 . 14 4 . 09 6 3 . 989 0 . 2013
3 5 3 . 15 5 . 428 3 . 989 0 . 2 5 18
3 5 3 . 14 6 . 879 3 . 989 0 . 3 02 2
3 5 3 . 14 8 . 54 0 3 . 989 0 . 3534
3 5 3 . 14 9 . 512 3 . 989 0 . 3785
( continued o n the next page )

1 63
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -38-9 ] Rump f , B. ; Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Ammonium sulfate ; ( NH4 ) 2 so4 ; Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Chem . 1993 ,
[ 7 7 8 3 -2 0- 2 ] 9 7 , 85-97 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ]
T/K p/MPa
3 9 3 . 16 0 . 1778 2 . 005 o.o

3 9 3 . 16 1 . 057 2 . 005 0 . 0506
3 9 3 . 16 1 . 770 2 . 005 0 . 0875
3 9 3 . 16 2 . 08 0 2 . 015 0 . 1005
3 9 3 . 18 2 . 768 2 . 005 0 . 1377
3 9 3 . 16 4 . 18 5 2 . 015 0 . 2 00 7
3 9 3 . 16 4 . 950 2 . 005 0 . 2397
3 9 3 . 16 6 . 456 2 . 005 0 . 3010
3 9 3 . 16 7 . 48 3 2 . 005 0 . 3 3 75
3 9 3 . 15 7 . 739 2 . 005 0 . 3485
3 9 3 . 16 8 . 84 8 2 . 005 0 . 3 9 07
3 9 3 . 16 0 . 1705 3 . 98 9 o.o
3 9 3 . 09 1 . 363 3 . 989 0 . 0496
3 9 3 . 15 2 . 757 3 . 989 0 . 1009
3 9 3 . 14 4 . 198 3 . 98 9 0 . 1516
3 9 3 . 15 5 . 905 3 . 989 0 . 2030
3 9 3 . 15 7 . 74 3 3 . 989 0 . 2531
3 9 3 . 14 9 . 764 3 . 98 9 0 . 3042
4 1 3 . 11 0 . 337 1 . 982 o.o

4 13 . 15 1 . 291 2 . 005 0 . 0499
4 13 . 15 1 . 808 2 . 005 0 . 0754
4 13 . 15 2 . 327 2 . 005 0 . 1006
4 13 . 16 4 . 52 6 2 . 005 0 . 2 00 5
4 13 . 15 6 . 905 2 . 005 0 . 3 013
4 1 3 . 16 6 . 975 2 . 005 0 . 3 012
4 1 3 . 15 8 . 397 2 . 00 5 0 . 3 5 19
413 . 15 9 . 868 2 . 005 0 . 4021
4 13 . 2 0 0 . 3 17 4 . 01 3 0.0
413 . 21 1 . 62 7 4 . 013 0 . 0489
413 . 11 3 . 2 14 3 . 989 0 . 1004
4 13 . 08 4 . 747 3 . 98 9 0 . 1499
4 1 3 . 14 6 . 62 1 3 . 989 0 . 2 0 16
413 . 21 8 . 294 4 . 013 0 . 2 4 13
4 1 3 . 08 8 . 58 0 3 . 98 9 0 . 2498
4 13 . 2 0 9 . 04 7 4 . 0 13 0 . 2592
4 3 3 . 15 0 . 57 2 2 . 005 o.o
4 3 3 . 14 1 . 59 4 2 . 00 5 0 . 0508
4 3 3 . 14 2 . 689 2 . 005 0. 1006
4 3 3 . 12 3 . 82 7 2 . 005 0 . 1513
4 3 3 . 14 5 . 010 2 . 005 0 . 2 0 12
4 3 3 . 10 6 . 297 2 . 005 0 . 2521
4 3 3 . 14 7 . 58 0 2 . 00 5 0 . 3 014
4 3 3 . 12 9 . 011 2 . 005 0 . 3539
4 3 3 . 14 9 . 751 2 . 005 0 . 3782
4 3 3 . 15 0 . 54 6 4 . 013 o.o
4 3 3 . 15 1 . 986 4 . 013 0 . 0462
4 3 3 . 14 3 . 470 4 . 013 0 . 0921
4 3 3 . 16 5 . 03 6 4 . 013 0 . 1382
4 3 3 . 15 6 . 350 4 . 013 0 . 1751
4 3 3 . 16 7 . 361 4 . 013 0 . 2 009
4 3 3 . 18 8 . 3 12 4 . 013 0 . 2256
4 3 3 . 10 9 . 372 4 . 013 0 . 2510
1 64
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8-9 ) Yasunishi , A . ; Tsuj i , M . ; Sada , E .
[ 12 12 5 - 0 2 -9 ] Adv . Chem . Ser . 19 7 9 , 1 7 7. , 1 8 9 - 2 0 3 .
( 3 ) Ammonium sulfate ; (NH4 ) 2S04 ;
[ 7 7 8 3 -2 0-2 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ]
T / K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 c . L . Young
( c2+c3 ) /mol dm- 1 = 0 - 2 . 8 7 3
T = 2 9 8 . 15 K ;
P = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa
x2 ( c2+c3 ) L a x2 ( c2+c3 ) L a
in mixed salt fmol dm-3 in mixed salt fmol dm- 3
0 0 0 . 8 2 64 0 . 75 0 . 254 0 . 7905
0 . 253 0 . 7378 0 . 601 0 . 7451
0 . 519 o. 6572 1 . 018 0 . 6978
0 . 845 0 . 5794 1 . 4 14 0 . 6594
1 . 235 0 . 4978 1 . 985 0 . 6133
1 . 836 0 . 3952 2 . 400 0 . 5800
2 . 48 6 0 . 3161 2 . 861 0 . 5524
2 . 873 0 . 2802
1 . 00 0 . 375 0 . 7958
0 . 25 0 . 282 0 . 7505 0 . 811 0 . 7704
0 . 573 0 . 6785 1 . 14 7 0 . 7460
0 . 998 0 . 5961 1 . 508 0 . 7328
1 . 396 0 . 5322 1 . 97 3 0 . 7 102
1 . 94 6 0 . 4580 2 . 338 0 . 6915
2 . 43 3 0 . 4015 2 . 816 0 . 6721
2 . 806 0 . 3 68 7
0 . 50 0. 333 0 . 7568
0 . 658 0 . 69 9 7
1 . 02 1 0 . 6460
1 . 330 0 . 5959
2 . 014 0 . 5223
2 . 67 3 0 . 4578
a
L = Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 ]
Volumetric apparatus with multibulb ( 1 ) Extra pure grade , purity 9 9 . 9 6
buret and magnetic stirrer . Amount of mole % .
volumetrica.L.L ·i Partial pressure de- ( 2 , 3 ) Reagent grade .
termined frol- to;,.al pressure and vapor
pressure of solution . The vapor pres- ( 4 ) Deionized .
sure of the mixed salt solution esti-
mated by the method of Robinson and
Bower ( 1 ) from corresponding data for. ESTIMATED ERROR :
each component salt solution .
Apparatus s 6milar to that described in 6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; 6L = ± 1 %
Ref . 2 .
REFERENCES :
1 . Robinson , R . A . ; Bower , V . E . J . Res . Nat . Bur . Stand . 1 9 6 5 , 69A , 3 6 5 .
2 . Tokunaga , J . J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
1 65
(1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . J
(2) Ammonium nitrate ; NH4No3 ; Ann . Cbim . Phys . [ 6 ) 1 8 9 2 , 25 ,
[ 64 8 4 -5 2 - 2 ) 2 2 6-7 0 .
(3) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )

T/K = 288 . 35
c2 tmol dm- 3 = 0 - 10 . 1 2 5 Pirketta Scharl in
t/ °C T/K a D ilution c2 fmol dm- 3 a a b

3
kscc/ dm mol- l a,c
X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 co 0 1 . 009 -
128 0 . 0791 1 . 010 -0 . 00544

64 0 . 1582 1 . 006 0 . 0 0 8 17
16 0 . 6328 0 . 989 0 . 0137
8 1 . 266 0 . 962 0 . 0164
4 2 . 531 0 . 911 0 . 0175
2 5 . 062 0 . 8 12 0 . 0186
1 10 . 125 0 . 612 0 . 0 2 14

c
kscc = Setchenow salt effect parameter ;
Initial solution : 8 1 . 0 4 g NH4No 3 + 4 8 . 0 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of

solution .
setchenow ( Ref . 1 ) based his appara ( 1 ) Apparently generated from l ime
Meyer ( 18 57 ) . The manometer was
flexible si lver capillary . The ab-
less than atmospheric . The l iquid statement that the results are good
was degassed by heating and then to the second decima l .
equil ibrium was establ ished . The gas
volume absorbed was reduced to o o c Akad . Nauk . SSSR Mem . Acad . imp .
and one meter Hg pressure . The Sci . St . Petersburg 1 8 8 7 , 35 ,
Bunsen coefficient was calculated . [ Ser . No . 7 ] , 1-59 .
1 66
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J .

( 2 ) Ammonium nitrate ; NH4No3 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 6 4 8 4 -5 2 -2 ] " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 2 8 . 15
P/kPa3 = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
c:2t mol dm- = 0 - 4
trc T/K c:2 t mol dm-3 a a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0 . 25 0 . 969 -
0.5 0 . 953 0 . 977
1 0 . 907 0 . 944
2 0 . 787 0 . 872
4 0 . 648 0 . 809
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0 . 25 0 . 858 -
0.5 0 . 847 0 . 860
1 0 . 799 0 . 834
2 0 . 693 0 . 769
4 0 . 562 0 . 69 1
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 -
0 . 25 0 . 747 -
0.5 0 . 737 0 . 758
1 0 . 711 0 . 743
2 0 . 618 0 . 688
4 0 . 490 0 . 6 15
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 671 -
0 . 25 0 . 662 -
0.5 0 . 64 6 0 . 665
1 0 . 634 0 . 663
2 0 . 560 0 . 625
4 0 . 434 0 . 545
AUXI LI ARY I NFORMAT ION
ME THOD /APPARATUS /PROCEDURE : S OURCE AND PURI TY OF MATE RI ALS :

The principle of the Ostwald method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vol %· ;
of gas-free l iquid is stirred in the water ( author ) .
in volume is measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro analys is grade
over mercury . The volume of l iquid by DDR Standard TGL 5 0 2 1 .
was measured at the experimental
temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Double dist i l led .
Kuenen coefficient , the density of
the solution was obtained from
Landolt-Bornstein extant 1 9 6 9 . The
l iquid was standardized at 2 0° C . E S T I MATED ERRO R :
These data are analyz ed and discussed
REFERENCE S :
Wiss . z . Tech . Hoc:hsc:h . Chem .
" Carl Sc:horl emmer" Leuna
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
1 67
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Gerecke , J .

{ 2 ) Ammonium nitrate ; NH4No3 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 64 84-52-2 ] " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
( continued)
t rc T/K c2 ;mol dm"3 a a s b

-- --- ---
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
-
0 . 25 0 . 58 7
0.5 0 . 564 0 . 58 1
1 0 . 564 0 . 59 1
2 0 . 509 0 . 568
4 0 . 3 67 0 . 462
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0 . 25 0 . 52 5 -
0.5 0 . 506 0 . 52 2
1 0 . 496 0 . 511
2 0 . 462 0 . 517
4 0 . 321 0 . 406
-
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482
0 . 25 0 . 471 -
0.5 0 . 454 0 . 469
1 0 . 453 0 . 477
2 0 . 43 1 0 . 483
4 0 . 281 0 . 356
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 . 0 . 436 -
0 . 25 0 . 430 -
0.5 0 . 418 0 . 432
1 0 . 407 0 . 4 19
2 0 . 390 0 . 438
4 0 . 248 0 . 3 14
-
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392
0 . 25 0 . 389 -
0.5 0 . 379 0 . 392
1 0 . 3 67 0 . 387
2 0 . 355 0 . 395
4 0 . 228 0 . 290
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm" 1 )

b s = Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) g· 1 ( H20 ) atm-1 ] .
1 68
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Ammonium nitrate ; NH4No 3 ;
[ 64 8 4 -5 2 - 2 ) J . Chem . Sng . Jpn 1970 , 3, 18-24 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
.VARIABLES : PREPARED BY :
TfK = 2 9 8 . 15
P /kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 c . L . Young
c2 /mol L- 1 = 0 - 3 . 6 3 2
T/K c2 /mol L- 1 a a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 7595
1 . 777 0 . 7 2 14
2 . 0 15 0 . 6974
2 . 615 0 . 6906
2 . 64 4 0 . 6917
3 . 372 0 . 6640
3 . 632 0 . 6616
• a = Bunsen coefficient
P = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
Solutions made up by weight and den ( 1 ) commercial sample , minimum
sity measured but not reported in pa purity 9 9 . 8 mole % .
per . Equi l ibrium established between
a measured volume of gas and a meas ( 2 ) Analytical grade .
ured amount of gas-free l iquid in a
cell fitted with a magnetic stirrer . ( 3 ) Distil led and degassed .
Amount of gas absorbed estimated from
change in volume of gas . Details in
source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/ K = ·± ·0.2 ; 6a = ± 2 %
( Estimated by the comp iler . )
REFERENCES :
1 69
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ]
( 2 ) Arsenic trioxide ; As2o 3 ; Robb , R . A . ; Z immer , M . F .

[ 13 2 7 - 5 3 - 3 ]
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 6 8 , 13 , 2 00-3 .
( 3 ) Arsenic pentoxide ; As2o5 ;
[ 13 0 3 -2 8 - 2 ]
[ 7647-01-0 ]
( 5 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15 - 3 0 3 . 15
P/kPa = 4 0 . 0 - 1 12 . 0 Pirketta Scharlin
m1/mo l kg- 1 = 0 - 12 . 754
tf ° C T/K 4 m2 tmol kg- 1 m3 tmol kg- 1 m4fmol kg- 1 a b

---
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 . 0344 0 0 0 . 880
0 . 0649 0 0 0 . 855
0 . 1113 0 0 0 . 835
0 0 . 0262 0 0 . 866
0 0 . 0509 0 0 . 865
0 0 . 1330 0 0 . 84 1
0 . 0329 0 . 0273 0 0 . 864
0 0 0 . 6370 0 . 854
0 0 10 . 97 1 0 . 938
0 0 12 . 7 5 4 0 . 924
0 . 0305 . 0 . 0307 0 . 12 7 1 1 . 029
0 . 0465 0 . 0159 0 . 0625 0 . 854
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 0 . 758 c
0 . 0344 0 0 0 . 749
0 . 0649 0 0 0 . 735
0 . 1113 0 0 o . 720
0 . 1113 0 0 0 . 724
0 0 . 0262 0 0 . 756
0 0 . 0509 0 0 . 748
0 0 . 1330 0 0 . 737
0 . 0329 0 . 0273 0 0 . 744
( �ontinued next page )
Volumetric method . The apparatus is ( 1 ) Commercial . Purity 9 9 . 9 %.
described in detai l in the source .
The C02 was purified in the line and ( 2 , 3 ) Fisher Certified Reagents .
subl imed into the system . Mercury Purity better than 9 9 . 3 % .
levels were read with a cathetometer
to ± 0 . 0 5 mm . Atmospheric pressures ( 4 ) Purified . Source not specified .
were read to ± 0 . 1 mm with a mercury
barometer and were corrected to o o c . ( 5 ) Conductivity water , distilled from
The volumes determined were reprodu a quartz sti l l . Conductivity less
cible to ± 0 . 0 2 mL . than 1 x 1 0- 7 n- 1 m- 1 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 0 5 ( authors )
6a = ± 1 . 1 % ( authors )
1 70
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ]
( 2 ) Arsenic trioxide ; As20 3 ; Robb , R . A . ; Z immer , M . F .
( 13 2 7 - 5 3 - 3 )
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 6 8 , 1 3 , 2 0 0-3 .
( 3 ) Arsenic pentoxide ; As2o 5 ;
[ 13 0 3 - 2 8-2 ]
[ 7 64 7 -01-0 ]
( 5 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
t/ ° C T/K a m2 /mol kg- 1 m3 tmol kg- 1 m4/mol kg- 1 a b

--- ---
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 . 1866 0 . 752
0 0 0 . 6370 0 . 74 3
0 0 1 . 261 0 . 728
0 0 2 . 562 0 . 735
0 0 7 . 459 0 . 8 12
0 0 10 . 9 7 1 0 . 8 18
0 0 12 . 7 5 4 0 . 816
0 . 0305 0 . 03 07 0 . 12 7 1 0 . 789
0 . 0465 0 . 0159 0 . 0625 0 . 732
27 . 3 3 00 . 45 0 0 0 0 . 74 3
30 3 03 . 15 0 . 0344 0 0 0 . 662
0 . 0649 0 0 0 . 651
0 . 1113 0 0 0 . 63 5
0 . 1113 0 0 0 . 63 3
0 0 . 0262 0 0 . 663
0 0 . 0509 0 0 . 655
0 0 . 13 3 0 0 0 . 640
0 . 0329 0 . 0273 0 0 . 64 9
0 0 0 . 6370 0 . 647
0 . 0305 0 . 0307 0 . 12 7 1 0 . 653
0 . 0465 0 . 0159 0 . 0625 0 . 650
a Added by the compiler .

b a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 )
c Average of f ive determinations . Standard deviation Sa
= 0 . 005 .
171
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Findlay , A . ; Creiqhton , H . J . M .
( 2 ) Arsenic trisufide ( colloidal ) ; J. Chem . Soc . 1 9 1 0 , 97, 5 3 6-61 .
As2s 3 ; [ 1 3 0 3 - 3 3 -9 )
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/ K = 2 9 8 . 15
P1 /kPa = 10 0 . 5 - 170 . 8 c . L . Younq
2
10 r2 / q cm- 3 = 0 . 392 - 2 . 289
p1 /bar s b p 1 f bar s b
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 392 0 . 997 1 . 008 0 . 816 1 . 18 8 0 . 817

1 . 268 0 . 8 14 1 . 396 0 . 816
1 . 563 0 . 8 18 1 . 679 0 . 82 0
1 . 4 10 1 . 003 1 . 008 0 . 810 1 . 13 5 0 . 810
1 . 296 0 . 8 12 1 . 44 3 0 . 810
1 . 516 0 . 8 12 1 . 708 0 . 811
2 . 289 1 . 007 1 . 005 0 . 806 1 . 13 7 0 . 806
1 . 251 0 . 806 1 . 337 0 . 806
1 . 424 0 . 806 1 . 615 0 . 806
a r2 = mass concentration of arsenic trisulfide

concentration of qas in liquid phase
b s = -----
concentration of qas in qaseous phase
Solubility in water : Ostwald coefficient L = 0 . 8 1 7 cm3 cm- 3
Gas burette and absorption pipette ( 1 ) Purity 9 9 . 4 2 mole % .
similar to that of Geffcken ( Ref . 1 )
except that the manometer tube was ( 2 ) Prepared by passinq hydroqen sul
lonqer . Concentration of As2 s 3 de f ide into arsenic trioxide solu
termined by precipitation with hydro tion . Hydroqen bubbled throuqh
chloric acid , dryinq at 8 0 o c and colloidal solution , f iltered and
weiqhinq . partially deqassed .
( 3 ) Nothinq speci fied .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.1; 68 = ± 0 . 25 %
REFERENCES :
1 . Geffcken , G .
Z . Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .
Verwandtschaftsl . 1904 , 49 ,
257-302 .
1 72
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) N, N-Dimethylmethanamine hydro- 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

Diss . Dr . rer . Nat .
chloride ; ( trimethylamine hydro- "Carl Schorlemmer" , Leuna-
chloride ) ; C 3 H 1 0NC 1 ; [ 59 3 - 8 1-7 ] Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )

T/K 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
c2 jmol dm- 3 = 0 - 4
t/ ° C T/K c2 jmol dm- 3 a a t/ °C T/K c2 jmol dm- 3 a a
-- --- -- ---
15 2 88 . 15 0 0 . 990 40 3 1 3 . 15 0 0 . 54 6
0 . 25 0 . 94 0 0 . 25 0 . 478
0.5 0 . 916 0.5 0 . 461
1 0 . 881 1 0 . 455
2 0 . 842 2 0 . 437
4 0 . 799 4 0 . 4 19
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482
0 . 25 0 . 810 0 . 25 0 . 4 19
o.s 0 . 792 0.5 0 . 4 08
1 0 . 761 1 0 . 396
2 0 . 728 2 0 . 385
4 0 . 710 4 0 . 373
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436
0 . 25 0 . 699 0 . 25 0 . 373
0.5 0 . 687 0.5 0 . 3 67
1 0 . 669 1 0 . 344
2 0 . 63 7 2 . 0 . 339
4 0 . 636 4 0 . 329
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392
0 . 25 0 . 62 1 0 . 25 0 . 330
0.5 0 . 603 0.5 0 . 3 18
1 0 . 584 1 0 . 3 08
2 0 . 561 2 0 . 3 04
4 0 . 54 9 4 0 . 297
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605 60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0 . 25 0 . 53 9 0 . 25 0 . 296
0.5 0 . 52 8 0.5 0 . 288
1 0 . 515 1 0 . 282
2 0 . 492 2 0 . 274
4 0 . 479 4 0 . 268
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 )
The principle of the Ostwald method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vol % ;
was used in which a measured volume of the impurity was mostly water
gas-free l iquid is stirred in the pre ( author )
sence of the gas , and its decrease in
volume is measured in a burette over ( 2 ) DDR pro analys is grade by DDR
mercury . The volume of l iquid was Standard TGL 5 0 2 1 .
measured at the experimental tem
perature . The molar concentration of ( 3 ) Double distil led .
salt in the l iquid was standardized at r-------_,
20 °C. ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not given .
These data are an�lyzed and discussed
further in Ref . 1 .
REFERENCES :
1 . Gerecke , J . ; B ittrich , H . J .
Wi ss . z . Tech . Hochsch . Chem .
"Carl Schorlemmer" Leuna
Merseburg 19 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 115-2 2 .
1 73
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Methanaminium , N, N, N-trimethyl Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
iodide ; ( tetramethyl ammonium " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
iodide ) ; C4H 1 2NI ; [ 7 5-58-1 ] Merseburq , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/ K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
c2 /mol dm- 3 = 0 - 0 . 19
t/ ° C T/ K c2 tmo l dm- 3 a a t/ ° C T/ K c2 tmol dm- 3 a a

-- --- -- ---
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6
0.1 0 . 998 0.1 0 . 507
0 . 19 0 . 980 0 . 19 0 . 49 6
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482
0.1 0 . 872 0.1 0 . 442
0 . 19 0 . 847 0 . 19 0 . 431
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436
0.1 0 . 754 0.1 0 . 390
0 . 19 0 . 730 0 . 19 0 . 379
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392
0.1 0 . 652 0.1 0 . 345
0 . 19 0 . 644 0 . 19 0 . 334
35 3 08 . 15 0 . 0 . 605 60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0.1 0 . 563 0.1 0 . 3 09
0 . 19 0 . 563
a a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
qas-free l iquid is stirred in the pre ( author )
sence of the qas , and its decrease in
volume is measured in a burette over ( 2 ) DDR pro analysis qrade by DDR
mercury . The volume of l iquid was Standard TGL 5 02 1 .
salt in the l iquid was standardized at
20 ° C . �------�
ESTIMATED ERROR :
These data are analyzed and discussed
further in Ref . 1 . Not qiven .
REFERENCES :
1 . Gerecke , J . ; Bittrich , H . J .

"Carl Schorlemmer" Leuna
Merseburg 19 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 115-2 2 .
1 74
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Lloyd , R .
( 2 ) Diammonium salt - of 2 -hydroxy- AEC Access ion No . 8 8 9 0 , Rep . No .

1 , 2 , 3 -propanetricarboxylic acid ; WAPD-TM-511 , 1 9 6 5 , 1 0 pp .
(NH4 ) 2C6H607 ; [ 3 0 1 2 -65-5 ]
Chem . Abstr . 1 9 6 6 , 65 , 1 2 9 1 0 a .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
Solubility of carbon dioxide in water and 0 . 053 mol L- 1 ammonium c itrate a
c 1 /mmol L- 1 d
T/K b p3 j atm pH c Total Fixed Unf ixed
80 299 . 82 0 . 966 0 4.2 31. 2 0 31.2

0 . 034 0 . 926 0 . 053 4 20 . 4 4.2 16 . 2
5 26 . 0 4.7 21 . 3
6 40 . 0 5.1 34 . 9
7 58 . 5 5.8 52 . 7
100 3 10 . 9 3 0 . 935 0 4.2 23 . 2 0 23 . 2

0 . 065 0 . 895 0 . 053 5 20 . 7 5.2 15 . 5
12 0 3 2 2 . 04 0 . 884 0 4.2 17 . 8 0 17 . 8
0 . 116 0 . 844 0 . 053 5 18 . 6 5.1 13 . 5
140 3 3 3 . 15 0 . 8 04 0 4.2 13 . 3 0 13 . 3
0 . 19 6 0 . 764 0 . 053 4 15 . 8 4.0 11 . 8
5 17 . 5 4.4 13 . 1
6 23 . 8 5.0 18 . 8
7 35 . 7 6.0 29 . 7
a The common name of the electrolyte is diammonium citrate .

b Added by the compiler . The Kelvin temperatures are not intended to rep
resent an accuracy , but to reproduce the Fahrenheit temperatures .
c The pH qiven for water ( c2 jmol L- 1 = 0 ) means pH of water saturated with
carbon dioxide . Accordinq to the author the measurements showed that
saturatinq water with co2 under the ambient barometric pressure in the
temperature ranqe of 8 0 to 14 0 ° F yielded a pH of 4 . 2 ± 0 . 1 .
The ammonium citrate solutions of certain pH ' s were prepared as follows :
At pH 4 the solution was prepared from an equimolar mixture of citric
acid and diammonium citrate to contain 11 . 1 q/L of monoammonium c itrate ,
and its pH was adj usted upward to pH 4 by addinq ammonia .
At pH 5 the solution was primarily diammonium citrate and was prepard by
dissolvinq 12 q of diammonium citrate per l iter .
At pH 6 and at pH 7 ammonia was added to the pH 5 solution . At pH 7 the
salt was in the form of triammonium citrate .
All solutions were initial ly prepared to contain 12 q diammonium citrate
per l iter ( 0 . 05 3 mol L- 1 ) .
d The values for the solubil ity of co2 in water are at a total pressure of
1 atm ( 1 0 1 . 3 kPa ) . The carbon dioxide in ammonium c itrate solutions was
measured at a barometric pressure of 7 3 0 mmHq ( 0 . 9 6 0 atm or 9 7 . 3 kPa ) .
The author distinquished between fixed co2 , assumed to be in the form of
bicarbonate and carbonate ion , and unfixed co2 , assumed to be in the form
of co2 ( aq) and H2co3 ( aq) .
Continued on the next paqe .

1 75
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Lloyd , R .
( 2 ) Diammonium salt of 2 -hydroxy- AEC Access ion No . 8 8 9 0 , Rep . No .
1 , 2 , 3 -propanetricarboxylic acid ; WAPD-TM-5 1 1 , 1 9 6 5 , 1 0 pp .
(NH4 ) 2 C6H607 ; ( 3 0 1 2 - 6 5-5 ]
Chem . Abstr . 1 9 6 6 , 65 , 1 2 9 10a .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 299 . 8 - 333 . 2 H. L . Clever
pfkPa = 101 . 3 , 97 . 3
c2 fmol L- 1 = o and 0 . 0 5 3
The author found that the fixed dissolved carbon dioxide did not vary with
temperature while the unf ixed dissolved carbon dioxide decreased as tempera
ture increased . He summarized these results in the following table .
Fixed co2 Unfixed co2 , cfmmo l ( L atm) - 1

Solution cfmmol L- 1 299 . 8 K (80 OF) 3 3 3 . 2 K ( 14 0 O F )
NH4-citr . pH 4 4.1 17 . 5 15 . 5
NH4-citr . pH 5 4.9 23 . 0 17 . 1
NH4-citr . pH 6 5.1 37 . 7 24 . 6
NH4-citr . pH 7 5.9 54 . 6 38 . 9
Water 0 32 . 3 16 . 5
The carbon dioxide solubilities

4 in water correspond
4 to mole fraction
solubilities of 5 . 8 3 x 10- and 3 . 0 2 x 10- at one atm assuming the
density of water and the C02 saturated solutions have the same value .
Two 100 mL samples of the solvent were ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . Described as pure
saturated with carbon dioxide by pas cyl inder gas , source not given .
sing pure cyl inder co2 through the
solutions for 3 0 minutes . One sample ( 2 ) Diammonium citrate . Nothing spe
was used to determine total co2 . It cified .
was treated with ammonia and barium
chloride to precipitate the tota l co2 ( 3 ) Water . Nothing specif ied .
as barium carbonate which was re
covered and treated with acid to lib
erate the co2 . The other sample was
stripped of unfixed co2 by heating
strongly under reduced pressure until
the solution volume was reduced in ESTIMATED ERROR :
half . The f ixed co2 remaining was
treated with ammonia and bar ium chlo Temperature : Nothing specif ied .
ride and the barium carbonate re Solubility : Nothing specif ied .
covered and treated with acid to re
cover the co2 • The Unf ixed co2 =
Total co2 - Fixed co2 • REFERENCES :
Compi ler ' s note : The 3 0 minute satu
ration time seems too short to attain
saturation .
1 76
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 124-3 8-9 ) Ownby , D . W . ; Prap a i traku l , W . ;

King , A . D . Jr .
( 2 ) N, N, N-Trimethy l - 1 -hexadecanaminium
bromide ; ( cetyltrimethylammonium J . Coll oid Interface Sci . 1988 ,
bromide ) ; c19H42N . Br ; ( 5 7 - 0 9 - 0 J 125 , 526-3 3 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
= o.o - 0.4
1
m2 jmo l kg- H . L . C lever
S o lubi l ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous cetyltrimethylammonium bromide .
1 b 2 1
t/ ° C T/K a m2 /mol kg- 1 0 m1 jmo l kg- c
--
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.0 3 . 28
0.1 3 . 46
0.2 3 . 60
0.3 3 . 73
0'. 4 3 . 88
a Added by the comp i ler .
b m2 = mo l a l ity of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide .
c m1 = s o lubi l ity of carbon dioxide .
The measurements are made at several pressures up to 1 0 - 15 atm

( 1 - 1 . 5 MPa ) . The s o lubi l ity va lues have been corrected to 1 atm
( 0 . 1 0 3 MPa) parti a l pressure of co2 • See method below .
METHOD /APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS :
The apparatus and method are descr ibed ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . Matheson Gas
in ear l ier papers ( 1 , 2 ) . Solub i l ity Products . Commer c i a l grade ,
is determined in a thermostated , mag stated to be 9 9 . 5 % min purity .
netic st irred cyl indr ical brass bomb
with an observat ion window . The so lu ( 2 ) Cetyltr imethylammonium bromide .
tion is prepared and put in a glass Lancaster Synthes i s Ltd . Stated
l iner in the bomb . The system is to be 9 8 . 0 % .
sealed , evacuated to a pressure j ust
above water vapor pres sure , and out ( 3 ) Water . Nothing spec i f ied , but
gassed with stirr ing for s everal have used doubly d i s t i l led water
hours . The gas is added to a known in ear l ier work .
pressure and equ i l ibrated with stir
ring for a minimum o f f ive hours .
Stirr ing is stopped , the s olution is ESTIMATED ERROR :
allowed to become st i l l . The gas is
vented leaving the supersaturated so oTfK not sp e c i f i ed .
om1 fmo l kg- = 0 . 0 2 X 1 0-
2
lution under a gaseous pressure of at
mospheric pressure for a f ixed time of
3 0 to 6 0 seconds . The rate of gas r------1
· loss during the s t i l l condition is REFERENCES :
measured to use in a later correct ion .
The gas is st irred and col lected . The 1 . �atheson , ! . B . C . ; King , A . D . Jr .
total volume of gas is measured along J . Colloid Interface Sci . 1978 , --
with ambi ent pressure and temperature . 66 , 4 6 4 .
2. Bolden , P . L . ; Hoskins , J . C . ;
King , A . D . Jr . J . Coll oi d Interface
Sci . 1 9 8 3 , 9 1 , 4 5 4 .
1 77
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8-9 ) Findlay , A . ; Creighton , H . J . M .
( 2 ) S i l icic acid ( col loidal ) ; J . Chem . Soc . 1 9 1 0 , 9 7 , 5 3 6 - 6 1 .
[ 13 4 3 -9 8 - 2 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
2 P1 /kPa = 97 . 5 - 180 . 5 Pirketta Scharl in
10 'Y2 / g cm- 3 = 1 . 4 0 - 2 . 80
p1 / bar s b p 1 / bar s b
2 9 8 . 15 1 . 40 1 . 000 0 . 975 0 . 822 1 . 4 18 0 . 816

1 . 105 0 . 8 19 1 . 59 0 0 . 816
1 . 248 0 . 816 1 . 805 0 . 816
2 9 8 . 15 2 . 20 1 . 002 0 . 976 0 . 828 1 . 384 0 . 820

1 . 115 0 . 822 1 . 57 1 0 . 820
1 . 251 0 . 820 1. 780 0 . 820
2 9 8 . 15 2 . 80 1 . 003 0 . 975 0 . 831 1 . 400 0 . 82 3

1 . 164 0 . 825 1 . 604 0 . 824
1 . 280 0 . 824 1 . 773 0 . 825
a
�2 = mas s concentration Si02 in the solvent
concentration of gas in liquid phase
b s =
concentration of gas in gaseous phase
Solubil ity in water : Ostwald coefficient L = 0 . 8 17 cm3 cm- 3
similar to that of Geffcken ( Ref . 1 )
except that the manometer tube was ( 2 , 3 ) Solutions of s i l icic acid were
longer . prepared by dissolving pure
s i l ica in potassium hydroxide
and adding excess of hydro
chloric acid . The l iquid was
then dialysed , f irst against
tap water and then against dis
til led water , until free from
chloride .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.1; 65 = ± 0 . 25 %
REFERENCES :
Geffcken , G .
Z . Phys . Chem . , stoechiom .
----
257-302 .
1 78
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Findlay , A . ; Wi l l iams , T .
( 2 ) S i l icic acid ( colloidal ) ; J . Chem . Soc . 19 1 3 , 103 , 6 3 6 - 4 5 .

. [ 13 4 3 -9 8 - 2 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
p 1 /kPa = 3 4 . 9 - 1 0 2 . 0 c . L . Young
2
10 n / g cm- 3 = 0 . 4 5 - 1 . 2 5
2 .s b
T/ K 1 0 '1'2 /g �m- 3 a p/ g cm- 3 p1 / bar s b p 1 / bar
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 45 0 . 996 0 . 356 0 . 8 16 0 . 64 1 0 . 813

0 . 876 0 . 816 1 . 016 0 . 8 18
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 95 0 . 999 0 . 349 0 . 836 0 . 513 0 . 823

0 . 64 1 0 . 823 0 . 869 0 . 816
1 . 008 0 . 82 2
2 9 8 . 15 1 . 25 1 . 000 0 . 353 0 . 842 0 . 512 0 . 82 6
0 . 636 0 . 826 0 . 876 0 . 82 0
1 . 020 0 . 824
a 'Y2 = mass concentration S i02

b s =
Solubi l ity in water : Ostwald coefficient L = 0 . 8 1 6 cm3 cm- 3
Volumetric static method . care was (1) No details given .
taken to reduce dead space because of
the small amounts of gas absorbed . (2) Solutions prepared by adding
Apparatus s imilar to that described in excess hydrochloric acid to
Ref . 1 . solutions of sodium s i l icate
and dialys ing the l iquid .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 1 ; 6S = ± 1 %
REFERENCES :
1 . Findlay , A . ; Creighton , H . J . M .
J . Chem . Soc . 1 9 1 0 , 97, 5 3 6 -6 1 .

1 79
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Shkol ' nikova , R . I .
(2) Hydrated aluminium oxide ; Uch . Zap . Leningr . Gos . Unov . , Ser .
Al20 3 • XH20 ; [ 1 3 3 3 -8 4 -2 ] Khim . Nauk . 1 9 5 9 , Nr . 18 , 6 4 -8 6 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Chem . Abstr . 19 6 1 , 55 , 2 5 4 4 3b .
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15 - 3 13 . 1 5 H . L . Clever
P/kPa
2 = 1 0 1 . '3 2 5 A . L . cramer
10 w2 = 0 - 0 . 4 2
2
T/K 10 w2 a 10 3 a b
2 9 3 . 15 0.1 770 . 0
3 0 3 . 15 593 . 2
3 1 3 . 15 47 0 . 1
2 9 3 . 15 0 . 35 698 . 0
3 0 3 . 15 551 . 9
3 1 3 . 15 438 . 0
2 9 3 . 15 0 . 42 64 1 . 1
3 0 3 . 15 523 . 0
3 1 3 . 15 4 16 . 1
a w2 = mass fraction of component 2 .

a =Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- ] .
b 1
The enthalpy of solution of co2 from the temperature coefficient of -the

Bunsen coefficient is 2 3 . 64 0 kJ mol- 1 ( 5 6 5 0 cal mol- 1 ) in water and
18 . 8 2 8 kJ mol- l ( 4 5 0 0 cal mol- 1 ) , 17 . 7 8 2 kJ mol- 1 ( 4 2 5 0 cal mol-,1) , and
16 . 5 2 7 kJ mol- 1 ( 3 9 5 0 cal mol- 1 ) for the 0 . 1 , 0 . 3 5 and 0 . 4 2 mass
- %
Al20 3 • xH20 solution , respectively .
The values for the solubil ity of co2 in water were not given in the
paper .
Al2o 3 · xH2o is described as a sol ( col loidal ) .
The apparatus and procedure of Lannung ( 1 ) source not given . Stated to be
were modif ied ( Ref . 1 ) . 99 . 98 % .
( 2 ) No information .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not given .
REFERENCES :
1 . Lannung , A .
J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 3 0 , 52 , 6 8 .
1 80
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Aluminium chloride ; AlC1 3 ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 9 , 24 , 1 1 - 1 4 .

. [ 74 46-70-0 ]
( 3 ) water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]

T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 c . L . Young
c2 jmo l L- 1 = 0 - 2 . 57 0
T/K c2 jmol L- 1 L a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8264
0 . 411 0 . 6582
0 . 936 0 . 4888
1 . 370 0 . 3854
1 . 868 0 . 2 9 17
2 . 57 0 0 . 1907

p = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar

( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Yasunishi , A . i Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Aluminium sulfate ; Al2 ( S04 ) J ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 24 , 11-14 .
[ 10 0 4 3 - 0 1 - 3 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 c . L . Young
c2 jmol L- 1 = 0 - 0 . 850
T/K c2 /mol L- 1 L a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8 2 64
0 . 18 6 0 . 6 1 17
0 . 392 0 . 4327
0 . 628 0 . 2753
0 . 850 0 . 19 1 3

p = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
volumetrically . Dens ity and composi- ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
tion of solution determined after ab- degassed by boi l ing .

1 . Tokunaga , J . 6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
1 81
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Setchenow , J . ( Sechenov , I . M . ]
( 2 ) Z inc sulfate ; znso4 ; [ 7 7 3 3 - 0 2 - 0 ] Ann . Chim . Phys . ( 6 ] 1892 , 25 ,
2 2 6 -7 0 .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 8 8 . 3 5
c2 /mol dm- 3 = o - 2 . 4 7 8 Pirketta Scharl in
a a a,c
t / °C T/K D i lution c2 ;mol dm- 3 a b k scc / dm3 mol- l
X
---
15 . 2 288 . 35 co 0 1 . 009 -
12 0 . 2065 0 . 903 0 . 233
6 0 . 4 13 0 0 . 783 0 . 267
2 1 . 239 0 . 474 0 . 2 65
1 2 . 478 0 . 2 09 0 . 276
a
c
k scc = Setchenow salt effect parameter ;
Initial solution : 4 0 . 0 0 g znso4 + water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of solution .
tus on those of Fernet ( 1857 ) and of stone and sulfuric acid . Dried .
measuring the pressure and one a distil led .
mercury reservo ir . The manometer was
mark in the constricting connection .
passed by the pressure difference in- �------�
volume absorbed was reduced to 0 o c Akad . Nauk . SSSR Mem . Acad . imp .
and one meter Hg pressure . The Sci . St . Petersburg 1887 , 35 ,
1 82
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Vazquez , G . ; Chenlo , F . ; Pereira , G .
(2) Copper sulfate ; cuso4 ; Afinidad 1 9 9 4 , 51 , ( No . 4 5 3 ) 3 6 9-74 .
[ 7 7 5 8 -9 8 - 7 ]
(3) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 98 . 1
P1 / bar = 1 . 013 Pirketta Schar l in
n / g L- 1 = 0 - 160 Rosa Crovetto
T/K n / g L- 1 a c2 fmol L- 1 b pfkg m- 3 c c1 tmo l dm- 3 d L e

---
298 . 1 0 0 997 . 0 0 . 03 3 3 0 . 8 14
40 0 . 251 1040 . 1 0 . 0275 0 . 67 3
80 0 . 501 1079 . 9 0 . 0238 0 . 582
12 0 0 . 752 1118 . 4 0 . 0208 0 . 509
160 1 . 002 1156 . 2 0 . 0181 0 . 443
a = mass concentration of cuso4

b
c
'Y2
c2
p
=
=
concentration of cuso4 ; calculated by compi ler
density of aqueous cuso4 solution
I
d c1 = solubil ity of co2
e L = Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 ] ; calculated by comp i ler ( P S )
( ideal gas behavior assumed)
The authors also report values for viscosity � :
n / g L- 1 0 40 80 120 160
�/mPa s 0 . 890 1. 028 1 . 2 17 1 . 431 1 . 664
METHOD/APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIAL S :
The apparatus is a combination of ( 1 ) Commercial , purity 9 9 . 5 mole % .
previous des igns ( Refs 1 and 2 ) . It
was modified to achieve a more accu ( 2 ) No details given .
rate determination of the volume of
the absorbent l iquid . The apparatus ( 3 ) Distil led and degassed .
measures the volume of absorbed gas as
the volume of mercury that must be �-�------4
suppl ied to the system in order to ESTIMATED ERROR :
restore the initial pressure .
The raw solubil ity data obtained are 6T/K = ± 0 . 1
gas / l iquid volume ratios . 6P/ bar = ± 0 . 0 0 1
A detai led description of apparatus , 6c 1 t c 1 < ± 1 % [ estimated by com
method and procedure is given in pi ler ( P S ) on the basis of
Ref . 3 . the information in Ref . 3 ] "
REFERENCES :
1 . Alvarez , J . R . ; Fernandez , A ; .•
Coll , A . Ing . Quim . 1 9 8 4 , 1 6 , 67 .

2 . Haimour , N . J . Ch.em . Eng . Data
19 9 0 , 3 5 , 1 7 7 .
3 . Vazquez , G . ; Chenlo , F . ;
Pereira , G . ; Peaguda , J . J . Chem .
Eng . Data 1 9 9 4 , 3 9 , 6 3 9 .
1 83
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Vazquez , G . ; Chenlo , F . ; Pereira , G . ;
Peaguda , J .
( 2 ) Copper sulfate ; cuso4 ; [ 7 7 5 8 -9 8 -7 )
An . Quim . 1 9 9 4 , 9 0 , 3 2 4 -2 8 .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 293 . 1 - 3 13 . 1
P1 / bar = 1 . 013 Pirketta Scharl in
m2 tmol kg- 1 = 0 . 250 - 1 . 006
a
T/K 'Y2 / g L- 1 p/kg m- 3 b m2 tmol kg- 1 c: c 1 tmol dm- 3 d L e
---
2 93 . 1 0 . 250 0 . 0310 0 . 746

0 . 502 0 . 0269 0 . 64 6
0 . 753 0 . 02 3 6 0 . 567
r
1 . 006 0 . 0205 0 . 494
298 . 1 40 1041 0 . 250 0 . 0275 0 . 672
80 1 07 9 0 . 502 0 . 0237 0 . 58 0
12 0 1118 0 . 753 0 . 0208 0 . 510
160 1156 1 . 006 0 . 0181 0 . 443
3 03 . 1 0 . 250 0 . 0241 0 . 600
0 . 502 0 . 0204 0 . 508
0 . 753 0 . 0183 0 . 456
1 . 006 0 . 0162 0 . 403
3 08 . 1 0 . 250 0 . 02 0 9 0 . 529
0 . 502 0 . 0178 0 . 450
0 . 753 0 . 0157 0 . 397
1 . 006 0 . 0139 0 . 352
3 13 . 1 0 . 250 0 . 0186 0 . 478
0 . 502 0 . 0158 0 . 405
0 . 753 0 . 0142 0 . 3 64
1 . 006 0 . 0129 0 . 332
a
'Y2 mass concentration of cuso4
b =
p density of aqueous cuso4 solution
c:
m2 = molal ity of cuso4 ; calculated by compiler
e
L = Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 ]
The apparatus is a combination of ( 1 ) Commercial , purity 9 9 . 9 5 mole % .
was modi f ied to achieve a more accu ( 2 ) Merck . Grade not given .
the volume of mercury that must be r-------_,
The raw solubi l ity data obtained are 6T/K = ± 0 . 1
A detai led description of apparatus , 6c 1 t c 1 < ± 1 % ( estimated by com
method and procedure is given in pi ler on the basis of the
Ref . 3 . information in Ref . 3 )
REFERENCES :
1 . Alvarez , J . R . ; Fernandez , A . ;
Coll , A . Ing . Quim . 1 9 8 4 , 1 6 , 67 .
2 . Haimour , N . J . Chem . Eng . Data
19 9 0 1 3 5 1 177 •
Eng . Data 1 9 9 4 , 3 9 , 6 3 9 .
1 84
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Shkol ' nikova , R . I .
(2) Hydrated ferric oxide ; Uch . Zap . Leningr . Gos . Unov . , Ser .
Fe20 3 • xH20 ; [ 12 2 5 9 -2 1-1 ) Khim . Nauk . 1 9 5 9 , Nr . 18 , 6 4 -8 6 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) Chem . Abstr . 1 9 6 1 , 55 , 2 5 4 4 3 b .
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15 - 3 1 3 . 15 H . L . Clever
P/ kPa
2 = 101 . 3 2 5 A . L . Cramer
10 w2 = o - 0 . 8
2
T/K 10 w2 a 10 3 a b
2 9 3 . 15 0.1 763 . 1
3 0 3 . 15 592 . 0
3 1 3 . 15 4 69 . 1
2 9 3 . 15 0.5 797 . 0
3 0 3 . 15 616 . 0
3 1 3 . 15 482 . 0
2 9 3 . 15 0 . 82 8 09 . 0
3 03 . 15 635 . 0
3 1 3 . 15 495 . 0
a w2 = mass fraction of component 2 .

b a =Bunsen coeff icient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
The enthalpy of solution of C02 from the temperature coefficient of the
punsen coefficient is 2 3 . 6 4 0 kJ mol- 1 ( 5 6 5 0 cal mol- 1 ) in water and
18 . 5 7 7 kJ mol- 1 ( 4 4 4 0 cal mor 1 ) , 18 . 9 1 2 kJ mol- 1 ( 4 5 2 0 cal mol- 1 ) , and
18� 3 2 6 kJ mol- 1 ( 4 3 8 0 cal mol- 1 ) for the 0 . 1 , 0 . 5 and 0 . 8 mass %
Fe2o 3 · xH2o solution , respectively .
The va lues for the solubil ity of co2 in water were not given in the
paper .
Fe2o 3 • xH2o is described as a sol ( c o lloidal ) .
The apparatus and procedure of Lannung ( 1 ) Source not given . Stated to be
were modif ied ( Ref . 1 ) . 99 . 9 8 % .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not given .
REFERENCES :
1 . Lannung , A .
J . Am . Chem . soc . 19 3 0 , 52 , 6 8 .
1 85
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -38 -9 ] Findlay , A . ; Creighton , H . J . M .
( 2 ) Ferric hydroxide ( col loidal ) ; J. Chem . Soc . 1 9 1 0 , 9 7 , 5 3 6 -6 1 .
Fe ( OH ) 3 ; [ 13 0 9-3 3 -7 )
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K 2 9 8 . 15
P1 / kPa 99 . 5 - 180 . 8 c . L . Young
2
1o ,2 t g cm- 3 0 . 569 - 1 . 661
I EXPERIMENTAL VALUES :
T/K
2
1 0 'Y2 / g cm- 3 a pfg cm- 3 p1 /bar s b p1 / bar s b
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 569 1 . 000 1 . 000 0 . 848 1 . 12 8 0 . 843

1 . 237 0 . 84 1 1 . 353 0 . 842
1 . 528 0 . 845 1 . 808 0 . 846
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 854 1 . 003 1 . 000 0 . 862 1 . 12 9 0 . 858
1 . 231 0 . 856 1 . 387 0 . 857
1 . 645 0 . 860 1. 763 0 . 861
2 9 8 . 15 1 . 277 1 . 005 0 . 995 0 . 886 1 . 12 1 0 . 881
1. 313 0 . 88 0 1 . 42 8 0 . 878
1 . 511 0 . 878 1 . 675 0 . 887
2 9 8 . 15 1 . 661 1 . 009 0 . 996 0 .. 9 0 4 1 . 108 0 . 901
1 . 224 0 . 896 1. 336 0 . 900
1 . 533 0 . 900 1 . 689 0 . 902
a 'Y2 = mas s concentration of ferric hydroxide

b s =
Solubil ity in water : Ostwald coefficient L = 0 . 8 1 7 cm3 cm- 3
simi lar to that of Geffcken (Ref . 1 )
except that the manometer tube was ( 2 ) Ferric hydroxide solution was
longer to give higher pressures . prepared by the method of Noyes
Concentration of ferrous hydroxide ( Ref . 2 . ) and dialysed .
determined by precipitation with
ammonium sulfate . ( 3 ) Nothing specif ied .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
&T/K = ± 0.1; &S = ± 0 . 25 %
REFERENCES :
1 . Geffcken , G .
z . Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .
2 5 7 -3 0 2 .
2 . Noyes , A . A .
J. Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 0 5 , 3 7 , 9 4 .
1 86
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Findlay , A . ; Wi l l iams , T .
( 2 ) Ferric hydroxide ( col loidal ) ; J. Cbem . Soc . 1 9 1 3 , 1 0 3 , 6 3 6 - 4 5 .
( Iron hydroxide ) ; Fe ( OH) 3 ;
[ 13 0 9 -3 3 -7 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 298 . 15
P 1 /kPa = 3 1 . 1 - 99 . 5 c. L . Young
2
10 y2 / g cm- 3 = 0 . 6 3 and 1 . 2 6
p1 / bar s b p 1 / bar s b
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 63 1 . 003 0 . 333 1 . 044 0 . 475 0 . 984

0 . 58 8 0 . 954 0 . 8 19 0 . 920
0 . 995 0 . 904
2 9 8 . 15 1 . 26 1 . 006 0 . 3 11 1 . 286 0 . 437 1 . 165
0 . 54 5 1 . 107 0 . 783 1 . 029
0 . 987 0 . 989
a y2 = mas s concentration ferric hydroxide

b s = -------
Solubi l ity in water : Ostwald coefficient L = 0 . 8 1 6 cm3 cm- 3
Volumetric static method . Care was (1) No details given .
the small amounts of gas absorbed . (2) Prepared by method of Noyes
Apparatus s imilar to that described in (Ref . 2 ) .
Ref . 1 .
(3) Nothing specified
ESTIMATED ERROR :
&T/K = ± 0.1; &S = ± 1 %
REFERENCES :
J . Cbem . Soc . 1 9 1 0 , 9 7 , 5 3 6 -6 1 .
2 . Noyes , A . A .
J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 0 5 , 3 7 , 9 4 .
1 87
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ] Gatterer , A .
( 2 ) Ferric hydroxide ( col loidal ) ; J . Chem . Soc . ( London) 1 9 2 6 , 129 ,
Fe ( OH ) 3 ; ( 13 09 - 3 3 -7 ) 2 9 9 -3 1 6 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 7 8 . 12 - 2 9 8 . 15
c2 tmol L- 1 = o - 0 . 9 6 7 Pirketta Scharl in
I-- �
L c L c
4 . 97 2 7 8 . 12 0 1 . 446 14 . 9 6 288 . 11 0 . 293 1 . 154

0 . 07 1 1 . 471 0 . 51 3 1 . 2 04
0 . 144 1 . 503 0 . 967 1 . 291
0 . 293 1 . 534 19 . 9 8 2 9 3 . 13 0 0 . 936
0 . 513 1 . 58 4 0 . 07 1 0 . 9 6 10
0 . 967 1 . 680 0 . 14 4 0 . 9870
9 . 95 2 8 3 . 10 0 1 . 240 0 . 293 1 . 016
0 . 07 1 1 . 2 67 0 . 513 1 . 066
0 . 144 1 . 297 0 . 967 1 . 149
0 . 293 1. 3 2 6 25 . 00 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 826
0 . 513 1 . 379 0 . 07 1 0 . 8533
0 . 967 1 . 470 0 . 144 0 . 8764
14 . 9 6 288 . 11 0 1 . 070 0 . 293 0 . 9063
0 . 07 1 1 . 09 5 0 . 513 0 . 9526
0 . 144 1 . 123 0 . 967 1. 032
a Calculated b y the compi ler .

b c 2 means the concentration of entities 1 / 3 Fe ( OH ) 3 • c2 = c { 1 / 3 Fe { OH ) 3 }
M{ 1 / 3 Fe { OH ) 3 } = 3 5 . 6 2 1 g mol- l
Author : "Although it is uncertain whether the colloids in question have

def inite chemical formulz , yet for the sake of clearness the
gram-equivalent of ferric hydroxide was taken as 1 / 3 Fe { OH ) 3 =
3 5 . 6 2 1 . 11
c L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 f cm- 3 ) . The values represented in table
are mean values of measurements .
The method of Ostwald was employed . 1 { 1 ) Careful ly washed . Purity of C02
The solutions were freed from air by was confirmed by the value ob
boil ing in a vacuum and , without con tained for its solubi l ity in dis
tact with air , transferred to the vac til led water .
uum mixing vessel at 25 ° C . The gas {2) A solution of pure ferric hydrox
was saturated with water vapor at the ide in acetic acid was di luted and
same temperature . Five measurements boi led unti l the ratio of acetic
were made with a given s olution at acid to ferric hydroxide became
five different temperatures , the pro 1 : 3 0 - 1 : 6 0 . The solution was
cess being repeated after an interval then evaporated under reduced
of several hours to check the former pressure .
result . (3) Not specified .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6L/L = ± 0 . 004 { by author )
REFERENCES :
1 . Ostwald , W . ; Luther , R .
Handbuch der Physi cochemischen
Messungen , 3 rd ed . , 1 9 1 0 , p . 2 4 6 .
1 88
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Findlay , A ; Shen , B .
( 2 ) Ferrous ammonium sulfate ; J . Chem . soc . 1912 , 101 , 1459-68 .
( NH4 ) 2 S04 FeS04 . 6H20 ; [ 7 7 8 3 -8 5 -9 )
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
2
10 'Y2 / q cm- 3 = 9 . 51 - 22 . 47 c . L . Younq
T/K s b
2 9 8 . 15 9 . 51 1 . 052 0 . 641 4 . 94
10 . 2 6 1 . 057 0 . 62 9 4 . 86
2 2 . 47 1 . 12 4 0 . 460 3 . 75
mass concentration of salt

concentration of qas in liquid phase
concentration of qas in qaseous phase
pressure ranqe ) ; value quoted is the mean .
c Calculated by compi ler assuminq Vm, l = 2 4 . 3 x 10- 3 m3 mol- 1 at 1 atm .
Solubi l ity in water : Ostwald coefficient L = 0 . 8 2 5 cm3 cm- 3 •
nometer tube was of such lenqth5 as to
allow measurements up to 2 x 10 Pa ( 2 ) No details qiven .
( about 2 atm) •
( 3 ) No details qiven .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.1; 65 = ± 1 %.
( estimated by comp iler )
REFERENCES :
1 89
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Gatterer , A .
( 2 ) Ferriferrocyanide ( colloidal ) ; J . Chem . Soc . ( London ) 1 9 2 6 , 129 ,
( Pruss ian blue ) ; [ 14 0 3 8 - 4 3 -8 ] ; 299-316 .
[ 12 2 4 0-15-2 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ] _ ,_
T/K = 2 7 8 . 12 - 2 9 8 . 15
c2 /mol L- 1 = 0 - 0 . 8 9 6 Pirketta Scharl in
L c t/ ° C T/K a c2 tmol L- 1 b L c
---
4 . 97 2 7 8 . 12 0 1 . 446 14 . 9 6 288 . 11 0 . 37 1 . 106

0 . 12 6 1 . 465 0 . 51 1. 093
0 . 178 1 . 472 0 . 896 1 . 087
0 . 37 1 . 478 19 . 9 8 2 9 3 . 13 0 0 . 936
0 . 51 1 . 4 64 0 . 12 6 0 . 9549
0 . 896 1 . 453 0 . 17 8 0 . 9633
9 . 95 2 8 3 . 10 0 1 . 240 0 . 37 0 . 9684
0 . 12 6 1 . 258 0 . 51 0 . 9613
0 . 17 8 1 . 268 0 . 896 0 . 9 5 12
0 . 37 1 . 277 25 . 00 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 826
0 . 51 1 . 264 0 . 12 6 0 . 8443
0 . 896 1 . 255 0 . 178 0 . 8530
14 . 9 6 288 . 11 0 1 . 07 0 0 . 37 0 . 8577
0 . 12 6 1 . 089 0 . 51 0 . 8505
0 . 17 8 1 . 098 0 . 896 0 . 8421
b c2 means the concentration o f entities 1 / 12 Fe4 [ Fe ( CN ) 6 ] 3 •

c2 = c { 1 / 12 Fe4 [ Fe ( CN ) 6 ] J } ; M{ 1 / 12 Fe4 [.Fe ( CN) 6 ] J } = 7 1 . 6 0 3 g mol- l
Author : "Although it is uncertain whether the colloids in question have
def inite chemical formulz , yet for the sake .of clearness the
gram-equivalent of Prussian blue was taken as 1 / 12 Fe4 [ Fe ( CN) 6 ] 3
= 7 1 . 6 0 3 . 11
c L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 / cm- 3 ) . The values represented in table

are mean values of measurements .
The method of Ostwa ld was employed . 1 ( 1 ) careful ly washed . Purity of C02
The solutions were freed from air by was confirmed by the value ob
boil ing in a vacuum and , without con tained for its solubi l ity in dis
tact with air , transferred to the vac til led water .
uum mixing vessel at 2 5 ·o c . The gas
was saturated with water vapor at the ( 2 ) Prepared by mixing sodium ferro
same temperature . Five measurements cyanide and ferric chloride ,
were made with a given solution at washed , redissolved , concentrated .
five different temperatures , the pro
cess being repeated after an interval ( 3 ) Not specif ied .
of several hours to check the former
result .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
oL/L = ± 0 . 004 ( by author )
REFERENCES :
1 . Ostwald-Luther , "Handbuch der
Physicochemischen Messungen" 1910 ,
3rd ed . , p . 2 4 6 .
1 90
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Magnes ium chloride ; MgCl2 ; J . Chem ; Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 24 , 11-14 .
[ 7 7 8 6- 3 0 - 3 )
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 0 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 32 5 c . L . Young
c2 /mol L- 1 = 0 - 3 . 955
4
T/K c2 /mol L- 1 L T/K c2 tmol L- 1 L 4
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 0634 2 9 8 . 15 2 . 392 0 . 3 04 5
0 . 356 0 . 9098 2 . 797 0 . 2 64 3
0 . 767 0 . 7 64 2 3 . 14 1 0 . 2 3 14
1 . 2 15 0 . 6262 3 . 609 0 . 1879
1 . 588 0 . 5374 3 . 955 0 . 1648
2 . 14 1 0 . 4286
2 . 568 0 . 3631 3 0 8 . 15 0 0 . 6675
2 . 92 1 0 . 3 12 1 0 . 14 6 0 . 6241
3 . 572 0 . 2332 0 . 411 0 . 5685
3 . 766 0 . 18 7 6 0 . 514 0 . 54 2 8
0. 973 0 . 4486
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8264 1 . 2 18 0 . 4048
0 . 363 0 . 7023 1 . 8 10 0 . 3 2 16
0 . 738 0 . 6038 2 . 17 2 0 . 2805
1 . 252 0 . 4813 2 . 511 0 . 2468
1. 633 0 . 4112 3 . 253 0 . 1965
2 . 018 0 . 3537 3 . 743 0 . 1604
4
L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 )
p = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
volumetrically . Dens ity and composi ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 20 , 41.
1 91
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ] He , S . ; Morse , J . W .
( 2 ) Magnes ium chloride ; MgC12 ; Geocbim . Cosmocbim . Acta 1 9 9 3 , S T,
[ 778 6-30-3 ] 3 5 3 3 -5 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 - 3 6 3 . 15
m2 tmo l kg- 1 = 0 . 1 - 5 . 02 1
'Yl f
2 7 3 . 15 0.1 1 . 0090 96 . 6 70 . 3 1 . 07
1.0 1. 0732 49 . 2 1 . 53
2.0 1 . 14 3 0 35 . 7 2 . 11
3.0 1 . 1980 24 . 9 3 . 03
4.0 1. 2530 15 . 6 4 . 83
5.0 1 . 3 0 14 10 . 2 7 . 52
2 9 8 . 15 0.1 1 . 0056 94 . 2 30. 0 1 . 07
1. 0 1 . 0680 21. 8 1 . 47
2.0 1 . 1342 17 . 1 2 . ·2 5
3.0 1 . 1917 9.9 3 . 24
5.0 1. 2948 6.7 4 . 83
3 2 3 . 15 0 . 2 15 1 . 0049 85 . 4 15 . 8 1 . 06
1 . 128 1 . 0669 15 . 5 1 . 23
1 . 83 1 1 . 1119 10 . 9 1 . 52
3 . 02 4 1 . 1827 9.6 1 . 73
4 . 02 1 1 . 1368 8.7 1 . 91
5 . 02 1 1 . 2862 7.5 2 . 22
3 4 8 . 15 0.1 0 . 9842 60 . 3 7.7 1 . 05
1.0 1 . 0460 7.3 1 . 11
2•0 1 . 1109 6.6 1 . 23
3.0 1 . 1701 6.3 1 . 28
5.0 1 . 2742 5.7 1 . 42
3 6 3 . 15 0.1 0 . 9751 30 . 1 3.3 1 . 04
1.0 1. 0376 3.1 1 . 10
2.0 1 . 1307 2.9 1 . 23
3.0 1 . 1629 2.7 1 . 27
5.0 1 . 2676 2.4 1 . 40
a Calculated by compi ler b m2 = molality of MgC12

e m1 = molal ity of C02 f = activity coefficient of co2
l1
Either pure C02 gas or C02-N2 mixtu ( 1 ) Commercial ; purity 9 9 . 9 %.
maintain a constant P ( C02 ) . The co2- ( 2 ) source not mentioned . Analytical
N2 mixtures were made by pumping pre reagent-grade which met ACS speci
determined amounts of co2 and N2 into fications . Mgcl2 · 6H2o was
a gas tank and their compos ition was weighed and dissolved in water .
verif ied by gas chromatography . The concentration of MgC12 in
co2 or co2 -N2 gas mixtures were equi solutions was determined by ana
librated with the aqueous solutions in lyz ing cl- concentration via
a series of stirred water-j acketed AgN03 titration in stock solu
reaction vessels with condensers . The tions .
gas was premoistured by f irst pass ing
it through distil led water at the tem ( 3 ) 18 MO water obtained from a
perature of experiment . Fine bubbles Mi l l i-Q super-Q water system .
were obtained by us ing gas-dispersion
tubes . The bubbl ing rate was 90 to 95 ESTIMATED ERROR :
mL min- 1 •
The mole fraction of co2 in the co2- 6T/K = ± 0.1
N2 mixture was determined using a 6m1tm1 = ± o . 012
Hewlett Packard ( 5 7 9 0A) gas chromato &n h1 = ± o . o4
graph .
1 92
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]

(2) Magnes ium sulfate ; Mgso4 ; Ann . chim . Phys . [ 6 ) 1892 , 25 ,
[ 7 4 87 - 8 8 - 9 ) 2 2 6-7 0 .
(3) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18 -5 )
T/K = 288 . 35
c2 jmol dm- 3 = 0 - 2 . 617 Pirketta Scharl in
t/ °C T/K a Dilution c2 jmol dm- 3 a a b k scc / dm3 mol- l a , c

X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 GO 0 1 . 009 -
12 0 . 2 18 0 . 901 0 . 225
8 0 . 327 0 . 822 0 . 272
4 0 . 654 0 . 669 0 . 2 73
2 1 . 3 09 0 . 441 0 . 275
1 2 . 617 0 . 18 8 0 . 279
'

Initial solution : 3 1 . 5 0 g Mgso4 + water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of solution .
Regnault in 18 6 1 . The one meter ma
flexible s ilver cap i l lary . The ab-
mark in the constricting connect ion .
passed by the pressure difference in- �-------�
equilibrium was established . The gas
Bunsen coefficient was calculated . [ Ser . No . 7 ] , 1 - 5 9 .
1 93
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Markham , A . A . ; Kobe , K . A .

