Law of Persons and Family 2nd Edition Sample Chapter

Law of Persons
and the Family

2nd Edition
Edited by A Barratt
W Domingo, W Amien, R Denson, JD Mahler-Coetzee,
M Olivier, F Osman, H Schoeman, PP Singh
9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 1 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Pearson South Africa (Pty) Ltd
4th Floor, Auto Atlantic, Corner Hertzog Boulevard and Heerengracht, Cape Town, 8001
www.pearsoned.co.za
Copyright © Pearson South Africa (Pty) Ltd 2017.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording
or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder.
ISBN: 978-1-928-22680-2 (print book)

ISBN: 978-1-776-10055-2 (epdf)
Publisher: Silvia Raninger

Editor: Michelle Galloway
Proofreader: Ulla Schüler
Indexer: Cecily van Gend
Book design: Lynn Siljeur
Artwork: Rassie Erasmus, Zapiro
Cover design: Candice Gemmell
Typesetting: Baseline Publishing Services
Printed by:
In line with Pearson’s editorial policy this book has been blind peer reviewed.
Every effort has been made to trace copyright holders. The publishers apologise for any errors
or omissions, and invite copyright holders to contact us if any have occurred, so that they may
be credited.
Photo credits
Cover image: Peopleimages. iStock; p 23 chameleon: fivespots, Shutterstock; p 23 African
native offered in the slave market Congo basin: North Wind Picture Archives / Alamy; p 23
orangutan: Paul McKinnon, Shutterstock

Contents
ABOUT THE AUTHORS xvi
HOW TO USE BOUNCEPAGES xvii
PART 1 Law of persons

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION
– Amanda Barratt 3
Chapter 2 THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS – DEFINING WORDS AND CONCEPTS IN LAW
1 Defining words and concepts 6
2 What is a ‘person’ – and why does this matter? 7
3 What are rights, duties and legal objects? 8
3.1 Real rights 8
3.2 Personal rights 9
3.3 Personality rights 9
3.4 Constitutional rights 10
4 What is capacity? 10
4.1 Passive legal capacity 10
4.2 Capacity to perform juristic acts 11
4.3 Capacity to be held accountable for wrongdoing (delicts
and crimes) 12
4.4 Capacity to litigate 12
5 What is ‘status’? 13
6 Forms of liability 14
6.1 Contractual liability 14
6.2 Delictual liability 15
6.3 Unjustified enrichment 16
7 Useful remedies, defences and doctrines 17
8 Succession 19
Chapter 3 THE BEGINNING OF LEGAL PERSONALITY

– Jacques Mahler-Coetzee 22
1 Preliminary considerations – birth and its legal significance 24
1.1 Natural persons, juristic persons, status, capacity,
legal subjects, legal objects 24
1.2 The legal system – living with the law, the power to
change legal rules and the ‘rule of law’ 24

2 Nasciturus fiction – origins in succession – limitations of
its application 25
2.1 Termination of pregnancy in relation to legal personality 31
3 Consequences of the beginning of legal personality 32
3.1 Natural persons: proof of birth and the medical evidence 32
3.2 Proof of paternity – how can we prove who the biological
parents of a child are? 32
3.3 Registration and the naming of natural persons 33
3.4 Identity in the context of naming 34
3.5 Changing a child’s name 34
3.6 Juristic persons – how do juristic persons come
into existence? 34
4 The status and protection of non-human animals or
environmental entities 36
Chapter 4 MINORITY: HOW AGE AFFECTS STATUS AND CAPACITY

1 The effect of age on status 41
2 Passive legal capacity 42
3 Capacity to perform juristic acts 42
4 Contracts 43
4.1 Infants 43
4.2 Minors seven years and older 43
4.3 The guardian’s assistance 44
4.4 The unassisted contract 47
4.5 The assisted contract 54
4.6 Ratification 58
4.7 The fraudulent minor 60
5 Acquiring and alienating property 62
5.1 Capacity to transfer ownership: contracts and ‘real agreements’ 63
5.2 Infants 64
5.3 Minors who are seven or older 64
6 Getting married 66
6.1 Children below the age of puberty 66
6.2 Children over the age of puberty 66
6.3 Consent required for the marriage of a minor 67
6.4 Absence of consent 67
7 Consenting to medical treatment 68
8 Capacity to hold offices and perform certain functions 70
9 Capacity to make a will 71
10 Specific juristic acts governed by statute 71
10.1 Statutes which give minors full capacity to act 71
10.2 Statutes which forbid minors’ juristic acts 71
11 Capacity to be held accountable for wrongdoing (crimes and delicts) 72
11.1 Infants 72
11.2 Minors seven years or older 72

12 Capacity to litigate 74
12.1 Infants 74
12.2 Minors aged seven or older 74
13 The emancipated minor 75
13.1 The scope of the emancipation 76
13.2 The guardian’s consent 76
13.3 Proving emancipation 77
13.4 Other consequences of emancipation 78
14 Termination of minority and attainment of majority 79
Chapter 5 SEX AND GENDER – STATUS AND CAPACITY

– Amanda Barratt, Jacques Mahler-Coetzee and Razaana Denson 83
1 What do we mean by ‘sex’ in a legal context? 84
2 When does the law treat people differently because of their sex? 85
2.1 The ‘marriageable’ age 86
3 Can you change your legal sex? Transexualism and sexual realignment 86
Chapter 6 OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING STATUS AND CAPACITY

– Morné Olivier and Razaana Denson 91
1 Mental illness: What the law says 93
2 Sources of law applicable to mental illness and mental disability 93
3 What is mental illness? 94
4 How is mental illness proved? 95
5 What is the impact of mental illness on capacity? 96
5.3 Capacity to hold office 97
5.4 Other statutory limitations imposed on mentally ill persons 98
5.5 Curatorship and administration 98
5.6 Administration in terms of the Mental Health Care
Act 17 of 2002 100
6 Mental illness in the commission of delicts and crimes 101
7 Intoxication from drugs and/or alcohol 102
7.3 Capacity to hold office 103
7.4 Curatorship 103
7.5 Delictual and criminal liability 104
8 Prodigality 104
8.1 What is a prodigal? 105
8.2 Application for an order of prodigality 105
8.3 The capacities of a prodigal 105
8.4 The effect of the Bill of Rights on an interdicted prodigal 109

9 Insolvency 109
9.1 Definition of insolvency 110
9.2 Consequences of insolvency 110
9.3 The legal capacities of an insolvent 111
10 Physical disability 112
10.1 Appointment of curators 113
10.2 Legal capacities of a person for whom a curator has
been appointed 113
Chapter 7 DOMICILE
– Amanda Barratt and Heidi Schoeman 116
1 What is domicile? 116
2 When is it important to know where a person is domiciled? 117
2.1 Which legal system applies? ‘Choice of law’ or ‘conflict of laws’ or
‘private international law’ 118
3 Where is a person domiciled? Domicile Act 3 of 1992 120
4 Domicile of choice 120
4.1 Is the person competent to establish a domicile of choice? 121
4.2 Has the person in fact established a domicile of choice? 121
5 Domicile of closest connection 124
6 Domicile of origin 126
7 Proving domicile 126
8 Exclusivity and tenacity of domicile 127
9 Excluding Renvoi 128
Chapter 8 THE END OF LEGAL PERSONALITY

1 Death and its legal significance
1.1 Juristic persons 132
1.2 Natural persons 133
2 Proof of death 133
3 Presumption of death and its effect – what if there is no corpse
to examine? 137
3.1 The common law presumption of death 138
3.2 The statutory procedure – Inquests Act 58 of 1959 140
3.3 Commorientes – presumptions about the order in which
people died 141
4 Registration of death 142
5 Returning from the dead 143
Chapter 9 LAW AND THE DEAD

1 Burial and other duties 147
2 Post-mortem examination 149

3 Crimes involving the body corpse 149
3.1 Body snatching and grave robbing 149
3.2 Necrophilia 150
3.3 The use of human tissue pre- and post-mortem 151
3.4 Approved use of human tissue and human organs 152
4 Endnote – returning from the dead? 157
PART 2 Family law

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION: FAMILY LAW IN 21ST CENTURY SOUTH AFRICA
– Amanda Barratt and Wesahl Domingo 161
1 The ‘sexual family’ … or families based on ‘shared commitment’? 163
1.1 Single mothers and single fathers 164
1.2 Extended families 165
1.3 Polygynous families 165
1.4 Unmarried families 166
1.5 Same-sex families 166
1.6 Child-headed households 166
1.7 Diverse families 167
2 Families and the Constitution 167
2.1 Inherent human dignity and the right to family life 167
2.2 Embracing diversity 168
2.3 Marriage-centrism? 170
2.4 Equality, fairness and respect within the family 170
3 The objectives of family law 171
3.1 Protection 172
3.2 Promote fairness within the family 172
3.3 Promote legal certainty and predictability 172
3.4 Value system for society 173
3.5 Symbolism 173
4 Defining ‘family law’ 173
5 The chapters in this part of the book 174
Chapter 2 PARENT AND CHILD

– Wesahl Domingo and Amanda Barratt 176
1 The rights and best interests of the child 178
1.1 The child’s best interests
1.2 What does ‘paramount’ mean? 181
1.3 The child’s views 183
2 Parental responsibilities and rights 184
3 What are parental responsibilities and rights? 185
3.1 What is guardianship? 185
3.2 What does ‘care’ mean? 186
3.3 What does ‘contact’ mean? 188
3.3 What is maintenance? 189

4 How do people acquire parental responsibilities and rights? 193
4.1 Parental responsibilities and rights of married and
unmarried mothers 194
4.2 Parental responsibilities and rights of married fathers 195
4.3 Parental responsibilities and rights of unmarried fathers 199
5 Co-holders of parental responsibilities and rights 201
5.1 Co-guardians 201
5.2 Sharing parental responsibilities and rights 202
5.3 Parenting plans (section 33) 202
5.4 What happens if a person refuses access or prevents a person
from exercising their parental responsibilities and rights? 203
6 Termination, extension, suspension or restriction of parental
responsibilities and rights 204
Chapter 3 ADOPTION, ARTIFICIAL FERTILISATION AND SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD

