A Report on

Structural Analysis and Design

of Residential Building
(Two & Half Story)

1
 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This report comprises the summary of the residential building of Mr. Sarendra
Dev Shrestha at Mahalaxmi Municipality- 06, Sanagaun, Lalitpur, Nepal. The
reports consist of the design procedures adopted, the assumptions made, the
inputs made in the design and the design output. During the design, it is
assumed that the client will completely follow the architectural as well as the
structural design. It is also assumed that the construction will be supervised
by professional engineer.

The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system
is made by the client or the contractor without the prior written permission
from the designer, or the alterations to non-structural system is made such
that the weight of each individual floor or the weight of the whole building is
altered by more than 10% of design weight of each floor and the total weight.

The design calculations and derivations are limited to only a minimum to let
the concerned people know the methodology adopted. However, the
calculations may be provided to the client or concerned authorities when
needed, upon request. Hence the building is safe.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II: PRELIMININARY DESIGN................................................................................. 7

PART III: METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................ 4

ACCIDENTAL ECCENTRICITY .......................................................................................... 7

FOR THE ANALYSIS FOR TORSIONAL EFFECTS, THE APPLIED TORSION AT

EACH LEVEL SHALL USE EITHER THE FORCES CALCULATED BY THE
EQUIVALENT STATIC METHOD OR THE COMBINED STORY INERTIAL
FORCES FOUND IN A MODAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD. THE
ACCIDENTAL ECCENTRICITY CAN BE TAKEN AS ±0.1B. ........................................ 7

PART IV: LOAD CALCULATION ....................................................................................... 7

PART V: DESIGN PARAMETERS ................................................................................... 13

................................................................................................................................................ 14

PART VI: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS.............................................................................. 14

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 22

INPUT DATA ...................................................................................................................... 22

PLOT ..................................................................................................................................... 23

TABULATED PLOT COORDINATES ............................................................................. 23

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 23

INPUT DATA ...................................................................................................................... 24

PLOT ..................................................................................................................................... 24

TABULATED PLOT COORDINATES ............................................................................. 24

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 24

INPUT DATA ...................................................................................................................... 25

PLOT ..................................................................................................................................... 25

TABULATED PLOT COORDINATES ............................................................................. 25

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 25

INPUT DATA ...................................................................................................................... 26

PLOT ..................................................................................................................................... 26

TABULATED PLOT COORDINATES ............................................................................. 26

PART VII: DESIGN CALCULATIONS ............................................................................. 28

PART I: GENERAL DATA

 Introduction

This report has been prepared as a part of the structural engineering analysis and
design of the residence building.

The massive data inputs, design analysis, calculations and outputs of the result are
computer aided by the Structural analysis and design software ETABS, which is a
special purpose computer program developed specifically for building structures by
CSI America. It provides the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to
create, modify, analyze, design, and optimize the structural elements in a building
model.

Based on the final results, the designs have been performed and drawings were
prepared using AutoCAD 2007.

 Building Design Parameters

Nepal is located in boundary between the Indian and Tibetan plates, along which a
relative shear strain of about 2 cm per year has been estimated. The Indian plate is
also sub-ducting at a rate of, thought to be, about 3 cm per year. The existence of the
Himalayan range with the world’s highest peaks is evidence of continued uplift. As a
result, Nepal is very active seismically.

Reinforced concrete buildings may fail due to the either columns are overstressed
and burst due to lack of enough strength to resist the shock of the earth tremor and
vibration or failure of reinforced concrete members like beams at the poor ductile
detailing. Columns also do fail due to short column effect and splicing failure. Beams
fail due to anchorage failure, shear failure and confinement failure.

The building consists of a RCC frame structure, which is essentially an assembly of

cast-in-situ-concrete beams and columns. Floors and roof design consists of cast-in-
place concrete slabs. Therefore the member sizes or structural elements,
reinforcement details, joint details are considered during design process such that to
meet the design standards for ductile performance of the structure.

The country is subdivided into different seismic zones based on the local seismic
hazard. The seismic hazard within each zone is assumed to be constant. The
Seismic Zoning Factor (Z) represents the peak ground acceleration (PGA) for
475 year return period. The value of Z can be obtained from Table 4-5 for
selected municipalities, cities and for the rest can be obtained from Figure 4-4
(approximate interpolation between the contour lines is permitted).

For the design of the building, NBC 105-2077 have been referred for earthquake
resistant design. According to the NBC 105-2077, the Seismic Zoning Factor (Z)
represents the peak ground acceleration (PGA) for 475 year return period for
Kathmandu has been taken with very severe seismic intensity (zone factor z = 0.35)
and tremor response period or fundamental natural period (T) were calculated. After
that all design requirements such as seismic weight of building, lateral forces at
different floor levels and different column heads, base shear, distribution of design
forces to different floor levels are considered.

The characteristic compressive strength for concrete of 20 N/mm 2 (M20) was used in
all structural members and characteristic strength of 500 N/mm2 (Fe500) was used
for reinforcing steel.

PART II: PRELIMININARY DESIGN

The tentative size of structural elements are determined through the preliminary
design so that after analysis the pre assumed dimensions might not deviated
considerably , thus making the final design both safe and economical . Tentative size
of various elements has been determined as follows:

 SLAB
For slab, preliminary design is done according to deflection criteria span /effective
depth = 40*modification factor. (IS 456-2000 Art 24.1)

From deflection criteria, we have,

l   (Cl.23-2.1, p.37, IS456:2000)
d
Where,
 = Basic value of span to effective depth ratios for spans up to spans 10m.
 = a factor which accounts for correction in the values of  for spans greater than
10m
 = a factors which depends on the stress at service and amount of steel for tension
reinforcement
Area of cross sec tion of steel required
For fy  500, fs  0 .58 fy 
Area of cross sec ti on provide
 =a factor which depends on the area of compression reinforcement.
 = a factor for flanged beams which depends on the ratio of web width to flange
width.
We taken,   32

 BEAM
Thumb rule of (d=L/10 to L/12) basis is adopted to consider the preliminary design of
the beam section.
b 1

D 2

i) Depth of beam:
We have,
1 1
dbeam = to ofspan
10 12
ii) Width of beam:
We have, bbeam = 1 to 2 of d beam
2 3
  COLUMN
Preliminary design of column is done consideration and interior column. For the load
acting in the column, live load is decreased according to IS 875-1978.
Cross-section of the column is adopted considering the economy. Square column
section is adopted in this building project as per the internal aesthetic requirements.
A percentage of steel is taken as 0.8 to 6 percentage of cross section area of
column, but as taking 6% area of steel is more at a laps section so generally % of
steel is taken up to 4% only..