( 2 ) Magnes ium sulfate ; Mgso4 ; J . Am . Chem . Soc . 194 1 , 63 , 449-54 .
[ 7487-88-9 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 7 3 . 3 5 - 3 13 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 25 D . M . Mason
m2 tmol kg- 1 = 0 - 2
trc T/K m2tmol kg- 1 a a s b
---
0.2 273 . 35 o.o 1 . 7023 1. 7025

0.5 1 . 1988 1 . 1986
1 0 . 8448 0 . 8470
2 0 . 4128 0 . 4201
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.0 0 . 7565 0 . 7587
0.5 0 . 5580 0 . 5606
1 0 . 4147 0 . 4 18 6
2 0 . 2250 0 . 2 3 06
40 3 1 3 . 15 o.o 0 . 5133 0 . 5173
0.5 0 . 3 8 14 0 . 3 8 52
1 0 . 2948 0 . 2992
2 0 . 1658 0 . 1708
a a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

b S = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ] .
The authors f itted their data to equations :
Sm/50 = am2 + 1 / ( 1 + bm2 ) , as follows :
t rc a b
0.2 -0 . 0852 0 . 701
25 -0 . 0 8 0 8 0 . 57 5
40 -0 . 0 7 3 6 0 . 54 5
AUX I L I ARY I N FO RMATION
METHOD /AP PARATUS /PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PUR I TY OF MATERIALS :

The principle of the Ostwald method ( 1 ) Commercial cylinder , 9 9 � 8 %
liquid and the decrease in volume of ( 2 ) Analytical grade .
a burette over mercury . The pressure ( 3 ) Disti l led and degassed .
agitation did not cause super- ·
saturation . E STIMATE D E RROR :

6T/K = <± 0 . 1 at 0 . 2 °C , ± 0 . 0 3 at
other temperatures ( authors ) ; , .
6af a , 65/S = ± 0 . 0 0 2 ( authors ) .
RE FERENCES :
1 94
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Magnes ium sulfate ; Mgso4 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 4 8 7 -8 8 - 9 ) " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
c2 fmol dm-3 = 0 - 2
t f °C T/K c2 fmol dm-3 a a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0 . 25 0 . 845 0 . 850
0.5 0 . 7 17 0 . 722
1 0 . 565 0 . 569
2 0 . 260 0 . 266
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0 . 25 0 . 752 0 . 7575
0.5 0 . 6 17 0 . 62 1
1 0 . 48 1 0 . 4863
2 0 . 255 0 . 261
'
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 -
0 . 25 0 . 661 0 . 667
0.5 0 . 552 0 . 557
1 0 . 4 16 0 . 421
2 0 . 203 0 . 2 083
30 3 03 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0 . 25 0 . 597 0 . 602
0.5 0 . 488 0 . 493
1 0 . 373 0 . 378
2 0 . 17 5 0 . 180
AUXI L I ARY I N FO RMAT I O N
METHOD /APPARATUS /PROCEDURE : S OURCE AND P U R I TY OF MATE RI ALS :

The principle of the Ostwald method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vol %;
presence o f the gas , and its decrease
in volume is measured in a burette { 2 ) DDR pro analys is grade
temperature . For calculation of the { 3 ) Double disti lled .
Kuenen coefficient , the dens ity of
liquid was standardized at 2 0°C . E S T I MATED E R RO R :
REFE RENCES :
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
1 95
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Magnes ium sulfate ; Mgso4 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat .1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 4 8 7 -8 8 -9 ] " Carl Schorlemmer" , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
{ 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
( continued)
T/K a a s b
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605
0 . 25 0 . 52 2 0 . 5275
0.5 0 . 432 0 . 437
1 0 . 337 0 . 342
2 0 . 160 0 . 1646
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6
0 . 25 0 . 461 0 . 467
0.5 0 . 379 0 . 384
1 0 . 297 0 . 3 02
2 0 . 14 0 0 . 1444
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482
0 . 25 0 . 4 14 0 . 420
0.5 0 . 339 0 . 344
1 0 . 270 0 . 275
2 0 . 12 6 0 . 1302
50 ) 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436
0 . 25 0 . 374 0 . 379
0.5 0 . 305 0 . 3 10
1 0 . 243 0 . 2475
2 0 . 113 0 . 117
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392
0 . 25 0 . 334 0 . 339
0.5 0 . 273 0 . 2775
1 0 . 223 0 . 2275
2 0 . 101 0 . 1048
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0.5 0 . 203 0. 2073
1 0 . 09 3 0 . 09 6
a a = Bunsen coeff icient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm-1 ] .

b s = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g· 1 ( H20 ) atm"1 ) .
1 96
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -38-9 ] Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Magnes ium sulfate ; Mgso4 ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 2 4 , 11-14 .

[ 7487-88-9 ]
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/ K = 2 9 8 . 15
P /kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 c . L . Young
c2 tmol L- 1 = o - 2 . 274
T/ K c2 tmol L- 1 L a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8264
0 . 118 0 . 7634
0 . 4 18 0 . 6480
0 . 724 0 . 5355
1 . 02 0 0 . 4513
1 . 375 0 . 3636
1 . 64 3 0 . 3 04 7
2 . 0 13 0 . 2382
2 . 274 0 . 2049

p = 1 atm = 10 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
volumetrica l ly . Density and compos i ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± o . o5 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 20 , 41.
1 97
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 124-3 8-9 ] He , S . ; Morse , J . W .
( 2 ) Magnesium sulfate ; MgS04 ; Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 1 9 9 3 , 5 7 ,
[ 7 4 8 7 -8 8 - 9 ) 3 5 3 3 -54 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 - 3 6 3 . 15
m2 /mol kg- 1 = o . 099 - 4 . 0 0 3
T/K • m2 tmol kg- 1 b f

'Y1
2 7 3 . 15 0 . 106 1 . 0150 96 . 6 69 . 8 1 . 08
0 . 498 1. 0 6 3 2 58 . 6 1 . 29
1 . 000 1 . 1200 45 . 5 1 . 65
1 . 493 1 . 1705 30. 4 2 . 47
1 . 79 6 1 . 1989 22 . 4 3 . 37
2 9 8 . 15 0.1 1. 0101 94 . 2 30. 5 1 . 05
0.5 1 . 0565 27 . 4 1 . 17
1.0 1 . 1114 23 . 7 1 . 36
1.5 1 . 1628 15 . 8 2 . 03
2.2 1. 2288 12 . 5 2 . 56
3 2 3 . 15 0 . 09 9 1 . 0005 85 . 4 15 . 8 1 . 05
0 . 507 1 . 0461 14 . 3 1 . 16
1 . 004 1 . 0996 13 . 3 1 . 25
2 . 011 1 . 2005 9.2 2 . 02
2 . 97 3 1 . 2879 5.1 2 . 35
4 . 003 1 . 3 7 17 3.9 4 . 28
3 4 8 . 15 0.1 0 . 9875 60 . 3 7.9 1 . 03
1.0 1 . 0859 7.0 1 . 15
2.0 1 . 1872 6.3 1 . 27
3.0 1 . 2801 5.6 1 . 43
4.0 1 . 3 64 6 4.9 1 . 64
3 6 3 . 15 0.1 0 . 9783 30. 1 3.4 1 . 02
1.0 1 . 07 7 8 3.1 1 . 11
2.0 1 . 1801 2.8 1 . 24
3.0 1 . 2735 2.5 1 . 37
4.0 1 . 3581 2.2 1 . 53
a Calculated by compi ler b m2 = molality of MgS04

c p = density of solvent d p1 = partial pressure of co2
e m1 = molality of co2 f 'Y 1 = activity coefficient of co2
Either pure co2 gas or co2 -N2 mixtu ( 1 ) Commercial ; purity 9 9 . 9 %.
maintain a constant P ( C02 ) . The co2 - ( 2 ) Source not mentioned .
N2 mixtures were made by pumping pre Analytical reagent-grade which met
determined amounts of co2 and N2 into ACS specifications .
a gas tank and their composition was vacuum-dried before use .
verified by gas chromatography .
co2 or co2-N2 gas mixtures were equi ( 3 ) 18 MD water obtained from a
librated with the aqueous solutions in Mill i-Q Super-Q water system .
a series of stirred water-j acketed
reaction vessels with condensers . The
it through dist i lled water at the tem ESTIMATED ERROR :
tubes . 1 The bubbl ing rate was 90 to 95 6m1 tm1 = ± 0 . 012
mL min- • 6'Y 1 1 'Yl = ± 0. 04
Hewlett Packard ( 5 7 9 0A ) gas chromato
graph .
1 98
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Markham , A . A . ; Kobe , K . A .

( 2 ) Magnesium nitrate ; Mg ( N03 ) 2 ; J . Am . Chem . Soc . 194 1 , 63 , 4 4 9-54 .
{ 10377-60-3 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 7 3 . 3 5 - 3 1 3 . 15
P/ kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
m2 tmol kg� 1 = 0 - 3
trc T/K a a s b
0.2 273 . 35 o.o 1 . 7023 1. 7025

0.5 1 . 3928 1 . 4 17 2
1 1 . 14 3 9 1 . 1863
2 0 . 7849 0 . 8488
3 0 . 5612 0 . 6326
25 2 9 8 . 15 o.o 0 . 7565 0 . 7587
0.5 0 . 6476 0 . 6627
1 0 . 5588 0 . 5840
2 0 . 4200 0 . 4587
3 0 . 3225 0 . 3 68 3
40 3 13 . 15 o.o 0 . 5133 0 . 5173
0.5 {) . 4 4 6 0 0 . 4590
1 0 . 3900 0 . 4 10 2
2 0 . 3 0 15 0 . 3316
3 0 . 2375 0 . 2736
a a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm-1 ) .

b s = Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 (H20 ) atm- 1 ] .
Sm/S0 = am2 + 1 / ( 1 + bm2) , as follows :
a b
0.2 -0 . 0 3 6 1 0 . 366
25 -0 . 0 2 6 8 0 . 257
40 -0 . 0 2 1 1 0 . 230
The principle of the Ostwald method ( 1 ) Commercial cyl inder , 9 9 . 8 %
solution-saturated gas is measured i�
a burette over mercury . The pressure ( 3 ) Disti lled and degassed .
was adjusted to yield one atmosphere
agitation did not cause super
saturation . ESTIMATED ERROR :
at 0 . 2 °C , ± 0 . 0 3 at
6T/ K = <± 0 . 1
other temperatures ( authors ) ,
6afa , 6SfS = ± 0 . 0 0 2 ( authors ) .
REFERENCES :
1 99
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Maqnesium nitrate ; Mq ( N0 3 ) 2 ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 2 4 , 1 1-14 .
[ 10 3 7 7 - 6 0 - 3 )
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 c . L . Younq
c2 tmol L- 1 = o - 3 . 3 7 2
T/K c2 tmol L- 1 L a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8264
0 . 203 o. 7771
0 . 3 64 0 . 7435
0 . 4 15 0 . 7328
0 . 63 6 0 . 6873
1 . 003 0 . 6129
1 . 007 0 . 6112
1 . 07 6 0 . 5975
1 . 158 0 . 5805
1 . 17 0 0 . 5767
1 . 350 0 . 54 6 3
1 . 746 0 . 4801
1 . 925 Q . 4508
2 . 18 6 . 0 . 4186
2 . 58 7 0 . 3656
2 . 930 0 . 3253
3 . 372 0 . 2796
P = 1 atm = 101 . 3 2 5 kPa = L 01j 2 5 bar
Volumetric apparatus with multibulb ( 1 ) Hiqh purity qrade sample ,
buret and maqnetic stirrer . Amount of purity 9 9 . 9 6 mole % �
solution and qas absorbed determined
volumetrically . Density and composi ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reaqent , solution
tion of solution determined after ab deqa s sed by boi linq .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± o . o5 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaqa , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
200
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Calcium chloride ; CaCl2 ; Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 2 5 ,

[ 10 0 4 3 - 5 2 -4 ] 2 2 6-7 0 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 288 . 35
c2 fmo l dm- 3 = o - 4 . 343 Pirketta Scharl in
c2 fmol dm- 3 a a b l
k scc / dm3 mol- a , c
tf °C T/K a Di lution
X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 00 0 1 . 009 -
30 0 . 1448 0 . 943 0 . 203

15 0 . 2895 0 . 867 0 . 228
10 0 . 4343 0 . 8 17 0 . 2 11
8 0 . 54 2 9 o. 770 0 . 2 16
5 0 . 8 6'8 6 0 . 67 5 0 . 201
4 1 . 08 6 0 . 58 3 0 . 2 19
3 1 . 448 0 . 514 0 . 202
2 2 . 17 1 0 . 344 0 . 215
1.5 2 . 895 0 . 24 1 0 . 215
1.1 3 . 94 8 0 . 137 0 . 220
1 4 . 343 0 . 13 5 0 . 201
a
b a = Bunsen coe f ficient [cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
c
ks cc = Setchenow salt effect parameter ; k scc
Initial solution : 4 8 . 2 0 g cac12 + water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of solution .
Setchenow (Ref . 1 ) based his appara ( 1 ) Apparently generated from l ime
f lexible s ilver capil lary . The ab-
mark in the constricting connection . r-------1
passed by the pressure difference in- r-------1
volume absorbed was reduced ta 0 o c Akad . Nauk . SSSR Mem . Acad . imp .
20 1
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Prutton , C . F . ; savage , R . L .
(2) Calcium chloride ; cacl2 ; J . Am . Chem . Soc . 194 5 , 67 , 1 5 5 0 - 4 .
[ 1 0 0 4 3 -5 2 - 4 ]
(3) Water ; H2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
T/K = 3 4 8 . 6 5 - 3 9 4 . 15
P/MPa = 1 . 52 - 88 . 6 D . M . Mason
2
10 w2 = 10 . 1 - 3 0 . 2
b
t j °C T/K P/ atm 3
1 0 x1
75 . 5 3 48 . 65 10 . 1 16 2.6
16 2.7
62 8.1
63 8.3
162 13 . 3
163 13 . 3
310 15 . 4
328 15 . 8
426 17 . 0
446 16 . 8
585 18 . 4
620 19 . 2
76 3 4 9 . 15 20 . 2 22 2.2
23 2.2
73 5.8
73 6.0
165 8.8
166 8.6
282 9.7
290 9.8

Salt solution and gas were charged to ( 1 ) Ohio Chemical Co . , medicinal .
a 3 0 0 -ml copper- l ined vessel .supported
in a heater , and were equil ibrated by ( 2 ) Baker , cp .
rocking . Temperature was measured by
a copper constantan thermocouple ( 3 ) No details .
placed in a wel l in the vessel ;
pressure was measured by a Crosby
deadweight balance . Samples were with
drawn from the bottom of the vessel
into a glass trap ; the gas evolved
from the sample was measured in a
water-j acketed buret over mercury at
atmospheric pressure , and the solutior ESTIMATED ERROR :
res idue was weighed . Correction was ox1 jx1 (mean ) = < ± 0 . 0 3 ( authors ) ,
made for the volume of gas still o T /K = ± 1 ( authors ) ,
disvolved in the solution . The total AP/P = ± 0 . 0 0 2 5 or AP/MPa < 0 . 0 0 7 ,
volume was reduced to STP and the whichever is larger ( authors ) .
number of moles was obtained from the �
molar volume of carbon dioxide , taken RE �F� �
ERE N��s-:
CE
______________
,
____________
as 2 2 , 2 6 4 cm3 • Measurements on a
charge of solution were made first at
the maximum pressure , after which the
pressure was reduced by venting gas .
Equilibration and sampl ing was
repeated for measurements at lower
pressures .
202
COMPONENT S: ORIGINAL MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Prutton , C . F . ; savage , R . L .

( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; cacl2 ; J. Am . Chem . Soc . 19 4 5 , 67 , 155 0-4 .
[ 10 0 4 3 -52-4 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2 0 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]

T/K P/ atm
76 3 4 9 . 15 20 . 2 454 10 . 7
460 10 . 8
572 11 . 7
600 11 . 8
76 3 4 9 . 15 30. 2 15 0.9
73 3.6
74 3.7
161 5.2
163 5.1
3 14 6.0
3 19 6.1
431 6.7
455 6.6
525 7.0
554 7.0
625 6.9
101 3 7 4 . 15 0 57 10 . 8
107 15 . 0
109 15 . 3
210 20 . 5
212 20 . 7
283 22 . 5
290 22 . 1
320 23 . 3
325 23 . 1
443 25 . 3
452 25 . 1
518 26. 6
558 27 . 8 '
615 28 . 2
101 3 7 4 . 15 10 . 1 17 2.1
17 2.2
56 8.1
120 11 . 2
12 0 11 . 3
2 13 13 . 5
2 13 14 . 0
286 14 . 7
286 15 . 2
347 16 . 2
352 15 . 9
380 16 . 5
394 16 . 8
500 17 . 4 '
575 18 . 5
618 18 . 6
101 3 7 4 . 15 20 . 2 23 1.7
23 1.8
88 5.9
91 5.8
203
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Prutton , C . F . ; Savage , R . L .
( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; CaC12 ; J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 4 5 , 6 7 , 155 0-4 .
[ 10 0 4 3 -5 2 -4 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2 0 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )

2 a
t f °C T/K 10 w2 P/ atm 10 3x1 b
--
101 . 3 7 4 . 15 20 . 2 142 7.4

142 7.4
169 8.4
17 0 8.3
290 9.7
292 9.9
566 11 . 6
574 11 . 8
648 12 . 3
101 3 7 4 . 15 30 . 2 74 3.1
76 3.3
151 4.7
154 4.9
234 5.4
238 5.2
261 5.8
388 6.4
389 6.4
402 6.3
525 7.0
630 7.1
120 3 9 3 . 15 o.o 23 3.8
23 4.0
68 10 . 0
69 10 . 5
186 19 . 3
187 20 . 0
353 24 . 8
3 60 25 . 0
562 28 . 8
570 29 . 0
646 29 . 9
694 30 . 0
121 3 9 4 . 15 10 . 1 21 2.7
21 2.7
76 6.1
77 6.9
149 11 . 3
153 11 . 1
297 14 . 8
300 14 . 8
437 16 . 8
460 16 . 7
585 18 . 4
62 1 18 . 1
703 19 . 3
12 1 3 9 4 . 15 20 . 2 25 1.7
25 1.9
63 3.9
63 3.9
204
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Prutton , C . F . ; Savage , R . L .

( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; CaC12 ; J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1945 , 67 ' 155 0-4 .
[ 10 04 3 -5 2 -4 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )

2
tj°C T/K 10 w2 a P/ atm 1 0 3 x1 b
--
12 1 3 9 4 . 15 20 . 2 150 7.3
150 7.3
280 9.4
282 9.4
464 11 . 0
491 11 . 0
506 11 . 3
602 11 . 7
636 11 . 5
659 11 . 5
12 1 3 9 4 . 15 30. 2 83 3.1
85 3.1
148 4.5
150 4.5
296 5.8
302 5.8
450 6.3
4 68 6.1
494 6.5
510 6.9
665 7.4
12 0 3 9 3 . 15 10 . 1 c 28 3.0
28 3.0
73 7.1
74 8.2
155 11 . 6
156 12 . 4
309 15 . 3
3 18 15 . 9 .
480 17 . 9
492 18 . 4
643 19 . 5
655 19 . 8
830 22 . 0
874 21 . 2
a w2 = mas s fraction of CaC1 2

b Based on moles of H2 0 , cacl 2 and co2
c Solid caco3 was also present during this set of measurements .
205
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; cacl2 ;
[ 1 0 04 3 -5 2 -4 ] J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 1 9 7 0 , 3 , 1 8 -2 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 298 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 c . L . Younq
c2 tmo l L- 1 = o - 2 . 169
T/K c2 fmol L- 1 a a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 7595
0 . 178 0 . 7003
0 . 287 0 . 6646
0 . 403 0 . 6279
0 . 55 1 0 . 59 2 0
0 . 812 0 . 52 6 7
1 . 220 0 . 4471
1 . 4 04 0 . 4120
2 . 169 0 . 2986
a
a = Bunsen coefficient
� = 1 atm = 10 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
Solutions made up by weiqht and den ( 1 ) Commercial sample , minimum
per . Equil ibrium established between
a measured volume of qas and a meas ( 2 ) Analytical qrade .
ured amount of qas-free l iquid in a
cell f itted with a maqnetic stirrer . ( 3 ) Distil led and deqassed .
Amount of qas absorbed estimated from
chanqe in volume of qas . Details in
source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.2; 6a = ± 2 %
( Estimated by the compi ler . )
REFERENCES :
206
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Mal inin , s . D . ; Savelyeva , N . I .

( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; CaCl2 ; *Geokbimiya 1 9 7 2 , ( 6 ) , 6 4 3 - 5 3 ;
[ 10 0 4 3 -52-4 ) Geocbem . Int . 19 7 2 , 9 , 4 10-8 .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15 - 3 5 3 . 15
P/ bar = 47 . 95 c . L . Young .
c2 jmo l L 1
- = o - 3 . 8 54
T/K P/bar c2 /mol L- 1 c1 a s1 b
2 9 3 . 15 47 . 95 o . oo 52 . 84 52 . 84
0 . 437 41. 37
4 2 . 2 0+
0 . 87 9 3 3 . 59+
1 . 349 2 6 . 80
26 . 71
2 . 341 16 . 84+
1 6 . 8 1+
3 . 443 10 . 4 9
10 . 4 7
3 2 3 . 15 4 7 . 95 o . oo 32 . 86 32 . 86
0 . 437 26 . 39 27 . 63
0 . 553 1 2 4 . 84+ 26. 33
24 . 82+
1 . 349 17 . 14 1 9 . 68
1 . 935 1 3 . 19 16 . 01
1 3 . 19
2 . 354 1 1 . 07 13 . 96
3 5 3 . 15 4 7 . 95 o . oo 2 3 . 92 2 3 . 92
0 . 1554 2 2 . 01 22 . 46
2 2 . 15
0 . 8766 15 . 3 3 + 16 . 86
15 . 3 6+
1 . 17 3 13 . 8 4 + 15 . 37
3 0 . 60+
1 . 283 12 . 8 8 + 14 . 7 0
12 . 68+
2 . 09 9 9 . 05 1 1 . 16
3 . 8 54 4 . 58 6 . 69
+ Equi librium state approached from supersaturation

a Solubil ity of C02 : c1 = m 1 ( in grams ) I 1 kg of solution
b Solubi l ity of C02 : s1 = m 1 ( in grams ) I 1 kg of water
Flow system with about 0 . 2 5 L of solu- ( 1 ) GOST 8 0 5 0 - 6 4 sample .
tion in 0 . 5 L stainless steel cell .
After equilibrium established , l iquid ( 2 ) Analytical reagent grade sample .
sampled and carbon dioxide absorbed in
potass ium hydroxide . Gain in weight ( 3 ) No details given .
of absorption train used to estimate
amount of carbon dioxide . Details in
source . ESTIMATED ERROR :
oT/K = ± 0 . 1; o c1 , os 1 = ± o . 5 %;
6P/bar = ± 0.1
207
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Malinin , s . D . ; Kurovskaya , N . A .
( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; CaC12 ; *Geokhimiya 1 9 7 5 , ( 4 ) , 5 4 7 -5 0 ;
[ 1 0 04 3 -5 2 - 4 ] Geochem . Int . 1 9 7 5 , 12 , 1 9 9 -2 0 1 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 3 7 3 . 15 and 4 2 3 . 15
P/ bar = 47 . 95 c . L . Young
c2 /mol L- 1 = 0 - 6 . 9474
T/K P/ bar
3 7 3 . 15 47 . 95 19 . 4 4
19 . 4 3 +
19 . 3 5
1 . 0451 12 . 8 1
12 . 7 9
1 . 9764 9 . 53 1
9 . 52 8
2 . 9874 7 . 115
4 . 8211 4 . 593
6 . 0313 3 . 568+
3 . 524+
4 2 3 . 15 47 . 95 0 . 00 15 . 2 1
15 . 3 2
0 . 8 8 18 10 . 62
2 . 5960 6. 336
6 . 248
4 . 8 67 2 3 . 68 0
6 . 9474 2 . 64 2
2 . 54 4
+ Equil ibrium state approached from supersaturation

a Solubil ity of C02 : s1 = m 1 ( in grams ) I 1 kg water
Flow system with about 0 . 2 5 L of solu No details given .
tion in 0 . 5 L stainless steel cell .
After equilibrium establ ished , l iquid
sampled and carbon dioxide absorbed in r-----_,
potass ium hydroxide . Gain in weight ESTIMATED ERROR :
amount of carbon dioxide . Details in 6T/K : ± 0 . 1 ; 6S 1 = ± 1 % ;
Ref . 1 . 6P/bar = ± 0 . 5
REFERENCES :
1 . Malinin , s . D . ; Savelyeva , N . I .
*Geokhimiya 1 9 7 2 , ( 6 ) , 6 4 3 -5 3 ;
Geochem . Int . 1 9 7 2 , 9 , 4 1 0-8 .
20 8
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; cacl2 ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 2 4 , 11-14 .
[ 10 04 3 -5 2 -4 )
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 and 3 0 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 c. L. Young
c2 jmol L- 1 = 0 - 4 . 52 8
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8264
0 . 227 0 . 7458
0 . 558 0 . 6477
0 . 8 9.3 0 . 5434
1 . 2 3'7 0 . 4701
1 . 601 0 . 4 1 18
2 . 008 0 . 3380
2 . 396 0 . 2 9 69
2 . 809 0 . 2544
3 . 486 0 . 2026
3 . 801 0 . 1876
4 . 52 8 0 . 1705
3 08 . 15 0 0 . 6675
0 . 295 0 . 5786
0 . 807 0 . 4742
0 . 809 0 . 4708
1 . 283 0 . 4 0 10
2 . 13 7 0 . 2864

P = 1 atm = 101 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
METHOD/APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND ' PURITY OF MATERIALS :
sorption . Deta ils in Ref . 1 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
--- - - - - - -------
209
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Eremina , A . O . ; Efanov , L . N . ;
Sorokina , N . A .
( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; cacl2
[ 1 0 0 4 3 -5 4 - 2 ) *zh . Fiz . Khim . 19 8 9 , 63 , 2 4 9 1-94 ;
Russ . J . Phys . Chern . (Engl . Transl . )
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) 1989 , 63 , 1 3 6 1- 6 3 .
T/ K = 2 9 8 . 15 and 3 13 . 15
p/MPa = 0.1 Yu . P . Yampol ' skii
10 3 c2 ;mo l L- 1 = o - 25
Solubil ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of calcium chloride . a
10 3 c2 ;mol L-1 b
1 c
T/K 10 3 c 1 f mol i,-
298 . 15 0 33 . 90
2.5 3 3 . 54
5 33 . 25
7.5 32 . 92
10 3 2 . 58
12 . 5 33 . 00
13 . 5 32 . 96
15 32 . 75
16 . 2 5 3 2 . 07
17 . 5 3 1 . 37
20 2 9 . 98
25 2 7 . 19
3 1 3 . 15 0 2 2 . 69
2.5 22 . 43
5 22 . 20
7.5 21 . 95
10 2 1 . 69
12 . 5 2 2 . 00
15 2 2 . 11
16 . 2 5 21 . 78
17 . 5 21. 41
20 2 0 . 68
25 19 . 2 1
a Data taken from a graph by compi ler .

b c2 = concentration of CaC12
c c1 = solubi l ity of C02
AUXI L IARY INFORMATION

Attainment of the equil ibrium was (1) source not given . Before contact
tent in 3 - 5 subsequent samples of gas al lowed to pass through the ves
was determined by titration . Detailed
description of the technique is given ( 2 ) Nothing specif ied .
in Ref . 1 .
(3) Distil led .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
oc1 f c1 = ± 0 . 06 - 0 . 2 %
oT/K = ± 0 . 05
REFERENCES :
1. Burmakina , G . V . ; Efanov , L . N . ;
Shnet , M . A . * zh . Fiz . Khim . 1982 ,
5 6 , 1 15 9 ; Russ . J . Phys . Chem:--
(Engl . Transl . ) 1982 , 56, 705 .
1
210
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Plyasunova , N . V . ; Shmulovich , K . I .
( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; CaC12 ; *Dokl . Akad . Nauk SSSR 1 9 9 1 , 3 1 9 ,
[ 1 0 04 3 -5 2 -4 ) 7 3 8-42 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] Chem . Abstr . 19 9 1 , 1 1 5 , 2 6 0 1 0 6 d .
T/K = 773
p/MPa
2 = 100 - 300 Yu . P . Yampol ' skii
1 0 w2 = 1 0 and 2 0
Solubil ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of CaC12 at 773 K. a
2
1 0 w2 b p/kbar
2
10 wl c
10 1 12
2 30
3 36
20 1 5
2 23
3 30
a Data taken from a graph by compi ler .

b w2 = mass fraction of cacl2
c w1 = mass fraction of co2
Phase equil ibria were studied by means ( 1 ) Nothing specif ied .
of the method described in Ref . 1 .
( 2 ) cacl2 · 6H2o served a s a source of
solutions . Purity not specified .
( 3 ) Not specif ied .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
oT/K = ± 5
op/ bar = ± 50
REFERENCES :
1 . Sterner , S . M . ; Bodnar , R . J .
Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 1 9 8 4 , 4 8 ,
2 6 59-68 .
21 1
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) He , S . ; Morse , J . W .
( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; cacl2 ; Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 1 9 9 3 , 5 7 ,
[ 1 0 0 4 3 - 5 2 -4 ] 3 5 3 3 -54 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 - 3 6 3 . 15
m2 tmol kg- 1 = 0 . 1 - 5. 004
b 2 "Yl L
T/K a m2/mol kg- 1 10 p 1 / atm d 1 0 3m 1 tmol kg- 1 e
--
2 7 3 . 15 0 . 104 1 . 0 2 14 96 . 6 69 . 7 1 . 08
1 . 02 1 1 . 0908 53 . 7 1 . 40
2 . 03 6 1 . 1696 34 . 6 2 . 18
2 . 998 1. 2263 25 . 7 2 . 93
4 . 02 7 1. 2991 16 . 9 4 . 45
5 . 001 1 . 3505 10 . 4 7 . 25
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 102 1 . 0118 94 . 2 30 . 1 1 . 07
1 . 001 1 . 1603 21.4 1 . 50
2 . 002 1 . 1607 14 . 2 2 . 25
3 . 001 1 . 2290 9.9 3 . 25
5 . 004 1 . 3449 6.7 4 . 80
3 2 3 . 15 0 . 105 1 . 0143 85 . 4 14 . 1 1 . 05
0 . 97 6 1 . 0809 10 . 2 1 . 25
1 . 849 1 . 14 3 5 7.9 1 . 69
2 . 706 1 . 2 0 08 6.3 1 . 85
4 . 958 1. 3 3 2 1 4.2 2 . 56
3 4 8 . 15 0 . 10 1 0 . 9957 60 . 3 7.7 1 . 04
0 . 999 1 . 0639 7.5 1 . 08
2 . 00 1 1 . 1345 6.9 1 . 17
3 . 001 1 . 2 000 6.7 1 . 20
5 . 001 1 . 3 12 7 5.8 1 . 38
3 6 3 . 15 0.1 0 . 9915 30 . 1 6.6 1 . 04
1.0 1 . 0567 6.4 1 . 07
2.0 1 . 1245 6.1 1 . 14
3.0 1 . 1874 5.9 1 . 17
5.0 1 . 2987 5.6 1 . 22
a Calculated by compiler b m2 = molal ity of cacl2

L
e m1 = molal ity of C02 "Y1 = activity coeff icient of co2
Either pure C02 gas or C02 -N2 mixtu ( 1 ) Commercial ; purity 9 9 . 9 % .
maintain a constant P ( C02 ) . The co2 - ( 2 ) Source not mentioned . Analytical
N2 mixtures were made by pumping pre reagent-grade which met ACS speci
determined amounts of co2 and N2 into fications . cac12 · 2H2o was
a gas tank and their composition was weighed and dissolved in water .
verified by gas chromatography . The concentration of cacl2 in
co2 or co2 -N2 gas mixtures were equi solutions was determined by ana
librated with the aqueous solutions in lyz ing cl- concentration via
a series of stirred water-j acketed AgN0 3 t�tration in stock solu
reaction vessels with condensers . The tions .
gas was premoistured by first pass ing
it through distil led water at the tem ( 3 ) 18 MO water obtained from a
perature of experiment . Fine bubbles Mill i-Q Super-Q water system .
were obtained by us ing gas-dispersion
tubes . The bubbl ing rate was 9 0 to 9 5 ESTIMATED ERROR :
mL min- 1 •
The mole fraction of C02 in the C02 - &T/K = ± 0.1
N2 mixture was determined us ing a &m 1 /m 1 = ± o . 012
Hewlett Packard ( 5 7 9 0A ) gas chromato &n h1 = ± o . o4
graph .
212
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -38-9 ] Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; CaC12 ;
[ 10 0 4 3 -5 2 -4 ] J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 19 7 0 , 3, 1 3 7-42 .
( 3 ) Ammonium nitrate ; NH4N0 3 ;
[ 64 8 4 - 5 2 -2 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 298 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 c . L . Young
c2 tmol L- 1 = o - 1 . 055
c3 tmol L- 1 = o - 3 . 16 6
T/K c2 tmol L- 1 11 c3 fmol L- 1 11

I/mol L- 1 b a b
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 0 .· 7 5 9 5
0 . 276 0 . 828 1 . 655 0 . 6528
0 . 559 1. 676 3 . 351 0 . 5628
0 . 699 2 . 09 6 4 . 19 1 0 . 53 3 1
0 . 899 2 . 69 7 5 . 394 0 . 4744
' 1 . 055 3 . 16 6 6 . 331 0 . 4365
a
Calculated from ionic strength and statement in paper that ratio
of ionic strength of calcium chloride to ammonium nitrate was 1 : 1 .
b Quoted in original paper .
I = ionic strength ; a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
P = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
Concentrated solutions prepared by (1) Commercial sample ,
weighting , less concentrated solutions purity 9 9 . 8 mole % .
prepared by di lution . Equil ibrium
established between a measured volume ( 2 ) Analytical grade sample .
of gas and a measured amount of gas
free l iquid in a cell f itted with a (3) No details given .
magnetic stirrer . Amount of gas ab
sorbed estimated from change in volume
of ga s . Details in source and Ref . 1 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
&T/K = ± 0.2; &a = ± 2 %
REFERENCES :
1 . Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 197 0 , 3, 18 .
213
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Sada , E . ; Kito , S . ; Ito , Y .
( 2 ) Calcium chloride ; cacl2 ; Adv . Chem . Ser . 19 7 6 , No . 155
( 1 0 0 4 3 - 5 2 -4 ] (Thermodynamic Behavi or of Electro
( 3 ) Methanol ; CH40 ; ( 6 7 - 5 6 - 1 ) lytes in Mixed Solvents Symp . , 1975
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] Furter , W . F . , Editor) 3 7 4 -8 0 .
VARIABLES : T /K = 2 9 8 . 15 PREPARED BY :
p 1 /kPa = 101 . 325
c2 tmol dm- 3 = 0 - 0 . 9623 H . L . Clever
X3 = 0 . 280 - 1 . 0
T/ K c2 tmol dm- 3 I/mol dm- 3 pfq cm- 3 a a
298 . 15 0 . 280 0 0 - 0 . 9 69 5
0 . 2 02 4 0 . 6072 0 . 9472 0 . 8885
0 . 3 05 1 0 . 9 154 0 . 9565 0 . 8486
0 . 4837 1 . 4510 0 . 9721 0 . 7897
0 . 6990 2 . 0969 0 . 9912 0 . 7228
0 . 389 0 0 - 1 . 1775
0 . 2130 0 . 6389 0 . 9260 1 . 0707
0 . 2 6 59 0 . 7978 0 . 9308 1 . 0546
0 . 3 2 08 0 . 9624 0 . 9358 1 . 0249
0 . 5983 1. 7948 0 . 9610 0 . 9 18 0
0 . 7502 2 . 2506 0 . 9743 0 . 8694
0 . 587 0 0 - 1 . 8 16 1
0 . 2340 0 . 7021 0 . 8857 1 . 6361
0 . 3 15 1 0 . 9454 0 . 89 3 1 1 . 5963
o. 7292 2 . 1877 0 . 9330 1 . 3 18 7
0 . 800 0 0 - 2 . 7813
0 . 3 2 57 0 . 9771 0 . 8562 2 . 3 8 69
0 . 5850 1. 7551 0 . 8827 2 . 1193
0 . 8667 2 . 6001 0 . 9 1 12 1 . 8634
1.0 0 0 - 3 . 9003
0 . 2935 0 . 8805 - 3 . 3 3 15
0 . 6643 1 . 9928 0 . 8637 2. 7794
0 . 9623 2 . 8868 0 . 8952 2 . 4 1 18
a Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
Full descriptions of the apparatus and ( 1 ) Source no.t qiven , commercial
the mode of operation are qiven else cyl inder . Purity of > 9 9 . 8 %
where ( Ref . 1 ) . The principle of the confirmed by qas chromatoqraphy .
method is that a known volume of qas
in liquid-saturated vapor state is ( 2 , 3 ) From Nakarai Chemicals Ltd .
brouqht into contact with a measured ( Tokyo ) . Used without further
amount of qas-free l iquid . Equilib purif ication .
rium is established by aqitation , and
the volume of qas remaininq is mea ( 4 ) Disti l led .
sured . After correction for the sol
vent vapor pressure , the chanqe in the �------�
qas volume qives the solubil ity . The ESTIMATED ERROR :
vapor pressures of the salt solutions
at 20 o c were calculated by use of 6afa = ± 0 . 0 1 ( compi ler )
Raoult ' s law . Mole fraction of salt free solvent
reproducible to 0 . 0 0 1 .
The qas free solution was prepared by
mixinq methanol , water and calcium
chloride , each of which was separately REFERENCES :
deqassed or desorbed .
1 . Onda , K . ; Sada , E . ; Kobayashi , T . ;
The compiler calculated the calcium Kito , s . ; Ito , K .
chloride molar concentrations from
the ionic strenqth qiven in the paper . J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 19 7 0 , 3 , 18 .
The methanol mole fract i on refers to
the salt free l iquid . The salt effect
in water is in Ref . 1 .
214
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Calcium nitrate ; Ca ( N0 3 ) 2 ;
[ 10124-37-5 ] J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 19 7 0 , 3, 1 8 -2 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 32 5 c . L . Young
c2 fmol L- 1 = o - 2 . 1 10
T/K c2 ;mol L- 1 a a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 7595
0 . 3 04 0 . 6847
0 . 701 0 . 5993
1. 340 0 . 4810
1 . 6 19 . 0 . 4356
2 . 110 0 . 3 647
a a = Bunsen coefficient
P = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 013 2 5 bar
Solutions made up by weight and den ( 1 ) Commercial sample , minimum
ured amount of gas-free liquid in a
cell f itted with a magnetic stirrer . ( 3 ) Distil led and degassed .
change in volume of gas . Deta ils in
source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.2; 6a = ± 2 %
REFERENCES :
21 5
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Calcium nitrate ; Ca ( N0 3 ) 2 ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 2 4 , 11-14 .
[ 1 0 1 2 4 -3 7 -5 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 c . L . Young
c2 /mol L- 1 = o - 3 . 58 1
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8264
0 . 232 0 . 7630
0 . 510 0 . 7027
0 . 801 0 . 6363
1 . 158 0 . 5584
1 . 476 o. 5014
1 . 788 0 . 4460
2 . 062 0 . 4067
2 . 5 04 0 . 3430
3 . 581 0 . 2370

p = 1 atm = 10 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
volumetrica l ly . Dens ity and composi ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
ESTIMATED �RROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; oL = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
216
( 1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Setschenow , J . ( Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Barium chloride ; BaC12 ; Nouv . Mem . Soc . Imp . Nat . Moscow
[ 1 0 3 6 1 - 3 7 -2 ] 1889 , 15 , 2 0 3 - 7 4 .
(3) Water ; H20 ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 288 . 35
c2 ;mo l dm- 3 = 0 - 1 . 590 Pirketta Scharl in
T/K a Dilution a b
X
15 . 2 288 . 35 co 0 1 . 009
1 1 . 590 0 . 479 0 . 203

Initial solution : 3 3 . 10 6 g BaC12 + 97 . 0 6 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of

solution ( saturated solution) .
mark i n the constricting connection .
passed by the pressure difference in- �------�
217
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Findlay , A ; Shen , B .
( 2 ) Barium chloride ; BaC12 ; J . Chem , $oc . 1 9 12 , 101 , 1459-68 .
[ 1 0 3 6 1- 3 7 - 2 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
2 T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
10 -r2 / g cm- 3 = 2 . 80 - 9 . 97 c. L. Young
2 4 c
T/K 1 0 1'2 / g cm- 3 a pfg cm- 3 s b 1 0 x1 (p = 1 atm)
2 9 8 . 15 2 . 80 1 . 018 0 . 789 5 . 89
5 . 81 1. 0 4 0 0 . 741 5 . 57
8 . 15 1 . 054 0 . 710 5 . 38
9 . 97 1 . 070 0 . 676 5 . 12
mas s concentration o f salt

c
Calculated by compiler assuming Vm , l = 2 4 . 3 x 10- 3 m3 mol- l at 1 atm .
Solubil ity in water : Ostwald coefficient L = 0 . 8 2 5 cm3 cm- 3 •
METHOD/ APPARATUS /PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS :
nometer tube was of such length 5 as to
al low measurements up to 2 x 10 Pa ( 2 ) No details given .
( about 2 atm) .
( 3 ) No details given .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
&T/K = ± 0.1; &S = ± 1 %.
( estimat ed by compi ler )
REFERENCES :
218
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Onda , K . i Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . i
( 2 ) Barium chloride ; BaC12 ; Kito , s . i Ito , K .
[ 1 0 3 6 1 - 3 7 -2 )
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ) J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 19 7 0 , 3, 1 8 -2 4 .
T/K =
2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa =
101 . 325 c. L. Young
c2 tmol L- 1 =
0 - 1 . 082
T/K c2 fmo l L- 1 a a T/K c2 fmol L- 1 a a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 7595 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 835 0 . 4961

0 . 371 0 . 6325 1 . 08 2 0 . 4482
0 . 53 9 0 . 5852
a a =
Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ) ; P= 1 atm =
1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
Solutions made up by weight and den- ( 1 ) Commercial sample , minimum
sity measured but not reported in pa- purity 9 9 . 8 mole % .
per . Equilibrium established between
a -measured volume of gas and a meas- ( 2 ) Analytical grade .
change in volume of gas . Details in ESTIMATED ERROR : ( by comp i ler )
source .
5T/K =
± 0.2; oa =
± 2 %

( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Yasunishi , A . i Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Barium chloride ; BaC12 ;
[ 10 3 6 1- 3 7 -2 ] J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 9 , 24 , 11-14 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 )
=
T/K 298 . 15
=
P/kPa 101 . 325 c . L . Young
c2 tmol L- 1 =
0 - 1 . 564
T/K c2 fmol L- 1 L a T/K c2 fmo l L- 1 L a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8264 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 763 0 . 5.6 2 4
0 . 155 0 . 7640 0 . 89 9 0 . 5270
0 . 3 17 0 . 7061 1 . 078 0 . 4834
0 . 505 0 . 6436 1 . 119 0 . 4750
0 . 64 6 0 . 6008 1 . 356 0 . 4 2 64
0 . 658 0 . 5914 1 . 564 0 . 3862
a L =
Ostwa ld coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 ) ; P= 1 atm =
1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa =
1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
volumetrically . Dens ity and compos i- ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
tion of solution determined after ab- degassed by boi l ing .
1 . Tokunaga , J . 5T/K =
± 0 . 05 ; 5L =
± 1 %.
J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 20 , 41.
219
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Eremina , A . O . ; Efanov , L . N . ;
Sorokina , N . A .
( 2 ) Barium chloride ; BaC12
[ 10 3 6 1- 3 7 -2 ] *zh . Fiz . Khim . 1 9 8 9 , 63 , 2 4 9 1-94 ;
Russ . J . Phys . Chem . (Engl . Transl . )
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ] 1989 , 63 , 13 6 1- 6 3 .
T / K = 2 9 8 . 15 and 3 13 . 15
p/MPa = 0.1 Yu . P . Yampol ' skii
10 3 c2 ;mol L- 1 = o - 50
Solubi l ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of barium chloride . a
T /K 10 3 c2 ;mol L- 1 b 10 3 c 1 ;mol i.- 1 c

2 9 8 . 15 0 33 . 90
2.5 33 . 25
5 32 . 83
7.5 3 2 . 50
10 32 . 2
12 . 5 3 2 . 77
15 3 3 . 16
20 3 2 . 94
25 3 2 . 75
50 3 1 . 75
3 13 . 15 0 2 2 . 69
2.5 22 . 23
5 21. 86
7.5 2 1 . 60
10 2 1 . 45
12 . 5 2 1 . 85
15 22 . 22
20 2 2 . 18
25 2 2 . 11
50 2 1 . 76
a Data taken from a graph by compiler .

b c2 = concentration of BaC12
c c = solubility of co2
1
Attainment of the equil ibrium was (1) Source not given . Before contact
checked by the constancy of C02 con ing with water solutions C02 was
was determined by titration . Detailed
description of the technique is given ( 2 ) Nothing specified .
in Ref . 1 .
(3) Distil led .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6c 1 ; c 1 = ± 0 . 06 - 0 . 2 %
6 T /K = ± 0 . 05
REFERENCES :
1 . Burmakina , G . V . ; Efanov , L . N . ;
Shnet , M . A . *zh . Fiz . Khim . 1982 ,
5 6 , 1159 ; Russ . J . Phys . Che�
(Engl . Transl . ) 1982 , 56, 705 .
220
COMPONENTS : ORI G I NAL MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Onda , K . ; Sada , E . ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Barium chloride ; BaC12 ; Kito , s . ; Ito , K .
[ 1 0 3 6 1- 3 7 -2 ]
( 3 ) Ammonium nitrate ; NH4No3 ; J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 19 7 0 , 3, 13 7-42 .
[ 6 4 8 4 - 5 2 -2 ]
( 4 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 C . L . Young
c2 ;mol L- 1 = 0 - 0. 302
c3 jmol L- 1 = 0 - 0 . 783
EXPERIMENTAL VALUE S :
T/K c2; mol L- 1 a c3 jmol L- 1 a Ijmol L- 1 b Q b
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 0 . 7595
0 . 059 0 . 154 0. 331 0 . 7370
0 . 060 0 . 155 0 . 335 0 . 7371
0 . 12 5 0 . 326 0 . 702 0 . 7086
0 . 13 1 0 . 341 0 . 734 0 . 7078
0 . 228 0 . 593 1 . 277 0 . 6679
0 . 302 0 . 783 1 . 688 0 . 6429
a Calculated from ionic strength and ratios of ionic strengths given

in paper .
I = ionic strength ; a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ]
P = 1 atm = 1 . 0 l 3 2 5 105 Pa
x
Concentrated solution prepared by ( 1 ) Commercial sample , pur ity

weighting , less concentrated 9 9 . 8 mole % .
solutions prepared by di lution .
Equilibrium established between a ( 2 ) Ana lytical grade sample .
measure volume of gas and a
measured amount of gas-free l iquid ( 4 ) No details given .
in a cel l f itted with a magnetic
stirrer . Amount of gas absorbed
estimated from change in volume of
gas . Details in source and ref . ( 1 ) .
E S T I MATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 2 ; oa = ± 2 %
REFERENCE S :

J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 19 7 0 , 3 , 18 .
22 1
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Lithium chloride ; LiCl ; Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 2 5 ,
[ 7 4 4 7 -4 1-8 ] 2 2 6-7 0 .
(3) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 3 5
c2 jmol dm- 3 = o - 1 1 . 8 3 Pirketta Scharl in
t j °C T/K a Di lution c2 jmol dm- 3 a Q b k scc f dm3 mol- l a , c

X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 ao 0 1 . 009 -
30 0 . 394 0 . 9355 0 . 0834
20 0 . 591 0 . 899 0 . 0848
10 1 . 183 0 . 808 0 . 0816
4 2 . 9 57 0 . 596 0. 0773
3 3 . 943 0 . 497 0 . 0780
1 11 . 8 3 0 . 12 0 0 . 0782

c k scc = Setchenow salt effect parameter ; k scc
Initial solution : 5 0 . 15 g LiCl + 7 5 . 2 3 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of

solution .
Setchenow ( Ref . 1 ) based his appara ( 1) Apparently generated from l ime
tus on those of Fernet ( 18 57 ) and of stone and sulfuric acid . Dried .
mark in the constricting connection . r-------�
was degassed by heating and then to the se·cond decimal .
passed by the pressure difference in- r-----�
equil ibrium was . established . The gas
and one meter H g pressure . The Sci . St . Petersburg 1 8 8 7 , 3 5 ,
222
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 -3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Lith ium chloride ; L i C l ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

