Enzyme Purification
Enzyme Purification
Enzyme Purification
enzymes
Dr Pooja Rana
Why isolate enzymes?
Objectives :
• maximum possible yield
• maximum catalytic activity
• maximum possible purity
• Enzymes that are used for biocatalysis are typically purified from
microbial cells or from culture media after or during growth of
microorganisms (in case of excreted proteins).
• The enzyme purification generally starts with a cleared cell
extract in which the enzyme is present in a soluble form.
• If the enzyme to be purified is excreted into the culture medium,
it is usually sufficient to remove the cells from the medium by
centrifugation (for small-scale purifications) or by filtration (for
large-scale industrial purifications).
• In the case of an intracellular enzyme, cells should be broken
first to release the protein into solution. Depending on the type of
cells, different techniques are employed
• The microbial cells are first harvested from the culture medium
by centrifugation and re-suspended in a small amount of buffer.
• The cells can be broken using a variety of techniques, e.g. by
treatment with enzymes that digest cell walls (e.g. lysozyme),
followed by osmotic shock, by using lysis buffers containing
detergents, by exposure to ultrasound using sonicators, by
pushing cells under high pressure through a small orifice using
a pressure cell system, or by grinding frozen cells in liquid
nitrogen.
• Extracts thus obtained are cleared from unbroken cells and
large, insoluble particles by centrifugation or filtration.
• To prevent enzyme inactivation during these treatments, and
also in the following purification steps, the temperature of the
enzyme solution is usually kept around 4 °C.
• Proteolytic degradation of the enzyme to be purified can be
precluded by adding a protease inhibitor cocktail during
breaking of the cells.
• Once a cell-free extract has been obtained, several methods
can be employed for further purification of the desired
enzyme.
Isolation of Enzymes
• Generally enzymes are isolated in the cold condition (at 0 to
4o C). For the purpose, homogenizing medium as well as
container should be in the chilled condition.
• Pestle and mortar-
• Pestle and mortar is a moderate technique for tissue
homogenization. Mechanical breakdown occurs during the process.
Sometimes, grinding is done in the presence of purified sand or
glass beads for aberration.
• Blenders –
• Waring blender (commonly called as mixie) is comparatively harsh
technique of grinding the tissue compared to pestle and mortar and is
mostly used for homogenizing the harder tissues (generally the plant
tissues).
• Vir-Tis homogenizer
• This is considered to be a mild technique and generally used for
homogenization of soft tissues such as animal tissues.
• Here a motorized pestle with teeth like aberrations is used. With Vir-
Tis homogenizer, generally no rupturing of cell organelles occurs
during grinding provided isotonic medium with no detergent is used.
Vir-Tis homogenizer Potter Elvejm homogenizer Ultra- Sonicator
• Potter Elvejm homogenizer
• This is also a mild technique and is used for homogenization of soft animal tissues.
• Potter Elvejm Homogenizer is a simple equipment having a pestle like glass rod with
teeth like aberrations on its tip. There are down aberrations in the tube too on which
teeth of the rod are fitted during up and down process of the rod. Up and down
process of the pestle is done manually by hand or by mechanical device.
• Razor blade
• It is comparatively very mild technique.
• It is generally used only for isolation of intact cell organelles for the purpose of
studying the intracellular localization of the enzyme proteins.
• In the technique, razor blade is used for chopping the tissue in the presence of
isolating medium. Although the technique is good for the isolation of intact
organelles, but it is unable to rupture all the cells. Therefore, there is low recovery of
the enzyme due to left out of unruptured or partially ruptured cells. These un-
ruptured or partially ruptured cells are removed as cell debris after centrifugation.
• Ultra- Sonicator
• This technique of rupturing the cells is generally used for microbial/
bacterial cells. Ultrasonicator generates low as well as high
wavelength ultrasonic waves.
• For the purpose, a suitable probe depending on the volume of the
homogenizing medium is selected and connected with the ultra-
sonicator.
• The container having cells and homogenizing (isolating) medium is
put in chilled condition by covering the container with ice.
• There is much generation of heat during ultra-sonication, therefore,
ultrasonic waves are thrown in the sample after few seconds interval,
every 10 to 15 seconds ultrasonication.
• Extrusion method-This method relies on the principle that forcing a
cell suspension at high pressure through a narrow orifice will provide
a rapid pressure drop. This is a powerful mean of disrupting cells
especially from bacteria.