We have,
p Ag  p Ag
P= 0.4 f A  0.67 f A
ck c y sc
 0.4 f A
ck g
   0.67
100 
f y 100

 STAIRCASE
Stairs is designed as per drawing. Column for stairs boxes is not included in the grid
system but they are assumed to be simply tied with main frame with beam.
PART III: METHODOLOGY
The methodology adopted in the Structural Analysis and Design of Two and half Storied RCC
framed Residential Building has been described below:
1. Data Collection
All the data required for this project work have been taken from different literatures. Design
parameters have been taken from Indian Standard Code of Practice. Soil test report collect from
site.

The 3D structure is analyzed as moment resisting frames i.e. space frames.

Indian Standard Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete, i.e.IS: 456-2000 for design
of Structural Elements had been followed.

Limit State Method bases on safety and serviceability requirements associated with the design
loads and design strengths of the materials has been used. These design loads and design
strengths are obtained by applying partial safety factors for characteristic loads and strengths of
the materials concrete and steel.

Limit States
The Limit State method of design covers the various forms of failure. There are several limit
states at which the structure ceases to function, the most important among them being,

a) The limit state of collapse or total failure of structure.

It corresponds to the maximum load carrying capacity. Violation of collapse implies failure. This
limit state corresponds to Flexure, Compression, Shear and Torsion.

Ultimate Limit State Verification:

Ultimate limit states are associated with collapse or with other forms of structural failure which
might endanger the safety of people. Design for ultimate limit state represents a procedure that
ensures the probability of collapse of a structure is at an acceptable level. The ultimate limit state
performance requirements are met when the structure satisfies the following:

1. The structural system has the required resistance and energy dissipation capacity;
2. The structure as a whole shall be checked to ensure that it is stable under the design
seismic forces. Both overturning and sliding stability shall be taken into account;
3. The structural system shall continue to perform its load-bearing function;
4. Both the foundation elements and the foundation soil are able to resist the forces
resulting from the response of the superstructure without substantial permanent
deformations;
5. Non-structural systems which are essential for safe evacuation from the structure shall
continue to function;
6. The nonstructural elements do not present risks to people and does not have a
detrimental effect on the response of the structural elements.

b) The limit state of serviceability includes excessive deflection and excessive local
damage. Excessive deflection adversely affects the finishes and excessive local damage results
in cracking of concrete, which impairs the efficiency, or appearance of the structure
Serviceability Limit State Verification:
Damage limitation states are associated with damage beyond which specified service
requirements are no longer met. It represents a level of force within the structure below which
there is a high degree of assurance that the structure can continue to be used as originally
intended without repair. The serviceability limit state performance requirements are met when the
structure satisfies the following:
1. The structural system shall not experience deformations that result in structural or non-
structural damage that can prevent the structure from performing its intended original
function.
2. In structures important for civil protection, the structure shall have sufficient resistance
and stiffness to remain operational so that it can perform its function of the vital services
in the event of an earthquake.

2. Load Calculation
Load calculations have been done using the IS 875-1987 (Part 1 & Part 2) as reference.
The exact value of unit weights of the material used in the building has been extracted from the
code for the calculation. Thickness of materials was taken as per design requirement.
2.1 Vertical Load
Loads on slabs may be divided into
i. Dead load - self-weight of slab.
ii. Live load - from relevant codes.
Load on beam are:
a. Self – weight of beam.
b. Load transfer from slab.
c. Load due to wall.
d. Floor Finish load
e. Load transfer from staircase.
Load on the columns were calculated by finding out the total dead load and live loads acting on
the columns according to their coverage and adding self – weight of it.

a.) Self weight of the beam

In ETABS, after fixing the size of beam, software calculates self-weight of beam itself. Moreover,
the self weight of the beam as uniformly distributed load over the span can be found by
multiplying cross-sectional area of beam with unit weight of reinforce concrete.

b.) Load Transfer from slab to beam

The load of the slab, dead load as well as live load, can be converted to equivalent uniformly
distributed load for beam by two ways.
 Triangulation Load Distribution
 Trapezoidal Load Distribution

c). Load due to wall

The load of wall as uniformly distributed load over the span can be found by multiplying thickness
and height of the wall with unit weight of brick work. Opening have been calculated and
deducted wherever opening such as window, door exist. Partition load has been taken as 1
kN/m2 area of the slab.
 d). Floor Finish Calculation

S.N. Screeding Unit wt. Ceramic Unit wt. Ceiling finish Unit wt. Load/m2
tiles
mm kN/m3 mm kN/m3 mm kN/m3 kN/m2
1 50 20.4 0 25 3 24 1.09

e). Load transfer from staircase

Reaction produce by staircase have been calculated and this reactions have been changed into
uniformly distributed load over the beam by dividing span of beam.

2.2 Lateral Load Calculation

Lateral loads acting on building are earthquake load only. Earthquake or seismic load on a
building depends upon its geographic location, lateral stiffness and mass, and it’s reversible.
Thus its effect has been considered along both axes of the building taken one at the time. Due to
flat slab roof we have not considered wind load, also it is not practically used in our context.
Hence only seismic load analysis is carried out. For analysis and design earthquake action,
following methods can be applied.
1. Equivalent Static Method (ESM).
2. Model Response Spectrum Method (MRSM).

The Equivalent Static Method may be used for all serviceability limit state (SLS) calculations
regardless of the building characteristics. For ultimate limit state (ULS), the Equivalent Static
Method may be used when at least one of the following criteria is satisfied (Clause 3.2.1):

i. The height of the structure is less than or equal to 15 m.

ii. The natural time period of the structure is less than 0.5 secs.

iii. The structure is not categorized as irregular as per 5.5 and the height is less than 40 m.

Since the height of the building is less than 40m, equivalent static method is used.
Seismic Load calculation As Per NBC 105:2077

The Elastic site spectra for horizontal loading shall be as given by equation 4.1.1.