– Wesahl Domingo 208
1 Adoption 209
1.1 When can a child be adopted? 209
1.2 Who can adopt? 210
1.3 Who must consent to the adoption? 211
1.4 Gathering information about required consent, and
giving notice of proposed adoption 211
1.5 When is consent to the adoption not required? 212
1.6 How does one go about giving consent to the adoption? 212
1.7 What are post-adoption agreements 213
1.8 What are freeing orders? 214
1.9 What are the procedural requirements when applying for
an adoption order? 214
1.10 What does the court consider in an adoption application? 214
1.11 What are the effects of an adoption order? 215
1.12 How do you cancel an adoption order? 216
1.13 What are the effects of cancelling an adoption order? 216
1.14 Are payments allowed for an adoption? 217
1.15 Can an adopted child find his or her biological parents? 217
1.16 What are inter-country adoptions? 217
2 Artificial fertilisation 218
2.1 What is artificial fertilisation? 218
2.2 What is the status of a child conceived by
artificial fertilisation? 219
2.3 Access to biographical and medical information regarding
genetic parents 219
3 Surrogate motherhood 219
3.1 What is a surrogate mother? 219
3.2 What is a surrogate motherhood agreement? 219
3.3 Do you have to enter into an agreement with the
surrogate mother? 220

3.4 Whose consent is required? 220
3.5 Genetic origin of the child 220
3.6 Confirmation by the court 221
3.7 What is the status of a child born of a surrogate
motherhood agreement 222
3.8 Can a surrogate motherhood agreement be terminated? 222
3.9 What is the effect of termination of a surrogate
motherhood agreement? 223
3.10 Can a surrogate mother terminate her pregnancy? 223
3.11 Can a surrogate mother receive payment? 224
3.12 Access to biographical and medical information
concerning genetic parents 224
Chapter 4 ENGAGEMENTS
1 Common law and the contents of an engagement 227
2 Capacity to conclude a contract of engagement 228
3 Termination of the contract of engagement 228
4 Breach of contract of engagement 229
5 Damages for breach of contract of engagement 230
5.1 Breach of contract 230
5.2 Delictual damages: the actio inuiriarum 233
5.3 Reconsidering damages for termination of engagement? 233
6 Return of the engagement gifts 234
7 The fate of children 235
Chapter 5 REQUIREMENTS FOR CIVIL MARRIAGE

1 What is a civil marriage? 236
2 Requirements for civil marriage 237
3 Capacity 238
3.1 Capacity to marry (absolute capacity) 238
3.2 Capacity to marry each other (relative capacity) 239
4 Consensus: Voluntary informed consent 242
4.1 Lack of capacity to give consent 243
4.2 Metus (duress or intimidation) 243
4.3 Material mistake or fraud 244
5 The prescribed formalities 246
5.1 Marriage officers 246
5.2 Objections 246
5.3 Proof of age and identity 247
5.4 The marriage formula 247
5.5 Witnesses 248
5.6 Place and time of the wedding 248
5.7 Registration of the marriage 249

Chapter 6 VOID, VOIDABLE AND PUTATIVE MARRIAGES
– Razaana Denson 251
1 Void marriages 251
1.1 Legal consequences of a void marriage 252
1.2 Grounds for nullity of marriage 252
2 Voidable marriages 253
2.1 Legal consequences of voidable marriages 254
2.2 Grounds for voidability 254
3 Putative marriages 255
3.1 Requirements for a putative marriage 256
3.2 Consequences of a putative marriage 256
Chapter 7 PERSONAL CONSEQUENCES OF CIVIL MARRIAGE

1 The consortium omnis vitae 259
1.1 Protection of the consortium omnis vitae 260
2 Reciprocal duty of spousal support 264
2.1 General principles of the common-law duty of support 265
2.2 Scope and content of the duty of support 266
2.3 Enforcing the duty of support between the spouses 266
2.4 Termination of the duty of support 267
2.5 Liability to third parties who have provided spousal support 267
2.6 Liability of third parties for loss of support 271
3 Managing the common household: household necessaries 271
3.1 ‘Household necessaries’ 272
3.2 Duties to pay for ‘household necessaries’ (the items and
services necessary for running the joint household 273
3.3 Power to bind the other spouse in contract for provision
of ‘household necessaries’ (the items and services
necessary for running the joint household) 273
3.4 Requirements for the power to incure debts for
household necessaries 274
3.5 Defences against claims based on provision of
household necessaries 275
3.6 The overlap between the duty of support and the duty
to provide household necessaries 276
4 The matrimonial home 277
4.1 Circumstances in which the court may order ejectment
of a spouse 278
5 Parental responsibilities and rights 278
6 Other personal consequences of marriage: ‘the marital status’ 278
Chapter 8 MARITAL PROPERTY

– Amanda Barratt, Priya Pravesh Singh, Wesahl Domingo 282
1 What is marital property? 283
2 Why is it important to have rules about marital property? 283

3 Matrimonial property systems 283
4 Marriages in community of property 284
4.1 The default matrimonial property system 284
4.2 Sharing everything: the basic rule of the in-community-
of-property system 284
4.3 Separate property: assets that do not fall into the joint estate 287
4.4 Liability for debts 288
5 Delicts committed by or against spouses married in community
of property 289
5.1 When a spouse pays delictual damages to a third party 289
5.2 When third parties pay delictual damage to one of the spouses 292
5.3 When spouses commit delicts against each other 292
6 Administration of the joint estate 294
6.1 Sole administration and marital power 294
6.2 Abolition of marital power 295
6.3 Equal powers to deal with the joint estate 295
6.4 Transactions that need spousal consent 295
6.5 What is the legal effect of section 15(2) and section 15(3)
transactions performed without spousal consent 301
6.6 What remedies does the non-consenting spouse have 302
6.7 Protecting third parties: ‘deemed consent’ in terms of
section 15(9)(a) 304
6.8 Protecting spouses when spousal consent is ‘deemed’:
section 15(9)(b) 305
6.9 When a spouse cannot give consent or unreasonably
refuses to give consent 308
6.10 When a spouse deals with the joint estate in an
irresponsible way 309
7 Capacity to litigate when married in capacity of property 310
8 Marriages out of community of property without accrual 310
8.1 Sharing nothing? The basic rule of the out-of-community-
of-property system 311
8.2 The antenuptial contract 311
8.3 Sharing expenses 312
8.4 Sharing property 312
9 Marriages out of community of property including the accrual system 313
9.1 Sharing eventual gains: the basics of the accrual system 313
9.2 Background: the reasons for introduction of the accrual
system in 1984 314
9.3 How much do the spouses share? 315
9.4 Complicating the calculation: exclusions from the accrual 316
9.5 Complicating things still further: commencement values 317
9.6 Respecting spouses’ interests in the accrual 320
9.7 Liability for household necessaries 321
9.8 The antenuptial contract 321
10 Changing the matrimonial property system during the marriage 322

Chapter 9 DISSOLUTION OF CIVIL MARRIAGE
– Amanda Barratt and Priya Pravesh Singh 324
1 Personal consequences of dissolution of marriage 325
2 Division of the marital property when the marriage is dissolved
by death 326
2.1 Marriages in community of property 326
2.2 Marriages out of community of property 327
2.3 Marriages out of community of property with the
accrual system 328
3 Claims of the surviving spouse 328
3.1 Claims based on inheritance 329
3.2 Claims based on the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act 329
Chapter 10 GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE

– Amanda Barratt and Priya Pravesh Singh 331
1 Divorce as a widespread social and legal practice 332
2 What is the purpose of divorce law? 333
2.1 Promote social stability 333
2.2 Protect the economic interests of the spouses 333
2.3 Protect the best interests of children 333
2.4 Provide divorce procedures that are efficient and inexpensive 334
2.5 Provide divorce proceedings that do not escalate hostility
and bitterness 334
3 Grounds for divorce 334
3.1 The move from fault-based divorce to no-fault divorce 334
3.2 Grounds for divorce in terms of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 335
3.3 The irretrievable breakdown of marriage (section 4(1)) 335
3.4 Listed circumstances that might indicate an irretrievable
breakdown (section 4(2)) 337
3.5 Mental illness or continuous unconsciousness (section 5) 338
3.6 Does the court have discretion to refuse to grant a divorce? 339
Chapter 11 ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF DIVORCE

1 The economic context of divorce 343
2 Written agreements (section 7(1)) and the ‘shadow of the law’ 344
3 Dividing the property according to the matrimonial property system 345
4 Forfeiture of patrimonial benefits of the marriage (section 9(1)) 346
4.1 How does forfeiture work? 346
4.2 When will the court order forfeiture of benefits? 348
4.3 How does the court decide if a spouse will be
unduly benefited? 349
5 Transfer of assets (section 7(3))
5.1 When will the divorce court make a transfer order 352
5.2 How much will the court transfer? 354
5.3 Is section 7(3) unconstitutional? 358

6 Spousal maintenance after divorce (section 7(2)) 359
6.1 What is spousal maintenance? 359
6.2 The ‘clean break’ model 360
6.3 Reasons to award spousal maintenance 360
6.4 Section 7(2) 361
6.5 Changing a spousal maintenance order 364
7 Pension interests 365
Chapter 12 CHILDREN AFTER DIVORCE

– Amanda Barratt and Wesahl Domingo 367
1 What is an order for ‘care’ or ‘custody’? 369
2 What is an order for ‘contact’ or ‘access’ 372
3 Maintenance orders 373
4 Guardianship 374
5 Arrangements for children and the ‘child’s best interests’ standard 374
5.1 What are the ‘child’s best interests’? 375
5.2 How do we ascertain the child’s ‘best interests’?
Procedural mechanisms 376
6 What about the rights and interests of parents? 380
Chapter 13 CUSTOMARY MARRIAGES

