Volume - 41 - 4 - 97 - 4 - Japanese Macaca
Volume - 41 - 4 - 97 - 4 - Japanese Macaca
Volume - 41 - 4 - 97 - 4 - Japanese Macaca
BRIEF REPORT
Auditory Behavioral Thresholds for Japanese Macaques
Using Insert Earphones
DAVID W. SMITH* AND VALERIE B. OLSZYK
Hearing Research Laboratories, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
INTRODUCTION
Because of its pleasant behavioral disposition and unique vocal repertoire,
the Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata) has served as subject in numerous pre-
vious studies of auditory behavior. A partial list includes studies of the voicing
and place features of speech perception [Kuhl & Padden, 1982, 1983]; discrimi-
nation of speech format frequency [Sommers et al., 1992]; perception of commu-
nication sounds [May et al., 1989]; and effects of cortical lesions on detection
threshold [Heffner & Heffner, 1986, 1989]. Somewhat surprisingly, then, we can
find no normative auditory threshold contours for the species in the literature.
These threshold data also provide a necessary framework for interpreting the
acoustic perceptual abilities of the Japanese macaque.
*Correspondence to: Dr. David W. Smith, Director, Hearing Research Laboratories, Division of Oto-
laryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Box 3550, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
METHODS
Subjects
Four juvenile male Japanese macaques (M. fuscata) with no history of otitis
media served as subjects in this study. All weighed between 5 and 9 kg at the
outset of the study and were maintained on a calorie-restricted diet to facilitate
the use of food as a reward in an operant reinforcement paradigm for training
and testing.
The care and use of the animals in this research was approved by the Duke
University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Behavioral Apparatus
All behavioral test sessions were carried out in two individual-sized, single-
walled wound-attenuating chambers (Acoustic Systems, Austin, TX), that were
housed inside a large, double-walled sound-attenuating chamber (Industrial Acous-
tics Company, Brooklyn, NY). A custom-designed restraint chair was affixed to
each test chamber to restrict movement of the animals relative to the testing
apparatus. Head movement was restricted by placing the animal’s muzzle through
a set of uprights and a stop behind the head. A feeder trough was mounted to the
Auditory Thresholds for Japanese Macaques / 325
chair within easy reach of the animal’s mouth. The wall directly in front of the
animal contained a mounted response key and a cue light that served to commu-
nicate the experimental conditions to the animal at all times. Stimulus presenta-
tion and all experimental parameters were computer controlled.
Behavioral Procedure
The behavioral procedures used in this study were comparable to those used
and described in detail previously [Moody et al., 1975; Smith et al., 1987]. Briefly,
we trained the animals by applying positive reinforcement in an operant rein-
forcement paradigm. We presented the subjects with a flashing cue light and
326 / Smith and Olszyk
trained them to initiate a trial by making contact with the response lever. When
contact was made, the light would remain on, without flashing, for the duration
of the trial sequence. If the subject maintained contact with the lever through
the required hold intervals (1–8 s, with an average delay of 5 s), the test stimu-
lus was presented and the animal was required to release the key to indicate
signal detection. A correct response (i.e., releasing the key within 0.8 s of the
onset of the signal) was followed by delivery of a 190-mg banana-flavored pellet
(P.J. Noyes, Lancaster, NH) through the feeder trough. Release of the lever at
any other time (i.e., a false alarm) resulted in a 5-s timeout, during which the
cue light was extinguished and the subject was unable to initiate a subsequent
trial sequence. Both ears were fitted with earphones and tested each day. The
right-left order of testing was randomized on a daily basis.
Stimulus intensity at the outset of a trial sequence was set at approximately
35 dB above the typical threshold for that frequency. Thresholds were deter-
mined using a tracking procedure, where stimulus intensity was adjusted on a
trial-to-trial basis by decreasing the intensity 5-dB for the subsequent trial fol-
lowing a correct response. Likewise, a miss resulted in a 5-dB increase in stimu-
lus intensity for the subsequent trial. The change from a hit to a miss, or vice
versa, defined a transition, and eight transitions were presented at each fre-
quency. Threshold for a give frequency was defined as the stimulus intensity at
which 50% signal detection was reported over the last six transitions. Following
determination of threshold for a given frequency, the stimulus frequency was
switched by computer and another tone frequency was selected randomly from
the stimulus list.
Twenty percent of all trials were “catch trials,” where all experimental pa-
rameters were identical to a test-tone trial, except the test signal was withheld.
Routinely, in summary data calculations, we do not include data from sessions
where the subject responds to more than 20% of the catch trials. In the present
studies, however, there were no such sessions, and the average response to catch
trial rate was approximately 1%.
Data were collected in daily testing sessions lasting from 2.5 to 3.5 hours.
Thresholds presented here are the average of six thresholds at each frequency.
RESULTS
Figure 1 presents behavioral threshold contours for both right and left ears
of subjects M03, M04, M05, and M06 for 1-s stimuli. The shape of the contours
was similar in both ears and across all subjects. The absolute level of contours,
however, varied somewhat across subjects with subject M05 being most sensitive
and subject M03 the least. The difference between these animals was greatest at
low frequencies (approximately 17 dB at 500 Hz), with thresholds being within 5
dB above 4.0 kHz. We generally found that thresholds did not vary substantially
across animals when frequencies were above 2.0 kHz.