C (T) =Ch(T)* Z* I ........................................................................ 4.1.1

Where,
Ch(T) = Spectral Shape factor as per Clause 4.1.2
T =0.075 h^(3/4) for Moment resisting concrete frame (Clause 5.1.1)
Z = Seismic Zoning Factor = 0.35 for Kathmandu
(Clause 4.1.4 Table 4-5: Seismic Zoning factors for selected cities and
Municipalities)
I = Importance Factor =1.0 for residential Building
(Clause 4.1.5 Table 4-6 for Moment resisting concrete frame)
H = Height of the building from foundation or from top of a rigid basement
considered in analysis
Design Base Shear

VB = C(T)*Wi [10.1.1 NBC 105-2077]

Where,

C(T) =The Elastic site spectra for horizontal loading

Wi = Seismic Weight of Building, that includes total Dead load plus appropriate
amount of live load.
 Percentage of live load to be taken for calculating seismic
weight =25% for live load intensity upto and including 3.0
KN/m2 and 50% for live load intensity above 3.0 KN/m2.[Table
6.1 NBC 105-1994].

 live load on roof need not be considered for calculating the

seismic weight of the building.

The seismic forces are applied to the model of building in Etabs automatically for the purpose of
seismic analysis; hence the manual calculation of seismic load and the seismic forces have not
been shown.

The seismic weight of the building and the distribution of the base shear to the horizontal
diaphragm are generated from the analysis in Etabs.

Inter-Story Deflections
The ratio of the inter-story deflection to the corresponding story height shall not exceed: 0.025 at
ultimate limit state 0.006 at serviceability limit state The deflections shall be obtained by using
the effective stiffness properties of the components as given in 3.4(as per NBC 105-2077)

ACCIDENTAL ECCENTRICITY
For the analysis for torsional effects, the applied torsion at each level shall use either the forces
calculated by the Equivalent Static Method or the combined story inertial forces found in a Modal
Response Spectrum Method. The accidental eccentricity can be taken as ±0.1b.

PART IV: LOAD CALCULATION

Design loads (imposed and earthquake) standard are referred to Indian Standard Code of
Practice IS: 875 (Part 2) 1987 for design loads for building and structures. Reduction in Imposed
Loads on Floors as allowed by the IS Code has been also applied. Dead loads are calculated as
per the mass and density of the structural and other building elements. The dead loads and live
loads are calculated as indicated below to start with for general guidance.
Loading assumption:
A. Dead Load
Assuming slab thickness of 125 mm
Self Load of slab = 125*25/1000
= 3.125 kN/m2
 50mm thick screed + punning on floor
Intensity = 1.00 kN/m2
Total Dead Load = 4.125 kN/m2

B. Live Load
IS: 875 (Part 2)-1987
Normal Residential building: 2 kN/m2

Roof:
LL = 1.5 kN/ m2

C. Column assuming size, C1 =350mmx350mm

D. Grid Beam & Secondary assuming size of 230mmx350mm

F. Exterior Wall assuming wall thickness of 230mm

Wall Load = 0.23(W)*2.5(H)*19.20
= 11 kN/m
Deducting 30% for openings,
Wall Load = 0.23(W)*2.5(H)*19.20* 0.7
= 7.73 kN/m
G. Partition Wall,
Wall Load = 0.115(W)*2.5(H)*19.20
= 5.52 kN/m

H. Parapet Wall
Load = 0.115(W)*1(H)*19.20
= 2.21 kN/m

 Static Load Cases

Name Type
Dead Linear Static
Live Linear Static
WALL Linear Static
FF Linear Static
Ex Linear Static
Ey Linear Static
E Linear Static
ROOF LL Linear Static

Seismic Load Calculation

Base Shear Calculation:
As Per NBC 105-2077:
Total Horizontal Base Shear V= C(T)  W
Where, C(T) = Ch(T)* Z* I
Where,
Basic Shear Factor Ch(T) = According to time period of vibration and Soil type
Seismic Zoning Factor (Z) = 0.35 for Kathmandu
Importance Factor (I) = According to the type of building
Distribution of design seismic force:
Fi = Design Seismic Force at floor Level I
Wi = seismic wt. at ith floor level
hi = height of floor i measured from base

According to NBC 105:2077

Height of building (h) = 8.61 m
Soil type = D
Time period (T) =0.075x H0.75
= 0.376 sec
Fundamental Time Period (T1) =1.25*T
=1.25*0.376
= 0.47 sec

Where,
α - peak spectral acceleration normalized by PGA
Ta and Tc - the lower and upper periods of the flat part of the spectrum
K=0.8 – Building Height Exp. (Coefficient that controls the descending branch
of the spectrum
Z = 0.35 -(for Lalitpur, NBC105:2077)
I = 1.0 -(Importance Factor =1.0 for residential Building
(Clause 4.1.5 Table 4-6 for Moment resisting concrete frame)
Here, the value of T is Ta<T<Tc so
Ch(T)= 2.25

C(T) = Ch(T)* Z* I
= 2.25*0.35*1
=0.7875
 Figure 1: Spectral Shape Factor, Ch(T) for Equivalent Static Method

For Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces,

The lateral seismic force (Fi) induced at each level ‘i’ shall be calculated as:

xV

Where,
Wi=seismic weight of the structure assigned to level ‘i’;
hi= height (m) from the base to level ‘i’;
n= total number of floors/levels
V= horizontal seismic base shear calculated as per 6.2
K= an exponent related to the structural period as follows:
 for structure having time period T≤0.5sec, k=1
 for structure having time period T≥2.5sec, k=2
 for structure having period between 0.5 sec and 2.5 sec, k shall be
determined by linear interpolation between 1 and 2.
Calculation of Ultimate Limit State
For the ultimate limit state, the horizontal base shear coefficient (design coefficient),
Cd (T), shall be given by:
Cd(𝑇) =C(𝑇)/(Rμ x Ωu) ……………………………..6.1.1
Where,
C(T) = Elastic Site Spectra as per 4.1.1
Rμ =4 (Ductility Factor as per Table 5-2)
𝛀u =1.5 (Over strength Factor for ULS as per 5.4 Table 5-2)
Cd(𝑇) =C(𝑇)/(Rμ x Ωu)
=0.7875/(4*1.5)
=0.13125
Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = Cd(T)x W =0.13125* 2171.8693 KN
Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = 285.0578 KN