[ 7 4 4 7 -4 1-8 ] " Car l Schorl emmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/ K = 2 8 8 . 1 5 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
c2tmol dm-3 = o - 3 . 75

t / °C T/ K c2 f mol dm-3 Q a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0 . 43 1 . 175 1 . 18 3
0 . 77 1 . 093 1 . 112
1 . 42 1 . 005 1 . 03 6
3 . 75 0 . 697 0 . 748
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0 . 43 1 . 024 1. 036
0 . 77 0 . 962 0 . 980
1 . 42 0 . 888 0 . 917
3 . 75 0 . 64 0 0 . 687
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 0 . 5173
0 . 43 0 . 910 0 . 922
0 . 77 0 . 849 0 . 866
1 . 42 0 . 775 0 . 801
3 . 75 0 . 543 0 . 58 6
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0 . 43 0 . 8055 0 . 817
0 . 77 0 . 751 0 . 767
1 . 42 0 . 6785 0 . 7025
3 . 75 0 . 475 0 . 513
AU XI L I ARY I N FO RMATION
METHOD /APPARATUS / P ROCEDURE ; S OURCE AND PURI TY OF MATERI ALS ;

The principle of the Ostwa ld method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 99 . 8 vo l % ;
was used in which a measured vo lume the impur ity was mostly
in volume i s measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro analy s i s grade
temperature . For calcu l ation of the ( 3 ) Double d i st i l led .
Kuenen coe f f i c ient , the dens ity of
the so lution was obta ined from
l iquid was standardi z ed at 2 0 ° C . E S T I MATE D E RROR :
These data are analy z ed and discussed
REFERENCES ;
Wiss . Z . Tech . Hochsch . Chem .
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
223
{ 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 1 2 4 - 3 8-9 ) Gerecke , J .
{ 2 ) Lithium chloride ; LiCl ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat .1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 4 4 7 -4 1-8 ) " Carl Schorlemmer" , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
( continued )
t ;oc T/K c2 tmol dm-3 a • s b
--
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0 . 43 0 . 73 0 0 . 741
0 . 77 0 . 661 0 . 676
1 . 42 0 . 59 2 0 . 613
3 . 75 0 . 408 0 . 4 4 15
-
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6
0 . 43 0 . 6503 0 . 660
0 . 77 0 . 5875 0 . 601
1 . 42 0 . 5 18 0 . 53 7
3 . 75 0 . 3 607 0 . 390
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0 . 43 0 . 58 3 0 . 592
0 . 77 0 . 516 0 . 52 9
1 . 42 0 . 464 0 . 482
3 . 75 0 . 3035 0 . 3283
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0 . 43 0 . 52 4 0 . 53 3
0 . 77 0 . 467 0 . 479
1 . 42 0 . 4112 0 . 427
3 . 75 0 . 248 0 . 270
-
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392
0 . 43 0 . 47 2 0 . 480
0 . 77 0 . 416 0 . 4265
1 . 42 0 . 3663 0 . 381
3 . 75 0 . 211 0 . 2296
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
0 . 43 0 . 422 0 . 430
0 . 77 0 . 377 0 . 388
1 . 42 0 . 328 0 . 342
3 . 75 0 . 1805 0 . 1966
a a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 { STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

b s = Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 { STP ) g-1 (H20) atm- 1 ) .
2 24
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Lithium chloride ; LiCl ;
[ 7 4 4 7-4 1-8 ) J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 1970 , 3, 1 8 -2 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P /kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 c . L . Young
c2 fmol L- 1 = o - 5 . 0 5 3
T/K c2 tmol L 1 - a a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 7595
1 . 004 0 . 6288
1 . 256 0 . 5977
1 . 940 0 . 5305
3 . 613 0 . 3950
5 . 053 0 . 3 18 2
•
P = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
cell f itted with a magnetic stirrer . ( 3 ) Distil led and degas sed .
source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.2; 6a = ± 2 %
REFERENCES :
225
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Sada , E . ; Kito , S . ; Ito , Y .
( 2 ) Lithium chloride ; LiCl ; Adv . Chern . ser . 197 6 , .No . 155
[ 7 44 7 -4 1-8 ) (Thermodynamic Behavior of Electro
( 3 ) Methanol ; CH4o ; [ 67 - 5 6 - 1 ) lytes in Mixed Sol vents Symp . , 1975
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ) Furter , W . F . , Editor) 3 7 4 -8 0 .
VARIABLES : T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 PREPARED BY :

P 1 /kPa = 101 . 32 5
c2 /mol dm- 3 = o - 2 . 2550 H . L . Clever
x3 = o - 1.0
T/K x3 c2 jmol dm- 3 p/g cm,... 3 a a
-
2 9 8 . 15 o.o 0 0 . 7597
o . 7707 1 . 0157 0 . 6565
1 . 0798 1. 0229 0 . 6207
1 . 18 8 3 1 . 0254 0 . 6050
-
0 . 280 0 0 . 9695
0 . 7433 0 . 9493 0 . 8078
0 . 9897 0 . 9553 0 . 7 7 14
1 . 3854 0 . 9661 0 . 7066
-
0 . 389 0 1 . 1775
o . 7288 0 . 9271 0 . 9875
1 . 0750 0 . 9366 0 . 9010
1 . 12 9 1 0 . 9386 0 . 8955
-
0 . 587 0 1 . 8 16 1
0 . 8 65 2 0 . 8899 1 . 4639
1 . 1876 0 . 8998 1 . 3525
2 . 2293 0 . 9253 1 . 0496
-
0 . 800 0 2 . 7813
0 . 4 3 16 0 . 8 3 67 2 . 4566
0 . 5525 0 . 8478 2 . 4073
0 . 8636 0 . 8518 2 . 2 003
1 . 2 9 05 0 . 8661 1 . 9650
-
1.0 0 3 . 9003
0 . 5930 0 . 8 104 3 . 2643
0 . 8000 0 . 8 18 2 3 . 0662
2 . 2550 0 . 8 7 07 2 . 03 9 1
a Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
Full descriptions of the apparatus and ( 1 ) Source not given , commercial
the mode of operation are given else cyl inder . Purity of > 9 9 . 8 t
where ( Ref . 1 ) . The principle of the conf irmed by gas chromatography .
method is that a known volume of gas
in liquid-saturated vapor state is ( 2 , 3 ) From Nakarai Chemicals Ltd .
brought into contact with a measured ( Tokyo ) . Used without further
amount of gas-free l iquid . Equilib purification .
rium is established by agitation , and
the volume of gas remaining is mea ( 4 ) Distil led .
sured . After correction for the sol
vent vapor pressure , the change in the r-------�
gas volume gives the solubil ity . The ES'l;'IMATED ERROR :
vapor pressures of the salt solutions
at 20 oc were calculated by use of o a f a = ± 0 . 0 1 ( compiler )
Raoult ' s law . Mole fraction of salt free solvent
reproducible to 0 . 0 0 1 .
The gas free solution was prepared by
mixing methanol , water and lithium
chloride , each of which was separately REFERENCES :
degassed or desorbed .
In the paper the lithium chloride Kito , S . ; I to , K .
concentration was labelled ionic
strength . The methanol mole fraction J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 19 7 0 , 3 , 18 .
refers to the salt free l iquid .
226
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Lithium bromide ; LiBr ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 5 5 0 - 3 5-8 ) " Carl Schor lemmer" , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5. D . M . Mason
c2 tmol dm-3 = 0 - 1 . 45
tf°C T/K c2 f mol dm-3 a a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0.2 1 . 066 1. 070
0.4 1 . 010 1 . 02 0
0.7 0 . 94 1 0 . 9575
1 . 45 0 . 772 0 . 803
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0.2 0 . 945 0 . 951
0.4 0 . 885 0 . 896
0.7 0 . 84 1 0 . 856
1 . 45 0 . 67 4 0 . 702
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 0 . 5173
0.2 0 . 835 0 . 8415
0.4 0 . 783 0 . 793
0.7 0 . 753 0 . 767
1 . 45 0 . 588 0 . 613
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0.2 0 . 742 0 . 750
0.4 0 . 700 0 . 710
0.7 0 . 67 6 0 . 689
1 . 45 0 . 532 0 . 555
AU X I L I ARY I N FO RMAT I O N
METHOD /APPARATUS /PROCEDURE : S OURCE AND P U R I TY O F MATE RI ALS :

of gas-free liquid is stirred in the water ( author ) .
temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Double distil led .
Kuenen coeff icient , the dens ity of
liquid was standardized at 2 0 °C . E S T I MATE D ERRO R :
These data are analyz ed and discussed
RE F E RE N CE S :
Merseburg 19 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 115-22 .
227
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Lithium bromide ; LiBr ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat .1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 5 5 0 - 3 5 -8 J " Carl Schorlemmer" , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
( continued)
T/K c2tmol dm-3 a a s b
-
35 3 0 8 . 15 0 0 . 605
0.2 0 . 664 0 . 67 1
0.4 0 . 634 0 . 644
0.7 0 . 605 0 . 618
1 . 45 0 . 48 6 0 . 5075
40 3 1 3 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0.2 0 . 601 0 . 608
0.4 0 . 57 7 0 . 5865
0.7 0 . 548 0 . 561
1 . 45 0 . 449 0 . 469
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0.2 0 . 54 5 0 . 59 2
0.7 0 � 499 0 . 511
1 . 45 0 . 413 0 . 4325
-
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436
0.2 0 . 498 0 . 505
0.7 0 . 45 3 0 . 464
1 . 45 0 . 379 0 . 399
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0.2 0 . 450 0 . 4565
0.7 0 . 406 0 . 417
-
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0.2 0 . 411 0 . 4 17
0.7 0 . 3 67 0 . 377
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm" 1 ) .

b S = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g· 1 ( H20 ) atm"1 ) .
2 28
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Lagarote , L .

( 2 ) Lithium sulfate ; Li2 so4 ; Bull . Soc . Chim . Fr . 1 9 4 3 , 1 0 , 4 16-7 .
[ 10 3 7 7 - 48-7 )
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 0 . 15
c2 Jmol L l - = 0-2 . 2 8 5 Pirketta Scharl in
T/K a k/L mol- 1 c
17 2 9 0 . 15 0 1 . 02
0 . 164 0 . 89 6 0 . 341
0 . 390 0 . 774 0 . 3 10
0 . 58 0 0 . 67 5 0 . 309
1 . 055 0 . 484 0 . 3 08
1 . 82 0 0 . 272 0 . 3 11
2 . 285 0 . 200 0 . 310

b s1 = solubi l ity coefficient of co2 .
s1 = (V ' 1 - V) f v , where (V ' 1 - V) is the volume of co2 dissolved at
pressure P , and v is the volume of the aqueous Li2 so4 solution .
The paper contained no definitive information about the pressure P .
The measurements probably were made a t atmospheric pressure .
c k = Sechenov constant , defined by equation lg ( S0/S1 ) = k c2 , where
s0 and s1 are the solubi lity coefficients of co2 in pure water
and in Li2so4 solution , respectively , and c2 is the concentration
of Li2 so4 in the aqueous Li2so4 solution .
A volume v1 of carbon dioxide , satu

rated with water vapor , was introduced
into Bunte ' s burette under atmospheric
pressure and at the temperature of 17 Nothing specif ied .
°C . A volume v of aqueous Li2so4 so-
lution of known concentration was then
introduced , and the mixture was
stirred until no diminution of volume
was observed . When the initial tem-
perature was reached , the volume v was
read under the pressure P . The volume
V1 at the partial pressure P1 of co2
was reduced to volume v • 1 at pressure ESTIMATED ERROR :
P; (V ' 1 = V1P1 /P) .
Nothing specified .
The solubility coefficient s 1 of co2
was calculated from the equation
(V 1 1 - V) REFERENCES :
----- .
v
229
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Lithium sulfate ; Li2 so4 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 1 0 3 7 7 - 4 8 -7 ] " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T / K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
c2 jmol dm-3 = 0 - 2
·
tj ° C T/K c2 jmol dm-3 a a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0 . 25 0 . 811 0 . 8155
0.5 0 . 704 o . 7 115
1 0 . 52 0 0 . 5325
2 0 . 284 0 . 299
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0 . 25 0 . 69 1 0 . 6955
0.5 0 . 598 0 . 605
1 0 . 437 0 . 448
2 0 . 237 0 . 250
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 -
0 . 25 0 . 59 4 0 . 5983
0.5 0 . 519 0 . 525
1 0 . 361 0 . 371
2 0 . 203 0 . 2 14 2
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0 . 25 0 . 518 0 . 523
0.5 0 . 446 0 . 452
1 0 . 302 0 . 3 105
2 0 . 18 1 0 . 19 1
AUXI L I ARY INFORMAT ION
METHOD IAPPARATUS / P ROCEDURE : SOURCE AND P U R I TY O F MATE R I ALS :

temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Double distil led .
Landolt-Bornstein extant 1969 . The
liquid was standardi z ed at 2 0 °C . E S T I MATE D ERRO R :
These data are ana lyz ed and discussed
REFE RENCE S :
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 115-2 2 .
230
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J .

( 2 ) Lithium sulfate ; Li2so4 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 1 0 3 7 7 -48-7 ] " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
( continued)
T/K c2 ;mol dm-3 a a s b
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0 . 25 0 . 450 0 . 4550
0.5 0 . 385 0 . 391
1 0 . 261 0 . 268
2 0 . 160 0 . 169
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0 . 25 0 . 391 0 . 3953
0.5 0 . 338 0 . 344
1 0 . 233 0 . 2395
2 0 . 14 0 0 . 1485
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0.5 0 . 298 0 . 3035
1 0 . 2 07 0 . 2 13 3
2 0 . 12 6 0 . 13 3 8
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0.5 0 . 266 0 . 271
1 0 . 18 6 0 . 192
2 0 . 113 0 . 1195
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0.5 0 . 234 0 . 239
1 0 . 106 0 . 17 6
2 0 . 106 0 . 113
-
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0.5 0 . 2 08 0 . 2 12 5
1 0 . 151 0 . 156
2 0 . 0987 0 . 105
11 a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

b s = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 ( H2o ) atm- 1 ] .
23 1
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J .

( 2 ) Sodium f luoride ; NaF ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 6 8 1- 4 9 - 4 ) " Carl Schorlemmer" , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/ K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
c2;mol dm-3 = 0 - 5
t ; oc T/K c2 ;mol dm-3 a a s b
--
-
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990
0.5 0 . 800 0 . 800
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0.5 0 . 674 0 . 6745
-
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758
0.5 0 . 582 0 . 58 3
-
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1
0.5 0 . 488 0 . 489
-
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605
0.5 0 . 415 0 . 417
-
40 3 1 3 . 15 0 0 . 54 6
0.5 0 . 356 0 . 3575
-
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482
0.5 0 . 3 04 0 . 306
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0.5 0 . 260 0 . 262
-
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392
0.5 0 . 228 0 . 230
-
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0.5 0 . 202 0 . 2043
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm-1 ) •
b s = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g-1 (H20 ) atm- 1 ] .

AUXI LIARY I N FO RMAT ION
METHOD IAPPARATUS /PROCEDURE : S OURCE AND PURI TY OF MATERIALS :

temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Double dist i lled .
Landolt-Bornstein extant 1969 . The
liquid was standardi z ed at 2 0 °C . E S TIMATED ERROR:
REFERENCES :
Merseburg 19 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 115-2 2 .
232
{1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 2 5 ,
[ 7 64 7 - 14-5 ] 2 2 6 -7 0 .
{3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 8 8 . 3 5
c2 /mol dm- 3 = o - 5 . 4 Pirketta Scharl in
t / °C T/K a D ilution c2 tmol dm- 3 • a b k s cc / dm3 mol- l a , c

X
--
15 . 2 2 88 . 3 5 .., 0 1 . 009 -
24 . 42 0 . 221 0 . 978 0 . 0613
12 . 2 1 0 . 442 0 . 919 0 . 0 9 18
8 . 14 0 . 663 0 . 865 0 . 101
6 0 . 900 0 . 811 0 . 105
5 1 . 080 0 . 778 0 . 105
4 1 . 350 0 . 728 0 . 105
3 1 . 800 0 . 64 0 0 . 110
2 2 . 700 0 . 53 0 0 . 104
1 5 . 400 0 . 281 0 . 103
• Calculated by the compiler •
b a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm - l ] .

c
ka cc = Setchenow salt effect parameter ;
Initial solution : 3 1 . 5 6 g NaCl + 88 . 4 cm3 water to make 100 cm3 of

solution .
setchenow ( Ref . 1 ) based his appara { 1 ) Apparently generated from l ime
Regnault in 1861 . The one meter ma
flexible s ilver capillary . The ab-
sorption cel l was of two bulbs with a
with water vapor and fil led the bulbs
233
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Harned , H . S . ; Davis , R . Jr .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 6 47 -14-5 ) J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 4 3 , 65 , 2 0 3 0-7 .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15-3 2 3 . 15
PJ ikPa = 101 . 325 Pirketta Scharl in
m2 tmol kq- 1 . = 0 -· 3
2
m2 tmol kq- 1 b 10 51 c Series d
0 2 7 3 . 15 0 7 . 726 A
0.2 7 . 256 A
0.5 6 . 708 A
6 . 64 2 B
1 5 . 869 A
5 . 895 B
2 4 . 608 A
4 . 59 7 B
3 3 . 69 5 A
3 . 718 B
5 2 7 8 . 15 0 6 . 402 A
0.2 6 . 099 A
0.5 5 . 59 3 A
1 4 . 932 A
2 3 . 910 A
3 3 . 16 6 A
10 2 8 3 . 15 0 5 . 3�9 . A
5 . 3 67 B
0.2 5 . 09 6 A
0.5 4 . 714 A
1 4 . 16 0 A
4 . 15 6 B
2 3 . 339 A
3 2 . 716 A
2 . 729 B
15 288 . 15 0 4 . 554 A
0.2 4 . 330 A
0.5 4 . 009 A
1 3 . 550 A
2 2 . 886 A
3 2 . 381 A
( continued next paqe )
The same apparatus and method were ( 1 ) From commercial tank .
used for measurements of solubil ity Purity 9 9 . 67 % ± o . o s % .
and electromotive force . A detailed
description of the experimental ( 2 ) 9 9 . 9 8 % pure
procedure is avai lable in the source .
( 2 ) Quality not stated . Deqassed by
Equil ibrium in the cel l was attained co2 bubbl inq and evacuation .
by bubblinq co2 throuqh the solvent
while qently rockinq the thermostatted �--�----�
cell . Pressure was maintained ESTIMATED ERROR :
constant at 1 atm . The concentration
was determined by titratinq about 65 1 = ± ( 0 . 2 -0 . 5 ) % , while at hiqh
90 cm3 of solution with excess temperatures and salt concen
standard Ba ( OH ) 2 solution and back trations 6s 1 = ± 1 % .
titratinq the excess . ( By authors )
234
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Harned , H . S . ; Davis , R . Jr .

( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 647 -14-5 ] J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1943 , 65 , 2 0 3 0 -7 .
( 3 ) water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]

2
tt o c T/K 4 m2 fmol kg- 1 b 1 o sl c Series d
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 3 . 923 A
3 . 92 8 B
0.2 3 . 725 A
0.5 3 . 4 50 A
1 3 . 08 5 A
2 2 . 504 A
3 2 . 07 1 A
2 . 08 6 B
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 3 . 438 . A
3 . 4 58 B
0.2 3 . 278 A
0.5 3 . 054 A
3 . 03 6 B
1 2 . 707 A
2 . 668 * B
2 . 734 c
2 2 . 223 A
2 . 227 B
2 . 242 c
3 1 . 8 1 0* A
1 . 844 B
1 . 847 c
30 3 03 . 15 0 3 . 02 6 A
.. 3 . 02 1 B
0.2 2 . 861 A
0.5 2 . 67 4 A
2 . 58 8 * B
1 2 . 407 A
2 . 418 B
2 1 . 97 1 A
1 . 92 7* B
1 . 965 c
3 1 . 658 A
1 . 688 * B
1 . 655 c
35 3 0 8 . 15 0 2 . 67 8 A
0.2 2 . 55 3 A
0.5 2 . 388 A
1 2 . 108 * A
2 . 1 67 c
2 1 . 763 A
1 . 778 c
3 1 . 488 A
1 . 488 c
40 . 3 13 . 15 0 2 . 407 A
2 . 407 B
0.2 2 . 289 A
0.5 2 . 14 1 A
2 . 18 8 * B
1 1 . 913 A
1 . 92 2 B
2 1 . 566 A
1 . 629* B
1 . 575 c
3 1 . 372* B
1 . 344 c

235
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Harned , H . S . ; Davis , R . Jr .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; ( 7 647 -14-5 ) J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 4 3 , 65 , 2 0 3 0-7 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )

t/ ° C T/K a m2 /mol kg- 1 b 1 o 2 s1 c Series d
45 3 18 . 15 0 2 . 19 2 A
0.2 2 . 08 4 A
0.5 1 . 955 A
1 1. 752 A
1. 7 4 3 C .
2 1 . 492 A
1 . 441 c
3 1 . 2 12 A
1 . 2 16 c
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 1 . 982 A
1 . 969 B
0.2 1 . 897 A
0.5 1. 753 A
1. 765 B
1 1 . 597 A
1. 5 5 9 * B
2 1 . 3 17 A
1. 330 B
1 . 3 17 c
3 1 . 09 3 A
1 . 14 5 * B
1 . 099 c
b m2 = molal ity of NaCl .
c s 1 = m1 /P1 where m1 is the molality of co2 ( mo l kg- 1 ] . ·
The s1 values are at P1 = 1 atm .

The starred values were not given as great a weight as the un
starred values in the final graphical estimation of s 1 .
d series A represents the mean of four s imultaneous measurements
of co2 1n water . In addition , this series comprises s ingle
observations of the solubi lity in 0 . 2 , o . s , 1 , 2 , and 3 mol kg- 1
NaCl solutions .
series B represents the mean of three experiments at each temper
ature on each salt concentration recorded .
Series C : the results of series A and B were plotted on a large
scale and all results in doubt redetermined .
The authors made large scale plots of ( -lg s1 ) versus molality of NaCl .
The smoothed values obtained from these graphs are given in Table 2 .
Table 2 . Smoothed values of ( -lg S1 ) • Deviations ( Obs . - Calcd . ) 8
t/ ° C Water 0 . 2 mol/kg o . s mol/kg 1 mol/kg 2 mol / kg 3 mol/kg
--
0 1 . 1 1 4 4 ( +4 ) 1 . 1 3 8 3 ( +2 ) 1 . 17 3 8 ( 0 ) 1 . 2 3 13 ( - 4 ) 1 . 3 3 65 ( -8 ) 1 . 4 2 9 0 ( -2 4 )
5 1 . 1 9 3 8 ( -1 0 ) 1 . 2 1 6 7 ( - 14 ) 1 . 2 5 1 0 ( -18 ) 1 . 3 0 6 5 ( +17 ) 1 . 4 0 7 7 ( -14 ) 1 . 4 9 8 0 ( -8 )
10 1 . 2 695 ( - 5 ) 1 . 2920 (-5) 1 . 3 2 5 9 ( -3 ) 1 . 3800 (-4) 1 . 4 7 6 8 ( +4 ) 1 . 5 6 4 2 ( +17 )
15 1 . 3 4 12 ( +1 3 ) 1 . 3 6 3 8 ( +2 0 ) 1 . 3 9 7 0 ( +2 5 ) 1 . 4482 (-20) 1 . 5 4 2 2 ( +2 7 ) 1 . 6 2 5 5 ( +2 9 )
20 1 . 4063 (+15) 1 . 4 2 8 5 ( +2 5 ) 1 . 4 6 0 5 ( +8 ) 1 . 5110 ( +2 8 ) 1 . 6 0 12 ( +2 5 ) 1 . 6 8 2 2 ( +2 9 )
25 1 . 4635 ( -1 6 ) 1 . 4 8 4 2 ( +16 ) 1 . 5152 ( -18 ) 1 . 5 6 4 5 ( -14 ) 1 . 653 0 ( - 9 ) 1 . 7 3 2 3 ( -8 )
30 1 . 5209 (+1) 1 . 5410 (-1) 1 . 5 7 12 ( -3 ) 1 . 6 1 9 1 ( -2 ) 1 . 7055 (-1) 1 . 7 8 2 0 ( -12 )
35 1 . 57 2 2 ( 0 ) 1 . 5917 ( - 3 ) 1 . 6 2 1 0 ( -9 ) 1 . 6668 (-20) 1. 7508 (-31) 1 . 8 2 8 0 ( -2 7 )
40 1 . 6 2 0 0 ( +5 ) 1 . 6 3 9 3 ( +2 ) 1 . 6 67 8 ( - 5 ) 1 . 7 14.0 ( -7 ) 1 . 7 9 8 2 ( -7 ) 1 . 8 7 3 3 ( -2 1 )
45 1. 6593 ( - 3 6 ) 1 . 6 7 9 7 ( -2 7 ) 1 . 7 0 9 2 ( -19 ) 1 . 7564 (-5) 1 . 8404 (-4) 1 . 9 16 8 ( -8 )
50 1 . 7 0 5 3 ( +2 6 ) 1 . 7 2 4 1 ( +2 2 ) 1 . 7 5 2 3 ( +2 2 ) 1 . 7 9 7 2 ( +15 ) 1 . 8 8 15 ( +18 ) 1 . 9 6 0 2 ( +2 1 )
e
Numbers in parentheses represent deviations in fourth decimal place
of ( - lg S1 ) •
236
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Harned , H . s . ; Davi s , R. Jr .

( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaC l ; [ 7 6 4 7 - 14 - 5 ] J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1943 , 65 , 2 0 3 0-7 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
The authors expressed the solubil ity data as a function of the abso lute
temperature by equation ( 1 ) :
- lg s 1 = -A* /T + o* - c*T (1)
The parameters o f equation ( 1 ) , obtained from the data by method o f least

squares , are given in Table 3 .
Table 3 . Least squared constants of equation ( 1 ) .

m2 /mol kg- 1 b A* /K o* c * / K- 1
o.o 2385 . 73 14 . 0184 0 . 0152642

0.2 2347 . 16 13 . 8 0 9 0 0 . 0149259
0.5 2 3 09 . 6 0 13 . 6 3 1 6 0 . 014 6 4 9 2
1.0 2 19 5 . 8 4 12 . 9 8 7 5 0 . 0136050
2.0 1912 . 4 3 11 . 2 9 6 8 0 . 0108268
3.0 1622 . 96 9 . 52 5 3 o. 0078770
b m2 =
molal ity of NaCl .
The deviations o f the observed results from those calculated
by equation ( 1 ) are given in parentheses immediately following
the values in Table 2 (previous page) . The maximum deviation
is 0 . 0 0 3 6 and the average deviation is 0 . 0015 in lg s 1 which
corresponds to 0 . 8 and 0 . 3 % in s 1 .
237
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Rosenthal , w.
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaC l ; [ 7 6 4 7 -1 4 -5 ] Thes . fac . sci . Univ . strasbourg

(France) 1 9 5 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15
c2 fmol dm- 3 = 0 - 5 . 058 H . L . Clever
T/K
2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 879
1 . 562 0 . 593 0 . 1095
3 . 44 0 . 394 0 . 1015
5 . 058 0 . 264 0 . 1035
a Oriqinal data .
b Ostwald coefficient .
c Sechenov constant ; k scc = ( 1 f c2 ) lq (L0 /L) .
d Calculated by compiler .
The prepared solvent and solution were ( 1 ) Source and purity not qiven .
charqed into an evacuated cell after An aqueous " soda" solution
deqass inq , and the mass of solvent was absorbed 9 9 . 8 % of the qas .
determined by weiqht . Gas was intro
duced into the cell from a measurinq ( 2 ) Source and purity not qiven .
buret in which the qas was stored over Recrystallized from water and
mercury . The cell was aqitated while dried .
the qas pressure was maintained by ad
justinq the qas volume . The Ostwald ( 3 ) Boi led to remove carbon dioxide .
coefficient was determined from the
mass of solvent and the volume of qas
absorbed . Solubilities were measured
at pressures above and below atmo ESTIMATED ERROR :
spheric .
6T/K = ± 0 . 2
6p/kPa = ± 0.1
6L/L = ± 0 . 02 ( compiler)
REFERENCES :
Some data in the thesis have been
published . See :
1. Maillard , A . ; Rosenthal , w .
comp rend . 1 9 5 2 , 2 3 4 , 2 5 4 6-8 .
238
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Ellis , A . J . ; Golding , R . M .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 647 -14-5 ) Am . J . Sci . 1 9 6 3 , 2 61 , 4 7 - 6 0 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 )
T/K = 4 4 5 - 6 0 7
Pl / MP a = 1 . 59 - 9 . 3 1 c . L . Young
c2 fmol dm- 3 = 0 - 2 . 0
2
T/K c2 tmol dm- 3 pl f atm Pl fMPa 10 x1 L a
---
450 o.o 15 . 7 1 . 59 0 . 223 0 . 26

475 17 . 7 1 . 79 0 . 283 0 . 29
477 36. 1 3 . 66 0 . 58 2 0 . 30
502 46 . 3 4 . 69 0 . 767 0 . 31
502 43 . 5 4 . 41 0 . 754 0 . 32
508 29 . 7 3 . 01 0 . 473 0 . 30
534 53 . 1 5 . 38 1 . 08 0 . 39
534 49 . 6 5 . 03 1 . 01 0 . 38
538 23 . 1 2 . 34 0 . 472 0 . 39
538 20 . 4 2 . 07 0 . 426 0 . 40
582 75 . 5 7 . 65 2 . 11 0 . 51
582 72 . 1 7 . 31 1 . 92 0 . 49
582 68 . 1 6 . 90 1 . 83 0 . 49
607 62 . 6 6 . 34 2 . 12 0 . 59
607 59 . 2 6 . 00 1 . 99 0 . 58
449 0.5 65 . 3 6 . 62 0 . 893 0 . 23
449 62 . 6 6 . 34 0 . 839 0 . 23
509 67 . 4 6 . 83 1 . 03 0 . 28
509 63 . 3 6 . 41 0 . 97 0 0 . 28
540 63 . 0 6 . 38 1 . 13 0 . 33
540 59 . 5 6 . 03 1 . 03 0 . 33
559 57 . 8 5 . 86 1 . 12 0 . 36
559 55 . 8 5 . 65 1 . 08 0 . 36
582 54 . 3 5 . 50 1 . 18 0 . 40
582 48 . 8 4 . 94 1 . 09 0 . 41
582 47 . 5 4 . 81 1 . 06 0 . 41
445 1.0 45 . 1 4 . 57 0 . 548 0 . 21
445 43 . 9 4 . 45 0 . 53 3 0 . 21
450 26 . 4 2 . 67 0 . 3 17 0 . 21
468 51 . 5 5 . 22 0 . 610 0 . 20
468 50 . 0 5 . 07 0 . 62 6 0 . 22
4 68 48 . 7 4 . 93 0 . 58 4 0 . 21
492 34 . 7 3 . 52 0 . 446 0 . 24
500 61 . 4 6 . 22 0 . 784 0 . 23
500 59 . 3 6 . 01 0 . 794 0 . 24
528 40 . 8 4 . 13 0 . 606 0 . 28
Static bomb of approximately 1 0 0 cm3 No details given .
capacity . Samples of mixture analysed
by absorbing water in Anhydrone and r--�-----�
carbon dioxide in Carbosorb . Details ESTIMATED ERROR :
in source .
ST/K = ± 1 . 0 ; Sx1 = ± 2 %
( estimated by comp i ler )
239
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C0 2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Ellis , A . J . ; Golding , R . M .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaC l ; [ 7 64 7 - 14-5 ) Am . J . Sci . 1 9 6 3 , 2 61 , 4 7 - 6 0 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
2 a
T/K c2 tmol dm- 3 pi f atm P1 /MPa 10 x1 L
---
537 1.0 71 . 1 7 . 20 1 . 04 0 . 26
537 69 . 0 6 . 99 1 . 00 0 . 26
565 48 . 8 4 . 94 0 . 806 0 . 32
565 46 . 7 4 . 73 0 . 789 0 . 33
579 67 . 0 6 . 79 1 . 05 0 . 30
598 91 . 9 9 . 31 1 . 73 0 . 35
598 87 . 8 8 . 90 1 . 81 0 . 38
449 2.0 68 . 8 6 . 97 0 . 674 0 . 16
. 449 64 . 6 6 . 55 0 . 651 0 . 17
472 67 . 7 6 . 86 0 . 695 0 . 17
472 65 . 6 6 . 65 0 . 669 0 . 18
501 66 . 5 6 . 74 0 . 736 0 . 20
501 63 . 1 6 . 39 0 . 675 0 . 20
535 64 . 5 6 . 54 0 . 763 0 . 22
579 64 . 5 6 . 54 0 . 847 0 . 25
579 60 . 5 6 . 13 0 . 752 0 . 24
579 56 . 3 5 . 70 0 . 74 6 0 . 26
603 54 . 9 5 . 56 0 . 742 0 . 27
a
L =
Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 )
240
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Yeh , S-Y . ; Peterson , R . E .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 ] J . Pharm . Sci . 1 9 6 4 , 53 , 8 2 2 •4 .
(3) Water ; H 2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15-3 18 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 25 Pirketta Scharl in
2
1 0 w2 = o and 0 . 9
L d llH 0 / kJ mol- 1 e aS 0 f J K- 1 mol- 1 e
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 . 8129 -20 . 52 7 -97 . 07

1 1
0.9 0 . 155 0 . 7576 ;_ 2 0 . 5 8 -97 . 9
2
3 0 3 . 15 0 0 0 . 7264 -19 . 4 8 4 -93 . 7
0.9 0 . 155 0 . 6800 -19 . 5 3 9 -94 . 56
2
3 10 . 1 5 0 0 0 . 6282 -18 . 0 3 3 -89 . 1
0.9 0 . 155 0 . 5876 -18 . 0 8 3 -88 . 7°
3 18 . 15 0 0 0 . 5453 -1 6 . 3 6 7 - 8 3 . 68
2
0.9 0 . 155 0 . 5100 - 1 6 . 4 14 -84 . 5
a Calculated by compiler . b w2 = mass fraction of NaCl .

c m2 = molal ity of NaCl . d L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 ) .
Each solubil ity value is the average of three or four measurements .
The standard deviation of each measurement closely approximates 1 % .
e The thermodynamic changes are for the transfer of 1 mol of co2 from the
gas phase at a concentration of 1 mol dm- 3 to the solution at a concen
tration of 1 mol dm- 3 •
In the original source the /lH 0 and f).S 0 values were given in the units
cal mol- 1 and cal K- 1 mol- 1 , respectively . Convers ion to the SI units
has been done by the compiler .
Freshly boiled solution was introduced ( 1 ) Research grade . Matheson Co .
into 1 2 5 cm3 absorption flask of so-
lubil ity apparatus ( 1 ) , then frozen ( 2 ) Analytical grade .
and boiled under vacuum three times .
Water-saturated gas was introduced and ( 3 ) Distilled from glass apparatus .
equil ibrated ( 2 ) and weight of solu-
tion was determined .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K 0 . 05
6Pfmm Hg 0.2
6L/L 0 . 01
REFERENCES :
1 . Geffken , G . z . Phys . Chem . 1 9 0 4 ,
49 , 2 5 7 .
2 . Yeh , S-Y . ; Peterson , R . E .

J . Pharm . Sci . 1 9 6 3 , 3 5 , 12 8 1 .
24 1
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Takenouchi , S . ; Kennedy , G .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 64 7 -14-5 ) Am . J . Sci . 1 9 6 5 , 2 63 , 4 4 5 - 5 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 4 2 3 . 15-7 2 3 . 15
P/ bar
2 = 100-1400 Pirketta Scharlin
1 0 w2 = O , 6 , and 2 0
T/K b P/ bar 6 wt-% NaCl c 2 0 wt-% NaCl d
150 4 2 3 . 15 100 3.1 2.5 0.9

200 5.1 4.0 1.6
300 6.1 4.7 2.2
400 6.9 5.2 2.5
500 7.5 5.6 2.8
600 8.0 6.0 3.2
800 9.0 6.6 3.8
1000 9.7 7.2 4.3
1200 10 . 3 7.7 4.8
1400 10 . 8 8.0 5.3
200 4 7 3 . 15 100 3.2 2.5
200 6.1 4.4
300 7.9 5.6
400 9.5 6.5
500 10 . 8 7.2
600 11 . 8 7.9
800 13 . 2 8.9
1000 14 . 2 9.6
1200 15 . 0 10 . 2
1400 15 . 6 10 . 7
250 5 2 3 . 15 100 2.8 2.4 1.0
200 6.0 4.9 2.0
300 9.6 6.8 2.8
400 12 . 1 8.5 3.4
500 14 . 3 10 . 0 4.1
600 16 . 4 11 . 5 4.7
800 20. 4 13 . 4 5.7
1000 24 . 2 14 . 8 6.6
1200 27 . 2 16 . 1 7.6
1400 28 . 8 17 . 0 8.2

The experimental apparatus was the ( 1 ) , ( 2 ) , and ( 3 ) : source and purity
same used in previous experimental not stated .
work . 1 After equil ibration the co2
and NaCl content of the l iquid samples �------�
was analyzed . The co2 composition ESTIMATED ERROR :
was determined by titration against
standard HCl solution . co2 was ab 6T/K = ± 0 . 8 % ( by authors )
sorbed in sodium hydroxide and esti 6S l = ± 2 % ( by authors )
mated by back titration with HCl . The
NaCl concentration o f the solution was �------�--�
determined by the Mohr method us ing REFERENCES :
standardi z ed AgN0 3 solution and a
potassium chromate solution as an in 1 . Takenouchi , S . ; Kennedy , G .
dicator . The composit ion of the co Am . J . Sci . 1 9 6 4 , 2 62 , 1055-74 .
existing gas phase was not determined .
242
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Takenouchi , S . ; Kennedy , G .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 64 7 - 14-5 ) Am . J . Sci . 1 9 6 5 , 2 63 , 4 4 5 - 5 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
51 a
P/ bar pure H2o 6 wt-% NaCl c 2 0 wt-% NaCl d
3 00 5 7 3 � 15 100 1.0 0.9

200 6.4 4.6
300 12 . 2 7.6
400 18 . 2 10 . 5
500 26 . 4 13 . 0
600 15 . 3
800 19 . 0
1000 21 . 6
1200 23 . 8
1400 25 . 3
350 6 2 3 . 15 200 3.6 3.2 1.1
300 14 . 3 7.5 2.6
400 11 . 5 3.9
500 14 . 8 5.1
600 18 . 0 6.2
800 23 . 0 7.9
1000 28 . 2 9.5
1200 31. 0 10 . 8
1400 34 . 0 12 . 0
400 6 7 3 . 15 300 1.7
400 7.5
500 13 . 5
450 7 2 3 . 15 500 2.2
600 4.2
700 6.0
800 7.6
900 9.2
a s 1 is solubil ity of co2 , expressed as mass % of co2 in water and NaCl

solutions .
c Molal ity of NaCl in the 6 mass % NaCl solution is m2 = 1 . 0 9 mol kg- 1 .
( calculated by the compi ler )
d
Molal ity of NaCl i n the 2 0 mass % solution is m 2 = 4 . 2 8 m o l kg- 1 .
( calculated by the compiler)
In the VARIABLES box , w2 = mass fraction of NaCl .
24 3
( 1 ) Carbon d i oxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Gerecke , J.

( 2 ) Sodium chl or ide ; NaC l ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 647-14-5 ) " Carl Schor l emmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )
T/ K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 25 D . M . Mason
c2 fmol dm-3 = 0 - 4.3
t j °C T/K c2;mol dm-3 a a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0.5 0 . 807 0 . 815
1 0 . 759 0 . 774
2 0 . 607 0 . 633
4.3 0 . 407 0 . 447
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0.5 0 . 728 0 . 735
1 0 . 689 0 . 704
2 0 . 560 0 . 585
4.3 0 . 340 0 . 3743
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 -
0.5 0 . 658 0 . 666
1 0 . 605 0 . 619
2 0 . 485 0 . 5075
4.3 0 . 3 10 0 . 3423
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0.5 0 . 57 5 0 . 582
1 0 . 53 2 0 . 545
2 0 . 441 0 . 463
4.3 0 . 282 0 . 3 12
AUXI L I ARY I N FORNATION
METHOD /APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURI TY OF MATE RI ALS :

The pr inciple of the Ostwald method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vo l %;
in vo lume i s measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro analy s i s grade
temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Doubl e d i s t i l led .
Kuenen coeff ic i ent , the dens ity of
mo lar concentration of s a lt in the
l iquid was standardi z ed at 2 0 ° C . E S T I MATED ERRO R :
These data a r e analy z ed and di scussed
REFE RE N CES :
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 115 -2 2 .
244
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Gerecke , J .

( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 6 4 7 - 1 4 -5 ) " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
( continued)
T/K c2 tmol dm-3 a a s b
-
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 6.0 5
0.5 0 . 515 0 . 52 2
1 0 . 477 0 . 4885
2 0 . 401 0 . 421
4.3 0 . 251 0 . 278
40 3 1 3 . 15 0 0 . 546 -
0.5 0 . 443 0 . 450
1 0 . 416 0 . 424
2 0 . 358 0 . 377
4.3 0 . 226 0 . 2507
-
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482
0.5 0 . 382 0 . 388
1 0 . 374 0 . 385
2 0 . 3 07 0 . 324
4.3 0 . 2 07 0 . 2303
-
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436
0.5 0 . 345 0 . 351
1 0 . 336 0 . 346
2 0 . 276 0 . 2 9 15
4.3 0 . 190 0 . 2 11 6
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
2 0 . 240 0 . 254
4.3 0 . 17 1 0 . 1911
-
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0.5 0 . 279 0 . 284
1 0 . 266 0 . 275
2 0 . 2225 0 . 2357
4.3 0 . 153 0 . 1714
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm- 1 ] .

b S = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 { STP ) g· 1 ( H20 ) atm" 1 ) .
245
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 6 47 -14-5 )
J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 19 7 0 , 3, 1 8 -2 4 .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 c . L . Young
c2jmol L- 1 = o - 3 . 006
T/K a a
2 9 8 . 15 0 · 0 . 7595
0 . 5 00 0 . 6644
0 . 603 0 . 6489
0 . 999 0 . 5972
1. 000 0 . 5941
1 . 153 0 . 5686
2 . 0 00 0 . 4 7 12
3 . 0 01 0 . 3776
3 . 0 06 0 . 3729
a a = Bunsen coefficient
P = 1 atm = 10 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
per . Equi l ibr ium established between
ured amount of gas-free liquid in a
source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.2; 6a = ± 2 %
REFERENCES :
246
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Malinin , s . D . ; Savelyeva , N . I .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; ( 7 64 7 -14-5 ] *Geokhimiya 1 9 7 2 , ( 6 ) , 6 4 3 -5 3 ;
Geochem . Int . 1 9 7 2 , 9 , 4 10-8 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
=
T/K 2 9 8 . 15- 3 5 8 . 15
P/ bar =
47 . 95 c .• L . Young
c2 jmol L 1-
=
0 - 4 . 458
T/K P/ bar c2 jmol L 1 - c1 a s1 b
2 9 8 . 15 47 . 95 0 . 00 52 . 6 7 52 . 84
52 . 9 5
52 . 84
0 . 905 40 . 81 43 . 25
4 1 . 61
40 . 98
40 . 99
4 1 . 27+
1. 793 3 2 . 7 1+ 3 6 . 14
2 . 5 97 2 6 . 19 30 . 43
26 . 23
3 2 3 . 15 47 . 95 0 . 00 32 . 86 32 . 86
3 2 . 8 6 5+
32 . 90
32 . 73
0 . 358 29 . 84 30. 38
29 . 77
1 . 012 2 5 . 10 26 . 72
25 . 25
1 . 794 20 . 80 2 3 . 14
20 . 94
2 . 741 17 . 17 19 . 9 5
Flow system with about 0 . 2 5 L of solu- ( 1 ) GOST 8 0 5 0 - 6 4 sample .
tion in 0 . 5 L stainless steel cel l .
After equilibrium established , liquid ( 2 ) Analytical reagent grade sample .
potass ium hydroxide . Gain in weight ( 3 ) No details given .
source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
= =
6T/K ± 0.1; 6C1 , 6S 1 ± 0.5 %;
=
&P/ bar ± 0.1
247
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Mal inin , s . D . ; Savelyeva , N . I .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 ] *Geokhimiya 1 9 7 2 , ( 6 ) , 6 4 3 -5 3 ;
Geochem . Int . 1 9 7 2 , 9 , 4 1 0-8 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
TIK PI bar cl a sl b
3 5 8 . 15 47 . 95 o . oo 23 . 93 2 3 . 92
24 . 01
2 3 . 79+
2 3 . 99+
0 . 4162 2 1 . 38+ 2 1 . 92
2 1 . 42+
1 . 13 3 17 . 8 1+ 19 . 0 6
17 . 8 8 +
2 . 200 14 . 07+ 16 . 03
14 . 19+
3 . 2 16 11 . 68+ 13 . 8 9
4 . 429 9 . 29+ 11 . 64
9 . 2 0+
4 . 458 9 . 18 + 11 . 60
9 . 24+
+ Equil ibrium state approached from supersaturation

4 Solubil ity of C02 : C1 = m 1 ( in grams ) I 1 kg of solution
b Solubility of C02 : s1 = m 1 ( in grams ) I 1 kg of water
248
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 -3 8 -9 ) Mal inin , s. D . ; Kurovskaya , N . A .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaC l ; ( 7 6 47-14-5 ) * Geokhimiya 19 7 5 , ( 4 ) , 5 4 7 - 5 0 ;
Geochem . Int . 1 9 7 5 , 12 , 1 9 9 -2 0 1 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 -5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 - 4 2 3 . 15
P/ bar = 48 . 0 c . L . Young
c2 fmol L- 1 = 0 - 5 . 9 15 4
T/K P/ bar T/K
2 9 8 . 15 48 . 0 o . oo 52 . 3 2 3 7 3 . 15 48 . 0 1 . 9968 13 . 32
52 . 5 7 13 . 3 7
52 . 3 3
52 . 27+ 3 . 0979 11 . 49
11 . 51
2 . 08 1 3 3 . 64
3 3 . 69 3 . 9849 10 . 25
1 0 . 16
3 . 03 9 28 . 29
28 . 50 4 . 98 7 3 9 . 19 9
2 8 . 07 9 . 206
4 . 03 7 24 . 03 5 . 9 15 4 8 . 242
24 . 10 8 . 269
5 . 04 0 20 . 44 4 2 3 . 15 48 . 0 o . oo 15 . 2 1
20 . 53 15 . 3 2
3 7 3 . 15 48 . 0 o . oo 19 . 4 4 1 . 0839 12 . 42
19 . 4 3 + 12 . 3 7
19 . 3 5
2 . 5208 9 . 899
0 . 9978 15 . 9 4 +
15 . 9 1 5 . 6522 6 . 694
15 . 8 6 6 . 699
+ Equilibrium state approached from supersaturation

a Solubil ity of co2 : s1 = m 1 ( in grams ) I 1 kg water
Flow system with about 0 . 2 5 L of solu No details given .
tion in 0 . 5 L stainless steel cel l .
After equilibrium established , liquid
sampled and carbon dioxide absorbed in �------�
potass ium hydroxide . Gain in weight ESTIMATED ERROR :
amount of carbon dioxide . Details in oT/K = ± 0 . 1 ; 55 1 = ± 1 % ;
Ref . 1 . oP/ bar ± 0.5 ""
REFERENCES :
1 . Malinin , s. D . ; Savelyeva , N . I .
*Geokhimiya 1 9 7 2 , ( 6 ) , 6 4 3 -5 3 ;
Geochem . Int . 1 9 7 2 , 9 , 4 1 0-8 .
249
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaC l ; [ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 ) J. Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 24 , 11-14 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 08 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 c . L . Young
c2 tmol L- 1 = 0 - 5 . 09 6
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 0634
0 . 478 0 . 9404
0 . 965 0 . 8 3 09
1 . 506 0 . 7 3 14
2 . 055 0 . 6346
3 . 07 1 0 . 5032
3 . 2 05 0 . 4939
3 . 753 0 . 4363
4 . 722 0 . 3487
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8264
0 . 455 0 . 7343
1 . 000 0 . 6508
1 . 442 0 . 5842
1 . 945 0 . 5187
2 . 486 0 . 4653
3 . 09 8 0 . 4037
3 . 400 0 . 3727
4 . 216 0 . 3 14 4
5 . 09 6 0 . 2584
3 0 8 . 15 0 0 . 6675
0 . 449 0 . 6016
0 . 880 0 . 5456
1 . 438 0 . 4821
1 . 949 0 . 4 3 07
2 . 264 0 . 4036
2 . 767 0 . 3637
2 . 997 0 . 3456
3 . 54 4 0 . 3 083
4 . 014 0 . 2782
4 . 860 0. 2330
P = 1 atm = 101 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
tion of solution determined after ab degassed by bo i l ing .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 20 , 41.
250
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Cramer , S . D .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 64 7 -14-5 ] Rep . Invest . - U . S . , Bur . Mines 1982 ,
RI 8 7 0 6 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 6 . 7 5 - 5 1 1 . 7 5
P/MPa = 0 . 8 - 6 . 2 Pirketta Scharlin
c2 fmol dm- 3 = o - 1 . 8 6
t/ °C T/K a P/MPa Ka/MPa b
---
33 3 0 6 . 15 0.8 0 206
126 . 3 399 . 45 2.0 602
132 . 5 405 . 65 2.0 617
146 . 0 4 19 . 15 2.8 565
153 . 5 4 2 6 . 65 3.1 580
198 . 1 471 . 25 4.1 537
2 13 . 1 486 . 25 5.8 484
23 . 6 296 . 75 0.8 0 . 49 0 . 50 199
73 . 7 346 . 85 1.7 499
123 . 6 396 . 75 2.1 645
25 . 2 298 . 35 1.9 1 . 86 1 . 95 329
52 . 9 3 2 6 . 05 1.3 514
57 . 2 330. 35 1.2 506
74 . 7 347 . 85 1.5 637
82 . 1 355 . 25 1.4 647
84 . 8 357 . 95 0.9 820
97 . 4 3 7 0 . 55 1.9 939
128 . 4 401 . 55 1.7 1060
144 . 3 4 17 . 4 5 2.1 1037
238 . 6 511 . 75 6.2 928
b KH = P1 � 1 ;x1 , where KH = Henry ' s law constant , P1 = partial pressure of

gas ( P1 = P-P2 ; P2 is the vapor pressure of water at the corresponding
temperature ) , � 1 = fugacity coefficient ( Smith , J . M . and Van Ness , H . C .
Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics , McGraw-Hi l l , New York 1 9 5 9 ) , and
x1 = mole fraction of the dissolved co2 .
The solubil ity of co2 was determined ( 1 ) 99 . 5 % .
from pressure-vo lume-temperature ( PVT )
measurements us ing the technique of ( 2 ) Reagent grade .
gas extraction . The apparatus con
sisted of ( 1 ) a high-pressure , high ( 3 ) Demineral i z ed .
temperature section for dissolving the
gas in the brine , ( 2 ) a heat exchanger �-------�
for cool ing ( or heating ) samples of ESTIMATED ERROR :
gas-saturated brine to room tempera
ture , and " ( 3 ) a low-pressure , constant ( by author )
temperature section for making PVT
measurements on collected gas and l i ( Detailed analys is of experimental
quid samples . contributions to the total error is
A two l iter , type 3 1 6 stainless steel given in the s"ource . )
stirred reactor , f itted with a heat
and chemical-resistant glass liner ;
was fil led two-thirds ful l with brine .
The brine was deaerated by evacuating the reactor to the vapor pressure of
the brine for at least 3 minutes . Upon reaching thermal equil ibrium , the gas
was inj ected into the reactor and allowed to distribute at a f ixed partial
pressure between the vapor and liquid phases . Equil ibration occurred within
5 hours at 150 ° C and above , and within 24 hours at lower temperatures .
The concentration of C02 in the l iquid was determined by desorption from a
a known volume of liquid f-o llowed by volumetric analysis of the evolved gas .
251
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Burmakina , G . V . ; Efanov , L . N . ;
Shnet , M . A .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 64 7-14-5 )
* zh . Fiz . Khim . 1 9 8 2 , 5 6 , 1 1 5 9 - 6 1 ;
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ) Russ . J . Phys . Chem . (Engl . Transl . )
1982 , 56, 7 0 5-7 .
T/ K =
2 9 8 . 15
p/MPa = 0 . 1 Yu . P . Yampo l ' ski i
3 1
10 c2 ; mol L- . = 0 - 2 0 0
Solubil ity of carbon dioxide i n aqueous solutions of NaCl a t 2 9 8 . 15 K . a
T/ K
298 . 15 0 33 . 90
1 3 3 . 50
2 3 3 . 15
5 3 3 . 00
10 33 . 25
25 3 3 . 10
50 3 3 . 00
100 3 2 . 50
200 3 1 . 67
a Data taken from a graph by comp i ler .

b c2 = concentration of NaCl
c c1 = concentration of co2
Attainment of the equil ibrium was ( 1 ) source not given . Before contact
checked by the constancy of C02 con ing with water solutions C02 was
tent in 3 - 5 subsequent samples of gas allowed to pass through the ves
was determined by titration .
( 3 ) Distil led .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
5c 1 f c 1 = ± 0 . 06 - 0 . 2 %
5T /K = ± 0 . 05
REFERENCES :
252
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Nighswander , J . A . ; Kalogerakis , N .
Mehrotra , A . K .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; ( 7 64 7 - 14-5 ]
J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 8 9 , 34 , 3 5 5-60 .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 352 . 85 - 473 . 65
P/MPa = 2 . 0 4 0 - 10 . 2 10 P irketta Scharl in
2
1 0 w2 = 0 and 1
TABLE 1 Solub i l ity , 4ens ity an4 Henry ' s law 4ata for the co2-H2o system .
2 0 e
T/K a P/kPa 1 0 x1 b m 1 ;mol kg- 1 pfkg m- 3 d ln (KH/kPa )
---
353 . 65 2 3. 3 0 0 . 47 0 . 2 62 951 8 . 967

353 . 35 4 3 10 0 . 85 0 . 476 956 8 . 911
353 . 75 4340 0 . 84 0 . 47 0 951 8 . 93 0
353 . 65 6110 1 . 12 0 . 629 963 8 . 906
353 . 65 7760 1. 37 0 . 771 950 8 . 868
353 . 65 7840 1. 38 0 . 777 951 8 . 868
353 . 45 10160 1 . 64 0 . 925 961 8 . 846
352 . 85 10180 1 . 66 0 . 937 961 8 . 833
av . ln (KH/kPa ) = 8 . 8 9 1 ± 0 . 04 5
3 93 . 05 2 11 0 0 . 34 0 . 18 9 936 9 . 15 5
393 . 25 2130 0 . 35 0 . 195 933 9 . 13 5
393 . 25 4050 0 . 65 0 . 363 929 9 . 14 1
393 . 05 4090 0 . 67 0 . 374 926 9 . 12 0
3 9 3 . 15 5960 0 . 91 0 . 510 933 9 . 14 4
3 9 3 . 15 6050 0 . 91 0 . 510 926 9 . 157
393 . 05 8 1 10 1 . 19 0 . 668 931 9 . 12 4
393 . 25 8 160 1. 20 0 . 674 926 9 . 111
393 . 25 9960 1 . 42 0 . 799 930 9 . 097
393 . 45 9980 1 . 45 0 . 8 17 930 9 . 078
av . ln (KH/kPa ) = 9 . 12 6 ± 0 . 0 2 5

Schematic diagrams of the apparatus , ( 1 ) Coleman Instrument grade with a
equil ibr ium cel l , and sample analys is minimum purity 9 9 . 9 9 % .
apparatus are shown in the source .
( 2 ) Fisher Scientific laboratory grade
Approximately 5 0 0 mL of liquid was in with 9 9 . 9 8 % purity .
j ected into the equil ibr ium cel l . The
cell was sealed and heated to the test ( 3 ) Purified us ing a reverse osmosis
temperature . Once thermal equilibrium system to a minimum resistance of
was achieved , approximately 5 0 0 mL of 11 Mn .
co2 at 6 MPa was added from the co2
cylinder . The system pressure was in- �-------4
creased to about 1 1 MPa by inserting ESTIMATED ERROR :
the cel l piston . The equilibrium cell
l was agitated unti l equil ibr ium at 10 I oT/T s ± o . o o s ; oP/P s ± o . 011 1
MPa was achieved . Equilibrium was as oxl fxl = 0 . 02 ; op f kg m- 3 = 3
sumed when no cel l pressure variation
was observed over a 12 h period . Once �------�
equil ibrium was reached , agitation was REFERENCES :
stopped and a sample of the liquid
phase was withdrawn for analysis . The
above procedure was then repeated de-
creas ing the pressure by 2 MPa steps
until the last samples at 2 MPa were
col lected .
253
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Nighswander , J . A . ; Kalogerakis , N .
Mehrotra , A . K .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 )
J. Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 8 9 , 3 4 , 3 5 5-60 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )

TABLE 1 S o lub i l ity , dens ity and Henry ' s law data for the co2 -H20 system .
T/K a P/kPa pfkg m- 3 d ln (KH/kPa ) e
432 . 85 2 04 0 0 . 29 0 . 161 896 9 . 050