DISCUSSION
Figure 2 compares the average and range of both ears in all subjects of M.
fuscata from the present studies with the range for threshold contours reported
in the literature for several other macaque species. (The studies used compa-
rable operant reinforcement techniques and closed-field transducers.) The bold
line in Figure 2 represents the average of all threshold functions presented in
Figure 1. In agreement with threshold data reported in other macaque species,
Auditory Thresholds for Japanese Macaques / 327
Fig. 1. Absolute auditory thresholds, measured behaviorally, in both ears of subjects (a) M03, (b) M04, (c)
M05, and (d) M06. Bars = mean ± SD.
the auditory range of M. fuscata extends from below 100 Hz to above 31.0 kHz,
the highest frequency we were able to test given the high-frequency limitations
of the ER-1 transducers. Differences were apparent, however, in the level of the
low-frequency thresholds between M. fuscata and thresholds measured in other
macaque species: The range of M. fuscata thresholds at 710 Hz and below over-
laps the range of thresholds from the literature, with the exception of 250 Hz.
Nevertheless, the averaged threshold curve, across all four subjects and for both
ears, falls consistently above the range of the macaque literature for frequencies
below 1.0 kHz.
At middle and high frequencies, above 2.0 kHz, the threshold ranges from the
literature and the present study show considerable overlap, though at 4.0 kHz and
above the M. fuscata average falls toward the lower limit of the literature range.
The data reported here do not allow resolution of the question of whether
the differences at low frequency are due to either, or both, real species differ-
ences or differences in transducer and calibration technique between studies.
According to Pfingst et al. [1975] the characteristics of the behavioral audiogram
can be significantly influenced by the techniques used in calibrating the trans-
ducers and these differences are greatest at low frequencies. For example, a trans-
ducer calibration made on a 6-cm3 coupler would, when applied to the much
smaller volume monkey external ear, underestimate low-frequency sound pres-
sure levels and, thereby, yield artificially low behavioral thresholds. The present
study employed a calibration procedure that should provide for an accurate esti-
mation of sound pressure levels near the tympanic membrane.
328 / Smith and Olszyk
Fig. 2. Range and average of thresholds for both ears in all Macaca fuscata subjects (horizontal cross-
hatching) plotted with the range of thresholds from the literature for monkeys from the genus Macaca
(vertical cross-hatching) [Stebbins et al., 1966 (M. fascicularis and M. nemestrina); Stebbins, 1973 (M. arc-
toides, M. fasicularis, M. mulatta, and M. nemestrina); Pfingst et al., 1975 (M. mulatta), 1978 (M. mulatta);
Lonsbury-Martin & Martin, 1981 (M. mulatta)].
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are indebted to Mr. Karl E.M. Konrad for his assistance in fab-
ricating the test chambers and developing the software facilities to conduct the
described experiments. We also thank Dr. Chris van den Honert for his collabo-
ration concerning the calibration algorithm and sound level measurements. Edi-
torial assistance was provided by Ms. Ann Tamariz. This research was funded by
Auditory Thresholds for Japanese Macaques / 329
the National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Deafness and Other Com-
munication Disorders (DC 001692).
REFERENCES
Heffner, H.E.; Heffner, R.S. Hearing loss in Pp. 439–495 in HANDBOOK OF AUDI-
Japanese macaques following bilateral au- TORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH
ditory cortex lesions. JOURNAL OF NEU- METHODS. J.A. Vernon; C.A. Smith, eds.
ROPHYSIOLOGY 55:256–271, 1986. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL 1975.
Heffner, H.E.; Heffner, R.S. Effects of re- Pfingst, B.E.; Hienz, R.; Miller, J. Reaction-
stricted cortical lesions on absolute thresh- time procedure for measurement of hear-
olds and aphasia-like deficits in Japanese ing. II. Threshold functions. JOURNAL OF
macaques. BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE THE ACOUSTIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA
103:158–169, 1989. 57:431–436, 1975.
Kuhl, P.K.; Padden, D.M. Enhanced discrim- Pfingst, B.E.; Laycock, J.; Flammino, F.;
inability at the phonetic boundaries for Lonsbury-Martin, B.; Martin, G. Pure tone
voicing feature in macaques. PERCEP- thresholds for the Rhesus monkey. HEAR-
TION AND PSYCHOPHYSICS 32:542–550, ING RESEARCH 1:43–47, 1978.
19892. Smith, D.W.; Moody, D.B.; Stebbins, W.C.
Kuhl, P.K.; Padden, D.M. Enhanced discrim- Effects of changes in absolute signal level
inability at the phonetic boundaries for the on psychophysical tuning curves in quiet and
place feature in macaques. JOURNAL noise in patas monkeys. JOURNAL OF THE
OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF ACOUSTIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA 82:63–
AMERICA 73:1003–1010, 1983. 68, 1987.
Lonsbury-Martin, B.; Martin, G. Effects of Sommers, M.S.; Moody, D.B.; Prosen, C.A.;
moderately intense sound on auditory sen- Stebbins, W.C. Formant frequency dis-
sitivity in rhesus monkeys: Behavioral and crimination by Japanese macaques (Macaca
neural observations. JOURNAL OF NEU- fuscata). JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTIC
ROPHYSIOLOGY 46:563–586, 1981. SOCIETY OF AMERICA 91:3499–3510, 1992.
May, B.; Moody, D.B.; Stebbins, W.C. Categori- Stebbins, W.C. Hearing of Old World monkeys
cal perception of conspecific communication (Cercopithecinae). AMERICAN JOURNAL
sounds by Japanese macaques, Macaca fus- OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 38:357–
cata. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTIC SO- 364, 1973.
CIETY OF AMERICA 85:837–847, 1989. Stebbins, W.C.; Green, S.; Miller, F.L. Audi-
Moody, D.B.; Beecher, M.D.; Stebbins, W.C. tory sensitivity in the monkey. SCIENCE
Behavioral methods in auditory research. 153:1646–1647, 1966.