Calculation of Serviceability Limit State

ELASTIC SITE SPECTRA FOR SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE The elastic site spectra
for Serviceability Limit State shall be given by:
Cs (T1) = 0.20 C (T)…………………………………………….4.2.1
=0.20*0.7875
=0.1575
Where C (T) = elastic site spectra for horizontal loading determined from clause 4.1.1
For the serviceability limit state, the horizontal base shear coefficient (design coefficient),
Cd (T1), shall be given by:
Cd(𝑇1) =Cs(𝑇1)/Ωs …………………………………….6.1.2
Where,
Cs(T1) = Elastic Site Spectr a determined for Serviceability Limit State as per 4.2
𝛀s = Over strength Factor for SLS as per 5.4
Cd(𝑇) =Cs(𝑇1)/Ωs
=0.1575/1.25
=0.126
Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = Cd(T)x W =0.126* 2171.8693 KN
Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = 273.6555 KN
PART V: DESIGN PARAMETERS
 ARCHITECTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Types of building Residential Building
Types of structural system Reinforced Concrete Frame
(Special RC Moment Resisting Frame
Structure)
Shape Regular Rectangular Shape
Plinth Area As per architectural drawing
Number of stories Two & Half Story
Design provision for future extension No
Story Height 2.87 m
Height of parapet wall 1.0 m
Total height of the Building 8.61 m
External wall/ some internal wall 230 mm
Few internal wall 115 mm
Plaster thickness 12 mm
Plinth level As per architectural drawing
Walls Brick walls

Depth of Min. 5ft below ground level or as per site condition

foundation
 CONSTRUCTION SITE
Soil type Type D (Very soft soil sites, Table
4.4, NBC105:2020)
Bearing capacity 120 KN/m2(Assumed)

 DIMENSIONS AND MATERIALS

Slab thickness125mm
Beam size (mm) 230x350
Column size (mm) 350x350
 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Cement Ordinary Portland cement
Grade of concrete M20 for the entire member
Grade of steel Fe500 for both main and shear
Reinforcement

 ASSESSMENT OF UNIT LOADS OF MATERIALS

DENSITY OF MATERIALS
Reinforced concrete 25.0KN/m3
Brick masonry 19.20KN/m3
Partition wall 1.1KN/m2
Floor finishes 1.00KN/m2

 ASSESSMENT OF LIVE LOAD

Unit loads on floor
Bed Rooms 2.0KN/m2
Shop 4.0KN/m2
Corridors 3.0 KN/m2
Stairs 3.0 KN/m2
Roof (accessible) 1.5 KN/m2
Roof (Non accessible) 0.75 KN/m2

 METHOD OF ANALYSIS
Analysis method adopted for EQ resistant design : Equivalent Static Method (ESM)
Level of design : Professionally engineered structure
Total number of design load cases considered :5
Seismic zoning factor : 0.35

PART VI: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

 Load Combinations taken in Analysis

The load combinations are based on NBC 105: 2077 Clause 3.6.1
Static Load Combination:
1.2 DL + 1.5 LL
Seismic Load Combinations:
1.0 DL + 0.3 LL EQ ULS
1.0 DL + 0.3 LL EQ SLS

For seismic loading, mass equivalent to the load that composed of 100% of Dead load and 30%
& 60% of Live load is taken into consideration.
The Earthquake lateral loads were used in the combination from the Self-Generated Load on the
Equivalent Static Method (ESM).
Following effective stiffness for flexure and shear is used as per NBC-105-2020.

Analysis Detail:

Fig: Typical Floor Plan

Fig: ELEVATIONAL VIEW

Fig: 3D VIEW
Fig: Dead Load (Floor Finish)

Fig: Dead Load (Wall load)

 Fig: Live Load

Fig: Wall Partition Load

RESULT OUTPUT
 Support Reactions
Lateral Forces

Lateral seismic loads for load pattern ULS using the user input coefficients

Lateral Force EQX ULS Lateral Force EQY ULS

Lateral seismic loads for load pattern SLS using the user input coefficients
Lateral Force EQx SLS Lateral Force EQy, SLS
Axial Force Diagram (Sample)

Shear Force Diagram (Sample)

 Bending Moment Diagram (Sample)

Story Response - Maximum Story Displacement

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load
combination.

Input Data
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories
Load Case EQx Top Story Story3
Output Type Step Number 1 Bottom Story Base
 Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Story Response Values
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m mm mm
Story3 8.61 Top 24.1 4.6
Story2 5.74 Top 18.8 3.8
Story1 2.87 Top 8.9 1.7
Base 0 Top 0 0

Story Response - Maximum Story Displacement

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load
combination.
Input Data
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories
Load Case EQy Top Story Story3
Output Type Step Number 1 Bottom Story Base

Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Story Response Values
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m mm mm
Story3 8.61 Top 1.7 19.6
Story2 5.74 Top 1.2 14.9
Story1 2.87 Top 0.5 7.1
Base 0 Top 0 0

Story Response - Maximum Story Displacement

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load
combination.
Input Data
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories
Load Case EQx SLS Top Story Story3
Output Type Step Number 1 Bottom Story Base

Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Story Response Values
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m mm mm
Story3 8.61 Top 23.1 4.4
Story2 5.74 Top 18.1 3.6
Story1 2.87 Top 8.5 1.6
Base 0 Top 0 0

Story Response - Maximum Story Displacement

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load
combination.
Input Data
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories
Load Case EQy SLS Top Story Story3
Output Type Step Number 1 Bottom Story Base

Plot

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Story Response Values
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m mm mm
Story3 8.61 Top 1.6 18.8
Story2 5.74 Top 1.1 14.3
Story1 2.87 Top 0.5 6.8
Base 0 Top 0 0
 STORY DRIFT
PART VII: DESIGN CALCULATIONS
 COLUMN DESIGN RESULT

Fig: Column rebar along grid A

Fig: Column rebar along grid A

Fig: Column rebar along grid A

Fig: Column rebar along grid B

 Fig: Column rebar along grid C

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 C10 103 C(14X14) DL+0.3LL+(EQx+0.3EQy) 0 2870 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
355.6 355.6 58 30
 Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
107.7425 27.3189 59.8467 2.1549 2.1549 1133 0.9

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.794832 2515.6 32.3024 0 2.1549
Minor Bend(M2) 0.798338 2515.6 12.6047 0 2.1549

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 27.373 59.0796 42.3301 20.1372 394.16
Minor, Vu3 18.2321 59.0796 42.3301 18.2321 394.16

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
1264.5 11.3 1562.7885 461.2635 107.7425 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.877 355.6 5.623 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.877 355.6 5.648 12 No 0

Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed
 BEAM DESIGN RESULT

Fig: Beam rebar in GF

Fig: Beam rebar in First Floor

 Fig: Beam rebar in Top Floor

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 B7 7 B(9x14) DL+0.3LL-(EQx-0.3EQy) 152.4 3041.6 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
228.6 355.6 228.6 0 16 16

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-36.1845 5.0429 41.9681 0.5464

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-36.1845 7.5808 0 -43.7653

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -43.7653 318 0 318 174
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 159 0 0 159

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
55.9484 33.9271 57.3171 39.5278 467.7

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, T u & VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
5.0429 41.9681 216.6 343.6 353.62
Standards and Codes of Practice:

1. Indian Standards Code of Practice For Plain & Reinforced Concrete IS: 456-2000;
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), July 2000, New Delhi
2. Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete IS: 456-1978 Special Publication: 16 Bureau
of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi
3. Nepal National Building Code, NBC 105: 2077, Department of Housing and
Physical Planning.
4. Handbook on Concrete reinforcement and Detailing, Special Publication: 34
[SP: 34 –1987].
5. Explanatory Handbook on Code for Earthquake Engineering IS: 1893 –2002,
Beau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
6. Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to Seismic forces-
Indian Code of Practice IS 13920: 1993, Beau of Indian Standards (BIS), New
Delhi.

ANNEX
 Moment of Resistance of Under Reinforced Beam
Check with rectangular column
Width of beam= 230 mm
Depth of Beam= 350 mm
Effective depth of beam (d)= 314 mm
Diameter of rebar= 16 mm
Clear Cover= 20 mm
Ast= 603 mm² 2-16 (R)+1-16(Ex)
Asc= 515 mm² 2-16+1-12(Re)
d'= 28 mm
Grade of steel= 500 Mpa
Grade of Concrete= 20 Mpa
Es= 200000 Mpa

Mu= 0.36*fck*b*xu*(d-0.416*xu)+Asc*(fsc-fcc)*(d-d')

where,
xu=(𝑓𝑠∗𝐴𝑠𝑡−(𝑓𝑠𝑐−𝑓𝑐𝑐)∗𝐴𝑠𝑐)/(0.36∗𝑓𝑐𝑘∗𝑏)

fs= 0.87*fy if the section is balanced or under reinforced < 0.87*fy if the section is over
reinforced and shall correspond to strain es= 0.0035(d-xu)/xu

fsc,fcc= design stresses in compression steel and concrete respectively

corresponding to strain ecs= 0.0035(xu-d')/xu
d'= clearcover to compression reinforcement + diameter of bar/2

a) Assume xu = xu,l
xu,l=0.0035/(0.0055+0.87𝑓𝑦/𝐸𝑠)∗𝑑= 143.19218 mm

Assume xu= 49.81 Iterate Xu Again

b) Compute esc= 0.001533

0.696*fy/Es= 0.00174
Hence, fsc= 306.5047
Hence, fcc= 8.432669
c) Compute modified value of xu as,

xu= 65.69921176 Iterate Again

xu< xul Hence it is an Under Reinforced Section.
75092029.71 N-mm
Mu= 75.092 KN-m
Sagging Moment Resistance Capacity (Mu)=75.092kN-m
The Hogging Moment Resisting Capacity =0.87𝑓𝑦𝐴𝑠𝑡𝑑(1−𝐴𝑠𝑡𝑓𝑦/𝑏𝑑𝑓𝑐𝑘

The Hogging Moment Resistance Capacity (Mu)=65.171kN-m

The total Moment Resistance Capacity= 140.263 kN-m
 Moment of Resistance of Column

Column

Lower Story
Grade of Concrete= M20
Grade of Steel= Fe500
Size Length(b)= 355mm Breadth(d)= 355mm
Pu= 347.00kN d'/D= 0.15
Ast Provided= 1608 mm²
p/fck= 0.06379687
Pu/fckbD= 0.1376711
Mu/fckbD²= 0.11 Use SP16 Chart 49 Pg. 134
Mu= 98.43kN-m

Upper Story
Grade of Concrete= M20
Grade of Steel= Fe500
Size Length= 355mm Breadth= 355mm
Pu= 347.00kN
Ast Provided= 1608 mm²
d'/D= 0.15
p/fck= 0.06379687
Pu/fckbD= 0.1376711
Mu/fckbD²= 0.11 Use SP16 Chart 49 Pg. 134
Mu= 98.43kN-m

Total= 196.85kN-m
Column Beam capacity Ratio= 1.403
Hence The Column Beam Capacity Ratio is 1.403

Column Beam ratio must be greater than 1.2

OK
 Design of isolated foundation
Pleft(X)(unfactored) 316.00 KN Area req 2.90
KN Width prov 1.83
Soil bearing 120 KN/mm2 Total Length 1.58
Cent Col Size 0.35 m provided length 1.83
Cornor Col Size 0.35 m Left Projection
Dist betw. Col. Center to center m Right Projection

CG/from Left
of Force 0
Max P 474 m
Net upward soil pressure = 141.54 KN/m2 Check Value 0.35
m
BENDING MOMENT about x-x passing through the face
70.92 KN/m maxim projection
of the column
0.000
d calculated from moments = 118.50 mm

Check for two way shear ok

D= 450 Ast mim.= 865.224

d= 394 mm mm2

5.943 Ast2 171390 Ast 70918688.52 =0

Ast at bottom 419.90 mm2 865.22 mm2

12 dia spacing = 239.00 provide spacing = 150 mm

Grade of concrete M 20
Check for one way shear
at d distance (Vu)= 89.62 kN
Nominal shear stress(Tv)= 0.12 N/mm2
% of tension steel p = 12 dia 0.19
shear strength of M20 concrete for above % steel = >360.9 Ok for 12 dia.
Check for two way shear

concreate capacity = 1310944.05 N

From load = 395653.06 N
check ok

Development length
Ld= 566.41 mm
Ld available 780 > 566.41
Ok
 Design of isolated foundation
Pleft(X)(unfactored) 240.00 KN Area req 2.20
KN Width prov 1.52
Soil bearing 120 KN/mm2 Total Length 1.45
Cent Col Size 0.35 m provided length 1.52
Cornor Col Size 0.35 m Left Projection
Dist betw. Col. Center to center m Right Projection