• Lytic enzymes -Cell wall and cell membrane lytic enzymes like
cellulase, pectinase, xylanase, pectin methyl esterase, lysozyme etc.
can be used for rupturing the cells.
• Enzymes being costly are not commonly used for making cell free
preparation for isolation of enzymes. In plant tissue culture, lytic
enzymes are used to prepare protoplast.
• Freeze-Thaw- With certain susceptible microbes and eukaryotic cells,
repeated freezing and thawing results in extensive membrane lesions
with release of periplasmic and intracellular proteins.
• Acetone powder- Drying with acetone is a good method for rupturing
the cell membrane. Using acetone, powder of the tissue may be
prepared which may be stored in a Deep freezer for a long time. It
forms a convenient starting material from which the enzyme may be
extracted with the isolating medium, whenever required. However,
one has to take much precautions of low temperature (generally –
20oC), otherwise, acetone may denature the enzyme protein.
• Isolation of enzymes from sub-cellular organelles requires rupturing of
the organelle. Generally for the purpose, organelle is isolated in intact
form thus removing the contaminating proteins of the cytoplasm and
other cell organelles.
• Afterwards, cell organelle is ruptured in the presence of a suitable
detergent like tween, teepol, digitonin etc.
Methods of enzyme purification
• The purification of a particular enzyme involves removal of other
substances (proteins as well as non-proteins) present in the preparation.
• Purification of an enzyme protein is generally a multi-step process
exploiting a range of biophysical and biochemical characteristics such
as its relative concentration in the source, solubility, charge, size
(molecular weight), hydrophobicity/ hydrophilicity of the target
protein.
• In general, design of the purification technique/ protocol should be
focused on: (i) high recovery, (ii) highly purified enzyme protein, (iii)
reproducibility of the methods, (iv) economical use of the chemicals
(reagents) and (v) shorter time for complete purification.
• Proteins are relatively labile and get denatured at high temperatures
and variation in pH.
• Each protein has its own physico-chemical characteristics. The
techniques selected for enzyme purification should be moderate and
native conformation of the enzyme protein should not change as a
result of purification.
• During purification, degree of purity and percent of recovery should
be checked after each step of purification. It is not always necessary
to purify the enzyme protein to homogeneity since enzyme
purification is a costly affair and also the time consuming. Therefore,
it is necessary to have an idea of the degree of purity necessary for the
intended use of the targeted enzyme.
These separation methods can be roughly
divided into the following categories:
(i) selective precipitation
(ii) separation based on charge
(iii) separation based on molecular size
(iv) separation based on bio-affinity, and
(v) separation based on adsorption principles
• Except for the first category, all these methods generally make use of
column chromatography
• A good purification results in the recovery of most of the enzyme
activity (i.e. a high yield) and in removal of many “contaminating”
proteins and other types of (bio)molecules (i.e. a strong increase in
specific activity).
• The purity of the final enzyme preparation can be tested in several
ways. The most common methods used are sodium dodecyl sulfate
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analytical gel
filtration, and mass spectrometry.
• The techniques selected for enzyme purification should be moderate
and native conformation of the enzyme protein should not change as a
result of purification
• Traditional enzyme purification procedures many times start with an
ammonium sulfate fractionation. This type of fractionation makes use of
the fact that individual proteins precipitate at different concentration
ranges of ammonium sulfate.
• To make an estimation of the fractionation range, a small-scale pilot
experiment can be performed.
Ammonium sulfate precipitation
✔ The matrix have negative functional groups such as carboxyl (- COO-), carboxy methyl (-
CH2COO-) and sulpho (- SO3-), and sulpho methyle (- CH2SO3-).
b. Anion Exchange chromatography-
✔ Analyte is negatively charged and matrix has a positively charged functional group. The
negatively charged analyte replaces the reversible bound anion and binds to the matrix
Porous beads
Ve Ve Ve
• Ultracentrifugation (300,000g)
• Mr is the major factor for separation
• Not very efficient to separate a enzyme from enzyme pool : Usually used to remove impurities
• Gel filteration (Mr ~ hundreds of thousands)
• Sephadex, Bio-Gel P, Sephacryl, and Sepharose –
• expensive and time-consuming
• Usually in later stage of purification
• Dialysis (Mr ~ tens of thousands)
• Usually used for removing salts, organic solvents, etc..