– Fatima Osman and Amanda Barratt 383
1 The nature of customary marriage 384
2 The legal status of customary marriages 386
3 Requirements for formation of a valid customary marriage 388
3.1 A marriage negotiated and entered into or celebrated in
accordance with customary law 389
3.2 Prohibited degrees of relationship 391
3.3 Existing civil marriages 391
3.4 Requirements for the formation of a polygynous marriage 391
4 Registration of the marriage 392
5 Personal consequences of marriage 393
6 Matrimonial property system 393
6.1 Monogamous marriages 393
6.2 Polygynous marriages 395
7 Divorce 397
7.1 Grounds for divorce 397
7.2 Children and divorce 398
7.3 Economic consequences of divorce 398
8 Converting a customary marriage into a civil marriage 399
Chapter 14 RELIGIOUS MARRIAGES

– Waheeda Amien, Amanda Barratt and Razaana Denson 401
1 The differences between a religious and a civil marriage 402
2 When can parties enter into a religious marriage and a civil marriage 402

3 Are religious marriage rules recognised and enforced as rules
of South African civil law? 403
3.1 Couples married by both religious law and civil law 403
3.2 Couples married by religious law only 404
4 ‘Mutually respectful coexistence’: Religious marriages and
the Constitution 406
5 Patchy legal recognition for Muslim and Hindu marriages 407
5.1 Religious marriages as universal partnerships 407
5.2 Rules of custom? 408
5.3 Regulation in terms of the rules of contract 408
5.4 Statutory recognition of religious marriages 408
5.5 Extension of benefits to spouses in in religious marriages
in court cases 410
6 Legal integration of religious and civil law 413
6.1 Legal nature of a Muslim marriage 413
6.2 The Muslim Marriages Bill 416
Chapter 15 CIVIL UNION ACT

1 What is a civil union? 423
2 Who can solemnise a civil marriage or civil partnership in
terms of the civil union act? 424
3 When can a marriage officer refuse to solemnise a civil marriage
or a civil partnership? 424
4 Who is allowed to get married or civil partnered in terms of the
Civil Union Act? 425
5 Can a person object to a proposed civil union? 425
6 What is the civil union solemnisation formula? 425
7 How is a civil union registered? 426
8 What are the legal consequences of a civil union? 426
Chapter 16 DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS

– Morné Olivier, Amanda Barratt and Razaana Denson 430
1 The legal status of domestic partnerships 431
2 Express private contracts and wills 432
2.1 Formal domestic partnership agreements 433
2.2 Wills 433
3 Tacit contracts 433
3.1 Partnership agreements 434
3.2 Support agreements 437
4 Legislation 438
5 Constitutional challenges to the legal status of life-partners 439
5.1 Successful constitutional challenges by same-sex
domestic partners 440
5.2 Unsuccessful constitutional challenge by a heterosexual
domestic partner 441

6 The Draft Domestic Partnerships Bill 2008 442
6.1 Registered domestic partnerships 443
6.2 Unregistered domestic partners 446
Chapter 17 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

1 Who can apply for a protection order? 452
2 Who is in a domestic relationship? 453
3 Forms of domestic violence 453
4 How do you stop the abuse? Protection orders 455
5 Considering the application 457
6 Issuing the interim protection order 457
7 Issuing the protection order 458
8 Can a protection order be varied or set aside? 460
9 Role of the police 461
10 Problems with implementation of the Domestic Violence Act 462
BIBLIOGRAPHY 464
TABLE OF STATUTES 479
TABLE OF CASES 488
INDEX 499

xvi
About the authors

Waheeda Amien is an Associate Professor in the Department of Public Law at the University of
Cape Town. Her expertise is in the areas of Legal Pluralism, Religion, Culture, Women’s Rights
and Personal and Family Laws.
Amanda Barratt is an Associate Professor in the Department of Private Law at the University of
Cape Town and teaches Family Law.
Razaana Denson is a lecturer in the Private Law Department in the Law Faculty at Nelson
Mandela Metropolitan University. Her field of speciality is Family Law.
Wesahl Domingo is an Associate Professor at the University of the Witwatersrand, School of
Law. She is also an accredited family law mediator.
Jacques Mahler-Coetzee is a Senior Lecturer at the Nelson Mandela School of Law, Attorney of
the High Court of South Africa and Instructor at the Law Society’s School for Legal Practice.
Morné Olivier is an Associate Professor in law at the University of the Witwatersrand,
Johannesburg.
Fatima Osman is a lecturer in the Department of Private Law where she teaches African
customary law and the law of succession. She is also an attorney of the High Court of South
Africa.
Heidi Schoeman is Head of Programme: Law at the Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd
and an admitted advocate of the High Court of South Africa.
Priya P. Singh is an admitted attorney and notary and teaches law at the University of KwaZulu-
Natal (Pietermaritzburg).

xvii
How to use BouncePages

Pearson’s BouncePages app launches engaging, interactive materials that
bring textbook pages to life. Use your mobile device to snap or scan a picture
of the pre-tagged Pearson page, and a video illustrating the concept launches
immediately. No slow websites or hard-to-remember logins required.
BouncePages transform textbooks into convenient digital platforms, breathe
life into learning and help you grasp difficult academic concepts.
The BouncePages app is available to download for free from Android and
iOS play stores. Search your app store for ‘BouncePages’ and download the
software. To access the enhanced material in this textbook, simply look out for the BouncePages
logo on selected pages and follow these steps:
1. Click on the BouncePages app on your smartphone.
2. Aim the camera so that the page is easily viewable on the screen.
3. Tap the screen to scan the page.
4. Tap the image that appears on screen to access engaging video material.

Part
1 Law of persons
Chapter 1: Introduction 3
Chapter 2: Through the looking glass: defining words
and concepts in law 6
Chapter 3: The beginning of legal personality 22
Chapter 4: Minority: how age affects status and capacity 40
Chapter 5: Sex and gender – status and capacity 84
Chapter 6: Other factors affecting status and capacity 92
Chapter 7: Domicile 118
Chapter 8: The end of legal personality 134
Chapter 9: Law and the dead 149

1 Introduction
Most South African universities offer a course called ‘The law of persons’ in the first year of the
LLB degree. Many new law students are somewhat perplexed by the course name – surely all law
is ‘the law of persons’? After all, people make the law, and the law regulates human behaviour.
Students soon discover that the law uses many puzzling or esoteric terms. In law, things are often
not quite what they seemed at first glance.
For a start, the word ‘person’ when used as a legal term does not mean exactly the same thing
as the word ‘person’ in everyday language. The first thing that law students learn in their law of
persons’ course is a new definition of ‘person’ – a legal definition of person. Students are ‘persons’
in the eyes of the law – but so is their university. In law, a university is also a ‘person’.
Much of the law of persons’ course examines ‘status’ and ‘capacity.’ A person’s ‘status’ (his or
her standing in the eyes of the law) depends on the class or group to which the person belongs.
The most important status is ‘minority’ (the status of people who are below the age of 18).
Typically a law of persons’ course will look at minors in detail and will examine the various
capacities that minors do or do not have in the eyes of the law. The law of persons is also
concerned with the capacities of other groups of persons, for example, those who are mentally ill,
or people who are intoxicated.
Many law schools use a course on the law of persons as a general ‘Introduction to Law’. Law
of persons is often the first substantive law course that students do at law school, and this is
where students first encounter the many legal principles and concepts that they will use
throughout their LLB (and in legal practice if they choose to become lawyers). These principles
and concepts are the ‘building blocks of law’ – they enable the law to work in the way that it does.
Fortunately for law teachers and students, the law of persons provides many opportunities for
using the foundational building blocks of law: What is a ‘right’? What does it mean to have a
right? How does the law protect your rights or enable you to assert them? What is a legal
‘remedy’? What can you do with a remedy, and when, and how?
This book is intended primarily for new law students. One of the book’s purposes is to explain
how to ‘think like a lawyer’ and how to ‘work with the rules’. Thus the purpose of the book is not
merely to present or state the rules. Rules are easy enough to find using the Internet ... anyone can do
that. The primary purpose of a law school is not to ‘teach rules’. Instead, students come to law school
to learn how to use the rules. One of the purposes of this book is to demonstrate why the rules and
principles are useful and important, and how they can be put to use when solving legal problems.
Law students also learn that all rules are not equal, and all sources of rules are not equal.
Rules found in the Constitution, Acts of Parliament, court judgments, or the writings of the
Roman-Dutch writers are more ‘authoritative’ and important than rules found in a textbook.
Constitutional rules are more important than rules found in the other authoritative sources. It is
important that you understand the sources of law, and learn how to use them well. We provide
examples of important legal sources and include activities intended to familiarise you with the