CG/from Left
of Force 0
Max P 360 m
Net upward soil pressure = 155.82 KN/m2 Check Value 0.35
m
BENDING MOMENT about x-x passing through the face
40.53 KN/m maxim projection
of the column
0.000
d calculated from moments = 98.29 mm

Check for two way shear ok

D= 450 Ast mim.= 718.656

d= 394 mm mm2

7.155 Ast2 171390 Ast 40526644.74 =0

Ast at bottom 238.84 mm2 718.66 mm2

12 dia spacing = 239.00 provide spacing = 150 mm

Grade of concrete M 20
Check for one way shear
at d distance (Vu)= 45.24 kN
Nominal shear stress(Tv)= 0.08 N/mm2
% of tension steel p = 12 dia 0.19
shear strength of M20 concrete for above % steel = >360.9 Ok for 12 dia.
Check for two way shear

concreate capacity = 1310944.05 N

From load = 273749.58 N
check ok

Development length
Ld= 566.41 mm
Ld available 625 > 566.41
Ok
Design of Mat Foundation
L Column Size offset
3.00 Dimension Along x 3.00 c/c 3.35 end to 0.35 m 0.00
3.78 Along y 3.78 c/c 4.73 end 0.60 offset 0.00 3.78
3.00
Loads 3.78
column 1 158 column 1' 252 column 1" 0 1"' 0 load along x (above from left to right)
column 2 197 column 2' 348 column 2" 0 2"' 0 load along x (below from left to right)
0 Y
Total Load 955 x' 1.68 0 column distance wrt first column
y' 2.37
Eccentricity of loads 0 X
x bar = (3.78*(158+252)/955) 1.62 m 0 column distance wrt first column
y bar = (3.0*(225+348)/955) 1.88 m 0 X'
0 column distance wrt first column
ex = x bar-x/2 0.12 0 X"
ey = y bar-y/2 -0.01 0 column distance wrt first column

Iy = db3/12 14.82 m4
Ix = bd3/12 29.54 m4

Area = b*d 15.85 m2

My = Pex = 114.6 KN-m

Mx = Pey = -9.55 KN-m

P/A = 60.25 KN/m2

My*x' / Iy = 12.95
Mx*y' / Ix = -0.76
P My Mx
Soil Pressure σ   x'  y'
A Iy Ix

Corner 1 Soil Pressure = 72.44 KN/m2

Corner 2 soil Pressure = 73.96 KN/m2 Max Soil Pressure
Corner 3 soil Pressure = 46.54 KN/m2 73.96 KN/m2
Corner 4 soil Pressure = 48.06 KN/m2
Design of Mat Foundation
calculation of steel X- Direction (Strip)
Concrete grade =M 20 Steel Grade = Fe 500
Ref. Step Calculation Output
Design for max. upward soil pressure
Column dim. At the point of maxm soil pressure
= 350 mm* 350 mm
1 Max.Upward soil press, q = 73.96 KN/m² q= 73.96 KN/mm²

Max. span length, l= 3.00 m l= 3.000 m

IS 456- 2 Moment Calculation

2000 (+ve) Max. Support Moment, Ms = ql²/10 = 66.564 KNm/m width Ms= 66.564 KNm/m

Table 12 (-ve) Max. span moment, Mm = ql²/12 = 55.47 KNm/m width Mm= 55.47 KNm/m

SP 16 3 Depth from Moment consideration

Table D
Depth of footing, d= M = 66.564 *106
2.66 * b 2.66* 1000
= 158.1899496 mm

4 Since footing is critical in shear, increasing depth

d= 450 mm d= 450 mm
Providing 12 mm dia bars & cover = 50 mm
D = d+dia/2+cover= 506 mm D= 506 mm

5 Check for two way shear i.e. Punching shear

Perimeter, bo = Column perimeter+4*d= 3200 mm= 3.2 m
Pu= 348 KN
Pu
IS 456- Nominal shear stress,  v =  241.7 KN/m² τv= 0.24
2000 bo d
= 0.242 N/mm²
Cl31.6.2.1
IS 456- Permissible Punching Shear,  c   * 0.25 f ck
2000 = 1*0.25*√ 20 = 1.12 N/mm² >τv τc= 1 Safe
Cl31.6.3.1
IS456- 6 Calculation of area of steel
2000 Min Ast= 0.12% of bD = 0.12 *1000 * 506 = 607 mm² Min Ast= 607 mm²
Cl26.5.2.1 Area of steel at support (Bottom Bars)
IS 456- f  4 .6 M u 
2000 Ast  0.5 ck 1  1  bd

fy  f ck bd 2 
Annex-G
*106 )* 1000 * 450
Ast= 0.5* 20
500 (1- √1- 4.6* 66.564
20 *1000 450 ²
2
= 347 mm > Astmin
Providing 12 mm bars@ 150 mm c/c 12 mm Ø bars @
2
Act. Ast= 754.1 mm OK 150 mm c/c
Pt= 0.149 %
 Ref. Step Calculation Output
Area of steel at mid span (Top Bars)
f  4 .6 M u 
Ast  0.5 ck 1  1  bd
fy  f ck bd 2 

*106 )* 1000 * 450

Ast= 0.5* 20
500 (1- √ 1- 4.6* 55.47
20 *1000 450 ²
2
= 288.1 mm
Providing 12 mm bars@ 150 mm c/c 12 mm Ø bars @
2
Act. Ast= 754.1 mm OK 150 mm c/c
Pt= 0.149 %

Total Pt= 0.149 + 0.149 = 0.2981 %

Note : The design of mat foundation along X and Y direction are consider same .
Design of Mat Foundation
calculation of steel Y-Direction
Concrete grade =M 20 Steel Grade = Fe 500
Ref. Step Calculation Output
Design for max. upward soil pressure
Column dim. At the point of maxm soil pressure
= 350 mm* 350 mm
1 Max.Upward soil press, q = 73.96 KN/m² q= 73.96 KN/mm²

Max. span length, l= 3.78 m l= 3.780 m

3.78
IS 456- 2 Moment Calculation
2000 Max. Support Moment, Ms = ql²/10 = 105.677006 KNm/m width Ms= 105.677 KNm/m

Table 12 Max. span moment, Mm = ql²/12 = 88.064172 KNm/m width Mm= 88.0642 KNm/m

SP 16 3 Depth from Moment consideration

Table D
Depth of footing, d= M = 105.677006 *106
2.66 * b 2.66* 1000
= 199.3193365 mm