433 . 05 2 060 0 . 29 0 . 161 893 9 . 061
433 . 05 3 9 10 0 . 54 0 . 301 894 9 . 2 14
4 3 3 . 15 3940 0 . 56 0 . 313 890 9 . 18 5
432 . 85 5940 0 . 80 0 . 448 890 9 . 249
432 . 95 8060 1 . 10 0 . 617 890 9 . 2 03
432 . 95 8070 1 . 10 0 . 617 890 9 . 2 04
av . ln (Ka/kPa ) = 9 . 1 6 7 ± 0 . 07 8
470 . 95 2450 0 . 22 0 . 12 2 851 8 . 946
471 . 25 4560 0 . 57 0 . 318 840 9 . 1 07
471 . 15 4600 0 . 52 0 . 290 860 9 . 2 12
470 . 85 6240 0 . 78 0 . 436 854 9 . 193
4 7 1 . 15 7970 1 . 06 0 . 595 853 9 . 16 6
470 . 75 8020 1 . 09 0 . 612 850 9 . 14 7
471 . 25 10200 1. 30 0 . 731 857 9 . 2 15
4 7 1 . 15 10210 1 . 40 0 . 788 856 9 . 14 1
av . ln (Ka/kPa ) = 9 . 14 1 ± 0 . 087
a Calculated by compi ler

b x1 = mole fraction of C02 in the solution
c m 1 = molal ity of co2
d p = dens ity of the solution
e
K8 = Henry ' s law constant
TABLE 2 S o lubi l ity , dens ity and Henry ' s law data for the co2 -Nacl -H2o
system . ( NaCl 1 mass % )
T/K a P/kPa m 1 ;mol kg- 1 c pfkg m- 3 d ln ( KH/kPa) e
353 . 45 4040 0 . 74 0 . 4 14 975 9 . 001

353 . 35 4130 0.76 0 . 425 974 8 . 983
353 . 35 602 0 1 . 01 0 . 566 986 8 . 995
353 . 35 6070 1 . 08 0 . 606 982 8 . 933
353 . 45 8040 1 . 35 0 . 759 988 8 . 904
353 . 75 8050 1 . 34 0 . 754 981 8 . 913
3 5 3 . 15 9490 1 . 41 0 . 794 986 8 . 967
352 . 25 9940 1 . 54 0 . 868 981 8 . 899
av . ln (KH/kPa ) = 8 . 9 4 9 ± 0 . 042
3 9 3 . 15 2 1 10 0 . 29 0 . 16 1 955 9 . 3 04
393 . 25 2 14 0 0 . 31 0 . 17 3 951 9 . 252
393 . 25 4040 0 . 59 0 . 329 945 9 . 225
393 . 25 4060 0 . 61 0 . 341 942 9 . 19 7
393 . 55 6020 0 . 97 0 . 544 935 9 . 076
393 . 25 6040 0 . 97 0 . 544 928 9 . 079
393 . 25 8 15 0 1.20 0 . 674 934 9 . 106
3 9 3 . 05 8 160 1 . 18 0 . 663 945 9 . 12 4
3 9 3 . 15 9970 1 . 39 0 . 782 935 9 . 104
393 . 35 10030 1 . 38 0 . 777 945 9 . 116
av . ln (K8/kPa ) = 9 . 15 8 ± 0 . 08 0

2 54
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Nighswander , J . A . ; Kalogerakis , N .
Mehrotra , A . K .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 ]
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 8 9 , 34 , 3 5 5-60 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
TABLE 2 Solubi l ity , dens ity and Henry ' s law data for the co2 -Nacl -H2o
system . ( NaCl 1 mass % )
2 e
T/K a P/kPa 10 x1 b m 1 ;mol kg- l c pfkg m- 3 d ln (KH/kPa)
---
433 . 35 2 15 0 0 . 28 0 . 15 6 916 9 . 12 8
4 3 3 . 15 4100 0 . 54 0 . 301 903 9 . 238
4 3 3 . 2·5 4120 0 . 55 0 . 3 07 911 9 . 225
4 3 3 . 05 6040 0 . 84 0 . 470 909 9 . 18 5
432 . 95 6060 0 �87 0 . 487 902 9 . 15 4
432 . 85 7950 1 . 06 0 . 595 912 9 . 202
4 3 3 . 15 8030 1 . 03 0 . 578 918 9 . 241
4 3 3 . 05 9930 1 . 31 0 . 737 915 9 . 18 6
433 . 25 9970 1 . 36 0 . 765 9 14 9 . 15 1
=
av . ln (KH/kPa ) 9 . 1 9 0 ± 0 . 04 0
4 7 3 . 15 4 12 0 0 . 47 0 . 262 869 9 . 07 7
473 . 25 4150 0 . 47 . 0 . 2 62 879 9 . 08 6
472 . 95 6010 0 . 69 0 . 386 878 9 . 19 9
4 7 3 . 05 6010 0 . 76 0 . 425 871 9 . 10 1
473 . 05 8120 0 . 94 0 . 527 873 9 . 237
4 7 3 . 15 . 8130 0 . 98 0 . 54 9 878 . 9 . 19 6
473 . 65 9930 1. 32 0 . 742 862 9 . 090
.av . ln (KH/kPa ) =
9 . 14 1 ± 0 . 067
a Calculated by compiler
b x1 =
mole fraction of co2 in the solution
c m1 =
molal ity of co2
d p =
density of the solution
e
KH = Henry ' s law constant
255
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] He , S . ; Morse , J . W .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride , NaC l ; [ 7 64 7 - 14 - 5 ] Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 1 9 9 3 , 5 7 ,
3 5 3 3 -54 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 - 3 6 3 . 15
P/MPa = 0 . 1 0 3 2 Pirketta Scharl in
m2 fmol kg- 1 = 0 . 1 - 6 . 14
m2 /mol kg- 1 b pfg cm- 3 c

2
10 3m 1 tmo l kg- 1 e r
T/K a 10 p1 / atm d 'Y1
--
2 7 3 . 15 0.5 1 . 0 2 14 96 . 6 63 . 6 1 . 18
1.0 1 . 0411 57 . 8 1 . 30
2.0 1 . 0787 45 . 7 1 . 65
3.0 1 . 1140 39 . 5 1 . 90
4.0 1 . 1460 31.7 2 . 38
5.0 1 . 1776 26. 9 2 . 79
6.0 1 . 2 09 5 21. 9 3 . 44
2 9 8 . 15 0.5 1 . 0189 3.9 1 . 20 1 . 10

1.0 1 . 0363 1 . 10 1 . 18
2.0 1 . 0700 0 . 90 1 . 48
3.0 1 . 102 6 0 . 80 1 . 76
4.0 1 . 1340 0 . 60 2 . 25
5.0 1 . 1642 0 . 50 2 . 61
6 . 14 1 . 197 4 0 . 40 3 . 21
3 2 3 . 15 0.5 1 . 0081 85 . 4 15 . 5 1 . 07
1.0 1 . 0262 14 . 7 1 . 13
2.0 1 . 0608 13 . 3 1 . 25
3.0 1 . 0934 10 . 6 1 . 56
4.0 1 . 1240 9.2 1 . 81
5.0 1 . 1524 8.4 1 . 98
6 . 14 1 . 1824 7.4 2 . 25
Either pure C02 gas or C02 -N2 mixtu ( 1 ) Commercial ; purity 9 9 . 9 % .
maintain a constant P ( C02 ) . The co2 - ( 2 ) source not mentioned .
determined amounts of C02 and N2 into ACS specifications .
a gas tank and their compos ition was Vacuum-dried before use .
co2 or co2 -N2 gas mixtures were equi ( 3 ) 18 MO water obtained from a
librated with the aqueous solutions in Mi ll i-Q Super-Q water system .
were obtained by us ing gas-dispersion 6T/K = ± 0 . 1
tubes . The bubbl ing rate was 9 0 to 9 5 6m 1 / m 1 = ± 0 . 012
mL min- 1 . 6 nln = ± o . o4
graph .
256
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) He , S . ; Morse , J . W .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride , NaCl ; [ 7 64 7 - 14-5 ) Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 1 9 9 3 , 5 7 ,
3 5 3 3 -5 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
2
T/K a
m2 tmol kg- 1 b p f q cm-
3 c
10 p1 /atm d 1 0 3 m 1 tmol kg- 1 e
'Yl
f
3 4 8 . 15 0.1 0 . 9795 60 . 3 7.8 1 . 03

1.0 1 . 0120 7.4 1 . 09
2.0 1 . 0463 7.0 1 . 15
4.0 1 . 1090 6.4 1 . 26
6.0 1 . 1638 5.9 1 . 37
3 6 3 . 15 0.1 0 . 9624 30 . 1 3.4 1 . 02

1.0 1 . 0028 3.2 1 . 06
2.0 1 . 0373 3.1 1 . 12
4.0 1 . 1002 2.8 1 . 21
6.0 1 . 1559 2.6 1 . 30
a
Calculated by compiler
b m2 molal ity of NaCl
c
p density of solvent
d
e
P1 partial pressure of C02
m1 molal ity of co2
f 'Yl activity coefficient of C02
257
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Rumpf , B . ; Nicolaisen , H . ; Ocal , c . ;
Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; ( 7 647 -1 4 -5 )
J . Solution Chem . 1994 , 23 , 4 3 1-48 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
T/ K = 3 1 3 . 14 - 4 3 3 . 12
p/MPa = 0 . 151 - 9 . 328 H . L . Clever
m2 /mol kg- 1 = o , near 4 . 0 and 6 . 0
Solubil ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous sodium chloride .
T/K p/MPa m2 t mol kg- 1 a m 1 tmo l kg- 1 b
3 2 3 . 17 1 . 059 o.o 0 . 19 6
3 2 3 . 16 1 . 247 o.o 0 . 230
3 2 3 . 17 1 . 432 o.o 0 . 259
3 2 3 . 17 1 . 660 o.o 0 . 299
3 2 3 . 17 1 . 809 0.0 0 . 323
3 2 3 . 17 3 . 480 0.0 0 . 5 8.1
3 2 3 . 18 5 . 798 o.o 0 . 8 7 1.
3 13 . 1 6 0 . 467 3 . 9 97 0 . 0497
3 13 1 4
• . 0 . 911 3 . 9 97 0 . 0995
3 13 . 1 4 1 . 900 3 . 9 97 0 . 19 9 6
3 13 . 19 3 . 147 3 . 997 0 . 3 09 8
3 13 . 19 5 . 12 3 3 . 997 0 . 4529
3 1 3 19
•. 6 . 917 3 . 9 97 0 . 5497 .
3 3 3 . 13 0 . 625 3 . 997 0 . 0509

3 3 3 . 16 1 . 14 1 3 . 9 97 0 . 0909
3 3 3 . 16 1 . 328 3 . 9 97 0 . 1073
3 3 3 . 15 2 . 514 3 . 9 97 0 . 19 2 2
3 3 3 . 16 2 . 871 3 . 997 0 . 2 18 4
3 3 3 . 14 3 . 52 1 3 . 9 97 0 . 2570
3 3 3 . 17 4 . 737 3 . 997 0 . 3 3 05
3 3 3 . 15 7 . 303 3 . 997 0 . 4472
3 3 3 . 16 9 . 64 2 3 . 997 0 . 5272
( continued on next page )

The apparatus is a modif ication of one ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . Messer Griesheim ,
used in earl ier work ( 1 ) . It consists Ludwigshafen , > 9 9 . 9 9 5 mol % ,
of a 3 0 mL high pressure optical cell , used as received .
thermostat , magnetic stirrer , thermo
couples and Pt res istance thermometer , ( 2 ) Sodium chloride . Merck GmbH ,
pressure transducers and tanks for Darmstadt . > 9 9 . 9 mas s % .
solute gas . Measured amounts of gas
and solvent are added to the cel l , ( 3 ) Water . Deionized and degassed by
extra solvent is added until the gas vacuum distil lation .
phase disappears . The pressure is
reduced by removing stepwise small
known amounts of solvent until a small ESTIMATED ERROR :
stable bubble appears . The solubil ity
is calculated from the known amounts 6 T/K = ± 0.1
of solvent and carbon dioxide in the op/p < ± 0 , 0 3 below 6 MPa
cell . op/p < ± 0 . 05 at higher pressures
6m2 1 m 2 = ± 0 . 003
om1/m1 =
± 0 . 0 1 to 0 . 0 3
REFERENCES :
1. Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .
Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Chem . 1993 ,
9 7 , 85 .
258
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Rumpf , B . ; Nicolaisen , H . ; Oca l , c . ;
Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 )
J . Solution Chem . 1994 , 23 , 4 3 1-48 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K p/MPa m2 tmol kg- 1 a m 1 jmol kg- 1 b
3 5 3 . 12 0 . 817 4 . 0 01 0 . 0505
3 5 3 . 12 1 . 64 2 4 . 001 0 . 1014
3 5 3 . 10 3 . 387 4 . 0 01 0 . 2032
3 5 3 . 10 5 . 59 2 4 . 0 01 0 . 3 08 4
3 5 3 . 12 6 . 940 4 . 0 01 0 . 3594
3 5 3 . 11 8 . 337 4 . 001 0 . 4 11 6
353 . 11 9 . 63 7 4 . 0 01 0 . 4 613
393 . 06 0 . 169 4 . 0 03 o . oooo

3 9 3 . 07 1 . 204 4 . 0 01 0 . 0518
3 9 3 . 19 2 . 331 4 . 003 0 . 1035
3 9 3 . 10 4 . 742 4 . 001 0 . 2 08 4
3 9 3 . 19 7 . 650 4 . 003 0 . 3 13 5
3 9 3 . 12 9 . 328 4 . 0 03 0 . 3 65 7
413 . 06 0 . 301 4 . 003 0 . 0000

4 1 3 . 07 1 . 393 4 . 003 0 . 0505
4 1 3 . 08 2 . 55 0 4 . 0 03 0 . 1011
4 1 3 . 09 5 . 04 2 4 . 003 0 . 2 02 7
4 1 3 . 07 8 . 67 1 4 . 003 0. 3272
4 3 2 . 97 0 . 515 4 . 003 0 . 0000

43 2 . 8 6 1 . 662 4 . 003 0 . 0506
432 . 96 2 . 8 58 4 . 003 0 . 1013
432 . 95 5 . 912 4 . 003 0 . 2 18 8
4 3 2 . 98 9 . 04 8 4 . 003 0 . 3 2 54
3 13 . 3 1 0 . 602 5 . 999 0 . 0517

3 13 . 2 2 1 . 232 5 . 999 0 . 1035
3 13 . 2 8 2 . 64 0 5 . 999 0 . 2 07 4
313 . 27 4 . 430 5 . 999 0 . 3133
3 13 . 3 1 6 . 799 5 . 999 0 . 4 17 7
3 1 3 . 19 8 . 427 5 . 999 0 . 4693
3 3 3 . 12 0 . 82 0 5 . 9 99 0 . 0526
3 3 3 . 12 1 . 678 5 . 999 0 . 1047
3 3 3 . 10 3 . 65 7 5 . 999 0 . 2 10 6
3 3 3 . 00 6 . 844 5 . 999 0 . 3388
3 3 3 . 05 8 . 67 0 5 . 999 0 . 3 9 65
3 5 3 . 12 0 . 997 5 . 999 0 . 0509
3 5 3 . 11 2 . 03 2 5 . 999 0 . 102 1
3 5 3 . 08 4 . 394 5 . 999 0 . 2043
3 5 3 . 10 7 . 610 5 . 999 0 . 3085
3 5 3 . 08 9 . 04 4 5 . 999 0 . 3553
3 9 3 . 09 0 . 151 5 . 999 0 . 0000
3 9 3 . 17 1 . 421 5 . 999 0 . 0518
3 9 3 . 14 2 . 77 8 5 . 999 0 . 103 1
3 9 3 . 13 5 . 937 5 . 999 0 . 2 0 67
3 9 3 . 12 9 . 13 5 5 . 999 0 . 3 04 9
4 1 3 . 10 0 . 275 5 . 999 0 . 0000
4 1 3 . 09 1 . 661 5 . 999 0. 0511
4 1 3 . 09 3 . 19 5 5 . 999 0 . 1024
4 13 . 09 6 . 291 5 . 999 0 . 2051
4 1 3 . 12 9 . 201 5 . 999 0 . 2878
4 3 3 . 12 0 . 471 5 . 999 0 . 0000
4 3 3 . 07 1 . 898 5 . 999 0 . 0512
4 3 3 . 05 3 . 406 5 . 999 0 . 1025
4 3 3 . 08 6 . 578 5 . 999 0 . 2 05 2
4 3 3 . 05 8 . 981 5 . 999 0 . 2743
a m2 = molality of NaCl b m1 = solubil ity o f co2
259
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Vazquez , G . ; Chenlo , F . ; Pereira , G .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaC l ; [ 7 64 7 -14-5 ] Afinidad 1994 , 5� , ( No . 4 5 3 ) 3 69-74 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 1
P 1 / bar = 1 . 0 1 3 Pirketta Scharl in
'Y2 f g L- 1 = 0 - 1 6 0 Rosa Crovetto
T/K 'Y2 f g L- 1 a c2 fmol L- 1 b pfkg m- 3 c c 1 fmol dm""·3 d L e

---
298 . 1 0 0 997 . 0 0 . 03 3 3 0 . 814

40 0 . 68 4 1028 . 7 0 . 0287 0 . 702
80 1 . 369 1054 . 9 0 . 0244 0 . 597
120 2 . 05 3 1079 . 4 0 . 0208 0 . 509
160 2 . 738 1102 . 7 0 . 0178 0 . 435
a mass concentration o f NaCl

b concentration of NaCl ; calculated by compi ler
c p = dens ity of aqueous NaCl solution
d c 1 = solubil ity of co2
e
L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 ] ; calculated by compiler (PS)
( ideal gas behavior assumed)
The authors also report values for viscosity � =

'Y2 f g L- 1 0 40 80 12 0 160
�/mPa s 0 . 890 0 . 948 1 . 016 1 . 092 1 . 17 5
The apparatus is a combination of ( 1 ) Commercial , purity 9 9 . 5 mole % .
was modif ied to achieve a more accu ( 2 ) No details given .
the absorbent l iquid . The apparatus ( 3 ) Distilled and degassed .
the volume of mercury that must be �-----�-----�
The raw solubil ity data obtained are 6TfK = ± 0 . 1
gas/ l iquid volume ratios . oP/ bar = ± 0 . 0 0 1
A detailed description of apparatus , oc1 f c1 < ± 1 % [ estimated by com
method and procedure is given in piler ( P S ) on the basis of
Ref . 3 . the information in Ref . 3 ]
REFERENCES :
Cal l , A . Ing . Quim . 1 9 8 4 , � 6 , 67 .
2 . Haimour , N . J . Chern . Eng . Data
1 9 9 0 , 3 5 , 177 .
Eng . Data 1 9 9 4 , 3 9 , 6 3 9 .
260
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Vazquez , G . ; Chenlo , F . ; Pereira , G . ;

Peaguda , J .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaC l ; [ 7 64 7 -14-5 )
An . Quim . 1 9 9 4 , 90 , 3 2 4 -2 8 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )
T/K =
2 9 3 . 1 - 3 08 . 1
P1 / bar =
1 . 013 Pirketta Scharl in
m2 /mol kg- 1 =
o. 692 - 2 . 903
T/K m2 /mol kg- 1 c c l fmol dm- 3 d L e
2 93 . 1 0 . 692 0 . 03 2 6 0 . 78 4
1 . 4 04 0 . 0277 0 . 666
2 . 14 3 0 . 0238 0 . 57 2
2 . 903 0 . 0207 0 . 497
2 98 . 1 40 1029 0 . 692 0 . 0289 o . 7.07

80 1055 1 . 404 0 . 0243 0 . 59 4
120 1078 2 . 14 3 0 . 0207 0 . 506
160 1103 2 . 903 0 . 0179 0 . 438
3 03 . 1 0 . 692 0 . 0250 0 . 64 4
1 . 404 0 . 02 14 0 . 532
2 . 14 3 0 . 0182 0 . 453
2 . 903 0 . 0164 0 . 408
3 08 . 1 0 . 692 0 . 0227 0 . 574

1 . 4 04 0 . 0193 0 . 488
2 . 14 3 0 . 0165 0 . 4 17
2 . 903 0 . 0147 0 . 372
a 'Y2 =
mass concentration of NaCl I
b
p =
density of aqueous NaCl solution
c m2 ...
molal ity of NaC l ; calculated by compi ler
d solubil ity of co2
c1 =
e
L =
Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 )

previous designs ( Refs 1 and 2 ) . It
was modif ied to achieve a more accu ( 2 ) Probus . Grade not given .
the volume of mercury that must be r-------�
supplied to the system in order to ESTIMATED ERROR :
The raw solubi l ity data obtained are 6T/K = ± 0 . 1
gas / liquid volume ratios . 6P/bar = ± 0 . 0 0 1
A deta iled description of apparatus , 6c 1 / c 1 < ± 1 % ( estimated b y com
method and procedure is given in p i ler on the bas i s of the
REFERENCES :
Coll , A . Ing . Quim . 1 9 8 4 , 1 6 , 67 .
19 9 0 ' 3 5 ' 1 7 7 .
Eng . Data 1 9 9 4 , 39 , 639 .
26 1
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Van S lyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr . ;
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 ]
J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 8 , 78 , 7 6 5 -9 9 .
[ 764 7-01-0 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 3 1 1 . 2
c2 /mo l L- 1 = 0 - o . 3 0 0 Pirketta Scharlin
c 3 ;mol L- 1 = 0 . 0 1
P = " atmospheric"
e
t/ ° C T/K a Method b P1 /mmHg c c2 ;mol L- 1 c 3 ;mol L- 1 a d s1
-- ---
38 . 0 3 11 . 2 B,T 0 0 . 01 0 . 5 4 5 2 * 0 . 5468*
B 721 . 8 0 . 15 0 0 . 01 0 . 5300 0 . 5327
T 7 15 . 1 0 . 150 0 . 01 0 . 5276 0 . 5302
B 721 . 8 0 . 3 00 0 . 01 o . 5116 0 . 5157
T 7 15 . 1 0 . 300 0 . 01 0 . 5113 0 . 5 154

b B : saturation by bubbling ; T : saturation in rotating tonometer .
c 1 mmHg = 13 3 . 3 2 2 Pa = 1 . 3 3 3 2 2 x 10- 3 bar

e
s1 = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 atm- 1 ]
* Average of six measurements .
(2) Not specified .
saturation by bubbl ing (B) . The solu
tion was placed in the saturating (3) Not specified .
nected through a wash bottle with a (4) Distil led .
by a mercury reservoir and the free 6 af a = ± 0 . 005
(Refs 1 and 2 ) . J . Biol . Chem . 1 9 2 4 , 61 , 5 2 3 .
3 . Austin , J . H . ; Cullen , G . E . ;
with solutions of acids and salts . J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 2 , 54 , 12 1 .
262
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Onda , K . ; Sada , E . ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; Kito , S . ; Ito , K .
[ 7 64 7 - 14-5 )
( 3 ) Nitric acid ; HN03 ; [ 7 6 9 7 - 3 7 -2 ] J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 19 7 0 , 3 , 1 3 7 -4 2 .
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
VARIABLES : "J."t_ � ..: � o • J.. :>

P REPARED BY :
P/kPa = 101 . 3 25 c . L . Y oung
c2 tmol L- 1 = 0 - 1 . 397
c3 tmol L- 1 = 0 - o. 766
EXPERIMENTAL VALUES : a
T /K c2 tmol L-1 c3 tmol L- 1 Ifmol L- 1 a
a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 0 . 7595
0 . 557 (b) 0 . 84 0 (b) 1 . 397 0 . 6865
1 . 17 5 (b) 1 . 771 (b) 2 . 946 0 . 6241
0 . 4 11 (c) 0 . 226 (c) 0 . 637 0 . 6898
1 . 14 0 (c) 0 . 62 6 (c) 1. 766 0 . 5953
1 . 397 (c) 0 . 766 (c) 2 . 163 0 . 5661
a Quoted i n original paper .

I = ionic strenght ; a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ]
( b ) Calculated from ratio of ionic strength NaCl : HN03 being

0 . 3 9 8 8 : 0 . 6 0 1 2 as quoted in original paper .
( c) Calculated from ratio of ionic strength NaCl : HN03 being
0 . 6458 : 0 . 3 5 4 2 as quoted in original paper .
P = 1 atm = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 • 1 05 Pa
AUXI L I ARY I NFORMAT ION
METHOD /APPARATUS /PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURl TY OF MATE R I ALS :
Concentrated solution prepared by ( 1 ) Commercial sample , purity

solutions prepared by dilution .
Equil ibrium established between a ( 2 ) Analytical grade sample .
in a cell fitted with a magnetic
ESTIMATED ERROR:
6T/K = ± 0 . 2 ; 6a = ± 2 %
REFE RENCES :

Kito , S . ; Ito , K .
J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 1 9 7 0 , 3 , 18 .
263
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -38-9 ] Yasunishi , A . ; Tsuj i , M . ; Sada , E .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 647-14-5 ]
( 3 ) Ammonium chloride ; NH4Cl ; Adv . Chem . Ser . 19 7 9 , 1 7 7 , 1 8 9 -2 0 3 .
[ 12 12 5-0 2 -9 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 c . L . Young
( c2 +c3 ) /mol dm- 1 = 0 - 5 . 48 0
T = 2 9 8 . 15 K ;
P = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa
x2 ( c2+c3 ) L a x2 ( c2 +c ) L a
in mixed salt / mo l dm- 3 in mixed salt 3
/mol dm-3
0 . 00 0 0 . 8264 0 . 50 3 . 4 53 0 . 5024
0 . 501 0 . 7880 4 . 15 7 0 . 4 6 14
0 . 98 0 0 . 7576 4 . 731 0 . 4296
1 . 508 0 . 7328 5 . 17 6 0 . 4 097
2 . 338 0 . 6915
2 . 816 0 . 67 2 1 0 . 75 0 . 945 0 . 6831
3 . 682 0 . 6452 1. 783 0 . 5834
4 . 42 1 0 . 6258 2 . 64 8 0 . 4 9 54
5 . 480 0 . 6015 3 . 57 2 0 . 4243
4 . 284 0 . 3737
0 . 25 0 . 426 0 . 7871 4 . 62 0 0 . 3552
0 . 892 0 . 7405 5 . 28 1 0 . 3 16 5
1. 709 0 6802
.•
2 . 550 0 . 6252 1 . 00 0 . 455 0 . 7343

3 . 398 0 . 57 8 1 1 . 000 0 . 6507
4 . 07 7 0 . 5467 1 . 442 0 . 5842
4 . 4 59 0 . 5275 1 . 945 0 . 5187
5 . 05 1 0 . 5059 2 . 486 0 . 4653
3 . 400 0 . 3727
0 . 50 0 . 446 0 . 7655 4 . 2 16 0 . 3 144
0 . 93 1 0 . 7147 5 . 09 6 0 . 2584
1. 750 0 . 6 3 09
2 . 233 0 . 5896
a L = Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm-3 ]
Volumetric apparatus with multibulb ( 1 ) Extra pure grade , purity 9 9 . 9 6
buret and magnetic stirrer . Amount of mole % .
volumetrica l ly . Partial pressure de- ( 2 , 3 ) Reagent grade .
termined from total pressure and vapor
pressure of solution . The vapor pres- ( 4 ) Deioniz ed .
sure of the mixed salt solution esti-
mated by the method of Robinson and
Bower ( 1 ) from corresponding data for ESTIMATED ERROR :
each component salt solution .
Apparatus s 6milar to that described in &T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; &L = ± 1 %
Ref . 2 .
REFERENCES :
1 . Robinson , R . A . ; Bower , V . E . J . Res . Nat . Bur . Stand . 1 9 6 5 , 69A , 3 6 5 .
2 . Tokunaga , J . J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
264
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Onda , K . ; Sada , E . ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; Kito , S . ; Ito , K .
[ 7 647 -14-5 ]
( 3 ) Ammonium nitrate ; NH4No3 ; J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 19 7 0 , 3, 1 3 7 -4 2 .
[ 64 8 4 -5 2 -2 ]
( 4 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 10 1 . 3 2 5 C . L . Young
c2 /lilol L" 1 = 0 - 1 . 9 3 1
c3 tmol L" 1 = 0 - 1 . 1 1
0:
T/K c2tmol L- 1 a c3 tmol L-1 a I/mol L- 1 b b
2 98 . 15 0 0 0 0 . 7595
0 . 188 0 . 372 0 . 560 0 . 7 18 8
0 . 331 0 . 655 0 . 986 0 . 6909
0 . 466 0 . 924 1 . 390 0 . 6673
0 . 619 1 . 226 1 . 845 0 . 6381
0 . 678 1 . 341 2 . 019 0 . 6 3 04
0 . 996 1 . 973 2 . 969 0 . 5710
0 . 270 0 . 270 0 . 53 9 0 . 7057
0 . 289 0 . 289 0 . 577 0 . 7030
0 . 652 0 . 652 1 . 034 0 . 663 0
0 . 698 0 . 698 1 . 396 0 . 6251
0 . 8 58 0 . 858 1 . 716 0 . 6082
1 . 388 1 . 388 2 . 775 0 . 5320
1 . 478 1 . 478 2 . 956 0 . 5 2 18
0 . 52 6 0 . 3 03 0 . 829 0 . 6 7 17
1 . 02 8 0 . 59 4 1. 622 0 . 5885
1 . 454 0 . 839 2 . 293 0 . 53 14
1 . 9n 1 . 11 3 . 04 6 0 . 4826
a Calculated from ionic strength and ratios of ionic strengths given

in paper .
I = ionic strength ; o: = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm-1 ]
P = 1 atm = 1 . 01325 • 1 05 Pa

weighting , less concentrated 99 . 8 mole % .
Equilibrium established between a ( 2 ) Analytical grade sample .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 2 ; 6o: = ± 2 %
REFERENCES :
J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 19 7 0 , 3 , 18 .
265
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8-9 )
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; Yasunishi , A . ; Tsuj i , M . ; Sada , E .
[ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 )
( 3 ) Magnes ium sulfate ; Mgso4 ; Adv . Chem . Ser . 19 7 9 , 1 7 7 , 189-203 .
( 7487-88-9 )
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
VARIABLES : PREPARED BY : . .
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 32 5 C . L . Young
( c2+c3 ) fmol dm-3 = 0 - 2 . 486
T/K x2 ( c2+c3 ) L a
in mixed salt /mol dm-3
2 9 8 . 15 o . oo 0 0 . 8 2 64
0 . 418 0 . 6480
0 . 724 0 . 5355
1 . 02 0 0 . 4513
1. 643 0 . 3 04 7
2 . 274 0 . 2049
0 . 25 0 . 2 64 0 . 7 19 4
0 . 515 0 . 6329
1 . 02 8 0 . 4837
1 . 562 0 . 3766
2 . 05 6 0 . 2872
0 . 50 0 . 387 0 . 7001
. 0 . 723 0 . 6110
1 . 111 0 . 5147
1 . 616 0 . 4 2 15
2 . 18 5 0 . 3 3 15
0 . 75 0 . 263 0 . 7540
0 . 53 7 0 . 6917
1 . 079 0 . 5799
1 . 62 6 0 . 4811
2 . 17 9 0 . 4 104
1 . 00 0 . 455 0 . 7343
1 . 000 0 . 6508
1 . 442 0 . 5842
1 . 945 0 . 5187
2 . 486 0 . 4653
a L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm-3 )
P = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa
Volumetric apparatus with multibulb ( 1 ) Extra pure grade , purity

buret and magnetic stirrer . Amount 9 9 . 9 6 mole % .
of solution and gas absorbed
determined volumetrica l ly . Partial ( 2 , 3 ) Reagent grade .
pressure determined from total
pressure and vapor pressure of ( 4 ) Deionized .
solution . The vapor pressure of the
mixed salt solution estimated by the
method of Robinson and Bower ( 1 )
from corresponding data for each ESTIMATED ERROR :
component salt solution . 6TfK = ± 0 . 05 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
Apparatus s imilar to that described
in ref . ( 2 ) .
REFERENCES :
1 . Robinson , R . A . ; Bower , V . E .
J . Res . Nat . Bur . stand .
1965 , 69A , 3 6 5 .
2 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
266
( 1 } Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Mal inin , s . D . ; Savelyeva , N . I .

( 2 } Sodium chlor ide ; NaC l ; [ 7 647-14-5 ] *Geokhimiya 1 9 7 2 , ( 6 ) , 6 4 3 -5 3 ;
Geochem . Int . 1 9 7 2 , 9 , 4 10-8 .
( 3 } Calcium chloride ; cacl2 ;
( 10 04 3 -5 2 -4 )
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
'1'/K = 2 98 . 15
P/ bar = 47 . 95 c. L . Young
c2 fmol L- 1 = 0 . 905
c3 tmol L- 1 = 0 . 4 3 68
'1'/K P/ bar
2 9 8 . 15 47 . 95 0 . 905 0 . 4368 41 . 41 4 3 . 43
• Solubi l ity of co2 : c1 = m 1 ( in grams ) I 1 kg o f s olution

b Solubil ity of C02 : s1 = m 1 ( in grams ) I 1 kg of water

Flow system with about 0 . 2 5 L of solu- ( 1 ) GOST 8 050-64 sample .
tion in o . s L stainless steel cell .
After equil ibrium established , l iquid ( 2 ) Analytical reagent grade sample .
potassium hydroxide . Gain in weight ( 3 ) No detai l s given .
source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6'1'/K = ± 0.1; 6C 1 , 6S 1 = ± 0.5 %;
6Pf bar = ± 0.1
( estimated by comp i l er )
REFERENCES :
267
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) He , s . ; Morse , J . W .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride , NaCl ; ( 7 647-14-5 ] Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 19 9 3 , 5 7 ,
3 5 3 3 -54 .
( 3 ) Calcium sulfate ; caso4 ;
( 7778-18-9 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
=
T/K 2 7 3 . 15 - 3 6 3 . 15
P/MPa =
0 . 1032 Pirketta Schar l in
m2 /mol kg- 1 =
0.1 - 6.0
m 3 tmol kg- 1 =
0 . 01
1 0 3m 1 tmo l kg- 1 e 'Yl f

T/K a m2 /mo l kg- 1 b pfg cm- 3 c 102p1 t atm d
--
2 7 � . 15 0.1 1 . 0114 96 . 6 74 . 5 1 . 03
0.5 1 . 0224 66 . 7 1 . 15
1.0 1 . 0411 59 . 0 1 . 30
2.0 1 . 0787 40. 1 1 . 63
4.0 1 . 1460 31.8 2 . 42
6.0 1 . 2 09 5 22 . 6 3 . 40
2 9 8 . 15 0.1 1 . 0189 94 . 2 31.0 1 . 03
0.5 1 . 0189 28 . 5 1 . 12
1.0 1 . 0363 26 . 6 1 . 20
2.0 1 . 0700 21. 5 1 . 47
4.0 1 . 1340 13 . 8 2 .31
6.0 1 . 1974 10 . 0 3 . 20
3 2 3 . 15 0.1 1 . 0081 85 . 4 16 . 0 1 . 02
0.5 1 . 0081 14 . 8 1 . 10
1.0 1 . 0262 14 . 0 1 . 16
2.0 1 . 0608 12 . 2 1 . 33
4.0 1 . 1240 .9 . 1 1 . 79
6.0 1 . 1824 6.8 2 . 40
Either pure co2 gas or co2 -N2 mixtu ( 1 ) Commercial ; purity 9 9 . 9 t.
maintain a constant P ( C02 ) . The co2- ( 2 , 3 ) source not mentioned .
N2 mixtures were made by pumping pre Analytical reagent-grade which
determined amounts of co2 and N2 into met ACS specifications .
verif ied by gas chromatography .
gas was premoistured by f irst passing
=
were obtained by us ing gas-dispersion 6T/K ± 0.1
=
tubes . The bubbl ing rate was 9 0 to 95 6m 1 /m 1 ± o . 012
mL min- 1 • 6n / n =
± o . o4
The mole fraction of co2 in the co2•
graph .
268
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] He , S . ; Morse , J . W .
( 2 ) Sodium chloride , NaCl ; [ 7 647-14-5 ] Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 1 9 9 3 , 5 7 ,
3 5 3 3 -54 .
( 3 ) Calcium sulfate ; caso4 ;
[ 7 7 7 8-18-9 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
a b 2 e f
T/ K m2 fmol kq- 1 pf q cm- 3 c 10 p1 / atm d 1 0 3m 1 fmol kq- 1 'Y1
--
3 4 8 . 15 0.1 0 . 9795 60 . 3 8.1 1 . 02
0.5 0 . 9795 7.9 1 . 05
1.0 1 . 0120 7.6 1 . 07
2.0 1 . 0463 7.2 1 . 15
4.0 1 . 1090 6.0 1 . 37
6.0 1 . 1638 5.6 1 . 48
3 63 . 15 0.1 0 . 9624 30. 1 3.4 1 . 03
0.5 0 . 9624 3.3 1 . 05
1.0 1 . 0028 3.2 1 . 08
2.0 1 . 0373 3.0 1 . 15
4.0 1 . 1002 2.7 1 . 27
6.0 1 . 1559 2.5 1 . 41
m 3 , the molal ity of caso4 , was 0 . 01 mol kq- 1 in all measurements

•
Calculated by compiler
b m2 = molality o£ NaCl
c
p = density of solvent
d
•
P1 = partial pressure of C02
m 1 = molality of co2
f
'Y1 = activity coefficient of C02
269
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ]
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaC l ; Onda , K . ; Sada , E . ; Kobayashi , T . ;
[ 7 647-14-5 ] Kito , S . ; Ito � K .
( 3 ) Barium chloride ; Bacl2 ;
( 1 0 3 6 1 - 3 7 -2 ] J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 19 7 0 , 3, 1 3 7 -4 2 .
( 4 ) Ammonium nitrate ; NH4No3 ;
[ 6484-52-2 ]
( 5 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 32 5 C . L . Young
c2;mol L- 1 = o - o. 632
c3 /mol L- 1 = 0 - 0 . 2 11
c4 fmol L- 1 = 0 - 0 . 632
T/K c2 ;mo l L- 1 a c3 ;mol L- 1 a c4 jmol L- 1 a Ifmol L- 1 b a b
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 0 0 . 7595
0 . 068 0 . 02 3 0 . 068 0 . 203 0 . 7338
0 . 2 09 0 . 07 0 0 . 209 0 . 626 0 . 6908
0 . 254 0 . 085 0 . 254 0 . 762 0 . 6758
0 . 463 0 . 15 1 0 . 463 1 . 390 0 . 6221
0 . 632 0 . 211 0 . 63 2 1 . 895 0 . 5769
a
Calculated from ionic strength and ratios of ionic strengths given
in paper .
b
Quoted in original paper .
I = ionic strength ; a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 { STP ) cm·3 atm-1 ]
P = 1 atm = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 105 Pa
x

Concentrated solution prepared by { 1 ) Commercial sample , purity
Equi librium established between a ( 2 ) Analytical grade sample .
gas . Details in source and ref . { 1 ) .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 2 ; &a = ± 2 �
REFERENCES :
1 . Onda , K . ; Sada , E . ; Kobayashi , .. T'� ;
J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 19 7 0 , 3 , 1 8 • .
270
COMPONENTS: ORIGINAL MEASUREMENTS:
(1) Carbon dioxide; co2; [124-38-9) Yuan, C-B.; Yang, J-Z.
(2) Sodium chloride; NaCl; [7647-14-5) Gaodeng Xuexiao Huaxue Xuebao 1993,
14, 80-3.
(3) D-Glucose; (dextrose); C6H12o6;
[50-99-7)
(4) Water; H2o; [7732-18-5]
VARIABLES: PREPARED BY:

T/K = 278.15 - 318.15
P/kPa = 101.325 Pirketta Scharlin
1
m2/mol kc:r- = o. oo -3. oo Xiaohui Shen
10 2w3 = 0 and 15
EXPERIMENTAL VALUES:
Table 1. Solubility of co2 at various molalities of NaCl in 15 mass-%

glucosejwater solution.
1 b 318.15 K
m2/mol kg- 278.15 K 288.15 K 298.15 K 308.15 K
0.00 6.11 * 4.29 * 3.13 * 2.56 * 2.10 *
o.oo 4.78 3.72 2.67 2.12 1.71

0.20 4.63 3.20 2.58 2.03 1.69
0.50 4.17 2.35 1.64
1.00 4.25 2.83 2,45 1.80 1.55
2.00 3.25 2.53 1.86 1.56 1.35
3.00 2.61 2.28 1.75 1.55 1.31
a S� = solubility of Co2; b m2 = molality of NaCl; The values marked

w1th asterisk ( * ) are solubilities in pure H2o.
(continued next page)
METHOD/APPARATUS/PROCEDURE: SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS:
Static-state method. The authors (1) Purity of co2 99.95 %.

designed a solubility apparatus which
is composed of three isothermal pre (2) Primary-standard grade NaCl was
saturators, saturator and sampler. A dried in an oven at 170 °C for 3
schematic diagram of the apparatus is hours and stored in desiccator.
in the original source. C02 was in
troduced (10 hours) through the pre (3) Not specified.
saturators and the saturator which
contained about 120 g of solvent. The (4) Double deionized. Conductivity of
equilibrated sample (about 100 g) was H20 was < 1.5x10 -4 s m-1
transferred from the saturator into
the weighed sampler which contained a
weighed amount of standard NaOH solu ESTIMATED ERROR:
tion. The sampler was weighed again
and shaken to complete the reaction 6T/K = ± 0.02
between co2 and NaOH. The excess of
NaOH and the NaHC03 was titrated po When fitting the data to the equation
tentiometrically with standard HCl lg s1 = A/T + B + CT, the standard
solution. The mass of dissolved co2 deviation a was 0.02 < a < 0.4.
was calculated from the equation (See Table 3 on the net page.)
where w = mass of dissolved C02, c8c1 = concentration of HCl; V1 and v2

are volumes of the HCl solution to the first and second end point,
respectively, and M = molar mass of co2•
271
COMPONENTS: ORIGINAL MEASUREMENTS:
(1) Carbon dioxide; co2; [124-38-9) Yuan, C-B.; Yang, J-Z.
(2) Sodium chloride; NaCl; [7647-14-5) Gaodeng Xuexiao Huaxue Xuebao 1993,
14, 80-3.
(3) D-Glucose; (dextrose) ; C6H12o6;
[50-99-7]
(4) Water; H2o; [7732-18-5)
EXPERIMENTAL VALUES: (continued)
The authors computed Setchenov salt effect parameter ksmm· Setchenow salt
effect equation was given as
where
5° solubility of co2 in 15 mass-% glucosefwater solution without NaCl,

Sm = solubility of co2 in 15 mass-% glucosefwater solution with NaCl,
m2 = molality of NaCl in 15 mass-% glucosefwater solution
ksmm was obtained from the slope of the graph lg (S0/Sm) vs. m2•
·values for ksmm computed at each temperature are listed in Table 2.
Table 2. setchenow salt effect parameters for the solubility of co2 in

in NaCl + 15 mass-% glucosefwater solution at 278.15 to 318.15 K
T/K 278.15 288.15 298.15 308.15 318.15

2
10 ksmmfmol kg-l 8.48 7.57 6.67 6.11 4.76
The experimental solubilities from Table 1 were fitted to an equation
lg s1 = A/ � + B + CT (2)
The coefficients of eq. (2) and the standard deviation in lg s are listed
in Table 3. 1
Table 3. Coefficients of eq. (2) for smoothed results for solubility of

C02 in pure H20, 15 mass-% glucosefH20 and NaC1+15 % glucose/H20
a
System A B c a
Pure H20 4608.8 -28.953 0.04018 0.02

15 mass-% glucosefH2o 2754.4 -16.607 0.01940 0.03
1 mol kg-1 NaCl + 15 % glucose/H2o 4181.1 -26.490 0.03625 0.04
3 mol kg-1 NaCl + 15 % glucosetH2o 1482.2 - 9.3530 0.008815 0.02
a
a = standard deviation in lg s1
Using the values of Table 3, the thermodynamic quantities of the solution

process for dissolving co2 can be calculated from the following relations:
o 2
ll.G -2.303R(A + BT + CT ) (3)
ll.Ho 2
-2.303R(A - CT ) (4)
2
ll.S 0 -2.303R(-B - 2CT ) (5)
o 2
ll.Cp -2.303R(- 2CT ) (6)
272
(2) Sodium chlorate ; NaCl0 3 ; Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 25 ,
[ 7 7 7 5-09-9 ] 2 2 6-7 0 .
(3) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 288 . 35
c2 jmol dm- 3 = 0 - 6 . 574 Pirketta Scharl in
tj °C T/K a Di lution c2 jmol dm- 3 a a b k scc / dm3 mol- l a , c

X
--
15 . 2 2 88 . 3 5 co 0 1 . 009 -
3 2 . 19 2 0 . 625 0 . 0949
2 3 . 287 0 . 506 0 . 0912
1 6 . 57 4 0 . 2 67 0 . 0878

Initial solution : 6 9 . 9 8 g NaCl0 3 + 7 4 . 0 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of

solution .
METHOD /APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS :
flexible s i lver capillary . The ab-
passed by the pressure difference in- �------,
273
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Sodium perchlorate ; NaClo4 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 6 0 1 -8 9 - 0 ) "Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 )
T/ K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
c2 t mol dm- 3 = o - 1. 6
T/ K c2 t mol dm- 3 a a T/K c2 t mol dm- 3 a a

--- ---
15 288 . 15 0 0 . 990 40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6
0.2 0 . 910 0.2 0 . 465
0.4 0 . 872 0.4 0 . 4535
0.8 0 . 808 0.8 0 . 436
1. 6 0 . 664 1.6 0 . 3 14
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482
0.2 0 . 777 0.2 0 . 4 12
0.4 0 . 751 0.4 0 . 401
0.8 0 . 7085 0.8 0 . 3838
1.6 0 . 565 1.6 0 . 2575
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 43 6
0.2 0 . 67 8 0.2 0 . 366
0.4 0 . 648 0.4 0 . 355
0.8 0 . 623 0.8 0 . 3327
1.6 0 . 488 1.6 0 . 220
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392
0.2 0 . 595 0.2 0 . 322
0.4 0 . 57 6 0.4 0 . 305
0.8 0 . 55 3 0.8 0 . 283
1.6 0 . 4265 1.6 0 . 18 3
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605 60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0.2 0 . 52 6 0.8 0 . 246
0.4 0 . 520 1.6 0 . 1578
0.8 0 . 485
1.6 0 . 3661
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 )
gas-free l iquid is stirred in the pre ( author ) ·
sence of the gas , and its decrease in
volume is measured in a burette over ( 2 ) DDR pro analys is grade by DDR
mercury . The volume of l iquid was Standard TGL 5 02 1 .
salt in the l iquid was standardized at �------�
20 °C. ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not given .
REFERENCES :
Wiss . z . Tech . Hocbscb . Chem .

" Carl Scborl emmer" Leuna
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
274
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) setchenow , J . ( Sechenov , I . M . ]
( 2 ) Sodium bromide ; NaBr ; [ 7 6 47 -15-6 ) Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 25 ,
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) 2 2 6-7 0 .
T/K = 2 8 8 . 3 5 H . L . Clever
c2 ;mol dm- 3 = 0 - 6 . 7 0 9
t/°C T/K a Di lution c2 ;mol dm- 3 a a b k800 / dm3 mol- l a , c
--
15 . 2 288 . 3 5 ao 0 1 . 009 -
6 1 . 118 0 . 775 0 . 102
1.5 4 . 473 0 . 3 64 0 . 099
1 6 . 709 0 . 221 0 . 098
c k scc = Setchenow salt effect parameter ; k scc = ( 1 / c 2 ) lg ( a0/ a ) .
Initial solution : 6 9 . 04 g NaBr + 8 1 . 15 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of sln .
See other data sheets on J . Setchenow papers

( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Rosenthal , w .
( 2 ) Sodium bromide ; NaBr ; ( 7 6 4 7 -15-6 ) Thes . fa c . sci . Univ . Strasbourg
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ) (Fran ce ) 1954 .
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15 H . L . Clever
c2 ;mol dm- 3 = 0 - 7 . 08
T/K c2 fmol dm- 3 a Lfcm3 cm- 3 a , b k800 / dm3 mol- l c , d
2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 879 -
1 . 384 0 . 658 0 . 09 1
1 . 81 0 . 616 0 . 0855
4 . 79 0 . 336 0 . 08 7
7 . 08 0 . 211 0 . 0 87 5
a original data . b Ostwald coefficient .
c Sechenov constant ; k scc = ( 1 / C2 ) lg (L0 /L) . d Calculated by compi ler .
The prepared solvent and solution were ( 1 ) source and purity not given .
charged into an evacuated cell after An aqueous " soda" solution
degassing , and the mass of solvent was absorbed 9 9 . 8 % of the gas .
determined by weight . Gas was intra-
duced into the cell from a measuring ( 2 ) Source and purity not given .
buret in which the gas was stored over Recrystallized from water and
mercury . The cell was agitated while dried .
the gas pressure was maintained by ad-
justing the gas volume . The Ostwald ( 3 ) Boi led to remove carbon dioxide .
mass of solvent and the volume of gas ESTIMATED ERROR :
at pressures above and below atmo- 6T/K = ± 0 . 2 ; 6p/ kPa = ± 0 . 1
spheric . 6L/L = ± 0 . 0 2 ( compi ler )
REFERENCES :
Some data in the thesis have been published .
See : 1 . Maillard , A . i Rosenthal , w . Comp rend . 1952 , 234 , 2 5 4 6-8 .
275
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J.
(2) Sodium bromide ; NaBr ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 647 -15-6 ] " Carl Schor l emmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18 -5 ]
T/ K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/ kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
c2 ; mo l dm-3 = o - 4.5
t j °C T/K c2 ; mol dm-3 a
a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0.5 0 . 844 0 . 855

1 0 . 806 0 . 828
2 0 . 69 8 0 . 736
4.5 0 . 388 0 . 440
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0.5 0 . 755 0 . 767
1 0 . 705 0 . 725
2 0 . 6 15 0 . 650
4.5 0 . 356 0 . 4 05
25 2 98 . 15 0 0 . 758 -
0.5 0 . 669 0 . 6805

1 0 . 62 7 0 . 646
2 0 . 552 0 . 584
4.5 0 . 331 0 . 378
30 3 03 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0.5 0 . 602 0 . 612
1 0 . 561 0 . 57 8
2 0 . 484 0 . 513
4.5 0 . 307 0 . 351
METHOD /APPARATUS / P ROCEDU RE : SOURCE AN D P U R I TY OF MATE RI ALS :

The princ ipl e of the Ostwald method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vo l % ;
was used in which a measured vo lume the impurity was mostly
in vo lume i s measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro analys i s grade
was measured at the exper imenta l
temperature . F o r calcu lation of the ( 3 ) Doubl e d i s t i l led .
the s o lution was obta ined from
mo lar concentrat ion of s a lt in the
l iquid was standard i z ed at 2 0 � C . rE
�' S�T�I-MA
� T�D-E�R-R_0_
E- R_:------------------------�
These data are ana lyzed and d1scussed
REF E RENCES :
1 . Gerecke , J. ; B ittr ich , H . J .
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 1 3 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
276
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J.

( 2 ) Sodium bromide ; NaBr ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 19 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 64 7 -15-6 ] " Carl Schor l emmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 ]
( continued )
t j °C T/K c2;mol dm-3 a

a s b
--
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0.5 0 . 54 0 0 . 54 9
1 0 . 504 0 . 52 0
2 0 . 442 0 . 47 0
4.5 0 . 285 0 . 327
40 3 1 3 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0.5 0 . 485 0 . 494
1 0 . 454 0 . 470
2 0 . 3 9.2 0 . 4 17 7
4.5 0 . 2 62 0 . 301
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0.5 0 . 437 0 . 446
1 0 . 407 0 . 422
2 0 . 350 0 . 374
4.5 0 . 236 0 . 272
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0.5 0 . 391 0 . 3995
1 0 . 3 68 0 . 382
2 0 . 3 11 0 . 332
4.5 0 . 230 0 . 265
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0.5 0 . 355 0 . 3635
1 0. 330 0 . 343
2 0 . 289 0 . 310
4.5 0 . 225 0 . 261
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
0.5 0 . 322 0 . 330
1 0 . 297 0 . 3 09
2 0 . 257 0 . 2755
4.5 0 . 219 0 . 254
a a = Bunsen coeffic ient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

b s =
1
Kuenen coe f f i c i ent [ cm3 ( STP ) g- ( H20 ) atm- 1 ] .
277
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Vazquez , G . ; Chenlo , F . ; Pereira , G . ;
Peaguda , J .
( 2 ) Sodium bromide ; NaBr ; ( 7 6 4 7 -15-6 ]
An . Quim . 1 9 9 4 , 90 , 324-28 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 298 . 1
Pt f bar = 1 . 013 Pirketta Scharl in
m2 ;mol kg- 1 = 0 . 392 - 2 . 951
T/K 'Y 2 / g L- 1 a pfkg m- 3 b m2 ;mol kg- 1 c

ctfmol dm- 3 d L e
---
298 . 1 40 103 1 0 . 392 0 . 0286 0 . 700

80 1057 0 . 796 0 . 0266 0 . 65 1
12 0 1088 1 . 2 05 0 . 0253 0 . 619
160 1116 1 . 627 0 . 02 3 0 0 . 563
200 1145 2 . 057 0 . 0212 0 . 518
240 1174 2 . 4 97 0 . 0201 0 . 492
280 1202 2 . 951 0 . 0181 0 . 443
a 'Y2 mass concentration of NaBr

b p = dens ity of aqueous NaBr solution
c m2 =
molal ity of NaBr ; calculated by compiler
e
L =
Ostwald coeff icient ( cm3 cm- 3 ]
was modified to achieve a more accu ( 2 ) Merck . Grade not given .
the absorbent l iquid . The apparatus ( 3 ) Distilled and degassed .
the volume of mercury that must be �-------1
supplied to the system in order to ESTIMATED ERROR :
The raw solubil ity data obtained are oT/K = ± 0 . 1
gas/ l iquid volume ratios . oF/ bar = ± 0 . 0 0 1
A detailed description of apparatus , oc 1 ; c 1 < ± 1 % ( estimated by com
method and procedure is given in pi ler on the basis of the
REFERENCES i
Col l , A . Ing . Qufm . 1 9 8 4 , 1 6 , . 67 .
19 9 0 , 3 5 , 1 7 7 .
Eng . Data 1 9 9 4 , 3 9 , 6 3 9 .
278
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Rosenthal , w.
( 2 ) Sodium iodide ; Nai ; [ 7 6 8 1-82 -5 ) Thes . fac . sci . Univ . strasbourg

(France) 1 9 5 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15
c2 f mol dm- 3 = 0 - 6 . 012 H . L . Clever
T/K
2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 879
0 . 16 1 0 . 650 0 . 0815
4 . 27 0 . 4 15 0 . 0765
6 . 012 0 . 322 0 . 0725
a Original data .
b Ostwald coefficient .
c Sechenov constant ; k scc = ( 1 f c2 ) lg (L0 /L) .

d Calculated by compi ler .
The prepared solvent and solution were ( 1 ) source and purity not given .
charged into an evacuated cel l after An aqueous " soda" solution
degass ing , and the mass of solvent was absorbed 99 . 8 % of the gas .
determined by weight . Gas was intro
buret in which the gas was stored over Recrystal l i zed from water and
mercury . The cel l was agitated while dried .
the gas pressure was maintained by ad
j usting the gas volume . The Ostwald ( 3 ) Boiled to remove carbon dioxide .
mass of solvent and the volume of gas
spheric .
6T/K = ± 0.2
op/kPa = ± 0.1
6L/L = ± 0 . 0 2 ( compi ler)
REFERENCES :
published . See :
1. Ma i l lard , A . ; Rosenthal , W .
Comp rend . 1 9 5 2 , 2 3 4 , 2 5 4 6-8 .
279
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Sodium i odide ; Nai ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

[ 7 6 8 1-8 2 -5 ) " Carl Schor lemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 77 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 1 5 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
c2 /mol dm-3 = 0 - 4
t / °C T/K c2 ; mo l dm-3 a
a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0.5 0 . 858 0 . 875
1 0 . 8 14 0 . 844
2 0 . 661 o. 713
4 0 . 470 0 . 553
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0.5 0 . 766 0 . 781
1 0 . 727 0 . 756
2 0 . 587 0 . 634
4 0 . 418 0 . 493
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 0 . 5173
0.5 0 . 694 0 . 709
1 0 . 642 0 . 668
2 0 . 522 0 . 566
4 0 . 374 0 . 4425
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 671 -
0.5 0 . 627 0 . 641
1 0 . 565 0 . 59 0
2 0 . 458 0 . 497
4 0 . 326 0 . 387
AU XI L I ARY I N FO RMAT ION
METHOD /APPARATUS / P ROCEDURE : SOURCE AND P U R I TY OF MATE R I ALS ;

in vo lume i s measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro ana lys i s grade
temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Doubl e d i s t i l led .
Kuenen coeff i c i ent , the density of
the s o lut ion was obta ined from
l iquid was standardi z ed at 2 0°C . E S T IMATED ERRO R :
Thes e data are analyzed and discussec
RE F E RENCES :
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
280
COMPONENTS : ORI GINAL MEASUREMENTS :

( 2 ) Sodium iodide ; Nai ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 6 8 1- 8 2 -5 ) " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 )
( continued)
b
tj°C T/K c2 ;mol dm-3 a a s
--
35 3 0 8 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0.5 0 . 570 0 . 584
1 0 . 498 0 . 52 1
2 0 . 409 0 . 445
4 0 . 308 0 - 3 66
40 3 1 3 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0.5 0 . 513 0 . 5265
1 0 . 445 0 - 4655
2 0 . 3 69 0 . 402
4 0 . 303 0 . 3 6 12
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0.5 0 . 465 0 . 478
1 0 . 408 0 . 42 8
2 0 . 327 0 . 3 57
4 0 . 292 0 . 3495
-
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436
0.5 0 . 430 0 - 443
1 0 . 367 0 . 386
2 0 . 294 0 . 322
4 0 . 288 0 . 3455
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0-5 0 . 395 0 . 407
1 0 . 334 0 . 3516
2 0 . 2 69 0 . 295
4 0 . 284 0 - 340
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
0-5 0 . 366 0 . 378
1 0 . 307 0 - 324
2 0 . 244 0 . 2 6.8
4 0 . 290 0 - 350
a a = Bunsen coeffic ient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

b
s = Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ) .
281
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Sodium hydrogen sulf ite ; NaHS0 3 ;
[ 7 6 3 1- 9 0 - 5 ) J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 197 0 , 3, 18-24 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 C . L . Young
c2 fmol L- 1 = o - 2 . 0 15
T/K a a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 7595
0 . 505 0 . 6528
1 . 017 0 . 5524
2 . 0 15 0 . 3 9 17
a
P = 1 atm = 101 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
oTfK = ± 0.2; oa = ± 2 %
REFERENCES :
282
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Setchenow , J. [ Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Sodium sulfate ; Na2so4 Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 2 5 ,
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 -6 ] 2 2 6-7 0 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 288 . 35
c2 /mol dm- 3 = 0 - 2 . 002 Pirketta Scharlin
a a a,c
t/°C T/K Di lution c2 ;mol dm- 3 Q
b k scc / dm3 mol- l
X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 00 0 1 . 009 -
20 0 . 100 0 . 950 0 . 261

10 0 . 200 0 . 876 0 . 3 07
5 0 . 400 0 . 753 0 . 3 17
4 0 . 501 0 . 700 0 . 3 17
3 0 . 667 0 . 62 0 0 . 3 17
2 1 . 001 0 . 485 0 . 3 18
1 2 . 002 0 . 2335 0 . 3 17
a
c
Initial solution : 2 8 . 4 4 g Na2so4 + 94 . 7 6 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of

solution .
METHOD/APPARATUS / PROCEDuRE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS :
tus on those of Fernet ( 1 8 5 7 ) and of stone and sulfuric acid . Dried .
passed by the pressure difference in- �----�
283
COMPONENTS : ORI GINAL MEAS UREMENTS :
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Markham , A . A . ; Kobe , K . A .
( 2 ) Sodium sul fate ; Na2 so4 ; J . Am . Chem . Soc . 194 1 , 63 , 4 4 9-54 .