4 Part 1: Law of persons
various types of legal literature. Again, the emphasis is on how to use the sources when solving
legal problems.
The book contains several design features which make it a useful learning resource for law
students: there are activity features in all the chapters and a ‘review your understanding’ section at
the end of each chapter. We also list core ‘further reading’ at the end of each chapter, and the book
has a full bibliography for those who wish to read beyond the ‘further reading’ lists. We use the
index instead of a formal, separate glossary. Some of the terms in the index are typed in bold, and
we provide the page number where you can find a full definition and explanation of the term.
We use the ‘Obiter’ feature for additional information and discussion. Many of the Obiter
discussions originate from questions asked by students during our lectures. The answers we gave
were not core to our lectures, but students found them interesting or useful, and we thought it
would be worthwhile to include parts of those discussions in this book.
Another core aim of a law school is to invite students to think critically about the law and its
rules. Everyone who works with the law should ask questions such as: ‘Is this a good rule?’; ‘Why
does the rule look like this?’; ‘Is this rule unfair?’; ‘Does this rule have the desired effect?’ In Part 1
of the book, we often use the Obiter boxes to ask critical questions like this.
Here is an overview of the chapters in the first part of the book.
Chapter 2 has two parts. The first part discusses the question: ‘What is a person – and why
does this matter?’ In the first part of Chapter 2 we define and discuss the concepts ‘person’, ‘rights’,
‘legal object’, ‘capacity’ and ‘status.’ These are foundational concepts for the law of persons.
The second part of Chapter 2 is really a reference resource. Here we discuss concepts that are
not core to the law of persons as such, but which originate in other branches of law such as the
law of obligations, the law of property, and the law of succession. In particular, we examine forms
of civil liability, important legal remedies, and the basic rules of succession. You will need to
know something about these concepts as you work through the book. In our experience, students
do not always find it meaningful to read the sections on forms of liability and remedies before
they start working with these concepts in the more focused contexts of the later chapters. You
might find it more useful to return to these sections later when you really need an explanation.
However, we have found that students find it very practical to have the forms of liability and the
most important remedies grouped together in one place. This enables them to see an overall
structure, and makes it easier to find (or compare) forms of liability or remedies when this is
relevant while reading other chapters in the book.
Chapter 3 expands on the concept ‘person’ or ‘legal subject’. We discuss how someone
becomes a ‘person’. What does the law regard as ‘live birth’ and why is this important? We learn
that the unborn can never have rights, but that under some circumstances, the law will take note
of the unborn and protect their potential interests. In the last part of the chapter we distinguish
between people (legal subjects) and other animals (legal objects). We end the chapter by making
you think hard about this distinction by considering the position of non-human animals in
relation to the legal system.
Chapter 4 is the longest chapter in Part 1. Here we focus on ‘minors’ – people below the age
of 18 – and explore how and why the law restricts the legal capacity of minors. How does the law
protect minors from the consequences of foolish or irresponsible acts? What about the other
people involved? Does the law offer them any protection when dealing with minors?
Chapter 5 looks at sex and gender. In the past, the law discriminated against women because
of their sex, particularly in the context of marriage law. Nowadays men and women are equal in
the eyes of the law, and the Constitution forbids any unfair discrimination against women.
Interestingly, however, it does permit some discrimination that is not unfair. We will examine
situations where the law treats people differently because of their sex and ask whether this

Chapter 1: Introduction 5
discrimination is fair or unfair. We will also explore how the law deals with gender and the issue
of sexual re-alignment in those who are born with the physical signs of one sex, but who believe
and feel themselves to be the opposite sex to the one they are biologically.
Chapter 6 looks at the limitations which the law places on the capacity to act of some other
categories of people. Here we focus particularly on the capacity of people who are mentally ill.
Can mentally ill people make valid wills? What about people who are so drunk that they don’t
know what they are doing? Can you get drunk and wake up legally married? We will also examine
restrictions on the capacity to act of people who are insolvent or have been declared prodigals. In
the last part of the chapter we look at how the law deals with people who have some physical
disability that makes it difficult for them to manage their affairs.
So far we have examined how age, sex and factors such as mental illness influence a person’s
capacity in the law. Chapter 7 deals with a factor that also has a significant effect on a person’s
status in the law – his or her place of domicile. As you will see, your domicile affects such matters
as your personal status, the property system under which you are married and what judicial
system operates in deciding how your estate will be settled when you die.
Chapter 8 is about death and the end of legal personality. Of course, death has important
legal implications. However, there is no clear and unambiguous legal definition of ‘death’.
What happens if someone disappears and everyone believes that they must be dead but can’t
produce a corpse to prove it? How can we create legal certainty about the death – and why is this
important? These are some of the questions we will examine in the section on presumption of death.
Chapter 9 looks at the law regarding the human corpse. Dead people have no rights. So why
is the law so concerned about the treatment of dead bodies? In this chapter we examine organ
donations and transplants, and the problem of trafficking in human tissue for commercial gain.

Through the looking
2 glass: defining words
and concepts in law
‘I don’t know what you mean by “glory”,’ Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. ‘Of course you don’t
– till I tell you. I meant: “there’s a nice knock-down argument for
you!”’
‘But “glory” doesn’t mean “a nice knock-down argument”,’ Alice
objected.
‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I
choose it to mean – neither more nor less.’1
Words and concepts are the tools of the law. Unlike Humpty Dumpty in Through the Looking
Glass, we are not free to decide what the words and concepts mean. In law, words and concepts
have very precise meanings – and this is what they mean, ‘neither more nor less’ as Humpty
Dumpty might say.
Lawyers are deeply concerned with definitions of words and concepts. They want to know
precisely what the words mean ... whole court cases sometimes hinge on the meaning of a
particular word.2 You will notice that Acts of Parliament often begin with a lengthy section called
‘definitions’. This section explains precisely what the words mean in the context of the statute.3
The first book on Roman-Dutch law, Introduction to the Jurisprudence of Holland (Inleiding
tot de Hollandsche Rechtsgeleertheyd) was written by Hugo Grotius. The first oﬃcial publication
of this book (in 1631) began with a foreword addressed to ‘Dear Reader’, which explained that
the reason for publishing the book was that unscrupulous publishers had been printing
unauthorised copies that were ‘all imperfect and full of mistakes’. The reader is assured that this
author ‘has been careful to make definitions correspond with the words defined, a matter in
which the jurists often go wrong.’4 So there is evidence of the need to define legal words and
concepts precisely on the first page of the very first published work on Roman-Dutch law.
1 DEFINING WORDS AND CONCEPTS

In this chapter we define and explain some of the foundational concepts used in private law. We
begin by asking, ‘What is a person – and why does this matter?’ The most important consequence
1 The quotation above is from Through the Looking Glass, a still popular book that was written for children in the
nineteenth century. (Carroll, 1998: 186).
2 See, for example, Minister of Home Aﬀairs v Fourie 2006 (1) SA 524 (CC) where the Constitutional Court considers
the legal meanings of the words ‘husband’, ‘wife’, ‘spouse’, and ‘marriage’.
3 See, for example, section 1 of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, which has several pages of definitions.
4 The quotations in this paragraph are from the Dear Reader foreword to Grotius’s Introduction to the Jurisprudence
of Holland as translated by R.W. Lee (Oxford University Press, 1926). Lee writes about the publishing history
of Grotius’s work in his own preface. He explains that Grotius wrote his book while imprisoned at the Castle of
Loevenstein between 1619 and 1621. Grotius did not intend to publish this work: he wrote it to teach his own
children about the laws of their country. However, defective copies of the book began to circulate in the 1620s, and
it was in response to this that Grotius decided to authorise the first official publication of the book in 1631.

Chapter 2: Through the looking glass: defining words and concepts in law 7
of being recognised as a ‘person’ in the eyes of the law is that a person can have legal rights and
duties. We explain why this is so important to the operation of our legal system by examining the
concepts ‘rights’ and ‘duties’ in some detail.
The rights and duties of a legal person depend in part on that person’s ‘status’ in law and on
the ‘capacities’ that such status gives. ‘Status’ and ‘capacity’ are core concepts in the law of persons,
and are the subject of the longest chapter in the book, which looks at the capacities of people who
have the status of ‘minors’. This introductory chapter provides an introduction to the concepts
‘capacity’ and ‘status’ as background to this part of the book.
We also use this chapter to introduce and define words and concepts from other areas of
private law. It is not possible to study the law of persons without referring to ‘liability’. All the
chapters in Part 1 require the reader to have a basic knowledge of what it means to be ‘liable’, for
example, ‘liable in contract’ or ‘delictually liable’. In this chapter, we provide introductory
explanations for three forms of liability: (a) contractual liability, (b) delictual liability, and
(c) liability for unjustified enrichment.
Many of the chapters in Part 1 refer to important legal ‘remedies’ that arise from contract,
delict, or unjustified enrichment. We have grouped together some of the most important
remedies at the end of this chapter, where we explain them briefly.
Finally, we provide a brief introduction to the law of succession because readers will require
some knowledge of this area of law when reading later chapters.
When you have worked through this chapter, you should be able to answer the following
questions:
•• What is a person (legal subject)?
•• What is a legal object?
•• What are the various classes of rights?
•• What is legal capacity?
•• What are the various types of legal capacity?
•• What is legal status?
The last three sections of the chapter are intended primarily for future reference. As you work
through this book, you can return to these sections for introductions to:
1. Forms of liability:
a) contractual
b) delictual
c) unjustified enrichment
2. Useful legal remedies
3. Introductory rules for the law of succession.
2 WHAT IS A ‘PERSON’ – AND WHY DOES THIS MATTER?

The word ‘person’ as defined in law, does not mean exactly the same thing as ‘person’ in everyday
language. The law defines a ‘person’ as someone or something that can have legal rights and
duties.5 As Boberg puts it, ‘A person may be defined as a being, entity or association which is
capable of having legal rights and duties.’6
This definition includes natural persons (human beings). But, as discussed in later chapters,
the law also regards other kinds of entities as ‘persons’. These are called ‘artificial persons’ or
‘juristic persons’, and include entities such as commercial companies, banks and universities.7
5 Wille’s Principles (2007: 145).

6 Boberg (1999: 6). Very similar definitions appear in Hahlo and Kahn (1973: 103); and Hahlo and Kahn (1960: 345).
See also Paton (1972: 391).
7 Boberg (1999: 4); Wille’s Principles (2007: 145); Hahlo and Kahn (1973: 104).

Some writers prefer to use the term ‘legal subject’ rather than ‘person’.8 The term ‘legal subject’
means exactly the same thing as ‘person’, as Boberg defines it. In other words, a legal subject is a
being or other entity which is capable of having legal rights and duties.
You will also encounter the term ‘legal personality’. All persons have legal personality. This
phrase describes the quality of being a person (as defined above). Some writers prefer the term
‘legal subjectivity’, which emphasises the legal aspects of a person’s activities and existence. Legal
subjectivity is a synonym for legal personality.9
The importance of being a ‘person’ in the eyes of the law is that the law recognises that you
can have legal rights and duties. Only persons can have legal rights and duties. In law, ‘this is the
essential characteristic that distinguishes a person from a thing’,10 or from ‘legal objects’ more
specifically.
3 WHAT ARE RIGHTS, DUTIES AND LEGAL OBJECTS?