4 Since footing is critical in shear, increasing depth

d= 450 mm d= 450 mm
Providing 12 mm dia bars & cover = 50 mm
D = d+dia/2+cover= 506 mm D= 506 mm

5 Check for two way shear i.e. Punching shear

Perimeter, bo = Column perimeter+4*d= 3200 mm= 3.2 m
Pu= 348 KN
Pu
IS 456- Nominal shear stress,  v =  241.7 KN/m² τv= 0.242
2000
bo d
= 0.242 N/mm²
Cl31.6.2.1
IS 456- Permissible Punching Shear,  c   * 0.25 f ck
2000 = 1*0.25*√ 20 = 1.118 N/mm² >τv τc= 1 Safe
Cl31.6.3.1
IS456- 6 Calculation of area of steel
2000 Min Ast= 0.12% of bD = 0.12 *1000 * 506 = 607 mm² Min Ast= 607.2 mm²
Cl26.5.2.1 Area of steel at support (Bottom Bars)
IS 456- f  4.6 M u 
2000 Ast  0.5 ck 1  1  bd
fy  f ck bd 2 
Annex-G
Ast= 0.5* 20
500 (1- √1- 4.6* 105.6770064 *106 )* 1000 * 450
20 *1000 450 ²
2
= 557 mm > Astmin
Providing 12 mm bars@ 150 mm c/c 12 mm Ø bars @
2
Act. Ast= 754.1 mm OK 150 mm c/c
Pt= 0.149 %
 Ref. Step Calculation Output
Area of steel at mid span (Top Bars)
f  4.6 M u 
Ast  0.5 ck 1  1  bd
fy  f ck bd 2 

Ast= 0.5* 20
500 (1- √ 1- 4.6* 88.064172
20 *1000
*106 )* 1000 * 450
450 ²
= 462 mm2
Providing 12 mm bars@ 150 mm c/c 12 mm Ø bars @
2
Act. Ast= 754.1 mm OK 150 mm c/c
Pt= 0.149 %

Total Pt= 0.149 + 0.149 = 0.2981 %

Note : The design of mat foundation along X and Y direction are consider same .
Project info:
Sarendra Shrestha
Data: Status of designe:
Exterior column load [KN].unfactored = 240 TRUE
Interior column load [KN].unfactored = 316 .
Load factor = 1
Distance between column center lines[m] = 4.11 11.0833
Depth of foundation Df [m] = 0.5
Allowable bearing capacity of soil [KN/sq.m] = 125
Width of ext. col. In strap beam direction [m] = 0.35
Width of ext. col. In direct perpendicular strap beam [m] = 0.35
Width of int. col. In strap beam direction [m] = 0.35
Width of int. col. In direct perpendicular strap beam [m] = 0.35
Breadth of strap beam [m] = 0.35
Eccentricity of exterior load from footing [m] = 0.77
R.C designation : Fcu [N/sq.mm] = 20
reinf. Strength : Fy [N/sq.mm] = 500
density of soil [KN/cu.m] 19
Calculation:
reaction of ext.footing R1 294.89 [KN]
geo. reaction of ext.footing R1T 319.14 [KN]
Req. ext. footing 2.55 [sq.m] Dim. sq 1.59786

reaction of int.footing R2 261.11 [KN]

geo. reaction of int.footing R2T 282.59 [KN]
Req. int. footing 2.26 [sq.m] Dim. sq 1.50357

Use dimensions for ext.footing L= 1.83 [m] Area prov.d 3.35 131%
B= 1.83 [m] in strap direction

Use dimensions for int.footing L= 1.83 [m] Area prov.d 3.35 148%
B= 1.83 [m] in strap direction
check dim TRUE
Designe of strap beam:
Breadth of strap beam [m] 0.35
depth of strap beam from shear d 293.25 [mm]
Use depth d 450 [mm] TRUE
total depth H 500 [mm]
fcu = 20 N/smm fy = 500 N/smm

Width = 350 mm Max. B.M. Mu¯ = 137 kNm

Depth = 450 mm Max. S.F. Vu = 184 kN
Mu = 60 kNm
K = M/bd2fcu = 0.13 N/mm
2
Ast required 0.00 mm2
Z = 322.76 mm Ast required 973.83 Top mm2 Ast prvd. 126%
2 2
Ast bottom = 600.00 mm Ast provided 1231 Top mm TRUE
2
Design shear v= 1.35 N/mm Diameter of stirrups 8 mm No. legs 2
2
Design concrete shear vc = 0.61 N/mm Spacing of stirrups reqd. 342 mm
check shear at col face TRUE

Designe of exterior footing:

Net presure under ext. footing 105.56 [KN/sq.m] TRUE

fcu 20 N/smm fy 500 N/smm

Ult. column load 294.89 [KN] Safe bearing capacity 125 [KN/sq.m]
Self weight 58.61 [KN] Overburden height 0.0 m A prvd.
2
Overburden 0.00 [KN] Area of footing reqd. 1.95 m TRUE
2
Total load 353.49 [KN] Area of footing provided 3.35 m L reqd.
Net upward pressure ult. 105.56 [KN/sq.m] Footing thickness 500 [mm] 1.07
Short span Long span B/W
Width B= 1.83 m Length L= 1.83 m 1.00
Column width 350.00 mm Column breadth 350 mm
Max. cantilever proj. 1.48 m Max. cantilever proj. 0.74 m Ast min
Max. B.M. /m width 115.60 kNm Max. B.M. /m width 29 kNm 577

K = M/bd2fcu 0.031 N/mm2 K = M/bd2fcu 0.007 N/mm2 No. of bars

Z 410.40 mm Z 422 mm 12
Ast required /m width 647.55 [mm] Ast required /m width 158 [sq.mm] 12
Diameter of bars 12 [mm] Diameter of bars 12 [mm]
Spacing of bars 150 [mm] Number of bars/side 150 [mm] Ast prvd. TRUE
Ast provided/m width 754 [sq.mm] Ast provided/m width 754 [sq.mm] 116%
479%
Punch shear 2.62 [KN] Dist. to critical section 740 [mm]
Punch shear stress 0.00 [N/sq.mm] Shear force 78 [KN]
Allow.shear stress 0.35 [N/sq.mm] Shear stress 0.18 [N/sq.mm] TRUE
Designe of interior footing:
Net presure under int. footing 95.47 [KN/sq.m] TRUE

fcu 20 N/smm fy 500 N/smm

Ult. column load 261.11211 [KN] Safe bearing capacity 125 [KN/sq.m]
Self weight 59 [KN] Overburden height 0.0 m A prvd.
2
Overburden 0 [KN] Area of footing reqd. 1.76 m TRUE
2
Total load 320 [KN] Area of footing provided 3.35 m L reqd.
Net upward pressure ult. 95 [KN/sq.m] Footing thickness 500 [mm] 0.96
Short span Long span B/W
Width B= 1.83 m Length L= 1.83 m 1.00
Column width 350 mm Column breadth 350 mm
Max. cantilever proj. 0.74 m Max. cantilever proj. 0.74 m Ast min
Max. B.M. /m width 26 kNm Max. B.M. /m width 26 kNm 577