[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 and 3 1 3 . 15
P / kP a = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
m2 ;mol kg- 1 = 0 - 1. 5
t;oc T/K a a s b
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.0 0 . 7565 0 . 7587

0 . 25 0 . 6335 0 . 6381
0.5 0 . 5330 0 . 5399
1 0 . 3855 0 . 3957
1.5 0 . 2824 0 . 2943
40 3 1 3 . 15 0.0 0 . 5133 0 . 5173
0 . 25 0 . 4394 0 . 4450
0.5 0 . 3735 0 . 3 8 04
1 0 . 2781 0 . 2872
1.5 0 . 2073 0 . 2 17 5
a a == Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

b S = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ] .
Sm/80 = am2 + 1 / ( 1 + bm2 ) , as f o l l ows :
a b
25 -0 . 0760 0 . 666
40 -0 . 0 8 3 8 0 . 560
AU XI L I ARY I NFORMAT ION
METHOD /AP PARATUS / P ROCEDURE : S OU RC E AND P U R I TY OF MAT E R I ALS :

a burette over mercury . The pressure ( 3 ) Disti lled and degassed .
The volume of gas was reduced to 0°C
saturation . ESTIMAT E D E R RO R :
oT/K == ± 0 . 0 3 ( authors ) ,
oa f a , oS/S = ± 0 . 0 0 2 ( authors ) .
REFERENCES :
284
( 1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Shchennikova , M . K . ; Devyatykh , G . G . ;
Korshunov , I . A .
(2) Sodium sulfate ; Na2 so4 ; Zh . Prikl . Khim . (Leningrad) 1957 ,
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ] 3 0 , 108 0-4 ; * J . Appl . Chem . USSR
( Engl . Trans l . ) 1957 , 3 0 ( 2 ) ,
--
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 -5 ] 1149-52 .

T/K = 2 9 8 - 3 4 8
c2 jmol dm- 3 = 0 . 2 - 1 . 6 8 Pirketta Scharlin
T/K 4 a b
2 9 9 . 15 5 . 34 0 . 658 0 . 72 1
5 . 41 0 . 678 0 . 742
35 3 08 . 15 3 . 85 0 . 47 3 0 . 543
45 3 18 . 15 2 . 78 0 . 340 0 . 396
2 . 75 0. 336 0 . 391
65 3 3 8 . 15 1 . 51 0 . 183 0 . 226
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 415 4 . 93 0 . 608 0 . 664
50 3 2 3 . 15 2 . 72 0 . 332 0 . 393
75 3 4 8 . 15 1 . 28 0 . 154 0 . 196
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 62 4 . 23 0 . 52 1 0 . 569
4 . 32 0 . 53 1 0 . 580
50 3 2 3 . 15 2 . 30 0 . 280 0 . 331
75 3 4 8 . 15 0 . 95 0 . 115 0 . 14 6
26 2 9 9 . 15 1 . 02 5 3 . 29 0 . 403 0 . 441
3 . 42 0 . 419 0 . 459
35 3 0 8 . 15 2 . 62 0 . 320 0 . 361
43 3 16 . 15 2 . 22 0 . 270 0 . 3 12
55 3 2 8 . 15 1.46 0 . 17 6 0 . 2 11
65 3 3 8 . 15 1 . 07 0 . 128 0 . 158
25 2 9 8 . 15 1.3 2 . 42 0 . 295 0 . 322
25 2 9 8 . 15 1 . 68 2 . 14 0 . 253 0 . 276
2 . 09 0 . 247 0 . 270
30 3 0 3 . 15 1 . 97 0 . 232 0 . 257
35 3 0 8 . 15 1 . 40 0 . 164 0 . 185
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 . 84 0 123 0 . 146
c:
4
Isotopic di lution method , with c 1 Not given .
tracer . Experimental procedure
described in Ref . 1 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
Not given .
REFERENCES :
1 . Shchennikova , M . K . ;
Devyatykh , G . G ; Korshunov , I . A .
Zh . Prikl . Khim . (Leningrad) 1957 ,
3 0 , 8 3 3 -8 ; * J . Appl . Chem . USSR
( Engl . Transl . ) 1 9 5 7 , 3 0 ( 6 ) ,
----
8 8 1- 6 .
285
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Gerecke , J.
(2) Sodium sulfate ; Na2 so4 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ] " Carl Schor lemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 77 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
c2 fmol dm·3 = 0 - 1

t rc T/K c2 t mol dm-3 a
a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0 . 25 0 . 780 0 . 784
0.5 0 . 695 0 . 702
1 0 . 545 0 . 5575
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0 . 25 0 . 672 0 . 676
0.5 0 . 611 0 . 6 18
1 0 . 467 0 . 479
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 0 . 5173
0 . 25 0 . 577 0 . 582
0.5 0 . 52 7 0 . 534
1 0 . 411 0 . 422
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 671 -
0 . 25 0 . 501 0 . 5055
0.5 0 . 464 0 . 4705
1 0 . 361 0 . 372
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0 . 25 0 . 439 0 . 4435
0.5 0 . 409 0 . 415
1 0 . 326 0 . 3 3 65
AU XI L I ARY I N FO RNAT ION
METHOD /AP PARATUS / P ROCEDURE : S OURCE AN D PURI TY OF MATE R I ALS :

The princ iple of the Ostwa ld method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vo l %;
was used in whi ch a measured volume the impurity was mostly
in vo lume i s measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro ana lys i s grade
temperature . For calcu l ation of the ( 3 ) Double d i st i l led .
the s o lution was obta ined from
l iquid was standardi z ed at 2 0°C . E S T I MATED E RROR :
Thes e data are analy z ed and di scussed
REF E RENCES :
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 1 3 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
286
COMPONENTS : ORI G INAL MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Gerecke , J .

{ 2 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2so4 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7757-82-6 ] " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
( continued )
T/K c2 ; mol dm-3 a a s b
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0 . 25 0 . 391 0 . 395
0.5 0 . 356 0 . 362
1 0 . 286 0 . 296
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0 . 25 0 . 345 0 . 349
0.5 0 . 3 16 0 . 3 2 15
1 0 . 252 0 . 261
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0 . 25 0 . 311 0 . 3 15
0.5 0 . 282 0 . 287
1 0 . 226 0 . 234
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0 . 25 0 . 278 0 . 282
0.5 0 . 253 0 . 258
1 0 . 200 0 . 2075
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
1 0 . 18 1 0 . 188
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 { STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

b S = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 { STP ) g- 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ] .
287
COMPONENTS : ORIGINAL -MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2so4 ;
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ] J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 197 0 , 3, 18-24 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 c . L . Young
c2 tmol L- 1 = o -1 . 436
T/K c2 tmol L- 1 a a
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 7595
0 . 54 0 0 . 5242
0 . 67 8 0 . 4742
1 . 436 0 . 2867
a
P = 1 atm = 101 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
Solutions made up by weight and den ( 1 ) commercial sample , minimum
cell fitted with a magnetic stirrer . ( 3 ) Distil led and degassed .
source .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.2; oa = ± 2 %
( Estimated by the compiler . )
REFERENCES :
288
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ] Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2so4 ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 24 , 11-14 .
( 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 )
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 08 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 c . L . Young
c2 /mol L- 1 = 0 - 2 . 2 05
T/K c2 /mol L- 1 L a
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 0634
0 . 285 0 . 7995
0 . 58 7 0 . 6632
0 . 786 0 . 5743
0 . 888 0 . 5247
1 . 063 0 . 4803
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8 2 64
0 . 2 10 0 . 7165
0 . 2 19 0 . 7081
0 . 261 0 . 6874
0 . 440 0 . 6040
0 . 510 0 . 5792
0 . 625 0 . 5363
0 . 657 0 . 5273
0 . 77 0 0 . 4859
0 . 949 0 . 4 3 18
0 . 951 0 . 4287
1 . 190 0 . 3 62 7
1 . 529 0 . 2954
1 . 7 10 0 . 2601
2 . 205 0 . 1828
3 08 . 15 0 0 . 6675
0 . 2 15 0 . 5825
0 . 439 0 . 5066
0 . 68 3 0 . 4270
0 . 940 0 . 3 687
1 . 202 0 . 3 19 1
1 . 481 0 . 2 64 5
1 . 763 0 . 2243
P = 1 atm = 101 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
.
Volumetric apparatus with multibulb ( 1 ) High pu rity grade sample ,
volumetrica l ly . Density and compos i ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
ESTIMATED ERROR :
oT/K = ± 0 . 05 ; oL = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 20 , 41.
289
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Corti , H . R . ; Krenzer , M . E . ;
de Pablo , J . J . ; Prausnitz , J . M .
[ 77 5 7 - 8 2 - 6 ] Ind . Eng . Chem . Res . 1990 , 29 ,
104 3 - 5 0 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 3 2 3 . 15 and 3 4 8 . 15
p/ bar = 3 7 . 9 -145 . 1 H . L . Clever
m2 /mol kg 1 - = 0 . 95 - 2 . 72
system co2 ( 1 ) + Na2so4 ( 2 ) + H20 ( 3 ) at 50 and 7 5 o c .
a
t/ °C T/K a p/bar m2 ;mol kg- 1 mdmol kg- 1 1 0 3 x1
-- --- ---
50 3 2 3 . 15 95 . 6 1 . 95 0 . 370 5 . 99
145 . 1 1 . 98 0 . 388 6 . 27
76 . 6 2 . 71 0 . 222 3 . 47
137 . 6 2 . 72 0 . 296 4 . 62
75 3 4 8 . 15 37 . 9 0 . 95 0 . 263 4 . 48
75 . 8 0 . 96 0 . 463 7 . 87
97 . 9 0 . 97 0 . 55 0 9 . 33
43 . 1 1 . 97 0 . 159 2 . 59
72 . 1 1 . 91 0 . 263 4 . 28
132 . 7 2 . 01 0 . 405 6 . 54

It was assumed the mole fraction was based on the total moles ,
Dt = n co2 + nH2o + nN a+ + n so4 - ·
2
The paper contained no definitive statement as to whether total pres

sure or partial pressue was measured or as to how mole fraction was
calculated .
The apparatus was des igned for the ( 1 ) carbon dioxide . No information .
measurement of N2 so4 solubil ity in
aqueous solutions of co2 . The equi ( 2 ) Sodium sulfate . No information .
librium cell is a high pressure stain
less steel Jerguson l iquid level gage ( 3 ) water . No informati on .
with an internal volume of about 150
mL . Mixing is achieved by recircu
lating both phases for about 4 hours . ESTIMATED ERROR :
The apparatus is in an air bath con
trol led to ± 0 . 1 K , pressure is mea 6T/K = ± 0.1
sured with a Heise bourdan tube pres opf bar = ± 0.2
sure gage to ± 0 . 0 2 MPa . The carbon ox1 fx1 = ± 0 . 01
dioxide is measured in a cal ibrated ,
about 1 . 3 mL , sampl ing loop . The gas
is " f lashed" to atm pressure and the REFERENCES :
volume of co2 gas measured to an ac
curacy of 1 % by displacement of a
co2 saturated aqueous solution .
290
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) He , S . ; Morse , J . W .

( 2 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2so4 ; Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 1 9 9 3 , 57 ,
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ] 3 5 3 3 -54 .
{ 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 -5 )
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 - 3 6 3 . 15
P/ MP a = 0 . 1032 Pirketta Scharl in
m2 ;mol kg- 1 = 0 . 01 - 3 . 0
'Yl f
T/ K a m2 ;mol kg- 1 b pfg cm- 3 c
2 7 3 . 15 0 . 01 1 . 0038 96 . 6 74 . 3 1 . 01
0 . 05 1 . 0082 70. 6 1 . 07
0.1 1 . 0143 68 . 3 1 . 10
0.2 1 . 0259 65 . 8 1 . 14
0.3 1 . 0391 64 . 4 1 . 17
2 9 8 . 15 0.1 1 . 0100 94 . 2 29 . 4 1 . 09
0.5 1 . 057 6 25 . 0 1 . 28
1.0 1 . 1134 19 . 6 1 . 64
1.5 1 . 1651 15 . 0 2 . 14
2.0 1 . 2127 13 . 6 2 . 36
3 2 3 . 15 0.1 1 . 0013 85 . 4 17 . 1 1 . 07
1.0 1 . 1035 12 . 8 1 . 43
2.0 1 . 1966 10 . 8 1 . 70
3.0 1 . 2821 9.5 1 . 94
3 4 8 . 15 0.1 0 . 9928 60 . 3 7.8 1 . 04
0.5 1 . 0447 7.3 1 . 11
1.0 1 . 104 1 6.5 1 . 25
2.0 1 . 2053 6.2 1 . 31
3.0 1 . 2 8 28 5.9 1 . 36
3 63 . 15 0.1 0 . 9223 30 . 1 3.3 1 . 03
0.5 1 . 0358 3.1 1 . 07
1.0 1. 0 9 6 2 2.9 1 . 13
2.0 1 . 1951 2.5 1 . 19
3.0 1 . 2 650 2.1 1 . 24
a Calculated by compiler b m2 = molal ity of Na2 so4

I c p density of solvent d p1 partial pressure of C02
e m 1 = molality of C02 f y1 = activity coeff icient of co2
Either pure co� gas or co2-N2 mixtu { 1 ) Commercial ; purity 9 9 . 9 % .
res were used 1n the experiments to
maintain a constant P { C02 ) . The co2- { 2 ) Source not mentioned .
determined amounts of C02 and N2 into ACS specifications .
a gas tank and their composition was Vacuum-dried before use .
co2 or co2-N2 gas mixtures were equi { 3 ) 18 MO water obtained from a
librated with the aqueous solutions in Mi 1li-Q Super-Q water system .
gas was premoistured by first passing
it through distilled water at the tem ESTIMATED ERROR :
tubes . The bubbl ing rate was 9 0 to 95 6m 1 fm 1 = ± 0 . 012
mL min- 1 • on / n = ± o . o4
N2 mixture was determined using a REFERENCES :
graph .
29 1
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; ( 12 4 -38-9 ) Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na 2 s o 4 ; Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Chem . 1993 ,
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ] 97, 85-97 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 )
T/K = 3 13 . 1 1 - 4 3 3 . 0 6
p/MPa = 0 . 0 1 9 2 - 9 . 713 H . L . Clever
m2 /mol kg- l = near 1. o o and 2 . o o
The authors used Pitzer ' s semiempirical model to correlate the data . The
dissociation of the carbon dioxide can be neglected at the concentrations
here . The system was treated as containing a non-dissociating gas , G and
a completely dissociating electrolyte , MX . A temperature dependent inter
action parameter , B0c02 , N a2 504 , and a temperature independent interaction
parameter , rc02 , N a2 s04 , Na2 s04 , were derived from the experimental data .
For the co2 + Na 2 s o 4 + H2 0 system the values are :

2
B0co2 , N a2 so4 = 0 . 4 4 5 8 - 2 2 5 . 4 { T/K) l + 5 6 2 0 0 { T/K) -
-
which gives values :

3 1 3 . 15 3 5 3 . 15 3 9 3 . 15 4 3 3 . 15
0 . 2991 0 . 2582 0 . 2361 0 . 2250
{ continued o n the next page)
The apparatus is a modification of one { 1 ) carbon dioxide . Messer Griesheim ,
used in earlier work { 1 ) . It consists Ludwigshafen , > 9 9 . 9 9 5 mol % ,
mostat , magnetic stirrer , thermo
couples and Pt resistance thermometer , ( 2 ) Sodium sulfate . Riedel de Haen
pressure transducers and tanks for AG , See l z e , > 99 mass % .
solute gas .
ture of the gas are measured after �------�
equi libration . A known amount of ESTIMATED ERROR:
sl ightly greater than that needed to 6TfK = ± 0 . 1
completely dissolve the gas . The om2 /m2 = ± 0 . 0 0 3
pressure in the cel l is reduced step om l fm l = ± 0 . 0 1 to 0 . 0 3
wise by removing very small amounts
of the liquid until the first stable REFERENC�S :
bubble appears •
. The mass of carbon dioxide is calcu 1 . Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .

lated from the Bender equation ( 2 ) . Fluid Phase Equ ilib . 1 9 9 2 , 8 1 ,
The volume of the cell is known within 2 4 1-60 .
0 . 0 6 mL . The solvent dens ity is from 2 . Bender , E . 5th Proc . Symp .
the literature . Thermophys . Prop . , ASME , NY , 19 7 0 ,
227-35 .
292
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -38-9 ] Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2S04 ; Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Cbem . 1993 ,

[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ] 97, 85-97 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]

Solubil ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous sodium sulfate .
T/K p/MPa m2 /mol kg- 1 m 1 ;mol kg- 1
3 13 . 12 0 . 422 1 . 013 o . 0511
3 1 3 . 12 0 . 824 1 . 013 0 . 1022
3 13 . 11 1. 705 1 . 013 0 . 2 0 14
3 13 . 1 1 2 . 68 5 1 . 013 0 . 3 07 1
3 13 . 11 3 . 77 0 1 . 013 0 . 4 1 15
3 1 3 . 11 5 . 064 1 . 013 0 . 5151
3 13 . 1 1 6 . 615 1 . 013 0 . 6131
3 13 . 12 7 . 84 6 1 . 013 0 . 6745
3 13 . 14 0 . 729 2 . 01 0 0 . 0508
3 13 . 14 1. 436 2 . 010 0 . 1003
3 13 . 12 3 . 110 2 . 010 0 . 2 016
3 13 . 14 5 . 206 2 . 010 0 . 3031
3 13 . 1 3 6 . 784 2 . 010 0 . 3535
3 13 . 13 7 . 4 19 2 . 01 0 0 . 3 8 07
3 2 3 . 14 0 . 513 1 . 012 0 . 0522
3 2 3 . 14 1 . 814 1 . 0 12 0 . 1785
3 2 3 . 15 1 . 805 1 . 014 0 . 1793
3 2 3 . 15 2 . 68 8 1 . 0 14 0 . 2587
3 2 3 . 15 4 . 386 1 . 014 0 . 3854
3 2 3 . 14 4 . 346 1 . 012 0 . 3889
3 2 3 . 15 5 . 19 5 1 . 014 0 . 4430
3 2 3 . 15 6 . 697 1 . 012 0 . 5310
3 2 3 . 16 8 . 3 17 1 . 012 0 . 6010
3 3 3 . 29 0 . 0192 0 . 998 o.o
3 3 3 . 15 0 . 564 1 . 011 0 . 0494
3 3 3 . 15 1 . 108 1. 012 0 . 0995
3 3 3 . 15 1 . 2 06 1 . 014 0 . 1079
3 3 3 . 15 2 . 347 1 . 014 0 . 1991
3 3 3 . 15 2 . 3 64 1 . 012 0 . 1995
3 3 3 . 15 3 . 77 0 1 . 012 0 . 2973
3 3 3 . 15 3 . 748 1. 012 0 . 2994
3 3 3 . 15 5 . 381 1 . 012 0 . 4024
3 3 3 . 15 7 . 246 1 . 012 0 . 5058
3 3 3 . 15 8 . 3 13 1 . 011 0 . 5456
3 3 3 . 15 8 . 599 1 . 012 0 . 5578
3 3 3 . 15 8 . 97 8 1 . 011 0 . 5667
3 3 3 . 17 0 . 953 2 . 010 0 . 0507
3 3 3 . 15 1 . 728 2 . 010 0 . 0942
3 3 3 . 15 2 . 994 2 . 010 0 . 1517
3 3 3 . 15 4 . 12 8 2 . 0 10 0 . 2 0 18
3 3 3 . 16 5 . 525 2 . 010 0 . 2505
3 3 3 . 16 7 . 159 2 . 010 0 . 3 038
3 3 3 . 15 8 . 08 0 2 . 010 0 . 3296
3 5 3 . 16 0 . 0464 1 . 004 o.o
3 5 3 . 15 0 . 718 1 . 011 0 . 0500
3 5 3 . 15 1. 3 9 8 1 . 011 0 . 0996
3 5 3 . 15 2 . 18 5 1 . 011 0 . 1502
3 5 3 . 15 2 . 973 1 . 011 0 . 2 0 04
3 53 . 15 4 . 67 3 1 . 011 0 . 3 005
3 5 3 . 15 5 . 719 1 . 011 0 . 3510
3 53 . 16 6 . 774 1 . 011 0 . 4 0 14
3 5 j . 15 8 . 007 1 . 011 0 . 4 5 17
3 5 3 . 15 9 . 357 1 . 011 0 . 4896
293
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 -38-9 ) Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2 so 4 ; Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Chem . 1993 ,
[ 7757-82-6 ] 97, 85-97 .
(3) Water ; H2 0 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )

1 1
T/K p/MPa m2 /mol kg- m 1 /mol kg-
3 5 3 . 15 0 . 04 3 6 2 . 002 0.0
3 5 3 . 14 1 . 138 2 . 010 0 . 0502
3 5 3 . 14 2 . 354 2 . 010 0 . 1007
3 5 3 . 15 3 . 64 1 2 . 010 0 . 1515
3 5 3 . 14 5 . 10 1 2 . 0 10 o 2023
.•
3 5 3 . 15 6 . 842 2 . 010 0 . 2534

3 5 3 . 15 8 . 781 2 . 010 0 . 3040
393 . 34 0 . 1893 1 . 007 0.0
3 9 3 . 14 0 . 1906 1 . 004 0.0
3 9 3 . 15 1 . 02 3 1 . 011 0 . 0502
3 9 3 . 17 1 . 963 1 . 011 0 . 1007
3 9 3 . 15 2 . 93 1 1 . 011 0 . 1504
3 9 3 . 16 3 . 965 1 . 011 0 . 2047
3 9 3 . 15 6 . 10 5 1 . 011 0 . 2994
393 . 16 7 . 344 1 . 011 0 . 3528
3 9 3 . 14 8 . 603 1 . 011 0 . 4033
3 9 3 . 15 9 . 372 1 . 011 0 . 4286
3 9 3 . 15 9 . 325 1 . 011 0 . 4294
3 9 3 . 12 1 . 488 2 . 002 0 . 0509
3 9 3 . 12 2 . 988 2 . 010 0 . 1047
3 9 3 . 14 4 . 372 2 . 002 0 . 1524
3 9 3 . 12 6 . 13 9 2 . 010 0 . 2022
3 9 3 . 14 8 . 05 1 2 . 010 0 . 2527
3 9 3 . 13 8 . 864 2 . 002 0 . 2778
3 9 3 . 14 8 . 821 2 . 0 02 0 . 2784
4 1 3 . 15 0 . 3 4 68 1 . 007 0.0
4 1 3 . 14 1 . 2 12 1 . 011 0 . 0501
4 1 3 . 16 2 . 18 0 1 . 011 0 . 1007
4 1 3 . 14 3 . 18 7 1 . 011 0 . 1508
4 1 3 . 14 4 . 234 1 . 011 0 . 2005
4 1 3 . 15 6 . 381 1 . 013 0 . 3023
4 1 3 . 15 7 . 725 1 . 011 0 . 3 5 10
4 1 3 . 15 8 . 942 1 . 011 0 . 4030
4 13 . 14 9 . 7 13 1 . 011 0 . 4306
4 13 . 18 0 . 337 1 . 999 0.0
413 . 16 1 . 656 2 . 0 02 0 . 0513
413 . 16 3 . 098 2 . 002 0 . 1 0 11
4 13 . 17 4 . 705 2 . 00 2 0 . 1 5 17
4 1 3 . 18 6 . 344 2 . 002 0 . 2030
4 1 3 . 17 8 . 2 14 2 . 0 02 0 . 2527
413 . 16 9 . 09 4 2 . 0 02 0 . 2792
4 3 3 . 08 0 . 598 0 . 994 0.0
4 3 3 . 15 1 . 567 1 . 013 0 . 0498
4 3 3 . 16 2 . 428 1 . 011 0 . 0995
4 3 3 . 16 3 . 390 . 1. 013 0 . 1498
4 3 3 . 14 4 . 498 1 . 013 0 . 2001
4 3 3 . 16 5 . 496 1 . 013 0 . 2501
4 3 3 . 16 6 . 661 1 . 013 0 . 3005
4 3 3 . 14 7 . 827 1 . 013 o. 3511
4 3 3 . 15 9 . 054 1 . 013 0 . 4 0 10
4 3 3 . 15 0 . 57 8 2 . 002 o.o
4 3 3 . 16 1 . 904 2 . 0 02 0 . 0509
4 3 3 . 10 3 . 298 2 . 002 0 . 1007
4 3 3 . 14 4 . 830 2 . 0 02 0 . 1511
4 3 3 . 14 6 . 447 2 . 0 02 0 . 2025
4 3 3 . 09 6 . 461 2 . 002 0 . 2024
4 3 3 . 15 8 . 289 2 . 002 0 . 2527
4 3 3 . 15 9 . 189 2 . 002 0 . 2787
29 4
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Kobe , K . A . ; Kenton , F . H .
( 2 ) Sulfuric acid ; H2so4 ; [ 7 6 64-93-9 ]
( 3 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2so4 ; Ind . Eng . Chem . , Anal . Ed . 1 9 3 8 , 1 0 ,
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ] 7 6-7 .
( 4 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 P . L . Long
P1 /kPa = 10 1 . 3 2 5 H . L . Clever
T/K a c L d
25 2 9 8 . 15 4 9 . 54 13 . 4 0 0 . 247 0 . 270
a
Solvent volume .
b Carbon dioxide volume absorbed .
c Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
d Ostwald coeff icient [ cm3 cm- 3 ] .
The solvent is a mixture of

800 g H20
200 g Na2so4 ( anhydrous )
4 0 ml H2 so4 ( concentrated , c = 18 mol dm- 3 )
Thus the molality of the solution is

m2 jmol kg- 1 = 0 . 90
m 3 jmol kg- 1 = 1 . 76
The apparatus is described in detai l ( 1 ) Source not given . Purity stated
i n a n earlier paper ( Ref . 1 ) . The to be 99+ % .
apparatus cons ists of a gas buret , a
pressure compensator , and a 2 0 0 cm 3 ( 2 , 3 ) Sources not given . Analytical
absorption bulb and mercury level ing grade .
bulb . The absorption bulb is attached
to a shaking mechanism . ( 4 ) Distilled .
The solvent and the gas are placed in
the absorption bulb . The bulb is
shaken until equilibrium is reached .
The remaining gas is returned to the
buret . The difference in the f inal ESTIMATED ERROR :
and initial volumes is taken as the
volume of gas absorbed . 6ajcm3 = ± 0 . 005 ( authors )
REFERENCES :
1 . Kobe , K . A . ; Wi l l iams , J . S .
Ind . Eng . Chem . , Anal . Ed . 1 9 3 5 ,
71 37 •
295
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Shchennikova , M . K . ; Devyatykh , G . G . ;
(2) Sodium sulfate ; Na2 so4 ; Korshunov , I . A .
[ 7757-82-6 ) Zh . Prikl . Khim . (Leningrad) 1957 ,
(3) Sulfuric acid ; H2S04 ; 3 0 , 1080-4 ; * J . Appl . Chem . USSR
[ 7 6 6 4 -9 3 -9 ] 1957 , 30 ( 2 ) ,
( Engl . Trans l . ) ----
(4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ] 1149-52 .
T/K = 2 9 8 - 3 4 8
c2 jmol dm- 3 = 0 . 2 - 1 . 3 Pirketta Scharlin
c3 jmo l dm- 3 = 0 . 2 - 5 . 6 6
t T a
a b L a, c
K mol dm- 3
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.2 0 . 238 2.3 5 . 79 0 . 706 o . 771

5 . 46 0 . 667 0 . 728
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.2 0 . 483 4.6 5 . 91 0 . 717 0 . 783
5 . 72 0 . 694 0 . 758
50 3 2 3 . 15 0.2 0 . 483 4.6 2 . 90 0 . 346 0 . 409
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.2 1 . 001 9 . 25 5 . 52 0 . 660 0 . 720
5 . 36 0 . 642 0 . 701
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.2 3 . 73 30 5 . 43 0 . 59 0 0 . 644
5 . 45 0 . 592 0 . 646
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.2 5 . 66 42 5 . 60 0 . 58 5 0 . 63 8
5 . 67 0 . 59 3 0 . 647
35 3 08 . 15 4 . 21 0 . 438 0 . 494
45 3 18 . 15 3 . 30 0 . 342 0 . 398
55 3 2 8 . 15 2 . 50 0 . 250 0 . 300
65 3 3 8 . 15 2 . 08 0 . 2 12 0 . 262
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 4 15 1 . 001 9 . 25 4 . 82 0 . 57 4 0 . 62 6
4 . 62 0 . 55 0 0 . 600
50 3 2 3 . 15 2 . 86 0 . 341 0 . 403
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 4 15 5 . 66 42 5 . 15 0 . 52 4 0 . 572
5 . 15 0 . 52 4 0 . 57 2
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 62 1 . 001 9 . 25 4 . 16 0 . 491 0 . 53 6
4 . 20 0 . 496 0 . 54 1
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 62 5 . 66 42 5 . 09 0 . 518 0 . 565
50 3 2 3 . 15 2 . 40 0 . 240 0 . 284
75 3 4 8 . 15 1.0 0 . 09 9 0 . 12 6
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 . 835 1 . 001 9 . 25 3 . 71 0 . 43 5 0 . 475
3 . 69 0 . 432 0 . 472
25 2 9 8 . 15 1.3 1 . 001 9 . 25 2 . 63 0 . 304 0 . 332

c
4
Isotopic dilution method , with c 1 Not given .
tracer . Experimental procedure ESTIMATED ERROR :
described in Ref . 1 . Not given .
REFERENCES :
1 . Shchennikova , M . K . ; Devyatykh , G . G ; Korshunov , I . A .
Zh . Prikl . Khim . (Leningrad) 1957 , 3 0 , 8 3 3 -8 ; * J . Appl . Chem . USSR
( Engl . Trans l . ) 1957 , 3 0 ( 6 ) , 8 8 1-6 .
296
.COMPONENTS : ORIGINAL MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) carbon diox ide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .

( 2 ) Ammonium sulfate ; ( NH4 ) 2so4 ; Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Chem . 1993 ,
[ 7 7 8 3 -2 0-2 ] 97, 85-9 7 .
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ]
( 4 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 3 13 . 17 - 4 3 3 . 1 6
p/ MPa = 0 . 0084 - 9 . 673 H . L . Clever
m2 ;mol kg- 1 • m 3 ;mo l kg- 1 = 1 . 0 0 3
The authors estimated the solubil ity of carbon dioxide in the multicom
ponent electrolyte system from the results of the carbon dioxide solu
bil ity in the single electrolyte aqueous solutions . The authors approach
and approximation used are outlined in the paper .
The apparatus is a modification of one ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . Messer Griesheim ,
used in earl ier work ( 1 ) . It consists Ludwigshafen , > 9 9 . 9 9 5 mol % ,
mostat , magnetic stirrer , thermo ( 2 ) Ammonium sulfate . Merck GmbH ,
couples and Pt resistance thermometer , Darmstadt , > 9 9 . 5 mass % .
pressure transducers and tanks for Degassed and dried under vacuum .
aqueous solutions , rinse water and ( 3 ) Sodium sulfate . Riedel de Haen
solute gas . AG , Seel z e , > 99 mass % .
The thermostated about 3 0 mL high Degassed and dried under vacuum .
pressure optical cel l is fil led with ( 4 ) Water . Deionized and degassed by
carbon dioxide . Pressure and tempera- vacuum distillation .
ture of the gas are measured after �------�
equil ibration . A known amount of ESTIMATED ERROR :
slightly greater than that needed to 6T/K = ± 0 . 1
completely dissolve the gas . The 6m2 /m2 = 6m 3 /m 3 = ± 0 . 0 0 3
pressure in the cell is reduced step 6m 1 tm1 = ± 0 . 0 1 t o 0 . 0 3
wise by removing very small amounts
of the l iquid until the first stable REFERENCES :
bubble appears .
The mass of carbon dioxide is calcu 1 . Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .
lated from the Bender equat ion ( 2 ) . Fluid Phase Equilib . 19 9 2 , 8 1 ,
The volume of the cel l is known within 2 4 1- 60 .
0 . 0 6 mL . The solvent dens ity is from 2 . Bender , E . 5th Proc . Symp .
the l iterature . Thermophys . Prop . , ASME , NY , 1970 ,
2 2 7 -3 5 .
297
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Rumpf , B . ; Maurer , G .
( 2 ) Ammonium sulfate ; (NH4 ) 2 S04 ; Ber . Bunsenges . Phys . Chem . 19 9 3 ,
[ 7 1 8 3 -2 0-2 ] 97, 85-97 .
( 3 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2 so4 ;
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K p/MPa
3 13 . 17 0 . 0084 1 . 003 1 . 003 0.0

3 1 3 . 19 0 . 504 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 , 0502
3 13 . 19 1 . 09 8 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 104 1
3 13 . 18 2 . 341 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 2087
3 13 . 19 3 . 803 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 3 16 0
3 1 3 . 18 5 . 54 3 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 4231
3 13 . 18 8 . 263 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 5323
3 3 3 . 19 0 . 0177 1 . 003 1 . 003 o.o
3 3 3 . 19 0 . 703 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 0506
3 3 3 . 19 1 . 468 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 1039
3 3 3 . 18 3 . 169 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 2 08 9
3 3 3 . 19 5 . 155 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 3 12 8
3 3 3 . 19 7 . 802 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 4 18 7
3 3 3 . 18 8 . 561 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 4446
3 3 3 . 17 9 . 67 3 1. 003 1 . 003 0 . 4 7 04
3 5 3 . 15 0 . 0415 1 . 003 1 . 003 0.0
3 53 . 2 0 0 . 94 0 1 . 003 1 . 003 0_. 05 2 6
3 5 3 . 19 1 . 855 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 1047
353 . 20 4 . 007 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 2 104
3 5 3 . 16 6 . 570 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 3 152
3 5 3 . 14 8 . 14 2 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 3696
3 9 3 . 08 0 . 18 3 3 1 . 0 03 1 . 003 o.o
3 9 3 . 14 1 . 300 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 0522
3 9 3 . 13 2 . 553 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 1048
3 9 3 . 14 5 . 221 1 . 003 1 . 003 o . 2 .0 98
3 9 3 . 14 8 . 257 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 3 145
413 . 16 0 . 3388 1 . 003 1 . 003 o.o
4 1 3 . 15 1 . 53 1 1 . 003 1 · 003 0 . 0541
4 1 3 . 15 1 . 57 1 1. 003 1 . 003 0 . 0527
4 13 . 15 2 . 844 1 . 0 03 1. 003 0 . 1053
4 1 3 . 15 5 . 686 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 2 109
4 1 3 . 15 8 . 967 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 3 17 4
413 . 16 8 . 987 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 3 17 2
4 3 3 . 16 0 . 5808 1. 003 1 . 003 o.o
4 3 3 . 16 1 . 845 1 . 003 1 . 0035 0 . 0523
4 3 3 . 14 1 . 876 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 0523
4 3 3 . 14 3 . 14 6 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 1043
4 3 3 . 14 4 . 54 0 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 1569
4 3 3 . 13 6 . 017 1 . 0 03 1 . 003 0 . 2 09 4
4 3 3 . 15 7 . 598 1 . 003 1 . 003 0 . 2622
4 3 3 . 15 9 . 104 1 . 003 1. 003 0 . 3 12 9
298
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Onda , K . ; Sada , E . ; Kobayashi , T . ;
( 2 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2so4 ; Kito , s . ; Ito , K .
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ]
( 3 ) Ammonium nitrate ; NH4No3 ; J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 19 7 0 , 3, 1 3 7 -4 2 .
[ 6 4 8 4 -52-2 ]
( 4 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P / kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 C . L . Young
c2fmol L- 1 = o - o . 445
c3 fmol L-1 = o - 1 . 334
T/K c2 tmol L- 1 a c3 {mol L- 1 a I/mol L- 1 b a b
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 0 . 7595
0 . 07 7 0 . 23 1 0 . 487 0 . 7 10 9
0 . 087 0 . 260 0 . 54 8 0 . 7051
0 . 14 7 0 . 44 1 0 . 931 0 . 6724
0 . 234 0 . 7 02 1 . 481 0 . 6248
0 . 341 1. 024 2 . 16 0 0 . 5797
0 . 445 1 . 334 2 . 814 0 . 5259
a Calculated from ionic strength and statement that ratio of

ionic strength of sodium sulfate to total ionic strength equals
0 . 52 59 : 1 .
b
Quoted in original paper .
I ionic strength ; a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ]
=
P = 1 atm = 1 . 01325 • 105 Pa

Equil ibrium established between a ( 2 ) Analytical grade sample .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 2 ; oa = ± 2 %
REFERENCES :
Kito , S . ; Ito , K .
J . Chem . Eng . Jpn . 1 9 7 0 , 3 , 18 .
299
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ]
[ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 ]
( 3 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2 so4 ; Adv . Chem . Ser . 1 9 7 9 , 1 7 7 , 189-2 0 3 .
[ 7 7 5 7 -8 2 - 6 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 10 1 . 3 2 5 C . L . Young
( c2 +c3 ) /mol dm- 3 = 0 - 2 . 486
T/K x2 ( ci+c ) L a
in mixed salt /mo 3 3
dm-
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 00 0 0 . 8264
0 . 210 0 . 7165
0 . 657 0 . 5273
1 . 19 0 0 . 3627
1 . 7 10 0 . 2601
2 . 205 0 . 1828
0 . 25 0. 233 0 . 7198
0 . 518 0 . 6098
0 . 854 0 . 5103
1 . 274 0 . 4038
1. 744 0 . 3 19 7
0 . 50 0 . 272 0 . 7283
0 . 59 5 0 . 6281
1 . 035 0 . 5201
1 . 502 0 . 4 2 15
2 . 060 0 . 3360
0 . 75 0 . 266 0 . 7507
0 . 534 0 . 6844
1 . 005 0 . 5892
1 . 54 5 0 . 4907
2 . 07 3 0 . 4 0 17
1 . 00 0 . 455 0 . 7343
1 . 000 0 . 6508
1 . 4 42 0 . 5842
1 . 945 0 . 5187
2 . 486 0 . 4653
a L = Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 ]
P = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa

pressure and vapor pressure of ( 4 ) . Deionized .
component salt solution . oT/K = ± 0 . 05 ; oL = ± 1 % .
Apparatus s imi lar to that described
in ref . ( 2 ) .
REFERENCES :
1965 , 69A , 3 6 5 .
2 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 20 , 41.
300
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ]
[ 7647-14-5 ]
( 3 ) Sodium sulfate ; Na2s o4 ; Adv . Chem . Ser . 1979 , 1 7 7 , 189-203 .
[ 7 7 57 - 8 2 - 6 ]
[ 12 12 5 - 0 2 - 9 )
( 5 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 C . L . Young
( c2+c3 +c4 ) /mol dm-3 = 0 - 3 . 453
T/K x2 x3 ( c c +c4 )
t l
L a
in mixed salt in mixed salt mo dm-3
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 0 . 8264
0 . 50 0 . 50 0 . 272 0 . 7283
0 . 59 5 0 . 6281
1 . 035 0 . 5201
1 . 502 0 . 4 2 15
2 . 060 0 . 3360
0 . 50 0 . 375 0 . 404 0 . 7 0 67
0 . 812 0 . 6068
1 . 2 11 0 . 5271
1. 627 0 . 4565
1 . 978 0 . 4011
0 . 50 0 . 25 0 . 332 0 . 7447
0 . 720 0 . 6591
1 . 113 0 . 5899
1 . 57 6 0 . 5165
1 . 981 0 . 4 613
2 . 484 0 . 4 0 17
0 . 50 .•
0 125 0 . 407 0 . 7558
0 . 800 0 . 6900
1 . 2 07 0 . 6348
1 . 572 0 . 5 8 67
2 . 008 0 . 5384
2 . 54 9 0 . 4870
0 . 50 0 . 000 0 . 446 0 . 7655

0 . 93 1 0 . 7 14 7
1. 750 0 . 6309
2 . 233 0 . 5896
3 . 453 0 . 5042
a L = Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm 3 ] -
P = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa

determined volumetrically . Partial ( 2 , 3 , 4 ) Reagent grade .
pressure and vapor pressure of ( 5 ) Deioni zed .
mixed salt solution estimated by the ��--------------------------�
method of Robinson and Bower ( 1 ) ESTIMATED ERROR :
from corresponding data for each 6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
component salt solution .
in ref . ( 2 ) .
REFERENCES :
J . Res . Nat . Bur . Stand .
1 9 6 5 , 69A , 3 6 5 .
2 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
30 1
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 124-3 8-9 ) Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Sodium nitrate ; NaN0 3 ; Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 25 ,
[ 7 6 3 1- 9 9 - 4 ] 2 2 6-7 0 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 8 8 . 3 5
c2 ;mo l dm- 3 = o - 7 . 3 5 6 Pirketta Scharl in
a,c
t /°C T/K a Di lution c2 ;mol dm- 3 4 a b k scc / dm3 mol- l
X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 00 0 1 . 009 -
6 1 . 226 0 . 795 0 . 0844

5 1 . 47 1 0 . 762 0 . 0829
4 1 . 839 0 . 7 10 0 . 0830
3 2 . 4 52 0 . 62 0 0 . 0862
2 3 . 67 8 0 . 495 0 . 0841
1 7 . 356 0 . 224 0 . 0838

c
Initial solution : 6 2 . 5 2 g NaNo3 + 7 4 . 10 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of

solution .
with water vapor and f i lled the bulbs
and manometer . to a known pressure The author makes a qual itative
turned 9 0 degrees and shaken until 1 . setchenow , J .
Bunsen coefficient was calculated . [ Ser . No . 7 ] , 1-59 . --
302
COMPONENTS : ORI GINAL MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Markham , A . A . ; Kobe , K . A .
( 2 ) Sodium nitrate ; NaN03 ; J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 4 1 , 63 , 4 4 9 -54 .
[ 7 6 3 1-99-4 ]
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 7 3 . 3 5 and 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
m2 ;mol kg- 1 = o - 4
t;oc T/K a a s b
0.2 273 . 35 0.0 1 . 7023 1. 7025

0.2 1 . 6167 1 . 6247
0.5 1 . 5040 1 . 5229
3 0 . 8840 0 . 9589
4 0 . 4055 0 . 5099
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.0 0 . 7565 0 . 7587
0.1 0 . 7 4 15 0 . 7458
0.2 0. 7289 0 . 7352
0.5 0 . 6946 0 . 7069
1 0 . 6352 0 . 6562
2 0 . 54 0 6 0 . 5758
3 0 . 4659 0 . 5109
4 0 . 2474 0 . 3 15 1
a a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

b s = Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 (H 0 ) atm- 1 ] .
2
a b
0.2 -0 . 0054 0 . 240
25 -0 . 0050 0 . 15 0
AUX I L I ARY I N FO RMAT ION
METHOD /APPARATUS /PROCEDURE : S OURCE AND P URI TY OF MATERI ALS ;

solution-saturated gas i s measured in
a burette over mercury . The pressure ( 3 ) Distil led and degassed .
saturation . E S T I MATE D ERRO R :
6T/K = <± 0 . 1 at 0 . 2 °C ,
± 0 . 0 3 at 2 5 °C ( authors ) ,
oa f a , 65/S = ± 0 . 0 0 2 ( authors ) .
REFE RENCES :
303
COMPONENTS : ORIGI NAL MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) Carbon d ioxide ; co2 ; ( 1 2 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Sodium n itrate ; NaNo3 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

[ 7 6 3 1-9 9 -4 ] " Carl Schorl ernrner " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
VARIABLES : P RE P ARED BY :
T/K = 2 8 8 . 1 5 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
c2;mol dm-3 = 0 - 4
a
t ; oc T/K c2;mol dm-3 a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0 . 25 0 . 956 -
0.5 0 . 93 1 0 . 948
1 0 . 863 0 . 889
2 0 . 74 1 0 . 792
4 0 . 532 0 . 612
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0 . 25 0 . 816 -
0.5 0 . 807 0 . 822
1 0 . 756 0 . 780
2 0 . 642 0 . 687
4 0 . 461 0 . 5 3 15
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 -
0 . 25 0 . 7 18 -
0.5 0 . 694 0 . 707
1 0 . 644 0 . 666
2 0 . 54 7 0 . 5865
4 0 . 404 0 . 4665
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 671 -
0 . 25 0 . 602 -
0.5 0 . 591 0 . 603
1 0 . 542 0 . 561
2 0 . 464 0 . 498
4 0 . 356 0 . 4 12
AU X I L I ARY I N FO RMAT ION
ME THOD /AP PARATUS / P ROCEDURE : S OURCE AND P U R I TY OF MATE R I ALS ;
The princip l e of the Ostwa ld method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vo l % ;

was used in whi ch a measured vo lume the impur ity was mostly
in volume i s measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro analy s i s grade
temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Doubl e disti l l ed .
Kuenen coef f i c ient , the density of
the s o lut ion was obtained from
l iquid was standard i z ed at 2 0 � C . E S T I MATED ERRO R :
These data a r e ana lyzed and d1scussed
REFERE N CES ;
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 1 3 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 - 2 2 .
304
COMPONENT S : ORI G I NAL MEASUREMENT S :
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Gerecke , J .

( 2 ) Sodium nitrate ; NaN03 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 6 3 1-9 9 -4 ] " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
( continued )
t rc T/K c2 tmol dm-3 a a s b
--
35 3 0 8 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0 . 25 0 . 516 -
0.5 0 . 510 0 . 52 1
1 0 . 468 0 . 486
2 0 . 403 0 . 434
4 0 . 3 14 0 . 3 65
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0 . 25 0 . 455 -
0.5 0 . 444 0 . 454
1 0 . 404 0 . 4 19 5
2 0 . 3 55 0 . 383
4 0 . 280 0 . 326
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0 . 25 0 . 401 -
0.5 0 . 391 0 . 401
1 0 . 345 0 . 3 59
2 0 . 311 0 . 3 3 55
4 0 . 247 0 . 2882
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0 . 25 0 . 350 -
0.5 0 . 344 0 . 353
1 0 . 299 0 . 3 115
2 0 . 2 68 0 . 290
4 0 . 2 19 0 . 2564
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0 . 25 0 . 3 09 -
0.5 0 . 306 0 . 3 14
1 0 . 262 0 . 273
2 0 . 237 0 . 257
4 0 . 200 0 . 2347
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
0 . 25 0 . 275 -
0.5 0 . 274 0 . 282
1 0 . 230 0 . 2402
2 0 . 2 11 0 . 2294
4 0 . 17 9 0 . 2 104
a
Q = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ) •
b s = Kuenen coeff icient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ) .

305
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Sodium nitrate ; NaN0 3 ; J . Cbem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 24 , 11-14 .
[ 7 6 3 1-99- 4 )
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 0 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 32 5 c . L . Young
c2 /mol L- 1 = 0 - 7 . 256
T/K c2 tmol L- 1 L a T/K c2 fmol L- 1 L a
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 0634 2 9 8 . 15 5 . 177 0 . 3253

0 . 608 0 . 9498 5 . 911 0 . 2876
1 . 370 0 . 8161 7 . 256 0 . 2257
2 . 019 0 . 7235
2 . 7 60 0 . 62 10 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 6675
3 . 5 65 0 . 5300 0 . 346 0 . 6320
4 . 5 03 0 . 4413 0 . 620 0 . 6071
5 . 929 0 . 3376 0 . 997 0 . 5703
1 . 279 0 . 5466
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8264 1 . 688 0 . 5091
0 . 382 0. 7723 2 . 003 0 . 4794
0 . 87 1 0 . 7098 2 . 387 0 . 4536
1 . 388 0 . 6500 2 . 704 0 . 4306
2 . 13 9 0 . 5646 3 . 13 7 0 . 3999
3 . 09 2 0 . 4749 3 . 645 0 . 3 686
3 . 67 0 0 . 4277 3 . 967 0 . 3463
4 . 455 0 . 3711 5 . 18 6 0 . 2829

p = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
volumetrical ly . Dens ity and compos i ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Cbem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 20 , 41 .
306
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 1 2 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Van Slyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr . ;
( 2 ) Sodium dihydrogen phosphate ;
NaH2Po4 ; [ 7 5 5 8 - 8 0 - 7 ] J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 8 , 78 , 7 6 5 -9 9 .
( 3 ) Phosphoric acid ; H3 Po4 ;
[ 7 6 6 4 - 3 8-2 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 3 11 . 2
c2 fmol L- 1 =
0 - 0 . 300 Pirketta Scharl in
c3 tmol L- 1 = 0 . 011 - 0 . 300
p = " atmospheric"
c
tt o c T/K a P1 /mmHg b c2 tmol L- 1 c3 fmol L- 1 a 51 d
-- ---
38 . 0 3 11 . 2 723 . 7 0 0 . 150 0 . 5396 0 . 5451

723 . 7 0 0 . 300 0 . 5 3 17 0 . 5410
7 10 . 7 0 . 0375 0 . 011 0 . 5360 0 . 5381
7 10 . 7 0 . 075 0 . 019 0 . 5272 0 . 5 3 02
7 10 . 7 0 . 12 0 0 . 024 0 . 5175 0 . 5 2 17
7 12 . 6 0 . 150 0 . 015 0 . 5109 0 . 5151
7 18 . 3 0 . 3 00 0 . 03 0 0 . 4791 0 . 4 8 64
7 12 . 6 0 . 300 0 . 030 0 . 4823 0 . 48 9 1

b 1 mmHg = 1 3 3 . 3 2 2 Pa = 1 . 3 3 3 2 2 x 10- 3 bar
c
a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
d 51 = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 atm- 1 ]
Solutions were saturated with co2 by ( 1 ) From a Kipp co2 generator .
a bubbl ing method :
( 2 ) The NaH2Po4 solutions were pre
Saturation by bubbling . The solution pared by addition of NaOH to stan
was placed in the saturating tube , the dard H3 Po 3 .
lower end of which was connected
through a wash bottle with a Kipp co2 ( 3 ) Not specif ied .
generator . The tube and wash bottle
were immersed in a constant tempera ( 4 ) Distil led .
ture bath . co2 was bubbled through
it rapidly for 3 0 minutes . The wash ESTIMATED ERROR :
bottle was replaced by a mercury res
ervoir and the free gas was driven 6T/K = ± 0.1
completely out of the saturating tube oafa = ± 0 . 005
by admitting mercury underneath the
solution . The co2 contents of the
solutions were determined in the ma REFERENCES :
nometric gas apparatus ( Refs 1 and 2 ) .
1 . Van Slyke , D . D . ; Nei l l , J . M .
J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 4 , 61 , 5 2 3 .
2 . Van S lyke , D . D . ; sendroy , J . , Jr .
J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 7 , 73 , 12 7 .
307
COMPONENTS : ORIGINAL ME AS UREMENTS :
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J .
{ 2 ) Sodium formate ; CH02Na ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 14 1- 5 3 - 7 ] " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 77 3 2 -18-5 ]
T /K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
c2 fmol dm-3 = o - 4

a
t rc T/ K c2tmol dm-3 a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0.1 1 . 010 1. 0145
0.2 1 . 028 1. 034
0.5 0 . 965 0 . 978
1 0 . 945 0 . 970
2 0 . 93 3 0 . 9875
4 1 . 047 1 . 184
2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
20
0.1 0 . 885 0 . 890
0.2 0 . 9 05 0 . 911
0.5 0 . 836 0 . 849
1 0 . 842 0 . 866
2 0 . 829 0 . 879
4 0 . 955 1 . 082
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 -
0.1 0 . 778 0 . 783
0.2 0 . 791 0 . 7975
0.5 0 . 741 0 . 754
1 0 . 747 0 . 7695
2 0 . 741 0 . 7875
4 0 . 870 0 . 988
AU XI L I ARY I N FORMATION
ME THOD iAPPARATUS / P ROCEDURE : S OU R C E AN D P U R I TY OF MATE R I ALS :

presence of the gas , and its decreas
in volume is measured in a burette { 2 ) DDR pro ana lys is grade
over mercury . The volume of liquid by DDR Standard TGL 5 0 2 1 .
temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Double dist i lled .
liquid was standardi z ed at 2 0°C . E S T I MATED E R RO R :
These data are ana lyz ed and discusse
REFERENCES :
Wiss . z . Tech . Hocbscb . Cbem .
" Carl Scborlemmer" Leuna
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 { 2 ) , 1 1 5 - 2 2
308
COMPONENT S : ORI G I NAL MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Gerecke , J .

( 2 ) Sodium formate ; CH02Na ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 14 1 - 5 3 - 7 ) " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 )
( continued )
T/K a a s b
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 671
0.1 0 . 687 0 . 692
0.2 0 . 7 17 0 . 7235
0.5 0 . 662 0 . 674
1 0 . 675 0 . 696
2 0 . 667 0 . 709
4 0 . 806 0 . 9 18
35 3 0 8 . 15 0 0 . 605
0.1 0 . 616 0 . 62 1
0.2 0 . 64 6 0 . 6525
0.5 0 . 594 0 . 605
1 0 . 611 0 . 63 1
2 0 . 611 0 . 651
4 0 . 729 0 . 832
40 3 1 3 . 15 0 0 . 54 6
0.1 0 . 560 0 . 565
0.2 0 . 583 0 . 583
0.5 0 . 53 1 0 . 54 1
1 0 . 553 0 . 5715
2 0 . 542 0 . 578
4 0 . 659 0 . 754
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482
0.1 0 . 505 0 . 510
0.2 0 . 528 0 . 534
0.5 0 . 468 0 . 478
1 0 . 506 0 . 52 3
2 0 . 500 0 . 5355
4 0 . 602 0 . 69 1
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436
0.1 0 . 452 0 . 457
0.2 0 . 480 0 . 487
0.5 0 . 447 0 . 456
1 0 . 479 0 . 496
2 0 . 480 0 . 515
4 0 . 582 0 . 67 0
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392
·
o.1 0 . 409 0 . 4 14
0.2 0 . 434 0 . 440
1 0 . 462 0 . 480
2 0 . 456 0 . 490
4 0 . 567 0 . 654
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0.1 0 . 373 0 . 378
0.2 0 . 396 0 . 402
1 0 . 433 0 . 451
2 0 . 450 0 . 484
4 0 . 54 8 0 . 635
a a = Bunsen coeffic ient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ) .

b s = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 ( H20) atm- 1 ) .
30 9
{ 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 - 3 8 - 9 ) Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Sodium acetate ; c2H3 02Na ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 12 7-09-3 ) " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
T/ K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 25 D . M . Mason
c2 ;mol dm-3 = o - 2

a
t ; oc T/ K c2 ;mol dm-3 a s b
15 2 88 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0 . 25 1 . 241 1. 254
0.5 1 . 292 1. 322
1 1 . 53 2 1 . 600
2 1 . 841 2 . 02
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0 . 25 1 . 113 1 . 12 6
0.5 1 . 177 1 . 2 02
1 1 . 400 1 . 463
2 1 . 691 1 . 856
25 2 98 . 15 0 0 . 758 -
0 . 25 0 . 999 1 . 0125
0.5 1 . 033 1 . 0585
1 1 . 253 1 . 3 12
2 1 . 553 1. 706
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0 . 25 0 . 898 0 . 911
0.5 0 . 939 0 . 962
1 1 . 168 1 . 225
2 1 . 450 1 . 595
METHOD /APPARATUS / P ROCEDU RE : S OU R C E AN D P U R I TY OF MATE R I ALS :
The principle of the Ostwald method { 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vol % ;

of gas-free liquid is stirred in the water ( author ) .
in volume is measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro analys i s grade
over mercury . The volume of liquid by DDR Standard TGL 5 0 2 1 .
temperature . For ca lculation of the ( 3 ) Double dist i l led .
the solution was obta ined from
liquid was standardized at 2 0°C . E S T I MATED E RROR :
REFERENCES :
Merseburg 19 7 1 , 13 { 2 ) , 115-2 2 .
310
COMPONENT S : ORI G I NAL MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Gerecke , J .