• Ultrafilteration
• Small molecules are filtered out by pressure
• Used for concentrating proteins
• Alternatively, centrifugation with dialysis membrane
Methods of separation
2. Polarity
• Ion-exchange chromatography
• Electrostatic property
• Flow through in low salt and at appropriate pH
• Desorption by changing salt conc’ and pH
• Enzymes can be separated by gradient condition
• Large scale is possible
• Usually 10-fold increase
Methods of separation
2. Polarity
• Electrophoresis
• Separation by movement of charged molecules
• Capillary electrophoresis (cross section less than 100m)
• Isoelectric focusing
Methods of separation
2. Polarity
• Change in pH
• Enzymes are least soluble at pI because there is no repulsive force between enzymes
• Enzyme must not be inactivated in a range of pH
• Change in ionic strength
• Large charged molecules are only slightly soluble in pure water; Addition of ion promotes sol
ubility (Salting in)
• Beyond a certain ionic strength, the charged molecules are quickly precipitated (Salting out)
• Ammonium sulfate is popularly used
• 10-fold increase in purity
• Fructose-
bisphosphate aldolase from rabbit muscle can be purified in high purity by ammonium sulfat
e
Methods of separation
3. Solubility
• Affinity chromatography
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Substrate or inhibitor is linked to a matrix
• Desorbed by a pulse of substrate or changed pH, ionic strength
Methods of separation
4.1 Affinity chromoatography
• Problems
• Attaching a suitable substrate or inhibitor to the matrix can be difficult
• Linking b/n substrate and matrix itself may inhibit the binding b/
n enzyme and substrate: Spacer arm (diaminehexane) may be needed
• Binding affinity b/n enzyme and substrate must be in a proper range
• Special attention is necessary to separate the enzymes using same substrate or using mo
re than one substrate
• Fusing proteins to solve the problems
• Glutathione-S-transferase : glutathione
• Maltose binding protein : maltose
• Hexahisitidine : Ni2+ (Elution by imidazole or thrombine cleavage site is added after the t
ag)
Methods of separation
4. Other chromoatographies
• Affinity elution
• Affinity occur at desorption step
• Can solve some problems of affinity chromatography and easy to scale up
• Dye-ligand chromatography
• Cibacron Blue F3G-A can bind to a number of dehydrogenases and kinases
• Procion Red HE-3B binds well with NADP+-dependent dehydrogenase
• Immunoadsorption chromatography
• Immobilize the antibody to CNBr treated Sepharose
• Achieve much higher purity
Methods of separation
4. Other chromoatographies
• Covalent chromatography
• Separation of cysteine containing protein using thiol-Sepharose 4B
Methods of separation
5. Choice of method
• Time/Large scale -
> Precipitation by ethanol or ammonium sulfate or purification based
on solubility
• Small scale/high purity -> Column chromatography or electrophoresis
• FPLC or HPLC -> Fast and high purity, expensive
How to know the success of purification
• Tests for catalytic activity
• By enzyme assay
• Check cofactors and inhibitors
• Stabilizing factors
• Neutral pH, storage in 50% glycerol may help
• 2-mercaptoethanol or DTT(Dithiothreitol)*
• Protease inhibitor PMSF (Phenylmethylsulfonyl flouride)
• Active site titrations
• Checking the proportion of active enzyme in the purified enzyme
Affinity chromatography
• The affinity chromatography works on the principle of mutual
interaction between a ligand (L) and receptor (R) forms ligand-
receptor complex (RL) with a dissociation constant Kd, which is
expressed as follows
✔ Dissociation constant Kd is specific to the receptor-ligand pair and number of interaction between them.
✔ when a crude mixture is passed through an affinity column, the receptor present on the matrix reacts
with the ligand present on different molecules.
•
✔ The affinity between receptor on matrix and ligands and consequently the best choice bind to the
receptor whereas all other molecules do not bind and appear in flow through.
•
✔ A wash step removes remaining weakly bound molecules on matrix.
✔ Subsequently, a counter ligand is used to elute the bound molecule through a competition between the
matrix bound molecule and counter ligand.
•
Advantages of Affinity chromatography-
• 3. Reproducible: Affinity purification is reproducible and gives consistent results from one
purification to other as long as it is independent to the presence of contaminating species.
• 4. Easy to perform: Affinity purification is very robust and it depends on force governing
ligand-receptor complex formation. Compared to other techniques