K = M/bd2fcu 0.007 N/mm

2
K = M/bd2fcu 0.007 N/mm2 No. of bars
Z 410 mm Z 422 mm 12
Ast required /m width 146 [mm] Ast required /m width 142 [sq.mm] 12
Diameter of bars 12 [mm] Diameter of bars 12 [mm]
Spacing of bars 150 [mm] Number of bars/side 150 [mm] Ast prvd. TRUE
Ast provided/m width 754 [sq.mm] Ast provided/m width 754 [sq.mm] 515%
529%
Punch shear 0 [KN] Dist. to critical section 370 [mm]
Punch shear stress 0.000 [N/sq.mm] Shear force 35 [KN]
Allow.shear stress 0.35 [N/sq.mm] Shear stress 0.08 [N/sq.mm] TRUE
DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB

Design Data
Dimensions of the slab (c/c distance b/w supports), fck = 20 N/mm
2

Length of short span, Lx = 3.05 m fy = 500 N/mm

2

Length of long span, Ly = 4.11 m

Width of the supporting beam, = 230 mm
Clear cover to main reinforcement = 20 mm
Assume dia. of reinforcement steel = 8 mm

Calculations
Assume the thickness of slab as 125 mm ; Effective depth, d = 101 mm
Effective span, lx = 3.05 m (or) 2.921 m whichever is less; d = 2.921 m
ly = 4.11 m (or) 3.981 m whichever is less; d = 3.981 m
(ly / lx ) = 1.36 < 2 ; Here, (ly / lx ) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab

Load Calculations
Dead Load of slab = 0.125 x 25 = 3.13 KN/m2 Dust Load on slab = 0 KN/m
2

Finishes load on slab = 1.20 KN/m2 Other load on slab = 0 KN/m

2

2
Live Load on slab = 2.0 KN/m
Total Dead load acting on the Structure = 4.33 KN/m2
Total live load acting on the Structure = 2.0 KN/m2
2
Factored Design Load w = 9.50 KN/m

Support Condition (Type of panel according to support condition)

Two Adjacent Edges Discontinuous For this support condition,
Short span coefficient for (ly / lx ) = 1.36, Long span coefficient,
For negative moment, ax = 0.0686 For negative moment, ay = 0.047
For positive moment, ax = 0.0514 For positive moment, ay = 0.035

Moment Calculation
Max. BM per unit width, Mx = ax w l x 2 & My = ay w l x 2
2
Mu Mu / bd pt Ast, req Ast , min = (0.12/100) bD = 150 mm
2

2 2
KNm N/mm % mm
For Short Span,
Reinforcement details
At mid span, 4.17 0.41 0.1164 118
At supports, 5.56 0.55 0.1576 159 Provide Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
For Long span, supports for short span (Ast pro. = 335 mm2 )
At mid span, 2.84 0.33 0.0932 94 Provide Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
At supports, 3.81 0.44 0.1252 126 supports for long span (Ast pro. = 335 mm2 )

Check for Deflection

Percentage of tension reinforcement = 0.33 %
fs = 0.58 fy (Ast req / Ast pro) = 102 OK
Refer Fig. 4 of IS 456,
Modification factor = 1.8
Allowable (Span / deff ) ratio = 41.4
Effective depth required = 71 mm
< d prov.
Hence OK
Column reinforcement details
Vertical
Floor Type Grid points Size Stirrups Remarks
reinforcement
Foundation, & Concrete
4-16+4-16
G.F. 8 mm @100 mm
at height
1st. floor C1 Grid:- All (350X350)mm 4-16+4-16
h/4 and 150 M20/rebar
mm onwards
Top floor 4-16+4-12 Fe 500

Note: grid names of column retain their position as per analysis

Slab reinforcement details

Reinf. along short Reinf. along long
Type Size(m) Slab thickness(mm) cover (mm)
span span
S1 (Slab) 3.05 X 4.11 8 mm @150c/c 8 mm @150c/c 125 20

S2 (landing) 1.067X 1.067 12 mm @150c/c 10 mm @150c/c 125 20

Beam reinforcement details
Side face
FLOOR (type) Size (m) Length(m) Reinforcement Stirrups
reinf.
support (top) mid (bottom)
Ground floor
2-16 (regular)
BM 230x350 2-16+1-12 (regular) 8 mm dia @100/150 c/c N/A
+1-16 (extra)
1st. floor
2-16 (regular)
BM 230x350 2-16+1-12 (regular) 8 mm dia @100/150 c/c N/A
+1-16 (extra)
Top floor
2-16 (regular)
BM 230x350 2-16(regular 8 mm dia @100/150 c/c N/A
+1-12 (extra)
Tie beam
Tie beam 230x300 3-12 (regular) 3-12 (regular) 8 mm dia @100/150 c/c N/A
Footing beam
Grid- (C4-C3, A1-
Strap beam-1 350x 500 3-16+2-20(regular) 3-16(regular) 8 mm dia @100/150 c/c -
B1 & A2-B2 )
Summary of Footings
Depth D d0 dia Provide
Provided Size of Description of Grid name of
S.N Spacing
Footing Footing Df (ft) (inch) (inch) (mm)
(inch )
1 F1 (6.0'X 6.0') Grid- B2, C3, C4 5 20 10 12 5
2 F2 (5.0'X 5.0')m Grid- A1, B1, C1, A2, C2 5 20 10 12 5
COMBINED FOOTING
T=x-12/y-12, T=x-5/y-5,
2 Mat (13'6''x 17') Grid- (A3-A4-B4-B3-A3) 5 20 20
B=x-12/y-12 B=x-5/y-5