( 2 ) Sodium acetate ; c2H3 o2Na ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 12 7 - 0 9 - 3 ] " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
( continued)
T/K c2 tmol dm·3 a a s b
35 3 0 8 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0 . 25 0 . 816 0 . 8285
0.5 0 . 852 0 . 875
1 1 . 074 1 . 12 8
2 1 . 357 1 . 494
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0 . 25 0 . 745 0 . 757
0.5 0 . 774 0 . 795
1 0 . 991 1. 040
2 1 . 268 1. 399
45 3 18 . 1 5 0 0 . 482 -
0 . 25 0 . 682 0 . 694
0.5 0 . 706 o. 726
1 0 . 9 11 0 . 959
2 1 . 18 6 1 . 3 11
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0 . 25 0 . 62 1 0 . 632
0.5 0 . 644 0 . 662
1 0 . 841 0 . 887
2 1 . 117 1. 237
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0 . 25 0 . 568 0 . 578
0.5 0 . 594 0 . 612
1 0 . 783 0 . 8275
2 1 . 050 1 . 160
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
2 0 . 997 1 . 108
a a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm- 1 ] .

b S = Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) g· 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ] .
31 1
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; ( 1 2 4 - 3 8-9 ] Kimura , H . i Takeuchi , T .
( 2 ) Sodium phenoxide ; c6H 5 0Na ; Kagaku Kogaku 1 9 6 3 , 2 7 , 2 - 6 .
[ 139-02-6 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 7 3 . 7 - 3 5 3 . 2
p1 / kPa = 9 . 3 8 - 1 0 0 T . Tominaga
c2 ;mol dm- 3 = 0 . 3 1 3 8 - 3 . 04
c:
t/ ° C T/K a c2 ;mol dm- 3 p 1 / atm Pl/kPa a c 1 ;mol dm- 3 b ( c 1 / P1 )
-- ---
0.5 273 . 7 0 . 805 0 . 98 99 1. 2 2 1 1 . 295

0 . 54 55 1 . 081 2 . 01
0 . 4 48 45 . 4 1 . 011 2 . 26
0 . 262 26 . 5 0 . 797 3 . 04
0 . 12 8 13 . 0 0 . 797 6 . 22
20 293 . 2 0 . 805 0 . 98 99 1 . 18 6 1 . 210
0 . 534 54 . 1 1 . 081 2 . 02 4
0 . 25 25 . 3 1 . 00 4 . 00
0 . 213 21 . 6 0 . 7473 3 . 50
0 . 14 3 14 . 5 0 . 6 3 19 5 . 58 1
1.3 0 . 99 100 1 . 857 1 . 87 6
0 . 616 62 . 4 1 . 770 2 . 833
0 . 267 27 . 1 1 . 694 6 . 345
0 . 15 1 15 . 3 1 . 650 10 . 96
2.0 0 . 99 100 3 . 073 3 . 10 4
0 . 477 48 . 3 3 . 069 6 . 434
0 . 229 23 . 2 3 . 1 07 1 3 . 17
0 . 12 2 12 . 4 2 . 877 2 3 . 58
3 . 04 0 . 99 100 4 . 09 4 . 14
50 323 . 2 0 . 805 0 . 98 99 1 . 02 9 1 . 05
0 . 443 44 . 9 0 . 8763 1 . 975
0 . 373 37 . 8 0 . 9792 2 . 60
0 . 2 15 21. 8 0 . 8824 4 . 10
0 . 163 16 . 5 0 . 7 17 5 4 . 40
2.0 0 . 99 100 3 . 08 3 . 1 04
0 . 604 61 . 2 2 . 737 4 . 53
0 . 216 21 . 9 2 . 525 11 . 62
0 . 12 6 12 . 8 2 . 29 18 . 2 0
80 353 . 2 0 . 3138 0 . 98 99 0 . 2 14 2 0 . 2 677
0 . 441 44 . 7 0 . 2502 0 . 568
0 . 336 34 . 0 0 . 1951 0 . 580
0 . 0926 9 . 38 0 . 107 1 . 155

b Solubi l ity of C02 (mol/dm3 sln) .
c:
( c 1 /p1 ) /mol dm- 3 atm- 1 = solubil ity of co2 at its one atm partial
pressure .
The absorption vessel was 5 0 0 mL five ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . From a cyl inder ,
necked glass f lask , to which a fixed purity not specif ied .
amount ( ca . 4 0 0 ml ) of sodium phenox ( 2 ) Sodium phenoxide . Sodium hydrox
ide solution was placed . Carbon diox ide was disso lved in distil led wa
ide and air , both washed and dried , ter , impurities fi ltered out ,
were mixed together and brought into di luted with distil led water , and
contact with sodium phenoxide solution equivalent amount of phenol was
without stirring at atmospheric total dissolved .
pressure . Equilibrium was conf irmed ( 3 ) Water . Distil led .
by the gas volume in the gas burette
and chemical analys is of the solution . ESTIMATED ERROR :
Nothing specif ied .
31 2
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Findlay , A ; Shen , B .
( 2 ) P- [ [p- ( dimethylamino ) phenyl ) az o ) J . Chem . Soc . 1912 , 101 , 1459-68 .
benz enesulfonic acid , sodium salt ,
(methyl orange ) ; C 1 4H]. 4N3 0 3 SNa ;
[ 5 4 7 -5 8 - 0 )
( 3 ) water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
2
10 �2 / g cm- 3 = 0 . 309 - 0 . 857 c . L . Young
p 1 / bar = 0 . 968 - 1 . 792
T/K p1 /bar s b p 1 / bar s b
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 309 0 . 998 0 . 968 0 . 831 1 . 097 0 . 833

1 . 220 0 . 829 1 . 408 0 . 827
1 . 588 0 . 82 6 1 . 759 0 . 826
0 . 428 1 . 000 0 . 984 0 . 855 1 . 117 0 . 850
1 . 243 0 . 844 1 . 433 0 . 838
1 . 620 0 . 835 1. 792 0 . 831
0 . 593 1 . 002 0 . 976 0 . 900 1 . 109 0 . 887
1 . 232 0 . 88 0 1 . 424 0 . 8 64
1 . 612 0 . 855 1. 780 0 . 850
0 . 857 1 . 004 0 . 972 0 . 975 1 . 105 0 . 952
1 . 224 0 . 936 1 . 417 0 . 9 15
1 . 604 0 . 899 1. 768 0 . 890
mass concentration o f salt

b s = ------
Solubi l ity in water : Ostwald coefficient L = 0 . 8 2 5 cm3 cm- 3 .
Volumetric static method . Care was ( 1 ) Purity 9 9 . 9 5 mole % .
small amounts of gas absorbed . ( 2 ) No details given .
Apparatus s imi lar to that described in
Ref . 1 . ( 3 ) No deta ils given .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 1; 6S = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
J . Chem . Soc . 1910 , 97, 53 6 .
313
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Van S lyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr . ;
( 2 ) Sodium lactate ; c 3 H s 0 3 Na ;
[ 9 2 0- 4 9 - 0 ) J . Biol . Chern . 19 2 8 , 78 , 7 6 5-99 .
( 3 ) 2 -Hydroxypropanoic acid ;
( lactic acid) ; c 3 H6o 3 ; [ 5 0-2 1-5 ]
{ 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 3 11 . 2
c2 fmol L- 1 = 0 - 0 . 3 00 Pirketta Scharl in
c3 tmol L- 1 = 0 . 100 - 0 . 300
p =
" atmospheric"
t/ ° C T/K a Method b p1 /mmHg c c2 tmol L- 1 c3 tmol L- 1 a d s1 e
38 . 0 3 11 . 2 B 7 12 . 9 0 0 . 150 0 . 54 3 6 0 . 5508
B 7 14 . 4 0 0 . 150 0 . 5473 0 . 5540
B 7 12 . 9 0 0 . 3 00 0 . 5434 0 . 5569
B 7 00 . 8 0 . 15 0 0 . 100 0 . 5 2 14 0 . 5303
T 707 . 0 0 . 150 0 . 150 0 . 5220 0 . 5350
B 700 . 8 0 . 300 0 . 100 0 . 5023 0 . 5174
T 7 07 . 0 0 . 300 0 . 300 0 . 4980 0 . 5207

b B: saturation by bubbling ; T: saturation in rotating tonometer .
c 1 mmHg = 1 3 3 . 3 2 2 Pa = 1 . 3 3 3 2 2 x 10- 3 bar

a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 { STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
e s1 = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 { STP ) g- 1 atm- 1 ]
Two procedures were used for saturat ( 1 ) From a Kipp C02 generator .
( 2 ) Na- lactate solutions were made by
Saturation by bubbl ing {B) . The solu adding known excess of lactic acid
tion was placed in the saturating to solutions of NaHC0 3 •
nected through a wash bottle with a ( 3 ) Not specif ied .
wash bottle were immersed in a con ( 4 ) Distil led .
stant temperature bath . co2 gas was
bubbled through it rapidly for 3 0 mi ESTIMATED ERROR :
by a mercury reservoir and the free 6a f a =
± 0 . 005
{Refs 1 and 2 ) . J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 4 , 61 , 5 2 3 .
Saturation in rotating tonometer {T) . 2 . Van Slyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr .
The technique used was that described J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 7 , 73 , 127 .
by Austin et al . { Ref . 3 ) .
3 . Austin , J . H . ; Cullen , G . E . ;
Hast i ngs , A . B . ; McLean , F . C . ;
with solutions of ac i ds and salts . J . Biol . Chem . 1 9 2 2 , 5 4 , 12 1 .
314
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Ownby , D . W . ; Prapaitrakul , W . ;
King , A . D . Jr .
( 2 ) Sulfuric acid monododecyl ester
sodium salt ; ( sodium dodecyl sul J . Colloid Interface Sci . 1988 ,
fate ) ; c 1 2H2 5 o4sNa ; ( 15 1-2 1-3 ] 125 , 5 2 6 -3 3 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
m2 /mol kg- 1 = 0.0 - 0.6 H . L . Clever
Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous sodium dodecyl sulfate .
2
t/ ° C T/K a m2 ;mol kg- 1 b 10 m 1 ;mol kg- 1 c
--
25 2 9 8 . 15 o.o 3 . 32 , 3 . 392*
0.2 3 . 54
0.4 3 . 69
0.6 3 . 91

b m2 = molality of sodium dodecyl sulfate .
c m1 = solubil ity of carbon dioxide .

* Value from Wi lhelm , E . ; Battino , R . ; Wilcock , R . J . Chem . Rev . 1977 ,
72 , 2 19 .
The measurements are made at several pressures up to 1 0 - 15 atm

( 1 - 1 . 5 MPa ) . The solubi l ity values have been corrected to 1 atm
( 0 . 1 0 3 MPa ) partial pressure of co2 • See method below .
The apparatus and method are described ( 1 ) carbon dioxide . Matheson Gas
in earl ier papers ( 1 , 2 ) . Solubil ity Products . commercial grade ,
netic stirred cyl indrical brass bomb
with an observation window . The solu ( 2 ) Sodium dodecyl sulfate . BDH Prod .
tion is prepared and put in a glass No . 4 4 2 4 4 , Lot No . 9 0 8 8 1 1C , stated
liner in the bomb . The system is to be 9 9 . 0 % .
sea led , evacuated to a pressure just
above water vapor pressure , and out ( 3 ) Water . Nothing specif ied , but
gassed with stirring for several have used doubly distil led water
hours . The gas is added to a known in earlier work .
pressure and equil ibrated with stir-
' ring for a minimum of f ive hours .
Stirring is stopped , the solution is ESTIMATED ERROR :
al lowed to become sti l l . The gas is
vented leaving the supersaturated so 6T/K not s:r ecified . 2
lution under a gaseous pressure of at 6m 1 jmol kg- . = 0 . 0 2 x 10-
30 to 60 seconds . The rate of gas
loss during the sti l l condition is REFERENCES :
measured to use in a later correction .
The gas is stirred and collected . The 1 . Matheson , I . B . C . ; King , A . D . Jr .
total volume of gas is measured along J . Coll oid Interface Sci . 1978 ,
--
with ambient pressure and temperature . 66 , 4 6 4 .
2 . Bolden , P . L . ; Hoskins , J . c . ;
King , A . D . Jr . J . Coll oid Interface
Sci . 1 9 8 3 , 9 1 , 4 5 4 .
31 5
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -38-9 ) Ownby , D . w . ; Prapai trakul , W . ;
King , A . D . Jr .
( 2 ) 1-Heptanesulfonic acid , sodium
salt ; ( sodium 1 -heptylsulfonate ) ; J . Coll oid Interface Sci . 1988 ,
C7H 1 5 0 3 SNa ; [ 2 2 7 6 7 - 5 0 - 6 ] 125 , 5 2 6 -3 3 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
m2 ;mol kg- 1 = o.o - 1.2 H . L . Clever
Solubil ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous sodium 1-heptylsulfonate .
T/K a m2 ;mol kg- 1 b

25 2 9 8 . 15 0.0 3 . 32 , 3 . 392*
0.2 3 . 17
0.3 3 . 12
0.4 3 . 05
0.5 3 . 05
0.6 3 . 07
0.8 3 . 16
1.0 3 . 26
1.2 3 . 33
a Added by the compiler .
b m2 = molal ity of sodium 1-heptylsulfonate .
c m1 = solubil ity of carbon dioxide .

* Va lue from Wi lhelm , E . ; Battino , R . ; Wilcock , R . J . Chem . Rev . 19 7 7 ,
72 , 2 19 .
The measurements are made at several pressures up to 10 - 15 atm

( 1 - 1 . 5 MPa ) . The solubil ity values have been corrected to 1 atm
( 0 . 1 0 3 MPa ) partial pressure of co2 • See method below .
The apparatus and method are described ( 1 ) carbon dioxide . Matheson Gas
in earlier papers ( 1 , 2 ) . Solubil ity Products . Commercial grade ,
with an observation window . The solu ( 2 ) Sodium 1-heptylsulfonate . Lan
tion is prepared and put in a glass caster Synthes is , Ltd . , stated
liner in the bomb . The system is to be 9 9 % .
sealed , evacuated to a pressure just
above water vapor pressure , and out ( 3 ) Water . Nothing specified , but
gassed with stirring for several have used doubly distil led water
hours . The gas is added to a known in earl ier work .
pressure and equ i l ibrated with stir
ring for a minimum of f ive hours . ESTIMATED ERROR :
Stirring is stopped , the solution is
allowed to become still . The gas is 6T/K not sp ecif ied . 2
vented leaving the supersaturated so 6m 1 tmol kg- = 0 . 0 2 x 10-
lution under a gaseous pressure of at
mospheric pressure for a fixed time of r---�----�--_,
3 0 to 6 0 seconds . The rate of gas REFERENCES :
loss during the sti l l condition is
measured to use in a later correction . 1 . Matheson , ! . B . C . ; King , A . D . Jr .
The gas i s stirred and collected . The J . Coll oid Interface Sci . 1978 , --
total volume of gas is measured along 66 , 4 6 4 .

with ambient pressure and temperature . 2 . Bolden , P . L . ; Hos�ins , J . c . ;
King , A . D . Jr . J . Coll oid Interface
Sci . 1 9 8 3 , 9 1 , 4 5 4 .
316
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Ownby , D . w . ; Prapaitrakul , w. ;
King , A . D . Jr .
( 2 ) Octarioic acid , pentadecaf luoro- ,
sodium salt ; ( sodium perf luoro J . Coll oid Interface Sci . 1988 ,
octanoate ) ; C8F 1 5 o2Na ; [ 3 3 5-95-5 ) 125 , 526-33 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
m2 tmol kg- 1 = 0.0 - 0.6 H . L . Clever
Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous sodium perf luorooctanoate .
t/ ° C T/K a m2 tmol kg- 1 b 2

10 m 1 /mol kg- 1 c
--
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.0 3 . 32 , 3 . 392*
0.2 3 . 61
0.4 3 . 90
0.6 4 . 16

b m2 = molal ity of sodium perfluorooctanoate .
c
m1 = solubi l ity of carbon dioxide .
* Va lue from Wi lhelm , E . ; Battino , R . ; Wilcock , R . J . Chem . Rev . 1 9 7 7 ,
72 , 2 19 .
The measurements are made at several pressures up to 10 - 15 atm

( 1 - 1 . 5 MPa ) . The solubi l ity values have been corrected to 1 atm
( 0 . 1 0 3 MPa ) partial pressure of C02 • See method below .
METHOD/APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY O F MATERIALS :
The apparatus and method are described ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . Matheson Gas
in earl ier papers ( 1 , 2 ) . Solubil ity Products . Commercial grade ,
with an observation window . The solu ( 2 ) Sodium perf luorooctanoate .
tion is prepared and put in a glass Prepared in si tu by titrating per
liner in the bomb . The system is fluorooctanoic acid with sodium
sealed , evacuated to a pressure just hydroxide to pH 9 - 1 2 .
above water vapor pressure , and out
gassed with stirring for several ( 3 ) Water . Nothing specif ied , but
hours . The gas is added to a known have used doubly distil led water
pressure and equilibrated with stir in earlier work .
ring for a minimum of five hours .
Stirring is stopped , the solution is ESTIMATED ERROR :
allowed to become sti l l . The gas is
vented leaving the supersaturated so 6T/K not sp ecif ied . 2
lution under a gaseous pressure of at 6m 1 /mol kg- = 0 . 02 x 10-
3 0 to 60 seconds . The rate of gas
loss during the sti l l condition is REFERENCES :
measured to use in a later correction .
The gas is stirred and collected . The 1 . Matheson , ! . B . c . ; King , A . D . Jr .
total volume of gas is measured along J . Coll oid Interface Sci . -- 1978 ,
with ambient pressure and temperature . 66 , 4 6 4 .
2 . Bolden , P . L . ; Hoskins , J . C . ;
King , A . D . Jr . J . Coll oi d Interface
Sci . 1 9 8 3 , 91 , 4 5 4 .
317
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Castel lani , F . ; Berchies i , G .
( 2 ) Sodium trifluoroacetate ; Anal . Proc . (London) 1994 , 31 ,
NaC2o2F 3 ; [ 2 9 2 3 - 18-4 ] 2 9 3 -94 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 4 . 65
p/kPa = 94 . 8 H . L . Clever
m2 /mol kg- 1 = 18 . 9 9 8 6 Pirketta Scharl in
T/K k smc /kg mol- l c
21. 5 2 9 4 . 65 0 0 . 0353 d
18 . 9 9 8 6 0 . 0077 0 . 035
a m2 = molal ity of sodium trifluoroacetate

b c
1 = solubi l ity of carbon dioxide
c k smc = salt effect parameter ; calculated by comp i ler ( H . L . C . )
d Estimated by compi ler (H . L . C ) from other data .
Schiff a z ometer ( Ref . 1 ) was used . ( 1 ) No details given .
The authors measured also the solu
bil ity of o2 and N2 • The gas dis ( 2 ) Fluka , Buchs , switz erland .
solved in the solution , after being Purity not given . The salt was
extracted by heating , was col lected stored several days at 9 0 ° C
in a graduated tube . The volume con under a dynamic vacuum .
tractions when the col lected gas was
put in contact successively with KOH ( 3 ) Doubly distil led .
and an a lkal ine solution of pyrogallol
gave the content of co2 and 02 , res
pectively , the remaining volume being
mainly N2 • The accuracy ( operating
at constant pressure ) was within ESTIMATED ERROR :
0.5 %.
No details given about 6 T , 6p and
6c 1 •
REFERENCES :
1 . Vogel , A . I .
A Textbook of Quanti
tative Inorgani c Analysis ,
Incl uding Elementary Instrumental
Analysis , 3rd Ed . , Longmans Green ,
London , 1 9 6 1 , p . 1 0 7 4 .
318
(2) Potass ium chloride ; KCl ; Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 2 5 ,
[ 7 4 4 7 -4 0 -7 ) 2 2 6-7 0 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )

T/K = 288 . 35
c2 tmol dm- 3 = o - 2 . 564 Pirketta Scharl in
ttoc T/K a
Di lution c2 tmol dm- 3 a
a b k scc / dm3 mol- l a,c
X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 00 0 1 . 009 -
3 0 . 8546 0 . 8 19 0 . 106
2 1 . 282 0 . 745 0 . 103
1 2 . 564 0 . 57 9 0 . 0941
a
b a= Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
c
Initial solution : 2 8 . 2 g KCl + 8 7 . 4 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of

solution .
mark in the constricting connection . r-------,
with water vapor and f.i l led the bulbs
passed by the pressure difference in- r-----,
and one meter Hg pressure . The Sci . st . Petersburg 1 8 8 7 , 3 5 ,
319
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Geffcken , G .
( 2 ) Potassium chloride ; KCl ; z. Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .
[ 7 4 4 7 -4 0-7 ) Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 0 4 , 4 9 ,
--
257-302 ;
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 and 2 9 8 . 15
c2 tmol dm- 3 = o - 1 . 058 c . L . Young
T/K c2 tmol dm- 3 L a
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 070
0 . 423 0 . 9892
0 . 432 0 . 9865
1 . 045 0 . 8875
1 . 058 0 . 8910
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8255
0 . 423 0 . 7695
0 . 432 0 . 7667
1 . 045 0 . 6920
1 . 058 0 . 6961
Volumetric method using s imple absorp- ( 1 ) Obtained by the subl imation of
tion p ipet and buret . Diagram and de- solid carbon dioxide . Dried .
paper . ( 2 ) Not specified .
( 3 ) Degassed .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.1; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
320
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Findlay , A ; Shen , B .
( 2 ) Potassium chloride ; KCl ; J . Chem . Soc . 1 9 12 , 1 01 , 1 4 5 9 - 6 8 .
[ 7 4 4 7 -4 0-7 ]
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
2
10 'Y2 / g cm- 3 = 1 . 84 - 7 . 46 c. L. Young
2 4
T/K 1 0 'Y2 / g cm- 3 a pfg cm- 3 s b 1 0 x1 (p = 1 atm) c
2 9 8 . 15 1 . 84 1 . 008 0 . 792 5 . 90
3 . 05 1 . 017 0 . 7 64 5 . 70
4 . 58 1 . 02 6 0 . 749 5 . 60
7 . 46 1 . 044 0 . 701 5 . 26
mass concentration o f salt

Solubility was stated to be independent of pressure ( over 1-2 atm
c Calculated by compiler assuming Vm , l = 2 4 . 3 x 10- 3 m3 mol- 1 at 1 atm .
Solubil ity in water : Ostwald coefficient L = 0 . 8 2 5 cm3 cm- 3 •
nometer tube was of such length5 as to
allow measurements up to 2 x 10 Pa { 2 ) No details given .
( about 2 atm) .
{ 3 ) No details given .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0.1; 65 = ± 1 %.
( estimated by compiler)
REFERENCES :
32 1
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Markham , A . A . ; Kobe , K . A .
( 2 ) Potass ium chloride ; KCl ; J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 4 1 , 63 , 4 4 9 -54 .
[ 7 4 4 7 -4 0-7 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 7 3 . 3 5 - 3 13 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 325 D . M . Mason
m2 /mol kg- 1 = o - 4
t / °C T/K a a s
b
0.2 273 . 35 0.0 1 . 7023 1 . 7025

0.1 1. 6611 1 . 6654
0.2 1 . 6268 1 . 6352
0.5 1 . 5285 1. 5481
1 1 . 4020 1 . 4389
2 1 . 1980 1 . 2644
3 1 . 0460 1 . 1356
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.0 0 . 7565 0 . 7587
0.1 0 . 7432 0 . 7475
0.2 0 . 7 3 07 0 . 7 3 69
0.5 0 . 6937 0 . 7055
1 0 . 6442 0 . 6646
2 0 . 5646 0 . 5998
3 0 . 5030 0 . 5503
4 0 . 4563 0 . 5141
40 3 13 . 15 0.0 0 . 5133 0 . 5173
1 0 . 4360 0 . 4522
2 0 . 3853 0 . 4 1 68
3 0 . 3520 0 . 3874
: a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

S = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g-1 (H20 ) atm-1 ] .
t / °C a b
0.2 0 . 0207 0 . 2 16
25 0 . 0201 0 . 168
40 0 . 0380 0 . 19 0

solution-saturated gas is measured ir
agitation did not cause super ESTIMATED ERROR :
saturation .
ST/K = <± 0 . 1 at 0 . 2 °C , ± 0 . 0 3 at
Sa f a , SS/S = ± 0 . 0 0 2 ( authors ) .
REFERENCES :
322
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -38-9 ] Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Potass ium chloride ; KCl ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 4 4 7 -4 0 -7 ] " Carl Schorlernrner " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2-18-5 ]
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 25 D . M . Mason
c2 jmol dm-3 = o - 3
t j °C T/K c2 jmol dm-3 a a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0.5 0 . 899 0 . 922
1 0 . 820 0 . 847
2 0 . 736 0 . 785
3 0 . 680 0 . 752
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0.5 0 . 781 0 . 794
1 0 . 7 14 0 . 7405
2 0 . 616 0 . 659
3 0 . 575 0 . 6375
-
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758
0.5 0 . 693 0 . 706
1 0 . 64 2 0 . 6645
2 0 . 560 0 . 5995
3 0 . 501 0 . 556
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0.5 0 . 606 0 . 6175
1 0 . 54 7 0 . 567
2 0 . 4955 0 . 532
3 0 . 452 0 . 502
METHOD /APPARATUS /PROCEDURE : S OURCE AN D PURI TY OF MATE RIALS :

temperature . For calculation of the ( 3 ) Double disti l led .
l iquid was standardi z ed at 2 0 °C . E S T I MATE D ERRO R :
RE F E RENCES :
1 . Gerecke , J . ; Bittrich , H.J.
Wiss . z . Tech . Hocbscb . Cbem .
" Carl Scborl emmer" Leuna
Merseburg 19 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 115-2 2 .
323
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Gerecke , J.
( 2 ) Potass ium chloride ; KCl ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
( c onti nued )
a b
t / °C T/K c2tmol dm"3 a s
--
-
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605
0.5 0 . 52 5 0 . 5363
1 0 . 478 0 . 4964
2 0 . 434 0 . 467
3 0 . 403 0 . 449
-
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6
0.5 0 . 47 1 0 . 482
1 0 . 425 0 . 4425
2 0 . 381 0 . 4 102
3 0 . 341 0 . 383
-
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482
0.5 0 . 4 19 5 0 . 430
1 0 . 381 0 . 397
2 0 . 345 0 . 372
3 0 . 316 0 . 3534
-
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436
0.5 0 . 376 0 . 386
1 0 . 337 0 . 352
2 0 . 3 02 0 0 . 3265
3 0 . 2825 0 . 3 1 66
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0.5 0 . 333 0 . 342
1 0 . 3 02 0 . 3 15 5
2 0 . 2 7 10 0 . 2936
3 0 . 251 0 . 281
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
0.5 0 . 3 02 0 . 3 10 2
1 0 . 272 0 . 2844
2 0 . 245 0 . 2655
3 0 . 227 0 . 254
a
a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm· 1 ) •
b l
s = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g· ( H20 ) atm-� ] .
324
COMPONENTS : ORIGINAL . MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8-9 ] Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Potass ium chloride ; KCl ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 2 4 , 11-14 .
[ 7 4 4 7 - 4 0-7 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 and 3 08 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 32 5 c . L . Young
c2 tmol L- 1 = 0 - 4 . 13 1
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8 2 64
0 . 498 0 . 7576
0 . 98 0 0 . 7041
1 . 890 0 . 6177
2 . 702 0 . 5554
3 . 5 05 0 . 5063
4 . 13 1 0 . 4703
3 08 . 15 0 0 . 6675
0 . 42 0 0 . 6227
0 . 804 0 . 5826
1 . 340 0 . 54 3 3
1 . 723 0 . 5136
2 . 201 0 . 4787
2 . 727 0 . 4493
3 . 04 8 0 . 4363
3 . 619 0 . 4 05 7
3 . 660 0 . 4028
4 . 110 0 . 3 8 17
• L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 )

P = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
volumetrica l ly . Density and composi ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
ESTIMATED ERROR :
GT/K = ± 0 . 05 ; GL = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 20 , 41.
325
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Burmakina , G . V . ; Efanov , L . N . ;

Shnet , M . A .
( 2 ) Potas s ium chlor ide ; KCl ;
[ 7 4 4 7 -4 0-7 ] *zh . Fiz . Khim . 1 9 8 2 , 56 ,1159 - 6 1 ;
Russ . J . Phys . Chem . (Engl . Transl . J
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ) 1 9 8 2 , 5 6 , 7 05-7 .
= 298 .
T/ K 15
p/MPa = 0 . 1 Yu . P . Yampo l ' skii
10 3 c2 tmol L- l = 0 - 200
Solub i l ity of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of KCl at 2 9 8 . 15 K. a
T/ K
2 9 8 . 15 · 0 33 . 90
1 3 3 . 85
2 3 3 . 55
5 33 . 35
10 3 3 . 60
20 3 3 . 65
50 3 3 . 50
100 33 . 20
200 3 2 . 50
a Data taken from a graph by comp i l er .
b c2 = concentration of KCl
c c 1 = concentration of co2
Attainment of the equ i l ibrium was ( 1 ) Source not given . Before contact
The concentration of carbon dioxide glass woo l and distil led water .
was determined by t itration .
( 2 ) Nothing speci f ied .
( 3 ) Distil led .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6c1 t c 1 = ± 0 . 06 - 0 . 2 %
6T/K = ± 0 . 05
REFERENCES :
326
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) He , S . ; Morse , J . W .
( 2 ) Potass ium chloride ; KCl ; Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 1 9 9 3 , 5 7 ,

[ 7 4 4 7 -4 0-7 ] 3 5 3 3-54 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 - 3 63 . 15
P/MPa = 0 . 1032 Pirketta Scharl i n
m2 /mol kg- 1 = 0 . 1 - 5. o
f
m2 jmol kg- 1 b
2
T/K a 1 0 p1 j atm d 1 0 3m 1 jmol kg- 1 • 'Yl
--
2 7 3 . 15 0.1 1 . 0059 96 . 6 71. 3 1 . 06

0 . 505 1 . 0248 69 . 1 1 . 09
1 . 008 1 . 0473 62 . 9 1 . 20
2 . 0 15 1. 0 8 9 6 57 . 2 1 . 32
3 . 0 04 1 . 1275 53 . 4 1 . 41
3 . 508 1 . 1443 52 . 5 1 . 44
2 9 8 . 15 0.1 1. 0027 94 . 2 30. 8 1 . 05
1.0 1 . 0 4 17 29 . 1 1 . 10
2.0 1 . 0820 24 . 5 1 . 31
4.0 1 . 1528 22 . 3 1 . 43
3 2 3 . 15 0 . 106 1 . 0015 85 . 4 16 . 1 1 . 03
1 . 001 1 . 0328 15 . 3 1 . 09
1 . 999 1 . 0672 14 . 5 1 . 15
2 . 994 1 . 1026 13 . 3 1 . 25
3 . 997 1 . 1377 12 . 8 1 . 30
4 . 998 1 . 17 2 7 12 . 3 1 . 35
3 4 8 . 15 0.1 0 . 9804 60 . 3 7.9 1 . 02
1.0 1 . 0179 7.5 1 . 08
2.0 1 . 0570 7.2 1 . 12
3.0 1 . 0932 6.8 1 . 18
5.0 1 . 1567 6.5 1 . 24
3 6 3 . 15 0.1 0 . 9 7 08 30. 1 3.4 1 . 01
1.0 1 � 0087 3.3 1 . 04
2.0 1 . 0478 3.2 1 . 09
3.0 1 . 0841 3.1 1 . 12
5.0 1 . 1476 2.8 1 . 20
a Calculated by compi ler b m2 = molal ity of KCl

I cp dens ity of solvent d p1 partial pressure o f C02
• m
1 molal ity of co2
=
f Y1 = activity coeff i c ient of C02
Either pure co2 gas or co2 -N2 mixtu ( 1 ) Commercial ; purity 9 9 . 9 % .

maintain a constant P ( C02 ) . The co2 - ( 2 ) source not mentioned .
determined amounts of co2 and N2 into ACS specifications .
a gas tank and their compos ition was Vacuum-dr ied before use .
veri f ied by gas chromatography .
it through dist i l led water at the tem ESTIMATED ERROR :
were obtained by us ing gas -dispers ion 6 T/ K = ± 0 . 1
tubes . The bubbl ing rate was 90 to 9 5 6m 1 tm1 = ± o . 0 1 2
mL min- 1 • 6 n f n = ± o . o4
Hewlett Packard ( 57 9 0A) gas chromato
graph .
327
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Van S lyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr . ;

( 2 ) Potass ium chloride ; KCl ;
[ 7 4 4 7 - 4 0-7 ) J . Biol . Chem . 1928 , 78 , 7 6 5-99 .
( 7 6 4 7 - 0 1-0 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K =
3 11 . 2
c2 jmol L- 1 =
0 - 0 . 300 Pirketta Scharlin
c3 jmol L- 1 =
0 . 01
p =
" atmospheric"
T / K a Method b p1 /mmHg c c2 t mol L- 1 c3 tmol L- 1 a d s1 e
38 . 0 3 11 . 2 B,T 0 0 . 01 0 . 5 4 5 2 * 0 . 5468*
B 7 00 . 8 0 . 15 0 0 . 01 0 . 5325 0 . 5363
T 7 09 . 0 0 . 15 0 0 . 01 0 . 5 3 14 0 . 5343
B 7 00 . 8 0 . 3 00 0 . 01 0 . 5207 0 . 5260
T 7 09 . 0 0 . 300 0 . 01 0 . 5187 0 . 5241 ;
b B : saturation by bubbling ; T : saturation in rotating tonometer .

c 1 mmHg =
1 3 3 . 3 2 2 Pa =
1 . 3 3 3 2 2 x 10- 3 bar
d a =
Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
e s1 =
Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 atm- 1 ]
* Average of s ix measurements .
ing solut ions with co2 :
(2) Not spec i f ied .
Saturation by bubbl ing (B) . The solu
tion was p laced in the saturating (3) Not specified .
nected through a wash bottle with a (4) Distil led .
nutes . The wash bottle was replaced 6T/K =
± 0.1
by a mercury reservoir and the free 6aja =
± o . oo5
saturating tube by admitt ing mercury
underneath the so lution . The co2 REFERENCES :
contents of the so lut ions were deter
mined in the manometric gas apparatus 1 . Van S lyke , D . D . ; Nei l l , J . M .
The technique used was that described J . Biol . Chem . 1 9 2 7 , 73 , 127 .
by Austin et a1 . ( Ref . 3 ) .
3 . Austin , J . H . ; Cul l en , G . E . ;
Hastings , A . B . ; McLean , F . c . ;
with so lut ions of acids and salts . J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 2 , 54 , 12 1 .
328
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 )
( 2 ) .Potass ium chlor ide ; KCl ; Yasunishi , A . ; Tsuj i , M . ; Sada , E .
[ 7 4 4 7 -4 0-7 )
( 3 ) Calcium chloride ; cacl 2 ; Adv . Chem . Ser . 1979 , 177, 1 8 9 -2 03 .
[ 10 0 4 3 -5 2 - 4 )
( 4 ) Water ; H20 ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 C . L . Young
( c 2 +c3 ) /mol dm- 3 = o - 3 . 8 0 1
T/K x2 ( c2 +c 3 ) L a
in mixed salt /mol dm- 3
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 00 0 0 . 8264
0 . 558 0 . 6477
1 . 237 0 . 4701
2 . 008 0 . 3380
2 . 809 0 . 2544
3 . 801 0 . 1876
0 . 25 0 . 426 0 . 7037
0 . 865 0 . 6011
1 . 611 0 . 4605
2 . 361 0 . 3 7 04
3 . 233 0 . 2845
0 . 50 0 . 512 0 . 7 0 12
1 . 079 0 . 6003
1 . 675 0 . 5062
2 . 605 0 . 3947
3 . 401 0 . 3253
0 . 75 0 . 429 0 . 7455
0 . 904 0 . 6735
1 . 845 0 . 5558
2 . 7 14 0 . 4691
3 . 501 0 . 4057
1 . 00 0 . 498 0 . 7576
0 . 980 0 . 7041
1 . 890 0 . 6177
2 . 702 0 . 5554
3 . 5 05 0 . 5063
• L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm- 3 ]

P = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa
buret and magnetic stirrer . Amount 9 9 . 9 6 mo le % .
pressure and vapor pressure of ( 4 ) Deion i z ed .
mixed salt solution estimated by the ��------_..._..._..._..._..._..._..._..._..._..._..._..._..._..._...�
from corresponding data for each 6T/K = ± 0 . 0 5 ; 6L = ± 1 % .
in ref . ( 2 ) .
REFERENCES :
1 9 6 5 , 69A , 3 6 5 .
2 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 20 , 41.
32 9
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 )
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaC l ; Yasunishi , A . ; Tsuj i , M . ; Sada , E .
[ 7 64 7 - 1 4 -5 )
( 3 ) Potass ium chloride ; KCl ; Adv . Chem . Ser . 1979 , 177, 18 9 -2 03 .
[ 7 4 4 7 - 4 0-7 )
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 325 c . L . Young
( c2+c3 ) /mo l dm"3 = o - 4. 396
T/K x2 ( c2_+c3 ) L a
in mixed salt ;mol dm·3
2 9 8 . 15 o . oo 0 0 . 8 2 6 4·
0 . 498 0 . 6576
0 . 980 0 . 7041
1 . 890 0 . 6177
2 . 702 0 . 5554
3 . 505 0 . 5063
4 . 13 1 0 . 4703
0 . 25 0 . 53 7 0 . 7455
1 . 039 0 . 6813
1. 765 0 . 6073
2 . 114 0 . 5705
3 . 104 0 . 4948
4 . 12 5 0 . 4243
0 . 50 0 . 479 0 . 7502
1 . 05 1 0 . 6720
1 . 851 0 . 5742
2 . 297 0 . 5344
3 . 343 0 . 4439
4 . 396 0 . 3 7 65
0 . 75 0 . 545 o . 7271
1 . 077 0 . 6511
1 . 830 0 . 5545
2 . 277 0 . 5070
3 . 434 0 . 4028
4 . 3 11 0 . 3 4 15
1 . 00 0 . 455 0 . 7343
1 . 000 0 . 6508
1 . 945 0 . 5187
2 . 486 0 . 4653
3 . 400 0 . 3727
4 . 2 16 0 . 3 14 4
a L = Ostwa ld coefficient [ cm3 cm-3 ]
P = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa

buret and magneti c stirrer . Amount 9 9 . 9 6 mole % .
determined volumetrically . Partial ( 2 , 3 ) Reagent grade .
so lut ion . The vapor pres sure of the
mixed salt so lution estimated by the ESTIMATED ERROR :
method of Robinson and Bower ( 1 ) 6T/K = ± 0 . 0 5 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
from corresponding data for each
component salt so lut ion . REFERENCES :
Apparatus s imi lar to that described 1 . Robinson , R . A . ; Bower , V . E .
in ref . ( 2 ) . J . Res . Nat . Bur . Stand .
� ' 69A , 3 6 5 .
2 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1975 , 20 , 41.
33 0
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 )
( 2 ) Potass ium chlor ide ; KCl ; Yasunishi , A . ; Tsuj i , M . ; Sada , E .
[ 7 4 4 7 -4 0-7 )
( 3 ) Sodium chlor ide ; NaC l ; Adv . Chem . Ser . 197 9 , 1 7 7 , 189-203 .
[ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 )
( 4 ) Calcium chlor ide ; CaC12 ;
[ 10 0 4 3 -5 2 -4 )
( 5 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 C . L . Young
( c2+c3 +c4 ) /mol dm·3 = o - 4 . 3 9 6
T/K x2 x3 L a
in mixed salt in mixed salt
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 0 . 8264
0 . 50 0 . 50 0 . 479 0 . 7502
1 . 05 1 0 . 6720
1 . 851 0 . 5742
2 . 297 0 . 5344
3 . 343 0 . 4439
4 . 396 0 . 3765
0 . 50 0 . 25 0 . 386 0 . 7505
0 . 722 0 . 6873
1 . 428 0 . 5901
1 . 938 0 . 52 9 1
2 . 4 55 0 . 4704
2 . 762 0 . 4405
0 . 50 0 . 00 0 . 512 0 . 7 0 12
1 . 07 9 0 . 6003
1 . 675 0 . 5062
2 . 605 0 . 3947
3 . 401 0 . 3253
a L = Ostwald coefficient ( cm3 cm·3 )

P = 10 1 . 3 2 5 kPa

Volumetric apparatus with multibulb ( 1 ) Extra pure grade , pur ity
buret and magnetic stirrer . Amount 9 9 . 9 6 mo le % .
determined volumetrica l ly . Partial ( 2 , 3 , 4 ) Reagent grade .
pressure and vapor pr�ssure of ( 5 ) Deioni z ed .
from corresponding data for each &T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; &L = ± 1 % .
in ref . ( 2 ) .
REFERENCES :
1965 , 69A , 3 6 5 .
2 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1975 , 20, 41.
33 1
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]

( 2 ) Potas s ium bromide ; KBr ; Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 25 ,
[ 7758-02-3 ] 2 2 6-7 0 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 -5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 3 5 Pirketta Scharlin
c2 fmol dm- 3 = 0 - 4 . 228
t / °C T/K a D i lution c2 fmol dm- 3 a a b k acc /dm3 mol- l a , c

X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 00 0 1 . 009 -
6 0 . 7046 0 . 908 0 . 0650
3 1 . 4 09 0 . 819 0 . 0643
2 2 . 114 0 . 748 0 . 0615
1 4 . 228 0 . 579 0 . 0571
a Calculated by the comp i ler .
b a = Bunsen coeffic ient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
c k acc = Setchenow salt effect parameter ; k acc ( 1 f c2 ) =
lg ( a0 f a ) .
Initial solution : 5 0 . 3 1 g KBr + 8 3 . 2 1 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of sln .
See other data sheets on J . setchenow papers .
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Geffcken , G .

( 2 ) Potas s ium bromide ; KBr ; z . Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .
[ 7758-02-3 ] Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 0 4 , 4 9 ,
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ) 2 57-3 02 .
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 and 2 9 8 . 15 c . L . Young
c2 fmo l dm- 3 = o - 1 . 064
T/K c2 t mo l dm- 3 L a T/K c2 fmo l dm- 3 L a

--- ---
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 070 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8255
0 . 550 0 . 9783 0 . 550 0 . 7621
0 . 565 0 . 9766 0 . 565 0 . 7 6 19
1 . 056 0 . 9100 1 . 056 0 . 7030
1 . 064 0 . 9 0 65 1 . 064 0 . 7068
Volumetric method us ing s imple absorp- ( 1 ) Obtained by the subl imation of

tion p ipet and buret . D iagram and de- solid carbon dioxide . Dried .
ta i led description given in original
paper . ( 2 ) Not spec i f i ed .
( 3 ) Degassed .
ESTIMATED ERROR : ( by comp i ler )
oTfK = ± 0 . 1 ; oL = ± 1 t .
332
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J.
( 2 ) Potass ium bromide ; KBr ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7758-02-3 ] " Carl Schor lemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 -5 ]
=
T /K 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 25 D . M . Mason
c2;mol dm-3 = 0 - 4
t / °C T/K c2 ;mol dm-3 a a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0.5 0 . 938 0 . 955
1 0 . 864 0 . 8965
2 0 . 793 0 . 855
4 0 . 901 1 . 054
-
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860
0.5 0 . 806 0 . 822
1 0 . 742 o. 770
2 0 . 705 0 . 7605
4 0 . 849 0 . 996
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 0 . 5173
0.5 0 . 710 0 . 725
1 0 . 660 0 . 687
2 0 . 63 1 0 . 683
4 0 . 797 0 . 936
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0.5 0 . 634 0 . 64 8
1 0 . 59 6 0 . 62 1
2 0 . 57 8 0 . 6275
4 0 . 736 0 . 867

METHOD /APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURI TY OF MAT E R I ALS :
The pr inciple of the Ostwa ld method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vo l %;
in volume is measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro analys i s grade
the solution was obta ined from
l iquid was standardi z ed at 2 0 � C . E S T I MATED ERRO R :
These data are analyz ed and d�scussed
REF E RENCE S :
Merseburg 19 7 1 , I3 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
333
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J.

( 2 ) Potass ium bromide ; KBr ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
( cont inued )
c2 jmo l dm"3 a a s
t j °C T/K
b
--
35 3 0 8 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0.5 0 . 562 0 . 57 5
1 0 . 527 0 . 55 0
2 0 . 504 0 . 548
4 0 . 67 6 0 . 798
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0.5 0 . 492 0 . 504
1 0 . 477 0 . 498
2 0 . 443 0 . 482
4 0 . 642 0 . 760
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0.5 0 . 453 0 . 4 64
1 0 . 412 0 . 431
2 0 . 402 0 . 4385
4 0 . 608 0 . 720
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0.5 0 . 401 0 . 4 12
1 0 . 3665 0 . 384
2 0 . 3 68 0 . 4 015
4 0 . 58 1 0 . 690
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -"
0.5 0 . 3 62 o . 3725
1 0 . 340 0 . 357
2 0 . 333 0 . 364
4 0 . 55 7 0 . 665
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
0.5 0 . 328 0 . 338
1 0 . 3 18 0 . 334
2 0 . 3 04 0 . 333
4 0 . 532 0 . 636
a
a = Bunsen coeffic ient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm·3 atm- ] .
1
b
s = Kuenen coeff ic ient ( cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ] .
334
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Potas s ium iodide ; KI ; Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ) 1 8 9 2 , 2 5 ,

[ 7 6 8 1-11-0 ) 2 2 6 -7 0 .
(3) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2-18-5 )
T/K = 288 . 35
=
c2 tmol dm-
3 0 - 5 . 767 Pirketta Scharl i n
t / °C T/K 4 D i lution c2 fmol dm- 3 4 a b k scc / dm3 mol- l a , c

X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 ao 0 1 . 009 -
3 1 . 922 0 . 77 3 0 . 0602
2 2 . 884 0 . 688 0 . 0577
1 5 . 767 0 . 506 0 . 052 0
4 Calculated by the comp i ler .

Initial solution : 9 5 . 7 3 g KI + 6 9 . 3 3 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of

solution .

tus on those of Fernet { 1857 ) and of stone and sul furic acid . Dried .
flexible s i lver cap i l l ary . The ab-
and manometer to a known pressure The author makes a qua l itative
turned 9 0 degrees and shaken unti l 1 . Setchenow , J .
335
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Geffcken , G .
( 2 ) Potass ium iodide ; KI ; [ 7 6 8 1-11-0 ] z . Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .

----
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ) 257-302 .
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 and 2 9 8 . 15
c2 tmol dm- 3 = o - 1 . 119 c . L . Young
T/K c2 tmol dm- 3 L a
2 8 8 . 15 0 1 . 07 0
0 . 559 0 . 9809
0 . 573 0 . 9835
1 . 043 0 . 9144
1 . 119 0 . 9090
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8255
0 . 559 0 . 7678
0 . 573 0 . 7676
1 . 04 3 0 . 7236
1 . 119 0 . 7 166
Volumetric method us ing s imple absorp- ( 1 ) Obta ined by the subl imation of
tion p ipet and buret . Diagram and de- solid carbon dioxide . Dried .
tai led description given in original
paper . ( 2 ) Not spec i f ied .
( 3 ) Degassed .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
oT/K = ± 0.1; oL = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
336
( 2 } Potass ium iodide ; KI ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

[ 7 6 8 1- 1 1 - 0 ] " Car l Schor l emmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
VARIABLE S : P RE PARED BY :
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
c2jmol dm·3 = o - 5
s
3 b
t j °C T/K c2jmol dm· a a
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0.5 0 . 952 0 . 978
1 0 . 894 0 . 938
2 0 . 8 08 0 . 892
5 0 . 699 0 . 920
-
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860
0.5 0 . 82 0 0 . 845
1 0 . 771 0 . 8 18
2 0 . 685 0 . 758
5 0 . 655 0 . 864
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 0 . 5173
0.5 o. 719 0 . 742
1 0 . 678 0 . 713
2 0 . 616 0 . 682
5 0 . 588 0 . 788
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0.5 0 . 629 0 . 650
1 0 . 595 0 . 6275
2 0 . 548 0 . 608
5 0 . 535 0 . 7085
METHOD iAP PARATUS / P ROCEDURE : SOURCE AND P U R I TY OF MATE RI ALS :

The principle of the Ostwa ld method ( 1 } VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vo l %;
in vo lume is mea sured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro ana lys i s grade
over mercury . The vo lume o f l iquid by DDR Standard TGL 5 0 2 1 .
temperature . For calculat i on of the ( 3 ) Double d i st i l led .
Kuenen coeffic ient , the dens ity of
l iquid was standardi z ed at 2 0°C . E S T I MATE D ERRO R :
REFE RE N CES :
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
33 7
{ 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 1 2 4 - 3 8-9 ] Gerecke , J .

( 2 ) Potass ium iodide ; KI ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 6 8 1- 1 1 - 0 ] " Carl Schor lenuner " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 )
( continued )
a
t ; oc T/K c2 ;mol dm-3 a s b
--
35 3 0 8 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0.5 0 . 55 6 0 . 5755
1 0 . 518 0 . 5475
2 0 . 457 0 . 508
5 0 . 494 0 . 6565
40 3 1 3 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
1 0 . 462 0 . 489
2 0 . 418 0 . 466
5 0 . 4 8 14 0 . 642
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0.5 0 . 4456 0 . 462
1 0 . 412 0 . 437
2 0 . 372 0 . 416
5 0 . 456 0 . 6085
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
1 0 . 363 0 . 386
2 0 . 322 0 . 3 606
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0.5 0 . 361 0 . 375
1 0 . 327 0 . 348
2 0 . 296 0 . 332
5 0 . 396 0 . 53 1
-
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372
0.5 0 . 3 18 8 0 . 332
1 0 . 288 0 . 3 07
2 0 . 251 0. 282
5 0 . 3 6 15 0 . 4885
a
a =
Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 { STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ) •
b
s =
Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 { STP ) g- 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ) .
338
(1) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Onda , K . ; Sada , E ; Kobayashi , T. ;

(2) Potas s ium iodide ; KI ;
[ 7 6 8 1- 1 1 - 0 ] J . Chem . Eng . Jpn 197 0 , 3, 1 8 -2 4 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2-18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 Pirketta Scharlin
c2 tmol dm- 3 = 1 . 0 0 3 -2 . 0 0 2
T/K a a L b,c
2 98 . 15 0 0 . 7595 0 . 8290
1 . 003 0 . 6640 0 . 7248
2 . 002 0 . 5976 0 . 6523
a a = Bunsen coef f icient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
b L = Ostwald coeff icient [ cm3 cm- 3 ) .

c
P = 1 atm = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
Solutions were made up by weight . ( 1 ) From commercial cyl i nder .

Concentration of each so lution was Purity 9 9 . 8 % .
ver i f ied by measuring the dens ity .
( Dens ity was not reported in paper . ) ( 2 ) Analytical grade .
A measured volume of gas was brought
into contact with a measured quantity ( 3 ) Dist i l l ed and degassed .
of gas-free so lvent . Equ i l ibrium was
estab l ished by agitation us ing a
magnetic st irrer . The volume of
remaining gas was measured . The
amount of gas absorbed was estimated
from change in volume of gas .
Deta i l s in original paper . ESTIMATED ERROR :
oT/K = ± 0 . 2 ; oa = ± 2 %
REFERENCES :
339
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Vazquez , G . ; Chenlo , F . ; Pereira , G . ;

Peaguda , J .
( 2 ) Potass ium iodide ; KI ; [ 7 6 8 1-11-0 ]
An . Quim . 1 9 9 4 , 90 , 324-28 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 298 . 1
P 1 / bar = 1 . 013 Pirketta Scharl i n
m2 j mo l kg- 1 = 0 . 245 - 1 . 835
T/K 'Y2 / g L-
1 a
p / kg m- 3 b m2 jmol kg- 1 c
c 1 jmol dm- 3 d L e
---
298 . 1 40 1024 0 . 245 0 . 0303 0 . 741

80 1053 0 . 495 0 . 0292 0 . 7 14
120 1082 0 . 751 0 . 0283 0 . 692
160 1111 1 . 014 0 . 0283 0 . 692
200 114 1 1 . 280 o. 0272 0 . 665
240 1165 1 . 563 0 . 0269 0 . 658
280 1199 1 . 835 0 . 0267 0 . 653
a 'Y2 mas s concentrat ion o f KI

b p = dens ity of aqueous KI so lut ion I
c m2 =
molal ity of KI ; calculated by comp i ler
d c1 =
s o lubi l ity of C02
e
L =
O stwald coefficient [ cm3 cm- 3 ]
The apparatus is a combination of ( 1 ) Commercial , purity 9 9 . 9 5 mo le % .

was modif ied to achieve a more accu ( 2 ) Merck . Grade not g iven .
the volume of mercury that must be r-------�
restore the init i a l pressure .
The raw solub i l ity data obta ined are 6T/K = ± 0 . 1
A detai led description of apparatus , 6c 1 t c 1 < ± 1 % ( estimated by com
method and procedure is given in pi ler on the bas i s of the
REFERENCES :
Col l , A . Ing . Quim . 1 9 8 4 , 1 6 , 67 .
1990 , 35 , 111 .
Eng . Data 1 9 9 4 , 3 9 , 6 3 9 .
340
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Potas s ium sulfate ; K2 so 4 ; J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 2 4 , 1 1 - 14 .