Private law deals with various kinds of rights, for example, real rights, personal rights and
personality rights. We distinguish between the various classes of rights by looking at the legal
objects to which the rights relate.11
There are three12 main types of legal objects, giving rise to the three main categories of rights:
•• Physical things (for example, houses, farms, cars, cats and pencils). Where the object of the
right is a physical thing, the right is a ‘real right’.
•• Performances (for example, babysitting, a taxi-ride, or the payment of money). Where the
object of the right is a performance, the right is a ‘personal right’.
•• Aspects of your personality (for example, your reputation or your privacy). Where the
object of the right is an aspect of your personality, the right is a ‘personality right’.
All legal rights give rise to corresponding legal duties. The kind of duty or obligation to which the
right gives rise depends on what kind of right is involved. This may be illustrated by using some
specific examples:
3.1 Real rights
Where the object of a right is a physical thing, the right is a real right. Ownership of a physical
thing is an example of a real right. The most interesting aspect of a real right is that it operates
against the whole world. For example, if a person owns a thing, everybody else in the world has a
corresponding duty towards him or her: they must not interfere with his or her real right of
ownership.
8 See, for example, Boezaart (2010: 3); Heaton (2012: 4); Hosten (1980: 281–283) using both terms.
9 See Boezaart (2010: 5), providing the following definition: ‘Legal subjectivity concerns the characteristic of being a
legal subject in legal intercourse.’ She contrasts this with their social or commercial activities.
10 Boberg (1999: 3).
11 This approach is clearly set out in Hosten (1980: 277–278); Boezaart (2010: 2–3); and Heaton (2012: 2–4).
12 Not all private law rights fit comfortably into these categories. Many writers also identify ‘immaterial property
rights’ as an independent category of rights. The objects of these rights are patents, copyrights, or other forms
of intellectual property protection (see, for example, Boezaart (2010: 2); Heaton (2012: 4); Hosten (1980: 278)).
Whether the literary work or invention to which the copyright or patent relates is in itself the object of the right is
an extremely complex and controversial issue. For a useful overview see Kamina (2001: 383).

Here we see a real right, its corresponding

duty, and the object of the right. Legal objects of ‘real rights’
We classify the right as a ‘real right’ because
John’s Everyone else
the object of the right is a physical thing (the
right has a duty
house).
to respect
It’s John’s house, so he has a real right of John’s right
ownership.
Everybody else has a duty towards John –
their duty is to respect John’s right and not to House
interfere with it (for example, they should not (legal object)
enter John’s house without his permission).
Figure 2.1: Legal objects of real rights
3.2 Personal rights
Where the object of the right is a performance, the right is a personal right. Personal rights
behave differently from real rights. We saw that real rights operate against the whole world –
everybody has a duty to respect a real right. Personal rights, on the other hand, operate primarily
against a particular person – the person who owes the performance. Good examples are the
performances owing in terms of a contract.
Here we see a typical contract: John and
Mary have agreed that Mary will babysit John’s Legal objects of ‘personal rights’
children one Saturday afternoon and that John
John’s Mary’s
will pay her R200.
right to duty to
This agreement (contract) creates two
babysitting babysit
personal rights: John has a personal right to the
performance of babysitting (and Mary has the
corresponding duty to babysit). Mary has the
right to be paid R200 (and John has the Performance of babysitting
corresponding duty to pay Mary R200). (legal object)
We classify both these rights as personal
rights because in both cases, the object of the Figure 2.2: Legal objects of personal rights (a)
right is a performance:
•• performance of babysitting, and
•• payment of R200.
3.3 Personality rights Legal objects of ‘personal rights’

The law protects various aspects of a person’s
personality. Every person has the right to these Mary’s John’s
aspects of personality and may claim damages if right duty to
they are infringed. The personality interests to R200 pay Mary
protected in South African law include: R200
•• physical integrity (the body)
•• bodily freedom, for example, protection
against unlawful arrest Performance – payment of R200
•• reputation (good name) (legal object)
•• dignity
•• privacy.13 Figure 2.3: Legal objects of personal rights (b)
13 See generally Neethling (2005); Burchell (1998).

Where the object of the right is one of these aspects of personality, the right is a personality right.
Personality rights operate against the whole world. Everyone else in the world has a corresponding
duty to respect these rights and must not interfere with them.
3.4 Constitutional rights
The rights we have examined above (real rights, personal rights, and personality rights) are
private law rights. Constitutional rights are public law rights. They are set out in the Bill of
Rights in the South African Constitution, 1996 (sections 7–39).14
The Constitution is the supreme law of the country and, in principle, no rule of law (whether
it comes from common law or from a statute) should violate any of the constitutional rights. In
this book, we will discuss what happens when common law or statutory rules are ‘unconstitutional’.
What happens when existing rules infringe someone’s constitutional rights?
4 WHAT IS ‘CAPACITY’?
In general terms, ‘capacity’ means ‘ability’ or ‘competence’. This is close to its legal meaning. In
law, ‘capacity’ refers to what a person is capable of doing in terms of the law. In other words,
what are the person’s legal abilities or legal competencies? Capacity is a complex legal concept
and has given rise to considerable debate among legal commentators.15
Boberg has a clear and straightforward approach to capacity: first, he distinguishes between
‘passive legal capacity’ and ‘active legal capacity’. Then he divides ‘active legal capacity’ into
various types or forms of active legal capacity. This chapter follows Boberg’s approach. This is the
overall structure:
•• passive legal capacity
•• capacity to perform juristic acts (for example, enter into contracts, get married, transfer
ownership of property)
•• capacity to be held accountable for wrongdoing (crimes and delicts)
•• capacity to litigate.
4.1 Passive legal capacity

To be ‘passive’ means to be ‘inert’ or ‘acted upon’.16 Passive legal capacity means the capacity
merely to have legal rights and duties. No effort or positive action is necessarily required of you;
sometimes the law automatically gives you rights and duties, or somebody else acquires the rights
and duties on your behalf.
Boberg defines passive legal capacity as ‘the capacity merely to have rights and duties.’17All
persons have passive legal capacity. All persons can be the bearers of rights and duties. This is
obvious from the very definition of a ‘person’ as ‘someone (or something) that can have legal
rights and duties’.18
Even newborn babies can have rights and duties. For example, babies are born with the
personality right to physical integrity – everyone else has a duty not to injure or harm the baby’s
14 Human rights are often understood to give rise to three kinds of state obligations: states have obligations to respect,
protect and fulfil people’s human rights. Section 7(2) of the Constitution provides that ‘The state must protect,
promote and fulfil the rights of the Bill of Rights.’ This particular approach is often called the ‘tripartite typology’.
See, for example, Steiner and Alston (2000: 181). The rights in the South African Constitution also apply to
relationships between private individuals (see Currie and De Waal, 2005: 50, 64).
15 See the discussion in Boberg (1999: 65–74).
16 This is part of the definition in the Oxford English Dictionary.
17 Boberg (1999: 66).
18 See the definition of ‘person’ above.

body.19 A newborn baby might even have obligations. Boberg gives the example of the child’s
duty to support his or her parents if he or she has the means to do so and the parents are in need
of support (for example, if the child has a large inheritance).20
4.2 Capacity to perform juristic acts

Juristic acts are voluntary human acts which have intended legal consequences.21 The capacity
to perform juristic acts refers to a person’s capacity to actively change his or her legal position,
for example, by doing things to acquire legal rights or incur legal obligations.22 In law, juristic acts
are regarded as ‘expressions of will’ of the person performing the acts23 – the person concerned
actively intends certain legal consequences to result from his or her acts. For this reason, the law
only recognises capacity to perform juristic acts if the person is capable of understanding the
legal nature and legal consequences of his or her acts.24
Some people have full capacity to perform juristic acts; other people have none. If an
unmarried, 45-year-old man of sound mind enters into a contract, he will be bound by that
contract.25 He has full capacity to act and the law will attach all the intended legal consequences
to his actions. A man like this is capable of understanding the legal nature and legal consequences
of his acts. On the other hand, if a six-year-old enters into a contract the contract will be void and
will have no legal effect. This is because the law does not recognise the contracts of six-year-olds.
In the eyes of the law, six-year-olds can never understand the legal nature and consequences of
their acts. Six-year-old children have no capacity to perform juristic acts.
Boberg has a useful way of organising the various kinds of juristic acts.26 He lists them
as follows:
•• entering into contracts
•• getting married
•• acquiring and alienating property
•• making a will
•• consenting to medical treatment
•• holding office.
We will discuss whether or not various categories of people have the capacity to perform these
juristic acts in the various contexts of the chapters in this book. The longest discussion in the
following chapters concerns the minor’s limited capacity to perform juristic acts. There, we will
look particularly at the minor’s capacity to incur binding contractual obligations.
19 See, for example, the discussion in Road Accident Fund v Mtati 2005 (6) SA 215 (SCA).
20 See Boberg (1999: 66 fn 8). See Part 2, Chapter 2 for more information on the reciprocal duties of support between
parents and children.
21 See Wille’s Principles (2007: 146) defining juristic acts as ‘voluntary human acts to which the law attaches at least
some of the legal consequences willed by the party or parties performing the act’.
22 See Boberg (1999: 746).
24 Boberg (1999: 747).
25 As we discuss in the following chapters, age and mental disability have an enormous impact on a person’s capacity
to act. Marriage might impact on a person’s capacity to act (we look at this in Part 2). Sex has very little impact on
a person’s capacity to act (we discuss this in Part 1, Chapter 5 on sex and gender). Sometimes a man like the one
described here might be legally prohibited from entering into certain contracts. This might be the case if he is an
interdicted prodigal or insolvent. We discuss this in Part 1, Chapter 6 on diverse factors that might influence a
person’s status and capacities.
26 The list is modelled on Boberg’s table of contents.

4.3 Capacity to be held accountable for wrongdoing (delicts

and crimes)
We will examine the capacity of various groups of people to be held accountable for their
wrongdoings. When does a person have the capacity to be held liable in delict27 or be found
guilty of a crime?
A person can only be found guilty of a crime or liable for a delict if she or he acted with ‘fault’
(a blameworthy state of mind).28 Specifically, the person must have acted with either intention
or negligence.
Intention and negligence are complex concepts. They are defined simply here:
People act with intention if they do something ‘on purpose’ or deliberately: they know
what will happen, and they purposefully go about achieving this result. For example,
person Z knows that Mr Smit’s cat will die if he shoots it, and he deliberately achieves
OBITER
the death of Mr Smit’s cat by shooting it.29

Negligence means ‘carelessness’ of a particular kind. In law, person X will be found to
have acted negligently if a reasonable person in X’s position (a) would have foreseen
the possibility that his action might cause damage to someone else, and (b) would
have taken steps to avoid this consequence, and (c) X failed to take such steps.30
In this book, however, our concern is not so much whether people acted with intention or
negligence, but whether they were even capable of having legal intention or negligence. If the
person is capable of having the mental states of intention or negligence he or she can be held
accountable for his or her crimes and delicts. If they are not capable of having these mental states,
they can never be accountable for crimes or delicts.31
A person will be accountable (that is, capable of having ‘fault’ in the form of intention or
negligence) if
a) the person has the mental ability to distinguish between right and wrong, and
b) the person is able to act in accordance with this understanding.32
As you will see in the following chapters, some people are not regarded as accountable in this way
(for example, very young children and people suffering from mental illness). Because these
people are not accountable and cannot form the mental states of intention or negligence, they
cannot be held liable in delict33 or be found guilty of a crime. In Latin, if a person is accountable
(that is, capable of fault in the form of negligence or intention) he or she is culpae capax.34
4.4 Capacity to litigate

The capacity to litigate means the capacity to be a party to a lawsuit, either as a plaintiff (the
person who brings the case) or as a defendant (the person against whom the case is brought). The
27 For more information about delictual liability see section 6.2 of this chapter.
28 Note the exception of the actio de pauperie and similar delicts that do not require fault. We discuss this in Part 1,
Chapter 4 on minority.
29 This form of intention is defined as ‘dolus directus’ or ‘direct intention’.
30 See Kruger v Coetzee 1966 (2) SA 428 (A) at 430.
31 There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as the actio de pauperie which we discuss in Part 1, Chapter 4.
32 Wille’s Principles (2007: 1122) citing Weber v Santam Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk 1983 (1) SA 381 (A) at 403.
33 With the exception of strict liability delicts. See the discussion in Part 1, Chapter 4.
34 For a general discussion on accountability as requirement for delictual liability, see Neethling (2010: 125–126). For a
discussion on the requirements for criminal accountability, see Burchell (2005: 455–554); Snyman (2008: 159–162).

question is not whether the person has a good case in law – it is whether she or he can bring the
case to the court.
A person might have an excellent case, for example, it might be clear that X has committed a
delict against her by driving through a red robot and crashing into her car. But if she has no
capacity to litigate, she will not be able to sue X in court.
In Latin, people’s capacity to litigate is referred to as their locus standi in judicio.
5 WHAT IS ‘STATUS’?
In the legal context, the word ‘status’ means your standing in the eyes of the law.35 People’s legal
status determines their ‘ability or capacity to relate to the legal system’.36 Specifically, a person’s
status determines which legal capacities a person has in the eyes of the law37 – how do we know
if a person has the capacity to conclude contracts, get married, or litigate? This will depend on his
or her ‘status’.
A person’s legal status (and his or her consequent legal capacities) is based on membership of
a particular class or group.38 The law is not concerned with all kinds of groups. Paton points out
that it is possible to identify various groups of people – he uses the example of people with blue
eyes, or people who play bridge.39 But the law is not concerned with such groups.40 As we explain
in the following chapters, the law is primarily concerned with groups of people defined in terms
of age and mental disability (we also look at sex and gender, intoxication, prodigality, insolvency
and physical disability as factors that might affect status and capacity). Marriage also affects
people’s status, and might affect their legal capacities. People who marry in community of
property, for example, have limited capacity to perform some juristic acts.41
On the whole, it is not possible to choose which of these groups you belong to.42 All 17-year-
olds fall into the class ‘minors’ for example.43 Furthermore, once the law assigns you to a class and
thus gives you a particular status, you cannot change the capacities conferred by this status.44 The
various capacities associated with a status are ‘conclusively fixed’ by the law, not chosen by the
people who have a particular status.45 All minors have limited capacity to bind themselves in
contract.46 This is the legal consequence of their minority status.
The law decides which groups will be associated with legal status. In South African law, for
example, membership of the group ‘minors’ affects legal status; membership of the group ‘blue-
eyed people’ does not. South African law also decides which people fall into the various groups –
35 Boberg (1999: 68).

36 Boberg (1999: 68).
37 Boberg (1999: 68). See also Boezaart (2010: 6); Hosten (1980: 284).
38 Paton (1972: 399).
39 Paton (1972: 400)
40 Paton (1972: 400). See also Hosten (1980: 284).
41 See Part 2, Chapter 8 on marital property.
42 See Paton (1972: 400). However, there are obvious exceptions to this general rule: for example, people can choose
whether to marry or not, and people who marry can decide whether or not they wish to marry in community of
property. We explain this in Part 2, Chapter 8 on marital property.
43 Unless they are married.
44 Paton (1972: 399). Again, the obvious exception is marriage. It is possible to change some of the consequences
of marriage (see Part 2, Chapter 8 on marital property). There are also invariable consequences of marriage that
cannot be changed (see Part 2, Chapter 7 on personal consequences of marriage).
45 Paton (1972: 399).
46 We discuss this in Part 1, Chapter 4 on minority. Minors need their guardians’ assistance to incur binding
contractual liability. Emancipated minors have more ‘general assistance’, but they are subject to the limited
capacities of their minority status.

how do we know that a 17-year-old is a minor? This is a rule of South African law. The Children’s
Act provides that the age of majority is 18.47
In South African law, a person’s status is determined by their legal domicile.48 The law of the
country of domicile determines which groups are important, and which group the person
belongs to. We discuss this in the Chapter 7 on domicile.
6 FORMS OF LIABILITY
Many of the chapters in the law of persons’ part of this book refer to various forms of civil
liability. The most important forms of civil liability discussed in this part of the book are:
•• contractual liability
•• delictual liability
•• liability for unjustified enrichment.
As background to the discussions in the following chapters, we set out some of the foundational
principles of these forms of liability here. You might prefer to postpone reading this section on
liability until you need to understand a particular form of liability in the context of another
chapter.
6.1 Contractual liability
A contract is an agreement between two or more people that can be enforced by legal mechanisms
if necessary. A contract is a juristic act through which the parties agree that one or both of them
will incur legal obligations to carry out certain performances – for example, to give something or
do something.49 Most contracts are reciprocal. This means that the parties agree that their
performances will be offered in exchange for the other party’s performance.50 A typical example
of this is a contract of sale.
For example, Mr Lee is selling a special underwater camera in his shop for R10 000. Trixie
offers to buy the camera. Trixie and Mr Lee enter into a contract in terms of which Mr Lee will
deliver the camera to Trixie and Trixie will pay Mr Lee R10 000. These performances are
reciprocal.
Suing someone ‘ex contractu’ (that is, on the basis of contract) is a very powerful claim. In
principle, you can use a contractual claim to get everything the person agreed to pay or do in
terms of the contract. The court can order specific performance from the other contracting
party. For example, the court can order that person to pay all the money he or she owes in terms
of the contract; or deliver the goods he or she promised; or perform the services he or she
promised.51 In our example, a court could order Mr Lee to hand over the camera, or order Trixie
to pay R10 000.
Where there has been a breach of contract, the court can order the breaching party to pay
damages. These damages can be extensive; they are aimed at putting the innocent party in the
47 Children’s Act 38 of 2005, s 17. The age of majority was changed in July 2007. Before this date, the age of majority
was 21, and 20-year-olds were thus minors. Since July 2007, 20-year-olds are majors in the eyes of the law.
48 Wille’s Principles (2007: 53); Hosten (1980: 284–285).
49 See Hutchison (2012: 7).
50 Hutchison (2012: 7).
51 See Wille’s Principles (2007: 738). Note, however, that the court will not always order a specific performance. There
are ‘some types of performance that the law cannot enforce, and others that it will not enforce’ (see Wille’s Principles,
2007: 738). See also Eiselen (2012: 322–324).

same position they would have been in if the terms of the contract had been fully and faultlessly
performed.52
Damages for breach of contract

Trixie is a professional photographer. She urgently needs a very special underwater
camera when she joins a team excavating a famous wreck in the South Atlantic. If she
has this camera, Trixie will be able to photograph the historic excavation and sell her
unique photographs to National Geographic magazine for R100 000.
USING LAW
Mr Lee promises to deliver the special underwater camera before 5 January (the day
the expedition team leaves). Unfortunately, he fails to do so. There is no other suitable
camera available in the whole of South Africa. Trixie is unable to take the unique
photographs, and she loses her opportunity to earn the R100 000.
What damages can Trixie claim from Mr Lee? How much money could she claim to put
her in the position that she would have been in if there had been full and faultless
performance of the contract (that is, if Mr Lee had delivered the camera in good time)?
This book focuses on people who either lack contractual capacity altogether, or who have limited
capacity to contract. People who have limited capacity to contract (for example, unassisted
minors between the ages of seven and 18) cannot incur binding contractual obligations. This
means that the other party to the contract will be unable to sue them ex contractu (on the basis of
contract) and will not have the benefit of the powerful contractual remedies. In some cases (for
example, if the contract involves an infant under seven or a person who is mentally ill), the
contract will be entirely void in the eyes of the law. As far as the law is concerned, there is no
contract at all – nothing happened. The parties must be put back in the same position that they
were immediately before the purported (apparent) contract was entered into.53
6.2 Delictual liability
Delicts are civil wrongs.54 A good example of a delict is a car accident. For example, if Sophia
drives her car through a red light and crashes into Mr Larney’s BMW, Mr Larney might be able
to sue Sophia in delict. To bring a delictual claim against a person, you must prove all the
‘elements of delict’.
Essentially, you must prove:

1. Conduct: the person did something (or failed to do something she or he should have done); and
2. this act is deemed to be wrongful in the eyes of the law; and
3. the person acted with fault (intention or negligence);55 and
52 The aim of these damages is to put the person in the position that he would have been in if there had been ‘full
and faultless performance’ of the contract (Hosten, 1980: 427–428). See Victoria Falls and Transvaal Power Co v
Consolidated Langlaagte Mines Ltd 1915 AD, holding that ‘the rule to be adopted is that it should be put in as good
position by the award of damages as it would have been in if the defendant company had carried out its contract’
(at 46); see also Wille’s Principles (2007: 882–883); Eiselen (2012: 329–340). We say that the person suing for breach
of contract is entitled to positive interesse. See Boezaart (2010: 56 fn 76).
53 See Wille’s Principles (2007: 738–739), noting that the purported contract is ‘worthless and non-existent’.
54 Boberg (1989: 1).
55 As explained above, infants (for example) are not legally capable of acting with either intention or negligence. This
means that this element of delict cannot be satisfied when the act of an infant causes damage to someone else.