[ 7 7 7 8 -8 0-5 )
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 c . L . Young
c2 jmol L- 1 = o - 0 . 4 5 4
298 . 15 0 0 . 8264
0 . 09 3 0 . 7816
0 . 188 0 . 7435
0 . 283 0 . 7 059
0 . 454 0 . 6442
a L = Ostwald coef f icient ( cm3 cm- 3 )
p = 1 atm = 10 1 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
Volumetric apparatus with multibulb ( 1 ) High pur ity grade samp l e ,

buret and magnet ic stirrer . Amount of purity 99 . 9 6 mole % .
volumetrica l ly . Dens ity and compos i ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , so lution
tion of so lution determined after ab degassed by bo i l ing .
sorpt ion . Detai l s in Ref . 1 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
oT/K = ± 0 . 05 ; oL = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
34 1
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] He , S . ; Morse , J . W .
( 2 ) Potass ium sulfate ; K2 so 4 ; Geochim . Cosmochim . Acta 1 9 9 3 , 5 7 ,

[ 7778-80-5 ] 3 5 3 3 -5 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 7 3 . 15 - 3 6 3 . 15
P/MPa = 0 . 1 0 3 2 P irketta S char lin
m2 fmol kg- 1 = 0 . 0 1 - 0 . 9
1 0 3m 1 f mol kg• f
2 1 e
1 0 p1 f atm d 'Yl
--
2 7 3 . 15 0 . 01 1 . 0017 96 . 6 74 . 1 1 . 02
0.1 1 . 0152 69 . 3 1 . 09
0.2 1. 0 2 9 1 67 . 1 1 . 14
0.3 1. 0425 64 . 7 1 . 16
0.4 1. 0553 59 . 8 1 . 26
2 9 8 . 15 0.1 1 . 0109 94 . 2 29 . 9 1 . 07
0.2 1. 0246 28 . 1 1 . 10
0.3 1 . 0372 27 . 9 1 . 15
0.4 1 . 0505 26. 4 1 . 22
0.6 1. 0747 24 . 4 1 . 31
3 2 3 . 15 0 . 02 0 . 9 9 17 85 . 4 17 . 9 1 . 02
0.1 1 . 0017 17 . 3 1 . 06
0.5 1 . 0525 15 . 5 1 . 18
0 . 81 1. 0893 14 . 6 1 . 25
3 4 8 . 15 0.1 0 . 9884 60 . 3 7.8 1 . 04
0.3 1. 0140 7.5 1 . 08
0.5 1. 0388 7.4 1 . 09
0.7 1. 0629 7.1 1 . 15
0.9 1. 0862 6.7 1 . 20
3 6 3 . 15 0.1 0 . 9788 30. 1 3.4 1 . 02
0.3 1 . 0046 3.3 1 . 05
0.5 1 . 0292 3.2 1 . 08
0.7 1. 0523 3.1 1 . 11
0.9 1. 0762 3.0 1 . 14
a Calculated by comp i ler b m2 = mo lal ity of K2 so4

I 0 p dens ity of solvent d p1 partial pressure of C02
f
e m
1 = molal ity of C02 'Yl = activity coefficient of co2
Either pure co2 gas or co2 -N2 mixtu ( 1 ) Commercia l ; purity 9 9 . 9 % .

maintain a constant P ( C02 ) . The co2 - ( 2 ) source not menti oned .
N2 mixtures were made by pumping pre Ana lytical reagent-grade which met
determined amounts of co2 and N2 into ACS speci f ications .
verif ied by gas chromatography .
co2 or co2 -N2 gas mixtures were equi ( 3 ) 18 MO water obta ined from a
librated with the aqueous solut ions in Mi l l i-Q Super-Q water system .
a series of st irred water- j acketed
reaction ves s e l s with condensers . The
gas was premo i stured by f irst pass ing
perature of exper iment . Fine bubbles
were obtained by us ing gas-dispers ion 6 T/ K = ± 0 . 1
tubes . The bubbl ing rate was 90 to 9 5 6m 1 fm1 = ± 0 . 0 1 2
mL min- 1 • o n f n = ± o . o4
The mole fraction of co 2 in the co 2 -
graph .
342
(1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Setschenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]

(2) Potass ium nitrate ; KN0 3 ; Nouv . Mem . Soc . Imp . Nat . Moscow
[ 7 757-79-1 ] 1 8 8 9 , 1 5 , 2 0 3 -7 4 .
(3) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
T/K =
288 . 35 P irketta S charl in
c2 jmo l dm- 3 =
0 - 2 . 325 ·
a a,c
t j °C T/K D i lution c2 ;mol dm- 3 a
a b k scc / dm3 mol- l
X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 00 0 1 . 009 -
4 0 . 5813 0 . 959 0 . 0380
2 1 . 163 0 . 8905 0 . 0466
1 2 . 325 0 . 78 1 0 . 0478
a
Calculated by the comp i ler .
b a Bunsen coefficient
=
[ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
c
k scc setchenow salt effect parameter ;
= k scc ( 1 / c2 ) =
lg ( a0 / a ) .
Initial solution : 2 3 . 5 1 g KN0 3 + 9 0 . 10 cm3 water to make 1 0 0 cm3 of sln .
see other data sheets on J . Setchenow papers .
. COMPONENTS : ORIGINAL MEASUREMENTS :
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Geffcken , G .

( 2 ) Potass ium n itrate ; KN03 ; z . Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .
[ 7757-79- 1 ] Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 0 4 , 4 9 ,
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ) 2 5 7 - 3 02 .
T/K =
2 8 8 . 15 and 2 9 8 . 15 c . L . Young
c2 ;mo l dm- 3 =
0 - 1 . 03 3

--- ---
288 . 15 0 1 . 070 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8255
0 . 53 6 1 . 002 0 . 53 6 0 . 7832
0 . 537 0 . 9997 0 . 537 0 . 7818
1 . 02 2 0 . 9439 1 . 022 0 . 7452
1 . 033 0 . 9421 1 . 033 0 . 7447
a
L =
Ostwa ld coeff icient ( cm3 cm- 3 )
Volumetric method using s imple absorp- ( 1 ) Obtained by the sub l imation of

tion p ipet and buret . D iagram and de- solid carbon dioxide . Dried .
ta iled description given in original
paper . ( 2 ) Not spec i f ied .
( 3 ) Degassed .
ESTIMATED ERROR : ( by comp i ler )
6T/K =
± 0. 1; 6L =
± 1 %.
343
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Markham , A . A . ; Kobe , K . A .
{ 2 ) Potass ium n itrate ; KN03 ; J . Am . Chem . Soc . 19 4 1 , 63 , 4 4 9 - 5 4 .

[ 7 7 5 7 -7 9 - 1 )
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 2 7 3 . 3 5 - 3 1 3 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
m2;mol kg- 1 = o - 3
a
s
t ; oc T/K a b
0.2 273 . 35 o.o 1 . 7023 1 . 7025

0.1 1. 6680 1. 6740
0.2 1. 6470 1 . 6584
0.5 1. 5733 1 . 6012
1 1 . 4610 1. 5142
25 2 9 8 . 15 0.0 0 . 7565 0 . 7587
0.1 0 . 7501 0 . 7552
0.2 0 . 7421 0 . 7500
0.5 0 . 7182 0 . 7345
1 0 . 6860 0 . 7 156
2 0 . 6296 0 . 6834
3 0 . 5 8 18 0 . 6568
40 3 1 3 . 15 0.0 0 . 5133 0 . 5173
1 0 . 4 7 04 0 . 4937
2 0 . 4370 0 . 4776
3 0 . 4083 0 . 4642
a a = Bunsen coeff i c ient [ cm3 { STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ) .
S = Kuenen coe f f i cient [ cm3 { STP ) g- 1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ] .

b

Sm/So = am2 + 1 / ( 1 + bm2) , as follows :
t / °C a b
--- ---
0.2 0 . 0350 0 . 17 0
25 0 . 0248 0 . 08 8
40 0 . 0343 0 . 08 6
METHOD /APPARATUS/PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PURITY OF MATERIALS :

The princip le of the Ostwa ld method ( 1 ) Commercial cyl inder , 9 9 . 8 %
with a measured quant ity of gas- free
l iquid and the decrease in volume of ( 2 ) Analyt ical grade .
solution-saturated gas i s measured i�
saturat ion . ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = <± 0 . 1 at 0 . 2 °C , ± 0 . 0 3 at
6a f a , 65/S = ± 0 . 0 0 2 ( authors ) .
REFERENCES :
�44
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Potass ium nitrate ; KN03 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7757-79-1 ] " Carl Schor lemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )
T /K = 2 8 8 . 15 - 3 2 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 D . M . Mason
c2 tmol dm-3 = o - 2
a
c2 fmol dm-3 a s
b
t j °C T/K
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0 . 25 0 . 951 0 . 961
0.5 0 . 920 0 . 94 1
1 0 . 888 0 . 925
2 0 . 807 0 . 87 8
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0 . 25 0 . 843 0 . 852
0.5 0 . 792 0 . 8 1 15
1 0 . 773 0 . 807
2 0 . 709 0. 773
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 0 . 5173
0 . 25 0 . 744 0 . 752
0.5 0 . 720 0 . 738
1 0 . 68 1 0 . 6841
2 0 . 636 0 . 695
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0 . 25 0 . 653 0 . 661
0.5 0 . 637 0 . 6535
1 0 . 602 0 . 63 0
2 0 . 568 0 . 62 1
AU XI L I ARY I N FO RMAT ION
METHOD /AP PARATUS / P ROCEDURE : SOURCE AND P UR l TY OF MATE R I ALS :

The principle of the Ostwald method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vo l %;
in volume is measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro ana lys is grade
Kuenen coefficient , the density of
l iquid was standardized at 2 0 ° C . E S T I MATE D ERROR:
These data are analyzed and discussed ·
RE FE RENCES :
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 115- 2 2 .
345
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Gerecke , J.
( 2 ) Potass ium nitrate ; KN03 ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
[ 7 7 5 7 -7 9 - 1 ) " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ]
( continued )
T/K c2fmol dm-3 a a s b
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0 . 25 0 . 568 0 . 57 6
0.5 0 . 552 0 . 567
1 0 . 52 3 0 . 54 8
2 0 . 504 0 . 553
40 3 1 3 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0 . 25 0 . 508 0 . 516
0.5 0 . 485 0 . 499
1 0 . 465 0 . 4885
2 0 . 449 0 . 4935
45 3 18 . 15 0 0 . 482 -
0 . 25 0 . 447 0 . 455
0.5 0 . 432 0 . 445
1 0 . 414 0 . 435
2 0 . 402 0 . 44 3
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0 . 25 0 . 399 0 . 407
0.5 0 . 390 0 . 402
1 0 . 373 0 . 393
2 0 . 3 62 0 . 400
-
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392
0 . 25 0 . 360 0 . 3 67 5
0.5 0 . 351 0 . 363
1 0 . 340 0 . 359
2 0 . 323 0 . 357
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ) .

b S = Kuenen coeff icient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 ( H2o ) atm- 1 ) .
346
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] Yasunishi , A . ; Yoshida , F .
( 2 ) Potass ium nitrate ; KN0 3 ; J . Cbem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 9 , 2 4 , 11-14 .

[ 7 7 5 7 -7 9 - 1 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
VARIABLES : PREPARED · BY :
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15 and 3 08 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 325 c . L . Young
c2 ;mol L- 1 = o - 1 . 768
T/K c2 ;mol L- 1 L a
2 98 . 15 0 0 . 8 2 64
0 . 288 0 . 7994
0 . 801 0 . 7592
1 . 101 0 . 7399
1 . 4 12 0 . 7164
1 . 63 0 0 . 7023
3 08 . 15 0 . 0 . 6675
0 . 275 0 . 6503
0 . 661 0 . 6285
0 . 961 0 . 6119
1 . 54 9 0 . 5805
1 . 692 0 . 5709
1. 768 0 . 5693
a L = Ostwald coeff icient ( cm3 cm- 3 )
p ""' 1 atm = 101 . 3 2 5 kPa = 1 . 0 1 3 2 5 bar
Volumetric apparatus with multibulb ( 1 ) High . purity grade sample ,

buret and magnetic stirrer . Amount of purity 9 9 . 9 6 mol e % .
volumetrica l ly . Dens ity and composi ( 2 , 3 ) Guaranteed reagent , solution
sorption . Deta i l s in Ref . 1 .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 05 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
1 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Cbem . Eng . Data 1 9 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
347
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ]
( 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaC l ; Yasunishi , A . ; Tsuj i , M . ; Sada , E .
[ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 )
( 3 ) Potass ium nitrate ; KN0 3 ; Adv . Chem . Ser . 19 7 9 , 1 7 7 , 189-2 0 3 .
[ 7757-79-1 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H 2 0 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 2 5 C . L . Young
( c2 +c3 ) /mol dm- 3 = 0 - 3 . 400
T/K L a
2 9 8 . 15 0 . 00 0 0 . 8 2 64
0 . 288 0 . 7994
0 . 801 0 . 7592
1 . 101 0 . 7399
1 . 412 o . 7 164
1 . 630 0 . 7023
0 . 25 0 . 298 0 . 7956
0 . 614 0 . 7663
1 . 007 0 . 7244
1 . 290 0 . 6983
1 . 664 0 . 6649
0 . 50 0 . 289 0 . 7857
o. 711 0 . 7352
1'. 127 0 . 6854
1 . 601 0 . 6330
2 . 17 3 0 . 58 2 0
0 . 75 0 . 264 0 . 7784
0 . 62 0 0 . 7 3 15
0 . 913 0 . 6901
1 . 324 0 . 6 3 67
1 . 72 3 0 . 5883
1 . 00 0 . 455 0 . 7343
1 . 000 0 . 6508
1 . 442 0 . 5842
1 . 945 0 . 5187
2 . 486 0 . 4653
3 . 400 0 . 3727
a
L = o�twald coeffic ient [ cm3 cm- 3 ]
P = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa

determined vo lumetrica l ly . Partial ( 2 , 3 ) Reagent grade .
pressure determined from tota l
mixed salt so lution estimated by the
component salt so lution . o T f K = ± o . o5 ; oL = ± 1 % .
in ref . ( 2 ) .
REFERENCES :
1965 , 69A , 3 6 5 .
2 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 1975 , 20 , 41.
348
{ 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ]
{ 2 ) Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; Yasunishi , A . ; Tsuj i , M . ; Sada , E.
[ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 ]
{ 3 ) Magnesium sulfate ; Mgso4 ; Adv . Chem . Ser . 1 9 7 9 , 1 7 7 , 1 8 9 -2 0 3 .
[ 7487-88-9 ]
{ 4 ) Potass ium nitrate ; KN03 ;
[ 7 7 57 - 7 9 - 1 ]
{ 5 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa = 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 C . L . Young
{ c2+c3 +c4 ) /mol dm-3 = 0 - 2 . 2 6 4
T/K x2 x3 { c2+c3 +c4 ) L a

in mixed salt in mixed salt /mol dm-3
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 0 0 . 8 2 64
0 . 50 0 . 50 0 . 387 0 . 7001
o. 723 0 . 6110
1 . 111 0 . 5147
1 . 616 0 . 4 2 15
2 . 18 5 0 . 3 3 15
0 . 50 0 . 25 0 . 19 3 0 . 7859
0 . 498 0. 7206
0 . 8 14 0 . 6577
1 . 13 1 0 . 6067
1 . 493 0 . 5506
1 . 910 0 . 4949
2 . 264 0 . 4497
0 . 50 0 0 . 289 0 . 7857
o. 711 0 . 7352
1 . 12 7 0 . 6854
1 . 601 0 . 6330
2 . 17 3 0 . 5820
11 L = Ostwald coefficient [ cm3 cm-3 ]

P = 101 . 3 2 5 kPa

determined volumetrically . Partial ( 2 , 3 , 4 ) Reagent grade .
pressure determined from tota l
pressure and vapor pressure of ( 5 ) Deioni z ed .
solut ion . The vapor pressure of the
mixed salt solut ion estimated by the
from corresponding data for each
Apparatus s imi lar to that descr ibed
in ref . ( 2 ) . ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 0 5 ; 6L = ± 1 %.
REFERENCES :
J . Res . Nat . Bur . Stand .
1 9 6 5 , 69A , 3 6 5 .
2 . Tokunaga , J .
J . Chem . Eng . Data 19 7 5 , 2 0 , 4 1 .
349
(1) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4-38-9 ] Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Potass ium dihydrogen phosphate ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

KH2P04 ; [ 7778-77-0 ] " Carl Schorlemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 )
=
T/ K 2 8 8 . 1 5 - 3 3 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 25 D . M . Mason
c2;mol dm·3 = o - 1·

t f °C T/K c2;mol dm·3 a a s b
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990 -
0 . 25 0 . 87 5 0 . 884
0.5 0 . 793 0 . 810
1 0 . 489 0 . 513
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860 -
0 . 25 0 . 782 0 . 7905
0.5 0 . 704 0 . 72 0
1 0 . 418 0 . 438
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758 -
0 . 25 0 . 692 0 . 700
0.5 o . 6 1 9. 0 . 63 4
1 0 . 355 0 . 3733
30 3 0 3 . 15 0 0 . 67 1 -
0 . 25 0 . 6 14 0 . 6 2 18
0.5 0 . 54 7 0 . 561
1 0 . 307 0 . 323
35 3 08 . 15 0 0 . 605 -
0 . 25 0 . 550 0 . 5575
0.5 0 . 491 0 . 504
1 0 . 266 0 . 2801
ME THOD /AP PARATUS / P ROCEDURE : SOURCE AN D PURI TY OF MATE RI ALS :

of gas-free l i quid is stirred in the water ( author ) .
over mercury . The vo lume of l iquid by DDR Standard TGL 5 02 1 .
temperature . For calculation of the · ( 3 ) Double dist i l l ed .
Kuenen coeff i c ient , the dens ity of
the so lution was obta ined from
liquid was standard i z ed at 2 0°C . E S T I MATED ERRO R :
REFERE N CES :
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 115-2 2 .
350
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Gerecke , J.

( 2 ) Potas s ium dihydrogen phosphate ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .
KH2P04 ; [ 7 7 7 8 -7 7 - 0 ] " Car l Schor lemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
( cont inued )
a b
T/K c2jmol dm-3 a s
40 3 13 . 15 0 0 . 54 6 -
0 . 25 0 . 489 0 . 4962
0.5 0 . 431 0 . 4422
1 0 . 228 0 . 2 3 05
45 3 18 1 5
.• 0 0 . 482 -
0 . 25 0 . 436 0 . 44 3
0.5 0 . 385 0 . 3855
1 0 . 198 0 . 209
50 3 2 3 . 15 0 0 . 436 -
0 . 25 0 . 401 0 . 4 075
0.5 0 . 344 0 . 354
1 0 . 169 0 . 179
55 3 2 8 . 15 0 0 . 392 -
0 . 25 0 . 3 59 0 . 3 65
0.5 0 . 312 0 . 3 2 18
1 0 . 15 0 0 . 1592
60 3 3 3 . 15 0 0 . 372 -
0 . 25 0 . 327 0 . 333
0.5 0 . 283 0 . 2925
a a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm-3 atm- 1 ] .

b s = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g-1 ( H20 ) atm- 1 ] .
35 1
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Van S lyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr . ;

( 2 ) Potas s ium d ihydrogen phosphate ;
KH2P04 ; [ 7 7 7 8 -7 7 - 0 ] J . Biol . Chem . 1928 , 78 , 7 6 5-99 .
( 3 ) Phosphoric acid ; H3 Po4 ;
[ 7 6 6 4 - 3 8 -2 ]
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 ]
T/K =
3 11 . 2
c2 fmol L- 1 =
c3 fmol L- 1 =
0 . 015 - 0 . 3 0 0
p =
" atmospheric"
tt o c T/K a P1 /mmHg b c2 fmol L- 1 c3 tmol L- 1 a c s1 d

-- ---
38 . 0 311 . 2 723 . 7 0 0 ·. 150 0 . 5396 0 . 5451

723 . 7 0 0 . 300 0 . 5 3 17 0 . 5410
720 . 3 0 . 150 0 . 015 0 . 5 1 63 0 . 5237
720 . 3 0 . 300 0 . 03 0 0 . 4906 0 . 4996
7 12 . 6 0 . 300 0 . 03 0 0 . 4 9 15 0 . 5005
a Calculated b y the compi ler .
b 1 mmHg =
1 3 3 . 3 2 2 Pa =
1 . 3 3 3 2 2 x 10- 3 bar
c a =
Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
d s1 =
Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 atm- 1 ]
Solutions were saturated with co2 by ( 1 ) From a Kipp C02 generator .

( 2 ) The KH2Po4 solutions were pre
saturation by bubbling . The solution pared by dissolving weighed
was placed in the saturating tube , the amounts of the salt in standard
lower end of which was connected di lute H3 P0 3 .
through a wash bottle with a Kipp co2
generator . The tube and wash bottle ( 3 ) Not specified .
were immers ed in a constant tempera
ture bath . co2 was bubbled through ( 4 ) Disti l led .
it rapidly for 3 0 minutes . The wash
bottle was replaced by a mercury res ESTIMATED ERROR :
ervo ir and the free gas was driven
completely out of the saturating tube oTfK ± 0.1 =
by admitting mercury underneath the oafa ± 0 . 005 =

solutions were determined in the ma
nometri c gas apparatus ( Refs 1 and 2 ) . REFERENCES :
1 . Van Slyke , D . D . ; Nei l l , J . M .

J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 4 , 61 , 5 2 3 .
2 . van S lyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr .
J . Biol . Chem . 1 9 2 7 , 73 , 127 .
352
( 1 ) carbon diox ide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ] de Mol iner i , N . A . ;
de Coz z itorti , P . A . ; Sosa , A . B . ;
( 2 ) B-D-Fructofuranosyl-a-D-gluco- Katz , M .
pyranos ide ; ( sucrose ) ; C 1 2H220 11 ;
[ 57 - 5 0- 1 ] Anal . Asoc . Quim . Argentina 1 9 8 9 , 7 7 ,
3 3 3 -4 0 .
( 3 ) Potass ium dihydrogen phosphate ;
KH2P04 ; [ 7 7 7 8 - 7 7 - 0 ]
( 4 ) water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 288 - 308
P/kPa = 101 . 3 P irketta Scharl i n
2
1 0 2 w2 = 5 - 15
1 0 w3 = o - 15
2
1 0 w2 a
2
1 0 w3 b a c (T = 2 8 8 K) a c (T = 298 K) a c (T =
3 08 K )
5 0 0 . 939 0 . 734 0 . 559

5 2.5 0 . 877 0 . 688 0 . 519
5 5 0 . 8 18 0 . 639 0 . 487
5 7.5 0 . 764 0 . 59 9 0 . 452
5 10 0 . 715 0 . 557 0 . 424
5 12 . 5 0 . 665 0 . 522 0 . 393
5 15 0 . 622 0 . 485 0 . 369
7.5 0 0 . 930 0 . 725 0 . 55 2

7.5 2.5 0 . 867 0 . 680 0 . 512
7.5 5 0 . 810 0 . 63 1 0 . 480
7.5 7.5 0 . 754 0 . 59 1 0 . 44 5
7.5 10 0 . 705 0 . 548 0 . 4 17
7.5 12 . 5 0 . 656 0 . 514 0 . 387
7.5 15 0 . 616 0 . 476 0 . 362
An Erlenmeyer f lask calibrated with ( 1 ) Source not mentioned .

distil led water up to a f inal value of Purity 9 9 . 9 % .
152 . 3 1 mL was connected to a pressure
transducer which in turn was connected ( 2 ) Source not ment i oned .
to a digital multimeter . The appara Purity 9 9 . 9 % .
tus was cal ibrated with a manometer
containing dibutylphtalate . Known vo ( 3 ) Merck , pro analys i .
lumes of gas and degassed solvent were
introduced into the f lask which was ( 4 ) Double dist i l led , degassed .
submerged in a thermostati c bath .
Compos ition of s olvent was checked by
refractive index measurement at 2 8 o c . ESTIMATED ERROR :
6T/K = ± 0 . 05
The ful l description of the apparatus 6P/kPa = ± 0 . 0 0 7
and mode of operation have been given 6afa = ± 1 %
in Ref . 1 .
REFERENCES :
1 . Postigo , M . A . ; Pedrosa , G . C . ;
Katz , M.
Anal . Asoc . Quim . Argentina 1 9 7 8 ,
66 , 2 5 .
353
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] de Mol iner i , N . A . ;

de coz z itort i , P . A . ; Sosa , A . B . ;
( 2 ) B-D-Fructofuranosyl-a-D-gluco Katz , M .
pyranos ide ; ( sucrose ) i C 1 2H220 11 i
[ 57-50-1 ] Anal . Asoc . Quim . Argentina � , 77,
3 3 3 -4 0 .
( 3 ) Potas s ium d ihydroqen phosphate ;
KH2P04 ; [ 7 7 7 8 -7 7 - 0 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ]
1 0 w3 b
2 2
10 w2 a a c:: (T = 2 8 8 K) a c:: (T = 2 9 8 K) a c:: (T = 3 0 8 K)
10 0 0 . 916 0 . 713 0 . 54 3
10 2.5 0 . 854 0 . 668 0 . 50 3
10 5 0 . 797 0 . 619 0 . 471
10 7.5 0 . 741 0 . 57 9 0 . 43 5
10 10 0 . 692 0 . 53 6 0 . 408
10 12 . 5 0 . 642 0 . 502 0 . 378
10 15 0 . 599 0 . 464 0 . 353
12 . 5 0 0 . 901 0 . 698 0 . 53 1
12 . 5 2.5 0 . 836 0 . 652 0 . 490
12 . 5 5 0 . 780 0 . 604 0 . 459
12 . 5 7.5 0 . 723 0 . 564 0 . 423
12 . 5 10 0 . 67 4 0 . 52 1 0 . 396
12 . 5 12 . 5 0 . 626 0 . 487 0 . 365
12 . 5 15 0 . 582 0 . 449 0 . 341
15 0 0 . 877 0 . 67 9 0 . 516
15 2.5 0 . 8 15 0 . 63 4 0 . 475
15 5 0 . 759 0 . 585 0 . 444
15 7.5 0 . 702 0 . 54 5 0 . 408
15 10 0 . 653 0 . 502 0 . 381
15 12 . 5 0 . 603 0 . 468 0 . 350
15 15 0 . 561 0 . 43 0 0 . 326
a
w2 = mass fraction of sucrose
b w3 = mass fraction of KH2P04
c::
a = Bunsen coeff i cient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
354
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ) Van S lyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr . ;

Hastings , A . B . ; Ne i l l , J . M .
( 2 ) Potass ium hydrogen oxa late ;
C2H04K ; [ 12 7 -95-7 ) J . Biol . Chem . 1928 , 78 , 7 65-99 .
{ 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 3 11 . 2
c2 fmo l L- 1 = 0 . 3 0 0 and o . 6 0 0 P irketta Schar l in
P = " atmospheric"
T/K 4 a c
38 . 0 3 11 . 2 7 18 . 5 0 . 300 0 . 52 1 1 0 . 5328
7 18 . 5 0 . 600 0 . 4969 0 . 1340
• Calculated by the compiler .
b 1 mmHg = 133 . 322 Pa = 1 . 3 3 3 2 2 x 10- 3 bar

c a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
d s1 = Kuenen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 atm- 1 ]
METHOD/APPARATUS / PROCEDURE : SOURCE AND PUR ITY OF MATERIALS :
Solutions were saturated with C02 by ( 1 ) From a . Kipp C02 generator .

( 2 ) The KHC2o4 solut ions were pre
Saturation by bubbling . The solution pared from K2 c2o4 plus equimolar
was placed in the saturating tube , the amounts of free oxa l i c acid
lower end of which was connected crystals .
through a wash bottle with a Kipp C02
generator . The tube and wash bottle { 3 ) Distil led .
were immersed in a constant tempera
ture bath . co2 was bubbled through
it rapidly for 3 0 minutes . The wash
bottle was replaced by a mercury res ESTIMATED ERROR :
ervoir and the free gas was driven
completely out of the saturating tube 6T/K = ± 0 . 1
by admitting mercury underneath the &afa = ± 0 . 0 0 5
solutions were determined in the ma
nometric gas apparatus (Refs 1 and 2 ) . REFERENCES :
1 . Van S lyke , D . D . ; Nei l l , J . M .

J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 4 , 61 , 5 2 3 .
2 . Van S lyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr .

J . Biol ; chem . 1 9 2 7 , 73 , 12 1 .
355
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -38-9 ) Van Slyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr . ;
Hastings , . A . B . ; Nei l l , J . M .
( 2 ) Potass ium lactate ; C 3 H 5 0 3 K ;
[ 996-31-6 ] J . Biol . Chem . 19 2 8 , 78 , 7 6 5 -9 9 .
( 3 ) 2 -Hydroxypropanoic acid ;
( lactic acid) ; c 3 H60 3 ; [ 5 0-2 1-5 )
( 4 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/ K = 3 1 1 . 2
c2 ;mol L- 11 =
c3 fmol L- = 0 . 1 0 0 - 0 . 3 0 0
p =
" atmospher ic"
e
T/K a Method b p1 /mmHg c c2 ;mol L- 1 c3 ;mol L- 1 a d s1
38 . 0 3 11 . 2 B 7 12 . 9 0 0 . 150 0 . 54 3 6 0 . 5508
B 7 14 · 4 0 0 . 15 0 0 . 5473 0 . 5540
B 7 12 . 9 0 0 . 300 0 . 5434 0 . 5569
B 721 . 8 0 . 150 0 . 100 0 . 5278 0 . 5398
T 720 . 4 0 . 15 0 0 . 150 0 . 5288 0 . 5429
B 721 . 8 0 . 300 0 . 100 0 . 5106 0 . 5308
T 720 . 4 0 . 3 00 0 . 3 00 0 . 5103 0 . 5362

b B : saturation by bubbl ing ; T : saturation i n rotating tonometer .
c 1 mmHg = 1 3 3 . 3 2 2 Pa = 1 . 3 3 3 2 2 x 10- 3 bar
e s 1 = Kuenen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) g- 1 atm- 1 )
Two procedures were used for saturat ( 1 ) From a Kipp co2 generator .
( 2 ) K- lactate solutions were made by
Saturation by bubbling (B) . The solu adding known excess of lactic acid
tion was placed in the saturating to solutions of KHC0 3 •
nected through a wash bottle with a ( 3 ) Not specif ied .
wash bottle were immersed in a con ( 4 ) Distil led .
stant temperature bath . co2 gas was
bubbled through it rapidly for 3 0 mi ESTIMATED ERROR :
nutes . The wash bottle was replaced GT/K =
± 0.1
by a mercury reservoir and the free Gafa = ± 0 . 005
underneath the solution . The C02 REFERENCES :
saturation in rotating tonometer (T) . 2 . Van Slyke , D . D . ; Sendroy , J . , Jr .

3 . Austin , J . H . ; Cul len , G . E . ;
with solutions of acids and salts . J . Biol . Chem . 1 9 2 2 , 54 , 12 1 .
356
(1) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Setchenow , J . [ Sechenov , I . M . ]
(2) Potass ium thiocyanate ; KSCN ; Ann . Chim . Phys . [ 6 ] 1 8 9 2 , 2 5 ,
[ 3 3 3-20-0 ] 2 2 6-7 0 .
(3) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 -5 ]
T/K =
288 . 35 P irketta . Scharl in
c2 jmol dm- 3 =
0 - 10 . 065
tj °C T/K a Dilution c2 jmol dm- 3 a a b k scc / dm3 mol- l a , c
X
--
15 . 2 288 . 35 00 0 1 . 009 -
3 3 . 355 0 . 691 0 . 0490
2 5 . 032 0 . 590 0 . 0463
1 10 . 0 6 5 0 . 387 0 . 0413
a calculated by the compiler .
b a Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ] .
=
c k scc Setchenow salt effect parameter § k scc

=
( 1 / c2 ) lg ( a0 � a ) .
=
·I nitial solution : 9 7 . 8 g KSCN + 4 5 . 3 3 em water to make 1 0 0 em of s ln .

See other data sheets on J . Setchenow papers .

( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 - 9 ] Rosenthal , w.
( 2 ) Potassium aluminium sulfate ; Thes . fac . sci . Univ . strasbourg
KAl ( S04 ) 2 ; [ 10 0 4 3 - 6 7 - 1 ] (France) 1 9 5 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
=
T/K 2 9 3 . 15 H . L . Clever
c2 ;mol dm- 3 =
o and o . 12 4 6
T/K c2 jmol dm- 3 a L/ cm3 cm- 3 a , b k scc / dm3 mol- l c , d
2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 879 -
0 . 1246 0 . 69 0 0 . 844
a Original data ; b Ostwald coefficient ;
c Sechenov constant ; ks cc ( 1 / c2 ) lg (L0 /L) ;
= d Calculated by compiler .
The prepared solvent and solution were ( 1 ) Source and purity not given .
charged into an evacuated cell after An aqueous " soda" solution
degass ing , and the mass of solvent was absorbed 9 9 . 8 % of the gas .
determined by weight . Gas was intro-
buret in which the gas was stored over Recrystal l i z ed from water and
mercury . The cell was agitated while dried .
the gas pressure was maintained by ad-
j usting the gas volume . The Ostwald ( 3 ) Boi led to remove carbon dioxide .
mass of solvent and the volume of gas ESTIMATED ERROR :
at pressures above and below atmo- 6T/K =
.± 0 . 2 ; op/kPa ± 0.1=
spheric . 6L/L =
± 0 . 02 ( compiler )
REFERENCES :
Some data in the thes is have been published .
See : 1 . Mai l lard , A . ; Rosenthal , w . Comp rend . 1 9 5 2 , 234 , 2 5 4 6-8 .
357
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ) Geffcken , G .

( 2 ) Rubidium chloride ; RbCl ; z . Phys . Chem . , Stoechiom .
[ 7 7 9 1- 1 1-9 ] Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 0 4 , 4 9 ,
257-302 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 -5 )
T/K = .2 8 8 . 15 and 2 9 8 . 15 c . L . Young
c2 j mo l dm- 3 = 0 - 1 . 012
288 . 15 0 1 . 070
0 . 479 0 . 9908
0 . 481 0 . 9910
1 . 007 0 . 9 2 10
1 . 012 0 . 9200
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8255
0 . 479 0 . 7 7 05
0 . 481 0 . 7698
1 . 007 0 . 7190
1 . 012 0 . 7 15 7

( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Geffcken , G .
( 2 ) Ces ium chloride ; CsCl ; z. Phys . Chem . , stoechiom .
[ 7 647-17-8 ] Verwandtschaftsl . 1 9 0 4 , 4 9 ,
257-302 .
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 1 5 and 2 9 8 . 15 c . L . Young
c2 jmol dm- 3 = o - 0 . 55 4
T/K c2 /mol dm- 3 L a
288 . 15 0 1 . 070
0 . 552 1 . 001
0 . 554 0 . 9995
2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 8255
0 . 552 0 . 7771
0 . 554 o . 7769
Volumetric method us ing simple absorp- ( 1 ) Obtained by the subl imation of
tion pipet and buret . Diagram and de- sol id carbon dioxide . Dried .
tai led description given in original
paper . ( 2 ) Not specif ied .
( 3 ) Degassed .
ESTIMATED ERROR : ( by compiler )

6T/K = ± 0 . 1; 6L = ± 1 %.
358
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; C02 ; [ 1 2 4 -3 8 -9 ] Gerecke , J .
( 2 ) Ces ium chl oride ; C s C l ; Diss . Dr . rer . Nat . 1 9 6 9 , Hochsch .

[ 7 647 -17-8 ] " Carl Schor lemmer " , Leuna
Merseburg , DDR .
( 3 ) water ; H2o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 ]
VARIABLES : P REPARE D BY :
T/ K = 2 88 . 15 - 3 0 3 . 15
P/kPa = 101 . 3 25 D . M . Mason
c2jmol dm-3 = 0 - 2

a
trc T/K c2 j mo l dm-3 a
15 2 8 8 . 15 0 0 . 990
0.5 0 . 959
1 0 . 888
2 0 . 843
20 2 9 3 . 15 0 0 . 860
0.5 0 . 831
1 0 . 799
2 0 . 749
25 2 9 8 . 15 0 0 . 758
0.5 0 . 716
1 0 . 694
2.8 0 . 650
30 3 0.3 . 1 5 0 0 . 671
0.5 0 . 631
1 0 . 603
2 0 . 580
a a = Bunsen coe f f i c ient ( cm3 ( STP )

1
cm-3 atm- ] .
AU X I L I ARY I NFO RMATION
METHOD /AP PARATUS / P ROCEDURE : SOURCE AND P U R I TY O F MATE R I A L S ;
The princ ip le of the Ostwa ld method ( 1 ) VEB Leuna Works ; 9 9 . 8 vo l % ;

presence of the gas , and · its decrease
in vo lume is measured in a burette ( 2 ) DDR pro analys i s grade
over mercury . The vo lume o f l i quid by DDR Standard TGL 5 0 2 1 .
temperature . The mo lar concentrat ion ( 3 ) Double d i s t i l led .
of salt in the l iquid was standard
i z ed at 2 0°C .
E S T I MATED ERRO R :
N o t given .
REFE RENCE S ;
1 . Gerecke , J . ; B ittri ch , H . J .
Merseburg 1 9 7 1 , 13 ( 2 ) , 1 1 5 -2 2 .
359
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Mackenz ie , J . J .
( 2 ) Ammo nium chloride Ann . Phys . (Leipzig) [ 3 ] 1 8 7 7 , 1 ,
Sodium chloride 4 3 8-51 .
Potass ium chloride
( 3 ) Water ; H2 o ; ( 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 )
a e
Ammo nium chloride ; NH4Cl ; ( 12 12 5- 0 2 - 9 ]
8 281 6 . 465 1 . 02 1 1 . 234 1 . 292 L. 0 2 2 7 ± 0 . 0 0 0 7 (2)

8 . 723 1 . 047 1 . 707 1 . 787 1 . 0000±0 . 0000 (2)
12 . 727 1 . 053 2 . 5 05 2 . 72 6 0 . 9 2 2 0± 0 . 0 0 2 3 (2)
10 283 24 . 233 1 . 072 4 . 857 5 . 979 0 . 813 2±0 . 0106 (3)
15 288 6 . 465 1 . 02 1 1 . 234 1 . 292 0 . 8253±0 . 0106 (3)
8 . 72 3 1 . 047 1 . 707 1 . 787 0 . 7 9 7 3 ± 0 � 0 1 15 (3)
12 . 727 1 . 053 2 . 5 05 2 . 726 0 . 7 9 8 1± 0 . 0 1 2 9 (3)
24 . 233 1 . 072 4 . 8 57 5 . 979 0 . 7384±0 . 0146 (2)
22 295 6 . 465 1 . 02 1 1 . 234 1 . 292 0 . 7 18 2 ± 0 . 0 0 4 0 (2)
8 . 723 1 . 047 1 . 707 1 . 787 0 . 7 0 2 2 ±0 . 0 1 2 2 (2)
12 . 727 1 . 053 2 . 707 2 . 726 0 . 6 8 4 0± 0 . 02 0 3 (3)
or 0 . 6 9 5 8 ± 0 . 0 0 17 (2)
24 . 233 1 . 053 4 . 8 57 5 . 979 0 . 5998±0 . 0172 (3)
Sodium chlor ide ; NaCl ; ( 7 647-14-5 )

6.4 279 . 6 7 . 062 1 . 038 1 . 254 1 . 300 0 . 8 9 9 0 ± 0 . 04 0 2 (4)
12 . 995 1 . 08 0 2 . 4 02 2 . 565 0 . 6 3 2 6±0 . 0181 (4)
17 . 4 2 1 . 12 3 3 . 347 3 . 610 0 . 5 1 8 1±0 . 0 3 19 (3)
or 0 . 4 9 9 8 ± 0 . 0 0 4 5 (2)
2 6 . 00 1 . 195 5 . 3 17 6 . 012 0 . 3 4 7 0± 0 . 0 3 14 (3)
or 0 . 3 6 4 9 ± 0 . 0 0 6 4 (2)
15 288 7 . 062 1 . 038 1 . 254 1 . 300 0 . 73 47±0 . 0186 (3)
12 . 995 1 . 080 2 . 402 2 . 565 0 . 5569±0 . 0057 (2)
17 . 4 2 1 . 123 3 . 347 3 . 610 0 . 4 3 0 6± 0 . 0 1 0 1 (3)
2 6 . 00 1 . 195 5 . 3 17 6 . 012 0 . 2 969±0 . 0168 (3)
22 295 1 2 . 9 95 1 . 080 2 . 402 2 . 565 0 . 4822±0 . 0104 (2)
17 . 4 2 1 . 12 3 3 . 347 3 . 610 0 ; 3 8 92±0 . 0084 (3)
2 6 . 00 1 . 195 5 . 3 17 6 . 012 0 . 2 6 3 0± 0 . 0 1 9 2 (3)
or 0 . 2 7 4 1± 0 . 0 0 2 0 (2)
Pota s s ium chloride ; KCl ; ( 7 4 4 7 -4 0-7 ]
8 281 6 . 0548 1 . 02 1 0 . 828 0 . 864 0 . 9 8 8 0± 0 . 0 0 0 4 (2)

8 . 64 6 0 1 . 053 1 . 221 1 . 2 69 0 . 9 17 8 ± 0 . 0 1 1 6 (3)
11 . 974 1 . 08 0 1 . 734 1 . 824 0 . 8 6 3 9±0 . 0056 (3)
22 . 506 1 . 54 9 ? ( 3 . 4 68 ) 3 . 8 95 0 . 6 8 7 7 ± 0 . 0 107 (3)
15 288 6 . 0548 1 . 02 1 0 . 828 0 . 864 0 . 7772±0 . 0282 (3)
or 0 . 7 9 3 5± 0 . 0 0 3 3 (2)
8 . 6460 1 . 053 1 . 221 1 . 269 0 . 7768±0 . 0107 (3)
11 . 974 1 . 080 1. 734 1 . 824 0 . 72 02±0 . 0085 (3)
22 . 506 1. 549 ? (3 . 468) 3 . 895 0 . 57 07±0 . 0091 (3)
22 295 6 . 0548 1 . 02 1 0 . 828 0 . 864 0 . 6 7 0 1± 0 . 0 2 2 5 (3)
or 0 . 682 0±0 . 0091 (2)
8 . 64 6 0 1 . 053 1 . 221 1 . 2 69 0 . 6488±0 . 0269 (3)
or 0 . 6 3 3 9±0 . 0105 (2)
11 . 974 1. 080 1 . 734 1 . 824 0 . 5970±0 . 0087 (3)
or 0 • 5 8 3 2 ±0 . 0 0 0 8 (2)
22 . 506 1 . 549 ? (3 . 468) 3 . 895 0 . 4 8 0 1±0 . 02 3 9 (3)
a
w2 = mas s fraction of salt b d :� = relative dens ity
c c2 = concentration of salt
d m2 = molal ity of salt
e a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3
( continued on next page )
360
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] Mackenz ie , J . J .
( 2 ) Ammonium chloride Ann . Phys . (Leipzig) (3 ) 1 8 7 7 , 1 ,
Sodium chloride 4 3 8 -5 1 .
Potassium chloride
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 -5 )
T/K = 279 . 6 - 295 . 2
p1 /kPa = 93 . 6 - 101 . 6 H . L . C lever
AUXILIARY INFORMATION :
For ammonium chloride at 2 8 8 K and 8 . 7 2 3 mass % the paper
gave an average solubi lity of 0 . 7 9 0 6 . The compiler ' s
average of 0 . 7 9 7 3 is given in the table .
The relative dens ity of 2 2 . 5 0 6 mass % KCl must be a printing
error . Comparison with dens ity values in the International
Cri tical Tables leads one to assume the value should be 1 . 1 4 9 .
The concentration is calculated with the assumption .
The compi ler calculated and added the Kelvin temperatures ,
the concentration and molal ity values and the standard
deviations .
For values of large standard deviation the compi ler has
dropped the value with largest deviation and given a second
average .
These data are of marginal value . Some show a standard
deviation as large as 10 % , although many show a standard
deviation under 3 % .
The author clearly states these are Bunsen coefficients .
However , the compi ler ' s analys is of the author ' s calculations
indicates the gas volume was reduced to the partial pressure
at equil ibrium . If this is true the values need to be reduced
from o to 7 . 5 % to the Bunsen coefficients .
Tabulated in the paper are pressure and ·volume of dry gas
before equil ibration , volume and partial pressure of wet co2
gas not absorbed , and mercury volume displaced .
The apparatus cons isted of a bulb of ( 1 ) carbon dioxide . Prepared by
known volume in which the initial action of sulfuric acid on marble .
pressure and carbon dioxide ( reduced Dried by bubbl ing through sulfuric
to 0 ° C ) was measured ; a bulb of known acid .
volume for the solvent ; and a manome
ter system to adj ust the final volume ( 2 ) Salts . Recrystal l i z ed . Solution
of the unabsorbed wet gas and measure prepared by weight and checked by
its total pressure ( reduced to 0 ° C ) . evaporation to dry salt .
The f inal total pressure of wet gas
was reduced to the partial pressure ( 3 ) Water . Nothing specified .
of carbon dioxide by subtraction of
the solution water vapor pressure .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
There was a statement that the carbon
dioxide solubi l ity in water was mea- Temperature : Nothing specified .
sured , but no solubil ity values were
given . Solubil ity : Nothing specified , but
see standard deviations
in table .
36 1
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Mackenz ie , J . J .
( 2 ) Calcium chloride Ann . Phys . (Leipzig) [ 3 ] 1 8 7 7 , 1 ,

Strontium chloride 4 3 8 -5 1 .
Barium chloride
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 -5 ]
a e
Ca l c ium chloride ; CaC12 ; [ 1 0 0 4 3 -5 2 - 4 ]
8 281 4 . 365 1 . 03 6 0 . 4 07 0 . 411 0 . 9 4 2 3 ±0 . 0 1 12 (3)

5 . 739 1 . 049 0 . 54 2 0 . 54 9 0 . 8548±0 . 0016 (2)
8 . 04 5 1 . 068 0 . 774 0 . 788 0 . 8 3 8 3 ±0 . 0 0 0 3 (2)
15 . 793 1 . 139 1 . 62 1 1 . 690 0 . 6 3 15±0 . 0010 (2)
16 . 2 5 2 8 9 . 4 4 . 3 6 5 1 . 036 0 . 4 07 0 . 411 0 . 7587±0 . 0039 (2)
5 . 739 1 . 049 0 . 54 2 0 . 54 9 0 . 7 2 6 0±0 . 0 0 5 8 (3)
8 . 04 5 1 . 068 0 . 774 0 . 788 0 . 6 7 4 0±0 . 0 0 3 5 (3)
15 . 793 1 . 13 9 1. 621 1 . 690 0 . 5 2 0 2 ±0 . 0 0 4 9 (3)
22 295 4 . 3 65 1 . 03 6 0 . 4 07 0 . 411 0 . 672 6±0 . 0057 (2)
5 . 739 1 . 049 0 . 542 0 . 54 9 0 . 6 15 9 ± 0 . 0 0 6 7 (3)
8 . 04 5 1 . 068 0 . 774 0 . 788 0 . 58 09±0 . 0095 (3)
15 . 793 1 . 139 1 . 621 1 . 690 0 . 47 09±0 . 0166 (3)
30 3 03 4 . 365 1 . 03 6 0 . 407 0 . 411 0 . 5957±0 . 0072 (2)
5 . 739 1 . 049 0 . 542 0 . 549 0 . 5 2 6 6± 0 . 0 0 8 6 (3)
8 . 04 5 1 . 068 0 . 774 0 . 788 0 . 4998±0 . 0029 (3)
15 . 793 1 . 139 1 . 621 1 . 690 0 . 3 9 9 5±0 . 0 0 5 6 (2)
strontium chloride ; srcl2 ; [ 1 0 4 7 6 - 8 5 -4 )
8 281 9 . 511 1 . 087 0 . 652 0 . 663 0 . 7 7 8 9± 0 . 0 0 3 5 (2)

12 . 3 2 5 1 . 116 0 . 868 0 . 887 0 . 7 3 67±0 . 0086 (2)
1 7 . 7 13 1 . 173 1 . 311 1 . 358 0 . 6057±0 . 0209 (2)
3 1 . 194 1. 343 2 . 64 3 2 . 860 0 . 2854±0 . 0014 (2)
16 . 2 5 2 8 9 . 4 9 . 5 1 1 1 . 087 0 . 652 0 . 663 0 . 663 3±0 . 0022 (2)
12 . 3 2 5 1 . 116 0 . 868 0 . 887 0 . 5859±0 . 0102 (3)
17 . 7 13 1 . 173 1 . 311 1 . 358 0 . 4 7 2 7±0 . 0062 (3)
3 1 . 194 1 . 343 2 . 64 3 2 . 860 0 . 2 4 4 9±0 . 0123 (3)
22 295 9 . 511 1 . 087 0 . 652 0 . 663 0 . 58 06±0 . 0171 (2)
12 . 32 5 1 . 116 0 . 868 0 . 887 0 . 5 0 7 1±0 . 0 0 7 3 (3)
17 . 7 13 1 . 173 1 . 3 11 1 . 358 0 . 4 4 3 5±0 . 0 0 0 9 (2)
3 1 . 194 1 . 343 2 . 64 3 2 . 860 0 . 2474±0 . 0066 (3)
30 303 9 . 511 1 . 08 7 0 . 652 0 . 663 0 . 5 0 7 9 ± 0 . 02 4 6 (2)
12 . 32 5 1 . 116 0 . 868 0 . 887 0 . 5 3 8 6± 0 . 0 0 7 0 (3)
17 . 7 13 1 . 173 1 . 311 1 . 358 0 . 3 67 2 ±0 . 0 2 4 3 (2)
3 1 . 19 4 1 . 343 2 . 64 3 2 . 860 0 . 2 2 3 1± 0 . 0 0 2 7 (3)
Barium chloride ; BaC12 ; [ 1 0 3 6 1- 3 7 -2 ]
8 281 7 . 3 16 1 . 068 0 . 375 0 . 379 0 . 9 69 4 ± 0 . 02 3 2 (2)

9 . 753 1. 0 9 2 0 . 511 0 . 519 1 . 02 07±0 . 0106 (2)
2 5 . 2 15 1 . 273 1. 541 1 . 619 0 . 4949±0 . 0130 (2)
12 . 5 2 8 5 . 7 1 4 . 0 3 0 1 . 13 7 0 . 766 0 . 784 0 . 677 9±0 . 0 (1)
15 288 2 5 . 2 15 1 . 273 1 . 541 1 . 619 0 . 4 3 8 5± 0 . 0 0 2 5 (2)
16 . 2 5 2 8 9 . 4 7 . 3 1 6 1 . 068 0 . 375 0 . 379 0 . 7 4 4 1± 0 . 0 0 4 0 (2)
9 . 753 1 . 092 0 . 511 0 . 519 0 . 6 4 4 5±0 . 0 0 3 7 (2)
14 . 0 3 0 1 . 137 0 . 766 0 . 784 0 . 6179±0 . 0033 (2)
a w2 = mass fraction o f salt b d :� = relative dens ity

c c2 = concentration of salt
e a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
( continued on next paqe )

362
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Mackenz ie , J. J .
( 2 ) Calcium chloride Ann . Phys . (Leipzig) [ 3 ] 1 8 7 7 , 1 ,
Strontium chloride 4 3 8 -5 1 .
Barium chloride
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 8 1 . 2 - 3 03 . 2
p1 /kPa = 94 . 45 - 100 . 2 H . L . Clever
2 d iS b c d a
t/ ° C T/K 1 0 w2 a 15
c2 tmol L- 1 m2 tmol kg- 1 e
-- -- --
Barium chloride ; BaC12 ; ( 1 03 6 1 - 3 7 -2 ] ( continued )

22 295 7 . 316 1 . 068 0 . 375 0 . 379 0 . 6 8 0 3 ±0 . 0 1 5 5 (2)
9 . 753 1 . 092 0 . 511 0 . 519 0 . 6072±0 . 0058 (3)
14 . 03 0 1 . 137 0 . 766 0 . 784 0 . 5 2 3 5± 0 . 0 0 6 1 (2)
2 5 � 2 15 1 . 273 1 . 54 1 1 . 619 0 . 383 3±0 . 0086 (2)
30 303 7 . 3 16 1 . 068 0 . 375 0 . 379 0 . 5 6 5 5± 0 . 0 1 3 2 (2)
9 . 753 1 . 092 0 . 511 0 . 519 0 . 542 6±0 . 0132 (2)
14 . 0 3 0 1 . 137 0 . 766 0 . 784 0 . 4 672±0 . 0040 (2)
2 5 . 2 15 1 . 273 1 . 54 1 1 . 619 0 . 3 152±0 . 0103 (2)
a
= mass fraction of salt b d :� = relative dens ity
"'2
c
c2 = concentration of salt
e a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 ]
The compi ler calculated and added the Kelvin temperatures ,

the concentration and molal ity values and the standard
deviations .
These data are of marginal value . Some show a standard
deviation as large as 6 . 6 % , although many show a standard
deviation under 3 % .
See the ammonium chloride , sodium chloride , and potass ium
chloride data sheet from this paper for additional comments .
The apparatus cons isted o f a bulb of ( 1 ) Carbon dioxide . Prepared by
known volume in which the initial action of sulfuric acid on marble .
pressure and carbon dioxide ( reduced Dried by bubbl ing through sulfuric
to 0 ° C ) was measured ; a bulb of known acid .
volume for the solvent ; and a manome
ter system to adjust the final volume ( 2 ) Salts . Recrystal l i z ed . Solution
of the unabsorbed wet gas and measure prepared by weight and checked by
its total pressure ( reduced to 0 ° C ) . evaporation to dry salt .
The final total pressure of wet gas
was reduced to the partial pressure ( 3 ) Water . Nothing . specified .
of carbon dioxide by subtraction of
the solution water vapor pressure .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
There was a statement that the carbon
dioxide solubi l ity in water was mea Temperature : Nothing specified .
sured , but no solubil ity values were
given . Solubi l ity : Nothing specified , but ·
see standard deviations

in table .
363
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Passauer , H .
( 2 ) Electrolyte ( saturated ) Feuerungstech . 1 9 3 1 , 1 9 , 1 4 2 -4 5 .
[ 19 4 9 : merged and became Brennst . -
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ] Waerme -Kraft ]
Chem . Abstr . 1 9 3 2 , 2 6 , 2 9 3 4 .
T/K = 2 9 3 . 15
p/MPa = 0 . 101 H . L . Clever
The data are taken from Chem . Abstr . as the original paper was not ava i lable
to us . Al l aqueous electrolyte solutions are at or near saturation at
2 9 3 . 15 K .
Electro lyte ; Formula ; CA Registry Number a a
Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ] ( distil led water ) 0 . 83

Water ; H20 ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ] ( tap water ) 0 . 77
Ammonium chloride ; NH4Cl ; [ 12 12 5 -02-9 ] 0 . 45

Ammo nium nitrate ; NH4No 3 ; [ 64 8 4 -5 2 - 2 ] 0 . 36
Zinc chloride ; ZnC12 ; [ 7 64 6 -85-7 ] 0 . 12 5
Zinc iodide ; Zni2 ; ( 10 1 3 9 - 4 7 - 6 ] 0 . 28
Silver nitrate ; AgN0 3 ; ( 7 7 6 1-88-8 ] 0 . 12
Iron ( I I ) chloride ; Fecl2 ; [ 7 7 58-94-3 ] 0 . 12 5
Magnesium chloride ; MgC12 ; [ 7 7 8 6-3 0-3 ] 0 . 18
Calcium chloride ; cacl2 ; [ 10 0 4 3 -5 2 - 4 ] 0 . 14
Barium iodide ; Bai2 ; [ 1 3 7 18-50-8 ] 0 . 22
Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 6 4 7 -14-5 ] 0 . 28
Sodium thiosulfate ; Na2 s2o 3 ; [ 7 7 7 2 -9 8 -7 ] 0 . 12
Sodium nitrite ; NaN02 ; [ 7 6 3 2 -00-0 ] 0 . 225
Sodium hydrogen carbonate ; NaHC0 3 ; [ 14 4 -55-8 ] o . 8 5+
Sodium dichromate ; Na2cr2o7 ; [ 1 0 5 8 8 - 0 1-9 ] 0 . 11
Potassium chloride ; KCl ; [ 7 4 4 7-4 0-7 ] 0 . 50
Potass ium iodide ; KI ; [ 7 68 1-11-0 ] 0 . 30
Potass ium sulfate ; K2 so4 ; [ 7 7 7 8-80-5 ] 0 . 53
Absorption of pure co2 at 2 0 ° C The abstract gives no information on
( 2 9 3 . 15 K ) was determined i n a gas source and purity of the components
buret type of apparatus . The cm3 of other than the statement "pure C02 " .
C02 absorbed per 1 0 0 cm3 of saturated
aqueous solution of the salts listed
above was measured . The abstract does ESTIMATED ERROR :
not make clear if the gas volume ab
sorbed was reduced to standard condi No information given in abstract .
tions , however , a reference ( 1 ) to
this work imp l ies the absorbed gas
volumes were reduced to standard con REFERENCES :
ditions .
1 . Nahoczky , A .
Neither dens ity nor composition of the
saturated salt solutions were given . B anyasz . Kohasz . Lapok 19 3 3 , 66 ,
3 3 2 -3 5 .
364
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ] Nahoczky , A .
( 2 ) Various salts ; ( see data table B anyaszati Koh aszati Lapok 1 9 3 3 , 66 ,
below) 332-35 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 8 8 . 15
P/kPa = 10 1 . 3 2 5 I . Labadi
Solubi l ity of co2 in saturated or nearly saturated aqueous solutions of

variuos salts .
p f g cm- 3 a a. b
Potass ium dichromate ; K2cr2o7 ; [ 7 7 7 8-50-9 ] 1 . 065 0 . 817

Potassium oxalate ; K2c2o4 ; [ 5 8 3 -5 2 -8 ] 1 . 155 0 . 722
Hexa-ammonium molybdate ; ( NH4 ) 6Mo7024 i [ 12 02 7 -67-7 ] 1 . 27 0 . 698
Tripotass ium hexacyanoferrate ; K3 [ Fe ( CN) 6 ] ; [ 13 7 4 6-66-2 ] 1 . 14 0 . 58 0
copper sulfate ; cuso4 ; [ 7 7 58 - 9 8 -7 ] 1 . 12 0 . 538
Manganese sulfate ; Mnso4 ; [ 7 7 8 5 -87-7 ] 1 . 20 0 . 466
Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; [ 7 64 7 -14-5 ) - 0 . 280
Magnesium sulfate ; Mgso4 ; [ 7 4 8 7 -88-9 ) 1 . 225 0 . 206
Magnes ium chloride ; MgC12 ; [ 7 7 8 6-3 0-3 ] 1 . 23 0 . 202
Sodium thiosulfate ; Na2 s2o 3 ; [ 7 7 7 2 -9 8 -7 ) 1 . 295 0 . 12 9
1 / 2 MgS04 + 1 / 2 NaCl 1 . 32 5 0 . 223