4. her or his action caused …

5. some form of damage to you.56
You use specific delictual remedies to claim damages for different kinds of harm.57 We discuss
some of these delictual remedies in the section on ‘remedies’ below. In general, the law
distinguishes between ‘patrimonial’ and ‘non-patrimonial’ damages. You sue for patrimonial
damages when the defendant’s act causes you financial or monetary loss. In our example,
Mr Larney can bring a delictual claim for the money he spends fixing his car; and for receiving
treatment in hospital. The aim of these patrimonial damages is to put the plaintiff (Mr Larney) in
the same financial position that he would have been in if the delict had not been committed.58
You can also sue in delict for non-patrimonial damages (for non-monetary harm). For
example, Mr Larney might have experienced considerable pain and suffering as a result of his
accident. Mr Larney’s pain does not cause him any financial loss. However, the law will still
award him delictual damages (in the form of money) as compensation for the pain caused by
Sophia’s wrongful and negligent act.59 These are non-patrimonial damages. The aim of non-
patrimonial damages awarded for pain and suffering is to compensate the plaintiff: to somehow
‘make good the loss; to amend the injury’.60 People can also sue for non-patrimonial damages if
other personality interests have been infringed – for example if someone damages their
reputation, invades their privacy, or harms their body. The aim of an award of damages under the
actio iniuriarum is to ‘compensate for impairment of personality rights’.61
6.3 Unjustified enrichment
Unjustified enrichment claims are the ‘Cinderella claims’ of our legal system. In practice, these
tend to be the claims you use when all else fails.62 Compared to the powerful contractual claims,
unjustified enrichment claims are very weak. Sometimes you will see these claims referred to as
‘quasi-contractual’ claims. It is important to remember, however, that these are not contractual
claims. Also, you should note that if a party does have a valid contractual claim, he or she must
sue in contract (ex contractu) and cannot use an enrichment remedy.63
In general,64 an action on the grounds of unjustified enrichment arises where ‘one person’s
estate is increased at the expense of another without legal cause’.65 The basic requirements for the
remedy are:
1. The defendant has been factually enriched, and the plaintiff has been factually impoverished.
2. There is a causal link between the defendant’s enrichment and the plaintiff ’s impoverishment
(in other words, the defendant has been enriched at the plaintiff ’s expense).
56 These ‘elements of delict’ are set out in Wille’s Principles page 1094 and briefly discussed on pages 1094–1095. See also
Boberg (1989: 24–25). The question of ‘wrongfulness’ is particularly complex and controversial. For a brief introduction
and overview of wrongfulness see Wille’s Principles (2007: 1096–1102). See also Neethling (2010), generally.
57 See Wille’s Principles (2007: 1092).
58 Wille’s Principles (2007: 1133); Boberg (1989: 478).
59 Boberg (1989: 516); Wille’s Principles (2007: 1161).
60 Per Moseneke DCJ in Van der Merwe v Road Accident Fund 2006 (4) SA 230 (CC) at para 41.
61 Burchell (1998: 435).
62 See Visser (2008: 9), pointing out that enrichment claims are used ‘where the rules of contract, delict, and property
“run out”,’ but arguing that unjustified enrichment should be seen as ‘an autonomous area of obligations’. See also
Sonnekus (2008: 29), discussing the view of enrichment remedies as offering ‘the last ray of hope’.
63 See BK Tooling (Edms) Bpk v Scope Precision Engineering (Edms) Bpk 1979 (1) SA 391. However, see also Visser’s
discussion on unjustified enrichment claims as ‘subsidiary’ to contractual claims (2008: 56–59).
64 It appears that South African law does not have a general ‘unjustified enrichment’ claim and that strictly speaking,
enrichment claims arise only in certain recognised situations (see Visser, 2008: 4–5). Sonnekus (2008: 17). These,
however, are the general principles that underpin the claim in these situations.
65 Visser (2007: 1041–1043), quoting Lotz & Brand.

3. There is no valid legal reason (cause) that justifies the enrichment of the defendant at the
plaintiff ’s expense, or that justifies the retention of the enrichment by the defendant.66
You can already see some of the reasons why this claim is weaker than a contractual claim. If
a person sues in contract, she or he can sue for the full amount owing in terms of the contract. In
unjustified enrichment, however, her or his claim is limited to the amount of the plaintiff ’s
factual impoverishment (see point 1 above).67 Imagine, for example, that a certain Mr Lee sells an
iPod to Bibi and the purchase price is R2 000. If Bibi is bound by her contract and doesn’t pay,
Mr Lee can sue Bibi ex contractu for the full amount owing. So if Bibi has not yet paid anything,
Mr Lee can sue Bibi for R2 000.
If Mr Lee is unable to sue Bibi on the contract (for example, if Bibi is an unassisted minor)
then Mr Lee could potentially bring a claim based on unjustified enrichment. Unjustified
enrichment claims are limited to the factual amount of the plaintiff ’s impoverishment.68 As it
happens, the real worth of the iPod is only R1 500. This means that the most Mr Lee will be able
to claim is R1 500. In fact, he has only been impoverished to the amount of R1 500-worth of iPod,
and the unjustified enrichment claim is based on factual impoverishment and not on the contract
price (that is, the enrichment claim is not based on the purchase price of R2 000).69
Another weakness of the unjustified enrichment remedy is that the plaintiff can sue only for
the amount that the defendant in fact remains enriched by, on the day that the plaintiff institutes
his or her action.70 This could be a problem for Mr Lee. Imagine for example that Bibi drops the
iPod into the ocean and it gets swept out to sea: now Bibi is no longer enriched by R1 500-worth
of iPod. This is unfortunate for Mr Lee – he is using an unjustified enrichment remedy, and his
claim is limited to the amount of Bibi’s factual remaining enrichment. Unfortunately for Mr Lee,
Bibi’s remaining enrichment is now zero.71
7 USEFUL REMEDIES, DEFENCES AND DOCTRINES

In this section we provide an introduction to some of the legal remedies that we refer to in the
following chapters. You might prefer to postpone reading this part of the chapter until you need
to understand a particular remedy in the context of another chapter.
Many of our most important common-law remedies have Latin names because we have
inherited them from Roman law. One of the reasons that these remedies have endured is that
they are very useful.
The rei vindicatio is one of the most powerful remedies in private law. The owner of a physical
thing (for example, a car or a necklace) can use this remedy to recover his or her thing from
anyone who is in possession of it without cause.72 The rei vindicatio is an action ‘in rem’ (a
property-based remedy).
A condictio is used to recover money when one person has been unjustly enriched at the
expense of another. There are several specific condictiones in our law.73
The exceptio non adimpleti contractus is a defence that can be used when parties owe
reciprocal obligations in terms of a contract. If A sues for performance without performing or
66 Visser (2007: 1041–1046). See also Visser (2008: 157). Sonnekus (2008: 1).
67 This is because of the ‘double cap rule’ (see, for example, Visser (2008: 8)). The plaintiff ’s claim is limited to the
extent of his impoverishment.
68 Visser (2008: 158–159).
69 But see Part 1, Chapter 4 discussing the rule that the contract price will set a maximum cap on what can be claimed
in situations where the true value of the thing is more than the contract price.
70 This is the other side of the ‘double cap rule’. Wille’s Principles (2007: 1049–1050); Visser (2008: 163).
71 We will look at other ways in which factual enrichment might be reduced or wiped out in Part 1, Chapter 4 on minority.
72 See Wille’s Principles (2007: 539); Silberberg (2006: 242–246).
73 See generally Visser (2008); and Visser (2007: 1041–1090); Sonnekus (2008).

offering to perform, B can raise the defence of exceptio non adimpleti contractus. This defence
gives B the right to withhold his performance until A has performed her side of the deal.74
The Aquilian action (called the actio legis Aquiliae in Latin) is a delictual remedy. A plaintiff
can use this remedy to claim damages for patrimonial loss caused by the defendant’s wrongful
act. The defendant must have acted with either intention or negligence.75
The actio iniuriarum is a delictual remedy. A plaintiff can use this remedy to claim non-
patrimonial damages when her or his personality rights have been infringed.76 The actio
iniuriarum requires fault in the form of intention; the plaintiff cannot use this remedy if the
defendant has been merely negligent.77
The action for pain and suffering is a delictual remedy. A plaintiff can use this remedy to sue
for non-patrimonial damages arising from physical injury (for example, caused in a car accident).
She or he can sue for pain, suffering, disfigurement, disability and loss of amenities of life, and
shortened life expectancy.78 The defendant must have acted with either intention or negligence.79
The doctrine of estoppel provides that:
1. where A has lied, and
2. B has relied on A’s lie to B’s disadvantage, then
3. A will be prevented (‘estopped’) from relying on the truth in her or his defence.80
Note that some of these remedies are ‘actions’. X takes the initiative and brings the case to court
using the remedy, for example, the actio iniuriarum or the rei vindicatio. The exceptio non
adimpleti contractus, however, is only a defence (i.e., not an ‘action’). B can use this exceptio only
if and when A sues her for performance.
You should also distinguish between the property-based claim (the rei vindicatio) and the
personal claims. The rei vindicatio is part of the law of property. The rei vindicatio is based on
ownership of the thing. It can be brought against anyone who is in possession of the thing
without cause. It is a claim in rem (rem means, ‘thing’, in Latin).81 It is based on a real right.
Claims based on contract, delict, or unjustified enrichment are part of the law of obligations.
The contractual, delictual and enrichment remedies cannot be brought against just anyone – they
can be brought only against a particular person. These are claims in personam.
74 U-Drive Franchise Systems (Pty) Ltd v Drive Yourself (Pty) Ltd 1976 (1) SA 137 (D) at 149D. See Wille’s Principles
(2007: 827–828). This remedy is available only if A has contracted to perform before B or at the same time as B. See
Skead v Conradie 1995 (2) SA 111 (A) at 118I. See also Eiselen (2012: 316–321).
75 Boberg (1989: 268–269). In practice, most claims are based on negligence rather than intention (Boberg, 1989: 269).
See also Neethling (2010: 8).
76 Wille’s Principles (2007: 1166). Neethling (2010: 12).
77 Boberg (1989: 18).
78 See Boberg (1989: 516); Wille’s Principles (2007: 1161); Neethling (2010: 15).
79 Boberg (1989: 516).
80 See, for example, the definition provided in Miller v Dannecker 2001 (1) SA 928 (C) at para 18. See also Wille’s
Principles (2007: 552).
81 The Latin word for ‘thing’ is res. In Latin, the form of the word changes depending on the context. Rem is the same
word, and so is rei.

8 SUCCESSION
This is the area of private law governing what happens to your property when you die. You will
need to have a basic knowledge of the law of succession as you work through some of the chapters
in this book.82
The property of the person who dies is referred to as ‘the estate’. Your estate means everything
you own: this includes all your physical property, for example, house, farm, car, clothes, CD
collection, and so on, and all the money you have in the bank.
If you die without a valid will, you die
‘intestate’ and your estate will be divided up Intestate succession if not married
according to the rules of ‘intestate succession’. and have no children:
‘Intestate succession’ means inheritance where
A
there is no valid will. Leaves R12 000
The basic rule of intestate succession is that
the estate must be divided among the deceased’s
next of kin (closest family).83 Here are some
typical examples: Mother gets Father gets
In Example One, A is unmarried and she has R6 000 R6 000
no children. However, both her parents are still
alive. In this situation, her next of kin are her Figure 2.4: Example 1 Intestate succession
parents and they will share her estate equally.
In Example Two, B is married and has two Intestate succession married
children. His wife and two children share the with two children:
estate equally.
Testate succession means succession in B
terms of a will. The basic rule is that the wishes Leaves R12 million
expressed in the will must be carried out.84 The
person who writes the will is called the testator.
If the will fails for some reason (for example, the Wife gets Child D gets
R4 million R4 million
person who is supposed to inherit the entire
estate in terms of the will is already dead), then
the rules of intestate succession will apply.85 Child C gets
For all forms of succession, the estate ‘vests’ R4 million
(becomes due) on the day of the deceased’s
death.86 Figure 2.5: Example 2 Intestate succession
82 For more information on the law of succession see Jamneck and Rautenbach (2009), De Waal (2008) and Palekar
(2007: 666–729).
83 See Wille’s Principles (2007: 679–682) for a full explanation of who the ‘next of kin’ are in terms of South African
Law of Succession.
84 See Wille’s Principles (2007: 683–684).

Review your understanding

1. Jacob agrees to look after Mary’s laptop while she goes to the post office. He promises not
to turn it on (she is trying to save the battery). While Mary is away, Jacob turns on the
laptop and reads her private email. He forwards one to his friend Demetri.
Which of Mary’s rights are infringed by Jacob’s actions (if any)? More than one might
apply.
a) a real right
b) a personal right
c) a personality right.
2. Mary and Jacob enter into an agreement in terms of which Mary will babysit Jacob’s
children on Saturday afternoon, and Jacob will give Mary his old iPod. When Mary arrives
on Jacob’s doorstep at lunchtime on Saturday, which of these rights does she have (if any)?
More than one might apply.
a) a real right to the iPod
b) a personal right to delivery of the iPod
c) a personality right to delivery of the iPod.
3. Classify the following remedies as (1) property remedies (actions in rem), (2) contractual
remedies, (3) delictual remedies, or (4) remedies to recover unjustified enrichment:
a) specific performance
b) actio iniuriarum
c) condictio indebiti
d) actio legis Aquiliae
e) rei vindicatio
f) breach of contract
g) condictio sine causa specialis
h) action for pain and suffering.
What can you claim with each of these remedies?
Further reading and a note on sources

Boberg’s Law of Persons and the Family. Many of the chapters in Part 1 of this book refer
repeatedly to P. Q. R. Boberg’s Law of Persons and the Family which was first published in 1977.
The latest edition (2nd edition, Juta, 1999) was edited by B. Van Heerden, A. Cockrell, and R.
Keightly and has contributions by a number of other people. On the whole, the ideas that we
attribute to ‘Boberg’ are Professor Boberg’s own ideas, and appear in identical form in the first
edition. We cite the second edition for convenience.
Boberg’s is an outstanding source on the law of persons, and we recommend that you consult
it regularly as you work through this textbook. It is also an excellent source for recommended
further reading. He cites hundreds of cases; you can read these for further elaboration on and
illustration of the rules concerned. He also cites the Roman-Dutch writers, which is very useful
if you want to follow up the Roman-Dutch origins of our common-law rules.
Wille’s Principles of South African Law (9th edition, edited by F. Du Bois, Juta, 2007). The first
edition of Wille was published in 1937. It was 426 pages long. The most recent edition is 1269
pages long. Clearly, there are a lot of new ideas in this book that cannot be attributed to Professor
Wille. However, it is extremely difficult to trace the original authors of the ideas through nine
editions of the work. We therefore just cite the abbreviated name of the book Wille’s Principles.

Other useful books on the law of persons

Boezaart, T. (2010) Law of Persons, 4th edition, Cape Town: Juta. [This is the latest edition of the book
previously written by Davel (now Boezaart) and Jordaan].
Heaton, J. (2012) The South African Law of Persons, 4th edition, Durban: LexisNexis
Useful introductions to other areas of law

Contract
Hutchison, D., and Pretorius C-J. (eds) (2012) The Law of Contract in South Africa, 2nd edition, Cape Town:
Oxford University Press.
See also the chapters on contract in Wille’s Principles.
Unjustified enrichment
Visser, D. (2008) Unjustified Enrichment, Cape Town: Juta.
See also the chapters on unjustified enrichment in Wille’s Principles.
Delict
Neethling, J., and Potgieter, J. (2010) Law of Delict, Durban: LexisNexis.
See also the chapters on delict in Wille’s Principles.
Criminal law
Burchell, J. (2008) Principles of Criminal Law, 3rd edition, Cape Town: Juta.
Snyman, C. (2008) Criminal Law, 5th edition, Durban: LexisNexis.
Property law
Mostert, H., and Pope, A. (eds) (2010) The Principles of the Law of Property in South Africa, Cape Town:
Oxford University Press.
See also the chapters on property law in Wille’s Principles.
Succession
Jamneck, J., and Rautenbach, C. (eds) (2009) The Law of Succession in South Africa, Cape Town: Oxford
University Press.
See also the chapter on succession in Wille’s Principles.
Constitutional rights
Currie, I., and de Waal, J. (2013) The Bill of Rights Handbook, 6th edition, Cape Town: Juta.
Useful foundational introduction to South African law

If you are a first year law student, you might find it useful to consult:
Meintjes-Van der Walt, L. (ed) (2011) Introduction to South African Law: Fresh Perspectives, 2nd edition,
Cape Town: Pearson Education. [This book provides a useful overall introduction to the South African
legal system, and is intended particularly for first-year undergraduate law students.]

Law of Persons and Family 2nd Edition Sample Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Law of Persons and Family 2nd Edition Sample Chapter

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Law of Persons and Family 2nd Edition Sample Chapter

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Law of Persons

and the Family

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 1 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Copyright © Pearson South Africa (Pty) Ltd 2017.

ISBN: 978-1-928-22680-2 (print book)

Publisher: Silvia Raninger

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 2 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

PART 1 Law of persons

Chapter 3 THE BEGINNING OF LEGAL PERSONALITY

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 3 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Chapter 4 MINORITY: HOW AGE AFFECTS STATUS AND CAPACITY

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 4 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Chapter 5 SEX AND GENDER – STATUS AND CAPACITY

Chapter 6 OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING STATUS AND CAPACITY

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 5 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Chapter 8 THE END OF LEGAL PERSONALITY

Chapter 9 LAW AND THE DEAD

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 6 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

PART 2 Family law

Chapter 2 PARENT AND CHILD

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 7 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Chapter 3 ADOPTION, ARTIFICIAL FERTILISATION AND SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 8 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Chapter 5 REQUIREMENTS FOR CIVIL MARRIAGE

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 9 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Chapter 7 PERSONAL CONSEQUENCES OF CIVIL MARRIAGE

Chapter 8 MARITAL PROPERTY

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 10 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 11 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Chapter 10 GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE

Chapter 11 ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF DIVORCE

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 12 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Chapter 12 CHILDREN AFTER DIVORCE

Chapter 13 CUSTOMARY MARRIAGES

Chapter 14 RELIGIOUS MARRIAGES

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 13 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Chapter 15 CIVIL UNION ACT

Chapter 16 DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 14 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Chapter 17 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 15 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

About the authors

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 16 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

How to use BouncePages

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 17 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 1 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 3 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 4 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 5 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

1 DEFINING WORDS AND CONCEPTS

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 6 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

2 WHAT IS A ‘PERSON’ – AND WHY DOES THIS MATTER?

5 Wille’s Principles (2007: 145).

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 7 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

3 WHAT ARE RIGHTS, DUTIES AND LEGAL OBJECTS?

9781928226802_law_ter_stb_eng_za.indb 8 2017/03/15 9:28 AM

Here we see a real right, its corresponding

3.3 Personality rights Legal objects of ‘personal rights’

13 See generally Neethling (2005); Burchell (1998).

3.3 Personality rights Legal objects of ‘personal rights’

4.1 Passive legal capacity

4.2 Capacity to perform juristic acts

4.3 Capacity to be held accountable for wrongdoing (delicts