1 / 2 MgC12 + 1 / 2 NaCl 1. 32 0 . 2 16
1 / 2 Na2 s2o 3 + 1 / 2 MgS04 1 . 24 0 . 19 2
Na2 s2o 3 + 1 / 3 glycerine ; C 3 H8o 3 ; [ 5 6-81-5 ] 1 . 275 0 . 19 1
Mgso4 + 1 / 5 a lcohol ; ( ethano l ) c2H60 ; [ 64-17-5 ] c 1 . 178 0 . 257
1 / 3 MnS04 + 1 / 3 MgC12 + 1 / 3 NaCl 1 . 28 0 . 266
1 / 3 MnS04 + 1 / 3 MgS04 + 1 / 3 NaCl 1 . 28 0 . 250
a Dens ity of the saturated l iquid .
b a = Bunsen coefficient [ cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1 )

c It is assumed by the compi ler that " alcohol " i n the original source is
ethanol .
Carbon dioxide was added by a cali ( 1 ) co2 was prepared by Kipp appara
brated burette to a cal ibrated vessel tus , washed with cadmium acetate
filled up with solvent at 1 atm pres and dried with sulfuric acid .
sure . Amount of the absorbed gas was
measured volumetrica l ly . ( 2 ) Nothing specified .
ESTIMATED ERROR :
6a = ± 0 . 005 cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- 1

365
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 -38-9 ) Kobe , K . A . , Wi l l iams , J . s .
( 2 ) Various salts and acids , see data Ind . Eng . Chem . 19 3 5 , 7 ( 1 ) , 3 7 -8 .
table below
( 3 ) Water ; H20 ; ( 7 7 3 2 -18-5 )
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P/kPa
2 = 104 . 46 Pirketta Scharl in
1 0 w2 = 0 - 5 0
Total pressure P in the measurements was 7 8 3 . 5 mmHg ( 1 04 . 4 6 kPa , 1 . 0 4 5 bar ) ,
and temperature 2 5 o c ( 2 9 8 . 1 5 K) .
a c
Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 ) 0 . 823 0 . 754

Sulfuric acid ; H2so4 ; ( 7 6 6 4 - 9 3 -9 ] 5 0 . 746 0 . 68 3
10 0 . 717 0 . 657
Sodium chloride ; NaCl ; ( 7 6 4 7 -14-5 ) 10 0 . 551 0 . 505
20 0 . 334 0 . 306
25 0 . 257 0 . 236
H2 so4 ( 5 mass % ) + NaCl ( 2 0 mass % ) 0 . 328 0 . 302
Hydrochloric acid ; HCl ; ( 7 647-01-0 ) 2
+ NaCl 20 0 . 352 0 . 323
Sodium sulfate ; Na2 so4 ; [ 7 757-82-6 ] 20 0 . 260 0 . 237
H2 so4 ( 5 vol . % ) + Na2 so4 ( 2 0 mass % ) 0 . 263 0 . 242
Phosphoric acid ; H3 Po4 ; ( 7 664-3 8-2 ) 7
+ Sodium phosphate ; Na 3 Po4 ; ( 7 601-54-9 ] 10 0 . 280 0 . 256
Calcium chloride ; cacl2 ; ( 1 0043 -52 -4 ] 40 0 . 158 0 . 14 4
Magnesium chloride ; MgC12 ; ( 7 7 8 6-30-3 ) 30 0 . 164 0 . 15 0
Z inc chloride ; zncl2 ; ( 7 64 6-85-7 ) 50 0 . 386 o . 354 .
Aluminium chloride ; A1Cl 3 ; ( 7 4 4 6 -70-0 ] 25 0 .243 0 . 222

Aluminium sulfate ; Al2 ( S04 ) 3 ; [ 1 0 0 4 3 -01-3 ) 20 0 . 221 0 . 2 03
a w2 = mass fraction o f component 2 . 2

( 10 w = mass % )
b s1 = solubil ity o f co2 expressed as mL o f G02. per mL o f solution
at a partial pressure of 7 6 0 mmHg ( 1 01 . 3 2 5 kPa , 1 . 0 1 3 bar ) of C02 •
c 1
a = Bunsen coefficient ( cm3 ( STP ) cm- 3 atm- ) .
All-glass apparatus . The total (1) "Pure" . Saturated · with water
pressure was kept constant during vapor .
equil ibration . The equil ibration cell
was shaken in a constant temperature (2) Analytical grade .
bath . After equil ibration , a l iquid
sample was volumetrically anlyzed for ( 3 ) Distil led .
solution and co2 content .
Detai led description given in the ESTIMATED ERROR :
original source .
oa = ± 0 . 0 0 5 ( by author )
366
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 - 3 8-9 ) Gj aldbek , J . Chr .
( 2 ) Aerosol OT ; c2 0H 3 807 S . Na ; Acta Chem . Scand . 1 9 5 3 , 7 , 5 3 7 - 4 4 .
[ 5 7 7 -11-7 ]
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 1 8 - 5 ]
T/K = 2 9 8 . 15
P 1/kPa
2 = 101 . 3 25 J . Chr . Gj a ldbek
10 w2 = o - 0 . 15
T/K
2 9 8 . 15 (760) 0 . 00 6 . 12 0 . 754
793 . 4 0 . 15 6 . 10 0 . 751
725 . 2 0 . 15 6 . 09 0 . 750
a w2 = mass fraction of Aerosol OT
Aerosol OT = Dioctylester o f the sodium salt o f sulfotartaric

acid . pH = 7 . 4 .
b The mole fraction solubil ity values were adj usted to a gas partial
pressure of 1 0 1 . 3 2 5 kPa (1 atm) by the compiler assuming Henry ' s law
is obeyed .
c a = Bunsen coefficient
A cal ibrated al l-glass combined ma (1) Prepared from potas s ium bicarbo
nometer and bulb was enclosed in an nate ( analytical reagent ) and
air thermostat and shaken until equi concentrated sulfuric acid .
librium . Mercury was used .for cali� 9 9 . 9 % C02 .
bration and as confining liquid . The
solvent was degassed in the apparatus . ( 2 ) 100 % . American Cyanamide Co .
The absorbed volume of gas is calcu ( 3 ) Redistil led .
lated from the initial and final
amounts , both saturated with solvent
vapor . The amount of solvent is det
ermined by the weight of displaced
mercury . ESTIMATED ERROR :
The mole fraction solubil ity values oT/K = ± 0 . 0 5
are at 1 atm assuming Henry ' s law is ox1 ;x1 = ± o . 0 1 5
obeyed .
Details of the apparatus and procedure REFERENCES :
are given in Ref . 1 and 2 .
1 . Lannung , A .
J . Am . Chem . Soc . 1 9 3 0 , 52 , , 68 .
2 . Gj aldbek , J . Chr .
Acta Chem . Scand . 1 9 5 2 , 6, 623 .
367
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; ( 12 4 - 3 8 -9 ) Rosenthal , w.
( 2 ) Teepol CH 5 3 ; ( 5 0 6 4 2 - 0 3 -0 J Thes . fac . sci . Univ . Strasbourg

(France) 1 9 5 4 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18-5 )
= 2 9 3 . 15
T/ K
W2 / g kg- 1 "" 0 - 1 H . L . Clever
T/K a
20 . 0 293 . 2 73 0 . 879 d
38 0 . 881 e

b a is surface tension .
In the original paper a was given in units dvn cm- 1 • 2
Relation, to SI units : 1 dyn cm- 1 = 10- 3 N m-� = 10- 3 J m- .
c Ostwald coefficient .
d Solvent pure water .
e Solvent pure water + 1 to Teepol CH 5 3 .
NOTE : Teepol CH 5 3 is sodium salt of dodecyl benz enesulfonic acid
mixture with a- ( nonylphenyl) -w-hydroxypoly ( oxo- 1 , 2 -ethanediyl ) .
The small amount of the surface active agent does not affect
the solubi l ity of carbon dioxide in water although it decreases
the water surface tension to about one-half the pure water
value .
The prepared solvent and solution were (1) No information .
charged into an evacuated cell after
degass ing , and the mass of solvent was (2) No information .
determined by weight . Gas was intro
duced into the cell from a measuring (3) Made carbon dioxide free by
buret in which the gas was stored over boi l ing .
mercury . The cel l was agitated while
the gas pressure was maintained by ad
justing the gas volume . The Ostwa ld
mass of solvent and the volume of gas
absorbed . Solubil ities were measured
spheric .
6 T/ K = ± 0.2
op/kPa = ± 0.1
6L/L = ± 0 . 0 2 ( compiler )
REFERENCES :
published . See :
1. Ma i l l ard , A . ; Rosentha l , w .
comp rend . 1 9 5 2 , 2 3 4 , 2 5 4 6-8 .
368
( 1 ) Carbon dioxide ; co2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 - 9 ) cramer , s . D .
( 2 ) synthetic Salton Sea geothermal Rep . Invest . - u.s . , Bur . Mines 1 9 8 2 ,
brine ( SSGB ) RI 8 7 0 6 .
( 3 ) Water ; H2o ; [ 7 7 3 2 -1 8 - 5 )
T/K = 2 7 8 . 0� - 5 2 2 . 3 5
P/MPa = 0.8 - 5.9 Pirketta Scharl in
c2 jmol dm- 3 = o and 4 . 19
Salton Sea geothermal brine ( SSGB ) was a synthetic brine based on Helgeson ' s
analys is of unflashed hypersal ine brine from geothermal wel l I ID-2 which is
located in the Imperial Valley of Cal ifornia (Helgeson , H. C . Am . J. Sci .
1 9 6 8 , 266 , 1 2 9 - 1 6 6 ) .
Detai led composition for the SSGB is given in Table 1 .

The pH ( measured at 2 5 ° C ) of SSGB is 4 . 6 . For experimenta l purposes the
pH of the brine was adj usted to neutral by the addition of NaOH .
The synthetic SSGB was prepared from chloride sa lts of the constituent metal
ions , sodium s i l icate , sodium sulf ide , and sodium metaborate , in accordance
with the composition given in Table 1 .
Table 1 . Com�osition of SSGB (�arts �er mi l l ion by weight� .
Ba 250 Fe 2 000 Rb 70
B 390 Pb 80 S i02 400
ca 28800 Li 2 10 Ag .<1a
Cs 20 Mg 10 Na 53 000
Cl 155000 Mn 1370 Sr 440
cu 3a K 16500 s 30
Zn 500
a Not included i n synthetic brine .
( continued on the next page)
The solubil ity of co2 was determined (1) 99 . 5 % .
from pressure-volume-temperature ( PVT )
measurements us ing the technique of ( 2 ) Prepared from reagent grade
gas extraction . The apparatus con chemicals .
sisted of ( 1 ) a high-pressure , high
temperature section for dissolving the ( 3 ) Deminera l i z ed .
gas in the brine , ( 2 ) a heat exchanger
for cool ing ( or heating) samples of �----�----�
gas-saturated brine to room tempera ESTIMATED ERROR :
ture , and ( 3 ) a low-pressure , constant
temperature section for making PVT 6Ka/Ka = o . 0 58 ( by author )
measurements on co llected gas and li
quid samples . ( Detailed ana lys is of experimental
A two l iter , type 3 1 6 stainless steel contributions to the total error is
stirred reactor , f itted with a heat given in the source . )
and chemical-resistant glass liner ,
was fil led two-thirds ful l with brine . �------_,
The brine was deaerated by evacuating
the reactor to the vapor pressure of the brine for at least 3 minutes. . Upon
reaching thermal equil ibrium , the gas was inj ected into the reactor and al
lowed to distribute at a f ixed partial pressure between the vapor and l iquid
phases . Equilibration occurred within 5 hours at 1 5 0 ° C and above , and wi
thin 24 hours at lower temperatures . The concentration of co2 in the liquid
was determined by desorption from a a known volume of l iquid followed by
volumetric analys is of the evolved gas .
369
( 1 ) carbon dioxide ; co 2 ; [ 12 4 -3 8 -9 ] cramer , s. D.
( 2 ) Synthetic Salton Sea geothermal Rep . Invest . - u.s., Bur . Mines � ,

brine ( SSGB ) RI 8 7 0 6 .
( 3 ) Water ; H 2 o ; [ 7 7 3 2 - 18 - 5 ]
System C0 2 ( 1 ) + SSGB ( 2 ) + H2 0 ( 3 )
Table 2 . Mean experimental values of the Henry ' s law constant KH .
a
t/ °C T/ K P/MPa
---
33 3 0 6 . 15 0.8 0 0 206
126 . 3 399 . 45 2.0 602
132 . 5 4 05 . 65 2.0 617
146 . 0 4 1 9 . 15 2.8 565
153 . 5 4 2 6 . 65 3.1 580
19 8 . 1 471 . 25 4.1 537
2 13 . 1 486 . 25 5.8 484
4.9 2 7 8 . 05 1.8 4 . 19 4 . 87 363

5.0 2 7 8 . 15 1.8 333
11 . 7 248 . 85 1.5 392
26 . 4 299 . 55 1.2 575
39 3 12 . 15 1.9 670
60 . 4 3 3 3 . 55 1.7 951
75 . 4 3 48 . 55 2.1 1144
97 3 7 0 . 15 2.1 1506
124 . 2 397 . 35 2.2 1622
137 . 1 4 10 . 2 5 2.2 2 1 09
156 . 3 429 . 45 1.5 1938
159 4 3 2 . 15 2.5 1833
199 . 8 472 . 95 3.9 1702
228 . 6 501 . 75 4.9 2081
2 49 . 2 522 . 35 5.9 2 18 2
a
b KH = P 1� 1 /x1 , where KH = Henry ' s law constant , P1 = partial pressure of
gas ( P1 = P-P2 ; P2 is the vapor pressure of water ' at the corresponding
temperature) , � 1 = fugacity coefficient ( Smith , J . M . and Van Ness , H . C .
Chemi cal Engineering Thermodynamics , McGraw-Hi l l , New York 1 9 59 ) ; and
x1 = mole fraction of the dissolved co2 •
370
SYSTEM INDEX
Page numbers preceded by E refer to evaluation texts whereas page numbers not preceded by E refer to
compiled tables . Compounds are named as in Chemical Abstracts indexes. Since carbon dioxide and
water are usually two of the compounds they are omitted in the listing.
Acetic acid, sodium salt E120, 309, 310

Acetic acid, trifluoro-, sodium salt E12:i, 3 17
Aerosol OT, see Butanedioic acid, sulfo-, 1 ,4-bis(2-ethylhexyl)ester, sodium salt
Aluminium chloride E96, 1 80, 365
Aluminium oxide, hydrate E95, 179
Aluminium sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, aluminium salt (3:2)
Ammonium bromide E90, 155 , 156
Ammonium chloride E89, E90, E92, E1 12, E1 19, E127, E128,
147-154, 1 64 , 263, 300, 359, 360, 363
Ammonium citrate, see 1 ,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid,
2-hydroxy-, diammonium salt
Ammonium nitrate, see Nitric acid, ammonium salt
Ammonium sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, diammonium salt
Arsenic pentoxide E93, E94, 169, 170
Arsenic trioxide E93, E94, 169, 170
Arsenic trisulfide (colloidal) E94, 171
Barium chloride E98, E104, E105, E 1 1 3 , 2 16-220, 269, 361-362

Barium iodide E13 1 , 363
Benzenesulfonic acid, 4-[[4-[dimethylamino]phenyl]azo]-, sodium salt E120, 3 12
Benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl-, sodium salt,
mixt. with a-(nonylphenyl)-w-hydroxypoly(oxy-1 ,2-ethanediyl) E13 1 , 367
Butanedioic acid, sulfo-, 1 ,4-bis(2"ethylhexyl)ester, sodium salt E13 1 , 366
Calcium chloride E98, E100-E103 , E106, E 1 1 3 , E123, E124, E128,

200-2 13, 266, 328, 330, 361-363 , 365 , 368, 369
Calcium nitrate, see Nitric acid, calcium salt
Calcium sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, calcium salt ( 1 : 1)
(Carbon dioxide)
Carbonic acid, monosodium salt El3 1 , 363
Cesium chloride E130, El3 1 , 357, 358
Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, see 1 -Hexadecanaminium,
N,N,N-trimethyl-, bromide
Chloric acid, sodium salt El l4, 272
Chromic acid (H2Cr207), dipotassium salt E13 1 , 364
Chromic acid (H2Cr207) , disodium salt El3 1 , 363
Copper sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, copper(2 +) salt ( 1 : 1)
Deuterium oxide, see Water-dz

Dextrose, see D-Glucose
Ethanedioic acid, dipotassium salt E13 1 , 364

Ethanedioic acid, monopotassium salt E129, 354
Ethanol E13 1 , 364
37 1
Ferrate(3-)- hexacis(cyano-C)-, tripotassium, (OC-6- 1 1) E13 1 , 364

Ferrate(4-)- hexacis(cyano-C)-, iron(3 +) (3:4), (OC-6-1 1) E98, 189
Ferric hydroxide (colloidal), see Iron hydroxide
Ferriferrocyanide (colloidal), see Ferrate(4-)- hexacis(cyano-C)-,
iron(3 +) (3 :4), (OC-6-1 1)-
Ferrous ammonium sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, ammonium iron(2 +) salt (2:2: 1),
hexahydrate
Formic acid, sodium salt E120, 307, 308
Geothermal brine, see Synthetic Salton Sea geothermal brine

a-D-Glucopyranoside, (j-D-fructofuranosyl- E129, E130, 352, 353
D-Glucose E 1 1 3 , 270, 271
Glycerine, see 1 ,2,3-propanetriol
1-Heptanesulfonic acid, sodium salt E12 1 , 3 15

Hexa-ammonium molybdate, see Molybdic acid, hexa-ammonium salt
1-Hexadecanaminium, N,N,N-trimethyl-, bromide E12 1 , 176
Hydrated aluminium oxide, see Aluminium oxide, hydrate
Hydrated ferric oxide, see Iron oxide, hydrate
Hydrochloric acid E85-E87, E93 , El l l , E123, 135-137,
169, 170, 261 , 327, 365
Hydrofluoric acid E85, 134
Iron (II) chloride E13 1 , 363

lron(III)hexacyanoferrate(II) E98
Iron(3 + )hexacyanoferrate(4-) E98
Iron hydroxide E97, 185-187
Iron hydroxide oxide E97
Iron oxide, hydrate E97, 184
Lactic acid, see Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-

Lactic acid, monosodium salt, D-, see Propanoic acid,
2-hydroxy-, monosodium salt, D-
Lithium bromide E106, E107, 226, 227
Lithium chloride E105 , E106, 22 1-225
Lithium sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, dilithium salt
Magnesium chloride E98, E99, El3 1 , 190, 191 , 363-365

Magnesium nitrate, see Nitric acid, magnesium salt
Magnesium sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, magnesium salt ( 1 : 1)
Manganese sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, manganese(2 +) salt (1 : 1)
Methanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, hydrochloride E94, 172
Methanaminium, N,N,N-trimethyl-, iodide E94, 173
Methanol E103 , E106, 213, 225
Methyl orange, see Ben�nesulfonic acid, 4-[[4-[dimethylamino]phenyl]azo]-,
sodium salt
Molybdic acid, hexa-ammonium salt E13 1 , 364
Nitric acid E88, E1 1 1 , E l 1 2 , E127, E128, 145 , 262

372
Nitric acid, ammonium salt E93, El03, E104, E1 12, E113, E l l S , E128,
165-168, 212, 220, 264, 269, 298, 363
Nitric acid, calcium salt E103 , E104, 2 14, 215
Nitric acid, magnesium salt E99, E100, 198, 199
Nitric acid, potassium salt E126-E129, 342-348
Nitric acid, silver(1 +) salt E13 1 , 363
Nitric acid, sodium salt E1 19, E120, 301-305
Nitrous acid, sodium salt E13 1 , 363
Octanoic acid, pentadecafluoro-, sodium salt E12 1 , 316
Perchloric acid E86, E87, 138

Perchloric acid, sodium salt E1 14, 273
Phenol, sodium salt E120, 3 1 1
Phosphoric acid E89, E120, E129, E13 1 , 146, 306, 35 1 , 365
Phosphoric acid, monopotassium salt E129, E130, 349-353
Phosphoric acid, monosodium salt E120, 306
Phosphoric acid, trisodium salt E13 1 , 365
Potassium aluminium sulfate, see Sulfuric acid,
aluminium potassium salt (2: 1 : 1)
Potassium bromide E124, E125 , 331-333
Potassium chloride E122-E124, E127, E128,
3 1 8-330, 359, 360, 363
Potassium dichromate, see Chromic acid (H2Cr2�), dipotassium salt
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate, see Phosphoric acid, monopotassium salt
Potassium ferrocyanide, see Ferrate(3-)- hexacis(cyano-C)-, tripotassium, (OC-6-1 1)
Potassium hydrogen oxalate, see . Ethanedioic acid, monopotassium salt
Potassium iodide E125, E126, 334-339, 363
Potassium lactate, see Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, monopotassium salt
Potassium nitrate, see Nitric acid, potassium salt
Potassium oxalate, see Ethanedioic acid, dipotassium salt
Potassium sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, dipotassium salt
Potassium thiocyanate, see Thiocyanic acid, potassium salt
1 ,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, diammonium salt E95, 174, 175
1 ,2,3-Propanetriol E13 1 , 364
Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy- E12 1 , E130, 313, 355
Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, monopotassium salt E130, 355
Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, monosodium salt, D- E12 1 , 313
Prussian blue E98, 189
Rubidium chloride E130, 357
Sea water E76-E78, 79-83

Silicic acid (colloidal) E95, 177, 178
Silver nitrate, see Nitric acid, silver( I +) salt
Sodium acetate, see Acetic acid, sodium salt
'
Sodium bromide E1 14, El lS, 274-277
Sodium chlorate, see Chloric acid, sodium salt
Sodium chloride E108-El 14, E1 19, E124, El27-El29, El3 1 , 232-271 ,
299, 300, 329, 330, 347, 348, 359, 360, 363-365, 368, 369
Sodium dichromate, see Chromic acid (H2Cr2�), disodium salt
Sodium dihydrogen phosphate, see Phosphoric acid, monosodium salt
Sodium dodecyl sulfate, see Sulfuric acid monododecyl ester sodium salt
Sodium fluoride E107, 23 1
373
Sodium formate, see Formic acid, sodium salt

Sodium 1-heptylsulfonate, see 1-Heptanesulfonic acid, sodium salt
Sodium hydrogen carbonate, see Carbonic acid, monosodium salt
Sodium hydrogen sulfite, see Sulfurous acid, monosodium salt
Sodium iodide El l5, 27S-2SO
Sodium lactate, see Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, monosodium salt, D-
(also Lactic acid, monosodium salt, D-)
Sodium nitrate, see Nitric acid, sodium salt
Sodium nitrite, see Nitrous acid, sodium salt
Sodium perchlorate, see Perchloric acid, sodium salt
Sodium perfluorooctanoate, see Octanoic acid, pentadecafluoro-, sodium salt
Sodium phenoxide, see Phenol, sodium salt
Sodium phosphate, see Phosphoric acid, trisodium salt
Sodium sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, disodium salt
Sodium thiosulfate, see Thiosulfuric acid (H2S203), disodium salt
Sodium trifluoroacetate, see Acetic acid, trifluoro-, sodium salt
Strontium chloride E98, E104, 361 , 362
Sucrose, see a-D-Glucopyranoside, �-D-fructofuranosyl-
Sulfuric acid E86-ESS, EllS, E13 1 , 139-144, 294, 295, 365
Sulfuric acid, aluminium salt (3:2) E96, lSO, 365
Sulfuric acid, aluminium potassium salt (2: 1 : 1) E130, 356
Sulfuric acid, ammonium iron(2 +) salt (2:2: 1), hexahydrate E97, 1SS
Sulfuric acid, calci:um salt ( 1 : 1) El l3, 267, 26S
Sulfuric acid, copper(2 +) salt ( 1 : 1) E96, 1S2, 1S3, 364
Sulfuric acid, diammonium salt E90-E92, E l l S , E12S, 157-164, 296, 297
Sulfuric acid, dilithium salt E107, 22S-230
Sulfuric acid, dipotassium salt E126, 340, 341 , 363
Sulfuric acid, disodium salt El l5-E1 19, El27, E12S, 282-300, 365
Sulfuric acid, magnesium salt ( 1 : 1) E99, E100, E1 12, E1 13, E12S, E129, E13 1 ,
192-197, 265, 34S, 364
Sulfuric acid, manganese(2 +) salt (1 : 1) E131, 364
Sulfuric acid monododecyl ester sodium salt E12'1 , 314
Sulfuric acid, zinc salt (1 : 1) · E96, 1S1
Sulfurous acid, monosodium salt El l5, 2S1
Synthetic sea water E76, 79
Synthetic Salton Sea geothermal brine 36S, 369
Teepol CH 53, see Benzenesulfonic acid, dodecyl-, sodium salt,

mixt. with a-(nonylphenyl)-w-hydroxypo1y(oxy-1 ,2-ethanediyl)
Tetramethyl ammonium iodide, see Methanaminium, N,N,N-trimethyl-, iodide
Thiocyanic acid, potassium salt E130, 356
Thiosulfuric acid (H2S203), disodium salt E1 19, E13 1 , 363, 364
Trimethylamine hydrochloride, see Methanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, hydroehloride
Tripotassium hexacyanoferrate, see Ferrate(3-)- hexacis(cyano-C)-, tripotassium, (OC-6-1 1 )-
(Water)
Water-dz E67-E70, 71-75
Zinc chloride E96, 363, 365

Zinc iodide E13 1 , 363
Zinc sulfate, see Sulfuric acid, zinc salt (1 : 1)
374
REGISTRY NUMBER INDEX
Page numbers preceded by E refer to evaluation texts whereas page numbers not preceded by E refer to
compiled tables. Since carbon dioxide ([124-38-9]) and water ([7732-18-5]) are usually two of the
compounds they are omitted in the listing.
50-21-5 E12 1 , E130, 313, 355

50-99-7 E1 13, 270, 271
56-81-5 E13 1 , 364
57-09-0 E12 1 , 176
57-50-1 E129, 352, 353
64-17-5 E13 1 , 364
67-56-1 E103, E106, 213, 225
75-58-1 E94, 173
(124-38-9)
127-09-3 E120, 309, 310
127-95-7 E129, 354
139-02-6 E120, 3 1 1
141-53-7 E120, 307, 308
144-55-8 E13 1 , 363
151-21-3 E12 1 , 314
333-20-0 E130, 356
335-95-5 E12 1 , 316
547-58-0 E120, 312
577-11-7 E13 1 , 366
583-52-8 E13 1 , 364
593-81-7 E94, 172
920-49-0 E12 1 , 313
996-31-6 E130, 355
1303-28-2 E93, 169, 170
1303-33-9 E94, 171
1309-33-7 E97, 185-1 87
1327-53-3 E93, 169, 170
1333-84-2 E95, 179
1343-98-2 E95, 177, 178
2923-1 8-4 E122, 317
3012-65-5 E95, 174, 175
6484-52-2 E93, E104, E1 12, El 13, El lS, 165-168, 212, 220, 264, 269, 298, 363
7446-70-0 E96, 1 80, 365
7447-40-7 E122-E124, 3 18-330, 359, 360, 363
7447-41-8 E105, E106, 221-225
7487-88-9 E98, E1 12, E128, E13 1 , 192-197, 265, 348, 364
7550-35-8 E106, 226, 227
7558-80-7 E120, 306
7601-54-9 E13 1 , 365
7601-89-0 E1 14, 273
7601-90-3 E87, 138
7631-90-5 E115, 281
7631-99-4 .E.1 19, 301-305
7632-00-0 E13 1 , 363
7646-85-7 E96, 363, 365
7647-01-0 E85, E93, E1 1 1 , 135-137, 169, 170, 261 , 327, 365
7647-14-5 E108, E1 1 1-E1 13, E1 19, E124, E127, E128, E13 1 , 232-271 , 299, 300, 329, 330, 347,
348, 359, 360, 363-365
7647-15-6 E1 14, 274-277 ,
7647-17-8 E130, 357, 358
7664-38-2 E89, E120, E129, E13 1 , 146, 306, 351 , 365
7664-39-3 E85, 134
7664-93-9 E87, E118, E13 1 , 139-144, 294, 295, 365
7681-1 1-0 E125, 334-339, 363
7681-49-4 E107, 23 1
7681-82-5 E115, 278-280
7697-37-2 E88, E1 1 1 , 145 , 262
375
(7732-18-5)
7733-02-0 E96, 181
7757-79-1 E126-E128, 342-348
7757-82-6 E115, E118, E1 19, 282-300, 365
7758-02-3 E124, 331-333
7758-94-3 E13 1 , 363
7758-98-7 E96, 182, 183, 364
7761-88-8 E13 1 , 363
7772-98-7 E1 19, E13 1 , 363, 364
7775-09-9 E1 14, 272
7778-1 8-9 E113, 267, 268
7778-50-9 E13 1 , 364
7778-77-0 E129, 349-353
7778-80-5 E126, 340, 341 , 363
7783-20-2 E90, E92, El18, 157-164, 296, 297
7783-85-9 E97, 188
7785-87-7 E13 1 , 364
7786-30-3 E98, E13 1 , 190, 191, 363-365
7789-20-0 E67, 71-75
7791-1 1-9 E130, 357
10043-01-3 E96, 180, 365
10043-52-4 E100, E103, E1 13, E123, E124, 200-213, 266, 328, 330, 361 , 363
10043-67- 1 E130, 356
10124-37-5 E103, 214, 215
10139-47-6 E13 1 , 363
10361-37-2 E104, E113, 216-220, 269, 361 , 362
10377-48-7 E107, 228-230
10377-60-3 E99, 198, 199
10476-85-4 E104, 361
10588-01-9 E13 1 , 363
12027-67-7 E13 1 , 364
12124-97-9 E89, 155, 156
12125-02-9 E89, E92, E1 12, E1 19, 147-154, 164, 263, 300, 359, 360, 363
12240-15-2 E98, 1 89
12259-21-1 E97, 184
13718-50-8 E13 1 , 363
13746-66-2 E13 1 , 364
14038-43-8 E98, 1 89
20344-49-4 E97
22767-50-6 E12 1 , 3 15
50642-03-0 E13 1 , 367
376
AUTHOR INDEX
Page numbers preceded by E refer to evaluation texts whereas

page numbers not preceded by E refer to compiled tables.
Aepelbaum, V .A. E9, 30

Alvarez, J. E5, E12
Angus, S. El , E4
Armstrong, B. El, E4
Austin, W.H. E8, 50
Bailey, S.M. E85, E133

Barbero, J.A. E6, E12
Bartels, H. ElO, 47
Bartholom�, E. El , E4
Barton, J.R. ElO, 57
Battino, R. El , E4, E6, E7, El l , E12, E69, E70, E84, E133
Bender, E. E3, E4, 64
Benson, B.B. E6, E12
Berchiesi, G. E122, E133, 3 17
Billett, F. E3, E4, E9, El l , 41
Blum, H. A . E8, 40
Bock, J. E8, ElO, 20
Bohr, c. E3, E4, E8, E10, 20, 21
Buch, K. E8, 27
Bunsen, M. see Bunsen, R.
Bunsen, R. E1 , E4, E8, E9, 13, 14
Bunsen, R.W.E. see Bunsen, R.
Burmakina, G. V. E89, E90, E108, E109, E122, E133, 152, 25 1 , 325
Carroll , J.J. E1-E4, E6S, E70

Castellani , F. E122, E133, 3 17
Chatterjee, M. E8, 50
Chenlo, F. E96, E10S, E109, El l4, El lS, E125, E126, El33, 1 S2, 1 S3, 259, 260, 277,
339
Christoff, A. E1 , E4, E87, ESS, E132, 141
Chumey, K.L. ES5, E133
Clever, H.L. ElOO, E109, E133
Corti, H.R. El l7, EllS, E133, 2S9
Coste, J.H. E76, E7S
Cox, J.D. ES5 , E132, 134
Craine, K. E1 , E4
Cramer, S.D. E8, ElO, 62, El lO, E133, 250, 36S, 369
Creighton, H.J.M. E3, E4, 23, E94, E95, E97, E132, 171 , 177, 1S5
Crovetto, R. E5, E6, ElO, E12, El lO
Curry, J. E8, 33, E67, E6S, E70, 71
Davies, G.A. E1, E4 ,

Davis, R. ,Jr. ES, 39, E109, E132, 233-236
de Cozzitorti, P.A. E129, E133, 352, 353
de Khanikof, M.M.N. ES, 15
de Molineri, N.A. E129, E133, 352, 353
de Pablo, J.J. El l7, EllS, E133, 2S9
de Reuck, K.M. E1 , E4
Devyatykh, G. G. E10, 42, E87, E88, El lS, El l6, El l S, E132, 143, 144, 284, 295
Drummond, S.E. , Jr. E1 10, E133
377
E
Efanov, L.N. E89, E90, ElOO, ElOl , E104, E105 , E108, El09, E122, E133, 152, 209, 219,
25 1 , 325
Ehrhardt, M. E78
Ellis, A.J. E6, ElO, E12, 43, 44, 5 1 , El lO, E132, 238, 239
Enders, C. E1 , E4
Eremina, A.O. ElOO, ElOl , E104, E105, E133 , 209, 219
Essery, R.E. E l , E4
Evans, W.H. E85 , E133
F
Fernandez-Prini, R. E5 , E12
Findlay, A. E3 , E4, 23, 25, E89, E90, E94, E95, E97, E104, E105 , E120, E122, El23,
E132, 148, 171 , 177, 178, 185, 186, 188, 217, 3 12 , 320
Fox, C.J.J. E76, E78
Franck, E. U. E6, E12
Fried, V. E9, 48, 49
Friz, H. El , E4
Furter, W.F. 2 1 3 , 225
G
Gaddy, V.L. E9, ElO, 34, 36, 38
Gadhoumi, M.H. E78
Gainar, I. E9, 55
Gallagher, J.G. E1 , E4, E6, E12
Gane, J. El , E4
Gatterer, A. E97, E98, E132, 187, 189
Geffcken, G. E85-E88, E122-E127, E130-E132, 135 , 140, 145 , 3 19, 33 1 , 335, 342, 357
Gerecke, J. E89-E9 1 , E93, E94, E99, E105-E108, E1 14-E1 17, El 19, E120, E122-E127,
E129-E132, 149, 150, 155, 156, 158, 159, 166, 167, 172, 173, 194, 195 , 222,
223, 226, 227, 229-23 1 , 243 , 244, 273 , 275 , 276, 279, 280, 285, 286, 303,
304, 307-3 10, 322, 323 , 332, 333, 336, 337, 344, 345, 349, 350, 358
Gjaldb�k, J. Chr. E13 1 , E132, 366
Golding, R.M. ElO, 5 1 , El lO, E132, 238, 239
Grasshoff, K. E78
H
Haar, L. El , E4, E6, E12
Halow, I. E85, E133
Hamberg, A. E76, E78
Handa, Y.P. E6, E12
Hantzsch, A. ElO, 22
Harned, H.S. E8, 39, E109, E132, 233-236
Harvey, A. E6, E12
Hastings, A.B. E85 , E89, El l l , E120, E12 1 , E123, E129, E130, El32, 136, 261 , 306, 313,
327, 35 1 , 354, 355
Hazelton, C.L. E8, 33, E67, E68, E70, 71
He, S. E85-E87, E98-E102, E109, El lO, E1 13, E1 16, E1 17, E122, E123, El26,
E133, 137, 191, 197, 21 1 , 255, 256, 267, 268, 290, 326, 341
Head, A.J. E85, E132, 134
Hepler, L.G. E6, E12
Hoffijzer, P.J. E84, E132
Holst, H. E9, 20
Howell, O.R. ElO, 25
Hsu, C.C. ElO, 57
Hutchings, L.E. E8, 40
I
Ito, K. E85 , E88, E93, ElOO, ElO l , E103-E105 , El08, E109, El l l-E1 13, E1 15-E1 18,
E126, E132, 145 , 168, 205, 212, 214, 218, 220, 224, 245, 262, 264, 269, 281 ,
287' 298, 338
Ito, Y. E85, E89 , E103, E105, E106, E132, E133, 146, 213, 225
378
J
Japas, M.L. E5-E7, E12
Just, G. E1 , E4
K
Kalogerakis, N. E1 10, E133, 252-254
Kapitanov, V.F. E67, E70, 74, 75
Katz, M. E10, 63, E129, E133, 352, 353
Kell, G. S . E1 , E4, E6, E12
Kennedy, G . ElO, 52, 54, El lO, El32, 241 , 242
Kenton, F .H. El lS, E132, 294
Kertes, A.S . E84, E133
Kimura, H. E120, E132, 3 1 1
King, A.D. , Jr. E12 1 , E133, 176, 3 14-3 16
Kirshenbaum, I. E69, E70
Kito, s . E85, E88, E89, E93, E100, El01 , E103-E106, E108, E109, El l 1-E1 13, E1 15-
E1 18, E125, E126, E132, E133, 145, 146, 168, 205, 2 12-214, 218, 220, 224,
225, 245, 262, 264, 269, 281 , 287, 298, 338
Kleber, W. E1 , E4
Kobayashi, T. E85, E88, E93, ElOO, E101, E103-E105, E108, E109, El l 1-El l3, El l5-El l8,
El25, E126, E132, 145, 168, 205, 212, 214, 218, 220, 224, 245, 262, 264,
269, 281 , 287, 298, 338
Kobe, K.A. E8, E9, 30, 37, E85, E87, E88, E96, E98-E100, E108, E109, El l 1 , E1 15-
E120, E122, E123, E126, E127, E13 1 , E132, 138, 142, 193, 198, 283, 294,
302, 321 , 343, 365
Koch, H.A. E8, 40
Korshunov, I.A. E10, 42, E87, E88, El l5, El l6, El lS, E132, 143, 144, 284, 295
Kratochvil, J. E67, E68, E70, 73
Krause, A. E85, E87, ElOO, E108, E132
Krause, D. E6, E12
Kremling, K. E78
Krenzer, M.E. El l7, E133, 289
Kritschewsk:y, I.R. E9, 30
Krogh, A. E76, E78
Kruse, R. E6, E12
Kunerth, W. E9, 26
Kurovskaya, N.A. E102, E103, El lO, El l 1 , E133, 207, 248
L
Lacombe, E. E8, 50
Lagarote, L. E107, E132, 228
Levett Sengers, J.M.H. E6, E7, E12
Lewis, E.L. E78
Li, Y-H. E9, 58, E76, 82
Lide, D.R. E98, E133
Lloyd, R. E95, E132, 174, 175
Louguinine, V. E8, 15
M
Maass, 0. E9, 29
Macinnes, D.A. E9, 3 1
Mackenzie, J .J. E89, ElOO, E101, E104, E105, E108, E132, 359-362
Malesinska, B. E3, E4, E10, 61
Malinin, S.D. E5 , ElO, E12, 45, 46, El02, E103, El lO, E1 1 1 , E1 13, E132, E133, 206, 207,
246-248, 266
Markham, A.A. E9, 37, E85, E87, E88, E99, E100, El l5-El l9, E122, E123, E126, E127,
E132, 138, 142, 193, 198, 283, 302, 321 , 343
Mather, A.E. E1-E4, E68, E70
�tou§, J. E9, 56, E67, E68, E70, 73
Maurer, G. E3 , E4, 64, E85, E89-E92, El lO, El l l , El l7, El l S, E133, 153, 154, 161-
163, 257, 258, 291-293, 296, 297
McClendon, J.F. E76, E78
379
McCurdy, K. G. E6, E12

McLeod, H. E76, E78
Mehrotra, A.K. El lO, E133, 252-254
Millero, F.J. E78
Morgan, J.L.R. E9, 28
Morgan, O.M. E9, 29
Morrison, T.J. E3, E4, E9, El l , 41
Morse, J.W. E85-E87, E98-E102, E109, El lO, El l3, El l6, E1 17, E122, E123, E126,
E133, 137, 191 , 197, 2 1 1 , 255, 256, 267, 268, 290, 326, 341
Munjal, P. E9, 57, E76, E78, 79
Murray, C.N. E9, El l , 58, E76, E77, 80, 81
Muller, G. E3, E4, 64
Nahoczky, A. E96, E98, E99, E108, E109, E1 19, E131 , E132, 364 ·
Neill, J.M. E85 , E89, El l l , E120, E12 1 , E123, E129, E130, E132, 136, 261 , 306, 313,
327, 35 1 , 354, 355
Newman, S. E5 , E12
Nicolaisen, H. E85, E89, El lO, E1 1 1 , E133, 153, 154, 257, 258
Nighswander, J.A. E1 10, El33, 252-254
Novak, J.P. E9, 48, 49, 56, E67, E68, E70
Nuttal, R.L. E85, El33
O'Connell, J.P. E5 , E12

Onda, K. E85 , E88, E93, E100, E101 , E103-E105, E108, El l l-El l3, E115, E1 16,
El lS, El25, El26, El32, 145, 168, 205, 2 12, 214, 218, 220, 224, 245, 262,
264, 269, 281 , 287, 298, 338
Orcutt, F.S. E9, 3 1
Ownby, D.W. El2 1 , El33, 176, 3 14-3 16
Parker, V.B. E85, E133

Passauer, H. E89, E93, E96, E98, E100, El08, E1 19, E122, El25, El26, E13 1 , El32, 363
Paukner, E. El, E4
Peaguda, J. E96, El08, El09, E1 14, E115, El25, El26, El33, 1 83, 260, 277, 339
Peng, D.Y. E5 , El l , El2
Pereira, G. E96, El08, El09, El 14, El 15, El25, El26, El33, 1 82, 183, 259, 260, 277,
339
Perkin, R.G. E78
Peterson, M.M. E6, El2
Peterson, R.E. E9, 53, El08, El09, El32, 240
Pick, J. E9, 48, 49, 56, E67, E68, E70, 73
Plyasunova, N.V. El03, E133, 210
Poisson, A. E78
Ponter, A.B. El, E4
Postigo, M.A. ElO, 63
Power, G.G. E9, 56
Prapaitrakul, w. El2 1 , E133, 176, 3 14-3 16
Prausnitz, J .M. El l7, El lS, E133, 289
Price, B.A. E77, E78
Prutton, C.F. El02, El03, E132, 201-204
Prytz, K. E9, 20
Pyne, H.R. E9, 28
Rand, P.W. E8, 50

Read, A.J. E6, El2
Rettich, T.R. E6, E12
Riley, J.P. E9, El l , 58, E76, E77, 80, 81
380
Robb, R.A. E85, E86, E93, E132, 169, 170

Robinson, R.A. E5, El l , E12
Rosenthal, W. E108, E l l4, El l5, E130-E132, 237, 274, 278, 356, 367
Rumpf, B. E85 , E89-E92, El lO, El l 1 , El l7, El lS, E133, 153, 154, 161-163 , 257, 258,
291-293, 296, 297
Sada, E. E85, E88, E89, E92, E93, E100, E101 , El03-E106, E108, E109, El l 1-El l3,
El l5-El l9, E123-E128, E132, E133, 145, 146, 164, 168, 205 , 2 12-214, 218,
220, 224, 225, 245, 262-265, 269, 28 1 , 287, 298-300, 328-330, 338, 347, 348
Salomaa, P. E67-E70, 72
Sander, W. ElO, 24
Sandler, S.l. E5 , E12
Savage, R.L. E102, E103, E132, 201-204
Savelyeva, N.I. E5 , E12, E102, E103, EUO, E1 1 1 , E1 13, E132, 206, 246, 247, 266
Scharlin, P. E69, E70
Schumm, R.H. E85, E133
Sechenov, I.M. , see Sechenov, J.
Sechenov, J. E10, 16-19, E84, E87-E91 , E93, E96, E99-El01 , E104, El05, El08, E109,
El 14-El l7, E1 19, E120, E122-E127, E130, E132, 139, 147, 157, 165, 181,
192, 200, 216, 221 , 232, 272, 274, 282, 301 , 318, 33 1 , 334, 342, 356
Seevers, M.H. E9, 3 1
Sendroy, J. , Jr. E85, E89, El l 1 , E120, E12 1 , E123, E129, El30, E132, 1 36, 261 , 306, 313,
327, 351 , 354, 355
Setchenow, J. see Sechenov, J.
Setschenow, J. see Sechenov, J.
Shagiakhmetov, R.A. see Shaiachmetou, R.A.
Shaiachmetou, R.A. E9, ElO, 60
Shaworonkoff, N.M. E9, 30
Shchennikova, M.K. E10, 42, E87, E88, El l5, E1 16, El lS, E132, 143, 144, 284, 295
Shcherbakova, O.M. E67, E70, 74, 75
Shedlovsky, T. E9, 3 1
Shen, B. E10, 23, E89, E90, E97, E104, El05, E120, E122, E123, E132, 148, 188,
217, 312, 320
Shkol'nikova, R.I. E95, E97, E132, 179, 184
Shmu1ovich, K.I. E103, E133, 210
Shnet, M.A. E89, E90, E108, E109, E122, E133, 152, 25 1 , 325
Slupsky, J.D. E1-E4; E68, E70
�obr, J. E9, 56, E67, E68, E70, 73
Sorokina, N.A. E100, E101, E104, E105, E133, 209, 219
Sosa, A.B. E129, E133, 352, 353
Stegall, H. E9, 56
Stewart, P.B. E9, 57, E76, E78, 79
Storvick, T.S. E5 , E12
Stutzman, L.F. E8, 40
Takenouchi, S . E10, 52, 54, El lO, E132, 241 , 242

Takeuchi, T. E120, E132, 3 1 1
Tarzimanov, A.A. E9, ElO, 60
Tremaine, P.R. E6, E12
Tsui, T-F. E9, 58, E76, 82
Tsuji, M. E85, E92, El l2, E1 19, E123, E124, E127, E128, E133, 164, 263, 265, 299,
300, 328-330, �47, 348
Vagt, A. ElO, 22
van Krevelen, D.W. E84, E132
Van Slyke, D.D. E9, 35, E85, E89, E1 1 1 , E120, E121 , E123 , El29, E130, E132, 1 36, 261 ,
306, 3 1 3 , 327, 35 1 , 354, 355
van Swaaij , W.P.M. E3, E4, 65
38 1
Vazquez, G. E96, E108, E109, El l4, El lS, E125, El33, 182, 1 83, 259, 260, 277, 339
Verdet, M. E9, 13
Versteeg , G.F. E3, E4, 65
Vesala, A. E67-E70, 72
Vesala, S. E67-E70, 72
Vilcu, R. E9, 55
von Hammel, A. E1, E4
Wagman, D.D. E85, E133

Weiss, R.F. E10, 59, E76-E78, 83
Wiebe, R. E9, E10, 34, 36, 38
Wilcock, R.J. E1 , E4, E7, El l , E12
Wilhelm, E. El, E4, E6, E7, El l , E12
Williams, J.S. E8, 30, ES7, E8S, E96, E9S, ElOO, El01, BIOS, E109, El l l , E1 17, EllS,
E13 1 , E132, 365
Williams, T. ElO, 25, E95, E97, E132, 178, 1S6
Wolf, 0. E85, E87, E100, E10S, E132
Wood, R.H. E5 , E10, E12
Wrbitzky, R. E1 0 , 47
Yang, J-Z. ElO, 66, E1 13, El 14, E133, 270, 271

Yasunishi, A. E85 , E89-E92, E96, E9S-E101 , E103-E105 , E10S, E109, E1 1 1 , E1 12, El l6,
El l7, El l9, E120, E122-E124, E126-E12S, E133, 151, 160, 164, 1 80, 190,
196, 199, 20S, 215, 21S, 249, 263, 265, 2S8, 299, 300, 305 , 324, 32S-330,
.
340, 346-34S
Yeh, S-Y. E9, 53; E108, E109, E132, 240
Yoshida, F. E85, E89-E92, E96, E9S-E101, E103-E105, BIOS, E109, El l 1 , E1 12, El16,
E1 17, El l9, E120, E122, E123, E126, E127, E133, 15 1 , 160, 180, 190, 196,
199, 20S, 215, 21S, 249, 2SS, 305, 324, 34:0, 346
Yuan, C-B. ElO, 66, E1 13, E1 14, E133, 270, 271
Zawisza, A. E3 , E4,
ElO, 61
Zel'venskii, Ya.D. E3 , E4,
32
Zimmer, M.P. ES5, ES6, E93, E132, 169, 170
6cal, c. ES5, El lO, El l l , E133, 257, 25S

38 2
Volume I H. L. C lever, Helium and Neon

Volume 2 H . L. Clever, Krypton, Xenon and Radon
Volume 3 M. Salomon, Silver Azide, Cyanide, Cyanamides, Cyanate, Selenocyanate
and Thyocyanate
Volume 4 H. L. C lever, Argon
Volume 5/6 C. L. Young, Hydrogen and Deuterium
Volume 7 · R. Battino, Oxygen and Ozone
Volume 8 C. L. Young, Oxides ofNitrogen
Volume 9 W. Hayduk, Ethane
Volume 1 0 R. Battino, Nitrogen and A ir
Volume 1 1 B. Scrosati and C. A. Vincent, A lkali Metal, Alkaline Earth Metal and
A mmonium Halides, 4mide Solvents
Volume 1 2 C. L. Young, Sulfur Dioxide, Chlorine, Fluorine and Chlorine Oxides
Volume 1 3 S. Siekierski, T. Mioduski and M. Salomon, Scandium, Yttrium,
Lanthanum and Lanthanide Nitrates
Volume 1 4 H. Miyamoto, M. Salomon and H. L. Clever, A lkaline Earth Metal
Halates
Volume 1 5 A . F. M . Barton, A lcohols with Water
Volume 1 6/ 1 7 E. Tomlinson and A. Regosz, Antibiotics: l, p-Lactam Antiobiotics
Volume 1 8 0. Popovych, Tetraphenylborates
Volume 1 9 C. L. Young; Cumulative Index: Volumes 1-18
Volume 20 A. L. Horvath and F. W. Getzen, Halogenated Benzenes, Toluenes and
Phenols with Water
Volume 2 1 C. L. Young and P. G . T. Fogg, Ammonia, Amines, Phosphine, Arsine,
Stibine, Silane, Germane and Stannane in Organic Solvents
Volume 22 T. Mioduski and M. Salomon, Scandium, Yttrium, Lanthanum and
Lanthanide Halides in Nonaqueous Solvents
Volume 23 T. P. Dirkse, Copper, Silver, Gold and Zinc, Cadmium, Mercury Oxides
and Hydroxides
Volume 24 W. Hayduk, Propane, Butane and 2-Methy/prppane
Volume 25 C. Hirayama, Z. Galus and C. Guminski, Metals in Mercury
Volume 26 M. R. Masson, H. D. Lutz and B. Engelen, Sulfites, Selenites and
Tellurites
Volume 27/28 H . L. Clever and C. L. Young, Methane
Volume 29 H. L. Clever, Mercury in Liquids, Compressed Gases, Molten Salts and
Other Elements
Volume 30 H. Miyamoto and M . Salomon, Alkali Metal Halates, Ammonium Iodate
and Jodie Acid
Volume 3 1 J. Eysseltova and T. P. Dirske, Alkali Metal Orthophosphates
Volume 32 P. G. T. Fogg and C. L. Young, Hydrogen Sulfide, Deuterium Sulfide and
Hydrogen Selenide
Volume 3 3 P. Franzosini, Molten Alkali Metal A/kanoates
Volume 34 . A. N . Paruta and R. Piekos, 4-Aminobenzenesu/fonamides.
Part 1: Non-cyclic Substitutents
Volume 3 5 A. N. Paruta and R. Piekos, 4-Aminobenzenesu/fonamides.
Part JJ: 5-Membered Heterocyclic Substituents
383
Volume 3 6 A . N. Paruta and R. Piekos, 4-Aminobenzenesulfonamides.

Part III: 6-Membered Heterocyclic Substituents and Miscellaneous
Systems
Vol ume 3 7 D . G. Shaw, Hydrocarbons with Water and Seawater.
Part 1: Hydrocarbons C5 to C7
Volume 3 8 D. G . Shaw, Hydrocarbons with Water and Seawater.
Part II: Hydrocarbons C8 to C36
Volume 3 9 C. L. Young, Cumulative Index: Volumes 20-38
Volume 40 J. Hal a, Halides, Oxyhalides and Salts ofHalogen Complexes of Titanium,
Zirconium, Hafnium, Vanadium, Niobium and Tantalum
Volume 4 1 C.-Y. Chan, I. N. Lepeshkov and K. H. Khoo, Alkaline Earth Metal
Perch/orates
Volume 42 P. G. T. Fogg and W. Gerrard, Hydrogen Halides in Non-aqueous
Solvents
Volume 43 R. W. Cargill, Carbon Monoxide
Volume 44 H. Miyamoto, E. M . Woolley and M. Salomon, Copper and Silver Halates
Volume 45/46 R. P. T. Tomkins and N. P. Bansal, Gases in Molten Salts
Volume 47 R. Cohen-Adad and J . W. Lorimer, Alkali Metal and Ammonium
Chlorides in Water and Heavy Water (Binary Systems)
Volume 48 F. Getzen, G. Hefter and A. Maczynski, Esters with Water.
Part 1: Esters 2-C to 6-C
Volume 49 F. Getzen, G. Hefter and A . Maczynski, Esters with Water.
Part II: Esters 7-C to 32-C
Volume 50 P. G. T. Fogg, Carbon Dioxide in Non-aqueous Solvents at Pressures Less
Than 200 kPa
Volume 5 1 J . G . Osteryoung, M. M. Schreiner, C. Guminski and Z. Galus,
Intermetal/ic Compounds in Mercury
Volume 52 I . Lambert and H. L. Clever, A lkaline Earth Hydroxides in Water and
Aqueous Solutions
Volume 53 C. L. Young, Cumulative Index: Volumes 40-52
Volume 54 W. E. Acree, Jr, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in ture and Binary
Solvents
Volume 55 S. Siekierski and S. L. Phillips, Actinide Nitrates
Volume 56 D. Shaw, A. Skrzecz, J. W. Lorimer and A. Maczynski, Alcohols with
Hydrocarbons
Volume 57 W. Hayduk, Ethene
Volume 5 8 W. E. Acree, Jr, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Binary Non-aqueous
Systems. Part 1: Solutes A-E
Volume 59 · W. E. Acree, Jr, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Binary Non-aqueous
Systems. Part ll: Solutes F-Z
Volume 60 A . L. Horvath and F. W. Getzen, Halogenated Methanes with Water
Volume 6 1 C.- Y. Chan, E. S. Gryzlova, K. H . Khoo and M.-T. Saugier-Cohen Adad,
Alkali metal and ammonium perch/orates. Part 1: Lithium and sodium
perch/orates

SDS 62

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SDS 62

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SDS 62

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

.

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY DIVISION

SOLUBILITY DATA SERIES

CARBON DIOXIDE IN WATER AND AQUEOUS

P.G.T. Fogg C.L. Young

R. Battino (USA) M. Salomon (USA)

IUPAC Secretariat, Oxford, UK

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY

CARBON DIOXIDE IN WATER AND AQUEOUS

Robert W. Cargill John J. Carroll* H. Lawrence Clever*

Rosa Crovetto* J. Chr. Gjaldbaek lmre Labadi

David M. Mason Alan E. Mather* Pirketta Scharlin*

Kelly R. Thornton Toshihiro Tominaga Denis A. Wiesenburg*

Yuri P. Yampol'skii Colin L. Young

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

Subscriptions: UK and Europe Rest of World

Any enquires regarding this publication should be addressed to:

Introduction to the Solubility Data Series;

Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Pure Water

The Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Water at Low Pressure

Evaluation of Solubility Data of the System C�-H20

Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Deuterium Oxide

Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Sea Water

An Evaluation of the Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Sea Water

Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions

An Evaluation of the Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions 84

System Index 370

Registry Number Index 374

Author Index 376

Solubility Data Series: Published and Forthcoming Volumes 382

SOLUBILITY OF GASES IN LIQUIDS

NATURE OF THE PROJECT

COMPILATIONS AND EVALUATIONS

Components: The format is the same as on the Compilation sheets.

QUANTITIES AND UNITS USED IN COMPILATION AND. EVALUATION OF SOLUBILITY

Mixtures, Solutions and Solubilities

Physicochemical Quantities and Units

1. Mole fraction of substance 1, x1 or x(1) (condensed phases) or y1 (gases):

2. Ionic mole fractions of salt i, xi+• xi_:

""(x. +x. )+"" 1

3. Mass fraction of substance 1, w1 or w{l):

5. Amount concentration of solute 1 in a solution of volume V, c1 :

6. Mass concentration of solute 1 in a solution of volume V, p1 or y 1:

7. Mole ratio, rA B (dimensionless) (16)

Mass ratio, symbol SA,B• may be defined analogously (16).

8. Ionic strength, Im (molality basis), or /c (concentration basis):

9. Bunsen coefficient, a (dimensionless):

10. Kuenen coefficient, S:

11. Ostwald coefficient, L (dimensionless) (18):

12. Absorption coefficient, 13 (dimensionless):

where p2 is the partial pressure of the vapor of the solvent.

13. Henry's Law constant, kH:

14. Salt Efficts on the Solubility of Gases (19)

log(zt/z1) = ksyz y [20]

SI base units: kg m-3. Here g is the total mass of the system.

Thermodynamics of Solubility (20)

lnx1 = A + B(K/ 1) + Cln(T/K) + D(T/K) [26]

aG:.tfR = -A(T/K) - B - C(T/K)ln(T/K) - D(TfK)2 [27]